Talk:Atlanta/Archive 4

5371:: Mmann1988, some of the changes you have made are contrary to the consensus that was reached after the "warring" period, specifically those related to race in the lead section. A consensus was reached after *much* discussion on the topic and it was concluded that the lead should contain information about Atlanta's status as a center of black culture, wealth and political power — what some call a "mecca". We are not going to throw out that consensus which took a long time to reach simply because you would compare Atlanta to Washington, Baltimore and Philadelphia - that is a personal point of view as compared to the dozens of reliable sources which refer to Atlanta - uniquely along with Harlem — as a black mecca. Atlanta is different because not only is there a black mayor and black political power, but also it is the home of the largest concentration of historically black colleges, which has produced a black business elite and "high society" (if you will). Add to this that Atlanta is the center of hip-hop music and black film, and it's plain to see that Atlanta is quite unique. I really don't think that, considering what happened with the warring and banning, that we are in a position to open this discussion again because you personally do not agree with the consensus. 1432:. Of course your aunt's good friend counts! But that doesn't mean that there wasn't a very important trend 1995-2010 when almost every single project was demolished, and only the minority were rehoused in mixed-income communities, resulting in something monumental happening to the black poor in this city - and a few other non-black poor. I can never make you happy about identifying trends with race, however reliable sources monitor major race-related trends, I hardly think it's unusual to call out a major trend happening to a major identifiable group in the city (the poor black population) simply because it also happened to a few members of other groups (i.e. 2%) On a related subject, the cause and effect of the black exodus 2000-2010, I can agree that it has not been conclusively proved that there was an exodus of poor blacks from the city, but reliable sources suspect it, considering the large drop in census figures for blacks 2010 vs. 2000. I'll check the language. 6315:

keep even "center of…" out of the lead is because it is in reference to a particular demographic group (and by extension, perhaps "unfair" to others like whites or Hispanics). I think you seldom see these references in articles about US cities even when they are overwhelmingly unique aspects of a city (e.g. Miami and Cubans) perhaps due to that sensitivity. Cities in other countries don't seem to have that issue - Salvador Brazil is identified straight away as the capital of Afro Brazilian culture; Nazareth Israel as the center of Arab Israeli culture. I still think we are leaving out something fundamental about the city because it is race related. At the end of the day, Atlanta's unique role with regard to African American culture is absent from the lead, whereas other aspects like "dense tree coverage" - far less important in the human experience - are in there.

1138:

encyclopedic. Are we proud of that as Atlantans? That all we can do is pump up the Knowledge article with tourist brochure adjectives and superlatives to make the city look good with only positive aspects? You talk to me in a condescending manner as if you have a lot of experience with encyclopedic writing, yet the end result of this article is a Chamber of Commerce brochure! Can you explan that? Look, I live here (IN the city) and love it. Ryoung's point was that the present tense wasn't encyclopedic. As for preference for certain ethnic groups, I am trying to represent them fairly as makes sense encyclopedically. At some point, I will provide some better text for the history paragraph about 2000-2010 - that text going on and on and on about white professionals and the whole detailed belabouring about restaurants is an embarrassment.

468:

education that advanced him n his mission to fight for Civil Rights. These institutions are also Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU's) and Religious Institutions that deserve recognition on this page as well seeing as though they have made great history and they are exceptionally well colleges and universities like the others named. The colleges and universities I am referring to are as follows, Clark Atlanta University, Morehouse College, Spelman College, The Interdenominational Theological Center (ITC) and Morris Brown College. Four of these universities,Clark Atlanta University, Morehouse College, Spelman College, The Interdenominational Theological Center (ITC) make-up 'the Atlanta University Center' (AUC). Please revise this section. There is no way that the AUC,and other HBCU's were overlooked.

1229:

those are gone now and I think the text is much better due to the resulting edits (including yours). You can continue to accuse me of having an anti-white agenda (or as in the past - you accused me of having a pro-black-and-white anti-diversity agenda, and I will continue to reply that I am just trying to state relevant, important trends in a succinct way, and in proportion to their importance. For example, that the percent increase in Hispanic and Asian residents in the city is high, but that the City of Atlanta still ranks near the bottom in diversity (non-black non-white) among major US cities (and I wish it were not so). However dramatic this interaction seems to be, I believe that slowly but surely the article is improving from Chamber of Commerce boosterism to something more encyclopedic and factual

4484:

is still under construction, so it's out of date. Not sure about Downtown. One thing, the pictures are not aligning very nicely. You know there is a trick to leave a blank line after every one, that helps the alignment a lot and also prevents these strange single lines that jut out all the way to the edge, between pictures. Another point, you used the term " Examples of Atlanta architecture" - I prefer simply "Atlanta architecture" - I think " Examples of" is not really necessary. Finally, but that's just a matter of taste, I prefer to have one picture left then a little further down, one on the right and so on, rather than "bars" of solid pictures on both sides. But again, that might just be my opinion, it's not like there's a rule.

5650:. But, in the same breath, an overhaul this large (on such a popular article) really should have been discussed first. I think that many of your edits were positive ones, without doing too much scrutiny (I only glanced through your edits and read the summary). Keizers and I have been on and off working with preventing vandalism on the page, and attempting to organize the layout and keep the article within a reasonable length while preserving factual accuracy and balancing due attention. I'll be more than happy to join any discussions about revisions to the article, just know that I follow consensus rather than argue points. Oftimes I've actually disagreed (heatedly) with consensus but you've got to go with it, you know? 5151:

Milledgeville? While the key to Atlanta development has been location (where the Atlantic watershed meets the Gulf watershed) and transportation (first four major railroads, later three major interstates and the world's busiest airport), the contribution of major civic leaders (such as Henry Grady, William B. Hartsfield, etc) and private corporations and citizens (Asa Candler and Robert W Woodruff of Coca-Cola) should be sketched. It should also be mentioned how Atlanta grew from a burned-out shell in 1864 to reach the 24th-largest city in America status by 1960. Finally, we need something about the arts and culture (mentioning the Fox Theatre and historic preservation, for example). Thanks.

7139:- SCI's position is not "a point of view". They are the accrediting agency in regards to this. Your position would be like saying someone isn't an academy award winner, simply because it's not listed on someone else's biography, who was the co-winner with them. The fact that the co-winner didn't list it, does not invalidate the Academy's position, being the accrediting agency. If Salzburg doesn't wish to list it, that's there prerogative. According to the agency in charge of bestowing the distinction, they are sister cities. Not a matter of opinion. Not a point of view. A fact. Therefore your note is misleading at best. Please check WP policies, facts are not subject to discussion! 8057:- Hmmm. Perhaps it's something you need to download. On the top of the page towards the right, there are: "Read"; "Edit"; "New Section"; "View History". After view history there is the "star" so you can add the page to your watchlist, then "More". "TW" shoule be between "more" and the search window. It stands for "Twinkle". If you go to your "Preferences", there is a tab marked "Gadgets". The first section is labeled "Browsing". In that section, about 2/3 of the way down is "Twinkle". Click on it, then save. After you save, you need to bypass your cache. After you do that, the TW should appear on your browser header where I describe above. Let me know if that worked for you. 5997:

the concepts of "Atlanta as a center of black professionals", the "black upper class", black (HBCU) education, black political power, and black cinema, music, and art. The identities and concepts are discussed as such in current media and in books (I've provided numerous references and even created articles), and are everyday realities for those of us who live in the City. I just don't want those items - which "exist separately" according to the media and books - to be lost because we "want things to be more integrated". We should discuss generic things generically, but also mark out those distinct items and aspects which are remarkable, and which happen to be black-specific.

1749:

of it in the intro. I am sick of you thinking black people are the only ones who live in Atlanta and the only people who matter. Yes, Atlanta is unique with its large black population, but that is not the single defining attribute of our city. It is multi-faceted and it is NOT FAIR to include one group in the intro as if they are all that matters to the entire article. The intro is an overview and you are breaking precedence set by every other major city article, and acting quite immature about it as well. You are trying to force this just to prove a point, which is against Knowledge rules. I am not going to budge just to prove I am not suppressing black-related content.--

4764:

Islamic holy city. I realise that it can be used as a purely descriptive term in English these days, but I think that a significant number of people will still treat it as a metaphor, and if it is treated as a metaphor it is problematic. Mecca is, of course, the holiest city in Islam, and Muslims are bound by their faith to visit it at least once in their lifetime. Atlanta, on the other hand, may not be the most important city for blacks, and "black" is not a religion. In my opinion, the insensitivity arises through the implicit assertion that Atlanta is as important to blacks as Mecca is to Muslims, which downplays the value that Muslims put in their faith and in the

1111:, it's always the same battle with you. You always want to downplay the increasing diversity of Atlanta. You always want certain groups maximized and other certain groups minimized. There's no belaboring involved. The increasing diversity of Atlanta a major development for this city, and the paragraph has been just fine for every other editor for the past five years. Maybe that's because they don't have an agenda against certain groups like you do. And until the increase in the white population has been proven to be stalled out, it should remain present tense. What proof does Ryoung have? Your willingness to embrace opinions as fact is a major flaw of your editing.-- 3413:

living in Atlanta (including Europeans) many of whom are not even permanent residents, many are here to study or work. Also it is not proved that the Hispanic and Asian populations consist of immigrants as opposed to native-born Americans. Unless so proved it should not be assumed that that is the case. Therefore, let's just call Hispanics and Asians by their name and not call them immigrants (unless proven) or "international". This kind of goes into the same category as "urban" being used to mean black. I also don't mean to imply that anyone was trying to be offensive with the term, I hope to promote genuinely clear language with this suggestion.

7590:

location, and (2) with the tepid Economy of Atlanta, the only place would be in the current history section. The existence of those plants, and the steel mill, is the apex of the industrialization of the urban South, beginning with the Civil War, through Reconstruction, and the movement of the textile industry fro the Northeast. It is, in fact the driving force in Atlanta history, obscured only in the overall de-industrialization of the USA. I know this is a big topic, and could not reasonably fit into a city's history section, save as a single sentence with a blue link to a definitive article; oh, wait, there are huge gaps in the

7206:. Second, this isn't an issue of POV, it is not a matter of opinion. SCI is the governing body which recognizes the official agreements between sister cities. A city can say they are the sister city of London, but if that agreement is not recognized by the SCI organization, then guess what, they ain't sister cities. This isn't a big issue to me. Not sure what you mean that SCI is not an independent organization, since it is, and has been since 1967. There are many types of city inter-relationships, "twinning", "trade-partnerships", etc. Being a "Sister City" is a very specific designation, and is governed by SCI. If you check 4093: 6461:

beginning the paragraph with "Atlanta has played a major or contributing role in the development of various genres of American music genres at various points in the city’s history." Also, the paragraph addresses your concern that we not imply "other genres of music are absent, but simply that Atlanta is not especially noted for them vs. other major US cities" since it only includes musical genres Atlanta has been noted for in the past (country, acid rock, Southern rock, punk) and is noted for today (hip hop, indie rock) and does not include every possible musical genre (ex., grunge and blues are omitted).--

5500:), "Other cities have had cohesive music scenes shape a large part of their identity. Just up Ga. 316, Athens was the fertile crescent of American college rock in the late '70s and early '80s. Seattle had grunge in the '90s. For most of the 2000s, Omaha, Neb., of all places, became an indie-rock mecca. But Atlanta seems to lack the sense of cohesion around which a defining scene can be built." Thus, hip hop, gospel, and soul join rock, electronica, and country to form the hodge-podge that is Atlanta music. No genre is dominant, so to be accurate, it is best to leave out music out of the lede. 1798:, which is not only recent (Nov 2011) but also says exactly what you're trying to say. That said, I'm not sure the whole identity of a city is so strongly defined by a brief newspaper article. I'd say the most appropriate thing would be writing in the #Race_and_ethnicity section that the city has recently acquired a reputation for black culture and entertainment and maybe a very brief note in the lead summarizing the whole race section along the lines of "Though the city has become increasingly white in the past decade, it also has a long-standing tradition as a center of black culture."-- 926:

word. No one pronounces it this way, not the government, the press, no one in the city or surrounding area. Having the primary pronunciation be such a bizarre pronunciation is confusing and strange. Someone commented that you wouldn't have NEW YAWK as the primary pronunciation for New York, but both of those words, New and York, existed before the city did and standard pronunciation applies. Atlanta is a proper noun in its own right and the local pronunciation æt'lænə should be used. Having it any other way is as weird as having ɛdən'bɚg (Edun-berg) be the proper pronunciation of Edinburgh.

7544:, "At one time, the Atlanta area had three automotive manufacturing facilities; Doraville Assembly and Lakewood Assembly operated by General Motors, and Atlanta Assembly in Hapeville operated by Ford. All three manufacturing locations have been demolished.", using the edit sumary, "unreferenced". While the paragraph is uncited, it is factual, uncontroversial, and easily soured as a simple statement of fact (aside from none of the three actually being inside the city limits), and "unreferenced" is better handled with a citation needed tag for that question. However, the 5967:"black money", the "black upper class", black political power, and black cinema, music, and art. These elements form a major part of everyday life in the city and the basic perception of what the city's identity is (along with other major "identity factors", say, Buckhead wealth; transport hub; Coca-Cola/Delta/Turner; economic capital of the South; etc.) Aside from my personal perception as a resident they are widely documented and discussed in both books and the press - and really, we should base what goes in the article on reliable sources and not our POVs. 1303:

if you think I am lying then state that I am lying about what I put in the Edit box. I will nominate the Demographics article for deletion and then you can react in that forum if you think the article is worth saving. I think it would be great to have a separate Demographics article if there were any extra information there. By the way did you check out the demographics table that is now in the main Atlanta article? I think we have a LOT better information now because we have every single census figure for all races, Hispanic and foreign born population.

4822:

education, and culture, including film and music; its reputation was such that it has been described as a "black mecca" by various academics, magazines, newspapers including the New York Times and Washington Post, and the New Georgia Encyclopedia.' I think that rather than just saying that Atlanta was regarded as a "black mecca" by some unspecified people, which I regard as both vague and still in Knowledge's voice, listing the specific sources that have described Atlanta as such both makes the statement more factual and gives it more clout. —

2451:

mention anything about one race in the intro without mentioning them all including ones that are 3 or 6%? So far I only hear one editor saying that. Is anyone else offended? Talking about Chicago or Seattle is not relevant here, there are a handful of cities in the US where the majority ethnic group is a defining attribute of the city's character- e.g. Miami, El Paso, San Antonio. Frankly it's weird that those cities overlook that characteristic in their intro. Again, many other cities in multiethnic countries do mention it without incident.

4444: 1845:

cities. Example, Miami - one of the basic things anyone should know about Miami is its 70%+ majority Latin American population and that Spanish is at least equal to English in being a language of communication, yet you have to hunt way down in the Demographics section for that info. Seems like people are following a kind of vapid formula for city article intros without regard to importance of key characteristics of a city. In other countries people are not hesitant to mention a defining characteristic in the intro just because it's ethnic.

7512:(my interpretation of that characterization is that no organized volunteer committees exist for the relationship in each of the two cities). For me, the best solution[in this case for Atlanta is to leave the sister city and remove the note. An estranged sister is still a sister, and, absent a revocation of the proclamation signed by their respective mayors, Salzburg is still properly sourced as an Atlanta sister city. "Estranged" does not seem a useful note, and the present negative note does not even rise to absence of evidence. — 4024: 3034:; publications such as the Journal of Urban Affairs, Urban Athropology, and Southeast Geographer have articles which use the term; there are also several books, such as "The Atlanta Paradox", "Affirmative action and black entrepreneurship", and "The closing door: Conservative policy and Black opportunity" which mention "Black Mecca" or variations of the term. You may wish to sift through some of these sources (best if you have JSTOR or similar access), select some of the most robust ones, and develop a note which shows that 889:

postcard. Let me tell you something that will surprise you, I AM one of these gentrifying folks who lives Intown and enjoys all those things to the max! I just don't think that's the only thing going in in the past decade. It does not reflect the reality of everyday life intown - which is all of those wonderful amenities, but also things like all the public housing going away... transportation or lack thereof ... condo gluts... the relationship to the region...etc. History is not just restaurants, art museums.

6335:

not really summarize the article, - Atlanta is the 10th largest metro in the US - is its being the 7th most visited really remarkable in that light? - "Atlanta is renowned for its robust cultural institutions" - isn't it really more or less at that level that one would expect in the nation's 10th metro? I think the statement sounds like way of stating "Atlanta isn't the Southern provincial city it used to be with no culture" and I am not sure that's really the point that needs to be proved.

7423: 7328: 7092: 7082: 433:

on the role race has played in Atlanta's history (i think the role it played is minimal and ended in the 1950s). As for AUC, I think it should be included in the "elite college" paragrpaph, that lists Agnes Scott, Emory, Tech, GSU, and Mercer. Putting it in its own paragraph implies it is not in the same league as those schools. Also, i took out the 2006 numbers and replaced with 2010 but left the main message of that source, which was that Atlanta #1 in the nation for white pop. growth. --

31: 3111:

important center of black wealth, political power, culture, and history in the United States. That status is also inextricable from the identity of the city in which we live. To not include it in the intro is to not describe Atlanta in the intro. The extensive references are kept to show that point in case new people come into this discussion and are not aware of the references. They do not make the readable text longer. They can be removed when this section is no longer in dispute.

6217:

all of these references together add up to an impressive list. These things are why the city is one of only two that American blacks consider a "mecca" (and you have seen all the sources for that ad nauseum). But now again, that aspect is *entirely* absent from the intro, and is in my opinion, buried in the demographics section (and replaced by information which does not seem that significant or unique to me, see "Intro" below". Is that *truly* what we want? Please advise.

5376:

Philly, and Baltimore was to show that, statistically and factually, Atlanta is not unique among major eastern cities in terms of its demographics. Stating that you think Atlanta is unique because its historically black colleges (DC has them) and black wealth (Philly has a huge black upper class) make it comparable to Harlem is purely opinion. Whether it is your opinion, or the opinion of Ebony magazine, is irrelevant. All of these statements are opinion and thus violate

111:

power when blacks became the majority in 1970, white flight and the growth of the suburbs/exurbs, influx of people and companies from outside the South, building of the freeway system and demise of streetcars/trolleybuses... those are the factors that truly change what Atlanta was vs. what it is. I will continue to make edits topic by topic on each subject and would request that other editors review their content for what it is... not as a part of some political motive.

4142:

sentences are paired that it could be construed as something along the lines of "Atlanta is a black mecca however whites are moving into the city." possibly insinuating that the larger number of whites will somehow lead to the downfall of the "black mecca" persona. =/ Am I alone in feeling that this could or should be reworded somehow? Is this even something that we need to establish in the lede? (not the black mecca part, but the increasing white population bit)

4081: 5819:

it). The other issue would be Religion and, if it is included at all, where it should be located within the article (I think it shouldn't be, because no FA city has it and the Guideline omits it, but if we do decide to include it, its demographic info). A third issue would be whether Language and dialect is a demographic aspect or a cultural aspect (I think its demographic). I am anxious to hear what you think of these issues, and exited to reach consensus! ~

5721:

1556::Please go check out a World Book Enclyopedia on Atlanta; you won't see "Atlanta is a black mecca" in the intro. The intro is meant to be a general overview of the city. Specifics regarding race, sections of town, culture, history, etc. beyond very general info (ex. "Atlanta was established in 1845" or "The city is home to various ethnic groups") should be placed in other parts. If you want to include Atlanta being a black mecca, the intro is not the place. 95:

War and increasing info about 20th century racial politics. Also, I am suspicious of edits that are made just so an editor can introduce articles he or she has created. Lastly, the 20th century was but one era and should not dominate the whole article. There must be a balance, which I think the present writing adequately achieves. Thus, I think the section is fine as it is and I oppose any politically motivated overhaul to the history section.--

4106: 5911:

the GWTW premiere which completely overlooks that it was a whites-only event and one of the Oscar-winning stars was excluded because of her race. Not to mention that MLK Senior led a choir of black youth dressed as Aunt Jemimas and pickanninies and was heavily criticized. The siginificance of the events was the hundreds of thousands of people who lined the streets - but to glorify the event is really taking one side of the story only.

4982: 4183: 651: 575: 5203:

Adding a picture of snowy Atlanta may be pretty, yes, but it adds huge undue weight to snow in Atlanta. Knowledge should be as representative as possible of reality. There are currently 30 photos of buildings and other outside (modern) scenes of Atlanta in sunshine, adding just 1 photo of snow would give a 521.1% over-representation of snow in Atlanta. It would be much more accurate to add pictures of rain in Atlanta (Just saying.)

5894:

example of *integration* in the history section would be the sentence that talks about the founding of Atlanta's colleges: "By 1885, the founding of the Georgia School of Technology (now Georgia Tech) and the city’s black colleges had established the city as a center for higher education." The sentence does not segregate between Georgia Tech and the AUC; rather, it treats each of their founding with equal importance. --

7577:- the reason I reverted is the fact that there is no citation to back it up as a pertinent addition to the current economy of Atlanta. At best it belongs in the Economy of Atlanta article, but that a pretty hot mess. It's not important enough to be in the History section, and it's not current economy. Hence my revert. If there was a History of Atlanta Economy, it would belong there. Anyway, that was my thinking. 550:"I think it is imperative that such institutions are listed", no where in this paragraph did I say the above listed HBCU's deserve their "own" paragraph. I do not think that HBCU's deserve special privileges. I just think that in the colleges and Universities paragraph, that they need to be listed individually as where the other institutions in Atlanta, GA in the section of colleges and universities. Thank-You. ( 1704:

just don't want to hear anything about black-related aspects of a city that is 56% black, was historically the center of black advancement, and is now a black capital in a unique way. I am sure with additional attention to this discussion from other editors, they will also agree that there has been a systematic suppression of content about black-related in this article for years, and it's high time this ended.

4036: 153:

The 20th century section of history is now only slightly longer than the 19th century part (and keep in mind, the city didn't even exist for all of the 19th). I agree the history section needs to be shortened, but believe this can be done by suppressing excessive detail in the 19th century part, and some fine tuning of sentences, rather than eliminating major socio-political trends from the 20th century.

6172:

articles are not meant to match reality. They can offer facts and statistics, but not emotions or opinions; they can describe how a city was then or is now, but not what it should be; they can describe how an event took place, but they cannot impart how it felt for those who experienced it. Basically, what I am trying to say is that an encyclopedia cannot match everyday reality, in all its complexity.

172:

the 1960s. I went ahead and tried it, and it required taking sutff out, but considering the 1950s and 60s are only 20% of the 20th century, they should not dominate this much. If anything, the 1980s should have a paragraph, yet it is not even mentioned. Not every event can be mentioned. The 1917 Atlanta fire is not mentioned. Neither is the 2008 tornado. Niether is the 1915 lynching of Leo Frank.--

3283:, likely as a result of the dispute. More sources aren't always better by default. 15 references for one statement is not "well sourced", it's a nightmare, and perhaps symptomatic of the fact that there is actually an issue with the content in the article. I think cleaning up that section and using only two or three of the strongest and most reliable sources would be the best thing to do. - 6113:

Basically, we need to reach consensus on this point: statistically and factually, is Atlanta unique among major eastern cities in terms of its demographics? Is it appropriate to mention the multiple demographic trends affecting Atlanta in the lede? Or is this kind of detail is much too specific and minute for the lede, and thus should be dealt with in its proper section (i.e., demographics)?--

8413: 7720: 1638:

most people who live in Atlanta, I could find numerous additional sources. I really don't understand why the other editor disputes those as facts but do recognize a consistent removal of facts and trends relating to African Americans who form the majority of the city's population. Anyway, I moved this information about "black mecca" to the Demographics section as the other editor requested.

1370:"As the city's new residents transformed communities long in decline into neighborhoods of choice" - there is no proof that the "new residents" are responsible for the gentrification - most of this gentrification in my experience is by people who already lived here - so it's both some new and many already resident people responsible for the trend - so best not to state the actor 3180:

info in the lead, but you can't just keep taking it out because you don't like it. Let us know what you'd do next to improve the weight and balance, or just go ahead and do it, as long as it's sensible and doesn't remove "black mecca". As I warned you on your talk page, more reverting of the addition of this info to the lead will get you blocked again, probably for longer.

7214:, you'll also see that Atlanta is listed as Salzburg's Sister City. Not sure why Salzburg doesn't have their sister city on their website, certain cities don't, even in this country. Salzburg's city website does not mention the sister city program at all, but does speak to other types of city relationships. Regardless, as I said earlier, this isn't a big thing for me. 3057:

little like the literacy tests that were applied here in the South for nearly 100 years... if you want to prove a "certain" point you need to go to all lengths... a dozen major newspapers and magazines are not sufficient. However if you want to say that Atlanta is famous for its rolling hills or pretty trees, one citation from a chamber of commerce brochure will do.

5864:

developers, the lack of environmental protections, and natural changes, such as drought. Thus, what is unique is that Atlanta not only has the highest tree coverage, but that it this tree coverage is being destroyed by the factors I have listed. I hope that makes sense; it's really the tree canopy + the threat to the tree canopy that makes the situation unique. --

5935:

Atlanta is simply #1 amongst other cities. No sentences such as "Atlanta's weather makes it ideal for..." ("ideal" is actually an exaggeration and not factual) Finally, we should not avoid the downsides to the city - the slums, the crime, the traffic. We are supposed to be writing the facts not painting a shining picture of the city, much as I do like the city.

3494:"Racist" Anyone who knows much about Islam knows that it is a religion which is very determined to unite different races (Middle Eastern white, African black, Indonesian, etc.). Muslims do not think in terms of race, they think in terms of religion, Islam. Muslims do not decry anti-Muslim bias as "racism" since it has nothing to do with race but purely religion. 3808:

probably *could* prove that there has been substantial growth in the foreign born population too. But to assert that "Atlanta has an international population" - I really think it cannot be done. BTW, can you share with me why you think it is my "opinion" that Atlanta is 8% foreign-born which is far less than the 12% national average? How is that my "opinion"?

418:

be amongst the most important in terms of Atlanta's history, that's all. As for AUC, it is the most important HBCU in the country (when taken as a whole) - why opposition to calling it out as such? I am too tired to edit it back in. But, lastly, I put back the 2010 stats, your edit replaced them with the old 2006 stats and I cannot imagine that was intentional.

8773:

mess down by removing the bogus ones, and fixing up as many of the rest as I can. I'm going a bit wonky at this point, my eyes can't focus from looking at so many Internet Archive URLs. So I'm going to leave the last 7 remaining tags for someone else to clean up - just search for "dead link" in the article. Let me know if I messed up anything. Cheers. --

2014:, the use of bullets is unnecessary, the block quote was too large and served too little purpose, and the entitling of a section "black Mecca" is far too sensationalist for an encyclopedia. The phrase "black Mecca" is well sourced now, due to your research, but as a section title, this is too much. I have edited the contribution down thoroughly.-- 5386:

to college is simply an educated individual, not and educated *black* individual. As a minority myself, I think its wonderful that in Atlanta, people are judged by the content of their character, not their skin color. But just like your view of race in Atlanta, mine is only an opinion and therefore must be omitted under Knowledge guidelines.

4420:

crucial part of the nickname that sets it apart from just "ATL"; in other words, ATL includes "the ATL". Does that make sense? Also Im African American so I am familiar with "The A"--for that nickname, "the" is deinitely included--you will never hear anybody say "Are you going to A for the weekend?" Just my two cents :) ;) -Ustmusichall

5660:

factual information within the article sections, we should be able to reach a consensus easily and quickly enough. Please feel free to create a new section describing what you think should be changed, how and why and then we'll discuss them. Any agreed-upon changes will be made, I promise. Keizers and I follow wikipolicy and consensus.

6852:

that. I don't necessarily disagree with him, but as it is now, stylistically, it gives a symmetry to the photos, and while Buckhead is correct, Uptown is not incorrect. I think Buckhead is more correct, but Uptown fits in more with the layout. Rather than simply change it, I thought it might be good to get other's thoughts.

818:

way. Quite different than what is relevant to people in the suburbs whose picture of the city is a caricature limited to the trendy restaurants, cultural and sports facilities and airport. Please go have a look at all the articles I've done in the last few days on antebellum Atlanta buildings. It may make you feel better.

1169:

worked very hard to construct it, and its entirely true. Nothing in it is fabricated, so YOU tell ME, what is un-enyclopaedic about it? Or is it more that you are just uncomfortable with the white population growth in Atlanta (which is why you keep going after the paragraph about white pop. growth and why you deleted

5574:

specific to Atlanta. For example, the Louisville, Kentucky article has a section dealing with the city's nomenclature and pronunciation, since its name is often mispronounced. Also, FYI, I plan on making a massive expansion of the Tree Canopy sub-article, which would make the two paragraphs here an adequate summary (

2222:

other cities in multi-ethnic countries; and that stating a fundamental characteristic about the city in the intro related to the majority ethnic group is somehow "unfair" to other ethnic groups). I would really like some advice about how I can stop the other editor from blocking the inclusion of that one sentence:

3758:

corporations, and the metro area is probably average as far as foreign born population goes. And the city may well be more international (foreign born) than ever in history. But the city of Atlanta is not a particularly "international" city. Any use of that term really needs to be sourced and have some meaning.

2732:

thinks that highly relevant race-related information is inappropriate in an intro. Until you do, I believe you should stop acting like this page belongs to you, stop the systematic suppression of information about Atlanta's black heritage that I have documented that you do under my "anti-black bias" post above.

4088:. removed because 1) the neighborhoods section needs to illustrate areas outside of downtown/Midtown/Buckhead skyline. 2) This pic was just not that great, showed the wedge end of the Candler Building and some trees in Woodruff Park, nothing really spectacular. Didn't really "say" anything about Downtown. 368:%ages of other races and without pockets of whites - only some white or mixed neighborhoods at the very edges (Home Park or Whittier Mills...) I will have to go crunch some historic census data by zip code to craft the exact sentence which is 100% true but still conveys the true essence of what happened. 8116:

Recently a editor added a 'local' IPA pronunciation for 'Atlanta', alongside the existing IPA pronunciation. A second editor then removed the local version, calling it slangy. Well, we don't judge material as suitable for WP articles based on our feelings as t what sounds right, nor by how long we've

7429:

I think it would be helpful if I do not respond directly to posts here. My position is that this is a simple content dispute, and that resolution will come from relying on reliable sources. The sources I have posted are gathered from using Google. In my opinion, those sources are reliable, and should

6984:

collapse") and editorializing on data found in sources ("Thus, Atlanta's current economic crisis was only worsened, and not caused, by the Recession."). It is also heavy on statistical comparisons; surely several statements could be cut to reduce wordiness. Please discuss changes, if any, that should

6949:

The article states "Atlanta has the highest elevation of major cities east of the Mississippi River." It then links to a website listing altitudes of US major cities. It isn't on the first page but Pittsburgh PA is listed at 1,203 ft. and Atlanta is 1,050 ft. Pittsburgh is a major city east of the

6497:

It took a lot of work, but I think the Atlanta article (hereinafter “Atlanta”) is ready for FA nomination. I conducted a complete re-write of the article, removing large amounts of unnecessary information, substituting outdated information with new information, and completely re-structuring the order

6354:

I am not really tied to these statements and would not be against their ommission. I do think the one referring to the culture is to say that Atlanta is not as devoid as culture as it is popularly perceived to be. There may be better ways to phrase that though. It may actually make for a better intro

6314:

Ok, so we established that it's not correct to say it's a Mecca because that's POV; and I think we might both agree it's a "center", perhaps some aspects are unique/leading (education, black elite, civil rights cradle) and others aren't (e.g. the simple demographic majority). It seems the argument to

6089:

Guys, I really don't think its a good idea (and may even be against Wikipolicy, but I'm not sure) to segregate the article by race, ex. "center of white wealth" or "center of black wealth." Labeling a city a "center of wealth" is itself un-encyclopaedic. The correct phrasing would be "high income" or

5783:

Thanks so much for joining the process and making helpful suggestions. I apologize for not using the correct process; I was under the incorrect assumption that as long as an overhaul is explained in the discussion, it can proceed. Sorry about that! The process you recommended (and, now that I look at

5692:

5627:

Keizers, I realize we have butted heads in the past, and for that, I sincerely apologize. My behavior was wrong. Please realize that I am a completely new person, and give me another chance to work with you in a civil manner. I will make sure that this time around, there will be NO edit warring on my

5375:

Thanks very much for the contributions and suggestions. I have read over the discussions, and I do not see any consensus reached that demographic information must be included in the lede. The only consensus I see was regarding the usage of the term "black mecca." The purpose of the comparisons to DC,

5301:

argument for the inclusion of this image aside from your stated: Snow isn't typical, the reader should know about the snow, Atlanta gets cold every winter and has for 130 years, it's a misconception to suggest no snow (No one suggested that, see the above quote from the article), Snow is a historical

5229:

I'll disagree, I'll tell you why. What is typical or stereotypical is not always the situation, and the reader should be familiar with that. The city of Atlanta always experiences temperatures as low as 20F, every winter, for 130+ years. Winters in Atlanta are mild, yet it would be a misconception to

5059:

It is one thing to note Atlanta's historical black history; it's another to make almost no mention of the city's white history as well. While there is a separate article on the history of Atlanta, just a "Atlanta quickly rebounded and prospered" after being burnt to the ground in 1864 doesn't cut it.

4850:

I would deal with it by just removing "black mecca" from the lede - in my opinion, the sentence would not lose anything by leaving it out. We would be left with "The city has long been known as a center of black wealth, political power and culture; it is a cradle of the Civil Rights Movement and home

4763:

I agree that using a sockpuppet for impersonation is disruptive, and I wasn't basing my comments on theirs. (Not that I checked the SPI report - I just tend to place lesser importance on posts written in all-caps.) I regard "Mecca" as somewhat of a loaded term due to its origins as a metaphor for the

4483:

I think it's fine to pare them down... I wanted to but was averse to offending anybody who might be "into" skylines. My only gripe is that it would be nice to show Downtown, Midtown and Buckhead skylines. I am pretty sure there is not a nice one of Buckhead... there is one that looks smoggy and a lot

4157:

You know, I was just reading the conversations above. I rescinded my opinion (though I still agree with it, I'd rather not get into an argument) But here's my two cents: Black Mecco should /not/ be in the lede and neither should the white population increase. 54% is /not/ enough to warrant mention in

4141:

I feel like the sentence in the lede, "The city has long been known as a "black mecca": a center of black wealth, political power and culture..." followed immediately by "However, the city's white population is growing rapidly..." sounds a little racist to me. I can't help but feel like the way these

4039:

at climate - this is a dark, not very good pic of the Midtown skyline with snow in Piedmont Park in foreground. Like I said, we had 7 pics of the Midtown skyline so removing this brings us down to 5. It actually doesn't fit in the climate section because the climate box is so long it is the length of

2100:

The conflict we're having here is not about the subsection - it's that I am asking to include one sentence in the intro which states Atlanta's unique character as a center of black culture, power, and wealth. It is fundamental to the definition of what Atlanta IS. Another editor is fighting tooth and

1844:

Loodog, thanks for the constructive advice. I am sure I can find more realiable sources to prove a larger point about the special status of Atlanta as a black mecca as being a primary defining characteristic of the city. It is interesting what Mmann1988 pointed out about articles about other major US

1566:

said. It is stated that Atlanta is majority black. It is stated that the 1906 race riots as a key historical event. It is stated that there was a black exodus (31,000 people) from the city in 2000-2010. The AUC are included in the list of Universities. However, Keizers is still not happy. He wants to

1265:

White population increase: I am not editing the text at this time, but the paragraph about the increase in white population (who cares what the percent was in 2006? We have a census!) is an extreme belaboring of the point, whereas any analysis of the decrease in the black population is systematically

813:

Putting back that very lengthy text which just goes on and on about restaurants and the exact percentages of growth in college educated 25-34 year olds is totally out of balance. I know you are trying to keep a theme here, but that is just way too much. You can't just have a theme for each decade and

467:

As a student at one of the colleges and universities that are not listed, I think it is imperative that such institutions are listed as they are deeply rooted in Atlanta, Ga as institutions where scholars such as W.E.B Dubois taught and students like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was able to receive an

432:

Yeah that's fine I just dont want readers to get the impression that there was no white/mixed neighborhoods left on the westside. Maybe "the majority of neighborhoods on the westside transitioned to almost entirely black"? And I dont mean to come off as combative, I just think we have different views

298:

Incorrect. The "entire" south side and west side did not become "virtually 100% black". Those are very absolute terms. West End retained white residents, as did Home Park, Whittier Mill, Home Park, Loring Heights, Berkley Park, etc. And even the other parts of the west side were never "virtually 100%

8772:

A few days ago someone used the (often malfunctioning) Checklinks script to drop no less than 46 dead link tags into the article. Yikes. It turned out many of these tags were bogus - either the links weren't dead or there were perfectly good Internet Archive links already supplied. I've whittled the

7898:

I also find them somewhat unappealing, but also don't have an issue with their inclusion either. They do seem to take up an inordinate amount of time as ips are continually adding their favorite foreign cities to the lists, which then have to be removed. The section is very well-sourced, being cited

6888:

I see material is back that states Atlanta is one of the most multi-cultural cities in the US. While I think Atlanta is an interesting place, and understand the point that "Atlanta is not particularly Southern" except in its historical roots, the numbers do not show that Atlanta has a lot of foreign

6556:

Atlanta is no Los Angeles. Unlike that city, where the film industry is such an integral part of the city’s economy that it seeps into the city’s culture, Atlanta’s film industry is purely an aspect of the city’s economy. Thus, I moved it to that section. Perhaps in time Atlanta’s film industry will

5981:

I also am a resident (and native) of intown Atlanta, and as a person of color, I must disagree. Atlanta's identity is progressive race relations, which has resulted in a city where everyone can thrive, regardless of skin color. In Atlanta, people are judged by the content of their character, not the

5809:

As stated earlier, I agree with avoiding too-detailed information in the lede paragraph, the lead section should be able to adequately stand alone as an accurate summary of the key points vital to the article, I'm not so sure about demographics but as I said, let's talk about the lead a bit later. -

5211:

one of the coldest cities in the United States (with a high temperature around 70 degrees) uses a picture of flowers and a river as the "Main" photograph despite the average high being lower than 60 for 8 months of the year. Regardless, you see and understand what I mean, it's grossly inaccurate for

5202:

To the point about adding a photograph of snow in Atlanta, I completely disagree with the addition of ANY snow photograph and I'll tell you why: Atlanta has an average of 1.9 days of snow per year, 113.3 days of Rain per year and that leaves 250.05 days of sunshine in an average year of 365.25 days.

4558:

Hey guys, I was trying not to edit the article, but things have taken a really disturbing turn. An editor who objects to the term "black mecca" has created a sock puppet, RodewayInn, and removed all references to "black mecca", even in the body of the article. I made an edit ONLY to put that content

4315:

208.253.23.130 changed the nickname "The ATL" to "ATL" saying it was more common. I added sources to show common use of the term "The ATL". I am aware of "ATL" as an airport code, but cannot find evidence of that as a nickname. (I live in Atlanta and do not also come across that usage, i.e. you hear

2899:

I'm not categorically against mentioning race in the lead. As the sources show, Atlanta as a center of black culture, in combination with the city's gentrification issues are probably a decently notable part of the story here. I'd say the lead probably merits one sentence about the city's race and

2363:

That's the thing, though. Kiezers only wants black people mentioned, and its not fair to minorities like myself who live in Atlanta and are a part of the city, too. In addition, Atlanta does not have the "highest ratio of blacks to total population of any US city except Detroit." Detroit is over 80%

2277:

If anything, the most noteworthy info about Atlanta's demographics is how many white people are moving into the city. Again, if Kiezers insists on including it, I am going to have to insist on including info about the explosive growth of white people, and how Atlanta's Hispanic and Asian populations

2221:

Majoreditor, I very much appreciate your comments. I am happy with what the other editor is "permitting" me to put in the Demographics section, this conflict is really about the intro section. It goes back to the same two arguments which I find invalid (i.e. what the Miami article does as opposed to

1668:

The article could and should say more about how Atlanta is a capitol for black culture, business and society. Editors should work at building upon single sentence which is currently in the demographic section; Keizers, thanks for adding the material. As it's built out it can become a sub-section and

1527:

As for your new emphasis of Atlanta as a "black Mecca" and center of black culture, is this an established fact of Atlanta? Is it a well-known thing for Atlanta to be a black culture center, more than say Philadelphia, Baltimore, DC, or New York? We always have to be on guard for the danger that a

1485:

Despite blocking any edition of basic facts and trends relating to blacks, the editor in question has fought for lengthy, extensive sections on the growing diversity of the city beyond black and white - a diversity of Hispanics and Asians which is still less than 9% of the city's population. This is

1137:

Thanks for the personal attack (again), Mmann1988. Look I don't know who the previous editors were but you and I seem to be the only continuously active ones here and there's a difference of opinion here. I do think that the article reads like a Chamber of Commerce brochure and is in many places not

417:

I just think there is a big difference between a word like "many" and the reality which is "almost entirely" (say, 90%+). As for race - if you look at my overall contributions you'll see I contribute what I believe are important points about Atlanta whatever they may be. Racial issues just happen to

367:

OK yes you are correct on both points in that they were not absolutes. I still think that saying "many" neighborhoods on the west and south side gives a very different impression than the reality which is that the northwest west and southsides became overwhelmingly black - neighborhoods with minimal

110:

Mmann1988 has characterized my opinions as politically motivated. I fail to see what political motive I have, I am merely suggesting that the content needs to reflect topics that are under-represented in the article: Trends such as blockbusting, the history of the political machine and the change of

8244:

The correct pronunciation of the city's name in standard English so closely tracks its simple spelling that I really see no need for an IPA pronunciation guide. This is not a Native American, French or Spanish-originated or influenced place name that has been corrupted or evolved in modern English

8120:

American English pronunciation is certainly not prescriptive. So I recommend we find WP:RS and discuss whether we really want to open this kettle of fish. I came across these edits from my watch list, and found myself running my mouth on Atlanta embedded in several phrases. Depending on the rest of

6268:

No, it would still be POV, even stating it in those terms. Saying that a because sources refer to something in a way makes it factually true violates POV. For example, I could collect a bunch of sources stating that "the U.S. is frequently referred to as a center of democracy." That may be true, or

6216:

Mmann1988, given the above, do you wish to keep references to Atlanta being a center of black wealth/culture/history/education/political power out of the intro? We have significant references throughout the article about specifically black educational institutions, political power, and culture, and

6148:

We have to remember Knowledge is an encylopedia, not a special interest magazine. I don't know of any encyclopedia that segregates topics by race, and I don't think its in-line with Wikipolicy. Even if it was appropriate for an encyclopedia to segregate topics based on race, including this specific

6133:

I don't mean it exists separately. I mean that the concepts of black wealth, black education, black political power, black history and black culture exist as separate topics which are covered in the press and books. Atlanta's significance in these areas, when they are identified as separate topics,

5659:

Still, I believe that we can definitely improve the article, but we need to establish consensus for changes. It might be best to ignore the lede (for now) as this is a hot-button issue for all the editors here. (My personal opinion being that we should generalize a bit more). But as far as sourced,

5559:

I edited this to make it more accurate. Gentrification is but one aspect of the revitalization of Atlanta, not the other way around. For example, the BeltLine is not gentrification, but it is revitalization. Also, it is important to note what effects revitalization has had on Atlanta's landscape: a

5440:

Again, this is another demographic trend. Atlanta has too many demographic trends for them to all be mentioned in the lede. This kind of detail is much too specific and minute for the lede, and, as previously mentioned, no consensus was reached as to whether demographic information should be in the

5385:

In my opinion, what makes Atlanta unique is its progressive race relations, which has created an environment where *everyone* can thrive. The theme is inclusiveness; a city that does not see skin color. Wealth is wealth in Atlanta; it doesn't have to be *black* wealth. In Atlanta, a person who went

4781:

The sentence now reads "Atlanta has long been known as a black mecca" - perhaps if it stated "Atlanta has long been called" or "referred to" "as a black mecca" that would address the potential issue i.e. make it clear that this is about what is *stated* by the numerous popular sources. The point is

4401:

208.253.23.130, your examples do remind me of how "ATL" is used, as a sort of shorthand. However, times have definitely changed since you grew up here and "The ATL" is definitely a nickname that is common. It started out as "urban" and nowadays "non-urban" Atlantans might well use it with a wink.

4070:

About neighborhoods The neighborhoods section needs to illustrate areas outside of downtown/Midtown/Buckhead skyline. The bulk of our neighborhoods fall into categories like: Victorian areas, bungalow areas, Buckhead/Morningside mansions & ranch houses, and then the new mixed-income communities

3179:

M, thanks for talking about it here, and letting us know that you have an issue with the term "mecca". But it seems that we have a consensus here that such a phrase, mentioned in so many sources to characterize Atlanta, is worth a mention in the lead. I'll help you keep a balance on the amount of

2731:

On your point 5, you attack my examples simply because they come from outside the US borders. In the end, this all comes down to: you don't believe something about black people belongs in the intro - at best because it offends you as a Hispanic. You have not shown that one other person on Knowledge

2450:

I'm simply asking to include a sentence about Atlanta being a unique center of black culture, power and wealth. Why is that so offensive? Anybody can include intro-worthy facts about other races, I'm just not aware of any others for Atlanta which define the city. Is there a consensus that you can't

1793:

Keizers, the only thing that belongs in the introduction are things that already appear in the article below in more depth. The intro is meant to be a summary of what's covered in the article. If you can write out a nice, developed section within the article, and we have a consensus that this is a

1748:

page; that city is arguably THE Hispanic mecca and yet there is no mention of it in the intro; then, go to San Francisco; that city is arguably THE Asian mecca, and yet there is no mention of it in the intro; then, go to Washington; that city is arguably THE black mecca, and yet there is no mention

1703:

I put back something in the intro - Atlanta's status as a black "capital" is not only a key, defining characteristic of what this city is, it also makes it unique in the country. To not have it in the intro as a basic fact about Atlanta is ridiculous. I am tired of acquiescing to people who clearly

1573:

He accuses me of being "anti-black." As a minority myself, I am extremely offended by this; in any case, he is the one who is racist. He wants other groups such as Hispanics, Asians, and, yes, whites, excluded from the article. He wants black people to be the sole focus of the article, to the point

1452:

I am running up against consistent anti-black bias on the part of the other active editor on this page. For the record I am white (not that it should matter) and live in the City. Anyone who lives in Atlanta knows, and it is well documented, that this is a black mecca, a center of black culture and

1302:

I removed the demographics article because it doesn't contain any additional factual information than what is here in the main article. I clearly stated that in the Edit Summary. Please read what I write there and at least challenge me on the motives I express there rather than guessing at them. Or

1067:

has slowed Atlanta's hiring of young urban professionals, it is likely that the "whitening" of Atlanta has stalled out. In any case, it is not encyclopedic to write this as a "current event," this comment should be re-written, something like "during the 2000-2010 decade, the city of Atlanta's white

992:

Majoreditor, you need to consider the *stress* in this situation. Certainly when people emphasize each syllable, it's AT-LAN-TUH with the "at" like the word "at". The initial ə is not indicating UHT-lanta but rather the unemphasized sound - called a "schwa"- like the "a" in "sofa". Yes it's an "uh"

925:

Currently, the primary pronunciation of Atlanta is listed as ətˈlæntə, for those who do not know IPA this translates to UT-LAN-TUH. I have lived in the city for all my life and I've never heard anyone pronounce the first sound in the word as an UH combined with pronouncing the T near the end of the

865:

I am not personally attacking you--I just think some people are VERY bothered by what Atlanta has become in recent years. They want the old Atlanta back, the crime-infested, non-diverse, declining 1990s Atlanta and want the Knowledge article to reflect that. but that is NOT reality. This is the NEW

206:

I also still agree the article is too long, minutiae should still be removed from other paragraphs (e.g. all the detail about "Thrasherville"). I'd still like to work on that. As for balance across decades I see your point that there's nothing there about the 80s. Perhaps that is because nothing of

192:

I totally agree the history section of the main article cannot contain every single event. Again I am saying that there were fundamental events and trends missing. At this point I would say my additions have rectified that, except for the explicit mention of how neighborhoods turned over and entire

94:

I think the history section is very impressive, and has served the page well for the several years it has been up. While edits and improvements should certainly be made, I don't think it's necessary nor appropriate to institute a complete overhaul of the section by reducing the info about the Civil

7351:

Founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956, Sister Cities International is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) nonprofit which serves as the national membership organization for individual sister cities, counties, and states across the U.S. This network unites tens of thousands of citizen diplomats and

7157:

Your arguments are not applicable, not at all. SCI is not an independent organisation. Further an US-american one. And secondly, Sister Cities, or whatever you may call it, is not an award, but a formal agreement between two municipalities, formally signed between them. Thirdly, there is no reason

6904:

Metro Atlanta is increasingly international, with its 716,434 foreign-born residents in 2010, a 69% increase versus 2000. This was the fourth largest rate of growth among the nation's top 100 metros, after Baltimore, Orlando and Las Vegas. The foreign-born proportion of the population went up from

6609:

Atlanta’s tree canopy is unique, and as such, it can be classified as a “topic specific to the city.” The Guideline suggested topics specific to a city be placed at the end of an article. The previous incarnation places the tree canopy in the parks section, which is a bit inaccurate, since I would

6444:

I don't agree that "Atlanta was never known for a particular genre" even though one source may have said that. Atlanta was famous for Country music. And Atlanta is today the capital of hip-hop/rap (as per the NYT article) - therefore I think it'd be more fair to say that Atlanta was well known for

6334:

Other points about the intro: The sentences: "As of 2010, Atlanta is the seventh most visited city in the United States, with over 35 million domestic and overseas visitors annually. Atlanta is renowned for its robust cultural institutions, which draw creative people and audiences to the city." do

6112:

Due to my sock-puppertry and immature antics, that discussion really should be re-initiated and should be centered not on whether mecca is included, but a general discussion on whether there is any top-level, one-sentence conclusion about Atlanta's demographics that should be included in the lede.

6097:

That is not correct. I would like to see the sentences that were there before - in the intro and in the body - about Atlanta being a center of black wealth, political power, history and culture. There was a whole discussion about that (well, specifically the term mecca but we had gone back on that

5996:

I am not contradicting that in any way. I agree with you about progressive race relations. But progressive race relations doesn't mean that all aspects of the city's life are integrated across races. Far from it. In some ways they are, and in some way there are distinct and separate identities for

5910:

2) that the history not revert to a style which glorifies events and does not present the struggles and downsides. Things were what they were - many glorious and beautiful things, and also much, much sadness for half the population punctuated by advances. An example is the extensive description of

5851:

Guys, I don't have *that* strong of an opinion on the matter, but my opinion is: I have not seen enough evidence that the Tree Canopy is sufficiently unique - rather than just the fact that Atlanta has the highest percentage of tree coverage. Only a truly unique situation would warrant it standing

5818:

I think the main issues outside the lede section that consensus needs to be reached on is whether the Tree canopy is a specific enough topic to the city (according to the Guideline) to warrant its own section (I think it is, because having the highest tree coverage means your susceptible to losing

5720:

5589:

No, it was intentional. As a religious person, it does sadden me to see how much religion has been scrubbed from the public sphere. Knowledge is no exception, for not a single FA city included religion, and the Guideline did not include a religion section and offered no advice to where it could be

5425:

The Civil Rights movement, similar to the Civil War and the 1996 Olympics, were a watershed event in the history of Atlanta. However, the Civil Rights movement is history, so I included it in the portion of the lede that summarizes the history of Atlanta. I am very happy with the end result, as it

4930:

True there's no obligation, but that's if you're *only* describing its role as a center of wealth (Etc.). I would argue that the phrase itself, as used by many people and in many sources, is worth referring to in and of itself. In other words, that it's notable that it's called a "black mecca", in

4419:

Oh, I know ATL only came about recently (as in, since millennium). I only moved away from ATL in 2007 to go to college, and I am about to mvoe back there and still friends with people who are from there or stay there. I just dont see "ATL" as distinct from "the ATL", as in, I dont think "the" is a

3826:

I am not an auto-confirmed editor and cannot edit it. I am unsure if it can be asserted that Atlanta has an international population, but I don't think your opinion that 8% foreign-born is not enough to make a city international should be substituted for reality if, in fact, "international" can be

3518:

Wow, literally the MINUTE I informed the other editor that I was aware of his sock puppet, he got active. Now, as I speak, user "RodewayInn" is busy making multiple minor edits to pages having to do with Islam. Presumably this is so that people will see a list of edits, not look at the timestamps,

3477:

User is too slick: The user is new and his first action was to make an edit at 0:09 GMT on 3 January, and then at 00:20 make an entry on the Atlanta Discussion page. Pretty good for a new user. In my experience, first-time users often clumsily make an edit, often with syntax errors, using their IP

2393:

Yes. I wanted to put in a general sentence regarding race and ethnicity that is similar to those found in the lead of every other major American city: "The city has a population from various ethnic and religious backgrounds and a large and growing international community." Kiezers promptly removed

2190:

Mmann, I hope that you're not discouraging Keizers or others from adding material to the article. Let's focus on adding relevant, balanced, properly-sourced material. In time some of the subsections may merit their own article. In the meanwhile, perhaps we should hold off on adding anything to the

1913:

An editor feels Atlanta is "too black", that blacks have brought the city down for so many reasons like crime and bad government and is sick of hearing about black people and how Atlanta is black. He or she would like to make up rules that say that any content relating to race or ethnicity must be

1637:

I gave two Ebony articles from different decades calling Atlanta "a" black mecca (I never called it "the" black mecca as the other editor alleges); I gave a recent NYT article calling Atlanta the mecca of black entertainment, and so forth. This is pretty established information which is obvious to

817:

Please stop personal attacks. You know that it's not appropriate on Knowledge. Am I harping on race simply because I find the razing of all the public housing important? I think that's completely normal when you live *in* the city and that is something that impacts you as a city resident in a huge

171:

The history section is supposed to just be an overview. It cannot include every single event. There is simply too much info covering 1950s and 1960s. Those are only two decades, yet they take up 5 paragraphs. They need to be consolodated into two paragraphs--one covering the 1950s and one covering

152:

I added back in some very important historic facts from the mid-20th century including blockbusting and white flight. These trends completely transformed the landscape of the city. Atlanta's history cannot be understood without understanding these trends, which is why I am arguing to include them.

7472:

Besides, let me make a personal remark about your "comment remark": Either you take part in a discussion and take position, whatever it may be (pro, contra, neutral, factual or whatever), or you stay away from stating any remark just from the beginning; anything else is just bloodless humming and

6851:

brought up some very valid points in making an edit I reverted regarding the 3 photos in the cityscape section. The captions read: Downtown, Midtown and Uptown. Mmann brought up the point that uptown section of Atlanta is called Buckhead, and wants to change the caption on the photo to indicate

6591:

As a religious person, it does sadden me to see how much it has been scrubbed from the public sphere. Knowledge is no exception, and not a single FA article included religion, and the Guideline offered no advice to whether it should be included (it isn’t in the Guideline template). Perhaps we can

6253:

It would be POV to state it in those words, but to state that "Atlanta is frequently referred to as a center of..." a center of all those things is simply a fact, given the plethora of press articles, books and other research. Try it on for size as I've just done the edit (in fact it's how it was

5800:

I also agree that we should reach consensus on other parts of the article and hold off on the lede (I also am of the aopinion that we should generalize as much as possible). I am really looking forward to reaching consensus in a civil way that follows Wikipolicy, and perhaps could even serve as a

5706:

5252:

I'll agree on one point: Historically significant occurrences do warrant mention but your argument to include an image of snow in Atlanta on that basis is invalid: It is neither common enough, nor rare enough to warrant an image in this article. The article is large enough as it is. Please feel

5122:

Agreed, my edits were a (admittedly failed) attempt to make the section a bit more concise in the context of this article because it's currently a bit on the long side. Although I have no qualms about expanding the history, for the Atlanta article to remain readable, we have to keep an eye on the

3807:

Really, "Ganway"? Then why don't you add the statement and source it. See if there is a source that you can attribute that would make the statement "international" meaningful. I think you can do that with regard to Atlanta's position as a HQ for international businesses, for its airport, etc. You

3218:

I'd like to hear from other editors before we deem this a consensus. Mecca is a very loaded term and does not belong in a lead. Just because you and another editor think it does is irrelevant. Also, please do not threaten me with probabilities. You are blocking our ability towards working towards

1228:

I just mixed up the two paragraphs that were currently in question. You are quite correct the 2000-2010 paragraph does not mention race. I was referring to the belabored point about white growth in demographics, and then to the belabored point about restaurants in the 2000-2010 paragraph. Both of

1168:

White professionals??? There you go again. DO YOU EVEN REALIZE THE 2000-2010 PARAGRAPH MAKES NO MENTION OF RACE?? Holy crap. That is so demented. I am not white, but I think its totally obvious you are targeting white people in your edits. You can say whatever you want about that paragraph, but I

902:

Last point, it de-legitimizes the whole argument about young professionsals to talk about the number of restaurants in Downtown. Downtown? Come on. Downtown is still for visitors and the very rare Fairlie-Poplar pioneer. These young people are enjoying restaurants in Midtown, the Old Fourth Ward,

6171:

I also wanted to touch briefly on your comments about matching the article to reality. I wanted to offer my opinion that not only do I think that this should never be a goal of a Knowledge article; but also that I do not think it is possible for a Knowledge article to match reality. Encyclopedia

6093:

Keizers, I am really trying to understand where you are coming from on this, but it is difficult, so please correct me if I'm wrong. But it seems as if you want sections of the article segregated into sub-sections by race, i.e., a non-black history of Atlanta and a black history of Atlanta, or a

5934:

3) that we not write in a "glowing" style like a tourist of chamber of commerce brochure, but rather write factually. This includes not using banal terms such as saying Atlanta's weather is "mild" (mild compared to where? and what about our scathing summers?). Not saying things are "unique" when

5893:

I don't think anyone is arguing against ignoring Atlanta's living, breathing role in African American history and culture. However, I think it is important that this history and culture be *integrated* into the article. In other words, the history section should not be segregated by race. A good

5669:

PS: General rule of thumb; if you want to edit an article, check the talk page and edit history to see how active the page is as far as editing; if it's fairly active (or has regular editors), it's best to discuss what you want to do first. If there's little/no editing (or only IP edits) you can

5573:

I made Tree Canopy its own section, even if it is a geographic feature. According to the guideline, topics specific to the city can have their own section at the end. It has nothing to do with uniqueness. With the highest tree coverage, the destruction of Atlanta's tree canopy is significant and

4821:

a black mecca. I think that you misunderstand my intention - I'm not suggesting that we "water down" the wording at all - rather, I think that properly attributing the term will make the wording stronger. How about this version: 'Atlanta was renowned as a center of black wealth, political power,

3412:

I would like to suggest that we please not use the term "international community" when talking about Hispanics and Asians. I am actually "international" — and white (European American). And if I speak about the international community I mean something completely different again — all foreigners

2345:

It should be OK in the lead, as it summarizes well-sourced content in the article. Singling out one race for a mention in the lead does make a bit of sense for a city with the "highest ratio of blacks to total population of any US city except Detroit." But if someone wants to add a sentence to

2194:

Keizers, it will be helpful to draw some additional material from high-quality sources such as academic articles and scholarly publications. I'm happy to pitch in and help later on -- be it for black, Hispanic, or demographics in general -- but I will be off-wiki for a short period starting this

2034:

I'm not supportive of including this in the intro; if it is included, then I will absolutely insist on including a line about the explosive growth of Asians and Hispanics (and for that matter, whites) in Atlanta, and I will label anyone who refuses to follow the template set by EVERY OTHER MAJOR

7589:

I agree with you about the 'hot mess' at AE. And, obviously, in the status quo ante, since I restored that. Two parts to my thinking: (1) I had been researching that very initial contribution when you be me to action—I thought it was best to encourage the contribution, but argue for a different

5966:

Just a general remark about the racial issue, as someone who lives in Intown Atlanta, I do agree that "we are all Atlantans" and it would be wonderful if there were less self-identification based on race. But the reality is that those racially-specific elements are huge - Atlanta as a center of

5863:

I agree with what you are saying: Atlanta having a tree canopy is not, in itself, unique. However, in my opinion, what is notable and unique is the situation Atlanta is facing: the city with the highest percentage of tree canopy is at risk of losing that ranking because of clear-cutting, greedy

5514:

This is an aspect of the city's economy, and I did consider adding it to the lede section that deals with the economy. However, even though it is growing, film and television production takes up an incredibly small portion of Atlanta's economy. As the Guideline suggests, only Primary industries

4498:

I don't really like the bars much either, aside from the occasional double-picture however, I couldn't think of how else to move them out of the gallery without having them all over the place. I moved the skylines around so they weren't all in one big block of pictures and I think it worked out

3056:

Thanks I appreciate the suggestion. I tried accessing a couple and it seems you need special access (I guess that is what JSTOR is?). I don't know how far I'll need to go to justify such an obvious fact. I have to laugh though (nothing against your suggestion, Majoredito) but it is ironically a

2557:

I do not want to compromise Atlanta's good article status by an un-encyclopedic intro that includes too much detail or unfairly highlights only one aspect of the city's complex demographics. I suggest we leave specific races out of it altogether and instead pursue an inclusive, general sentence

1489:

My "agenda" is to have the Atlanta article describe the important facts and trends about the city, whether those be pleasant or not, and whether those have to do with race or not. I argue against pursuing an agenda which goes to extreme lengths to specifically minimize the black history of, and

6460:

I am very happy with the paragraph as is, as it accurately describes Atlanta's multifaceted and evolving music scene that is not dominated by one genre. "Atlanta was never known for a particular genre" could be omitted from the paragraph and it would still convey the same meaning to readers by

6153:: I have found many sources arguing that Atlanta is NOT a black mecca due to vast income disparity, high child poverty levels, worrisome drop-out rates, corruption in city government, black-on-black crime, etc. Most of the references you point out take a very rosy, biased, and one-sided view.-- 5938:

Yes, any references to "ideal" and "mild weather" should be removed. I think traffic and pollution are pretty adequately covered in the transportation section. I also constructed (from scratch) a very comprehensive paragraph on Atlanta's economic struggles, which you can find at the end of the

3004:

I have added back the black mecca sentence into the intro. I am inviting the other participants in the discussion (from the previous Discussion section) to provide actual editing input on this point, because at the moment it is just being completely reverted back by the other editor who has an

2524:

If we include that sentence, others will have to be included to be fair to the other 46% of Atlanta, including the most noteworthy demographic trend: that Atlanta has the fastest-growing white population among major American cities. This trend, more than anything else, defines 2011 Atlanta, in

1893:

I have added quite a number of solid references showing that Atlanta is commonly referred to as "a" or "the" black mecca: Atlanta Journal-Constitution (x2), New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, MSNBC, Associated Press, Ebony (3x from 3 decades), Black Enterprise, Atlanta Magazine,

8184:

My take: is that the first "t" is almost always a hard consonant pronunciation emphasized by the accentuation on the first syllable, and the pronunciation of the second "t" is invariably softer but still present. Pronouncing the word as "Atlanna" (or "Alanna") is just wrong, and does not not

7487:

Why are you adding that note? Maybe it isn't on the website of Salzburg, but it seems that you are trying to cast doubt on whether or not they are sister cities. I haven't been here for any of this discussion so far, so if I've gotten any wrong impressions, I'm sorry, but how is this helpful?

6582:

I removed information about metro Atlanta from every section except “Economy.” This article is about the city, not the metro. However, for the economy, it is impossible to separate the city from the metro. Including references to the metro in a section like Demographics is not appropriate nor

6234:

My preference would be to exclude any references to demographics from the lede, regardless of the group. There are too many micro-trends in play for all to be mentioned. As for black educational institutions, political power, and culture, they are adequately covered in the education, history,

5455:

Demographic information about metro Atlanta should not be in the article at all, let alone in the lede. Even if this was about Atlanta, and not metro Atlanta, this kind of detail is much too specific and minute for the lede, and, as previously mentioned, no consensus was reached as to whether

5127:

get expanded. The problem lies when you expand history, John expands the cityscape section while Jane is expanding the climate section. Individually, all their edits are probably good improvements but together make the article as a whole harder to read. The main article should hit on the most

4835:

That sounds good - slightly expanded from that, it could even be a paragraph on its own somewhere down in the body of the article, in a new section about local culture or about the ethnic communities. However, how would one summarize that in an intro section - I think it's important enough to

4467:

I think that the 3 images of the skyline is too many and we should probably pick one. Also, we could probably remove some of the skyscraper pictures (the whole article is littered with them, I say keep the 2 or 3 that are the best examples. (I prefer the Candler Building over the others). Any

4031:- This was a pic of the downtown/midtown skyline with tree canopy. Main reason to remove, the picture looks like terrible smog, but in fact I think the image itself is discolored. Also, we already had 7 pics of the Midtown skyline, and we already have one other picture showing the tree canopy. 3110:

I put back the term "black mecca" — to change it to "historically significant black population" as was done in the last edit is to downplay the importance of the black population in Atlanta's identity and vice versa. The term black mecca shows that Atlanta can arguably be regarded as the most

5827:

The Tree Canopy is both unique and a geographic feature of the city. Does it warrant it's own section? I'm of the opinion that it certainly has enough notability, and I'm assuming adequate sources, to exist as a separate section. Although I'm not personally fond of the appended city-specific

888:

I give up (for now). I see some of your points, but the fact is that the paragraph is still an extremely wordy, obsessive essay on these young people and the cultural offerings and the restaurants. If that's all that's happened in Atlanta 2000-2010 is some sort of chamber of commerce picture

7162:

is not about opinions, but about the documentation of different presentations, here, about SIC's and the official Salzburg. It is not our decision to judge it, but simply to doument it. And the note I added does nothing else than this, documenting a different "factual situation"! Thanks for

6867:

It should remain Buckhead until consensus is reached that "Uptown," which is not a place, should be used instead. Uptown would be incorrect, as it is not a proper noun when used to refer to Buckhead. Perhaps "the uptown district of Atlanta" would work, but Uptown, as a proper noun, would be

3757:

I have now again removed unsourced assertions that Atlanta is "international". Atlanta's foreign born population is only 8%, far less than the US average of 12% and far, far less than cities like Miami and LA which have 40-60% foreign born. Yes, Atlanta has the headquarters of international

6569:

was established the same year as Atlanta, yet its history section was about three times as long as Atlanta. A lot has happened in Atlanta, and many key events had been omitted, despite their significance. The current incarnation of the history section is a very succinct summary of the main

5150:

How about we cut back on some of the modern-day "boosterism" and avoid the problem of "recentism". To me, the history of a city is like the history of a person: how did they grow from a small child to someone important/famous? Why did Atlanta grow to become the capital city and not stay at

2945:

will be added to the page. It will be more helpful to revise what's been added than to do a blanket reversion. Each time you see an addition that isn't encyclopedic or otherwise up to wikipedia quality, revise, but keep as much of the edit as you can. Eventually a consensus version will

2697:

On your point 3, FYI, I live in a 100-year-old section of the city of Atlanta, not in the northern suburbs, I am a member of our local history committee and have authored dozens of new Knowledge history articles about Atlanta. Reading my sources it's clear I am extremely familiar with the

7553:

Atlanta, rather than just in the 'Atlanta area'), and is an essential part of the shift from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, with a committant loss of unionized jobs. And that the rise and fall of industrial production in the Atlanta area is part of the economic history of

4718:

I agree with SudoGhost and LadyofShalott - I think we should include the basic idea, but use more neutral phrasing in the lede. I don't have a problem with having it in the article body, but if we do choose to include it there I think we should attribute it to its (multiple) sources per

3909:

An international population would have to be significant in order to make it worth mentioning. And I still haven't seen one solitary reference that says Atlanta has a relative, or significant, international population. I asked if you could provide one and I think it eludes you as it has

7785:: "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". There are no secondary, third-party sources for this section. I do not understand why this section is needed to have encyclopedic coverage of Atlanta. I think it unduly gives weight (violates 7396:, yes I know. And for the third time: I do not contradict it, not at all. And my added note to Salzburg's listing does not contradict it, neither. It just simply says, that Atlanta is not listed on Salzburg's official website as a Sister City. And again: I never said something else, 6702:

Also, it would be useful to include a sentence about the city's ParkScore ranking. This would give readers context about the success of Atlanta's city park system as compared to the 50 most populous cities in the US. Atlanta ranks 31st, tied with Tulsa. It has a raw score of 45/100.

1402:

Not all the public housing residents were black; not sure why you think that's the case. My aunt's good friend lived in one and she was Hispanic. Does she not count? In any case, I have seen many reports that most of the "displaced" residents remain in Atlanta, albeit in section 8

2321:

So, in my opinion, Kiezers has a choice: include everyone or leave out race altogether. His actions of highlighting only one group and leaving out everyone else is not done on any other major American city article, un-encyclopedic, inappropriate, sensationalist, and exclusionary.

6526:

Again, I just want to clarify that my single motivation for the edits I have made was for Atlanta to become an FA. There was a lot of info removed, but please, PLEASE do not think it was personal or to further an agenda. Again, my sole motivation was for Atlanta to become an FA.

1937:

Hi, I just want to note that the above comment from Keizersnl is mine, I am not trying to "sock puppet", I use Dutch Knowledge and Keizers was taken so I use Keizersnl for Dutch Knowledge, and when I go there it logs me into all Wiki sites with that ID. I didn't notice that this

6535:

This section was completely re-wrote it mostly using the FAs as a guide. However, according to the Guideline, “his section should include a description of the cultural aspects of the city, such as points of interest, museums, libraries...”, not a list of people from the city.

5212:

these kinds of images to be used out of place and usually by people in cities that rarely experience them. That's why so many people want snow pictures of Atlanta and people in Fairbanks have decided that a picture of flowers in the summer is a "good picture" for their city.

3084:. I added a sentence that summarizes the demographic section in one sentence, since that is the primary purpose of the lead. Keizers addition was completely overkill, and terming the city a black mecca is a POV that doesn't belong in the lead, especially the first sentence.-- 1901:

Again, one of the city's primary defining characteristics is its position as a black mecca, a center of black culture, economic power, and history which is unique. To suppress mentioning this from the intro section is absurd. There can only be one of a couple reasons for it:

220:

I'm making some small edits to make sure the text remains correct in terms of cause and effect e.g. blockbusting was actually what completely countered the efforts to keep neighborhoods white. Freeway system construction drove exodus to the suburbs not really the automobile.

677:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 7977:

I restored the Sister City section; the removal argument asserted is contrary to reality. Perhaps more persuasive arguments might be found, but section blanking on a single article out of a huge class is not the place, as is pointed out above, nor the way to make them. —

6632:

I removed the information about demographics from the lede, since Atlanta’s current demographic makeup is not notable enough to warrant mention in the lede, as the city’s demographics are in-line with almost every other majority or plurality black city on the east coast:

861:

Young People - These are statistics and they are important. Statistics provide a factual basis for the assertion. New young residents + New Restauarsnts and Bars + New Cultural offerings is by far the most notable historical aspect of the 2000s, and those stats support

1395:

The inclusion of tornado and floods and natural disasters in the history section was the subject of a lengthy debate a couple of years ago. It was agreed they shouldn't be included in the history section, and should go in the geography section, which is where they are

3246:

I removed mecca again as that is completely unecyclopedic and does no belong in an article that is aspiring FA status. I also think "center of black political power, education, wealth" can be summed up as a center of black culture, which is synonymic with "culturally

2299:

If Atlanta was 80%, 70%, or even 60% black, I would see his point. But it's only 54% black, which is around the same percentage as Philadelphia and Washington. Excluding from the lead the whopping 46% of the city that is non-black, and the fastest-growing segment, is

1373:

There is NO "proof" that the city's expanded cultural offerings had anything to do with the increased # of educated young people - this could well be OTP people (i.e. from suburbia), older people, whatever. Restoring such an assertion would really require a reliable

3879:"? An international population is an international population, and, if properly sourced, would be noteworthy enough to merit inclusion. I think we should try to be as open-minded as possible and not let our own opinions and subjective experiences color the article.-- 3448:

I have no issue with or objection to your use of "international" in the lead or elsewhere, as you suggested on my talk page. My reverts were only about your repeated (10 or more times) removal of "black Mecca" from the lead. I've invited comments in the RFC below.

5402:

Atlanta has too many demographic trends for them to all be mentioned in the lede. This kind of detail is much too specific and minute for the lede, and, as previously mentioned, no consensus was reached as to whether demographic information should be in the lede at

2117:

do) or (b) it is unfair to other races in the city who make up <6% of the population and are not a fundamental aspect of the city. Neither of those are very strong reasons. I think I've proved the point about how fundamental this aspect is to what makes Atlanta,

4895:

The whole "culturally sensitive" thing is distracting us from what should be an uncontroversial cosmetic change. "X is the Y Mecca" might be a common English idiom but it's overly colloquial and promotional for an encyclopaedia article. We should remove it because

8796:

The cited reference in fact lists at least three other cities in the Eastern US with higher elevations, including Pittsburgh PA (1203 ft), Akron OH (1228 ft), and Asheville NC (2165 ft). Perhaps Akron and Asheville are not *major* cites, but surely Pittsburgh is.

4627:

Couldn't the idea be conveyed with more neutral phrasing? I'm not Muslim, but I have to admit that phrasing seems rather culturally insensitive. One suggestion off the top of my head is "black haven", but I'm sure there are a myriad of ways to say the same thing.

8299:

of multiple specific pronunciations is unnecessary (where to stop, where to find and how to judge RS). And, as above, see New York City, Atlantic Ocean, and Atlantis. In the case of Chicago, the two IPA's given are so close as to beg the same solution—neither. —

2926:

Exactlly. Mmann's approach of reverting ("restoring the status quo") does not lead to progress. Tune it up instead. You've got 72 hours to work on it together without him, since he got blocked for his 4th revert in 24 hours after being warned not to do that.

6445:

Country in particular and is today well-known for hip-hop/rap in particular. (But it should be written in a way which does not imply that the other genres of music are absent, but simply that Atlanta is not especially noted for them vs. other major US cities).

5257:. A city's temperature has nothing to do with occurrence of snow so your "20F winters for 130+ years" argument is also invalid. Your only argument left is that the reader should be familiar that snow is possible in Atlanta. I'll quote the article directly here: 5569:: Compared to that discussion, everything else is minor - however I put Tree Canopy under Geography - it is clearly a geographic feature, whether or not it is unique (it is certainly the highest percent of major cities, but I am not sure that makes it unique) 4768:. Having said that, I agree that the coverage the phrase has in sources about Atlanta warrants mentioning it in the article body. I merely think that as the term could be seen as insensitive, we should hedge our bets and attribute it to its sources. Regards — 2164:

And while Hispanics and Asians make up less than 6%, may I remind you that they are the fastest growing segment, and are as much a part of what makes Atlanta, Atlanta. They are very much so a fundamental aspect of the city, and I find any suggestion otherwise

7251:

I do NOT contradict to most points you mention regarding Salzburg (except for the independability of SCI). AND my added note says nothing else than what you just said. So there was never a legitimate reason to carelessly undo it, right from the beginning. --

8015:- on the top of your screen there should be the letters TW, hover over them and a drop down menu should appear. One of the choices should be "RPP" (which stands for Request Page Protection). You can click that and give admins your reasons for the request. 6548:. I did set aside a paragraph to give an overview of Atlanta’s role in certain genres; however, I only included the ones it had a central or contributing role in (hip-hop, Southern Rock) and left out genres it only played a minor role in (blues, grunge). 5603:: note that when the article was previously overhauled a few months ago, quite a number of new subarticles were created. We tried to follow the principles of writing a summary of the subarticle in the main article which is the principle of Summary Style ( 6971:

The last section in the Economy section of the article is of dubious neutrality in tone. It reads like an argumentative essay with a clear thesis ("The city's economic problems are displayed "), using value-laden descriptors not found in the sources ("a

6272:

In any case, it is not in-line with the Guideline to include demographic micro-trends in the lead. The only reference to demographics in the intro should be to the population count. This is supported by the awkwardness of the sentence, which seems very

5230:

suggest they do not happen. Showing "one" alternative scenario is not overdoing it. And even if the photo were "snow in Miami," that would have been an historical event, so the percent of time that it occurs is not relevant. That is sometimes occurs is.

4736:

Can someone please tell me what exactly is the problem with "mecca". So far I se LadyofShalott say that it's "culturally insensitive" - but I would ask if she still thinks so considering that the one and only one person that complained about that was a

1388:

I changed the article so it has a more neutral tone. While it is unknown whether gentrification, young people moving in, and cultural expansion are all linked, it is known that they all occurred simultaneously. Thus, I removed the cause-and-effect

6129:

Also, I don't see any articles or references that claim black culture "exists seperately" from Atlanta's overall culture. Black culture is a component of Atlanta's overall culture, but I don't think anyone could argue that it "exists separately."

402:

Why dont you just say "the majority"? is an exact percentage really necessary? And im just wondering--why does EVERYTHING have to be focused on race? It seems like thats all you have been contributing to the article. Not everyone is so focused on

6748:. I won't be changing any content, merely the order. Occasionally, I will also move a picture just to clean up spacing issues. I've already gone through the top 20 or so on the above list, if you'd like to see how they turned out. Thoughts? 5175:

The 2010 population is for the combined statistical area (CSA), not the metropolitan statistical area (MSA). All of the previous data is for the MSA and the 2010 data should be changed to reflect the MSA population (5,729,304) to be consistent.

3025:

Utilize a footnote rather than a citation to support the term "Black Mecca" as a footnote allows for a more expansive treatment. (This shows as a "Footnote" rather than a "Citation" or "Refeence" and uses the wiki designation <ref group=note:

5939:

Economy section. The crime paragraph (under law and government) should really be expanded to detail how Atlanta is still among the most crime-ridden cities in the US, and that it was the murder capital of American from the 1970s to the 1990s. --

2255:

Majoreditor, I am not discouraging others from adding material. However, I have spent a ton of time improving the Atlanta article, using the World Book as a guide, so that it can reach featured status. That sentence just does not belong in the

264:"Across the city" is a very broad term.It affected some neighborhoods on the east, some neighborhoods on the west, and most neighborhoods on the south. It definitely affected the west and south the most. No northern neighborhoods were affected. 7118:

position. I do not deny SCI's point of view, but you should also accept that this reference is not given by Salzburg's official website. I does not matter whether it's Atlanta's or Salzburg's page. Please check the WP policies! It is "just" a

5315:

All arguments above aside, there is already an image of snow in Piedmont park. Snow is mentioned in the article (almost a whole paragraph, really) and is shown in the climate data table. We don't need the picture you were trying to add to it.

1521:

Looking at the explanations given for the removal of your material, I think the main issue is that you added most of your new material to the lead. The lead should be a summary of the various subsections of the article and not be stand-alone

8203:

Well, our difference in 'take' is why I took both IPA's out. The added 'local' IPA had no RS citation, and the original also had none. English is not a prescriptive language—a single IPA is neither sufficient or necessary. Best to go bare—cf

6600:

All the information about gentrification, arguably the most relevant and influential factor in the composition of contemporary Atlanta, affecting everything from demographics, economy, to politics, was removed. I restored this information.

6498:

and flow, from top to bottom. It’s impossible to explain every change here, but I will attempt a summary of what I have done. However, some may wonder what basis I used for my edits. I conducted the overhaul of the article using a hybrid of

1906:

An editor does not wish to any aspect about a particular race/ethnicity in the intro section, no matter how important it is, no matter how fundamental it is to describing in a nutshell, "what a city is" – I would argue that there is no such

7508:

After further research, I have come across an article in what seems to be a respectable, if perhaps not WP:RS, website that has the current Atlanta city government promising to re-energize their relationships with "estranged" sister cities

6373:

The sentence "the seventh most visited city" probably shouldn't be in the lead unless there's a more substantial discussion of tourism in the article. It may be appropriate to move the sentence elsewhere or to remove it entirely. Thoughts?

5889:

1) that the Atlanta's living, breathing unique role in African American history and culture, and all the history events associated with that, not only be buried in the demographic section, but that this be apparent from reading the article

1532:. We have to make sure we're getting it right when we change the emphasis of an article, to make sure that we're merely describing reality, not defining it. That said, if you have good sources that attest to this, it should be included.-- 851:

We have tried very hard to keep information about Metro Atlanta and the suburbs out of Atlanta's page. I just don't see how the growth of Forsyth County has relevance on Atlanta's page. Why don't you add your info to Metro Atlanta where it

8334:

is not supported by the cite (neither the 15th (world) nor the sixth (national) rank. According to the cite the correct rankings are 45th in the world and eight in the U.S. I've corrected the rankings to reflect the cite (a 2012 ranking).

7282:

This is my last interaction with you, since you are so uncivil. Not sure what part of "Personal talk page cleanup: Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages." you don't understand. (from

6905:

10.3% to 13.6%, and Atlanta moved up from 14th to 12th in ranking of US metro areas with the largest immigrant population by sheer numbers. Still, its 13.6% proportion of immigrants is only the 29th highest of the nation's top 100 metros.

3295:

Yes, I agree. I took the citations out the lead, leaving the long string of refs in the body; clearly it could do with many fewer, but the editor was trying this as a way to address Mmann's objections. Didn't work too good for anyone.

3030:

You should also incorporate higher-quality sources such as academic publications as support, rather than relying only upon newspaper and magazines. A quick Google Scholar search of the term "Atlanta Black Mecca" yielded promising results

125:

Stripping Civil War History and GWTW tends to have a political motive. A "political machine" is political theory, not historical fact. Change of power is already included. White flight is fine, as long as we don't delve too much into the

1918:

If my single sentence addition to the intro is reversed, we need to have a discussion in this section about exactly why we cannot have it there – the only fundamental unique characteristic of the city that is suppressed from the intro.

4499:

fairly well. let me know what you think about that. I also removed a couple of the images, I prefer to have them staggered like you said, but I'm not sure if it looks alright. Take a look and see if you would suggest any other changes.

777:

The 2000s was a decade of enormous change for Atlanta, and that is what the decade is known for. Just as the 1960s is only talked about in terms of civil rights. Not every trend from every decade can be included. Your agenda is showing

4613:

for that term, it seems to be a "quantity over quality" situation, and while it may warrant a brief mention in the article, I don't see any evidence of the term being prevalent enough to warrant inclusion in the lede of the article. -

1337:

to be a featured article, and I am confident it will be accepted. However, I would like to request that editors refrain from making large-scale edits until we have a picture of what we need to do to take the article to the next level.

3432:

Dicklyon is blocking me from reaching consensus on the lead just because I think mecca doesn't belong. I am going to report him as best way I know possible (although reporting is not my forte) but I would like other editors to weigh

299:

black". There is no such thing as "virtually 100% black". It's either 100% or it isnt, and it wasnt. That's offensive to the white residents who did stay, and to whites who didn't flee. Please try to be a bit more sensitive to the

7334:

For those interested in resolving this content dispute, I offer a copy of the proclamation by the Mayor of Atlanta, and the Mayor of Salzburg, signed in 1967, proclaiming Salzburg, Austria and Atlanta, Georgia, USA sister cities:

4787: 8494:

gave no rationale in the edit summary; nor did editor User:BilCat give a rationale on this talk page for his deletion. Yet, the facts in the deleted section are there. See for example this reference: www.georgiarail.org/, and

8518:, which was correct. Another editor partially restored the info. What exactly is your remaining issue? (I'm assuming the diff I cited is the one you have issue with, as you didn't even give a date for the edit in question.) - 4264:, Cityscape and all the subsections beneath it, is actually part of the Geography of the city. I really think we should merge the subsections into Geography. Also, Surrounding municipalities should be moved up there, as well. 2094: 809:

I think the mention of the recession is brief and relevant - the condo glut is relevant, it has really been affecting us Intown; yet the restaurants/nightclubs/etc. are still flourishing despite that, that is also a relevant

847:

The public housing removal is ongoing, so it really should not be in the history. There is an entire subsection devoted to ongoing gentrification, and THAT is where the public housing removal should go, as that is why it is

6650:

A lede should be general, not specific. The only demographic information that needs to be present is the city’s population. Other information, including demographic trends, should only be addressed in the proper section.

6405:

Well, I would make the suggestion in line with wikipedia "summary style" that the intro paragraphs try to summarize what is in the article. I wish I were in a position to have a stab at it, but I am traveling right now.

8236:

has, to my ears, little, if any, evidence of the first 't', but a very definite second 't', for North American English. That final 't' isn't going to survive when the speaking rate moves above 300 wpm. So I'm good with

5762:

There is not an "edit war" to be "won." Neither can we say that consensus cannot change. Instead, if major changes are to be made and there is disagreement as to those changes, they should be discussed on the talk page

3145:. I would also think many editors over at Detroit, Washington, Chicago, NYC, etc. would all disagree with your assertions, so lets just not open that can of worms by using such a loaded term and opinionated statement.-- 4782:

indeed that it is referred to as such. I would never expect Knowledge to state that something "is" a mecca. BTW the potential issue is still theoretical - a Muslim scholar uses it freely in slightly different context:

5060:

No mention of Henry Grady, Uncle Remus, the Phoenix symbol (rising from the ashes), or the spectacular growth after the war? No mention of the city emerging as a center of Southern business, skyscrapers, or GA Tech?

5206:

To reiterate: Atlanta is a southern city, it gets snow on average of (not quite) 2 days per year. It's grossly inaccurate to put a picture of snow on here. Apparently this is a problem that's rampant in Knowledge.

4316:"do you live in the A-T-L?" but not "do you live in A-T-L"?) I did leave in "ATL" as an additional nickname, but keep in mind it is unsourced. We need to concentrate on what is sourced here as opposed to opinion. 802:

the systematic removal of all public housing from a city is, in my opinion of major importance, and after further research you are correct it started in 1994. It did mostly stop in 2010 as the HOPE IV act expired

5595:

Also, language and dialect were never removed, they were only moved to the demographics section, since language and dialect is a demographic topic. However, I made it a distinct and seperate paragraph to improve

4442:

Gotcha; for me, "the ATL" sounds very different from "ATL", the very fact that you can say "the" kind of makes it distinct. You can't say "the N-Y-C" or "the L-A-X" but you *can* say both "ATL" *and* "the A-T-L"

2378:

Has Kiezers been removing things that you wanted to put in the lead? I agree that if he's doing that, then it would be disingenuous to expect you to be nice about what he wants to add. But I haven't seen that.

2121:

My question to the other editors or administrators is: Is it unreasonable to want to include one sentence about this in the intro, considering how fundamental I have established it is with numerous (!) sources?

2848:

I restored the status quo; Majoreditor and Loudog both agreed that should not be in the lead, which makes it three votes against including it versus one vote for including it (you). Majority wins, and it stays

2168:

I don't want to get administrators involved, but if this continues, I will, and I am confident that they will agree with me (just as Loudog and Majoreditor have) and lock the page sans Kiezers contributions.--

1610:

If we have good sources attesting that Atlanta is a hub of black culture, we'll include it. If not, we won't. In the meantime, we don't need to comment on other editor's motivations, intentions, or supposed

1039:

I looked up this Brookings quote and referenced it. (But, type "Atlanta is becoming whiter, and at a pace that outstrips the rest of the nation" and a top result is from Stormfront, a white power organization)

3481:

Timing: 00:20 was 4 minutes before another "anti-mecca" editor was active on the Atlanta "black mecca" issue. Are we to believe that this person came out of nowhere exactly at the time this issue is disputed?

2010:. Demographics sections in general are not split into race and sexuality, let alone, subsplit into the various races. Paragraphs perform this function without the needless segmenting. As per the wikipedia 6791:

I counted nine pictures in the lead montage, which is easily 3-4 more snapshots than the other major cities of the world. Atlanta is a fine city, and you really don't have to try so hard. Just some friendly

4543:. I tried to help, but am giving up for now. Please review sections above and suggest a resolution. It might be helpful if present disputants would hold off until after we get some independent comments. 8153:

desegregated, the African-American Civil Rights Movement occured, and the diversity of the Atlanta area expanded greatly. As best I can hear my usual pronunciation, the first 't' gets swallowed between the

3608:

This is a ludicrous accusation, and I cannot believe Keizers is allowed to slander my good name by accusing me of sock puppeting without conducting the proper investigation. He is targeting me because I am

3079:

I appreaciate the work Keizers is doing, but specific and intense sentences regarding one racial group does not belong in the lead. I think Keizers work should be added to the demographics section, or even

2161:. We are all Americans, and in such a multi-ethnic country as America, it would be simply too much to get into the specifics of ethnicity and race in an intro that is only supposed to be a general overview. 7548:

question is where the content belongs. I reinstated the paragraph, and argue that it is a historical fact in the devolopment of Atlanta economic history (the city has a now demolished steel plant actually

5390:

To accompany my edits and engage in this civil debate, I have conducted a sentence-by-sentence analysis of the third paragraph of the lede to explain my rationale, in order that we may reach an agreement.

2065:

I tend to agree with Loodog. As of now, there's not enough material to justify a separate sub-section, per MOS. As more material is added then it may become a subsection, and eventually even merit its own

2140:

Yes, and I will continue to fight it, because it is entirely inappropriate for an intro section to single out one racial group. It doesn't follow the template set by American cities (last time I checked,

8481:

line, multiple interstate highways, the world's busiest airport, and over 45 miles (72 kilometres) of bike paths. Additionally, proposals are underway for utilizing the network of rail lines to create a

1922:

We need to be transparent and air this issue out so that we can be absolutely sure what the consensus is and that we are not suppressing material for the sole reason that it relates to African Americans.

6710:

Sorry, I was the one reverting it. I mischaracterized the source as unreliable, so that was my mistake. I added the ParkScore content, but put it in a place that preserves the structure and flow of the

6425:

I'm glad to see the paragraph about religion was replaced. There is a rich sub-article about it, and I don't think that the idea of Knowledge is that every single template has to be followed to the "t".

1447: 858:

Restrautants - I have no problem taking out the exact number. The point is that Atlanta's dining scene has become very sophisticated and refined compared to what it was in 2000, and that should remian.

8458: 6051:

That is true, but I am going on what books and media cover as topics. Do a Google search and a Google news search using "black wealth Atlanta" and you will see it's a significant topic of discussion.

5008:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 4209:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 601:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 2492:

That type of detail doesn't belong in the lead. That's why Hispanicity is not mentioned in Miami's intro. The lead is supposed to be about THE CITY AS A WHOLE, not just one side of one aspect of it.

156:

I did shorten the texts to the absolute minimum due to concerns that the texts were too long. The amount of detail included is considerably less than the detail given to other events in the article.

5628:

part. This overhaul took a TON of work, and I am really looking forward to collaborating with you on the creation of a final product that all editors find accurate, appropriate, and encyclopedic!--

5097:, and, while he has made numerous improvements to the article, I have to agree that the history section wound up a bit meager after his edit, as Ryoung points out. It would be nice if the intro of 641: 7614:, less than 8%. There are historical reasons for that, likely connected with the feudal tails of the plantation system; it makes it difficult to tweeze out Atlanta history from the area history. 3488:

in order that his sockpuppet username not show up in red on the Atlanta Discussion pages. Knowing to enter any character on his empty user page is a trick that only experienced Wikipedians know.

3587:

The CheckUser has confirmed that RodewayInn is likely the same as Mmann1988. That should be enough for a long block, given the situation. Comment at the 3RR filing or making a new report at

1466:

Most recently to even state that Atlanta is majority black, a black mecca, and a center of the black entertainment industry and state this in the intro as a defining characteristic of the city

7904: 4402:

So I think we are right mentioning both as nicknames. BTW, I would guess you also don't recognize "the A" as a nickname. That's even more recent and even more urban. I would say urban-only.

4051:

Pic of North Avenue Presbyterian Church. We already have a pic of one church (cathedral) and the North Avenue church is not architecturally remarkable, so it doesn't add much to the article.

4040:

the entire text in the section (and you can't float a pic on the right when there is something else floating left. So we can show what snow in Atlanta looks like by moving the very good pic

6239:. Thus, the only thing we are left with are Atlanta's demographic statistics, which, as I pointed out, are not notable or unique in that they are in-line with every major east coast city.-- 4341:

I am the same person who changed it last night. Forgot to sign in b/c im on public computer. I grew up in the city and never hear "the" placed before "ATL." The city's media doesn't either:

728:

I have made some deletions in this section. It had an entire paragraph about young people moving into Downtown Atlanta and surroundings but was completely missing some other facts such as:

5128:

important points while trying at every possible point to stay in a state that would be easy to read from top to bottom by someone who knows nothing about the city. That's just my opinion.

8696: 5254: 4121:

I changed the kind of random picture from a Midtown building, to a gallery with a sample of buildings - a couple of landmark skyscapers and a couple of varieties of architectural styles.

3752: 7816:

Whie I personally have no use for these sections, they are a common feature of many city articles, so other editors appear to find them useful. It might be better to raise the issue at

6689:

This data is from 2012 and inaccurate. According to the Trust for Public Land's 2013 ParkScore rankings - which analyzes acreage, access, and service/investment in city park systems -

4582:

AS A MUSLIM, USING MAKKAH OUTSIDE OF AN ISLAMIC CONTEXT IS EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS OUR HOLY CITY AND TO DILUTE ITS SANCTITY IN THIS WAY IS INTOLERABLE AND RACIST!!!!!!

3316:

AS A MUSLIM, USING MAKKAH OUTSIDE OF AN ISLAMIC CONTEXT IS EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE!!!!!!!!!!! THAT IS OUR HOLY CITY AND TO DILUTE ITS SANCTITY IN THIS WAY IS INTOLERABLE AND RACIST!!!!!!

8662: 8162:; just not enough time to get more than a hint of a 't' as the toung goes forward to begin 'lan'; and the finial sound becomes 'na', with scant time for a real tip of the toung 't'. 8149:

pronunciation: the city is too diverse by class, nationality, origin, and education. And in the time I've lived in and around Atlanta, the state population has trippled, schools were

1794:

key point of the whole article, then it belongs in the intro. As for now, I think you're overstretching the impact of the sources you've provided. The strongest by far would be the

89: 6235:

government, and culture sections. Combining these aspects of the city to form a statement that "Atlanta is one of only two that American blacks consider a 'mecca'" actually violates

5344:, not on this article. Although there is freezing weather every year in Atlanta, snow is rare and a pic of Atlanta covered in snow gives the impression that Atlanta is a snowy city. 4749:. If someone is genuinely offended, I see a reason to change it, but so far I am wondering if everyone is just "assuming" that the word "mecca" is offensive... or even "non-neutral". 4904:

The city has long been known as a "black mecca": a center of black wealth, political power and culture; a cradle of the Civil Rights Movement and home to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

2355: 714: 5082:. Along that principle, I am a big supporter of making great sub-articles, then making leads for them, then porting over that lead to the main article. So originally (for example 2131: 1456:

When I started editing this page, the page made almost no mention of any of this - it was relegated to demographic data about the percentage of blacks in the population, period.

337:

Not every white neighborhood engaged in these tactics. SOME did. Please tone down the absolutes! Its very offensive to southerners who weren't involved yet lived in these areas.--

8714: 8710: 7004:

The integration of Atlanta public schools begin in 1961 and by 1970 most all Atlanta city schools were integrated. The article reads as if integration did not occur until 1973.

7668: 1361:"Atlanta completed its transformation into a cosmopolitan city, becoming well known for its cultural offerings" - this is a point of view and requires a reliable neutral source. 1045:

This is the main article on Atlanta - let's state the facts and truly notable trend and move on, not go on and on, which I think could give the wrong impression, on this subject

320:"After forced-housing patterns were outlawed, violence, intimidation and organized political pressure were used to discourage blacks from buying homes in white neighborhoods." 193:

sections of the city became 100% black. To someone who lives in the City of Atlanta, that is definitely a fundamental historic trend. As is the renaissance of Intown Atlanta.

6842: 8185:

represent standard spoken English. In the absence of a reliable source that suggests the mispronounced "Atlanna" version is regionally predominant, it should be omitted.

1981:

I'm supportive of adding material which is supported by reliable sources to the article, and I think that "black mecca" merits inclusion. However, I hope that editors will

8802: 1328: 4293:

Alright! I'll get to that, also I've been re-arranging and merging some sections. I've not really done much to change the actual content though. I aligned some pictures.

5054: 1515: 4745:

offensive, disrespectful act that just makes my jaw drop. "Mecca" as a generic term is commonly used in English. Even the New Georgia Encyclopedia uses the term in the

8508: 4972: 1502: 7839:

Thanks for commenting. I wonder, though, if that would be a niche of the website where one would find opinions that deviate from a more randomly generated consensus.

6807:

The newest photo Montage has 3 images of the Atlanta skyline + 1 of Manhattan? Why? I don't have the time/images on hand to make a change. Does anyone have anything?

2558:

regarding demographics that's appropriate for a lead: "The city has a population from various ethnic and religious backgrounds and a growing international community."

1490:

presence in, the city, and goes to outlandish lengths to present some kind of picture postcard perfect Chamber of Commerce brochure about a mythical sylvan paradise.

6990: 6832: 5470:

I re-worded this sentence, as it was very awkward-sounding. Entertainment cannot be represented in the same sense that art can be represented by robust institutions.

5271:

Annual snowfall averages 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) annually. The heaviest single storm brought around 16 inches on March 12–14, 1993 during The Storm of the Century. True

5045: 565: 8608: 8568: 8558: 4912:

The city has long been known as a center of black wealth, political power and culture: a cradle of the Civil Rights Movement and home to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

3503:

I encourage as many people as possible to be involved with this page, in order to fight racism in editing, as well as sick deceptive practices such as sock puppets.

632: 8111: 6618: 5982:

color of their skin. Progressive race relations is what this city's identity is, and this is the aspect that is documented and discussed in books and the press. --

1567:

include opinions, such as Atlanta is a black mecca, or that it's the center of black entertainment. This is all purely subjective and cannot be supported by facts.

1364:

there was a great amount of detail about the trend of more young people, more than there is space for in the headline article. It is sufficient to state the trend.

8632: 6640:

Washington, D.C.: 50.7% African American, 38.5% white, 3.5% Asian, and 0.3% Native American, other races 4.1%, two or more races 2.9%. Hispanics of any race 9.1%.

4786:. Also BTW, you state that English uses the term "mecca" generically *nowadays*, in fact regarding Atlanta the sources in the article date back to the 1960s, and 4246: 3989: 746:

deleted "45 new restaurants opened Downtown from 2008 to mid-2011." - restaurants open in many parts of Atlanta, and the suburbs, this doesn't really say enough.

8642: 7688: 5063:

OK, I added a few of those things. Like a "bio-graphy," or "life-graph," the history of a city is not just important outliers but how the city grew organically.

3767: 1493:

We have a wonderful, rich, diverse, interesting city. There's no shame in presenting a factual Knowledge article about it. Let's not look like yee-haw boosters.

104: 6957: 5646:

Hello, Mmann. I just wanted to say a couple of things. First of all, I do commend your efforts to improve this article, and I believe that you didn't overstep

4173: 3801: 551: 472: 147: 6694: 4738: 4576: 4698:

And that quote above is from a proved sock puppet who was *impersonating* a Muslim. So far *no* Muslim person has said that the term "mecca" is insensitive.

3263: 281:"BUT the entire west- and southside (not just some) became virtually 100% black. This is referenced (census data will also prove), so no need to tone down." 6706:

I tried to update this information twice, but it has been reverted back to its original content. Can anyone tell me why this information is being deleted?

6643:

Baltimore: 63.7% African American, 29.6% white, 2.3% Asian, 0.4% Native American, other races 0.2%, 2.1% of two or more races. Hispanics of any race, 4.2%.

1392:

The order of importance has always been Downtown, Midtown, and Buckhead. Even if that was not the case, this is a general overview of Atlanta, not Midtown.

8332:

Atlanta is considered an "alpha-" or "world city", ranking 15th among world cities and sixth in the nation with a gross domestic product of $ 270 billion.

6861: 4320:

Sorry if I appeared to "own" the article as I contribute so much to it, I don't feel that way, my reverts are based on what I am able to find out as fact.

1475:

To mention the destruction of 10% of the city's housing stock (the projects) from 1995-2010 how this affected black Atlanta (98% of AHA tenants are black)

1462:

For every important basic trend or fact relating to blacks, whether it be negative or positive, I have had to fight the editor in question for inclusion:

1347: 7908: 6646:

Philadelphia: 43.4% African American, 41% white, 6.3% Asian, .5% Native American. Other races 5.9%, two or more races 2.8%. Hispanics of any race, 12.3%.

6637:

Atlanta: 54.0% African American, 38.4% white, 3.1% Asian and 0.2% Native American, other races 2.2%, two or more races 2.0%. Hispanics of any race, 5.2%.

5072: 1985:

and not question the motives of other editors or seek to tar them as racists. Let's lower the temperature on this talk page and focus on a path forward.

7678: 6269:

it may not be--the phrase is still not objective, even if the sentence itself is not proclaiming the U.S. as a center of democracy. Do you see my point?

8652: 3497:

Mecca - Use of the term "mecca" in the generic sense is generally not offensive to Muslims, unlike disrespectful uses of the name of Mohammed or Allah.

3473:(who removed references to "black mecca" ostensibly because it was offensive to him as a Muslim - is clearly a sock puppet, for the following reasons. 1562:: I think many black residents of DC feel that thier city is a black mecca. This is purely your point of view you want included, which allures to what 742:

In order to mention these other important trends and create some balance, I shortened the details about young people moving in and cultural offerings:

3773:

I wonder if the statement should be sourced instead of simply removed? We need to be careful about substituting our own opinion in place of reality.--

6999: 6953: 4851:

to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr." (I've also tidied this up ever so slightly.) This is just my opinion - others may be able to think of better ways. —

773:

2008 Recession - Hasn't every city in America been hit hard? The real estate market crashed everywhere. This goes without saying it affected Atlanta.

8663:

https://web.archive.org/web/20111230102913/http://blogs.ajc.com/inside-access/2009/09/17/atlanta-a-national-geographic-traveler-place-of-a-lifetime/

7064:(Dispute's source: SIC claims that Salzburg is a twin city of Atlanta. However, Salzburg official website does not list Atlanta as a twin city.) -- 7900: 7872:

Like I said when I removed my comments, "it's clear you are only interested in pushing your own views, not seeking input from others." Good day. -

7012: 4731: 3036:

Atlanta is often considered and frequently refered to as a "black mecca", that is, a cultural, economic, and artisitic center for African-Americans

2070: 1459:

The article read (and still reads mostly) as Chamber of Commerce boosterism, and dealt very little with issues about African Americans in Atlanta.

207:

note happened then, whereas in mid-century there was more change than had ever happened in the city of Atlanta, other than its burning and rebirth.

8178: 6950:

Mississippi River. I think this should be deleted, and it's discouraging that contributors post facts without looking through their own sources.

165: 4376:

I didnt meant to accuse you or anything, it just seemed rather petty and i was surprised somebody would revert such a minor edit. Cheers! :) ;)

1486:

extreme favoritism in describing at length the trends regarding Hispanics and Asians vs. those regarding the majority ethnic group of the city.

1068:

population increased substantially, in both percentage and total number." This would avoid the mistake of expecting temporary trends to continue.

542:, Thank-You so very much for your honest input, I really do appreciate you not taking it personally and answering to the best of your knowledge. 7024: 6925: 4873: 4351: 4261: 7669:

https://web.archive.org/20090419091606/http://www.allbusiness.com:80/company-activities-management/company-locations-facilities/6399916-1.html

1795: 1744:

No, it doesn't belong in the intro. It has nothing to do with "minimizing black people," and I want you to stop saying that. Please go to the

1377:

Additional important events in the decade were the increasing importance of Midtown, the tornado and floods, and the approval of the BeltLine.

8588: 4859: 4845: 4830: 4810: 4776: 4758: 4364: 3726: 3624: 985: 559: 505:

I added the AUC colleges. However, it belongs in the paragraph with Tech and Emory. It doesn't need to be segregated in it's own paragraph.--

480: 8666: 8254: 8169:

iIPA pronunciation goes back in, it should be supported by a reliable source that makes specific reference to the pronucation of Atlanta. —

7521: 6191:

These are just my .02 cents. I would love for others to weigh in. I think this is a great discussion, and I am glad I can be a part of it.--

4644: 496: 8268: 8225: 8194: 8068: 8026: 5191: 4693: 4679: 4658: 4456: 4411: 4391: 6475:

OK I removed that phrase because the phrase contradicts the fact that Atlanta was known for country and is now well-known for hip-hop/rap.

6397: 6300: 5948: 5927: 5903: 5353: 2204: 2082: 806:

I do think it's of relevance to the City of Atlanta that growth of *its* region is in the exurbs, I can make the mention more brief though

8309: 8286: 6909:

How can you change the text so that the point is made, without using a statement which factually is not supported by the census numbers?

5958: 5828:

sections, it is a part of the guidelines and manual of style. I just wonder if it may be better to have it under geography or city-scape?

5497: 4723:. Working out the exact phrasing could be tricky, but I'm sure it can be done while still keeping the main thrust of the section. Best — 3407: 1013: 657: 8762: 7963: 7672: 7586: 7503: 7384: 6470: 6383: 6248: 6200: 6184: 6162: 6143: 6107: 5873: 5743: 5679: 5325: 5239: 5160: 4508: 3686: 3066: 3047: 2802:

Look at my latest edit and you will see that it's short, to the point, and includes all ethnic groups including minorities like myself.

2664:

I've reversed the removal of the sentence again. Mmann1988, again you resort to personal attack to defend an anti-black-content crusade.

2590:

I suggest Kiezers go to his local library, find an encyclopedia, and see what he finds under "Atlanta"--he may actually learn something.

2234: 1994: 1713: 1678: 875: 7431: 6883: 6877: 6778: 6741: 5170: 3618: 3458: 3422: 3353: 3305: 3290: 3274: 3228: 3189: 2969: 2427: 2388: 2373: 7881: 7859: 7829: 7626: 7567: 7482: 6918: 6484: 6364: 6282: 6263: 6122: 6060: 6044: 6006: 5991: 5637: 5137: 5117: 4526: 4493: 4302: 4288: 3718: 3700: 3399: 3154: 3120: 3093: 3032: 2858: 2811: 2631: 2460: 2331: 2177: 1947: 1758: 1441: 1312: 1275: 1238: 1203: 1147: 1120: 1095: 1077: 827: 528: 514: 442: 427: 412: 377: 346: 230: 181: 139: 120: 8598: 7708: 7510: 6745: 6499: 4944: 4707: 4602: 4568: 4435: 4004: 3738: 2921: 2048: 2023: 1620: 1583: 462: 8806: 8527: 7922: 7413: 7312: 7299:, since I've asked you politely several times not to edit on my talk page. Have a good life. Oh, and now you're in violation of the 7261: 7223: 7185: 7148: 6938: 5283:

usually cause more trouble than does snowfall; the most severe such storms may have occurred on January 7, 1973 and January 9, 2011.

4621: 3528: 2955: 2936: 4962: 4922: 4552: 3933:

I have to assume that another new editor showing up to take the side of blocked Mmann1988 is just another sock. Just ignore him:

3919: 3888: 3858: 3836: 3817: 3792:. If a statement in a Knowledge article is also used as the title of a published book, I would consider it a sourced assertion...-- 3782: 1866: 1807: 1647: 1541: 8000:

I've noticed quite a bit of vandalism on this page. Perhaps an admin could set autoconfirmed protection for 2 weeks or something?

5560:

higher density and income (demographics), shaken up the mayoral race (politics), and led to more demands for park space (culture).

2035:

AMERICAN CITY to be a racist. Kiezers is absolutely out of control, is hijacking the Atlanta page, and is bordering on vandalism.

787: 8782: 8609:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140815134909/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

8569:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140815134909/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

8559:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140815134909/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

8453: 7535: 5772: 5670:

leave a message on the talk page explaining what you plan to do and, if you get no protests, you can go ahead with the overhaul.

1042:

It makes no sense to say the change in Atlanta "outstrips the nation" - the nation's white population is not increasing (as a %)!

935: 7903:

is a pretty good summation of the consensus we reached at the City project and US Cities. If you go to the talk page and search

6994: 4933:

Anyway, no one else is chiming in that using the phrase "black mecca" in the lead is important, so I'm changing it to "center".

1057: 912: 8633:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110513194342/https://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=3421&NewsAreaID=2

7760: 6720: 5616: 5411: 4534: 1412: 8348: 5089:

and did a three-paragraph lead section for that article, which I then copied over and used as the History section of the main

4335: 4060: 4042: 2039:, please direct me to an administrator (perhaps you are one?) so I can see about getting this page locked. Enough is enough.-- 8767: 8643:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120213175803/http://www.georgia.org/GeorgiaIndustries/Entertainment/FilmTV/Pages/FilmFacts.aspx

8626: 7689:

https://web.archive.org/20140814230029/http://www2.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/SameSexCouplesandGLBpopACS.pdf

7198:

First, you don't seem to understand the difference between a talk page of an article, which is the guideline you cite above (

6492: 6324: 6226: 5976: 3849:

What references would support an assertion that Atlanta has a (significant) "international population"? Can you provide one?

3141:

Mecca refers to the Islamic holy city, so using the term outside of the religious context is itself unecyclopedic. Ditch the

8794:

at 1,050 feet (320 m) above mean sea level, Atlanta has the highest elevation of major cities east of the Mississippi River.

7207: 6836: 5221: 3579: 8390: 7992: 4427: 4383: 3600: 2765:

Final notes, stop changing the title of this post to something calling my content "malicious". And spell my handle right?!?

1910:

We are following some sort of template for city descriptions which omits race/ethnicity – I am unaware of any such template

1021: 723: 8035:

Um, I don't see 'TW' OR 'RPP'. I checked via CTRL+F and inspect element, but that didn't help. What are you talking about?

7211: 5759:"Mmann1988, some of the changes you have made are contrary to the consensus that was reached after the "warring" period," 4949:

One of the outdated controversies of how to represent Atlanta as a "Black Mecca", went hand-in-hand with how to represent

3512: 519:

AUC doesn't need its own paragraph, but it does need to be recognized as the largest HBCU campus. That's a relevant fact.

8612: 8572: 8562: 8139:

the Alana Braves are going to the World Series! The prominence ot the two t's varies with phrasing and excitement levels.

6986: 6828: 5842: 5363: 5028: 4988: 4130: 3951: 7692: 7336: 6744:) in an effort to provide some uniformity in structure. Anyone have an issue with me restructuring this article as per 6027:

The city of Atlanta also has the largest concentration of Southern white wealth in the Southeast US. No one talks about

4096:- doesn't really show much about the neighborhood architecture, just the bricks at the center of Buckhead Triangle Park. 1194:

I will fight the implementation of your agenda at every corner. If it means getting the Atlanta page locked, so be it.--

8636: 6816: 6614: 6604: 5183: 4310: 2908:

also makes a mention of gentrification in the lead. I think Keizers first try additions are overkill on the issue and

2073:. I'm hoping that editors can reach a consensus and move forward. I'm happy to help if there's anything else I can do. 927: 581: 8273:

What is the argument against including both, similar to other cities that can be pronounced in multiple ways, such as

6801: 4559:

back in. We need HELP here from you guys and we need a LOT of eyes on this article and what this one editor is doing.

8646: 8533: 8353: 7682: 7679:

https://web.archive.org/20111208211609/http://spelman.edu/academics/enrichment/census/pdf/cicnewsletterjan2009vs2.pdf

7047: 6673: 5756:

Knowledge operates on the principle of establishing "consensus," not "warring". The following comment is disturbing:

5590:

included. Perhaps we can find a way to trim it down to city-only info and then work it into the demographics section?

1972:

As best I can tell, many people and several sources have identified Atlanta as a sort of "capitol" for black culture.

1352: 8653:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080408183722/http://www.apta.com/research/stats/ridership/riderep/documents/07q4hr.pdf

8550: 7987: 7809: 6622: 6557:

become so ever-present that it extends to the city’s culture. However, right now, it is purely an economic element.

3442: 3336: 1426: 5041: 4598: 4242: 3672: 3332: 3256: 920: 710: 628: 6521: 4817:

I agree that we should be pointing out what the sources say about it, and that we shouldn't just say that Atlanta

8787: 8325: 7698: 7631: 7020: 6654: 6544:

What musical artists are from the city doesn’t really have to do with its culture, and that is covered under the

5585:: I believe you accidentally removed that section — I reinstated it along with material about the local dialect. 4273: 4229: 4189: 3714: 3682: 3642: 3575: 3395: 3014: 1931: 8713:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

6961: 6518:(hereinafter “FAs”) as guides. The end result is a hyrbid article that combines the formatting of those pages. 5123:

article as a whole. As editors, we sometimes overlook that focusing on improvements to a section. A section can

4168: 4151: 1961: 7448: 7404:

did unthinkingly undo it for several times obviously without considering its simply understandable content. --

7365: 7108: 6966: 6889:

born residents. The city has 7.8% foreign born as of 2008-2012, which is actually one of the lowest %ages (see

5197: 4477: 3568:

I'm sorry if this usage offends your sensibilities, but your sensibilities do not define the English language.

3464: 3388:

I'm sorry if this usage offends your sensibilities, but your sensibilities do not define the English language.

993:

sound but unstressed. And in normal speech, most people say "uht-LAN-tuh" - kind of like "about" is "uh-BOUT".

6757: 6668: 763:

Destruction of projects - eh, not really that notable, and this is still ongoing and started in the early 90s.

8245:

like Arkansas, Biloxi, Chattahoochee, Illinois or New Orleans. In this case, I think the IPA is redundant.

4806: 4770: 4010: 3657: 2912:

on the subject, but the subject merits inclusion if it can be suitably trimmed, toned done, and cleaned up.--

1009: 8656: 6765:

Will you be adding a bunch of sub-sections, or just moving the existing sections around? Some cities, like

6434: 4352:

http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-braves-blog/2012/01/27/pastornicky-simmons-at-forefront-of-atl-shortstop-depth/

3995:

Sorry, oops, I made one last edit before I saw your advice. Alright, I will follow your advice for a while.

8757: 8578: 7129: 7073: 3945: 1956:

As a side note, the distinguished novelist Tom Wolfe chose "Chocolate Mecca" as the title for chapter 1 of

8589:

https://web.archive.org/web/20141218203321/http://urbanhealth.gsu.edu/files/gsu_public_housing_report1.pdf

7954: 7850: 7800: 6613:

The language that the tree canopy is "under assault" is POV. Should be changed to something more factual.

5027:

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant

4365:

http://clatl.com/atlanta/Search?cx=002407891961455841536%3Aeipla0hprou&cof=FORID%3A9&q=best+of+atl

4228:

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant

4092: 2224:

Atlanta is often called a "Black Mecca" due to its unique concetration of black culture, power and wealth.

8667:

http://blogs.ajc.com/inside-access/2009/09/17/atlanta-a-national-geographic-traveler-place-of-a-lifetime/

7778: 7031: 6682:

of Atlantans live within a 10-minute walk of a park, placing the city just above the national average of

6545: 6454: 6415: 6344: 6094:

culture of Atlanta and a black culture of Atlanta. Separate but equal, if you will. Am I correct on this?

5777: 5415: 5037: 4897: 4610: 4238: 3484:

Though the user was new, 1.5 hours later (1:51 GMT on 3 Jan) he knew to assign himself a username and to

3280: 706: 624: 8732:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

8425:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

7732:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

6693:

of Atlantans live within a 10-minute walk of a park, placing the city at the national average (of 64%).

5448:"while Metro Atlanta has quickly become ethnically diverse with large Hispanic and Asian populations..." 3623:

Agreed that this talk page is not the proper place for a sockpuppet investigation. The proper place is

2800:

Atlanta is often called a "Black Mecca" due to its role as a center of black culture, power and wealth".

8549:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 6786: 6420: 6175:

OK, it's fine for us to stick to what is covered in reliable sources such as books and the major media.

38: 7099:

forward, posted 19:21 May 30, 2015, is original to this thread, and not copied from another source. —

5498:

http://clatl.com/atlanta/damn-hipsters-is-atlanta-falling-prey-to-its-indie-cachet/Content?oid=1278176

3975: 3344:

The above comment by "Rodeway Inn" is by a sock puppet. Disgusting that someone would resort to this.

2158: 6134:

results in it's being called a black mecca, or at least a "center of black wealth, education, etc.".

5545: 5426:

recognizes that without Atlanta's peacefulness, it would have never become the city that it is today.

838:

I restored it to the status quo as Knowledge protocol is to discuss changes before implementing them.

767: 555: 476: 7673:

http://www.allbusiness.com/company-activities-management/company-locations-facilities/6399916-1.html

7375:- How did you find that? I can't figure out on the SCI site where to look for those types of items. 6595: 4517:

Looks good! I think it's good to continue to pare down where possible. And the placement looks good.

3963: 3478:

address, and do not participate in the discussion, we are lucky if they include an edit description.

8515: 7771: 4431: 4387: 2901: 8599:

http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html

8592: 7709:

https://web.archive.org/20090225201702/http://www.atlantafalcons.com:80/People/Alumni/History.aspx

7202:) versus an editor's own talk page, which I have explained to you is more appropriately guided by 6577: 4539:

There is a long-running edit war here over the inclusion of the term "Black Mecca" in the lead of

4447:. So for that reason I would like to keep them both there as they are, if you don't mind too much. 2622:

Atlanta is in AMERICA. What other multi-ethnic countries do with their city pages is irrelevant.--

8748: 6897: 6439: 6355:

if we strike those two sentences and then combine the second and third paragraphs of the intro.--

6329: 5101:

was improved (if required) and that same text was copied over and used as the History section of

4673: 4638: 4346: 3081: 2154: 2006:

This is fine and the sources are good, but what was added to the article was a clear cut case of

1170: 8717:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

7059: 5886:

The points that I really want to make sure are not lost - from my point of view - are threefold:

8733: 8426: 7733: 7496: 5915: 5515:

supporting a city's economy (e.g. service, manufacturing, tourism, etc ...) should be included.

5276: 5187: 4746: 4720: 3427: 2101:

nail to not have that mentioned in the intro - nominally because either (a) City articles like

1367:

The fact that Atlanta was #6 in the country in such growth is not notable, but 61% increase is.

931: 81: 69: 64: 59: 7352:

volunteers in 545 communities with over 2,100 partnerships in 145 countries on six continents.

8798: 8720: 8445: 8250: 8190: 7817: 7765: 7752: 6379: 6296: 5914:

I completely agree with this. There should be no glorification, but we also don't want to be

5349: 4853: 4824: 4725: 4618: 4023: 3553:@RodewayInn: While I respect your religious views, they cannot change the fact that the word 3373:@RodewayInn: While I respect your religious views, they cannot change the fact that the word 3287: 3142: 3043: 2999: 2965: 2200: 2078: 1990: 1674: 981: 247:"Fixed edits that made statements incorrect. White flight affected 'hoods *across* the city." 7461:: Dear neonrange, I repeat myself even for the forth time now, what I just said above: I do 6586: 6254:

before for many months after the whole previous discussion about "Atlanta as a black mecca")

4356: 753:

gained 9,722 residents aged 25 to 34 holding at least a four-year degree, an increase of 61%

8740: 8687: 8433: 8344: 8305: 8264: 8221: 8174: 7983: 7948: 7844: 7794: 7740: 7712: 7622: 7563: 7517: 7444: 7361: 7158:

for Salzburg's government not to publish it (it could be an error, but we do not know it).

7144: 7104: 7008: 6824: 5541: 5341: 5179: 4950: 4794: 4594: 4586: 4423: 4379: 3969: 3666: 3328: 3320: 3279:

I don't know the exact details of the dispute, but there does seem to be a large amount of

1528:

change made to wikipedia without adequate verification can become ingrained as the article

997: 8869: 8627:

http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2003/11_livingcities_Atlanta/atlanta.pdf

7210:, you'll see that Salzburg is listed as a Sister City of Atlanta. Further, if you look at 6729:

No worries. Thanks for your help with this. The information sounds great and flows nicely!

5395:"The city has long been known as a center of black wealth, political power and culture..." 1026:

I had edited the section for a second time now and want to explain why this is necessary:

8: 8282: 7032: 7016: 6873: 6774: 6716: 6664: 6466: 6393: 6360: 6278: 6244: 6196: 6158: 6118: 5987: 5944: 5923: 5899: 5869: 5838: 5739: 5675: 5633: 5523: 5321: 5217: 5133: 4869: 4504: 4473: 4298: 4269: 4255: 4164: 4147: 4113:- bungalows in Inman Park, a much better illustration of typical Atlanta "Neighborhoods". 3636: 3614: 3438: 3252: 3224: 3150: 3089: 2854: 2627: 2423: 2369: 2327: 2173: 2044: 1927: 1888: 1754: 1579: 1408: 1343: 1199: 1116: 871: 783: 510: 438: 408: 342: 177: 135: 100: 8391:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090824215442/http://www.hlamarwillis.com:80/CityCouncil.htm

6985:

be made to this section to bring it back in line with Knowledge's neutrality standards.

6890: 6821:

The first photo in the montage is of the downtown and midtown skyline, not of Buckhead

2069:

I'm not an admin and can't lock down the page. Should you wish to contact an admin, try

1857:

that it's heavily influenced by Franco-Ontarians. Anyway I'll work on those references.

8699:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 8620: 8504: 8054: 8012: 7774: 7591: 7582: 7380: 7308: 7219: 6857: 6812: 6753: 6571: 5105:, rather than recreating something separate. That would help us get back on track with 5098: 5086: 4689: 4665: 4654: 4630: 4548: 4135: 3985: 3957: 3734: 3596: 3454: 3301: 3270: 3185: 2932: 2384: 2351: 8841: 8739:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

8613:

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

8573:

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

8563:

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk

8432:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

7739:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

6560: 6530: 3675:) are the same. Further discussion of that issue should be relegated to the SPI page. 1033:

It is sufficient to state the % change that it was the #1 increase in major US cities.

8778: 8372: 8337:

I am adding a belated sig to this post I made January 18, 2015 (to assure archiving).

7693:

http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/SameSexCouplesandGLBpopACS.pdf

7650: 7611: 7489: 7288: 7284: 7241: 7203: 6944: 6934: 6914: 6797: 6735: 6480: 6450: 6430: 6411: 6340: 6320: 6259: 6222: 6180: 6139: 6103: 6056: 6002: 5972: 5612: 5208: 5113: 5083: 4992: 4940: 4841: 4802: 4783: 4754: 4703: 4564: 4522: 4489: 4462: 4452: 4407: 4331: 4284: 4193: 4126: 4000: 3915: 3854: 3813: 3763: 3696: 3651: 3524: 3508: 3418: 3349: 3116: 3062: 3010: 2807: 2456: 2230: 2127: 1943: 1895: 1862: 1709: 1643: 1511: 1498: 1437: 1308: 1271: 1234: 1143: 1091: 1053: 1030:

the text was an extreme belaboring of the point - this is the main article on Atlanta

1005: 908: 823: 661: 585: 524: 492: 423: 373: 226: 161: 116: 8819: 8637:

https://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=3421&NewsAreaID=2

8469:

Atlanta's transportation infrastructure comprises a complex network that includes a

7782: 5918:, as that brings its own controversies. I'm confident we can reach a good balance.-- 2278:

grew from virtually nothing in 1990 to make up 10% of the population 20 years later.

2153:

are NOT American cities), nor does it follow standards set by encyclopedias such as

8523: 8441: 8292: 8246: 8186: 7877: 7825: 7748: 7478: 7409: 7257: 7181: 7125: 7069: 7052: 7038:

What is missing from the city timeline? Please add relevant content. Thank you. --

6929:

200,000 total population (yes, I need to add rank numbers!) -- towards the bottom.

6375: 6292: 5852:

out at the end of the article, rather than be identified as a geographical feature.

5784:

other pages, seems to be the standard) sounds a lot more efficient and effective. ~

5345: 4958: 4916:

We've no obligation to use a particular wording just because it's used in sources.

3939: 3884: 3832: 3797: 3778: 3558: 3486:

enter text (he entered a single symbol, a right parenthesis) on his empty user page

3378: 3039: 2961: 2951: 2917: 2196: 2074: 2036: 2019: 1986: 1803: 1670: 1616: 1537: 977: 944: 750: 8647:

http://www.georgia.org/GeorgiaIndustries/Entertainment/FilmTV/Pages/FilmFacts.aspx

7770:

I boldly removed the "sister city" section, and was asked to start a section here.

7683:

http://www.spelman.edu/academics/enrichment/census/pdf/cicnewsletterjan2009vs2.pdf

7347:] is the page explaining the organization, beginning with the following paragraph 3566: 3386: 2346:

summarize content about how other races are doing there, that should be OK, too.

8546: 8380: 8366: 8340: 8301: 8260: 8217: 8170: 7979: 7944: 7907:, you can see the two discussions US Cities has had in the last couple of years. 7840: 7790: 7658: 7644: 7618: 7610:

A consideration for Atlanta is the relative tiny population in comparison to the

7574: 7559: 7513: 7458: 7440: 7393: 7372: 7357: 7296: 7100: 7043: 6697: 5693:

other pages, seems to be the standard) sounds a lot more efficient and effective.

4590: 4080: 3662: 3485: 3470: 3324: 2909: 2150: 2142: 2114: 2106: 2007: 1854: 1846: 1599: 1064: 8602: 7172:

Besides, would you restrain from modifying my own text, even on your talk page!

6627: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8278: 8209: 7786: 7434: 7292: 7245: 7199: 7173: 7159: 7115: 6869: 6848: 6770: 6712: 6660: 6462: 6389: 6356: 6274: 6240: 6192: 6154: 6114: 6036: 5983: 5940: 5919: 5895: 5865: 5834: 5820: 5811: 5802: 5793: 5785: 5764: 5735: 5671: 5647: 5629: 5549: 5317: 5231: 5213: 5152: 5129: 5064: 5013: 4865: 4615: 4500: 4469: 4294: 4265: 4214: 4160: 4143: 3708: 3676: 3632: 3610: 3569: 3543: 3434: 3389: 3363: 3284: 3248: 3220: 3146: 3085: 2850: 2623: 2419: 2365: 2323: 2169: 2095:

Specifically including a fact about a racial group (and not others) in the lead

2040: 1923: 1750: 1575: 1404: 1339: 1195: 1112: 1069: 867: 779: 696: 682: 606: 546: 506: 434: 404: 338: 173: 131: 96: 8705:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 8394: 7781:, and inappropriately sourced. Knowledge asks for articles to be based off of 7699:

https://web.archive.org/20141218203743/http://www.museumofdesign.org/about.htm

7465:

contradict your referred sources. The note I added to Salzburg's listing does

8500: 8483: 8474: 8205: 8058: 8016: 7912: 7578: 7401: 7376: 7304: 7300: 7215: 7140: 6853: 6808: 6749: 6503: 6236: 6150: 6098:

term in the meantime). Many people chimed in saying it belonged in the intro.

5478: 5377: 5020: 5016:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

4918: 4685: 4650: 4544: 4221: 4217:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

4105: 3981: 3875:

There are many; a Google search yielded quite a few. Why does it have to be "

3730: 3592: 3588: 3547: 3450: 3367: 3297: 3266: 3181: 2928: 2380: 2347: 2011: 1982: 1957: 1607: 1603: 899:

And there is a damn typo which is still in there about a "tree" mile radius.

689: 685:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

613: 609:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

7911:

is a nice discussion that took place on the city project. There are others.

7439:. Please add reliable sources, and/or ask for other eyes on this dispute. — 5034:

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image

4235:

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image

8774: 7541: 7422: 7327: 7091: 7081: 6930: 6910: 6793: 6476: 6446: 6426: 6407: 6336: 6316: 6288: 6255: 6218: 6176: 6135: 6099: 6052: 6028: 5998: 5968: 5608: 5604: 5575: 5482: 5109: 5106: 5079: 4936: 4837: 4798: 4750: 4699: 4560: 4518: 4485: 4448: 4403: 4327: 4280: 4122: 3996: 3911: 3850: 3809: 3759: 3692: 3691:

WikiDan, you mean a likelihood that RodewayInn and Mmann1988 are the same.

3647: 3520: 3504: 3414: 3345: 3112: 3058: 3006: 2905: 2803: 2452: 2226: 2123: 1939: 1858: 1705: 1639: 1507: 1494: 1433: 1304: 1267: 1230: 1139: 1108: 1087: 1049: 1001: 904: 819: 814:

then leave out important trends that don't fit into the decade's one theme.

735:

2000-2010 most suburban growth in outer counties beyond Cobb & Gwinnett

539: 520: 488: 419: 369: 222: 157: 112: 47: 17: 7702: 8849: 8706: 8657:

http://www.apta.com/research/stats/ridership/riderep/documents/07q4hr.pdf

8519: 8491: 8464: 7873: 7821: 7603: 7474: 7437: 7405: 7253: 7177: 7136: 7121: 7065: 6032: 4954: 3934: 3880: 3828: 3793: 3774: 3563:

a place regarded as a center for a specified group, activity, or interest

3383:

a place regarded as a center for a specified group, activity, or interest

2947: 2913: 2015: 1799: 1612: 1563: 1533: 8579:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov

8496: 8467:

has deleted the following without explanation from the Atlanta article.

8377:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

7655:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

5507:"in addition, it has become a major center of film and TV production..." 4035: 1550:

Sorry, but Kiezers, you really have no clue what you are talking about.

8470: 7958: 7854: 7804: 7039: 1036:

There is no need to quote 2006 numbers - we have the 2010 census in now

8420:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

7727:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

5792:

Yes, we should talk through things and reach a community consensus. -

1849:

clearly states that Salvador is the center of Afro-Brazilian culture,

8478: 5280: 3535:

Reiterating comments from above to include them in the proper dialog:

5833:

I'd still like to see Keizer's opinion on this particular matter. -

5533:

I agree with the edit. I also added two other geographical features.

8213: 7617:

So, now I understand why you consider cities so fascinating B^€ —

5486: 5272: 4836:

include, but your suggested wording would be too long for the intro

4066:

up from the architecture section to climate as mentioned previously

3519:

and think he is a real contributor to Knowledge, not a sock puppet.

2146: 2110: 1850: 1478:

To explain the black exodus (31,000 people) from the city 2000-2010

1448:

Oppression by certain editors and implementation of a racist agenda

8459:

Why is there deletionism on Atlanta transportation infrastructure?

8385:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

7663:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

5734:

Thanks again for the help and advice, it is GREATLY appreciated!--

4981: 4182: 2698:

authoritative books on Atlanta history such as Franklin Garrett's.

2105:

do not talk about race in their intro (note that many others like

1063:

These trends are also temporary and can change rapidly. Since the

650: 574: 8542: 8362: 8274: 7640: 7555: 6566: 6511: 6507: 5102: 5094: 5090: 4540: 4323:

It would be useful if 208.253.23.130 would log in with a username

2415: 2411: 2403: 2399: 1334: 642:

File:Atlanta tpb 2008 concept 3.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

8582: 6539: 3790:

Atlanta Rising: The Invention of an International City 1946-1996

8593:

http://urbanhealth.gsu.edu/files/gsu_public_housing_report1.pdf

6766: 6515: 5463:"The arts and entertainment are well represented in Atlanta..." 5340:

A photo of snow in Atlanta should be in the Climate section of

4663:

For information, yes... but why is that exact phrasing needed?

2395: 6610:

guess that most of the city’s trees are not located in parks.

4371:"ATL" is similar to "NYC" or "LA". No one ever says "The NYC". 4347:

http://www.ajc.com/sports/atls-record-154-seasons-1331879.html

2798:

Reminder, all this drama is in order to exclude one sentence:

1574:

that every section isn't about Atlanta, but black Atlantans.--

7747:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the —

5548:

that has intensified into the 21st century, revitalizing the

2407: 2102: 1745: 8672:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

8400:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

5433:"However, the city's white population is growing rapidly..." 3550:, but do not throw around unsupported accusations like that. 3370:, but do not throw around unsupported accusations like that. 4788:

here is a book from 1850 using the term "mecca" generically

4765: 4361:

Creative Loafing does "Best of ATL", not "Best of the ATL":

8553:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

7339: 6551: 5093:

article. Ncboy had a go at editing the History section of

4015:

I have added some images and removed others. Here is why:

766:

Suburban growth does not belong on the Atlanta page - the

695:

If the image has already been deleted you may want to try

487:

A couple people have now added information about the AUC.

303:

side too. Not every white person simply picked up an left!

90:

Possible Politically-Motivated Overhaul to History Section

7594:

article. At any rate, this is much more significant than

4931:

addition to the fact that it's a center of wealth (etc.)

4357:

http://www.ajc.com/news/choice-for-atl-police-537804.html

3491:

The person who wrote the fake comments was not a Muslim:

2941:

Agree. Mmann, we're at the stage where it's agreed that

2418:, etc. Ethnicity specifics are inappropriate in a lead.-- 8473:

intercity passenger line, several freight rail lines, a

8361:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

7713:

http://www.atlantafalcons.com/People/Alumni/History.aspx

4048:

up from the architecture section into the parks section.

3262:

Yes, I see that you did. See my 3RR violation report:

1914:

suppressed and only be located in the Demography section

1472:

To mention the 1906 race riots as a key historical event

941:

The "UY" needs to go. I have changed it to "AT" instead

855:

Recession - Fine, if you really think that is necessary.

8497:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Georgia_Rail_Passenger_Program

7901:

Knowledge:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline#Sister cities

7639:

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on

1529: 795:

I am putting most of it back for the following reasons:

8295:, IPA isn't necessary in this case. Also, as above, a 8121:

the phrase, I used at least four pronunciations: both

1357:

Reasons for elimination of some of the existing text:

758:

I undid your revision because it has some major flaws.

749:"From 2000 to 2009, the three-mile radius surrounding 7602:

should be spun off into a suitable list article, and

6843:

Captions for skyline pics in the neighborhood section

6592:

find a way to work it into the demographics section?

5456:

demographic information should be in the lede at all.

4747:

intro to the History section of its "Atlanta" article

2900:

race history. For a good example of this see the FA

1453:

success in the US. Many would say the #1 such place.

5522:"Atlanta stands out among major U.S. cities for its 4649:Usually we prefer to stick with what's in sources. 2394:

this. But this sentence follows the template set by

1481:

To add the AUC colleges to the list of universities.

8709:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 6565:I’m not sure why the History section was so short. 6388:

Agree. It should be moved to the tourism section.--

5369:

Center of black culture, wealth and political power

5019:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 4220:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1333:I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating 953: 688:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 612:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 6291:or finding another way to get an outside opinion? 4973:File:SnowMidtownAtlanta.jpg Nominated for Deletion 4784:http://www.temple.edu/religion/abdullah/index.html 3753:"Atlanta is international" - meaningless statement 1853:that it's the center of Arab-Israeli culture, and 976:, also showing the local variant without the "t". 6740:Hi. I'm going through all the US Cities (as per 566:File:Montage Atlanta 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion 7899:by SCI, which is pretty much the gold standard. 7058:The following discussion thread is copied from: 1425:98 percent of the AHA's tenants are black. See: 7558:. So where to put the paragraph in question? — 6287:Is there any interest in obtaining feedback at 2525:everything from schools to politics to housing. 2071:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1399:BeltLine fits nicely into the 2000-2009 trends. 738:2008 recession - economy hard hit, empty condos 8792:In the *Geography* section, there is a claim: 8695:This message was posted before February 2018. 8232:] wherein the audible pronunciation given for 7789:) to a concept with primary sourcing. Thanks. 6926:List of U.S. cities by foreign-born population 4174:File:Richs pink pig.jpg Nominated for Deletion 1898:and the well respected local Saporta Report. 148:Adding historic milestones of the 20th century 8603:http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html 6928:showing where Atlanta lies among cities : --> 4935:I'll deal with it in the body of the article 4739:sockpuppet of a person impersonating a Muslim 4198:Media without a source as of 10 February 2012 3788:I did find this book that could be a source: 3727:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mmann1988 1669:may eventually merit mentioning in the lead. 7088:the material in this section, from my first 1086:Good point Ryoung122 I adjusted accordingly 903:Reynoldstown, Cabbagetown and East Atlanta! 660:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 8395:http://www.hlamarwillis.com/CityCouncil.htm 8230:Interesting site (Oxford University Press) 8112:IPA pronunciations for 'Atlanta' Suggestion 4953:, or Atlanta as one of the new "Mo-towns" 4577:sockpuppet of a user impersonating a Muslim 3219:consensus on the lead as we agreed to do.-- 968: 590:Media without a source as of 12 August 2011 8870:"Quick Facts: Atlanta", U.S. Census Bureau 8541:I have just modified 10 external links on 6742:List of United States cities by population 3627:, where a checkuser clerk has confirmed a 1329:Nomination of article to "featured" status 8241:IPA and open to discussing alternatives. 7398:again and again, right from the beginning 7000:The integration of Atlanta public schools 6746:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline 6659:Please let me know what you all think! -- 6500:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline 5496:As this Creative Loafing article states ( 5055:Historical Balance and the "Social Other" 4864:I agree with the removal of Black Mecca. 4684:It's a quote from the numerous sources. 4059: 4041: 3542:@Keizers: If you believe RodewayInn is a 3362:@Keizers: If you believe RodewayInn is a 959: 947: 7820:, and get that project's input there. - 5029:image page (File:SnowMidtownAtlanta.jpg) 4262:WikiProject Cities Guideline - Geography 1469:To state that the city is black-majority 7703:http://www.museumofdesign.org/about.htm 7430:definitively decide the question. Here 7287:). And just for good measure, there's 5550:city's center and in-town neighborhoods 14: 7777:, insignificant triva, promotional to 5085:) I added a LOT of information to the 4908:Means exactly the same thing as this: 3038:... or something like that. Cheers, 1530:starts getting cited outside wikipedia 703:This notification is provided by a Bot 621:This notification is provided by a Bot 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 8684:to let others know (documentation at 7433:is an additional source, and another 4991:, has been nominated for deletion at 4192:, has been nominated for deletion at 2960:I agree with Louiedog and Dicklyon. 962: 584:, has been nominated for deletion at 7773:I found the content appearing to be 7295:, and you might also take a look at 5622:Duly noted. Thanks for the heads up. 4230:image page (File:Richs pink pig.jpg) 2195:morning due to a medical procedure. 965: 956: 950: 25: 7208:page 35 of the membership directory 6769:, have way too many sub-sections.-- 6035:as being "centers of white wealth". 5477:"the city is an important base for 5023:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 4224:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 3707:Yes, I did mean that. My mistake! 2364:African-American; Atlanta is 54%.-- 1608:comment on content, not on editors. 692:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 658:File:Atlanta tpb 2008 concept 3.jpg 616:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 23: 7540:An editor recently reverted, from 6884:ATL as an international city/metro 6502:(hereinafter “Guideline”) and FAs 5544:, an event that spurred a wave of 5297:So therefore, you have absolutely 5275:are rare but possible; one hit in 5255:Climate and Environment of Atlanta 5171:Error in historical population box 4074:So for that reason I also removed 770:page is the proper place for that. 24: 8883: 8545:. Please take a moment to review 8365:. Please take a moment to review 7643:. Please take a moment to review 463:Colleges and Universities missing 8411: 7718: 7421: 7326: 7090: 7080: 4980: 4609:While the article currently has 4181: 4104: 4091: 4079: 4034: 4022: 943: 649: 573: 29: 7536:Auto assembly plants in Atlanta 4987:An image used in this article, 4188:An image used in this article, 4061: 4043: 656:An image used in this article, 580:An image used in this article, 8863: 8834: 8820:"Atlanta, Georgia (1900–2000)" 8812: 8528:00:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC) 8514:I did give a valid rationale: 8509:23:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC) 8085:Thank you Onel5969. It worked! 7961:}}) while signing a reply, thx 7857:}}) while signing a reply, thx 7807:}}) while signing a reply, thx 7240:You are obviously wrong about 5801:model for future revisions. ~ 4575:- - - Comment below is from a 1427:"Reinventing Public Housing", 715:09:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC) 13: 1: 8807:19:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC) 8783:03:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC) 8768:Whittling down the dead links 8583:http://factfinder2.census.gov 8454:07:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC) 8349:04:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 8310:01:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 8287:23:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 8269:23:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 8255:21:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 8226:17:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 8195:16:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 8179:08:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 7025:16:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC) 6995:22:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC) 6962:01:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC) 6779:18:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 6758:16:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 6493:Article overhaul edit summary 5540:"In 1996, Atlanta hosted the 4527:21:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 4509:15:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 4494:04:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 4478:18:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 4457:21:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 4436:18:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 4412:17:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 4392:17:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 4336:17:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 4303:16:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 4289:15:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 4274:14:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 4247:22:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3048:19:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC) 3015:17:09, 31 December 2011 (UTC) 2970:00:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 2956:20:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2937:18:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2922:18:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2859:17:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2812:13:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2632:07:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2461:07:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2428:07:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2389:06:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2374:06:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2356:05:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2332:06:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2235:05:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2205:05:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2178:05:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2132:05:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2083:04:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2049:04:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 2024:04:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1995:04:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1948:04:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1932:04:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC) 1867:21:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1808:18:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1759:17:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1714:17:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1679:00:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 1648:19:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1621:19:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1584:18:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1542:18:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1516:18:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1503:18:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1442:13:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1413:05:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1348:23:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1313:13:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1276:13:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1239:13:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1204:03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1148:03:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 1121:23:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1096:18:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1078:17:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1058:14:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 1014:08:55, 4 December 2011‎ (UTC) 913:02:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 876:01:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 828:01:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC) 788:22:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 732:all public housing demolished 8763:20:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC) 8069:00:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 8027:02:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC) 7993:Temporary protection request 7905:the archives (here's a link) 7598:, a mere score card—perhaps 7338:. This is from the website, 6817:17:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 5354:15:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 5302:event in Atlanta (it's not). 4997:Deletion requests March 2012 4945:17:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 4923:16:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 4874:15:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 4860:01:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 4846:01:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 4831:01:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 4811:19:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 4777:07:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 4759:21:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 4732:23:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 4708:20:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 4694:19:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 4680:17:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 4659:06:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 4645:20:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 4169:15:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 4152:14:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 4131:21:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 4071:that replaced the projects. 1022:Increase in white population 986:01:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC) 936:09:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC) 724:History of Atlanta 2000-2010 7: 7988:17:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7964:16:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7923:16:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7882:15:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7860:15:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7830:15:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7810:15:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 7779:Sister Cities International 7761:10:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC) 7343:Sister Cities International 7060:User talk:Onel5969#May 2015 6939:14:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC) 6919:14:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC) 6546:List of people from Atlanta 5707:model for future revisions. 5416:Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 5364:Article overhaul discussion 4995:in the following category: 4989:File:SnowMidtownAtlanta.jpg 4622:04:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 4603:15:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 4569:14:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 4553:03:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 4196:in the following category: 4005:22:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3990:22:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3920:00:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 3889:22:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3859:22:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3837:22:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3827:used to describe Atlanta.-- 3818:21:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3802:21:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3783:21:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3768:20:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3739:17:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3719:17:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3701:16:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3687:16:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3619:16:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3601:16:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3580:16:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3529:15:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3513:15:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3459:03:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3443:00:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3423:16:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 3400:16:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3354:14:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3337:00:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 3306:23:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3291:21:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3275:20:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3257:14:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3229:14:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3190:04:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3155:02:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC) 3121:16:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 3094:15:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 3067:00:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 633:20:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 588:in the following category: 549:This is what I wrote--: --> 10: 8888: 8726:(last update: 5 June 2024) 8538:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 8383:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 8358:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 8330:In the lede, the sentence 7661:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 7636:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 6837:15:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC) 5326:19:12, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 5240:15:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 5222:11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 5161:15:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 5138:11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 5118:23:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 5087:History of Atlanta article 5073:19:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 4963:15:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 4311:Nicknames: The ATL vs. ATL 1960:, his book about Atlanta. 697:Commons Undeletion Request 664:for the following reason: 582:File:Montage Atlanta 2.jpg 7596:tall buildings in Atlanta 6678:The article states: "... 6674:Parks and Recreation Data 6669:02:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC) 6623:14:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 6485:08:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6471:03:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6455:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6435:21:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6416:08:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6398:03:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6384:03:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6365:03:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6345:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6325:20:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 6301:23:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC) 6283:12:47, 25 July 2012 (UTC) 6264:08:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6249:03:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6227:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6201:02:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 6185:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6163:03:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6144:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6123:03:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6108:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6061:21:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6045:16:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 6007:15:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 5992:15:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5977:14:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5959:Atlanta and black culture 5949:15:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5928:15:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5904:15:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5874:15:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5843:13:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5773:16:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 5744:12:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5680:11:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5638:03:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 5617:15:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC) 5253:free to add the image to 5192:17:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 5046:18:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 3408:"International community" 1353:2000-2010 history section 8117:heard 'Atlanta' spoken. 7627:04:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC) 7587:03:56, 8 June 2015 (UTC) 7568:02:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC) 7522:01:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC) 7504:23:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC) 7483:22:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC) 7449:20:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7414:19:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7385:19:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7366:19:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7313:18:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7262:18:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7224:13:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7186:05:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 7163:acknowledge these facts. 7149:04:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 7130:04:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 7109:02:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC) 7074:06:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 7048:08:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC) 6721:17:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC) 6149:information may violate 4772:Mr. Stradivarius on tour 3557:has entered into common 3377:has entered into common 2902:Providence, Rhode Island 921:Pronunciation of Atlanta 8788:Dubious elevation claim 8534:External links modified 8354:External links modified 8326:World city rank Comment 8137:s at all. For example 7632:External links modified 7291:, and the ever-popular 6898:Demographics of Atlanta 6878:19:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 6862:17:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 6802:13:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC) 4190:File:Richs pink pig.jpg 3546:, file the appropriate 3366:, file the appropriate 3082:Demographics of Atlanta 2159:Encyclopædia Britannica 2155:World Book Encyclopedia 1600:civility in here please 1171:Demographics of Atlanta 560:10:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 529:15:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 515:21:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 497:21:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 481:15:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 443:21:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 428:20:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 413:16:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 378:15:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 347:21:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 231:12:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 182:21:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 166:20:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 140:21:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 121:19:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 105:17:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 8486:system for the region. 7943:Thanks for the links. 7354: 7341:, of the organization 6967:NPOV Dispute - Economy 6090:"high per capita GDP." 5824: 5806: 5789: 5198:Snow photos of Atlanta 5038:CommonsNotificationBot 4239:CommonsNotificationBot 3465:Sock puppet RodewayInn 707:CommonsNotificationBot 625:CommonsNotificationBot 8822:. Our Georgia History 7356:I hope this helps. — 7349: 7244:, which is a part of 6522:Motivation/disclaimer 5816: 5798: 5781: 5412:Civil Rights Movement 4011:Images in the article 42:of past discussions. 8707:regular verification 8408:to let others know. 8369:. If necessary, add 7647:. If necessary, add 5342:Geography of Atlanta 4951:So So Def Recordings 4898:WP:Use plain English 4535:RFC of "Black Mecca" 666:Copyright violations 8697:After February 2018 8676:parameter below to 8404:parameter below to 8291:As stated above by 7086:Clarification note: 7033:Timeline of Atlanta 6980:statistics", "This 5778:Revision discussion 5524:dense tree coverage 3725:Comments go here: 3143:persecution complex 8846:Storm Encyclopedia 8751:InternetArchiveBot 8702:InternetArchiveBot 7592:History of Atlanta 6787:Lead photo montage 6572:History of Atlanta 5099:History of Atlanta 5021:fair use rationale 4611:no lack of sources 4222:fair use rationale 690:fair use rationale 614:fair use rationale 130:of white flight.-- 8727: 8452: 7962: 7858: 7808: 7759: 7612:Metropolitan Area 7542:Atlanta#Economics 7028: 7011:comment added by 6827:comment added by 5410:"a cradle of the 5209:Fairbanks, Alaska 5182:comment added by 5052: 5051: 5001:What should I do? 4993:Wikimedia Commons 4814: 4797:comment added by 4606: 4589:comment added by 4426:comment added by 4382:comment added by 4253: 4252: 4202:What should I do? 4194:Wikimedia Commons 3591:if you need to. 3536: 3340: 3323:comment added by 3281:citation overkill 3005:opinion on this. 1983:assume good faith 1896:Henry Louis Gates 1604:Assume good faith 1017: 1000:comment added by 721: 720: 670:What should I do? 662:Wikimedia Commons 639: 638: 594:What should I do? 586:Wikimedia Commons 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 8879: 8872: 8867: 8861: 8860: 8858: 8856: 8838: 8832: 8831: 8829: 8827: 8816: 8799:MatthewZimmerman 8761: 8752: 8725: 8724: 8703: 8691: 8624: 8448: 8447:Talk to my owner 8443: 8418: 8415: 8414: 8384: 8376: 8145:there is no one 8065: 8062: 8023: 8020: 7952: 7919: 7916: 7848: 7798: 7755: 7754:Talk to my owner 7750: 7725: 7722: 7721: 7662: 7654: 7500: 7494: 7425: 7330: 7111: 7094: 7089: 7084: 7027: 7005: 6839: 6042: 6039: 5770: 5767: 5237: 5234: 5194: 5158: 5155: 5070: 5067: 5012:If the image is 4984: 4977: 4976: 4856: 4855:Mr. Stradivarius 4827: 4826:Mr. Stradivarius 4813: 4791: 4773: 4728: 4727:Mr. Stradivarius 4678: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4643: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4605: 4583: 4438: 4394: 4213:If the image is 4185: 4178: 4177: 4108: 4095: 4083: 4065: 4063: 4047: 4045: 4038: 4026: 3979: 3952:deleted contribs 3711: 3679: 3572: 3534: 3392: 3339: 3317: 3020:Two suggestions: 2300:un-encyclopedic. 1796:NY Times article 1606:and remember to 1429:Washington Times 1075: 1072: 1016: 994: 975: 974: 971: 970: 967: 964: 961: 958: 955: 952: 949: 751:Downtown Atlanta 681:If the image is 653: 646: 645: 605:If the image is 577: 570: 569: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 8887: 8886: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8878: 8877: 8876: 8875: 8868: 8864: 8854: 8852: 8840: 8839: 8835: 8825: 8823: 8818: 8817: 8813: 8790: 8770: 8755: 8750: 8718: 8711:have permission 8701: 8685: 8618: 8551:this simple FaQ 8536: 8461: 8451: 8446: 8416: 8412: 8378: 8370: 8356: 8328: 8114: 8063: 8060: 8021: 8018: 7995: 7917: 7914: 7768: 7758: 7753: 7723: 7719: 7656: 7648: 7634: 7538: 7498: 7490: 7098: 7079: 7055: 7036: 7006: 7002: 6969: 6947: 6886: 6845: 6822: 6789: 6738: 6676: 6657: 6630: 6607: 6598: 6589: 6580: 6563: 6554: 6542: 6533: 6524: 6495: 6442: 6423: 6332: 6273:out-of-place.-- 6040: 6037: 5961: 5780: 5768: 5765: 5542:Summer Olympics 5366: 5235: 5232: 5200: 5177: 5173: 5156: 5153: 5068: 5065: 5057: 4975: 4854: 4825: 4792: 4771: 4726: 4721:WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV 4674: 4670: 4666: 4664: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4629: 4584: 4537: 4465: 4421: 4377: 4313: 4258: 4176: 4158:the lede. : --> 4138: 4013: 3937: 3755: 3717: 3709: 3685: 3677: 3578: 3570: 3467: 3430: 3410: 3398: 3390: 3318: 3002: 2151:Greater Sudbury 2115:Greater Sudbury 2097: 2012:manual of style 1891: 1855:Greater Sudbury 1847:Salvador, Bahia 1598:Guys, a bit of 1450: 1355: 1331: 1073: 1070: 1065:Great Recession 1024: 995: 946: 942: 923: 726: 644: 568: 552:Kiamiss202Queen 473:Kiamiss202Queen 465: 150: 92: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 8885: 8874: 8873: 8862: 8833: 8810: 8789: 8786: 8769: 8766: 8745: 8744: 8737: 8670: 8669: 8661:Added archive 8659: 8651:Added archive 8649: 8641:Added archive 8639: 8631:Added archive 8629: 8615: 8607:Added archive 8605: 8597:Added archive 8595: 8587:Added archive 8585: 8577:Added archive 8575: 8567:Added archive 8565: 8557:Added archive 8535: 8532: 8531: 8530: 8460: 8457: 8444: 8438: 8437: 8430: 8398: 8397: 8389:Added archive 8355: 8352: 8327: 8324: 8323: 8322: 8321: 8320: 8319: 8318: 8317: 8316: 8315: 8314: 8313: 8312: 8228: 8210:Atlantic Ocean 8198: 8197: 8113: 8110: 8109: 8108: 8107: 8106: 8105: 8104: 8103: 8102: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8090: 8089: 8088: 8087: 8086: 8076: 8075: 8074: 8073: 8072: 8071: 8047: 8046: 8045: 8044: 8039: 8038: 8037: 8036: 8030: 8029: 8004: 7994: 7991: 7975: 7974: 7973: 7972: 7971: 7970: 7969: 7968: 7967: 7966: 7932: 7931: 7930: 7929: 7928: 7927: 7926: 7925: 7889: 7888: 7887: 7886: 7885: 7884: 7865: 7864: 7863: 7862: 7834: 7833: 7783:WP:RS#Overview 7767: 7764: 7751: 7745: 7744: 7737: 7716: 7715: 7707:Added archive 7705: 7697:Added archive 7695: 7687:Added archive 7685: 7677:Added archive 7675: 7667:Added archive 7633: 7630: 7608: 7607: 7537: 7534: 7533: 7532: 7531: 7530: 7529: 7528: 7527: 7526: 7525: 7524: 7470: 7436:, and another 7419: 7418: 7417: 7416: 7388: 7387: 7324: 7323: 7322: 7321: 7320: 7319: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7315: 7271: 7270: 7269: 7268: 7267: 7266: 7265: 7264: 7249: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7228: 7227: 7226: 7191: 7190: 7189: 7188: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7152: 7151: 7054: 7051: 7035: 7030: 7001: 6998: 6976:0.4%", "These 6968: 6965: 6946: 6943: 6942: 6941: 6907: 6906: 6885: 6882: 6881: 6880: 6849:User:Mmann1988 6844: 6841: 6806: 6788: 6785: 6784: 6783: 6782: 6781: 6737: 6734: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6730: 6724: 6723: 6675: 6672: 6656: 6653: 6648: 6647: 6644: 6641: 6638: 6629: 6626: 6606: 6603: 6597: 6596:Gentrification 6594: 6588: 6585: 6579: 6576: 6562: 6559: 6553: 6550: 6541: 6538: 6532: 6529: 6523: 6520: 6494: 6491: 6490: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6441: 6438: 6422: 6419: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6368: 6367: 6331: 6328: 6312: 6311: 6310: 6309: 6308: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6303: 6270: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6203: 6189: 6188: 6187: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6095: 6091: 6076: 6075: 6074: 6073: 6072: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6068: 6067: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6063: 6016: 6015: 6014: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6010: 6009: 5960: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5932: 5931: 5930: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5887: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5856: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5846: 5845: 5830: 5829: 5815: 5814: 5797: 5796: 5779: 5776: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5746: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5699: 5698: 5697: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5641: 5640: 5624: 5623: 5598: 5597: 5592: 5591: 5580: 5579: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5554: 5553: 5546:gentrification 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5528: 5527: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5509: 5508: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5491: 5490: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5465: 5464: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5450: 5449: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5442: 5435: 5434: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5420: 5419: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5397: 5396: 5388: 5387: 5382: 5381: 5365: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5290: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5199: 5196: 5172: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5056: 5053: 5050: 5049: 5025: 5024: 5017: 5003: 5002: 4985: 4974: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4914: 4913: 4906: 4905: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4889: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4574: 4572: 4571: 4536: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4512: 4511: 4496: 4464: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4428:208.253.23.130 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4396: 4395: 4384:208.253.23.130 4373: 4372: 4368: 4367: 4362: 4359: 4354: 4349: 4343: 4342: 4325: 4324: 4321: 4312: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4257: 4254: 4251: 4250: 4226: 4225: 4218: 4204: 4203: 4186: 4175: 4172: 4137: 4134: 4115: 4114: 4098: 4097: 4089: 4068: 4067: 4053: 4052: 4049: 4032: 4012: 4009: 4008: 4007: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3821: 3820: 3786: 3785: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3713: 3681: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3574: 3561:usage to mean 3551: 3532: 3531: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3495: 3489: 3482: 3479: 3466: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3429: 3428:Lead consensus 3426: 3409: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3394: 3381:usage to mean 3371: 3357: 3356: 3315: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3051: 3050: 3028: 3022: 3021: 3001: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2192: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2166: 2162: 2135: 2134: 2119: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2067: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2027: 2026: 2002: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1951: 1950: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1908: 1890: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1568: 1557: 1545: 1544: 1524: 1523: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1354: 1351: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1081: 1080: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1018: 989: 988: 922: 919: 917: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 879: 878: 863: 859: 856: 853: 849: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 831: 830: 815: 811: 807: 804: 799: 798: 797: 796: 775: 774: 771: 764: 760: 759: 755: 754: 747: 740: 739: 736: 733: 725: 722: 719: 718: 700: 699: 693: 686: 672: 671: 654: 643: 640: 637: 636: 618: 617: 610: 596: 595: 578: 567: 564: 545:In regards to 538:In regards to 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 500: 499: 464: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 185: 184: 149: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 8884: 8871: 8866: 8851: 8847: 8843: 8837: 8821: 8815: 8811: 8809: 8808: 8804: 8800: 8795: 8785: 8784: 8780: 8776: 8765: 8764: 8759: 8754: 8753: 8742: 8738: 8735: 8731: 8730: 8729: 8722: 8716: 8712: 8708: 8704: 8698: 8693: 8689: 8683: 8679: 8675: 8668: 8664: 8660: 8658: 8654: 8650: 8648: 8644: 8640: 8638: 8634: 8630: 8628: 8622: 8616: 8614: 8610: 8606: 8604: 8600: 8596: 8594: 8590: 8586: 8584: 8580: 8576: 8574: 8570: 8566: 8564: 8560: 8556: 8555: 8554: 8552: 8548: 8544: 8539: 8529: 8525: 8521: 8517: 8513: 8512: 8511: 8510: 8506: 8502: 8498: 8493: 8488: 8487: 8485: 8484:commuter rail 8480: 8476: 8475:rapid transit 8472: 8466: 8456: 8455: 8449: 8442: 8435: 8431: 8428: 8424: 8423: 8422: 8421: 8409: 8407: 8403: 8396: 8392: 8388: 8387: 8386: 8382: 8374: 8368: 8364: 8359: 8351: 8350: 8346: 8342: 8338: 8333: 8311: 8307: 8303: 8298: 8294: 8290: 8289: 8288: 8284: 8280: 8276: 8272: 8271: 8270: 8266: 8262: 8259:Good idea. — 8258: 8257: 8256: 8252: 8248: 8243: 8242: 8240: 8235: 8231: 8229: 8227: 8223: 8219: 8215: 8211: 8207: 8206:New York City 8202: 8201: 8200: 8199: 8196: 8192: 8188: 8183: 8182: 8181: 8180: 8176: 8172: 8168: 8163: 8161: 8157: 8152: 8148: 8144: 8140: 8136: 8133:only, and no 8132: 8128: 8124: 8118: 8101: 8100: 8099: 8098: 8097: 8096: 8095: 8094: 8084: 8083: 8082: 8081: 8080: 8079: 8078: 8077: 8070: 8067: 8066: 8056: 8055:EnigmaLord515 8053: 8052: 8051: 8050: 8049: 8048: 8043: 8042: 8041: 8040: 8034: 8033: 8032: 8031: 8028: 8025: 8024: 8014: 8013:EnigmaLord515 8010: 8009: 8008: 8006: 8001: 7998: 7990: 7989: 7985: 7981: 7965: 7960: 7956: 7950: 7946: 7942: 7941: 7940: 7939: 7938: 7937: 7936: 7935: 7934: 7933: 7924: 7921: 7920: 7910: 7906: 7902: 7897: 7896: 7895: 7894: 7893: 7892: 7891: 7890: 7883: 7879: 7875: 7871: 7870: 7869: 7868: 7867: 7866: 7861: 7856: 7852: 7846: 7842: 7838: 7837: 7836: 7835: 7832: 7831: 7827: 7823: 7819: 7814: 7813: 7812: 7811: 7806: 7802: 7796: 7792: 7788: 7784: 7780: 7776: 7772: 7766:Sister cities 7763: 7762: 7756: 7749: 7742: 7738: 7735: 7731: 7730: 7729: 7728: 7714: 7710: 7706: 7704: 7700: 7696: 7694: 7690: 7686: 7684: 7680: 7676: 7674: 7670: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7660: 7652: 7646: 7642: 7637: 7629: 7628: 7624: 7620: 7615: 7613: 7605: 7601: 7597: 7593: 7588: 7584: 7580: 7576: 7572: 7571: 7570: 7569: 7565: 7561: 7557: 7552: 7547: 7543: 7523: 7519: 7515: 7511: 7507: 7506: 7505: 7502: 7495: 7493: 7486: 7485: 7484: 7480: 7476: 7471: 7468: 7464: 7460: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7454: 7453: 7452: 7451: 7450: 7446: 7442: 7438: 7435: 7432: 7428: 7424: 7415: 7411: 7407: 7403: 7399: 7395: 7392: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7386: 7382: 7378: 7374: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7363: 7359: 7353: 7348: 7346: 7344: 7340: 7337: 7333: 7329: 7314: 7310: 7306: 7302: 7298: 7294: 7290: 7286: 7281: 7280: 7279: 7278: 7277: 7276: 7275: 7274: 7273: 7272: 7263: 7259: 7255: 7250: 7247: 7243: 7239: 7238: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7225: 7221: 7217: 7213: 7209: 7205: 7201: 7197: 7196: 7195: 7194: 7193: 7192: 7187: 7183: 7179: 7175: 7171: 7170: 7169: 7168: 7161: 7156: 7155: 7154: 7153: 7150: 7146: 7142: 7138: 7135: 7134: 7133: 7132: 7131: 7127: 7123: 7117: 7112: 7110: 7106: 7102: 7097: 7093: 7087: 7083: 7077: 7076: 7075: 7071: 7067: 7062: 7061: 7050: 7049: 7045: 7041: 7034: 7029: 7026: 7022: 7018: 7014: 7010: 6997: 6996: 6992: 6988: 6987:72.215.49.159 6983: 6982:unprecedented 6979: 6975: 6964: 6963: 6959: 6955: 6951: 6940: 6936: 6932: 6927: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6920: 6916: 6912: 6903: 6902: 6901: 6899: 6894: 6892: 6879: 6875: 6871: 6866: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6859: 6855: 6850: 6840: 6838: 6834: 6830: 6829:50.199.105.57 6826: 6819: 6818: 6814: 6810: 6804: 6803: 6799: 6795: 6780: 6776: 6772: 6768: 6764: 6763: 6762: 6761: 6760: 6759: 6755: 6751: 6747: 6743: 6728: 6727: 6726: 6725: 6722: 6718: 6714: 6709: 6708: 6707: 6704: 6700: 6699: 6696: 6692: 6687: 6685: 6681: 6671: 6670: 6666: 6662: 6652: 6645: 6642: 6639: 6636: 6635: 6634: 6625: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6611: 6602: 6593: 6584: 6578:Metro Atlanta 6575: 6573: 6568: 6558: 6549: 6547: 6537: 6528: 6519: 6517: 6513: 6509: 6505: 6504:San Francisco 6501: 6486: 6482: 6478: 6474: 6473: 6472: 6468: 6464: 6459: 6458: 6457: 6456: 6452: 6448: 6437: 6436: 6432: 6428: 6418: 6417: 6413: 6409: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6381: 6377: 6372: 6366: 6362: 6358: 6353: 6352: 6351: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6346: 6342: 6338: 6327: 6326: 6322: 6318: 6302: 6298: 6294: 6290: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6280: 6276: 6271: 6267: 6266: 6265: 6261: 6257: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6246: 6242: 6238: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6228: 6224: 6220: 6202: 6198: 6194: 6190: 6186: 6182: 6178: 6174: 6173: 6170: 6164: 6160: 6156: 6152: 6147: 6146: 6145: 6141: 6137: 6132: 6131: 6128: 6124: 6120: 6116: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6105: 6101: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6082: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6062: 6058: 6054: 6050: 6049: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6043: 6034: 6030: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 6021: 6020: 6019: 6018: 6017: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5989: 5985: 5980: 5979: 5978: 5974: 5970: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5937: 5936: 5933: 5929: 5925: 5921: 5917: 5913: 5912: 5909: 5905: 5901: 5897: 5892: 5891: 5888: 5885: 5884: 5883: 5882: 5875: 5871: 5867: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5858: 5857: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5844: 5840: 5836: 5832: 5831: 5826: 5825: 5823: 5822: 5813: 5808: 5807: 5805: 5804: 5795: 5791: 5790: 5788: 5787: 5775: 5774: 5771: 5760: 5757: 5755: 5745: 5741: 5737: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5715: 5714: 5705: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5691: 5690: 5689: 5688: 5687: 5686: 5681: 5677: 5673: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5649: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5626: 5625: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5602: 5601:Summary style 5594: 5593: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5584: 5577: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5568: 5567:"Tree canopy' 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5538: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5525: 5521: 5520: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5506: 5505: 5499: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5475: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5462: 5461: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5447: 5446: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5432: 5431: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5409: 5408: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5384: 5383: 5379: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5370: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5343: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5327: 5323: 5319: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5300: 5296: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5284: 5282: 5278: 5274: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5256: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5241: 5238: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5210: 5204: 5195: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5162: 5159: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5126: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5108: 5104: 5100: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5081: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5071: 5061: 5048: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5030: 5022: 5018: 5015: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5007: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4994: 4990: 4986: 4983: 4979: 4978: 4964: 4960: 4956: 4952: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4921: 4920: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4899: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4858: 4857: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4843: 4839: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4829: 4828: 4820: 4816: 4815: 4812: 4808: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4789: 4785: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4775: 4774: 4767: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4730: 4729: 4722: 4717: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4677: 4669: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4642: 4634: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4620: 4617: 4612: 4607: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4580: 4578: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4528: 4524: 4520: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4497: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4475: 4471: 4468:suggestions? 4458: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4375: 4374: 4370: 4369: 4366: 4363: 4360: 4358: 4355: 4353: 4350: 4348: 4345: 4344: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4322: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4260:According to 4249: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4231: 4223: 4219: 4216: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4208: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4184: 4180: 4179: 4171: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4133: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4112: 4111:Neighborhoods 4107: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100:and I added: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4086:Neighborhoods 4082: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4072: 4064: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4050: 4046: 4037: 4033: 4030: 4025: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4016: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3977: 3974: 3971: 3968: 3965: 3962: 3959: 3956: 3953: 3950: 3947: 3944: 3941: 3936: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3674: 3671: 3668: 3664: 3661: 3659: 3656: 3653: 3649: 3644: 3641: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3567: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3549: 3548:investigation 3545: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3496: 3493: 3492: 3490: 3487: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3472: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3387: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3369: 3368:investigation 3365: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3247:important."-- 3230: 3226: 3222: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3024: 3023: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3012: 3008: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2944: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2523: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2225: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2193: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1962: 1959: 1958:A Man in Full 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1920: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1897: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1423: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 991: 990: 987: 983: 979: 973: 940: 939: 938: 937: 933: 929: 918: 915: 914: 910: 906: 900: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 877: 873: 869: 864: 860: 857: 854: 850: 846: 845: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 829: 825: 821: 816: 812: 808: 805: 801: 800: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 772: 769: 768:Metro Atlanta 765: 762: 761: 757: 756: 752: 748: 745: 744: 743: 737: 734: 731: 730: 729: 717: 716: 712: 708: 704: 698: 694: 691: 687: 684: 680: 679: 678: 676: 669: 668: 667: 663: 659: 655: 652: 648: 647: 635: 634: 630: 626: 622: 615: 611: 608: 604: 603: 602: 600: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 579: 576: 572: 571: 563: 561: 557: 553: 548: 543: 541: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 512: 508: 504: 503: 502: 501: 498: 494: 490: 486: 485: 484: 482: 478: 474: 469: 444: 440: 436: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 379: 375: 371: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 348: 344: 340: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 302: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 232: 228: 224: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 183: 179: 175: 170: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 154: 141: 137: 133: 129: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 109: 108: 107: 106: 102: 98: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 8865: 8853:. Retrieved 8845: 8842:"Ice Storms" 8836: 8824:. Retrieved 8814: 8793: 8791: 8771: 8749: 8746: 8721:source check 8700: 8694: 8681: 8677: 8673: 8671: 8540: 8537: 8489: 8468: 8462: 8439: 8419: 8410: 8405: 8401: 8399: 8360: 8357: 8336: 8331: 8329: 8296: 8238: 8233: 8166: 8164: 8159: 8155: 8150: 8146: 8142: 8138: 8134: 8130: 8126: 8122: 8119: 8115: 8059: 8017: 8007: 8002: 7999: 7996: 7976: 7913: 7815: 7769: 7746: 7726: 7717: 7638: 7635: 7616: 7609: 7604:this section 7599: 7595: 7550: 7545: 7539: 7491: 7466: 7462: 7426: 7420: 7397: 7355: 7350: 7342: 7331: 7325: 7120: 7113: 7095: 7085: 7078: 7063: 7057: 7056: 7037: 7007:— Preceding 7003: 6981: 6977: 6973: 6970: 6952: 6948: 6908: 6895: 6887: 6868:incorrect.-- 6846: 6823:— Preceding 6820: 6805: 6790: 6739: 6711:paragraph.-- 6705: 6701: 6690: 6688: 6683: 6679: 6677: 6658: 6649: 6631: 6615:96.35.201.96 6612: 6608: 6599: 6590: 6581: 6564: 6555: 6543: 6534: 6525: 6496: 6443: 6424: 6404: 6333: 6313: 6215: 6029:Truett Cathy 5817: 5799: 5782: 5761: 5758: 5753: 5752: 5600: 5599: 5582: 5581: 5566: 5565: 5441:lede at all. 5414:and home to 5389: 5368: 5367: 5298: 5270: 5205: 5201: 5184:75.132.161.1 5178:— Preceding 5174: 5124: 5062: 5058: 5033: 5032: 5026: 5005: 5004: 4996: 4932: 4917: 4915: 4907: 4894: 4852: 4823: 4818: 4793:— Preceding 4769: 4742: 4724: 4608: 4585:— Preceding 4581: 4573: 4538: 4466: 4422:— Preceding 4418: 4378:— Preceding 4326: 4314: 4279:sounds good 4259: 4234: 4233: 4227: 4206: 4205: 4197: 4156: 4140: 4139: 4119:Architecture 4118: 4116: 4110: 4099: 4085: 4073: 4069: 4054: 4028: 4017: 4014: 3972: 3966: 3960: 3954: 3948: 3942: 3932: 3876: 3789: 3787: 3756: 3669: 3654: 3646: 3639: 3628: 3586: 3562: 3554: 3533: 3502: 3468: 3431: 3411: 3382: 3374: 3319:— Preceding 3314: 3245: 3035: 3003: 2942: 2910:undue weight 2906:Philadelphia 2799: 2619: 2587: 2554: 2521: 2489: 2344: 2223: 2008:undue weight 2001: 1921: 1917: 1900: 1892: 1570: 1559: 1553: 1506: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1451: 1428: 1356: 1332: 1048: 1025: 996:— Preceding 928:98.192.76.96 924: 916: 901: 898: 848:signifigant. 776: 741: 727: 702: 701: 674: 673: 665: 620: 619: 598: 597: 589: 544: 537: 470: 466: 300: 155: 151: 127: 93: 75: 43: 37: 18:Talk:Atlanta 8850:Weather.com 8688:Sourcecheck 8492:User:BilCat 8465:User:BilCat 8293:Dirtlawyer1 8247:Dirtlawyer1 8187:Dirtlawyer1 8165:I think if 8129:only, last 7957:me (i.e. {{ 7853:me (i.e. {{ 7803:me (i.e. {{ 7775:wp:fancruft 7473:hawing. -- 7345:, and this 6792:advice...-- 6605:Tree Canopy 6583:necessary. 6376:Majoreditor 6293:Majoreditor 6033:Chick Fil-A 5916:revisionist 5596:visibility. 5346:Jim Michael 5006:Don't panic 4256:Suggestions 4207:Don't panic 3877:significant 3609:Hispanic.-- 3544:sock puppet 3364:sock puppet 3040:Majoreditor 3000:Black mecca 2962:Majoreditor 2197:Majoreditor 2075:Majoreditor 2037:Majoreditor 1987:Majoreditor 1889:Black mecca 1671:Majoreditor 1266:edited out. 978:Majoreditor 675:Don't panic 599:Don't panic 36:This is an 8758:Report bug 8477:system, a 8471:heavy rail 8341:Neonorange 8302:Neonorange 8261:Neonorange 8218:Neonorange 8171:Neonorange 8151:desecrated 7980:Neonorange 7945:Biosthmors 7841:Biosthmors 7791:Biosthmors 7619:Neonorange 7575:Neonorange 7560:Neonorange 7514:Neonorange 7459:Neonorange 7441:Neonorange 7394:Neonorange 7373:Neonorange 7358:Neonorange 7289:WP:REMOVED 7285:WP:OWNTALK 7242:WP:OWNTALK 7204:WP:OWNTALK 7101:Neonorange 6954:TheWhiz410 6924:Here is a 5281:Ice storms 5277:March 1993 5078:Guys, see 4900:and this: 4591:RodewayInn 4136:Rewording? 4029:Topography 3970:block user 3964:filter log 3663:RodewayInn 3629:likelihood 3471:RodewayInn 3325:RodewayInn 2165:insulting. 1403:housing.-- 866:Atlanta.-- 8741:this tool 8734:this tool 8621:dead link 8516:Unsourced 8479:streetcar 8434:this tool 8427:this tool 8279:Mmann1988 8143:certainly 8125:s, first 7818:WT:CITIES 7741:this tool 7734:this tool 7606:expanded. 7114:I take a 7013:Saltgrass 6945:Elevation 6891:this list 6870:Mmann1988 6771:Mmann1988 6736:Structure 6713:Mmann1988 6661:Mmann1988 6574:article. 6463:Mmann1988 6390:Mmann1988 6357:Mmann1988 6275:Mmann1988 6241:Mmann1988 6193:Mmann1988 6155:Mmann1988 6115:Mmann1988 5984:Mmann1988 5941:Mmann1988 5920:Mmann1988 5896:Mmann1988 5866:Mmann1988 5835:Ncboy2010 5821:Mmann1988 5812:Ncboy2010 5803:Mmann1988 5794:Ncboy2010 5786:Mmann1988 5736:Mmann1988 5672:Ncboy2010 5630:Mmann1988 5318:Ncboy2010 5273:blizzards 5214:Ncboy2010 5130:Ncboy2010 4866:Ncboy2010 4501:Ncboy2010 4470:Ncboy2010 4463:Cityscape 4295:Ncboy2010 4266:Ncboy2010 4161:Ncboy2010 4144:Ncboy2010 4018:Removed: 3976:block log 3710:WikiDan61 3678:WikiDan61 3633:Mmann1988 3611:Mmann1988 3571:WikiDan61 3435:Mmann1988 3391:WikiDan61 3249:Mmann1988 3221:Mmann1988 3147:Mmann1988 3086:Mmann1988 2946:emerge.-- 2943:something 2851:Mmann1988 2624:Mmann1988 2420:Mmann1988 2366:Mmann1988 2324:Mmann1988 2170:Mmann1988 2041:Mmann1988 1924:Keizersnl 1751:Mmann1988 1611:biases.-- 1576:Mmann1988 1522:material. 1405:Mmann1988 1389:language. 1340:Mmann1988 1196:Mmann1988 1113:Mmann1988 868:Mmann1988 780:Mmann1988 547:Mmann1988 507:Mmann1988 435:Mmann1988 405:Mmann1988 339:Mmann1988 174:Mmann1988 132:Mmann1988 97:Mmann1988 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 8855:April 2, 8826:April 2, 8747:Cheers.— 8501:Dogru144 8440:Cheers.— 8373:cbignore 8214:Atlantis 8158:and the 7651:cbignore 7579:Onel5969 7427:Comment: 7402:Onel5969 7377:Onel5969 7332:Comment: 7305:Onel5969 7297:WP:NOBAN 7216:Onel5969 7141:Onel5969 7096:Comment: 7053:Salzburg 7021:contribs 7009:unsigned 6900:states: 6854:Onel5969 6825:unsigned 6809:Cwkimbro 6750:Onel5969 6698:Source 2 6695:Source 1 6655:Feedback 6587:Religion 6421:Religion 5754:Comment. 5583:Religion 5487:neo soul 5180:unsigned 5014:non-free 4807:contribs 4795:unsigned 4686:Dicklyon 4651:Dicklyon 4599:contribs 4587:unsigned 4545:Dicklyon 4445:examples 4424:unsigned 4380:unsigned 4215:non-free 3982:Dicklyon 3946:contribs 3731:Dicklyon 3715:ReadMe!! 3683:ReadMe!! 3673:contribs 3658:contribs 3643:contribs 3593:Dicklyon 3576:ReadMe!! 3451:Dicklyon 3396:ReadMe!! 3333:contribs 3321:unsigned 3298:Dicklyon 3267:Dicklyon 3182:Dicklyon 2948:Louiedog 2929:Dicklyon 2914:Louiedog 2620:Point 5: 2588:Point 4: 2555:Point 3: 2522:Point 2: 2490:Point 1: 2381:Dicklyon 2348:Dicklyon 2147:Nazareth 2143:Salvador 2118:Atlanta. 2111:Nazareth 2107:Salvador 2066:article. 2016:Louiedog 1851:Nazareth 1800:Louiedog 1613:Louiedog 1564:Louiedog 1534:Louiedog 1010:contribs 998:unsigned 852:belongs. 778:again.-- 683:non-free 607:non-free 471:signed ( 8775:Krelnik 8674:checked 8625:tag to 8547:my edit 8543:Atlanta 8490:Editor 8463:Editor 8450::Online 8402:checked 8367:my edit 8363:Atlanta 8275:Chicago 8234:Atlanta 8005:Enigma 8003:Thanks, 7787:WP:NPOV 7757::Online 7645:my edit 7641:Atlanta 7556:Atlanta 7467:neither 7400:. Only 7371:Thanks 7293:WP:DRRC 7246:WP:TALK 7212:page 49 7200:WP:TALK 7174:WP:TALK 7160:WP:NPOV 7116:WP:NPOV 6931:Keizers 6911:Keizers 6794:Chimino 6567:Houston 6561:History 6531:Culture 6512:Houston 6508:Detroit 6477:Keizers 6447:Keizers 6427:Keizers 6408:Keizers 6337:Keizers 6317:Keizers 6256:Keizers 6219:Keizers 6177:Keizers 6136:Keizers 6100:Keizers 6053:Keizers 5999:Keizers 5969:Keizers 5648:WP:BOLD 5609:Keizers 5479:hip hop 5110:Keizers 5103:Atlanta 5095:Atlanta 5091:Atlanta 4937:Keizers 4919:joe•roe 4838:Keizers 4799:Keizers 4751:Keizers 4743:grossly 4700:Keizers 4675:Shalott 4640:Shalott 4561:Keizers 4541:Atlanta 4519:Keizers 4486:Keizers 4449:Keizers 4404:Keizers 4328:Keizers 4281:Keizers 4123:Keizers 4055:Moved: 3997:Keizers 3912:Keizers 3851:Keizers 3810:Keizers 3760:Keizers 3693:Keizers 3648:Keizers 3559:English 3521:Keizers 3505:Keizers 3415:Keizers 3379:English 3346:Keizers 3113:Keizers 3059:Keizers 3007:Keizers 2804:Keizers 2453:Keizers 2416:Chicago 2412:Seattle 2404:Phoenix 2400:Houston 2227:Keizers 2124:Keizers 1940:Keizers 1859:Keizers 1706:Keizers 1640:Keizers 1571:Point 3 1560:Point 2 1554:Point 1 1508:Keizers 1495:Keizers 1434:Keizers 1374:source. 1335:Atlanta 1305:Keizers 1268:Keizers 1231:Keizers 1140:Keizers 1109:Keizers 1088:Keizers 1050:Keizers 1002:Keizers 905:Keizers 820:Keizers 540:Keizers 521:Keizers 489:Keizers 420:Keizers 370:Keizers 223:Keizers 158:Keizers 113:Keizers 39:archive 8682:failed 8617:Added 8520:BilCat 8381:nobots 8216:... — 7955:notify 7874:BilCat 7851:notify 7822:BilCat 7801:notify 7659:nobots 7492:Dustin 7475:ZH8000 7406:ZH8000 7303:rule. 7301:WP:3RR 7254:ZH8000 7178:ZH8000 7137:ZH8000 7122:ZH8000 7066:ZH8000 6978:dismal 6974:meager 6767:Dallas 6516:Boston 6514:, and 6237:WP:POV 6151:WP:POV 6038:Ryoung 5766:Ryoung 5763:first. 5489:music. 5485:, and 5483:gospel 5378:WP:POV 5233:Ryoung 5154:Ryoung 5125:always 5066:Ryoung 4955:Ncsr11 4579:- - - 4159:_< 4117:Under 3935:Ganway 3881:Ganway 3829:Ganway 3794:Ganway 3775:Ganway 3645:) and 3589:WP:ANI 2849:out.-- 2396:Dallas 2149:, and 2113:, and 1396:today. 1071:Ryoung 8147:local 7119:note! 7040:M2545 6847:Hi. 6540:Music 6440:Music 6330:Intro 6289:WP:PR 5605:WP:SS 5576:WP:SS 5107:WP:SS 5080:WP:SS 4619:Ghost 3631:that 3555:mecca 3469:User 3433:in.-- 3375:mecca 3288:Ghost 2408:Miami 2256:lead. 2191:lead. 2103:Miami 1938:time. 1746:Miami 803:then. 403:it.-- 301:other 16:< 8857:2006 8828:2006 8803:talk 8779:talk 8678:true 8524:talk 8505:talk 8406:true 8345:talk 8306:talk 8297:list 8283:talk 8265:talk 8251:talk 8222:talk 8191:talk 8175:talk 8141:And 8064:5969 8061:Onel 8022:5969 8019:Onel 7997:Hi, 7984:talk 7953:pls 7949:talk 7918:5969 7915:Onel 7909:Here 7878:talk 7849:pls 7845:talk 7826:talk 7799:pls 7795:talk 7623:talk 7600:that 7583:talk 7564:talk 7546:real 7518:talk 7499:talk 7479:talk 7445:talk 7410:talk 7381:talk 7362:talk 7309:talk 7258:talk 7220:talk 7182:talk 7145:talk 7126:talk 7105:talk 7070:talk 7044:talk 7017:talk 6991:talk 6958:talk 6935:talk 6915:talk 6874:talk 6858:talk 6833:talk 6813:talk 6798:talk 6775:talk 6754:talk 6717:talk 6686:." 6665:talk 6628:Lede 6619:talk 6552:Film 6481:talk 6467:talk 6451:talk 6431:talk 6412:talk 6394:talk 6380:talk 6361:talk 6341:talk 6321:talk 6297:talk 6279:talk 6260:talk 6245:talk 6223:talk 6197:talk 6181:talk 6159:talk 6140:talk 6119:talk 6104:talk 6057:talk 6031:and 6003:talk 5988:talk 5973:talk 5945:talk 5924:talk 5900:talk 5870:talk 5839:talk 5740:talk 5676:talk 5634:talk 5613:talk 5526:..." 5418:..." 5403:all. 5350:talk 5322:talk 5218:talk 5188:talk 5134:talk 5114:talk 5042:talk 4959:talk 4941:talk 4870:talk 4842:talk 4803:talk 4766:Hajj 4755:talk 4741:- a 4704:talk 4690:talk 4667:Lady 4655:talk 4632:Lady 4616:Sudo 4595:talk 4565:talk 4549:talk 4523:talk 4505:talk 4490:talk 4474:talk 4453:talk 4432:talk 4408:talk 4388:talk 4332:talk 4299:talk 4285:talk 4270:talk 4243:talk 4165:talk 4148:talk 4127:talk 4001:talk 3986:talk 3958:logs 3940:talk 3916:talk 3885:talk 3855:talk 3833:talk 3814:talk 3798:talk 3779:talk 3764:talk 3735:talk 3697:talk 3667:talk 3652:talk 3637:talk 3625:here 3615:talk 3597:talk 3525:talk 3509:talk 3455:talk 3439:talk 3419:talk 3350:talk 3329:talk 3302:talk 3285:Sudo 3271:talk 3253:talk 3225:talk 3186:talk 3151:talk 3117:talk 3090:talk 3063:talk 3044:talk 3011:talk 2966:talk 2952:talk 2933:talk 2918:talk 2855:talk 2808:talk 2628:talk 2457:talk 2424:talk 2385:talk 2370:talk 2352:talk 2328:talk 2231:talk 2201:talk 2174:talk 2157:and 2128:talk 2079:talk 2045:talk 2020:talk 1991:talk 1944:talk 1928:talk 1907:rule 1863:talk 1804:talk 1755:talk 1710:talk 1675:talk 1644:talk 1617:talk 1580:talk 1538:talk 1512:talk 1499:talk 1438:talk 1409:talk 1344:talk 1309:talk 1272:talk 1235:talk 1200:talk 1144:talk 1117:talk 1092:talk 1054:talk 1006:talk 982:talk 932:talk 909:talk 872:talk 824:talk 810:fact 784:talk 711:talk 629:talk 556:talk 525:talk 511:talk 493:talk 477:talk 439:talk 424:talk 409:talk 374:talk 343:talk 227:talk 178:talk 162:talk 136:talk 117:talk 101:talk 8715:RfC 8692:). 8680:or 8665:to 8655:to 8645:to 8635:to 8611:to 8601:to 8591:to 8581:to 8571:to 8561:to 8393:to 8277:?-- 8167:any 8160:lan 8011:Hi 7711:to 7701:to 7691:to 7681:to 7671:to 7573:Hi 7463:not 7176:-- 6896:As 6893:). 6691:64% 6684:62% 6680:63% 6041:122 5769:122 5236:122 5157:122 5069:122 4109:at 4084:at 4027:at 3980:. 3910:me. 3729:. 3265:. 3026:--> 2904:. 1602:. 1074:122 862:it. 128:why 8848:. 8844:. 8805:) 8781:) 8728:. 8723:}} 8719:{{ 8690:}} 8686:{{ 8623:}} 8619:{{ 8526:) 8507:) 8499:. 8379:{{ 8375:}} 8371:{{ 8347:) 8339:— 8308:) 8285:) 8267:) 8253:) 8239:no 8224:) 8212:, 8208:, 8193:) 8177:) 8135:t' 8123:t' 7986:) 7951:) 7880:) 7847:) 7828:) 7797:) 7657:{{ 7653:}} 7649:{{ 7625:) 7585:) 7566:) 7551:in 7520:) 7481:) 7447:) 7412:) 7383:) 7364:) 7311:) 7260:) 7222:) 7184:) 7147:) 7128:) 7107:) 7072:) 7046:) 7023:) 7019:• 6993:) 6960:) 6937:) 6917:) 6876:) 6860:) 6835:) 6815:) 6800:) 6777:) 6756:) 6719:) 6667:) 6621:) 6510:, 6506:, 6483:) 6469:) 6453:) 6433:) 6414:) 6396:) 6382:) 6363:) 6343:) 6323:) 6299:) 6281:) 6262:) 6247:) 6225:) 6199:) 6183:) 6161:) 6142:) 6121:) 6106:) 6059:) 6005:) 5990:) 5975:) 5947:) 5926:) 5902:) 5872:) 5841:) 5742:) 5678:) 5636:) 5615:) 5607:) 5578:). 5552:." 5481:, 5352:) 5324:) 5299:no 5279:. 5220:) 5190:) 5136:) 5116:) 5044:) 5036:-- 4961:) 4943:) 4872:) 4844:) 4819:is 4809:) 4805:• 4757:) 4706:) 4692:) 4671:of 4657:) 4636:of 4601:) 4597:• 4567:) 4551:) 4525:) 4507:) 4492:) 4476:) 4455:) 4434:) 4410:) 4390:) 4334:) 4301:) 4287:) 4272:) 4245:) 4237:-- 4167:) 4150:) 4129:) 4003:) 3988:) 3918:) 3887:) 3857:) 3835:) 3816:) 3800:) 3781:) 3766:) 3737:) 3699:) 3617:) 3599:) 3527:) 3511:) 3457:) 3441:) 3421:) 3352:) 3335:) 3331:• 3304:) 3273:) 3255:) 3227:) 3188:) 3153:) 3119:) 3092:) 3065:) 3046:) 3027:). 3013:) 2968:) 2954:) 2935:) 2920:) 2857:) 2810:) 2630:) 2459:) 2426:) 2414:, 2410:, 2406:, 2402:, 2398:, 2387:) 2372:) 2354:) 2330:) 2322:-- 2233:) 2203:) 2176:) 2145:, 2130:) 2109:, 2081:) 2047:) 2022:) 1993:) 1946:) 1930:) 1865:) 1806:) 1757:) 1712:) 1677:) 1646:) 1619:) 1582:) 1540:) 1514:) 1501:) 1440:) 1411:) 1346:) 1338:-- 1311:) 1274:) 1237:) 1202:) 1173:)? 1146:) 1119:) 1094:) 1056:) 1012:) 1008:• 984:) 934:) 911:) 874:) 826:) 786:) 713:) 705:-- 631:) 623:-- 562:) 558:) 527:) 513:) 495:) 483:) 479:) 441:) 426:) 411:) 376:) 345:) 229:) 180:) 164:) 138:) 119:) 103:) 8859:. 8830:. 8801:( 8777:( 8760:) 8756:( 8743:. 8736:. 8522:( 8503:( 8436:. 8429:. 8417:Y 8343:( 8304:( 8281:( 8263:( 8249:( 8220:( 8189:( 8173:( 8156:A 8131:t 8127:t 7982:( 7959:U 7947:( 7876:( 7855:U 7843:( 7824:( 7805:U 7793:( 7743:. 7736:. 7724:Y 7621:( 7581:( 7562:( 7516:( 7501:) 7497:( 7477:( 7469:. 7443:( 7408:( 7379:( 7360:( 7307:( 7256:( 7248:. 7218:( 7180:( 7143:( 7124:( 7103:( 7068:( 7042:( 7015:( 6989:( 6956:( 6933:( 6913:( 6872:( 6856:( 6831:( 6811:( 6796:( 6773:( 6752:( 6715:( 6663:( 6617:( 6479:( 6465:( 6449:( 6429:( 6410:( 6392:( 6378:( 6359:( 6339:( 6319:( 6295:( 6277:( 6258:( 6243:( 6221:( 6195:( 6179:( 6157:( 6138:( 6117:( 6102:( 6055:( 6001:( 5986:( 5971:( 5943:( 5922:( 5898:( 5868:( 5837:( 5738:( 5674:( 5632:( 5611:( 5380:. 5348:( 5320:( 5216:( 5186:( 5132:( 5112:( 5040:( 4957:( 4939:( 4868:( 4840:( 4801:( 4790:. 4753:( 4702:( 4688:( 4653:( 4593:( 4563:( 4547:( 4521:( 4503:( 4488:( 4472:( 4451:( 4443:( 4430:( 4406:( 4386:( 4330:( 4297:( 4283:( 4268:( 4241:( 4163:( 4146:( 4125:( 4078:' 4062:x 4044:x 3999:( 3984:( 3978:) 3973:· 3967:· 3961:· 3955:· 3949:· 3943:· 3938:( 3914:( 3883:( 3853:( 3831:( 3812:( 3796:( 3777:( 3762:( 3733:( 3695:( 3670:· 3665:( 3660:) 3655:· 3650:( 3640:· 3635:( 3613:( 3595:( 3565:. 3523:( 3507:( 3453:( 3437:( 3417:( 3385:. 3348:( 3327:( 3300:( 3269:( 3251:( 3223:( 3184:( 3149:( 3115:( 3088:( 3061:( 3042:( 3009:( 2964:( 2950:( 2931:( 2916:( 2853:( 2806:( 2626:( 2455:( 2422:( 2383:( 2368:( 2350:( 2326:( 2229:( 2199:( 2172:( 2126:( 2077:( 2043:( 2018:( 1989:( 1963:. 1942:( 1926:( 1861:( 1802:( 1753:( 1708:( 1673:( 1642:( 1615:( 1578:( 1536:( 1510:( 1497:( 1436:( 1407:( 1342:( 1307:( 1270:( 1233:( 1198:( 1142:( 1115:( 1090:( 1052:( 1004:( 980:( 972:/ 969:ə 966:t 963:n 960:æ 957:l 954:ˈ 951:t 948:æ 945:/ 930:( 907:( 870:( 822:( 782:( 709:( 627:( 554:( 523:( 509:( 491:( 475:( 437:( 422:( 407:( 372:( 341:( 225:( 176:( 160:( 134:( 115:( 99:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index