Knowledge

Preference utilitarianism

Source đź“ť

430:, for much of his career a major proponent of preference utilitarianism and himself influenced by the views of Hare, has been criticised for giving priority to the views of beings capable of holding preferences (being able actively to contemplate the future and its interaction with the present) over those solely concerned with their immediate situation, a group that includes animals and young children. There are, he writes in regard to killing in general, times when "the preference of the victim could sometimes be outweighed by the preferences of others". Singer does, however, still place a high value on the life of rational beings, since killing them does not infringe upon just one of their preferences, but "a wide range of the most central and significant preferences a being can have". 442: 401:
Unlike classical utilitarianism, in which right actions are defined as those that maximize pleasure and minimize pain, preference utilitarianism entails promoting actions that fulfil the interests (i.e., preferences) of those beings involved. Here beings might be
410:, even those who lack the capacity to contemplate long-term interests and consequences. Since what is good and right depends solely on individual preferences, there can be nothing that is in itself good or bad: for preference utilitarians, the source of both 425:
in 1981, is controversial, insofar as it presupposes some basis by which a conflict between A's preferences and B's preferences can be resolved (for example, by weighting them mathematically). In a similar vein,
418:
in general is subjective preference. Preference utilitarianism therefore can be distinguished by its acknowledgement that every person's experience of satisfaction is unique.
406:, that is to say, that their interests have been carefully selected and they have not made some kind of error. However, 'beings' can also be extended to all 393:
forms of utilitarianism, preferentialism values actions that fulfill the most personal interests for the entire circle of people affected by said action.
361: 620: 587: 560: 530: 667: 652: 235: 78: 245: 641: 354: 180: 63: 706: 470: 160: 701: 386: 347: 280: 265: 145: 25: 315: 305: 170: 577: 520: 270: 612: 165: 97: 8: 465: 275: 150: 675: 645: 455: 325: 240: 155: 679: 616: 583: 556: 526: 447: 337: 320: 605: 230: 110: 662: 550: 407: 285: 68: 403: 382: 115: 105: 73: 33: 695: 83: 460: 427: 390: 125: 310: 579:
Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology
546: 522:
Refuting Peter Singer's ethical theory: the importance of human dignity
422: 225: 120: 58: 53: 220: 205: 411: 210: 683: 575: 215: 642:"3. What is Good? Hedonistic vs. Pluralistic Consequentialisms" 415: 200: 48: 569: 555:. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. pp. 101–105. 437: 604: 639: 693: 518: 525:. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 28–29. 552:Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point 355: 602: 576:Till GrĂĽne-Yanoff; Sven Ove Hansson (2009). 514: 512: 362: 348: 596: 509: 611:. Cambridge University Press. pp.  539: 694: 682:& Richard Yetter-Chappell (2021), 660: 545: 668:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 653:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 13: 640:Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2023). 14: 718: 633: 519:Susan F. Krantz (January 2002). 440: 685:Introduction to Utilitarianism 496: 483: 396: 246:Utilitarian social choice rule 1: 476: 7: 433: 421:The theory, as outlined by 10: 723: 582:. Springer. p. 187. 375:Preference utilitarianism 471:Two-level utilitarianism 387:contemporary philosophy 281:Replaceability argument 266:Demandingness objection 139:Types of utilitarianism 64:Claude Adrien HelvĂ©tius 676:Theories of Well-Being 316:Neoclassical economics 306:Rational choice theory 661:Crisp, Roger (2021). 603:Peter Singer (1993). 271:Mere addition paradox 547:Hare, Richard Mervyn 466:Rule utilitarianism 276:Paradox of hedonism 236:Equal consideration 456:Act utilitarianism 326:Effective altruism 241:Felicific calculus 680:William MacAskill 622:978-0-521-43971-8 589:978-90-481-2592-0 562:978-0-19-824659-6 532:978-0-275-97083-3 448:Philosophy portal 372: 371: 338:Philosophy portal 321:Population ethics 79:Francis Hutcheson 714: 707:Ethical theories 672: 657: 647:Consequentialism 627: 626: 610: 607:Practical ethics 600: 594: 593: 573: 567: 566: 543: 537: 536: 516: 507: 504:Practical Ethics 500: 494: 491:Practical Ethics 487: 450: 445: 444: 443: 364: 357: 350: 231:Consequentialism 111:John Stuart Mill 21: 20: 722: 721: 717: 716: 715: 713: 712: 711: 692: 691: 636: 631: 630: 623: 601: 597: 590: 574: 570: 563: 544: 540: 533: 517: 510: 501: 497: 488: 484: 479: 446: 441: 439: 436: 408:sentient beings 399: 381:) is a form of 379:preferentialism 377:(also known as 368: 332: 331: 330: 300: 292: 291: 290: 286:Utility monster 260: 252: 251: 250: 195: 187: 186: 185: 140: 132: 131: 130: 100: 90: 89: 88: 69:Cesare Beccaria 43: 17: 16:Topic in ethics 12: 11: 5: 720: 710: 709: 704: 702:Utilitarianism 690: 689: 673: 658: 635: 634:External links 632: 629: 628: 621: 595: 588: 568: 561: 538: 531: 508: 502:Peter Singer, 495: 489:Peter Singer, 481: 480: 478: 475: 474: 473: 468: 463: 458: 452: 451: 435: 432: 398: 395: 383:utilitarianism 370: 369: 367: 366: 359: 352: 344: 341: 340: 334: 333: 329: 328: 323: 318: 313: 308: 302: 301: 299:Related topics 298: 297: 294: 293: 289: 288: 283: 278: 273: 268: 262: 261: 258: 257: 254: 253: 249: 248: 243: 238: 233: 228: 223: 218: 213: 208: 203: 197: 196: 193: 192: 189: 188: 184: 183: 178: 173: 168: 163: 158: 153: 148: 142: 141: 138: 137: 134: 133: 129: 128: 123: 118: 116:Henry Sidgwick 113: 108: 106:Jeremy Bentham 102: 101: 98:Key proponents 96: 95: 92: 91: 87: 86: 81: 76: 74:William Godwin 71: 66: 61: 56: 51: 45: 44: 41: 40: 37: 36: 34:Utilitarianism 30: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 719: 708: 705: 703: 700: 699: 697: 687: 686: 681: 677: 674: 670: 669: 664: 659: 655: 654: 649: 648: 643: 638: 637: 624: 618: 614: 609: 608: 599: 591: 585: 581: 580: 572: 564: 558: 554: 553: 548: 542: 534: 528: 524: 523: 515: 513: 506:, 2011, p. 13 505: 499: 493:, 2011, p. 14 492: 486: 482: 472: 469: 467: 464: 462: 459: 457: 454: 453: 449: 438: 431: 429: 424: 419: 417: 413: 409: 405: 394: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 365: 360: 358: 353: 351: 346: 345: 343: 342: 339: 336: 335: 327: 324: 322: 319: 317: 314: 312: 309: 307: 304: 303: 296: 295: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 272: 269: 267: 264: 263: 256: 255: 247: 244: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 202: 199: 198: 191: 190: 182: 179: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 143: 136: 135: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 103: 99: 94: 93: 85: 84:William Paley 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 65: 62: 60: 57: 55: 52: 50: 47: 46: 39: 38: 35: 32: 31: 27: 23: 22: 19: 684: 666: 663:"Well-Being" 651: 646: 606: 598: 578: 571: 551: 541: 521: 503: 498: 490: 485: 428:Peter Singer 420: 400: 391:value monist 378: 374: 373: 194:Key concepts 175: 126:Peter Singer 42:Predecessors 18: 397:Description 311:Game theory 696:Categories 477:References 423:R. M. Hare 226:Eudaimonia 176:Preference 121:R. M. Hare 59:David Hume 54:Shantideva 461:R.G. Frey 389:. Unlike 221:Happiness 206:Suffering 181:Classical 161:Two-level 549:(1981). 434:See also 412:morality 404:rational 259:Problems 211:Pleasure 146:Negative 26:a series 24:Part of 216:Utility 171:Average 619:  586:  559:  529:  416:ethics 678:, in 166:Total 617:ISBN 584:ISBN 557:ISBN 527:ISBN 414:and 201:Pain 151:Rule 49:Mozi 385:in 156:Act 698:: 665:. 650:. 644:. 615:. 613:95 511:^ 28:on 688:. 671:. 656:. 625:. 592:. 565:. 535:. 363:e 356:t 349:v

Index

a series
Utilitarianism
Mozi
Shantideva
David Hume
Claude Adrien Helvétius
Cesare Beccaria
William Godwin
Francis Hutcheson
William Paley
Key proponents
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
Henry Sidgwick
R. M. Hare
Peter Singer
Negative
Rule
Act
Two-level
Total
Average
Preference
Classical
Pain
Suffering
Pleasure
Utility
Happiness
Eudaimonia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑