Talk:Selena/Archive 2

4949:

with her career. Had she been a model, I could see that sentence (rewritten extensively of course) being included, but she was a singer. I'm also wondering what movement Selena supposedly started. The movement of being pretty? I think these are the kinds questions people have when they read some of the oddly worded content throughout this article because quite a bit of what is written simply makes no sense. Most of it sounds like oddly worded fluff that is only present to paint the subject in a glowing light. Further, just because content can be sourced does not mean it belongs in an article. That is a HUGE misconception. The bottom line here is the content included should support why Selena is notable (ie her music career and accomplishments in the industry). Content about how she was pretty and supposedly a super person who was nice to her fans just doesn't belong, especially since the majority of that content sounds like it was run through Google translator and makes very little sense to those who read and speak English. Again, I think your best bet is to go through the history of this article back to when it actually passed FA standards and review the content. Personally, I think rolling it back to an older version before all these changes were implemented is a good idea. There is just far too many problems in the current version to even wade through and fix.

4404:

references, many of the references are themselves bloated. Trivial data fields are filled. For newspaper and magazine articles, long headlines PLUS subheadlines are entered. With all these references that sprawl over three lines, this article is so hard to read. Deleting the trivia and ensuring that every major aspect is included in the lead can't be accomplished at once. And the revert restores a mass of terrible writing AND broken English. For example, the past perfect auxiliary ('had') was repeatedly used by editors for whom English is a second language. This mass revert was done by an editor who describes himself on this Talk page and in Featured Article Peer Review or FAR that he writes English badly. At the same time, he insists how much he wants to see improvement and how he has put in a request to

185:

web site, they have archives of past (not recent lolz) awards of Selena and her certifications for her albums. They also have a short biography of Selena which really doesn't tell the world who she was, as a entertainer and as a person, which is sad, because there are numerous specials and books and magazines about her that has very good information about her, but I don't know if citing information from there will be ok?. I tried calling them, but they are nothing like Selena they are very rude when you ask them "simple" questions like "Is it true, Selena's father, holds the rights to all her earlier years "? and they would get mad very fast! But hey, what about unofficial sites, like they have accurate information is there anything wrong with citing information from there? Thanks

2835:

had notes about her fantasies, love dept with her husband, how "evil" her father was, and unreleased song lyrics. THESE ALL were featured on News Channels all over the United States! Did you know that her attorney had went to Mexico (where Saldivar confessed of the whereabouts) to retrieve the diary. All of this was thought to release Saldivar from prison! When he got there, guess what? I mean idk I thought it would be in the article! Where is it? Did you know that she was lying, her attorney took himself off as a defense for Saldivar because of this! Did you know that fans had thought Saldivar was a lesbian lover of Selena, which she stated wasn't true? Did you know that she told news channels that Selena had love triangles? All of which were lies? Did you know that

1923:

an "official" Catholic, even though I take part in Mass at least weekly. I don't know from what I've seen, but it might be possibly useful to know if Selena's blood transfusion was with or without her personal explicit consent, If it wasn't with her explicit consent or possibly prior instructions of some sort, then I wouldn't hold it as necessarily relevant. Even if it wasn't with consent, though, there might still be a question whether "inactive" but still potentially somewhat "observant" in some way people can be counted, provided that observation is itself verifiable in some way. I would like I said in the beginning lean against the category, based on what I know, but would be open to it if further verifiable information was presented to support her inclusion.

4969:

with her career, believe it or not, no one could understand a female singer lead a Tejano band, let alone a female who looked like Selena. Selena was seen as a "sex symbol" to male fans and a "barbie doll" to female fans. Selena was not like other Tejano artists, let alone female Tejano artists, because Selena emphasizes family values then her personnel on stage even though she had wore sexy outfits. I requested that I expanded this article (since at the time it did not represent the major aspects of the subject and was not broad in its coverage) with WP:RfC and they took in favor of my additions. I wouldn't want to rollback the article, in my point of view, because the article is now expanded and is soon going to be c/e at WP:GOCE. But if any content that

4634:. After 2:30 on 10 October, I added an Unreferenced tag, believing that certain subjective claims were unsourced. The response of AJona^Selena 4 ever^ was to add over 100 more references in the space of 24 hours to an article that already had 175. If nothing else, the result of this outburst on AJona's part is to degrade the article, which counteracts his desire to keep it deserving of Featured Article status. The new references referred to trivial points or to already referenced points. Example: the number of references to support the sentence, the family "was evicted . . . relocated to Corpus Christi" increased from one to seven. Example: four references were given to support the date of the rerelease of her first recordings. The full title of 5257:. Try the major WP criterion of notability. I've read dozens of entertainer BLP's at WP, dozens of post 1950 musical performer BLP's, and they do not contain crap like what hospital the person was born at. It is absolutely irrelevant that an inappropriate item appeared in the original FA! There's no need for consensus on getting rid of trivia. Half of the disgrace of this article is not that trivia was put in, that literal nonsense was put in, but that other editors allowed these things to stay in, sometimes for years. Agaaain: you're talking about protecting stuff that doesn't appear in just about any comparable BLP. 6261: 109: 4815:

nonsensical sentences throughout the article (ex. "Selena's nail polishes were all disguised by color, texture, and name." - what does that mean? Far as I know, nail polishes are not disguised to begin with and they should only have one texture!). I tried to go through the article awhile back to make sense of and correct a lot of the content and found it almost impossible. If your aim is to bring the article back up to FA quality, I suggest looking to earlier versions of the article for guidance as a lot of the changes made were not beneficial and are poorly written.

707:, and is not acceptable. Like I said before, other articles about famous people who have died do have "spinout" articles just about their death, but in those cases, the articles are very large and the death section would make it a lot larger. This is not the case here. Please don't readd the unsourced material to that article. I appreciate that you want to work on it, but it's still in the history, and you know how to use sandboxes in your userspace. If you have the sources for the information, but are not sure how to add them, please let me know.-- 2724:) Why doesn't the article speak about her salary from Coca-Cola? why doesn't it say that she was asked by beer commercials (and how that Tejano artists can only get beer commercials to sponsor them, because the genre wasn't popular?) and that her father didn't want that? Oh and a HUGE ONE, where in the article does it say how Abraham wanted "Selena y Los Dinos" to have a clean image? What about Chris Perez, he was in a Rock band before Los Dinos, where does it state that Selena had met him BEFORE he auditioned for the group? He was her husband. 5044:. Saying "...was credited with..." makes it sound like it was universally accepted and not just someone's offered opinion. Other than that I don't think as written it even correctly represents that person's opinion. And "she started that movement" is hopelessly vague, so even if she did start some movement that would need to be clearly identified (and linking to "feminist movement" further obfuscates the matter). I'm really just trying to be helpful here, you asked what was wrong with the sentence and I'm offering my humble opinion. 4358:? As I understand him, the only reason he solicited Featured Article Review was to attract more editors to work on expanding it to make it EVen BETTer. So AJona^Selena 4 ever^, stop doggedly reverting all my edits, like you did four hours after my last edit, falsely insinuating that *i* put "original research in the lead". You're a bad writer, let other people fix this article. Any original research in the lead was already there. (3) Next time he wants to disagree with criticism, don't just say "no it isn't!". 532:

basics article on Selena. I want to ADD MORE with SOURCES but people on wikipedia just dislike HER and ME to the point that I can't do shit here so oh well that's why I always get banned or something like that. Also YOU need to know that YOU should NEVER threaten me EVER because I don't play fair nor do I back down from ANYONE as you can tell on my old talk page. I know theres rules and stuff like that but once you cross me I can be just as mean as anyone maybe even worse *laughs to the floor OUT LOUD*.

4708:

with references to the domineering father. Even if it had been true that she and her siblings were permanently under his thumb, he did not do the singing that earned all the glory, and he is not the subject of this biography. Besides, she had six years of life as an adult and she did assert herself enough to marry against his fierce opposition, and she stayed married to that guy. Telling the truth about his impact on her career does not have to mean a litany of her father this, her father that.

31: 6370:, the annual memorial held in Corpus Christi, the Selena look-alike TV competitions, the Selena Museum, her statue and the allegations of the Quintanilla family as exploiting her. Last but not least, her "Philanthropy" section is missing accounting that there are over 20 books on her and each dedicates her own "Philanthropy" section in their books is astonishing to say that this FA does not have one. I'm not impress with this article—never have been—and would like to see it similar to 4170: 3724: 5304:. That's just one thing I caught but I think the archives of the talk page show that others questioned a few of the claims that were made throughout the article too. I don't see a problem with new content being added as long as the article doesn't turn back into the fanfest that it previously was. Content about how friendly, nice and beautiful Selena was shouldn't be included. While I'm sure she was all those things, it has nothing to do with her notability. 1715:), only that her religion is not "specifically relevant to at least one of the subject's notable activities and an essential part of that activity" which is the criterion for inclusion in the category. The fact that Selena had a JW funeral is no more notable than it would be for any celebrity of any religion to have a particular denominational funeral service, but the religious affiliation of other people is not automatically categorised on such a basis.-- 3593:

Anyway, the entire writing of this article is as if done by teenagers who are learning composition. Ignorance of set phrases; staccato arrangement of information (awkward like the walk of a toddler); etc. One can learn what I'm referring to by inspecting the changes I just made. The notion that quality of content and quality of prose are among the criteria for Featured Article is so naive. This is at least the second outrageous counterexample I've seen.

2071:

whatever evidence of notability there may be after her death. I am the first to acknowledge that the funeral being presided over by a JW is at best tangentially related to her notability per se, but as it is related to her early death, which has contributed to her post-mortem popularity, it might, barely, be relevant. If someone has a full-length biography of her (if there is one), that might be a very useful source to use to help determine this matter.

2803:(1992) - how else did Selena crossover to Mexico? She also broke the barrier for a Mexican American, in Mexico they dislike them because they were Americans! Why isn't this in the article? What about that Selena's father was threatening Selena that if she had married Chris Perez that he WOULD disband the group? Also how did the news of Selena's marriage surfaced? What about the famous press tour Selena had done in Mexico? It was featured in the 3320:

this article and expanded it to its fullest (content) was because, I believed the article could have been expanded, it was only at 40,000 bytes when I started it. The article had only basic information and not an impressive overall article on Selena, who had done way more then what the old revision stated. Since I will be away for a month on vacation, please, if you do spot anything that needs to be fix, please addressed them. Thank you,

6593: 6513: 6428: 6217: 6009: 4033: 3950: 6478: 5296:

thinking I could trim some content and clean it up a bit, but the amount of trivial junk (for lack of a better word) and POV content was just overwhelming. I also think there may have been some issues with sourcing as I found a dubious claim in the article awhile back claiming Selena became a billionaire during the course of her career. Turns out the source that was given (a video from an episode of

3466: 1467:

simply because you don't like the guideline. I'm not sure what you're on about regarding Hairston, as I never made any attempt to rank anything notable about him in order of importance at all—I simply didn't edit that article because it was unclear whether his becoming a JW had had any impact on his career, however if there was no notable change reported, he can also be removed from the category.--

3554:. At your User page, you make explicit you're an ESL (I am applying that term with jocularly loose grammar). Even though you have a superb command of English, you might not be the person to vouch for the quality of this prose. (I also am alert to the possibility that, unlike me, the original complainant is not a native speaker either.) See my additional comment below within this section. 6562: 3343:. Despite being sourced, I find this claim rather dubious. Selena is/was a very popular act and I don't doubt she probably became a millionaire at some point, but I can't recall her ever being named on any billionaire entertainers list or anything of that nature. Unless another source that can actually be verified can be found to back this up, I believe this claim should be removed. 6330:" is not a encyclopedic tone, among others. The murder section is short and leaves out the meeting Selena and her husband had made the night before, the amount Saldivar stole from Selena, the fact that her father found out and not the entire family and Saldivar's 9 hour standoff. The "Posthumous commemorations and popularity" is a joke and shouldn't be that small when comparing to 2120: 4508:

the world, and were minorities. Selena was credited for giving them a voice, and power to do anything that they set their mind to." It was terrible for such a strong opinion to be unsourced. But I left it alone. Later the same day, a third editor deleted it charging NPOV. AJona's 100+ extra footnotes did not improve the article. Later, another editor called our attention to

4884:

allow other users to simply fix the outstanding issues. The public image section (I believe you are referring to) is an encyclopedic section, however, its tone and writing may not be at the moment, but that section tells about the subject's life outside of her career. If this is not suitable then may I suggest a "public image" article for Selena? (similar to

3273:

the article's supposed shortcomings can be dealt with by those who watch this talkpage. Afterwards, if AJona1992 is convinced at the article no longer meets FA status, he/she should nominate the article at FAR. But reviewing the completeness of entire article, or examining dozens of purported weaknesses, is outside the scope of a single RFC, in my opinion. –

4256:

and terrible writing ability. Knowledge is supposed to be a well written and informative. It's not very considerate of a person who insistently proclaims his writing skills are poor to do a lot of editing and "expanding" the article. And while proclaiming he wants improvement, he mischaracterizes all attacks on the bad writing as personal attacks. This

6351: 6363: 5344:

reader? We don't need to remove content that passed FA, we need to expand and update with WP:RS. Not everyone in the world knows who Selena is so we can't just say "... Selena was preparing for a crossover album" Why isn't crossover wikilink? and why was she recording a crossover album if she sung songs in Spanish? Just my two cents. Best,

3640:. Notice I added the Unreferenced tag. This article is full of sweeping, opinionated statements that in a normal article would have attracted many gentle admonitions to supply a source. This applies to music criticism judgements, sociological judgements, etc. This article sticks out like a sore thumb for its violation of WP standards. 2715:

discriminated because she was a female singer in a male-dominate music by Freddie Records and other fans of Tejano music. She was also booed off stage and had food thrown at her because she was a female. Selena had to learn Spanish phonetically (Selena's first language was English, so how did she knew Spanish?) The article talks about

6359: 5542:

Aventura, Jennifer Pena, David Archuleta, The Cheetah Girls, Lila Downs, Tito Nieves, Manny Manuel, Girl in a Coma, Malverde, Angel y Khriz, Karen Rodriguez, Sara Tavares, Prince Royce, Bruno Mars, Frankie J, Perez Hilton, Katy Perry, Ashlee Simpson, Q'orianka Kilcher, and Enrique Iglesias have identified themselves as fans of her.

5078:

is full of grammatically incorrect content that doesn't make sense. If you did not want constructive criticism about the article, you should not have asked for it. If you truly want to improve the article, stop taking comments about the content as a personal affront. First off, I said the sentence regarding Selena's beauty is

2781:? And that Saldivar's friends convinced her to attend a San Antonio concert of Selena, and THAT'S when Saldivar approached Selena's father about opening a fan club and becoming a fan. Where is this in the article, that the "Selena Fan Club" went to be one of the largest fan club throughout the San Antonio-area? seems 6305:

artists, first recordings, expanding venture, death, impact and total sales figures. The lead also blocks her signature recording "Como La Flor" and does not mention her studio albums before and after signing a recording contract with Capital/EMI Latin. The lead also does not cover her first Grammy win, the fact

5106:

came about like that, I was just replying on what I felt about the statement. I agree with you on what you said, however, Selena's down-to-Earth is second to why she got so famous and her beauty and attraction to male fans is third to that argument. Now, since the article is going to be at WP:FAR, I feel bad for

6679:, a vocal group consisting of Selena, her older brother A.B. and her older sister Suzette. They sang at the restaurant their father managed but after it closed in 19??, the family moved to Corpus Christi. Selena y Los Dinos then performed wherever they could - street corners, weddings, quinceañeras and local 1823:. I mean am I missing something out? I just read the guidelines and rules 2-4 is not an issue with what we are talking about since (1) we have sources that back up our claims, (2) this is about a religion not a country, (3) this is not going out of context. So I believe you are worrying about the 4th criteria. 1541:- The source provided states, "Though inactive Jehovah's Witnesses, the Quintanilla family ascribe to the principles of the religion which prohibits birthday fanfare, said Bert Quintanilla, Selena's uncle and marketing director of the family-owned Q Productions." The "inactive" part isn't an issue, I hope... 2810:

hectic to Selena's growing schedule." Selena's BMW was stolen and dumped in the ocean, not in the article and notable. Around this time, Astudillo left the band, but why? In the article it doesn't state that nor does it say he left the group to peruse a solo career. It also doesn't state that Selena's record "

1967:(a TV program I didn't recognise), Lark Voorhies was specifically reported as breaking an acting contract because the role conflicted with her religious beliefs, which directly relates to her notability. The closest Selena seems to come to her (informal) religious beliefs relating to her notability is that 6392:

Something that should be fixed: In the second paragraph, there's a mention of Selena being names one of the "100 Coolest Americans in History" or somesuch, as named by the Albany Times-Union. In reality, this was just the Times-Union reporting on an honor given to her by the National Portrait Gallery

5893:

should be added, weather, the argument is about Hurmata removing a historic event that warrants its inclusion in the article per the WP:FAC2 and the statement is sourced. Before I even started editing the Selena article, this statement was there. Again, Hurmata removed the content without a consensus

5087:

stated above, this supposed "movement" the sentence refers to vague. I am aware that Selena's presence and success was one of (if not the) first in Tejano music, but that had little to do with her looks. Her being young and attractive no doubt helped her career, but I'd bet good money that the reason

4916:

This article could honestly be a candidate for worst article on Knowledge. It's way too long, disorganized, and large swaths of it don't make syntactic or grammatical sense in English. Take, for instance, this sentence: "Selena was credited as being the first woman to change the minds of people about

4519:

I have started to track down some of the worst of the bad edits, like the above quotation and two instances of broken English. So far, each thing I've tracked was originated by AJona^Selena 4 ever^ at the end of July. Originally, the above social criticism statement (inserted 07:24, 29 July 2011) was

2819:

Coca-Cola released a commemorative bottle in her honor to celebrate their five-year relationship, 4,900 bottles were distributed in Texas and New Mexico, by October 1994 the bottles were sold out. Did you know that Selena was given twenty-thousand dollars from Coca-Cola for just saying "I Like Coke"?

2709:

The article fails to discuss that doctors believed Selena was a tumor and that Selena's mother had needed it removed. But went to see a second doctor and was told she was pregnant. I believe that this should be told in the article as it has been mentioned in books, magazines, newspapers, and in every

2617:

You started this section even though you are fully aware that editors generally agree with the guidelines I have cited for inclusion in categories about people. It was unnecessary to say anything, and though you later claimed it was "for others to know", your initial comment was specifically directed

1841:

source that says Selena was officially a member of the religion, and I have seen several sources that say she was not officially a member but simply from a family of inactive JWs. Her informal attachment to the religion through her family is insufficient for inclusion in the category per the criteria

6293:

She was named the "top Latin artist of the '90s" and "Best selling Latin artist of the decade" by Billboard for her fourteen top-ten singles in the Top Latin Songs chart, including seven number-one hits. Selena had the most successful singles of 1994 and 1995, "Amor Prohibido" and "No Me Queda Más".

5684:

songs were sung at the Selena memorial concert. Hel-lo! I noticed too that the source for the statistic on the popularity of the broadcast was an online report by the broadcaster itself. Although I do trust this source on this particular occasion, the reliance on a source with a conflict of interest

5679:

As for (1), one of the bad judgements exercised over the years by some editors of this article is to make it a masturbatory and fetishistic indulgence in statistics about her accolades, chart positions, and dollar figures. Selena had a record breaking popularity and some editors can't quit detailing

5058:

I agree with you, he was the first person that I heard even mentioned Selena as part of a break for female beauty/feminine. I don't mind searching for sources indicating that Selena was somehow reliable for changing views of female beauty/feminine. No, I am very glad that you are being helpful here,

4612:

I'm the third editor involved, many of AJona sources are very questionable, like Spanish television gossip shows and so forth, while some of the content is good and can stay, every source needs to be checked for accuracy, and I can't access some of them because they under paid walls. If I could find

4564:

the lead, and you have not shown there was a bibliographic entry that I overlooked. BTW, once again you give yourself away as someone who is not a native speaker of English, contrary to what you claim. In that respect at least, you are not everything you claim to be. Native speakers of English, even

4555:

I don't say that statements in the lead must be sourced in the lead. That is a red herring on your part, which you have used at least once in edit summaries. Besides, it has nothing to do with the objection you are trying to rebut. Let others notice that once again, you refuse to get into specifics:

4507:

In a single day, October 10, 2011, AJona^Selena 4 ever^ increased the number of footnotes from 175 to 283. This was in response to me adding the Unreferenced tag at the top of the page. I had in mind very subjective statements like "Selena's fan base, were people who were "shut-off" from the rest of

4151:"After Selena won a Grammy, became a recipient of several accolades, signed a sponsorship tour with Coca-Cola, and dominated the Latin music charts while expanding the "Tejano Music Movement" across the United States, EMI Latin felt that the moment was right for Selena to release a crossover album." 4117:

for copy-editing. Hopefully soon the article can be back to its FA status, even though no one, surprisingly, has brought this attention to WP:FAR (besides my failed attempts) :). If there are more claims or sentences that needs a better quality RS or a source please note them below here and I'll get

3663:

need to be sourced, unless it is not currently in the article body. Therefore, I removed the tag because it is a FA, and having tags placed, that clearly are not right, is not a good thing. Like I told you on your talk page, if you found something wrong then fix it. Why come on the talk page to bash

3631:

This is to follow up my commments within the last hour in this section. In regard to the writing being quite undereducated, this article is by no means typical of the quality of Knowledge articles, even of just entertainer biographies. I have already mentioned the ignorant prose style. But it's also

3592:

Right on, 71.204.165.254! (Usually, I disdain unregistered users, but you made a complaint that is very important to make here.) How did this article get to be Featured Article? And by the way, when? I thought clicking on the gold star would link to specifics of the awarding of this article, but no.

3319:

on the article per discussion above. However, my English is not very good, even though I am a native speaker. I am bringing up this discussion to talk about improvements such as grammar fixes, prose, and other fixes that need to be made to keep the article an FA status. The reason why I went bold on

3272:

RFCs are usually made when the people on a talk page are unable to come to consensus about a specific single point of controversy. This RFC, by contrast, seems to be more of a request for a peer-review, or (more accurately) a mini-FAR before a FAR. In my opinion this RFC should be closed, and any of

3088:

on Selena? If there are fixes that should be made why not add them? BTW the SAME damn book you used on the article is where I got all that information. They are all notable, no trivial is in there. I see the same info on other FA artists articles, so why can't it be on Selena? Because you don't want

2834:

Ok, every entertainer has some, but why isn't Selena's controversies on the article? Did you know Saldivar was making up stories that Selena had cheated on her husband with her doctor and label partner? That Selena wasn't the "girl you knew she was"? That Selena had kept a diary that Saldivar stated

2470:

And it surely doesn't matter if you disagree either. I can be the biggest ass hole and keep adding this category because numerous of books spot that she was a JW point blank. I came here and wanting to discuss this as a civilized individual but coming at me "it doesn't matter whether you agree" - is

2123:

says early in her career she refused to sing songs which ran contrary to her faith, but that later in her career JW beliefs became less important to her. I'm still leaning against the categorization, but think some of the material might be relevant enough for mention in the article. I don't know how

1922:

Based on the evidence presented, I would be inclined to not use the category. The one question I do have however is regarding the "official/unofficial" matter. I don't "know" that I, who am not currently officially registered as a member of my local Catholic parish, having moved recently, qualify as

1769:

I think removing this category is like removing "Category:Mexican Americans" from Selena, that's her religion, and yes I read what you guys were talking about, but she, like Doc has said above, has practice that religion she never celebrated her birthday, and the blood transfusions was thought to be

1323:

page under "Religion", it states: "The requirements of Knowledge:Biographies of living persons#Categories are strictly enforced. For a dead person, there must be a verified general consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate." Both Prince (living) and Mickey Spillane

160:

There wasn't a question as to whether the site was the official site. The question was whether the site added any value to the page. The site appears to be nothing more than a store front to buy stuff. If the family simply wants to capitalize on her fame, that doesn't lend much credibility to the

5943:

Well its 3 against 1, however, I believe Hurmata's voice shouldn't be left out of this. Although she is against mentioning the concert, I would like to know further on why she thinks that so we can have a better understanding on what we might not get. This can improve on the way we will mention the

5082:

false because it is clearly an opinion and can easily be argued by anyone. Again, the fact that it is sourced means nothing - that just makes it a very unclear opinion that happens to be sourced. An opinion is also not a fact and should not be presented as such - that's basically what that sentence

5077:

I'm fairly certain no one here is screaming or pointing fingers at you. In fact, I do not see any personal attacks or even a comment about you as a person. You asked for opinions about the article and thus far, all you have done is challenge everyone who has (correctly) pointed out that the article

4948:

The IP makes a valid point (several actually) - the sentence makes no sense and is probably downright false. Selena was hardly the first unconventional beauty who changed people's conceptions of what a pretty woman is or was. She was a musician first and foremost - her looks really had little to do

4883:

sorry about that. I do agree that is it poorly written but so are all the others that's why I requested a c/e at WP:GOCE/REQ. Not everyone in the world is perfect and yes I made a lot of mistakes but I WP:AGF with this article and asked for a WP:PR and WP:GOCE, I had not left the article to die and

4707:

You could come away thinking that this article, and Selena's life, are as much about her father as about her. Well, it's even conceivable that the evidence supports that opinion (in which case, source the opinion properly). But that does not excuse the present state of the article, swamped as it is

3513:

Just for the record: I can't perceive anything close to an "overwhelming" or "vast" number of spelling or grammatical errors, so the reason I'm saying the above is not mere laziness. I don't have the slightest idea what exactly you are finding so glaringly incorrect, so you'll have to become active

3187:

I'm not asking you guys to remove its status, just allow me to add content with RS that the editor had used while nominating it for FA. I've been more discourage to add anything because of my reputation and that other editors feel that the article shouldn't be expanded or written like other artists

1994:

The blood transfusions were done on her to save her life by that time she unconscious as medics tried to revived her. After the fact her father did not approved of it due to their religion. Selena never mentioned that she was JW her family and quiz shows on MTV Tres has cited her religion to be JW.

1884:

I'm not contending that a person can't make some kind of nominal self-identification for a religion without being a formal member. What I am saying is that the verifiability requirements for the purposes of the category has not been met. Additionally, the notability requirement for inclusion in the

749:

Well I don't know how to cite those unsourced information that is only given in magazines and TV special so if you can help me learn how to I would be much appreciated. I never worked in the "Death" section on this article, I felt that Selena's death was the main reason on how Selena's legacy still

184:

Your right! The family really doesn't put in effort in trying to teach the world about Selena, it's us fans who do, it makes me sick that all they want to do is "sell" her with complication albums every year of the same songs. But unfortunately this is the only official site from her family, in the

6544:

In the beginning of the article it states Selena is the "Queen of Latin Music" but that is disputed in fact, a quick search in any search engine for "Queen of Latin Music" shows some other latin artists such as La Lupe and Celia Cruz... I think that should be removed, the site from the citation is

5915:

supports that it was highly rated, so much so that it was released on CD and DVD. Since it was also seemingly the first concert memorial regarding Selena, I also don't see a problem with mentioning it. Now if it had been the fifth or twentieth, I could see a notability problem as memorial concerts

5826:

already established because the article was mass reverted back to a previous version. As I told you before, just because you can find a source to support something does not always mean it belongs in an article on Knowledge. If a few of you guys are jonesing to put the "Legacy" section back in, why

4353:

the average for Knowledge. It is the messiest, worst written article I can remember seeing at Knowledge. In the last 2 or 3 days, I've tried to improve it. (2) AJona^Selena 4 ever^ has said about himself (twice, maybe) that his writing ability is poor even though English is his native language. In

4275:

I understand you're frustrations on this article, but why can't you just state the issues instead of insulting editors? The FA version of the article is, no doubt in my mind, an extremely good well-written article. However, the article had lack the major aspects of the subject and was not broad in

4255:

dramatically changes what's appropriate to say and to criticize. A featured article deserves no patience with bad writing and policy deviations The editors who have been devoting themselves to this article collectively have no judgement on how to just tell a story, no judgement on citing sources,

4144:"After Selena's Grammy win, becoming a recipient of several accolades, signing a sponsorship tour with Coca-Cola, dominating the Latin music charts and expanding the "Tejano Music Movement" across the United States, EMI Latin felt that the moment was right for Selena to release a crossover album." 5765:

To provide more perspective on the unwelcome edits. They seem to represent a morbid urge to pretend that Selena is still alive, 16 years on. It's like inserting, "every day millions of fans of Selena listen to her recordings at home, on the street, while driving. There was a broadcast X, Y people

5343:

edit warring here. I think its best to get everyone to understand each others points and see which path is best. The recent removal made by Hurmata was not a very good one, DOY is considered a "Historic day in Latin music history" (Billboard) why remove most of that information for the uninformed

5105:

Not in this section but in the previous ones and on their talk pages they were. That's why I felt that having this section so everyone could all come together and talk about improving the article would be best then having multiple sections in one sentence about the same thing. Well I'm sorry if I

4968:

if you can see it is sourced by the Biography Channel episode which had experience writers, musicians, film producers, etc talking about Selena and her life and what she had done for women. This episode/show is foremost reliable then an independent biographical film. Selena's look had a lot to do

4863:

article that deals with Selena's product endorsements is poorly written and far too long. I could see mentioning her endorsement deals within the text of her career as it relates to that, but I don't see why such a subject warrants its own lengthy section. As for Selena being down to earth, etc.,

3242:

Well everyone who edits the article or monitors it believe that none of the information (that I risen) should be added onto the article because its already an "FA". My English isn't too good, even though I am a native speaker, and when I do add content they always revert it even if its a reliable

3070:

which your television documenturies I can't tell if they are reliable sources or not, if you could find those newspaper sources or w.e why can't you fix them. Some of your concerns were already mentioned in the article but was removed because I wasn't active enough to take care of the article for

2871:

because it fails to identifies criteria for inclusion. If the article was allowed to be edited and expanded, this wouldn't have happened. As Selena was trail blazing for female artists, was told she will never be anything because she was a female, had to deal with male coliseum, had broken female

2809:

starring Jennifer Lopez. Selena was also the biggest Tejano act during this? And this? "Selena's husband, Chris Perez and co-designer for Selena's clothing, Martin Gomez, elaborated Selena's dream of opening a boutiques, whereas her father and siblings were worried that "Selena Etc." would be too

2719:

being released in 1985, but wasn't it pulled off shelves because of copyright control? and didn't the album helped Selena become musical guest on the Johnny Canales Show in 1985? - which was her break? Where in the article does it state that after Selena had graduated that she had applied to take

2371:

Although I didn't add this category back because of Jeffro77's complains about it. However, your edit summary states that her father objected the blood transfusions. The doctors at Memorial Hospital did perform a BT without her or her father's consent. Secondly, her father later announced that he

2138:

The available sources seem to support the view that Selena's father could be added to the category (if he were notable enough to merit an article), based on the funeral and his (post-facto) objection to a blood transfusion. A movie was made about Selena's life and it did not mention her religion,

1466:

I grow tired of your poor argumentation. Your suggestion that 'Ignore all rules' applies is utterly ridiculous, being based on a tenuous subjective contrivance that removing Selena from a category "prevents you from improving or maintaining Knowledge"; rather, you want to apply 'Ignore all rules'

1343:

The statement from the guideline regarding persons who have died does not mean that the principle no longer applies. Prince's conversion to the JW religion was notable because it was specifically reported on in reliable sources rather than simply mentioned as a side point in passing. If there are

531:

Everything that is UNSOURCED is TRUE due to wikipedias lame rules we can't add that the information given was from MAGAZINES and SPECIALS that AIR EVERY year. Oh well I can care LESS that this article gets taken away from its FA status because this article LACKS INFORMATION this article is like a

5541:

Tejano music has not recovered since the death of Selena whose appeal extended beyond the Tejano genre: Such celebrities as Beyoncé, Myra, Paula DeAnda, 3LW, Christina Aguilera, Shakira, Nadia López, Diana Reyes, Ivy Queen, Fanny Lú, Don Omar, Kat Deluna, Eva Longoria, Wyclef Jean, Daddy Yankee,

4814:

documenting this for other performers on Knowledge. It seems needless. The "Public image" section is also poorly written. Who cares if Selena "gave compliments to each person she had encountered"? Again, that sounds very fansite-y. There are also quite a few grammatically incorrect and downright

4809:

Numerous sections need to be pruned quite drastically to be honest. This article sounds more like a mooning fan page than an encyclopedic article. For instance, does there really need to be an entire section on the products Selena endorsed? I think people realize that most public figures endorse

2714:

was strict when it came to his kids in music, religious beliefs and personal when he was Selena's manager. The article fails to say what "Los Dinos" means in Italian and Abraham's wisdom that helped the band prosper, did you know they wanted to quit? The article doesn't talk about how Selena was

2070:

which said that Selena did "embrace" (that's the word used) the JW faith. Whether that is sufficient, I don't know. And there could be, I suppose, an argument made that the fact that her funeral was presided over by a JW, and that funeral, and her related early death, have contributed greatly to

6671:

From: After learning to sing at age three, Selena's father started a vocal group when she was nine. The group, Selena y Los Dinos, consisted of Selena, her older brother A.B., and her older sister Suzette. The group initially performed at a restaurant the family operated until the business went

5688:

As for (2), every year worldwide there are tens of thousands of public entertainment events — World Cup matches, Rolling Stones concerts, etc. — which attract 50,000 bodies and gross hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars. Those facts don't make them notable for an encyclopedia. How

4247:

You're not supposed to support every single statement in an article with 3 to 5 references. There is no need to source trivial and uncontroversial claims like "in year X Selena released album Y". The footnotes have too much information. This article is extremely difficult to edit because of the

6304:

represents a past-to-present flow (how the artist began in the music business, first album, first success, expanding ventures, number-one singles, honors from media outlets, total sales figures and current works). Selena's article does not; honors from media outlets, number-one singles, cited

5361:

A mass revert to the last good version will inevitably kill some good along with the bad; there is usually some content that may need to be restored. But this time, just do it slowly and based on consensus-- there's no need to edit war again, and there's no hurry. Content can be restored and

4232:

to play the guitar, Selena came in the room and began to sing. While doing so, Quintanilla Jr noticed Selena's pitch ...." To say "Quintinilla Jr" instead of "her father"? This writing that has been perpetrated on this article is just perverse. Of course, this sentence is also lousy because it

3546:

sections?! Wow, a person with a distinctively non-English speaking country name objecting they can't see the glaring errors! ("Florian" is a given name which has currency only in Germany). Well, here's the most awful error I've seen so far: "Selena's death reactions" for "Reactions to Selena's

1490:

After re-reading (a few times) your earlier response questioning whether "Prince is not notable for other reasons?!" I think I now understand your abstruse conclusion wherein you failed to correctly interpret what I wrote. You seem to have taken my statement that "Selena is notable for reasons

5793:

and numerous of other online searches on google.news and you still want to say that it shouldn't be included because you're only valid argument is that Selena is dead therefore we shouldn't add anything that talks about her milestones in the history of America pertaining after her murder? All

5295:

mentioned, the article was also riddled with grammatical errors and sentences that made no sense. It was basically impossible to make heads or tails out of some of the content that was included which is why I supported the rollback to a previous version. I read through the article awhile back

5276:— for shame. Again, to people who may be stunned at my vehemence, we're dealing with an article which (1) was deemed a paragon of WP, (2) which is bound to get especially many visits because of who it's about, (3) is, as somebody else wrote in the last few days, is now one of the dregs of WP. 4403:

In light of having been reverted with the justification, "per WP:LEAD every major aspect must be included. The lead had WP:OR problems", I elaborate on old points. This article is prohibitively hard to edit because it is bloated with trivia and with references. And not only are there too many

4209:

The article is way too long, absurdly so. The subject inherently does not merit such a length. Probably overzealous fans are to blame. All Selena was was a bestselling entertainer. She was not a Jimi Hendrix, a major innovator. He's a strong comparison to Selena because his time as a big name

5675:

I deleted the report of a televised memorial concert that was held to commemorate the tenth anniversary of Selena's death. The point of the passage was how popular she still is. Here are two things that in themselves are not worthy of being discussed in detail in a Knowledge article. (1) The

3672:. Thirdly, please do not attack the consensus that passed the article to FA status. The previous version (as stated above this talk page) was found FA-worthy. Therefore, the current version needs criticism not criticism to editors who edit the article. Lastly, if you are going to continue to 4838:

has a "products" section so Selena shouldn't be any exception. That first sentence you had brought up was to show how Selena cared for her community/people around her as she was known to be more of a fan then a celebrity and was down-to-Earth, can't really say that to any other celebrities.

1592:

I don't know who 'the girl from Save By the Bell' is. However, as stated previously, those articles that I did not edit do not constitute specific endorsement for those people remaining in the category. If other people are in the category who also do not meet the criteria, they can also be

1328:

from Saved By the Bell has no reference, and this could be considered a BLP violation without one. Selena has a reliable reference that she was raised a JW, and I see no reason whatsover why she can't be included in this category. It is not remotely against policy for her to be there...

6347: 1364:

been covered in any meaningful way by reliable sources rather than only a brief mention or in some cases no mention at all. I left it on some articles that I was less sure about, but that does not constitute endorsement of the category for all articles from which I did not remove the

2694:

Obviously the article was written by a fan who really didn't know her entire career and only added basic information (early life, early LPs, emerging years, success, death, and legacy). However, the article is not broad in its coverage it doesn't state any of the aspects on Selena's

5912: 2294: 5476: 3547:

death". No native would think to say that. As I alluded to in the edit summary when I corrected this, certain errors are so unexpected even from second language speakers that I suspect they are computer translations (many articles at Knowledge have aroused this suspicion in me).

2262: 4683:

There are many instances of bad grammar, and a few of outright broken English. The reasons I single this one out for its own section are (1) as an intended paraphrase of "reactions to Selena's death", it's especially atrocious, totally un-English; (2) it was quickly REVERTED

2267: 6035:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 6624:

I think that it shouldn't be removed because she made Latin music popular and if she would have lived longer, she would have been more successful than what she was. I think also by adding a lot of the cumbia and merenque steps it just made her more known as the "Queen".

3607:

The article was passed back in 2006, of course the article has changed ever since. It is among the most traffic article in enWP. Also please refrain from making attacks on this talk page of Selena. If you find mistakes, please clean it up. The article is currently being

1885:

category is also not met. The sources available online are pretty clear that her family were inactive JWs and that Selena was not an official member. If they did not want people to know and did not speak about it, then it would fail the criteria for notability anyway.--

2327:

Save your breath, no one is going to edit the article, because people just don't want to expand it to it's fullest, even if the information can be useful in the article, because it's a "FA", which all I see is two letters, but others see it as something special. LOLZ,

1083:

Um, that bit about Billboard 200 is already stated in the first sentence of the paragraph. Seems redundant to say it again in the middle. Also, "Dreaming of You" is both a song and an album, as far as I can tell from reading the paragraph. I assume you mean the album,

3083:

I believe Alex was talking to me, I'll deal with you after. Alex, the article fails to be broad in its coverage, if you had read the the whole thing you've know why I nominated the article. To Secret, I don't have nothing against you at all! However, why can't I be

2996:. We're trying to de-banner, but sometimes when we do, other editors put the banner back (usually not project members). You'll be doing us a great favor if you see articles that clearly are outside scope and de-banner them; or if you're not sure, drop at note at 1869:

to be a member in order to be classified as a JW? Third of all how would you know if her family is not or still is a JW after Selena's death? I don't even know if they are, and its not our business to even know unless they spoked about and want people to know.

5380:

I agree, that's why I decided to not edit the article at all unless there are consensus for it. Or better yet, allow someone who is better at writing content to add the information on the article so it won't effect the prose and grammar of the article. Best,

1043:

Oh it's a Magazine, I got access to the Rolling Stones archives, for a music project I abandoned, just checked the magazine, it didn't break any record of any kind and while it did said it sold 400,000 records it seems like it's for the year not the week.

881:

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://ezinearticles.com/?Selena:-A-Life-Remembered-%28Part-1%29&id=345947. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,

699:. Not because people are out to get you, or don't like you, or don't like Selena, but because we want the article to stay at a high standard, and meet Knowledge's policies and guidelines. The fact that your edits about her death were not accepted in 5267:

to enliven the narration, to advance it, when they would in fact do so. Especially if they're amusing or directly relate to how the subject came to be famous, to be culturally important (e.g., an anecdote about how the members of a great band met).

1690:

And, "The New York Times covered her death with a front-page story, as did Texas major dailies. Six hundred persons attended her private Jehovah's Witness funeral. More than 30,000 viewed her casket at the Bayfront Plaza Convention Center in Corpus

5827:

not copy it from a previous version in the article to a sandbox and work on it sentence by sentence to bring it up to speed. Once an agreed upon version is made, bring it to this talk page and let the community decide if it is worthy of inclusion.

1181:

states: "Inclusion must be specifically relevant to at least one of the subject's notable activities and an essential part of that activity, but is not required to be an exclusive interest." Though there is no contention about whether Selena was

6286:

I've made several failed attempts to request an expansion on this article in the past. There are several, if not, numerous vital information that this FA is missing. Atop of the number of information the article lacks, the lead does not follow

5110:

because he had done an amazing job with the article. I only wanted to expand it and like I said not everyone is perfect, esp in writing in perfect English. I just don't think I should be pointed as the "bad guy" since I was only following what

4613:

time, I'll do the source check because I don't want the article to go though featured article review, but I myself would personally place the article there if Ajona interferes with us improving the article from any policy violating statements.

2742:

and Joe ojeda join the group? Wait a mintue, didn't Selena and her father approach them (they were in a group together) and wanting them to open up for Selena? Then they joined with Selena y Los Dinos. It also fails to say that Astudillo was a

1194:, which is a very explicit criterion for inclusion in categories about people. Selena being raised as a JW (particularly without any indication that she was involved with the religion in her adult life) simply does not satisfy that criteria.-- 4464:

One good way to start "rewriting" would be "dewriting": going back to June 2011 or even earlier. Even going back to October 9, 2011 — before over 100 pointless references were added in one day (see subsection below) — would give you clarity.

5001:" and while there may be cases where it has stylistic value this isn't one of them. But the main problem is neither of the two contentions could possibly be supported. "She started that movement"? Which movement is that? The link is to 635:

The "Death of Selena" shouldn't be merged because it gives vital TRUTH information about her death, the reason why I didn't include it in this article is because that this article is a FA and it will only get reverted. So again, what do

4520:"sourced" — but to a work for which I can find no bibliographic citation! Somehow, even that was eventually deleted. AJona^Selena 4 ever^ was also the creator of the phrase "Selena's death reactions" for "reactions to Selena's death". 5676:

continued popularity of an dead entertainer. (2) That a public gathering was huge and got a lot of publicity. These things are either nonnotable in themselves or they add nothing to an essay about a life and career that was notable.

4108:

to add into the article since IPs and users alike were complaining about the quality of the article. Now that I just completed adding more sources, the next issue is prose and overall grammar errors. The article is currently up for a

3446:

For God's sake, somebody please fix them. I am far too lazy, not to mention overwhelmed by the vast number of errors. Please, somebody who has a lot of patience, clean this article up. It's a shame to call this a "featured" article.

3441: 5239:

I think we should discuss in talk the recent removal of some content, including most of the impact section that was the same content since it first became an FA back in 2006. I reverted so we could discuss further in talk. Thanks

319:

But was she a Polka musician? Did she produce a Polka album? If Tejano was derived from Polka that doesn't make Tejano musicians Polka musicians. It seems that categorizing her as a Polka musician is a bit of a stretch. --

3046:

I have been randomly selected to provide a comment on this but I'm afraid I can't work out exactly what it is I am supposed to comment on. Could someone provide a brief summary of what responders to the RfC are to comment on?

144:

Hey I have reverted, somewhat added back, the information that was thought not to be Selena's "official" website, when the web site, in fact, is owned by Selena's family. I am just writing it here, so I won't get in trouble.

5910:

Again, I'm not seeing any ownership issues. What I see is a content dispute about mentioning a memorial concert. That being said, I see no reason not to mention it as it did involve Selena and was evidently a popular event.

3844:

The name "Selena" may be pronounced "seLAYnah" in Spanish but she grew up speaking English and learned Spanish only later in her life. I have personal knowledge that she pronounced it "seLEEna" and as an example listen to

5680:

it ad nauseam. Selena's like Elvis or the Beatles, she continues to be popular long beyond the end of her final recording. Elvis has a museum too. And Dolly Parton. Nothing to dwell on. One deleted sentence reported that

4338:

There are many atrocious edits in this article — not poor, but atrocious. Any editor who took a big interest in this article over a long term, and still failed to notice them, has taken on a share of blame for not fixing

1444:. There is nothing against policy to keep Prince in and Selena out, and I recommend you show some concrete support in the way of diffs to guideline and policy references for what you're claiming about this (and, really, 2769:

The band also was motorizing Tejano music and making it assailable to younger audiences. Selena was the first Tejano recording artist to sign a major recording studio and brought other major studios to sign other Tejano

5889:. Hurmata has been bordering the WP:OWN policy, esp her massive removal of content without a consensus from the community. Furthermore, this argument is not weather or not a statement about a historic event that has a 5766:

tuned in, there was a broadcast Q, Z people tuned into that one." Take these edits to a fan site, for goodness' sake. Likewise, the article on Shakespeare should not advise as to the minutiae of Shakespeare festivals.

497:

Well, merging that article here would mean that any new information in that article would be added here. Is there any reason why the information can't be here, in the main article? Why does it need to be in a separate

5272:, because the person's career is supposed to provide sufficient interest on its own. Use judgement. Of course, the history of this article is that it has been dominated by editors who have no judgement at any level. 5023:

and at 0:48 the person says "It just change the way people see feminine beauty and Selena is the one who made that break and who started that". So she had not made a "movement" for feminine beauty but a break. Best,

3377:

If this claim was from a book, it should be attributed to the book and not a television show. That said, I really see no reason to even mention the fact about her finances - it has nothing to do with her notability.

2038:

membership. If John Carter self-identifies as Catholic (and it related to his notability), that would satisfy the criteria for the category; in the absence of such self-identification, we would need an indication of

6550: 5320:

Yes the article that SandyGeorgia reverted was deservedly removed, but I don't see the point of removing most of the legacy section and album details, especially that most other music articles GAs and FAs has them,

1811:"Inclusion must be specifically relevant to at least one of the subject's notable activities and an essential part of that activity, but is not required to be an exclusive interest." - which is not celebrating her 1388:

The accusation that I am simply 'picking people I want in the category' on some hypothetical basis other than the rules for categories about people is laughable, and I have no idea what you imagine my criteria to

6687:

The sentence, "The group initially performed at a restaurant the family operated until the business went bankrupt soon thereafter." implies that the restaurant went bankrupt because the group was playing there.

4348:

Now that AJona^Selena 4 ever^ has claimed for the fifth time or whatever that he's been insulted ("attacked personally"), let me distill the advice I've been giving. (1) The quality of this article is currently

3118:- I have no experience with selection of FAs and no knowledge of Selena or Latin music. That said, I do think it would be better to work on improving the article rather than vying to have its FA status revoked. 1708:

Your first link to the Google search results doesn't seem to constitute reliable sources, but seems to be chiefly forum sites and other that list people as Witnesses with only very tenuous connections to the

1218:

Well she died, as you can tell, at age 23 she went to church every single day. So if that doesn't qualify for her to be on that category is just wrong because that's her religion and she practice it as well.

466:(165 kb). Is there any need to spin this one out? Apart from anything else, the new article contains a whole lot of unsourced material, which (hopefully) would not have been allowed into a featured article.-- 4864:

that is conjecture and again, not encyclopedic. That kind of content is more fitted to a fansite, not an encyclopedia. Her personality or how she treated fans probably merits a one sentence mention at best.

1448:) categories. I think there is a possible POV issue here, that you're making this up as you go along, and that one editor doesn't get to "control" what does or doesn't go in a category. That's why we have 1356:. Feel free to remove the reference to Spillane if there are not notable sources indicating that his being a JW has any relevance to his notability. I removed the category for those articles where it seemed 6321:

out. In previous discussions on this article had brought attention that it also does not follow other FA music-related artists articles. The success section does not cover her four-number one singles from

1344:

notable sources that have reported specifically on Selena being a Witness, then they can be cited in the article and the category would be appropriate. However, if notable sources simply happen to briefly

4502: 1674: 3393:

Both the episode and book state she was a billionaire. I don't mind giving you a link to the episode where it says it if you would like? If you think it shouldn't be in the article then I will agree.

1770:

true but after VH1 released a special about her regarding her death, she was given one anyway. I mean if another celebrity was a Christian and practice that religion why remove it from their article?

4059:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 2196:

The criteria are clear, and you are taking this far too personally. I haven't seen any sources saying she personally identified as a JW beyond her family's affiliation with the religion. Do you have

5822:(which you're using in the wrong context anyway) when the editor you're speaking with is not exhibiting those behaviors. Fact of the matter is that a consensus about most of what you're bringing up 207:

There is nothing that says that an external links section is required. Your comments support the exclusion of this "official" site. It doesn't need to be included just because it is official. --

2888:

A major goal of WikiProject Women's History is to incorporate the perspective of women's history in overview articles of historical periods or pre-1950 events which may currently lack such coverage

1578:

The way I see it, if you can have Prince and the girl from Saved By the Bell, you can have Selena. If you want to make it only church leaders who are notable for being JW's it's all or nothing...

3550:

I take great offense at the irrelevance of your knee jerk defense, that a crappy article which had not received the "bold editing" it so desperately needed could still be deemed an example of the

2143:

can cite sources, such as those mentioned by John Carter, that mention her informal religious affiliation. However, there simply does not appear to be sufficient support for adding Selena to the

5115:

had said. Furthermore, removing content is now at the hands at WP:FAR and hopefully the article will remain a WP:FA with improvements from users who can c/e the article and improve on its prose.

6672:

bankrupt soon thereafter. The Quintanilla family then moved to Corpus Christi, Texas, where Selena y Los Dinos performed wherever they could - street corners, weddings, quinceañeras, and fairs.

4626:

by Secret, 2:30 10 October 2011. Before posting the change, I added back more recent changes. First and foremost, my justification for doing this is quality and ease of editing. But I also cite

3141:. I've been selected through the Wiki random process to comment on this RfC. After studying the text, the sources and what's been discussed so far, I find the article worthy, in general, of its 6583: 4785:. This section is for improvements that needs to be done to maintain the article's FA status, not to scream to other users who edited the article. If tensions spiral out of control I believe a 4195: 4448:

I did that yesterday at 10:48 and you reverted the entire thing at 14:31. By the way, I have read your user page now and it turns out you have rollback privileges, which are being abused. :)

1785: 1643: 1178: 454:

is about 9 kb. Why do we need it to be separate? There are some "Death of..." articles, but as far as I can tell, they have been created when the main article is already long. Some examples:

6554: 2555:

be turned over and there's nothing you can do about it, unless the majority agrees with it. Secondly, I have nothing else to discuss with you so go feed your invisible pink unicorn, LOLZ!

4325:

Let other editors be advised that over the last few days, AJona^Selena 4 ever^ HAS NOT responded to specific criticisms (that were directed at any words or anybody), has NEITHER defended

3940: 335:

Have to agree with Mufka here. Norteno is clearly just polka played with Mexican instrumentation, but Tejano is different enough that classifying Tejano as a form of polka is inaccurate.—

3458: 829:, I can't see any relevant info that should be included that isn't already in the death section of this article. If others disagree and want to salvage any of it, it's in the history of 6503: 5538:

The single "Bidi Bidi Bom Bom" was a song that was not originally planned to be recorded, became one of Selena's most famous songs, winning Bertelsmann Music Group's "Song of The Year".

5522:

The success from Entre a Mi Mundo helped EMI Latin to prepare Selena for a press tour, including a high-profile meet-and-greet conference with music media types in Monterrey, Mexico.

5325:

for example. And I don't consider most of the information to be trivia, (I removed the hospital, and the birth name details as that was way too trivial) and irrelevant. It's ok per

4206:

I'll lead off by pointing out the bloatedness. Pay particular attention to the lead. The lead violates policy by its length. This lead should only be 1/4 to 1/3 it current length.

1412:

I find your "argument" to include Prince and not the others more than slightly ridiculous. What guideline are you reading that states, "if notable sources simply happen to briefly

1030:, anyways that statement doesn't make any sense, what record did she break, etc. I have a source that it sold 330,000 copies not 400,000+ copies, and that it debut in number one in 5980: 4582:

AJona1992^Selena 4 ever^ made three spurious references to support his claim that she "is regarded as the most popular Latin artist". This editor cited three sources that date to

3957: 3649: 2418:

notable as a JW, although she was raised as a JW until she later perform acts that aren't JW-like, for example: her choice of clothing. I only brought this up for others to know.

507:

However, as I said, a great deal of the information there is unsourced and can be removed at any time, so I suggest you add some sources to the time line, or it will be removed.--

4362:

why some detail of Selena's childhood is not tedious trivia, or why particular references are fine as they are; etc. (4) Next time he yells "personal attacks!", he has a duty to

2814:" (1994) sold over 400,000 copies which was "unheard of" for a Tejano artist. A lot of barriers Selena broke, aren't even mentioned in this article! What about her appearance in 662:

be cited as reliable sources. Articles often have sources that aren't on the internet (books, newspapers etc.) If you need help with that, just ask. Also, you can have a look at

5535:

Selena's image helped her to stay in Coca-Cola after the company fired other celebrities only keeping Selena for Coke, Elton John for Diet Coke and Christopher Cross for Sprite.

2890:

and "The biography of a woman born after 1950 may be included only if she has exceptional and verifiable historic significance.", Selena is not Hillary Clinton or Elizabeth II.

2093:

There's numerous specials on her (see filmography) but theres way more than listed. None of those specials talk about her JW though that's why I didn't use them as a reference.

857:

Excuse me? It's not a Memorial! I was going by the way other death topics had theirs, like really? No wonder your username here is annoying LOLZ BTW it really suits you! hahaha

228:

Your so right, JLO, Shakira, Michael Jackson, etc., has official sites, but they really don't need to be included in their pages, ooo deleting them right now, thanks dude! haha

4757:(not users, if you have an issue with a user, please address it to their talk page not here). Please write down what needs to be fixed or any other concerns you have with this 4565:

uneducated ones, do not confuse "costume" with "custom" or "accustomed". Of course, in this context "accustomed" would also be wrong. The word you were seeking is "customary".

5685:

is unfortunate. Again, this point should not distract us from the first point, that there is a history with this article of overkill in describing her posthumous popularity.

3821: 2524:

If you were to intentionally "be the biggest ass hole and keep adding this category", it would be clear indication of disruptive editing, and would therefore be inadvisable.--

2276:

Also this is kind of creepy, but should it be included in this article? It talks about Selena fans scraping her blood off the floors and windows of the hotel she was shot in.

750:

flurish today so it was a great idea to me. I use sandboxes a lot before I create a new article because I like that I can work on it and no one can delete or remove anything.

139: 6315:

and her clothing ventures. The lead spotlights on her murder for two sentences which is enough but doesn't cover the impact it had among Hispanics around the world and keeps

4014: 1028: 3703:

This sentence makes no sense at all. A coliseum is an amphitheatre. The grammar also seems wrong. I can guess what the sentence is supposed to say, but I have no idea what

1865:

Well I am not a JW to know about that and second of all practicing a religion does not need a "you have to be an official member" what? so is JW the only religion that you

6546: 6387: 6169: 5999: 3339:

Going through the article (which is rife with problems), I noticed the claim that Selena supposedly became a billionaire in 1995. This claim attributed to an episode of

2599:

with you.? Whatever, I know that they agree but I'm telling you that if they all disagree then that rule will no longer apply. Go lecture someone who will care and stop

6174:

I removed it, not because I do not think she has any, but because I see no evidence of it in the article, if you wish to cite a source that says otherwise, please do.

6139: 4539:

statements do not need to be sourced if not in article body. Every statement is sourced, its not costumed to cite every sentence if they are of the same source. Best,

4203:

The Featured Article was awarded five years ago, which is quite a long time. It would not be surprising if the flaws it has in fall 2011 have accumulated since then.

3454: 2839:

publicized the autopsy pictures of Selena without permission? Did you know that her father sued them? What about the "Abraham Quintanilla Jr vs. Maria Celeste" case?

2664: 1676:. One of the most notable things about it concerning her tragic death is that her father refused to allow her a blood transfusion because of her religious beliefs... 1555:

That quote says nothing at all about Selena personally, but their inactivity in the religion does make wanting inclusion in the category just that bit more tenuous.--

1432:. If she were not notable for other reasons, we simply wouldn't know about her religion. That is the criteria." Prince is not notable for other reasons?! How about 6078: 97: 6634: 6249: 5712:

In my final sentence just previous, "it" refers to the concert, of course, not the article about the concert. I should have constructed that sentence differently.

4922: 4417: 4269: 4242: 4223: 3097:

up to GA status, I expanded all her Amor Prohibido singles to B-Class. So please quite and let this review be held. Anyways I am only doing this because it fails

6408: 5253:

obvious to some editors, but: nitty gritty details of someone's life, the stuff that would properly fill a book or a magazine story, usually do not belong in an

5154: 4688:) by the editor who says of himself that he's a poor writer in English. Please do not put grossly ungrammatical writing into Knowledge just to oppose an editor. 4426: 902:

text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of

419: 5789:

by telling us that because X celebrity doesn't have it Selena shouldn't it, (4) I'm not sure why are you arguing about this anyway, I provided you a WP:RS from

5785:

this article, (2) if consensus by the community wants that information on the article it will be on it weather you like it or not, (3) why are trying to make a

3158: 6578: 6128:

This reference Caller-Times April 16, 1997. is cited in "Early Life" but has no corroborative statements indicating her parents belonged to a denomination.

5510:

Yolanda Saldivar (murderer of Selena) originally dislike the singer but her friends told her to give her a try and that's when she asked to open the fan club.

1712:

Regarding your second link, no one is contending that Selena did not profess to be a JW (although in actuality "Selena was not an official member of the sect"

6630: 5977: 4745:

I have started this discussion to help users who are involved with the Selena article on what needs to be done to keep the FA status of this article. Please

3834: 2316: 4316:

Nobody needs to ask permission to expand or contract an article. The "community who agreed with him" means "the handful of editors who happened to respond".

2872:

barriers in the music world, and other notable barriers that Selena had broke aren't in the article, which made the article to be removed from the project.

6412: 6183: 5484:

joined the band in 1989 as a back-up dancer. (there's no mention of him at all, he wrote some of Selena's biggest hits and had done several duets with her)

2471:

completely wrong, if more people disagree with that rule then the rule wouldn't stand a chance to be there any more and you can't do anything about it ha!

267:

Take your OWN advices, oh wait I used the word "own" so you can't read correctly I am so sorry I mean take your comment and flush it down the toilet. LOLZ

154: 79: 6497: 6418: 6175: 4090: 1513:

for his conversion to the JW religion, whereas sources do not seem to indicate that Selena's membership of the JW religion is particularly significant.--

5519:

The album reached number one on Billboard's Regional Mexican Albums chart, and earned the accolade as the number-one Regional Mexican Album of The Year.

6153: 5928:(as it was a tv special) and getting it deleted is unlikely to happen. The article currently needs extensive work but I do think it is likely notable. 3826: 5442:

Selena was given $ 145,000 a year from Coca-Cola USA for three Spanish-language commercials in Mexico, including one in English for the United States.

3486:. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out 2842:

Artistry, stage/charisma, public image, products/endorsements, and her philanthropy sections are ALL missing! These are all important to the article.

6343: 5249:

Wow, a lot of that crap was allowed to stay in the article when it attained FA! (I've seen enough other Knowledge FA not to be surprised.) OK, it is

4831: 3743: 3537: 2247:

These sources talks about Selena being a role model and idol to Latinos should there be a new sub section for this or is it too small for inclusion?

1054:

OK, now that you've verified what sources say, please indicate below exactly how the text should appear, wikimarkup and all, and I can paste it in. ~

101: 4329:

NOR apologized for them. (In this regard, yesterday I created a section on the Talk page to call attention to a wrong headed revert by this editor).

929:

for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators

436: 6626: 6470: 3523: 3295:

I'm a guy, and secondly I was told to put the article for RFC. I'll start to improve what needs to be done since the majority here agrees with me.

4997:

One thing that's wrong with it grammatically is that it is two complete sentences (independent clauses) separated by a comma. That's known as a "

2720:

college courses through correspondence from a California school, that she was accepted in December 1990? - this was why she wanted to do fashion (

5670: 4422:

I'm going to try to rewrite the article again, removing some of the more trivial content and dubious content, while keeping some of Ajona edits.

4023: 1275:

So... Prince and Mickey Spillane were notable for their membership (well, primarily, at least) and Selena can't be in the category? Exactly who

4678: 2139:

suggesting her connection to the JW religion through her family did not have a significant bearing on her notability. As previously stated, the

6311:

became one of the best-selling Latin Albums of the United States, her success in the Latin world that led to her crossover deal, the impact of

3310: 2828:

for Sprite! It doesn't talk about Selena's perfume line and that it was stolen by Saldivar. What about in 1995, Selena became a billionaire?

1695: 1677: 1579: 1542: 1453: 1330: 1288: 424:

I would like to add "footnotes" to replace ciations that can't be sourced in this article. For more about what I am trying to say please visit

242:

Removing the links in other articles would be unproductive and it would appear that your intention is to be disruptive in an attempt to make a

6161: 5507:

Selena's works pave way for the "Tejano music movement" in Texas, wider audiences and record sales began to expand awareness for Tejano music.

3761: 518: 492: 5814:

AJona1992, can you dial it back a bit because you're coming off as defensive and bordering on rude. There's no reason to bring up stuff like

844: 6655: 4187: 3585: 3563: 2300: 956: 937:

from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.

6275: 4984: 4959: 4855:

I just looked at the Britney Spears article and there is no section about her product endorsements as far as I can tell (further, that's a

4200:

I recognize that this issue was previously discussed in July, under the title, FAR. But it seems to have gained more traction since then.

3329: 3219: 3149:

sentences (e.g. "Their efforts at spreading their names and talents paid off") must be amended; release date (1997) for the Jennifer Lopez

3127: 3056: 1937:

To satisfy the criteria in question, there would need to be some indication that Selena's religious beliefs are relevant to her notability

6201: 6122: 5775: 5706: 5392: 5228: 4943: 3602: 2107:

Understood, this is probably a somewhat minor point, and I'm not faulting anyone for not including it. For what little it might be worth,

866: 759: 718: 649: 589: 541: 5955: 5938: 5905: 5837: 5126: 5098: 4899: 4874: 4850: 3429: 3402: 3388: 3372: 2997: 2133: 2023:

a member, the criteria are not met. In case Selena's father becomes notable enough for his own article, it would be appropriate to place

4276:

its coverage. Yes its true the article went through a FAR but I was determined to expand the article. The article is just as lengthy as

2165: 2080: 1989: 1932: 816: 5662: 5314: 5189: 4697: 4647: 4607: 4529: 3256: 3237: 3205: 2881: 2747:

for Selena and that he did several duets with Selena on her albums, he also helped with writing the songs most of them #1 on Billboard

2337: 2320: 2285: 366: 276: 237: 133: 5070: 5053: 5040:

If someone's opinion is particularly noteworthy it should be presented in a way that makes it clear it is that person's opinion. See

5035: 5014: 4617: 3930: 3914: 3892: 3813: 3795: 3469:

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Knowledge is a

3027: 3009: 2636: 2612: 2591: 2564: 2542: 2519: 2480: 2465: 2427: 2409: 2232: 2218: 2191: 2102: 2061: 2004: 1903: 1879: 1860: 1832: 1806: 1779: 1270: 1228: 654:

If the information gets reverted, it maybe because you're not following an important policy or guideline, which in this case could be

6382: 6253: 5993: 5920:

being deleted...I think if someone has a problem with it, they should nominated it for deletion. Personally, I think it likely meets

5809: 5757: 4734: 4672: 4574: 4550: 4457: 4395: 4382:

would be guilty, because of what he complains about me. (6) If someone considers anything said in (1)–(5) to be a "personal attack",

4307: 4292:. I already had asked for permission to expand the article (if you had looked in the talk page) and you could see that the community 3716: 3687: 3623: 2987: 2973: 2950: 2908: 1314: 1162: 695:

Featured articles have very high standards which is why some of your edits may have been reverted in the past, and why I started the

6335: 6267:

please be more specific about what needs to be changed. If you're talking about the vandalism on the article it has been reverted. —

5632: 5355: 4496: 4443: 3304: 3178: 3110: 1764: 1733: 1703: 1685: 1611: 1587: 1573: 1550: 1531: 1485: 1461: 1407: 1383: 1296: 6281: 5735: 5721: 4717: 4702: 4296:

with my additions. This is the last time I will warn you. If you continue to insult others, I'll asked an admin to step in. Thanks

3286: 2772:? Selena helped OTHER Tejano singers sign with EMI Latin, oh and Selena was the FIRST artist to sign with that label! Next ---: --> 2372:

didn't want them to perform a BT on her which her father had said in an interview for TV Y Novelas magazine. Just to let you know,

1338: 1131: 1099: 1065: 1021: 941: 891: 384: 330: 314: 256: 217: 194: 175: 4474: 4251:

To the editor who has been complaining about my criticisms: pleased try to realize that the fact that this article is an official

3277: 3089:

to loose your FA status? Anyways, glad to see your back, however, I shouldn't be banned from Selena related articles, heck, I got

1233:

You seem to misunderstand the purpose and criteria of Knowledge categories about people. Removing someone from such a category is

1667: 6355: 5739: 4598:, but forgot to remove it from the body. Selena's been dead 16 years. In 2011 there are "Latin" artists more popular than her. 2887: 2868: 1639: 1174: 610:

Like I said before all information is from magazines (not on the internet) and TV specials (not on the internet) ok so what do

4926: 3784:

Yes, but is it different from the current statement "male opposition"? If so, I'll just replace it with "chauvinism". Thanks,

3066:

now. It doesn't need to go into great detail, and most of the stuff you mentioned are very trivial. It needs to be covered by

2992:

No, all the biographies listed above are outside the scope of the Women's History project. We're not even sure about adopting

6207: 4825: 3778: 3632:

lacking more directly in a sense of the responsibilities that are specifically the priorities at Knowledge, when it comes to

344: 5842:

Yea I'm sorry, I did said sorry if I was bordering as defensive. Actually the editor is, that's why I had brought those up.

5532:

In (or by) December 1994, the album Amor Prohibido sold more than 400,000 copies, which was "unheard of" for a Tejano artist

4138: 1837:

For a start, JWs don't go to church "every day". They have two (formerly three) meetings for worship each week. I have seen

1502:, which from the context is clearly not what I meant at all. The point is that sources indicate notability about Prince for 887: 6647: 6143: 6135: 4800: 3450: 1633: 414: 375:

Secondly, she has recorded her second album in "polka" so ha! source: "Selena Remembered" VHS. hahaha I win AGAIN ahhahaha

6706: 5445:

How Selena's father turned down beer companies from advertising Selena because of her image and had wanted it to be clean.

4160: 2710:

single documentary of Selena since 1995. The article also lacks about how Selena got into the music world, how her father

6107: 3875: 3480: 3153:

must be included, while one of the sources ("Etc") cited for that does not seem to carry relevant content; Selena had a "

2676: 2256: 667: 484: 93: 5260:

This encyclopedia article is not supposed to read like a real biography; it's not supposed to read like a fan Website.

3353: 2753:

By 1990, Selena was a millionaire and became a spokesperson for the Texas Prevention Partnership, sponsored by the TCADA

477: 6493: 6462: 6245: 6099: 4918: 3881:

This still needs a pronunciation visible on the lead as it once was. I'm not sure how to tweak the words though. Best,

3528:

OK, I didn't read the lower sections of the article. There are passages that need copyediting quite bad, admittedly. --

3062:

Oh AJona what now, u should be banned from any Selena article as you clearly have a huge bias against this article for

2820:

Selena's image helped her to stay in Coca-Cola after the company fired other celebrities only keeping Selena for Coke,

2305:

Stern did not apologise in his on-air statement in Spanish. He even said on the air that it was in no way an apology.

1237:

a statement claiming that they are not sincere members of a particular religion. It is an indication that they are not

5504:

The album remained on Billboard's Regional Mexican Albums for fifty-six weeks, an unprecedented feat for a Tejano act.

5374: 5207: 6404: 4661:

this article and I thought it would lower tension about WP:RS issues. But I do agree with you on the overkill. Best,

4129: 3693: 3505: 2761:

The album remained on Billboard's Regional Mexican Albums for fifty-six weeks, an unprecedented feat for a Tejano act

2361: 1784:

Your statement indicates that you either do not understand, or are deliberately ignoring, the very clear criteria at

876: 6663: 6374:

someday. However, today I request the addition of missing information and the expansion that will follow it. Best,

6074: 5606: 5172: 4086: 4010: 2381: 792: 5855: 2703:

established from the same book that was used in this article that had helped the article pass two FA nominations:

5988: 5950: 5900: 5804: 5752: 5657: 5627: 5601: 5387: 5350: 5285: 5184: 5121: 5065: 5059:

you are giving me advice on things I can't see instead of screaming and pointing fingers like other users. Best,

5030: 4979: 4938: 4894: 4845: 4795: 4729: 4667: 4545: 4491: 4438: 4302: 4182: 4124: 3925: 3887: 3790: 3682: 3618: 2501:

you are ignoring the criteria that are explicitly stated for inclusion in categories about people. That is all.--

2312: 5615: 5333: 5244: 5088:

she was successful had more to do with the catchy songs she released and the fact that she toured relentlessly.

1252:. If she were not notable for other reasons, we simply wouldn't know about her religion. That is the criteria.-- 4740: 2112: 1212: 1152: 1111: 1075: 1048: 1038: 1000: 390: 6489: 6394: 6061: 6015: 3839: 1320: 6339: 5041: 4885: 3497: 3487: 2658: 2242: 947:

Seriously all I see is "blah blah blah blah" lolz its so funny to see you here again lolz nice seeing you.

299: 6060:

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant

4139:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Selena#1990.E2.80.931993:_Selena.2C_Ven_Conmigo.2C_Entre_a_Mi_Mundo_and_Grammy_win

3992:

If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.

805:, which is unacceptable. I see no reason why Knowledge needs a to-the-minute account of Selena's death. — 6070: 5798:. BTW, sorry if this sounds a bit harsh in anyway just trying to reply to your comment about this. Best, 4631: 4509: 4082: 4006: 3282:

I'll also note that articles should still be improved where possible, even if the article is featured. –

2485:

It seems you have again missed the point. The sources do not indicate that being a JW is relevant to her

328: 297: 254: 215: 173: 6691:

I think it would be good to add the year the restaurant closed to give readers a sense of the timeline.

5178:

Why if users are improving it and are giving helpful insight on what needs to be done on the talk page?

2854: 5578: 4856: 3739: 3712: 3533: 3519: 3142: 38: 4685: 3978:

before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

2349: 6569:

the cited source does not state "Queen of Latin Music" at all, so I have removed this as unsourced -

6087: 5574: 3334: 3075: 2447:. There are not. Anyone interested can read the other lengthy threads already present at this page.-- 2116: 1746:. She didn't refuse a transfusion, and didn't die as a result of not receiving a blood transfusion.-- 934: 6651: 4156: 4099: 4039: 2711: 2343: 2175: 1692: 663: 483:

No need to merge. The "Death" section here LACKS information that the new article has. (AJona1992)

441: 6545:

probably a fan website. One thing I do not question is her being the "The Queen of Tejano Music".

5730:

I disagree with your removal of the content, however, I agree with what you said. The source is a

5436:

Sony Music Latin offered Selena's dad double the amount EMI Latin was offering for signing Selena.

3846: 3749: 3419:(it's at around 2:25). As such, I am going to remove this claim as it is attributed to this show. 6675:

To: Selena learned to sing when she was three years old. When she was nine, her father started

6599: 6519: 6434: 6223: 3228:

do what you honestly believe must be done! (And then be prepared for an avalanche of criticism!)-

3215: 3123: 3052: 2119:

indicates that Selena's professional work as a musician might have been unacceptable to the JWs.

488: 6466: 6190: 6179: 6103: 5886: 5882: 5878: 5874: 5870: 5370: 5234: 5203: 5148: 4432:

I really wish Hurmata could help out too. Like why just say things like that? Come and help :)

2815: 2690:, I would like to discuss the issues within the article and the issues that the article lacks. 2366: 1139: 969: 839: 713: 584: 513: 472: 396: 4210:

performer was similarly brief and he lived only four years longer than Selena. Hendrix was an

3752:. However, I just now know that the newspaper print is what I mistakenly written for. Thanks, 2182:

to be on that category even though sources says she was a JW and practice it then fine by me.

578:

article about her death. Why can't the relevant information be included in the main article?--

395:

I believe this category should be brought back (1) Selena released her first single entitled "

6719:

Nilou Panahpour (1995). "Rock and Roll yearbook, the best in music, movies, and television".

6291:

and is disorganized. The lead represents the present first then the past. Here's an example:

6157: 5935: 5834: 5526: 5407:

these following statements should be in the article, I would like to hear what others think:

5311: 5095: 4956: 4871: 4822: 4513: 3830: 3735: 3708: 3529: 3515: 3426: 3385: 3350: 3192:) , so if I had the ok to add such content from RS I'll do so and not bring any issues up at 3090: 2767:

in Texas that Selena helped boost album sales, bookings, and more? What about this statement

2129: 2076: 1928: 976:

Can someone remove "Dreaming of You" sold more than 400,000 copies in its first week beating

962: 71: 59: 5462:" became the highest charted (peaked at #8 on the Latin Regional Mexican Airplay chart) for 5439:

Al Aguilar, president of the Lionel Sosa agency declared Selena as "the next Janet Jackson".

5433:

Domination at the Tejano Music Awards (she won Female Vocalist for eight consecutive years).

4781:

this article. Also as a reminder, please do not address the issues with a user if it was in

1144:

Can someone remove the portals from the external links section, and fix citation 12 to work

6400: 6131: 6095: 5697:

ought to be deleted unless it was significant in some way other than it celebrated Selena.

5516:

sold 300,000 copies and became the first Tejano album by a female singer to sell that many.

5459: 4834:

was deleted we can't merge that section on there. Also other celebrities (singers) such as

4354:

that case, why is he confident that this article is in fine shape and needs only to become

4229: 3015: 2782: 2731: 2716: 2700: 2308: 1126: 1094: 1060: 1016: 989: 980:'s record for the most sold album in a week and also outperforming that weeks top charters 922: 899: 895: 399:" in 1979 and (2) Selena began singing live in concerts beginning the late 1970s. (Source: 289:

Is there any source (or mention) anywhere that supports that she was a Polka musician? --

1279:

notable for just being a Jehovah's Witness and nothing else? I think you are reading the

640:

want me to do? I can't do ANYTHING here because everyone disagree with me and my actions.

8: 6380: 6199: 6120: 5991: 5953: 5903: 5807: 5755: 5660: 5630: 5604: 5390: 5353: 5218: 5187: 5162: 5124: 5068: 5033: 4982: 4941: 4897: 4848: 4798: 4732: 4670: 4548: 4494: 4441: 4305: 4185: 4152: 4127: 3928: 3890: 3793: 3757: 3685: 3621: 3581: 3398: 3368: 3325: 3300: 3252: 3233: 3201: 3174: 3106: 3023: 2983: 2946: 2877: 2864: 2850: 2790: 2778: 2672: 2608: 2560: 2476: 2423: 2377: 2357: 2333: 2281: 2252: 2228: 2187: 2098: 2000: 1875: 1828: 1775: 1449: 1433: 1424:"? You simply contradict yourself by making an "exception" for Prince, while "Selena is 1310: 1224: 1168: 952: 938: 862: 755: 645: 537: 432: 410: 380: 362: 310: 272: 233: 190: 150: 3210:

Okay so who is saying you're not allowed to add new content per your suggestions above?

2978:

I'm not going to do that, I'm not part of the project just to remove banners like that.

703:

does not mean that you should create a separate article to put them in. That would be a

557:

available, so if you want to include the information, cite it to those reliable sources.

6676: 5925: 5795: 5049: 5010: 4723:

Can you explain what needs to be removed (and maybe moved to his own article)? Thanks,

4653:

You was not the only user who complained about the lack of sources. So I added more in

4114: 3910: 3871: 3862: 3809: 3774: 3731: 3211: 3119: 3048: 3005: 2632: 2587: 2538: 2515: 2461: 2405: 2214: 2161: 2057: 1985: 1899: 1856: 1802: 1760: 1729: 1663: 1607: 1569: 1527: 1481: 1403: 1379: 1266: 1208: 1006:

Um, you want that line removed because you don't have the source? Aren't old issues of

802: 284: 6331: 4277: 3442:

Wow, I have never seen so many spelling/grammatical errors in one Knowledge article...

3189: 3157:

relationship" with Coca Cola -or, better yet, a "collaboration"; etc. But, in sum,

1305:

agree with Doc here are you just only picking people you want to put in the category?

6574: 6485: 6019: 5921: 5890: 5851: 5847: 5771: 5731: 5717: 5702: 5363: 5281: 5196: 5002: 4713: 4693: 4643: 4603: 4570: 4525: 4470: 4453: 4413: 4391: 4265: 4238: 4219: 4043: 3645: 3598: 3559: 3501: 3493: 3098: 2993: 2955:

You, or anyone, is welcome to remove the project if the subject is not within scope.

2825: 1699: 1681: 1583: 1546: 1457: 1436:- not famous for being a baseball player before a JW? Policy trumps guidelines, and 1334: 1292: 1145: 834: 806: 708: 704: 579: 508: 467: 463: 401: 5866: 5859: 4747:

do not add more needless sections of the same issues as it is flooding the talk page

4623: 4288:. You're only argument that is valid is the prose. Instead of complaining about it, 2391:, but it is irrelevant to the scope of whether Selena was herself notable as a JW.-- 2387:

This has been covered previously. Selena's father objected to the blood transfusion

6702: 5930: 5829: 5648: 5513: 5501:" became the first Tejano album recorded by a female artist to achieve gold status. 5411:

Information about Marcella having a tumor and that doctors had wanted to remove it.

5326: 5306: 5090: 4951: 4866: 4817: 3576:? I already requested three Selena-related pages there which is the limit. Thanks, 3421: 3380: 3345: 2922: 2799: 2774: 2748: 2125: 2072: 2031: 1924: 451: 447: 6317: 5917: 5694: 5564:

Selena is regarded as one of the most widely known Mexican-American vocal artists.

4686:

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/search/?title=Selena&oldid=454866985

4248:

jungle of footnotes. The markup version seems to be more footnotes than content.

4228:

One of many bizarre and/or atrocious passages: "While teaching, Selena's brother,

3699:

Selena had to face male coliseum in traditional barriers in the Latin music world.

2111:

says that she shortly prior to her death taken up Bible study which, according to

926: 886:

it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

6393:

in Washington, D.C. - her inclusion in the "American Cool" exhibit, which is 100

6294:

She was called "The Queen of Tejano music" and the Mexican equivalent of Madonna.

6269: 5819: 5786: 5490:

She became a spokesperson for the Texas Prevention Partnership, sponsored by the

5475:" became Selena's first charted single August 1987. (not sure whats the peak per 5414:

That Selena was thought to be a boy and her parents were going for "Marc Antony".

4774: 4762: 4635: 4627: 4285: 4211: 3665: 2968: 2903: 2836: 2600: 2573:

agree, so your hypothetical contention is irrelevant. Please just stop arguing.--

1819:. After her death, her father did not approve of blood transfusions due to their 1452:, and so far 2 editors want her in and 1 wants her out. Start citing, please... 1159: 985: 830: 455: 326: 295: 252: 243: 213: 171: 126: 6395:"public figures who point up the richness and depth of American popular culture" 5973: 5423:

How Selena was discriminated for being a female singer in a male-dominate genre.

3902: 918:

be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6375: 6307: 6288: 6194: 6115: 6054: 6040: 5983: 5945: 5895: 5799: 5747: 5652: 5622: 5596: 5585: 5481: 5464: 5449: 5382: 5345: 5214: 5179: 5158: 5116: 5112: 5060: 5025: 4974: 4933: 4889: 4840: 4835: 4790: 4766: 4724: 4662: 4540: 4536: 4486: 4433: 4405: 4297: 4289: 4177: 4119: 4064: 3983: 3920: 3882: 3785: 3753: 3677: 3656: 3613: 3577: 3573: 3394: 3364: 3321: 3316: 3296: 3248: 3229: 3225: 3197: 3170: 3102: 3085: 3019: 2979: 2942: 2934: 2873: 2846: 2811: 2786: 2744: 2739: 2668: 2604: 2556: 2472: 2419: 2373: 2353: 2329: 2277: 2248: 2224: 2183: 2094: 1996: 1957: 1871: 1824: 1771: 1306: 1220: 948: 858: 751: 641: 533: 428: 406: 376: 358: 306: 268: 229: 186: 162: 146: 5020: 3855: 3412: 6301: 6047: 6043:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

5815: 5782: 5641: 5340: 5084: 5045: 5006: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4770: 4658: 4654: 4482: 4071: 4067:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

3996: 3987: 3975: 3906: 3901:

I added the IPA pronunciation and respelling according to the conventions at

3867: 3858: 3805: 3770: 3673: 3669: 3193: 3146: 3001: 2805: 2699:

Here are some pointers of missing content in the article that have all their

2687: 2619: 2574: 2525: 2502: 2448: 2392: 2201: 2148: 2044: 1972: 1886: 1843: 1789: 1747: 1716: 1650: 1594: 1556: 1514: 1468: 1437: 1425: 1390: 1366: 1325: 1284: 1253: 1245: 1195: 1121: 1089: 1055: 1031: 1011: 696: 340: 6067:

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image

6570: 6459:

Please lower main picture size and correct spelling errors in description.

6297: 5767: 5743: 5713: 5698: 5547: 5292: 5277: 4998: 4709: 4689: 4639: 4599: 4566: 4521: 4466: 4449: 4409: 4387: 4281: 4261: 4234: 4215: 4110: 4105: 3641: 3609: 3594: 3555: 3283: 3274: 3067: 2956: 2926: 2891: 2011: 981: 977: 784: 554: 459: 1786:

Knowledge:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality#General

1644:

Knowledge:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality#General

1179:

Knowledge:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality#General

6698: 5843: 5612: 5498: 5330: 5241: 5107: 4614: 4423: 3655:

Actually the article is referenced (not referenced enough I'll say). Per

3072: 2794: 2756: 2721: 2681: 2436:. What matters is whether there are sources supporting your opinion that 1149: 1108: 1072: 1045: 1035: 997: 993: 801:: Merge the articles as best as you can. The death article seems to be a 655: 547: 47: 17: 6114:

Because only her studio albums are needed, those were LP records. Best,

5430:" had led Selena to appear as musical guests on the Johnny Canales Show. 5195:

I have reverted, per that discussion, to the October 13, 2010 version.

5155:

Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review#Double_checking_before_nominating

4169: 3723: 3707:

is supposed to stand for, therefore I hesitate to try and correct it. --

2352:, can it be moved to the article or are there current problems with it? 6643: 5969: 3974:; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review 3676:

others then I'll just simply bring an admin to help defuse this. Best,

3094: 2821: 1324:(deceased) have one reference each that they are a Jehovah's Witness. 324: 293: 250: 211: 169: 118: 5976:

and was considered the "Most-Watched NFL Season Ever among Hispanics"

5529:" (song) was nominated for a Grammy Award as well as the album itself. 4535:

Can you say "Jona" or "AJona1992" like everyone else? Thanks, btw per

3962:

Knowledge files with no non-free use rationale as of 11 September 2011

3145:. I also think that there are some minor items that need to be fixed: 425: 5894:

that was clearly stated by three editors for any improvements. Best,

4594:

the most popular Latin artist! A third editor has removed this claim

3363:

book. I doubt she was a billionaire however, it said so in the book.

2938: 6366:. That section also does not mention the record-breaking ratings of 4408:. This article doesn't need copy editing, it needs content editing. 6488:. You'll need to be more specific about the other changes. Thanks, 5858:. However, since the article was reverted by SandyGerogia, Hurmata 5472: 3960:, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: 1638:

Is Selena's JW membership notable enough for inclusion in category

1071:"Dreaming of You" sold more than 330,000 copies in its first week, 336: 6642:

I think not, there are other artists that have that title such as

6008: 5621:

Alright, we can cross that off the list :) What about the others?

5567:

Selena was most popular Latin artist in the United States in 1995.

4137:

This sentence (found in the beginning of the last paragraph here:

4032: 3949: 1177:

is against the criteria for inclusion in categories about people.

357:

Ugh you guys love to team up on me, well I don't really care haha

5968:

I would also like to point out that the concert outperformed the

5427: 5322: 4590:

reporting that she had been shot dead, didn't even state she was

2930: 2551:

of the contributors of Knowledge disagrees with a rule, the rule

1673:

A Google search of "Selena Jehovah's Witness" turns up a few hits

996:

the book source, the other Ajona edit after that is fine. Thanks

89:

List all of Selena awards: Furia Musical, other Mexican Awards..

4880: 4624:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Selena&oldid=454807253

3473:, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the 2727:

1990–1993: Selena, Ven Conmigo, Entre a Mi Mundo and Grammy win

2108: 1713: 6603: 6523: 6438: 6092:

Why has her early discography been deleted from the articles?

5693:

dedicated to, say, each Beatles concert ever. Accordingly, the

5561:

That Selena specials air annually on Spanish-speaking channels.

4196:

Why the Featured Article status should be questioned. Fall 2011

3150: 1738:

Additionally, Selena did receive a blood transfusion, to which

826: 700: 4973:

be deleted, reworded or just remove then what would that be?

4481:

I didn't use rollback to undo your edits because they were in

3903:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Pronunciation_respelling_key

1941:

a verifiable reliable source indicating either a) a statement

5491: 2759:

is fine as it states ONE of the success but what about this?

5794:

information could be added, just as long as it doesn't fail

3941:

File:ConcertAustinTexas945.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

2200:

source in which Selena personally self-identified as a JW?--

1148:

and the date when the article was published April 16, 1997.

6680: 5555: 3769:

The word that was mistaken for "coliseum" is "chauvinism".

3664:

editors and myself who expanded the article? This is not a

3470: 2777:

hated her because Selena was winning all the awards at the

2493:

how her religion is relevant to her notability, not simply

115:

please be more specific about what needs to be changed. --

6646:. But don't get me wrong selena was a great latina artist. 6587: 6507: 6422: 6211: 6053:

If the image has already been deleted you may want to try

5869:. These examples are WP:OWN, esp when the editor has been 3995:

If the image has already been deleted you may want to try

1953:

a member. None of the criteria have been satisfied so far.

1186:, there seems to be no indication that her being a JW has 4622:

This is to discuss my partially reverting the article to

3162: 890:

if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or

574:

You still haven't given a reason why there needs to be a

4917:

feminine beauty, she also started that movement." Right.

1960:'s concern about alleged disparity about 'the girl from 6371: 6152:

any chance of a decent pic of what Selena looked like?

5611:

How Selena Gomez was named by Selena is kinda trivial.

3071:

vandalism and what not. I consider your concerns moot.

2066:

Just to say that I did find an at least marginally RS,

1945:(not from someone else on her behalf) stating that she 6326:, becoming the first Hispanic act to do so. And this " 4260:, in its state as of two days ago, is simply no good. 3822:

what did Selena look like? any chance of a decent pic?

3748:

Here's the link of the episode (9:13) where it states

783:

not deserve its own article, is the same information.

161:"official" site. It seems like that site falls under 6584:

Nickname "Queen of Latin Music" is not being disputed

4638:

is "Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point".

2785:

to me. This article also doesn't talk about Selena's

1694:. I would think it's notable based on that alone... 5455:

EMI didn't believe Selena was "crossover potential".

2147:

based on the criteria for categories about people.--

450:

has been created. This article is only 35.5 kb, and

6170:

Category:American people of Native American descent

6046:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 6000:

File:Selena Linda.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

5854:told everyone that consensus should be made before 4586:— sixteen years ago! And at least one of them, the 4070:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 2497:. It doesn't matter whether you (or others) agree, 5581:". Can they also be divided like it once was with 5005:which of course started well before she was born. 3804:I think it's fine as it is, no need to change it. 2618:to me. So, if anyone is 'trolling'... Just stop.-- 1971:objected to a blood transfusion after the event.-- 6723:(724/725). Straight Arrow Publishers Company: 64. 6504:Nickname "Queen of Latin Music" is being disputed 5695:article on the tenth anniversary memorial concert 3165:, though.) If I were obliged to judge its status 2734:" being Selena's FIRST charted song to appear on 1495:" as some kind of suggestion that the others are 1360:that the person's membership of the religion has 6718: 6328:Selena and her band received yet more accolades 5339:I agree with Secret, I just don't want to do a 4233:implies Selena was the one doing the teaching. 2818:, it was worth 20 million dollars! And ---: --> 5153:I have opened a discussion on this article at 4932:That sentence is sourced whats wrong with it? 4556:this time, you have not shown where the claim 4386:deserve to be blocked from editing Knowledge. 4378:is not in itself a personal attack. Otherwise 5570:A "Philanthropy" section needs to be written. 5291:Aside from a lot of the trivial details that 4859:argument). Be that as it may, the section in 4104:I just completed one-in-half days of finding 6018:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 4284:and its lead is the same size as FA article 3413:"in the last year of her life, she became a 2773:Did you know the women who murdered Selena, 2706:1971–1989: Early life and career beginnings 548:The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is 305:"Tejano music" is blended with Polka music. 140:reverting back "official" web site of Selena 80:Edit request from 63.231.116.52, 23 May 2010 6419:Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2014 5329:. I honestly don't like how this is going. 3853:her father clearly pronounces it that way. 6397:Which is probably a bigger honor anyway. 6388:"Coolest Americans in History" attribution 5420:How Selena learned Spanish (phonetically). 3856:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWBfWqKHHZo 3479:The Knowledge community encourages you to 2998:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Women's History 2348:I have expanded this section located here 165:. BTW, the revert put in a bad link. -- 5573:The "Discography" section needs to have " 5300:) clearly stated she eventually became a 4789:and/or an admin action would help. Best, 3919:Thanks for adding the correct one. Best, 1027:I can't verify if the book exists or not 6668:I think this part needs to be reworded. 5647:template for the "death" section to the 5417:How Selena was discovered by her father. 4366:how the criticism is not a criticism of 4148:I think it would read better like this: 3159:no Knowledge article needs to be perfect 2667:? Thanks, I need all the help possible, 6484:I set the image to 200px as advised in 5671:Whether to report on a memorial concert 4024:File:Finale1.jpg Nominated for Deletion 3169:, I would cautiously keep it Featured.- 3018:it is included. I'll sure will thanks, 1949:as a JW or b) a statement that she was 1416:someone's religion, that can go in the 1348:someone's religion, that can go in the 14: 6547:2602:306:CC23:2D20:AC7E:CF02:22E5:9CA3 5916:can become a dime a dozen. As for the 4079:This notification is provided by a Bot 4003:This notification is provided by a Bot 3311:Discussion expansion made by AJona1992 2489:. There would need to be sources that 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5856:editing/improving the article further 4176:thanks for you're suggestions. Best, 4042:, has been nominated for deletion at 1640:Category:American Jehovah's Witnesses 1175:Category:American Jehovah's Witnesses 888:"using copyrighted works from others" 420:Adding "footnotes" instead of sources 6694:There needs to be a link to "fair." 5487:By 1990, Selena became a millionaire 5452:requested for the crossover in 1989. 5399:These could help improve the article 5263:Anecdotes can be appropriate to use 4503:Citation overkill and other excesses 3851:the host Johnny Canales consistently 2751:. And where is this in the article? 2730:The article fails to discuss about " 1173:Inclusion of Selena in the Category 553:". It sounds like you have a lot of 246:. Doing so is not a good idea. -- 25: 6050:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 5865:information found in "Legacy" that 5362:upgraded the right way this time. 4810:products, but I have yet to see an 4074:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 3498:New contributors are always welcome 825:Ok, I've redirected the article to 668:Knowledge:Referencing for beginners 23: 6062:image page (File:Selena Linda.jpg) 4761:. While addressing, please do not 3506:many reasons why you might want to 2686:Before I nominate the article for 2414:Then I would disagree that she is 446:I'm not sure why a new article at 24: 6754: 4214:of mass culture; Selena was not. 3496:to try out your editing skills. 2178:and if you feel that she doesn't 1283:criteria far too literally. See 925:from that source. Please see our 658:. Magazines and television shows 6591: 6560: 6511: 6476: 6426: 6282:Request for expansion of article 6259: 6215: 6007: 5554:That Selena's music is liked by 4703:Focus on her father is excessive 4168: 4141:) seems oddly structured to me: 4113:and simultaneously nominated at 4048:Deletion requests September 2011 4031: 3948: 3722: 3670:instead of improving the article 3464: 3411:episode on YouTube and it said, 892:"donating copyrighted materials" 107: 29: 6014:An image used in this article, 5883:admin tried to talk to the user 5274:The hospital Selena was born in 4038:An image used in this article, 3986:then you may need to provide a 3956:An image used in this article, 3865:) 01:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC) 3161:! (We do take special care for 2863:Also note that Selena was just 2495:mention her religion in passing 2295:Spin Magazine August 1995 issue 1420:but it doesn't quality for the 1352:but it doesn't quality for the 6736: 6727: 6712: 4374:. (5) Criticizing an editor's 4091:09:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC) 4015:19:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC) 3958:File:ConcertAustinTexas945.jpg 3893:06:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC) 3762:23:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 3586:23:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 2432:It doesn't matter whether you 2286:15:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 2257:15:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1990:08:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1933:18:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1904:22:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1880:13:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1861:13:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1833:13:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1807:13:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1780:13:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1765:10:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1734:09:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1704:07:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1686:06:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1668:04:57, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1612:09:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1588:06:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1574:04:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1551:04:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1532:05:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1486:04:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1462:04:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1408:04:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1384:04:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1339:02:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 1315:01:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 1297:01:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 1271:22:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1229:14:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1213:08:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1163:08:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1153:04:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1132:00:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 1112:22:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1100:22:31, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1076:22:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1066:21:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1049:21:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1039:21:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1022:21:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 1001:20:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 13: 1: 6372:this Knowledge article on her 6208:Edit request on 24 April 2013 5746:and could be replaced. Best, 3744:09:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC) 3538:09:14, 5 September 2011 (UTC) 2350:User:AJona1992/sandbox#Legacy 2338:03:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 2321:11:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 1815:birthday, she went to church 867:21:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 6707:02:58, 26 October 2014 (UTC) 6656:17:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 6162:12:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 6144:02:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 5994:03:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC) 5956:17:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC) 5939:21:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 5906:13:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 5838:04:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 5810:14:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5776:06:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5758:02:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5722:02:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5707:01:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5663:03:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 5633:14:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5616:03:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 5607:21:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 5393:14:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 5375:14:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 5356:13:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 5334:08:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC) 5315:00:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 5286:21:52, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 5245:21:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 5229:01:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 5208:23:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5190:22:44, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5173:21:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5127:22:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5099:22:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5071:17:30, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5054:16:34, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5036:14:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 5015:04:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 4985:14:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 4960:21:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4944:17:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4927:15:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4900:14:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 4886:Public image of David Irving 4875:21:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4851:17:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4826:00:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 4801:17:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC) 4753:concerns that you have with 4735:17:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4718:05:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4698:10:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 4673:17:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4648:05:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4618:04:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4608:04:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4584:around the time of her death 4575:04:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 4551:01:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 4530:18:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4497:01:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC) 4475:18:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4458:18:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4444:16:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4427:16:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4418:12:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4396:11:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 4308:14:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 4270:10:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 4243:09:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 4224:09:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC) 4188:14:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 4161:14:10, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 4130:18:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 3931:18:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 3915:18:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 3876:17:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 3814:17:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 3796:16:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 3779:15:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 3688:13:56, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 3668:to just talk down to others 3650:13:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 3624:13:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 3603:12:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 3564:12:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 2362:22:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 1634:RfC: Notability for category 1034:for a week so mention that. 914:. Accordingly, the material 7: 6635:17:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC) 6618:to reactivate your request. 6606:has been answered. Set the 6538:to reactivate your request. 6526:has been answered. Set the 6453:to reactivate your request. 6441:has been answered. Set the 6296:However, other FAs such as 6238:to reactivate your request. 6226:has been answered. Set the 4046:in the following category: 3835:08:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 3717:15:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 3524:14:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 3459:05:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 3430:22:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 3403:21:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 3389:21:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 3373:21:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 3354:20:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 2964:. Grammatically incorrect? 2899:. Grammatically incorrect? 2869:WikiProject Women's History 2806:1997 film based on her life 2233:04:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC) 2219:00:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC) 2192:19:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 2174:Selena's father has a page 2166:09:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 2134:22:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC) 2103:18:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC) 2081:18:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC) 2062:01:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC) 2005:22:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 1107:The album and I edited it. 1010:available in the library? ~ 957:18:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 942:17:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 845:09:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 817:03:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 793:22:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 760:16:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 719:08:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 650:03:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 590:16:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 542:17:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 519:08:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 493:03:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 478:21:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 437:13:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC) 10: 6759: 6579:14:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC) 6555:21:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 6413:05:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 6276:19:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 6254:18:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC) 6202:01:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC) 6184:01:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 6079:08:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 6055:Commons Undeletion Request 6022:for the following reason: 5637:BTW you think you can add 5579:Selena singles discography 4679:"Selena's death reactions" 3572:Can someone request it at 2677:17:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 2663:Can anyone help me by c/e 1500:notable for their religion 927:guideline on non-free text 6498:16:22, 13 June 2014 (UTC) 6471:13:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC) 6123:12:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 6108:00:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 5575:Selena albums discography 4879:Oh I'm sorry I had meant 3694:Incomprehensible sentence 3500:. You don't even need to 3359:The source came from the 3330:08:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 3305:00:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 3287:23:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 3278:23:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 3257:19:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 3238:09:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 3220:07:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 3206:15:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 3179:09:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 3128:09:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 3111:06:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 3076:06:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 3057:05:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 3028:22:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 3010:22:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2988:22:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2974:22:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2970:See terms and conditions. 2951:22:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2909:21:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2905:See terms and conditions. 2882:21:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2855:19:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 2637:01:05, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 2613:00:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 2592:00:20, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 2565:23:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 2543:11:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 2520:11:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 2481:14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 2466:14:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 2428:14:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 2410:13:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 2382:13:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 906:, but not as a source of 877:Copyright problem removed 415:20:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 385:21:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 367:21:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 345:20:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 331:20:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 315:19:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 300:17:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 277:13:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 257:16:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 238:15:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC) 218:18:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 195:15:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 176:23:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 155:21:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 6664:editing change requested 6490:Older and ... well older 6346:. But what about all of 4749:instead, please address 2886:It was removed because " 2712:Abraham Quintanilla, Jr. 2301:Howard Stern's "apology" 2176:Abraham Quintanilla, Jr. 1158:Uncontroversial. Done. 664:Knowledge:Citing sources 550:verifiability, not truth 134:18:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 102:07:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 6383:18:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5689:ridiculous, to have an 5550:was named after Selena. 4777:, remember that no one 3014:Actually, according to 2223:You can drop this now. 2015:indicating that Selena 1649:See Talk section above. 1493:other than her religion 1430:other than her religion 1250:other than her religion 458:(main article 178 kb), 6071:CommonsNotificationBot 4741:What needs to be done? 4083:CommonsNotificationBot 4007:CommonsNotificationBot 2941:who are in the scope. 2816:Dos mujeres, un camino 2763:. Damn what about the 2569:So what? The majority 2019:as JW or that she was 391:Category:1970s singers 6244:Her name is changed. 6016:File:Selena Linda.jpg 4964:That sentence is not 3840:correct pronunciation 3730:Thanks for the help, 3091:Amor Prohibido (song) 2068:Entertainment Weekly, 86:{{editsemiprotected}} 42:of past discussions. 6024:Copyright violations 5691:encyclopedia article 5460:Contigo Quiero Estar 4632:WP:Citation overkill 4510:WP:Citation overkill 4368:words in the article 4118:to them asap. Best, 3504:(although there are 2732:Contigo Quiero Estar 2717:The New Girl in Town 2659:Copy-editing request 2243:Selena a Latino Idol 4857:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 3976:deletion guidelines 3407:I just watched the 2779:Tejano Music Awards 1434:Jerry Hairston, Jr. 1242:for that membership 898:, we cannot accept 614:want me to do then? 546:Ok, first of all, " 6699:Rissa, copy editor 6677:Selena y Los Dinos 6048:fair use rationale 5781:Ok, (1) you don't 5551: 4072:fair use rationale 3988:fair use rationale 3732:User:Arno Matthias 3489:how to edit a page 2824:for Diet Coke and 2009:Unless there is a 1642:per criteria 4 at 803:memorial to Selena 6622: 6621: 6542: 6541: 6457: 6456: 6403:comment added by 6242: 6241: 6189:There's a source 6134:comment added by 6098:comment added by 6088:Early Discography 6085: 6084: 6028:What should I do? 6020:Wikimedia Commons 5887:last warning made 5852:User:Brianboulton 5848:User:SandyGeorgia 5734:source, however, 5545: 5225: 5169: 5019:I just looked at 5003:Feminist movement 4588:Victoria Advocate 4327:specific passages 4097: 4096: 4052:What should I do? 4044:Wikimedia Commons 4021: 4020: 3967:What should I do? 3659:the lead section 3552:best of Knowledge 3484:in updating pages 3335:Billionaire claim 2994:Christine Lagarde 2826:Christopher Cross 2311:comment added by 2115:a JW taught, but 2034:'s concern about 1962:Saved By the Bell 1842:already stated.-- 1190:relevance to her 1130: 1098: 1064: 1020: 894:if you are.) For 464:Joseph Smith, Jr. 402:Selena Remembered 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6750: 6743: 6740: 6734: 6731: 6725: 6724: 6716: 6613: 6609: 6595: 6594: 6588: 6568: 6564: 6563: 6533: 6529: 6515: 6514: 6508: 6480: 6479: 6448: 6444: 6430: 6429: 6423: 6415: 6378: 6329: 6295: 6274: 6263: 6262: 6233: 6229: 6219: 6218: 6212: 6197: 6146: 6118: 6110: 6039:If the image is 6011: 6004: 6003: 5986: 5948: 5933: 5898: 5867:passed at WP:FAC 5832: 5802: 5750: 5655: 5649:Murder of Selena 5646: 5640: 5625: 5599: 5590: 5584: 5514:Entre a Mi Mundo 5385: 5367: 5348: 5309: 5223: 5200: 5182: 5167: 5119: 5093: 5063: 5028: 4977: 4954: 4936: 4892: 4869: 4843: 4820: 4793: 4773:to illustrate a 4727: 4665: 4657:because I don't 4543: 4489: 4436: 4300: 4253:featured article 4180: 4172: 4122: 4100:Expansion Part 2 4063:If the image is 4040:File:Finale1.jpg 4035: 4028: 4027: 3982:If the image is 3952: 3945: 3944: 3923: 3885: 3788: 3736:Florian Blaschke 3726: 3709:Florian Blaschke 3680: 3616: 3530:Florian Blaschke 3516:Florian Blaschke 3477:link at the top. 3468: 3467: 3424: 3383: 3348: 3068:reliable sources 2962: 2959: 2923:Yolanda Saldivar 2897: 2894: 2800:Entre a Mi Mundo 2775:Yolanda Saldivar 2749:Hot Latin Tracks 2629: 2624: 2584: 2579: 2535: 2530: 2512: 2507: 2458: 2453: 2402: 2397: 2344:Legacy expansion 2323: 2211: 2206: 2158: 2153: 2054: 2049: 2027:in the category. 1982: 1977: 1966: 1896: 1891: 1853: 1848: 1799: 1794: 1757: 1752: 1726: 1721: 1660: 1655: 1604: 1599: 1566: 1561: 1524: 1519: 1478: 1473: 1400: 1395: 1376: 1371: 1263: 1258: 1205: 1200: 1143: 1124: 1092: 1058: 1014: 973: 842: 837: 813: 810: 790: 787: 716: 711: 587: 582: 555:reliable sources 516: 511: 475: 470: 442:Merge discussion 323: 292: 249: 210: 168: 132: 129: 124: 121: 111: 110: 88: 87: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6758: 6757: 6753: 6752: 6751: 6749: 6748: 6747: 6746: 6742:Patoski pg. 199 6741: 6737: 6732: 6728: 6717: 6713: 6666: 6611: 6607: 6592: 6586: 6561: 6559: 6531: 6527: 6512: 6506: 6477: 6446: 6442: 6427: 6421: 6398: 6390: 6376: 6327: 6313:Dreaming of You 6292: 6284: 6268: 6260: 6231: 6227: 6216: 6210: 6195: 6172: 6129: 6116: 6093: 6090: 6002: 5984: 5946: 5944:concert. Best, 5931: 5896: 5830: 5800: 5748: 5673: 5653: 5651:article? Best, 5644: 5638: 5623: 5597: 5588: 5582: 5448:Jose Behar and 5383: 5365: 5346: 5307: 5237: 5222: 5198: 5180: 5166: 5151: 5117: 5091: 5061: 5026: 4975: 4952: 4934: 4890: 4867: 4841: 4832:Selena products 4818: 4791: 4743: 4725: 4705: 4681: 4663: 4541: 4505: 4487: 4434: 4298: 4286:Michael Jackson 4278:Beyoncé Knowles 4212:Evariste Galois 4198: 4178: 4120: 4102: 4026: 3997:Deletion Review 3943: 3921: 3883: 3842: 3824: 3786: 3696: 3678: 3614: 3514:on your own. -- 3465: 3444: 3422: 3381: 3346: 3337: 3313: 3190:Beyoncé Knowles 3143:Featured status 2960: 2957: 2895: 2892: 2787:signature songs 2765:Tejano Movement 2684: 2661: 2625: 2620: 2580: 2575: 2531: 2526: 2508: 2503: 2454: 2449: 2438:her activities 2398: 2393: 2389:after the event 2369: 2346: 2306: 2303: 2268:August 17, 2002 2245: 2207: 2202: 2154: 2149: 2050: 2045: 2017:self-identified 2012:reliable source 1978: 1973: 1964: 1947:self-identified 1892: 1887: 1849: 1844: 1795: 1790: 1753: 1748: 1744:after the event 1722: 1717: 1656: 1651: 1636: 1600: 1595: 1562: 1557: 1520: 1515: 1474: 1469: 1396: 1391: 1372: 1367: 1259: 1254: 1201: 1196: 1171: 1137: 1086:Dreaming of You 986:Michael Jackson 967: 965: 879: 840: 835: 831:Death of Selena 811: 808: 788: 785: 714: 709: 585: 580: 514: 509: 473: 468: 456:Michael Jackson 452:Death of Selena 448:Death of Selena 444: 422: 393: 321: 290: 287: 247: 208: 166: 142: 127: 125: 119: 116: 108: 85: 84: 82: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6756: 6745: 6744: 6735: 6733:Patoski pg 199 6726: 6710: 6685: 6665: 6662: 6661: 6660: 6659: 6658: 6648:192.107.136.16 6620: 6619: 6596: 6585: 6582: 6540: 6539: 6516: 6505: 6502: 6501: 6500: 6455: 6454: 6431: 6420: 6417: 6389: 6386: 6324:Amor Prohibido 6308:Amor Prohibido 6283: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6240: 6239: 6220: 6209: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6171: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6136:75.190.144.132 6126: 6125: 6089: 6086: 6083: 6082: 6058: 6057: 6051: 6044: 6030: 6029: 6012: 6001: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5966: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5725: 5724: 5672: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5593: 5592: 5571: 5568: 5565: 5562: 5559: 5552: 5543: 5539: 5536: 5533: 5530: 5527:Amor Prohibido 5523: 5520: 5517: 5511: 5508: 5505: 5502: 5495: 5488: 5485: 5482:Pete Astudillo 5479: 5469: 5456: 5453: 5450:Stephen Finfer 5446: 5443: 5440: 5437: 5434: 5431: 5424: 5421: 5418: 5415: 5412: 5401: 5400: 5396: 5395: 5359: 5358: 5318: 5317: 5236: 5235:Recent removal 5233: 5232: 5231: 5219: 5213:Thanks Sandy, 5193: 5192: 5163: 5150: 5149:FAR discussion 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5130: 5129: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4989: 4988: 4987: 4914: 4913: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4836:Britney Spears 4812:entire section 4807: 4742: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4704: 4701: 4680: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4514:WP:Bombardment 4504: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4478: 4477: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4311: 4310: 4197: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4153:PrintedScholar 4147: 4134: 4101: 4098: 4095: 4094: 4076: 4075: 4068: 4054: 4053: 4036: 4025: 4022: 4019: 4018: 4000: 3999: 3993: 3990: 3969: 3968: 3953: 3942: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3896: 3895: 3847:this interview 3841: 3838: 3823: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3799: 3798: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3695: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3589: 3588: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3548: 3510: 3509: 3478: 3475:edit this page 3451:71.204.165.254 3443: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3336: 3333: 3312: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3222: 3182: 3181: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3060: 3059: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 2935:Jennifer Lopez 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2831:Controversies 2812:Amor Prohibido 2745:back up dancer 2740:Pete Astudillo 2697: 2696: 2683: 2680: 2665:Selena Sandbox 2660: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2522: 2368: 2367:JW category #2 2365: 2345: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2302: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2271: 2270: 2265: 2263:March 26, 2005 2244: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2028: 1954: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1736: 1710: 1688: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1488: 1386: 1317: 1184:raised as a JW 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1146:WP:MOS#ALLCAPS 1135: 1134: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1069: 1068: 1025: 1024: 964: 961: 960: 959: 939:Moonriddengirl 878: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 850: 849: 848: 847: 820: 819: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 524: 523: 522: 521: 502: 501: 500: 499: 443: 440: 421: 418: 392: 389: 388: 387: 372: 371: 370: 369: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 262: 261: 260: 259: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 200: 199: 198: 197: 179: 178: 141: 138: 137: 136: 92: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6755: 6739: 6730: 6722: 6721:Rolling Stone 6715: 6711: 6709: 6708: 6704: 6700: 6695: 6692: 6689: 6684: 6682: 6678: 6673: 6669: 6657: 6653: 6649: 6645: 6641: 6640: 6639: 6638: 6637: 6636: 6632: 6628: 6617: 6614:parameter to 6605: 6601: 6597: 6590: 6589: 6581: 6580: 6576: 6572: 6567: 6557: 6556: 6552: 6548: 6537: 6534:parameter to 6525: 6521: 6517: 6510: 6509: 6499: 6495: 6491: 6487: 6483: 6475: 6474: 6473: 6472: 6468: 6464: 6460: 6452: 6449:parameter to 6440: 6436: 6432: 6425: 6424: 6416: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6396: 6385: 6384: 6381: 6379: 6373: 6369: 6365: 6361: 6357: 6353: 6349: 6345: 6341: 6337: 6333: 6325: 6320: 6319: 6318:Selena ¡VIVE! 6314: 6310: 6309: 6303: 6302:Janet Jackson 6299: 6290: 6277: 6273: 6272: 6266: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6251: 6247: 6237: 6234:parameter to 6225: 6221: 6214: 6213: 6203: 6200: 6198: 6192: 6188: 6187: 6186: 6185: 6181: 6177: 6163: 6159: 6155: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6145: 6141: 6137: 6133: 6124: 6121: 6119: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6109: 6105: 6101: 6097: 6081: 6080: 6076: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6063: 6056: 6052: 6049: 6045: 6042: 6038: 6037: 6036: 6034: 6027: 6026: 6025: 6021: 6017: 6013: 6010: 6006: 6005: 5995: 5992: 5990: 5987: 5981: 5978: 5975: 5971: 5967: 5957: 5954: 5952: 5949: 5942: 5941: 5940: 5937: 5936: 5934: 5927: 5923: 5919: 5914: 5909: 5908: 5907: 5904: 5902: 5899: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5876: 5872: 5868: 5864: 5861: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5836: 5835: 5833: 5825: 5821: 5817: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5808: 5806: 5803: 5797: 5792: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5773: 5769: 5759: 5756: 5754: 5751: 5745: 5741: 5737: 5733: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5723: 5719: 5715: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5704: 5700: 5696: 5692: 5686: 5683: 5677: 5664: 5661: 5659: 5656: 5650: 5643: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5631: 5629: 5626: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5614: 5609: 5608: 5605: 5603: 5600: 5587: 5580: 5576: 5572: 5569: 5566: 5563: 5560: 5557: 5553: 5549: 5544: 5540: 5537: 5534: 5531: 5528: 5524: 5521: 5518: 5515: 5512: 5509: 5506: 5503: 5500: 5496: 5493: 5489: 5486: 5483: 5480: 5477: 5474: 5470: 5467: 5466: 5461: 5457: 5454: 5451: 5447: 5444: 5441: 5438: 5435: 5432: 5429: 5425: 5422: 5419: 5416: 5413: 5410: 5409: 5408: 5406: 5398: 5397: 5394: 5391: 5389: 5386: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5372: 5368: 5357: 5354: 5352: 5349: 5342: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5316: 5313: 5312: 5310: 5303: 5299: 5294: 5290: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5283: 5279: 5275: 5271: 5266: 5261: 5258: 5256: 5252: 5247: 5246: 5243: 5230: 5227: 5226: 5216: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5205: 5201: 5191: 5188: 5186: 5183: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5171: 5170: 5160: 5156: 5128: 5125: 5123: 5120: 5114: 5109: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5097: 5096: 5094: 5086: 5081: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5069: 5067: 5064: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5034: 5032: 5029: 5022: 5018: 5017: 5016: 5012: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4986: 4983: 4981: 4978: 4972: 4967: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4958: 4957: 4955: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4942: 4940: 4937: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4924: 4920: 4911: 4910: 4901: 4898: 4896: 4893: 4887: 4882: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4873: 4872: 4870: 4862: 4858: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4849: 4847: 4844: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4824: 4823: 4821: 4813: 4808: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4799: 4797: 4794: 4788: 4784: 4780: 4776: 4772: 4771:attack anyone 4768: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4736: 4733: 4731: 4728: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4700: 4699: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4674: 4671: 4669: 4666: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4620: 4619: 4616: 4610: 4609: 4605: 4601: 4597: 4596:from the lead 4593: 4589: 4585: 4576: 4572: 4568: 4563: 4559: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4549: 4547: 4544: 4538: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4517: 4515: 4511: 4498: 4495: 4493: 4490: 4484: 4480: 4479: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4451: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4442: 4440: 4437: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4425: 4420: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4352: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4309: 4306: 4304: 4301: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4254: 4249: 4245: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4231: 4226: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4207: 4204: 4201: 4189: 4186: 4184: 4181: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4149: 4145: 4142: 4140: 4135: 4132: 4131: 4128: 4126: 4123: 4116: 4112: 4107: 4093: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4073: 4069: 4066: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4058: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4034: 4030: 4029: 4017: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4004: 3998: 3994: 3991: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3977: 3973: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3959: 3954: 3951: 3947: 3946: 3932: 3929: 3927: 3924: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3894: 3891: 3889: 3886: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3866: 3864: 3860: 3857: 3852: 3848: 3837: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3797: 3794: 3792: 3789: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3701: 3700: 3689: 3686: 3684: 3681: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3636:attention to 3635: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3617: 3611: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3591: 3590: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3512: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3492:, or use the 3491: 3490: 3485: 3483: 3476: 3472: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3431: 3428: 3427: 3425: 3418: 3416: 3410: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3387: 3386: 3384: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3352: 3351: 3349: 3342: 3332: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3318: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3288: 3285: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3276: 3271: 3268: 3267: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3224:Go ahead and 3223: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3139:Cautious Keep 3137: 3136: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3074: 3069: 3065: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3045: 3044: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2843: 2840: 2838: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2823: 2817: 2813: 2808: 2807: 2802: 2801: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2718: 2713: 2707: 2704: 2702: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2689: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2628: 2623: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2583: 2578: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2534: 2529: 2523: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2511: 2506: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2457: 2452: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2401: 2396: 2390: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2210: 2205: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2157: 2152: 2146: 2142: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2124:much though. 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2053: 2048: 2043:membership.-- 2042: 2037: 2033: 2030:In regard to 2029: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1981: 1976: 1970: 1963: 1959: 1956:In regard to 1955: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1921: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1895: 1890: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1852: 1847: 1840: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1798: 1793: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1756: 1751: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1725: 1720: 1714: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1659: 1654: 1647: 1645: 1641: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1603: 1598: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1565: 1560: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1523: 1518: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1477: 1472: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1399: 1394: 1387: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1375: 1370: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1326:Lark Voorhees 1322: 1318: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1262: 1257: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1204: 1199: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1141: 1140:editprotected 1133: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1032:Billboard 200 1029: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1009: 1008:Rolling Stone 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 979: 974: 971: 970:editprotected 963:Editprotected 958: 954: 950: 946: 945: 944: 943: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 896:legal reasons 893: 889: 885: 868: 864: 860: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 846: 843: 838: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 821: 818: 815: 814: 804: 800: 799:Third opinion 797: 796: 795: 794: 791: 782: 761: 757: 753: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 720: 717: 712: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 591: 588: 583: 577: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 556: 552: 551: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 520: 517: 512: 506: 505: 504: 503: 496: 495: 494: 490: 486: 485:67.189.173.65 482: 481: 480: 479: 476: 471: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 439: 438: 434: 430: 427: 417: 416: 412: 408: 404: 403: 398: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 368: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 353: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 332: 329: 327: 325: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 302: 301: 298: 296: 294: 278: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 258: 255: 253: 251: 245: 241: 240: 239: 235: 231: 227: 226: 219: 216: 214: 212: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 196: 192: 188: 183: 182: 181: 180: 177: 174: 172: 170: 164: 159: 158: 157: 156: 152: 148: 135: 130: 122: 114: 106: 105: 104: 103: 99: 95: 94:63.231.116.52 90: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6738: 6729: 6720: 6714: 6696: 6693: 6690: 6686: 6674: 6670: 6667: 6623: 6615: 6600:edit request 6565: 6558: 6543: 6535: 6520:edit request 6482:Partly done: 6481: 6463:67.249.52.99 6461: 6458: 6450: 6435:edit request 6399:— Preceding 6391: 6367: 6323: 6316: 6312: 6306: 6298:Mariah Carey 6285: 6270: 6264: 6246:72.229.60.62 6243: 6235: 6224:edit request 6173: 6130:— Preceding 6127: 6100:50.133.12.13 6094:— Preceding 6091: 6066: 6065: 6059: 6032: 6031: 6023: 5974:Soy Tu Dueña 5929: 5918:main article 5862: 5828: 5823: 5790: 5764: 5690: 5687: 5681: 5678: 5674: 5610: 5594: 5548:Selena Gomez 5463: 5404: 5402: 5360: 5327:WP:MOS#MUSIC 5319: 5305: 5301: 5297: 5273: 5269: 5264: 5262: 5259: 5255:encyclopedia 5254: 5250: 5248: 5238: 5217: 5194: 5161: 5152: 5089: 5079: 4999:comma splice 4970: 4965: 4950: 4919:209.6.28.116 4915: 4865: 4860: 4816: 4811: 4758: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4744: 4706: 4682: 4621: 4611: 4595: 4592:at that time 4591: 4587: 4583: 4581: 4561: 4557: 4518: 4512:. (See also 4506: 4421: 4402: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4350: 4326: 4293: 4282:Mariah Carey 4257: 4252: 4250: 4246: 4227: 4208: 4205: 4202: 4199: 4173: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4136: 4133: 4103: 4078: 4077: 4056: 4055: 4047: 4002: 4001: 3971: 3970: 3961: 3955: 3854: 3850: 3843: 3825: 3768: 3727: 3704: 3702: 3698: 3697: 3660: 3637: 3633: 3630: 3551: 3543: 3488: 3481: 3474: 3449: 3445: 3420: 3414: 3408: 3379: 3361:Como La Flor 3360: 3344: 3340: 3338: 3314: 3269: 3244: 3243:source like 3166: 3154: 3138: 3115: 3063: 3061: 2969: 2965: 2927:Selena Gomez 2904: 2900: 2860: 2844: 2841: 2833: 2830: 2804: 2798: 2791:Como La Flor 2768: 2764: 2760: 2752: 2735: 2729: 2726: 2708: 2705: 2698: 2685: 2662: 2626: 2621: 2596: 2581: 2576: 2570: 2552: 2548: 2532: 2527: 2509: 2504: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2455: 2450: 2443: 2439: 2437: 2433: 2415: 2399: 2394: 2388: 2370: 2347: 2304: 2246: 2208: 2203: 2197: 2179: 2155: 2150: 2144: 2140: 2117:this article 2113:this article 2067: 2051: 2046: 2040: 2035: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2010: 1979: 1974: 1968: 1961: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1893: 1888: 1866: 1850: 1845: 1838: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1796: 1791: 1754: 1749: 1743: 1739: 1723: 1718: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1637: 1601: 1596: 1563: 1558: 1538: 1521: 1516: 1510: 1507: 1504:other things 1503: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1475: 1470: 1450:WP:CONSENSUS 1445: 1441: 1429: 1428:for reasons 1421: 1417: 1413: 1397: 1392: 1373: 1368: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1302: 1280: 1276: 1260: 1255: 1249: 1248:for reasons 1244:. Selena is 1241: 1238: 1234: 1202: 1197: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1172: 1136: 1117: 1106: 1085: 1070: 1042: 1026: 1007: 982:Mariah Carey 978:Mariah Carey 975: 966: 930: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 883: 880: 807: 798: 780: 779: 659: 637: 611: 575: 549: 460:Adolf Hitler 445: 423: 400: 394: 288: 143: 112: 91: 83: 65: 43: 37: 6405:24.13.90.63 6368:Selena VIVE 6154:CorvetteZ51 6033:Don't panic 5932:Pinkadelica 5926:WP:TVSERIES 5913:This source 5879:three times 5871:warned once 5844:User:Secret 5831:Pinkadelica 5796:WP:MEMORIAL 5499:Ven Conmigo 5308:Pinkadelica 5302:millionaire 5108:User:Secret 5092:Pinkadelica 4953:Pinkadelica 4868:Pinkadelica 4830:Well since 4819:Pinkadelica 4806:Pinkadelica 4769:and do not 4755:the article 4356:EVen BETTer 4115:WP:GOCE/REQ 4111:peer review 4057:Don't panic 3972:Don't panic 3827:CorvetteZ51 3423:Pinkadelica 3415:millionaire 3382:Pinkadelica 3347:Pinkadelica 3212:Alex Harvey 3120:Alex Harvey 3049:Alex Harvey 2966:Correct it! 2921:Neither is 2901:Correct it! 2795:La Carcacha 2757:Ven Conmigo 2722:Selena Etc. 2307:—Preceding 2126:John Carter 2073:John Carter 2032:John Carter 1943:from Selena 1925:John Carter 1506:(clearly), 1365:category.-- 1287:as well... 1169:JW category 904:information 900:copyrighted 36:This is an 18:Talk:Selena 6697:Thank you 6644:Celia Cruz 6608:|answered= 6528:|answered= 6486:WP:infobox 6443:|answered= 6271:KuyaBriBri 6228:|answered= 5970:Super Bowl 5922:WP:NALBUMS 5891:WP:PRIMARY 5732:WP:PRIMARY 3612:. Thanks, 3188:articles ( 3101:. Gratts, 3099:WP:PERFECT 3095:Si Una Vez 3000:. Thanks. 2845:Thoughts? 2822:Elton John 2738:. How did 2701:notability 2487:notability 2109:Slate here 2021:officially 1969:her father 1951:officially 1740:her father 1593:removed.-- 1358:very clear 1192:notability 1160:Courcelles 992:, I can't 923:plagiarize 462:(243 kb), 285:Categories 6627:Gabreno03 6265:Not done: 5791:Billboard 5270:Sparingly 5265:sparingly 5221:<: --> 5215:Ruhrfisch 5165:<: --> 5159:Ruhrfisch 5083:does. As 4881:this link 4351:far below 3754:AJona1992 3634:conscious 3578:AJona1992 3542:Just the 3395:AJona1992 3365:AJona1992 3322:AJona1992 3297:AJona1992 3249:AJona1992 3245:Billboard 3230:The Gnome 3198:AJona1992 3171:The Gnome 3103:AJona1992 3020:AJona1992 2980:AJona1992 2943:AJona1992 2939:Lady Gaga 2874:AJona1992 2847:AJona1992 2736:Billboard 2669:AJona1992 2605:AJona1992 2557:AJona1992 2473:AJona1992 2420:AJona1992 2374:AJona1992 2354:AJona1992 2330:AJona1992 2313:92.8.32.5 2278:AJona1992 2249:AJona1992 2225:AJona1992 2184:AJona1992 2121:This book 2095:AJona1992 1997:AJona1992 1958:AJona1992 1872:AJona1992 1825:AJona1992 1817:every day 1772:AJona1992 1742:objected 1709:religion. 1691:Christi." 1307:AJona1992 1281:guideline 1221:AJona1992 949:AJona1992 908:sentences 859:AJona1992 752:AJona1992 642:AJona1992 534:AJona1992 429:AJona1992 426:this link 407:AJona1992 377:AJona1992 359:AJona1992 307:AJona1992 269:AJona1992 230:AJona1992 187:AJona1992 163:WP:ELNO#5 147:AJona1992 128:Notify Me 113:Not done: 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 6401:unsigned 6193:. Best, 6132:unsigned 6096:unsigned 6041:non-free 5982:. Best, 5885:and the 5820:WP:POINT 5787:WP:POINT 5473:La Bamba 5085:Gr8white 5080:probably 5046:Gr8white 5007:Gr8white 4775:WP:POINT 4763:WP:SHOUT 4636:WP:POINT 4628:WP:POINT 4560:sourced 4485:. Best, 4065:non-free 3984:non-free 3907:Gr8white 3868:Gr8white 3859:Gr8white 3806:Gr8white 3771:Gr8white 3705:coliseum 3666:WP:FORUM 3661:does not 3638:validity 3610:reviewed 3270:Comment. 3167:as it is 3155:business 3147:Fan-like 3002:Cynwolfe 2601:trolling 2549:majority 2309:unsigned 2145:category 2041:official 2036:official 1821:religion 1422:category 1354:category 1122:Amatulić 1090:Amatulić 1056:Amatulić 1012:Amatulić 705:POV fork 576:separate 498:article? 397:Feelings 6571:Arjayay 6289:WP:LEAD 5860:removed 5768:Hurmata 5714:Hurmata 5699:Hurmata 5577:" and " 5558:people. 5428:Oh Mama 5405:believe 5366:Georgia 5323:Aaliyah 5293:Hurmata 5278:Hurmata 5199:Georgia 5113:WP:BOLD 4779:WP:OWNs 4767:WP:BITE 4759:article 4710:Hurmata 4690:Hurmata 4640:Hurmata 4600:Hurmata 4567:Hurmata 4562:outside 4537:WP:LEAD 4522:Hurmata 4467:Hurmata 4450:Hurmata 4410:Hurmata 4406:WP:GOCE 4388:Hurmata 4376:conduct 4372:conduct 4364:explain 4360:Explain 4262:Hurmata 4258:article 4235:Hurmata 4216:Hurmata 3657:WP:LEAD 3642:Hurmata 3595:Hurmata 3574:WP:GOCE 3556:Hurmata 3494:sandbox 3482:be bold 3317:WP:BOLD 3315:I went 3284:Quadell 3275:Quadell 3116:Comment 3086:WP:Bold 3016:WP:WHPP 2931:Rihanna 2865:removed 2797:" from 2793:" and " 2783:notable 2770:singers 2597:Arguing 2571:doesn't 2547:If the 2499:because 2491:discuss 2444:notable 2440:as a JW 2141:article 1696:Doc9871 1678:Doc9871 1580:Doc9871 1543:Doc9871 1454:Doc9871 1426:notable 1418:article 1414:mention 1350:article 1346:mention 1331:Doc9871 1289:Doc9871 1246:notable 1239:notable 994:vertify 935:blocked 912:phrases 836:Beloved 812:Annyong 710:Beloved 581:Beloved 510:Beloved 469:Beloved 39:archive 6604:Selena 6524:Selena 6439:Selena 5816:WP:OWN 5783:WP:OWN 5682:Selena 5613:Secret 5595:Best, 5465:Selena 5426:That " 5341:WP:3RR 5331:Secret 5242:Secret 4971:should 4787:WP:RFC 4783:WP:AGF 4659:WP:OWN 4655:WP:AGF 4615:Secret 4483:WP:AGF 4424:Secret 4370:or of 4294:agreed 4290:fix it 3849:where 3674:WP:NPA 3502:log in 3226:boldly 3194:WP:FAR 3151:biopic 3073:Secret 2789:like " 2755:. Ok, 2688:WP:FAR 2622:Jeffro 2577:Jeffro 2528:Jeffro 2505:Jeffro 2451:Jeffro 2395:Jeffro 2204:Jeffro 2151:Jeffro 2047:Jeffro 1975:Jeffro 1889:Jeffro 1846:Jeffro 1792:Jeffro 1750:Jeffro 1719:Jeffro 1653:Jeffro 1597:Jeffro 1559:Jeffro 1517:Jeffro 1471:Jeffro 1442:policy 1438:WP:IAR 1393:Jeffro 1369:Jeffro 1303:highly 1285:WP:IAR 1256:Jeffro 1198:Jeffro 1150:Secret 1109:Secret 1073:Secret 1046:Secret 1036:Secret 998:Secret 990:Monica 884:unless 827:Selena 701:Selena 697:WP:FAR 6681:fairs 6612:|ans= 6598:This 6532:|ans= 6518:This 6447:|ans= 6433:This 6364:these 6360:these 6352:these 6348:these 6232:|ans= 6222:This 5875:twice 5744:WP:RS 5740:these 5586:Col-2 5546:That 5492:TCADA 5364:Sandy 5298:20/20 5220:: --> 5197:Sandy 5164:: --> 4966:false 4339:them. 4174:Fixed 4106:WP:RS 3728:Fixed 3544:lower 3409:20/20 3341:20/20 3064:years 2961:hotch 2896:hotch 2867:from 2837:Globe 2695:life. 2434:agree 1440:is a 1389:be.-- 841:Freak 809:Hello 789:hotch 781:Merge 715:Freak 586:Freak 515:Freak 474:Freak 322:Mufka 291:Mufka 248:Mufka 244:point 209:Mufka 167:Mufka 120:MWOAP 16:< 6703:talk 6652:talk 6631:talk 6575:talk 6566:Done 6551:talk 6494:talk 6467:talk 6409:talk 6377:jona 6362:and 6356:this 6344:this 6342:and 6340:this 6336:this 6332:this 6300:and 6250:talk 6196:Jona 6191:here 6180:talk 6176:Adam 6158:talk 6140:talk 6117:Jona 6104:talk 6075:talk 5985:Jona 5972:and 5947:Jona 5924:and 5897:Jona 5850:and 5818:and 5801:Jona 5772:talk 5749:Jona 5742:are 5738:and 5736:this 5718:talk 5703:talk 5654:Jona 5642:main 5624:Jona 5598:Jona 5556:LGBT 5384:Jona 5371:Talk 5347:Jona 5282:talk 5204:Talk 5181:Jona 5118:Jona 5062:Jona 5050:talk 5042:here 5027:Jona 5021:this 5011:talk 4976:Jona 4935:Jona 4923:talk 4891:Jona 4861:this 4842:Jona 4792:Jona 4726:Jona 4714:talk 4694:talk 4664:Jona 4644:talk 4630:and 4604:talk 4571:talk 4542:Jona 4526:talk 4488:Jona 4471:talk 4454:talk 4435:Jona 4414:talk 4392:talk 4384:they 4299:Jona 4266:talk 4239:talk 4230:A.B. 4220:talk 4179:Jona 4157:talk 4121:Jona 4087:talk 4011:talk 3922:Jona 3911:talk 3884:Jona 3872:talk 3863:talk 3831:talk 3810:talk 3787:Jona 3775:talk 3758:talk 3750:this 3740:talk 3734:. -- 3713:talk 3679:Jona 3646:talk 3615:Jona 3599:talk 3582:talk 3560:talk 3534:talk 3520:talk 3471:wiki 3455:talk 3399:talk 3369:talk 3326:talk 3301:talk 3253:talk 3234:talk 3216:talk 3202:talk 3175:talk 3163:BLPs 3124:talk 3107:talk 3093:and 3053:talk 3024:talk 3006:talk 2984:talk 2947:talk 2937:and 2878:talk 2861:Note 2851:talk 2673:talk 2633:talk 2609:talk 2588:talk 2561:talk 2553:will 2539:talk 2516:talk 2477:talk 2462:talk 2442:are 2424:talk 2406:talk 2378:talk 2358:talk 2334:talk 2317:talk 2282:talk 2253:talk 2229:talk 2215:talk 2188:talk 2180:need 2162:talk 2130:talk 2099:talk 2077:talk 2058:talk 2001:talk 1986:talk 1929:talk 1900:talk 1876:talk 1867:have 1857:talk 1829:talk 1803:talk 1776:talk 1761:talk 1730:talk 1700:talk 1682:talk 1664:talk 1608:talk 1584:talk 1570:talk 1547:talk 1539:P.S. 1528:talk 1511:also 1498:only 1482:talk 1458:talk 1404:talk 1380:talk 1335:talk 1321:this 1311:talk 1293:talk 1267:talk 1225:talk 1209:talk 1127:talk 1118:Done 1095:talk 1061:talk 1017:talk 988:and 953:talk 931:will 863:talk 756:talk 666:and 656:WP:V 646:talk 538:talk 489:talk 433:talk 411:talk 381:talk 363:talk 341:talk 311:talk 273:talk 234:talk 191:talk 151:talk 98:talk 6610:or 6602:to 6530:or 6522:to 6445:or 6437:to 6230:or 5989:yo! 5951:yo! 5901:yo! 5863:all 5824:was 5805:yo! 5753:yo! 5658:yo! 5628:yo! 5602:yo! 5388:yo! 5351:yo! 5251:not 5185:yo! 5122:yo! 5066:yo! 5031:yo! 4980:yo! 4939:yo! 4895:yo! 4888:)? 4846:yo! 4796:yo! 4751:all 4730:yo! 4668:yo! 4546:yo! 4516:) 4492:yo! 4439:yo! 4303:yo! 4183:yo! 4125:yo! 3926:yo! 3888:yo! 3791:yo! 3683:yo! 3619:yo! 2682:FAR 2416:not 2198:any 2025:him 1939:and 1813:own 1788:.-- 1508:and 1446:all 1362:not 1319:On 1235:not 1188:any 1120:. ~ 1088:? ~ 933:be 916:may 910:or 833:.-- 660:can 638:you 612:you 405:). 337:Kww 6705:) 6683:. 6654:) 6633:) 6616:no 6577:) 6553:) 6536:no 6496:) 6469:) 6451:no 6411:) 6358:, 6354:, 6350:, 6338:, 6334:, 6252:) 6236:no 6182:) 6160:) 6142:) 6106:) 6077:) 6069:-- 5979:, 5881:, 5877:, 5873:, 5846:, 5774:) 5720:) 5705:) 5645:}} 5639:{{ 5589:}} 5583:{{ 5403:I 5373:) 5284:) 5206:) 5157:, 5052:) 5013:) 4925:) 4912:IP 4765:, 4716:) 4696:) 4646:) 4606:) 4573:) 4558:is 4528:) 4473:) 4456:) 4416:) 4394:) 4380:he 4280:, 4268:) 4241:) 4222:) 4159:) 4089:) 4081:-- 4013:) 4005:-- 3913:) 3905:. 3874:) 3833:) 3812:) 3777:) 3760:) 3742:) 3715:) 3648:) 3601:) 3584:) 3562:) 3536:) 3522:) 3508:). 3457:) 3401:) 3371:) 3328:) 3303:) 3255:) 3247:. 3236:) 3218:) 3204:) 3196:. 3177:) 3126:) 3109:) 3055:) 3026:) 3008:) 2986:) 2958:Tb 2949:) 2933:, 2929:, 2925:, 2893:Tb 2880:) 2853:) 2675:) 2635:) 2627:77 2611:) 2603:. 2590:) 2582:77 2563:) 2541:) 2533:77 2518:) 2510:77 2479:) 2464:) 2456:77 2426:) 2408:) 2400:77 2380:) 2360:) 2336:) 2319:) 2284:) 2255:) 2231:) 2217:) 2209:77 2190:) 2164:) 2156:77 2132:) 2101:) 2079:) 2060:) 2052:77 2003:) 1988:) 1980:77 1931:) 1902:) 1894:77 1878:) 1859:) 1851:77 1839:no 1831:) 1805:) 1797:77 1778:) 1763:) 1755:77 1732:) 1724:77 1702:) 1684:) 1666:) 1658:77 1646:? 1610:) 1602:77 1586:) 1572:) 1564:77 1549:) 1530:) 1522:77 1484:) 1476:77 1460:) 1406:) 1398:77 1382:) 1374:77 1337:) 1313:) 1301:I 1295:) 1277:is 1269:) 1261:77 1227:) 1211:) 1203:77 1142:}} 1138:{{ 984:, 972:}} 968:{{ 955:) 920:or 865:) 786:Tb 758:) 648:) 540:) 491:) 435:) 413:) 383:) 365:) 343:) 313:) 275:) 236:) 193:) 153:) 100:) 6701:( 6650:( 6629:( 6573:( 6549:( 6492:( 6465:( 6407:( 6248:( 6178:( 6156:( 6138:( 6102:( 6073:( 5770:( 5716:( 5701:( 5591:? 5525:" 5497:" 5494:. 5478:) 5471:" 5468:. 5458:" 5369:( 5280:( 5224:° 5202:( 5168:° 5048:( 5009:( 4921:( 4712:( 4692:( 4684:( 4642:( 4602:( 4569:( 4524:( 4469:( 4452:( 4412:( 4390:( 4264:( 4237:( 4218:( 4155:( 4085:( 4009:( 3909:( 3870:( 3861:( 3829:( 3808:( 3773:( 3756:( 3738:( 3711:( 3644:( 3597:( 3580:( 3558:( 3532:( 3518:( 3453:( 3417:" 3397:( 3367:( 3324:( 3299:( 3251:( 3232:( 3214:( 3200:( 3173:( 3122:( 3105:( 3051:( 3022:( 3004:( 2982:( 2945:( 2876:( 2849:( 2671:( 2631:( 2607:( 2586:( 2559:( 2537:( 2514:( 2475:( 2460:( 2422:( 2404:( 2376:( 2356:( 2332:( 2315:( 2280:( 2251:( 2227:( 2213:( 2186:( 2160:( 2128:( 2097:( 2075:( 2056:( 1999:( 1984:( 1965:' 1927:( 1898:( 1874:( 1855:( 1827:( 1801:( 1774:( 1759:( 1728:( 1698:( 1680:( 1662:( 1606:( 1582:( 1568:( 1545:( 1526:( 1480:( 1456:( 1402:( 1378:( 1333:( 1309:( 1291:( 1265:( 1223:( 1207:( 1129:) 1125:( 1097:) 1093:( 1063:) 1059:( 1019:) 1015:( 951:( 861:( 754:( 670:. 644:( 536:( 487:( 431:( 409:( 379:( 361:( 339:( 309:( 271:( 232:( 189:( 149:( 131:\ 123:| 117:/ 96:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index