Knowledge

Politeness

Source šŸ“

296: 31: 376: 98: 248: 406:
Some studies have shown that women are more likely to use politeness formulas than men, though the exact differences are not clear. Most current research has shown that gender differences in politeness use are complex, since there is a clear association between politeness norms and the stereotypical
402:
to direct statements, such as "You were at the store, weren't you?" There are three types of tags: modal tags, affective tags, and facilitative tags. Modal tags request information of which the speaker is uncertain: "You haven't been to the store yet, have you?" Affective tags indicate concern for
336:... to bring philosophy out of the closets and libraries, schools and colleges, to dwell in clubs and assemblies, at tea-tables and coffeehouses." It provided its readers with educated, topical talking points, and advice on how to carry on conversations and social interactions in a polite manner. 455:
is perhaps the most widely known example of a language that encodes politeness at its core. Japanese has two main levels of politeness, one for intimate acquaintances, family, and friends, and one for other groups, and verb morphology reflects these levels. Besides that, some verbs have special
195:
is when a person refrains from making a comment or asserting their beliefs during a discussion so as to remain polite to others present. It is also when a person goes along with a decision made by someone else so as not to appear impolite, essentially following general social
403:
the listener: "You haven't been here long, have you? Facilitative tags invite the addressee to comment on the request being made: "You can do that, can't you?" Finally, softeners reduce the force of what would be a brusque demand: "Hand me that thing, could you?"
75:
While the goal of politeness is to refrain from behaving in an offensive way so as not to offend others, and to make all people feel relaxed and comfortable with one another, these culturally defined standards at times may be broken within the context of
291:
in the early 18th century. Shaftesbury defined politeness as the art of being pleasing in company: "'Politeness' may be defined a dext'rous management of our words and actions, whereby we make other people have better opinion of us and themselves."
287:, the art of elegant dress and graceful conversation and how to act courteously, especially with women. Influential in this new discourse was a series of essays on the nature of politeness in a commercial society, penned by the philosopher 407:
speech of middle class white women, at least in the UK and US. It is therefore unsurprising that women tend to be associated with politeness more and their linguistic behavior judged in relation to these politeness norms.
460:
forms. This happens also with some nouns and interrogative pronouns. Japanese also employs different personal pronouns for each person according to gender, age, rank, degree of acquaintance, and other cultural factors.
351:" referred to a desired social interaction which valued sober and reasoned debate on matters of interest. Established rules and procedures for proper behavior, as well as conventions, were outlined by 347:
was supposed to conform to a particular manner, with the language of polite and civil conversation considered to be essential to the conduct of coffeehouse debate and conversation. The concept of "
239:
Some cultures, groups, and individuals prefer some ideals of politeness over the other. In this way, politeness is culturally bound, and even within broader cultures, people may disagree.
493:
is oriented towards the need for acknowledgment of the positions or roles of all the participants as well as adherence to formality norms appropriate to the particular situation.
340: 279:
increasingly tried to identify themselves with the elite through their adopted artistic preferences and their standards of behavior. They became preoccupied with precise rules of
181:
is the act of making a request less infringing, such as "If you don't mind..." or "If it isn't too much trouble..."; respects a person's right to act freely. This is a variety of
212:
seeks to establish a positive relationship between parties, and it respects a person's need to be liked and understood. This standard of politeness is determined by
473:, including Japanese. Matsumoto and Ide claim that Brown and Levinson assume the speaker's volitional use of language, which allows the speaker's creative use of 227:
They show an awareness that the relationship is strong enough to cope with what would normally be considered impolite (in the popular understanding of the term);
477:-maintaining strategies toward the addressee. In East Asian cultures like Japan, politeness is achieved not so much on the basis of volition as on discernment ( 332:
in 1711, gave regular advice to its readers on how to be a polite gentleman. Its stated goal was "to enliven morality with wit, and to temper wit with morality
367:, intended to infuse politeness into English coffeehouse conversation, as their explicit purpose lay in the reformation of English manners and morals. 202:
can be when a person offers their opinion in a positive and constructive way to be assistive and helpful during an interaction, or refrains from
288: 421:
Besides and additionally to the above, many languages have specific means to show politeness, deference, respect, or a recognition of the
60:
so as not to offend others and to put them at ease. It is a culturally defined phenomenon, and therefore what is considered polite in one
1134: 383:
There is a variety of techniques one can use to seem polite. Some techniques include expressing uncertainty and ambiguity through
1181: 980:
Politeness in Parliamentary Discourse: A Comparative Pragmatic Study of British and Moroccan MPs' Speech Acts at Question Time
268:, a self-conscious process of the imposition of polite norms and behaviors became a symbol of being a genteel member of the 1166: 469:
Brown and Levinson's theory of politeness has been criticised as not being universally valid, by linguists working with
1034: 787: 749: 584: 145: 575:
Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England
127: 429:(for example, employing certain words in formal occasions, and colloquial forms in informal contexts), and in its 1476: 1119: 123: 890:
Ide, S. (1989). "Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness".
295: 230:
They articulate an awareness of the other person's values, which fulfills the person's desire to be accepted.
30: 660:
Klein, Lawrence E. (1996). "Coffeehouse Civility, 1660-1714: An Aspect of Post-Courtly Culture in England".
446: 17: 425:
of the speaker and the hearer. There are two main ways in which a given language shows politeness: in its
537: 474: 171: 119: 1983: 1501: 1289: 767: 375: 2133: 1217: 863:
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). "Reexamination of the universality of Face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese".
2000: 1568: 1176: 1101: 517: 430: 416: 108: 695:
Klein, Lawrence E. (2002). "Politeness and the Interpretation of the British Eighteenth Century".
112: 1910: 1648: 1434: 1339: 1057: 697: 1583: 1027: 1803: 572: 635: 470: 442: 363: 320: 252: 8: 2128: 1638: 1578: 1439: 1171: 1074: 930: 434: 384: 352: 300: 213: 163: 77: 69: 600:
Klein, Lawrence (1984). "The Third Earl of Shaftesbury and the Progress of Politeness".
2123: 1603: 1232: 1139: 1068: 907: 722: 714: 677: 617: 1944: 1938: 1696: 1689: 1558: 1399: 1257: 911: 876: 783: 745: 726: 580: 568: 532: 527: 502: 452: 438: 265: 1867: 437:
is a common example in Western languages, while some Asian languages extend this to
1704: 1598: 1451: 1151: 1124: 1114: 1020: 899: 872: 706: 669: 609: 43: 2138: 2065: 1778: 1712: 1633: 1062: 573: 308: 903: 256:
fostered a culture of politeness among the middle-classes of early 18th century
1824: 1202: 1005:, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Amanda Vickery, David Wootton & John Mullan ( 522: 329: 325: 167: 159: 710: 303:
had to conform to a socially acceptable standard of politeness. The painting,
2117: 2009: 1623: 1608: 1588: 1389: 1374: 1359: 1272: 1267: 1161: 1145: 1084: 422: 357: 339:
The art of polite conversation and debate was particularly cultivated in the
221: 27:
Practical application of good manners or etiquette so as not to offend others
1951: 1875: 1002: 1845: 1681: 1643: 1593: 1563: 1531: 1521: 1516: 1429: 1409: 1329: 1129: 1108: 1079: 484: 399: 344: 273: 1663: 1553: 1471: 1394: 1344: 1247: 547: 392: 379:
A polite notice on the side of a bus that reads "please pay as you enter"
276: 269: 186: 1976: 1785: 1753: 1618: 1511: 1491: 1364: 1354: 1314: 1294: 1252: 718: 681: 621: 457: 2024: 1770: 1768: 1761: 1759: 1736: 1613: 1446: 1424: 1414: 1369: 1349: 1319: 1309: 1284: 1207: 1156: 512: 388: 280: 217: 203: 57: 1896: 673: 613: 216:, and often violates etiquette norms in letter. Direct speech acts, 97: 2017: 1838: 1746: 1628: 1548: 1506: 1481: 1456: 1404: 1334: 1279: 1242: 1237: 1227: 1222: 1212: 742:
The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse
507: 348: 65: 2096: 1958: 433:(for example, using special verb forms for polite discourse). The 204:
purporting to agree with something they do not actually agree with
2072: 2058: 1991: 1924: 1889: 1817: 1573: 1496: 1466: 1419: 1379: 1304: 1262: 542: 426: 284: 257: 61: 1931: 1852: 2040: 2032: 1903: 1882: 1831: 1810: 1653: 1384: 1043: 1917: 1859: 1738: 1730: 1526: 1486: 1324: 1186: 464: 247: 2088: 2080: 1538: 1461: 1299: 1012: 441:. Some languages have complex politeness systems, such as 224:
can be considered aspects of positive politeness because:
1658: 355:, such as Harrington's Rota Club. Periodicals, including 1865: 982:(Ph.D. thesis). Rabat, Morocco: Mohammed V University. 488: 478: 1702: 1679: 817:
Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French
166:identified four kinds of politeness, deriving from 768:"Introduction: Cultural and Historical Background" 766: 189:. It is also considered a part of being assertive. 744:. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 101. 2115: 56:is the practical application of good manners or 819:. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 773:The Commerce of Everyday Life: Selections from 233:They convey a natural, relaxed, casual setting. 2094: 2078: 1028: 959: 935:Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage 928: 2030: 2007: 1998: 1989: 782:. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's. p. 1. 126:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 1135:Four Cardinal Principles and Eight Virtues 1035: 1021: 986: 465:Criticism of Brown and Levinson's typology 862: 387:and indirectness, polite lying or use of 146:Learn how and when to remove this message 991:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 973:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 937:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 849:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 814: 391:(which make use of ambiguity as well as 374: 294: 246: 29: 1182:Values in Action Inventory of Strengths 14: 2116: 977: 941: 835: 805: 764: 483:, finding one's place), or prescribed 1016: 968: 844: 739: 694: 659: 599: 567: 410: 206:in a way that does not offend others. 185:. There is a greater use of indirect 950: 324:, founded as a daily publication by 124:adding citations to reliable sources 91: 1167:Teachings of the Seven Grandfathers 889: 24: 922: 25: 2150: 996: 955:(in Italian). Bologna: Il Mulino. 550:, expression used to say farewell 636:"First Edition of The Spectator" 96: 883: 856: 68:or simply eccentric in another 1120:Catalogue of Vices and Virtues 826: 796: 771:. In Mackie, Erin Skye (ed.). 758: 733: 688: 653: 628: 593: 579:. Cambridge University Press. 561: 13: 1: 987:Kadar, D.; Haugh, M. (2013). 810:. New York: Harper & Row. 740:Cowan, Brian William (2005). 554: 370: 311: 1769: 1760: 1737: 877:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 662:Huntington Library Quarterly 447:honorific speech in Japanese 7: 1866: 1703: 1680: 1042: 904:10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 538:Register (sociolinguistics) 496: 489: 479: 10: 2155: 960:Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). 808:Language and Woman's Place 765:Mackie, Erin Skye (1998). 602:Eighteenth-Century Studies 439:avoiding pronouns entirely 414: 398:Additionally, one can use 242: 2050: 1968: 1795: 1722: 1672: 1195: 1093: 1050: 711:10.1017/S0018246X02002716 39:"Your eel, I think, Sir?" 989:Understanding Politeness 944:Women Men and Politeness 518:Intercultural competence 417:Honorifics (linguistics) 193:Non-assertive politeness 87: 978:Moumni, Hassan (2005). 283:, such as when to show 64:can sometimes be quite 2095: 2079: 2031: 2008: 1999: 1990: 838:Women Men and Language 698:The Historical Journal 380: 315: 261: 50: 1584:Righteous indignation 953:Elogio della cortesia 865:Journal of Pragmatics 847:Gender and Politeness 815:Beeching, K. (2002). 378: 318:Periodicals, such as 298: 250: 33: 1102:Bodhipakkhiyā dhammā 969:Watts, R.J. (2003). 471:East-Asian languages 443:Korean speech levels 200:Assertive politeness 120:improve this section 1172:Theological virtues 1075:Positive psychology 962:Culturally Speaking 942:Holmes, J. (1995). 836:Holmes, J. (1995). 806:Lakoff, R. (1975). 640:Information Britain 305:A Club of Gentlemen 214:personal boundaries 210:Positive politeness 179:Negative politeness 82:positive politeness 80:ā€“ this is known as 78:personal boundaries 1604:Self-transcendence 1196:Individual virtues 1140:Nine Noble Virtues 1069:Nicomachean Ethics 946:. London: Longman. 845:Mills, S. (2003). 569:Klein, Lawrence E. 411:Linguistic devices 381: 316: 272:. Upwardly mobile 262: 51: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2106: 1258:Conscientiousness 1125:Epistemic virtues 951:Axia, G. (1999). 533:Politeness theory 528:Politeness maxims 503:Confirmation bias 353:gentleman's clubs 266:Enlightenment era 156: 155: 148: 16:(Redirected from 2146: 2134:Sociolinguistics 2100: 2084: 2036: 2013: 2004: 1995: 1871: 1774: 1765: 1742: 1708: 1685: 1670: 1669: 1599:Self-cultivation 1152:Prussian virtues 1115:Cardinal virtues 1037: 1030: 1023: 1014: 1013: 1009:, Sep. 30, 2004) 992: 983: 974: 965: 956: 947: 938: 916: 915: 898:(2ā€“3): 223ā€“248. 887: 881: 880: 860: 854: 850: 841: 830: 824: 820: 811: 800: 794: 793: 770: 762: 756: 755: 737: 731: 730: 692: 686: 685: 657: 651: 650: 648: 647: 632: 626: 625: 597: 591: 590: 578: 565: 492: 482: 335: 313: 301:Gentlemen's club 289:Lord Shaftesbury 164:Stephen Levinson 158:Anthropologists 151: 144: 140: 137: 131: 100: 92: 70:cultural context 21: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2103: 2046: 1964: 1791: 1718: 1668: 1191: 1177:Three Treasures 1094:Virtue families 1089: 1063:Moral character 1046: 1041: 999: 925: 923:Further reading 920: 919: 888: 884: 861: 857: 853: 831: 827: 823: 801: 797: 790: 763: 759: 752: 738: 734: 693: 689: 674:10.2307/3817904 658: 654: 645: 643: 634: 633: 629: 614:10.2307/2738536 598: 594: 587: 566: 562: 557: 499: 467: 435:Tā€“V distinction 419: 413: 373: 343:of the period. 333: 309:Joseph Highmore 245: 152: 141: 135: 132: 117: 101: 90: 41: 35:True Politeness 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2152: 2142: 2141: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2104: 2102: 2101: 2092: 2085: 2076: 2069: 2062: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2045: 2044: 2037: 2028: 2021: 2014: 2005: 1996: 1987: 1980: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1965: 1963: 1962: 1955: 1948: 1935: 1928: 1921: 1914: 1907: 1900: 1893: 1886: 1879: 1872: 1863: 1856: 1849: 1842: 1835: 1828: 1821: 1814: 1807: 1799: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1782: 1775: 1766: 1757: 1750: 1743: 1734: 1726: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1709: 1700: 1693: 1686: 1676: 1674: 1667: 1666: 1661: 1656: 1651: 1646: 1641: 1636: 1631: 1626: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1586: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1479: 1474: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1270: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1203:Accountability 1199: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1190: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1105: 1097: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1088: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1065: 1060: 1054: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1040: 1039: 1032: 1025: 1017: 1011: 1010: 998: 997:External links 995: 994: 993: 984: 975: 966: 957: 948: 939: 924: 921: 918: 917: 882: 871:(4): 403ā€“426. 855: 852: 851: 842: 832: 825: 822: 821: 812: 802: 795: 788: 757: 750: 732: 705:(4): 869ā€“898. 687: 652: 627: 608:(2): 186ā€“214. 592: 585: 559: 558: 556: 553: 552: 551: 545: 540: 535: 530: 525: 523:Polite fiction 520: 515: 510: 505: 498: 495: 466: 463: 415:Main article: 412: 409: 372: 369: 330:Richard Steele 326:Joseph Addison 244: 241: 237: 236: 235: 234: 231: 228: 222:Grice's maxims 207: 197: 190: 170:'s concept of 168:Erving Goffman 160:Penelope Brown 154: 153: 104: 102: 95: 89: 86: 49:: 28 July 1920 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2151: 2140: 2137: 2135: 2132: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2122: 2121: 2119: 2099: 2098: 2093: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2077: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2053: 2049: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2029: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2006: 2003: 2002: 1997: 1994: 1993: 1988: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1967: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1947: 1946: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1864: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1841: 1840: 1836: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1798: 1794: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1758: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1735: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1721: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1701: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1671: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1642: 1640: 1637: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1627: 1625: 1624:Sportsmanship 1622: 1620: 1617: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1589:Righteousness 1587: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1502:Nonattachment 1500: 1498: 1495: 1493: 1490: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1418: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1194: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1162:Seven virtues 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1109:Brahmavihārās 1106: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1096: 1092: 1086: 1085:Virtue ethics 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1051:About virtues 1049: 1045: 1038: 1033: 1031: 1026: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1008: 1004: 1001: 1000: 990: 985: 981: 976: 972: 967: 963: 958: 954: 949: 945: 940: 936: 932: 927: 926: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 886: 878: 874: 870: 866: 859: 848: 843: 839: 834: 833: 829: 818: 813: 809: 804: 803: 799: 791: 789:0-312-16371-1 785: 781: 779:The Spectator 778: 774: 769: 761: 753: 751:0-300-10666-1 747: 743: 736: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 691: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 656: 641: 637: 631: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 596: 588: 586:9780521418065 582: 577: 576: 570: 564: 560: 549: 546: 544: 541: 539: 536: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 500: 494: 491: 486: 481: 476: 472: 462: 459: 456:hyper-polite 454: 450: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423:social status 418: 408: 404: 401: 400:tag questions 396: 394: 390: 386: 377: 368: 366: 365: 364:The Spectator 360: 359: 354: 350: 346: 342: 337: 331: 327: 323: 322: 321:The Spectator 310: 306: 302: 299:Members of a 297: 293: 290: 286: 282: 278: 275: 271: 267: 259: 255: 254: 253:The Spectator 249: 240: 232: 229: 226: 225: 223: 220:and flouting 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 201: 198: 194: 191: 188: 184: 180: 177: 176: 175: 173: 169: 165: 161: 150: 147: 139: 129: 125: 121: 115: 114: 110: 105:This section 103: 99: 94: 93: 85: 83: 79: 73: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 48: 46: 40: 36: 32: 19: 2087: 2071: 2064: 2057: 2039: 2023: 2016: 1982: 1975: 1957: 1950: 1943: 1937: 1930: 1923: 1916: 1909: 1902: 1895: 1888: 1881: 1874: 1858: 1851: 1846:Brahmacharya 1844: 1837: 1830: 1823: 1816: 1809: 1802: 1784: 1777: 1752: 1745: 1729: 1711: 1695: 1688: 1644:Tranquillity 1594:Self-control 1564:Renunciation 1543: 1522:Philanthropy 1517:Perspicacity 1477:Magnificence 1430:Intelligence 1410:Impartiality 1330:Faithfulness 1218:Authenticity 1144: 1130:Five virtues 1107: 1100: 1080:Trait theory 1067: 1006: 988: 979: 970: 964:. Continuum. 961: 952: 943: 934: 931:Levinson, S. 895: 891: 885: 868: 864: 858: 846: 837: 828: 816: 807: 798: 780: 776: 772: 760: 741: 735: 702: 696: 690: 665: 661: 655: 644:. Retrieved 642:. 2010-03-01 639: 630: 605: 601: 595: 574: 563: 485:social norms 468: 451: 420: 405: 397: 382: 362: 356: 345:Conversation 341:coffeehouses 338: 319: 317: 304: 274:middle class 263: 251: 238: 209: 199: 192: 182: 178: 157: 142: 133: 118:Please help 106: 81: 74: 53: 52: 44: 38: 34: 18:Congeniality 1664:Workmanship 1554:Punctuality 1472:Magnanimity 1395:Hospitality 1345:Forgiveness 1290:Discernment 1248:Cleanliness 1007:In Our Time 929:Brown, P.; 892:Multilingua 548:Valediction 393:connotation 277:bourgeoisie 270:upper class 264:During the 187:speech acts 42:Cartoon in 2129:Pragmatics 2118:Categories 1977:Auctoritas 1825:Aparigraha 1804:Adhiį¹­į¹­hāna 1786:Sophrosyne 1754:Eutrapelia 1639:Temperance 1619:Solidarity 1609:Simplicity 1569:Resilience 1544:Politeness 1512:Patriotism 1492:Moderation 1365:Good faith 1355:Generosity 1315:Equanimity 1295:Discipline 1253:Compassion 1003:Politeness 971:Politeness 840:. Longman. 775:The Tatler 646:2014-08-15 555:References 458:suppletive 431:morphology 389:euphemisms 371:Techniques 358:The Tatler 54:Politeness 2124:Etiquette 2025:Humanitas 1771:Phronesis 1762:Philotimo 1614:Sincerity 1579:Reverence 1447:Judgement 1435:Emotional 1425:Integrity 1415:Innocence 1370:Gratitude 1350:Frugality 1340:Foresight 1320:Etiquette 1310:Endurance 1285:Diligence 1208:Alertness 1157:Scout Law 1058:Endowment 912:144575072 727:145752613 668:(1): 34. 513:Formality 281:etiquette 183:deference 107:does not 58:etiquette 2018:Gravitas 2001:Dignitas 1747:Ataraxia 1629:Sympathy 1559:Religion 1549:Prudence 1507:Patience 1482:Meekness 1457:Kindness 1405:Humility 1400:Humanity 1335:Fidelity 1280:Courtesy 1243:Chivalry 1238:Chastity 1228:Charisma 1223:Calmness 1213:Altruism 933:(1987). 571:(1994). 508:Courtesy 497:See also 453:Japanese 349:civility 218:swearing 136:May 2024 47:magazine 2073:Sadaqah 2059:Ganbaru 1992:Decorum 1984:Caritas 1939:Śraddhā 1925:Shaucha 1890:Kshanti 1818:Akrodha 1673:Chinese 1574:Respect 1497:Modesty 1467:Loyalty 1452:Justice 1420:Insight 1380:Honesty 1375:Heroism 1305:Empathy 1263:Courage 1233:Charity 1146:PāramÄ«s 1044:Virtues 719:3133532 682:3817904 622:2738536 543:Respect 490:Wakimae 480:wakimae 427:lexicon 385:hedging 285:emotion 258:England 243:History 128:removed 113:sources 62:culture 2139:Virtue 2041:Virtus 2033:Pietas 1952:Upekį¹£Ä 1945:Saddhā 1911:PrajƱā 1904:Muditā 1883:Kshama 1876:Karuį¹‡Ä 1839:Asteya 1832:Ārjava 1811:Ahimsa 1796:Indian 1779:Sophia 1654:Wisdom 1532:Filial 1440:Social 1385:Honour 910:  786:  748:  725:  717:  680:  620:  583:  334:  196:norms. 2097:VirtĆ¹ 2051:Other 2010:Fides 1969:Latin 1959:VÄ«rya 1918:Satya 1897:Mettā 1860:Dhį¹›ti 1739:Arete 1731:Agape 1723:Greek 1649:Trust 1634:Taste 1527:Piety 1487:Mercy 1360:Glory 1325:Faith 1273:Moral 1268:Civil 1187:Yamas 908:S2CID 723:S2CID 715:JSTOR 678:JSTOR 618:JSTOR 314:1730. 88:Types 45:Punch 2089:Sisu 2081:Seny 2066:Giri 1932:Sevā 1853:Dāna 1690:Jing 1539:Pity 1462:Love 1390:Hope 1300:Duty 784:ISBN 777:and 746:ISBN 581:ISBN 475:face 445:and 395:). 361:and 328:and 172:face 162:and 111:any 109:cite 66:rude 1868:HrÄ« 1705:Ren 1659:Wit 900:doi 873:doi 707:doi 670:doi 610:doi 307:by 122:by 2120:: 1713:Yi 1697:Li 1682:De 906:. 894:. 869:12 867:. 721:. 713:. 703:45 701:. 676:. 666:59 664:. 638:. 616:. 606:18 604:. 487:. 449:. 312:c. 174:: 84:. 72:. 37:. 1942:/ 1036:e 1029:t 1022:v 914:. 902:: 896:8 879:. 875:: 792:. 754:. 729:. 709:: 684:. 672:: 649:. 624:. 612:: 589:. 260:. 149:) 143:( 138:) 134:( 130:. 116:. 20:)

Index

Congeniality

Punch magazine
etiquette
culture
rude
cultural context
personal boundaries

cite
sources
improve this section
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
Learn how and when to remove this message
Penelope Brown
Stephen Levinson
Erving Goffman
face
speech acts
purporting to agree with something they do not actually agree with
personal boundaries
swearing
Grice's maxims

The Spectator
England
Enlightenment era
upper class
middle class

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘