Knowledge

Presumption

Source 📝

397: 110: 531:
time of the operation of the vehicle as at the time of the offence. If the test is conducted outside the two hours, and the blood alcohol concentration is greater than 20 mg of alcohol/100 mL of blood, there is now a conclusive presumption that the blood alcohol concentration can be increased by 5 mg of alcohol/100 mL of blood for each 30 minutes.
559:, if it is found that the defendant intentionally deceived the complainant as to the "nature or the purpose of the act", or if "the defendant intentionally induced the complainant to consent by impersonation of a "person known personally to the complainant"" it can be conclusively presumed the defendant is guilty of rape and must be convicted. 941: 381:
constitutional requirements. The party challenging the constitutionality of a statute bears the burden of proof, and any doubts are resolved against that party. If there are two reasonable interpretations of a statute, one of which is constitutional and the other not, the courts choose the path that
530:
Recent amendments to Impaired Driving law allows the Crown to rely on a conclusive presumption. Normally, where the police conduct a breathalyzer test within 2 hours of the operation of a conveyance (or care and control), the court can accept the blood alcohol concentration as being the same at the
60:
can reject a rebuttable presumption based on other evidence. Conversely, a conclusive/irrebuttable presumption cannot be challenged by contradictory facts or evidence. Sometimes, a presumption must be triggered by a predicate fact—that is, the fact must be found before the presumption applies.
521:
In Australian law, it is a conclusive presumption that no child under the age of 10 can be held responsible for criminal action. This presumption exists to protect children by acknowledging that they do not have sufficient development to understand the gravity and consequences of committing a
338:) decision made on 27 February 1970 thought there was "every reason to presume that reasonable parties will wish to have the relationships created by their contract and the claims arising therefrom ... decided by the same tribunal and not by two different tribunals", and the 325:
In commercial contracts, there is a presumption that parties to a contract intend all disputes between them to be determined within the same forum. This presumption is also known as "one-stop adjudication" and reflects the belief that contracts are entered into by
218:. A person who has been absent for seven years without explanation and "gone to parts unknown" is presumed dead at common law. The time period it takes for the presumption to arise has often been modified by statute. 985:
John Davison Lawson. The Law of Presumptive Evidence: Including Presumptions both of Law and of Fact, and the Burden of Proof both in Civil and Criminal Cases, Reduced to Rules. Bancroft-Whitney Company. 1886.
968:
John Hubbersty Mathews and Benjamin Rand. A Treatise on the Doctrine of Presumption and Presumptive Evidence: As Affecting the Title to Real and Personal Property. Gould, Banks and Company. New York. 1830.
225:. A person who faces criminal trial is presumed sane until the opposite is proved. Similarly, a person is presumed to have testamentary capacity until there is evidence to undermine that presumption. 84:, where, for example, if there was doubt as to whether a child was really the issue of someone who had been left money in a will, the presumption was in favour of the child. Medieval Roman and 547:. The age has continually been under debate with adjustments being made in line with rulings, the results of psychological research and to some extent public pressure. The age was seven at 346:(2006) referred to a "sensible commercial presumption that the parties did not intend the inconvenience of having possible disputes from their transaction being heard in two places". The 311:
is another way of expressing a burden of proof: the official acts of courts are presumed valid, and those who would challenge them must overcome this presumption. This is also termed the
259: 270:
intend for the survivors to have the assets put into the fund upon the death of one of the joint account holders has also been called the "presumption of survivorship".
255:. Some jurisdictions also hold that a presumption of paternity arises when a father accepts a child into his home, or publicly represents that he is the child's father. 232:, which holds that the prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal case with the result that the accused may be acquitted without putting forward any evidence. 975:
William Mawdesley Best. A Treatise on Presumptions of Law and Fact, with the Theory and Rules of Presumptive or Circumstantial Proof in Criminal Cases. London. 1844.
687: 274: 262:
has referred to a number of different presumptions. The term is sometimes used to refer to presumptions that one or another of two persons lived the longer when
44:". There are two types of presumptions: rebuttable presumptions and irrebuttable (or conclusive) presumptions. A rebuttable presumption will either shift the 866: 88:
graded presumptions according to strength: light, medium or probable, and violent. These gradings and many individual presumptions were taken over into
418: 411: 131: 124: 884:
Premium Nafta Products Limited (20th Defendant) and others (Respondents) v. Fili Shipping Company Limited (14th Claimant) and others (Appellants)
839:
Cooper, Simon & Murphy, Peter & Beaumont, John. Cases & Materials on Evidence. Fourth Edition. Oxford University Press. 1994. p. 86
77:), propositions taken to be true unless there was reason to believe otherwise, such as "One does not ordinarily pay a debt before term." 347: 1018: 461: 174: 552: 359: 849: 433: 146: 620: 378: 777: 646: 480: 374: 193: 440: 370: 153: 20: 555:
to eight (section 50) and by the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 to ten, at which it remains. In the case of
540: 510: 447: 247:
of a child born to his wife during the marriage, or within nine months after the marriage is ended by death,
160: 85: 429: 142: 908: 509:
and must be taken to be the case whatever the evidence to the contrary. For example, a child below the
339: 319: 769: 604: 312: 236: 354:(2007) noted that "this approach to the issue of construction is now firmly embedded as part of the 366: 335: 240: 229: 543:
cannot be held legally responsible for their actions, and so cannot be convicted of committing a
407: 362:
made on this basis, stating that this presumption "must now be accepted as part of our law too".
355: 308: 293: 120: 1013: 920: 568: 222: 53: 980: 976: 970: 595: 215: 45: 8: 997: 454: 167: 352:
Premium Nafta Products Ltd (20th Defendant) and Ors v. Fili Shipping Company Ltd and Ors
668: 263: 773: 672: 301: 244: 883: 658: 544: 248: 647:"Fighting the Establishment: The Need for Procedural Reform of Our Paternity Laws" 493:
A conclusive presumption, also known as an irrebuttable presumption, is a type of
56:(requiring the disadvantaged party to show the presumption is wrong); in short, a 987: 289: 663: 942:"Rape and Sexual Offences - Chapter 6: Consent | The Crown Prosecution Service" 506: 278: 49: 1007: 322:
in relation to transfers from husbands to wives and from fathers to children.
267: 57: 277:
presumes that a properly addressed letter delivered to the post office or a
599: 297: 573: 498: 93: 89: 548: 207: 81: 37: 993: 909:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cpa1987261/s5.html
396: 109: 867:
One-stop adjudication – the rational approach to dispute resolution
502: 327: 501:, a conclusive presumption is a presumption of law that cannot be 919:
Thomas Crofts, Doli Incapax: Why Children Deserve its Protection
718:
The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal
252: 70: 886:, UKHL 40, delivered 17 October 2007, accessed 18 January 2024 804:
U-Haul Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Dept. of State Revenue
285: 556: 41: 921:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurUEJL/2003/26.html
373:
presumes that all statutes are drafted in accordance with
266:. The presumption that two or more people who establish a 29: 386: 344:
Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd.
304:
applies the other person's assets to their own benefit.
210:
jurisdictions. Examples of these presumptions include:
818:, 919 N.E.2d 1181, (Ind.Ct.App. 2010), trans. denied 513:
is presumed to be incapable of committing a felony.
281:
was in fact delivered and received by the addressee.
856:, published 19 March 2015, accessed 18 January 2024 48:(requiring the disadvantaged party to produce some 873:, published 10 June 2015, accessed 18 January 2024 711: 709: 707: 705: 994:"Irrebuttable Presumptions: An Illusory Analysis" 828:Monon Corp. v. Townsend, Yosha, Cline & Price 590: 588: 1005: 702: 585: 907:Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 s5 720:. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 206:A number of presumptions are found in most 830:, 678 N.E.2d 807, 809 (Ind.Ct.App. 1997). 780:), p. 1068, "Presumption of survivorship" 662: 481:Learn how and when to remove this message 194:Learn how and when to remove this message 16:In law, an inference of a particular fact 850:Fiona Trust v Privalov in the High Court 715: 99: 73:, included reasoning from presumptions ( 19:For the term in Catholic canon law, see 733:, 197 Ind. 50, 149 N.E. 718 (Ind. 1925) 640: 638: 579: 292:arises where a person in a position of 264:they died together in the same accident 243:, which presumes that a husband is the 1006: 772:(5th. ed., 1979; West Publishing Co., 417:Please improve this section by adding 130:Please improve this section by adding 80:The same concept was found in ancient 644: 594: 387:Conclusive (irrebuttable) presumption 685: 651:Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 635: 618: 534: 390: 103: 731:Prudential Insurance Comp. v. Moore 679: 553:Children and Young Persons Act 1933 13: 962: 497:used in several legal systems. In 14: 1030: 69:The ancient Jewish law code, the 806:, 896 N.E.2d 1253 (Ind.Tax 2008) 395: 371:presumption of constitutionality 108: 21:Presumption (Catholic canon law) 934: 925: 913: 901: 889: 876: 871:Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP 859: 842: 833: 821: 809: 796: 783: 763: 1019:Legal doctrines and principles 754: 745: 736: 724: 612: 541:age of criminal responsibility 511:age of criminal responsibility 382:permits upholding the statute. 92:in the seventeenth century by 1: 419:secondary or tertiary sources 356:law of international commerce 132:secondary or tertiary sources 793:, 622 N.E.2d 476 (Ind. 1993) 516: 358:" and endorsed a ruling the 7: 898:, 675 N.E.2d 318 (Ind.1996) 760:E.g. Ind. Code § 31-14-7-2. 751:E.g. Ind. Code § 31-14-7-1. 664:10.36641/mjgl.21.1.fighting 562: 330:business parties. A German 260:presumption of survivorship 10: 1035: 742:E.g. Ind. Code § 29-2-5-1. 688:"Evidentiary Presumptions" 340:Federal Court of Australia 320:presumption of advancement 64: 18: 896:Boehm v. Town of St. John 791:Matter of Estate of Banko 625:The Cornell Law Quarterly 525: 313:presumption of regularity 237:presumption of legitimacy 645:Rogus, Caroline (2014). 367:law of the United States 336:Federal Court of Justice 296:over another, such as a 241:presumption of paternity 230:presumption of innocence 52:to the contrary) or the 931:Criminal Code 320.31(4) 854:Herbert Smith Freehills 816:In re Estate of Compton 686:Hall, Keith B. (1998). 309:presumption of validity 979:. Philadelphia. 1845. 770:Black's Law Dictionary 619:Fisk, Otis H. (1925). 605:Black's Law Dictionary 406:relies excessively on 275:presumption of mailing 119:relies excessively on 716:Franklin, J. (2001). 596:Black, Henry Campbell 569:Legal burden of proof 223:presumption of sanity 100:Specific presumptions 580:Notes and references 551:, and raised by the 216:presumption of death 46:burden of production 998:Stanford Law Review 992:Phillips, John M., 300:or the holder of a 284:The presumption of 539:A child below the 692:Tulane Law Review 535:England and Wales 491: 490: 483: 465: 332:Bundesgerichtshof 302:power of attorney 245:biological father 204: 203: 196: 178: 1026: 957: 956: 954: 952: 938: 932: 929: 923: 917: 911: 905: 899: 893: 887: 882:House of Lords, 880: 874: 863: 857: 846: 840: 837: 831: 825: 819: 813: 807: 800: 794: 787: 781: 767: 761: 758: 752: 749: 743: 740: 734: 728: 722: 721: 713: 700: 699: 683: 677: 676: 666: 642: 633: 632: 616: 610: 609: 592: 545:criminal offence 486: 479: 475: 472: 466: 464: 423: 399: 391: 249:legal separation 199: 192: 188: 185: 179: 177: 136: 112: 104: 40:of a particular 1034: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1004: 1003: 965: 963:Further reading 960: 950: 948: 940: 939: 935: 930: 926: 918: 914: 906: 902: 894: 890: 881: 877: 864: 860: 847: 843: 838: 834: 826: 822: 814: 810: 801: 797: 788: 784: 768: 764: 759: 755: 750: 746: 741: 737: 729: 725: 714: 703: 684: 680: 643: 636: 617: 613: 593: 586: 582: 565: 537: 528: 519: 487: 476: 470: 467: 424: 422: 416: 412:primary sources 400: 389: 360:Court of Appeal 290:undue influence 200: 189: 183: 180: 137: 135: 129: 125:primary sources 113: 102: 67: 54:burden of proof 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1032: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1002: 1001: 990: 983: 973: 964: 961: 959: 958: 933: 924: 912: 900: 888: 875: 858: 841: 832: 820: 808: 795: 782: 762: 753: 744: 735: 723: 701: 678: 634: 621:"Presumptions" 611: 583: 581: 578: 577: 576: 571: 564: 561: 536: 533: 527: 524: 522:criminal act. 518: 515: 489: 488: 403: 401: 394: 388: 385: 384: 383: 363: 348:House of Lords 323: 316: 305: 282: 279:common carrier 271: 256: 233: 226: 219: 202: 201: 116: 114: 107: 101: 98: 66: 63: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1031: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1009: 999: 995: 991: 989: 984: 982: 978: 974: 972: 967: 966: 947: 943: 937: 928: 922: 916: 910: 904: 897: 892: 885: 879: 872: 868: 862: 855: 851: 845: 836: 829: 824: 817: 812: 805: 799: 792: 786: 779: 778:0-8299-2041-2 775: 771: 766: 757: 748: 739: 732: 727: 719: 712: 710: 708: 706: 697: 693: 689: 682: 674: 670: 665: 660: 657:(1): 67–122. 656: 652: 648: 641: 639: 630: 626: 622: 615: 607: 606: 601: 600:"Presumption" 597: 591: 589: 584: 575: 572: 570: 567: 566: 560: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 532: 523: 514: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 485: 482: 474: 463: 460: 456: 453: 449: 446: 442: 439: 435: 432: –  431: 430:"Presumption" 427: 426:Find sources: 420: 414: 413: 409: 404:This section 402: 398: 393: 392: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 324: 321: 317: 314: 310: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 280: 276: 272: 269: 268:joint account 265: 261: 257: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 231: 227: 224: 220: 217: 213: 212: 211: 209: 198: 195: 187: 176: 173: 169: 166: 162: 159: 155: 152: 148: 145: –  144: 143:"Presumption" 140: 139:Find sources: 133: 127: 126: 122: 117:This section 115: 111: 106: 105: 97: 95: 91: 87: 83: 78: 76: 72: 62: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 26: 22: 1014:Evidence law 996:, (1975) 27 988:Google Books 981:Google Books 977:Google Books 971:Google Books 949:. Retrieved 945: 936: 927: 915: 903: 895: 891: 878: 870: 861: 853: 848:Peacock, N, 844: 835: 827: 823: 815: 811: 803: 798: 790: 785: 765: 756: 747: 738: 730: 726: 717: 695: 691: 681: 654: 650: 628: 624: 614: 603: 538: 529: 520: 494: 492: 477: 468: 458: 451: 444: 437: 425: 405: 351: 343: 331: 205: 190: 181: 171: 164: 157: 150: 138: 118: 79: 74: 68: 33: 27: 25: 574:Prima facie 499:English law 495:presumption 94:Edward Coke 90:English law 58:fact finder 34:presumption 1008:Categories 946:cps.gov.uk 865:Hart, S., 698:: 1321–28. 549:common law 441:newspapers 408:references 208:common law 154:newspapers 121:references 673:152740413 517:Australia 86:canon law 82:Roman law 38:inference 631:: 20–40. 598:(1990). 563:See also 507:evidence 503:rebutted 471:May 2023 328:rational 298:guardian 184:May 2023 50:evidence 455:scholar 375:Federal 365:In the 253:divorce 168:scholar 75:hazakah 65:History 36:is an " 951:6 July 776:  671:  526:Canada 457:  450:  443:  436:  428:  369:, the 170:  163:  156:  149:  141:  71:Talmud 802:E.g. 789:E.g. 669:S2CID 462:JSTOR 448:books 379:state 294:trust 286:fraud 251:, or 175:JSTOR 161:books 953:2021 774:ISBN 557:rape 434:news 377:and 318:The 307:The 273:The 235:The 228:The 221:The 214:The 147:news 42:fact 32:, a 1000:449 659:doi 505:by 410:to 350:in 342:in 288:or 239:or 123:to 30:law 28:In 1010:: 944:. 869:, 852:, 704:^ 696:72 694:. 690:. 667:. 655:21 653:. 649:. 637:^ 629:11 627:. 623:. 602:. 587:^ 421:. 258:A 134:. 96:. 955:. 675:. 661:: 608:. 484:) 478:( 473:) 469:( 459:· 452:· 445:· 438:· 415:. 334:( 315:. 197:) 191:( 186:) 182:( 172:· 165:· 158:· 151:· 128:. 23:.

Index

Presumption (Catholic canon law)
law
inference
fact
burden of production
evidence
burden of proof
fact finder
Talmud
Roman law
canon law
English law
Edward Coke

references
primary sources
secondary or tertiary sources
"Presumption"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
common law
presumption of death
presumption of sanity
presumption of innocence
presumption of legitimacy
presumption of paternity

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.