415:
agent is allowed to do based on what the principal wants of the agent. Express and implied authority are both types of actual authority. The second type of authority is apparent authority. This occurs when a principal's actions lead a third party to reasonably assume that the agent can act in a certain way and create contracts with the third party on behalf of the principal. To determine if an agent is liable for a contract, one must look at the type of principal. There are four types of principals. A disclosed principal is known to the third party, and the third party knows that the agent is acting for this principal. The agent is not liable on authorized contracts made for a disclosed principal since all parties are aware of the contract and who is participating in the contract. An unidentified principal is seen when the third party knows the agent is acting for a principal but lacks knowledge on the principal's identity. The agent is typically liable for contracts made for an unidentified principal. An undisclosed principal is seen when the third party does not know the principal's existence and identity and reasonably believes the agent is the other party in the contract. In this instance, the agent can be held liable for the contract. A nonexistent principal refers to when an agent knowingly acts for principal that does not exist, such as an unincorporated association. The agent is liable here if they knew the principal had no capacity to take part in the contract even if the third party knows that the principal does not exist. An agent can also bind themselves to contracts by expressly agreeing to be liable. To avoid this, agents should make no express promises in their own name and should make sure the contract only obligates the principal. An agent may also be liable to a third party if they lack the authority to contract for a principal. The agent may escape liability in this scenario if the third party knows the agent lacks authority, the principal ratifies/affirms the contract, or the agent notifies the third party of his lack of authority.
305:
manufacturing of products that results in injuries and/or accidents, which is discussed in more detail in the following section. Errors/omissions is another category where a lawsuit can result from a mistake on the part of the company such as in a contract or paperwork. Finally, the last major category relates to holding directors and officers personally liable for actions taken by the company, as seen in piercing the corporate veil. Overall, as businesses get larger and more successful, their chances of liability lawsuits increase, but small businesses are not completely immune to them. Entrepreneurs and business owners need to be aware of these types of liability exposures to ensure their businesses are protected.
329:
anything, there was more of need to impose liability standards on industries because consumers had less power to freely bargain with corporations and other business forms. Furthermore, the complexities and intricacies of goods was increasing, making it harder for the average buyer to determine manufacturing issues when purchasing these goods. Now a new phrase dominates liability: "caveat venditor" or "let the seller beware." The law finds that sellers and manufacturers can face more liability for defects with the help of insurance and socializing the damages by raising prices and forcing the consumer to pay for it.
385:
for a few hours so he can do some personal shopping, and on his way to the store, he hits a pedestrian. A detour is more minor. The employee is still participating in a non-work related activity, but the activity is not a major disregard for work duties. An example of a detour would be if on the way to deliver a package, a delivery driver stops at a drive-thru to grab something to eat. When pulling away from the restaurant to continue with deliveries, the driver hits a pedestrian. Here, the employer could still be liable for these damages because the detour was minor.
389:
can also face liability and repercussions if they know that the worker poses a potential danger but keeps them on the job. This is called negligent retention. To avoid claims regarding negligent hiring or retention, employers should be diligent when hiring employees who will have a lot of contact with customers and the public (especially if they will have access to vulnerable members of the public, go to customers' homes, and/or have access to weapons), and dismiss any employees who pose a potential danger.
397:
principal/employer can wield on the agent. Employees are subjected to more control while nonemployee agents, like independent contractors, have more freedom in how they do their job. A principal is not ordinarily liable for torts committed by nonemployee agents since the principal does not fully control the method of work done. However, there are exceptions to this. There can be direct liability if the principal hired an incompetent agent, if harm resulted from nonemployee agent's failure to perform a
336:, that means they breached their duty to the customer by not eliminating a reasonably foreseeable risk caused by the product. The manufacturer can be seen as negligent if there are problems in the manufacturing process, do not properly inspect their products, do not give a reasonable warning to the customer when the product has a foreseeable risk of harm, and/or the design lends itself to risk of harm. The magnitude and severity of the foreseeable harm are also assessed when looking at negligence.
36:
292:." Courts generally try not to utilize this exception unless there have been serious transgressions. Limited liability aids entrepreneurs, businesses, and the economy in growing and innovating. Therefore, if courts often chose to pierce the veil, that innovation would be restricted. The exact test a court will use to determine if the veil needs to pierced vary by state in the United States.
249:
that protects owners from liabilities of the business. This means that when a business is found liable in a case, the owners are not themselves liable; rather, the business is. Thus, only the funds or property the owner(s) have invested into the business are subject to that liability. If, for example, a limited liability business goes
348:. For it to apply, one party has responsibility for a third party, and the third party commits an unlawful action. An employer may be held liable for the actions of an employee if it is unlawful (i.e. harassment or discrimination), or the employee's negligent actions while working causes damages to property or injury.
379:
If these four factors are found to be true, the employer will have to answer for the tort. The reasoning behind this legal principle is because it is thought that the employer is best suited for bearing the financial burden, employers can protect themselves against this burden with insurance, and the
388:
An employer can also be liable for a legal principle called negligent hiring. This happens when in the process of hiring a new employee, the employer does not check criminal pasts, backgrounds, or references to ensure the applicant did not pose a potential danger if hired as an employee. An employer
384:
changes how the liability applies. A frolic is when the employee causes a tort when completing an activity that is unrelated to their job. If it is found that the employee had frolicked, the employee would then be liable for damages. For example, if a delivery driver does not complete his deliveries
299:
For business owners, there are main categories of liability exposure to be aware of in order to protect their businesses from liability and financial troubles and issues. The first is employment-related issues where the larger the work force, and the more turnover there is, the larger the likelihood
414:
is the ability an agent has to pursue and complete certain activities based on communication and manifestations from the principal. Express authority is when the principal clearly states what the agent has the authority to do while implied authority is based on what is reasonable to assume that the
401:
that the principal bestowed on them (a duty of care is an action whose successful performance is so important that if it is delegated to an agent and not accomplished, the principal is still liable), and a principal is liable if the nonemployee agent did not take the correct precautions required to
328:
was beginning and changing the business world. In order to promote this rise in industrialization and manufacturing, the law avoided allowing damage recoveries that would weaken new industries. In the 20th and 21st centuries, there was no longer this need to protect manufacturers from liability. If
248:
is a method of protection included in some business formations that shields its owners from certain types of liability and that amount a given owner will be liable for. A limited liability form separates the owner(s) from the business. The limited liability form essentially acts as a corporate veil
180:
Claimants can prove liability through a myriad of different theories, known as theories of liability. Which theories of liability are available in a given case depends on nature of the law in question. For example, in case involving a contractual dispute, one available theory of liability is breach
323:
Product liability and its prevalence in the law has changed throughout history. In the 19th century, it worked to both the manufacturers' and other sellers' advantages. "Caveat emptor" ("let the buyer beware") reigned supreme in this area of the law. In this era, the seller had no liability unless
208:
Each theory of liability has certain conditions, or elements, that must be proven by the claimant before liability will be established. For example, the theory of negligence requires the claimant to prove that (1) the defendant had a duty; (2) the defendant breached that duty; (3) the defendant's
295:
For sole proprietorships and general partnerships, the liability is unlimited. Unlimited liability means that the owner(s) of the business have the full responsibility of assuming all the business's debts. This can include seizure of personal assets in the face of bankruptcy and liquidation.
304:
claims. Another area is accidents and/or injuries on the premises. Next, vehicle-related liability if employees are allowed to drive company cars since this could lead to accidents while they use the company cars. Product-related liability (also called manufacturer's liability) details poor
396:
or an employee. An employee is someone who is a paid worker for the employer. An independent contractor, on the other hand, contracts with a principal to produce a result and in the process, gets to determine how that result will be completed. The difference lies in how much control the
405:
An employer should also be aware on how the extent of their liability can change based on the agreements their agents make. An agent is a person who has the power to act on behalf of another party (typically the principal). Usually, a principal is liable for a
287:
There is an exception to this rule, however, which allows a claimant to litigate against the owner(s) of a limited liability business, if the owner(s) have engaged in conduct that justifies the claimant's recovery from the owner(s): This exception is called
362:" is when an employee is doing work assigned by their employer or is completing a task that is subject to the employer's control. To test whether the conduct that led to the incident is within the scope of employment, one must determine:
296:
Professionals in limited liability partnerships and limited liability companies will have unlimited liability for their own torts and malpractices. The limited liability of the business will no longer apply for these wrongdoings.
380:
cost can be passed to customers by raising prices. On the other hand, if the employee was found to have either detoured or frolicked then defining the scope of employment becomes trickier. The rule of
354:("Let the superior answer") is a legal principle that dictates when an employer is responsible for the actions of an employee. Employers should worry about this rule when the employee commits a
280:
This is the standard model for larger businesses, in which a shareholders will only lose the amount invested (in the form of stock value decreasing). For an explanation, see
520:
Gevurtz, Franklin A. (1997). "Piercing
Piercing: An Attempt to Lift the Veil of Confusion Surrounding the Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil".
600:
228:. In general, however, insurance providers only cover liabilities arising from negligent torts rather than intentional wrongs or
100:
480:
358:
or harmful act when the employee was acting within the course and scope of employment at the time of the incident. The term "
72:
687:
584:
79:
731:
119:
574:
711:
53:
316:
governs civil lawsuits between a plaintiff and defendant who furnishes defective goods that caused loss or injury
86:
57:
317:
258:
253:, then the owner(s) will not lose unrelated assets, such as a personal residence (assuming they do not give
68:
747:
324:
they had made an express promise to the customer that was not received. The 19th century was also when the
289:
772:
20:
777:
262:
46:
723:
639:
540:
423:
Economists use the term "legal liability" to describe the legal-bound obligation to pay debts.
393:
344:
There is a form of liability that exists between employers and their employees. This is called
145:
24:
575:
Langvardt, A. James Barnes, Jamie Darin
Prenkert, Martin A. McCrory, Joshua E. Perry (2018).
325:
93:
715:
301:
8:
359:
345:
270:
198:
194:
741:
594:
254:
229:
165:
614:
410:
made by the agent if the agent had actual or apparent authority to make the contract.
782:
727:
716:
580:
476:
432:
381:
375:
The incident was motivated, at least in part, for the purpose of serving the employer
313:
245:
190:
663:
496:
442:
411:
202:
281:
372:
The incident was not unreasonably far away from the employer authorized location
16:
Legal obligation for any damage, enforceable by either civil law or criminal law
241:
217:
209:
breach caused the injury; and (4) that injury resulted in recoverable damages.
767:
761:
392:
It is important for employers to note whether someone working for them is an
212:
Theories of liability can also be created by legislation. For example, under
398:
257:). Forms of businesses that offer the limited liability protection include
149:
274:
266:
213:
722:. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp.
473:
The Three Pillar Model for
Business Decisions: Strategy, Law, and Ethics
333:
250:
186:
541:"With Unlimited Liability, You Are Responsible for Any Business Debts"
339:
225:
169:
224:
usually resolves the liability. A given liability may be covered by
35:
407:
153:
615:"Liability Definition – Entrepreneur Small Business Encyclopedia"
221:
220:, it is an offense to evade a liability dishonestly. Payment of
366:
If it was the type of task the employee was employed to perform
205:, or intentional conduct are all valid theories of liability.
140:
means "responsible or answerable in law; legally obligated".
577:
Business Law: The
Ethical, Global, and E-Commerce Environment
437:
369:
It occurred flexibly within the authorized work time period
355:
182:
157:
161:
133:
19:"Liable" redirects here. For other uses of "liable", see
172:
is the one who seeks to establish, or prove, liability.
710:
475:. United States: Van Rye Publishing, LLC. p. 61.
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
340:Liability as it relates to employers and employees
152:and can arise from various areas of law, such as
759:
688:"Employer Liability for an Employee's Bad Acts"
461:LIABLE, Black's Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014)
599:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
235:
175:
519:
760:
470:
418:
570:
568:
566:
564:
562:
560:
402:complete very dangerous activities.
308:
58:adding citations to reliable sources
29:
13:
637:
557:
538:
277:do not include limited liability.
14:
794:
668:LII / Legal Information Institute
501:LII / Legal Information Institute
332:If a manufacturer is found to be
34:
718:Economics: Principles in Action
704:
680:
45:needs additional citations for
714:; Sheffrin, Steven M. (2003).
656:
631:
607:
532:
513:
489:
464:
455:
300:of liability lawsuits such as
259:limited liability partnerships
1:
448:
7:
426:
290:piercing the corporate veil
263:limited liability companies
10:
799:
216:, with the passing of the
21:Liability (disambiguation)
18:
579:. McGraw-Hill Education.
746:: CS1 maint: location (
471:Siedel, George (2016).
181:of contract; or in the
394:independent contractor
25:Libel (disambiguation)
640:"Vicarious Liability"
326:Industrial Revolution
236:Liability in business
176:Theories of liability
302:wrongful termination
271:Sole proprietorships
164:, or fines given by
54:improve this article
664:"Frolic and Detour"
497:"Limited Liability"
419:Additional concepts
360:scope of employment
352:Respondeat superior
346:vicarious liability
255:personal guarantees
199:vicarious liability
195:respondeat superior
166:government agencies
23:. For "libel", see
712:O'Sullivan, Arthur
230:breach of contract
773:Legal terminology
522:Oregon Law Review
482:978-0-9970566-1-7
433:Attribution (law)
382:frolic and detour
314:Product liability
309:Product liability
246:limited liability
191:negligence per se
130:
129:
122:
104:
69:"Legal liability"
790:
778:Public liability
752:
751:
745:
737:
721:
708:
702:
701:
699:
698:
684:
678:
677:
675:
674:
660:
654:
653:
651:
650:
635:
629:
628:
626:
625:
611:
605:
604:
598:
590:
572:
555:
554:
552:
551:
536:
530:
529:
517:
511:
510:
508:
507:
493:
487:
486:
468:
462:
459:
443:Strict liability
412:Actual authority
203:strict liability
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
38:
30:
798:
797:
793:
792:
791:
789:
788:
787:
758:
757:
756:
755:
739:
738:
734:
709:
705:
696:
694:
686:
685:
681:
672:
670:
662:
661:
657:
648:
646:
636:
632:
623:
621:
613:
612:
608:
592:
591:
587:
573:
558:
549:
547:
537:
533:
518:
514:
505:
503:
495:
494:
490:
483:
469:
465:
460:
456:
451:
429:
421:
342:
311:
282:business entity
238:
178:
142:Legal liability
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
51:
39:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
796:
786:
785:
780:
775:
770:
754:
753:
732:
703:
679:
655:
638:Kenton, Will.
630:
606:
586:978-1260091809
585:
556:
539:Tarver, Evan.
531:
512:
488:
481:
463:
453:
452:
450:
447:
446:
445:
440:
435:
428:
425:
420:
417:
377:
376:
373:
370:
367:
341:
338:
310:
307:
242:commercial law
237:
234:
218:Theft Act 1978
177:
174:
144:concerns both
128:
127:
42:
40:
33:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
795:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
763:
749:
743:
735:
733:0-13-063085-3
729:
725:
720:
719:
713:
707:
693:
689:
683:
669:
665:
659:
645:
641:
634:
620:
616:
610:
602:
596:
588:
582:
578:
571:
569:
567:
565:
563:
561:
546:
542:
535:
527:
523:
516:
502:
498:
492:
484:
478:
474:
467:
458:
454:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
424:
416:
413:
409:
403:
400:
395:
390:
386:
383:
374:
371:
368:
365:
364:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
347:
337:
335:
330:
327:
321:
319:
315:
306:
303:
297:
293:
291:
285:
283:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
243:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
173:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
124:
121:
113:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
49:
48:
43:This article
41:
37:
32:
31:
26:
22:
717:
706:
695:. Retrieved
692:www.nolo.com
691:
682:
671:. Retrieved
667:
658:
647:. Retrieved
644:Investopedia
643:
633:
622:. Retrieved
619:Entrepreneur
618:
609:
576:
548:. Retrieved
545:Investopedia
544:
534:
525:
521:
515:
504:. Retrieved
500:
491:
472:
466:
457:
422:
404:
399:duty of care
391:
387:
378:
351:
350:
343:
331:
322:
312:
298:
294:
286:
279:
275:partnerships
267:corporations
239:
211:
207:
179:
150:criminal law
141:
137:
131:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
64:
52:Please help
47:verification
44:
214:English law
762:Categories
697:2020-12-14
673:2020-12-13
649:2020-12-05
624:2020-12-05
550:2020-12-05
506:2020-12-18
449:References
187:negligence
80:newspapers
742:cite book
595:cite book
334:negligent
226:insurance
185:context,
154:contracts
146:civil law
110:July 2017
783:Tort law
427:See also
408:contract
251:bankrupt
170:claimant
222:damages
94:scholar
730:
583:
528:: 853.
479:
265:, and
168:. The
138:liable
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
162:taxes
158:torts
101:JSTOR
87:books
768:Debt
748:link
728:ISBN
601:link
581:ISBN
477:ISBN
438:Tort
356:tort
273:and
183:tort
148:and
73:news
724:187
240:In
134:law
132:In
56:by
764::
744:}}
740:{{
726:.
690:.
666:.
642:.
617:.
597:}}
593:{{
559:^
543:.
526:76
524:.
499:.
320:.
318:11
284:.
269:.
261:,
244:,
232:.
201:,
197:,
193:,
189:,
160:,
156:,
136:,
750:)
736:.
700:.
676:.
652:.
627:.
603:)
589:.
553:.
509:.
485:.
288:"
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
50:.
27:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
