Knowledge

Notability in the English - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

32: 1434: 1422: 184:: especially when it is based on consensual mass media judgment or—in the case of lesser known individuals—on different smaller, but mutually independent sources. Of course, this policy does not acknowledge that a Knowledge entry may itself become a factor in reputation building: especially when the information that this entry exists is propagated by journalists and other potent 'multiplicators 188:". Geser also refers, in more general terms, to the same effect described by Segal, that "a Knowledge article may soon be considered as an indicator of relevance, eminence, popularity and reputation - for persons as well as for music bands, art works, localities, historical events and any kind of voluntary association". 110:
according to the corresponding Knowledge guideline. Reliable sources generally include mainstream news media and major academic journals, and exclude self-published sources, particularly when self-published on the internet. The foundation of this theory is that credible sources "exercise some form of
92:
introduced a notability criterion via the core policy of "What Knowledge Is Not". Wales commented that "I added Knowledge is not a newspaper and especially not a tabloid newspaper and that we… attempt to make some sort of judgment about the long term historical notability of something…" The criterion
87:
The language of the criterion was modified and adapted to produce notability guidance in specific subject areas, before being introduced into the proposed notability guideline in September 2006. In response to growing concerns in 2006 about issues specifically affecting biographies of living persons,
141:
Commentators have stressed the novelty of the notability criterion, which makes Knowledge the first encyclopedia to openly discuss criteria for inclusion: "For the first time in history, a broad open discussion about 'encyclopedia notability' has been started that has already given rise to intensive
74:
to determine whether a topic merits a separate Knowledge article. It is described in the guideline "Knowledge:Notability". In general, notability is an attempt to assess whether the topic has "gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time" as evidenced by
172:
wrote several articles in 2007 about the threatened deletion of his entry on grounds of his insufficient notability. He concluded that "Knowledge's notability policy resembles U.S. immigration policy before 9/11: stringent rules, spotty enforcement." David Segal observed that "Wiki-worthiness has
114:
Verifiability — the ability for the reader to confirm that content corresponds to the cited source — is the standard. "Gather references both to use as source(s) of your information and also to demonstrate notability of your article's subject matter. References to blogs, personal websites and
93:
was subsequently refined into this Notability guideline; Wales was unsure if the policy changes would be accepted, but within weeks the policy had been "refined, copyedited, and extended to include heuristics for determining long-term notability."
463: 138:. This trend is reflected in the development and increasing complexity of the notability guidelines, with various special notability guidelines being proposed for specific topic areas, including notability criteria for porn stars. 161:
should be deleted on the grounds that the various topics lacked notability. Some of the comic artists concerned reacted negatively, accusing editors of being "wannabe tin-pot dictators masquerading as humble editors".
126:, which is prohibited on Knowledge. "A correlate to this notability criterion, crucial to the identity of the site, is the prohibition on original research, including the synthesis of previously published material." 1052: 1042: 173:
quietly become a new digital divide, separating those who think they are notable from those granted the imprimatur of notability by a horde of anonymous geeks."
1344: 1120: 1163: 281: 579: 1362: 1168: 79:
that are independent of the topic". The notability guideline was introduced in 2006 and has since been subject to various controversies.
1019: 1312: 1107: 621: 574: 151: 1112: 1141: 1014: 402: 1082: 1261: 1024: 197: 386:
There are quires, reams, bales of controversy over what constitutes notability in Knowledge: nobody will ever sort it out.
1153: 650: 542: 166:
noted that by 2007, notability disputes had spread into other topics, including companies, places, websites, and people.
1146: 708: 616: 1327: 1220: 1470: 1317: 1069: 1465: 1087: 916: 599: 491: 217: 1235: 604: 310: 1402: 1387: 793: 1356: 1158: 951: 660: 180:
is that "Knowledge sees itself as a publication that relies on reputation that has already been produced
1460: 1225: 645: 434:"From Printed to "Wikified" Encyclopedias: Sociological Aspects of an Incipient Cultural Revolution" 847: 834: 698: 655: 609: 594: 134:
As the Knowledge community has grown, its rules have in turn become more complex, a trend known as
752: 569: 535: 441:
Sociology in Switzerland: Towards Cybersociety and "Vireal" Social Relations:Online Publikationen
747: 674: 586: 871: 249:"Authority and Authorship in a 21st-Century Encyclopaedia and a 'Very Mysterious Foundation'" 142:
debates and detailed – while still unfinished and unofficial – lists of possible criteria."
1377: 1230: 1102: 1077: 1004: 980: 966: 824: 783: 559: 495: 20: 8: 1350: 1307: 1240: 856: 819: 684: 344: 340:"Knowledge's Old-Fashioned Revolution; The online encyclopedia is fast becoming the best" 45:
Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
1438: 1426: 1392: 1382: 1201: 1194: 1097: 1092: 946: 886: 735: 528: 906: 891: 861: 259: 135: 71: 63: 941: 339: 1372: 1188: 881: 829: 814: 634: 300: 292: 76: 1367: 896: 666: 289:
Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2008
248: 163: 1276: 1245: 1009: 931: 921: 718: 222: 911: 1454: 1407: 1125: 956: 926: 901: 876: 713: 263: 1029: 936: 762: 741: 296: 169: 961: 866: 788: 778: 757: 89: 443:. Zurich: Institute of Sociology of the University of Zurich. p. 59 433: 365: 282:"Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Knowledge Governance" 1397: 1281: 730: 177: 305: 798: 703: 640: 551: 514: 499: 464:"Look Me Up Under 'Missing Link', Oblivion Looms for the Non-Notable" 158: 67: 1286: 1034: 510: 1302: 1271: 1266: 997: 181: 157:
In one instance, a group of editors agreed that many articles on
116: 19:
For the official notability policy of the English Knowledge, see
723: 150:
Two polarized perspectives on notability are commonly known as
1322: 992: 520: 198:
Criticism of Knowledge § Notability of article topics
503: 16:
Outline of a policy on the English version of Knowledge
1345:
The Iraq War: A Historiography of Knowledge Changelogs
122:
Content not based upon reliable sources may be deemed
215: 291:. Waikoloa, Big Island, HI, US: IEEE. p. 6. 1452: 275: 273: 536: 359: 357: 355: 279: 396: 394: 270: 216:Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth (March 22, 2014). 333: 331: 209: 1421: 543: 529: 352: 391: 304: 119:don't count – we need reliable sources." 427: 425: 423: 328: 1363:People imprisoned for editing Knowledge 1121:United States congressional staff edits 337: 1453: 242: 240: 1025:Hillsborough disaster Knowledge posts 524: 461: 431: 420: 363: 280:Forte, Andrea; Bruckman, Amy (2008). 1083:Carlos Bandeirense MirandĂłpolis hoax 1053:on the Arabic and Persian Wikipedias 455: 400: 25: 338:Crovitz, L. Gordon (6 April 2009). 237: 13: 401:Noah, Timothy (24 February 2007). 364:Baker, Nicholson (20 March 2008). 14: 1482: 484: 106:Notability is demonstrated using 75:significant coverage in reliable 1433: 1432: 1420: 651:Predictions of the project's end 462:Segal, David (3 December 2006). 246: 152:"inclusionism" and "deletionism" 145: 30: 1108:Seigenthaler biography incident 258:(12: Technology and Humanity). 1: 1039:Wikimedia Foundation actions 550: 203: 1403:List of online encyclopedias 1388:Knowledge for World Heritage 1164:Israeli–Palestinian conflict 794:WikiConference North America 622:deletionism and inclusionism 575:Conflict-of-interest editing 370:The New York Review of Books 7: 1357:Magna Carta (An Embroidery) 1169:Russian invasion of Ukraine 952:Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight 580:political editing incidents 432:Geser, Hans (1 June 2007). 191: 101: 96: 66:of the online encyclopedia 10: 1489: 82: 18: 1416: 1336: 1295: 1254: 1211: 1181: 1134: 1068: 1015:Internet Watch Foundation 988: 979: 843: 807: 771: 694: 683: 558: 366:"The Charms of Knowledge" 176:A criticism by Professor 39:This article needs to be 1043:on the Chinese Knowledge 403:"Evicted From Knowledge" 129: 1114:Star Trek Into Darkness 753:Wikipedian in residence 218:"The Geography of Fame" 1471:Criticism of Knowledge 748:Wikimedian of the Year 297:10.1109/HICSS.2008.383 1466:Reputation management 709:Arbitration Committee 88:Knowledge co-founder 1378:Wikimedia Foundation 1313:Google and Knowledge 1078:Alan MacMasters hoax 784:WikiConference India 617:Deletion of articles 111:editorial control." 1351:LGBTQ and Knowledge 1328:Science information 1308:Depths of Knowledge 1241:Listen to Knowledge 345:Wall Street Journal 1393:Knowledge in India 1383:Wikimedia movement 1318:Health information 1202:Knowledge Monument 1195:Viola angustifolia 1098:Henryk Batuta hoax 1093:Essjay controversy 947:Lisa Seitz-Gruwell 887:Dariusz Jemielniak 736:List of Wikipedias 511:More on Wikability 506:; March 22, 2014). 70:, notability is a 1461:English Knowledge 1448: 1447: 1177: 1176: 1154:COVID-19 pandemic 1142:American politics 1103:Jar'Edo Wens hoax 975: 974: 907:Ira Brad Matetsky 892:Rebecca MacKinnon 862:Florence Devouard 517:; March 1, 2007). 513:" (Timothy Noah; 492:Geography of Fame 136:instruction creep 124:original research 77:secondary sources 60: 59: 1478: 1436: 1435: 1424: 1423: 1373:Wiki rabbit hole 1221:Academic studies 1189:274301 Knowledge 986: 985: 882:Maryana Iskander 857:Esra'a Al Shafei 692: 691: 635:Ignore all rules 545: 538: 531: 522: 521: 479: 478: 476: 474: 459: 453: 452: 450: 448: 438: 429: 418: 417: 415: 413: 398: 389: 388: 383: 381: 361: 350: 349: 335: 326: 325: 323: 321: 316:on June 14, 2011 315: 309:. Archived from 308: 286: 277: 268: 267: 253: 244: 235: 234: 232: 230: 213: 187: 108:reliable sources 55: 52: 46: 34: 33: 26: 1488: 1487: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1412: 1368:Print Knowledge 1332: 1291: 1250: 1213: 1207: 1173: 1130: 1064: 971: 897:Katherine Maher 845: 839: 803: 767: 686: 679: 667:Citation needed 561: 554: 549: 487: 482: 472: 470: 468:Washington Post 460: 456: 446: 444: 436: 430: 421: 411: 409: 399: 392: 379: 377: 362: 353: 336: 329: 319: 317: 313: 284: 278: 271: 251: 247:Tabb, Kathryn. 245: 238: 228: 226: 214: 210: 206: 194: 185: 164:Nicholson Baker 148: 132: 104: 99: 85: 64:English version 56: 50: 47: 44: 35: 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1486: 1485: 1474: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1430: 1417: 1414: 1413: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1353: 1348: 1340: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1331: 1330: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1299: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1290: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1277:Knowledge Zero 1274: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1249: 1248: 1246:Wikipediocracy 1243: 1238: 1233: 1228: 1223: 1217: 1215: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1205: 1198: 1191: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1172: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1118: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1074: 1072: 1066: 1065: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 1001: 1000: 989: 983: 977: 976: 973: 972: 970: 969: 964: 959: 954: 949: 944: 942:MarĂ­a Sefidari 939: 934: 932:Annie Rauwerda 929: 924: 922:Raju Narisetti 919: 914: 909: 904: 899: 894: 889: 884: 879: 874: 869: 864: 859: 853: 851: 841: 840: 838: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 811: 809: 805: 804: 802: 801: 796: 791: 786: 781: 775: 773: 769: 768: 766: 765: 760: 755: 750: 745: 738: 733: 728: 727: 726: 716: 711: 706: 701: 699:Administrators 695: 689: 681: 680: 678: 677: 672: 671: 670: 663: 653: 648: 643: 638: 631: 630: 629: 624: 614: 613: 612: 607: 602: 597: 589: 584: 583: 582: 572: 566: 564: 556: 555: 548: 547: 540: 533: 525: 519: 518: 507: 486: 485:External links 483: 481: 480: 454: 419: 390: 351: 327: 269: 236: 223:New York Times 207: 205: 202: 201: 200: 193: 190: 147: 144: 131: 128: 103: 100: 98: 95: 84: 81: 58: 57: 38: 36: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1484: 1483: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1441: 1440: 1431: 1429: 1428: 1419: 1418: 1415: 1409: 1408:List of wikis 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1339: 1335: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1298: 1294: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1280: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1257: 1253: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1239: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1216: 1210: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1184: 1180: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1137: 1133: 1127: 1126:Zhemao hoaxes 1124: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1071: 1070:Controversies 1067: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 999: 996: 995: 994: 991: 990: 987: 984: 982: 978: 968: 965: 963: 960: 958: 957:Lila Tretikov 955: 953: 950: 948: 945: 943: 940: 938: 935: 933: 930: 928: 927:Steven Pruitt 925: 923: 920: 918: 915: 913: 910: 908: 905: 903: 902:Magnus Manske 900: 898: 895: 893: 890: 888: 885: 883: 880: 878: 877:James Heilman 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 854: 852: 849: 842: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 812: 810: 806: 800: 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 777: 776: 774: 770: 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 743: 739: 737: 734: 732: 729: 725: 722: 721: 720: 717: 715: 712: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 696: 693: 690: 688: 687:(Wikipedians) 682: 676: 673: 669: 668: 664: 662: 661:Fact-checking 659: 658: 657: 654: 652: 649: 647: 644: 642: 639: 636: 632: 628: 625: 623: 620: 619: 618: 615: 611: 608: 606: 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 592: 590: 588: 585: 581: 578: 577: 576: 573: 571: 568: 567: 565: 563: 557: 553: 546: 541: 539: 534: 532: 527: 526: 523: 516: 512: 508: 505: 501: 497: 494:" (based on " 493: 489: 488: 469: 465: 458: 442: 435: 428: 426: 424: 408: 404: 397: 395: 387: 375: 371: 367: 360: 358: 356: 347: 346: 341: 334: 332: 312: 307: 302: 298: 294: 290: 283: 276: 274: 265: 261: 257: 250: 243: 241: 225: 224: 219: 212: 208: 199: 196: 195: 189: 183: 179: 174: 171: 167: 165: 160: 155: 153: 146:Controversies 143: 139: 137: 127: 125: 120: 118: 112: 109: 94: 91: 80: 78: 73: 69: 65: 54: 42: 37: 28: 27: 22: 21:WP:Notability 1437: 1425: 1355: 1343: 1226:Bibliography 1214:and analysis 1200: 1193: 1147:Donald Trump 1113: 1030:VisualEditor 937:Larry Sanger 872:David Gerard 763:Women in Red 742:The Signpost 740: 714:Art+Feminism 665: 626: 600:geographical 471:. Retrieved 467: 457: 445:. Retrieved 440: 410:. Retrieved 406: 385: 378:. Retrieved 373: 369: 343: 318:. Retrieved 311:the original 288: 255: 227:. Retrieved 221: 211: 175: 170:Timothy Noah 168: 156: 149: 140: 133: 123: 121: 113: 107: 105: 86: 61: 48: 40: 1296:Content use 1020:Scientology 967:Molly White 962:Jimmy Wales 917:Jason Moore 912:Erik Möller 867:Sue Gardner 789:Wiki Indaba 779:Edit-a-thon 758:WikiProject 656:Reliability 605:ideological 473:18 December 447:18 December 412:18 December 380:18 December 90:Jimmy Wales 1455:Categories 1398:Wikiracing 1282:WikiReader 1212:References 1005:First edit 808:Wiki Loves 731:Edit count 646:Plagiarism 627:notability 570:Censorship 496:Notability 306:10535/5638 204:References 178:Hans Geser 1088:Edit wars 1035:#1Lib1Ref 825:Monuments 799:Wikimania 704:AfroCrowd 685:Community 675:Vandalism 641:MediaWiki 587:Criticism 562:(outline) 552:Knowledge 515:Slate.com 500:Knowledge 264:1742-4542 229:March 23, 159:webcomics 72:criterion 68:Knowledge 1439:Category 1287:Wikiwand 1231:Cultural 1135:Coverage 820:Folklore 560:Overview 192:See also 102:Sourcing 97:Criteria 51:May 2021 1337:Related 1303:DBpedia 1272:Wapedia 1267:QRpedia 998:Nupedia 981:History 835:Science 591:Biases 320:May 11, 182:ex ante 117:MySpace 83:History 62:In the 41:updated 1255:Mobile 1182:Honors 1116:debate 844:People 772:Events 724:Lsjbot 610:racial 595:gender 262:  256:ESharp 1323:Kiwix 1236:Films 1159:Death 993:Bomis 830:Pride 815:Earth 498:" in 437:(PDF) 407:Slate 314:(PDF) 285:(PDF) 252:(PDF) 130:Rules 1427:List 1262:Apps 1057:2022 1047:2021 1010:Logo 848:list 719:Bots 475:2016 449:2016 414:2016 382:2016 322:2016 260:ISSN 231:2014 504:NYT 502:) ( 376:(4) 301:hdl 293:doi 1457:: 466:. 439:. 422:^ 405:. 393:^ 384:. 374:55 372:. 368:. 354:^ 342:. 330:^ 299:. 287:. 272:^ 254:. 239:^ 220:. 154:. 850:) 846:( 637:" 633:" 544:e 537:t 530:v 509:" 490:" 477:. 451:. 416:. 348:. 324:. 303:: 295:: 266:. 233:. 186:' 53:) 49:( 43:. 23:.

Index

WP:Notability
English version
Knowledge
criterion
secondary sources
Jimmy Wales
MySpace
instruction creep
"inclusionism" and "deletionism"
webcomics
Nicholson Baker
Timothy Noah
Hans Geser
ex ante
Criticism of Knowledge § Notability of article topics
"The Geography of Fame"
New York Times


"Authority and Authorship in a 21st-Century Encyclopaedia and a 'Very Mysterious Foundation'"
ISSN
1742-4542


"Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Knowledge Governance"
doi
10.1109/HICSS.2008.383
hdl
10535/5638
the original

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑