199:
improved OPL predates both by over three years. The OCL was developed primarily by me... The improved OPL was written primarily by Eric
Raymond after discussions with me, Tim O'Reilly, and others... The OPL was truly innovative in that, in addition to requiring citation of the original author as source, it contained two license options which authors could choose to invoke: one restricts users' abilities to creative derivative works, while the second restricts users' abilities to make certain commercial uses of the material. The student of open content licensing will recognize that these are exactly the options that Creative Commons now employs. What may be forgotten is that in version 1.0 of the Creative Commons licenses, Attribution was actually included in the licenses only as an option. In version 2.0 of the CC licenses (May 24, 2004) attribution was standard on every license, and there were two licenses options: one regarding derivative works, and one regarding commercial use. So in terms of high level structure, the OPL was here about five years before CC. ... Actually, the licenses weren't that great, seeing as I am not a lawyer, and neither was anyone else involved in the creation of the license. The concept was right, and the execution was "good enough," but Creative Commons (with its excellent lawyers and law school students) created a better legal instrument. As I said on the opencontent.org homepage on Monday June 30, 2003: 'My main goal in beginning OpenContent back in the Spring of 1998 was to evangelize a way of thinking about sharing materials, especially those that are useful for supporting education. ... I'm closing OpenContent because I think Creative Commons is doing a better job of providing licensing options which will stand up in court Creative Commons as Director of Educational Licenses. Now I can focus in on facilitating the kind of sharing most interesting to me ... with the pro bono support of really good IP lawyers... The OpenContent License and Open Publication License will remain online for archival purposes in their current locations. However, no future development will occur on the licenses themselves.' ... Anyone interested in a license like this is far better off using a Creative Commons license.
198:
Open
Content License (July 14, 1998), which was replaced by the Open Publication License (June 8, 1999), were the first licenses to bring the ideals of open source software to the world of content. The OCL predates the GFDL (Nov 2002) and Creative Commons (Dec 2002) by over four years, while the
71:
144:). With the exception of media and handling costs, it forbids charging for copies of a licensed work, but does not otherwise forbid commercial use.
129:
for software and would create the GFDL. The license text is titled "OpenContent
License (OPL)". "OPL" stood for OpenContent Principles and License.
163:
306:
269:
393:
352:
363:
335:
211:
110:
166:, which was launched in 2005 as a global open catalogue for e-commerce, and is embraced by the tech sector.
398:
126:
374:
156:
152:
122:
90:
248:
68:
291:
403:
133:
314:
219:
148:
94:
48:
8:
279:
137:
140:) in that it requires derivative works to be licensed under the Open Content License (
113:(GFDL) and other non-software public licenses. Though discussions were held between
118:
155:. The OpenContent as well as the Open Publication license were succeeded by the
244:
114:
28:
387:
141:
189:
98:
87:
339:
223:
43:
101:. It is one of the earliest non-software free content licenses.
353:
Updating the OpenContent
License and Clarifying a Few Things
109:
The Open
Content License, dated July 14, 1998, predates the
97:
in 1998. The license can be applied to a work to make it
375:
OpenContent is officially closed. And that's just fine.
147:Another license released a year later, also by the
385:
16:Free-content license by Open Content Project
377:on opencontent.org (30 June 2003, archived)
117:, creator of the Open Content License, and
307:"New Free License to Cover Content Online"
304:
104:
298:
237:
183:
181:
179:
386:
187:
190:"About the Open Publication License"
176:
162:A project licensed under the OPL is
267:
13:
204:
14:
415:
136:with most other licenses (beside
368:
357:
346:
328:
261:
111:GNU Free Documentation License
1:
169:
305:Grossman, Lev (1998-07-18).
222:. 1998-07-14. Archived from
7:
336:"OpenContent License (OPL)"
212:"OpenContent License (OPL)"
188:Wiley, David (2007-05-06).
10:
420:
268:Inc, AUUG (28 June 2000).
127:GNU General Public License
394:Public copyright licenses
364:OpenContent License (OPL)
274:. AUUG, Inc. p. 224.
194:iterating toward openness
157:Creative Commons licenses
67:
54:
42:
34:
24:
153:Open Publication License
123:Free Software Foundation
91:public copyright license
249:Open Source Initiative
105:History and reception
220:Open Content Project
149:Open Content Project
132:This license is not
95:Open Content Project
84:Open Content License
49:Open Content Project
20:Open Content License
138:permissive licenses
21:
399:1998 introductions
290:has generic name (
245:"Licenses by Name"
125:, who created the
19:
80:
79:
411:
378:
372:
366:
361:
355:
350:
344:
343:
338:. Archived from
332:
326:
325:
323:
322:
313:. Archived from
302:
296:
295:
289:
285:
283:
275:
265:
259:
258:
256:
255:
241:
235:
234:
232:
231:
208:
202:
201:
185:
151:, is called the
121:, leader of the
119:Richard Stallman
22:
18:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
384:
383:
382:
381:
373:
369:
362:
358:
351:
347:
334:
333:
329:
320:
318:
303:
299:
287:
286:
277:
276:
266:
262:
253:
251:
243:
242:
238:
229:
227:
216:opencontent.org
210:
209:
205:
186:
177:
172:
107:
62:
59:Current version
17:
12:
11:
5:
417:
407:
406:
401:
396:
380:
379:
367:
356:
345:
342:on 1998-12-06.
327:
297:
260:
236:
203:
174:
173:
171:
168:
115:David A. Wiley
106:
103:
78:
77:
74:
65:
64:
56:
52:
51:
46:
40:
39:
36:
35:Latest version
32:
31:
29:David A. Wiley
26:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
391:
389:
376:
371:
365:
360:
354:
349:
341:
337:
331:
317:on 2000-06-19
316:
312:
308:
301:
293:
281:
273:
272:
264:
250:
246:
240:
226:on 1998-12-06
225:
221:
217:
213:
207:
200:
195:
191:
184:
182:
180:
175:
167:
165:
160:
158:
154:
150:
145:
143:
142:Viral license
139:
135:
130:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
102:
100:
96:
92:
89:
85:
75:
73:
70:
66:
63:July 14, 1998
60:
57:
53:
50:
47:
45:
41:
37:
33:
30:
27:
23:
404:Open content
370:
359:
348:
340:the original
330:
319:. Retrieved
315:the original
310:
300:
288:|last1=
270:
263:
252:. Retrieved
239:
228:. Retrieved
224:the original
215:
206:
197:
193:
161:
146:
131:
108:
99:open content
83:
81:
58:
164:Open Icecat
88:share-alike
388:Categories
321:2010-12-27
311:Netly News
254:2018-10-19
230:2018-10-18
170:References
134:compatible
280:cite book
159:in 2003.
55:Published
44:Publisher
72:approved
25:Author
271:AUUGN
86:is a
292:help
82:The
93:by
69:OSI
38:1.0
390::
309:.
284::
282:}}
278:{{
247:.
218:.
214:.
196:.
192:.
178:^
76:No
324:.
294:)
257:.
233:.
61::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.