1201:. A descriptively adequate grammar for a particular language defines the (infinite) set of grammatical sentences in that language; that is, it describes the language in its entirety. A grammar that achieves explanatory adequacy has the additional property that it gives insight into the mind's underlying linguistic structures. In other words, it does not merely describe the grammar of a language, but makes predictions about how linguistic knowledge is mentally represented. For Chomsky, such mental representations are largely innate and so if a grammatical theory has explanatory adequacy, it must be able to explain different languages' grammatical nuances as relatively minor variations in the universal pattern of human language.
387:, sentences are automatically transformed by the move operation from the underlying SVO order on which the matrix of all sentences in all languages is reconstructed. Therefore, there is no longer a need for a separate surface and deep matrix and additional rules of conversion between the two levels. According to Chomsky, this solution allows sufficient descriptive and explanatory adequacy—descriptive because all languages are analyzed on the same matrix, and explanatory because the analysis shows in which particular way the sentence is derived from the (hypothesized) initial cognitive state.
1260:
and thus a mental object. From that perspective, most of theoretical linguistics is a branch of psychology. E-language encompasses all other notions of what a language is, such as a body of knowledge or behavioural habits shared by a community. Thus E-language is not a coherent concept by itself, and
Chomsky argues that such notions of language are not useful in the study of innate linguistic knowledge or competence even though they may seem sensible and intuitive and useful in other areas of study. Competence, he argues, can be studied only if languages are treated as mental objects.
2449:, Zwart 1998 observed, "D-Structure is eliminated in the sense that there is no base component applying rewrite rules to generate an empty structure which is to be fleshed out later by 'all at once' lexical insertion. Instead, structures are created by combining elements drawn from the lexicon, and there is no stage in the process at which we can stop and say: this is D-Structure." Similarly, "there is no need for language particular S-Structure conditions in order to describe word order variation" and can be handled by LF.
829:
1036:, took transformations to be relations between sentences such as "I finally met this talkshow host you always detested" and simpler (kernel) sentences "I finally met this talkshow host" and "You always detested this talkshow host." A transformational-generative (or simply transformational) grammar thus involved two types of productive rules:
993:
either atomic or generated by other rules, and combine them. For example, the generalized transformation of embedding would take the kernel "Dave said X" and the kernel "Dan likes smoking" and combine them into "Dave said Dan likes smoking." GTs are thus structure-building rather than structure-changing. In the
Extended Standard Theory and
949:(SAI). That rule takes as its input a declarative sentence with an auxiliary, such as "John has eaten all the heirloom tomatoes", and transforms it into "Has John eaten all the heirloom tomatoes?" In the original formulation (Chomsky 1957), those rules were stated as rules that held over strings of terminals, constituent symbols or both.
985:
to have gone", and a third reordered arguments in the dative alternation. With the shift from rules to principles and constraints in the 1970s, those construction-specific transformations morphed into general rules (all the examples just mentioned are instances of NP movement), which eventually changed into the single general rule
1084:. He argued that it is impossible to describe the structure of natural languages with context-free grammars. His general position on the non-context-freeness of natural language has held up since then, though his specific examples of the inadequacy of CFGs in terms of their weak generative capacity were disproved.
1259:
that is similar but not identical to the competence/performance distinction. "I-language" is internal language; "E-language" is external language. I-language is taken to be the object of study in linguistic theory; it is the mentally represented linguistic knowledge a native speaker of a language has
1204:
Chomsky argued that even though linguists were still a long way from constructing descriptively adequate grammars, progress in descriptive adequacy would come only if linguists held explanatory adequacy as their goal: real insight into individual languages' structure can be gained only by comparative
1120:
Chomsky argued that "grammatical" and "ungrammatical" can be meaningfully and usefully defined. In contrast, an extreme behaviorist linguist would argue that language can be studied only through recordings or transcriptions of actual speech and that the role of the linguist is to look for patterns in
1097:
Using a term such as "transformation" may give the impression that theories of transformational generative grammar are intended as a model of the processes by which the human mind constructs and understands sentences, but
Chomsky clearly stated that a generative grammar models only the knowledge that
984:
The earliest conceptions of transformations were that they were construction-specific devices. For example, there was a transformation that turned active sentences into passive ones. A different transformation raised embedded subjects into main clause subject position in sentences such as "John seems
980:
In the 1970s, by the time of the
Extended Standard Theory, following Joseph Emonds's work on structure preservation, transformations came to be viewed as holding over trees. By the end of government and binding theory, in the late 1980s, transformations were no longer structure-changing operations at
914:
But the fundamental reason for inadequacy of traditional grammars is a more technical one. Although it was well understood that linguistic processes are in some sense "creative," the technical devices for expressing a system of recursive processes were simply not available until much more recently.
1223:
To complicate the understanding of the development of
Chomsky's theories, the precise meanings of deep structure and surface structure have changed over time. By the 1970s, Chomskyan linguists normally called them D-Structure and S-Structure. In particular, Chomskyan linguists dropped for good the
1213:
Though transformations continue to be important in
Chomsky's theories, he has now abandoned the original notion of deep structure and surface structure. Initially, two additional levels of representation were introduced—logical form (LF) and phonetic form (PF), but in the 1990s, Chomsky sketched a
1051:
In this context, transformational rules are not strictly necessary to generate the set of grammatical sentences in a language, since that can be done using phrase structure rules alone, but the use of transformations provides economy in some cases (the number of rules can be reduced), and it also
992:
Transformations actually come in two types: the post-deep structure kind mentioned above, which are string- or structure-changing, and generalized transformations (GTs). GTs were originally proposed in the earliest forms of generative grammar (such as in
Chomsky 1957). They take small structures,
1105:
Chomsky is not the first person to suggest that all languages have certain fundamental things in common. He quoted philosophers who posited the same basic idea several centuries ago. But
Chomsky helped make the innateness theory respectable after a period dominated by more behaviorist attitudes
1362:
In 1983 Koerner retracted his earlier statement suggesting that transformational grammar was a 1960s fad that had spread across the U.S. at a time when the federal government had invested heavily in new linguistic departments. But he claims
Chomsky's work is unoriginal when compared to other
1129:
is enough to define the grammaticality of a sentence; that is, if a particular string of
English words elicits a double-take or a feeling of wrongness in a native English speaker, with various extraneous factors affecting intuitions controlled for, it can be said that the string of words is
1121:
such observed speech, not to hypothesize about why such patterns might occur or to label particular utterances grammatical or ungrammatical. Few linguists in the 1950s actually took such an extreme position, but Chomsky was on the opposite extreme, defining grammaticality in an unusually
1040:, such as "S → NP VP" (a sentence may consist of a noun phrase followed by a verb phrase) etc., which could be used to generate grammatical sentences with associated parse trees (phrase markers, or P markers); and transformational rules, such as rules for converting statements to
1339:. In 1998, Chomsky suggested that derivations proceed in phases. The distinction between deep structure and surface structure is absent in Minimalist theories of syntax, and the most recent phase-based theories also eliminate LF and PF as unitary levels of representation.
893:
developed the idea that each sentence in a language has two levels of representation: a deep structure and a surface structure. But these are not quite identical to Hjelmslev's content plane and expression plane. The deep structure represents the core
1278:. It aims to further develop ideas involving "economy of derivation" and "economy of representation", which had started to become significant in the early 1990s but were still rather peripheral aspects of transformational-generative grammar theory:
1130:
ungrammatical. That, according to Chomsky, is entirely distinct from the question of whether a sentence is meaningful or can be understood. It is possible for a sentence to be both grammatical and meaningless, as in Chomsky's famous example, "
1401:, in order to win popularity among the Europeans. The transformational agenda was subsequently forced through at American conferences where students, instructed by Chomsky, regularly verbally attacked and ridiculed his potential opponents.
1335:: rules should not be stipulated as applying at arbitrary points in a derivation but instead apply throughout derivations. Minimalist approaches to phrase structure have resulted in "Bare Phrase Structure", an attempt to eliminate
192:
It was generally agreed that a degree of simplicity improves the quality of speech and writing, but closer inspection of the deep structures of different types of sentences led to many further insights, such as the concept of
173:. It is more desirable, for example, to say "Maggie and Alex went to the market" than to express the full underlying idea "Maggie went to the market and Alex went to the market". Such phenomena were described in terms of
1134:". But such sentences manifest a linguistic problem that is distinct from that posed by meaningful but ungrammatical (non)-sentences such as "man the bit sandwich the", the meaning of which is fairly clear, but which no
1177:. Chomsky noted the obvious fact that when people speak in the real world, they often make linguistic errors, such as starting a sentence and then abandoning it midway through. He argued that such errors in linguistic
1326:
Economy of representation is the principle that grammatical structures must exist for a purpose: the structure of a sentence should be no larger or more complex than required to satisfy constraints on grammaticality.
1055:
This notion of transformation proved adequate for subsequent versions, including the "extended", "revised extended", and Government-Binding (GB) versions of generative grammar, but it may no longer be sufficient for
1330:
Both notions, as described here, are somewhat vague, and their precise formulation is controversial. An additional aspect of minimalist thought is the idea that the derivation of syntactic structures should be
936:
The usual usage of the term "transformation" in linguistics refers to a rule that takes an input, typically called the deep structure (in the Standard Theory) or D-structure (in the extended standard theory or
910:. Deep structure was developed largely for technical reasons related to early semantic theory. Chomsky emphasized the importance of modern formal mathematical devices in the development of grammatical theory:
1098:
underlies the human ability to speak and understand, arguing that because most of that knowledge is innate, a baby can have a large body of knowledge about the structure of language in general and so need to
1185:, the knowledge that allows people to construct and understand grammatical sentences. Consequently, the linguist can study an idealised version of language, which greatly simplifies linguistic analysis.
58:. It considers grammar to be a system of rules that generate exactly those combinations of words that form grammatical sentences in a given language and involves the use of defined operations (called
1106:
towards language. He made concrete and technically sophisticated proposals about the structure of language as well as important proposals about how grammatical theories' success should be evaluated.
332:
Transformational generative grammar included two kinds of rules: phrase-structure rules and transformational rules. But scholars abandoned the project in the 1970s. Based on Chomsky's concept of
1359:'s sociological approach to a Chomskyan conception of linguistics as analogous to chemistry and physics. Koerner also praised the philosophical and psychological value of Chomsky's theory.
1548:
1617:
971:
321:
in humans. In particular, generative linguists tried to reconstruct the underlying innate structure based on deep structure and unmarked forms. Thus, a modern notion of
1149:
of observed speech became downplayed since the grammatical properties of constructed sentences were considered appropriate data on which to build a grammatical model.
313:. While the humanistic grammarians considered language manmade, Chomsky and his colleagues exploited markedness and transformation theory in their attempt to uncover
201:
in active and passive sentences. Transformations were given an explanatory role. Sanctius, among others, argued that surface structures pertaining to the choice of
1001:
as the Substitution and Adjunction operations, and have recently reemerged in mainstream generative grammar in Minimalism, as the operations Merge and Move.
1319:"), but in most sentences, that inflection just duplicates the information about number that the subject noun already has, and the inflection is therefore
110:
91:. In such a context, the addition of the values of one and two, for example, transform into the value of three; many types of transformation are possible.
919:'s words) "make infinite use of finite means" has developed only within the last thirty years, in the course of studies in the foundations of mathematics.
17:
2421:
1052:
provides a way of representing the grammatical relations between sentences, which would not be reflected in a system with phrase structure rules alone.
1048:, which acted on the phrase markers to produce other grammatically correct sentences. Hjelmslev had called word-order conversion rules "permutations".
906:. The concept of transformations had been proposed before the development of deep structure to increase the mathematical and descriptive power of
205:
in certain Latin expressions could not be understood without the restoration of the deep structure. His full transformational system included
1804:
Percival, William Keith (1976). "Deep and surface structure concepts in renaissance and mediaeval syntactic theory". In Parret (ed.).
1598:
Percival, William Keith (1976). "Deep and surface structure concepts in renaissance and mediaeval syntactic theory". In Parret (ed.).
1583:
Percival, William Keith (1976). "Deep and surface structure concepts in renaissance and mediaeval syntactic theory". In Parret (ed.).
1389:, where an exceptional opportunity was arranged for Chomsky to give a keynote speech making questionable claims of belonging to the
1220:, in which deep structure and surface structure are no longer featured and PF and LF remain as the only levels of representation.
2591:
1636:
360:
2827:
2758:
1956:
1903:
1765:
1531:
1131:
856:
344:. These findings could not be generalized cross-linguistically whereby they could not belong to an innate universal grammar.
1430:
1420:
870:
746:
178:
1193:
The other idea related directly to evaluation of theories of grammar. Chomsky distinguished between grammars that achieve
1157:
In the 1960s, Chomsky introduced two central ideas relevant to the construction and evaluation of grammatical theories.
2168:
1989:
1305:
can be used to refer only to several dogs, not a single dog, and so the inflection contributes to meaning by making it
251:
359:. This more lenient approach offers more prospects of universalizability. It is, for example, argued that the English
162:
2861:
2739:
2721:
2573:
2527:
2497:
2472:
2076:
2048:
2016:
1630:
1561:
1506:
1385:. Koerner suggests that great sums of money were spent to fly foreign students to the 1962 International Congress at
889:
706:
1972:
Benmamoun, labbas; Choueiri, Lina (2013). "The Syntax of Arabic From A Generative Perspective". In Owens (ed.).
2104:
766:
711:
484:
2347:
1374:
994:
938:
741:
432:
686:
552:
309:
The transformational grammar of the 1960s differs from the Renaissance linguistics in its relation to the
2851:
946:
806:
512:
181:
of the second, and the second expression is the deep structure of the first. The notions of ellipsis and
1484:{{cite book|author=Carnap, Rudolph |title=Philosophy and Logical Syntax |publisher=AMS Press |year=1935}
2846:
2676:
Koerner, E. F. K. (1983). "The Chomskyan 'revolution' and its historiography: a few critical remarks".
1445:
2064:
1013:
849:
796:
696:
522:
1274:
From the mid-1990s onward, much research in transformational grammar has been inspired by Chomsky's
2217:
1364:
1245:
941:), and changes it in some restricted way to result in a surface structure (or S-structure). In TG,
701:
644:
459:
279:
1224:
idea that a sentence's deep structure determined its meaning (taken to its logical conclusions by
956:
113:
separation of semantics from syntax. Hjelmslev's structuralist conception including semantics and
2809:
1465:
1205:
study of a wide range of languages, on the assumption that they are all cut from the same cloth.
997:, GTs were abandoned in favor of recursive phrase structure rules, but they are still present in
801:
639:
616:
233:
2134:
129:
Transformational analysis is a part of the classical Western grammatical tradition based on the
2544:
the I-language is the actual function, whereas the E-language is the extension of this function
1460:
1363:
syntactic models of the time. According to Koerner, Chomsky's rise to fame was orchestrated by
1282:
Economy of derivation is the principle that movements, or transformations, occur only to match
1173:
1122:
998:
942:
751:
718:
671:
587:
567:
547:
449:
427:
422:
209:
170:
158:
118:
95:
78:
2399:
1981:
2856:
1613:
1356:
1167:
1037:
527:
255:
87:
2626:
Lappin, Shalom; Levine, Robert; Johnson, David (2001). "The Revolution Maximally Confused".
2417:
2404:
356:
2343:
2258:
Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Gerald Gazdar (1982). "Natural languages and context-free languages".
1832:
1425:
1394:
1225:
1077:
916:
907:
842:
771:
681:
562:
507:
404:
229:
1076:
An important feature of all transformational grammars is that they are more powerful than
317:. It would be later clarified that such grammar arises from a brain structure caused by a
8:
2409:
1064:
may require a formal definition that goes beyond the tree manipulation characteristic of
1061:
612:
542:
517:
489:
142:
1836:
1440:
2785:
2643:
2608:
2547:
2516:
2461:
2387:
2275:
2240:
2191:
2032:
1895:
1868:
1855:
1820:
1757:
1724:
1684:
1450:
1398:
1386:
1369:
1310:
1275:
1269:
1216:
1057:
832:
811:
781:
736:
691:
659:
649:
537:
532:
348:
310:
267:
263:
51:
2504:(Supervised by Noam Chomsky, this dissertation introduced the idea of "logical form.")
981:
all; instead, they add information to already existing trees by copying constituents.
347:
The concept of transformation was nevertheless not fully rejected. In Chomsky's 1990s
169:, so learning to use a language correctly requires certain additional effects such as
2823:
2817:
2754:
2735:
2717:
2689:
2647:
2612:
2569:
2542:
Chomsky, Noam (2001). "Derivation by Phase." In other words, in algebraic terms, and
2523:
2493:
2468:
2395:
2391:
2379:
2279:
2244:
2153:
2100:
2072:
2044:
2012:
2006:
1985:
1952:
1899:
1860:
1761:
1688:
1626:
1557:
1550:
Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories, part 1
1527:
1502:
1081:
1009:
884:
828:
676:
654:
597:
364:
337:
322:
283:
198:
55:
2195:
1872:
2789:
2777:
2685:
2635:
2600:
2267:
2232:
2183:
2149:
1977:
1924:
1891:
1886:
Battistella, Edwin (2015). "Markedness in Linguistics". In Wright, James D. (ed.).
1850:
1840:
1786:
1753:
1748:
Battistella, Edwin (2015). "Markedness in Linguistics". In Wright, James D. (ed.).
1676:
1348:
776:
607:
602:
577:
572:
557:
380:
376:
372:
202:
102:
82:
185:
are complementary: the deep structure is converted into the surface structure and
2711:
2294:
2092:
2038:
1382:
1021:
325:, in contrast to the humanistic classics, suggested that the basic word order of
194:
98:
70:
2199:
1821:"Evolutionary Dynamics Do Not Motivate a Single-Mutant Theory of Human Language"
1709:
165:, 1587). The core observation is that grammatical rules alone do not constitute
2806:- Chapter 1 of I-language: An Introduction to Linguistics as Cognitive Science.
2413:
1845:
1435:
1415:
1378:
1352:
1229:
1135:
1126:
1115:
621:
314:
306:, developed what they called transformational generative grammar in the 1960s.
275:
259:
258:
argued for limiting linguistic analysis to the surface structure. By contrast,
154:
2803:
2781:
2639:
2604:
1680:
2840:
2383:
2187:
1928:
1790:
1455:
1232:
had begun to argue that both deep and surface structure determined meaning).
1228:
during the same period) when LF took over this role (previously, Chomsky and
1146:
1145:
to base their research on a methodology in which studying language through a
1045:
1041:
1033:
341:
106:
74:
2819:
I-language: An Introduction to Linguistics as Cognitive Science, 2nd edition
2589:
Lappin, Shalom; Levine, Robert; Johnson, David (2000). "Topic ... Comment".
1661:
2707:
1919:
Partee, Barbara (2011). "Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact".
1864:
1781:
Partee, Barbara (2011). "Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact".
1410:
1336:
1102:
only the idiosyncratic features of the language(s) to which it is exposed.
876:
664:
454:
384:
340:, Katz and Fodor had conducted their research on English grammar employing
299:
295:
291:
66:
1819:
de Boer, Bart; Thompson, Bill; Ravigniani, Andrea; Boeckx, Cedric (2020).
898:
of a sentence and is mapped onto the surface structure, which follows the
1390:
945:
generate deep structures. For example, a typical transformation in TG is
816:
791:
412:
303:
146:
145:. These were joined to establish linguistics as a natural science in the
130:
31:
1728:
887:
practice of excluding semantics from structural analysis, his 1965 book
105:
in 1908. Chomsky adopted the concept of transformation from his teacher
2271:
2236:
2071:. Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics. Blackwell Publishers. p. 2.
1921:
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
1783:
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
1291:
1241:
786:
469:
333:
287:
243:
239:
114:
1710:"Jakobson und Husserl: Ein beitrag zur genealogie Des strukturalismus"
94:
Generative algebra was first introduced to general linguistics by the
2661:
Koerner, E. F. K. (1978). "Towards a historiography of linguistics".
2554:. MIT Press. Pages 1-52. (See p. 49 fn. 2 for comment on E-language.)
1005:
899:
895:
761:
756:
592:
582:
474:
464:
213:
138:
2768:
Zwart, Jan-Wouter (1998). "Review Article: The Minimalist Program".
1235:
1065:
986:
318:
223:
166:
150:
1888:
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
1750:
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
1017:
352:
1818:
1355:
in linguistics, arguing that it had brought about a shift from
1142:
479:
217:
250:
Transformational analysis fell out of favor with the rise of
134:
65:
The method is commonly associated with the American linguist
189:
from it by what were later known as transformational rules.
2218:"Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language"
2067:(1995). "Phonological Theory". In John A. Goldsmith (ed.).
1662:"Husserl on Meaning, Grammar, and the Structure of Content"
368:
77:
introduced the term "transformation" in his application of
1806:
History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics
1600:
History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics
1585:
History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics
1188:
2358:[Transformational-generative approach to language in
1141:
The use of such intuitive judgments permitted generative
915:
In fact, a real understanding of how a language can (in
2663:
Toward a Historiography of Linguistics: Selected Essays
1290:. An example of an interpretable feature is the plural
395:
329:
is unmarked, and unmodified in transformational terms.
226:, the occurrence of syntactically superfluous elements;
2318:
2135:"On the generative power of transformational grammars"
1351:
hailed transformational grammar as the third and last
282:, which was likewise influenced by Saussure. Based on
1240:"E-language" redirects here. Not to be confused with
959:
177:. In modern terminology, the first expression is the
69:'s biologically oriented concept of language. But in
2123:, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc., 1966, pp. 59–69.
1496:
1125:
way for the time. He argued that the intuition of a
2625:
2588:
2257:
290:and, having moved to the United States, influenced
149:. Transformational analysis was later developed by
2515:
2460:
1020:) and the surface form that is articulated during
965:
101:, although the method was described before him by
2815:
2812:– an online textbook on transformational grammar.
1971:
254:in the 19th century, and the historical linguist
2838:
2132:
1949:The Minimalist Program. 20th Anniversary Edition
1251:In 1986, Chomsky proposed a distinction between
1160:
375:) represents the initial state of the cognitive
62:) to produce new sentences from existing ones.
2458:
2348:"Transformacijsko-generativni pristup jeziku u
1499:Western linguistics: An historical introduction
1309:. English verbs are inflected according to the
2753:. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 47–55.
2487:
2169:"Three models for the description of language"
2085:
1492:
1490:
1092:
1071:
262:, in his 1921 elaboration of the 17th-century
2729:
2563:
2513:
2463:Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
2036:
2004:
1976:. Oxford Umiversity Press. pp. 115–164.
850:
2669:
2654:
2121:An Introduction to Transformational Grammars
1890:(2nd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 533–537.
1752:(2nd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 533–537.
1606:
1313:of their subject ("Dogs bite" v. "A dog bite
1885:
1747:
1612:
1487:
1707:
1540:
1214:new program of research known at first as
1208:
1181:are irrelevant to the study of linguistic
857:
843:
336:as the proper subject of linguistics as a
2091:
2063:
2025:
1974:The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics
1854:
1844:
1797:
1515:
2628:Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
2592:Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
1803:
1659:
1597:
1591:
1582:
1576:
1008:, another form of transformation is the
298:. Chomsky and his colleagues, including
27:Part of the theory of generative grammar
2776:. Cambridge University Press: 213–226.
2706:
2675:
2660:
2215:
2166:
2035:of 1660 identified similar principles;
1998:
1982:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0006
1946:
1912:
1774:
1524:Saussure and Sechehaye: Myth and Genius
1189:Descriptive versus explanatory adequacy
1012:, which describes a mapping between an
977:(NP = Noun Phrase and AUX = Auxiliary)
902:form of the sentence very closely, via
14:
2839:
2342:
2176:IRE Transactions on Information Theory
1923:. Vol. 6. BIYCLC. pp. 1–52.
1918:
1808:. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 238–253.
1785:. Vol. 6. BIYCLC. pp. 1–52.
1780:
1602:. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 238–253.
1587:. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 238–253.
1546:
1521:
1197:and those that go further and achieve
1080:. Chomsky formalized this idea in the
2816:Isac, Daniela; Charles Reiss (2013).
2767:
2748:
2427:from the original on January 16, 2013
1942:
1940:
1938:
1879:
1741:
1342:
1263:
1132:colorless green ideas sleep furiously
124:
2133:Peters, Stanley; R. Ritchie (1973).
1431:Head-driven phrase structure grammar
1421:Generalised phrase structure grammar
1152:
1027:
871:Deep structure and surface structure
747:Conservative and innovative language
396:Deep structure and surface structure
2097:Prolegomena to a Theory of Language
2069:The Handbook of Phonological Theory
390:
286:, Jakobson developed his theory of
44:transformational-generative grammar
24:
18:Transformational generative grammar
2751:The linguistics studentʻs handbook
2323:(Second ed.). Academic Press.
2292:
1935:
1896:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.52037-6
1758:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.52037-6
931:
252:historical-comparative linguistics
25:
2873:
2797:
2665:. John Benjamins. pp. 21–54.
2099:. University of Wisconsin Press.
1109:
351:, transformations pertain to the
1625:. New York: Philosophy Library.
1347:In 1978, linguist and historian
1294:on regular English nouns, e.g.,
1165:One was the distinction between
1087:
827:
274:). Husserl's concept influenced
2700:
2619:
2582:
2557:
2536:
2507:
2481:
2452:
2439:
2364:Aspects of the theory of syntax
2336:
2327:
2319:Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1986).
2312:
2286:
2251:
2209:
2160:
2126:
2113:
2057:
2008:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax
1965:
1812:
1547:Butler, Christopher S. (2003).
925:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax
890:Aspects of the Theory of Syntax
163:Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas
2810:The Syntax of Natural Language
1701:
1653:
1478:
960:
270:on classical transformations (
13:
1:
2490:The Grammar of Quantification
2043:. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
1619:Course in general linguistics
1497:Seuren, Pieter A. M. (1998).
1471:
1375:Linguistic Society of America
1236:"I-language" and "E-language"
1161:Competence versus performance
1138:would accept as well-formed.
995:government and binding theory
939:government and binding theory
379:. However, in languages like
232:, the violation of a rule of
212:, the deletion of understood
2690:10.1016/0271-5309(83)90012-5
2678:Language & Communication
2552:Ken Hale: A Life in Language
2321:Linguistic Theory in America
2154:10.1016/0020-0255(73)90027-3
966:{\displaystyle \Rightarrow }
687:Functional discourse grammar
553:Ethnography of communication
7:
2822:. Oxford University Press.
2716:, The Hague/Paris: Mouton,
1404:
1093:Innate linguistic knowledge
1072:Mathematical representation
947:subject-auxiliary inversion
807:Second-language acquisition
50:) is part of the theory of
10:
2878:
2354:Aspektima teorije sintakse
2260:Linguistics and Philosophy
2225:Linguistics and Philosophy
1846:10.1038/s41598-019-57235-8
1717:Tijdschrift voor Filosofie
1708:Holenstein, Elmar (2018).
1446:Lexical functional grammar
1267:
1239:
1113:
868:
485:Syntax–semantics interface
278:, who advocated it in the
242:, the violation of normal
2782:10.1017/S0022226797006889
2372:SOL: LingvistiÄŤki ÄŤasopis
1681:10.1007/s10743-017-9223-2
1660:Bianchin, Matteo (2018).
1014:underlying representation
797:Philosophy of linguistics
697:Interactional linguistics
2862:Syntactic transformation
2492:. MIT Phd Dissertation.
2459:Jackendoff, Ray (1974).
2350:SintaktiÄŤkim strukturama
2216:Shieber, Stuart (1985).
2188:10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
1929:10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1580
1791:10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1580
1288:uninterpretable features
1246:E (programming language)
280:Prague linguistic circle
36:transformational grammar
2640:10.1023/A:1013397516214
2605:10.1023/A:1006474128258
2488:May, Robert C. (1977).
1522:Seuren, Pieter (2018).
1466:Transformational syntax
1393:tradition of Saussure,
1381:, a personal friend of
1226:generative semanticists
1209:Development of concepts
266:, based his version of
2770:Journal of Linguistics
2749:Bauer, Laurie (2007).
2732:The Minimalist Program
2730:Chomsky, Noam (1995).
2566:The Minimalist Program
2564:Chomsky, Noam (1995).
2514:Chomsky, Noam (1986).
2447:The Minimalist Program
2295:"Language Acquisition"
2167:Chomsky, Noam (1956).
2037:Chomsky, Noam (1972).
2005:Chomsky, Noam (1965).
1947:Chomsky, Noam (2015).
1614:de Saussure, Ferdinand
1461:Structural linguistics
1284:interpretable features
1038:phrase structure rules
999:tree-adjoining grammar
967:
943:phrase structure rules
929:
634:Theoretical frameworks
588:Philosophy of language
568:History of linguistics
161:(1540), and Sanctius (
159:Julius Caesar Scaliger
141:and on the grammar of
111:American descriptivist
79:Alfred North Whitehead
2518:Knowledge of Language
2374:(in Serbo-Croatian).
2366:of Noam Chomsky]
1373:, the journal of the
1357:Ferdinand de Saussure
1268:Further information:
1114:Further information:
1078:context-free grammars
968:
912:
908:context-free grammars
528:Conversation analysis
294:, especially through
256:Ferdinand de Saussure
117:is incorporated into
88:Principia Mathematica
2713:Syntactic Structures
2522:. New York:Praeger.
2360:Syntactic structures
2142:Information Sciences
1426:Generative semantics
1199:explanatory adequacy
1195:descriptive adequacy
957:
881:Syntactic Structures
772:Internet linguistics
682:Construction grammar
383:, which has a basic
153:grammarians such as
2804:What is I-language?
1837:2020NatSR..10..451D
1501:. Wiley-Blackwell.
1032:Chomsky's advisor,
885:distributionalistic
707:Systemic functional
502:Applied linguistics
444:General linguistics
175:understood elements
143:Apollonius Dyscolus
109:, who followed the
96:structural linguist
2852:Grammar frameworks
2548:Michael Kenstowicz
2272:10.1007/BF00360802
2237:10.1007/BF00630917
2033:Port-Royal Grammar
1825:Scientific Reports
1556:. John Benjamins.
1451:Minimalist program
1399:Port-Royal Grammar
1353:Kuhnian revolution
1343:Critical reception
1276:minimalist program
1270:Minimalist program
1264:Minimalist program
1058:minimalist grammar
963:
896:semantic relations
883:followed Harris's
812:Theory of language
782:Origin of language
737:Autonomy of syntax
692:Grammaticalization
538:Discourse analysis
533:Corpus linguistics
349:Minimalist Program
327:biological grammar
311:theory of language
268:generative grammar
264:Port-Royal Grammar
125:Historical context
119:functional grammar
52:generative grammar
2847:Generative syntax
2829:978-0-19-953420-3
2760:978-0-7486-2758-5
2299:Simply Psychology
2065:Goldsmith, John A
2040:Language and Mind
1958:978-0-262-52734-7
1905:978-0-08-097087-5
1767:978-0-08-097087-5
1533:978-90-04-37815-5
1153:Theory evaluation
1082:Chomsky hierarchy
1028:Formal definition
1010:phonological rule
867:
866:
655:Distributionalism
598:Psycholinguistics
338:cognitive science
323:universal grammar
284:opposition theory
179:surface structure
56:natural languages
16:(Redirected from
2869:
2833:
2793:
2764:
2745:
2726:
2694:
2693:
2673:
2667:
2666:
2658:
2652:
2651:
2623:
2617:
2616:
2586:
2580:
2579:
2561:
2555:
2540:
2534:
2533:
2521:
2511:
2505:
2503:
2485:
2479:
2478:
2466:
2456:
2450:
2443:
2437:
2436:
2434:
2432:
2426:
2407:
2369:
2344:Kordić, Snježana
2340:
2334:
2331:
2325:
2324:
2316:
2310:
2309:
2307:
2305:
2290:
2284:
2283:
2255:
2249:
2248:
2222:
2213:
2207:
2206:
2204:
2198:. Archived from
2173:
2164:
2158:
2157:
2139:
2130:
2124:
2117:
2111:
2110:
2093:Hjelmslev, Louis
2089:
2083:
2082:
2061:
2055:
2054:
2029:
2023:
2022:
2002:
1996:
1995:
1969:
1963:
1962:
1944:
1933:
1932:
1916:
1910:
1909:
1883:
1877:
1876:
1858:
1848:
1816:
1810:
1809:
1801:
1795:
1794:
1778:
1772:
1771:
1745:
1739:
1738:
1736:
1735:
1714:
1705:
1699:
1698:
1696:
1695:
1666:
1657:
1651:
1650:
1648:
1647:
1641:
1635:. Archived from
1624:
1610:
1604:
1603:
1595:
1589:
1588:
1580:
1574:
1573:
1571:
1570:
1555:
1544:
1538:
1537:
1519:
1513:
1512:
1494:
1485:
1482:
1441:Jerzy Kuryłowicz
1383:Chomsky's father
1349:E. F. K. Koerner
972:
970:
969:
964:
927:
859:
852:
845:
831:
777:LGBT linguistics
767:Internationalism
742:Compositionality
603:Sociolinguistics
578:Neurolinguistics
573:Interlinguistics
558:Ethnomethodology
400:
399:
391:Basic mechanisms
381:Classical Arabic
377:language faculty
203:grammatical case
103:Albert Sechehaye
83:Bertrand Russell
54:, especially of
21:
2877:
2876:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2868:
2867:
2866:
2837:
2836:
2830:
2800:
2761:
2742:
2724:
2703:
2698:
2697:
2674:
2670:
2659:
2655:
2624:
2620:
2587:
2583:
2576:
2562:
2558:
2541:
2537:
2530:
2512:
2508:
2500:
2486:
2482:
2475:
2457:
2453:
2445:In a review of
2444:
2440:
2430:
2428:
2424:
2403:
2367:
2356:Noama Chomskog"
2341:
2337:
2333:Chomsky 1957:15
2332:
2328:
2317:
2313:
2303:
2301:
2291:
2287:
2256:
2252:
2220:
2214:
2210:
2202:
2171:
2165:
2161:
2137:
2131:
2127:
2118:
2114:
2107:
2090:
2086:
2079:
2062:
2058:
2051:
2030:
2026:
2019:
2003:
1999:
1992:
1970:
1966:
1959:
1945:
1936:
1917:
1913:
1906:
1884:
1880:
1817:
1813:
1802:
1798:
1779:
1775:
1768:
1746:
1742:
1733:
1731:
1712:
1706:
1702:
1693:
1691:
1669:Husserl Studies
1664:
1658:
1654:
1645:
1643:
1639:
1633:
1622:
1611:
1607:
1596:
1592:
1581:
1577:
1568:
1566:
1564:
1553:
1545:
1541:
1534:
1520:
1516:
1509:
1495:
1488:
1483:
1479:
1474:
1407:
1345:
1321:uninterpretable
1272:
1266:
1249:
1238:
1211:
1191:
1163:
1155:
1118:
1112:
1095:
1090:
1074:
1030:
958:
955:
954:
934:
932:Transformations
928:
923:
904:transformations
873:
863:
822:
821:
732:
724:
723:
635:
627:
626:
622:Writing systems
513:Anthropological
503:
495:
494:
445:
437:
398:
393:
127:
99:Louis Hjelmslev
60:transformations
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2875:
2865:
2864:
2859:
2854:
2849:
2835:
2834:
2828:
2813:
2807:
2799:
2798:External links
2796:
2795:
2794:
2765:
2759:
2746:
2740:
2727:
2722:
2702:
2699:
2696:
2695:
2684:(2): 147–169.
2668:
2653:
2634:(4): 901–919.
2618:
2599:(3): 665–671.
2581:
2574:
2556:
2535:
2528:
2506:
2498:
2480:
2473:
2451:
2438:
2378:(12–13): 105.
2335:
2326:
2311:
2285:
2266:(4): 471–504.
2250:
2231:(3): 333–343.
2208:
2205:on 2010-09-19.
2182:(3): 113–124.
2159:
2125:
2112:
2105:
2084:
2077:
2056:
2049:
2024:
2017:
1997:
1991:978-0199764136
1990:
1964:
1957:
1934:
1911:
1904:
1878:
1811:
1796:
1773:
1766:
1740:
1723:(3): 560–607.
1700:
1675:(2): 101–121.
1652:
1631:
1605:
1590:
1575:
1562:
1539:
1532:
1514:
1507:
1486:
1476:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1436:Heavy NP shift
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1416:Biolinguistics
1413:
1406:
1403:
1379:Roman Jakobson
1344:
1341:
1328:
1327:
1324:
1265:
1262:
1237:
1234:
1230:Ray Jackendoff
1210:
1207:
1190:
1187:
1162:
1159:
1154:
1151:
1136:native speaker
1127:native speaker
1116:Grammaticality
1111:
1110:Grammaticality
1108:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1073:
1070:
1029:
1026:
1022:natural speech
1004:In generative
975:
974:
962:
933:
930:
921:
869:Main article:
865:
864:
862:
861:
854:
847:
839:
836:
835:
824:
823:
820:
819:
814:
809:
804:
802:Prescriptivism
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
733:
730:
729:
726:
725:
722:
721:
716:
715:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
669:
668:
667:
662:
657:
652:
647:
636:
633:
632:
629:
628:
625:
624:
619:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
560:
555:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
515:
510:
504:
501:
500:
497:
496:
493:
492:
487:
482:
477:
472:
467:
462:
457:
452:
446:
443:
442:
439:
438:
436:
435:
430:
425:
419:
416:
415:
409:
408:
397:
394:
392:
389:
357:move operation
315:innate grammar
276:Roman Jakobson
272:Modifikationen
260:Edmund Husserl
248:
247:
237:
227:
221:
155:Thomas Linacre
126:
123:
71:logical syntax
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2874:
2863:
2860:
2858:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2848:
2845:
2844:
2842:
2831:
2825:
2821:
2820:
2814:
2811:
2808:
2805:
2802:
2801:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2766:
2762:
2756:
2752:
2747:
2743:
2741:0-262-53128-3
2737:
2734:. MIT Press.
2733:
2728:
2725:
2723:9783110172799
2719:
2715:
2714:
2709:
2708:Chomsky, Noam
2705:
2704:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2672:
2664:
2657:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2622:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2593:
2585:
2577:
2575:0-262-53128-3
2571:
2568:. MIT Press.
2567:
2560:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2539:
2531:
2529:0-275-90025-8
2525:
2520:
2519:
2510:
2501:
2499:0-8240-1392-1
2495:
2491:
2484:
2476:
2474:0-262-10013-4
2470:
2467:. MIT Press.
2465:
2464:
2455:
2448:
2442:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2406:
2405:CROSBI 446914
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2355:
2351:
2345:
2339:
2330:
2322:
2315:
2300:
2296:
2289:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2254:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2219:
2212:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2170:
2163:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2136:
2129:
2122:
2116:
2108:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2088:
2080:
2078:1-4051-5768-2
2074:
2070:
2066:
2060:
2052:
2050:0-15-147810-4
2046:
2042:
2041:
2034:
2028:
2020:
2018:0-262-53007-4
2014:
2011:. MIT Press.
2010:
2009:
2001:
1993:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1968:
1960:
1954:
1951:. MIT Press.
1950:
1943:
1941:
1939:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1915:
1907:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1882:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1815:
1807:
1800:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1777:
1769:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1744:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1711:
1704:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1663:
1656:
1642:on 2020-04-14
1638:
1634:
1632:9780231157278
1628:
1621:
1620:
1615:
1609:
1601:
1594:
1586:
1579:
1565:
1563:9781588113580
1559:
1552:
1551:
1543:
1535:
1529:
1525:
1518:
1510:
1508:0-631-20891-7
1504:
1500:
1493:
1491:
1481:
1477:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1456:Parasitic gap
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1365:Bernard Bloch
1360:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1340:
1338:
1334:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1308:
1307:interpretable
1304:
1300:
1299:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1277:
1271:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1247:
1243:
1233:
1231:
1227:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1206:
1202:
1200:
1196:
1186:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1158:
1150:
1148:
1144:
1143:syntacticians
1139:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1117:
1107:
1103:
1101:
1088:Core concepts
1085:
1083:
1079:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1053:
1049:
1047:
1046:passive voice
1044:or active to
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:Zellig Harris
1025:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:
1000:
996:
990:
988:
982:
978:
953:X NP AUX Y
952:
951:
950:
948:
944:
940:
926:
920:
918:
911:
909:
905:
901:
897:
892:
891:
886:
882:
879:'s 1957 book
878:
872:
860:
855:
853:
848:
846:
841:
840:
838:
837:
834:
830:
826:
825:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
752:Descriptivism
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
734:
728:
727:
720:
719:Structuralism
717:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
702:Prague circle
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
674:
673:
670:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
642:
641:
638:
637:
631:
630:
623:
620:
618:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
548:Documentation
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
523:Computational
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
505:
499:
498:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
447:
441:
440:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
420:
418:
417:
414:
411:
410:
406:
402:
401:
388:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
345:
343:
342:introspection
339:
335:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
245:
241:
238:
235:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
204:
200:
196:
190:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
122:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:Zellig Harris
104:
100:
97:
92:
90:
89:
84:
80:
76:
75:Rudolf Carnap
72:
68:
63:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
2857:Noam Chomsky
2818:
2773:
2769:
2750:
2731:
2712:
2701:Bibliography
2681:
2677:
2671:
2662:
2656:
2631:
2627:
2621:
2596:
2590:
2584:
2565:
2559:
2551:
2543:
2538:
2517:
2509:
2489:
2483:
2462:
2454:
2446:
2441:
2429:. Retrieved
2375:
2371:
2363:
2359:
2353:
2349:
2338:
2329:
2320:
2314:
2302:. Retrieved
2298:
2288:
2263:
2259:
2253:
2228:
2224:
2211:
2200:the original
2179:
2175:
2162:
2145:
2141:
2128:
2120:
2119:Emmon Bach,
2115:
2096:
2087:
2068:
2059:
2039:
2027:
2007:
2000:
1973:
1967:
1948:
1920:
1914:
1887:
1881:
1831:(451): 451.
1828:
1824:
1814:
1805:
1799:
1782:
1776:
1749:
1743:
1732:. Retrieved
1720:
1716:
1703:
1692:. Retrieved
1672:
1668:
1655:
1644:. Retrieved
1637:the original
1618:
1608:
1599:
1593:
1584:
1578:
1567:. Retrieved
1549:
1542:
1523:
1517:
1498:
1480:
1411:Antisymmetry
1368:
1367:, editor of
1361:
1346:
1337:X-bar theory
1332:
1329:
1320:
1315:
1314:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1295:
1287:
1283:
1273:
1256:
1252:
1250:
1222:
1215:
1212:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1192:
1182:
1178:
1172:
1166:
1164:
1156:
1140:
1119:
1104:
1099:
1096:
1075:
1054:
1050:
1031:
1003:
991:
983:
979:
976:
935:
924:
913:
903:
900:phonological
888:
880:
874:
665:Glossematics
645:Constituency
617:interpreting
455:Lexicography
363:word-order (
346:
331:
326:
308:
300:Jerrold Katz
296:Morris Halle
292:Noam Chomsky
271:
249:
191:
186:
182:
174:
128:
93:
86:
67:Noam Chomsky
64:
59:
47:
43:
39:
35:
29:
2431:7 September
2304:21 February
2293:McLeod, S.
1391:rationalist
1301:. The word
1179:performance
1174:performance
1123:mentalistic
817:Terminology
792:Orthography
712:Usage-based
613:Translating
508:Acquisition
413:Linguistics
304:Jerry Fodor
183:restoration
147:Middle Ages
131:metaphysics
32:linguistics
2841:Categories
2106:0299024709
1734:2022-08-08
1694:2022-08-08
1646:2022-08-08
1569:2020-01-19
1472:References
1292:inflection
1257:E-language
1253:I-language
1242:E language
1217:Minimalism
1183:competence
1168:competence
987:move alpha
973:X AUX NP Y
787:Orismology
672:Functional
660:Generative
650:Dependency
470:Pragmatics
460:Morphology
450:Diachronic
334:I-language
288:markedness
244:word order
240:hyperbaton
151:humanistic
115:pragmatics
2648:140876545
2613:189900915
2414:1080348-8
2392:186964128
2384:0352-8715
2280:189881482
2245:222277837
2148:: 49–83.
2095:(1969) .
1689:254553890
1616:(1959) .
1526:. Brill.
1042:questions
1006:phonology
989:or Move.
961:⇒
762:Iconicity
757:Etymology
677:Cognitive
640:Formalist
593:Phonetics
583:Philology
475:Semantics
465:Phonology
385:VSO order
234:agreement
230:syllepsis
220:elements;
218:syntactic
139:Aristotle
2710:(1957),
2422:Archived
2418:(CROLIB)
2346:(1991).
2196:19519474
1873:92035839
1865:31949223
1729:40882437
1405:See also
1397:and the
1395:Humboldt
1370:Language
922:—
917:Humboldt
563:Forensic
543:Distance
490:Typology
405:a series
403:Part of
355:and the
319:mutation
224:pleonasm
214:semantic
210:ellipsis
187:restored
171:ellipsis
167:elegance
157:(1524),
2790:1647815
2400:3445224
1856:6965110
1833:Bibcode
1387:Harvard
1333:uniform
1018:phoneme
877:Chomsky
518:Applied
428:History
423:Outline
365:subject
353:lexicon
199:patient
81:'s and
2826:
2788:
2757:
2738:
2720:
2646:
2611:
2572:
2550:(ed.)
2526:
2496:
2471:
2412:
2410:ZDB-ID
2398:
2390:
2382:
2278:
2243:
2194:
2103:
2075:
2047:
2015:
1988:
1955:
1902:
1871:
1863:
1853:
1764:
1727:
1687:
1629:
1560:
1530:
1505:
1377:, and
1311:number
1147:corpus
1066:Move α
875:While
833:Portal
731:Topics
480:Syntax
373:object
2786:S2CID
2644:S2CID
2609:S2CID
2546:. In
2425:(PDF)
2388:S2CID
2368:(PDF)
2276:S2CID
2241:S2CID
2221:(PDF)
2203:(PDF)
2192:S2CID
2172:(PDF)
2138:(PDF)
1869:S2CID
1725:JSTOR
1713:(PDF)
1685:S2CID
1665:(PDF)
1640:(PDF)
1623:(PDF)
1554:(PDF)
1286:with
1100:learn
1062:merge
1060:, as
1016:(the
433:Index
195:agent
135:Plato
42:) or
2824:ISBN
2755:ISBN
2736:ISBN
2718:ISBN
2570:ISBN
2524:ISBN
2494:ISBN
2469:ISBN
2433:2020
2396:SSRN
2380:ISSN
2362:and
2306:2019
2101:ISBN
2073:ISBN
2045:ISBN
2031:The
2013:ISBN
1986:ISBN
1953:ISBN
1900:ISBN
1861:PMID
1762:ISBN
1627:ISBN
1558:ISBN
1528:ISBN
1503:ISBN
1303:dogs
1255:and
1171:and
615:and
608:Text
369:verb
302:and
197:and
137:and
2778:doi
2686:doi
2636:doi
2601:doi
2268:doi
2233:doi
2184:doi
2150:doi
1978:doi
1925:doi
1892:doi
1851:PMC
1841:doi
1787:doi
1754:doi
1677:doi
1296:dog
1244:or
361:SVO
216:or
133:of
85:'s
48:TGG
30:In
2843::
2784:.
2774:34
2772:.
2680:.
2642:.
2632:19
2630:.
2607:.
2597:18
2595:.
2420:.
2416:.
2408:.
2402:.
2394:.
2386:.
2370:.
2352:i
2297:.
2274:.
2262:.
2239:.
2227:.
2223:.
2190:.
2178:.
2174:.
2144:.
2140:.
1984:.
1937:^
1898:.
1867:.
1859:.
1849:.
1839:.
1829:10
1827:.
1823:.
1760:.
1721:35
1719:.
1715:.
1683:.
1673:34
1671:.
1667:.
1489:^
1068:.
1024:.
407:on
371:,
367:,
121:.
73:,
40:TG
34:,
2832:.
2792:.
2780::
2763:.
2744:.
2692:.
2688::
2682:3
2650:.
2638::
2615:.
2603::
2578:.
2532:.
2502:.
2477:.
2435:.
2376:6
2308:.
2282:.
2270::
2264:4
2247:.
2235::
2229:8
2186::
2180:2
2156:.
2152::
2146:6
2109:.
2081:.
2053:.
2021:.
1994:.
1980::
1961:.
1931:.
1927::
1908:.
1894::
1875:.
1843::
1835::
1793:.
1789::
1770:.
1756::
1737:.
1697:.
1679::
1649:.
1572:.
1536:.
1511:.
1323:.
1316:s
1298:s
1248:.
858:e
851:t
844:v
246:.
236:;
46:(
38:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.