Knowledge

Problem set

Source 📝

55:
It is essentially a list of several mildly difficult problems or exercises based on material already taught, which the student is expected to solve with a full written solution. There is no further research involved, and the goal is to learn and become familiar with the material and solving typical
75:
to solve them and help get a better understanding of the material, but most professors require each student to hand in their own individual problem set. Some professors explicitly encourage collaboration, some allow it, and some explicitly disallow it or consider it cheating. Most, however, do not
87:
for others to post their solutions. The professor failed him for his actions and recommended him for expulsion; the university faculty appeal committee overturned the recommended penalty and instead gave a zero grade for the assignments that were done through the course of the semester.
64:, between 10% and 25% of the total mark of the course for all problem sets put together, and sometimes will count for nothing if the student receives a better grade on the exam. Alternatively, problem sets may be used purely for 76:
disallow collaboration, because they see the goal as primarily pedagogical. This is to be distinguished from larger, more important assignments, for which students are still expected to work independently.
258: 195: 101: 312: 172: 56:
problems. They are usually issued once every week or two weeks, and due one or two weeks later. If used as part of a
216: 97: 80: 111: 164: 344: 79:
Collaboration on problem sets has caused controversy, including a media storm around a student of
138: 65: 57: 48:
will give problem sets on a regular basis. They can also appear in other subjects, such as
8: 236: 349: 262: 115: 105: 192: 168: 45: 287: 220: 199: 61: 338: 291: 213: 156: 152: 72: 37: 25: 49: 41: 316: 84: 83:, Chris Avenir, who started a forum on the social networking site 118:. In this case they are collectively worth 20% of the total mark. 29: 193:
Course Policy for a physics course at the University of Virginia
161:
First Day to Final Grade: A Graduate Student's Guide to Teaching
33: 313:"T.O. student won't be expelled over Facebook group" 151: 112:A list of all of the problem sets from that class 336: 259:"Ryerson student cheered at expulsion hearing" 256: 285: 281: 279: 252: 250: 248: 246: 244: 209: 207: 237:Ohio State University economics syllabus 337: 276: 241: 232: 230: 228: 204: 288:"Student faces Facebook consequences" 214:Caltech quantum mechanics course page 188: 186: 184: 225: 98:An example of a typical problem set 68:and do not count towards a degree. 13: 24:, is a teaching tool used by many 14: 361: 257:James Bradshaw (March 12, 2008). 181: 81:Toronto Metropolitan University 305: 286:Louise Brown (March 6, 2008). 145: 131: 1: 124: 60:they are usually given a low 165:University of Michigan Press 7: 91: 10: 366: 139:"The Process of Psetting" 20:, sometimes shortened as 71:Many students work in 66:formative assessment 58:summative assessment 263:The Globe and Mail 219:2008-06-28 at the 198:2007-12-13 at the 167:. pp. 65–66. 116:MIT OpenCourseWare 28:. Most courses in 357: 345:Higher education 329: 328: 326: 324: 319:. March 18, 2008 309: 303: 302: 300: 298: 283: 274: 273: 271: 269: 254: 239: 234: 223: 211: 202: 190: 179: 178: 149: 143: 142: 135: 108:(physics) class 46:computer science 365: 364: 360: 359: 358: 356: 355: 354: 335: 334: 333: 332: 322: 320: 311: 310: 306: 296: 294: 284: 277: 267: 265: 255: 242: 235: 226: 221:Wayback Machine 212: 205: 200:Wayback Machine 191: 182: 175: 150: 146: 137: 136: 132: 127: 94: 12: 11: 5: 363: 353: 352: 347: 331: 330: 304: 275: 240: 224: 203: 180: 173: 144: 129: 128: 126: 123: 122: 121: 120: 119: 93: 90: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 362: 351: 348: 346: 343: 342: 340: 318: 314: 308: 293: 289: 282: 280: 264: 260: 253: 251: 249: 247: 245: 238: 233: 231: 229: 222: 218: 215: 210: 208: 201: 197: 194: 189: 187: 185: 176: 174:0-472-03188-0 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 148: 140: 134: 130: 117: 113: 110: 109: 107: 103: 99: 96: 95: 89: 86: 82: 77: 74: 69: 67: 63: 59: 53: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 321:. Retrieved 307: 295:. Retrieved 292:Toronto Star 266:. Retrieved 160: 153:Curzan, Anne 147: 133: 78: 70: 54: 26:universities 21: 17: 15: 157:Lisa Damour 38:engineering 18:problem set 339:Categories 125:References 106:relativity 350:Didactics 50:economics 42:chemistry 323:June 10, 317:CTV News 297:June 10, 268:June 10, 217:Archived 196:Archived 159:(2006). 92:Examples 85:Facebook 100:, from 30:physics 171:  73:groups 62:weight 44:, and 114:, on 325:2008 299:2008 270:2008 169:ISBN 34:math 22:pset 104:'s 102:MIT 341:: 315:. 290:. 278:^ 261:. 243:^ 227:^ 206:^ 183:^ 163:. 155:; 52:. 40:, 36:, 32:, 16:A 327:. 301:. 272:. 177:. 141:.

Index

universities
physics
math
engineering
chemistry
computer science
economics
summative assessment
weight
formative assessment
groups
Toronto Metropolitan University
Facebook
An example of a typical problem set
MIT
relativity
A list of all of the problem sets from that class
MIT OpenCourseWare
"The Process of Psetting"
Curzan, Anne
Lisa Damour
University of Michigan Press
ISBN
0-472-03188-0



Course Policy for a physics course at the University of Virginia
Archived
Wayback Machine

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.