102:
62:
50:
88:
broke up during re-entry. In
February 2003 Spacehab received $ 17.7 million from its commercial insurance policy. In January 2004, Spacehab filed a formal claim against NASA for the amount of $ 87.7 million for the loss caused by the Columbia accident and in October 2004 NASA paid the company $ 8.2
161:
157:
167:
245:
276:
112:
151:
145:
85:
35:
179:
24:
199:
Two
Spacehab press releases from January 2004 and 2005 regarding the claims filed against
80:
The inaugural flight of
Spacehab's research double module, which launched January 2003 on
73:
The
Spacehab hardware was specifically designed to be nestled inside the cargo bay of the
8:
209:
207:
270:
74:
54:
28:
220:
89:
million. In
February 2007, Spacehab dropped all litigation against NASA.
101:
246:"Firm Seeks $ 8 Million For Experiment That Survived Columbia Accident"
61:
49:
175:
137:
204:
81:
66:
38:
200:
16:
SPACEHAB-built laboratory flown on Space
Shuttle Columbia
34:
The
Research Double Module flew only on the ill-fated
268:
23:was a payload module built by Spacehab Inc (now
221:"$ 87.7 million claim filed over Columbia loss"
53:Spacehab Research Double Module (RDM) in the
178:, another reusable laboratory flown in the
65:Spacehab Research Double Module on board
44:
60:
48:
269:
96:
41:mission, in which it was destroyed.
13:
14:
288:
154:(ESP-2 and ESP-3), an ICC variant
100:
92:
142:Other Spacehab hardware :
238:
213:
193:
1:
186:
7:
131:
10:
293:
152:External Stowage Platform
146:Integrated Cargo Carrier
162:Logistics Double Module
158:Logistics Single Module
109:This section is empty.
86:Space Shuttle Columbia
70:
58:
45:Research Double Module
36:Space Shuttle Columbia
21:Research Double Module
277:Space Shuttle program
64:
52:
25:Astrotech Corporation
148:(ICC), unpressurized
71:
59:
180:Shuttle orbiter's
170:(SM), pressurized
129:
128:
84:, ended when the
284:
261:
260:
258:
257:
242:
236:
235:
233:
232:
217:
211:
197:
124:
121:
111:You can help by
104:
97:
292:
291:
287:
286:
285:
283:
282:
281:
267:
266:
265:
264:
255:
253:
244:
243:
239:
230:
228:
219:
218:
214:
198:
194:
189:
134:
125:
119:
116:
95:
47:
17:
12:
11:
5:
290:
280:
279:
263:
262:
237:
212:
191:
190:
188:
185:
184:
183:
173:
172:
171:
165:
155:
149:
140:
133:
130:
127:
126:
107:
105:
94:
91:
75:Space Shuttles
46:
43:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
289:
278:
275:
274:
272:
251:
247:
241:
226:
222:
216:
210:
208:
206:
202:
196:
192:
181:
177:
174:
169:
168:Single Module
166:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
143:
141:
139:
136:
135:
123:
114:
110:
106:
103:
99:
98:
93:Specification
90:
87:
83:
78:
76:
68:
63:
56:
55:Space Shuttle
51:
42:
40:
37:
32:
30:
29:Space Shuttle
27:) for the US
26:
22:
254:. Retrieved
252:. 2009-02-02
249:
240:
229:. Retrieved
227:. 2004-01-20
224:
215:
195:
117:
113:adding to it
108:
79:
72:
33:
20:
18:
256:2024-09-22
231:2024-09-22
187:References
182:cargo bay.
160:(LSM) and
120:April 2019
31:Orbiters.
250:Space.com
271:Category
225:NBC News
176:Spacelab
138:Spacehab
132:See also
205:STS-107
82:STS-107
67:STS-107
39:STS-107
164:(LDM)
203:for
201:NASA
19:The
115:.
273::
248:.
223:.
77:.
259:.
234:.
122:)
118:(
69:.
57:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
