Knowledge

Trump v. Vance

Source đź“ť

38: 523:
the defenses that are available to everyone else like overbreadth and unwarranted harassment. In remanding the case to the District Court, the Court's order stated that "the President may raise further arguments as appropriate" to challenge the subpoena. In evaluating those arguments judges should be "meticulous" according to the Court, but "this does not mean they should use a stricter standard in evaluating them."
573:, which determined that a prosecutor must have a "demonstrated, specific need" for subpoenaing a President. Otherwise, Kavanaugh agreed with the judgment and added that the Court "unanimously agrees that this case should be remanded to the District Court, where the President may raise constitutional and legal objections to the subpoena as appropriate." 457:
The Second Circuit panel ruled unanimously against Trump in November 2019. The decision stated that the president is not immune from "the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to
643:
On the next day, August 21, Trump's lawyers filed an emergency request with a federal appeals court to put the subpoena on hold, but the court denied his request that same day. Instead, the court granted him a hearing that was scheduled for September 1, but meanwhile, the subpoena remained in force.
592:
Thomas wrote that the majority opinion, which allowed subpoenas to be placed against the president, created an undue burden: "the demands on the president's time and the importance of his tasks are extraordinary, and the office of the president cannot be delegated to subordinates. A subpoena imposes
550:
established the principle 200 years earlier that no citizen, including the president, may escape the common duty to produce evidence when he is called upon during a criminal proceeding. Roberts wrote, "In our judicial system, 'the public has a right to every man's evidence'. Since the earliest days
609:
case was remanded to the lower court by the Supreme Court with the same 7–2 split. Congress has the authority to subpoena the president as part of its legislative duties, but the Supreme Court found a stronger requirement to exist for the congressional subpoena than for a state grand jury subpoena.
522:
of the Constitution. Through those principles, the Court also held that the president enjoys no absolute immunity from state criminal subpoenas directed at his private papers and that he is not entitled to a heightened standard for the issuance of such a subpoena. Instead, the president can rely on
346:
candidate, he was called upon to release his income tax returns in the public interest, as most other presidential candidates did. Trump had stated in his campaign that he would release them once they had been "worked on." After his election victory and taking office in 2017, Trump refused to give
435:
Prosecutors countered that Trump had "sweeping immunity" from a criminal probe while he was in office and that Trump was "seeking to invent and enforce a new presidential 'tax return privilege,' on the theory that disclosing information in a tax return will necessarily reveal information that will
664:
Within hours of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mazars handed over to Vance millions of pages of documents containing Trump's tax returns from January 2011 to August 2019, as well as financial statements, engagement agreements, documents relating to the preparation and review of tax returns, and work
466:
Trump petitioned to the US Supreme Court on the Second Circuit's ruling to the New York district attorney subpoena as well as in the separate cases related to the House Committee subpoenas. The Supreme Court certified all three cases in December 2019 by consolidating the two House Committee cases
617:
At the request of Vance, the Supreme Court on July 17, 2020 allowed the judgment from its ruling to take effect immediately, instead of the 25 days after decision normally established, to allow the district attorney's office to proceed to request documents while the judicial arguments continued.
596:
Alito wrote on his concern that the majority opinion would open the president to potential action from over 2000 local prosecutors and would impair the functionality of the presidential office: "Respect for the structure of government created by the Constitution demands greater protection for an
634:
set a deadline of July 15, 2020, for Trump to provide additional objections to the subpoena. Trump’s revised complaint asserted that Vance's subpoena was politically motivated and overly broad. Marrero declined to block the subpoena on August 20, 2020, saying that Trump's new complaint was not
652:
Trump had stated his intent to appeal that ruling to the Supreme Court and was granted 12 days in which to do so and prosecutors delayed execution of the subpoena. On October 13, 2020, Trump submitted a petition to the Supreme Court for a stay pending its review of the appeals court decision.
1655: 644:
Trump's accounting records could have been given to the New York State grand jury before the hearing took place, but that did not happen. The appeals court ruled unanimously on October 7, 2020, to deny Trump's objection and ordered the subpoena to be obeyed.
445:(1971), which had stated federal courts should abstain in the matters of tort claims being brought by the person who was prosecuted by those claims. As such, the District Court ordered Trump to comply with the subpoena, pending a ruling from the 920: 1645: 1498: 458:
the President" and that a state grand jury may issue subpoenas "in aid of its investigation of potential crimes committed by persons within its jurisdiction, even if that investigation may in some way implicate the President."
859: 912: 1488: 1816: 1387: 656:
On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court denied the stay request, clearing the path for Trump’s tax records as well as other records to be released to prosecutors for review by a grand jury.
301:
do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president. The 7–2 decision was issued in July 2020, with Justices
1688: 121:
Article II and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president.
1997: 635:
substantially different from the first and dismissed Trump's case with prejudice, which allowed the subpoena to be executed. He concluded: "Justice requires an end to this controversy."
826: 950: 1353: 1417: 502:
likely to favor the release of the tax records. Justices also spoke of possibly sending both cases to the lower courts with a set of standards to evaluate the subpoena requests.
2038: 672:
in the 117th Congress, reissued its subpoena to Mazars seeking the same documents as had been provided to Vance, and which it had previously sought and been unable to obtain in
849: 510:
The Court released its decision on July 9, 2020, by affirming the decision of the Second Circuit and remanding the case for continued review. The 7–2 decision affirmed that
398:, where Trump had accounts, and those entities had indicated they would comply with the subpoenas. Trump then tried to block the subpoenas, which led to two separate suits, 1044: 390:
refused to comply with the subpoenas and asserted that they lacked "a legitimate legislative purpose." However, those subpoenas were directed at Mazars and later at
2028: 977: 1783: 1547: 429: 1269: 1943: 1752: 1622: 795: 669: 257: 86: 610:
Chief Justice Roberts gave the lower courts a list of four considerations to determine when a congressional subpoena is appropriate within the scope of the
2048: 1008: 1198: 1140: 2033: 1719: 1074: 1302: 1109: 1223: 701: 498:, involving subpoenas related to a Congressional investigation, very differently and expected there to be different results between the cases, with 1806: 1395: 1325: 725: 1678: 1244: 359: 1981: 1446: 770: 816: 290: 942: 519: 243: 1361: 2043: 446: 2013: 1171: 890: 593:
both demands on the president's limited time and a mental burden, even when the president is not directly engaged in complying."
421: 375: 329: 19: 1589: 1919: 1034: 428:
in August 2019 subpoenaed Mazars for Trump's tax returns. Trump filed suit against the district attorney and Mazars in the
1839: 973: 2023: 1775: 1557: 42: 432:
to block the subpoena arguing that a sitting president enjoys "absolute immunity from criminal process of any kind."
2018: 1259: 695: 351: 343: 1858: 1742: 1612: 282:'s accounting firm, for Trump's tax records and related documents, as part of his ongoing investigation into the 1000: 1194: 1132: 1711: 1489:"Supreme Court says Manhattan prosecutor may pursue Trump's financial records, denies Congress access for now" 1067: 1292: 1102: 1884: 1220: 1915:"The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution before Impeachment?" 1460: 756: 70: 355: 321: 268: 733: 1646:"New York judge gives Trump deadline in lawsuit over tax returns following major Supreme Court ruling" 1776:"Subpoena for Trump tax returns heading back to Supreme Court after President dealt another setback" 674: 436:
somehow impede the functioning of a President, sufficiently to meet the test of irreparable harm."
400: 363: 325: 1914: 1520: 569: 283: 1972: 1947: 1525: 1391: 1354:"Supreme Court rules against Trump in 2 landmark cases about his taxes and financial records" 799: 367: 81: 1712:"Appeals court sets September 1 hearing on deadline for Trump's financial records subpoena" 1528: 1293:"Supreme Court Hints at Split Decision in Two Cases on Obtaining Trump's Financial Records" 611: 387: 1954: 1326:"Supreme Court rules Trump will have to fight to keep secret his taxes, financial records" 8: 1650: 1493: 821: 531: 152: 93: 1982:
EXCLUSIVE: How Brett Kavanaugh tried to sidestep abortion and Trump financial docs cases
1747: 1297: 1264: 1039: 802: 482:
arguments, both as part of the set of cases held through teleconference because of the
374:. The IRS failed to comply with the request. Both the Ways and Means Committee and the 309: 1163: 882: 511: 483: 441: 1859:"Trump's tax returns and related records turned over to Manhattan district attorney" 1579: 1456: 1451: 1357: 766: 761: 688: 515: 294: 260: 239: 18:
This article is about the US Supreme Court case. For the Trump–Vance campaign, see
1992:
who details the decision-making process leading to the landmark court decision in
567:. Kavanaugh wrote that he would have held the case to the standard established in 371: 1552: 1227: 854: 582: 560: 539: 425: 306: 298: 271: 188: 168: 144: 1221:
Trump Taxes: Appeals Court Rules President Must Turn Over 8 Years of Tax Returns
1030: 631: 551:
of the Republic, 'every man' has included the President of the United States."
535: 156: 1840:"Supreme Court Denies Trump's Final Bid to Block Release of Financial Records" 2007: 1989: 1418:"From Burr to Clinton, Supreme Court Takes History Tour in Trump Wealth Case" 547: 391: 1679:"Judge throws out Trump challenge to Manhattan DA subpoena for tax records" 586: 564: 527: 339: 335: 302: 279: 180: 164: 136: 1613:"Trump taxes subpoena fight can resume quickly after Supreme Court action" 850:"All the excuses Trump has given for why he won't release his tax returns" 420:
Separately, as part of the city's ongoing criminal investigation into the
1963: 543: 395: 347:
over his tax records and stated that voters were not interested in them.
176: 109: 1133:"New York prosecutors reject Trump's immunity claim in tax returns case" 2000:
from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved on February 19, 2020.
1807:"Trump attorneys ask Supreme Court for stay in Manhattan DA's tax case" 1103:"Trump Taxes: President Ordered to Turn Over Returns to Manhattan D.A." 491: 97: 1580:"Trump taxes: Supreme Court says New York prosecutors can see records" 1035:"Justice Dept. Backs Mnuchin's Refusal to Release Trump's Tax Returns" 726:"Supreme Court Rules Trump Cannot Block Release of Financial Records" 379: 366:(IRS) six years of Trump's returns, a power vested in Congress under 1857:
Scannell, Kara; Prokupecz, Shimon; Cole, Devan (February 25, 2021).
1811: 1447:"The Supreme Court Brings the Presidency Back From a Lawless Brink" 1330: 1001:"Steven Mnuchin Refuses to Release Trump's Tax Returns to Congress" 974:"Mnuchin defies House Democrats' subpoenas for Trump's tax returns" 757:"The Supreme Court Brings the Presidency Back From a Lawless Brink" 264: 1388:"Trump's tax returns: Why the Supreme Court should end things now" 597:
institution that is vital to the nation's safety and well-being."
1422: 1381: 1379: 1195:"Judge dismisses Trump request to keep taxes secret in New York" 1260:"Supreme Court to Rule on Release of Trump's Financial Records" 1068:"8 Years of Trump Tax Returns Are Subpoenaed by Manhattan D.A." 913:"White House maneuvers to block release of Trump's tax returns" 383: 275: 37: 1376: 1164:"Prosecutor says Trump wants 'sweeping immunity' in tax fight" 386:, Trump's accounting firm, to obtain the tax information. The 286:. Trump commenced legal proceedings to prevent their release. 943:"Here's how Democrats plan to get Donald Trump's tax returns" 1885:"U.S. House panel reissues subpoena for Trump's tax records" 1743:"Manhattan D.A. Can Obtain Trump's Tax Returns, Judges Rule" 1683: 1741:
Weiser, Benjamin; Rashbaum, William K. (October 7, 2020).
1101:
Rashbaum, William K.; Weiser, Benjamin (October 7, 2019).
1985: 1617: 1584: 1066:
Rashbaum, William K.; Protess, Ben (September 16, 2019).
883:"White House pushes back on request for Trump tax forms" 478:
Oral arguments were held on May 12, 2020, alongside the
430:
US District Court for the Southern District of New York
2039:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
1548:"Supreme Court Advances Subpoena of Trump Tax Returns" 665:
papers and communications related to the tax returns.
439:
The District Court dismissed the case on the basis of
358:
in the 2018 midterm elections, and by April 2019, the
1856: 205:
Roberts, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
1710:
Scannell, Kara; Polantz, Katelyn (August 21, 2020).
1059: 817:"5 things Donald Trump promised he'd do, but hasn't" 719: 717: 1541: 1539: 1537: 1482: 1480: 1478: 526:The majority opinion was written by Chief Justice 1352:Sheth, Sonam; Samuelsohn, Darren (July 9, 2020). 702:New York investigations of The Trump Organization 486:. Observers recognized that the Justices treated 2005: 1988:'s legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer 1805:Winter, Tom; Williams, Pete (October 13, 2020). 1284: 1161: 714: 2029:United States Constitution Article Two case law 1709: 1534: 1475: 1351: 1065: 992: 630:to the Southern New York District Court, Judge 1804: 1740: 1610: 1100: 1611:Scannell, Kara; Berman, Dan (July 17, 2020). 563:wrote a concurring opinion joined by Justice 1572: 1213: 412:suit by the Supreme Court in its 2019 term. 2049:United States taxation and revenue case law 1096: 1094: 1092: 621: 2034:United States executive privilege case law 1130: 971: 647: 638: 546:. Roberts wrote that former Chief Justice 447:US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 213:Kavanaugh (in judgment), joined by Gorsuch 1029: 998: 490:, which involved a subpoena related to a 1912: 1773: 1323: 1089: 808: 659: 1676: 1385: 1305:from the original on September 27, 2020 1174:from the original on September 26, 2019 1162:Larry Neumeister (September 23, 2019). 1143:from the original on September 25, 2019 1077:from the original on September 16, 2019 847: 514:to the president is not granted by the 376:House Committee on Oversight and Reform 330:List of lawsuits involving Donald Trump 20:Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign 2006: 1837: 1819:from the original on February 15, 2021 1755:from the original on February 15, 2021 1691:from the original on February 15, 2021 1658:from the original on February 15, 2021 1643: 1625:from the original on February 15, 2021 1592:from the original on February 15, 2021 1501:from the original on February 15, 2021 1486: 1290: 1272:from the original on December 17, 2019 1257: 880: 841: 723: 576: 61:Donald J. Trump v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. 1920:Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 1882: 1386:Lempert, Richard (October 19, 2020). 1237: 1192: 1112:from the original on October 16, 2019 980:from the original on November 4, 2019 965: 953:from the original on January 18, 2019 554: 471:and handling the New York case under 25:2020 United States Supreme Court case 1786:from the original on October 7, 2020 1722:from the original on August 22, 2020 1545: 1444: 1201:from the original on October 7, 2019 848:Harwell, Drew (September 15, 2016). 754: 670:House Oversight and Reform Committee 589:wrote separate dissenting opinions. 408:, which were consolidated under the 1984:". A background article written by 1677:Higgens, Tucker (August 20, 2020). 1219:Benjamin Weiser & Adam Liptak, 1011:from the original on April 28, 2020 874: 829:from the original on April 19, 2019 505: 13: 1906: 1838:Liptak, Adam (February 22, 2021). 1774:Scannell, Kara (October 7, 2020). 1258:Liptak, Adam (December 13, 2019). 1047:from the original on June 16, 2019 923:from the original on April 5, 2019 893:from the original on April 5, 2019 862:from the original on July 25, 2019 43:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2060: 2044:United States Supreme Court cases 1980:Biskupic, Joan (July 29, 2020): " 1950:___ (2020) is available from: 1932: 1131:Toby Ecker (September 23, 2019). 814: 773:from the original on July 9, 2020 452: 415: 1644:Jacobs, Shayna (July 10, 2020). 1193:Orden, Erica (October 7, 2019). 696:Doe et al. v. Trump Corp. et al. 600: 461: 406:Trump et al. v. Deutsche Bank AG 362:had formally requested from the 338:indicated his intent to run for 36: 1876: 1850: 1831: 1798: 1767: 1734: 1703: 1670: 1637: 1604: 1513: 1487:Barnes, Robert (July 9, 2020). 1438: 1410: 1345: 1324:Williams, Pete (July 9, 2020). 1317: 1251: 1186: 1155: 1124: 1023: 999:Rappeport, Alan (May 6, 2019). 881:Gordon, Marcy (April 4, 2019). 2014:2020 in United States case law 935: 905: 785: 748: 424:, Manhattan District Attorney 360:House Ways and Means Committee 1: 1291:Liptak, Adam (May 12, 2020). 724:Liptak, Adam (July 9, 2020). 707: 315: 256:, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a 1973:Supreme Court (slip opinion) 1883:Wolfe, Jan (March 3, 2021). 494:criminal investigation, and 7: 1445:Ford, Matt (July 9, 2020). 972:Lauren Fox (May 17, 2019). 755:Ford, Matt (July 9, 2020). 681: 356:US House of Representatives 322:Tax returns of Donald Trump 269:Manhattan District Attorney 96:907; 2020 WL 3848062; 2020 10: 2065: 1964:Oyez (oral argument audio) 1913:Freedman, Eric M. (1992). 1546:Ryan, Tim (July 9, 2020). 668:On February 23, 2021, the 319: 17: 2024:Supremacy Clause case law 267:issued in August 2019 by 238: 233: 225: 217: 209: 201: 196: 130: 125: 120: 115: 105: 76: 66: 56: 49: 35: 30: 675:Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP 622:Remand to District Court 401:Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP 364:Internal Revenue Service 326:Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP 2019:Donald Trump litigation 1248:(2d Cir. Nov. 4, 2019). 648:Appeal to Supreme Court 639:Appeal to Federal Court 530:and joined by Justices 240:U.S. Const. art. VI § 2 1942:, No. 19-635, 1521:United States v. Nixon 570:United States v. Nixon 422:Stormy Daniels scandal 354:gained control of the 284:Stormy Daniels scandal 1392:Brookings Institution 949:. December 20, 2018. 660:Disclosure of records 605:On the same day, the 92:140 S. Ct. 2412; 207 612:separation of powers 388:Trump administration 289:The Court held that 263:case arising from a 52:Decided July 9, 2020 1651:The Washington Post 1494:The Washington Post 1398:on November 1, 2020 1234:(November 4, 2019). 822:The Washington Post 577:Dissenting opinions 532:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 244:U.S. Const. art. II 153:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 50:Argued May 12, 2020 1844:The New York Times 1748:The New York Times 1298:The New York Times 1265:The New York Times 1226:2019-11-05 at the 1106:The New York Times 1040:The New York Times 1005:The New York Times 730:The New York Times 555:Concurring opinion 141:Associate Justices 1033:(June 14, 2019). 626:On the remand of 512:absolute immunity 484:COVID-19 pandemic 442:Younger v. Harris 278:, then-President 249: 248: 2056: 1977: 1971: 1968: 1962: 1959: 1953: 1928: 1900: 1899: 1897: 1895: 1880: 1874: 1873: 1871: 1869: 1854: 1848: 1847: 1835: 1829: 1828: 1826: 1824: 1802: 1796: 1795: 1793: 1791: 1771: 1765: 1764: 1762: 1760: 1738: 1732: 1731: 1729: 1727: 1707: 1701: 1700: 1698: 1696: 1674: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1632: 1630: 1608: 1602: 1601: 1599: 1597: 1588:. July 9, 2020. 1576: 1570: 1569: 1567: 1565: 1560:on July 11, 2020 1556:. Archived from 1543: 1532: 1517: 1511: 1510: 1508: 1506: 1484: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1468: 1459:. Archived from 1457:The New Republic 1452:The New Republic 1442: 1436: 1435: 1433: 1431: 1414: 1408: 1407: 1405: 1403: 1394:. Archived from 1383: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1360:. Archived from 1358:Business Insider 1349: 1343: 1342: 1340: 1338: 1321: 1315: 1314: 1312: 1310: 1288: 1282: 1281: 1279: 1277: 1255: 1249: 1241: 1235: 1217: 1211: 1210: 1208: 1206: 1190: 1184: 1183: 1181: 1179: 1168:Associated Press 1159: 1153: 1152: 1150: 1148: 1128: 1122: 1121: 1119: 1117: 1098: 1087: 1086: 1084: 1082: 1063: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1052: 1027: 1021: 1020: 1018: 1016: 996: 990: 989: 987: 985: 969: 963: 962: 960: 958: 939: 933: 932: 930: 928: 909: 903: 902: 900: 898: 887:Associated Press 878: 872: 871: 869: 867: 845: 839: 838: 836: 834: 812: 806: 789: 783: 782: 780: 778: 767:The New Republic 762:The New Republic 752: 746: 745: 743: 741: 732:. Archived from 721: 689:Clinton v. Jones 516:Supremacy Clause 506:Majority opinion 352:Democratic Party 295:Supremacy Clause 261:US Supreme Court 126:Court membership 40: 39: 28: 27: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2004: 2003: 1975: 1969: 1966: 1960: 1957: 1951: 1935: 1909: 1907:Further reading 1904: 1903: 1893: 1891: 1881: 1877: 1867: 1865: 1855: 1851: 1836: 1832: 1822: 1820: 1803: 1799: 1789: 1787: 1772: 1768: 1758: 1756: 1739: 1735: 1725: 1723: 1708: 1704: 1694: 1692: 1675: 1671: 1661: 1659: 1642: 1638: 1628: 1626: 1609: 1605: 1595: 1593: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1563: 1561: 1553:Courthouse News 1544: 1535: 1518: 1514: 1504: 1502: 1485: 1476: 1466: 1464: 1463:on July 9, 2020 1443: 1439: 1429: 1427: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1401: 1399: 1384: 1377: 1367: 1365: 1364:on July 9, 2020 1350: 1346: 1336: 1334: 1322: 1318: 1308: 1306: 1289: 1285: 1275: 1273: 1256: 1252: 1242: 1238: 1228:Wayback Machine 1218: 1214: 1204: 1202: 1191: 1187: 1177: 1175: 1160: 1156: 1146: 1144: 1129: 1125: 1115: 1113: 1099: 1090: 1080: 1078: 1064: 1060: 1050: 1048: 1031:Rappeport, Alan 1028: 1024: 1014: 1012: 997: 993: 983: 981: 970: 966: 956: 954: 941: 940: 936: 926: 924: 917:Washington Post 911: 910: 906: 896: 894: 879: 875: 865: 863: 855:Washington Post 846: 842: 832: 830: 813: 809: 790: 786: 776: 774: 753: 749: 739: 737: 736:on July 9, 2020 722: 715: 710: 684: 662: 650: 641: 624: 607:Trump v. Mazars 603: 583:Clarence Thomas 579: 561:Brett Kavanaugh 557: 540:Sonia Sotomayor 508: 480:Trump v. Mazars 469:Trump v. Mazars 464: 455: 426:Cyrus Vance Jr. 418: 410:Trump v. Mazars 332: 320:Main articles: 318: 307:Clarence Thomas 299:US Constitution 272:Cyrus Vance Jr. 242: 189:Brett Kavanaugh 179: 169:Sonia Sotomayor 167: 155: 145:Clarence Thomas 101: 51: 45: 26: 23: 12: 11: 5: 2062: 2052: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2002: 2001: 1994:Trump v. Vance 1978: 1940:Trump v. Vance 1934: 1933:External links 1931: 1930: 1929: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1875: 1849: 1830: 1797: 1766: 1733: 1702: 1669: 1636: 1603: 1571: 1533: 1524:, ___ 1512: 1474: 1437: 1426:. July 9, 2020 1409: 1375: 1344: 1316: 1283: 1250: 1245:Trump v. Vance 1236: 1232:New York Times 1212: 1185: 1154: 1123: 1088: 1071:New York Times 1058: 1022: 991: 964: 934: 904: 873: 840: 815:Blake, Aaron. 807: 792:Trump v. Vance 784: 747: 712: 711: 709: 706: 705: 704: 699: 692: 683: 680: 661: 658: 649: 646: 640: 637: 632:Victor Marrero 628:Trump v. Vance 623: 620: 602: 599: 578: 575: 556: 553: 536:Stephen Breyer 507: 504: 473:Trump v. Vance 463: 460: 454: 453:Second Circuit 451: 417: 416:District Court 414: 368:26 U.S.C. 317: 314: 253:Trump v. Vance 247: 246: 236: 235: 231: 230: 227: 223: 222: 219: 215: 214: 211: 207: 206: 203: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 157:Stephen Breyer 142: 139: 134: 128: 127: 123: 122: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 103: 102: 91: 78: 74: 73: 68: 64: 63: 58: 57:Full case name 54: 53: 47: 46: 41: 33: 32: 31:Trump v. Vance 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2061: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2009: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990:Joan Biskupic 1987: 1983: 1979: 1974: 1965: 1956: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1890: 1886: 1879: 1864: 1860: 1853: 1845: 1841: 1834: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1808: 1801: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1770: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1744: 1737: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1706: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1680: 1673: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1647: 1640: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1614: 1607: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1581: 1575: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1549: 1542: 1540: 1538: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1516: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1490: 1483: 1481: 1479: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1448: 1441: 1425: 1424: 1419: 1413: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1382: 1380: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1348: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1320: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1287: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1254: 1247: 1246: 1240: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1216: 1200: 1196: 1189: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1158: 1147:September 25, 1142: 1138: 1134: 1127: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1097: 1095: 1093: 1081:September 16, 1076: 1072: 1069: 1062: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1032: 1026: 1010: 1006: 1002: 995: 979: 975: 968: 952: 948: 944: 938: 922: 918: 914: 908: 892: 888: 884: 877: 861: 857: 856: 851: 844: 828: 824: 823: 818: 811: 804: 801: 797: 793: 788: 772: 768: 764: 763: 758: 751: 735: 731: 727: 720: 718: 713: 703: 700: 698: 697: 693: 691: 690: 686: 685: 679: 677: 676: 671: 666: 657: 654: 645: 636: 633: 629: 619: 615: 613: 608: 601:Post-judgment 598: 594: 590: 588: 584: 574: 572: 571: 566: 562: 552: 549: 548:John Marshall 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 524: 521: 517: 513: 503: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 476: 474: 470: 462:Supreme Court 459: 450: 448: 444: 443: 437: 433: 431: 427: 423: 413: 411: 407: 403: 402: 397: 393: 392:Deutsche Bank 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 348: 345: 341: 337: 331: 327: 323: 313: 311: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 285: 281: 277: 273: 270: 266: 262: 259: 255: 254: 245: 241: 237: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197:Case opinions 195: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133:Chief Justice 132: 131: 129: 124: 119: 114: 111: 110:Oral argument 108: 104: 99: 95: 89: 88: 83: 79: 75: 72: 69: 65: 62: 59: 55: 48: 44: 34: 29: 21: 16: 1993: 1939: 1924: 1918: 1892:. Retrieved 1888: 1878: 1868:February 25, 1866:. Retrieved 1862: 1852: 1843: 1833: 1821:. Retrieved 1810: 1800: 1788:. Retrieved 1779: 1769: 1757:. Retrieved 1746: 1736: 1724:. Retrieved 1715: 1705: 1693:. Retrieved 1682: 1672: 1660:. Retrieved 1649: 1639: 1627:. Retrieved 1616: 1606: 1594:. Retrieved 1583: 1574: 1562:. Retrieved 1558:the original 1551: 1519: 1515: 1503:. Retrieved 1492: 1465:. Retrieved 1461:the original 1450: 1440: 1428:. Retrieved 1421: 1412: 1402:November 29, 1400:. Retrieved 1396:the original 1366:. Retrieved 1362:the original 1347: 1335:. Retrieved 1329: 1319: 1307:. Retrieved 1296: 1286: 1274:. Retrieved 1263: 1253: 1243: 1239: 1231: 1215: 1203:. Retrieved 1188: 1176:. Retrieved 1167: 1157: 1145:. Retrieved 1137:politico.com 1136: 1126: 1114:. Retrieved 1105: 1079:. Retrieved 1070: 1061: 1049:. Retrieved 1038: 1025: 1013:. Retrieved 1004: 994: 982:. Retrieved 967: 955:. Retrieved 946: 937: 925:. Retrieved 916: 907: 895:. Retrieved 886: 876: 864:. Retrieved 853: 843: 831:. Retrieved 820: 810: 791: 787: 775:. Retrieved 760: 750: 738:. Retrieved 734:the original 729: 694: 687: 673: 667: 663: 655: 651: 642: 627: 625: 616: 606: 604: 595: 591: 587:Samuel Alito 580: 568: 565:Neil Gorsuch 558: 528:John Roberts 525: 509: 499: 495: 487: 479: 477: 475:separately. 472: 468: 465: 456: 440: 438: 434: 419: 409: 405: 399: 349: 340:US president 336:Donald Trump 333: 303:Samuel Alito 288: 280:Donald Trump 252: 251: 250: 234:Laws applied 184: 181:Neil Gorsuch 172: 165:Samuel Alito 160: 148: 137:John Roberts 85: 60: 15: 1823:October 13, 1531: (1974) 805: (2020) 544:Elena Kagan 396:Capital One 372:§ 6103 210:Concurrence 177:Elena Kagan 2008:Categories 1927:(1): 7–68. 1790:October 7, 1759:October 7, 1726:August 21, 1695:August 20, 708:References 520:Article II 492:grand jury 344:Republican 316:Background 310:dissenting 291:Article II 98:U.S. LEXIS 67:Docket no. 866:August 7, 833:April 19, 581:Justices 380:subpoenas 94:L. Ed. 2d 77:Citations 1998:Archived 1938:Text of 1894:March 5, 1817:Archived 1812:NBC News 1784:Archived 1753:Archived 1720:Archived 1689:Archived 1662:July 13, 1656:Archived 1629:July 17, 1623:Archived 1596:July 10, 1590:Archived 1564:July 10, 1499:Archived 1430:July 10, 1331:NBC News 1303:Archived 1270:Archived 1224:Archived 1199:Archived 1172:Archived 1141:Archived 1110:Archived 1075:Archived 1051:June 17, 1045:Archived 1009:Archived 978:Archived 957:April 5, 951:Archived 947:NBC News 927:April 5, 921:Archived 897:April 5, 891:Archived 860:Archived 827:Archived 771:Archived 682:See also 559:Justice 293:and the 274:against 265:subpoena 258:landmark 202:Majority 106:Argument 1889:Reuters 1505:July 9, 1467:July 9, 1423:Reuters 1368:July 9, 1337:July 9, 1309:July 9, 1276:July 9, 1205:July 9, 1197:. CNN. 1178:July 9, 1116:July 9, 984:July 9, 976:. CNN. 777:July 9, 740:July 9, 297:of the 226:Dissent 218:Dissent 116:Holding 1976:  1970:  1967:  1961:  1958:  1955:Justia 1952:  1015:May 7, 794:, 542:, and 496:Mazars 384:Mazars 378:filed 370:  334:After 328:; and 276:Mazars 221:Thomas 187: 185:· 183:  175: 173:· 171:  163: 161:· 159:  151: 149:· 147:  71:19-635 1946: 798: 500:Vance 488:Vance 467:into 342:as a 229:Alito 100:3552. 84:___ ( 1948:U.S. 1896:2021 1870:2021 1825:2020 1792:2020 1761:2020 1728:2020 1697:2020 1684:CNBC 1664:2020 1631:2020 1598:2020 1566:2020 1526:U.S. 1507:2020 1469:2020 1432:2020 1404:2020 1370:2020 1339:2020 1311:2020 1278:2020 1207:2020 1180:2020 1149:2019 1118:2020 1083:2019 1053:2019 1017:2019 986:2020 959:2019 929:2019 899:2019 868:2019 835:2019 800:U.S. 779:2020 742:2020 585:and 404:and 394:and 350:The 305:and 87:more 82:U.S. 80:591 1986:CNN 1944:591 1863:CNN 1780:CNN 1716:CNN 1618:CNN 1585:BBC 1529:683 803:___ 796:591 518:or 382:to 2010:: 1996:. 1925:20 1923:. 1917:. 1887:. 1861:. 1842:. 1815:. 1809:. 1782:. 1778:. 1751:. 1745:. 1718:. 1714:. 1687:. 1681:. 1654:. 1648:. 1621:. 1615:. 1582:. 1550:. 1536:^ 1497:. 1491:. 1477:^ 1455:. 1449:. 1420:. 1390:. 1378:^ 1356:. 1328:. 1301:. 1295:. 1268:. 1262:. 1230:, 1170:. 1166:. 1139:. 1135:. 1108:. 1091:^ 1073:. 1043:. 1037:. 1007:. 1003:. 945:. 919:. 915:. 889:. 885:. 858:. 852:. 825:. 819:. 769:. 765:. 759:. 728:. 716:^ 678:. 614:. 538:, 534:, 449:. 324:; 312:. 1898:. 1872:. 1846:. 1827:. 1794:. 1763:. 1730:. 1699:. 1666:. 1633:. 1600:. 1568:. 1509:. 1471:. 1434:. 1406:. 1372:. 1341:. 1313:. 1280:. 1209:. 1182:. 1151:. 1120:. 1085:. 1055:. 1019:. 988:. 961:. 931:. 901:. 870:. 837:. 781:. 744:. 90:) 22:.

Index

Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign
Supreme Court of the United States
19-635
U.S.
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Oral argument
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
U.S. Const. art. VI § 2
U.S. Const. art. II
landmark
US Supreme Court
subpoena
Manhattan District Attorney
Cyrus Vance Jr.
Mazars
Donald Trump
Stormy Daniels scandal
Article II
Supremacy Clause
US Constitution

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑