Knowledge

Teaching to the test

Source 📝

77:, which placed a far higher emphasis than before on the evaluation of schools' effectiveness through standardized tests, could hypothetically be considered to have been a step in the wrong direction for schooling in the US. Teaching to the test is frequently criticized by academics and educators, while its critics argue that students who are simply taught to the test fail to achieve a lasting and truly comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. Even if students score better on tests, something which different studies have not confirmed, critics worry students may not truly grasp the domain's key concepts, as teaching to the test centers on 22: 161: 65:
questions that assess the same skill or concept in a different way. According to Craig Jerald, one study has shown that in a district that relied heavily on item drilling, 83 percent of students selected the correct answer to a multiple-choice item "87 − 24 =." However, only 66 percent could correctly answer the equivalent non-drilled item "Subtract 24 from 87."
48:
teacher's ability to foster a holistic understanding of the subject matter. With high-stakes testing impeding over every decision teachers make, they are often forced to teach to the tests rather than to their students. This can drain instruction of passion and meaning as students are taught information from a bare-bones curriculum. This would be an incidence of
52:, the general principle that a social indicator distorts the process it is intended to monitor. Furthermore, opponents argue, teachers who engage in it are typically below-average teachers. Some research suggests that teaching to the test is ineffective and often does not achieve its primary goal of raising student scores. 93:
W. James Popham, an emeritus professor at University of California Graduate School of Education Studies, also claimed that standardized tests are not a level playing field for students with different backgrounds. The high-stakes exam would be a larger challenge to international students, who probably
81:
while excluding the building of creative skills and abstract-thinking abilities. According to Richard D. Kahlenber, both teachers and students spend most of their time studying textbook concepts to prepare for exams, despite morality, aesthetic, life skills, and, depending on the student's ambitions,
60:
The usual method of teaching to the test is to give specific information, then test it at the end of each unit. Typically, these are tests of rote procedures and memorized facts, rather than of understanding or logical thinking. Teaching to the test is also frequently used for skill-based learning,
89:
WNBC-TV senior correspondent Gabe Pressman expressed another concern about teaching to the test; benchmarks for standardized tests can sometimes be affected by political pressures. In many cases test scores are dumbed down to achieve the forecasted figures; as a result, improvement in standardized
47:
Opponents of this practice argue that it forces teachers to limit curriculum to a set range of knowledge or skills in order to increase student performance on the mandated test. This produces an unhealthy focus on excessive repetition of simple, isolated skills ("drill and kill") and limits the
64:
Teaching to the test may misrepresent students' true learning. For example, students who have learned vocabulary words for a reading test will score well even though they cannot use a broad vocabulary. In mathematics, students drilled on only test-like questions often can not correctly answer
85:
The practice has also been shown to reduce the validity of standardized tests, and can create an incorrect profile of a student's achievement. Dr. Louis Volante, an associate professor at Brock University, observed that test scores are, for many reasons, not necessarily a fair indicator of a
438: 140:
in the United States has increased the practice of teaching to the test because of its emphasis on standardized test scores; this is especially true in schools with disadvantaged students, which rely heavily on government funding.
82:
creativity being more important for success. According to critics, educational systems that center on standardized tests do not truly educate students or provide them with the ability to fulfill the needs of their future lives.
44:. Teaching to the test allows instructors to format their lessons based directly off of questions on standardized tests. Curriculum-teaching is more effective because it tests a student's knowledge of a particular concept. 94:
have had different class materials and learning methods. If teaching to the test remains prevalent in the U.S. education system, the course-drop rates of new immigrants are likely to be high.
528: 686: 551: 86:
student's ability. Some students who master class materials through homework or study may not succeed in testing environments due to a lack of test-taking skills.
128:
The study concluded that the ethical boundary fell between points three and five, with points one and two being ethical and points six and seven being unethical.
102:
A 1989 study on teaching to the test evaluated the ethical "continuum" of the practice, and identified seven practice points, ranging from most to least ethical:
366: 474: 374: 524: 711: 443: 578: 254: 501: 405: 303: 274: 654: 610:"Teaching to the Test: How No Child Left Behind Impacts Language Policy, Curriculum, and Instruction for English Language Learners" 576:
Mehrens, W.A.; Kaminski, J (1989). "Methods for Improving Standardized Test Scores: Fruitful, Fruitless or Fraudulent?".
298: 345: 268: 237: 316: 466: 179: 121:
Instruction using a released test or a "clone" test that replicates the format and content of the test used
362: 617: 184: 433: 137: 74: 609: 497: 397: 370: 293: 258: 229: 222: 659: 681: 61:
like typing or athletics; in this context, teaching to the test is the dominant practice.
8: 634: 591: 294:
Learning about Teaching: Initial Findings from the Measuring Effective Teaching Program
638: 341: 264: 233: 174: 78: 49: 41: 630: 626: 587: 166: 142: 699:
Popham, W.J. (2001). Teaching to the test. Educational Leadership, 58 (6), 16-20.
124:
Instruction using the test to be used, either before or during test administration
189: 255:"A Quandary for School Leaders: Equity, High-stakes Testing and Accountability" 705: 118:
Instruction on objectives specific to the test used and using the same format
260:
The Handbook of Research on Educational Leadership for Equity and Diversity
201: 195: 146: 21: 498:"Teaching To the Test: What Every Educator and Policy-maker Should Know" 434:"Teaching to the Test: What Every Educator and Policy-Maker Should Know" 37: 90:
tests result does not always represent students' real level of skill.
33: 525:"Teaching to the Test and Charter Schools Won't Help Kids: Expert" 112:
Instruction on objectives generally measured by standardized tests
192:, the general phenomenon which gives rise to teaching to the test 160: 317:"Study backs 'value-added' analysis of teacher effectiveness" 198:, a similar problem in statistics and optimization problems 552:"Why Standardized Tests Don't Measure Educational Quality" 439:
Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy
554:. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 257:. In Tillman, Linda C.; Scheurich, James Joseph (eds.). 252: 156: 253:Vasquez Heilig, Julian; Nichols, Sharon L. (2013). 246: 115:
Instruction on objectives specific to the test used
575: 306:from the original on 16 December 2010 – via 221: 703: 682:"Teaching to the test: A very large red herring" 40:is heavily focused on preparing students for a 149:are limited examples of teaching to the test. 579:Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 571: 569: 314: 16:Idiom for extrinsically-motivated education 464: 427: 425: 423: 109:Instruction on general test-taking skills 566: 522: 20: 495: 431: 106:General instruction on local objectives 32:is a colloquial term for any method of 704: 679: 652: 607: 549: 420: 712:Educational assessment and evaluation 467:"The Problem for Low-Income Students" 377:from the original on 18 November 2010 338:The Case Against Standardized Testing 288: 286: 284: 277:from the original on 21 January 2018. 219: 496:Volante, Louis (25 September 2004). 465:Kahlenber, Richard (3 August 2009). 335: 354: 299:Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 13: 653:Phelps, Richard P. (Autumn 2011). 601: 592:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1989.tb00304.x 477:from the original on 18 April 2012 446:from the original on 24 March 2010 408:from the original on 16 March 2015 395: 281: 14: 723: 531:from the original on 3 March 2016 432:Volante, Louis (September 2004). 523:Pressman, Gabe (31 March 2010). 398:"Teach to the Test? Just Say No" 360: 315:Jason Felch (11 December 2010). 159: 680:Phelps, Richard P. (May 2016). 543: 516: 504:from the original on 4 May 2012 631:10.1080/15235882.2006.10162888 489: 458: 389: 329: 213: 180:Education in the United States 131: 1: 228:. Crown Publishers. pp.  207: 55: 687:Nonpartisan Education Review 608:Menken, Kate (Summer 2006). 550:Popham, James (March 1999). 68: 7: 152: 10: 728: 618:Bilingual Research Journal 263:. Routledge. p. 422. 302:(Report). December 2010. 185:Maotanchang Middle School 97: 340:. Heinemann. p. 8. 220:Kozol, Jonathan (2005). 138:No Child Left Behind Act 75:No Child Left Behind Act 224:The Shame of the Nation 371:University of Victoria 363:"Teaching to the Test" 30:"Teaching to the test" 26: 367:Carnegie Perspectives 321:The Los Angeles Times 308:The Los Angeles Times 24: 660:The Wilson Quarterly 655:"Teach to the Test?" 336:Kohn, Alfie (2000). 471:The New York Times 27: 25:ATC Admission Exam 79:rote memorization 42:standardized test 719: 695: 676: 674: 672: 649: 647: 645: 614: 596: 595: 573: 564: 563: 561: 559: 547: 541: 540: 538: 536: 527:. NBC New York. 520: 514: 513: 511: 509: 493: 487: 486: 484: 482: 462: 456: 455: 453: 451: 429: 418: 417: 415: 413: 393: 387: 386: 384: 382: 358: 352: 351: 333: 327: 324: 311: 290: 279: 278: 250: 244: 243: 227: 217: 169: 167:Education portal 164: 163: 143:Test-preparation 727: 726: 722: 721: 720: 718: 717: 716: 702: 701: 670: 668: 643: 641: 612: 604: 602:Further reading 599: 574: 567: 557: 555: 548: 544: 534: 532: 521: 517: 507: 505: 494: 490: 480: 478: 463: 459: 449: 447: 430: 421: 411: 409: 402:Reading Rockets 396:Jerald, Craig. 394: 390: 380: 378: 359: 355: 348: 334: 330: 292: 291: 282: 271: 251: 247: 240: 218: 214: 210: 190:Washback effect 165: 158: 155: 134: 100: 71: 58: 17: 12: 11: 5: 725: 715: 714: 697: 696: 677: 650: 625:(2): 521–546. 603: 600: 598: 597: 565: 542: 515: 488: 457: 419: 388: 353: 346: 328: 326: 325: 280: 269: 245: 238: 211: 209: 206: 205: 204: 199: 193: 187: 182: 177: 175:Campbell's Law 171: 170: 154: 151: 133: 130: 126: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 107: 99: 96: 70: 67: 57: 54: 50:Campbell's law 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 724: 713: 710: 709: 707: 700: 693: 689: 688: 683: 678: 666: 662: 661: 656: 651: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 619: 611: 606: 605: 593: 589: 585: 581: 580: 572: 570: 553: 546: 530: 526: 519: 503: 499: 492: 476: 472: 468: 461: 445: 441: 440: 435: 428: 426: 424: 407: 403: 399: 392: 376: 372: 368: 364: 361:Bond, Lloyd. 357: 349: 347:0-325-00325-4 343: 339: 332: 322: 318: 313: 312: 309: 305: 301: 300: 295: 289: 287: 285: 276: 272: 270:9781135128432 266: 262: 261: 256: 249: 241: 239:1-4000-5244-0 235: 231: 226: 225: 216: 212: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 186: 183: 181: 178: 176: 173: 172: 168: 162: 157: 150: 148: 144: 139: 129: 123: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 105: 104: 103: 95: 91: 87: 83: 80: 76: 66: 62: 53: 51: 45: 43: 39: 35: 31: 23: 19: 698: 691: 685: 669:. Retrieved 664: 658: 644:18 September 642:. Retrieved 622: 616: 586:(1): 14–22. 583: 577: 556:. Retrieved 545: 533:. Retrieved 518: 506:. Retrieved 491: 479:. Retrieved 470: 460: 450:18 September 448:. Retrieved 437: 410:. Retrieved 401: 391: 381:18 September 379:. Retrieved 356: 337: 331: 320: 307: 297: 259: 248: 223: 215: 202:Volvo effect 147:cram schools 145:courses and 136:The federal 135: 127: 101: 92: 88: 84: 72: 63: 59: 46: 29: 28: 18: 196:Overfitting 132:In practice 694:(1): 1–17. 667:(4): 38–42 208:References 56:Activities 38:curriculum 671:2 January 639:144641891 500:. CJEAP. 369:(via the 69:Criticism 34:education 706:Category 558:21 April 535:21 April 529:Archived 508:21 April 502:Archived 481:21 April 475:Archived 444:Archived 406:Archived 375:Archived 304:Archived 275:Archived 153:See also 412:9 March 637:  442:(35). 344:  267:  236:  98:Ethics 36:whose 635:S2CID 613:(PDF) 673:2012 646:2010 560:2012 537:2012 510:2012 483:2012 452:2010 414:2015 383:2010 342:ISBN 265:ISBN 234:ISBN 73:The 627:doi 588:doi 373:). 230:132 708:: 692:12 690:. 684:. 665:35 663:. 657:. 633:. 623:30 621:. 615:. 582:. 568:^ 473:. 469:. 436:. 422:^ 404:. 400:. 365:. 319:. 296:. 283:^ 273:. 232:. 675:. 648:. 629:: 594:. 590:: 584:8 562:. 539:. 512:. 485:. 454:. 416:. 385:. 350:. 323:. 310:. 242:.

Index


education
curriculum
standardized test
Campbell's law
No Child Left Behind Act
rote memorization
No Child Left Behind Act
Test-preparation
cram schools
icon
Education portal
Campbell's Law
Education in the United States
Maotanchang Middle School
Washback effect
Overfitting
Volvo effect
The Shame of the Nation
132
ISBN
1-4000-5244-0
"A Quandary for School Leaders: Equity, High-stakes Testing and Accountability"
The Handbook of Research on Educational Leadership for Equity and Diversity
ISBN
9781135128432
Archived


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.