991:, "papers cited by formal review articles generally experience a dramatic loss in future citations. Typically, the review gets cited instead of the specific articles mentioned in the review." The study identifies an exception to this trend: articles that are characterized by the review as being bridges between clusters of scholarship tend to get disproportionate future attention. An analysis was conducted by McAlister et al. of review articles in six different medical journals. Of the six journals, less than 25% included a description, evaluation, or synthesis of evidence that had been provided. Only one-third of the articles had a clinical topic at the forefront, and only half of the articles presented
912:
1050:". This term was coined by Sackett (2000) and refers to the combination of available research, practitioner expertise, and consumer values. Due to the inundation of original research in the field, there is a need for review articles which highlight relevant studies, results and trends. The varying methods and participants used among original research studies can provide inconsistent results, thereby presenting a challenge in synthesising information using one common metric. The conjunction of meta-analyses and systematic reviews has proven to be more effective in organising data and drawing conclusions, especially when it comes to
730:
65:
858:
existing research and identifying gaps in this research. They were born out of the necessity to categorise and make sense of the ongoing plethora of research publications being released annually. Between 1991 and 2008, there were forty times more papers published within the field of biodiversity alone. This overload of research papers makes it difficult for scientists and clinicians to remain up to date on current findings and developments within their discipline.
999:
studies commenting on the effect of review articles on the impactfullness of journals that usually only publish research papers. This prevents one from saying with certainty that review articles could replace original research papers in large journals. Of the 538 review articles published in pathology journals within the year 2005, a mere 21% of them have been cited over ten times following their issuance. Furthermore, in a 2000-2006 comparison of journals;
747:. Once the scope of the journal the author intends to submit to is identified, then identify the own personal scope and aim for the article. Experienced author, Angus Crake emphasises the need to define a scope that is "manageable, not too large or small" and to "focus on recent advances if the field is well established". This equates to a succinct, refreshing review article that adds a new perspective to the field whilst still being grounded in academia.
841:
paper to be acknowledged so that the review can be as well-informed and comprehensive as possible. Peers will often recommend other research articles and studies to be included in the review, which can add strength to the article. Confusion amongst peers also indicates that your paper is not clear or lacking synergy.
960:. Literature reviews provide a summary of what the authors believe are the best and most relevant prior publications. Systematic reviews determine an objective list of criteria, and find all previously published original papers that meet the criteria; they then compare the results presented in these papers.
784:
at the start. The 'Abstract' section of the review article should include: a synopsis of the topic being discussed or the issue studied, an overview of the study participants used in the empirical study being reviewed, a discussion of the results found and conclusions drawn by the scholars conducting
1025:
increased from 14,815 to 45,829 between 1991 and 2005. Following the same trend, the number of dedicated review journals within the
Science Citation Index database grew from 163 to 198 between 1999 and 2006. Although, the percentage of review articles in review journals that formed the foundation of
944:
results. An expert's opinion is valuable, but an expert's assessment of the literature can be more valuable. When reading individual articles, readers could miss features that are apparent to an expert clinician-researcher. Readers benefit from the expert's explanation and assessment of the validity
721:
where they are published. A meta-analysis lends itself more to statistical research, often converting the original research into one common metric referred to as "effect sizes", so as to easily identify patterns and anomalies among publications. Systematic reviews may include meta-analysis results.
840:
is critical to their credibility. The peer review process is a way to ensure the article is as polished and accurate as possible. Most often, those reviewing the article are fellow academics or experts within the field under discussion in the paper. Sending out a peer review allows for gaps in the
797:
Within this section of the review article is the suggestion of improvements and areas to further extend the research in reference. The bibliography included at the end of review articles is equally important as it leads to further information on the study being discussed and is a way for academics
627:
Review articles have increased in impact and relevance alongside the increase in the amount of research that needs to be synthesised. They are a concise way of collating information for practitioners or academics that are not able to read the plethora of original research that is being published.
998:
Historically, review journals have a higher impact than primary research journals. The year 2006 showed the top 10 most impactful journals to be compiled exclusively of review articles. In addition to this, review articles are cited more frequently than research articles. There are currently no
853:
under review and how future studies of the same nature can be improved. They also present findings of other studies within the same discipline, comparing results and drawing conclusions based on each individual finding. Essentially, they are an evaluation of already published academic research.
1029:
Separate to the quality of articles, the number of review articles published poses its own challenge to those searching for succinct but comprehensive research analysis. This makes it just as difficult for experts to navigate through the synthesised review articles as it is to sift through the
857:
It is important that review articles do not introduce new results, but rather, reiterate existing results. However, they are able to draw conclusions on the results presented (within reason). Review articles hold importance as they forecast to see new research opportunities by synthesising the
742:
Review articles initially identify the scope and aim. If submitting the review article to a journal, the author must familiarise themselves with the theme of the journal as well as its conditions for submission. Some journals only accept review articles whereas others strictly publish
677:. It details the aims, hypothesis, and research method clearly so as to remain transparent and neutral. This review format adheres to explicit criteria when selecting what research is included in the review. Common methods used to analyse selected research articles include
785:
the study, an explanation of how such findings have already or could potentially impact the theory and practice within the relevant discipline. Within this section, context and the relevance of the review is included. The jargon used will depend on the intended audience.
1026:
review literature decreased by 17% between 1999 and 2005. This indicates that most review articles are being allocated to original research journals as opposed to strictly review journals. This is also dependent on the quality of the review articles published.
596:
Academic publications that specialize in review articles are known as review journals. Review journals have their own requirements for the review articles they accept, so review articles may vary slightly depending on the journal they are being submitted to.
926:
A research article has more narrow parameters on what is included (often depending on the journal it is being pitched to), whereas a review article is more open, being able to incorporate multiple research papers albeit still being contained within journal
807:... The review selects from these (research) papers, juxtaposes them, and puts them in a narrative that holds them together… clearly the best reviews are not only concerned with what was done in the past, but also present a means to sculpt the future."
1020:
In terms of the growth of review articles, the rate has been exponential. The number of papers on the topic of 'pathology' has increased 2.3 times between the years 1991 to 2006. Within the science discipline, the number of review articles in the
758:. This ensures a wide berth of knowledge that presents multiple perspectives and allows for a reasonably balanced article. Some disciplines encourage the use of certain search engines. For example, science-based review articles heavily utilise
693:. These types of reviews also include a discussion on the theoretical implications of such research. Systematic reviews are more highly regarded and selected than narrative reviews due to their specificity and neutrality. In the field of
716:
summarises quantitative results from a variety of research articles on a chosen topic. Given that these articles are formulating conclusions from multiple data sets, meta-analyses adhere to specific guidelines stipulated by the
788:
The discussion section of the article presents multiple perspectives, stating limitations and potential extensions of the study being reviewed. Also, within this section, similarities and dissonances among studies are stated.
1042:, the use of review articles within the social, behavioural and health science disciplines has proliferated. 2007 statistics showed that systematic review articles were produced at a rate of 2,500 per year on the
1030:
primary research itself. Additionally, the inclusion of poorly referenced, inadequately researched, and overly biased review articles serve to muddy the water and make it even harder to determine quality writing.
644:. Review articles do not introduce new results, but rather state existing results, drawing conclusions on the results presented. Review articles can be categorised by using the same domain, underlying theory, or
794:
Previous work is always vulnerable. Criticising is easy, and of little value; it is more important to explain how research builds upon previous findings rather than to claim previous research is inadequate and
1017:, published both with and without review articles included, it was found that journals published with review articles had a greater impact on readers than those that did not include review articles.
792:
The presentation of both the shortcomings and advancements of the research papers under review is important for comprehensiveness. Daft (1985, p 198) emphasised this by saying "
869:
form the basis of review articles. Review articles use the original information presented in research articles to draw conclusions and pose suggestions for future research.
974:
literature. A review article, even one that is requested or "peer-invited", will be either peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed depending on how submissions are treated.
1754:
Melissa L. Rethlefsen; M. Hassan Murad; Edward H. Livingston (September 10, 2014). "Engaging
Medical Librarians to Improve the Quality of Review Articles".
923:
A research article presents original content, whereas a review article synthesises that content and makes sense of it within the context of the discipline.
208:
1453:
920:
A research article presents original information from the perspective of the author, whereas a review article analyses that statement and information.
471:
726:
aided the development of various analysis techniques that could be used in systematic review articles, thereby developing this form of literature.
2667:
2652:
2495:
2144:
1046:
platform (Moher et al., 2007). The increase in prevalence of review articles within these disciplines can be attributed to the pull towards "
624:
summarizes a large number of already published experimental or epidemiological studies and provides statistical analysis of their result.
1736:
773:
The title, abstract and keywords chosen bring awareness to the audience of the article, and should describe what the article is about.
540:
2662:
589:, since they do not provide additional analysis and synthesis of new conclusions. A review of such sources is often referred to as a
1093:
1505:
498:
977:
Writing review articles can be a popular task among students. At times, teachers from schools and universities assign this task
481:
168:
1868:
1711:
1322:
1857:
Research
Companion to Green International Management Studies: A Guide for Future Research, Collaboration and Review Writing
2422:
1413:
Webster, Jane; Watson, Richard T. (2002). "Analyzing the Past to
Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review".
2485:
2137:
1001:
37:
Not to be confused with articles that are reviews in the more general sense (such as a book review), for which see
1022:
476:
2432:
911:
533:
17:
2682:
1818:
1176:
503:
156:
2045:"Impact factor: certainly a factor, but just whom does it impact? Important lessons from another discipline"
849:
A key aim of review articles is to pose other potential avenues of research, stating the limitations of the
569:
since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies. It resembles a
2708:
2677:
2647:
2130:
987:
461:
2642:
2195:
901:
2657:
2637:
2044:
774:
1127:
872:
Research and empirical articles are reporting the results of the author's study, thereby deeming it a
777:
is important when publishing articles within a discipline where the literature is already saturated.
526:
488:
275:
2672:
1768:
1655:"Delaware State University Guides Patrons into more Effective Research with Standardized Lib Guides"
2713:
1740:
1013:
1007:
31:
1482:"Research Guides: NFS 4021 Contemporary Topics in Nutrition: Research Articles vs Review Articles"
1314:
729:
2574:
2518:
1860:
1047:
698:
443:
1070:
because it reviews or summarizes the records for a series of patients at a single medical clinic
2703:
2614:
2330:
2286:
1763:
318:
265:
2604:
2579:
2356:
2265:
2177:
1338:
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, eds. (February 2022).
992:
493:
466:
372:
203:
143:
1530:
2594:
2559:
2513:
2401:
2361:
2346:
1596:
957:
558:
431:
173:
131:
1940:
1531:"Research Guides: Publishing in the Sciences: How to Write a Scientific Literature Review"
1481:
1389:
8:
2728:
2153:
1101:
121:
1834:
1753:
1600:
2564:
2200:
2172:
2080:
2025:
1968:
1799:
1717:
1627:
1584:
1430:
1240:
949:
893:
850:
781:
654:
describe the published information on a theme or topic, but often does not include the
562:
399:
323:
136:
1362:
Proceedings of the
Workshop on Publishing for Biomedical Journal Editors and Reviewers
1143:
940:
analyze or discuss research previously published by others, rather than reporting new
828:
are useful for when it comes to actually structuring and writing your review article.
2723:
2718:
2620:
2508:
2475:
2296:
2217:
2072:
2064:
2060:
2017:
2009:
1960:
1921:
1884:
1864:
1781:
1721:
1707:
1676:
1632:
1614:
1560:"What's the difference between a research article and a review article? - LibAnswers"
1422:
1318:
1280:
1244:
1232:
1155:
1147:
953:
817:
744:
694:
686:
674:
670:
663:
651:
637:
585:, instead of reporting new facts and results. Survey articles are however considered
516:
424:
409:
367:
350:
285:
270:
86:
81:
48:
2084:
2029:
1972:
658:
involved in researching the topic. This can lead to narrative review articles being
645:
2609:
2523:
2245:
2167:
2111:
2056:
1999:
1952:
1911:
1830:
1773:
1699:
1666:
1622:
1604:
1365:
1310:
1272:
1222:
1139:
964:
937:
866:
799:
718:
706:
666:, and innovative suggestions to further develop the field through further studies.
586:
582:
566:
565:
on a topic within a certain discipline. A review article is generally considered a
387:
355:
345:
313:
126:
91:
1364:. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya.
2584:
2381:
2371:
2318:
2301:
2227:
1609:
1390:"MVCC Libraries: Identify Types of Academic Journal Articles: Literature Reviews"
1339:
590:
394:
333:
250:
245:
240:
235:
74:
64:
2533:
2503:
2439:
2406:
2376:
2325:
2212:
1051:
873:
578:
419:
362:
260:
213:
193:
163:
2004:
1987:
1227:
1210:
636:
There are various categories of review articles, including narrative reviews,
2697:
2589:
2396:
2366:
2250:
2235:
2068:
2013:
1964:
1925:
1916:
1899:
1703:
1680:
1618:
1426:
1284:
1236:
1151:
1073:
971:
967:
likewise specialize in review of a field; they are known as review journals.
755:
713:
641:
621:
414:
404:
1956:
1694:
Young, Suzanne (2022-02-16). "Writing Up and
Presenting Your Dissertation".
2115:
2076:
2021:
1785:
1777:
1671:
1654:
1636:
1559:
1370:
1357:
1159:
255:
1900:"Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation"
2569:
2427:
2386:
2240:
1128:"Why publish review articles? Why write review articles for publication?"
1063:
837:
690:
678:
655:
382:
328:
228:
183:
2102:
Woodward, A. M. (1977). "The roles of reviews in information transfer".
1340:"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.3"
2449:
2351:
1434:
1305:
Littell, Julia H.; Corcoran, Jacqueline; Pillai, Vijayan (2008-03-13).
1276:
941:
436:
340:
308:
280:
198:
188:
178:
2122:
2470:
2313:
1033:
377:
1209:
Palmatier, Robert W.; Houston, Mark B.; Hulland, John (2018-01-01).
2543:
2538:
2465:
2255:
751:
682:
303:
101:
96:
56:
1506:"Tips for writing your first scientific literature review article"
2480:
2444:
2391:
1043:
821:
759:
970:
The concept of "review article" is separate from the concept of
892:
frequently throughout. Review articles are academic but are not
2528:
2291:
2281:
825:
767:
763:
38:
915:
Key differences between review articles and research articles.
876:. They often include raw data and statistics, using the words
2599:
2260:
1337:
750:
When finding sources, it is ideal to search through multiple
2308:
1986:
Ketcham, Catherine M.; Crawford, James M. (December 2007).
1696:
995:
that support the suggestions made at the end of the piece.
780:
Like most academic articles, a review article includes an '
659:
1263:
Barczak, Gloria (2017-01-17). "Writing a Review
Article".
662:, missing important theoretical details pertaining to the
30:"Review journal" redirects here. For daily newspaper, see
577:, which also surveys and summarizes previously published
798:
and students alike to further their research. These are
2104:
Journal of the
American Society for Information Science
1208:
844:
1304:
861:
1454:"How to write a review article | Writing your paper"
1351:
1349:
1854:
1358:"What do Editors of General Medical Journals Want?"
1585:"Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review"
1211:"Review articles: purpose, process, and structure"
1034:Social, behavioural and health science disciplines
1346:
2695:
1897:
737:
1985:
733:Exemplar of Alzheimer's Disease review article
2138:
1945:Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
1898:McMahan, Peter; McFarland, Daniel A. (2021).
1412:
1355:
534:
1941:"What IF? Does Impact Factor Really Matter?"
1652:
1804:The Regents of the University of California
1653:Brooks-Tatum, Shanesha R. F. (2012-02-01).
1215:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
616:suggestions of where research might go next
2145:
2131:
1747:
908:the results of already published studies.
541:
527:
63:
2003:
1915:
1767:
1670:
1626:
1608:
1369:
1315:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326543.001.0001
1300:
1298:
1296:
1294:
1258:
1256:
1254:
1226:
945:and applicability of individual studies.
900:the results of a study (which would be a
2101:
1848:
1582:
1265:Journal of Product Innovation Management
1125:
910:
728:
472:Library and information science software
2152:
2042:
1819:"Preface: A "Peer-Invited" Publication"
1734:
1698:. London: Routledge. pp. 111–123.
1331:
1262:
707:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
673:is more detailed and structured than a
27:Summary of the understanding on a topic
14:
2696:
1816:
1810:
1528:
1291:
1251:
1204:
1202:
1200:
1198:
1196:
931:
831:
816:Reference management software such as
648:. Sometimes these categories overlap.
467:Geographic information system software
2653:Academic databases and search engines
2126:
1693:
1648:
1646:
1554:
1552:
1550:
1475:
1473:
1448:
1446:
1444:
836:The process of review articles being
811:
701:publishes systematic reviews (called
607:recent major advances and discoveries
1938:
1792:
1728:
1383:
1381:
1307:Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
1171:
1169:
1121:
1119:
948:Review articles come in the form of
845:Relevance within academic literature
1835:10.1146/annurev.an.33.090204.100001
1817:Durham, William H. (October 2004).
1737:"Have I Found A Scholarly Article?"
1387:
1193:
24:
2423:Academic journal publishing reform
2095:
1829:(1): annurev.an.33.090204.100001.
1643:
1547:
1479:
1470:
1441:
1177:"LISTSERV 16.5 - Archives - Error"
862:Difference from a research article
604:the main people working in a field
25:
2740:
1378:
1166:
1126:Jerrells, Thomas R (2000-11-01).
1116:
1002:The American Journal of Pathology
985:According to a 2021 study in the
2061:10.1111/j.0303-6987.2006.00340.x
610:significant gaps in the research
2043:Smoller, Bruce R. (June 2006).
2036:
1988:"The impact of review articles"
1979:
1932:
1891:
1877:
1687:
1576:
1522:
1498:
1406:
2049:Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
1583:Pautasso, Marco (2013-07-18).
1086:
1040:Handbook of Research Synthesis
724:Handbook of Research Synthesis
705:) on healthcare topics in the
13:
1:
2683:Category:Scientific documents
1939:Roth, Kevin A. (April 2007).
1823:Annual Review of Anthropology
1144:10.1016/S0741-8329(00)00123-3
1079:
1038:Following the release of the
738:Structure of a review article
631:
600:Review articles teach about:
2678:Category:Academic publishing
1904:American Sociological Review
1855:Deborah E. De Lange (2011).
1610:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
1094:"What's a "Review Article?""
988:American Sociological Review
561:that summarizes the current
7:
1309:. Oxford University Press.
1057:
10:
2745:
2496:Indexes and search engines
1589:PLOS Computational Biology
1054:within the medical field.
802:. Meyers and Sinding say,
775:Search engine optimisation
36:
29:
2630:
2552:
2494:
2458:
2415:
2339:
2274:
2226:
2188:
2160:
2005:10.1038/labinvest.3700688
1228:10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
980:
722:The first edition of the
494:Qualitative data analysis
1992:Laboratory Investigation
1917:10.1177/0003122421996323
1885:"Article Review Writing"
1704:10.4324/9781003016335-10
1014:Laboratory Investigation
1008:The Journal of Pathology
952:and, more specifically,
573:or, in news publishing,
32:Las Vegas Review-Journal
2673:Style/formatting guides
2575:Scholarly communication
2275:Other publication types
1957:10.1369/jhc.7E7201.2007
1861:Edward Elgar Publishing
1800:"Scientific Literature"
1098:The University of Texas
1048:evidence-based practice
2615:Least publishable unit
2287:Collection of articles
2116:10.1002/asi.4630280306
1778:10.1001/jama.2014.9263
1672:10.7771/2380-176x.6077
1371:10.2349/biij.2.4.e54-8
1356:Rajendra Kale (2006).
1023:Science Citation Index
916:
734:
656:methodological process
563:state of understanding
373:Inferential statistics
319:Descriptive statistics
266:Human subject research
2605:Electronic publishing
2580:Scientific literature
2357:Article-level metrics
1564:jwu-ri.libanswers.com
1480:Morgan, Randa Lopez.
1066:, sometimes called a
956:; both are a form of
914:
732:
699:Cochrane organisation
157:Philosophical schools
2648:Open-access journals
2595:Open scientific data
2402:SCImago Journal Rank
2362:Author-level metrics
2347:Acknowledgment index
1535:guides.lib.umich.edu
958:secondary literature
687:co-citation analysis
482:Reference management
432:Scientific modelling
174:Critical rationalism
2709:Academic publishing
2643:Scientific journals
2154:Academic publishing
1601:2013PLSCB...9E3149P
1342:. Cochrane Library.
936:Review articles in
932:Academic publishing
904:), review articles
832:Peer review process
462:Argument technology
2663:Copyright policies
2658:University presses
2565:Scientific writing
2433:Citation advantage
2340:Impact and ranking
2173:Scientific journal
1529:Tschirhart, Lori.
1486:guides.lib.lsu.edu
1394:mvcc.libguides.com
1277:10.1111/jpim.12365
954:systematic reviews
950:literature reviews
917:
812:Method of research
735:
638:systematic reviews
456:Tools and software
400:Secondary research
324:Discourse analysis
2691:
2690:
2668:Preprint policies
2638:Academic journals
2621:Publish or perish
2476:Version of record
2416:Reform and access
2218:Literature review
1998:(12): 1174–1185.
1870:978-1-84980-727-2
1713:978-1-003-01633-5
1659:Against the Grain
1421:(2): xiii–xxiii.
1388:Ehrlich, Claire.
1324:978-0-19-532654-3
993:quantitative data
965:academic journals
938:academic journals
867:Research articles
851:empirical studies
800:secondary sources
745:original research
695:clinical research
671:systematic review
664:original research
652:Narrative reviews
583:secondary sources
551:
550:
517:Philosophy portal
425:Systematic review
410:Literature review
368:Historical method
351:Social experiment
286:Scientific method
271:Narrative inquiry
122:Interdisciplinary
116:Research strategy
87:Research question
82:Research proposal
16:(Redirected from
2736:
2610:Ingelfinger rule
2524:Semantic Scholar
2246:Technical report
2168:Academic journal
2147:
2140:
2133:
2124:
2123:
2119:
2089:
2088:
2040:
2034:
2033:
2007:
1983:
1977:
1976:
1936:
1930:
1929:
1919:
1895:
1889:
1888:
1881:
1875:
1874:
1863:. pp. 1–5.
1852:
1846:
1845:
1843:
1841:
1814:
1808:
1807:
1796:
1790:
1789:
1771:
1762:(10): 999–1000.
1751:
1745:
1744:
1739:. Archived from
1732:
1726:
1725:
1691:
1685:
1684:
1674:
1650:
1641:
1640:
1630:
1612:
1580:
1574:
1573:
1571:
1570:
1556:
1545:
1544:
1542:
1541:
1526:
1520:
1519:
1517:
1516:
1502:
1496:
1495:
1493:
1492:
1477:
1468:
1467:
1465:
1464:
1450:
1439:
1438:
1410:
1404:
1403:
1401:
1400:
1385:
1376:
1375:
1373:
1353:
1344:
1343:
1335:
1329:
1328:
1302:
1289:
1288:
1260:
1249:
1248:
1230:
1206:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1181:listserv.utk.edu
1173:
1164:
1163:
1123:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1109:
1100:. Archived from
1090:
902:research article
896:. As opposed to
703:Cochrane Reviews
675:narrative review
587:tertiary sources
575:overview article
567:secondary source
543:
536:
529:
489:Science software
388:Cultural mapping
356:Quasi-experiment
346:Field experiment
314:Content analysis
209:Critical realism
127:Multimethodology
67:
44:
43:
21:
2744:
2743:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2714:Review journals
2694:
2693:
2692:
2687:
2626:
2585:Learned society
2548:
2490:
2454:
2411:
2382:Journal ranking
2372:Citation impact
2335:
2270:
2228:Grey literature
2222:
2184:
2156:
2151:
2098:
2096:Further reading
2093:
2092:
2041:
2037:
1984:
1980:
1937:
1933:
1896:
1892:
1883:
1882:
1878:
1871:
1853:
1849:
1839:
1837:
1815:
1811:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1769:10.1.1.648.3777
1752:
1748:
1733:
1729:
1714:
1692:
1688:
1651:
1644:
1595:(7): e1003149.
1581:
1577:
1568:
1566:
1558:
1557:
1548:
1539:
1537:
1527:
1523:
1514:
1512:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1490:
1488:
1478:
1471:
1462:
1460:
1458:Author Services
1452:
1451:
1442:
1411:
1407:
1398:
1396:
1386:
1379:
1354:
1347:
1336:
1332:
1325:
1303:
1292:
1261:
1252:
1207:
1194:
1185:
1183:
1175:
1174:
1167:
1124:
1117:
1107:
1105:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1068:clinical review
1060:
1052:clinical trials
1036:
983:
934:
864:
847:
834:
814:
740:
691:topic modelling
646:research method
634:
613:current debates
591:tertiary review
547:
511:
510:
457:
449:
448:
395:Phenomenography
334:Autoethnography
299:
291:
290:
251:Grounded theory
246:Critical theory
241:Art methodology
236:Action research
231:
221:
220:
159:
149:
148:
117:
109:
108:
77:
75:Research design
42:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2742:
2732:
2731:
2726:
2721:
2716:
2711:
2706:
2689:
2688:
2686:
2685:
2680:
2675:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2634:
2632:
2628:
2627:
2625:
2624:
2617:
2612:
2607:
2602:
2597:
2592:
2587:
2582:
2577:
2572:
2567:
2562:
2556:
2554:
2553:Related topics
2550:
2549:
2547:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2534:Web of Science
2531:
2526:
2521:
2516:
2511:
2506:
2504:Google Scholar
2500:
2498:
2492:
2491:
2489:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2462:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2453:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2440:Serials crisis
2437:
2436:
2435:
2425:
2419:
2417:
2413:
2412:
2410:
2409:
2407:Scientometrics
2404:
2399:
2394:
2389:
2384:
2379:
2377:Citation index
2374:
2369:
2364:
2359:
2354:
2349:
2343:
2341:
2337:
2336:
2334:
2333:
2328:
2326:Poster session
2323:
2322:
2321:
2316:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2299:
2289:
2284:
2278:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2269:
2268:
2263:
2258:
2253:
2248:
2243:
2238:
2232:
2230:
2224:
2223:
2221:
2220:
2215:
2213:Position paper
2210:
2208:Review article
2205:
2204:
2203:
2192:
2190:
2186:
2185:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2170:
2164:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2150:
2149:
2142:
2135:
2127:
2121:
2120:
2110:(3): 175–180.
2097:
2094:
2091:
2090:
2055:(6): 458–461.
2035:
1978:
1951:(4): 313–314.
1931:
1910:(2): 341–376.
1890:
1876:
1869:
1847:
1809:
1791:
1746:
1743:on 2013-01-28.
1727:
1712:
1686:
1642:
1575:
1546:
1521:
1497:
1469:
1440:
1405:
1377:
1345:
1330:
1323:
1290:
1271:(2): 120–121.
1250:
1192:
1165:
1138:(3): 121–122.
1115:
1104:on 4 June 2011
1084:
1083:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1059:
1056:
1035:
1032:
982:
979:
933:
930:
929:
928:
924:
921:
874:primary source
863:
860:
846:
843:
833:
830:
813:
810:
756:search engines
739:
736:
633:
630:
618:
617:
614:
611:
608:
605:
571:survey article
555:review article
549:
548:
546:
545:
538:
531:
523:
520:
519:
513:
512:
509:
508:
507:
506:
501:
496:
486:
485:
484:
479:
469:
464:
458:
455:
454:
451:
450:
447:
446:
441:
440:
439:
429:
428:
427:
422:
420:Scoping review
417:
412:
407:
397:
392:
391:
390:
380:
375:
370:
365:
363:Field research
360:
359:
358:
353:
348:
338:
337:
336:
326:
321:
316:
311:
306:
300:
297:
296:
293:
292:
289:
288:
283:
278:
273:
268:
263:
261:Historiography
258:
253:
248:
243:
238:
232:
227:
226:
223:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
214:Subtle realism
211:
201:
196:
194:Postpositivism
191:
186:
181:
176:
171:
169:Constructivism
166:
164:Antipositivism
160:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
141:
140:
139:
129:
124:
118:
115:
114:
111:
110:
107:
106:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
78:
73:
72:
69:
68:
60:
59:
53:
52:
26:
18:Survey article
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2741:
2730:
2727:
2725:
2722:
2720:
2717:
2715:
2712:
2710:
2707:
2705:
2704:Meta-analysis
2702:
2701:
2699:
2684:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2635:
2633:
2629:
2622:
2618:
2616:
2613:
2611:
2608:
2606:
2603:
2601:
2598:
2596:
2593:
2591:
2590:Open research
2588:
2586:
2583:
2581:
2578:
2576:
2573:
2571:
2568:
2566:
2563:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2555:
2551:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2537:
2535:
2532:
2530:
2527:
2525:
2522:
2520:
2517:
2515:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2499:
2497:
2493:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2463:
2461:
2457:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2434:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2426:
2424:
2421:
2420:
2418:
2414:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2397:Impact factor
2395:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2385:
2383:
2380:
2378:
2375:
2373:
2370:
2368:
2367:Bibliometrics
2365:
2363:
2360:
2358:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2345:
2344:
2342:
2338:
2332:
2329:
2327:
2324:
2320:
2317:
2315:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2307:
2303:
2300:
2298:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2279:
2277:
2273:
2267:
2264:
2262:
2259:
2257:
2254:
2252:
2251:Annual report
2249:
2247:
2244:
2242:
2239:
2237:
2236:Working paper
2234:
2233:
2231:
2229:
2225:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2206:
2202:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2194:
2193:
2191:
2187:
2179:
2178:Public health
2176:
2175:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2165:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2148:
2143:
2141:
2136:
2134:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2099:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2039:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1982:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1935:
1927:
1923:
1918:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1894:
1886:
1880:
1872:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1851:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1813:
1805:
1801:
1795:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1750:
1742:
1738:
1735:John Siegel.
1731:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1690:
1682:
1678:
1673:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1649:
1647:
1638:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1579:
1565:
1561:
1555:
1553:
1551:
1536:
1532:
1525:
1511:
1510:www.asbmb.org
1507:
1501:
1487:
1483:
1476:
1474:
1459:
1455:
1449:
1447:
1445:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1415:MIS Quarterly
1409:
1395:
1391:
1384:
1382:
1372:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1352:
1350:
1341:
1334:
1326:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1301:
1299:
1297:
1295:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1259:
1257:
1255:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1229:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1203:
1201:
1199:
1197:
1182:
1178:
1172:
1170:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1122:
1120:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1085:
1075:
1074:Living review
1072:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1010:
1009:
1004:
1003:
996:
994:
990:
989:
978:
975:
973:
972:peer-reviewed
968:
966:
961:
959:
955:
951:
946:
943:
939:
925:
922:
919:
918:
913:
909:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
879:
875:
870:
868:
859:
855:
852:
842:
839:
838:peer-reviewed
829:
827:
823:
819:
809:
808:
803:
801:
796:
795:incompetent."
790:
786:
783:
778:
776:
771:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
748:
746:
731:
727:
725:
720:
715:
714:meta-analysis
710:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
647:
643:
642:meta-analysis
639:
629:
625:
623:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
602:
601:
598:
594:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
544:
539:
537:
532:
530:
525:
524:
522:
521:
518:
515:
514:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
492:
491:
490:
487:
483:
480:
478:
477:Bibliometrics
475:
474:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
459:
453:
452:
445:
442:
438:
435:
434:
433:
430:
426:
423:
421:
418:
416:
415:Meta-analysis
413:
411:
408:
406:
405:Bibliometrics
403:
402:
401:
398:
396:
393:
389:
386:
385:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:
342:
339:
335:
332:
331:
330:
327:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
301:
295:
294:
287:
284:
282:
279:
277:
276:Phenomenology
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
254:
252:
249:
247:
244:
242:
239:
237:
234:
233:
230:
225:
224:
215:
212:
210:
207:
206:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
161:
158:
153:
152:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
119:
113:
112:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
76:
71:
70:
66:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
50:
46:
45:
40:
33:
19:
2207:
2107:
2103:
2052:
2048:
2038:
1995:
1991:
1981:
1948:
1944:
1934:
1907:
1903:
1893:
1879:
1856:
1850:
1840:21 September
1838:. Retrieved
1826:
1822:
1812:
1803:
1794:
1759:
1755:
1749:
1741:the original
1730:
1695:
1689:
1662:
1658:
1592:
1588:
1578:
1567:. Retrieved
1563:
1538:. Retrieved
1534:
1524:
1513:. Retrieved
1509:
1500:
1489:. Retrieved
1485:
1461:. Retrieved
1457:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1397:. Retrieved
1393:
1361:
1333:
1306:
1268:
1264:
1218:
1214:
1184:. Retrieved
1180:
1135:
1131:
1106:. Retrieved
1102:the original
1097:
1088:
1067:
1039:
1037:
1028:
1019:
1012:
1006:
1000:
997:
986:
984:
976:
969:
962:
947:
942:experimental
935:
905:
897:
889:
885:
881:
878:participants
877:
871:
865:
856:
848:
835:
815:
806:
804:
793:
791:
787:
779:
772:
749:
741:
723:
711:
702:
668:
650:
635:
626:
619:
599:
595:
574:
570:
554:
552:
256:Hermeneutics
144:Quantitative
2570:Peer review
2450:#ICanHazPDF
2428:Open access
2387:Eigenfactor
2331:Proceedings
2241:White paper
1064:Case series
927:guidelines.
679:text mining
329:Ethnography
229:Methodology
184:Fallibilism
132:Qualitative
102:Referencing
2729:Literature
2698:Categories
2486:Retraction
2459:Versioning
2352:Altmetrics
2297:Biological
1569:2022-05-10
1540:2022-05-10
1515:2022-05-10
1491:2022-05-10
1463:2022-05-10
1399:2022-05-10
1221:(1): 1–5.
1186:2022-05-10
1080:References
898:presenting
890:experiment
632:Categories
622:meta-study
504:Statistics
499:Simulation
437:Simulation
378:Interviews
341:Experiment
309:Case study
281:Pragmatism
199:Pragmatism
189:Positivism
179:Empiricism
2471:Postprint
2314:Monograph
2266:Lab notes
2069:0303-6987
2014:1530-0307
1965:0022-1554
1926:0003-1224
1764:CiteSeerX
1722:246907163
1681:2380-176X
1619:1553-7358
1427:0276-7783
1285:0737-6782
1245:168954586
1237:1552-7824
1152:0741-8329
894:empirical
782:abstract'
752:databases
137:Art-based
2724:Academia
2719:Research
2544:OpenAlex
2539:Paperity
2466:Preprint
2302:Chemical
2256:Pamphlet
2201:Abstract
2161:Journals
2085:13426464
2077:16776724
2030:19634133
2022:17952095
1973:85573154
1786:25203078
1637:23874189
1160:11163118
1058:See also
906:evaluate
886:subjects
719:journals
683:citation
304:Analysis
97:Argument
57:Research
49:a series
47:Part of
2560:Imprint
2481:Erratum
2445:Sci-Hub
2392:h-index
2319:Chapter
1628:3715443
1597:Bibcode
1435:4132319
1132:Alcohol
1044:MEDLINE
822:EndNote
760:Medline
579:primary
559:article
383:Mapping
298:Methods
204:Realism
92:Writing
2529:Scopus
2509:AMiner
2292:Patent
2282:Thesis
2189:Papers
2083:
2075:
2067:
2028:
2020:
2012:
1971:
1963:
1924:
1867:
1784:
1766:
1720:
1710:
1679:
1635:
1625:
1617:
1433:
1425:
1321:
1283:
1243:
1235:
1158:
1150:
1108:8 June
1011:, and
981:Impact
888:, and
882:sample
826:Zotero
824:, and
818:Papers
768:CINAHL
764:Embase
697:, the
689:, and
660:biased
640:, and
557:is an
444:Survey
39:Review
2631:Lists
2600:ORCID
2261:Essay
2196:Paper
2081:S2CID
2026:S2CID
1969:S2CID
1718:S2CID
1665:(1).
1431:JSTOR
1241:S2CID
963:Some
2519:CORE
2514:BASE
2309:Book
2073:PMID
2065:ISSN
2018:PMID
2010:ISSN
1961:ISSN
1922:ISSN
1865:ISBN
1842:2021
1782:PMID
1756:JAMA
1708:ISBN
1677:ISSN
1633:PMID
1615:ISSN
1423:ISSN
1319:ISBN
1281:ISSN
1233:ISSN
1156:PMID
1148:ISSN
1110:2011
766:and
754:and
581:and
2112:doi
2057:doi
2000:doi
1953:doi
1912:doi
1831:doi
1774:doi
1760:312
1700:doi
1667:doi
1623:PMC
1605:doi
1366:doi
1311:doi
1273:doi
1223:doi
1140:doi
2700::
2108:28
2106:.
2079:.
2071:.
2063:.
2053:33
2051:.
2047:.
2024:.
2016:.
2008:.
1996:87
1994:.
1990:.
1967:.
1959:.
1949:55
1947:.
1943:.
1920:.
1908:86
1906:.
1902:.
1859:.
1827:33
1825:.
1821:.
1802:.
1780:.
1772:.
1758:.
1716:.
1706:.
1675:.
1663:24
1661:.
1657:.
1645:^
1631:.
1621:.
1613:.
1603:.
1591:.
1587:.
1562:.
1549:^
1533:.
1508:.
1484:.
1472:^
1456:.
1443:^
1429:.
1419:26
1417:.
1392:.
1380:^
1360:.
1348:^
1317:.
1293:^
1279:.
1269:34
1267:.
1253:^
1239:.
1231:.
1219:46
1217:.
1213:.
1195:^
1179:.
1168:^
1154:.
1146:.
1136:22
1134:.
1130:.
1118:^
1096:.
1005:,
884:,
880:,
820:,
770:.
762:,
712:A
709:.
685:,
681:,
669:A
620:A
593:.
553:A
51:on
2623:"
2619:"
2146:e
2139:t
2132:v
2118:.
2114::
2087:.
2059::
2032:.
2002::
1975:.
1955::
1928:.
1914::
1887:.
1873:.
1844:.
1833::
1806:.
1788:.
1776::
1724:.
1702::
1683:.
1669::
1639:.
1607::
1599::
1593:9
1572:.
1543:.
1518:.
1494:.
1466:.
1437:.
1402:.
1374:.
1368::
1327:.
1313::
1287:.
1275::
1247:.
1225::
1189:.
1162:.
1142::
1112:.
805:"
542:e
535:t
528:v
41:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
