Knowledge

Market power

Source đź“ť

588:. Within this market structure, the market is highly concentrated and several firms control a significant share of market sales. The emergence of oligopoly market forms is mainly attributed to the monopoly of market competition, i.e., the market monopoly acquired by enterprises through their competitive advantages, and the administrative monopoly due to government regulations, such as when the government grants monopoly power to an enterprise in the industry through laws and regulations and at the same time imposes certain controls on it to improve efficiency. The main characteristics of an oligopoly are: 737:-firm concentration ratio, one usually uses sales revenue to calculate market share, however, concentration ratios based on other measures such as production capacity may also be used. For a monopoly, the 4-firm concentration ratio is 100 per cent whilst for perfect competition, the ratio is zero. Moreover, studies indicate that a concentration ratio of between 40 and 70 percent suggests that the firm operates as an oligopoly. These figures are viable but should be used as a 'rule of thumb' as it is important to consider other market factors when analysing concentration ratios. 530:' and consists of one firm that produces a unique product or service without close substitutes. Whilst pure monopolies are rare, monopoly power is far more common and can be seen in many industries even with more than one supplier in the market. Firms with monopoly power can charge a higher price for products (higher markup) as demand is relatively inelastic. They also see a falling rate of labour share as firms divest from expensive inputs such as labour. Often, firms with monopoly power exist in industries with high barriers to entry, which include, but are not limited to: 652:, the sources of market power is derived from distinctiveness of the good and or seller. For a monopolist, distinctiveness is a necessary condition that needs to be satisfied but this is just the starting point. Without barriers to entries, above normal profits experienced by monopolists would not persist as other sellers of homogenous or similar goods would continue to enter the industry until above normal profits are diminished until the industry experiences 42: 396: 801: 312:(MC) without losing revenue. This indicates that the magnitude of market power is associated with the gap between P and MC at a firm's profit maximising level of output. The size of the gap, which encapsulates the firm's level of market dominance, is determined by the residual demand curve's form. A steeper reverse demand indicates higher earnings and more dominance in the market. Such propensities contradict 333:(DWL) and a decline in consumer surplus. This is viewed as socially undesirable and has implications for welfare and resource allocation as larger firms with high markups negatively effect labour markets by providing lower wages. Perfectly competitive markets do not exhibit such issues as firms set prices that reflect costs, which is to the benefit of the customer. As a result, many countries have 432:"Perfect Competition" refers to a market structure that is devoid of any barriers or interference and describes those marketplaces where neither corporations nor consumers are powerful enough to affect pricing. In terms of economics, it is one of the many conventional market forms and the optimal condition of market competition. The concept of 714:
power. Measures of concentration summarise the share of market or industry activity accounted for by large firms. An advantage of using concentration as an empirical tool to quantify market power is the requirement of only needing revenue data of firms which results in the corresponding disadvantage of the inconsideration of costs or profits.
797:-firm concentration ratio, large firms are given more weight in the HHI and as a result, the HHI conveys more information. However the HHI has its own limitations as it is sensitive to the definition of a market, therefore meaning you cannot use it to cross-examine different industries, or do analysis over time as the industry changes. 749:
The Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) is another measure of concentration and is the sum of the squared market shares of all firms in a market. The HHI is a more widely used indicator in economics and government regulation. The index reflects not only the market share of large firms within the market,
697:
Magnitude of a firm's market power is shown by a firm's ability to deviate from an elastic demand curve and charge a higher price (P) above its marginal cost (C), commonly referred to as a firm's mark-up or margin. The higher a firm's mark-up, the larger the magnitude of power. This said, markups are
624:
Oligopolistic firms are believed to operate within the confines of the kinked demand function. This means that when firms set prices above the prevailing price level (P*), prices are relatively elastic because individuals are likely to switch to a competitor's product as a substitute. Prices below P*
605:
It is salient to note that only a few firms make up the market share. Hence, their market power is large as a collective and each firm has little or no market power independently. For firms trying to enter these industries, unless they can start with a large production scale and capture a significant
517:
The word monopoly is used in various instances referring to a single seller of a product, a producer with an overwhelming level of market share, or refer to a large firm. All of these treatments have one unifying factor which is the ability to influence the market price by altering the supply of the
320:
The market power of any individual firm is controlled by multiple factors, including but not limited to, their size, the structure of the market they are involved in, and the barriers to entry for the particular market. A firm with market power has the ability to individually affect either the total
898:
under section 2 restricts firms from engaging in anticompetitive conduct by utilising an individual firm's power to manipulate the market or partake in anticompetitive acts. A firm can be found in breach of the act if they have leveraged their market power to unfairly gain further market power in a
881:
Where P represents the price of the good set by the firm and MC representing the firm's marginal cost.The formula focuses on the nature of monopoly and emphasising welfare economic implications of the Pareto optimal principle. Although Lerner is usually credited for the price/cost margin index, the
672:
High start-up costs. This barrier makes it difficult for new entrants to succeed as the initial creation costs are ingrained within the industry. Firms like power, cable television and telecommunication companies fall within this category. A firm seeking to enter such industries require the ability
488:
as it shares elements present in both market structures that are on different ends of the market structure spectrum. Monopolistic competition is a type of market structure defined by many producers that are competing against each other by selling similar goods which are differentiated, thus are not
316:
markets, where market participants have no market power, P = MC and firms earn zero economic profit. Market participants in perfectly competitive markets are consequently referred to as 'price takers', whereas market participants that exhibit market power are referred to as 'price makers' or 'price
617: 407:
depicts how different industries are characterized and differentiated based upon the types of goods the firms sell (homogenous/heterogenous) and the nature of competition within the industry. The degree of market power firms assert in different markets are relative to the market structure that the
684:
Factors of Production Barriers. An important influencing factor of market power is the control of the supply of factors of production to produce the good. Factors of production can be divided into tangible land, capital, and intangible human resources, intelligence, etc. As the industrial economy
680:
Government policies/regulations. One significant technique of governmental action to create monopolies is the granting of franchises and operating licenses. This is due to the fact that no other businesses are permitted by law to operate without a franchise. A prime example are patents granted to
508:
Firms within this market structure are not price takers and compete based on product price, quality and through marketing efforts, setting individual prices for the unique differentiated products. Examples of industries with monopolistic competition include restaurants, hairdressers and clothing.
713:
of the largest firms in the market account for a significant portion of the economic activities quantifiable by various metrics such as sales, employment, active users. Recent macroeconomic market power literature indicates that concentration ratios are the most frequently used measure of market
676:
Brand loyalty of consumers and value placed by consumers on reputation. Incumbent firms often have a competitive advantage over new entrants as customers are familiar with the product and service. An incumbent firm can engage in several entry-deterring strategies such as limit pricing, predatory
468:
As all firms in the market are price takers, they essentially hold zero market power and must accept the price given by the market. A perfectly competitive market is logically impossible to achieve in a real world scenario as it embodies contradiction in itself and therefore is considered an
740:
An advantage of concentration ratios as an empirical tool for studying market power is that it requires only data on revenues and is thus easy to compute. The corresponding disadvantage is that concentration is about relative revenue and includes no information about costs or profits.
356:, holding excess capacity and strategic bundling. A firm usually has market power by having a high market share although this alone is not sufficient to establish the possession of significant market power. This is because highly concentrated markets may be contestable if there are no 307:
to influence the price at which it sells a product or service by manipulating either the supply or demand of the product or service to increase economic profit. In other words, market power occurs if a firm does not face a perfectly elastic demand curve and can set its price (P) above
374:
Regulators are able to assess the level of market power and dominance a firm has and measure competition through the use of several tools and indicators. Although market power is extremely difficult to measure, through the use of widely used analytical techniques such as
371:, or the exercise of a group of participants' collective market power. An example of which was seen in 2007, when British Airways was found to have colluded with Virgin Atlantic between 2004 and 2006, increasing their surcharges per ticket from ÂŁ5 to ÂŁ60. 493:
as a result of differentiated goods providing sellers with some degree of market power; however, profits approaches zero as more competitive toughness increases in the industry. The main characteristics of monopolistic competition include:
685:
changes to a knowledge-based economy, the control of the supply of intangible factors of production such as talent, intelligence, information, etc. will become more and more of a barrier to entry for companies with unlimited market power.
817:
is a widely accepted and applied method of estimating market power in a monopoly. It compares a firm's price of output with its associated marginal cost where marginal cost pricing is the "socially optimal level" achieved in market with
606:
market share, the high average costs will make it impossible for them to compete with the existing firms. Generally, when a firm operating in an oligopolistic market adjusts prices, other firms in the industry will be directly impacted.
899:
manner that is detrimental to the market and consumers. The measurement of market power is key in determining a breach of the act and can be determined from multiple measurements as discussed in measurements of market power above.
750:
but also the market structure outside of large firms, and therefore, more accurately reflects the degree of influence of large firms on the market. For example, in a market with two firms, each with 50% market share, the HHI is
911:
The degree to which a firm can raise its price above marginal cost depends on the shape of the demand curve at a firm's profit maximising level of output. Consequently, the relationship between market power and the
902:
In Australia, consumer law allows for firms to have significant market power and utilise it, as long as it is determined to not have “the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition”
632:, either tacit or overt to exercise market power and manipulate prices to control demand and revenue for a collection of firms. A group of firms that explicitly agree to affect market price or output is called a 681:
pharmaceutical companies which prevent competitors from creating and selling their specific goods. These patents give the drug companies a virtual monopoly in the protected product for the term of the patent.
440:. This occurs when the quantity supplied by sellers in the market equals the quantity demanded by buyers in the market at the current price. Firms competing in a perfectly competitive market faces a 669:
Increasing returns to scale. Firms that experience increasing returns to scale also experience decreasing average total costs and therefore become more profitable with size and higher demand levels.
2193: 987: 352:. As a result, legislation recognises that firms with market power can, in some circumstances, damage the competitive process. In particular, firms with market power are accused of limit pricing, 1159: 698:
complicated to measure as they are reliant on a firm's marginal costs and as a result, concentration ratios are the more common measures as they require only publicly accessible revenue data.
662:
High barriers to entry. These barriers include the control of scarce resources, increasing returns to scale, technological superiority and government created barriers to entry.
598:
High barriers to entry. This includes, but is not limited to, 'technology challenges, government regulations, patents, start-up costs, or education and licensing requirements'.
791: 894:
Market power within competition law can be used to determine whether or not a firm has unfairly manipulated the market in their favour, or to the detriment of entrants. The
424:. Perfect competition and monopoly represent the two extremes of market structure, respectively. Monopolistic competition and oligopoly exist in between these two extremes. 876: 826:(1934) believes that market power is the monopoly manufacturers' ability to raise prices above their marginal cost. This notion can be expressed by using the formula: 104: 1087: 1056: 1021: 733:
firms in the market. For example, a 4-firm concentration ratio measures the total market share of the four largest firms in an industry. In order to calculate the
694:
Measuring market power is inherently complex because the most widely used measures are sensitive to the definition of a market and the range of analysis.
677:
pricing and strategic bundling. Microsoft has substantial pricing or market power due to technological superiority in its design and production processes.
2116: 625:
are believed to be relatively inelastic as competitive firms are likely to mimic the change in prices, meaning less gains are experienced by the firm.
804:
Relationship between the Herfindahl-Hirschman index and market structure. The greater the Herfindahl-Hirschman value, the greater the market power.
3634: 3527: 1781: 572:
with its operating system. In this respect, the notion of dominance and dominant position in EU Antitrust Law is a strictly related aspect.
321:
quantity or price in the market. This said, market power has been seen to exert more upward pressure on prices due to effects relating to
2221: 2036:
Vatiero, M. (2009). An Institutionalist Explanation of Market Dominances. World Competition. Law and Economics Review, 32(2):221–226.
1173: 282: 3588: 1875: 3573: 2167: 367:
If no individual participant in the market has significant market power, anti-competitive conduct can only take place through
2241: 1912: 1804: 1757: 1377: 1341: 448:, therefore, no economic profits are present. The following criteria need to be satisfied in a perfectly competitive market: 922: 1099: 2092: 613:
who was an American economist. It is important to note that this graph is a simplistic example of a kinked demand curve.
2402:"Relationship between concentration ratio and Herfindahl-Hirschman index: A re-examination based on majorization theory" 2844: 2800: 2713: 2476: 2730: 2076: 1681: 1571: 337:
or other legislation intended to limit the ability of firms to accrue market power. Such legislation often regulates
251: 3629: 3593: 380: 329:
and as a result, price increases lead to a lower quantity demanded. The decrease in supply creates an economic
89: 793:= 0.50 + 0.50 = 0.50. The HHI for a monopoly is 1 whilst for perfect competition, the HHI is zero. Unlike the 3113: 895: 275: 194: 17: 2660:"Who Invented the Lerner Index? Luigi Amoroso, the Dominant Firm Model, and the Measurement of Market Power" 3537: 3208: 518:
good or service through its own production decisions. The most discussed form of market power is that of a
3075: 2752: 1474: 1429:
Vatiero, Massimiliano (2010). "The Ordoliberal Notion of Market Power: An Institutionalist Reassessment".
3032: 3017: 1944: 3273: 2997: 913: 564: 349: 123: 58: 2046: 753: 403:
In economics, market structure can profoundly affect the behavior and financial performance of firms.
3138: 2623:
Elzinga, Kenneth G.; Mills, David E. (2011). "The Lerner Index of Monopoly Power: Origins and Uses".
364:. Invariably, this limits the incumbent firm's ability to raise its price above competitive levels. 3608: 477: 413: 325:
and profitable deviations that can be made by raising prices. Price makers face a downward-sloping
268: 666:
is an example of an organization that has market power due to control over scarce resources — oil.
568:
case dealt with an allegation that Microsoft illegally exercised its market power by bundling its
3583: 3447: 2853: 1590:
Lábaj, Martin; Morvay, Karol; Silanič, Peter; Weiss, Christoph; Yontcheva, Biliana (2018-03-28).
832: 3578: 3376: 3002: 2922: 2837: 648:
By remaining consistent with the strict definition of market power as any firm with a positive
168: 2233: 1907:, How Market Power Fosters Creative Production, University of Michigan Press, pp. 25–53, 3568: 3477: 3467: 3173: 2967: 1219: 1194: 256: 1463:
Leslie, C. (2013). PREDATORY PRICING AND RECOUPMENT. Columbia Law Review, 113(7), 1695–1771.
1240: 1093:
and market power approaches zero. The equation is derived from the monopolist pricing rule:
3497: 3462: 3268: 3105: 3095: 2927: 2872: 2413: 1214: 1199: 706: 211: 206: 94: 3007: 2742:
Perloff, J: Microeconomics Theory & Applications with Calculus page 369. Pearson 2008.
1705:
McDermott, John F. M. (2015-05-19). "Perfect competition, methodologically contemplated".
1061: 1030: 995: 436:
represents a theoretical market structure where the market reaches an equilibrium that is
8: 3547: 3457: 3452: 3442: 3432: 3356: 3253: 3055: 2937: 2932: 2780: 1529: 1177: 819: 653: 481: 433: 409: 376: 313: 3396: 3328: 2987: 2417: 3563: 3427: 3338: 3243: 3183: 2902: 2867: 2695: 2687: 2640: 2531: 2444: 2401: 2338: 2330: 2289: 2149: 1918: 1857: 1775: 1730: 1654: 1566:(6th ed.). Printed in the United States of America 6th Edition. pp. 171–172. 1541: 1446: 1306: 1260: 882:
generalized version was fully derived prior to WWII by Italian neoclassical economist,
534: 490: 304: 230: 152: 2220:
White, Lawrence J. (2013-07-01), Thomas, Christopher R.; Shughart, William F. (eds.),
3437: 3303: 3263: 2830: 2796: 2699: 2679: 2644: 2572: 2449: 2431: 2382: 2237: 2072: 2019: 1908: 1861: 1849: 1829: 1810: 1800: 1763: 1753: 1734: 1722: 1687: 1677: 1613: 1567: 1533: 1494: 1450: 1373: 1337: 1310: 1209: 556: 539: 357: 353: 216: 201: 84: 72: 2342: 1058:
ratio, the more market power the firm possesses. As PED increases in magnitude, the
408:
firms operate in. There are four main forms of market structures that are observed:
3522: 3507: 3472: 3391: 3386: 3371: 3323: 3288: 3238: 3133: 3022: 3012: 2992: 2962: 2942: 2882: 2812: 2671: 2632: 2603: 2562: 2523: 2439: 2421: 2372: 2320: 2229: 2009: 1841: 1714: 1644: 1603: 1525: 1486: 1438: 1409: 1369: 1365: 1329: 1296: 1252: 1204: 1189: 559: 404: 361: 322: 225: 179: 175: 77: 2567: 2550: 2426: 1718: 1608: 1591: 1333: 3532: 3487: 3482: 3411: 3381: 3258: 3223: 3218: 3213: 3193: 3178: 3168: 2977: 2917: 2907: 2887: 2753:"The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2014" 1592:"Market structure and competition in transition: results from a spatial analysis" 609:
The graph below depicts the kinked demand curve hypothesis which was proposed by
330: 184: 163: 109: 33: 2947: 526:
and more moderate versions of these extremes exist. A monopoly is considered a '
387:, regulators are able to oversee and attempt to restore market competitiveness. 3603: 3406: 3401: 3313: 3283: 3198: 3153: 3080: 3065: 3040: 2982: 2912: 2892: 2717: 1490: 823: 673:
to spend millions of dollars before starting operations and generating revenue.
527: 437: 132: 114: 2675: 2608: 2591: 2325: 2308: 1845: 1830:"Oligopolistic vs. monopolistic competition: Do intersectoral effects matter?" 1767: 1360:
Davis, Douglas D. (2018). "Market Power and Collusion in Laboratory Markets".
3623: 3598: 3492: 3366: 3361: 3351: 3298: 3278: 3248: 3233: 3163: 3148: 3143: 3090: 3050: 3045: 2972: 2952: 2897: 2683: 2576: 2500:
Samuelson & Nordhaus, Microeconomics, 17th ed. (McGraw-Hill 2001) at 184.
2466:
Samuelson & Nordhaus, Microeconomics, 17th ed. (McGraw-Hill 2001) at 183.
2435: 2386: 2023: 1922: 1900: 1853: 1814: 1726: 1617: 1537: 1498: 883: 445: 309: 221: 189: 27:
Ability of a firm to raise the market price of a commodity over marginal cost
2480: 2361:"Macroeconomics and Market Power: Context, Implications, and Open Questions" 1968: 1285:"Macroeconomics and Market Power: Context, Implications, and Open Questions" 709:, also referred to as industry concentration, refers to the extent of which 3512: 3346: 3318: 3293: 3158: 3085: 3060: 2957: 2781:
Macroeconomics and Market Power: Context, Implications, and Open Questions.
2453: 814: 710: 649: 384: 326: 235: 148: 2822: 2636: 1945:"Monopoly power as a market failure | Economics Online | Economics Online" 1691: 3542: 3517: 3228: 3123: 3070: 2877: 2117:"Section 3: Characteristics of an Oligopoly Industry | Inflate Your Mind" 2014: 1997: 1442: 1414: 1397: 1169: 729:-firm concentration ratio gives the combined market share of the largest 610: 569: 342: 158: 2691: 2659: 2377: 2360: 2334: 2293: 2277: 1545: 1513: 1301: 1284: 3203: 3188: 3118: 2535: 2153: 2137: 1658: 1264: 640:) being one of the most well known example of an international cartel. 585: 464:
All firms have relatively small market share and cannot influence price
2093:"Barriers to Entry - Types of Barriers to Markets & How They Work" 1512:
Borenstein, Severin; Bushnell, James; Knittel, Christopher R. (1999).
3308: 3128: 629: 581: 552: 523: 417: 395: 368: 348:
Market power provides firms with the ability to engage in unilateral
334: 296: 137: 67: 41: 2527: 1649: 1632: 1514:"Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures" 1473:
Lin, Jing; Ma, Xin; Talluri, Srinivas; Yang, Cheng-Hu (2021-02-09).
1256: 800: 616: 2047:"Oligopoly - characteristics | Economics Online | Economics Online" 519: 485: 421: 63: 2511: 489:
perfect substitutes. In the short term, firms are able to obtain
1876:"Monopolistic Competition - Overview, How It Works, Limitations" 1828:
d’Aspremont, Claude; Dos Santos Ferreira, Rodolphe (June 2016).
2809:"The Theory of Industrial Organization", Tirole, MIT Press 1988 2309:"Perceptions regarding strategic and structural entry barriers" 633: 338: 143: 2512:"The New Merger Guidelines and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index" 1998:"The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications*" 1827: 1674:
Theory of value; an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium
2790: 1996:
De Loecker, Jan; Eeckhout, Jan; Unger, Gabriel (2020-05-01).
1398:"The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications" 544:
Control of key resources (required in production of the good)
441: 2069:
Global Oligopoly : a Key Idea for Business and Society
663: 637: 636:, with the organization of petroleum-exporting countries ( 2590:
Sun, Baowen; Jing, Wenjun; Zhao, Xuankai; He, Yi (2017).
1511: 1939: 1937: 2817:
The Great Reversal: How America Gave Up on Free Markets
2266:
Krugman & Wells, Microeconomics 2d ed. (Worth 2009)
1995: 1794: 1589: 1396:
Unger, Gabriel; Eeckhout, Jan; De Loecker, Jan (2020).
1395: 1324:
Pleatsikas, Christopher (2018). "Perfect Competition".
2791:
Brickley, Smith and Zimmerman (13 October 2008). "7".
2222:"Market Power: How Does it Arise? How is it Measured?" 1991: 1989: 1934: 1475:"Retail channel management decisions under collusion" 1102: 1064: 1033: 998: 982:{\displaystyle {\frac {P}{MC}}={\frac {PED}{1+PED}}.} 925: 835: 756: 658:
There are several sources of market power including:
551:
A well-known example of monopolistic market power is
2793:
Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture
1154:{\displaystyle {\frac {P-MC}{P}}=-{\frac {1}{PED}}.} 341:
and sometimes introduces a judicial power to compel
2549:Spierdijk, Laura; Zaouras, Michalis (2017-09-02). 2477:"Glossary: Learn more about IBISWorld's key terms" 1986: 1585: 1583: 1391: 1389: 1153: 1081: 1050: 1015: 981: 889: 870: 785: 2354: 2352: 2194:"Interdependence in Oligopolies | Revision World" 1963: 1961: 1326:The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management 472: 3621: 2548: 1799:(8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley. 1472: 1355: 1353: 480:can be described as the "middle ground" between 2592:"Research on market power and market structure" 1580: 1386: 1239:Landes, William M.; Posner, Richard A. (1981). 2349: 2215: 2213: 1958: 1750:The Economics of Food and Agricultural Markets 689: 2838: 2589: 1899:McKenzie, Richard B.; Lee, Dwight R. (2008), 1350: 744: 717: 276: 2622: 1238: 427: 2852: 2551:"The Lerner index and revenue maximization" 2228:, Oxford University Press, pp. 30–65, 2226:The Oxford Handbook of Managerial Economics 2210: 1898: 1795:Krugman, Paul R.; Maurice Obstfeld (2009). 580:Another form of market power is that of an 2845: 2831: 1797:International economics: theory and policy 1780:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 1323: 643: 283: 269: 2607: 2566: 2443: 2425: 2376: 2324: 2013: 1704: 1648: 1607: 1413: 1300: 1278: 1276: 1274: 1174:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 916:(PED) can be summarised by the equation: 244:Enforcement authorities and organizations 2399: 2358: 1630: 1479:European Journal of Operational Research 1362:The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 1282: 799: 615: 394: 2657: 2509: 2262: 2260: 2258: 2234:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199782956.013.0003 2135: 1747: 1561: 1428: 1164: 906: 701: 14: 3622: 3574:English historical school of economics 3528:Structure–conduct–performance paradigm 2596:International Journal of Crowd Science 2275: 1671: 1271: 595:Homogenous or differentiated products. 3635:Power (social and political) concepts 2826: 2773: 2736: 2494: 2219: 1557: 1555: 1359: 1176:for his analysis of market power and 2306: 2255: 2066: 1676:. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1530:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol20-No4-3 399:Different types of market structures 1707:Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 469:idealised framework by economists. 390: 24: 2400:KvĂĄlseth, Tarald O. (2018-10-11). 2278:"On the Relevance of Market Power" 2138:"Monopoly and Oligopoly by Merger" 2109: 2002:The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1637:The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1552: 1402:The Quarterly Journal of Economics 575: 40: 25: 3646: 2731:Competition and Consumer Act 2010 2664:Review of Industrial Organization 2307:Lutz, Clemens H. M. (July 2010). 1241:"Market Power in Antitrust Cases" 512: 252:International Competition Network 2785:Journal of Economic Perspectives 2365:Journal of Economic Perspectives 1289:Journal of Economic Perspectives 786:{\displaystyle \sum (S_{i})^{2}} 601:Interaction/strategic behaviour. 2745: 2723: 2706: 2651: 2616: 2583: 2542: 2503: 2469: 2460: 2393: 2300: 2269: 2186: 2160: 2129: 2085: 2060: 2039: 2030: 1892: 1868: 1821: 1788: 1741: 1698: 1665: 1624: 890:Connection with Competition Law 808: 452:Producers sell homogenous goods 3594:Historical school of economics 2136:Stigler, George J (May 1950). 1633:"What is Perfect Competition?" 1505: 1466: 1457: 1422: 1370:10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2836 1317: 1232: 857: 842: 774: 760: 592:A few sellers and many buyers. 473:Monopolistic competition power 257:List of competition regulators 13: 1: 2795:(3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. 2568:10.1080/13504851.2016.1254333 2510:Calkins, Stephen (Mar 1983). 2427:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00846 2359:Syverson, Chad (2019-08-01). 1719:10.1080/01603477.2015.1050335 1609:10.1080/00036846.2017.1374535 1334:10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_558 1225: 896:Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 461:No barriers to enter and exit 3538:Theory of two-level planning 3033:New institutional economists 2479:. 2018-12-08. Archived from 2142:The American Economic Review 1431:European Competition Journal 7: 3018:Edward Lawrence Wheelwright 2819:. Harvard University Press. 2097:Corporate Finance Institute 2071:(1st ed.). Routledge. 1880:Corporate Finance Institute 1183: 690:Measurement of market power 628:An oligopoly may engage in 303:refers to the ability of a 10: 3651: 3513:Penalty of taking the lead 2067:Carr, Christopher (2020). 1901:"Deadweight-Loss Monopoly" 1491:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.046 914:price elasticity of demand 871:{\displaystyle L=(P-MC)/P} 745:Herfindahl-Hirschman index 565:United States v. Microsoft 522:, but other forms such as 455:All firms are price takers 381:Herfindahl-Hirschman index 124:Anti-competitive practices 90:Herfindahl–Hirschman index 59:History of competition law 3556: 3420: 3337: 3104: 3031: 2860: 2676:10.1007/s11151-012-9355-7 2609:10.1108/IJCS-08-2017-0009 2555:Applied Economics Letters 2326:10.1007/s11187-008-9159-1 1846:10.1007/s00199-015-0905-8 721:-firm concentration ratio 428:Perfect competition power 350:anti-competitive behavior 3609:Post-Keynesian economics 3589:French historical school 2861:Institutional economists 2658:Giocoli, Nicola (2012). 2625:American Economic Review 2313:Small Business Economics 1748:Barkley, Andrew (2016). 478:Monopolistic competition 414:monopolistic competition 3584:Evolutionary psychology 3448:Conspicuous consumption 2854:Institutional economics 2779:Syverson, Chad. 2019. " 1672:Debreu, Gerard (1959). 1631:Robinson, Joan (1934). 1562:Besanko, David (2013). 1283:Syverson, Chad (2019). 1023:is always greater than 644:Sources of market power 501:Many sellers and buyers 498:Differentiated products 444:that is equal to their 3579:Evolutionary economics 3421:Key concepts and ideas 3377:Donald Angus MacKenzie 3003:George W. Stocking Sr. 2923:John Kenneth Galbraith 2276:Kaplow, Louis (2017). 1905:In Defense of Monopoly 1364:. pp. 8260–8263. 1328:. pp. 1272–1275. 1155: 1083: 1052: 1017: 983: 872: 805: 787: 621: 400: 169:Occupational licensing 45: 3630:Imperfect competition 3569:Development economics 3478:Hiding hand principle 3468:Effective competition 3339:Economic sociologists 3106:Behavioral economists 2968:Wesley Clair Mitchell 2637:10.1257/aer.101.3.558 2516:California Law Review 2168:"Kinked Demand Curve" 1564:ECONOMICS OF STRATEGY 1220:Dominance (economics) 1195:Imperfect competition 1172:was awarded the 2014 1156: 1084: 1053: 1018: 984: 873: 803: 788: 619: 398: 314:perfectly competitive 44: 3498:Market concentration 3463:Countervailing power 3269:Sendhil Mullainathan 3096:Oliver E. Williamson 2928:Walton Hale Hamilton 2873:Clarence Edwin Ayres 1443:10.5235/ecj.v6n3.689 1215:Price discrimination 1200:Market concentration 1165:Nobel Memorial Prize 1100: 1082:{\displaystyle P/MC} 1062: 1051:{\displaystyle P/MC} 1031: 1016:{\displaystyle P/MC} 996: 923: 907:Elasticity of demand 833: 754: 707:Market concentration 702:Concentration ratios 377:concentration ratios 212:Occupational closure 207:Dividing territories 195:Essential facilities 95:Market concentration 3548:Veblenian dichotomy 3458:Conventional wisdom 3453:Conspicuous leisure 3443:Bounded rationality 3433:Administered prices 3254:Brigitte C. Madrian 3056:Steven N. S. Cheung 2938:Albert O. Hirschman 2933:Orris C. Herfindahl 2418:2018Heliy...400846K 2378:10.1257/jep.33.3.23 1752:. Minneapolis, MN. 1302:10.1257/jep.33.3.23 1178:economic regulation 1027:and the higher the 820:perfect competition 654:perfect competition 620:Kinked Demand Curve 504:Free entry and exit 482:perfect competition 458:Perfect information 434:perfect competition 410:perfect competition 3564:Cultural economics 3428:Accelerator effect 3244:George Loewenstein 3184:Catherine C. Eckel 2903:John Maurice Clark 2868:Werner Abelshauser 2774:Further references 2538:– via JSTOR. 2282:Harvard Law Review 2156:– via JSTOR. 2015:10.1093/qje/qjz041 1975:. 23 February 2019 1518:The Energy Journal 1415:10.1093/qje/qjz041 1245:Harvard Law Review 1151: 1079: 1048: 1013: 979: 868: 806: 783: 622: 535:Economies of scale 401: 231:Regulatory capture 46: 3617: 3616: 3438:Barriers to entry 3304:Robert J. Shiller 3264:Matteo Motterlini 3008:Lars PĂĄlsson Syll 2561:(15): 1075–1079. 2243:978-0-19-978295-6 2198:revisionworld.com 2174:. 17 October 2018 1914:978-0-472-11615-7 1806:978-0-321-49304-0 1759:978-1-944548-22-3 1602:(15): 1694–1715. 1596:Applied Economics 1379:978-1-349-95188-8 1343:978-0-230-53721-7 1210:Predatory pricing 1146: 1122: 1089:ratio approaches 974: 939: 560:operating systems 547:Legal regulations 540:Predatory pricing 358:barriers to entry 354:predatory pricing 293: 292: 222:Misuse of patents 217:Predatory pricing 202:Exclusive dealing 85:Barriers to entry 73:Coercive monopoly 16:(Redirected from 3642: 3523:Shortage economy 3508:Market structure 3473:Herfindahl index 3397:Laurent ThĂ©venot 3392:Richard Swedberg 3387:Lynette Spillman 3372:Mark Granovetter 3357:James S. Coleman 3329:Georg Weizsäcker 3324:Robert W. Vishny 3289:Klaus M. Schmidt 3239:Jeffrey R. Kling 3134:Douglas Bernheim 3023:Erich Zimmermann 3013:Thorstein Veblen 2993:Herbert A. Simon 2988:François Simiand 2963:Jesse W. Markham 2943:Geoffrey Hodgson 2883:Shimshon Bichler 2847: 2840: 2833: 2824: 2823: 2813:Thomas Philippon 2806: 2767: 2766: 2764: 2763: 2749: 2743: 2740: 2734: 2727: 2721: 2710: 2704: 2703: 2655: 2649: 2648: 2620: 2614: 2613: 2611: 2587: 2581: 2580: 2570: 2546: 2540: 2539: 2507: 2501: 2498: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2473: 2467: 2464: 2458: 2457: 2447: 2429: 2397: 2391: 2390: 2380: 2356: 2347: 2346: 2328: 2304: 2298: 2297: 2288:(5): 1303–1407. 2273: 2267: 2264: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2217: 2208: 2207: 2205: 2204: 2190: 2184: 2183: 2181: 2179: 2164: 2158: 2157: 2133: 2127: 2126: 2124: 2123: 2113: 2107: 2106: 2104: 2103: 2089: 2083: 2082: 2064: 2058: 2057: 2055: 2054: 2043: 2037: 2034: 2028: 2027: 2017: 1993: 1984: 1983: 1981: 1980: 1969:"Monopoly Power" 1965: 1956: 1955: 1953: 1952: 1941: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1896: 1890: 1889: 1887: 1886: 1872: 1866: 1865: 1840:(1–2): 299–324. 1825: 1819: 1818: 1792: 1786: 1785: 1779: 1771: 1745: 1739: 1738: 1702: 1696: 1695: 1669: 1663: 1662: 1652: 1628: 1622: 1621: 1611: 1587: 1578: 1577: 1559: 1550: 1549: 1509: 1503: 1502: 1470: 1464: 1461: 1455: 1454: 1426: 1420: 1419: 1417: 1393: 1384: 1383: 1357: 1348: 1347: 1321: 1315: 1314: 1304: 1280: 1269: 1268: 1236: 1205:Natural monopoly 1190:Bargaining power 1160: 1158: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1145: 1131: 1123: 1118: 1104: 1088: 1086: 1085: 1080: 1072: 1057: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1041: 1022: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1006: 988: 986: 985: 980: 975: 973: 956: 945: 940: 938: 927: 877: 875: 874: 869: 864: 792: 790: 789: 784: 782: 781: 772: 771: 555:market share in 491:economic profits 405:Market structure 391:Market structure 285: 278: 271: 176:Product bundling 78:Natural monopoly 30: 29: 21: 3650: 3649: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3613: 3552: 3533:Technostructure 3488:Instrumentalism 3483:Hirschman cycle 3416: 3412:Viviana Zelizer 3382:Joel M. Podolny 3333: 3259:Gary McClelland 3224:Daniel Kahneman 3219:David Ryan Just 3214:Charles A. Holt 3194:Urs Fischbacher 3179:Stephen Duneier 3169:Werner De Bondt 3100: 3027: 2978:Jonathan Nitzan 2918:Robert H. Frank 2908:John R. Commons 2888:Robert A. Brady 2856: 2851: 2803: 2776: 2771: 2770: 2761: 2759: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2737: 2728: 2724: 2711: 2707: 2656: 2652: 2621: 2617: 2588: 2584: 2547: 2543: 2528:10.2307/3480160 2508: 2504: 2499: 2495: 2486: 2484: 2475: 2474: 2470: 2465: 2461: 2398: 2394: 2357: 2350: 2305: 2301: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2256: 2248: 2246: 2244: 2218: 2211: 2202: 2200: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2177: 2175: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2134: 2130: 2121: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2101: 2099: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2079: 2065: 2061: 2052: 2050: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2035: 2031: 1994: 1987: 1978: 1976: 1967: 1966: 1959: 1950: 1948: 1943: 1942: 1935: 1927: 1925: 1915: 1897: 1893: 1884: 1882: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1834:Economic Theory 1826: 1822: 1807: 1793: 1789: 1773: 1772: 1760: 1746: 1742: 1703: 1699: 1684: 1670: 1666: 1650:10.2307/1883878 1629: 1625: 1588: 1581: 1574: 1560: 1553: 1510: 1506: 1471: 1467: 1462: 1458: 1427: 1423: 1394: 1387: 1380: 1358: 1351: 1344: 1322: 1318: 1281: 1272: 1257:10.2307/1340687 1237: 1233: 1228: 1186: 1167: 1135: 1130: 1105: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1068: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1037: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1002: 997: 994: 993: 957: 946: 944: 931: 926: 924: 921: 920: 909: 892: 860: 834: 831: 830: 811: 777: 773: 767: 763: 755: 752: 751: 747: 723: 704: 692: 646: 578: 576:Oligopoly power 515: 475: 430: 393: 331:deadweight loss 323:Nash equilibria 289: 185:Refusal to deal 164:Tacit collusion 110:Relevant market 34:Competition law 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3648: 3638: 3637: 3632: 3615: 3614: 3612: 3611: 3606: 3604:Microeconomics 3601: 3596: 3591: 3586: 3581: 3576: 3571: 3566: 3560: 3558: 3557:Related fields 3554: 3553: 3551: 3550: 3545: 3540: 3535: 3530: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3510: 3505: 3500: 3495: 3493:Kuznets cycles 3490: 3485: 3480: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3460: 3455: 3450: 3445: 3440: 3435: 3430: 3424: 3422: 3418: 3417: 3415: 3414: 3409: 3407:Harrison White 3404: 3402:Carlo Trigilia 3399: 3394: 3389: 3384: 3379: 3374: 3369: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3349: 3343: 3341: 3335: 3334: 3332: 3331: 3326: 3321: 3316: 3314:Richard Thaler 3311: 3306: 3301: 3296: 3291: 3286: 3284:Howard Rachlin 3281: 3276: 3274:Michael Norton 3271: 3266: 3261: 3256: 3251: 3246: 3241: 3236: 3231: 3226: 3221: 3216: 3211: 3206: 3201: 3199:Herbert Gintis 3196: 3191: 3186: 3181: 3176: 3171: 3166: 3161: 3156: 3154:David Cesarini 3151: 3146: 3141: 3136: 3131: 3126: 3121: 3116: 3114:George Ainslie 3110: 3108: 3102: 3101: 3099: 3098: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3081:Douglass North 3078: 3073: 3068: 3066:Harold Demsetz 3063: 3058: 3053: 3048: 3046:Armen Alchian 3043: 3041:Daron Acemoglu 3037: 3035: 3029: 3028: 3026: 3025: 3020: 3015: 3010: 3005: 3000: 2998:Frank Stilwell 2995: 2990: 2985: 2983:Warren Samuels 2980: 2975: 2970: 2965: 2960: 2955: 2950: 2945: 2940: 2935: 2930: 2925: 2920: 2915: 2913:Richard T. Ely 2910: 2905: 2900: 2895: 2893:Daniel Bromley 2890: 2885: 2880: 2875: 2870: 2864: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2850: 2849: 2842: 2835: 2827: 2821: 2820: 2810: 2807: 2802:978-0073375823 2801: 2788: 2775: 2772: 2769: 2768: 2757:NobelPrize.org 2744: 2735: 2722: 2714:15 U.S.C. 2705: 2670:(3): 181–191. 2650: 2631:(3): 558–564. 2615: 2602:(3): 210–222. 2582: 2541: 2522:(2): 402–429. 2502: 2493: 2468: 2459: 2412:(10): e00846. 2392: 2348: 2299: 2268: 2254: 2242: 2209: 2185: 2159: 2128: 2108: 2084: 2077: 2059: 2038: 2029: 2008:(2): 561–644. 1985: 1957: 1933: 1913: 1891: 1867: 1820: 1805: 1787: 1758: 1740: 1713:(4): 687–703. 1697: 1682: 1664: 1643:(1): 104–120. 1623: 1579: 1572: 1551: 1504: 1485:(2): 700–710. 1465: 1456: 1437:(3): 689–707. 1421: 1408:(2): 561–644. 1385: 1378: 1349: 1342: 1316: 1270: 1251:(5): 937–996. 1230: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1185: 1182: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1150: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1134: 1129: 1126: 1121: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1078: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1012: 1009: 1005: 1001: 990: 989: 978: 972: 969: 966: 963: 960: 955: 952: 949: 943: 937: 934: 930: 908: 905: 891: 888: 879: 878: 867: 863: 859: 856: 853: 850: 847: 844: 841: 838: 810: 807: 780: 776: 770: 766: 762: 759: 746: 743: 722: 716: 703: 700: 691: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 667: 645: 642: 603: 602: 599: 596: 593: 577: 574: 549: 548: 545: 542: 537: 528:market failure 514: 513:Monopoly power 511: 506: 505: 502: 499: 474: 471: 466: 465: 462: 459: 456: 453: 438:Pareto optimal 429: 426: 392: 389: 291: 290: 288: 287: 280: 273: 265: 262: 261: 260: 259: 254: 246: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 233: 228: 219: 214: 209: 204: 199: 198: 197: 192: 182: 173: 172: 171: 166: 161: 156: 146: 135: 133:Monopolization 127: 126: 120: 119: 118: 117: 115:Merger control 112: 107: 102: 97: 92: 87: 82: 81: 80: 75: 61: 53: 52: 51:Basic concepts 48: 47: 37: 36: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3647: 3636: 3633: 3631: 3628: 3627: 3625: 3610: 3607: 3605: 3602: 3600: 3599:Legal realism 3597: 3595: 3592: 3590: 3587: 3585: 3582: 3580: 3577: 3575: 3572: 3570: 3567: 3565: 3562: 3561: 3559: 3555: 3549: 3546: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3536: 3534: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3524: 3521: 3519: 3516: 3514: 3511: 3509: 3506: 3504: 3501: 3499: 3496: 3494: 3491: 3489: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3461: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3451: 3449: 3446: 3444: 3441: 3439: 3436: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3426: 3425: 3423: 3419: 3413: 3410: 3408: 3405: 3403: 3400: 3398: 3395: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3380: 3378: 3375: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3367:Paula England 3365: 3363: 3362:Paul DiMaggio 3360: 3358: 3355: 3353: 3352:Fred L. Block 3350: 3348: 3345: 3344: 3342: 3340: 3336: 3330: 3327: 3325: 3322: 3320: 3317: 3315: 3312: 3310: 3307: 3305: 3302: 3300: 3299:Hersh Shefrin 3297: 3295: 3292: 3290: 3287: 3285: 3282: 3280: 3279:Matthew Rabin 3277: 3275: 3272: 3270: 3267: 3265: 3262: 3260: 3257: 3255: 3252: 3250: 3249:Graham Loomes 3247: 3245: 3242: 3240: 3237: 3235: 3234:George Katona 3232: 3230: 3227: 3225: 3222: 3220: 3217: 3215: 3212: 3210: 3209:David Halpern 3207: 3205: 3202: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3192: 3190: 3187: 3185: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3164:Rachel Croson 3162: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3149:Colin Camerer 3147: 3145: 3144:Sarah Brosnan 3142: 3140: 3139:Samuel Bowles 3137: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3125: 3122: 3120: 3117: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3109: 3107: 3103: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3091:Elinor Ostrom 3089: 3087: 3084: 3082: 3079: 3077: 3076:Claude MĂ©nard 3074: 3072: 3069: 3067: 3064: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3054: 3052: 3051:Masahiko Aoki 3049: 3047: 3044: 3042: 3039: 3038: 3036: 3034: 3030: 3024: 3021: 3019: 3016: 3014: 3011: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3001: 2999: 2996: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2986: 2984: 2981: 2979: 2976: 2974: 2973:Gunnar Myrdal 2971: 2969: 2966: 2964: 2961: 2959: 2956: 2954: 2953:Simon Kuznets 2951: 2949: 2946: 2944: 2941: 2939: 2936: 2934: 2931: 2929: 2926: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2916: 2914: 2911: 2909: 2906: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2898:Ha-Joon Chang 2896: 2894: 2891: 2889: 2886: 2884: 2881: 2879: 2876: 2874: 2871: 2869: 2866: 2865: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2848: 2843: 2841: 2836: 2834: 2829: 2828: 2825: 2818: 2814: 2811: 2808: 2804: 2798: 2794: 2789: 2787:33(3): 23–43. 2786: 2782: 2778: 2777: 2758: 2754: 2748: 2739: 2732: 2726: 2719: 2715: 2709: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2654: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2619: 2610: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2586: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2545: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2506: 2497: 2483:on 2018-12-08 2482: 2478: 2472: 2463: 2455: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2428: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2396: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2355: 2353: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2327: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2303: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2272: 2263: 2261: 2259: 2245: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2216: 2214: 2199: 2195: 2189: 2173: 2169: 2163: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2132: 2118: 2112: 2098: 2094: 2088: 2080: 2078:9780429316050 2074: 2070: 2063: 2048: 2042: 2033: 2025: 2021: 2016: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1992: 1990: 1974: 1970: 1964: 1962: 1946: 1940: 1938: 1924: 1923:j.ctvnjbdsg.5 1920: 1916: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1895: 1881: 1877: 1871: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1824: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1802: 1798: 1791: 1783: 1777: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1755: 1751: 1744: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1701: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1683:0-300-01558-5 1679: 1675: 1668: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1627: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1586: 1584: 1575: 1573:9781118273630 1569: 1565: 1558: 1556: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1508: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1469: 1460: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1425: 1416: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1392: 1390: 1381: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1356: 1354: 1345: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1320: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1279: 1277: 1275: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1235: 1231: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1181: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1148: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1127: 1124: 1119: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1092: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1026: 1010: 1007: 1003: 999: 976: 970: 967: 964: 961: 958: 953: 950: 947: 941: 935: 932: 928: 919: 918: 917: 915: 904: 900: 897: 887: 885: 884:Luigi Amaroso 865: 861: 854: 851: 848: 845: 839: 836: 829: 828: 827: 825: 821: 816: 802: 798: 796: 778: 768: 764: 757: 742: 738: 736: 732: 728: 720: 715: 712: 711:market shares 708: 699: 695: 683: 679: 675: 671: 668: 665: 661: 660: 659: 656: 655: 651: 641: 639: 635: 631: 626: 618: 614: 612: 607: 600: 597: 594: 591: 590: 589: 587: 583: 573: 571: 567: 566: 561: 558: 554: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 532: 531: 529: 525: 521: 510: 503: 500: 497: 496: 495: 492: 487: 483: 479: 470: 463: 460: 457: 454: 451: 450: 449: 447: 446:marginal cost 443: 439: 435: 425: 423: 419: 415: 411: 406: 397: 388: 386: 382: 378: 372: 370: 365: 363: 359: 355: 351: 346: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 318: 315: 311: 310:marginal cost 306: 302: 298: 286: 281: 279: 274: 272: 267: 266: 264: 263: 258: 255: 253: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 242: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 196: 193: 191: 190:Group boycott 188: 187: 186: 183: 181: 177: 174: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 154: 150: 147: 145: 142:Formation of 141: 140: 139: 136: 134: 131: 130: 129: 128: 125: 122: 121: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 79: 76: 74: 71: 70: 69: 65: 62: 60: 57: 56: 55: 54: 50: 49: 43: 39: 38: 35: 32: 31: 19: 18:Pricing power 3543:Veblen goods 3503:Market power 3502: 3347:Jens Beckert 3319:Amos Tversky 3294:Eldar Shafir 3159:Kay-Yut Chen 3086:Mancur Olson 3061:Ronald Coase 2958:Hunter Lewis 2948:János Kornai 2816: 2792: 2784: 2760:. Retrieved 2756: 2747: 2738: 2725: 2708: 2667: 2663: 2653: 2628: 2624: 2618: 2599: 2595: 2585: 2558: 2554: 2544: 2519: 2515: 2505: 2496: 2485:. Retrieved 2481:the original 2471: 2462: 2409: 2405: 2395: 2371:(3): 23–43. 2368: 2364: 2319:(1): 19–33. 2316: 2312: 2302: 2285: 2281: 2271: 2247:, retrieved 2225: 2201:. Retrieved 2197: 2188: 2176:. Retrieved 2171: 2162: 2148:(2): 23–34. 2145: 2141: 2131: 2120:. Retrieved 2111: 2100:. Retrieved 2096: 2087: 2068: 2062: 2051:. Retrieved 2049:. 2020-01-20 2041: 2032: 2005: 2001: 1977:. Retrieved 1972: 1949:. Retrieved 1947:. 2020-01-29 1926:, retrieved 1904: 1894: 1883:. Retrieved 1879: 1870: 1837: 1833: 1823: 1796: 1790: 1749: 1743: 1710: 1706: 1700: 1673: 1667: 1640: 1636: 1626: 1599: 1595: 1563: 1524:(4): 65–88. 1521: 1517: 1507: 1482: 1478: 1468: 1459: 1434: 1430: 1424: 1405: 1401: 1361: 1325: 1319: 1295:(3): 23–43. 1292: 1288: 1248: 1244: 1234: 1168: 1090: 1024: 991: 910: 901: 893: 880: 815:Lerner index 812: 809:Lerner index 794: 748: 739: 734: 730: 726: 724: 718: 705: 696: 693: 657: 650:Lerner index 647: 627: 623: 608: 604: 579: 563: 550: 516: 507: 476: 467: 442:market price 431: 402: 385:Lerner index 373: 366: 347: 327:demand curve 319: 301:market power 300: 294: 236:Rent-seeking 149:Price fixing 100:Market power 99: 3518:Satisficing 3229:Ariel Kalil 3124:Nava Ashraf 3071:Avner Greif 2878:Joe S. Bain 1973:xplaind.com 1170:Jean Tirole 611:Paul Sweezy 570:web browser 553:Microsoft's 343:divestiture 159:Bid rigging 3624:Categories 3204:Uri Gneezy 3189:Armin Falk 3174:Paul Dolan 3119:Dan Ariely 2762:2021-04-25 2487:2021-04-18 2249:2021-04-25 2203:2021-04-18 2122:2021-04-18 2102:2021-04-18 2053:2021-04-18 1979:2021-04-20 1951:2021-04-20 1928:2021-04-25 1885:2021-04-27 1768:1151088067 1226:References 992:The ratio 586:oligopsony 317:setters'. 226:copyrights 105:SSNIP test 3309:Uwe Sunde 3129:Ofer Azar 2700:153832234 2684:0889-938X 2645:154743000 2577:1350-4851 2436:2405-8440 2387:0895-3309 2024:0033-5533 1862:155013659 1854:0938-2259 1815:174112719 1776:cite book 1735:154042857 1727:0160-3477 1618:0003-6846 1538:0195-6574 1499:0377-2217 1451:154973650 1311:201326865 1128:− 1110:− 849:− 758:∑ 630:collusion 582:oligopoly 524:monopsony 418:oligopoly 369:collusion 335:antitrust 297:economics 138:Collusion 68:oligopoly 2815:. 2019. 2718:§ 2 2692:43550398 2454:30338305 2343:67784475 2335:40802429 2294:44865537 2178:18 April 1546:41326187 1184:See also 520:monopoly 486:monopoly 422:monopoly 383:and the 64:Monopoly 2536:3480160 2445:6190613 2414:Bibcode 2406:Heliyon 2154:1818020 1659:1883878 1265:1340687 339:mergers 144:cartels 2799:  2716:  2698:  2690:  2682:  2643:  2575:  2534:  2452:  2442:  2434:  2385:  2341:  2333:  2292:  2240:  2152:  2075:  2022:  1921:  1911:  1860:  1852:  1813:  1803:  1766:  1756:  1733:  1725:  1692:420976 1690:  1680:  1657:  1616:  1570:  1544:  1536:  1497:  1449:  1376:  1340:  1309:  1263:  824:Lerner 634:cartel 562:. The 484:and a 420:, and 379:, the 2696:S2CID 2688:JSTOR 2641:S2CID 2532:JSTOR 2339:S2CID 2331:JSTOR 2290:JSTOR 2172:Toppr 2150:JSTOR 1919:JSTOR 1858:S2CID 1731:S2CID 1655:JSTOR 1542:JSTOR 1447:S2CID 1307:S2CID 1261:JSTOR 180:tying 153:cases 2797:ISBN 2729:See 2712:See 2680:ISSN 2573:ISSN 2450:PMID 2432:ISSN 2383:ISSN 2238:ISBN 2180:2021 2073:ISBN 2020:ISSN 1909:ISBN 1850:ISSN 1811:OCLC 1801:ISBN 1782:link 1764:OCLC 1754:ISBN 1723:ISSN 1688:OCLC 1678:ISBN 1614:ISSN 1568:ISBN 1534:ISSN 1495:ISSN 1374:ISBN 1338:ISBN 813:The 725:The 664:OPEC 638:OPEC 362:exit 305:firm 224:and 178:and 66:and 2672:doi 2633:doi 2629:101 2604:doi 2563:doi 2524:doi 2440:PMC 2422:doi 2373:doi 2321:doi 2286:130 2230:doi 2010:doi 2006:135 1842:doi 1715:doi 1645:doi 1604:doi 1526:doi 1487:doi 1483:294 1439:doi 1410:doi 1406:135 1366:doi 1330:doi 1297:doi 1253:doi 584:or 360:or 295:In 3626:: 2783:" 2755:. 2694:. 2686:. 2678:. 2668:41 2666:. 2662:. 2639:. 2627:. 2598:. 2594:. 2571:. 2559:24 2557:. 2553:. 2530:. 2520:71 2518:. 2514:. 2448:. 2438:. 2430:. 2420:. 2408:. 2404:. 2381:. 2369:33 2367:. 2363:. 2351:^ 2337:. 2329:. 2317:35 2315:. 2311:. 2284:. 2280:. 2257:^ 2236:, 2224:, 2212:^ 2196:. 2170:. 2146:40 2144:. 2140:. 2095:. 2018:. 2004:. 2000:. 1988:^ 1971:. 1960:^ 1936:^ 1917:, 1903:, 1878:. 1856:. 1848:. 1838:62 1836:. 1832:. 1809:. 1778:}} 1774:{{ 1762:. 1729:. 1721:. 1711:37 1709:. 1686:. 1653:. 1641:49 1639:. 1635:. 1612:. 1600:50 1598:. 1594:. 1582:^ 1554:^ 1540:. 1532:. 1522:20 1520:. 1516:. 1493:. 1481:. 1477:. 1445:. 1433:. 1404:. 1400:. 1388:^ 1372:. 1352:^ 1336:. 1305:. 1293:33 1291:. 1287:. 1273:^ 1259:. 1249:94 1247:. 1243:. 1180:. 886:. 822:. 557:PC 416:, 412:, 345:. 299:, 2846:e 2839:t 2832:v 2805:. 2765:. 2733:. 2720:. 2702:. 2674:: 2647:. 2635:: 2612:. 2606:: 2600:1 2579:. 2565:: 2526:: 2490:. 2456:. 2424:: 2416:: 2410:4 2389:. 2375:: 2345:. 2323:: 2296:. 2232:: 2206:. 2182:. 2125:. 2105:. 2081:. 2056:. 2026:. 2012:: 1982:. 1954:. 1888:. 1864:. 1844:: 1817:. 1784:) 1770:. 1737:. 1717:: 1694:. 1661:. 1647:: 1620:. 1606:: 1576:. 1548:. 1528:: 1501:. 1489:: 1453:. 1441:: 1435:6 1418:. 1412:: 1382:. 1368:: 1346:. 1332:: 1313:. 1299:: 1267:. 1255:: 1149:. 1143:D 1140:E 1137:P 1133:1 1125:= 1120:P 1116:C 1113:M 1107:P 1091:1 1077:C 1074:M 1070:/ 1066:P 1046:C 1043:M 1039:/ 1035:P 1025:1 1011:C 1008:M 1004:/ 1000:P 977:. 971:D 968:E 965:P 962:+ 959:1 954:D 951:E 948:P 942:= 936:C 933:M 929:P 866:P 862:/ 858:) 855:C 852:M 846:P 843:( 840:= 837:L 795:N 779:2 775:) 769:i 765:S 761:( 735:N 731:N 727:N 719:N 284:e 277:t 270:v 155:) 151:( 20:)

Index

Pricing power
Competition law

History of competition law
Monopoly
oligopoly
Coercive monopoly
Natural monopoly
Barriers to entry
Herfindahl–Hirschman index
Market concentration
Market power
SSNIP test
Relevant market
Merger control
Anti-competitive practices
Monopolization
Collusion
cartels
Price fixing
cases
Bid rigging
Tacit collusion
Occupational licensing
Product bundling
tying
Refusal to deal
Group boycott
Essential facilities
Exclusive dealing

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑