Knowledge

Certificate authority

Source đź“ť

383:(EV) certificates as a more rigorous alternative to domain validated certificates. Extended validation is intended to verify not only control of a domain name, but additional identity information to be included in the certificate. Some browsers display this additional identity information in a green box in the URL bar. One limitation of EV as a solution to the weaknesses of domain validation is that attackers could still obtain a domain validated certificate for the victim domain, and deploy it during an attack; if that occurred, the difference observable to the victim user would be the absence of a green bar with the company name. There is some question as to whether users would be likely to recognise this absence as indicative of an attack being in progress: a test using 793:
is a serious shortcoming given that the most commonly encountered technology employing X.509 and trusted third parties is the HTTPS protocol. As all major web browsers are distributed to their end-users pre-configured with a list of trusted CAs that numbers in the dozens this means that any one of these pre-approved trusted CAs can issue a valid certificate for any domain whatsoever. The industry response to this has been muted. Given that the contents of a browser's pre-configured trusted CA list is determined independently by the party that is distributing or causing to be installed the browser application there is really nothing that the CAs themselves can do.
473: 140:) to a Card Issuing Bank to transfer the funds from the card holder's bank account to the payment recipient's bank account. Each payment card presents along with its card data also the Card Issuer Certificate to the POS. The Issuer Certificate is signed by EMV CA Certificate. The POS retrieves the public key of EMV CA from its storage, validates the Issuer Certificate and authenticity of the payment card before sending the payment request to the payment scheme. 39:. A digital certificate certifies the ownership of a public key by the named subject of the certificate. This allows others (relying parties) to rely upon signatures or on assertions made about the private key that corresponds to the certified public key. A CA acts as a trusted third party—trusted both by the subject (owner) of the certificate and by the party relying upon the certificate. The format of these certificates is specified by the 707:
name, might be true, increasing the certificate's credibility. Eve, however, would have the all-important private key associated with the certificate. Eve could then use the certificate to send a digitally signed email to Bob, tricking Bob into believing that the email was from Alice. Bob might even respond with encrypted email, believing that it could only be read by Alice, when Eve is actually able to decrypt it using the private key.
71:. The client uses the CA certificate to authenticate the CA signature on the server certificate, as part of the authorizations before launching a secure connection. Usually, client software—for example, browsers—include a set of trusted CA certificates. This makes sense, as many users need to trust their client software. A malicious or compromised client can skip any security check and still fool its users into believing otherwise. 492:
server or other entity noted in the certificate. A CA's obligation in such schemes is to verify an applicant's credentials, so that users and relying parties can trust the information in the issued certificate. CAs use a variety of standards and tests to do so. In essence, the certificate authority is responsible for saying "yes, this person is who they say they are, and we, the CA, certify that".
226:
servers. The top spot has been held by Symantec (or VeriSign before it was purchased by Symantec) ever since survey began, with it currently accounting for just under a third of all certificates. To illustrate the effect of differing methodologies, amongst the million busiest sites Symantec issued 44% of the valid, trusted certificates in use — significantly more than its overall market share."
792:
The critical weakness in the way that the current X.509 scheme is implemented is that any CA trusted by a particular party can then issue certificates for any domain they choose. Such certificates will be accepted as valid by the trusting party whether they are legitimate and authorized or not. This
536:
It is difficult to assure correctness of match between data and entity when the data are presented to the CA (perhaps over an electronic network), and when the credentials of the person/company/program asking for a certificate are likewise presented. This is why commercial CAs often use a combination
510:
protocol. In this example let us suppose that the user logs on to their bank's homepage www.bank.example to do online banking. When the user opens www.bank.example homepage, they receive a public key along with all the data that their web-browser displays. The public key could be used to encrypt data
714:
issued two certificates to a person claiming to represent Microsoft. The certificates have the name "Microsoft Corporation", so they could be used to spoof someone into believing that updates to Microsoft software came from Microsoft when they actually did not. The fraud was detected in early 2001.
511:
from the client to the server but the safe procedure is to use it in a protocol that determines a temporary shared symmetric encryption key; messages in such a key exchange protocol can be enciphered with the bank's public key in such a way that only the bank server has the private key to read them.
225:
in May 2015, the industry standard for monitoring active TLS certificates, "Although the global ecosystem is competitive, it is dominated by a handful of major CAs — three certificate authorities (Symantec, Comodo, GoDaddy) account for three-quarters of all issued certificates on public-facing web
764:
An attacker who steals a certificate authority's private keys is able to forge certificates as if they were CA, without needed ongoing access to the CA's systems. Key theft is therefore one of the main risks certificate authorities defend against. Publicly trusted CAs almost always store their keys
706:
For example, suppose an attacker, Eve, manages to get a CA to issue to her a certificate that claims to represent Alice. That is, the certificate would publicly state that it represents Alice, and might include other information about Alice. Some of the information about Alice, such as her employer
565:
Despite the security measures undertaken to correctly verify the identities of people and companies, there is a risk of a single CA issuing a bogus certificate to an imposter. It is also possible to register individuals and companies with the same or very similar names, which may lead to confusion.
518:
This mechanism is only safe if the user can be sure that it is the bank that they see in their web browser. If the user types in www.bank.example, but their communication is hijacked and a fake website (that pretends to be the bank website) sends the page information back to the user's browser, the
459:
Baseline Requirements, adopted November 2011, specified a list of such addresses. This allowed mail hosts to reserve those addresses for administrative use, though such precautions are still not universal. In January 2015, a Finnish man registered the username "hostmaster" at the Finnish version of
74:
The clients of a CA are server supervisors who call for a certificate that their servers will bestow to users. Commercial CAs charge money to issue certificates, and their customers anticipate the CA's certificate to be contained within the majority of web browsers, so that safe connections to the
611:
For distributing revocation information to clients, timeliness of the discovery of revocation (and hence the window for an attacker to exploit a compromised certificate) trades off against resource usage in querying revocation statuses and privacy concerns. If revocation information is unavailable
522:
This is what the certificate authority mechanism is intended to prevent. A certificate authority (CA) is an organization that stores public keys and their owners, and every party in a communication trusts this organization (and knows its public key). When the user's web browser receives the public
143:
Browsers and other clients of sorts characteristically allow users to add or do away with CA certificates at will. While server certificates regularly last for a relatively short period, CA certificates are further extended, so, for repeatedly visited servers, it is less error-prone importing and
527:
certificate). The browser already possesses the public key of the CA and consequently can verify the signature, trust the certificate and the public key in it: since www.bank.example uses a public key that the certification authority certifies, a fake www.bank.example can only use the same public
491:
and the identity of the owner. The matching private key is not made available publicly, but kept secret by the end user who generated the key pair. The certificate is also a confirmation or validation by the CA that the public key contained in the certificate belongs to the person, organization,
399:
Domain validation suffers from certain structural security limitations. In particular, it is always vulnerable to attacks that allow an adversary to observe the domain validation probes that CAs send. These can include attacks against the DNS, TCP, or BGP protocols (which lack the cryptographic
514:
The rest of the communication then proceeds using the new (disposable) symmetric key, so when the user enters some information to the bank's page and submits the page (sends the information back to the bank) then the data the user has entered to the page will be encrypted by their web browser.
164:
Worldwide, the certificate authority business is fragmented, with national or regional providers dominating their home market. This is because many uses of digital certificates, such as for legally binding digital signatures, are linked to local law, regulations, and accreditation schemes for
403:
One of the most common domain validation techniques involves sending an email containing an authentication token or link to an email address that is likely to be administratively responsible for the domain. This could be the technical contact email address listed in the domain's
732:
In 2012, it became known that Trustwave issued a subordinate root certificate that was used for transparent traffic management (man-in-the-middle) which effectively permitted an enterprise to sniff SSL internal network traffic using the subordinate certificate.
553:
has been to "prevent conflicting and overly burdensome local regulation and to establish that electronic writings satisfy the traditional requirements associated with paper documents." Further the US E-Sign statute and the suggested UETA code help ensure that:
445:
Domain validation implementations have sometimes been a source of security vulnerabilities. In one instance, security researchers showed that attackers could obtain certificates for webmail sites because a CA was willing to use an email address like
599:
A certificate may be revoked before it expires, which signals that it is no longer valid. Without revocation, an attacker would be able to exploit such a compromised or misissued certificate until expiry. Hence, revocation is an important part of a
519:
fake web-page can send a fake public key to the user (for which the fake site owns a matching private key). The user will fill the form with their personal data and will submit the page. The fake web-page will then get access to the user's data.
740:
malware (also known as SkyWiper) contained modules that had an MD5 collision with a valid certificate issued by a Microsoft Terminal Server licensing certificate that used the broken MD5 hash algorithm. The authors thus was able to conduct a
777:, except when it is needed to sign shorter-lived intermediate certificates. The intermediate certificates, stored in an online HSM, can do the day-to-day work of signing end-entity certificates and keeping revocation information up to date. 651:(CASC) – In February 2013, the CASC was founded as an industry advocacy organization dedicated to addressing industry issues and educating the public on internet security. The founding members are the seven largest Certificate Authorities. 66:
to a server via the Internet. A certificate is essential in order to circumvent a malicious party which happens to be on the route to a target server which acts as if it were the target. Such a scenario is commonly referred to as a
1454: 769:(HSM), which allows them to sign certificates with a key, but generally prevent extraction of that key with both physical and software controls. CAs typically take the further precaution of keeping the key for their long-term 537:
of authentication techniques including leveraging government bureaus, the payment infrastructure, third parties' databases and services, and custom heuristics. In some enterprise systems, local forms of authentication such as
372:" to authenticate the recipient of the certificate. The techniques used for domain validation vary between CAs, but in general domain validation techniques are meant to prove that the certificate applicant controls a given 1930: 580:
In large-scale deployments, Alice may not be familiar with Bob's certificate authority (perhaps they each have a different CA server), so Bob's certificate may also include his CA's public key signed by a different
155:
and, since authors and receivers of encrypted messages, apparently, know one another, the usefulness of a trusted third party remains confined to the signature verification of messages sent to public mailing lists.
454:
Prior to 2011, there was no standard list of email addresses that could be used for domain validation, so it was not clear to email administrators which addresses needed to be reserved. The first version of the
688:
The CA/Browser Forum publishes the Baseline Requirements, a list of policies and technical requirements for CAs to follow. These are a requirement for inclusion in the certificate stores of Firefox and Safari.
1376: 1099: 75:
certified servers work efficiently out-of-the-box. The quantity of internet browsers, other devices and applications which trust a particular certificate authority is referred to as ubiquity.
2194: 1446: 561:
a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation.
2272: 2527:
Larisch, James; Choffnes, David; Levin, Dave; Maggs, Bruce M.; Mislove, Alan; Wilson, Christo (2017). "CRLite: A Scalable System for Pushing All TLS Revocations to All Browsers".
1938: 495:
If the user trusts the CA and can verify the CA's signature, then they can also assume that a certain public key does indeed belong to whoever is identified in the certificate.
2064: 2428: 54:, the secure browsing protocol for the World Wide Web. Another common use is in issuing identity cards by national governments for use in electronically signing documents. 2485:
Chung, Taejoong; Lok, Jay; Chandrasekaran, Balakrishnan; Choffnes, David; Levin, Dave; Maggs, Bruce M.; Mislove, Alan; Rula, John; Sullivan, Nick; Wilson, Christo (2018).
558:
a signature, contract or other record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and
671:– In 2005, a new consortium of Certificate Authorities and web browser vendors was formed to promote industry standards and baseline requirements for internet security. 442:
in the domain. The theory behind domain validation is that only the legitimate owner of a domain would be able to read emails sent to these administrative addresses.
2364: 1429: 1368: 545:
are required in some cases to personally know the party whose signature is being notarized; this is a higher standard than is reached by many CAs. According to the
102:. Some large cloud computing and web hosting companies are also publicly-trusted CAs and issue certificates to services hosted on their infrastructure, for example 1092: 1908: 515:
Therefore, even if someone can access the (encrypted) data that was communicated from the user to www.bank.example, such eavesdropper cannot read or decipher it.
1566: 2220: 639:
presents connection latency and privacy issues. Other schemes have been proposed but have not yet been successfully deployed to enable fail-hard checking.
1208: 1016: 1287: 391:, shows a significantly greater difference between EV and domain validated certificates, with domain validated certificates having a hollow, grey lock. 2010: 2190: 400:
protections of TLS/SSL), or the compromise of routers. Such attacks are possible either on the network near a CA, or near the victim domain itself.
2250: 528:
key. Since the fake www.bank.example does not know the corresponding private key, it cannot create the signature needed to verify its authenticity.
703:
If the CA can be subverted, then the security of the entire system is lost, potentially subverting all the entities that trust the compromised CA.
136:
payment cards are governed by the EMV Certificate Authority, payment schemes that route payment transactions initiated at Point of Sale Terminals (
2468: 1472: 147:
Less often, trustworthy certificates are used for encrypting or signing messages. CAs dispense end-user certificates too, which can be used with
953: 1507: 1233: 79:, which is a non-profit business, issues several commercial CA certificates with its products. While Mozilla developed their own policy, the 2893: 2442: 506:
can be used to encrypt data communicated between two parties. This can typically happen when a user logs on to any site that implements the
2769: 2264: 1509:
Applied Cryptography and Network Security: Second International Conference, ACNS 2004, Yellow Mountain, China, June 8-11, 2004. Proceedings
2461:"In the Wake of Unauthorized Certificate Issuance by the Indian CA NIC, can Government CAs Still be Considered "Trusted Third Parties"?" 2090: 2714: 2343: 797: 2720: 749: 654: 2418: 2060: 2038: 176:
due to the technical requirements. While not legally required, new providers may choose to undergo annual security audits (such as
1344: 1533: 2864: 2708: 1493: 1420: 801: 648: 718:
In 2008, Comodo reseller Certstar sold a certificate for mozilla.com to Eddy Nigg, who had no authority to represent Mozilla.
2611: 2546: 1045: 585:, which is presumably recognizable by Alice. This process typically leads to a hierarchy or mesh of CAs and CA certificates. 2164: 2116: 448: 451:
for domain.com, but not all webmail systems had reserved the "ssladmin" username to prevent attackers from registering it.
244:
top 10 million and the Tranco top 1 million websites, lists the six largest authorities by absolute usage share as below.
752:
issued unauthorized certificates for Google domains. Google thus removed both MCS and the root certificate authority from
214:
as well as software to enable installation and maintenance of certificates. Let's Encrypt is operated by the newly formed
3165: 2986: 2368: 1405: 98:
In addition to commercial CAs, some non-profits issue publicly-trusted digital certificates without charge, for example
3205: 2802: 1916: 823: 636: 1594: 523:
key from www.bank.example it also receives a digital signature of the key (with some more information, in a so-called
3210: 2908: 2696: 2667: 2509: 1543: 1517: 1176: 1131: 387:
in 2009 showed that the absence of IE7's EV warnings were not noticed by users, however Microsoft's current browser,
2318: 2293: 2142: 1559: 722: 240:
As of July 2024 the survey company W3Techs, which collects statistics on certificate authority usage among the
3195: 3190: 3129: 1703:
Deterministic Usage of the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)
464:
and was able to obtain a domain-validated certificate for live.fi, despite not being the owner of the domain name.
215: 2821: 2216: 1789: 1742: 1664: 1622: 605: 380: 234: 849: 144:
trusting the CA issued, rather than confirm a security exemption each time the server's certificate is renewed.
3134: 2731: 1200: 549:
outline on Online Transaction Management the primary points of US Federal and State statutes enacted regarding
203: 199:. As of Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean), Android currently contains over 100 CAs that are updated with each release. 2592:
Smith, Trevor; Dickinson, Luke; Seamons, Kent (2020). "Let's Revoke: Scalable Global Certificate Revocation".
2393: 1279: 627:
Due to the cost of revocation checks and the availability impact from potentially-unreliable remote services,
83:
developed similar guidelines for CA trust. A single CA certificate may be shared among multiple CAs or their
2567:
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
725:, allegedly by Iranian hackers. There is evidence that the fraudulent DigiNotar certificates were used in a 472: 2003: 1258: 2946: 2916: 2815: 2139:"Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-017: Erroneous VeriSign-Issued Digital Certificates Pose Spoofing Hazard" 925: 632: 369: 368:
The commercial CAs that issue the bulk of certificates for HTTPS servers typically use a technique called "
1001: 2926: 2796: 2242: 1956: 910: 187:
As of 24 August 2020, 147 root certificates, representing 52 organizations, are trusted in the
804:(DNSSEC) DANE will greatly reduce if not eliminate the role of trusted third parties in a domain's PKI. 3107: 2870: 2460: 1981: 1468: 1070: 949: 573:
proposes auditing all certificates in a public unforgeable log, which could help in the prevention of
2966: 2898: 2837: 601: 122: 3087: 3050: 3017: 2690: 2676: 2486: 1843: 1841: 1301: 766: 726: 567: 546: 68: 63: 1229: 3200: 2848: 2832: 2737: 1447:"A Finnish man created this simple email account - and received Microsoft's security certificate" 1338:"Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates, v.1.2.3" 503: 126: 1838: 784:
when generating signing keys, in order to ensure that the keys are not tampered with or copied.
2827: 2791: 2702: 2635: 594: 477: 425: 233:, "DigiCert is the world's largest high-assurance certificate authority, commanding 60% of the 169: 36: 3154: 3055: 2660: 2086: 115: 2217:"Another fraudulent certificate raises the same old questions about certificate authorities" 1319: 676: 662: 657:(CCSF) – In 2009 the CCSF was founded to promote industry standards that protect end users. 2581: 2294:"Flame malware collision attack explained | MSRC Blog | Microsoft Security Response Center" 1811: 1764: 1725: 1686: 1644: 813: 710:
A notable case of CA subversion like this occurred in 2001, when the certificate authority
541:
can be used to obtain a certificate which can in turn be used by external relying parties.
995: 172:
is largely held by a small number of multinational companies. This market has significant
8: 698: 538: 484: 384: 107: 2034: 1041: 50:
One particularly common use for certificate authorities is to sign certificates used in
3071: 2786: 2617: 2552: 2515: 1337: 774: 152: 202:
On November 18, 2014, a group of companies and nonprofit organizations, including the
3022: 2748: 2621: 2607: 2542: 2505: 1803: 1756: 1717: 1678: 1636: 1539: 1513: 1320:"Usage statistics of SSL certificate authorities for websites, August 2024 - W3Techs" 997: 892: 838: 550: 196: 173: 2519: 3027: 2843: 2781: 2653: 2597: 2571: 2556: 2532: 2497: 1793: 1746: 1707: 1668: 1626: 882: 770: 742: 668: 456: 267: 207: 137: 99: 80: 2112: 679:
organized the first meeting and is considered the founder of the CA/Browser Forum.
191:
web browser, 168 root certificates, representing 60 organizations, are trusted by
184:
in Europe) to be included as a trusted root by a web browser or operating system.
2753: 1302:"DigiCert - World's Largest High-Assurance Certificate Authority | Netcraft" 737: 631:
limit the revocation checks they will perform, and will fail-soft where they do.
188: 2584: 2565: 1820: 1814: 1783: 1777: 1773: 1767: 1736: 1728: 1701: 1695: 1689: 1658: 1647: 1616: 887: 870: 748:
In 2015, a Chinese certificate authority named MCS Holdings and affiliated with
833: 461: 388: 241: 1397: 3184: 2808: 2743: 2602: 1807: 1760: 1721: 1682: 1640: 896: 753: 542: 2501: 1093:"Standards and Industry Regulations Applicable to Certification Authorities" 787: 195:, and 255 root certificates, representing 101 organizations, are trusted by 3102: 2876: 2419:"Symantec sacks staff for issuing unauthorized Google certificates - ZDNet" 2394:"China's CNNIC issues false certificates in serious breach of crypto trust" 1853: 1152: 828: 818: 781: 672: 658: 628: 617: 20: 1590: 1123: 2138: 507: 373: 2344:"CA Linked to Chinese Registrar Issued Unauthorized Google Certificates" 2319:"Crypto breakthrough shows Flame was designed by world-class scientists" 1909:"Multivendor power council formed to address digital certificate issues" 1877: 1738:
Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
624:
and treat it as unrevoked (and allow attackers to sidestep revocation).
430:
the domain. Some Certificate Authorities may accept confirmation using
210:, a nonprofit certificate authority that provides free domain validated 3149: 2537: 2165:"SSL Certificate Vendor Sells Mozilla.com CSSL Certificate to Some Guy" 488: 283: 111: 2564:
Sheffer, Yaron; Saint-Andre, Pierre; Fossati, Thomas (November 2022).
1614: 974: 715:
Microsoft and VeriSign took steps to limit the impact of the problem.
612:(either due to accident or an attack), clients must decide whether to 3144: 2956: 2921: 2576: 1798: 1751: 1712: 1673: 1631: 843: 299: 103: 84: 1889: 2961: 2951: 2936: 1865: 711: 574: 331: 230: 222: 177: 2594:
Proceedings 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
2191:"Independent Iranian hacker claims responsibility for Comodo hack" 1826: 1153:"List of available trusted root certificates in macOS High Sierra" 121:
Large organizations or government bodies may have their own PKIs (
3001: 2996: 2981: 2971: 1931:"Major Certificate Authorities Unite In The Name Of SSL Security" 1254: 1012: 348: 315: 237:
market, and 96% of organization-validated certificates globally.
76: 796:
This issue is the driving impetus behind the development of the
3159: 3112: 3092: 2991: 2976: 2941: 148: 2645: 2484: 1952: 1859: 721:
In 2011 fraudulent certificates were obtained from Comodo and
604:. Revocation is performed by the issuing CA, which produces a 3139: 3097: 2931: 2726: 2423: 524: 405: 218:, a California nonprofit recognized as federally tax-exempt. 211: 192: 51: 40: 1977: 616:
and treat a certificate as if it is revoked (and so degrade
1066: 181: 2563: 2526: 2243:"Inside 'Operation Black Tulip': DigiNotar hack analysed" 1883: 1847: 788:
Implementation weakness of the trusted third party scheme
133: 44: 1615:
Laurie, Ben; Langley, Adam; Kasper, Emilia (June 2013).
2494:
Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018
871:"Dynamic Public Key Certificates with Forward Secrecy" 376:, not any information about the applicant's identity. 95:
CA certificates with varying validation requirements.
2591: 2443:"Unauthorized Google Digital Certificates Discovered" 1895: 1871: 1832: 1535:
The Shortcut Guide to Managing Certificate Lifecycles
1369:"CA/Forbidden or Problematic Practices - MozillaWiki" 977:. EMV Certificate Authority Worldwide. 2 October 2010 151:. However, encryption entails the receiver's public 2636:
How secure is HTTPS today? How often is it attacked?
1660:
A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Examples
2265:"Trustwave issued a man-in-the-middle certificate" 1785:Autonomous System (AS) Reservation for Private Use 1398:"SSL FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions - Rapid SSL" 635:are too bandwidth-costly for routine use, and the 125:), each containing their own CAs. Any site using 229:In 2020, according to independent survey company 180:for certificate authorities in North America and 91:CA certificate may be the base to issue multiple 3182: 2529:2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) 950:"Mozilla Included CA Certificate List — Mozilla" 926:"How do Digital Certificates Work - An Overview" 800:(DANE) protocol. If adopted in conjunction with 2691:Transport Layer Security / Secure Sockets Layer 2136: 996:Zakir Durumeric; James Kasten; Michael Bailey; 2156: 1656: 1230:"Let's Encrypt: Delivering SSL/TLS Everywhere" 35:) is an entity that stores, signs, and issues 2894:Export of cryptography from the United States 2661: 1422:Criminal charges are not pursued: Hacking PKI 1002:"Analysis of the HTTPS Certificate Ecosystem" 2770:Automated Certificate Management Environment 1781: 1469:"Responsibilities of Certificate Authority" 62:Trusted certificates can be used to create 2715:DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities 2668: 2654: 2369:"Maintaining digital certificate security" 798:DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities 2721:DNS Certification Authority Authorization 2601: 2575: 2536: 2391: 1797: 1750: 1711: 1699: 1672: 1630: 1090: 886: 745:with the hash listed in the certificate. 655:Common Computing Security Standards Forum 642: 588: 168:However, the market for globally trusted 2487:"Is the Web Ready for OCSP Must-Staple?" 1177:"Microsoft Included CA Certificate List" 683: 471: 467: 394: 379:Many Certificate Authorities also offer 206:, Mozilla, Cisco, and Akamai, announced 2363: 1848:Sheffer, Saint-Andre & Fossati 2022 1734: 1608: 911:"What is a certificate authority (CA)?" 408:entry, or an administrative email like 363: 16:Entity that issues digital certificates 3183: 2865:Domain Name System Security Extensions 2709:Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation 2341: 2316: 2240: 2214: 2188: 1418: 1280:"Counting SSL certificates - Netcraft" 923: 802:Domain Name System Security Extensions 665:is considered the founder of the CCSF. 649:Certificate Authority Security Council 2649: 1022:from the original on 22 December 2013 868: 2471:from the original on 3 October 2016. 1294: 967: 2416: 2197:from the original on 29 August 2011 2162: 2041:from the original on 7 January 2014 1937:. February 14, 2013. Archived from 1915:. February 14, 2013. Archived from 1896:Smith, Dickinson & Seamons 2020 1872:Smith, Dickinson & Seamons 2020 1833:Smith, Dickinson & Seamons 2020 1780:. |- |6996 |Best Current Practice | 1560:"Electronic Signatures and Records" 1009:The Internet Measurement Conference 756:and have revoked the certificates. 13: 2803:Online Certificate Status Protocol 2093:from the original on 20 March 2017 2067:from the original on 15 April 2017 2001: 824:People for Internet Responsibility 637:Online Certificate Status Protocol 14: 3222: 2697:Datagram Transport Layer Security 2629: 1655:|- |6963 |Best Current Practice | 3130:Certificate authority compromise 2431:from the original on 2016-10-02. 2398:Committee to Protect Journalists 2253:from the original on 2017-07-03. 2087:"Apple Root Certificate Program" 1538:. Realtimepublishers.com. 2006. 1457:from the original on 2015-08-08. 1435:from the original on 2013-04-15. 1408:from the original on 2015-02-06. 1290:from the original on 2015-05-16. 1232:(Press release). Let's Encrypt. 692: 216:Internet Security Research Group 3135:Random number generator attacks 2822:Extended Validation Certificate 2675: 2453: 2435: 2410: 2385: 2357: 2335: 2310: 2286: 2275:from the original on 2012-03-13 2257: 2234: 2223:from the original on 2011-09-12 2208: 2189:Bright, Peter (28 March 2011). 2182: 2145:from the original on 2011-10-26 2130: 2119:from the original on 2013-11-02 2105: 2079: 2053: 2037:. CAB Forum. 4 September 2013. 2027: 2016:from the original on 2013-05-12 1995: 1984:from the original on 2013-05-12 1970: 1959:from the original on 2014-08-23 1945: 1923: 1901: 1790:Internet Engineering Task Force 1743:Internet Engineering Task Force 1733:| |- |6980 |Proposed Standard | 1665:Internet Engineering Task Force 1623:Internet Engineering Task Force 1597:from the original on 2013-11-01 1583: 1572:from the original on 2016-03-04 1552: 1526: 1500: 1486: 1475:from the original on 2015-02-12 1461: 1439: 1412: 1390: 1379:from the original on 2017-07-21 1361: 1350:from the original on 2015-03-23 1330: 1312: 1272: 1261:from the original on 2015-06-10 1247: 1236:from the original on 2014-11-18 1222: 1211:from the original on 2017-07-08 1193: 1169: 1145: 1134:from the original on 2017-03-25 1116: 1105:from the original on 2016-03-04 1073:from the original on 2013-08-18 1048:from the original on 2015-11-03 956:from the original on 2013-08-04 750:China's central domain registry 606:cryptographically authenticated 235:Extended Validation Certificate 2732:HTTP Strict Transport Security 2640:Electronic Frontier Foundation 2478: 2137:Microsoft, Inc. (2007-02-21). 2115:. Cert.org. 31 December 2001. 1850:, 7.5. Certificate Revocation. 1124:"CA:IncludedCAs - MozillaWiki" 1084: 1059: 1034: 989: 942: 917: 903: 862: 759: 316:Sectigo (Comodo Cybersecurity) 204:Electronic Frontier Foundation 1: 2392:Lowenthal, Tom (2015-03-31). 2342:Fisher, Dennis (2015-03-23). 1823:. |} 1201:"Security with HTTPS and SSL" 1181:ccadb-public.secure.force.com 1042:"What is an SSL Certificate?" 869:Chien, Hung-Yu (2021-08-19). 856: 566:To minimize this hazard, the 476:The procedure of obtaining a 2816:Domain-validated certificate 2215:Bright, Peter (2011-08-30). 852:certificate authority breach 846:certificate authority breach 633:Certificate revocation lists 159: 132:Commercial banks that issue 7: 2797:Certificate revocation list 2241:Leyden, John (2011-09-06). 2061:"Mozilla Root Store Policy" 1698:. |- |6979 |Informational | 1657:P. Saint-Andre (May 2013). 888:10.3390/electronics10162009 807: 531: 170:TLS/SSL server certificates 57: 10: 3227: 2871:Internet Protocol Security 2684:Protocols and technologies 2317:Goodin, Dan (2012-06-07). 2004:"CA/Browser Forum History" 1953:"CA/Browser Forum Founder" 1706:. Independent Submission. 1591:"Certificate transparency" 696: 592: 498: 3206:Public key infrastructure 3122: 3080: 3064: 3043: 3036: 3010: 2907: 2899:Server-Gated Cryptography 2886: 2857: 2838:Public key infrastructure 2763:Public-key infrastructure 2762: 2683: 1782:J. Mitchell (July 2013). 1700:T. Pornin (August 2013). 1428:. DEF CON 17. Las Vegas. 608:statement of revocation. 602:public key infrastructure 165:certificate authorities. 123:public key infrastructure 3211:Transport Layer Security 3051:Man-in-the-middle attack 3018:Certificate Transparency 2603:10.14722/ndss.2020.24084 1618:Certificate Transparency 1091:Kirk Hall (April 2013). 767:hardware security module 727:man-in-the-middle attack 569:certificate transparency 547:American Bar Association 127:self-signed certificates 69:man-in-the-middle attack 3196:Public-key cryptography 3191:Certificate authorities 3162:(in regards to TLS 1.0) 3115:(in regards to SSL 3.0) 2849:Self-signed certificate 2833:Public-key cryptography 2754:Perfect forward secrecy 2738:HTTP Public Key Pinning 2502:10.1145/3278532.3278543 2035:"Baseline Requirements" 1735:F. Gont (August 2013). 1512:. Springer. June 2004. 924:Villanueva, John Carl. 773:in an HSM that is kept 504:Public-key cryptography 29:certification authority 3166:Kazakhstan MITM attack 2828:Public key certificate 2792:Certificate revocation 2703:Server Name Indication 643:Industry organizations 595:Certificate revocation 589:Certificate revocation 480: 478:public key certificate 3155:Lucky Thirteen attack 3056:Padding oracle attack 2776:Certificate authority 1419:Zusman, Mike (2009). 1205:developer.android.com 1000:(12 September 2013). 684:Baseline requirements 475: 468:Issuing a certificate 395:Validation weaknesses 116:Google Cloud Platform 25:certificate authority 2531:. pp. 539–556. 2496:. pp. 105–118. 2373:Google Security Blog 814:Validation authority 780:CAs sometimes use a 485:digital certificates 364:Validation standards 129:acts as its own CA. 37:digital certificates 1884:Larisch et al. 2017 1306:trends.netcraft.com 699:Supply chain attack 385:Internet Explorer 7 381:Extended Validation 108:Amazon Web Services 3072:Bar mitzvah attack 2787:Certificate policy 2538:10.1109/sp.2017.17 2417:Osborne, Charlie. 2298:msrc.microsoft.com 1978:"CA/Browser Forum" 1941:on April 10, 2013. 1819:|Updates RFC  1772:|Updates RFC  1694:|Updates RFC  1496:. 17 January 2000. 677:Melih AbdulhayoÄźlu 663:Melih AbdulhayoÄźlu 551:digital signatures 481: 212:X.509 certificates 64:secure connections 3178: 3177: 3174: 3173: 2749:Opportunistic TLS 2642:(25 October 2011) 2613:978-1-891562-61-7 2548:978-1-5090-5533-3 2449:. 12 August 2014. 1919:on July 28, 2013. 1860:Chung et al. 2018 1284:news.netcraft.com 1257:. Let's Encrypt. 998:J. Alex Halderman 839:Digital signature 771:root certificates 370:domain validation 361: 360: 197:Microsoft Windows 174:barriers to entry 3218: 3041: 3040: 3028:HTTPS Everywhere 2844:Root certificate 2782:CA/Browser Forum 2670: 2663: 2656: 2647: 2646: 2625: 2605: 2588: 2579: 2577:10.17487/RFC9325 2560: 2540: 2523: 2491: 2473: 2472: 2467:. 24 July 2014. 2457: 2451: 2450: 2439: 2433: 2432: 2414: 2408: 2407: 2405: 2404: 2389: 2383: 2382: 2380: 2379: 2361: 2355: 2354: 2352: 2351: 2339: 2333: 2332: 2330: 2329: 2314: 2308: 2307: 2305: 2304: 2290: 2284: 2283: 2281: 2280: 2261: 2255: 2254: 2238: 2232: 2231: 2229: 2228: 2219:. Ars Technica. 2212: 2206: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2193:. Ars Technica. 2186: 2180: 2179: 2177: 2175: 2163:Seltzer, Larry. 2160: 2154: 2153: 2151: 2150: 2134: 2128: 2127: 2125: 2124: 2109: 2103: 2102: 2100: 2098: 2083: 2077: 2076: 2074: 2072: 2057: 2051: 2050: 2048: 2046: 2031: 2025: 2024: 2022: 2021: 2015: 2008: 2002:Wilson, Wilson. 1999: 1993: 1992: 1990: 1989: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1965: 1964: 1949: 1943: 1942: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1905: 1899: 1893: 1887: 1881: 1875: 1869: 1863: 1857: 1851: 1845: 1836: 1830: 1824: 1818: 1801: 1799:10.17487/RFC6996 1771: 1754: 1752:10.17487/RFC6980 1732: 1715: 1713:10.17487/RFC6979 1693: 1676: 1674:10.17487/RFC6963 1651: 1634: 1632:10.17487/RFC6962 1612: 1606: 1605: 1603: 1602: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1564: 1556: 1550: 1549: 1530: 1524: 1523: 1504: 1498: 1497: 1490: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1480: 1465: 1459: 1458: 1443: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1427: 1416: 1410: 1409: 1402:www.rapidssl.com 1394: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1373:wiki.mozilla.org 1365: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1355: 1349: 1342: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1316: 1310: 1309: 1298: 1292: 1291: 1276: 1270: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1251: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1226: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1188: 1187: 1173: 1167: 1166: 1164: 1163: 1149: 1143: 1142: 1140: 1139: 1128:wiki.mozilla.org 1120: 1114: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1097: 1088: 1082: 1081: 1079: 1078: 1063: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1053: 1038: 1032: 1031: 1029: 1027: 1021: 1006: 993: 987: 986: 984: 982: 971: 965: 964: 962: 961: 946: 940: 939: 937: 936: 921: 915: 914: 907: 901: 900: 890: 866: 743:collision attack 669:CA/Browser Forum 457:CA/Browser Forum 450: 441: 437: 433: 428: 423: 419: 415: 411: 247: 246: 81:CA/Browser Forum 3226: 3225: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3170: 3118: 3076: 3060: 3037:Vulnerabilities 3032: 3006: 2909:Implementations 2903: 2882: 2853: 2758: 2679: 2674: 2632: 2614: 2549: 2512: 2489: 2481: 2476: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2415: 2411: 2402: 2400: 2390: 2386: 2377: 2375: 2362: 2358: 2349: 2347: 2340: 2336: 2327: 2325: 2315: 2311: 2302: 2300: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2278: 2276: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2239: 2235: 2226: 2224: 2213: 2209: 2200: 2198: 2187: 2183: 2173: 2171: 2161: 2157: 2148: 2146: 2135: 2131: 2122: 2120: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2096: 2094: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2070: 2068: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2044: 2042: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2019: 2017: 2013: 2006: 2000: 1996: 1987: 1985: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1962: 1960: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1894: 1890: 1882: 1878: 1870: 1866: 1858: 1854: 1846: 1839: 1831: 1827: 1613: 1609: 1600: 1598: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1575: 1573: 1569: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1546: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1520: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1494:"Network World" 1492: 1491: 1487: 1478: 1476: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1432: 1425: 1417: 1413: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1382: 1380: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1353: 1351: 1347: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1286:. 13 May 2015. 1278: 1277: 1273: 1264: 1262: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1239: 1237: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1214: 1212: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1185: 1183: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1161: 1159: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1137: 1135: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1108: 1106: 1102: 1098:. Trend Micro. 1095: 1089: 1085: 1076: 1074: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1051: 1049: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1004: 994: 990: 980: 978: 973: 972: 968: 959: 957: 952:. Mozilla.org. 948: 947: 943: 934: 932: 922: 918: 909: 908: 904: 867: 863: 859: 810: 790: 762: 701: 695: 686: 645: 597: 591: 584: 534: 501: 487:that contain a 470: 447: 439: 435: 431: 426: 421: 417: 413: 409: 397: 366: 189:Mozilla Firefox 162: 60: 17: 12: 11: 5: 3224: 3214: 3213: 3208: 3203: 3201:Key management 3198: 3193: 3176: 3175: 3172: 3171: 3169: 3168: 3163: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3126: 3124: 3123:Implementation 3120: 3119: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3105: 3100: 3095: 3090: 3084: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3075: 3074: 3068: 3066: 3062: 3061: 3059: 3058: 3053: 3047: 3045: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3031: 3030: 3025: 3020: 3014: 3012: 3008: 3007: 3005: 3004: 2999: 2994: 2989: 2984: 2979: 2974: 2969: 2964: 2959: 2954: 2949: 2944: 2939: 2934: 2929: 2924: 2919: 2913: 2911: 2905: 2904: 2902: 2901: 2896: 2890: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2881: 2880: 2874: 2868: 2861: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2852: 2851: 2846: 2841: 2835: 2830: 2825: 2819: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2806: 2800: 2789: 2784: 2779: 2773: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2757: 2756: 2751: 2746: 2741: 2735: 2729: 2724: 2718: 2712: 2706: 2700: 2694: 2687: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2673: 2672: 2665: 2658: 2650: 2644: 2643: 2631: 2630:External links 2628: 2627: 2626: 2612: 2589: 2561: 2547: 2524: 2510: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2474: 2465:casecurity.org 2452: 2434: 2409: 2384: 2367:(2015-03-23). 2356: 2334: 2309: 2285: 2271:. 2012-02-07. 2269:The H Security 2256: 2233: 2207: 2181: 2155: 2129: 2104: 2078: 2052: 2026: 1994: 1969: 1944: 1922: 1900: 1898:, p. 1-2. 1888: 1886:, p. 542. 1876: 1864: 1852: 1837: 1825: 1607: 1582: 1551: 1544: 1525: 1518: 1499: 1485: 1460: 1438: 1411: 1389: 1360: 1329: 1311: 1293: 1271: 1246: 1221: 1192: 1168: 1144: 1115: 1083: 1058: 1033: 988: 966: 941: 930:www.jscape.com 916: 902: 860: 858: 855: 854: 853: 847: 841: 836: 834:Chain of trust 831: 826: 821: 816: 809: 806: 789: 786: 761: 758: 694: 691: 685: 682: 681: 680: 666: 652: 644: 641: 593:Main article: 590: 587: 582: 563: 562: 559: 533: 530: 500: 497: 469: 466: 462:Microsoft Live 414:administrator@ 396: 393: 365: 362: 359: 358: 355: 352: 346: 342: 341: 338: 335: 329: 325: 324: 321: 318: 313: 309: 308: 305: 302: 297: 293: 292: 289: 286: 281: 277: 276: 273: 270: 265: 261: 260: 257: 254: 251: 161: 158: 59: 56: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3223: 3212: 3209: 3207: 3204: 3202: 3199: 3197: 3194: 3192: 3189: 3188: 3186: 3167: 3164: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3127: 3125: 3121: 3114: 3111: 3109: 3106: 3104: 3101: 3099: 3096: 3094: 3091: 3089: 3086: 3085: 3083: 3079: 3073: 3070: 3069: 3067: 3063: 3057: 3054: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3046: 3042: 3039: 3035: 3029: 3026: 3024: 3021: 3019: 3016: 3015: 3013: 3009: 3003: 3000: 2998: 2995: 2993: 2990: 2988: 2985: 2983: 2980: 2978: 2975: 2973: 2970: 2968: 2965: 2963: 2960: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2950: 2948: 2945: 2943: 2940: 2938: 2935: 2933: 2930: 2928: 2925: 2923: 2920: 2918: 2917:Bouncy Castle 2915: 2914: 2912: 2910: 2906: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2889: 2885: 2878: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2860: 2856: 2850: 2847: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2836: 2834: 2831: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2810: 2809:OCSP stapling 2807: 2804: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2765: 2761: 2755: 2752: 2750: 2747: 2745: 2744:OCSP stapling 2742: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2707: 2704: 2701: 2698: 2695: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2671: 2666: 2664: 2659: 2657: 2652: 2651: 2648: 2641: 2637: 2634: 2633: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2609: 2604: 2599: 2595: 2590: 2586: 2583: 2578: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2544: 2539: 2534: 2530: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2511:9781450356190 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2488: 2483: 2482: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2456: 2448: 2444: 2438: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2420: 2413: 2399: 2395: 2388: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2365:Langley, Adam 2360: 2345: 2338: 2324: 2320: 2313: 2299: 2295: 2289: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2260: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2237: 2222: 2218: 2211: 2196: 2192: 2185: 2170: 2166: 2159: 2144: 2140: 2133: 2118: 2114: 2108: 2092: 2088: 2082: 2066: 2062: 2056: 2040: 2036: 2030: 2012: 2005: 1998: 1983: 1979: 1973: 1958: 1954: 1948: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1926: 1918: 1914: 1913:Network World 1910: 1904: 1897: 1892: 1885: 1880: 1874:, p. 10. 1873: 1868: 1861: 1856: 1849: 1844: 1842: 1834: 1829: 1822: 1816: 1813: 1810:. BCP 6. 1809: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1779: 1775: 1769: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1730: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1697: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1654: 1653:Experimental. 1649: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1611: 1596: 1592: 1586: 1568: 1561: 1555: 1547: 1545:9781931491594 1541: 1537: 1536: 1529: 1521: 1519:9783540222170 1515: 1511: 1510: 1503: 1495: 1489: 1474: 1470: 1464: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1442: 1431: 1424: 1423: 1415: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1393: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1364: 1346: 1339: 1333: 1325: 1321: 1315: 1307: 1303: 1297: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1275: 1260: 1256: 1250: 1235: 1231: 1225: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1196: 1182: 1178: 1172: 1158: 1157:Apple Support 1154: 1148: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1101: 1094: 1087: 1072: 1068: 1062: 1047: 1043: 1037: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1003: 999: 992: 976: 970: 955: 951: 945: 931: 927: 920: 912: 906: 898: 894: 889: 884: 880: 876: 872: 865: 861: 851: 848: 845: 842: 840: 837: 835: 832: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 815: 812: 811: 805: 803: 799: 794: 785: 783: 778: 776: 772: 768: 757: 755: 751: 746: 744: 739: 736:In 2012, the 734: 730: 728: 724: 719: 716: 713: 708: 704: 700: 693:CA compromise 690: 678: 674: 670: 667: 664: 660: 656: 653: 650: 647: 646: 640: 638: 634: 630: 625: 623: 619: 615: 609: 607: 603: 596: 586: 578: 576: 572: 570: 560: 557: 556: 555: 552: 548: 544: 540: 529: 526: 520: 516: 512: 509: 505: 496: 493: 490: 486: 479: 474: 465: 463: 458: 452: 449: 443: 429: 407: 401: 392: 390: 386: 382: 377: 375: 371: 356: 353: 350: 347: 344: 343: 339: 336: 333: 330: 327: 326: 322: 319: 317: 314: 311: 310: 306: 303: 301: 298: 295: 294: 290: 287: 285: 282: 279: 278: 274: 271: 269: 268:Let's Encrypt 266: 263: 262: 259:Market Share 258: 255: 252: 249: 248: 245: 243: 238: 236: 232: 227: 224: 221:According to 219: 217: 213: 209: 208:Let's Encrypt 205: 200: 198: 194: 190: 185: 183: 179: 175: 171: 166: 157: 154: 150: 145: 141: 139: 135: 130: 128: 124: 119: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 100:Let's Encrypt 96: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 72: 70: 65: 55: 53: 48: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 2877:Secure Shell 2775: 2639: 2593: 2566: 2528: 2493: 2464: 2455: 2447:linkedin.com 2446: 2437: 2422: 2412: 2401:. Retrieved 2397: 2387: 2376:. Retrieved 2372: 2359: 2348:. Retrieved 2346:. ThreatPost 2337: 2326:. Retrieved 2323:Ars Technica 2322: 2312: 2301:. Retrieved 2297: 2288: 2277:. Retrieved 2268: 2259: 2247:The Register 2246: 2236: 2225:. Retrieved 2210: 2199:. Retrieved 2184: 2172:. Retrieved 2168: 2158: 2147:. Retrieved 2132: 2121:. Retrieved 2113:"CA-2001-04" 2107: 2095:. Retrieved 2081: 2069:. Retrieved 2055: 2043:. Retrieved 2029: 2018:. Retrieved 2009:. DigiCert. 1997: 1986:. Retrieved 1972: 1961:. Retrieved 1947: 1939:the original 1935:Dark Reading 1934: 1925: 1917:the original 1912: 1903: 1891: 1879: 1867: 1862:, p. 3. 1855: 1835:, p. 1. 1828: 1784: 1737: 1702: 1659: 1652: 1617: 1610: 1599:. Retrieved 1585: 1574:. Retrieved 1554: 1534: 1528: 1508: 1502: 1488: 1477:. Retrieved 1463: 1450: 1441: 1421: 1414: 1401: 1392: 1381:. Retrieved 1372: 1363: 1352:. Retrieved 1332: 1323: 1314: 1305: 1296: 1283: 1274: 1263:. Retrieved 1249: 1238:. Retrieved 1224: 1213:. Retrieved 1204: 1195: 1184:. Retrieved 1180: 1171: 1160:. Retrieved 1156: 1147: 1136:. Retrieved 1127: 1118: 1107:. Retrieved 1086: 1075:. Retrieved 1069:. webtrust. 1061: 1050:. Retrieved 1036: 1024:. Retrieved 1008: 991: 981:February 17, 979:. Retrieved 969: 958:. Retrieved 944: 933:. Retrieved 929: 919: 905: 881:(16): 2009. 878: 874: 864: 829:Web of trust 819:Contact page 795: 791: 782:key ceremony 779: 763: 747: 735: 731: 720: 717: 709: 705: 702: 687: 673:Comodo Group 659:Comodo Group 629:Web browsers 626: 621: 618:availability 613: 610: 598: 579: 568: 564: 535: 521: 517: 513: 502: 494: 483:A CA issues 482: 453: 444: 402: 398: 378: 367: 239: 228: 220: 201: 186: 167: 163: 146: 142: 131: 120: 97: 93:intermediate 92: 88: 73: 61: 49: 32: 28: 24: 21:cryptography 18: 3023:Convergence 2677:TLS and SSL 2479:Works cited 2063:. Mozilla. 1324:w3techs.com 1026:20 December 875:Electronics 760:Key storage 508:HTTP Secure 427:postmaster@ 422:hostmaster@ 374:domain name 3185:Categories 3150:Heartbleed 2403:2023-10-13 2378:2023-09-27 2350:2023-09-27 2328:2023-10-13 2303:2023-10-13 2279:2012-03-14 2227:2011-09-01 2201:2011-09-01 2174:5 December 2149:2011-11-09 2123:2014-06-11 2020:2013-04-23 1988:2013-04-23 1963:2014-08-23 1601:2013-11-03 1576:2014-08-28 1479:2015-02-12 1383:2017-07-06 1354:2015-03-20 1265:2015-06-07 1240:2014-11-20 1215:2017-06-09 1186:2020-08-24 1162:2020-08-24 1138:2017-03-18 1109:2014-06-11 1077:2013-03-02 1067:"webtrust" 1052:2022-03-19 960:2014-06-11 935:2021-09-05 857:References 697:See also: 571:initiative 489:public key 418:webmaster@ 284:GlobalSign 112:Cloudflare 47:standard. 3145:goto fail 2957:MatrixSSL 2922:BoringSSL 2693:(TLS/SSL) 2622:211268930 2089:. Apple. 1808:2070-1721 1761:2070-1721 1722:2070-1721 1683:2070-1721 1641:2070-1721 897:2079-9292 844:DigiNotar 729:in Iran. 723:DigiNotar 622:fail-soft 614:fail-hard 300:IdenTrust 160:Providers 104:IBM Cloud 85:resellers 3081:Protocol 3011:Notaries 2987:SChannel 2962:mbed TLS 2952:LibreSSL 2937:cryptlib 2867:(DNSSEC) 2858:See also 2520:53223350 2469:Archived 2429:Archived 2273:Archived 2251:Archived 2221:Archived 2195:Archived 2143:Archived 2117:Archived 2097:14 April 2091:Archived 2071:14 April 2065:Archived 2045:14 April 2039:Archived 2011:Archived 1982:Archived 1957:Archived 1792:(IETF). 1745:(IETF). 1667:(IETF). 1625:(IETF). 1595:Archived 1567:Archived 1473:Archived 1455:Archived 1430:Archived 1406:Archived 1377:Archived 1345:Archived 1288:Archived 1259:Archived 1234:Archived 1209:Archived 1132:Archived 1100:Archived 1071:Archived 1046:Archived 1017:Archived 975:"EMV CA" 954:Archived 808:See also 712:VeriSign 620:) or to 575:phishing 543:Notaries 539:Kerberos 532:Security 440:support@ 332:DigiCert 231:Netcraft 223:Netcraft 178:WebTrust 58:Overview 3002:wolfSSL 2997:stunnel 2982:s2n-tls 2972:OpenSSL 2887:History 2873:(IPsec) 2557:3926509 1451:tivi.fi 1255:"About" 1013:SIGCOMM 775:offline 499:Example 349:GoDaddy 77:Mozilla 3160:POODLE 3113:POODLE 3108:Logjam 3093:BREACH 3065:Cipher 3044:Theory 2992:SSLeay 2977:Rustls 2942:GnuTLS 2805:(OCSP) 2772:(ACME) 2740:(HPKP) 2734:(HSTS) 2717:(DANE) 2711:(ALPN) 2699:(DTLS) 2620:  2610:  2555:  2545:  2518:  2508:  1806:  1759:  1720:  1681:  1639:  1542:  1516:  895:  850:Comodo 754:Chrome 410:admin@ 307:12.4% 291:14.0% 275:56.3% 253:Issuer 149:S/MIME 114:, and 3140:FREAK 3103:DROWN 3098:CRIME 3088:BEAST 2932:BSAFE 2927:Botan 2879:(SSH) 2840:(PKI) 2799:(CRL) 2727:HTTPS 2723:(CAA) 2705:(SNI) 2618:S2CID 2553:S2CID 2516:S2CID 2490:(PDF) 2424:ZDNet 2169:eWeek 2014:(PDF) 2007:(PDF) 1570:(PDF) 1563:(PDF) 1433:(PDF) 1426:(PDF) 1348:(PDF) 1341:(PDF) 1103:(PDF) 1096:(PDF) 1020:(PDF) 1005:(PDF) 765:on a 738:Flame 525:X.509 438:, or 436:info@ 432:root@ 406:WHOIS 357:4.4% 351:Group 340:5.3% 334:Group 323:7.3% 304:11.6% 288:13.1% 272:52.5% 256:Usage 242:Alexa 193:macOS 87:. A 52:HTTPS 41:X.509 2947:JSSE 2824:(EV) 2818:(DV) 2778:(CA) 2608:ISBN 2585:9325 2543:ISBN 2506:ISBN 2176:2021 2099:2017 2073:2017 2047:2017 1821:1930 1815:6996 1804:ISSN 1778:4861 1776:and 1774:3971 1768:6980 1757:ISSN 1729:6979 1718:ISSN 1696:1930 1690:6963 1679:ISSN 1648:6962 1637:ISSN 1540:ISBN 1514:ISBN 1028:2013 983:2019 893:ISSN 675:CEO 661:CEO 389:Edge 354:4.2% 337:5.0% 320:6.8% 250:Rank 182:ETSI 89:root 23:, a 2967:NSS 2598:doi 2582:RFC 2572:doi 2533:doi 2498:doi 1812:RFC 1794:doi 1765:RFC 1747:doi 1726:RFC 1708:doi 1687:RFC 1669:doi 1645:RFC 1627:doi 883:doi 434:, 424:or 153:key 138:POS 134:EMV 45:EMV 43:or 27:or 19:In 3187:: 2638:, 2616:. 2606:. 2596:. 2580:. 2570:. 2551:. 2541:. 2514:. 2504:. 2492:. 2463:. 2445:. 2427:. 2421:. 2396:. 2371:. 2321:. 2296:. 2267:. 2249:. 2245:. 2167:. 2141:. 1980:. 1955:. 1933:. 1911:. 1840:^ 1802:. 1788:. 1763:. 1755:. 1741:. 1724:. 1716:. 1685:. 1677:. 1663:. 1643:. 1635:. 1621:. 1593:. 1565:. 1471:. 1453:. 1449:. 1404:. 1400:. 1375:. 1371:. 1343:. 1322:. 1304:. 1282:. 1207:. 1203:. 1179:. 1155:. 1130:. 1126:. 1044:. 1015:. 1011:. 1007:. 928:. 891:. 879:10 877:. 873:. 581:CA 577:. 420:, 416:, 412:, 118:. 110:, 106:, 33:CA 2669:e 2662:t 2655:v 2624:. 2600:: 2587:. 2574:: 2559:. 2535:: 2522:. 2500:: 2406:. 2381:. 2353:. 2331:. 2306:. 2282:. 2230:. 2204:. 2178:. 2152:. 2126:. 2101:. 2075:. 2049:. 2023:. 1991:. 1966:. 1817:. 1796:: 1770:. 1749:: 1731:. 1710:: 1692:. 1671:: 1650:. 1629:: 1604:. 1579:. 1548:. 1522:. 1482:. 1386:. 1357:. 1326:. 1308:. 1268:. 1243:. 1218:. 1189:. 1165:. 1141:. 1112:. 1080:. 1055:. 1030:. 985:. 963:. 938:. 913:. 899:. 885:: 583:2 345:6 328:5 312:4 296:3 280:2 264:1 31:(

Index

cryptography
digital certificates
X.509
EMV
HTTPS
secure connections
man-in-the-middle attack
Mozilla
CA/Browser Forum
resellers
Let's Encrypt
IBM Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Cloudflare
Google Cloud Platform
public key infrastructure
self-signed certificates
EMV
POS
S/MIME
key
TLS/SSL server certificates
barriers to entry
WebTrust
ETSI
Mozilla Firefox
macOS
Microsoft Windows
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Let's Encrypt

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑