663:
court's holding in this case would promote certainty, "Things done may or may not be wrong in themselves, or necessarily injurious and punishable as such at common law; but laws are passed declaring them offenses, and making them punishable, because they tend to injurious consequences; but more especially for the sake of having a definite, known and authoritative rule which all can understand and obey." 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 471, 481 (2004). Shaw gave an example of the certainty outcome he expected to obtain with this holding: "The trademan needs to know, before incurring expenses, how near he may build his works without violating the law or committing a nuisance; builders of houses to know, to what distance they must keep from the obnoxious works already erected, in order to be sure of the protection of the law for their habitations. This requisite certainty and precision can only be obtained by a positive enactment...enforcing the rule thus fixed, by penalties." 61 Mass. 53, 96-97 (1851). Applying this reasoning to the facts in Alger, Professor Barros concluded that, "the law challenged in Alger thus legitimately established a point beyond which wharves could not be built, and Alger's wharf was subject to such regulation even though it was not intrinsically harmful." 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 471, 482 (2004).
659:. Professor Benjamin Barros states, "Shaw's attempt to make a principled distinction between eminent domain and the police power was understandable. In the 19th century, it was widely accepted that just compensation was required only for physical takings, and regulatory restraints on property were generally considered to be outside of the scope of the Takings clause. Categorizing the law that prohibited Alger from building his wharf as a regulation allowed Shaw to deny Alger's claim for compensation. By using the new term 'police power,' Shaw tried to explain this rule in terms of two distinct government powers, each serving a different purpose." 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 471, 480-81(2004). Shaw provides obvious uses of police power, such as prohibiting the use of warehouses for the storage of gunpowder when the warehouses are located near homes or highways, placing restraints on the height of wooden buildings in crowded areas and requiring them to be covered with incombustible material, and prohibiting buildings from being used as hospitals for contagious diseases or carrying on of noxious or offensive trades. 61 Mass. 53, 85-86(1851).
33:
711:, 123 U.S. 623 (1887): Justice Harlan, delivering the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court held, "If something was so harmful as to justify regulation under the police power, it could be regulated without compensation, regardless of the effect of the regulation on value." Id. at 504. This was consistent with Justice Shaw's holdings in Alger of "police power" as a very broad, sweeping concept and his recognition that compensation was not due when the government was exercising their police power as opposed to declaring a government action eminent domain.
652:
requires it; which can be done only on condition of providing a reasonable compensation therefore. The power we allude to is rather the police power, the power vested in the legislature by the constitution, to make, ordain, and establish all manner of wholesome and reasonable laws, statutes and ordinance, either with penalties or without, not repugnant to the constitution, as they shall judge to be for the good and welfare of the commonwealth, and of the subjects of the same." Id.
639:
and welfare of the community as it sees fit, subject to the limitations that the regulation be both reasonable and constitutional." Id. at 479-80. Shaw goes on to explain that, "It is much easier to perceive and realize the existence and sources of this power, then to mark its boundaries, or prescribe limits to its exercise." 61 Mass 53, 85(1851).
602:
Massachusetts legislature enacted a subsequent statute pursuant to the Colony
Ordinance of 1647 which established lines in the Boston harbor limiting how far out wharves may extend. The statutes stated that if a wharf extended beyond an established line, then it will be considered a public nuisance.
638:
Police power today is, "generally, but vaguely understood in
American jurisprudence to refer to state regulatory power," but really encompasses more. 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 471, 473(2004). In an attempt to define police power, Shaw stated, "the government's power to enact such regulations for the good
692:
demonstrated an expanded interpretation of the new term "police power" with Shaw holding, "that state authority to enact police regulations includes, but is not limited to, such doctrines as "use your own as not to injure another's property," and that the legislature has broad authority to exercise
598:
Colony
Ordinance of 1647 which stated that owners of waterfront property also owned the adjoining land above the low water mark and within 100 rods of the land, with power to erect wharves and other buildings thereon; subject to the reasonable use of other individuals and of the public's ability to
662:
Justice Shaw reasoned the
Massachusetts statute was, "not an appropriation of the property to a public use, but the restraint of an injurious private use by the owner, and is therefore not within the principle of property taken under the right of eminent domain." Id. at 86. Shaw also thought the
651:
and police power. In what is often referred to as the most important paragraph of the opinion, the court explains that police power, "is very different from the right of eminent domain, the right of a government to take and appropriate private property to public use, whenever the public exigency
625:
is "What are the just powers of the legislature to limit, control, or regulate the exercises and enjoyment of a property owner's rights." 61 Mass. 53, 65 (1851). In short, when, if ever, can a regulation be a taking? The
Massachusetts Supreme Court held the Massachusetts Legislature's statutes
634:
Justice Shaw held it is settled principle that, "every holder of property...holds it under the implied liability that his use of it may be so regulated, that it shall not be injurious to the equal enjoyment of others having an equal right to the enjoyment of their property, not injurious to the
671:
Justice Shaw states that even though these prohibitions and restraints resulting from the
Massachusetts statute may diminish the profits of the owner, the owners are not entitled to compensation because they are exercises of police power. (61 Mass. 53, 86). Justice Shaw's statement regarding
612:
In this case, Alger (Defendant) built a wharf in the Boston Harbor that extended beyond a line established by the
Massachusetts legislature. Alger's wharf was otherwise within the geographical limits of the colony ordinance of 1647 and it did not impede or obstruct the public's navigation.
727:, stating that an exercise of police power which, as the court decided that it did on the facts of this case, prohibited all economic use of a piece of land owned by the plaintiff was a taking and compensation was due. This decision helped explain the concept of a "
672:
compensation was generally accepted doctrine at the time, namely that the obligation to compensate was limited to exercises of eminent domain. 58 U. Miami L. Rev 471, 480(2004). However, passage of time "would show this rule to be flawed." Id. at 481.
683:
helped signify a shift from community-based common-law regulation toward the modern regulatory state. Id. at 471 (2004). The case helped define what we now think of as the broad scope of policing regulations. The decision in
599:
navigate. Construction was also subject to the restraints and limitations as the legislature may see fit to impose for the preservation and protection of public and private rights. 61 Mass. 53 (1851).
626:
creating the lines were constitutional, and the legislature had the authority to make that statute. The statute establishing the line was binding on Alger and he violated the line. Id. at 102.
603:
In establishing these lines, the legislature overruled the Colony
Ordinance of 1647 which allowed owners of harbor-front land to build a wharf extending 100 rods into the harbor.
688:
also breaks "with a laissez-faire tradition and ushers in an era of positivist regulation." Id. at 482. Finally, the court's decision in
842:
562:
543:
719:, 43 Sup Ct 158 (1922): Justice Holmes, delivering the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court effectively overrules the holding in
847:
117:
442:
852:
412:
714:
326:
582:
The defendant, Alger, was a Boston resident who owned property along the Boston harbor. The
Plaintiff is the
583:
424:
496:
391:
397:
536:
317:
203:
448:
309:
304:
137:
112:
435:
299:
32:
376:
345:
529:
417:
270:
8:
360:
231:
824:
250:
107:
92:
61:
813:
728:
193:
176:
102:
56:
707:
458:
429:
255:
198:
71:
769:
386:
289:
186:
181:
656:
648:
506:
402:
355:
155:
146:
122:
836:
239:
66:
501:
265:
245:
222:
24:
566:
407:
381:
275:
213:
208:
171:
519:
488:
468:
160:
87:
41:
492:
453:
260:
799:
478:
350:
340:
165:
127:
770:
COMMONWEALTH vs. CYRUS ALGER,7 Cush. 53, 61 Mass. 53,March, 1851
280:
132:
647:
Most notably, the court also attempts to differentiate between
483:
335:
97:
795:
793:
791:
789:
787:
785:
783:
781:
779:
777:
655:
It is often hard to distinguish between police power and
515:
774:
565:
in 1851. The majority opinion was written by
Justice
809:
807:
642:
834:
804:
629:
594:There are two statutes involved in this case.
16:1851 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case
765:
537:
763:
761:
759:
757:
755:
753:
751:
749:
747:
745:
696:
561:, 61 Mass. (7 Cush) 53, was decided by the
544:
530:
742:
563:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
835:
635:rights of the community." Id. at 84.
118:Lost, mislaid, and abandoned property
589:
13:
800:58 U. Miami L. Rev. 471, 473(2004)
14:
864:
31:
666:
643:Eminent domain vs. police power
843:1851 in United States case law
818:
1:
735:
716:Pennsylvania Coal Co v. Mahon
584:Commonwealth of Massachusetts
425:Lateral and subjacent support
848:Massachusetts state case law
814:Mugler v. Kansas, 123 US 623
392:Practicing without a license
7:
630:Sources of regulatory power
10:
869:
577:
318:Doctrine of worthier title
675:
449:Conflict of property laws
305:Rule against perpetuities
616:
607:
572:
853:Takings Clause case law
300:Restraint on alienation
327:Nonpossessory interest
721:Commonwealth v. Alger
690:Commonwealth v. Alger
686:Commonwealth v. Alger
681:Commonwealth v. Alger
623:Commonwealth v. Alger
558:Commonwealth v. Alger
276:Action to quiet title
825:43 Sup Ct 158 (1922)
271:Equitable conversion
413:prior appropriation
361:Equitable servitude
693:this power." Id.
443:Quicquid plantatur
251:Deeds registration
93:Adverse possession
62:Community property
729:regulatory taking
590:Relevant statutes
554:
553:
194:Concurrent estate
177:Defeasible estate
57:Personal property
860:
827:
822:
816:
811:
802:
797:
772:
767:
725:Mugler v. Kansas
708:Mugler v. Kansas
546:
539:
532:
513:Higher category:
459:Security deposit
256:Estoppel by deed
199:Leasehold estate
72:Unowned property
35:
21:
20:
868:
867:
863:
862:
861:
859:
858:
857:
833:
832:
831:
830:
823:
819:
812:
805:
798:
775:
768:
743:
738:
703:
678:
669:
645:
632:
619:
610:
592:
580:
575:
550:
511:
398:Property rights
396:
244:
182:Future interest
170:
147:Estates in land
17:
12:
11:
5:
866:
856:
855:
850:
845:
829:
828:
817:
803:
773:
740:
739:
737:
734:
733:
732:
712:
702:
695:
677:
674:
668:
665:
657:eminent domain
649:eminent domain
644:
641:
631:
628:
618:
615:
609:
606:
605:
604:
600:
591:
588:
579:
576:
574:
571:
552:
551:
549:
548:
541:
534:
526:
523:
522:
510:
509:
504:
499:
486:
481:
473:
472:
464:
463:
462:
461:
456:
451:
446:
439:
432:
427:
422:
421:
420:
415:
405:
403:Mineral rights
400:
394:
389:
384:
379:
371:
370:
369:Related topics
366:
365:
364:
363:
358:
353:
348:
343:
338:
330:
329:
323:
322:
321:
320:
315:
312:Shelley's Case
307:
302:
294:
293:
286:
285:
284:
283:
278:
273:
268:
263:
261:Quitclaim deed
258:
253:
248:
242:
237:
226:
225:
219:
218:
217:
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
190:
189:
179:
174:
168:
163:
158:
156:Allodial title
150:
149:
143:
142:
141:
140:
135:
130:
125:
123:Treasure trove
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
82:
81:
77:
76:
75:
74:
69:
64:
59:
51:
50:
46:
45:
37:
36:
28:
27:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
865:
854:
851:
849:
846:
844:
841:
840:
838:
826:
821:
815:
810:
808:
801:
796:
794:
792:
790:
788:
786:
784:
782:
780:
778:
771:
766:
764:
762:
760:
758:
756:
754:
752:
750:
748:
746:
741:
730:
726:
722:
718:
717:
713:
710:
709:
705:
704:
701:adjudications
700:
694:
691:
687:
682:
673:
664:
660:
658:
653:
650:
640:
636:
627:
624:
621:The issue in
614:
601:
597:
596:
595:
587:
585:
570:
568:
564:
560:
559:
547:
542:
540:
535:
533:
528:
527:
525:
524:
521:
517:
514:
508:
505:
503:
500:
498:
494:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
465:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
444:
440:
438:
437:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
419:
416:
414:
411:
410:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
395:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:
373:
372:
368:
367:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
324:
319:
316:
314:
313:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
288:
287:
282:
279:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
254:
252:
249:
247:
243:
241:
240:Torrens title
238:
236:
234:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
221:
220:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
145:
144:
139:
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
83:
79:
78:
73:
70:
68:
67:Real property
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
54:
53:
52:
48:
47:
43:
39:
38:
34:
30:
29:
26:
23:
22:
19:
820:
724:
720:
715:
706:
698:
689:
685:
680:
679:
670:
667:Compensation
661:
654:
646:
637:
633:
622:
620:
611:
593:
581:
557:
556:
555:
512:
502:Criminal law
479:Contract law
441:
434:
408:Water rights
311:
246:Strata title
232:
223:Conveyancing
204:Condominiums
40:Part of the
25:Property law
18:
567:Lemuel Shaw
214:Land tenure
209:Real estate
172:Life estate
80:Acquisition
837:Categories
736:References
520:Common law
469:common law
430:Assignment
290:Future use
161:Fee simple
138:Alienation
42:common law
454:Blackacre
387:Partition
235:purchaser
233:Bona fide
187:remainder
113:Accession
108:Discovery
507:Evidence
484:Tort law
436:Nemo dat
418:riparian
377:Fixtures
356:Covenant
351:Usufruct
341:Easement
310:Rule in
266:Mortgage
166:Fee tail
128:Bailment
103:Conquest
578:Parties
497:estates
292:control
281:Escheat
133:License
676:Impact
493:trusts
467:Other
346:Profit
44:series
699:Alger
697:Post
617:Issue
608:Story
573:Brief
489:Wills
471:areas
382:Waste
49:Types
723:and
518:and
495:and
336:Lien
98:Deed
88:Gift
516:Law
839::
806:^
776:^
744:^
731:".
586:.
569:.
491:,
545:e
538:t
531:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
