Knowledge

Scienter

Source 📝

141:, requiring no more than proof of injury, the animal's having a problematic trait, and the knowledge of the person in control about the trait in the animal. Strict liability means that there is no need to argue fault in the form of wilful intent or negligence on the part of the animal or its controller. The only defence is if it can be proved the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of injury by their actions, or if the plaintiff was the cause of the injury. 144:
It is common to distinguish between harmless animals and wild animals, as no scienter is needed for wild animals. Animals are classed as wild or harmless on the basis of species or kind, not on the basis of being a tame individual. An elephant is considered wild regardless of its use. The scienter
186:
is not used in the text of the U.S. Code, although it appears once in a section title. This use reflects the development of American law speaking plainly instead of employing Latin phrases of
288:, an 8–1 ruling of the Court defined the standard that the plaintiff had to meet to proceed with a securities fraud litigation. A complaint must show "cogent and compelling evidence" of 118:. If an animal is known to behave in a certain way and is expressed on a person causing injury, an action can be taken in this tort, which also is not available in 66:
For example, if a man sells a car with brakes that do not work to his friend, but the seller does not know about the brake problem, the seller then has no
282: 175:
condition, requiring that the accused "knowingly conducts, controls, manages, supervises, directs, or owns" a prohibited type of business.
372: 163:
Scienter is generally used as a necessary condition of certain causes of civil action and as a standard for civil liability or criminal
266: 398: 354: 339: 377: 255: 123: 278: 94:
jurisdictions that deals with the damage done by an animal directly to a human. It had a long history in
40: 137:
To be successful, the plaintiff needs to take action against the person in control of the animal. It is
269:
of 1995 added the requirement that a plaintiff must plead facts giving rise to a "strong inference" of
63:. An offending party then has knowledge of the "wrongness" of an act or event prior to committing it. 182:, appearing as "knowingly", "actual knowledge", "known", "knowledge fairly implied", etc. The word 151:
in that one who keeps a wild thing "must keep it at his peril" to make reference to part of Justice
103: 134:. In those jurisdictions, the actions involving animals need to be in nuisance or negligence. 403: 393: 213: 8: 147: 178:
The concept of scienter is uniformly expressed in the text of the U.S. Code as the word
418: 281:
issued a decision that clarified what was to be understood as a "strong inference." In
209: 168: 413: 408: 221: 138: 99: 358: 343: 301: 235: 205: 152: 127: 119: 115: 106:
in which it has not been extinguished by statute is in addition to the torts of
44: 387: 251: 187: 72:. If he sells the car and knew of the problem before he sold the car, he has 202: 52: 164: 131: 95: 51: 'to know, to separate one thing from another') is a legal term for 277:
under the 1995 law has been very controversial since its enactment. The
321: 107: 91: 60: 316: 225: 56: 32: 254:, to prevail in a securities fraud claim under Section 10(b) of the 311: 111: 258:, a plaintiff must allege and prove that the defendant acted with 239: 306: 217: 212:
in which the aggrieved party alleges some destruction of the
87: 373:
Split Widens on Scienter Pleading Standard Under the PSLRA
20: 245: 385: 167:. For instance, Section 1960 of Title 18 of the 284:Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, LTD 81: 16:In law, the intent or knowledge of wrongdoing 73: 67: 25: 216:, also known as mutual assent, because of 86:The scienter action is a category within 267:Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 386: 246:Element of claim of securities fraud 13: 193: 14: 430: 378:Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft 366: 256:Securities Exchange Act of 1934 348: 333: 158: 98:until it was abolished by the 1: 327: 399:United States securities law 124:Australian Capital Territory 7: 295: 279:United States Supreme Court 114:or more bespoke torts like 82:Scienter action in tort law 10: 435: 201:is also an element of the 145:action is referred to in 238:to a breach of contract 104:common law jurisdictions 234:can also be used as a 74: 68: 26: 214:meeting of the minds 148:Rylands v. Fletcher 102:. An action in the 210:breach of contract 169:United States Code 273:. The meaning of 222:misrepresentation 426: 361: 352: 346: 337: 139:strict liability 100:Animals Act 1971 77: 71: 42: 29: 434: 433: 429: 428: 427: 425: 424: 423: 384: 383: 369: 364: 353: 349: 338: 334: 330: 302:Intrinsic fraud 298: 248: 206:cause of action 196: 194:In contract law 161: 153:Colin Blackburn 128:South Australia 120:New South Wales 116:cattle trespass 84: 17: 12: 11: 5: 432: 422: 421: 416: 411: 406: 401: 396: 382: 381: 368: 367:External links 365: 363: 362: 355:15 U.S.C. 347: 340:18 U.S.C. 331: 329: 326: 325: 324: 319: 314: 309: 304: 297: 294: 286:(21 June 2007) 247: 244: 195: 192: 160: 157: 83: 80: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 431: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 391: 389: 380: 379: 374: 371: 370: 360: 356: 351: 345: 341: 336: 332: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 303: 300: 299: 293: 291: 287: 285: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 261: 257: 253: 252:United States 243: 241: 237: 233: 229: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 200: 191: 189: 188:legal English 185: 181: 176: 174: 170: 166: 156: 154: 150: 149: 142: 140: 135: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 79: 76: 70: 64: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 41:/skiˈen.ter/, 38: 34: 30: 28: 22: 404:Criminal law 394:Contract law 376: 350: 335: 289: 283: 274: 270: 264: 259: 249: 231: 230: 203:contract law 198: 197: 183: 179: 177: 172: 162: 155:'s comment. 146: 143: 136: 90:law in some 85: 65: 48: 36: 24: 18: 359:§ 7706 344:§ 1960 171:provides a 159:General use 132:New Zealand 96:English law 43:, from 388:Categories 328:References 322:Relativism 224:or duress 108:negligence 92:common law 61:wrongdoing 419:Intention 317:Per minas 226:per minas 57:knowledge 37:knowingly 33:Law Latin 414:Lawsuits 409:Tort law 312:Mens rea 296:See also 290:scienter 275:scienter 271:scienter 260:scienter 232:Scienter 199:Scienter 184:scienter 173:scienter 112:nuisance 75:scienter 69:scienter 27:scienter 250:In the 240:lawsuit 236:defense 357:  342:  122:, the 53:intent 307:Fraud 218:fraud 165:guilt 49:scire 47: 45:Latin 35:for " 265:The 208:for 180:know 110:and 88:tort 130:or 59:of 55:or 39:", 21:law 19:In 390:: 375:, 292:. 262:. 242:. 228:. 220:, 190:. 126:, 78:. 23:, 31:(

Index

law
Law Latin
Latin
intent
knowledge
wrongdoing
tort
common law
English law
Animals Act 1971
common law jurisdictions
negligence
nuisance
cattle trespass
New South Wales
Australian Capital Territory
South Australia
New Zealand
strict liability
Rylands v. Fletcher
Colin Blackburn
guilt
United States Code
legal English
contract law
cause of action
breach of contract
meeting of the minds
fraud
misrepresentation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.