38:
321:" or "opinion of the court" is an opinion of a judge or group of judges that accompanies and explains an order or ruling in a controversy before the court. A judicial opinion generally lays out the facts that the court recognized as being established, the legal principles the court is bound by, and the application of the relevant principles to the recognized facts. The goal is to demonstrate the rationale the court used in reaching its decision.
146:
271:"Scientific opinion" may reflect opinions on scientific concerns as articulated by one or more scientists, published in scholarly journals or respected textbooks, both of which entail peer-review and rigorous professional editing. It may also refer to opinions published by professional, academic, or governmental organizations about scientific findings and their possible implications.
364:(2007, entered into force on 1 December 2009) allows Member States to issue a reasoned opinion within 8 weeks of their official notification of the draft legislation. As from 2019-20 the European Commission has allowed a longer period for reasoned opinions to be issued over the Christmas and New Year period.
308:
transactions. The opinion expresses the attorney's professional judgment regarding the legal aspect of the transaction. The opinion can be "clean" or "reasoned". A legal opinion is not a guarantee that a court will reach any particular result. However, a mistaken or incomplete legal opinion may be
285:
Scientific opinion(s) can be "partial, temporally contingent, conflicting, and uncertain" so that there may be no accepted consensus for a particular situation. In other circumstances, a particular scientific opinion may be at odds with consensus.
215:(e.g., opinions of users of a particular product or service). Typically, because the process of gathering opinions from all individuals is difficult, expensive, or impossible to obtain, public opinion (or consumer opinion) is estimated using
304:" or "closing opinion" is a type of professional opinion, usually contained in a formal legal-opinion letter, given by an attorney to a client or a third party. Most legal opinions are given in connection with
309:
grounds for a professional malpractice claim against the attorney, pursuant to which the attorney may be required to pay the claimant damages incurred as a result of relying on the faulty opinion.
356:
Also under EU law, a "reasoned opinion" may be issued by a Member State in relation to proposed EU legislation, if the Member State is concerned that the proposal infringes the EU's
211:
is the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs held by a population (e.g., a city, state, or country), while consumer opinion is the similar aggregate collected as part of
106:
Different people may draw opposing conclusions (opinions) even if they agree on the same set of facts. Opinions rarely change without new arguments being presented. It can be
846:
292:, also called public understanding of science, is an educational goal concerned with providing the public with the necessary tools to benefit from scientific opinion.
99:," versus "United States of America was right to get involved in the Vietnam War". An opinion may be supported by facts and principles, in which case it becomes an
95:
from opinion is that facts are verifiable, i.e. can be agreed to by the consensus of experts. An example is: "United States of
America was involved in the
617:
350:
509:
915:
132:
Though not hard fact, collective opinions or professional opinions are defined as meeting a higher standard to substantiate the opinion.
1105:
737:
ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY AND ON RELATIONS WITH NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS
602:
429:
method) identifies potential problems that could affect data quality and data collection by evaluating survey questionnaires and
353:, constitutes a formal request to the state concerned for implementing action to be taken, usually within a two month deadline.
404:
and are typically sponsored by one side or the other in a litigation in order to support that party's claims. The reports state
868:
783:
519:
279:
251:, or other collective decision-making body. In these situations, researchers are often interested in questions related to
411:
In medicine, an expert report is a critical assessment of a medical topic, for example, an independent assessment of the
774:
Marks P (2007). "Clinical research education and training for pharmaceutical staff". In
Edwards LD, Fletcher AJ (eds.).
338:
1186:
908:
758:
189:
17:
171:
80:
matters in which there is no conclusive finding, or it may deal with facts which are sought to be disputed by the
723:
1191:
801:
239:, group opinion refers to the aggregation of opinions collected from a group of subjects, such as members of a
156:
799:
Yan, T.; Kreuter, F.; Tourangeau, R (December 2012). "Evaluating Survey
Questions: A Comparison of Methods".
736:
690:
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, Article 258 (ex Article 226 TEC)
483:
357:
85:
901:
821:
643:"American Bar Association Committee on Legal Opinions, Legal Opinion Principles, 53 Bus. Law. 831 (1998)"
689:
346:
110:
that one opinion is better supported by the facts than another, by analyzing the supporting arguments.
666:
702:
642:
46:
31:
822:"Translation Review and Cognitive Testing of ACS Language Assistance Guides in Multiple Languages"
1125:
463:
167:
118:
945:
426:
412:
749:
Hirt TC (1999). "Expert reports". In Koeltl JG; Kiernan JS; ABA Section of
Litigation (eds.).
1160:
453:
422:
220:
430:
278:, is the prevailing view on a scientific topic within the scientific community, such as the
590:
275:
8:
1097:
924:
488:
473:
408:, discuss details, explain reasoning, and justify the experts' conclusions and opinions.
342:
334:
289:
107:
594:
988:
874:
563:
555:
260:
212:
739:, COM(2021) 417 final, section 2.1, published 23 July 2021, accessed 26 September 2023
1020:
1005:
932:
878:
864:
779:
754:
724:
The Role of the
National Parliaments in the European Union - European Union Committee
567:
515:
416:
232:
1150:
1042:
856:
598:
547:
361:
318:
126:
37:
1181:
1135:
984:
216:
163:
937:
719:
551:
397:
330:
208:
81:
1175:
382:
374:
349:
or other EU law. The reasoned opinion, provided for under
Article 258 of the
301:
252:
122:
1130:
1115:
458:
448:
77:
860:
1110:
1000:
970:
667:"O.S. Kerr, How to Read a Judicial Opinion: A Guide for New Law Students"
244:
96:
61:
1155:
1145:
1052:
1027:
980:
603:
10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200001)84:1<71::aid-sce6>3.0.co;2-c
511:
Attacking Faulty
Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-free Arguments
478:
401:
256:
236:
893:
559:
1087:
1067:
975:
950:
852:
581:
Laugksch, R.C. (2000). "Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview".
248:
174:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
1140:
1120:
1072:
1057:
995:
955:
390:
305:
100:
57:
1047:
1032:
1015:
468:
386:
42:
1082:
1077:
1062:
960:
726:, chapter 4, published 11 March 2014, accessed 7 November 2022
405:
65:
1010:
965:
443:
240:
92:
337:
issues a "reasoned opinion" when it is concerned that a
27:
Judgment, viewpoint, or statement that is not conclusive
135:
400:
offering their opinions on points of controversy in a
798:
753:(3rd ed.). American Bar Assn. pp. 477–87.
776:Principles and Practice of Pharmaceutical Medicine
1173:
838:
351:Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
580:
909:
538:Brian Wynne (1991). "Knowledges in Context".
618:"Real Estate Opinion Letters: Introduction"
537:
916:
902:
848:The Sociolinguistics of Survey Translation
703:"Enforcement: Frequently Asked Questions"
190:Learn how and when to remove this message
396:In law, expert reports are generated by
360:principle. Article 6, Protocol 2 to the
36:
923:
778:(2nd ed.). Wiley. pp. 25–40.
773:
748:
540:Science, Technology, & Human Values
533:
531:
14:
1174:
845:Pan, Yuling; Sha, Mandy (2019-07-09).
844:
64:that is not conclusive, as opposed to
897:
507:
266:
615:
528:
514:. Cengage Learning. pp. 14–15.
280:scientific opinion on climate change
231:In some social sciences, especially
139:
136:Collective and professional opinions
125:, particular feelings, beliefs, and
819:
324:
312:
24:
385:is a study written by one or more
274:A related—but not identical—term,
25:
1203:
889:
202:
86:one is entitled to their opinions
389:that states findings and offers
373:This section is an excerpt from
367:
295:
226:
144:
117:may be the result of a person's
813:
792:
767:
742:
729:
333:'s infringement procedure, the
802:Journal of Official Statistics
713:
695:
682:
659:
635:
609:
574:
501:
425:, an expert report (using the
76:A given opinion may deal with
13:
1:
494:
71:
68:, which are true statements.
692:, accessed 26 September 2023
7:
826:United States Census Bureau
437:
170:the claims made and adding
10:
1208:
552:10.1177/016224399101600108
484:I'm entitled to my opinion
372:
329:As the second step of the
29:
1096:
1043:Parsimony (Occam's razor)
931:
820:Sha, Mandy (March 2012).
508:Damer, T. Edward (2008).
1187:Concepts in epistemology
113:In casual use, the term
47:Chinatown, San Francisco
32:Opinion (disambiguation)
464:Perspective (cognitive)
207:In contemporary usage,
49:
1192:Subjective experience
1098:Theories of deduction
861:10.4324/9780429294914
751:The Litigation Manual
735:European Commission,
454:Justified true belief
221:representative sample
40:
855:. pp. 118–124.
276:scientific consensus
30:For other uses, see
925:Philosophical logic
709:. 28 November 2022.
707:European Commission
595:2000SciEd..84...71L
489:Scientific evidence
431:survey translations
335:European Commission
290:Scientific literacy
989:Unity of opposites
616:Thompson, Robert.
413:cost–benefit ratio
267:Scientific opinion
261:group polarization
223:of a population).
213:marketing research
155:possibly contains
50:
1169:
1168:
1021:List of fallacies
1006:Explanatory power
933:Critical thinking
870:978-0-429-29491-4
785:978-0-470-09313-9
583:Science Education
521:978-0-495-09506-4
423:survey pretesting
417:medical treatment
233:political science
200:
199:
192:
157:original research
18:Political opinion
16:(Redirected from
1199:
1151:Platonic realism
918:
911:
904:
895:
894:
883:
882:
842:
836:
835:
833:
832:
817:
811:
810:
796:
790:
789:
771:
765:
764:
746:
740:
733:
727:
717:
711:
710:
699:
693:
686:
680:
679:
677:
676:
671:
663:
657:
656:
654:
653:
647:
639:
633:
632:
630:
628:
613:
607:
606:
578:
572:
571:
535:
526:
525:
505:
474:Speaker's Corner
415:of a particular
398:expert witnesses
362:Treaty of Lisbon
325:Reasoned opinion
319:judicial opinion
313:Judicial opinion
195:
188:
184:
181:
175:
172:inline citations
148:
147:
140:
60:, viewpoint, or
21:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1165:
1136:Logical atomism
1092:
985:Socratic method
936:
927:
922:
892:
887:
886:
871:
843:
839:
830:
828:
818:
814:
797:
793:
786:
772:
768:
761:
747:
743:
734:
730:
718:
714:
701:
700:
696:
687:
683:
674:
672:
669:
665:
664:
660:
651:
649:
645:
641:
640:
636:
626:
624:
622:americanbar.org
614:
610:
579:
575:
536:
529:
522:
506:
502:
497:
440:
435:
434:
378:
370:
327:
315:
298:
269:
229:
217:survey sampling
205:
196:
185:
179:
176:
161:
149:
145:
138:
91:Distinguishing
82:logical fallacy
74:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1205:
1195:
1194:
1189:
1184:
1167:
1166:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1106:Constructivism
1102:
1100:
1094:
1093:
1091:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
992:
991:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
942:
940:
938:informal logic
929:
928:
921:
920:
913:
906:
898:
891:
890:External links
888:
885:
884:
869:
837:
812:
791:
784:
766:
759:
741:
728:
720:House of Lords
712:
694:
681:
658:
634:
608:
573:
546:(1): 111–121.
527:
520:
499:
498:
496:
493:
492:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
439:
436:
379:
371:
369:
366:
331:European Union
326:
323:
314:
311:
297:
294:
268:
265:
228:
225:
219:(e.g., with a
209:public opinion
204:
203:Public opinion
201:
198:
197:
152:
150:
143:
137:
134:
73:
70:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1204:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1185:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
990:
986:
982:
979:
978:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
943:
941:
939:
934:
930:
926:
919:
914:
912:
907:
905:
900:
899:
896:
880:
876:
872:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:
841:
827:
823:
816:
809:(4): 503–529.
808:
804:
803:
795:
787:
781:
777:
770:
762:
760:1-57073-639-1
756:
752:
745:
738:
732:
725:
721:
716:
708:
704:
698:
691:
685:
668:
662:
644:
638:
623:
619:
612:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
577:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
534:
532:
523:
517:
513:
512:
504:
500:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
432:
428:
427:expert review
424:
420:
418:
414:
409:
407:
403:
399:
394:
392:
388:
384:
383:expert report
376:
375:Expert report
368:Expert report
365:
363:
359:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
322:
320:
310:
307:
303:
302:legal opinion
296:Legal opinion
293:
291:
287:
283:
281:
277:
272:
264:
262:
258:
254:
253:social choice
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
227:Group opinion
224:
222:
218:
214:
210:
194:
191:
183:
180:December 2009
173:
169:
165:
159:
158:
153:This section
151:
142:
141:
133:
130:
128:
124:
123:understanding
120:
116:
111:
109:
104:
102:
98:
94:
89:
87:
83:
79:
69:
67:
63:
59:
55:
48:
44:
39:
33:
19:
1131:Intuitionism
1116:Fictionalism
1037:
847:
840:
829:. Retrieved
825:
815:
806:
800:
794:
775:
769:
750:
744:
731:
715:
706:
697:
684:
673:. Retrieved
661:
650:. Retrieved
648:. Abanet.org
637:
625:. Retrieved
621:
611:
589:(1): 71–94.
586:
582:
576:
543:
539:
510:
503:
459:Opinion poll
449:Epistemology
410:
395:
380:
358:subsidiarity
355:
339:Member State
328:
316:
299:
288:
284:
273:
270:
230:
206:
186:
177:
154:
131:
114:
112:
105:
90:
75:
53:
51:
1111:Dialetheism
1001:Explanation
971:Credibility
421:As part of
387:authorities
343:implemented
245:legislature
119:perspective
97:Vietnam War
1176:Categories
1156:Pragmatism
1146:Nominalism
1053:Propaganda
1028:Hypothesis
981:Antithesis
851:. London:
831:2024-01-08
675:2013-02-18
652:2013-02-18
495:References
479:Truthiness
402:legal case
257:conformity
237:psychology
164:improve it
78:subjective
72:Definition
43:Soapboxing
1126:Formalism
1088:Vagueness
1068:Relevance
1063:Reasoning
976:Dialectic
951:Ambiguity
879:198632812
853:Routledge
688:EUR-Lex,
568:144773885
347:Directive
249:committee
168:verifying
62:statement
1141:Logicism
1121:Finitism
1073:Rhetoric
1058:Prudence
996:Evidence
956:Argument
946:Analysis
438:See also
391:opinions
341:has not
306:business
108:reasoned
101:argument
58:judgment
1161:Realism
1048:Premise
1038:Opinion
1033:Inquiry
1016:Fallacy
591:Bibcode
469:Soapbox
162:Please
127:desires
115:opinion
54:opinion
1182:Belief
1083:Theory
961:Belief
877:
867:
782:
757:
627:2 June
566:
560:690044
558:
518:
259:, and
1078:Rigor
875:S2CID
670:(PDF)
646:(PDF)
564:S2CID
556:JSTOR
406:facts
84:that
66:facts
56:is a
45:" in
1011:Fact
966:Bias
865:ISBN
780:ISBN
755:ISBN
629:2016
516:ISBN
444:Doxa
241:jury
235:and
93:fact
935:and
857:doi
599:doi
548:doi
381:An
317:A "
300:A "
166:by
52:An
1178::
987:,
983:,
873:.
863:.
824:.
807:28
805:.
722:,
705:.
620:.
597:.
587:84
585:.
562:.
554:.
544:16
542:.
530:^
419:.
393:.
345:a
282:.
263:.
255:,
247:,
243:,
129:.
121:,
103:.
88:.
917:e
910:t
903:v
881:.
859::
834:.
788:.
763:.
678:.
655:.
631:.
605:.
601::
593::
570:.
550::
524:.
433:.
377:.
193:)
187:(
182:)
178:(
160:.
41:"
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
