388:, an arrest warrant is distinct from a search warrant in that the probable-cause determination under review is different. An arrest warrant certifies that there is probable cause that a person has committed a crime and therefore the police are justified in seizing (i.e., taking into custody) the subject of the warrant. For a search warrant, on the other hand, the judicial officer reviews whether the police have probable cause to search a particular location for a specific object, justifying intrusion of the interest in privacy by entering the premises. Allowing the police to enter any place where they suspected the subject of an arrest warrant might be would pave the way for abuse because police could, for example, search the home of every known family member and acquaintance of the subject. Accordingly, the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's ruling that an arrest warrant justifies the search of a third party's home and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Fourth Amendment.
312:. Agent Goodowens then instructed a colleague to obtain a search warrant for the home while he and the rest of the officers conducted a second search of the home, which uncovered more cocaine. Once the search warrant for the home was obtained, the house was searched for a third time revealing a clear plastic bag containing 450 grams (approx. 1 pound) of 45% pure cocaine hydrochloride, two suitcases containing 8,394 grams (approx. 18.5 pounds) of 99% pure cocaine hydrochloride and 10,445 grams (approx 23 pounds) of 95% pure cocaine hydrochloride respectively, a box of clear plastic bags, two sets of
31:
356:, 545 F.2d 406, 421 (5th Cir. 1976), which held that "when an officer holds a valid arrest warrant and reasonably believes that its subject is within premises belonging to a third party, he need not obtain a search warrant to enter for the purpose of arresting the subject." Steagald then appealed to the
307:
both and determining that neither was Lyons, the officers proceeded to the front door, where they met
Gaultney's wife, Cathy, who advised that no one else was present in the home. The police nevertheless instructed Gaultney's wife to place her hands on a wall while they conducted a search of the home
391:
Justice
Rehnquist, in his dissent, argued that it is not reasonable to expect the police to secure a separate warrant for premises belonging to a third party when they already have probable cause to believe the fugitive is there because fugitives are, by their very nature, highly mobile. Therefore,
295:
indictment dating back to July 1977, could be reached for the next 24 hours. The
Michigan DEA agent relayed the information to a DEA agent in Atlanta, Kelly Goodowens. After contacting Southern Bell Telephone Company to obtain the address corresponding to the telephone number, Goodowens, along with
331:
in hollowed-out ornamental brass lamps and table bases. Gualtney and
Steagald were both indicted on federal drug charges as a result. While the officers were at the home, James "Jimmy" Albert Smith, to whom the house in question had been leased and who was the subject of a state arrest warrant
380:, in favor of Steagald. The court held that an arrest warrant authorizes police to arrest the subject of the warrant, but does not authorize them to enter a third party's home in search of that person. The court reasoned that since the purpose of a warrant is to allow for
352:. In a 2–1 opinion, the Fifth Circuit agreed with the district court that the arrest warrant for Lyons was sufficient grounds for law enforcement to search the premises and affirmed the convictions. In so doing, the Fifth Circuit relied on their own precedent in
443:
348:. The trial court denied the motion to suppress and Gualtney and Steagald were convicted. Steagald and Gaultney then moved for a mistrial, which the trial court denied, prompting them to appeal the convictions to
473:
704:
638:
401:
72:
572:
349:
714:
244:
224:
568:
709:
493:
327:. The approximately 43 pounds of cocaine, with a wholesale value of some $ 2.5 million at the time, had been smuggled as custom imports from
613:
303:
Upon arrival at the address, the officers encountered Hoyt
Gaultney and Gary Keith Steagald working on a vehicle outside the home. After
532:
694:
248:
448:
699:
364:
to decide whether the government may search a third-party's property pursuant to an arrest warrant without the owner's consent.
376:
delivered the majority opinion of the court, in which he was joined by all of the remaining justices on the court except for
357:
240:
35:
276:
667:
576:
110:
An arrest warrant is not sufficient under the Fourth
Amendment to search the home of a third party unless
100:
540, 615 F.2d 642 (affirming district court's denial of motion to suppress and upholding convictions)
719:
503:
617:
137:
642:
64:
649:
260:
111:
8:
169:
465:
341:
377:
373:
345:
181:
173:
157:
516:
457:
129:
296:
eleven other police officers and federal agents, drove to the lakeside cottage in
67:
658:
392:
while the police are attempting to secure the warrant, the suspect might escape.
381:
332:
related to drug charges, arrived in a pickup truck and was immediately arrested.
297:
385:
316:
308:
for Lyons. Although they did not find Lyons, they discovered a small amount of
256:
252:
161:
145:
688:
324:
498:
676:
149:
469:
444:"Fourth Amendment--Balancing the Interests in Third Party Home Arrests"
361:
344:
the evidence discovered through the warrantless search pursuant to the
616: (Supreme Court of the United States 1981), archived from
292:
272:
251:
of a third party's home in an attempt to apprehend the subject of an
79:
461:
328:
320:
304:
288:
309:
284:
280:
198:
Marshall, joined by
Brennan, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens
30:
313:
97:
705:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
402:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 451
533:"Supreme Court reaffirms a man's home is his castle"
350:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
491:
291:subject to a federal arrest warrant related to a
686:
526:
524:
384:of determinations by law enforcement regarding
287:-area telephone number at which Ricky Lyons, a
521:
437:
494:"Oral argument in Steagald v. United States"
435:
433:
431:
429:
427:
425:
423:
421:
419:
417:
715:Drug Enforcement Administration litigation
530:
449:Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology
414:
367:
603:
601:
599:
597:
595:
593:
591:
589:
587:
585:
558:
556:
554:
552:
550:
548:
546:
710:United States Fourth Amendment case law
492:U.S. Supreme Court (January 14, 1981).
687:
487:
485:
483:
441:
582:
543:
335:
266:
247:, a police officer may not conduct a
18:1981 United States Supreme Court case
531:Kilpatrick, James (April 28, 1981),
300:in order to apprehend the fugitive.
271:In mid-January 1978, a confidential
480:
243:case which held that, based on the
13:
358:Supreme Court of the United States
340:Steagald asked the trial court to
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
731:
695:United States Supreme Court cases
645:204 (1981) is available from:
627:
539:, Twin Falls, Idaho, pp. A-4
29:
575:. 1979), archived from
277:Drug Enforcement Administration
700:1981 in United States case law
54:Gary Steagald v. United States
1:
407:
319:, and a bag containing beta-
239:, 451 U.S. 204 (1981), is a
7:
395:
241:United States Supreme Court
228:21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846
10:
736:
677:Oyez (oral argument audio)
442:Watson, G. Andrew (1981).
317:triple beam balance scales
275:contacted an agent of the
214:Rehnquist, joined by White
635:Steagald v. United States
609:Steagald v. United States
564:United States v. Gaultney
236:Steagald v. United States
223:
218:
210:
202:
194:
189:
123:
118:
109:
104:
92:
87:
59:
49:
42:
28:
24:Steagald v. United States
23:
354:United States v. Cravero
43:Argued January 14, 1981
368:Supreme Court decision
138:William J. Brennan Jr.
45:Decided April 21, 1981
476:on December 17, 2017.
261:exigent circumstances
225:U.S. Const. amend. IV
112:exigent circumstances
569:606 F.2d 540
506:on December 23, 2017
78:101 S. Ct. 1642; 68
668:Library of Congress
620: on 2017-12-17.
614:451 US 2014
579: on 2017-12-17.
170:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
336:Procedural history
267:Factual background
249:warrantless search
134:Associate Justices
378:William Rehnquist
374:Thurgood Marshall
346:exclusionary rule
232:
231:
174:William Rehnquist
158:Thurgood Marshall
727:
681:
675:
672:
666:
663:
657:
654:
648:
621:
611:
605:
580:
566:
560:
541:
540:
528:
519:
515:
513:
511:
502:. Archived from
489:
478:
477:
472:. Archived from
439:
360:, which granted
283:and provided an
245:Fourth Amendment
130:Warren E. Burger
119:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
735:
734:
730:
729:
728:
726:
725:
724:
720:Buford, Georgia
685:
684:
679:
673:
670:
664:
661:
655:
652:
646:
630:
625:
624:
607:
606:
583:
562:
561:
544:
529:
522:
509:
507:
490:
481:
462:10.2307/1143233
440:
415:
410:
398:
382:judicial review
370:
338:
269:
227:
182:John P. Stevens
172:
160:
148:
83:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
733:
723:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
683:
682:
629:
628:External links
626:
623:
622:
581:
542:
520:
479:
456:(4): 1263–75.
412:
411:
409:
406:
405:
404:
397:
394:
386:probable cause
369:
366:
337:
334:
268:
265:
253:arrest warrant
230:
229:
221:
220:
216:
215:
212:
208:
207:
204:
200:
199:
196:
192:
191:
187:
186:
185:
184:
162:Harry Blackmun
146:Potter Stewart
135:
132:
127:
121:
120:
116:
115:
107:
106:
102:
101:
94:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
732:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
692:
690:
678:
669:
660:
651:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
619:
615:
610:
604:
602:
600:
598:
596:
594:
592:
590:
588:
586:
578:
574:
570:
565:
559:
557:
555:
553:
551:
549:
547:
538:
534:
527:
525:
518:
505:
501:
500:
495:
488:
486:
484:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
445:
438:
436:
434:
432:
430:
428:
426:
424:
422:
420:
418:
413:
403:
400:
399:
393:
389:
387:
383:
379:
375:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
333:
330:
326:
325:cutting agent
322:
318:
315:
311:
306:
301:
299:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
226:
222:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:Case opinions
188:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:Chief Justice
125:
124:
122:
117:
113:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
634:
618:the original
608:
577:the original
563:
536:
510:December 17,
508:. Retrieved
504:the original
499:Oyez Project
497:
474:the original
453:
447:
390:
371:
353:
339:
302:
270:
235:
234:
233:
219:Laws applied
177:
165:
153:
141:
114:are present.
88:Case history
71:
53:
15:
323:, a common
203:Concurrence
150:Byron White
689:Categories
537:Times News
408:References
362:certiorari
293:marijuana
279:(DEA) in
273:informant
255:, absent
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
633:Text of
396:See also
372:Justice
342:suppress
329:Colombia
321:mannitol
305:frisking
289:fugitive
195:Majority
650:Findlaw
573:5th Cir
517:Alt URL
470:1143233
310:cocaine
285:Atlanta
281:Detroit
257:consent
211:Dissent
105:Holding
680:
674:
671:
665:
662:
659:Justia
656:
653:
647:
612:,
571: (
567:,
468:
298:Buford
206:Burger
180:
178:·
176:
168:
166:·
164:
156:
154:·
152:
144:
142:·
140:
641:
466:JSTOR
314:Ohaus
93:Prior
643:U.S.
512:2017
98:F.2d
96:606
73:more
65:U.S.
63:451
639:451
458:doi
259:or
68:204
691::
637:,
584:^
545:^
535:,
523:^
496:.
482:^
464:.
454:72
452:.
446:.
416:^
263:.
82:38
514:.
460::
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.