308:... the development of international law since the Second World War justifies the conclusion that by the time of the 1973 coup d'état, and certainly ever since, international law condemned genocide, torture, hostage taking and crimes against humanity (during an armed conflict or in peacetime) as international crimes deserving of punishment. Given this state of international law, it seems to me difficult to maintain that the commission of such high crimes may amount to acts performed in the exercise of the functions of a Head of State.
981:
971:
28:
313:... International law has made plain that certain types of conduct, including torture and hostage-taking, are not acceptable conduct on the part of anyone. This applies as much to heads of state, or even more so, as it does to everyone else. The contrary conclusion would make a mockery of international law.
218:
In the first judgment, a panel of five judges ruled that
Pinochet, as a former head of state, was not entitled to immunity from prosecution for the crimes of torture and could therefore be extradited to Spain to face charges. However, in a subsequent judgment that was to prove controversial, the
592:"Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet; R v. Evans and Another and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v. [1999] UKHL 17 (24th March, 1999"
239:)) subsequently affirmed that Pinochet was not entitled to state immunity but that acts committed outside of British territories could only be prosecuted under national law if committed after the passage of section 134 of the
442:"Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v. [1998] UKHL 41; [2000] 1 AC 61; [1998] 4 All ER 897; [1998] 3 WLR 1456 (25th November, 1998)"
275:
that since
Pinochet was head of state at the time of the alleged crimes, he was immune from the jurisdiction of British courts. The panel disagreed, ruling that Pinochet did not enjoy immunity from prosecution.
539:
388:, the House ruled that Pinochet did not enjoy immunity from prosecution for torture, but only as it applied after 8 December 1988, when section 134 of the
1040:
984:
263:. While on a visit to London for a medical treatment, Pinochet was arrested by British authorities following the issuance of an arrest warrant via
1055:
1050:
694:
666:
699:
1025:
1010:
1005:
902:
410:
142:
89:
839:
345:
154:
864:
659:
86:
369:
396:
over crimes of torture, came into effect, Pinochet could not be tried as it would constitute a retroactive law.
1015:
1035:
1030:
974:
948:
652:
634:
629:
817:
540:"Regina v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2); HL 15 Jan 1999"
1045:
259:
of torture, a crime under international law that can be prosecuted in any country under the doctrine of
349:
158:
215:. They have proven to be of landmark significance in international criminal law and human rights law.
859:
765:
714:
389:
240:
941:
834:
734:
465:
Byers, Michael, The Law and
Politics of the Pinochet Case, 10 Duke J. of Comp. & Int'l L. p 416
227:) following revelations that one of the Law Lords had links to one of the intervenors in the case,
881:
780:
619:
Byers, Michael, The Law and
Politics of the Pinochet Case, 10 Duke J. of Comp. & Int'l L. 415
639:
934:
393:
260:
244:
405:
373:
337:
228:
192:
146:
675:
8:
824:
475:
724:
927:
844:
591:
955:
849:
797:
510:
441:
386:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 3)
334:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
233:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 3)
221:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2)
200:
188:
184:
110:
103:
33:
775:
709:
256:
565:
514:
854:
812:
415:
204:
196:
44:
1020:
999:
739:
361:
294:
290:
170:
138:
130:
55:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte
889:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 2)
829:
802:
729:
704:
689:
357:
353:
272:
166:
162:
920:
785:
644:
321:
317:
298:
268:
211:
allegations made by a Spanish court and therefore avoid extradition to
134:
126:
27:
760:
341:
150:
364:, set aside the first judgment on the grounds that an appearance of
895:
807:
791:
719:
569:
479:
264:
231:, thereby creating an appearance of bias. A new panel of judges (
208:
368:
had been created, following revelations that one of the judges,
180:
R (Pinochet Ugarte) v Bow St Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate
744:
212:
770:
365:
267:
by the Spanish judge. Pinochet's lawyers argued before a
304:
Notable passages of the judgment include the following:
301:ruled that Pinochet did not enjoy state immunity.
997:
695:Conflict of interest in the healthcare industry
435:
433:
431:
376:, an intervenor in the case against Pinochet.
199:that examined whether former Chilean dictator
985:Conflicts of interest on Knowledge (category)
660:
865:Sponsorship of continuing medical education
476:"UK Politics Pinochet judge under pressure"
428:
255:Pinochet had been accused by Spanish judge
667:
653:
439:
372:, had failed to disclose personal ties to
26:
1041:Indictment and arrest of Augusto Pinochet
509:
674:
446:United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions
21:R (Pinochet Ugarte) v Bow St Magistrate
1056:United Kingdom constitutional case law
1051:United Kingdom administrative case law
998:
903:R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
648:
336:, a new panel of judges, composed of
85:Augusto Pinochet Ugarte, 38 ILM 68 (
840:Pharmaceutical sales representative
411:Augusto Pinochet's arrest and trial
13:
700:Conflicts of interest on Knowledge
379:
327:
284:
14:
1067:
623:
980:
979:
970:
969:
515:"Legal lessons of Pinochet case"
1026:Conflict of interest mitigation
1011:1999 in United Kingdom case law
1006:1998 in United Kingdom case law
975:Conflict of interest (category)
640:Legal Overview of Pinochet Case
584:
558:
532:
503:
494:
468:
459:
1:
613:
949:Who Killed the Electric Car?
7:
399:
279:
10:
1072:
965:
912:
873:
753:
715:Judicial disqualification
682:
566:"A look at Lord Hoffmann"
390:Criminal Justice Act 1988
247:over crimes of torture).
241:Criminal Justice Act 1988
122:
117:
96:
81:
76:
68:
60:
50:
40:
25:
20:
835:Pharmaceutical marketing
635:House of Lords Judgement
421:
250:
882:Nemo iudex in causa sua
455:– via bailii.org.
766:Arm's length principle
394:universal jurisdiction
315:
310:
261:universal jurisdiction
245:universal jurisdiction
243:(which gave UK courts
219:ruling was set aside (
203:was entitled to claim
1016:Amnesty International
406:UK constitutional law
374:Amnesty International
338:Lord Browne-Wilkinson
311:
306:
229:Amnesty International
193:UK constitutional law
147:Lord Browne-Wilkinson
1036:House of Lords cases
1031:Extradition case law
676:Conflict of interest
825:Medical ghostwriter
392:, giving UK courts
289:By a 3–2 majority,
1046:Sovereign immunity
725:Regulatory capture
630:American Diplomacy
572:. 17 December 1998
271:panel presided by
191:is a set of three
97:Subsequent actions
993:
992:
845:Pharmacovigilance
511:Rozenberg, Joshua
482:. 15 January 1999
237:Pinochet III
195:judgments by the
176:
175:
72:UKHL 41, 1 AC 61
32:Chilean dictator
1063:
983:
982:
973:
972:
956:Taken for a Ride
850:Political ethics
798:Follow the money
669:
662:
655:
646:
645:
607:
606:
604:
602:
588:
582:
581:
579:
577:
562:
556:
555:
553:
551:
536:
530:
529:
527:
525:
513:(2 March 2000).
507:
501:
498:
492:
491:
489:
487:
472:
466:
463:
457:
456:
454:
452:
440:House of Lords.
437:
225:Pinochet II
201:Augusto Pinochet
118:Court membership
64:25 November 1998
34:Augusto Pinochet
30:
18:
17:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1060:
996:
995:
994:
989:
961:
908:
869:
776:Business ethics
749:
735:Self-regulation
710:Insider trading
678:
673:
626:
616:
611:
610:
600:
598:
590:
589:
585:
575:
573:
564:
563:
559:
549:
547:
538:
537:
533:
523:
521:
508:
504:
499:
495:
485:
483:
474:
473:
469:
464:
460:
450:
448:
438:
429:
424:
402:
382:
380:Pinochet (No 3)
330:
328:Pinochet (No 2)
287:
285:Pinochet (No 1)
282:
257:Baltazar Garzon
253:
36:
12:
11:
5:
1069:
1059:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
991:
990:
988:
987:
977:
966:
963:
962:
960:
959:
952:
945:
938:
931:
924:
916:
914:
910:
909:
907:
906:
899:
892:
885:
877:
875:
871:
870:
868:
867:
862:
860:Revolving door
857:
855:Political bias
852:
847:
842:
837:
832:
827:
822:
821:
820:
813:Medical ethics
810:
805:
800:
795:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
757:
755:
751:
750:
748:
747:
742:
737:
732:
727:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
686:
684:
680:
679:
672:
671:
664:
657:
649:
643:
642:
637:
632:
625:
624:External links
622:
621:
620:
615:
612:
609:
608:
596:www.bailii.org
583:
557:
546:. 30 June 2015
531:
502:
493:
467:
458:
426:
425:
423:
420:
419:
418:
416:State immunity
413:
408:
401:
398:
381:
378:
329:
326:
286:
283:
281:
278:
252:
249:
205:state immunity
197:House of Lords
174:
173:
124:
123:Judges sitting
120:
119:
115:
114:
106:, 1 AC 119.
98:
94:
93:
83:
79:
78:
74:
73:
70:
66:
65:
62:
58:
57:
52:
51:Full case name
48:
47:
45:House of Lords
42:
38:
37:
31:
23:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1068:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1001:
986:
978:
976:
968:
967:
964:
958:
957:
953:
951:
950:
946:
944:
943:
939:
937:
936:
932:
930:
929:
925:
923:
922:
918:
917:
915:
911:
905:
904:
900:
898:
897:
893:
891:
890:
886:
884:
883:
879:
878:
876:
872:
866:
863:
861:
858:
856:
853:
851:
848:
846:
843:
841:
838:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
819:
816:
815:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
793:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
758:
756:
752:
746:
743:
741:
740:State capture
738:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
687:
685:
681:
677:
670:
665:
663:
658:
656:
651:
650:
647:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
627:
618:
617:
597:
593:
587:
571:
567:
561:
545:
541:
535:
520:
516:
512:
506:
497:
481:
477:
471:
462:
447:
443:
436:
434:
432:
427:
417:
414:
412:
409:
407:
404:
403:
397:
395:
391:
387:
377:
375:
371:
370:Lord Hoffmann
367:
363:
362:Lord Phillips
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
325:
323:
319:
314:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
295:Lord Hoffmann
292:
291:Lord Nicholls
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
172:
171:Lord Phillips
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:Lord Nicholls
136:
132:
131:Lord Hoffmann
128:
125:
121:
116:
112:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
91:
88:
84:
82:Prior actions
80:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
35:
29:
24:
19:
16:
954:
947:
942:Side Effects
940:
933:
926:
919:
901:
894:
888:
887:
880:
830:Moral hazard
803:Legal ethics
790:
730:Self-dealing
705:Funding bias
690:Chinese wall
599:. Retrieved
595:
586:
574:. Retrieved
560:
548:. Retrieved
543:
534:
522:. Retrieved
518:
505:
496:
484:. Retrieved
470:
461:
449:. Retrieved
445:
385:
383:
358:Lord Millett
354:Lord Saville
333:
331:
316:
312:
307:
303:
288:
273:Lord Bingham
254:
236:
232:
224:
220:
217:
179:
178:
177:
167:Lord Millett
163:Lord Saville
113:, 1 AC 147.
107:
100:
77:Case history
54:
15:
544:swarb.co.uk
350:Lord Hutton
324:dissented.
159:Lord Hutton
1000:Categories
935:Inside Job
928:Big Pharma
921:Bad Pharma
786:Corruption
614:References
601:3 February
322:Lord Lloyd
318:Lord Slynn
299:Lord Steyn
269:High Court
143:Lord Lloyd
135:Lord Steyn
127:Lord Slynn
761:AllTrials
346:Lord Hope
342:Lord Goff
183:1 AC 61,
155:Lord Hope
151:Lord Goff
90:Div'l Ct.
896:R v Neil
808:Lobbying
792:Cui bono
781:Cochrane
720:Nepotism
570:BBC News
524:15 April
519:BBC News
500:1 AC 147
480:BBC News
400:See also
280:Judgment
265:Interpol
69:Citation
754:Related
209:torture
111:UKHL 17
104:UKHL 52
61:Decided
683:Issues
576:10 May
550:19 May
486:10 May
451:29 May
913:Media
818:cases
745:Shill
422:Notes
251:Facts
213:Spain
207:from
92:1998)
41:Court
1021:Bias
771:Bias
603:2020
578:2010
552:2016
526:2021
488:2010
453:2021
366:bias
360:and
320:and
297:and
187:and
108:No 3
101:No 2
87:Q.B.
874:Law
384:In
332:In
189:147
185:119
1002::
594:.
568:.
542:.
517:.
478:.
444:.
430:^
356:,
352:,
348:,
344:,
340:,
293:,
169:,
165:,
161:,
157:,
153:,
149:,
145:,
141:,
137:,
133:,
129:,
668:e
661:t
654:v
605:.
580:.
554:.
528:.
490:.
235:(
223:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
