105:
44:
71:
163:
annual applications for leave to appeal of which an average of 170 were granted. Of that 170, conviction was quashed in 20 percent of cases and sentence varied in another 22 per cent. Rulings of the court included limitation of the lower courts' ability simultaneously to try multiple defendants, multiple
162:
Though the court was staffed with the judges who had shown such hostility (consisting of the Lord Chief
Justice and eight judges of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court), it had a restraining effect on the excesses of prosecutors. During the period 1909–1912, there was an average of 450
167:
and disparate counts within an indictment. The ability of the prosecution to introduce further evidence after the close of the prosecution case was curtailed as were several prejudicial practices with a defendant's previous
104:
248:
321:
139:
to which referral had been solely discretionary and which could only consider points of law. Throughout the nineteenth century, there had been opposition from
341:
351:
336:
346:
326:
20:
56:
290:
96:
188:
331:
48:
176:
came under scrutiny, as did the practice of insisting that the defence proceed even in the case of an inadequate
136:
151:
against such an appeal court with collateral right of appeal. However, disquiet over the convictions of
316:
159:
led to the concession of a new court that could hear matters of law, fact or mixed law and fact.
187:
On 1 October 1966, the Court of
Criminal Appeal was superseded by the Criminal Division of the
70:
8:
91:
magazine cartoon from 1890, noting then current discussion as to the need to relieve the
82:"Why, indeed? But I don't see any Help for it till we get a Court of Criminal Appeal."
286:
87:
181:
169:
120:
180:
case by the prosecution. The Court also did much to refine and systematise the
92:
310:
173:
156:
124:
148:
164:
152:
132:
61:
140:
117:
172:. Further, trial judges' ability to invade the jury's role as
99:, of the responsibility for determining criminal case appeals.
144:
285:. London: Sweet & Maxwell. pp. 619–623.
108:Law book with the rules of court and forms (1908)
322:Former courts and tribunals in England and Wales
308:
301:Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law
342:1966 disestablishments in the United Kingdom
352:Courts and tribunals disestablished in 1966
337:1907 establishments in the United Kingdom
77:"Oh, dear! Oh, dear! Why leave it to Me!"
21:Court of Criminal Appeal (disambiguation)
347:Courts and tribunals established in 1907
103:
69:
309:
263:, 4th ed. Vol.10 (Reissue), "Courts",
259:Lord Mackay of Clashfern (ed.) (2002)
283:Law and Society in England 1750-1950
189:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
13:
327:Criminal law of the United Kingdom
280:
267:'Divisions of the Court of Appeal'
223:
207:
14:
363:
16:Former court of England and Wales
281:Cornish, W.; Clarke, G. (1989).
49:Parliament of the United Kingdom
42:
274:
253:
242:
233:
217:
201:
137:Court for Crown Cases Reserved
1:
194:
7:
135:. c. 23) It superseded the
10:
368:
261:Halsbury's Laws of England
28:United Kingdom legislation
18:
80:Mr. P. (sympathetically).
55:
41:
36:
332:Legal history of England
249:Criminal Appeal Act 1966
129:Criminal Appeal Act 1907
114:Court of Criminal Appeal
32:Criminal Appeal Act 1907
109:
101:
107:
73:
224:Cornish & Clarke
208:Cornish & Clarke
19:For other uses, see
127:established by the
33:
299:Davies, S. (1949)
110:
102:
31:
292:978-0-421-31150-3
100:
68:
67:
37:Act of Parliament
359:
317:Appellate courts
303:(new series) 425
296:
268:
257:
251:
246:
240:
237:
231:
221:
215:
205:
85:
46:
45:
34:
30:
367:
366:
362:
361:
360:
358:
357:
356:
307:
306:
293:
277:
272:
271:
258:
254:
247:
243:
238:
234:
222:
218:
206:
202:
197:
182:law of evidence
170:criminal record
121:appellate court
84:
83:
78:
51:
43:
29:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
365:
355:
354:
349:
344:
339:
334:
329:
324:
319:
305:
304:
297:
291:
276:
273:
270:
269:
252:
241:
232:
216:
199:
198:
196:
193:
125:criminal cases
97:Henry Matthews
93:Home Secretary
66:
65:
59:
53:
52:
47:
39:
38:
27:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
364:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
314:
312:
302:
298:
294:
288:
284:
279:
278:
266:
262:
256:
250:
245:
239:Davies (1949)
236:
229:
225:
220:
213:
209:
204:
200:
192:
190:
185:
183:
179:
175:
174:trier of fact
171:
166:
160:
158:
157:George Edalji
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
119:
115:
106:
98:
94:
90:
89:
81:
76:
72:
63:
60:
58:
54:
50:
40:
35:
26:
22:
300:
282:
275:Bibliography
264:
260:
255:
244:
235:
227:
219:
211:
203:
186:
177:
161:
128:
113:
111:
86:
79:
74:
25:
178:prima facie
165:indictments
149:Home Office
311:Categories
195:References
153:Adolf Beck
75:Home Sec.
147:and the
133:7 Edw. 7
62:7 Edw. 7
57:Citation
226:(1989)
210:(1989)
141:lawyers
118:English
116:was an
64:. c. 23
289:
145:judges
88:Punch
287:ISBN
155:and
123:for
112:The
265:634
230:620
214:619
313::
228:p.
212:p.
191:.
184:.
143:,
95:,
295:.
131:(
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
