514:
persons, not the U.S. government). Subsequently, Babcock reversed himself on advice by a higher court that such an act by an arm of government (Congress) changed the traditional interpretation of copyright and should be subject to First
Amendment scrutiny. That reversal was itself reversed on appeal and summary judgement granted for the government. Babcock's holding - that "In the United States, that body of law includes the bedrock principle that works in the public domain remain in the public domain. Removing works from the public domain violated Plaintiffs’ vested First Amendment interests" - therefore no longer applies. In 2012, the
129:
66:
373:. This date will move forward one year, every year, meaning that films released in 1929 will enter the public domain on New Year's Day 2025, films from 1930 on New Year's Day 2026, and so on. All copyrightable works made by United States government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain from their creation. The status of works made by contractors is dependent on the terms of their contract. State or local governments, which
541:, even if other elements of the film are in the public domain. Thus even if a film dates from 1915 and as such is ineligible for copyright in the United States of America, a 2004 version with new visual or audio elements (including the addition of a new recording of the score of a silent film) may be itself eligible for a 2004 copyright to those new elements. Special features and packaging are themselves subject to copyright protection.
165:
553:
25:
414:
387:
417:
421:
420:
416:
415:
422:
441:
513:
was not applicable to resurrecting foreign copyright claims. This holding followed tradition in that the First
Amendment (which protects against suppression of free speech by government) has always been held not to prevail against the earlier copyright clause (copyrights are generally held by
484:
In the course of changes made to both U.S. domestic law and international copyright agreements in the last two decades, some works which had fallen in the public domain had copyright restored in the U.S, and many others had new copyright protections placed on them for the first time. This was
396:
419:
423:
395:
394:
392:
391:
390:
393:
389:
447:
446:
443:
442:
448:
485:
challenged on the grounds that works once in the public domain could not revert to copyright protection - a constitutional question. The see-saw course of court decisions on the matter has caused confusion, with many significant works (such as
445:
418:
506:, which held that the "limited time" language of the United States Constitution's Copyright Clause does not preclude the extension of copyright protections to works previously in the public domain.
388:
494:
Specifically, from a holding published on 3 April 2009 to a reversal on 21 June 2010, re-imposition of copyright was not permitted. That brief period came after the 2001 American case
325:
In 2004, Japan extended its copyright protection of films from 50 years to 70 years. However, films released before 1971 remain under copyright until 38 years after the director dies.
655:
444:
698:
369:
In the United States, motion pictures published before 1978 are copyrighted for 95 years. All motion pictures made and exhibited before 1929 are indisputably in the
374:
566:
364:
312:
is smaller. However, many films have become public domain because the copyright has expired, or they have been intentionally released by their creators.
625:
510:
477:
agreements on copyright led to the U.S. Congress re-imposing copyright on some items which had fallen into the public domain (in section 514 of the
360:
76:
699:"BeatRoute Magazine - Western Canada's Monthly Arts & Entertainment Source - Archives - Film - Kurosawa, the Emperor of Cinema"
677:
651:
288:
229:
571:
287:. A film can lack copyright protection for various reasons, but often it occurs following the end of a copyright term. Because
201:
702:
297:
entered the United States public domain in 2023, but under current EU copyright law, the film will remain under copyright in
208:
182:
38:
351:
ruled that films released before 1971 would have their copyrights restored if the director died less than 38 years ago.
370:
266:
248:
110:
52:
215:
348:
308:
Due to the relatively shorter history of film compared to other artistic mediums the total number of films in the
459:
197:
186:
629:
478:
515:
522:
upheld the ability of
Congress to restore copyright to public domain works by international treaty.
403:
92:
175:
88:
44:
678:"Paramount Pictures - Japanese Court Rules Pre-1953 Movies In Public Domain - Contactmusic News"
222:
748:
743:
292:
530:
406:
entered the public domain immediately upon release due to having an improper copyright notice
291:, certain films might be public domain in one country but not another. For example, the film
84:
534:
333:
8:
576:
473:
Another issue specifically affects copyright of foreign works in the United States. The
142:
Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
329:
581:
526:
496:
455:
601:
626:"Argument for the Extension of the Copyright Protection over Cinematographic Works"
723:
502:
430:
344:
302:
737:
487:
474:
309:
462:, entered the public domain in 2023 following the end of its 95 year term
336:
ruled that films released before 1954 were in the
Japanese public domain.
558:
538:
284:
164:
298:
468:
433:
entered the public domain after its copyright was not renewed
381:
Examples of films in the public domain in the United States
340:
305:
until the end of 2046, 70 years after Fritz Lang's death.
567:
List of films in the public domain in the United States
365:
List of films in the public domain in the United States
548:
491:) changing status several times in a short period.
189:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
735:
315:
537:versions of films can themselves be subject to
361:Copyright status of work by the U.S. government
469:Re-imposing copyright following Uruguay Round
73:The examples and perspective in this article
53:Learn how and when to remove these messages
377:over their works, depending on state laws.
267:Learn how and when to remove this message
249:Learn how and when to remove this message
111:Learn how and when to remove this message
509:Initially, Judge Babcock held that the
328:In July 2006, following a lawsuit from
16:Film that is not protected by copyright
736:
187:adding citations to reliable sources
158:
122:
59:
18:
572:List of countries' copyright length
13:
371:public domain in the United States
339:In 2008, following a lawsuit from
14:
760:
34:This article has multiple issues.
551:
439:
412:
385:
354:
349:Intellectual Property High Court
289:copyright term varies by country
283:is one that is not protected by
163:
127:
64:
23:
174:needs additional citations for
42:or discuss these issues on the
716:
701:. Beatroute.ca. Archived from
691:
680:. Contactmusic.com. 2006-07-12
670:
644:
618:
594:
460:Academy Award for Best Picture
375:may or may not claim copyright
1:
587:
316:Public domain film by country
458:, the first film to win the
7:
544:
516:United States Supreme Court
87:, discuss the issue on the
10:
767:
606:www.gesetze-im-internet.de
358:
343:over the distribution of
136:This article needs to be
602:"§ 65 UrhG - Einzelnorm"
404:Night of the Living Dead
320:
727:, 565 U.S. 302 (2012).
658:on September 29, 2011
500:was reconsidered in
334:Tokyo District Court
301:and the rest of the
198:"Public domain film"
183:improve this article
93:create a new article
85:improve this article
75:may not represent a
632:on February 4, 2008
577:Public domain music
330:Paramount Pictures
281:public domain film
582:Public Domain Day
497:Golan v. Gonzales
456:Wings (1927 film)
449:
424:
397:
277:
276:
269:
259:
258:
251:
233:
157:
156:
121:
120:
113:
95:, as appropriate.
57:
756:
728:
720:
714:
713:
711:
710:
695:
689:
688:
686:
685:
674:
668:
667:
665:
663:
654:. Archived from
648:
642:
641:
639:
637:
628:. Archived from
622:
616:
615:
613:
612:
598:
561:
556:
555:
554:
451:
450:
426:
425:
399:
398:
272:
265:
254:
247:
243:
240:
234:
232:
191:
167:
159:
152:
149:
143:
131:
130:
123:
116:
109:
105:
102:
96:
68:
67:
60:
49:
27:
26:
19:
766:
765:
759:
758:
757:
755:
754:
753:
734:
733:
732:
731:
724:Golan v. Holder
721:
717:
708:
706:
697:
696:
692:
683:
681:
676:
675:
671:
661:
659:
650:
649:
645:
635:
633:
624:
623:
619:
610:
608:
600:
599:
595:
590:
557:
552:
550:
547:
511:First Amendment
503:Golan v. Holder
481:), as of 1996.
471:
464:
463:
452:
440:
435:
434:
431:Fear and Desire
427:
413:
408:
407:
400:
386:
367:
359:Main articles:
357:
323:
318:
273:
262:
261:
260:
255:
244:
238:
235:
192:
190:
180:
168:
153:
147:
144:
141:
132:
128:
117:
106:
100:
97:
82:
69:
65:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
764:
763:
752:
751:
746:
730:
729:
715:
705:on May 7, 2009
690:
669:
643:
617:
592:
591:
589:
586:
585:
584:
579:
574:
569:
563:
562:
546:
543:
470:
467:
466:
465:
454:
453:
438:
436:
429:
428:
411:
409:
402:
401:
384:
382:
356:
353:
347:'s films, the
345:Akira Kurosawa
322:
319:
317:
314:
303:European Union
275:
274:
257:
256:
171:
169:
162:
155:
154:
135:
133:
126:
119:
118:
79:of the subject
77:worldwide view
72:
70:
63:
58:
32:
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
762:
761:
750:
749:Public domain
747:
745:
744:Films by type
742:
741:
739:
726:
725:
719:
704:
700:
694:
679:
673:
657:
653:
647:
631:
627:
621:
607:
603:
597:
593:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
564:
560:
549:
542:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
521:
517:
512:
507:
505:
504:
499:
498:
492:
490:
489:
488:The Third Man
482:
480:
476:
475:Uruguay Round
461:
457:
437:
432:
410:
405:
383:
380:
379:
378:
376:
372:
366:
362:
355:United States
352:
350:
346:
342:
337:
335:
331:
326:
313:
311:
310:public domain
306:
304:
300:
296:
295:
290:
286:
282:
271:
268:
253:
250:
242:
231:
228:
224:
221:
217:
214:
210:
207:
203:
200: –
199:
195:
194:Find sources:
188:
184:
178:
177:
172:This article
170:
166:
161:
160:
151:
148:December 2010
139:
134:
125:
124:
115:
112:
104:
101:December 2010
94:
90:
86:
80:
78:
71:
62:
61:
56:
54:
47:
46:
41:
40:
35:
30:
21:
20:
722:
718:
707:. Retrieved
703:the original
693:
682:. Retrieved
672:
660:. Retrieved
656:the original
646:
634:. Retrieved
630:the original
620:
609:. Retrieved
605:
596:
524:
519:
518:decision in
508:
501:
495:
493:
486:
483:
472:
368:
338:
327:
324:
307:
293:
280:
278:
263:
245:
236:
226:
219:
212:
205:
193:
181:Please help
176:verification
173:
145:
137:
107:
98:
74:
50:
43:
37:
36:Please help
33:
652:"HDR Japan"
559:Film portal
738:Categories
709:2010-12-05
684:2010-12-05
611:2023-04-29
588:References
525:Note that
294:Metropolis
239:March 2011
209:newspapers
39:improve it
662:March 14,
636:March 14,
539:copyright
531:subtitled
285:copyright
89:talk page
45:talk page
545:See also
527:restored
479:URAA Act
83:You may
299:Germany
223:scholar
138:updated
535:dubbed
533:, and
332:, the
225:
218:
211:
204:
196:
520:Golan
321:Japan
230:JSTOR
216:books
91:, or
664:2008
638:2008
363:and
341:Toho
202:news
185:by
740::
604:.
529:,
279:A
48:.
712:.
687:.
666:.
640:.
614:.
270:)
264:(
252:)
246:(
241:)
237:(
227:·
220:·
213:·
206:·
179:.
150:)
146:(
140:.
114:)
108:(
103:)
99:(
81:.
55:)
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
