29:
116:
As he often did, Brown took the opportunity to include some obliquely related material that he had been working on for some time; indeed as early as 1809. Partly as a result of this, production of the paper lagged, and by 1825 there was some concern that the paper would be preempted by
Cunningham's
211:
declared that "no more important discovery was ever made in the domain of comparative morphology and systematic Botany". That Brown was able to observe the gymnosperm ovule at all is remarkable given the difficulty of finding the same with a modern microscope.
220:
Despite the importance of Brown's paper, it received very little attention at first; for example reviewers of King's book took little notice of it. The longer term impact, however, was immense. It would take some time before the
49:
Character and description of Kingia, a new genus of plants found on the south-west coast of New
Holland, with observations on the structure of its unimpregnated ovulum, and on the female flower of Cycadeae and
28:
125:
in
November 1825, and appeared in print the following year as a preprint. Official publication occurred in 1827, in the second volume of Phillip Parker King's
89:
for many years, having collected specimens himself in 1800. However early specimens lacked good fruiting material, rendering it impossible to determine its
416:
188:
describes this section as "a remarkably clear exposition of one of the most intricate and misunderstood areas of developmental anatomy in higher plants."
207:
grains are drawn into the ovule in gymnosperms, whereas in angiosperms, contact is via pollen tubes. This was a profoundly important discovery: in 1890,
75:. Of the latter it has been said that "no more important discovery was ever made in the domain of comparative morphology and systematic Botany".
263:
411:
244:
was first published in 1826 as a preprint. It appeared the following year as an appendix to Volume 2 of
Phillip Parker King's
54:
323:
127:
Narrative of a survey of the intertropical and western coasts of
Australia performed between the years 1818 and 1822
41:
Narrative of a survey of the intertropical and western coasts of
Australia performed between the years 1818 and 1822
67:
anatomy and development, in which Brown sets out for the first time the modern understanding of the structure of
406:
141:
comes first; the genus is formally described and explicitly named after the Kings, and tentatively placed in
225:
were fully worked out, but ultimately the work laid the foundation for a great deal of work; for example
94:
230:
110:
71:
ovules, and publishes the first description of the fundamental difference between angiosperms and
401:
396:
93:, so no attempt was made to formally publish it. Publication was not initiated until 1823, when
254:, and in a number of separate reprints, including one in which it was paired with Cunningham's
250:
199:. In it, Brown sets out for the first time the fundamental difference between angiosperms and
8:
279:
102:
36:
226:
222:
98:
372:
319:
208:
262:
in 1827, and German translations were published three times in 1827 and 1828, in
185:
122:
97:
approached Brown with a request that he consider naming a plant after the Kings,
156:
In the second part, Brown sets down for the first time the modern view of the
390:
376:
256:
A few general remarks on the vegetation of certain coasts of Terra
Australis
119:
A few general remarks on the vegetation of certain coasts of Terra
Australis
246:
Narrative of a survey of the intertropical and western coasts of
Australia
181:
173:
113:
sent Brown specimens of ripe fruit, and Brown set to work describing it.
90:
200:
161:
72:
68:
346:
The
Miscellaneous Botanical Works of Robert Brown, Esq., D.C.L., F.R.S
344:
Bennett, J. J., ed. (1866–68). "Character and description of Kingia".
57:. Though nominally a formal description of the then-unpublished genus
142:
19:
This article is about the scientific paper. For the plant genus, see
165:
137:
The paper was essentially divided into three parts. A treatment of
35:
was first published in 1826 as an appendix to the second volume of
196:
169:
157:
105:. Cunningham provided a list of potential plants, which included
164:
ovule. He describes the standard arrangement in angiosperms—the
204:
85:
59:
20:
192:
177:
146:
64:
191:
The third part is a discussion of the "female flower" of
248:. It was subsequently republished in Volume 67 of the
316:
Jupiter botanicus: Robert Brown of the British Museum
121:. However Brown's paper was eventually read to the
343:
284:The miscellaneous botanical works of Robert Brown
153:, which acts as a bridge to the following parts.
388:
309:
307:
305:
303:
301:
299:
363:pollen: A reprise of the first observations".
268:Robert Brown's Vermischte botanische Schriften
63:, it is more notable for its digressions into
359:Ford, Brian J. (1992). "Brownian movement in
296:
145:. Then follows a detailed description of the
339:
337:
335:
264:Christian Gottfried Daniel Nees von Esenbeck
176:, which surround the nucellus except at the
417:Works by Robert Brown (botanist, born 1773)
332:
313:
352:
27:
389:
236:
358:
318:. British Museum (Natural History).
258:. A French translation appeared in
242:Character and description of Kingia
33:Character and description of Kingia
13:
14:
428:
16:Botanical article by Robert Brown
412:Angiosperms of Western Australia
348:. Vol. 2. pp. 433–461.
260:Annales des Sciences Naturelles
278:. In 1866 it was reprinted in
1:
289:
78:
53:is an 1826 paper by botanist
7:
10:
433:
231:alternation of generations
229:'s groundbreaking work on
132:
18:
314:Mabberley, David (1985).
215:
160:and development of the
251:Philosophical Magazine
44:
109:. The following year
31:
407:Botanical literature
180:, through which the
280:John Joseph Bennett
237:Publication details
103:Phillip Parker King
83:Brown had known of
37:Phillip Parker King
227:Wilhelm Hofmeister
99:Philip Gidley King
45:
274:, and finally in
424:
381:
380:
356:
350:
349:
341:
330:
329:
311:
209:Julius von Sachs
95:Allan Cunningham
432:
431:
427:
426:
425:
423:
422:
421:
387:
386:
385:
384:
357:
353:
342:
333:
326:
312:
297:
292:
239:
218:
203:; namely, that
186:David Mabberley
135:
123:Linnean Society
81:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
430:
420:
419:
414:
409:
404:
402:Dasypogonaceae
399:
397:1826 documents
383:
382:
371:(4): 235–241.
365:The Microscope
351:
331:
324:
294:
293:
291:
288:
238:
235:
217:
214:
168:joined by the
134:
131:
111:William Baxter
80:
77:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
429:
418:
415:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
394:
392:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
355:
347:
340:
338:
336:
327:
325:3-7682-1408-7
321:
317:
310:
308:
306:
304:
302:
300:
295:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
247:
243:
234:
232:
228:
224:
213:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
189:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
154:
152:
148:
144:
140:
130:
128:
124:
120:
114:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
76:
74:
70:
66:
62:
61:
56:
52:
51:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
368:
364:
360:
354:
345:
315:
283:
275:
271:
267:
259:
255:
249:
245:
241:
240:
219:
190:
182:pollen tubes
155:
150:
138:
136:
126:
118:
117:forthcoming
115:
106:
84:
82:
58:
55:Robert Brown
48:
47:
46:
40:
32:
25:
201:gymnosperms
174:integuments
91:systematics
73:gymnosperms
391:Categories
290:References
270:, then in
223:homologies
162:angiosperm
79:Background
69:angiosperm
377:0026-282X
178:micropyle
143:Liliaceae
50:Coniferae
197:conifers
166:nucellus
361:Clarkia
272:Linnaea
184:enter.
172:to the
170:chalaza
158:anatomy
133:Content
375:
322:
216:Legacy
205:pollen
193:cycads
151:Kingia
139:Kingia
107:Kingia
86:Kingia
60:Kingia
21:Kingia
147:ovule
65:ovule
373:ISSN
320:ISBN
276:Isis
195:and
101:and
282:'s
266:'s
149:of
39:'s
393::
369:40
367:.
334:^
298:^
286:.
233:.
129:.
379:.
328:.
43:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
