Knowledge

Crime harm index

Source 📝

77:
to calculate the harm score of each crime. The system has already been adopted by several UK police forces. According to the CCHI, the harm score for a crime is the default prison sentence that an offender would receive for committing it, if the crime was committed by a single offender with no prior
56:
policies to decide what the "harm score" of an offence should be. The harm score of an offence is the default length of the prison sentence that an offender would receive, if the crime was committed by a single offender.
49:
and two other researchers wrote in 2016 that "All crimes are not created equal. Counting them as if they are fosters distortion of risk assessments, resource allocation, and accountability."
78:
convictions. For minor crimes that would instead result in a fine, the harm score is the number of days it would take someone with a minimum wage job to earn the money to pay the fine.
81:
The Cambridge Crime Harm Index has inspired other crime harm indices for New Zealand, Denmark and Western Australia. It has also been evaluated for use in Scotland, though officers of
168: 142: 33:
The most simple and most common method of measuring an area's crime rate is to count the number of crimes. In this case, one minor crime (e.g. a
194:
Curtis-Ham, Sophie; Walton, Darren (23 August 2017). "The New Zealand Crime Harm Index: Quantifying Harm Using Sentencing Data".
288: 74: 323: 318: 108:"The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring Total Harm from Crime Based on Sentencing Guidelines" 328: 146: 8: 66: 46: 289:"BLOG: Is the Crime Harm Index the future? – By Dr Laura Knight and Supt. Dave Hill" 267: 234: 203: 119: 143:"Crime: measuring by 'damage to victims' will improve policing and public safety" 82: 53: 272: 255: 239: 222: 312: 70: 207: 124: 107: 106:
Sherman, Lawrence; Neyroud, Peter William; Neyroud, Eleanor (3 April 2016).
65:
The Cambridge Crime Harm Index was unveiled in 2016. It was developed by
34: 27: 42: 85:
have noted that it does not reflect Scottish sentencing guidelines.
37:
incident) counts for the same as a single very serious crime (e.g.
30:
in which crimes are weighted based on how much "harm" they cause.
256:"Developing a Crime Harm Index for Western Australia: the WACHI" 38: 223:"The Danish Crime Harm Index: How It Works and Why It Matters" 221:
Anderson, Helle Aagard; Mueller-Johnson, Katrin (7 May 2018).
41:). Leading criminologists have argued in favour of creating a 24: 220: 105: 310: 193: 169:"Bobbies on the spreadsheet - Measuring crime" 137: 135: 101: 99: 97: 60: 260:Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing 253: 227:Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing 287:Knight, Laura; Hill, Dave (21 April 2017). 132: 94: 286: 254:House, Paul; Neyroud, Peter (9 May 2018). 196:Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 75:sentencing guidelines of England and Wales 271: 238: 123: 311: 13: 14: 340: 280: 247: 214: 187: 161: 1: 88: 73:and Eleanor Neyroud. It uses 52:Most crime harm indices use 7: 10: 345: 61:Cambridge Crime Harm Index 273:10.1007/s41887-018-0022-6 240:10.1007/s41887-018-0021-7 16:Crime rates measurement 208:10.1093/police/pax050 125:10.1093/police/paw003 147:Cambridge University 43:weighted measurement 23:is a measurement of 67:Lawrence W. Sherman 47:Lawrence W. Sherman 175:. 1 September 2016 54:prison sentencing 336: 324:Crime statistics 304: 303: 301: 299: 284: 278: 277: 275: 251: 245: 244: 242: 218: 212: 211: 191: 185: 184: 182: 180: 165: 159: 158: 156: 154: 139: 130: 129: 127: 103: 21:crime harm index 344: 343: 339: 338: 337: 335: 334: 333: 309: 308: 307: 297: 295: 285: 281: 252: 248: 219: 215: 192: 188: 178: 176: 167: 166: 162: 152: 150: 141: 140: 133: 104: 95: 91: 83:Police Scotland 63: 17: 12: 11: 5: 342: 332: 331: 326: 321: 319:Harm reduction 306: 305: 279: 266:(1–2): 70–94. 246: 233:(1–2): 52–69. 213: 202:(4): 455–467. 186: 160: 149:. 4 April 2016 131: 118:(3): 171–183. 92: 90: 87: 62: 59: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 341: 330: 329:Index numbers 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 316: 314: 294: 290: 283: 274: 269: 265: 261: 257: 250: 241: 236: 232: 228: 224: 217: 209: 205: 201: 197: 190: 174: 173:The Economist 170: 164: 148: 144: 138: 136: 126: 121: 117: 113: 109: 102: 100: 98: 93: 86: 84: 79: 76: 72: 71:Peter Neyroud 68: 58: 55: 50: 48: 44: 40: 36: 31: 29: 26: 22: 296:. Retrieved 292: 282: 263: 259: 249: 230: 226: 216: 199: 195: 189: 177:. Retrieved 172: 163: 151:. Retrieved 115: 111: 80: 64: 51: 32: 20: 18: 179:15 November 153:15 November 35:shoplifting 313:Categories 298:7 December 89:References 112:Policing 39:murder 293:EMPAC 28:rates 25:crime 300:2017 181:2017 155:2017 268:doi 235:doi 204:doi 120:doi 315:: 291:. 262:. 258:. 229:. 225:. 200:12 198:. 171:. 145:. 134:^ 116:10 114:. 110:. 96:^ 69:, 45:. 19:A 302:. 276:. 270:: 264:2 243:. 237:: 231:2 210:. 206:: 183:. 157:. 128:. 122::

Index

crime
rates
shoplifting
murder
weighted measurement
Lawrence W. Sherman
prison sentencing
Lawrence W. Sherman
Peter Neyroud
sentencing guidelines of England and Wales
Police Scotland



"The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring Total Harm from Crime Based on Sentencing Guidelines"
doi
10.1093/police/paw003


"Crime: measuring by 'damage to victims' will improve policing and public safety"
Cambridge University
"Bobbies on the spreadsheet - Measuring crime"
doi
10.1093/police/pax050
"The Danish Crime Harm Index: How It Works and Why It Matters"
doi
10.1007/s41887-018-0021-7
"Developing a Crime Harm Index for Western Australia: the WACHI"
doi
10.1007/s41887-018-0022-6

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.