228:
Hill and have little relation to the activities of
Parliament (except insofar as they are federal buildings, and all federal government departments technically serve Parliament). This is a template for Parliament Hill, not Parliament. Any definition/scope we use should really be backed up with a source -- since PWGS is responsible for Parliament Hill, I would tend to defer to its definition ("all Crown-owned buildings occupied by the House of Commons, the Senate and the Library of Parliament") of what it considers the Parliamentary Precinct to be (although I suspect we could also find support for the inclusion of the Langevin Block, given that it contains the PMO/PCO). --
81:
22:
71:
53:
207:, where I used it in the third paragraph of the "Grounds" section. I employed the words because the buildings beyond Parliament Hill are occupied by departments parliamentary in nature, and thus seem to fall within a parliamentary jurisdiction - or, precinct. So, I suppose I did engage in a bit of OR, though I didn't intend it to cause any problems. Is there another phrase that could be used to describe the same thing? --
188:
used by the
National Capital Commission, which includes in the Precinct everything along Wellington (on both sides), from the Canal in the east to the Ottawa River Parkway in the west. Keep in mind this map was prepared for land use planning purposes, rather than on any official or funational basis,
169:
used by Public Works and
Government Services. I'm not suggesting that we be quite that strict (for example, I find it hard to imagine discussing a Parliamentary Precinct without the Langevin Block, and am sure we could find support for its inclusion). However, I'm not sure that the Precinct, absent
141:
What definition of
Parliamentary Precinct is being used here? Many of the buildings in this section of the template are far removed from the Parliamentary Precinct, as I would imagine it is generally understood, but I did not want to remove anything in case there is some obscure official definition
227:
There is nothing wrong with the term itself. Given the sources I located above, it seems absolutely correct, and it is a good addition to the template. Sorry for any confusion. My concern is actually with the contents of the section -- many of the buildings listed are far removed from
Parliament
251:
appears to have been as a navbox for things on
Parliament Hill and it appears to me that it is still only used on articles that are located on the grounds
237:
222:
198:
179:
288:
303:
308:
252:
150:, could we please substantiate that all the buildings in this section are, in fact, in considered to be in a Parliamentary Precinct?--
159:
273:
313:
103:
136:
142:
for the precint (that, given the contents of this section, covers downtown Hull and most of Ottawa). As per
94:
58:
33:
248:
185:
166:
170:
some reliable source indicating otherwise, extends all the way to Tunney's
Pasture or Heron Road. --
102:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
209:
284:
233:
194:
175:
155:
39:
268:
8:
216:
280:
229:
203:
The term "parliamentary precinct" seems to have been carried over from the article
190:
171:
151:
256:
204:
297:
86:
147:
189:
and isn't necessarily authoritative in its depiction of the precinct. --
143:
70:
52:
99:
255:. I think a more narrow scope is entirely proper and useful.
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
76:
295:
253:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Parliament Hill
279:Ok. Trimmed in the manner described above.
249:Template:Parliament_Hill&oldid=156549953
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
304:Template-Class Canada-related articles
296:
247:The original intent for this template
309:NA-importance Canada-related articles
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
325:
79:
69:
51:
20:
1:
106:and see a list of open tasks.
314:All WikiProject Canada pages
112:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
7:
115:Template:WikiProject Canada
10:
330:
289:20:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
274:01:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
238:20:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
223:16:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
199:19:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
180:19:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
160:14:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
64:
46:
118:Canada-related articles
137:Parliamentary precinct
184:Then there is also
95:WikiProject Canada
34:content assessment
272:
165:For example, see
134:
133:
130:
129:
126:
125:
321:
266:
264:
261:
221:
219:
214:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
329:
328:
324:
323:
322:
320:
319:
318:
294:
293:
262:
257:
217:
210:
208:
205:Parliament Hill
167:this definition
139:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
327:
317:
316:
311:
306:
292:
291:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
182:
138:
135:
132:
131:
128:
127:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
326:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
301:
299:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:
276:
275:
270:
265:
260:
254:
250:
239:
235:
231:
226:
225:
224:
220:
215:
213:
206:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
187:
183:
181:
177:
173:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
87:Canada portal
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
258:
246:
218:MIESIANIACAL
211:
186:this mapping
140:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
281:Skeezix1000
230:Skeezix1000
191:Skeezix1000
172:Skeezix1000
152:Skeezix1000
298:Categories
30:template
259:Double
109:Canada
100:Canada
59:Canada
36:scale.
148:WP:OR
28:This
285:talk
269:talk
263:Blue
234:talk
195:talk
176:talk
156:talk
146:and
144:WP:V
300::
287:)
236:)
197:)
178:)
158:)
283:(
271:)
267:(
232:(
212:Ħ
193:(
174:(
154:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
