Knowledge

Relationship (archaeology)

Source 📝

22: 87: 159:
Above: A context is said to be above another if created later and, in general, vertically above the other context but not necessarily in physical contact. The description holds even when they are not aligned vertically, if one and the same intervening context lies both below the higher and above the
171:
Contemporary with. a context may be different but formed in the sequence at the same time. an example of this would be a body in a coffin was already in the coffin when the two where fixed in the sequence. arguments concerning that the skeleton went into the coffin afterwards are based on knowledge
163:
Below: A context is said to be below another context if it was created earlier and in general is vertically below the other context but not necessarily in physical contact. The description holds even when they are not aligned vertically, if one and the same intervening context lies both below the
123:
A gardener swept a pile of soil into a corner, laid a gravel path or planted a bush in a hole. A builder built a wall and back-filled the trench. Years later, someone built a pig sty onto it and drained the pig sty into the nettle patch. Later still, the original wall blew over and so
137:. Their position in the matrix places the contexts in their sequence in time. Provided the archaeologist has maintained a record of the context in which each artefact was found, the tracing of the contexts by the matrix does equally well for the artefacts (objects). 167:
Butts: A context "butts up to" or "abuts" another context when it was created later and contacts the other but in general does not have a vertical physical relationship "above". An example would be a clay floor laid up to the vertical face of an already existing
183:
and a relationship that is earlier "lower" though the term higher or lower does not itself imply a context needs to be physically higher or lower. It is more useful to think of this higher or lower term as it relates to the contexts position in a
172:
of what constituted the formation of the sequence offsite. Is the body created at death or birth? anomalies like this show up the limitations of the stratigraphic sequencing of human made deposits
126:
Each event, which may have taken a short or long time to accomplish, leaves a context, a deposit of material, on the site. This deposit and its relationship to earlier contexts may show up in
121:
Archaeological material would, to a very large extent, have been called rubbish when it was left on the site. It tends to accumulate in events.
175:
Same as. A context upon further investigation may be discovered to the same one another context but assigned different context numbers in error
156:
Overlies: A context is said to overlie another when the overlying context is later in time and makes physical contact with the earlier context.
51: 133:
When there are hundreds of these relationships, a formal method of keeping track of them is required. An effective method is to prepare a
153:, cuts all the contexts that made up the ground the ditch was dug into. Reciprocally, a context may be said to be cut by another. 266: 149:
Cuts: A context is said to cut another context if the former's creation removed a part of the latter. For example a ditch
277: 73: 44: 292: 105:
with respect to another. This is determined, not by linear measurement but by determining the sequence of their
110: 272:
Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. 40 figs. 1 pl. 136 pp. London & New York: Academic Press.
203: 180: 34: 248: 38: 30: 198: 223: 208: 127: 102: 55: 233: 213: 106: 145:
Terminology in archaeology is not definitive but the following are typical uses of terms:
8: 218: 179:
A relationship that is later in the sequence is sometimes referred to as "higher" in the
238: 273: 262: 228: 150: 188:
which is a two dimensional representation of a sites formation in space and time.
95: 286: 243: 185: 134: 86: 101:
is the position in space and by implication, in time, of an object or
261:
The MoLAS archaeological site manual MoLAS, London 1994.
109:– which arrived before the other. The key to this is 284: 43:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 116: 74:Learn how and when to remove this message 140: 85: 285: 130:or in plan when viewed from above. 15: 13: 14: 304: 20: 1: 255: 7: 191: 164:higher and above the lower. 117:Stratigraphic relationships 10: 309: 204:Archaeological association 249:Single context recording 29:This article includes a 199:Alignment (archaeology) 58:more precise citations. 293:Methods in archaeology 224:Archaeological section 209:Archaeological context 91: 234:Feature (archaeology) 141:Types of relationship 90:Relationship examples 89: 214:Archaeological phase 219:Archaeological plan 239:Fill (archaeology) 92: 31:list of references 269:. Rb 128pp. bl/wh 267:978-0-904818-40-6 229:Cut (archaeology) 84: 83: 76: 300: 79: 72: 68: 65: 59: 54:this article by 45:inline citations 24: 23: 16: 308: 307: 303: 302: 301: 299: 298: 297: 283: 282: 258: 253: 194: 143: 119: 80: 69: 63: 60: 49: 35:related reading 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 306: 296: 295: 281: 280: 270: 257: 254: 252: 251: 246: 241: 236: 231: 226: 221: 216: 211: 206: 201: 195: 193: 190: 177: 176: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 154: 142: 139: 118: 115: 96:archaeological 82: 81: 39:external links 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 305: 294: 291: 290: 288: 279: 278:0-12-326651-3 275: 271: 268: 264: 260: 259: 250: 247: 245: 244:Harris matrix 242: 240: 237: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 197: 196: 189: 187: 186:Harris matrix 182: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 147: 146: 138: 136: 135:Harris matrix 131: 129: 125: 114: 112: 108: 104: 100: 97: 88: 78: 75: 67: 57: 53: 47: 46: 40: 36: 32: 27: 18: 17: 178: 144: 132: 122: 120: 111:stratigraphy 99:relationship 98: 93: 70: 64:October 2012 61: 50:Please help 42: 56:introducing 256:References 107:deposition 287:Category 192:See also 181:sequence 128:section 103:context 52:improve 276:  265:  160:lower. 168:wall. 37:, or 274:ISBN 263:ISBN 151:cut 124:on. 94:An 289:: 113:. 41:, 33:, 77:) 71:( 66:) 62:( 48:.

Index

list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message

archaeological
context
deposition
stratigraphy
section
Harris matrix
cut
sequence
Harris matrix
Alignment (archaeology)
Archaeological association
Archaeological context
Archaeological phase
Archaeological plan
Archaeological section
Cut (archaeology)
Feature (archaeology)
Fill (archaeology)
Harris matrix
Single context recording
ISBN
978-0-904818-40-6

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.