254:
63:
125:
22:
1393:
1143:(1946): "It is not too early, it is never too early, for the nation to steadfastly follow its great constitutional traditions, none older or more universally protective against unbridled power than due process of law in the trial and punishment of men, this is, of all men, whether citizens, aliens, alien enemies or enemy belligerents. It can become too late."
785:. Because the lease with Cuba regarding Guantanamo Bay stated that Cuba technically has "ultimate sovereignty", the court held Guantanamo Bay could not be considered a sovereign territory of the United States and therefore foreign nationals could not be given a trial in the U.S. The plaintiffs pointed out that the U.S. has all effective powers in the area.
1807:, 13 February 2011, accessed 25 January 2011. Quote: "DAMNING evidence from an Egyptian intelligence officer that names an Australian official who witnessed the torture of Sydney man Mamdouh Habib in has been revealed as the trigger for a hushed-up government payout to Mr Habib and a high-level investigation".
953:
If it wanted to change the habeas statute, it could make all sorts of refined modifications about issues that we know nothing whatever about because we have only lawyers before us, we have no witnesses, we have no cross-examination, we have no investigative staff. And we should be the ones, Justice
947:
Can we hold hearings to determine the problems that are bothering you? I mean, we have to take your word for what the problems are. We can't call witnesses and see what the real problems are, can we, in creating this new, substantive rule that we're going to let the courts create? Congress could do
938:
So what I'm thinking now, assuming that it's very hard to interpret
Eisentrager, is that if we go with you, it has a virtue of clarity. There is a clear rule. Not a citizen outside the United States; you don't get your foot in the door. But against you is that same fact. It seems rather contrary to
657:
take up arms, it was only when being attacked and in self-defense. Rasul and Iqbal say they were with the
Taliban because they were taken captive. Hicks is silent on the matter in court filings, but his father, in filing the brief, said that he believed that his son had joined the Taliban forces.
897:
noted that the ability of a U.S. citizen to get a trial may necessarily imply that the court has jurisdiction in that geographic area, since jurisdiction is largely a geographic and sovereignty matter. Since the government had said it would not challenge 'habeas corpus' by a U.S. citizen in
1039:
concurred only in the judgment. While refusing to join the majority's opinion's view of "automatic statutory authority", Justice
Kennedy felt federal-court jurisdiction is permitted, "in light of the status of Guantanamo Bay and the indefinite pretrial detention of detainees".
780:
763 (1950), in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that U.S. courts had no jurisdiction over German war criminals held in a U.S.-administered German prison, the
District Court ruled that U.S. courts have jurisdiction only in a territory where the U.S. has
851:
with no charges filed, along with three other
British citizen detainees. The British government had been pressing the United States for the return of its citizens and legal residents. The next day, the UK government released all five men without charge.
751:. Each of the filings alleged that the government had not allowed the detainee to speak at all to friends, family or lawyers, and had not given him any hearing whatsoever on the question of whether he was an enemy combatant in the war.
672:
claimed that they were in
Pakistan and Afghanistan giving humanitarian aid. They were seized by villagers seeking bounties and "sold" to the United States (US) forces. The US transferred them to Guantanamo Bay starting in January 2002.
1720:, 2 Burr. 765, 97 Eng. Rep. 551 (K. B. 1759) (reviewing the habeas petition of a neutral alien deemed a prisoner of war because he was captured aboard an enemy French privateer during a war between England and France);
1068:
Justice Scalia wrote, "for this Court to create such a monstrous scheme in time of war, and in frustration of our military commanders' reliance upon clearly stated prior law, is judicial adventurism of the worst sort."
623:
1229:. Justice Stevens, writing for a five justice majority, found that courts had jurisdiction to hear those detainees' petitions which had been filed before Congress enacted the DTA and that the CSRTs violated the
927:
The
Constitution requires jurisdiction—the Constitution requires that an American citizen who has the protection of the Constitution have some manner of vindicating his rights under the Constitution.
1252:, which gave statutory authorization to the CSRTs and was explicit in retroactively stripping detainees of any right to petition courts for habeas review. On February 20, 2007, D.C. Circuit Judge
1399:
1216:
vacated the lower rulings and threw out the detainees' petitions. On
November 7, 2005, the Supreme Court agreed to review that judgment. On December 30, 2005, Congress responded by passing the
907:
The court had concern that there is a gray area where certain types of cases would fall through the cracks, because only the U.S. military appeared to have jurisdiction. On the other hand,
1099:
soon after his arrest. He was held and interrogated under torture in Egypt for five months before being returned to
Pakistan, and then transferred to military custody and Guantanamo Bay.
649:, an Australian citizen, to Guantanamo Bay in December 2001. Each denied voluntarily joining any terrorist forces. As noted by the District Court, they did not deny having fought for the
800:
501:
334:
2331:
2646:
277:
Shafiq Rasul, et al., Petitioners v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al.; Fawzi Khalid
Abdullah Fahad al Odah, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.
2339:
1519:
2582:
537:
2491:
1726:, 20 How. St. Tr. 1, 79-82 (K. B. 1772) (releasing on habeas an African slave purchased in Virginia and detained on a ship docked in England and bound for Jamaica);
1178:
744:
2636:
711:, challenging the U.S. government's practice of holding foreign nationals in detention indefinitely who were captured in Afghanistan during the war against the
2345:
891:
decision, the basis of the Eisentrager decision, had since been largely reversed in Braden (1973), and thus relevant parts of Eisentrager may no longer apply.
2240:
1554:
1380:
1339:
1077:
The United States Government announced that it planned to charge Hicks and Habib before a military commission. Habib was released in January 2005, after the
773:
523:. The U.S. transported the three men to the United Kingdom in March 2004 before the decision was handed down, and the government released them the next day.
342:
295:
2004:
1849:
2641:
2127:
1198:
573:
1472:
1798:
1732:, 13 East 195, 104 Eng. Rep. 344 (K. B. 1810) (reviewing the habeas petition of a "native of South Africa" allegedly held in private custody).
2626:
1821:
2169:
939:
an idea of a constitution with three branches that the executive would be free to do whatever they want, whatever they want without a check.
1277:, writing for a five justice majority, held that the detainees had a right to petition federal courts for writs of habeas corpus under the
1008:
finding that an American citizen detained in Guantanamo had a constitutional right to petition federal courts for habeas review under the
2621:
2555:
1344:
2563:
911:
noted, it may be possible, and better, for Congress to remedy that situation, as they have deliberative powers the court does not.
2631:
577:
2325:
869:
491:
634:
The various plaintiffs were taken to Guantanamo Bay for different reasons, but were generally captured or arrested during the
359:
The degree of control exercised by the United States over the Guantanamo Bay base is sufficient to trigger the application of
2139:
1016:
635:
189:
2531:
1625:
161:
2380:
2507:
1865:
964:
824:
483:
258:
2200:
Wilke, Christiane (2005). "War v. Justice: Terrorism Cases, Enemy Combatants, and Political Justice in U.S. Courts".
226:
208:
168:
106:
84:
49:
77:
1249:
1234:
1170:
700:
1285:
strongly dissented, writing that the Court's decision, "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed".
827:, over the Government's objections, agreed in November 2003 to hear the cases of the Guantánamo detainees, namely
1910:
883:
was immaterial to the jurisdictional question at hand, while the government argued that it was material. Justice
619:
2001:
541:
175:
146:
142:
35:
1193:
granted the detainees petition, finding the CSRTs were insufficient to protect the detainees rights under the
626:, which sought to detain and try enemy combatants by military commissions under Presidential authority alone.
2590:
2353:
2102:: Federal Courts Have Jurisdiction over Habeas Challenges and Other Claims Brought by Guantanamo Detainees".
1844:
1220:, which changed the statute to explicitly strip detainees of any right to petition courts for habeas review.
954:
Breyer suggests, to draw up this reticulated system to preserve our military from intervention by the courts.
487:
1581:
763:
denied the detainees' petitions on July 30, 2002, finding that aliens in Cuba had no access to U.S. courts.
330:
2030:
1979:
1665:
1498:
1427:
723:
and did not allow them access to counsel, the right to a trial, or knowledge of the charges against them.
157:
1660:
1422:
642:
2598:
1278:
1774:
2472:
1463:
847:
On March 9, 2004, two years after they were first detained, the U.S. released Rasul and Iqbal to the
2281:
1974:
1575:
1324:
1126:
1065:
795:
667:
595:
71:
500:
to review the legality of their detention. The Court's 6–3 judgment on June 28, 2004, reversed a
2373:
1493:
1084:
588:
135:
1892:
1549:
1295:
1217:
1001:
972:
836:
768:
760:
557:
398:
88:
686:
was arrested by Pakistani authorities on October 5, 2001, two days before the fighting began.
2263:
2244:
1803:
1558:
1384:
1186:
1116:
777:
346:
287:
2272:
2123:
549:
545:
182:
1536:
8:
2523:
2456:
2408:
1311:
1253:
1213:
1205:
1174:
980:
861:
812:
804:
426:
2358:
2254:
1775:"Terror Suspect Alleges Torture: Detainee Says U.S. Sent Him to Egypt Before Guantanamo"
2448:
2432:
2366:
2316:
2290:
2247:
2217:
2156:
2024:
1924:
1722:
1630:
1561:
1387:
1318:
1269:
1230:
1225:
1139:
1061:
1020:
1009:
561:
41:
1930:
1136:
In 1956, Stevens wrote a book chapter where he quoted Justice Rutledge's dissent from
1027:
courts exercise habeas jurisdiction over all dominions under the sovereign's control.
2499:
2424:
2221:
2188:
2111:
2086:
1728:
1350:
1303:
1257:
1194:
1108:
1053:
1005:
996:
968:
900:
884:
479:
390:
382:
943:
Justice Scalia on whether the courts or Congress are better suited to rewrite laws:
860:
One-hour of oral arguments were heard on April 20, where former-Circuit Chief Judge
624:
Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism
2547:
2539:
2515:
2464:
2209:
2148:
1621:
1261:
1190:
720:
607:
569:
290:
2008:
1853:
1476:
1357:
1274:
1260:
upheld the Act and dismissed the detainees' petitions, over the dissent of Judge
1182:
1121:
1079:
1057:
1036:
808:
611:
565:
422:
410:
2440:
1886:
1840:
1656:
1489:
1418:
1332:
1282:
1166:
1049:
984:
931:
920:
908:
865:
848:
615:
581:
434:
402:
2615:
2390:
2213:
2192:
2115:
2090:
1970:
737:
732:
681:
676:
603:
496:
2048:
1948:
1692:
1599:
1267:
On June 12, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided against the Government in
1209:
1130:
976:
894:
727:
553:
520:
516:
509:
414:
2073:
Martin, David A. (2005). "Offshore Detainees and the Role of Courts after
2043:
1687:
2308:
1943:
1766:
1594:
1459:
782:
646:
2174:: John Paul Stevens's Influence from World War II to the War on Terror"
2160:
1024:
338:
306:
1828:: John Paul Stevens's Influence from World War II to the War on Terror
1223:
On June 29, 2006, the Supreme Court decided against the Government in
1846:
Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction, Substantive Rights, and the War on Terror
1770:
1133:, provoking Justice Rutledge to file a dissent Stevens helped draft.
1112:
610:
abroad, indefinitely, without Congressional oversight, and free from
591:
512:
to hear any petitions from foreign nationals held in Guantanamo Bay.
505:
302:
2299:
2152:
124:
1088:
801:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
716:
599:
1185:
rejected the detainees petition because they "have no cognizable
994:
That same day, the Supreme Court ruled against the Government in
988:
712:
650:
367:
can be exercised in all dominions under the sovereign's control.
730:, a British citizen, petitioned in federal court for a writ of
662:
253:
747:
and the court decided them together, consolidating them under
736:
to review the legality of his detention. Guantanamo detainee
1092:
934:
on whether to deny jurisdiction to citizens outside the U.S.
1204:
On July 15, 2005, a panel of the D.C. Circuit made of Judge
1125:(1948), the Court held that no federal court had been given
1030:
2147:(6). The University of Pennsylvania Law Review: 2017–2071.
486:
in which the Court held that foreign nationals held in the
327:
538:
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists
2388:
1179:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
1096:
745:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
2647:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
1744:, 542 U.S. at 488 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment).
1400:
public domain material from this U.S government document
879:
Many of the Justices' questions indicated a belief that
875:
During the oral arguments the following points came up:
703:(CCR) was the first organization to file two petitions,
2077:: The Underappreciated Virtues of Deferential Review".
1759:
1154:, fifty-six years after he had drafted it as a clerk.
904:(2004), this could establish jurisdiction at the base.
309:
4760; 72 U.S.L.W. 4596; 2004 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 457
1340:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 542
451:
Stevens, joined by O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
1765:
991:
right to petition federal courts for habeas review.
149:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1870:Khalid v. Bush, In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases,
1199:Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
1181:were consolidated into two cases. In one, Judge
719:. The government had designated the detainees as
2613:
1626:"THE SUPREME COURT: DETAINEES; ACCESS TO COURTS"
1620:
740:, an Australian citizen, also filed a petition.
574:Judge Advocate General of the United States Army
568:proposed holding public hearings modeled on the
2104:Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
1102:
598:developed by Deputy Assistant Attorney General
1799:"Australians saw Habib tortured, says officer"
1655:
1488:
1417:
2374:
1969:
842:
2637:Guantanamo captives' habeas corpus petitions
2002:The Supreme Court, 2007 Term — Leading Cases
1240:
1189:" on January 19, 2005. In the other, Judge
1157:
587:However, Assistant Attorney General for the
560:advised that the President must observe the
1875:24 Yale Law & Policy Review 241 (2006).
1756:, 542 U.S. at 506 (Scalia, J., dissenting).
1651:
1649:
1043:
536:On September 14, 2001, Congress passed the
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
2381:
2367:
2326:"Supreme Court Decision goes against Bush"
2322:, Center for Constitutional Rights website
1413:
1411:
1409:
1072:
872:, personally appeared for the Government.
726:On February 19, 2002, Guantanamo detainee
2642:American Civil Liberties Union litigation
2556:Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fazaga
2340:information about the filing of the brief
2122:
1345:List of United States Supreme Court cases
1031:Justice Kennedy's concurrence in judgment
967:decided against the Government. Justice
629:
227:Learn how and when to remove this message
209:Learn how and when to remove this message
107:Learn how and when to remove this message
2564:Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre
1646:
1455:
1453:
1451:
1449:
1447:
1445:
788:
641:The U.S. military transferred Rasul and
70:This article includes a list of general
1817:
1815:
1813:
1465:The Supreme Court, 2005 Term — Comment:
1406:
958:
923:regarding the purpose of jurisdiction:
602:, advised the President in a series of
2614:
2128:"Guantanamo and the Conflict of Laws:
2097:
2079:Boston College Third World Law Journal
2072:
1177:. Detainee's habeas petitions to the
870:Solicitor General of the United States
754:
2362:
2199:
2140:University of Pennsylvania Law Review
1442:
689:
636:United States invasion of Afghanistan
515:The lead petitioner, British citizen
239:2004 United States Supreme Court case
2627:United States habeas corpus case law
2532:Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
2167:
1810:
1520:The Center for Constitutional Rights
147:adding citations to reliable sources
118:
56:
15:
1792:
743:These cases were each filed in the
614:. On November 13, 2001, President
572:. Major General Thomas Romig, the
556:and State Department Legal Advisor
467:Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Thomas
13:
2508:Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
2342:, Center for Constitutional Rights
2066:
1469:The Legal Academy Goes to Practice
1248:Congress responded by passing the
965:Supreme Court of the United States
948:all that, though, couldn't it? ...
825:Supreme Court of the United States
694:
259:Supreme Court of the United States
76:it lacks sufficient corresponding
14:
2658:
2622:United States Supreme Court cases
2229:
1173:" to determine if detainees were
1171:Combatant Status Review Tribunals
855:
531:
504:decision which had held that the
31:This article has multiple issues.
1856:, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 2029 (2007).
1716:, 542 U.S. at 482, citing e.g.,
1391:
1250:Military Commissions Act of 2006
1235:Uniform Code of Military Justice
1023:, Justice Stevens reasoned that
987:, held that the detainees had a
818:
701:Center for Constitutional Rights
252:
123:
61:
20:
2036:
2016:
1994:
1963:
1936:
1916:
1906:In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases
1898:
1878:
1859:
1834:
1747:
1735:
1707:
1680:
1614:
864:appeared for the detainees and
835:(the latter represented twelve
134:needs additional citations for
39:or discuss these issues on the
2632:2004 in United States case law
2250: (2004) is available from:
1872:and the Neutral Decisionmaker,
1587:
1567:
1542:
1524:
1513:
1482:
1479:, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 65 (2006).
1370:
831:, which was consolidated with
542:President of the United States
1:
2591:Republic of Sudan v. Harrison
2354:Duke University School of Law
2098:Osborn, Meredith B. (2005). "
2013:122 Harv. L. Rev. 395 (2008).
1364:
645:, both British citizens, and
526:
488:Guantanamo Bay detention camp
478:, 542 U.S. 466 (2004), was a
2332:Briefs and papers filed for
1980:The New York Review of Books
1831:, 92 Va. L. Rev. 501 (2006).
1666:The New York Review of Books
1661:"What the Court Really Said"
1499:The New York Review of Books
1428:The New York Review of Books
1423:"Why It Was a Great Victory"
1103:Justice Rutledge's influence
1064:. Attacking the majority's
815:affirmed on March 11, 2003.
544:broad powers to prosecute a
7:
1911:355 F. Supp. 2d 443
1893:355 F. Supp. 2d 311
1729:Case of the Hottentot Venus
1288:
1146:Justice Stevens quoted the
1107:Directly after law school,
653:, but claimed that if they
484:United States Supreme Court
10:
2663:
2599:Opati v. Republic of Sudan
2309:Oyez (oral argument audio)
2033: (D.C. Cir. 2007).
1933: (D.C. Cir. 2005).
1584: (D.C. Cir. 2003).
1537:215 F. Supp. 2d 55
1398:This article incorporates
1279:United States Constitution
1052:, joined by Chief Justice
843:Release of Rasul and Iqbal
2583:Republic of Iraq v. Beaty
2574:
2483:
2473:United States v. Zubaydah
2397:
2170:"The Law Clerk Who Wrote
1233:standards enacted in the
1165:Deputy Defense Secretary
915:
463:
455:
447:
442:
376:
371:
358:
353:
319:
314:
282:
272:
265:
251:
244:
2389:Case law related to the
2214:10.1177/0032329205280926
1868:One Case, Two Decisions:
1576:Al Odah v. United States
1325:Al Odah v. United States
1127:territorial jurisdiction
1066:statutory interpretation
1044:Justice Scalia's dissent
796:Al Odah v. United States
668:Al Odah v. United States
596:unitary executive theory
324:Al Odah v. United States
2492:United States v. Ressam
1975:"Why the Court Said No"
1913: (D.D.C. 2005).
1895: (D.D.C. 2005).
1824:The Law Clerk Who Wrote
1539: (D.D.C. 2002).
1169:responded by creating "
1150:dissent approvingly in
1085:extraordinary rendition
1073:Subsequent developments
1004:wrote the four justice
589:Office of Legal Counsel
580:be modeled on existing
91:more precise citations.
2202:Politics & Society
1866:Note, Daniel Freeman,
1843:& Richard Fallon,
1550:Johnson v. Eisentrager
1296:Johnson v. Eisentrager
1218:Detainee Treatment Act
963:On June 28, 2004, the
956:
950:
941:
929:
881:Johnson v. Eisentrager
769:Johnson v. Eisentrager
761:Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
630:Capture and detainment
576:, recommended any new
558:William Howard Taft IV
552:. Secretary of State
2168:Thai, Joseph (2006).
1804:Sydney Morning Herald
1582:321 F.3d 1134
1201:on January 31, 2005.
1187:Constitutional rights
1117:Wiley Blount Rutledge
971:, joined by Justices
951:
945:
936:
925:
789:U.S. Court of Appeals
459:Kennedy (in judgment)
363:rights. The right to
301:124 S. Ct. 2686; 159
268:Decided June 28, 2004
266:Argued April 20, 2004
2044:"Boumediene v. Bush"
2031:476 F.3d 981
1944:"Hamdan v. Rumsfeld"
1494:"Forever Guantánamo"
1467:Hamdan v. Rumsfeld:
959:Opinion of the Court
759:U.S. District Judge
550:September 11 attacks
546:Global War on Terror
143:improve this article
2524:Ashcroft v. al-Kidd
2457:al-Marri v. Spagone
2409:Rumsfeld v. Padilla
2398:Guantanamo Bay and
2181:Virginia Law Review
1931:415 F.3d 33
1688:"Hamdi v. Rumsfeld"
1312:Rumsfeld v. Padilla
1254:A. Raymond Randolph
1214:Stephen F. Williams
1208:then-Circuit Judge
1206:A. Raymond Randolph
1175:unlawful combatants
1002:Sandra Day O'Connor
981:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
973:Sandra Day O'Connor
898:Guantanamo Bay, in
862:John Joseph Gibbons
813:Stephen F. Williams
805:A. Raymond Randolph
755:U.S. District Court
679:, the plaintiff in
606:that he could hold
548:in response to the
427:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
399:Sandra Day O'Connor
2449:Boumediene v. Bush
2433:Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
2025:Boumediene v. Bush
2007:2021-02-24 at the
1973:(10 August 2006).
1925:Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
1852:2021-02-27 at the
1773:(6 January 2005).
1723:Somerset v Stewart
1659:(12 August 2004).
1631:The New York Times
1475:2015-09-29 at the
1421:(14 August 2008).
1319:Boumediene v. Bush
1270:Boumediene v. Bush
1256:, joined by Judge
1242:Boumediene v. Bush
1231:Geneva Conventions
1226:Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
1159:Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
1140:Tomoyuki Yamashita
1062:dissenting opinion
1021:William Blackstone
1010:Due Process Clause
690:Procedural history
578:military tribunals
562:Geneva Conventions
387:Associate Justices
2609:
2608:
2500:Ashcroft v. Iqbal
2425:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
2124:Roosevelt, Kermit
1492:(17 April 2008).
1351:Ex parte Milligan
1304:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
1258:David B. Sentelle
1195:Geneva Convention
1109:John Paul Stevens
1054:William Rehnquist
1006:plurality opinion
997:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
969:John Paul Stevens
901:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
594:, relying on the
519:, was one of the
480:landmark decision
471:
470:
383:William Rehnquist
237:
236:
229:
219:
218:
211:
193:
117:
116:
109:
54:
2654:
2548:Tanzin v. Tanvir
2540:Ziglar v. Abbasi
2516:Snyder v. Phelps
2465:Kiyemba v. Obama
2383:
2376:
2369:
2360:
2359:
2313:
2307:
2304:
2298:
2295:
2289:
2286:
2280:
2277:
2271:
2268:
2262:
2259:
2253:
2225:
2196:
2178:
2164:
2136:
2119:
2094:
2061:
2060:
2058:
2056:
2040:
2034:
2028:
2020:
2014:
1998:
1992:
1991:
1989:
1987:
1967:
1961:
1960:
1958:
1956:
1940:
1934:
1928:
1920:
1914:
1908:
1902:
1896:
1890:
1882:
1876:
1863:
1857:
1838:
1832:
1822:Joseph P. Thai,
1819:
1808:
1796:
1790:
1789:
1787:
1785:
1763:
1757:
1751:
1745:
1739:
1733:
1711:
1705:
1704:
1702:
1700:
1684:
1678:
1677:
1675:
1673:
1653:
1644:
1643:
1641:
1639:
1624:(29 June 2004).
1622:Linda Greenhouse
1618:
1612:
1611:
1609:
1607:
1591:
1585:
1579:
1571:
1565:
1546:
1540:
1534:
1528:
1522:
1517:
1511:
1510:
1508:
1506:
1486:
1480:
1457:
1440:
1439:
1437:
1435:
1415:
1404:
1395:
1394:
1374:
1262:Judith W. Rogers
1191:Joyce Hens Green
803:including Judge
721:enemy combatants
608:enemy combatants
570:Nuremberg trials
372:Court membership
349:1003 (2003).
256:
255:
242:
241:
232:
225:
214:
207:
203:
200:
194:
192:
151:
127:
119:
112:
105:
101:
98:
92:
87:this article by
78:inline citations
65:
64:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
2662:
2661:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2605:
2570:
2479:
2393:
2387:
2320:and other cases
2311:
2305:
2302:
2296:
2293:
2287:
2284:
2278:
2275:
2269:
2266:
2260:
2257:
2251:
2232:
2176:
2153:10.2307/4150656
2134:
2069:
2067:Further reading
2064:
2054:
2052:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2022:
2021:
2017:
2009:Wayback Machine
1999:
1995:
1985:
1983:
1968:
1964:
1954:
1952:
1942:
1941:
1937:
1922:
1921:
1917:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1884:
1883:
1879:
1864:
1860:
1854:Wayback Machine
1839:
1835:
1820:
1811:
1797:
1793:
1783:
1781:
1779:Washington Post
1764:
1760:
1752:
1748:
1740:
1736:
1718:King v Schiever
1712:
1708:
1698:
1696:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1671:
1669:
1654:
1647:
1637:
1635:
1619:
1615:
1605:
1603:
1595:"Rasul v. Bush"
1593:
1592:
1588:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1547:
1543:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1518:
1514:
1504:
1502:
1487:
1483:
1477:Wayback Machine
1458:
1443:
1433:
1431:
1416:
1407:
1392:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1358:Ex parte Quirin
1291:
1275:Anthony Kennedy
1246:
1183:Richard J. Leon
1163:
1122:Ahrens v. Clark
1105:
1080:Washington Post
1075:
1058:Clarence Thomas
1046:
1037:Anthony Kennedy
1033:
961:
918:
889:Ahrens v. Clark
887:noted that the
858:
845:
833:al Odah v. Bush
821:
809:Merrick Garland
799:a panel of the
791:
757:
697:
695:Court petitions
692:
632:
612:judicial review
566:Lawrence Morris
534:
529:
490:could petition
425:
423:Clarence Thomas
413:
411:Anthony Kennedy
401:
391:John P. Stevens
310:
267:
261:
240:
233:
222:
221:
220:
215:
204:
198:
195:
158:"Rasul v. Bush"
152:
150:
140:
128:
113:
102:
96:
93:
83:Please help to
82:
66:
62:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
2660:
2650:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2624:
2607:
2606:
2604:
2603:
2595:
2587:
2578:
2576:
2572:
2571:
2569:
2568:
2560:
2552:
2544:
2536:
2528:
2520:
2512:
2504:
2496:
2487:
2485:
2481:
2480:
2478:
2477:
2469:
2461:
2453:
2445:
2441:Munaf v. Geren
2437:
2429:
2421:
2413:
2404:
2402:
2395:
2394:
2386:
2385:
2378:
2371:
2363:
2357:
2356:
2352:, commentary,
2343:
2337:
2329:
2323:
2314:
2282:Google Scholar
2231:
2230:External links
2228:
2227:
2226:
2208:(4): 637–669.
2197:
2165:
2120:
2095:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2062:
2035:
2015:
1993:
1962:
1935:
1915:
1897:
1887:Khalid v. Bush
1877:
1858:
1841:Daniel Meltzer
1833:
1809:
1791:
1758:
1746:
1734:
1706:
1679:
1657:Ronald Dworkin
1645:
1613:
1586:
1566:
1541:
1523:
1512:
1490:Raymond Bonner
1481:
1441:
1419:Ronald Dworkin
1405:
1368:
1366:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1354:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1333:Munaf v. Geren
1329:
1328:(consolidated)
1315:
1308:
1300:
1290:
1287:
1283:Antonin Scalia
1245:
1239:
1167:Paul Wolfowitz
1162:
1156:
1104:
1101:
1074:
1071:
1056:, and Justice
1050:Antonin Scalia
1045:
1042:
1032:
1029:
1017:Lord Mansfield
985:Stephen Breyer
960:
957:
932:Justice Breyer
921:Justice Scalia
917:
914:
913:
912:
909:Justice Scalia
905:
895:Justice Souter
892:
866:Theodore Olson
857:
856:Oral arguments
854:
849:United Kingdom
844:
841:
820:
817:
790:
787:
756:
753:
696:
693:
691:
688:
665:, combined in
631:
628:
620:military order
616:George W. Bush
582:courts-martial
533:
532:Military order
530:
528:
525:
492:federal courts
469:
468:
465:
461:
460:
457:
453:
452:
449:
445:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
435:Stephen Breyer
403:Antonin Scalia
388:
385:
380:
374:
373:
369:
368:
356:
355:
351:
350:
321:
317:
316:
312:
311:
300:
284:
280:
279:
274:
273:Full case name
270:
269:
263:
262:
257:
249:
248:
238:
235:
234:
217:
216:
131:
129:
122:
115:
114:
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2659:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2620:
2619:
2617:
2601:
2600:
2596:
2593:
2592:
2588:
2585:
2584:
2580:
2579:
2577:
2573:
2566:
2565:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2553:
2550:
2549:
2545:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2526:
2525:
2521:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2510:
2509:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2494:
2493:
2489:
2488:
2486:
2482:
2475:
2474:
2470:
2467:
2466:
2462:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2443:
2442:
2438:
2435:
2434:
2430:
2427:
2426:
2422:
2419:
2418:
2417:Rasul v. Bush
2414:
2411:
2410:
2406:
2405:
2403:
2401:
2400:habeas corpus
2396:
2392:
2391:War on Terror
2384:
2379:
2377:
2372:
2370:
2365:
2364:
2361:
2355:
2351:
2349:
2348:Rasul v. Bush
2344:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2335:
2334:Rasul v. Bush
2330:
2327:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2318:Rasul v. Bush
2315:
2310:
2301:
2292:
2283:
2274:
2265:
2264:CourtListener
2256:
2249:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2237:Rasul v. Bush
2234:
2233:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2175:
2173:
2172:Rasul v. Bush
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2133:
2131:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2100:Rasul v. Bush
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2075:Rasul v. Bush
2071:
2070:
2051:
2050:
2045:
2039:
2032:
2027:
2026:
2019:
2012:
2010:
2006:
2003:
1997:
1982:
1981:
1976:
1972:
1971:David D. Cole
1966:
1951:
1950:
1945:
1939:
1932:
1927:
1926:
1919:
1912:
1907:
1901:
1894:
1889:
1888:
1881:
1874:
1873:
1869:
1862:
1855:
1851:
1848:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1830:
1829:
1826:Rasul v. Bush
1825:
1818:
1816:
1814:
1806:
1805:
1800:
1795:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1762:
1755:
1754:Rasul v. Bush
1750:
1743:
1742:Rasul v. Bush
1738:
1731:
1730:
1725:
1724:
1719:
1715:
1714:Rasul v. Bush
1710:
1695:
1694:
1689:
1683:
1668:
1667:
1662:
1658:
1652:
1650:
1633:
1632:
1627:
1623:
1617:
1602:
1601:
1596:
1590:
1583:
1578:
1577:
1570:
1563:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1545:
1538:
1533:
1532:Rasul v. Bush
1527:
1521:
1516:
1501:
1500:
1495:
1491:
1485:
1478:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1454:
1452:
1450:
1448:
1446:
1430:
1429:
1424:
1420:
1414:
1412:
1410:
1403:
1401:
1390: (2004).
1389:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1377:Rasul v. Bush
1373:
1369:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1286:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1265:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1243:
1238:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1202:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1160:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1144:
1142:
1141:
1134:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1083:reported his
1082:
1081:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1041:
1038:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
992:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
955:
949:
944:
940:
935:
933:
928:
924:
922:
910:
906:
903:
902:
896:
893:
890:
886:
882:
878:
877:
876:
873:
871:
867:
863:
853:
850:
840:
838:
834:
830:
829:Rasul v. Bush
826:
819:Supreme Court
816:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
786:
784:
779:
775:
771:
770:
764:
762:
752:
750:
749:Rasul v. Bush
746:
741:
739:
738:Mamdouh Habib
735:
734:
733:habeas corpus
729:
724:
722:
718:
714:
710:
709:Habib v. Bush
706:
705:Rasul v. Bush
702:
687:
685:
683:
682:Habib v. Bush
678:
677:Mamdouh Habib
674:
671:
669:
664:
659:
656:
652:
648:
644:
639:
637:
627:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
585:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:, giving the
539:
524:
522:
518:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
497:habeas corpus
494:for writs of
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:Rasul v. Bush
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:Case opinions
441:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:Chief Justice
378:
377:
375:
370:
366:
365:habeas corpus
362:
361:habeas corpus
357:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
325:
322:
318:
313:
308:
304:
298:
297:
292:
289:
285:
281:
278:
275:
271:
264:
260:
250:
247:
246:Rasul v. Bush
243:
231:
228:
213:
210:
202:
191:
188:
184:
181:
177:
174:
170:
167:
163:
160: –
159:
155:
154:Find sources:
148:
144:
138:
137:
132:This article
130:
126:
121:
120:
111:
108:
100:
90:
86:
80:
79:
73:
68:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
2597:
2589:
2581:
2562:
2554:
2546:
2538:
2530:
2522:
2514:
2506:
2498:
2490:
2471:
2463:
2455:
2447:
2439:
2431:
2423:
2416:
2415:
2407:
2399:
2347:
2333:
2317:
2236:
2205:
2201:
2184:
2180:
2171:
2144:
2138:
2129:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2053:. Retrieved
2049:Oyez Project
2047:
2038:
2023:
2018:
2000:
1996:
1984:. Retrieved
1978:
1965:
1953:. Retrieved
1949:Oyez Project
1947:
1938:
1923:
1918:
1905:
1900:
1885:
1880:
1871:
1867:
1861:
1845:
1836:
1827:
1823:
1802:
1794:
1782:. Retrieved
1778:
1761:
1753:
1749:
1741:
1737:
1727:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1697:. Retrieved
1693:Oyez Project
1691:
1682:
1670:. Retrieved
1664:
1636:. Retrieved
1634:. p. A1
1629:
1616:
1604:. Retrieved
1600:Oyez Project
1598:
1589:
1574:
1569:
1564: (1950).
1548:
1544:
1531:
1526:
1515:
1503:. Retrieved
1497:
1484:
1468:
1464:
1432:. Retrieved
1426:
1397:
1376:
1372:
1356:
1349:
1331:
1323:
1317:
1310:
1302:
1294:
1268:
1266:
1247:
1241:
1224:
1222:
1210:John Roberts
1203:
1164:
1158:
1151:
1147:
1145:
1137:
1135:
1131:Ellis Island
1120:
1111:worked as a
1106:
1078:
1076:
1047:
1034:
1014:
995:
993:
977:David Souter
962:
952:
946:
942:
937:
930:
926:
919:
899:
888:
880:
874:
859:
846:
832:
828:
822:
811:, and Judge
794:
792:
767:
765:
758:
748:
742:
731:
728:Shafiq Rasul
725:
708:
704:
698:
680:
675:
666:
660:
654:
640:
633:
586:
554:Colin Powell
535:
521:Tipton Three
517:Shafiq Rasul
514:
510:jurisdiction
502:D.C. Circuit
495:
474:
473:
472:
430:
418:
415:David Souter
406:
394:
364:
360:
323:
315:Case history
294:
276:
245:
223:
205:
196:
186:
179:
172:
165:
153:
141:Please help
136:verification
133:
103:
94:
75:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
2132:and Beyond"
2055:23 February
1986:23 February
1955:23 February
1784:1 September
1767:Dana Priest
1699:23 February
1672:23 February
1638:25 February
1606:23 February
1505:25 February
1460:Neal Katyal
1434:23 February
1322:(2008) and
1281:. Justice
1273:. Justice
1115:to Justice
1000:. Justice
783:sovereignty
715:regime and
661:The twelve
647:David Hicks
622:titled the
564:. Colonel
456:Concurrence
341:. granted,
199:August 2012
97:August 2012
89:introducing
2616:Categories
2300:OpenJurist
1365:References
1212:and Judge
1060:, filed a
1025:common law
643:Asif Iqbal
527:Background
307:U.S. LEXIS
305:548; 2004
169:newspapers
72:references
36:improve it
2222:154518753
2193:0042-6601
2116:0017-8039
2091:0276-3583
1771:Dan Eggen
1113:law clerk
989:statutory
618:signed a
592:Jay Bybee
506:judiciary
335:D.C. Cir.
303:L. Ed. 2d
283:Citations
42:talk page
2484:Domestic
2235:Text of
2126:(2005).
2005:Archived
1850:Archived
1473:Archived
1289:See also
1197:and the
1089:Pakistan
1048:Justice
1035:Justice
1015:Quoting
807:, Judge
717:al-Qaida
663:Kuwaitis
600:John Yoo
448:Majority
2273:Findlaw
2255:Cornell
2187:: 501.
2161:4150656
2110:: 265.
2085:: 125.
1095:by the
885:Stevens
837:Kuwaiti
766:Citing
713:Taliban
651:Taliban
508:has no
482:of the
464:Dissent
354:Holding
337:2003);
183:scholar
85:improve
2602:(2020)
2594:(2019)
2586:(2009)
2575:Others
2567:(2024)
2559:(2022)
2551:(2020)
2543:(2017)
2535:(2013)
2527:(2011)
2519:(2011)
2511:(2010)
2503:(2009)
2495:(2008)
2476:(2022)
2468:(2010)
2460:(2009)
2452:(2008)
2444:(2008)
2436:(2006)
2428:(2004)
2420:(2004)
2412:(2004)
2312:
2306:
2303:
2297:
2294:
2291:Justia
2288:
2285:
2279:
2276:
2270:
2267:
2261:
2258:
2252:
2239:,
2220:
2191:
2159:
2114:
2089:
2029:,
1929:,
1909:,
1891:,
1580:,
1553:,
1535:,
1396:
1379:,
1336:(2008)
1307:(2004)
1299:(1950)
1244:(2008)
1161:(2006)
1148:Ahrens
1138:In re
1119:. In
983:, and
916:Quotes
868:, the
839:men).
433:
431:·
429:
421:
419:·
417:
409:
407:·
405:
397:
395:·
393:
326:, 321
185:
178:
171:
164:
156:
74:, but
2328:, CDI
2243:
2218:S2CID
2177:(PDF)
2157:JSTOR
2135:(PDF)
2130:Rasul
1557:
1383:
1152:Rasul
1129:over
1093:Egypt
1087:from
776:
604:memos
345:
320:Prior
190:JSTOR
176:books
2245:U.S.
2189:ISSN
2112:ISSN
2087:ISSN
2057:2017
1988:2017
1957:2017
1786:2007
1701:2017
1674:2017
1640:2017
1608:2017
1559:U.S.
1507:2017
1436:2017
1385:U.S.
1019:and
823:The
778:U.S.
707:and
699:The
347:U.S.
339:cert
331:1134
328:F.3d
296:more
288:U.S.
286:542
162:news
2248:466
2241:542
2210:doi
2149:doi
2145:153
1562:763
1555:339
1388:466
1381:542
1097:CIA
1091:to
793:In
774:339
655:did
343:540
291:466
145:by
2618::
2216:.
2206:33
2204:.
2185:92
2183:.
2179:.
2155:.
2143:.
2137:.
2108:40
2106:.
2083:25
2081:.
2046:.
1977:.
1946:.
1812:^
1801:,
1777:.
1769:;
1690:.
1663:.
1648:^
1628:.
1597:.
1496:.
1462:,
1444:^
1425:.
1408:^
1264:.
1237:.
1012:.
979:,
975:,
772:,
638:.
584:.
45:.
2382:e
2375:t
2368:v
2350:"
2346:"
2224:.
2212::
2195:.
2163:.
2151::
2118:.
2093:.
2059:.
2011:,
1990:.
1959:.
1788:.
1703:.
1676:.
1642:.
1610:.
1509:.
1438:.
1402:.
684:,
670:,
333:(
299:)
293:(
230:)
224:(
212:)
206:(
201:)
197:(
187:·
180:·
173:·
166:·
139:.
110:)
104:(
99:)
95:(
81:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
