Knowledge

Tsilhqotʼin Nation v British Columbia

Source 📝

42: 204:
At trial, which lasted five years, both the federal and provincial governments opposed the title claim. The trial judge applied a test for Aboriginal title that examined whether the Xeni Gwet'in regularly and exclusively used the sites or territory within the claim area. The trial judge rejected the
195:
people who had lived in the area for centuries, managing these lands and repelling invaders. The Xeni Gwetʼin blockaded the area, preventing Carrier from logging. The company conducted unsuccessful negotiations with the provincial government to continue logging. The Xeni Gwetʼin filed suit seeking a
232:
The court held that Aboriginal title constitutes a beneficial interest in the land, the underlying control of which is retained by the Crown. Rights conferred by Aboriginal title include the right to decide how the land will be used; to enjoy, occupy and possess the land; and to proactively use and
174:
First Nation, with larger effects. As a result of the landmark decision, provinces cannot unilaterally claim a right to engage in clearcut logging on lands protected by Aboriginal title; they must engage in meaningful consultation with the title holder before they proceed. Although the Aboriginal
212:, where the court upheld the decision that the Tsilhqotʼin did not hold title to these lands, except for limited situations. The court applied a more stringent title test that examined site-specific occupation of definite tracts of land at the time of European sovereignty. 508: 196:
court declaration that would prohibit Carrier Lumber's commercial logging operations in this area, and establish their claim for Aboriginal title to the land, which was part of their historical territory.
518: 224:, unanimously allowed the appeal. They ruled that the Tsilhqotʼin did have a claim of Aboriginal title to the 1,750 square kilometres (680 sq mi) they had historically occupied. 450: 856: 1024: 574: 296: 498: 17: 625: 807: 443: 347: 912: 1107: 436: 175:
title holder does not have to consent to the activity, meaningful consultation is required before infringement of the right can take place.
1138: 187:
issued a licence to Carrier Lumber to cut trees in lands that included remote central British Columbia territory which was claimed by the
877: 800: 1017: 503: 1003: 751: 1128: 849: 763: 1050: 619: 1133: 124: 795: 209: 783: 488: 259: 167: 842: 265: 472:
Note: "Aboriginal law" refers to Canadian law dealing with Indigenous peoples; "Indigenous law" refers to the
249:
the Crown's action must have been consistent with its fiduciary obligation to the Aboriginal body in question.
870: 757: 568: 289: 613: 1153: 1055: 667: 316: 769: 493: 891: 334: 587: 420: 1148: 1042: 637: 556: 463: 459: 192: 163: 132: 47: 540: 136: 789: 828: 246:
the Crown's actions must have been supported by a compelling and substantial objective; and
239:-style mechanism by which the Crown can override Aboriginal title in the public interest: 8: 428: 1093: 1065: 120: 105: 1143: 1031: 674: 643: 221: 63: 41: 1010: 863: 745: 607: 580: 184: 128: 919: 776: 188: 905: 550: 116: 171: 1122: 1069: 982: 953: 940: 926: 562: 513: 473: 1076: 961: 933: 898: 233:
manage the land, including its natural resources. But, the court set out a
1088: 1059: 989: 281: 235: 112: 996: 968: 947: 884: 835: 738: 348:"Supreme Court grants land title to B.C. First Nation in landmark case" 273: 730: 725: 631: 191:
band of the Tsilhqotʼin. The Tsilhqotʼin are a semi-nomadic group of
720: 715: 710: 705: 700: 695: 690: 685: 680: 520:
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
975: 243:
the Crown must have carried out consultation and accommodation;
1081: 458: 297:
Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources)
499:
Section 25 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
598: 1108:Index of articles related to Indigenous Canadians 1120: 215: 808:Ongoing treaty negotiations in British Columbia 444: 509:Section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867 451: 437: 345: 208:In 2012, the decision was appealed to the 18:Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia 504:Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 1004:St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R 752:James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement 14: 1121: 878:Native Women's Assn of Canada v Canada 422:Tsilhqotʼin Nation v. British Columbia 1018:Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia 432: 330:Tsilhqotʼin Nation v British Columbia 205:title claim for procedural reasons. 159:Tsilhqotʼin Nation v British Columbia 35:Tsilhqotʼin Nation v British Columbia 1139:Aboriginal title case law in Canada 829:Attorney General of Canada v Lavell 339: 317:SCC Case Information - Docket 34986 227: 24: 346:MacCharles, Tonda (26 June 2014). 25: 1165: 850:Chippewas of Sarnia Band v Canada 414: 27:2014 Supreme Court of Canada case 476:of individual Indigenous groups. 210:British Columbia Court of Appeal 40: 784:Duty to consult and accommodate 620:Lake Simcoe–Lake Huron Purchase 489:Aboriginal land title in Canada 260:Aboriginal land title in Canada 199: 424:at the Supreme Court of Canada 401: 392: 383: 374: 365: 322: 310: 266:Calder v British Columbia (AG) 162:is a landmark decision of the 84:Appealed from British Columbia 13: 1: 1129:Supreme Court of Canada cases 871:Delgamuukw v British Columbia 758:Nunavut Land Claims Agreement 569:Peace and Friendship Treaties 303: 290:Delgamuukw v British Columbia 216:Decision of the Supreme Court 178: 614:Penetanguishene Bay Purchase 7: 668:Gradual Enfranchisement Act 253: 10: 1170: 494:Royal Proclamation of 1763 220:The Supreme Court, led by 1134:2014 in Canadian case law 1103: 1041: 892:R v Marshall; R v Bernard 843:Calder v British Columbia 820: 657: 538: 529: 481: 470: 183:In 1983, the province of 147: 142: 101: 96: 88: 80: 72: 62: 56:Hearing: 7 November 2013 55: 39: 34: 1043:Indigenous customary law 588:Gradual Civilization Act 575:Treaties of Fort Niagara 913:Paul v British Columbia 770:Nisga'a Final Agreement 638:Saugeen Tract Agreement 557:Great Peace of Montreal 319:Supreme Court of Canada 164:Supreme Court of Canada 133:Andromache Karakatsanis 48:Supreme Court of Canada 532:governmental relations 58:Judgment: 26 June 2014 168:Aboriginal land title 626:Huron Tract Purchase 148:Unanimous reasons by 460:Canadian Aboriginal 1154:Forestry in Canada 1066:Great Law of Peace 790:Jordan's Principle 658:Post-Confederation 646:(1850, 1854, 1859) 274:Guerin v The Queen 121:Marshall Rothstein 106:Beverley McLachlin 1116: 1115: 1032:Restoule v Canada 857:Corbiere v Canada 816: 815: 675:Numbered Treaties 653: 652: 644:Robinson Treaties 222:Beverly McLachlin 166:that established 155: 154: 16:(Redirected from 1161: 1025:Daniels v Canada 1011:R v Van der Peet 864:Daniels v Canada 608:Toronto Purchase 596: 595: 581:Douglas Treaties 536: 535: 453: 446: 439: 430: 429: 408: 405: 399: 396: 390: 387: 381: 378: 372: 369: 363: 362: 360: 358: 343: 337: 326: 320: 314: 228:Aboriginal title 185:British Columbia 129:Michael Moldaver 110:Puisne Justices: 97:Court membership 44: 32: 31: 21: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1112: 1099: 1051:Self-government 1037: 920:Paulette Caveat 812: 801:specific claims 792:(proposed 2005) 777:Paix des Braves 659: 649: 600: 594: 543: 531: 525: 477: 466: 457: 417: 412: 411: 406: 402: 397: 393: 388: 384: 379: 375: 370: 366: 356: 354: 344: 340: 327: 323: 315: 311: 306: 256: 230: 218: 202: 181: 125:Thomas Cromwell 108: 57: 51: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1167: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1114: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1097: 1085: 1073: 1063: 1053: 1047: 1045: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1028: 1021: 1014: 1007: 1000: 993: 986: 979: 972: 965: 958: 957: 956: 944: 937: 930: 923: 916: 909: 906:Mitchell v MNR 902: 895: 888: 881: 874: 867: 860: 853: 846: 839: 832: 824: 822: 818: 817: 814: 813: 811: 810: 805: 804: 803: 793: 787: 781: 773: 767: 761: 755: 749: 743: 742:(1876–present) 735: 734: 733: 728: 723: 718: 713: 708: 703: 698: 693: 688: 683: 672: 663: 661: 655: 654: 651: 650: 648: 647: 641: 635: 629: 623: 617: 611: 604: 602: 593: 592: 584: 578: 572: 566: 560: 554: 551:Covenant Chain 547: 545: 533: 527: 526: 524: 523: 516: 511: 506: 501: 496: 491: 485: 483: 482:Sources of law 479: 478: 471: 468: 467: 464:Indigenous law 456: 455: 448: 441: 433: 427: 426: 416: 415:External links 413: 410: 409: 400: 391: 382: 373: 364: 338: 321: 308: 307: 305: 302: 301: 300: 294: 286: 278: 270: 262: 255: 252: 251: 250: 247: 244: 229: 226: 217: 214: 201: 198: 180: 177: 153: 152: 149: 145: 144: 140: 139: 137:Richard Wagner 117:Rosalie Abella 103:Chief Justice: 99: 98: 94: 93: 92:Appeal allowed 90: 86: 85: 82: 78: 77: 74: 70: 69: 66: 60: 59: 53: 52: 45: 37: 36: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1166: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1124: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1070:Haudenosaunee 1067: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1056:Grand Council 1054: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1006: 1005: 1001: 999: 998: 994: 992: 991: 987: 985: 984: 983:R v Pamajewon 980: 978: 977: 973: 971: 970: 966: 964: 963: 959: 955: 954:Gladue report 952: 951: 950: 949: 945: 943: 942: 941:R v Gladstone 938: 936: 935: 931: 929: 928: 927:Powley ruling 924: 922: 921: 917: 915: 914: 910: 908: 907: 903: 901: 900: 896: 894: 893: 889: 887: 886: 882: 880: 879: 875: 873: 872: 868: 866: 865: 861: 859: 858: 854: 852: 851: 847: 845: 844: 840: 838: 837: 833: 831: 830: 826: 825: 823: 819: 809: 806: 802: 799: 798: 797: 794: 791: 788: 785: 782: 779: 778: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 740: 736: 732: 729: 727: 724: 722: 719: 717: 714: 712: 709: 707: 704: 702: 699: 697: 694: 692: 689: 687: 684: 682: 679: 678: 676: 673: 670: 669: 665: 664: 662: 656: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 605: 603: 597: 590: 589: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 570: 567: 564: 563:Nanfan Treaty 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 548: 546: 542: 541:Confederation 537: 534: 530:Treaties and 528: 522: 521: 517: 515: 514:Treaty rights 512: 510: 507: 505: 502: 500: 497: 495: 492: 490: 487: 486: 484: 480: 475: 474:customary law 469: 465: 461: 454: 449: 447: 442: 440: 435: 434: 431: 425: 423: 419: 418: 404: 395: 386: 377: 368: 353: 349: 342: 336: 332: 331: 325: 318: 313: 309: 298: 295: 292: 291: 287: 284: 283: 279: 276: 275: 271: 268: 267: 263: 261: 258: 257: 248: 245: 242: 241: 240: 238: 237: 225: 223: 213: 211: 206: 197: 194: 193:First Nations 190: 186: 176: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160: 150: 146: 143:Reasons given 141: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 111: 107: 104: 100: 95: 91: 87: 83: 81:Prior history 79: 75: 71: 67: 65: 61: 54: 50: 49: 43: 38: 33: 30: 19: 1087: 1077:Pittailiniit 1075: 1030: 1023: 1016: 1009: 1002: 995: 988: 981: 974: 967: 962:R v Gonzales 960: 946: 939: 934:R v Drybones 932: 925: 918: 911: 904: 899:R v Marshall 897: 890: 883: 876: 869: 862: 855: 848: 841: 834: 827: 786:(since 2004) 775: 737: 677:(1871–1921) 666: 599:Upper Canada 586: 519: 421: 407:SCC, para 77 403: 394: 389:SCC, para 70 385: 376: 367: 355:. Retrieved 352:Toronto Star 351: 341: 329: 328: 324: 312: 288: 280: 272: 264: 234: 231: 219: 207: 203: 200:Lower courts 189:Xeni Gwetʼin 182: 158: 157: 156: 109: 102: 46: 29: 1149:Tsilhqot'in 1094:Plains Cree 1089:Wahkohtowin 990:R v Sparrow 796:Land claims 746:White Paper 671:(1869–1876) 660:(post-1867) 591:(1857–1869) 577:(1764–1784) 571:(1725–1779) 398:SCC, par 73 380:SCC, para 8 371:SCC, para 5 335:2014 SCC 44 282:R v Sparrow 172:Tsilhqotʼin 113:Louis LeBel 68:2014 SCC 44 1123:Categories 997:Re Eskimos 969:R v Guerin 948:R v Gladue 885:Kruger v R 836:R v Badger 739:Indian Act 544:(pre-1867) 304:References 179:Background 73:Docket No. 632:Treaty 45 583:(1850–54) 151:McLachlin 64:Citations 1144:Land use 821:Case law 601:treaties 254:See also 170:for the 1060:Miꞌkmaq 976:R v Jim 553:(1670s) 357:26 June 333:, 236:Sparrow 780:(2002) 772:(1998) 766:(1995) 760:(1993) 754:(1975) 748:(1969) 640:(1836) 634:(1836) 628:(1827) 622:(1815) 616:(1798) 610:(1787) 565:(1701) 559:(1701) 299:(2014) 293:(1997) 285:(1990) 277:(1984) 269:(1971) 89:Ruling 76:34986 1082:Inuit 764:RCAP 539:Pre- 462:and 359:2014 1125:: 731:11 726:10 350:. 135:, 131:, 127:, 123:, 119:, 115:, 1096:) 1092:( 1084:) 1080:( 1072:) 1068:( 1062:) 1058:( 721:9 716:8 711:7 706:6 701:5 696:4 691:3 686:2 681:1 452:e 445:t 438:v 361:. 20:)

Index

Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia
Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
Beverley McLachlin
Louis LeBel
Rosalie Abella
Marshall Rothstein
Thomas Cromwell
Michael Moldaver
Andromache Karakatsanis
Richard Wagner
Supreme Court of Canada
Aboriginal land title
Tsilhqotʼin
British Columbia
Xeni Gwetʼin
First Nations
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Beverly McLachlin
Sparrow
Aboriginal land title in Canada
Calder v British Columbia (AG)
Guerin v The Queen
R v Sparrow
Delgamuukw v British Columbia
Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources)
SCC Case Information - Docket 34986
2014 SCC 44
"Supreme Court grants land title to B.C. First Nation in landmark case"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.