Knowledge

Open-field system

Source 📝

158: 450:
England were actually highly managed; they were considered to be privately owned by the village as a whole, which led to a communal sense of responsibility to maintaining the land. Managerial practices such as stinting, or limiting the amount of cattle permitted, required weed removal, removal of straw, cutting thistles, ringing swine, and knobbing cow's horns to prevent grubbing were common. The commons were regularly inspected by the villagers and sometimes by a delegation from the manorial court. It is even argued that the commons that Hardin was referring to in "The Tragedy of the Commons" were actually pre-enclosure commons, which were not true commons, but rather left over lands that were misused by the poor, displaced, and criminals.
421:
prices in fifteenth century England gave a competitive advantage to the production of wool, meat, and milk. The shift away from grain to livestock accelerated enclosure of fields. The steadily increasing number of formerly open fields converted to enclosed (fenced) fields caused social and economic stress among small farmers who lost their access to communal grazing lands. Many tenants were forced off the lands their families may have cultivated for centuries to work for wages in towns and cities. The number of large and middle-sized estates grew in number while small land-holders decreased in number. In the 16th and early 17th centuries, the practice of enclosure (particularly depopulating enclosure) was denounced by the
394: 267: 458:
More than half the agricultural land of England was still not enclosed in 1700, after which the government discouraged the continuation of the open-field system. It was finally laid to rest in England about 1850 after more than 5,000 Acts of Parliament and just as many voluntary agreements over several centuries had transformed the "scattered plots in the open fields" into unambiguous private and enclosed properties free of village and communal control and use. Over half of all agricultural land in England was enclosed during the 18th and 19th centuries. Other European countries also began to pass legislation to eliminate the scattering of farm land, the
405: 224:, a rich farmer who cultivated one hide of land and had tenants of his own. The tenants' houses lined a road rather than being grouped in a cluster. Some of the village houses were fairly large, 50 feet (15 m) long by 14 feet (4.3 m) wide. Others were only 20 feet (6 m) long and 10 feet (3 m) wide. All were insubstantial and required frequent reconstruction. Most of the tenants' houses had outbuildings and an animal pen with a larger area, called a 33: 251:
the church. A family might possess about 70 selions totalling about 20 acres (8 ha) scattered around the fields. The scattered nature of family holdings ensured that families each received a ration of both good and poor land and minimised risk. If some selions were unproductive, others might be productive. Ploughing techniques created a landscape of ridge and furrow, with furrows between ridges dividing holdings and aiding drainage.
486: 442:" and assert that private ownership is a better steward of resources than common or public ownership. "Tragedy of the commons" refers to the alleged destruction of common pastures in England as a result of overgrazing, each tenant maximizing his gain by grazing as many animals as possible and ignoring the long-term impact of overgrazing. The author of the term "tragedy of the commons", 232:
acres (1 ha). To survive, they also had to work for larger landowners. 22 percent of tenants had a virgate of land (which varied in size between 24 acres (10 ha) and 32 acres (13 ha) and 31 percent had one-half virgate. To rely on the land for a livelihood a tenant family needed at least 10 acres (4 ha).
534:, where long strips, of an average size of half an acre, curve to follow the gently sloping ground and are used for growing vegetables or cereal crops. The boundaries are mostly unmarked, although where several strips have been amalgamated a deep furrow is sometimes used to divide them. The ancient village game of 425:
and the government, and legislation was drawn up against it. The dispossession of tenants from their land created an "epidemic of vagrancy" in England in the late 16th and early 17th century. The tide of elite opinion began to turn towards support for enclosure, and the rate of enclosure increased in
385:
The population in Europe grew in the early centuries of the open-field system, doubling in Britain between 1086 and 1300, which required increased agricultural production and more intensive cultivation of farmland. The open-field system was generally not practised in marginal agricultural areas or in
231:
The tenants on the manor did not have equal holdings of land. About one-half of adults living on a manor had no land at all and had to work for larger landholders for their livelihood. A survey of 104 13th-century manors in England found that, among the landholding tenants, 45 percent had less than 3
311:
per acre harvested. Battle Abbey may have been atypical, with better management and soils than typical of demesnes in open-field areas. Barley was used in making beer – consumed in large quantities – and mixed with other grains to produce bread that was a dietary staple for the poorer farmers. Wheat
250:
One of the two or three fields was fallowed each year to recover soil fertility. The fields were divided into parcels called furlongs. The furlong was further subdivided into long, thin strips of land called selions or ridges. Selions were distributed among the farmers of the village, the manor, and
200:
each. The acreage of a hide and virgate varied; but at Elton, a hide was 144 acres (58 ha) and a virgate was 24 acres (10 ha). Thus, the total of arable land amounted to 1,872 acres (758 ha). The abbot's demesne land consisted of three hides plus 16 acres (6.5 ha) of meadow and 3
771:
Whilst the stitches (strips) to the west of track across the open field were arable at the time of this visit (early May 2009), on the east side they are covered in grass. This illustrates the system whereby the stitches were cultivated by their owners during the Summer, but grazed in common during
457:
of the open field system, calling it a "robbery of the common lands". The "brave new world" of a harsher, more competitive and capitalistic society from the 16th century onward destroyed the securities and certainties of land tenure in the open-field system. The open field system died only slowly.
336:
Much of the land in the open-field system during medieval times had been cultivated for hundreds of years earlier on Roman estates or by farmers belonging to one of the ethnic groups of Europe. There are hints of a proto-open-field system going back to AD 98 among the Germanic tribes. Germanic and
556:. In many towns and cities there are areas of land of one or two acres (up to about one hectare) interspersed between the buildings. These areas are usually owned by local authorities, or by allotment associations. Small patches of the land are allocated at a low rent to people for growing food. 449:
The fact that the open-field system endured for roughly a thousand years over a large part of Europe and provided a livelihood to a growing population indicates that there might not have been a better way of organizing agriculture during that time period. However, some argue that the pastures of
134:
and those rights were passed down from generation to generation. A medieval lord could not evict a tenant nor hire labour to replace him without legal cause. Most tenants likewise were not free without penalty to depart the manor for other locations or occupations. The rise of capitalism and the
420:
of 1348–1350 killed 30–60% of Europe's population. As a consequence the surviving population had access to larger tracts of empty farmland and wages increased due to a shortage of labour. Richer farmers began to acquire land and remove it from communal usage. An economic recession and low grain
298:
in the second field in the fall and the third field would be left fallow. The following year, the planting in the fields would be rotated. Pasturage was held in common. The tenants pastured their livestock on the fallow field and on the planted fields after harvest. An elaborate set of laws and
434:
The open-field system is considered by many economists to have been inefficient for agricultural production and resistant to technological innovation. "Everyone was forced to conform to village norms of cropping, harvesting, and building." The communal institutions, the manorial court, and the
435:
tenants regulated agricultural practices and economic behaviour. The manorial lord exercised control over the tenants by extracting rent for land or labour to cultivate his demesne lands. The scattered holdings of each farmer increased the time needed to travel to and from fields.
306:
in Sussex in the late 14th century ranged from 2.26 to 5.22 seeds harvested for every seed planted, averaging 4.34 seeds harvested for every seed planted. Barley production averaged 4.01 and oats 2.87 seeds harvested for seeds planted. This translates into yields of 7 to 17
201:
acres (1 ha) of pasture. The remainder of the land was cultivated by 113 tenants who lived in a village on the manor. Counting spouses, children, and other dependents, plus landless people, the total population resident in the manor village was probably 500 to 600.
504:, North Devon. It is still farmed with due regard to its ancient origins and is conserved by those who recognise its importance although the number of owners has fallen dramatically throughout the years and this has resulted in the amalgamation of some of the strips. 328:, and poultry. Pork was the principal meat eaten; sheep were primarily raised for their wool, a cash crop. Only a few rich landholders had enough horses and oxen to make up a ploughing-team of six to eight oxen or horses, so sharing among neighbours was essential. 337:
Anglo-Saxon invaders and settlers possibly brought the open-field system to France and England after the 5th century AD. The open-field system appears to have developed to maturity between AD 850 and 1150 in England, although documentation is scarce prior to the
357:
system of farming in small, square, enclosed fields. In much of eastern and western England, fields were similarly either never open or were enclosed earlier. The primary area of open fields was in the lowland areas of England in a broad swathe from
144:
in England. France, Germany, and other northern European countries had systems similar to England, although open fields generally endured longer on the continent. Some elements of the open-field system were practised by early settlers in the
446:, pointed out that the pastures of England were "protected from ruin by limiting each tenant to a fixed number of animals". Thus, Hardin says the commons were "managed...which may be good or bad depending on the quality of the management". 462:
and France passing laws making land consolidation compulsory in the 1930s and 1950s respectively. In Russia, the open-field system, called "cherespolositsa" ("alternating ribbons (of land)") and administered by the
497:. It is thought that its anomalous survival is due to the inability of two early 19th-century landowners to agree on how the land was to be enclosed, thus resulting in the perpetuation of the existing system. 139:
led to the gradual demise of the open-field system. The open-field system was gradually replaced over several centuries by private ownership of land, especially after the 15th century in the process known as
344:
The open-field system was never practiced in all regions and countries in Europe. It was most common in heavily populated and productive agricultural regions. In England, the south-east, notably parts of
320:
in Cambridgeshire in 1286, perhaps typical of that time in England, the tenants harvested about twice as much barley as wheat with lesser amounts of oats, peas, beans, rye, flax, apples, and vegetables.
390:
were needed to cut through the soil and the ox or horse teams which pulled the ploughs were expensive, and thus both animals and ploughs were often shared by necessity among farm families.
126:
In medieval times, little land was owned outright. Instead, generally the lord had rights given to him by the king, and the tenant rented land from the lord. Lords demanded rents and
239:, where the villagers would graze their livestock throughout the year, woodland for pigs and timber, and also some private fenced land (paddocks, orchards and gardens), called 100:. The holdings of a manor also included woodland and pasture areas for common usage and fields belonging to the lord of the manor and the religious authorities, usually 235:
The land of a typical manor in England and other countries was subdivided into two or three large fields. Non-arable land was allocated to common pasture land or
453:
The replacement of the open-field system by privately owned property was fiercely resisted by many elements of society. Karl Marx was extremely opposed to the
119:
administered the manor and exercised jurisdiction over the peasantry. The Lord levied rents and required the peasantry to work on his personal lands, called a
631: 221: 88:
or village had two or three large fields, usually several hundred acres each, which were divided into many narrow strips of land. The strips or
1244: 438:
The open-field system, especially its characteristic of common grazing lands, has often been used as an example by economists to illustrate "
177:
The most visible characteristic of the open-field system was that the arable land belonging to a manor was divided into many long narrow
302:
Wheat and barley were the most important crops with roughly equal amounts planted on the average in England. Annual wheat production at
254:
The right of pasture on fallowed fields, land unsuitable for cultivation, and harvested fields was held in common with rules to prevent
962: 691:
Issue no. 33, April 1998; Ault, W. O. "Open-Field Farming in Medieval England" London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1972, pp. 15–16
108:
with a much larger manor house and church nearby. The open-field system necessitated co-operation among the residents of the manor.
1092:"The Enclosure of Open Fields: Preface to a Study of Its Impact on the Efficiency of English Agriculture in the Eighteenth Century" 1016:"The Enclosure of Open Fields: Preface to a Study of Its Impact on the Efficiency of English Agriculture in the Eighteenth Century" 192:, is representative of a medieval open-field manor in England. The manor, whose Lord was an abbot from a nearby monastery, had 13 " 299:
controls, partly set by the Lord of the Manor and partly by the tenants themselves regulated planting, harvest, and pasturing.
1211: 797: 173:. The outlines of the medieval strips of cultivation, called selions, are still clearly visible in these now enclosed fields. 1091: 1015: 400:
in Dorset, England, a manor house built about 1370. The part of the house in the background was added in the 16th century.
157: 947:<81::AID-JCOP2290140108>3.0.CO;2-G "The Tragedy of the Commons and the Comedy of Community: The Commons in History" 386:
hilly and mountainous regions. Open fields were well suited to the dense clay soils common in northwestern Europe. Heavy
1278: 1170: 641: 17: 473:
process that started in 1905, but generally continued for many years, finally ending only with the Soviet policy of
1283: 1273: 931: 789: 69: 1229: 469:(the general village community), remained as the main system of peasant land ownership in Russia until the 393: 1068: 531: 439: 674:
McCloskey, Donald N. "The open fields of England: rent, risk, and the rate of interest, 1300–1815" in
185:-field system. Each tenant of the manor cultivated several strips of land scattered around the manor. 1288: 1193: 404: 1248: 1162: 1146: 976: 166: 713:
Brandon, P. F. "Cereal Yields on the Sussex Estates of Battle Abby during the Later Middle Ages,"
494: 1057: 1004:, ed. by Rosemary Horrox and W. Mark Ormrod. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 237 378:, and most of south central England. This area was the main grain-growing region (as opposed to 904: 1181: 783: 626: 553: 547: 527: 317: 189: 1293: 870: 8: 874: 493:
One place in England where the open-field system continues to be used is the village of
830: 519: 507:
There is also a surviving medieval open strip field system in Wales in the township of
1207: 1186: 1166: 1111: 1053: 1035: 886: 861: 793: 637: 422: 275: 112: 105: 324:
The land-holding tenants also had livestock, including sheep, pigs, cattle, horses,
278:
to cut through the heavy soils. A team could plough about one acre (0.4 ha) per day.
1103: 1027: 958: 878: 584: 474: 397: 375: 162: 882: 228:, of about one-half acre (0.2 ha), enclosed for a garden and grazing for animals. 104:
in medieval Western Europe. The farmers customarily lived in separate houses in a
515: 470: 170: 101: 946: 1154: 856: 443: 209: 116: 1107: 1031: 1267: 1115: 1039: 465: 354: 338: 217: 181:
for cultivation. The fields of cultivated land were unfenced, hence the name
136: 127: 678:, ed. David W. Galenson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp 6–7 1234: 963:
10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<81::AID-JCOP2290140108>3.0.CO;2-G
704:
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 17–20; Astill and Grant, p. 27
500:
The only other surviving medieval open strip field system in England is in
363: 303: 243:. The ploughed fields and the meadows were used for livestock grazing when 225: 890: 511:, which is also the last town in the UK with an intact medieval charter. 459: 417: 266: 255: 193: 146: 131: 85: 73: 37: 1065:
European Peasants and Their Markets: Essays in Agrarian Economic History
535: 205: 130:
from the tenants, but the tenants had firm user rights to cropland and
32: 1242: 508: 454: 409: 359: 313: 141: 772:
the winter. This grazing adds manure to the soil to keep it fertile.
717:, New Series, Vol. 25, No. 8 (Aug 1972), pp. 405, 412, 417, 419–420 501: 379: 213: 47: 40:, showing strip farming. The mustard-colored areas are part of the 552:
A similar system to open fields survives in the United Kingdom as
27:
Prevalent ownership and land use structure in medieval agriculture
485: 371: 367: 197: 178: 120: 97: 93: 42: 785:
A pest in the land: new world epidemics in a global perspective
387: 308: 291: 283: 244: 216:
on the manor. The village contained a church, a manor house, a
89: 81: 1198:(On the expansion of the open-field system into the New World) 702:
Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History
977:"Economic Manuscripts: Capital Vol. I - Chapter Twenty-Seven" 523: 346: 282:
The typical planting scheme in a three-field system was that
52: 604:
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000, p. 11
366:
diagonally across England to the south, taking in parts of
350: 287: 77: 295: 161:
The method of ploughing the fields created a distinctive
325: 573:
Iran. Religion, Politics and Society: Collected Essays
514:
Vestiges of an open-field system also persist in the
1188:
Puritan Village: The Formation of a New England Town
632:
Puritan Village: The Formation of a New England Town
617:
London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1972, pp. 77–78
137:
concept of land as a commodity to be bought and sold
429: 1185: 859:(13 December 1968). "The Tragedy of the Commons". 602:From British Peasants to Colonial American Farmers 294:would be planted in one field in spring, wheat or 636:Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT 215pp. 1265: 676:Markets in History: Economic Studies of the Past 165:pattern in open-field agriculture, seen here at 1063:. In Parker, William N.; Jones, Eric L (eds.). 1243:Trent & Peak Archaeological Trust (1995). 929:Cox, S., (1985). "No tragedy on the commons". 1058:"2: The Persistence of English Common Fields" 837:(Revised ed.) London: Sutton, 1998, p. 102 ff 781: 920:Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 95 316:. Richer people ate bread made of wheat. At 76:and lasted into the 20th century in Russia, 426:the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. 1089: 1052: 1013: 656:New York: Harper and Row, 1990, pp 31, 42 591:Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988, pp.23, 64 484: 403: 392: 265: 156: 31: 1153: 753:Ault, pp. 15–16, Oosthuizen, p. 165-166 261: 14: 1266: 1180: 1002:A Social History of England, 1200–1500 944: 855: 687:"Medieval fields in their many forms" 615:Open-Field Farming in Medieval England 489:Open-fields in Laxton, Nottinghamshire 1227: 374:, Cambridgeshire, large areas of the 1201: 1140: 1000:Campbell, Bruce M. S. "The Land" in 575:London: Routledge, 1980, pp. 186–187 541: 1090:McCloskey, Donald N. (March 1972). 1014:McCloskey, Donald N. (March 1972). 589:The Countryside of Medieval England 24: 1134: 821:Gies, p. 196; Kulikoff, pp. 19, 50 538:is played in this open landscape. 247:or after the grain was harvested. 25: 1305: 1221: 965:– via Wiley Online Library. 918:The Open Field System and Beyond, 430:Controversies and inefficiencies 1228:Smith, Roly (2 December 2000). 1177:(On Britain, primarily England) 1122: 1096:The Journal of Economic History 1083: 1046: 1020:The Journal of Economic History 1007: 994: 969: 951:Journal of Community Psychology 938: 923: 910: 897: 849: 840: 824: 815: 806: 782:Austin Alchon, Suzanne (2003). 775: 765: 756: 747: 738: 729: 720: 707: 694: 480: 274:1330. The ploughman is using a 1159:The History of the Countryside 945:Levine, Bruce (January 1986). 790:University of New Mexico Press 681: 668: 659: 646: 620: 607: 594: 578: 565: 152: 13: 1: 883:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 559: 149:region of the United States. 72:in much of Europe during the 905:"The Tragedy of the Commons" 835:The Lost Villages of England 382:farming) in medieval times. 7: 1245:"The Laxton Village Survey" 715:The Economic History Review 258:enforced by the community. 212:for finishing cloth, and a 10: 1310: 1204:The Open Fields of England 1069:Princeton University Press 654:Life in a Medieval Village 545: 440:the tragedy of the commons 331: 96:, often called tenants or 36:Generic map of a medieval 1279:Agricultural soil science 1194:Wesleyan University Press 1163:Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1145:. Cambridge, MA; London: 1143:The English Field Systems 1108:10.1017/S0022050700075379 1067:. Princeton, New Jersey: 1032:10.1017/S0022050700075379 916:Dahlman, Carl J. (1980), 907:, accessed 22 August 2019 652:Gies, Frances and Joseph 522:, around the villages of 204:The abbot also owned two 1147:Harvard University Press 1141:Gray, Howard L (1959) . 196:" of arable land of six 587:and Grant, Annie, eds. 495:Laxton, Nottinghamshire 270:A four-ox-team plough, 220:, and the sub-manor of 115:, his officials, and a 56:. William R. Shepherd, 1284:History of agriculture 1274:Agricultural economics 1182:Powell, Sumner Chilton 700:Hopcroft, Rosemary L. 627:Powell, Sumner Chilton 490: 413: 401: 279: 208:for grinding grain, a 174: 61: 735:Gies, pp. 82, 145–149 548:Allotment (gardening) 488: 407: 396: 269: 190:Elton, Cambridgeshire 160: 35: 1202:Hall, David (2014). 1054:McCloskey, Donald N. 932:Environmental Ethics 312:was often sold as a 262:Crops and production 1251:on 24 December 2019 875:1968Sci...162.1243H 788:. Albuquerque, NM: 689:British Archaeology 92:were cultivated by 70:agricultural system 1192:. Middletown, CT: 831:Beresford, Maurice 812:Hopcroft, pp 70–81 520:North Lincolnshire 491: 414: 402: 280: 175: 68:was the prevalent 62: 50:areas part of the 1213:978-0-19-870295-5 1206:. Oxford: O.U.P. 799:978-0-8263-2871-7 585:Astill, Grenville 571:Keddie, Nicki R. 554:allotment gardens 542:Allotment gardens 353:, retained a pre- 276:mouldboard plough 113:Lord of the Manor 106:nucleated village 66:open-field system 18:Open field system 16:(Redirected from 1301: 1289:Medieval society 1260: 1258: 1256: 1247:. Archived from 1239: 1217: 1197: 1191: 1176: 1150: 1129: 1128:McCloskey, p. 11 1126: 1120: 1119: 1087: 1081: 1080: 1078: 1076: 1062: 1050: 1044: 1043: 1011: 1005: 998: 992: 991: 989: 987: 981:www.marxists.org 973: 967: 966: 942: 936: 927: 921: 914: 908: 903:Hardin, Garret, 901: 895: 894: 869:(3859): 1243–8. 853: 847: 844: 838: 828: 822: 819: 813: 810: 804: 803: 779: 773: 769: 763: 760: 754: 751: 745: 742: 736: 733: 727: 724: 718: 711: 705: 698: 692: 685: 679: 672: 666: 663: 657: 650: 644: 624: 618: 611: 605: 600:Kulikoff, Allan 598: 592: 582: 576: 569: 475:collectivisation 398:Fiddleford Manor 163:ridge and furrow 58:Historical Atlas 21: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1264: 1263: 1254: 1252: 1224: 1214: 1173: 1155:Rackham, Oliver 1149:; Merlin Press. 1137: 1135:Further reading 1132: 1127: 1123: 1088: 1084: 1074: 1072: 1060: 1051: 1047: 1012: 1008: 999: 995: 985: 983: 975: 974: 970: 943: 939: 928: 924: 915: 911: 902: 898: 857:Hardin, Garrett 854: 850: 846:Hopcroft, p. 48 845: 841: 829: 825: 820: 816: 811: 807: 800: 780: 776: 770: 766: 761: 757: 752: 748: 744:Hopcroft, p. 40 743: 739: 734: 730: 726:Gies, pp. 60–62 725: 721: 712: 708: 699: 695: 686: 682: 673: 669: 665:Gies, pp. 34–36 664: 660: 651: 647: 625: 621: 612: 608: 599: 595: 583: 579: 570: 566: 562: 550: 544: 516:Isle of Axholme 483: 471:Stolypin reform 466:obshchina / mir 432: 408:Strip field at 334: 264: 188:The village of 171:Gloucestershire 155: 102:Roman Catholics 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1307: 1297: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1262: 1261: 1240: 1230:"Open Society" 1223: 1222:External links 1220: 1219: 1218: 1212: 1199: 1178: 1172:978-0460044493 1171: 1151: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1121: 1082: 1045: 1006: 993: 968: 937: 922: 909: 896: 848: 839: 823: 814: 805: 798: 792:. p. 21. 774: 764: 755: 746: 737: 728: 719: 706: 693: 680: 667: 658: 645: 619: 606: 593: 577: 563: 561: 558: 546:Main article: 543: 540: 482: 479: 477:in the 1930s. 444:Garrett Hardin 431: 428: 333: 330: 263: 260: 154: 151: 117:manorial court 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1306: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1269: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1225: 1215: 1209: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1183: 1179: 1174: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1125: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1086: 1070: 1066: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1010: 1003: 997: 982: 978: 972: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 941: 934: 933: 926: 919: 913: 906: 900: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863: 858: 852: 843: 836: 832: 827: 818: 809: 801: 795: 791: 787: 786: 778: 768: 759: 750: 741: 732: 723: 716: 710: 703: 697: 690: 684: 677: 671: 662: 655: 649: 643: 642:0-8195-6014-6 639: 635: 633: 628: 623: 616: 610: 603: 597: 590: 586: 581: 574: 568: 564: 557: 555: 549: 539: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 512: 510: 505: 503: 498: 496: 487: 478: 476: 472: 468: 467: 461: 456: 451: 447: 445: 441: 436: 427: 424: 419: 411: 406: 399: 395: 391: 389: 383: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 356: 352: 348: 342: 340: 339:Domesday Book 329: 327: 322: 319: 315: 310: 305: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 277: 273: 268: 259: 257: 252: 248: 246: 242: 238: 233: 229: 227: 223: 222:John of Elton 219: 218:village green 215: 211: 207: 202: 199: 195: 191: 186: 184: 180: 172: 168: 164: 159: 150: 148: 143: 138: 133: 129: 124: 122: 118: 114: 109: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 59: 55: 54: 49: 45: 44: 39: 34: 30: 19: 1253:. Retrieved 1249:the original 1235:The Guardian 1233: 1203: 1187: 1158: 1142: 1124: 1102:(1): 15–35. 1099: 1095: 1085: 1073:. Retrieved 1071:. p. 73 1064: 1048: 1026:(1): 15–35. 1023: 1019: 1009: 1001: 996: 984:. Retrieved 980: 971: 954: 950: 940: 930: 925: 917: 912: 899: 866: 860: 851: 842: 834: 826: 817: 808: 784: 777: 767: 758: 749: 740: 731: 722: 714: 709: 701: 696: 688: 683: 675: 670: 661: 653: 648: 630: 622: 614: 613:Ault, W. O. 609: 601: 596: 588: 580: 572: 567: 551: 513: 506: 499: 492: 481:Modern usage 464: 452: 448: 437: 433: 415: 384: 364:Lincolnshire 343: 335: 323: 304:Battle Abbey 301: 281: 271: 253: 249: 240: 236: 234: 230: 210:fulling mill 203: 187: 182: 176: 167:Wood Stanway 125: 110: 65: 63: 57: 51: 41: 29: 1294:Land tenure 762:Ault, 20–21 460:Netherlands 418:Black Death 256:overgrazing 206:water mills 153:Description 147:New England 132:common land 74:Middle Ages 1268:Categories 1161:. London: 986:15 October 629:. (1963). 560:References 536:Haxey Hood 412:, Cornwall 1116:0022-0507 1040:0022-0507 957:: 81–99. 509:Laugharne 455:enclosure 410:Forrabury 360:Yorkshire 341:of 1086. 314:cash crop 142:enclosure 1184:(1963). 1157:(1986). 1056:(1975). 935:7:49–61. 502:Braunton 380:pastoral 376:Midlands 245:fallowed 214:millpond 198:virgates 179:furlongs 94:peasants 1075:16 June 891:5699198 871:Bibcode 862:Science 528:Epworth 388:ploughs 372:Suffolk 368:Norfolk 332:History 309:bushels 292:legumes 121:demesne 90:selions 84:. Each 48:hatched 43:demesne 1255:8 June 1210:  1169:  1114:  1038:  889:  796:  640:  532:Belton 423:Church 284:barley 241:closes 128:labour 82:Turkey 80:, and 60:, 1923 46:, the 1061:(PDF) 524:Haxey 355:Roman 347:Essex 318:Elton 290:, or 272:circa 237:waste 226:croft 194:hides 98:serfs 86:manor 53:glebe 38:manor 1257:2004 1208:ISBN 1167:ISBN 1112:ISSN 1077:2013 1036:ISSN 988:2022 887:PMID 794:ISBN 638:ISBN 530:and 416:The 370:and 362:and 351:Kent 349:and 326:oxen 288:oats 183:open 111:The 78:Iran 64:The 1104:doi 1028:doi 959:doi 879:doi 867:162 296:rye 1270:: 1232:. 1165:. 1110:. 1100:32 1098:. 1094:. 1034:. 1024:32 1022:. 1018:. 979:. 955:14 953:. 949:. 885:. 877:. 865:. 833:. 526:, 518:, 286:, 169:, 123:. 1259:. 1238:. 1216:. 1196:. 1175:. 1118:. 1106:: 1079:. 1042:. 1030:: 990:. 961:: 893:. 881:: 873:: 802:. 634:. 20:)

Index

Open field system

manor
demesne
hatched
glebe
agricultural system
Middle Ages
Iran
Turkey
manor
selions
peasants
serfs
Roman Catholics
nucleated village
Lord of the Manor
manorial court
demesne
labour
common land
concept of land as a commodity to be bought and sold
enclosure
New England

ridge and furrow
Wood Stanway
Gloucestershire
furlongs
Elton, Cambridgeshire

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.