Knowledge

Talk:Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy

Source 📝

242:. The problem was that all this text is sourced but the sheer volume of it was causing that article to become excessively long and unbalanced. As a result, we now have this article which is even more unbalanced but which I hoped could be made into an encyclopedic article somehow. I'm an inclusionist rather than a deletionist so I always try to salvage sourced text if at all possible. The article is, at the moment, an orphan and is in need of further work to make it more NPOV. If anyone has suggestions to improve it, I would very much appreciate it. Or, be 300:
Tradition....this is a Western Notion. There is only Holy Tradition in which Scripture has primacy. All in all this article is fine. It is not an apologia....for that go to official Orthodox Websites. I am stunned that some Roman Catholics seem to think their Articles are simply Facts and not Apologetics. Please. Unless someone can point out material that does not reflect the historical and actual position of the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Communion...I suggest silence. - Rev. Fr. Ken Huffman
411: 40: 525: 154: 278:
Do orthodox apologetics have a place in an encyclopedia? It needs to be completely rewritten or deleted. If the purpose of the article is to present the Orthodox response to Papal Supremacy (is there even an official response, or merely a collection of opinions?), it should be cut down and made
299:
This Page is concerning the Orthodox Catholic Position on the Issue of the claimed Supremacy of the Patriarchate of Rome....it is accurate for the most part. If Roman Catholics desire a Latin Rite Response Article....go for it. If there are any inaccuracies they are separating Scripture from
515: 279:
into a subsection of a rewrite of the (truly inadequate) article on Papal Supremacy. If it deserves its own article, it should be clearly geared toward informing the reader of Orthodox views rather than convincing the reader.
321:
I am not worried about the Catholic Encyclopedia...I am concerned about the accuracy of Knowledge. How can you talk about Augustine being misquoted about the use of articles in a language (Latin) that has no articles?
549: 537: 49:
for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
428: 509: 288: 273: 529: 284: 201:
Is this a work in progress?? It does not seem to have any cross-page linking (i mean, like it does not seem to be able to be found by any other way than by searching)
311: 364:
from "Eastern Orthodox opposition to the doctrine of Papal Primacy" to "Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy" in 2013 yet the article was not changed.
489: 220:
This page seems to be simply Eastern Orthodox apologia without any balance or caveats. Is Knowledge really the place for such anti-Catholic diatribes?
466: 395: 329: 259: 315: 134: 111: 88: 65: 341: 229: 210: 418: 443: 360: 354: 138: 115: 92: 69: 485: 476:
This article should be completely rewritten, this article do not have a neutral point of view, and looks more like an article from
481: 280: 453: 307: 202: 533: 517: 46: 337: 538:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Eastern Orthodox opposition to the doctrine of Papal Primacy
234:
No one ever seems to mind that Knowledge has been used as a Western-centric apologia field since it's creation.
448: 383: 239: 26: 400: 347: 126: 103: 80: 57: 130: 107: 84: 61: 122: 99: 76: 53: 540:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
255: 269: 206: 22: 45:
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
429:
Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy § Opposition arguments from early church history
333: 179: 186:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
435: 325: 303: 225: 8: 505: 462: 391: 251: 187: 374:
I thought the various Eastern Orthodox Churches maintain separate concepts for the term
265: 215: 545: 247: 166: 221: 196: 501: 458: 387: 243: 497: 410: 541: 471: 369:"Making title more precise (primacy has never been at issue; supremacy is)" 516:"Eastern Orthodox opposition to the doctrine of Papal Primacy" listed at 174:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
238:
I created this article back in January 2012 using text extracted from
477: 178:] The anchor (#Mosaic law) is no longer available because it was 528:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
524: 530:
Eastern Orthodox opposition to the doctrine of Papal Primacy
496:
Yeah, this is horrible. Tagged for NPOV since 6 years ago.
441:. The unreferenced content was copied into this article ( 296:
Tell this to the writers of the "Catholic Encyclopedia"!
419:
Talk:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome#Unreferenced content
386:, is this current opposition article title correct? — 382:? In other words, if most of the content came 135:Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy 112:Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy 89:Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy 66:Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy 38: 148: 34: 15: 367:The edit summary for the move was: 13: 454:I removed the unreferenced content 14: 560: 536:. This discussion will occur at 523: 409: 152: 482:Pseudo-Dionysius the areopagite 264:It was the least worst option. 510:01:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 490:00:26, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 1: 449:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 384:primacy of the Bishop of Rome 342:03:45, 18 November 2018 (UTC) 240:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 123:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 100:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 77:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 54:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 27:Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 316:20:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 7: 550:01:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 25:of this article appears in 10: 565: 289:14:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 467:03:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 396:22:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 274:23:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 260:17:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 230:12:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 211:13:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 518:Redirects for discussion 500:is our last, best hope. 141:) on 2012-08-03T20:40:27 118:) on 2012-08-03T20:37:18 95:) on 2012-08-03T20:16:46 72:) on 2012-01-10T16:14:37 532:and has thus listed it 414:Relevant discussion at 401:Unreferenced content 348:Primacy or supremacy 47:provide attribution 424: 423: 361:article was moved 344: 328:comment added by 306:comment added by 194: 193: 180:deleted by a user 169:in most browsers. 147: 146: 33: 32: 556: 527: 456: 446: 440: 434: 413: 406: 405: 363: 357: 323: 318: 188:Reporting errors 156: 155: 149: 42: 41: 35: 16: 564: 563: 559: 558: 557: 555: 554: 553: 521: 474: 452: 442: 438: 432: 425: 403: 359: 355:lead was edited 353: 350: 345: 301: 218: 199: 190: 172: 171: 170: 153: 39: 12: 11: 5: 562: 534:for discussion 520: 514: 513: 512: 473: 470: 422: 421: 415: 404: 402: 399: 349: 346: 320: 294: 293: 292: 291: 281:76.226.196.122 276: 252:Pseudo-Richard 217: 214: 198: 195: 192: 191: 185: 184: 183: 167:case-sensitive 161: 160: 159: 157: 145: 144: 143: 142: 119: 96: 73: 43: 31: 30: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 561: 552: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 526: 519: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 493: 491: 487: 483: 479: 469: 468: 464: 460: 455: 450: 445: 437: 430: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 398: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 378:and the term 377: 372: 370: 365: 362: 356: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 319: 317: 313: 309: 308:24.49.125.106 305: 297: 290: 286: 282: 277: 275: 271: 267: 266:Laurel Lodged 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 236: 235: 232: 231: 227: 223: 213: 212: 208: 204: 203:75.73.114.111 189: 181: 177: 176: 175: 168: 164: 158: 151: 150: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 50: 48: 44: 37: 36: 28: 24: 20: 18: 17: 522: 478:OrthodoxWiki 475: 436:unreferenced 426: 379: 375: 373: 368: 366: 352:The article 351: 324:— Preceding 302:— Preceding 298: 295: 233: 219: 200: 173: 165:Anchors are 162: 330:Gnuwhirled 222:St.wulfric 216:Neutrality 502:Elizium23 459:BoBoMisiu 444:this edit 427:I tagged 388:BoBoMisiu 380:supremacy 246:and just 451:, where 358:and the 338:contribs 326:unsigned 304:unsigned 542:Veverve 447:) from 376:primacy 197:Linking 182:before. 131:history 121:Copied 108:history 98:Copied 85:history 75:Copied 62:history 52:Copied 23:summary 498:WP:TNT 248:fix it 431:with 127:oldid 104:oldid 81:oldid 58:oldid 546:talk 506:talk 486:talk 472:NPOV 463:talk 392:talk 334:talk 312:talk 285:talk 270:talk 256:talk 250:. -- 244:bold 226:talk 207:talk 163:Tip: 139:diff 133:) → 116:diff 110:) → 93:diff 87:) → 70:diff 64:) → 492:). 457:. — 371:. 548:) 508:) 488:) 465:) 439:}} 433:{{ 417:→ 394:) 340:) 336:• 314:) 287:) 272:) 258:) 228:) 209:) 129:, 106:, 83:, 60:, 21:A 544:( 504:( 484:( 480:( 461:( 390:( 332:( 310:( 283:( 268:( 254:( 224:( 205:( 137:( 125:( 114:( 102:( 91:( 79:( 68:( 56:( 29:.

Index

summary
Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
provide attribution
Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
oldid
history
Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy
diff
Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
oldid
history
Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy
diff
Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
oldid
history
Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy
diff
Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
oldid
history
Eastern Orthodox opposition to papal supremacy
diff
case-sensitive
deleted by a user
Reporting errors
75.73.114.111
talk
13:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
St.wulfric

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.