Knowledge

Defrocking

Source 📝

269:"deposition from the exercise of ministry if the person is ordained" does not amount to defrocking, but merely removes the right to the exercise of ministry by ordained persons. These powers are given to the diocesan bishop (in most cases) subject to appeal to a diocesan court, or the diocesan court may exercise primary jurisdiction when the bishop asks it to (for diocesan bishops the provincial metropolitan is given primary jurisdiction, for metropolitans the provincial House of Bishops is given jurisdiction, for the primate it is the national House of Bishops). All these powers are subject to appeal to courts of appeal and on matters of doctrine to the Supreme Court of the Anglican Church of Canada (Appendix 4, General Synod Canon XVIII - Discipline). General Synod 2007 clarified deposition, including forbidding the practice of suspending the licence in cases where discipline proceedings could be commenced instead (Resolution A082). 327:). A United Methodist elder or deacon may only have their credentials revoked through voluntary surrender or church trial. A minister who enters the status of honorable location retains their ordination credentials unless they voluntarily surrender them, while a minister who is involuntarily located may or may not, at the discretion of the Board of Ordained Ministry of their Annual Conference, retain their credentials of ordination. As a general rule, elders may only lose their credentials through voluntary surrender or action of a church court. Ministers who are found not competent to exercise their office may be suspended from ministry, but only for the duration of the incompetence. The 107:, (which is a solemn vesture of an archbishop,) then said he, "Which of you hath a pall, to take off my pall;" which imported as much as they, being his inferiors, could not degrade him. Whereunto one of them said, in that they were but bishops, they were his inferiors, and not competent judges; but being the pope's delegates, they might take his pall. And so they did, and so proceeding took every thing in order from him, as it was put on. Then a barber clipped his hair round about, and the bishop scraped the tops of his fingers where he had been anointed... Last of all they stripped him out of his gown into his jacket, and put upon him a poor 283:, the relevant canon provides for a bishop, priest or deacon to relinquish or be deposed from, or prohibited from functioning in, Holy Orders. Upon relinquishing or being deposed from Holy Orders, the relinquished or deposed person ceases to have any right, privilege or advantage attached to the relevant order(s) (of bishop, priest or deacon), and, if wholly relinquished or deposed, is considered, except for any Church law relating to a Church Tribunal, to be a lay person for the purposes of the Church. Where a person in Holy Orders has been prohibited from functioning, the prohibition has effect according to its terms. 20: 258:, for instance, states that "No person who has been admitted to the order of bishop, priest, or deacon can ever be divested of the character of his order..." though the church has processes to allow any clergy (by own volition or otherwise) to cease to function in the role. Anglican clergy are generally licensed to preach and administer sacraments by the bishop of the diocese in question; however if a bishop suspends this licence, the deacon or priest may no longer exercise their respective ministerial functions lawfully in that diocese. Within the Church of England The 276:, Title IV "Ecclesiastical Discipline", there are three modes of depriving a member of clergy from exercising ministerial rights: inhibition, suspension, or deposition. Inhibitions and suspensions are temporary. Clergy who are deposed are "deprived of the right to exercise the gifts and spiritual authority of God's word and sacraments conferred at ordination." (Title IV, Canon 15, Of Terminology Used in This Section, Deposition). 155:) at the priest's own request. New regulations issued in 2009 regarding priests who abandon their ministry for more than five years and whose behaviour is a cause of serious scandal have made it easier for bishops to secure laicization of such priests even against the priests' wishes. Once a priest or bishop is laicized, they do not lose what is conferred to them through the graces imparted to them that relate to the 143:("acts of the power of orders") or are exercises of his power of governance or of rights and functions attached to the office he holds. As a censure, suspension is meant to cease when the censured person shows repentance. Laicization, on the contrary, is a permanent measure, whereby for a sufficient reason a cleric is from then on juridically treated as a layman. Laicization is sometimes imposed as a punishment ( 211:, he can be suspended from exercising all clerical functions. If, disregarding his suspension, he continues to liturgize or does not repent of his actions, he may be permanently deposed from the sacred orders (in common parlance, "laicized"). Strictly speaking, the deposition can be appealed at the 58:, but may also be done at their request for personal reasons, such as running for civil office, taking over a family business, declining health or old age, desire to marry against the rules for clergy in a particular church, or an unresolved dispute. The form of the procedure varies according to the 171:
theologians believe that ordination to the priesthood does not confer an indelible character on the person's soul and that laicization could remove the ordained status completely. From the time of laicization all actions of a former cleric that would have been considered sacred are normally
69:
of clergy and ministers. These rituals are generally no longer practiced and were sometimes separate from dismissals from ordained ministry, leading some to contend that modern use of "defrocking" is inaccurate. However, others maintain "defrocking" as a common synonym for laicization, one
226:, the permanent act of excommunication, against a member of the church or a former cleric is usually imposed by the decision of the synod of bishops or the ecclesiastical council. In such cases, this not only defrocks the former cleric but also banishes him from entering an 134:
clergy may be dismissed from the clerical state, an action known as "laicization". The term "defrocking" is not normally used within the Catholic Church, although journalistic reports on laicization of Catholic clergy sometimes use it. Laicization differs from
194:
Forced laicization or removal from sacred orders is a form of ecclesiastical punishment, imposed by the ruling bishop of a cleric for certain transgressions. According to the canonical procedure, if the cleric is found guilty of an infringement of a
86:
church, priests were publicly defrocked or "degraded" by having their vestments ceremonially removed. The procedure was intended to evoke shame and humiliation in the subject. A description of the degradation of Archbishop
178:
of a cleric may come as a result of a request for removal from sacred orders, or as an ecclesiastical punishment. In the first case, very often, the cleric may ask to be laicized in order to enter a second
764: 701:
Constitution & Canons, Together with the Rules of Order, For the government of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, Otherwise Known as The Episcopal Church
187:
or the death of his spouse. In this case, the man remains in good standing with the Church but is no longer a cleric. Laicization of a bishop can only be done by the convening of a
736: 699: 115:'s gown, full bare and nearly worn, and as evil-favouredly made as one might lightly see, and a townsman's cap on his head; and so delivered him to the secular power". 768: 331:
outlines the specific rules for each option. Elders and deacons may not simply be defrocked by a bishop, but only through ecclesiastical due process.
839: 685: 520: 638: 491: 849: 834: 196: 548: 573: 725: 844: 136: 708: 139:. The latter is a censure prohibiting certain acts by a cleric, whether the acts are of a religious character deriving from his 475: 386: 588: 308: 328: 422: 864: 307:
is defrocked, his ministerial credentials are removed. Defrocking is usually the result of blatantly disobeying the
273: 732: 280: 46:
is the removal of their rights to exercise the functions of the ordained ministry. It may be grounded on
439: 266: 531: 645: 499: 292: 227: 125: 59: 412: 19: 671: 619: 790: 552: 455: 212: 8: 47: 859: 829: 300: 251: 262:
provides for a range of sanctions up to a lifelong ban from the exercise of ministry.
65:
The words "defrocking" or "unfrocking" refers to the ritual removal of the frock-like
679: 567: 418: 371: 296: 255: 472: 168: 854: 479: 363: 222:
of the former cleric from the church for a certain period, or indefinitely. The
219: 131: 250:, defrocking is extremely rare and often impossible. Different provinces in the 324: 88: 823: 707:. New York: Church Publishing Incorporated. 2006. p. 171. Archived from 669: 644:. The Anglican Diocese of Eastern Newfoundland & Labrador. Archived from 247: 156: 140: 83: 672:"Resolution Number: A082, Subject: Canon XVII - The Licensing of Clergy" 316: 235: 208: 188: 231: 204: 96: 66: 315:
standards. A defrocked clergyman is prohibited from celebrating the
312: 223: 215:, but, in modern practice, the bishop's decision is usually final. 180: 79: 51: 218:
Laicization as an ecclesiastical punishment may carry with it the
320: 184: 104: 456:"'Defrocking' priests: the media keep asking the wrong question" 304: 200: 112: 108: 92: 43: 621:
Handbook of the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada
144: 55: 726:"Holy Orders (Removal from Exercise of Ministry) Canon 2017" 589:"Some Theological and Canonical Considerations (see sec. 8)" 387:"Theodore McCarrick will continue to be a Catholic priest" 95:
in 1556, based on eye-witness accounts, was recorded by
441:
Foxe's book of martyrs : an edition for the people
765:"Creech found guilty; loses ministerial credentials" 639:"Appendix 4, General Synod Canon XVIII - Discipline" 670:The Anglican Church of Canada, General Synod 2007. 272:According to the constitutions and canons of the 821: 444:. New York: Eaton & Mains. pp. 378–379. 759: 757: 50:, disciplinary problems, or disagreements over 782: 254:handle this differently; the canon law of the 767:. The United Methodist Church. Archived from 311:of the United Methodist Church and violating 754: 151:), or it may be granted as a favour (Latin, 791:"United Methodists Move to Defrock Lesbian" 684:: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 410: 347: 350:Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Encyclopedia 411:Ayris, Paul; Selwyn, David, eds. (1999). 840:Canon law of the Eastern Orthodox Church 788: 362: 18: 16:Removal of clergy from ordained ministry 813:The United Methodist Book of Discipline 384: 822: 572:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 586: 437: 414:Thomas Cranmer: Churchman and Scholar 274:Episcopal Church in the United States 438:Berry, William Grinton, ed. (1907). 385:Schmalz, Mathew (20 February 2019). 162: 850:Major orders in the Catholic Church 835:Canon law of the Anglican Communion 329:United Methodist Book of Discipline 13: 742:from the original on 30 March 2021 627:(15th ed.). 2007. p. 86. 103:...when they came to take off his 14: 876: 238:, and being blessed by a priest. 70:particularly popular in English. 348:Stravinskas, Peter M.J. (1991). 845:Laicized Roman Catholic priests 807: 718: 692: 663: 631: 612: 603: 580: 541: 370:(3rd ed.). New York City: 789:Banerjee, Neela (2004-12-03). 587:Scouteris, Prof. Constantine. 513: 484: 466: 448: 431: 417:. Boydell Press. p. 274. 404: 378: 356: 341: 260:Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 241: 119: 1: 591:. Orthodox Research Institute 473:Code of Canon Law, canon 1333 334: 23:Defrocking of patriarch Nikon 733:Anglican Church of Australia 609:Church of England Canon C1.2 286: 281:Anglican Church of Australia 7: 10: 881: 123: 73: 267:Anglican Church of Canada 865:Catholic penal canon law 157:Sacrament of Holy Orders 478:March 29, 2008, at the 460:www.catholicculture.org 293:United Methodist Church 230:church, receiving the 126:Loss of clerical state 117: 60:Christian denomination 24: 368:A Catholic Dictionary 101: 22: 309:Order and Discipline 213:ecclesiastical court 172:considered invalid. 48:criminal convictions 374:. p. 140, 505. 265:Similarly, in the 252:Anglican Communion 207:or ecclesiastical 25: 372:Macmillan Company 256:Church of England 163:Eastern Orthodoxy 872: 814: 811: 805: 804: 802: 801: 786: 780: 779: 777: 776: 761: 752: 751: 749: 747: 741: 730: 722: 716: 715: 713: 706: 696: 690: 689: 683: 675: 667: 661: 660: 658: 656: 650: 643: 635: 629: 628: 626: 616: 610: 607: 601: 600: 598: 596: 584: 578: 577: 571: 563: 561: 560: 551:. Archived from 545: 539: 538: 536: 530:. Archived from 529: 517: 511: 510: 508: 507: 498:. Archived from 488: 482: 470: 464: 463: 452: 446: 445: 435: 429: 428: 408: 402: 401: 399: 397: 391:The Conversation 382: 376: 375: 364:Attwater, Donald 360: 354: 353: 345: 169:Eastern Orthodox 880: 879: 875: 874: 873: 871: 870: 869: 820: 819: 818: 817: 812: 808: 799: 797: 787: 783: 774: 772: 763: 762: 755: 745: 743: 739: 728: 724: 723: 719: 711: 704: 698: 697: 693: 677: 676: 668: 664: 654: 652: 648: 641: 637: 636: 632: 624: 618: 617: 613: 608: 604: 594: 592: 585: 581: 565: 564: 558: 556: 549:"Archived copy" 547: 546: 542: 534: 527: 521:"An example of 519: 518: 514: 505: 503: 492:"An example of 490: 489: 485: 480:Wayback Machine 471: 467: 454: 453: 449: 436: 432: 425: 409: 405: 395: 393: 383: 379: 361: 357: 346: 342: 337: 289: 244: 220:excommunication 165: 132:Catholic Church 130:Members of the 128: 122: 76: 17: 12: 11: 5: 878: 868: 867: 862: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 816: 815: 806: 795:New York Times 781: 753: 717: 714:on 2010-08-21. 691: 662: 651:on 6 July 2011 630: 611: 602: 579: 540: 537:on 2013-02-28. 512: 483: 465: 447: 430: 424:978-0851157405 423: 403: 377: 355: 352:. p. 293. 339: 338: 336: 333: 325:Holy Communion 288: 285: 243: 240: 203:, breaking of 199:, unrepentant 164: 161: 124:Main article: 121: 118: 89:Thomas Cranmer 75: 72: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 877: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 827: 825: 810: 796: 792: 785: 771:on 2008-06-03 770: 766: 760: 758: 738: 734: 727: 721: 710: 703: 702: 695: 687: 681: 673: 666: 647: 640: 634: 623: 622: 615: 606: 590: 583: 575: 569: 555:on 2009-06-04 554: 550: 544: 533: 526: 524: 516: 502:on 2016-09-10 501: 497: 495: 487: 481: 477: 474: 469: 461: 457: 451: 443: 442: 434: 426: 420: 416: 415: 407: 392: 388: 381: 373: 369: 365: 359: 351: 344: 340: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 284: 282: 277: 275: 270: 268: 263: 261: 257: 253: 249: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 216: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 192: 190: 186: 182: 177: 173: 170: 160: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 133: 127: 116: 114: 110: 106: 100: 98: 94: 90: 85: 81: 71: 68: 63: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 21: 809: 798:. Retrieved 794: 784: 773:. Retrieved 769:the original 744:. Retrieved 720: 709:the original 700: 694: 665: 655:23 September 653:. Retrieved 646:the original 633: 620: 614: 605: 593:. Retrieved 582: 557:. Retrieved 553:the original 543: 532:the original 525:laicization" 522: 515: 504:. Retrieved 500:the original 496:laicization" 493: 486: 468: 459: 450: 440: 433: 413: 406: 394:. Retrieved 390: 380: 367: 358: 349: 343: 321:Holy Baptism 290: 278: 271: 264: 259: 245: 217: 193: 175: 174: 166: 152: 148: 129: 102: 77: 64: 39: 35: 31: 27: 26: 396:18 December 248:Anglicanism 242:Anglicanism 176:Laicization 120:Catholicism 84:Renaissance 62:concerned. 40:laicization 36:degradation 824:Categories 800:2007-07-12 775:2007-07-12 559:2009-10-04 523:pro gratia 506:2014-01-18 335:References 317:sacraments 295:, when an 236:sacraments 234:and other 209:discipline 197:sacred vow 189:Holy Synod 183:after the 153:pro gratia 141:ordination 137:suspension 32:unfrocking 28:Defrocking 860:Methodism 830:Canon law 746:5 January 494:ad poenam 287:Methodism 232:Eucharist 205:canon law 149:ad poenam 97:John Foxe 67:vestments 737:Archived 680:cite web 568:cite web 476:Archived 366:(1962). 313:Biblical 228:Orthodox 224:anathema 181:marriage 167:Certain 80:Medieval 52:doctrine 291:In the 279:In the 185:divorce 78:In the 74:History 855:Clergy 595:25 May 421:  305:deacon 301:bishop 201:heresy 113:beadle 109:yeoman 93:heresy 44:clergy 740:(PDF) 729:(PDF) 712:(PDF) 705:(PDF) 649:(PDF) 642:(PDF) 625:(PDF) 535:(PDF) 528:(PDF) 303:, or 297:elder 145:Latin 56:dogma 38:, or 748:2022 686:link 657:2010 597:2012 574:link 419:ISBN 398:2022 323:and 105:pall 91:for 82:and 246:In 54:or 42:of 826:: 793:. 756:^ 735:. 731:. 682:}} 678:{{ 570:}} 566:{{ 458:. 389:. 299:, 191:. 159:. 147:, 99:: 34:, 30:, 803:. 778:. 750:. 688:) 674:. 659:. 599:. 576:) 562:. 509:. 462:. 427:. 400:. 319:( 111:-

Index


clergy
criminal convictions
doctrine
dogma
Christian denomination
vestments
Medieval
Renaissance
Thomas Cranmer
heresy
John Foxe
pall
yeoman
beadle
Loss of clerical state
Catholic Church
suspension
ordination
Latin
Sacrament of Holy Orders
Eastern Orthodox
marriage
divorce
Holy Synod
sacred vow
heresy
canon law
discipline
ecclesiastical court

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.