413:
481:
emotional dimension. Its multidimensionality refers to how cohesion is based on many factors. Its dynamic nature refers to how it gradually changes over time in its strength and form from the time a group is formed to when a group is disbanded. Its instrumental basis refers to how people cohere for some purpose, whether it be for a task or for social reasons. Its emotional dimension refers to how cohesion is pleasing to its group members. This definition can be generalized to most groups characterized by the group definition discussed above. These groups include
740:
high IQ performed better on learning tests when they learnt in high cohesive groups than low cohesive groups. For children with a low IQ, however, the cohesiveness factor made little difference. Still, there was a slight tendency for low IQ children to perform better in high cohesive groups. The researchers believed that if children worked with other students whom they liked, they would more likely have a greater drive to learn than if they had neutral or negative attitudes towards the group.
974:
680:
project and naturally, likes and dislikes for the people around them emerged. The experimenter then formed cohesive groups by grouping people who liked each other. It was found that the masons and carpenters were more satisfied when they worked in cohesive groups. As quoted from one of the workers "the work is more interesting when you've got a buddy working with you. You certainly like it a lot better anyway."
655:
different ways. When cohesion is defined as attraction, it is better correlated with performance. When it is defined as task commitment, it is also correlated with performance, though to a lesser degree than cohesion as attraction. Not enough studies were performed with cohesion defined as group pride. In general, cohesion defined in all these ways was positively related with performance.
727:
was controlled for and other controls were set in place. Furthermore, those with friends who all engaged in illegal activities were most likely to engage in illegal activities themselves. Another study found that adolescents with no friends did not engage in as many illegal activities as those with at least one friend. Other studies have found similar results.
659:
relationship in this order (from strongest to weakest): sports teams, military squads, groups that form for a purpose, groups in experimental settings. There is some evidence that cohesion may be more strongly related to performance for groups that have highly interdependent roles than for groups in which members are independent.
605:, a theory that says individual members of a group will actually put in less effort, because they believe other members will make up for the slack. It has been found that social loafing is eliminated when group members believe their individual performances are identifiable – much more the case in smaller groups.
477:, cohesion means "the force that unites the molecules of a liquid or of a solid". Thereby, there are different ways to define group cohesion, depending on how researchers conceptualize this concept. However, most researchers define cohesion to be task commitment and interpersonal attraction to the group.
947:
On a societal level
Albrekt Larsen defines social cohesion 'as the belief—held by citizens in a given nation state—that they share a moral community, which enables them to trust each other'. In a comparative study of the US, UK, Sweden and Denmark he shows that the perceived trustworthiness of fellow
505:
The bonds between group members do not develop spontaneously. They develop from a number of components such as attraction, coordination, sense of belonging and shared emotions. The components can be known as antecedents of cohesion. Moreover, they also define the nature of cohesion. Each component is
699:
when the group is under stress, more than when it is not under stress. The study studied forty-six three-person teams, all of whom were faced with the task of selecting the best oil drilling sites based on information given to them. The study manipulated whether or not the teams had high cohesion or
726:
Illegal activities have been stemmed from conformity pressures within a group. Haynie in 2001 found that the degree to which a group of friends engaged in illegal activities was a predictor of an individual's participation in the illegal activity. This was even after the individual's prior behavior
722:
suggests that the pressures hinder the group from critically thinking about the decisions it is making. Giordano in 2003 suggested that this is because people within a group frequently interact with one another and create many opportunities for influence. It is also because a person within a group
480:
Cohesion can be more specifically defined as the tendency for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members. This definition includes important aspects of cohesiveness, including its multidimensionality, dynamic nature, instrumental basis, and
739:
investigated how group cohesiveness influenced individual learning. They wanted to test whether learning would be better if children studied with peers they liked than peers they did not like. The degree of member liking was presumed to indicate group cohesiveness. They found that children with a
654:
Studies have shown that cohesion can cause performance and that performance can cause cohesion. Most meta-analyses (studies that have summarized the results of many studies) have shown that there is a relationship between cohesion and performance. This is the case even when cohesion is defined in
571:
On the other hand, from the perspective of social attraction as the basis of group cohesiveness, similarity among group members is the cue for individuals to categorize themselves and others into either an ingroup or outgroup. In this perspective, the more prototypical similarity individuals feel
558:
The forces that push group members together can be positive (group-based rewards) or negative (things lost upon leaving the group). The main factors that influence group cohesiveness are: members' similarity, group size, entry difficulty, group success and external competition and threats. Often,
540:
It is believed that cohesion is more about the willingness to work together to accomplish a set of goals than the interpersonal relationships between group members. According to
Siebold in 2007, task-oriented groups such as flight crews and military squads share a drive to accomplish their goals.
679:
One study involved a team of masons and carpenters working on a housing development. For the first five months, their supervisor formed the groups they were to work in. These groups changed over the course of five months. This was to help the men get to know everyone working on this development
675:
Studies have shown that people in cohesive groups have reported more satisfaction than members of a noncohesive group. This is the case across many settings, including industrial, athletic, and educational settings. Members in cohesive groups also are more optimistic and suffer less from social
514:
Festinger and his colleagues in 1950 highly focused on attraction as a force in comparison to any other forces. In a study, they asked the group members to identify all their good friends and calculated the ratio of ingroup choices to outgroup choices. According to Dion in 2000, the greater the
593:). Dissonance reduction can occur when a person has endured arduous initiation into a group; if some aspects of the group are unpleasant, the person may distort their perception of the group because of the difficulty of entry. Thus, the value of the group increases in the group member's mind.
575:
In addition, similar background makes it more likely that members share similar views on various issues, including group objectives, communication methods and the type of desired leadership. In general, higher agreement among members on group rules and norms results in greater trust and less
567:
Similarity of group members has different influences on group cohesiveness depending on how to define this concept. Lott and Lott who referred in 1965 to interpersonal attraction as group cohesiveness conducted an extensive review on the literature and found that individuals' similarities in
706:
has also asserted that adolescents with behavioral problems do not have close interpersonal relationships or have superficial ones. Many studies have found that an individual without close peer relationships are at a higher risk for emotional adjustment problems currently and later in life.
666:
However, it is important to note that the link between cohesion and performance can differ depending on the nature of the group that is studied. Some studies that have focused on this relationship have led to divergent results. For example, a study conducted on the link between cohesion and
549:
One of the most obvious features of a cohesive group is a shared positive emotion. Emotional cohesion is a multilevel process as emotions can be collective. For example, a group member may experience emotion when he/she learns that the other group member has been mistreated. An emotion is a
658:
However, some groups may have a stronger cohesion-performance relationship than others. Smaller groups have a better cohesion-performance relationship than larger groups. Carron in 2002 found cohesion-performance relationships to be strongest in sports teams and ranked the strength of the
519:. Social attraction is a liking for other group members based on their status as typical group members. Attraction is a basic ingredient for most groups, however, when interpersonal relations between group members intensify, it can transform a conjoined group into a cohesive one.
515:
ratio, the greater the cohesiveness of the group. Hogg in 1992 and 2001 noted personal attraction is not a group cohesion even though members of cohesive groups like one another. Group cohesion is similar to a type of group-level attraction which, according to Hogg, is known as
700:
low cohesion and how urgent the task was to be done. The study found that teams with low cohesion and high urgency performed worse than teams with high cohesion and high urgency. This indicates that cohesion can improve group decision-making in times of stress.
723:
perceives other members as similar to themselves and is thus more willing to give into conformity pressures. Another reason is that people value the group and are thus, more willing to give into conformity pressures to maintain or enhance their relationships.
628:
Group cohesion has been linked to a range of positive and negative consequences. Its consequences on motivation, performance, member satisfaction, member emotional adjustment, and the pressures felt by the member will be examined in the sections below.
667:
performance in a governmental social service department found a low positive association between these two variables, while a separate study on groups in a Danish military unit found a high negative association between these two variables.
584:
Difficult entry criteria or procedures to a group tend to present it in more exclusive light. The more elite the group is perceived to be, the more prestigious it is to be a member in that group. As shown in dissonance studies conducted by
662:
In regards to group productivity, having attraction and group pride may not be enough. It is necessary to have task commitment in order to be productive. Furthermore, groups with high performance goals were extremely productive.
641:
of team members are key factors that contribute to a company's performance. By adaptability development, self-worth, and personal motivation growth, each member becomes able to feel confident and progress in the team.
1091:
893:
between individuals and communities, or "active social relationships". Such contacts and connections are potential resources for places since they offer people and organisations mutual support, information,
531:
to the group by being loyal to the group, identifying with the group and classifying themselves as members. They would also describe their unity by using terms such as family, us, community, team, etc.
527:
In a cohesive group, individuals tend to fuse together to form a whole. Nonmembers who would encounter a group will be convinced that it is a tightly bonded group. Group members would express their
2057:
Gammage, K.L.; Carron, A.V. & Estabrooks, P.A. (2001). "Team cohesion and individual productivity: The influence of the norm for productivity and the identifiability of individual effort".
1642:
791:"If there has been a key word added to the Runnymede lexicon in 2002, it is cohesion. A year from publication of the report of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, the
550:
collective emotion when all the members of a group experience the same emotional reaction. The intensity of such emotions is high when the members strongly identify with their group.
51:
559:
these factors work through enhancing the identification of individuals with the group they belong to as well as their beliefs of how the group can fulfill their personal needs.
710:
While people may experience better emotional in cohesive groups, they may also face many demands on their emotions, such as those that result from scapegoating and hostility.
2740:
Wilkinson, D.L. (2001). "Violent events and social identity: specifying the relationship between respect and masculinity in inner-city youth violence". In D.A. Kinney (ed.).
2697:
Dishion, T.J.; Andrews, D.W.; Crosby L. (1995). "Anti-social boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process".
1955:
2789:
2341:
Zaccaro, S.J.; Gualtieri, J. & Minionis, D. (1995). "Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency." Military
Psychology, 7".
913:. It also includes people's sense of belonging to a city and the strength of shared experiences, identities and values between those from different backgrounds.
1131:
Beal, D. J.; Cohen, R.; Burke, M. J. & McLendon, C. L. (2003). "Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relation".
1910:
Gully, S.M.; Devine, D.J. & Whitney, D.J. (1995). "A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence".
568:
background (e.g., race, ethnicity, occupation, age), attitudes, values and personality traits have generally positive association with group cohesiveness.
1407:
1354:
Hogg, M. A.; Hardie, E. A. (1992). "Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A self-categorization analysis of group cohesiveness".
2092:
Casey-Campbell, Milly; Martens, Martin (June 2009). "Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion–performance literature".
867:, ill-health, poor skills and bad living conditions. These basic necessities of life are the foundations of a strong social fabric and important
800:
796:
792:
769:
497:
groups, and social groups. However, it is important to note that other researchers claim that cohesion cannot be generalized across many groups.
2560:
Demuth S. (1997). "Understanding the "loner": Delinquency and the peer, family, and school relations of adolescents with no close friendships".
748:
Social cohesion has become an important theme in
British social policy in the period since the disturbances in Britain's Northern mill towns (
1587:
William R. Thompson; David P. Rapkin (December 1981). "Collaboration, Consensus, and Détente: The
External Threat-Bloc Cohesion Hypothesis".
823:
thematic reports, there are five different dimensions of social cohesion: material conditions, passive relationships, active relationships,
439:
to one another and to the group as a whole. Although cohesion is a multi-faceted process, it can be broken down into four main components:
948:
citizens is strongly influenced by the level of social inequality and how 'poor' and 'middle classes' are represented in the mass media.
2643:
Kandel, D.B. (1991). "Friendship networks, intimacy and illicit drug use in young adulthood: a comparison of two competing theories".
1545:
Zaccaro, S. J.; McCoy, M. C. (1988). "The
Effects of Task and Interpersonal Cohesiveness on Performance of a Disjunctive Group Task".
1987:
Langfred, C.W. (1998). "Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance".
3013:
1007:
2395:
Sociometry Then and Now: Building on Six
Decades of Measuring Children's Experiences with The Peer Group: New Directions for Child
1962:
1614:
Rempel, Martin W; Fisher, Ronald J. (July 1997). "Perceived Threat, Cohesion, and Group
Problem Solving in Intergroup Conflict".
2182:
Hoyle, R. H. & Crawford, A.M. (1994). "Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies".
1872:
2953:
370:
2926:
2833:
2757:
2402:
2377:
2136:
1464:
1390:
1302:
1059:
812:
2825:
The Rise and Fall of Social
Cohesion: The Construction and De-construction of Social Trust in the US, UK, Sweden and Denmark
1518:
Gerard, H. B. & Mathewson, G. C. (1966). "The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication".
2798:
397:
1220:
Cota, A. A.; Dion, K. L. & Evans, C. R. (1993). "A reexamination of the structure of the Gross
Cohesiveness Scale".
2998:
2850:
2282:
Shaw, M.E. & Shaw, L.M. (1962). "Some effects of sociometric grouping upon learning in a second grade classroom".
2597:
2322:
1802:
Forsyth, D.R.; Zyzniewski, L.E. & Giammanco, C.A. (2002). "Responsibility diffusion in cooperative collectives".
589:
and Mills in 1959 and confirmed by Gerard and Mathewson in 1966, this effect can be due to dissonance reduction (see
1887:
1643:"Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables"
886:
and respect for other people, along with peace and security, are hallmarks of a stable and harmonious urban society.
412:
2886:
Piper, W.; Marrache, M.; Lacroix, R.; Richardson, A. & Jones, B. (1983). "Cohesion as a basic bond in groups".
2152:
Hackman, J.R. (1992). "Group influences on individuals in organizations". In M.D. Dunnett & L.M. Hough (eds.).
348:
17:
2916:
2310:
646:
is less frequent when there is cohesion in a team; the motivation of each team member is considerably greater.
359:
321:
316:
153:
1255:
Cota, A.A.; Evans, C.R.; Dion, K.L.; Kilik, L. & Longman, R.S. (1995). "The structure of group cohesion".
1890:. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 11, 13. Archived from
1787:
Feltz, D.L. (1992). "Understanding motivation in sport: a self efficacy perspective". In G.C. Roberts (ed.).
718:
People in cohesive groups have greater pressure to conform than people in non-cohesive groups. The theory of
1438:
447:. Members of strongly cohesive groups are more inclined to participate readily and to stay with the group.
364:
107:
2943:
Cartwright, Dorwin (1968). "The Nature of Group Cohesiveness". In Dorwin Cartwright; Alvin Zander (eds.).
692:
and tension. It was also found that people cope better with stress when they belong to a cohesive group.
354:
688:
People in cohesive groups experience better emotional adjustment. In particular, people experience less
3003:
772:). In investigating these, academic Ted Cantle drew heavily on the concept of social cohesion, and the
306:
959:
243:
2521:
2993:
937:
1480:
Carron A. V. & Spink, K.S. (1995). "The group-size cohesion relationship in minimal groups".
390:
127:
92:
1405:
3008:
2516:
2445:
Pepitone, A. & Reichling, G. (1955). "Group cohesiveness and the expression of hostility".
932:. In pursuit of social equality amidst the changing nature of work and future uncertainty, the
288:
2156:. Vol. 3 (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. pp. 199–267.
958:
have also introduced the possibility of adding social cohesion as a formal rating into their
924:
or disparity in access to opportunities or material circumstances, such as income, health or
855:. Relations between and within communities suffer when people lack work and endure hardship,
696:
297:
183:
173:
97:
2670:
Pleydon, A.P.; Schner, J.G. (2001). "Female adolescent friendship and delinquent behavior".
952:
921:
590:
572:
between themselves and other ingroup members, the stronger the group cohesiveness will be.
342:
326:
158:
148:
82:
8:
2988:
2493:
1888:"The Relationship of Group Cohesion to Group Performance: A Research Integration Attempt"
1017:
832:
576:
dysfunctional conflict. This, in turn, strengthens both emotional and task cohesiveness.
417:
163:
2903:
2714:
2656:
2625:
2617:
2577:
2542:
2534:
2462:
2233:
2199:
2109:
2074:
2039:
2004:
1927:
1864:
1819:
1748:
1596:
1558:
1497:
1430:
1367:
1272:
1237:
1202:
1156:
1012:
987:
906:
617:
383:
311:
238:
233:
223:
203:
188:
178:
168:
77:
34:
2749:
2247:
Myers, A.E. (1962). "Team competition, success, and the adjustment of group members".
2922:
2907:
2829:
2753:
2722:
2679:
2629:
2581:
2546:
2466:
2398:
2373:
2318:
2264:
2203:
2132:
2113:
2105:
2078:
2043:
2008:
1931:
1868:
1752:
1740:
1686:
Hogg, M. A. (1993). "Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions".
1665:
1531:
1501:
1460:
1386:
1298:
1276:
1241:
1206:
1148:
1055:
1002:
703:
253:
213:
193:
122:
72:
2877:
Eisenberg, J. (2007). "Group Cohesiveness". In R. F. Baumeister; K. D. Vohs (eds.).
2968:
2895:
2745:
2706:
2652:
2609:
2569:
2526:
2507:
Haynie, D.L. (2001). "Delinquent peers revisited: does network structure matter?".
2489:
2454:
2427:
2350:
2291:
2256:
2229:
2220:
Van Zelst, R.H. (1952). "Sociometrically selected work teams increase production".
2191:
2101:
2066:
2031:
1996:
1919:
1856:
1823:
1811:
1730:
1695:
1657:
1623:
1554:
1527:
1489:
1422:
1363:
1264:
1229:
1194:
1185:
Carron, A.V.; Brawley, L.R. (2000). "Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues".
1160:
1140:
1051:
1047:
902:
278:
268:
198:
117:
102:
2295:
1735:
1718:
940:
2855:
2823:
1714:
925:
917:
872:
784:
465:
440:
112:
67:
1233:
2899:
2458:
2070:
2035:
1841:
1765:
1198:
1144:
1130:
1022:
979:
943:
governments to increase human capital investments and expand social protection.
890:
808:
804:
780:
777:
765:
643:
602:
586:
283:
258:
218:
132:
2885:
2538:
2354:
1699:
868:
2982:
2573:
2195:
2000:
1923:
1860:
1815:
1744:
1493:
1268:
910:
528:
490:
486:
273:
1801:
2683:
2268:
1406:
Barnett, William P.; Caldwell, David F.; O'Reilly; Charles A., III (1989).
1152:
992:
929:
879:
761:
736:
613:
436:
263:
228:
2726:
1669:
601:
Small groups are more cohesive than large groups. This is often caused by
2056:
2022:
Berkowitz, L. (1954). "Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity".
1891:
1842:"The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration"
997:
895:
864:
609:
482:
87:
1719:"Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it"
1254:
2718:
2621:
1434:
955:
933:
889:
The third dimension refers to the positive interactions, exchanges and
883:
836:
824:
773:
719:
638:
494:
2340:
1961:(Report). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Archived from
1600:
2431:
2260:
1661:
1627:
848:
456:
248:
42:
2710:
2418:
French, J.R.P. Jr. (1941). "The disruption and cohesion of groups".
1909:
1426:
2696:
2613:
2530:
882:, safety and freedom from fear, or "passive social relationships".
753:
444:
1586:
1219:
973:
1613:
860:
757:
689:
474:
844:
840:
749:
2308:
695:
One study showed that cohesion as task commitment can improve
1517:
1089:
852:
2851:"Future funding strategies could prove a test of patriotism"
1839:
1723:
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
856:
2181:
1544:
435:, is the degree or strength of bonds linking members of a
2918:
Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders
2821:
2669:
2444:
1408:"Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover"
1184:
1288:
1286:
616:, the limits to group size are theorized to accord with
2775:
The Group Effect: Social Cohesion & Health Outcomes
2480:
Giordano, P.C. (2003). "Relationships in adolescence".
1634:
1479:
1044:
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
2595:
1640:
1347:
2309:
Bowers, C.A.; Weaver, J.L.; Morgan, B.B. Jr. (1996).
2091:
1712:
1513:
1511:
1297:(5 ed.). New York: Wadsworth. pp. 119–122.
1283:
2744:. Vol. 8. New York: Elsevier. pp. 235–69.
2281:
2154:
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
969:
416:Levels of trust are higher in countries with lower
2942:
2586:Presented at Am. Soc. Criminol. Meet., Chicago, IL
2417:
1508:
811:reports moved cohesion to the forefront of the UK
2392:
2311:"Moderating the performance effects of stressors"
1885:
1840:Mullen, Brian & Carolyn Copper (March 1994).
1092:"Unearthed: The Other Side of Group Cohesiveness"
835:are fundamental to social cohesion, particularly
2980:
2951:
2945:Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 3rd Edition
1572:Murphy, Shane M. (1995). Shane M. Murphy (ed.).
1571:
1385:(5 ed.). New York: Wadsworth. p. 120.
1079:. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. pp. 118–122.
1075:Forsyth, D.R. (2010). "Components of cohesion".
2739:
2219:
1956:Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group
787:noted in their "The Year of Cohesion" in 2003:
2914:
2479:
1986:
1953:
1681:
1679:
1459:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 25–29.
1374:
909:of people into the mainstream institutions of
562:
2876:
2848:
2215:
2213:
2151:
2021:
1454:
1090:Dyaram, Lata & T.J. Kamalanabhan (2005).
1074:
783:) in turn widely promoted the notion. As the
391:
2881:. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 386–388.
2642:
2506:
2120:
1616:International Journal of Conflict Management
1042:Manca, Anna Rita (2014). "Social Cohesion".
901:The fourth dimension is about the extent of
676:problems than those in non-cohesive groups.
468:
2596:Giordano PC, Cernkovich SA, Pugh M (1986).
2246:
2129:The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness
2126:
2094:International Journal of Management Reviews
1786:
1685:
1676:
459:
2742:Sociological Studies of Children and Youth
2336:
2334:
2210:
2166:
1804:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
1795:
1353:
1257:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
819:According to the government-commissioned,
500:
398:
384:
2781:
2559:
2520:
2420:Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
2367:
2317:. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 163–192.
2249:Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
1835:
1833:
1734:
1520:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
1222:Educational and Psychological Measurement
2787:
1905:
1903:
1901:
1457:Social Identity and Intergroup Relations
1180:
1178:
1176:
1174:
1172:
1170:
411:
2331:
2131:. New York: New York University Press.
1380:
1292:
713:
683:
443:, task relations, perceived unity, and
14:
2981:
2954:"Unit Cohesion and the Impact of DADT"
1879:
1830:
1641:Lott, A. J. & Lott, B. E. (1965).
1126:
1124:
1122:
1120:
1118:
1116:
1114:
1112:
878:The second basic tenet of cohesion is
670:
2772:
2313:. In J.E. Driskell; E. Salas (eds.).
2171:(2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
1898:
1167:
1041:
1008:Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory
522:
2494:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100047
1688:European Review of Social Psychology
1547:Journal of Applied Social Psychology
1356:British Journal of Social Psychology
1248:
2921:(5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
2828:. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1713:Fonseca, Xavier; Lukosch, Stephan;
1213:
1109:
579:
24:
2936:
2879:Encyclopaedia of Social Psychology
2822:Albrekt Larsen, Christian (2013).
2657:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01074.x
2393:Bukowski WM, Cillessen AH (1998).
2234:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1952.tb01010.x
1875:from the original on 8 April 2013.
1589:The Journal of Conflict Resolution
1559:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01178.x
1368:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00954.x
544:
49:
27:Bonding between members of a group
25:
3025:
2849:Tett, Gillian (8 January 2010).
2169:Handbook of small group research
2106:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x
1789:Motivation in sport and exercise
1421:(1). Cornell University: 21–37.
1415:Administrative Science Quarterly
972:
743:
2842:
2815:
2766:
2733:
2690:
2663:
2636:
2589:
2553:
2500:
2473:
2438:
2411:
2386:
2361:
2302:
2275:
2240:
2175:
2160:
2145:
2085:
2050:
2015:
1980:
1947:
1938:
1780:
1771:
1759:
1706:
1607:
1580:
1565:
1538:
1473:
1448:
1399:
1338:
1329:
1320:
623:
535:
2952:Schaub, Gary Jr. (Fall 2010).
2372:. Berkeley: Univ. Cal. Press.
1574:Sport Psychology Interventions
1311:
1083:
1068:
1052:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2739
1035:
776:government (particularly then
649:
360:Category:Community development
322:Community development planning
317:Community economic development
154:Collectivism and individualism
13:
1:
2750:10.1016/S1537-4661(01)80011-8
2598:"Friendships and delinquency"
2509:American Journal of Sociology
2296:10.1080/00224545.1962.9710941
1736:10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
1133:Journal of Applied Psychology
1028:
760:) in the summer of 2001 (see
632:
596:
509:
450:
2315:Stress and human performance
2284:Journal of Social Psychology
1532:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90084-9
898:and credit of various kinds.
371:Join the Community community
365:Category:Localism (politics)
108:Philosophy of social science
7:
3014:Majority–minority relations
2967:(3): 85–101. Archived from
2961:Strategic Studies Quarterly
2947:. New York: Harper and Row.
1777:Gerard and Mathewson (1966)
1234:10.1177/0013164493053002019
1077:Group Dynamics, 5th Edition
965:
821:State of the English Cities
730:
563:Similarity of group members
355:Category:Community building
10:
3030:
2900:10.1177/001872678303600201
2482:Annual Review of Sociology
2459:10.1177/001872675500800306
2071:10.1177/104649640103200101
2036:10.1177/001872675400700405
1886:Oliver, Laurel W. (1988).
1199:10.1177/104649640003100105
1145:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
827:, inclusion and equality.
553:
506:explained in-depth below.
307:Community-based management
2999:Cross-cultural psychology
2355:10.1207/s15327876mp0702_3
1700:10.1080/14792779343000031
244:Small-group communication
2574:10.1177/0044118X03255027
2196:10.1177/1046496494254003
2001:10.1177/1046496498291005
1924:10.1177/1046496412468069
1861:10.1177/1046496406287311
1816:10.1177/0146167202281005
1494:10.1177/1046496495261005
1269:10.1177/0146167295216003
938:World Development Report
2915:Wheelan, S. A. (2016).
2777:. Springer. p. 39.
1954:Seashore, S.E. (1954).
1381:Forsyth, D. R. (2009).
1317:Festinger et al. (1950)
1293:Forsyth, D. R. (2009).
920:refers to the level of
501:Antecedents of cohesion
128:Sociocultural evolution
93:Computational sociology
2788:Berkeley, Rob (2003),
1849:Psychological Bulletin
1455:Tajfel, Henri (1982).
960:sovereign debt indices
831:The report shows that
817:
469:
460:
421:
289:Solidarity (sociology)
54:
2974:on 10 September 2012.
2370:Causes of Delinquency
789:
697:group decision-making
415:
349:WikiProject Community
298:Community development
184:Community of practice
174:Community of interest
98:Cultural anthropology
53:
2804:on 22 September 2020
2791:The Year of Cohesion
2773:Bruhn, John (2009).
2222:Personnel Psychology
2184:Small Group Research
2127:Hogg, M. A. (1992).
2059:Small Group Research
1989:Small Group Research
1912:Small Group Research
1482:Small Group Research
1187:Small Group Research
953:credit rating agency
714:Conformity pressures
684:Emotional adjustment
591:cognitive dissonance
327:Community organizing
159:Community engagement
149:Affinity (sociology)
83:Community psychology
2562:Youth & Society
2343:Military Psychology
2167:Hare, A.P. (1976).
1791:. pp. 107–128.
1576:. pp. 154–157.
1018:Structural cohesion
833:material conditions
671:Member satisfaction
418:economic inequality
164:Community education
2368:Hirschi T (1969).
1013:Sense of community
988:Community cohesion
529:sense of belonging
523:Sense of belonging
425:Group cohesiveness
422:
312:Community building
239:Sense of community
234:Prosocial behavior
224:Imagined community
209:Group cohesiveness
204:Community politics
189:Community of place
179:Community practice
169:Community cohesion
78:Community practice
55:
3004:Social psychology
2928:978-1-4833-9099-4
2835:978-0-19-968184-6
2759:978-0-7623-0051-8
2699:Child Development
2404:978-0-7879-1247-5
2379:978-0-520-01901-0
2138:978-0-7450-1062-5
1466:978-0-521-15365-2
1392:978-0-495-59952-4
1304:978-0-495-59952-4
1061:978-94-007-0752-8
1003:Cultural identity
704:Attachment theory
517:social attraction
408:
407:
254:Social alienation
214:Group (sociology)
194:Community service
123:Social philosophy
73:Community studies
16:(Redirected from
3021:
2975:
2973:
2958:
2948:
2932:
2911:
2882:
2869:
2868:
2866:
2864:
2846:
2840:
2839:
2819:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2809:
2803:
2797:, archived from
2796:
2785:
2779:
2778:
2770:
2764:
2763:
2737:
2731:
2730:
2694:
2688:
2687:
2678:(142): 189–205.
2667:
2661:
2660:
2640:
2634:
2633:
2593:
2587:
2585:
2557:
2551:
2550:
2524:
2504:
2498:
2497:
2477:
2471:
2470:
2442:
2436:
2435:
2432:10.1037/h0057883
2415:
2409:
2408:
2390:
2384:
2383:
2365:
2359:
2358:
2338:
2329:
2328:
2306:
2300:
2299:
2279:
2273:
2272:
2261:10.1037/h0046513
2244:
2238:
2237:
2217:
2208:
2207:
2179:
2173:
2172:
2164:
2158:
2157:
2149:
2143:
2142:
2124:
2118:
2117:
2089:
2083:
2082:
2054:
2048:
2047:
2019:
2013:
2012:
1984:
1978:
1977:
1975:
1973:
1967:
1960:
1951:
1945:
1942:
1936:
1935:
1907:
1896:
1895:
1894:on 8 April 2013.
1883:
1877:
1876:
1846:
1837:
1828:
1827:
1799:
1793:
1792:
1784:
1778:
1775:
1769:
1768:and Mills (1959)
1763:
1757:
1756:
1738:
1717:(16 July 2018).
1715:Brazier, Frances
1710:
1704:
1703:
1683:
1674:
1673:
1662:10.1037/h0022386
1647:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1628:10.1108/eb022796
1611:
1605:
1604:
1584:
1578:
1577:
1569:
1563:
1562:
1542:
1536:
1535:
1515:
1506:
1505:
1477:
1471:
1470:
1452:
1446:
1445:
1444:on 11 July 2010.
1443:
1437:. Archived from
1412:
1403:
1397:
1396:
1378:
1372:
1371:
1351:
1345:
1342:
1336:
1333:
1327:
1324:
1318:
1315:
1309:
1308:
1290:
1281:
1280:
1252:
1246:
1245:
1217:
1211:
1210:
1182:
1165:
1164:
1128:
1107:
1106:
1096:
1087:
1081:
1080:
1072:
1066:
1065:
1039:
982:
977:
976:
951:Analysts at the
903:social inclusion
735:Albert Lott and
580:Entry difficulty
472:
463:
441:social relations
400:
393:
386:
279:Social rejection
269:Social exclusion
199:Communitarianism
118:Social geography
103:Internet studies
60:Academic studies
52:
30:
29:
21:
3029:
3028:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3020:
3019:
3018:
2994:Group processes
2979:
2978:
2971:
2956:
2939:
2937:Further reading
2929:
2888:Human Relations
2873:
2872:
2862:
2860:
2856:Financial Times
2847:
2843:
2836:
2820:
2816:
2807:
2805:
2801:
2794:
2786:
2782:
2771:
2767:
2760:
2738:
2734:
2711:10.2307/1131196
2695:
2691:
2668:
2664:
2641:
2637:
2608:(5): 1170–202.
2594:
2590:
2558:
2554:
2522:10.1.1.492.4909
2505:
2501:
2478:
2474:
2447:Human Relations
2443:
2439:
2416:
2412:
2405:
2397:. Jossey-Bass.
2391:
2387:
2380:
2366:
2362:
2339:
2332:
2325:
2307:
2303:
2280:
2276:
2245:
2241:
2218:
2211:
2180:
2176:
2165:
2161:
2150:
2146:
2139:
2125:
2121:
2090:
2086:
2055:
2051:
2024:Human Relations
2020:
2016:
1985:
1981:
1971:
1969:
1968:on 16 June 2022
1965:
1958:
1952:
1948:
1943:
1939:
1908:
1899:
1884:
1880:
1844:
1838:
1831:
1800:
1796:
1785:
1781:
1776:
1772:
1764:
1760:
1711:
1707:
1684:
1677:
1645:
1639:
1635:
1612:
1608:
1585:
1581:
1570:
1566:
1553:(10): 837–851.
1543:
1539:
1516:
1509:
1478:
1474:
1467:
1453:
1449:
1441:
1427:10.2307/2392984
1410:
1404:
1400:
1393:
1379:
1375:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1339:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1321:
1316:
1312:
1305:
1291:
1284:
1253:
1249:
1218:
1214:
1183:
1168:
1139:(6): 989–1004.
1129:
1110:
1094:
1088:
1084:
1073:
1069:
1062:
1040:
1036:
1031:
978:
971:
968:
928:, or in future
926:quality of life
918:social equality
873:social progress
785:Runnymede Trust
746:
733:
716:
686:
673:
652:
635:
626:
618:Dunbar's number
599:
582:
565:
556:
547:
545:Shared emotions
538:
525:
512:
503:
453:
433:social cohesion
404:
113:Rural sociology
68:Social sciences
50:
28:
23:
22:
18:Social cohesion
15:
12:
11:
5:
3027:
3017:
3016:
3011:
3006:
3001:
2996:
2991:
2977:
2976:
2949:
2938:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2927:
2912:
2883:
2871:
2870:
2841:
2834:
2814:
2780:
2765:
2758:
2732:
2689:
2662:
2635:
2614:10.1086/228390
2588:
2568:(3): 366–392.
2552:
2539:10.1086/320298
2531:10.1086/320298
2515:(4): 1013–57.
2499:
2488:(1): 257–281.
2472:
2453:(3): 327–337.
2437:
2426:(3): 361–377.
2410:
2403:
2385:
2378:
2360:
2330:
2323:
2301:
2290:(2): 453–458.
2274:
2255:(5): 325–332.
2239:
2228:(3): 175–185.
2209:
2190:(4): 464–485.
2174:
2159:
2144:
2137:
2119:
2100:(2): 223–246.
2084:
2049:
2030:(4): 509–519.
2014:
1995:(1): 124–143.
1979:
1946:
1937:
1918:(6): 497–520.
1897:
1878:
1829:
1794:
1779:
1770:
1758:
1729:(2): 231–253.
1705:
1675:
1656:(4): 259–309.
1633:
1622:(3): 216–234.
1606:
1595:(4): 615–637.
1579:
1564:
1537:
1526:(3): 278–287.
1507:
1472:
1465:
1447:
1398:
1391:
1383:Group Dynamics
1373:
1346:
1337:
1328:
1319:
1310:
1303:
1295:Group Dynamics
1282:
1263:(6): 572–580.
1247:
1228:(2): 499–506.
1212:
1166:
1108:
1082:
1067:
1060:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:Urban vitality
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
984:
983:
980:Society portal
967:
964:
945:
944:
914:
899:
887:
876:
781:David Blunkett
778:Home Secretary
766:Bradford riots
745:
742:
732:
729:
715:
712:
685:
682:
672:
669:
651:
648:
644:Social loafing
634:
631:
625:
622:
603:social loafing
598:
595:
581:
578:
564:
561:
555:
552:
546:
543:
537:
534:
524:
521:
511:
508:
502:
499:
491:military units
452:
449:
429:group cohesion
427:, also called
406:
405:
403:
402:
395:
388:
380:
377:
376:
375:
374:
367:
362:
357:
352:
345:
337:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
324:
319:
314:
309:
301:
300:
294:
293:
292:
291:
286:
284:Social support
281:
276:
271:
266:
261:
259:Social capital
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
231:
226:
221:
219:Group dynamics
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
186:
181:
176:
171:
166:
161:
156:
151:
143:
142:
138:
137:
136:
135:
133:Urban planning
130:
125:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
80:
75:
70:
62:
61:
57:
56:
46:
45:
39:
38:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3026:
3015:
3012:
3010:
3009:Social groups
3007:
3005:
3002:
3000:
2997:
2995:
2992:
2990:
2987:
2986:
2984:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2955:
2950:
2946:
2941:
2940:
2930:
2924:
2920:
2919:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2897:
2894:(2): 93–108.
2893:
2889:
2884:
2880:
2875:
2874:
2858:
2857:
2852:
2845:
2837:
2831:
2827:
2826:
2818:
2800:
2793:
2792:
2784:
2776:
2769:
2761:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2736:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2705:(1): 139–51.
2704:
2700:
2693:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2666:
2658:
2654:
2651:(3): 441–69.
2650:
2646:
2639:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2602:Am. J. Sociol
2599:
2592:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2556:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2503:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2476:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2441:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2414:
2406:
2400:
2396:
2389:
2381:
2375:
2371:
2364:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2337:
2335:
2326:
2324:1-134-77182-7
2320:
2316:
2312:
2305:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2278:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2243:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2216:
2214:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2178:
2170:
2163:
2155:
2148:
2140:
2134:
2130:
2123:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2088:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2053:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2018:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1983:
1964:
1957:
1950:
1944:Carron (2002)
1941:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1906:
1904:
1902:
1893:
1889:
1882:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1843:
1836:
1834:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1798:
1790:
1783:
1774:
1767:
1762:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1709:
1701:
1697:
1694:(1): 85–111.
1693:
1689:
1682:
1680:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1650:Psychol. Bull
1644:
1637:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1610:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1583:
1575:
1568:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1541:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1514:
1512:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1488:(1): 86–105.
1487:
1483:
1476:
1468:
1462:
1458:
1451:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1409:
1402:
1394:
1388:
1384:
1377:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1350:
1341:
1332:
1323:
1314:
1306:
1300:
1296:
1289:
1287:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1251:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1216:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1193:(1): 89–106.
1192:
1188:
1181:
1179:
1177:
1175:
1173:
1171:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1127:
1125:
1123:
1121:
1119:
1117:
1115:
1113:
1105:(3): 185–190.
1104:
1100:
1093:
1086:
1078:
1071:
1063:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1046:: 6026–6028.
1045:
1038:
1034:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
985:
981:
975:
970:
963:
961:
957:
954:
949:
942:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
912:
911:civil society
908:
904:
900:
897:
892:
888:
885:
881:
877:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
829:
828:
826:
822:
816:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
788:
786:
782:
779:
775:
771:
770:Burnley riots
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
744:Public policy
741:
738:
728:
724:
721:
711:
708:
705:
701:
698:
693:
691:
681:
677:
668:
664:
660:
656:
647:
645:
640:
637:Cohesion and
630:
621:
619:
615:
611:
606:
604:
594:
592:
588:
577:
573:
569:
560:
551:
542:
533:
530:
520:
518:
507:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
478:
476:
471:
467:
462:
458:
448:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
419:
414:
410:
401:
396:
394:
389:
387:
382:
381:
379:
378:
373:
372:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
350:
346:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
334:
333:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
299:
296:
295:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
274:Socialization
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
139:
134:
131:
129:
126:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
65:
64:
63:
59:
58:
48:
47:
44:
41:
40:
36:
32:
31:
19:
2969:the original
2964:
2960:
2944:
2917:
2891:
2887:
2878:
2861:. Retrieved
2854:
2844:
2824:
2817:
2806:, retrieved
2799:the original
2790:
2783:
2774:
2768:
2741:
2735:
2702:
2698:
2692:
2675:
2671:
2665:
2648:
2644:
2638:
2605:
2601:
2591:
2565:
2561:
2555:
2512:
2508:
2502:
2485:
2481:
2475:
2450:
2446:
2440:
2423:
2419:
2413:
2394:
2388:
2369:
2363:
2349:(2): 77–93.
2346:
2342:
2314:
2304:
2287:
2283:
2277:
2252:
2248:
2242:
2225:
2221:
2187:
2183:
2177:
2168:
2162:
2153:
2147:
2128:
2122:
2097:
2093:
2087:
2062:
2058:
2052:
2027:
2023:
2017:
1992:
1988:
1982:
1970:. Retrieved
1963:the original
1949:
1940:
1915:
1911:
1892:the original
1881:
1852:
1848:
1810:(1): 54–65.
1807:
1803:
1797:
1788:
1782:
1773:
1761:
1726:
1722:
1708:
1691:
1687:
1653:
1649:
1636:
1619:
1615:
1609:
1592:
1588:
1582:
1573:
1567:
1550:
1546:
1540:
1523:
1519:
1485:
1481:
1475:
1456:
1450:
1439:the original
1418:
1414:
1401:
1382:
1376:
1362:(1): 41–56.
1359:
1355:
1349:
1340:
1331:
1322:
1313:
1294:
1260:
1256:
1250:
1225:
1221:
1215:
1190:
1186:
1136:
1132:
1102:
1098:
1085:
1076:
1070:
1043:
1037:
993:Entitativity
950:
946:
930:life chances
880:social order
820:
818:
790:
762:Oldham riots
747:
737:Bernice Lott
734:
725:
717:
709:
702:
694:
687:
678:
674:
665:
661:
657:
653:
636:
627:
624:Consequences
614:anthropology
607:
600:
583:
574:
570:
566:
557:
548:
539:
536:Coordination
526:
516:
513:
504:
483:sports teams
479:
454:
437:social group
432:
428:
424:
423:
409:
369:
347:
264:Social death
229:Organization
208:
141:Key concepts
2672:Adolescence
2645:Criminology
2065:(1): 3–18.
1344:Hogg (2001)
1335:Hogg (1992)
1326:Dion (2000)
1099:J. Soc. Sci
998:Linked fate
907:integration
865:self-esteem
650:Performance
610:primatology
487:work groups
88:Social work
2989:Conformity
2983:Categories
2863:12 January
2808:3 February
1972:29 October
1855:(2): 217.
1029:References
934:World Bank
869:indicators
837:employment
825:solidarity
774:New Labour
720:groupthink
639:motivation
633:Motivation
597:Group size
510:Attraction
495:fraternity
451:Definition
2908:145592068
2630:144997609
2582:143494449
2547:144262731
2517:CiteSeerX
2467:146649549
2204:145779011
2114:143448147
2079:144716627
2044:145346687
2009:145369559
1932:220319732
1869:145115867
1753:150284711
1745:1351-1610
1502:144462941
1277:143923288
1242:144603957
1207:220367599
941:calls for
884:Tolerance
849:education
457:Neo-Latin
249:Sobornost
43:Community
2859:. London
2684:11572300
2269:13936942
1873:Archived
1153:14640811
966:See also
936:'s 2019
922:fairness
916:Lastly,
891:networks
815:debate."
754:Bradford
731:Learning
470:cohésion
461:cohaesio
445:emotions
335:See also
35:a series
33:Part of
2727:7497821
2719:1131196
2622:2780125
1824:5738250
1766:Aronson
1670:5318041
1435:2392984
1161:1342307
956:Moody's
861:anxiety
853:housing
809:Ritchie
805:Ouseley
758:Burnley
690:anxiety
587:Aronson
554:Factors
475:physics
343:Outline
2925:
2906:
2832:
2756:
2725:
2717:
2682:
2628:
2620:
2580:
2545:
2537:
2519:
2465:
2401:
2376:
2321:
2267:
2202:
2135:
2112:
2077:
2042:
2007:
1930:
1867:
1822:
1751:
1743:
1668:
1601:173912
1599:
1500:
1463:
1433:
1389:
1301:
1275:
1240:
1205:
1159:
1151:
1058:
863:, low
845:health
841:income
801:Clarke
797:Denham
793:Cantle
750:Oldham
466:French
2972:(PDF)
2957:(PDF)
2904:S2CID
2802:(PDF)
2795:(PDF)
2715:JSTOR
2626:S2CID
2618:JSTOR
2578:S2CID
2543:S2CID
2535:JSTOR
2463:S2CID
2200:S2CID
2110:S2CID
2075:S2CID
2040:S2CID
2005:S2CID
1966:(PDF)
1959:(PDF)
1928:S2CID
1865:S2CID
1845:(PDF)
1820:S2CID
1749:S2CID
1646:(PDF)
1597:JSTOR
1498:S2CID
1442:(PDF)
1431:JSTOR
1411:(PDF)
1273:S2CID
1238:S2CID
1203:S2CID
1157:S2CID
1095:(PDF)
896:trust
473:, in
455:From
2923:ISBN
2865:2010
2830:ISBN
2810:2010
2754:ISBN
2723:PMID
2680:PMID
2399:ISBN
2374:ISBN
2319:ISBN
2265:PMID
2133:ISBN
1974:2016
1741:ISSN
1666:PMID
1461:ISBN
1387:ISBN
1299:ISBN
1149:PMID
1056:ISBN
857:debt
851:and
813:race
807:and
756:and
612:and
464:and
2896:doi
2746:doi
2707:doi
2653:doi
2610:doi
2570:doi
2527:doi
2513:106
2490:doi
2455:doi
2428:doi
2351:doi
2292:doi
2257:doi
2230:doi
2192:doi
2102:doi
2067:doi
2032:doi
1997:doi
1920:doi
1857:doi
1853:115
1812:doi
1731:doi
1696:doi
1658:doi
1624:doi
1555:doi
1528:doi
1490:doi
1423:doi
1364:doi
1265:doi
1230:doi
1195:doi
1141:doi
1048:doi
905:or
871:of
608:In
431:or
2985::
2963:.
2959:.
2902:.
2892:36
2890:.
2853:.
2752:.
2721:.
2713:.
2703:66
2701:.
2676:36
2674:.
2649:29
2647:.
2624:.
2616:.
2606:91
2604:.
2600:.
2576:.
2566:35
2564:.
2541:.
2533:.
2525:.
2511:.
2486:29
2484:.
2461:.
2449:.
2424:36
2422:.
2345:.
2333:^
2288:57
2286:.
2263:.
2253:65
2251:.
2224:.
2212:^
2198:.
2188:25
2186:.
2108:.
2098:11
2096:.
2073:.
2063:32
2061:.
2038:.
2026:.
2003:.
1993:29
1991:.
1926:.
1916:26
1914:.
1900:^
1871:.
1863:.
1851:.
1847:.
1832:^
1818:.
1808:28
1806:.
1747:.
1739:.
1727:32
1725:.
1721:.
1690:.
1678:^
1664:.
1654:64
1652:.
1648:.
1618:.
1593:25
1591:.
1551:18
1549:.
1522:.
1510:^
1496:.
1486:26
1484:.
1429:.
1419:34
1417:.
1413:.
1360:31
1358:.
1285:^
1271:.
1261:21
1259:.
1236:.
1226:53
1224:.
1201:.
1191:31
1189:.
1169:^
1155:.
1147:.
1137:88
1135:.
1111:^
1103:10
1101:.
1097:.
1054:.
962:.
859:,
847:,
843:,
839:,
803:,
799:,
795:,
768:,
764:,
752:,
620:.
493:,
489:,
485:,
37:on
2965:4
2931:.
2910:.
2898::
2867:.
2838:.
2762:.
2748::
2729:.
2709::
2686:.
2659:.
2655::
2632:.
2612::
2584:.
2572::
2549:.
2529::
2496:.
2492::
2469:.
2457::
2451:8
2434:.
2430::
2407:.
2382:.
2357:.
2353::
2347:7
2327:.
2298:.
2294::
2271:.
2259::
2236:.
2232::
2226:5
2206:.
2194::
2141:.
2116:.
2104::
2081:.
2069::
2046:.
2034::
2028:7
2011:.
1999::
1976:.
1934:.
1922::
1859::
1826:.
1814::
1755:.
1733::
1702:.
1698::
1692:4
1672:.
1660::
1630:.
1626::
1620:8
1603:.
1561:.
1557::
1534:.
1530::
1524:2
1504:.
1492::
1469:.
1425::
1395:.
1370:.
1366::
1307:.
1279:.
1267::
1244:.
1232::
1209:.
1197::
1163:.
1143::
1064:.
1050::
875:.
420:.
399:e
392:t
385:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.