108:
30:
165:, were openly so, and the family was close to the French royal court. The work may be seen to mock this continental, Popish affiliation: In return for patronage, the writers offer to venerate Lady Castlemaine as their sister prostitutes in Rome and Venice venerated the Pope. However, as historian James Grantham Turner underlines, there may have been no political agenda to the letter, as Castlemaine was already the target of court wits and city satire for her lascivious reputation.
210:
represented further political ventriloquism, especially on behalf of lady
Castlemaine. Turner describes the transgressive satires as "mingling the political protest against absolutism and corruption with the misogynistic hatred of 'female' secrecy, passion, and influence. Castlemaine becomes a figure of extravagance and carnivalesque theatricality, an embodiment of the kind of libertines and radicals in early modern London.
131:, the King's lover, notorious for her own wild promiscuity, the brothel owners requested that the aristocrat act on the behalf of her 'sisters' and repay the madams for the rebuilding of their brothels, funded by the national tax coffers. They address Castlemaine as a prostitute herself, a great practitioner of "venereal pleasures", and list the sites of the brothels where her fellows struggle. It is addressed as:
177:
noted that
Castlemaine was "horribly vexed" by it. He writes "the times are loose and come to a great disregard of the King or Court." The letter itself was so finely tuned to the political dynamics of the day that though the printer was arrested, the court censor writes that "I can fasten nothing
135:
The Poor Whores' Petition to the most splendid, illustrious, serene and eminent Lady of
Pleasure the Countess of Castlemayne &c: The humble petition of the undone company of poore distressed whores, bawds, pimps, and panders ... Signed by us, Madam Cresswell and Damaris Page, in the behalf
140:
Given her great experience in whoring, Lady
Castlemaine would, they argued, be able to deeply sympathise with prostitutes across the city. "Should your Eminency but once fall into these Rough hands", they wrote, "you may expect no more Favour than they have shewn unto us poor Inferiour Whores".
209:
Turner comments: "These broadsides were indeed printed, distributed, and enjoyed by the radical underground; by changing their style from fiery sermonizing to sexual mockery and ventriloquistic parody, anti-monarchist dissidents exploit the amphibiousness of festive-aggressive satire." They
149:
Some historians, such as
Linnane, infer an active role of the addressers Page and Cresswell in the writing of the document. Others such as Mowry and Turner suggest it is an organ of political ventriloquism on behalf of anonymous, radical dissenters; a "bogus work" and "pseudo-female".
186:
satires, poems and ballads on the subject through the following year. The historian James Turner terms this event as an example of a new carnivalisation of sexuality in
Restoration England, where genuine political attack, satire, street commentary and bawdy theatre came together.
100:; the rioters assaulted the prostitutes and looted the properties. Many thousand London apprentices could neither afford their prostitutes nor, due to their own working contracts, legally marry. Some of the brothels were supported by the patronage of
136:
of our sisters and fellow sufferers (in this day of our calamity) in Dog and Bitch Yard, Lukenor's Lane, Saffron Hill, Moorfields, Chiswell Street, Rosemary Lane, Nightingale Lane, Ratcliffe
Highway, Well Close, East Smithfield etc.
153:
The agenda of the
Petition may be interpreted in varied ways. It may taken as an anti-royalist work, lampooning Charles's court as "the great bawdy house at Whitehall", in
64:. It requested that she come to the aid of her "sisters" and pay for the rebuilding of their property and livelihoods. Addressed from madams such as
190:
Many anonymous, satirical broadside responses to the
Petition circulated in the London coffee houses. They included four pamphlets entitled
17:
415:
420:
128:
127:
Following the riot, a satirical petition began to circulate, addressed from Page and
Cresswell and other London madams. Written to
57:
200:
The Most gracious answer of Dame Barbara CountesseofC to the peticion of undone, poore, and distressed company of Whores
425:
381:
362:
329:
310:
192:
The Gracious answer of the most illustrious lady of pleasure, the Countess of Castlem---- to the poor-whores petition
445:
405:
410:
249:
104:
were representative of Charles's continental Catholic-style court, awash with unaffordable debauchery.
450:
101:
72:, it sought to mock the perceived extravagance and licentiousness of Castlemaine and the royal court.
85:
53:
440:
374:
Libertines and Radicals in Early Modern London: Sexuality, Politics and Literary Culture, 1630–1685
158:
61:
107:
8:
400:
162:
97:
69:
435:
430:
52:) was a satirical letter addressed from brothel owners and prostitutes affected by the
303:
The Bawdy Politic in Stuart England, 1660–1714: Political Pornography and Prostitution
377:
358:
325:
306:
183:
112:
84:
1668, widespread violence swept London in a period that would become known as the '
37:
was written to Lady Castlemaine in March 1668 (full text given in file description)
29:
92:
and men burnt and smashed up brothels, including those owned by madams such as
89:
81:
394:
254:
Politics, Literary Culture & Theatrical Media in London : 1625–1725
174:
93:
65:
173:
The petition was a brazen act of transgressive, public satire and diarist
157:'s words. Charles was suspected of being a practising Catholic; his wife,
116:
204:
The Citizen's Reply to the Whores' Petition and the Prentices' Answer
355:
London: The Wicked City: A Thousand Years of Prostitution and Vice
182:
that a jury will take notice of." The Petition caused a flurry of
324:(1985) Samuel Pepys, University of California Press, p. 895,
154:
392:
161:and brother, heir to the throne, and the future
196:The Prentices' Answer to the Whores' Petition
344:Callow, John (2004). "Madam Cresswell".
272:
270:
268:
266:
264:
262:
144:
106:
28:
352:
346:Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
297:
295:
293:
291:
236:
234:
228:Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
14:
393:
371:
343:
224:
222:
259:
288:
231:
75:
250:University of Massachusetts archive
219:
24:
416:Prostitution in the United Kingdom
25:
462:
421:English brothel owners and madams
348:. Oxford University Press online.
305:, Ashgate Publishing, pp. 60–64,
115:, mistress of King Charles II by
372:Turner, James Grantham (2001).
376:. Cambridge University Press.
315:
279:
243:
18:The Poor Whores' Petition
13:
1:
213:
168:
7:
122:
10:
467:
337:
301:Melissa M. Mowry (2004)
180:The Poor Whore's Petition
54:Bawdy House Riots of 1668
49:The Poor Whores' Petition
426:17th-century manuscripts
353:Linnane, Fergus (2007).
256:"The Whores' Petition".
446:17th-century documents
406:17th century in London
138:
119:
38:
411:Charles II of England
159:Catherine of Braganza
145:Authorship and agenda
133:
110:
62:Charles II of England
32:
285:Linnane (2007) p. 75
240:Linnane (2007) p. 76
43:The Whores' Petition
98:Elizabeth Cresswell
70:Elizabeth Cresswell
276:Turner pp. 190–192
120:
39:
451:Letters (message)
322:The Shorter Pepys
86:Bawdy House Riots
76:Bawdy House Riots
16:(Redirected from
458:
387:
368:
349:
332:
319:
313:
299:
286:
283:
277:
274:
257:
247:
241:
238:
229:
226:
129:Lady Castlemaine
113:Lady Castlemaine
60:, lover of King
58:Lady Castlemaine
35:Whores' Petition
21:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
441:1668 in England
391:
390:
384:
365:
340:
335:
320:
316:
300:
289:
284:
280:
275:
260:
248:
244:
239:
232:
227:
220:
216:
171:
147:
125:
102:King Charles II
90:Apprentice boys
78:
46:(also known as
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
464:
454:
453:
448:
443:
438:
433:
428:
423:
418:
413:
408:
403:
389:
388:
382:
369:
363:
350:
339:
336:
334:
333:
314:
287:
278:
258:
242:
230:
217:
215:
212:
170:
167:
146:
143:
124:
121:
82:Shrove Tuesday
77:
74:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
452:
449:
447:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
422:
419:
417:
414:
412:
409:
407:
404:
402:
399:
398:
396:
385:
383:9780521782791
379:
375:
370:
366:
364:9781861059901
360:
356:
351:
347:
342:
341:
331:
330:9780520034266
327:
323:
318:
312:
311:9780754641575
308:
304:
298:
296:
294:
292:
282:
273:
271:
269:
267:
265:
263:
255:
251:
246:
237:
235:
225:
223:
218:
211:
207:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
185:
181:
176:
166:
164:
160:
156:
151:
142:
137:
132:
130:
118:
114:
109:
105:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
73:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
50:
45:
44:
36:
31:
27:
19:
373:
354:
345:
321:
317:
302:
281:
253:
245:
208:
203:
199:
195:
191:
189:
179:
175:Samuel Pepys
172:
152:
148:
139:
134:
126:
111:Portrait of
94:Damaris Page
80:Starting on
79:
66:Damaris Page
48:
47:
42:
41:
40:
34:
26:
401:1668 works
395:Categories
357:. Robson.
214:References
117:Peter Lely
436:Petitions
431:Pamphlets
184:broadside
169:Responses
163:James II
123:Petition
338:Sources
380:
361:
328:
309:
155:Pepys
56:, to
378:ISBN
359:ISBN
326:ISBN
307:ISBN
202:and
96:and
68:and
33:The
178:on
88:'.
397::
290:^
261:^
252:,
233:^
221:^
206:.
198:;
194:;
386:.
367:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.jpg)
.jpg)