Knowledge

Load factor (aeronautics)

Source 📝

254: 167:, because of the relation between load factor and apparent acceleration of gravity felt on board the aircraft. A load factor of one, or 1 g, represents conditions in straight and level flight, where the lift is equal to the weight. Load factors greater or less than one (or even negative) are the result of maneuvers or wind gusts. 440:
When the load factor is +1, all occupants of the aircraft feel that their weight is normal. When the load factor is greater than +1 all occupants feel heavier than usual. For example, in a 2 g maneuver all occupants feel that their weight is twice normal. When the load factor is zero, or very
276:
During straight and level flight, the load factor is +1 if the aircraft is flown "the right way up", whereas it becomes −1 if the aircraft is flown "upside-down" (inverted). In both cases the lift vector is the same (as seen by an observer on the ground), but in the latter the vertical axis of the
198:
acceleration of gravity (i.e. relative to their frame of reference) equal to load factor times the acceleration of gravity. For example, an observer on board an aircraft performing a turn with a load factor of 2 (i.e. a 2 g turn) will see objects falling to the floor at twice the normal
354:
control at the bottom of a dive, whereas strongly pushing the stick forward during straight and level flight is likely to produce negative load factors, by causing the lift to act in the opposite direction to normal, i.e. downwards.
374:
The lift in the load factor is also intended as having a sign, which is positive if the lift vector points in, or near the same direction as the aircraft's vertical axis, or negative if it points in, or near the opposite direction.
448:
can be designed for much greater load factors, both positive and negative, than conventional aircraft, allowing these vehicles to be used in maneuvers that would be incapacitating for a human pilot.
345: 284:
the load factor is +2. Again, if the same turn is performed with the aircraft inverted, the load factor becomes −2. In general, in a balanced turn in which the angle of bank is
87: 243: 157: 135: 113: 221:
to increase by a factor equal to the square root of the load factor. For example, if the load factor is 2, the stall speed will increase by a ratio of
273:
The load factor, and in particular its sign, depends not only on the forces acting on the aircraft, but also on the orientation of its vertical axis.
655: 633: 611: 584: 389:
specify the load factor limits within which different categories of aircraft are required to operate without damage. For example, the US
677: 371:, or in other words it is the component perpendicular to the airflow of the sum of all aerodynamic forces acting on the aircraft. 743: 163:
Since the load factor is the ratio of two forces, it is dimensionless. However, its units are traditionally referred to as
383:
Excessive load factors must be avoided because of the possibility of exceeding the structural strength of the aircraft.
421:
airplanes, are designed so that they can tolerate load factors much higher than the minimum required. For example, the
441:
small, all occupants feel weightless. When the load factor is negative, all occupants feel that they are upside down.
723: 540: 206:
is used, it is formally correct to express it using numbers only, as in "a maximum load factor of 4". If the term
306: 562: 444:
Humans have limited ability to withstand a load factor significantly greater than 1, both positive and negative.
764: 428:
The maximum load factors, both positive and negative, applicable to an aircraft are usually specified in the
390: 56: 445: 386: 280:
In turning flight the load factor is normally greater than +1. For example, in a turn with a 60°
224: 737: 612:"Part 23. Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes" 429: 293: 363:
In the definition of load factor, the lift is not simply that one generated by the aircraft's
17: 759: 8: 351: 681: 398: 367:, instead it is the vector sum of the lift generated by the wing, the fuselage and the 180: 142: 120: 98: 47: 719: 536: 350:
Another way to achieve load factors significantly higher than +1 is to pull on the
281: 194:
units refers to the fact that an observer on board an aircraft will experience an
486: 266: 753: 401:
airplanes, from −1 to +2.5 (or up to +3.8 depending on design takeoff weight)
528: 422: 35: 218: 253: 418: 404:
For normal category and commuter category airplanes, from −1.52 to +3.8
368: 277:
aircraft points downwards, making the lift vector's sign negative.
39: 656:"Part 29. Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Rotorcraft" 470: 466:
Loss of consciousness due to excessive G (also known as blackout)
457: 585:"Part 25. Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes" 393:
prescribe the following limits (for the most restrictive case):
478: 43: 634:"Part 27. Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft" 50:("load") to which the structure of the aircraft is subjected: 462: 179:
units does not mean that it is dimensionally the same as the
31: 364: 175:
The fact that the load factor is commonly expressed in
563:"Groundschool - Theory of Flight. Manoeuvring forces" 309: 248: 227: 145: 123: 101: 59: 410:
For acrobatic category airplanes, from −3.0 to +6.0
435: 407:For utility category airplanes, from −1.76 to +4.4 339: 237: 214:is used instead, as in "pulling a 3 g turn". 151: 129: 107: 81: 751: 265:, during a coordinated turn. Pink force is the 187:. The load factor is strictly non-dimensional. 716:Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics 23:Ratio of the lift of an aircraft to its weight 425:family has load factor limits of −10 to +12. 417:However, many aircraft types, in particular 340:{\displaystyle n={\frac {1}{\cos \theta }}.} 217:A load factor greater than 1 will cause the 482:Incapacitation due to excessive negative G 474:Incapacitation due to excessive positive G 711:. A National Flightshop Reprint. Florida. 252: 678:"Su-26, 29, 31 – Historical background" 606: 604: 602: 358: 46:and represents a global measure of the 752: 504: 502: 524: 522: 520: 518: 516: 514: 599: 560: 535:. Pitman Publishing Limited. London 170: 744:Load Test of Boeing 777 Wing (1995) 499: 378: 13: 718:. John Wiley & Sons. New York 511: 249:Positive and negative load factors 14: 776: 731: 82:{\displaystyle n={\frac {L}{W}},} 680:. Sukhoi Company. Archived from 413:For helicopters, from −1 to +3.5 709:Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators 436:Human perception of load factor 670: 648: 626: 577: 554: 545: 202:In general, whenever the term 1: 714:McCormick, Barnes W. (1979). 700: 257:Variation of the load factor 391:Federal Aviation Regulations 7: 551:McCormick, p. 464–468. 451: 238:{\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}} 10: 781: 387:Civil aviation authorities 15: 199:acceleration of gravity. 492: 446:Unmanned aerial vehicles 16:Not to be confused with 181:acceleration of gravity 430:aircraft flight manual 341: 270: 239: 183:, also indicated with 153: 131: 109: 83: 765:Aircraft aerodynamics 342: 256: 240: 154: 132: 110: 84: 18:Passenger load factor 359:Load factor and lift 307: 261:with the bank angle 225: 143: 121: 99: 57: 26:In aeronautics, the 707:Hurt, H.H. (1960). 684:on 10 February 2012 115:is the load factor, 746:, boeingimages.com 740:, aerospaceweb.org 738:Bank Angle and G's 399:transport category 337: 292:is related to the 288:, the load factor 271: 235: 149: 127: 105: 79: 332: 245:, or about 140%. 233: 171:Load factor and g 152:{\displaystyle W} 130:{\displaystyle L} 108:{\displaystyle n} 74: 772: 694: 693: 691: 689: 674: 668: 667: 665: 663: 652: 646: 645: 643: 641: 630: 624: 623: 621: 619: 608: 597: 596: 594: 592: 581: 575: 574: 572: 570: 561:Gardiner, Dave. 558: 552: 549: 543: 526: 509: 506: 379:Design standards 346: 344: 343: 338: 333: 331: 317: 244: 242: 241: 236: 234: 229: 210:is omitted then 158: 156: 155: 150: 136: 134: 133: 128: 114: 112: 111: 106: 88: 86: 85: 80: 75: 67: 780: 779: 775: 774: 773: 771: 770: 769: 750: 749: 734: 729: 703: 698: 697: 687: 685: 676: 675: 671: 661: 659: 654: 653: 649: 639: 637: 632: 631: 627: 617: 615: 610: 609: 600: 590: 588: 583: 582: 578: 568: 566: 559: 555: 550: 546: 527: 512: 507: 500: 495: 487:Apparent weight 454: 438: 381: 361: 321: 316: 308: 305: 304: 267:apparent weight 251: 228: 226: 223: 222: 173: 144: 141: 140: 122: 119: 118: 100: 97: 96: 66: 58: 55: 54: 24: 21: 12: 11: 5: 778: 768: 767: 762: 748: 747: 741: 733: 732:External links 730: 728: 727: 712: 704: 702: 699: 696: 695: 669: 647: 625: 598: 576: 553: 544: 510: 497: 496: 494: 491: 490: 489: 484: 476: 468: 460: 453: 450: 437: 434: 415: 414: 411: 408: 405: 402: 380: 377: 360: 357: 348: 347: 336: 330: 327: 324: 320: 315: 312: 250: 247: 232: 172: 169: 161: 160: 159:is the weight. 148: 138: 126: 116: 104: 90: 89: 78: 73: 70: 65: 62: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 777: 766: 763: 761: 758: 757: 755: 745: 742: 739: 736: 735: 725: 724:0-471-03032-5 721: 717: 713: 710: 706: 705: 683: 679: 673: 657: 651: 635: 629: 613: 607: 605: 603: 586: 580: 564: 557: 548: 542: 541:0-273-01120-0 538: 534: 530: 525: 523: 521: 519: 517: 515: 508:Hurt, page 37 505: 503: 498: 488: 485: 483: 480: 477: 475: 472: 469: 467: 464: 461: 459: 456: 455: 449: 447: 442: 433: 431: 426: 424: 420: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 396: 395: 394: 392: 388: 384: 376: 372: 370: 366: 356: 353: 334: 328: 325: 322: 318: 313: 310: 303: 302: 301: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282:angle of bank 278: 274: 268: 264: 260: 255: 246: 230: 220: 215: 213: 209: 205: 200: 197: 193: 188: 186: 182: 178: 168: 166: 146: 139: 124: 117: 102: 95: 94: 93: 76: 71: 68: 63: 60: 53: 52: 51: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 19: 715: 708: 686:. Retrieved 682:the original 672: 660:. Retrieved 650: 638:. Retrieved 628: 616:. Retrieved 589:. Retrieved 579: 567:. Retrieved 556: 547: 533:Aerodynamics 532: 529:L. J. Clancy 481: 473: 465: 443: 439: 427: 423:Sukhoi Su-26 416: 385: 382: 373: 362: 349: 297: 289: 285: 279: 275: 272: 262: 258: 216: 211: 207: 203: 201: 195: 191: 189: 184: 176: 174: 164: 162: 91: 27: 25: 760:Aeronautics 219:stall speed 208:load factor 204:load factor 190:The use of 137:is the lift 28:load factor 754:Categories 701:References 419:aerobatic 369:tailplane 329:θ 326:⁡ 269:on board. 688:25 March 662:29 March 640:29 March 618:29 March 591:29 March 569:25 March 565:. RA-Aus 531:(1975). 452:See also 352:elevator 196:apparent 40:aircraft 471:Greyout 458:g-force 42:to its 34:of the 30:is the 722:  539:  479:Redout 294:cosine 92:where 48:stress 44:weight 38:of an 658:. FAA 636:. FAA 614:. FAA 587:. FAA 493:Notes 463:G-LOC 32:ratio 720:ISBN 690:2010 664:2010 642:2010 620:2010 593:2010 571:2010 537:ISBN 397:For 365:wing 300:as 36:lift 323:cos 296:of 756:: 601:^ 513:^ 501:^ 432:. 726:. 692:. 666:. 644:. 622:. 595:. 573:. 335:. 319:1 314:= 311:n 298:θ 290:n 286:θ 263:θ 259:n 231:2 212:g 192:g 185:g 177:g 165:g 147:W 125:L 103:n 77:, 72:W 69:L 64:= 61:n 20:.

Index

Passenger load factor
ratio
lift
aircraft
weight
stress
acceleration of gravity
stall speed

apparent weight
angle of bank
cosine
elevator
wing
tailplane
Civil aviation authorities
Federal Aviation Regulations
transport category
aerobatic
Sukhoi Su-26
aircraft flight manual
Unmanned aerial vehicles
g-force
G-LOC
Greyout
Redout
Apparent weight


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.