Knowledge

Type certificate

Source 📝

405:
solutions for service difficulties or mandatory corrective action. If the holder is no longer capable or if the TC is transferred to another holder a regulatory authority should take appropriate action in accordance with the national legislation. In the case of the TC being transferred to another holder the new holder shall be capable of fulfilling the TC holder responsibilities in following ADs and providing technical support to keep the type design current with the applicable airworthiness requirements, even after the production of the aircraft type has stopped but many out-of-production aircraft continue useful lives. STCs are also bound by the same rules. When the holder decides to stop supporting the aircraft type without the transfer of TC holder responsibilities, the TC is returned to the issuing regulatory authority and the remaining aircraft fleet can be grounded by the current states of registry until further decisions on the registered aircraft continuing airworthiness. In this manner the whole
126:(STC). The choice is determined by considering whether or not the change constitutes a new design (i.e. introduces risk not considered in the first type design). If so, then type design holder must develop and approve a modification to the type design. If the regulatory authority agrees the change does not introduce new risk, the STC option is available. An STC is less expensive because the design change can be developed by a specialized design organization, a generally more flexible and efficient process than going through the original manufacturer. The STC defines the product design change, states how the modification affects the existing type design, and lists serial numbers of the aircraft affected. It also identifies the certification basis for regulatory compliance for the design change. 253: 194: 349:
systems, fuselage, wings or engines resulting in a new variant may require re-certification. Again the basic process of type certifications is repeated (including maintenance programs). However, unaltered items from the basic design need not be retested. Normally, one or two of the original prototype fleet are remanufactured to the new proposed design. As long as the new design does not deviate too much from the original, static airframes do not need to be built. The resultant new prototypes are again subjected to flight tests.
133:. To meet those requirements the aircraft and each sub-assembly must also be approved. For example, in the U.S. these sub-assemblies must meet requirements in the applicable Technical Standards Order (TSO). To meet those requirements the design documents are examined for compliance with the applicable Minimum Operating Performance Standards (MOPS) applicable to that sub-assembly. MOPS are published by expert industry groups such as: RTCA Inc., EUROCAE, and SAE. 206:
comments and amendments in order to fulfill the laws), becomes the basis of the certification. The firm follows it and draws a proposed timetable of actions required for certification tests. With the application, the regulations to be applied will usually be frozen for this application for a given amount of time in order to avoid a situation where the applicant would have to change the design as a result of changed regulation.
425: 31: 146: 303:
and to all owners globally. The directives normally consists of additional maintenance or design actions that are necessary to restore the type's airworthiness. Compliance is mandatory and thus if an operator does not comply with an AD, then the datum aircraft is not considered airworthy and further operation of the affected aircraft type would be
214:
used for ground and system tests. One of the prototypes (known as the "static airframe") is subject to destructive testing, i.e., the prototype is subject to stress beyond normal and abnormal operations until destruction. The test-results are compared with initial submitted calculations to establish the ultimate structural strength.
348:
Often the basic design is enhanced further by the type certificate holder. Major changes beyond the authority of the service bulletins require amendments to the type certificate. For example, increasing (or decreasing) an aircraft's flight performance, range and load carrying capacity by altering its
375:
Any additions, omissions or alterations to the aircraft's certified layout, built-in equipment, airframe and engines, initiated by any party other than the type certificate holder, need an approved supplementary ("supplemental" in FAA terminology) type certificate, or STC. The scope of an STC can be
302:
Sometimes during service, the aircraft may encounter problems that may compromise the aircraft's safety, which are not anticipated or detected in prototype testing stages. The aircraft design is thus compromised. The regulators will now issue an airworthiness directive to the type certificate holder
238:
After successful completion of ground and flight tests, along with an approved maintenance program, the prototype is approved, and the firm is granted the TC for the prototype (as understood that it should include all furnished equipment for its intended role). The legal term for the firm is now the
395:
into an agricultural aircraft. STCs are applied due to either the type certificate holder's refusal (frequently due to economics) or its inability to meet some owners' requirements. STCs are frequently raised for out-of-production aircraft types conversions to fit new roles. Before STCs are issued,
234:
In parallel with aircraft testing, the applicant firm also draws up maintenance program to support continuous airworthiness after approval of the design. The program is drawn with inputs from tests results and also from initial customers' engineering departments. The proposed maintenance program is
330:
The certifying authority issues an AD when an unsafe condition is found to exist in a product (aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance) of a particular type design. ADs are used by the certifying authority to notify aircraft owners and operators of unsafe conditions and to require their
136:
When aircraft are produced to meet a given TC, each one need not be tested as rigorously but the confidence demonstrated by the TC is conferred, when the aircraft has been assigned a certificate of airworthiness (CoA). A CoA is issued for each aircraft that is properly registered if it conforms to
93:
of the approved design or "type" of an aircraft to be manufactured. The TC is issued by a regulatory authority, and once issued, the design cannot be changed unless at least part of the process for certification is repeated to cover the changes. The TC reflects a determination made by a regulatory
404:
The TC holder remains responsible for the continued integrity of the approved aircraft type design and must continue to be the focal point for resolving issues that may require corrective action. This requires the continued capability, or access to a capability, of providing appropriate technical
340:
owners/operators as optional (and may be extra cost) items. The owner/operator shall exercise their discretion whether or not to incorporate the bulletins and report the decision to the regulatory authority of the state of the aircraft registry. Sometimes SBs can become mandated by relevant ADs.
213:
is built. This refers to either the aircraft, the engines or the propeller, depending on the basis of the certification. For the purpose of illustration, the discussion shall be limited to the aircraft. Normally a few prototypes are built, each subject to different tests. The prototypes are first
339:
With increasing in-service experience, the type certificate holder may find ways to improve the original design resulting in either lower maintenance costs or increased performance. These improvements (normally involving some alterations) are suggested through service bulletins to an aircraft
205:
Initially, the applicant design organisation submits documents to their local aviation regulating body, detailing how the proposed aircraft type design would fulfill the airworthiness requirements. After investigations by the regulator, the final approval of such documents (after the required
270:
As the aircraft enters into service, it is subject to operational wear and tear which may cause performance degradations. The set of processes by which an aircraft, engine, propeller or part complies with the applicable airworthiness requirements and remains in a condition for safe operation
239:"type certificate holder". Subsequently, the prototype now serves as a template for serial aircraft production and the aircraft rolling out of the factory should be identical to the prototype within the frames outlined in a TC data sheet, and each given a serial number (a "series aircraft"). 352:
Upon successful completion of the certification program, the original type certificate is amended to include the new variant (normally denoted by a new model number additional to the original type designation). Typical examples are; the
217:
Other prototypes will undergo other systems tests until the satisfaction of the regulators. With all ground tests completed, prototypes are made ready for flight tests. The flight tests are flown by specially approved flight
226:
is tested, the flight tests may cover the whole world. Tests may also cover different environments - high and low altitude, freezing and hot climates, and so on, to confirm correct performance throughout the aircraft's
376:
extremely narrow or broad. It could include minor modifications to passenger cabin items or installed instruments. More substantial modifications may involve engine replacement, as in the Blackhawk modifications to
396:
procedures similar to type certificate changes for new variants are followed, likely including thorough flight tests. STCs belong to the STC holder and are generally more restrictive than type certificate changes.
121:
When changes are needed to an airframe or on-board equipment, there are two options. One is to initiate a modification by the type design holder (manufacturer), and the other is to request a third party
323:
coverage. ADs may also be raised with changes of the local or global aviation rules and requirements, e.g., the requirement to fit armored cockpit doors for all passenger airliners after the
137:
its type design and ready for safe operation. The CoA is valid and the aircraft may be operated as long as it is maintained in accordance with the rules issued by the regulatory authority.
651: 279:
is issued by the aircraft operator and approved by the regulatory authority of the state of registry to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft of the type owned by the operator.
357:
737NG (737-600, 737-700, 737-800 and 737-900) which replaced the 737 Original family (737-100 and 737-200) and the 737 Classic family (737-300, 737-400 and 737-500) and the
693: 62:
confirms that the aircraft of a new type intended for serial production is in compliance with applicable airworthiness requirements established by the national
283:
outlined in the maintenance program have to be scheduled and timely accomplished in order for the airworthiness certificate of their aircraft to remain valid.
331:
correction. ADs prescribe the conditions and limitations, including inspection, repair, or alteration under which the product may continue to be operated.
286:
Other continuing airworthiness activities include additional tasks associated with the maintenance program and design changes to be accomplished via:
535: 640: 708: 94:
authority that the type design is in compliance with airworthiness requirements. Examples of regulatory authorities are the United Kingdom's
626: 560: 70: 222:
who will fly the prototypes to establish the ultimate flight limits which should be within the airworthiness rules. If a long range
111: 502: 115: 595: 157:
The concept of a 'type certificate' was introduced by the "Air Navigation Regulations" published in May 1919 by the UK's
486: 17: 103: 99: 35: 370: 123: 539: 263: 252: 307:, making the operator liable to legal action by the relevant national aviation authority, and rendering 169: 158: 150: 678: 130: 443: 95: 172:
was the first aircraft to receive a type certificate in the US, (i.e. A.T.C. No. 1) issued by the
177: 39: 81:; certification delays can cost millions of dollars and can decide a program's profitability. 438: 129:
The TC implies that aircraft manufactured according to the approved design can be issued an
388: 324: 280: 276: 8: 381: 320: 193: 78: 173: 620: 554: 482: 162: 312: 107: 74: 679:
Federal Aviation Administration - Certificate Types - Type Certificate Data Sheets
361:
A340-500 and the A340-600 which is based on the Airbus A340-200 and the A340-300.
430: 392: 377: 228: 602: 702: 90: 59: 54:
of a particular category of aircraft, according to its manufacturing design (
51: 198: 201:
very large aeroplane prototype intended for certification flight testing
384: 308: 259: 219: 266:
maintenance at the British Airways Engineering maintenance base (1996)
688: 316: 256: 210: 683: 574: 364: 474: 406: 387:, or a complete role change for the aircraft, such as converting a 223: 145: 63: 520:
Finnegan, Joy (2005). "Master Change or STC, Which is Better?".
30: 410: 358: 354: 73:
certification costs around US$ 1 million, US$ 25 million for a
27:
Document noting the airworthiness of a certain type of aircraft
694:
FAA Guide For Obtaining a Supplemental Type Certificate; 2007
478: 304: 235:
submitted to the regulators for comment and approval.
420: 650:. USA Federal Aviation Administration. 1 May 1987. 77:aircraft and hundreds of millions of dollars for a 684:List of US Approved Type Certificates; 1927 - 1958 365:Supplementary/supplemental type certificate (STC) 89:A type certificate (TC) is issued to signify the 700: 343: 183: 641:"60th Anniversary of Aircraft Certification" 471:Airworthiness manual. Doc 9760. 3rd Edition 297: 242: 519: 251: 192: 144: 29: 247: 153:the first US type certificated aircraft 14: 701: 625:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 559:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 116:Civil Aviation Administration of China 34:Sample type certificate issued by the 689:List of US Group 2 Memos; 1929 - 1947 465: 463: 461: 459: 271:throughout its operating life called 709:Aviation licenses and certifications 657:from the original on 28 January 2015 334: 209:An initial design sample known as a 24: 456: 25: 720: 672: 112:Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil 423: 409:fleet was finally grounded when 507:Aerospace testing international 104:European Aviation Safety Agency 100:Federal Aviation Administration 633: 588: 567: 528: 513: 495: 315:relating to the type, such as 290:Airworthiness directives (ADs) 13: 1: 449: 371:Supplemental type certificate 124:Supplemental type certificate 197:Test equipment on-board the 188: 84: 7: 509:. Oct 23, 2018. p. 38. 416: 399: 344:Changes to type certificate 184:Aircraft type certification 10: 725: 368: 170:Buhl-Verville CA-3 Airster 159:Secretary of State for Air 151:Buhl-Verville CA-3 Airster 140: 131:airworthiness certificate 71:primary category aircraft 444:Unapproved aircraft part 413:SAS surrendered its TC. 298:Airworthiness directives 273:continuing airworthiness 243:Continuing airworthiness 96:Civil Aviation Authority 293:Service bulletins (SBs) 69:For up to three seats, 311:any of the operator's 267: 202: 178:Department of Commerce 154: 43: 503:"Certifiably cheaper" 439:Experimental aircraft 255: 196: 148: 33: 522:Aviation Maintenance 325:September 11 attacks 248:Aircraft maintenance 648:Designee Newsletter 382:Beechcraft King Air 277:maintenance program 180:on March 29, 1927. 79:commercial aircraft 313:insurance policies 268: 203: 174:Aeronautics Branch 155: 44: 335:Service bulletins 281:Maintenance tasks 163:Winston Churchill 16:(Redirected from 716: 666: 665: 663: 662: 656: 645: 637: 631: 630: 624: 616: 614: 613: 607: 601:. Archived from 600: 592: 586: 585: 583: 582: 571: 565: 564: 558: 550: 548: 547: 538:. Archived from 532: 526: 525: 517: 511: 510: 499: 493: 492: 467: 433: 428: 427: 426: 108:Transport Canada 98:(CAA), the U.S. 75:general aviation 48:type certificate 21: 18:Type Certificate 724: 723: 719: 718: 717: 715: 714: 713: 699: 698: 675: 670: 669: 660: 658: 654: 643: 639: 638: 634: 618: 617: 611: 609: 605: 598: 596:"Archived copy" 594: 593: 589: 580: 578: 577:. Aerofiles.com 573: 572: 568: 552: 551: 545: 543: 536:"Archived copy" 534: 533: 529: 518: 514: 501: 500: 496: 489: 469: 468: 457: 452: 431:Aviation portal 429: 424: 422: 419: 402: 378:Cessna Conquest 373: 367: 346: 337: 300: 250: 245: 229:design envelope 191: 186: 143: 87: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 722: 712: 711: 697: 696: 691: 686: 681: 674: 673:External links 671: 668: 667: 632: 587: 566: 527: 512: 494: 487: 454: 453: 451: 448: 447: 446: 441: 435: 434: 418: 415: 401: 398: 369:Main article: 366: 363: 345: 342: 336: 333: 299: 296: 295: 294: 291: 249: 246: 244: 241: 190: 187: 185: 182: 142: 139: 86: 83: 50:signifies the 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 721: 710: 707: 706: 704: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 676: 653: 649: 642: 636: 628: 622: 608:on 2016-03-04 604: 597: 591: 576: 570: 562: 556: 542:on 2017-01-08 541: 537: 531: 523: 516: 508: 504: 498: 490: 488:9789292494544 484: 480: 476: 472: 466: 464: 462: 460: 455: 445: 442: 440: 437: 436: 432: 421: 414: 412: 408: 397: 394: 390: 386: 383: 379: 372: 362: 360: 356: 350: 341: 332: 328: 326: 322: 319:and accident 318: 314: 310: 309:null-and-void 306: 292: 289: 288: 287: 284: 282: 278: 274: 265: 261: 258: 254: 240: 236: 232: 230: 225: 221: 215: 212: 207: 200: 195: 181: 179: 175: 171: 166: 164: 160: 152: 147: 138: 134: 132: 127: 125: 119: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 92: 91:airworthiness 82: 80: 76: 72: 67: 65: 61: 60:Certification 57: 53: 52:airworthiness 49: 41: 37: 32: 19: 659:. Retrieved 647: 635: 610:. Retrieved 603:the original 590: 579:. Retrieved 569: 544:. Retrieved 540:the original 530: 521: 515: 506: 497: 470: 403: 374: 351: 347: 338: 329: 301: 285: 272: 269: 237: 233: 216: 208: 204: 167: 156: 135: 128: 120: 88: 68: 55: 47: 45: 321:third party 262:undergoing 220:test pilots 110:, Brazil’s 102:(FAA), the 56:type design 661:2020-05-01 612:2015-01-22 581:2014-05-09 546:2017-01-07 450:References 385:turboprops 260:Boeing 757 317:hull loss 257:Transaero 211:prototype 189:Prototype 85:Authority 42:aeroplane 703:Category 652:Archived 621:cite web 555:cite web 481:. 2014. 475:Montreal 417:See also 407:Concorde 400:Validity 393:Stearman 305:unlawful 224:airliner 118:(CAAC). 114:and the 106:(EASA), 38:for the 264:C-check 176:of the 141:History 64:air law 36:USA FAA 575:"ATCs" 485:  411:Airbus 359:Airbus 355:Boeing 655:(PDF) 644:(PDF) 606:(PDF) 599:(PDF) 199:A-380 627:link 561:link 483:ISBN 479:ICAO 389:B-17 380:and 275:. A 168:The 149:The 40:DC-9 391:or 58:). 705:: 646:. 623:}} 619:{{ 557:}} 553:{{ 505:. 477:: 473:. 458:^ 327:. 231:. 165:. 161:, 66:. 46:A 664:. 629:) 615:. 584:. 563:) 549:. 524:. 491:. 20:)

Index

Type Certificate

USA FAA
DC-9
airworthiness
Certification
air law
primary category aircraft
general aviation
commercial aircraft
airworthiness
Civil Aviation Authority
Federal Aviation Administration
European Aviation Safety Agency
Transport Canada
Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil
Civil Aviation Administration of China
Supplemental type certificate
airworthiness certificate

Buhl-Verville CA-3 Airster
Secretary of State for Air
Winston Churchill
Buhl-Verville CA-3 Airster
Aeronautics Branch
Department of Commerce

A-380
prototype
test pilots

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.