Knowledge

Case–control study

Source 📝

128:. The results may be confounded by other factors, to the extent of giving the opposite answer to better studies. A meta-analysis of what was considered 30 high-quality studies concluded that use of a product halved a risk, when in fact the risk was, if anything, increased. It may also be more difficult to establish the timeline of exposure to disease outcome in the setting of a case–control study than within a prospective cohort study design where the exposure is ascertained prior to following the subjects over time in order to ascertain their outcome status. The most important drawback in case–control studies relates to the difficulty of obtaining reliable information about an individual's exposure status over time. Case–control studies are therefore placed low in the 96:
breast cancer, were retrospective investigations. Most sources of error due to confounding and bias are more common in retrospective studies than in prospective studies. For this reason, retrospective investigations are often criticised. If the outcome of interest is uncommon, however, the size of prospective investigation required to estimate relative risk is often too large to be feasible. In retrospective studies the odds ratio provides an estimate of relative risk. One should take special care to avoid sources of
2774: 169:). The validity of the odds ratio depends highly on the nature of the disease studied, on the sampling methodology and on the type of follow-up. Although in classical case–control studies, it remains true that the odds ratio can only approximate the relative risk in the case of rare diseases, there is a number of other types of studies (case–cohort, nested case–control, cohort studies) in which it was later shown that the 2798: 2786: 92:
interest should be common; otherwise, the number of outcomes observed will be too small to be statistically meaningful (indistinguishable from those that may have arisen by chance). All efforts should be made to avoid sources of bias such as the loss of individuals to follow up during the study. Prospective studies usually have fewer potential sources of bias and confounding than retrospective studies.
148:. They showed a statistically significant association in a large case–control study. Opponents argued for many years that this type of study cannot prove causation, but the eventual results of cohort studies confirmed the causal link which the case–control studies suggested, and it is now accepted that tobacco smoking is the cause of about 87% of all lung cancer mortality in the US. 82:
As with any epidemiological study, greater numbers in the study will increase the power of the study. Numbers of cases and controls do not have to be equal. In many situations, it is much easier to recruit controls than to find cases. Increasing the number of controls above the number of cases, up to
54:
defines the case–control study as: "an observational epidemiological study of persons with the disease (or another outcome variable) of interest and a suitable control group of persons without the disease (comparison group, reference group). The potential relationship of a suspected risk factor or an
33:
in which two existing groups differing in outcome are identified and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute. Case–control studies are often used to identify factors that may contribute to a medical condition by comparing subjects who have the condition with patients who do not have
184:
When the logistic regression model is used to model the case–control data and the odds ratio is of interest, both the prospective and retrospective likelihood methods will lead to identical maximum likelihood estimations for covariate, except for the intercept. The usual methods of estimating more
112:
Case–control studies are a relatively inexpensive and frequently used type of epidemiological study that can be carried out by small teams or individual researchers in single facilities in a way that more structured experimental studies often cannot be. They have pointed the way to a number of
95:
A retrospective study, on the other hand, looks backwards and examines exposures to suspected risk or protection factors in relation to an outcome that is established at the start of the study. Many valuable case–control studies, such as Lane and Claypon's 1926 investigation of risk factors for
91:
A prospective study watches for outcomes, such as the development of a disease, during the study period and relates this to other factors such as suspected risk or protection factor(s). The study usually involves taking a cohort of subjects and watching them over a long period. The outcome of
70:
Controls need not be in good health; inclusion of sick people is sometimes appropriate, as the control group should represent those at risk of becoming a case. Controls should come from the same population as the cases, and their selection should be independent of the exposures of interest.
156:
Case–control studies were initially analyzed by testing whether or not there were significant differences between the proportion of exposed subjects among cases and controls. Subsequently, Cornfield pointed out that, when the disease outcome of interest is rare, the
74:
Controls can carry the same disease as the experimental group, but of another grade/severity, therefore being different from the outcome of interest. However, because the difference between the cases and the controls will be smaller, this results in a lower
55:
attribute to the disease is examined by comparing the diseased and nondiseased subjects with regard to how frequently the factor or attribute is present (or, if quantitative, the levels of the attribute) in each of the groups (diseased and nondiseased)."
113:
important discoveries and advances. The case–control study design is often used in the study of rare diseases or as a preliminary study where little is known about the association between the risk factor and disease of interest.
120:
they tend to be less costly and shorter in duration. In several situations, they have greater statistical power than cohort studies, which must often wait for a 'sufficient' number of disease events to accrue.
2584: 185:
interpretable parameters than odds ratios—such as risk ratios, levels, and differences—is biased if applied to case–control data, but special statistical procedures provide easy to use consistent estimators.
817:
Rodrigues L, Kirkwood BR (1990). "Case–control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls".
196:
and Gardner claimed that the contributions of medical science to increasing human longevity and public health were negligible, and too often negative, until Scottish physician
1038: 2579: 1133: 2569: 42:. Some statistical methods make it possible to use a case–control study to also estimate relative risk, risk differences, and other quantities. 140:
One of the most significant triumphs of the case–control study was the demonstration of the link between tobacco smoking and lung cancer, by
2619: 1425: 1421: 2652: 2624: 1664: 1471: 1429: 1417: 2629: 1945: 1126: 2687: 2594: 935: 405: 376: 34:
the condition but are otherwise similar. They require fewer resources but provide less evidence for causal inference than a
2677: 1592: 1508: 2634: 2198: 1786: 1373: 1343: 585:"Commentary: the hormone replacement-coronary heart disease conundrum: is this the death of observational epidemiology?" 1702: 2692: 2218: 1801: 1119: 1089: 1630: 718:"Lung cancer and other causes of death in relation to smoking; a second report on the mortality of British doctors" 2335: 1963: 1940: 201: 1437: 2829: 2790: 2609: 2559: 2371: 2268: 2029: 1930: 1843: 1475: 1197: 2802: 2442: 2213: 1623: 1308: 213: 2307: 2034: 1602: 125: 2454: 2347: 2258: 2071: 2059: 1968: 1657: 1566: 1538: 1467: 1221: 228: 35: 2524: 2449: 2354: 1890: 1616: 1292: 218: 124:
Case–control studies are observational in nature and thus do not provide the same level of evidence as
624:
Ioannidis JP (2005). "Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research".
2834: 2646: 2641: 2509: 2208: 1915: 1873: 1837: 1744: 1411: 2484: 2183: 1895: 1791: 1349: 1297: 1177: 223: 2755: 2682: 2514: 1395: 1265: 1243: 1212: 1187: 1170: 166: 62:, wherein exposed and unexposed subjects are observed until they develop an outcome of interest. 2778: 2750: 2529: 1739: 1650: 1546: 1383: 1043: 2824: 2735: 2519: 2054: 1955: 1848: 1697: 1387: 1274: 1182: 1146: 129: 1111: 424:
Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2005). "Compared to what? Finding controls for case–control studies".
2710: 2494: 2359: 2325: 2273: 2098: 2093: 2039: 1995: 1885: 1823: 1712: 1707: 1353: 178: 145: 951:
Prentice RL, Pyke R (1979). "Logistic disease incidence models and case–control studies".
513: 8: 2720: 2715: 2489: 2288: 2278: 2113: 1722: 1260: 1192: 30: 2342: 1925: 1774: 1513: 1463: 1278: 1207: 1165: 1015: 904: 865: 742: 717: 693: 668: 649: 580: 492: 449: 343: 307: 276: 791: 766: 480: 437: 2504: 2499: 2427: 2376: 2150: 2130: 2118: 2078: 2049: 2017: 1935: 1828: 1796: 1692: 1587: 1551: 1518: 1443: 1365: 1142: 1085: 1078: 1033: 1007: 999: 931: 908: 873: 834: 796: 747: 698: 641: 606: 561: 484: 441: 401: 372: 335: 327: 281: 193: 97: 76: 1019: 653: 496: 347: 2669: 2422: 2381: 2193: 2168: 1980: 1910: 1754: 1361: 1282: 1236: 1231: 1055: 991: 960: 900: 857: 826: 786: 778: 737: 729: 688: 680: 633: 596: 551: 476: 433: 319: 271: 263: 1096:(Still a very useful book, and a great place to start, but now a bit out of date.) 767:"Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors" 453: 2730: 2432: 2235: 2228: 2163: 2103: 1985: 1975: 1905: 1878: 1863: 1818: 1808: 1759: 1556: 1379: 1334: 1047: 980:"Estimating risk and rate levels, ratios and differences in case–control studies" 394: 308:"Estimating risk and rate levels, ratios and differences in case–control studies" 197: 782: 2417: 2203: 2140: 2125: 2108: 2066: 1868: 1749: 1582: 1503: 1455: 1248: 1160: 964: 248: 16:
Type of observational study comparing two existing groups differing in outcome
2818: 2725: 2604: 2412: 2386: 2263: 2223: 2188: 2178: 2158: 1900: 1858: 1833: 1781: 1769: 1764: 1673: 1561: 1528: 1523: 1003: 331: 240: 174: 162: 1051: 891:
Miettinen O (1976). "Estimability and estimation in case–referent studies".
733: 2745: 2173: 2022: 2012: 1990: 1920: 1813: 1727: 1403: 1287: 1011: 830: 800: 751: 702: 684: 645: 637: 610: 565: 556: 539: 488: 445: 364: 339: 285: 141: 117: 83:
a ratio of about 4 to 1, may be a cost-effective way to improve the study.
59: 1059: 912: 877: 852:
Greenhouse SW (1982). "Jerome Cornfield's contributions to epidemiology".
838: 467:
Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002). "Case–control studies: research in reverse".
2740: 2437: 2135: 2044: 2007: 1597: 1451: 1324: 1314: 601: 584: 101: 979: 514:"Prospective, Retrospective, Case–control, Cohort Studies - StatsDirect" 359: 357: 267: 2366: 2088: 1399: 1391: 1357: 1319: 1226: 869: 170: 158: 39: 1075: 2464: 2283: 1853: 1734: 1459: 1447: 995: 354: 323: 861: 2330: 2083: 1717: 1687: 1493: 930:(3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2002: 1498: 1642: 2297: 86: 181:
of exposure without the need for the rare disease assumption.
2459: 1141: 1106: 1032: 2585:
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
2391: 764: 578: 200:
was able to convince the medical establishment to adopt
188: 669:"Smoking and carcinoma of the lung; preliminary report" 58:
The case–control study is frequently contrasted with
925: 1039:
Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
371:(5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. 38:. A case–control study is often used to produce an 1077: 393: 1076:Stolley, Paul D., Schlesselman, James J. (1982). 816: 812: 810: 2816: 765:Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I (2004). 1080:Case–control studies: design, conduct, analysis 807: 1658: 1127: 419: 417: 249:"8. Case–control and cross sectional studies" 950: 944: 758: 709: 660: 617: 466: 423: 400:. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 87:Prospective vs. retrospective cohort studies 884: 845: 572: 460: 107: 2620:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1665: 1651: 1134: 1120: 851: 414: 65: 2580:Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 2570:Center for Disease Control and Prevention 926:Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008). 890: 790: 741: 692: 623: 600: 555: 275: 1426:Preventable fraction among the unexposed 1422:Attributable fraction for the population 977: 715: 666: 305: 173:of exposure can be used to estimate the 161:of exposure can be used to estimate the 2625:Health departments in the United States 1430:Preventable fraction for the population 1418:Attributable fraction among the exposed 391: 2817: 2630:Council on Education for Public Health 1107:Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2688:Professional degrees of public health 2595:Ministry of Health and Family Welfare 1646: 1115: 537: 363: 189:Impact on longevity and public health 2785: 2678:Bachelor of Science in Public Health 1593:Correlation does not imply causation 1509:Animal testing on non-human primates 1084:. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 508: 506: 246: 2797: 1946:Workers' right to access the toilet 1787:Human right to water and sanitation 13: 1069: 905:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112220 14: 2846: 2219:Commercial determinants of health 1672: 1100: 503: 2796: 2784: 2773: 2772: 1802:National public health institute 2199:Open-source healthcare software 1941:Sociology of health and illness 1026: 971: 919: 2560:Caribbean Public Health Agency 2372:Sexually transmitted infection 2269:Statistical hypothesis testing 2030:Occupational safety and health 1931:Sexual and reproductive health 1844:Occupational safety and health 1476:Pre- and post-test probability 1198:Patient and public involvement 978:King G, Zeng L (30 May 2002). 531: 385: 306:King G, Zeng L (30 May 2002). 299: 79:to detect an exposure effect. 1: 2214:Social determinants of health 481:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07605-5 438:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66379-9 396:Epidemiology: An Introduction 234: 45: 2274:Analysis of variance (ANOVA) 2035:Human factors and ergonomics 1603:Sex as a biological variable 369:A Dictionary of Epidemiology 126:randomized controlled trials 7: 2455:Good manufacturing practice 2259:Randomized controlled trial 1567:Intention-to-treat analysis 1539:Analysis of clinical trials 1468:Specificity and sensitivity 1222:Randomized controlled trial 783:10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE 229:Randomized controlled trial 207: 151: 135: 36:randomized controlled trial 10: 2851: 2525:Theory of planned behavior 2450:Good agricultural practice 2355:Public health surveillance 2247:epidemiological statistics 1891:Public health intervention 256:Emergency Medicine Journal 219:Retrospective cohort study 104:in retrospective studies. 52:Dictionary of Epidemiology 2768: 2703: 2662: 2647:World Toilet Organization 2642:World Health Organization 2549: 2538: 2475: 2400: 2316: 2244: 2209:Public health informatics 2149: 1954: 1916:Right to rest and leisure 1745:Globalization and disease 1680: 1611: 1576:Interpretation of results 1575: 1537: 1486: 1436: 1410: 1372: 1342: 1333: 1309:Nested case–control study 1259: 1206: 1153: 214:Nested case–control study 202:randomized control trials 2693:Schools of public health 2485:Diffusion of innovations 2184:Health impact assessment 1896:Public health laboratory 1792:Management of depression 1178:Academic clinical trials 716:Doll R, Hill AB (1956). 667:Doll R, Hill AB (1950). 544:Evidence-Based Dentistry 224:Prospective cohort study 116:Compared to prospective 108:Strengths and weaknesses 2756:Social hygiene movement 2683:Doctor of Public Health 2515:Social cognitive theory 2317:Infectious and epidemic 2099:Fecal–oral transmission 1396:Relative risk reduction 1244:Adaptive clinical trial 1188:Evidence-based medicine 1171:Adaptive clinical trial 965:10.1093/biomet/66.3.403 734:10.1136/bmj.2.5001.1071 167:rare disease assumption 66:Control group selection 2751:Germ theory of disease 2530:Transtheoretical model 1384:Number needed to treat 1044:Crown Publishing Group 1036:, Dan Gardner (2015), 984:Statistics in Medicine 685:10.1136/bmj.2.4682.739 638:10.1001/jama.294.2.218 557:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400355 312:Statistics in Medicine 2830:Design of experiments 2635:Public Health Service 2520:Social norms approach 2510:PRECEDE–PROCEED model 1956:Preventive healthcare 1849:Pharmaceutical policy 1698:Chief Medical Officer 1388:Number needed to harm 1275:Cross-sectional study 1227:Scientific experiment 1183:Clinical study design 130:hierarchy of evidence 2711:Sara Josephine Baker 2610:Public Health Agency 2495:Health communication 2360:Disease surveillance 2326:Asymptomatic carrier 2308:Statistical software 1996:Preventive nutrition 1824:Medical anthropology 1713:Environmental health 1354:Cumulative incidence 831:10.1093/ije/19.1.205 583:, Ebrahim S (2004). 204:after World War II. 179:incidence rate ratio 2721:Carl Rogers Darnall 2716:Samuel Jay Crumbine 2490:Health belief model 2343:Notifiable diseases 2279:Regression analysis 2114:Waterborne diseases 1703:Cultural competence 1261:Observational study 1193:Real world evidence 1147:experimental design 928:Modern Epidemiology 856:. 38 Suppl: 33–45. 518:www.statsdirect.com 268:10.1136/emj.20.1.54 31:observational study 27:case–referent study 2319:disease prevention 2254:Case–control study 1926:Security of person 1775:Health care reform 1547:Risk–benefit ratio 1514:First-in-man study 1464:Case fatality rate 1305:Case–control study 1279:Longitudinal study 602:10.1093/ije/dyh124 392:Rothman K (2002). 23:case–control study 2812: 2811: 2764: 2763: 2674:Higher education 2505:Positive deviance 2500:Health psychology 2476:Health behavioral 2403:safety management 2377:Social distancing 2151:Population health 2131:Smoking cessation 2079:Pharmacovigilance 2050:Injury prevention 2018:Infection control 1936:Social psychology 1886:Prisoners' rights 1829:Medical sociology 1797:Public health law 1693:Biological hazard 1640: 1639: 1588:Survivorship bias 1552:Systematic review 1519:Multicenter trial 1482: 1481: 1472:Likelihood-ratios 1444:Clinical endpoint 1412:Population impact 1366:Period prevalence 1143:Clinical research 1034:Philip E. Tetlock 990:(10): 1409–1427. 937:978-0-7817-5564-1 819:Int. J. Epidemiol 728:(5001): 1071–81. 538:Levin KA (2005). 432:(9468): 1429–33. 407:978-0-19-513554-1 378:978-0-19-531450-2 318:(10): 1409–1427. 2842: 2835:Nursing research 2800: 2799: 2788: 2787: 2776: 2775: 2670:Health education 2547: 2546: 2401:Food hygiene and 2382:Tropical disease 2194:Infant mortality 2169:Community health 2045:Controlled Drugs 1981:Health promotion 1911:Right to housing 1755:Health economics 1667: 1660: 1653: 1644: 1643: 1487:Trial/test types 1362:Point prevalence 1340: 1339: 1283:Ecological study 1266:EBM II-2 to II-3 1237:Open-label trial 1232:Blind experiment 1208:Controlled study 1136: 1129: 1122: 1113: 1112: 1095: 1083: 1064: 1062: 1030: 1024: 1023: 996:10.1002/sim.1032 975: 969: 968: 948: 942: 941: 923: 917: 916: 893:Am. J. Epidemiol 888: 882: 881: 849: 843: 842: 814: 805: 804: 794: 762: 756: 755: 745: 713: 707: 706: 696: 679:(4682): 739–48. 664: 658: 657: 621: 615: 614: 604: 576: 570: 569: 559: 540:"Study design I" 535: 529: 528: 526: 524: 510: 501: 500: 464: 458: 457: 421: 412: 411: 399: 389: 383: 382: 361: 352: 351: 324:10.1002/sim.1032 303: 297: 296: 294: 292: 279: 253: 247:Mann CJ (2003). 244: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2808: 2760: 2731:Margaret Sanger 2699: 2658: 2542: 2540: 2534: 2477: 2471: 2443:Safety scandals 2402: 2396: 2318: 2312: 2246: 2240: 2236:Social medicine 2229:Race and health 2164:Child mortality 2145: 2104:Open defecation 1986:Human nutrition 1976:Family planning 1964:Behavior change 1950: 1906:Right to health 1819:Maternal health 1809:Health politics 1760:Health literacy 1676: 1671: 1641: 1636: 1607: 1571: 1533: 1478: 1432: 1406: 1380:Risk difference 1368: 1329: 1263: 1255: 1210: 1202: 1166:Trial protocols 1149: 1140: 1103: 1092: 1072: 1070:Further reading 1067: 1031: 1027: 976: 972: 949: 945: 938: 924: 920: 889: 885: 862:10.2307/2529852 850: 846: 815: 808: 763: 759: 714: 710: 665: 661: 622: 618: 589:Int J Epidemiol 577: 573: 536: 532: 522: 520: 512: 511: 504: 475:(9304): 431–4. 465: 461: 422: 415: 408: 390: 386: 379: 362: 355: 304: 300: 290: 288: 251: 245: 241: 237: 210: 198:Archie Cochrane 191: 154: 138: 110: 89: 68: 48: 29:) is a type of 25:(also known as 17: 12: 11: 5: 2848: 2838: 2837: 2832: 2827: 2810: 2809: 2807: 2806: 2794: 2782: 2769: 2766: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2759: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2743: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2723: 2718: 2713: 2707: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2690: 2685: 2680: 2672: 2666: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2657: 2656: 2649: 2644: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2607: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2582: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2553: 2551: 2544: 2539:Organizations, 2536: 2535: 2533: 2532: 2527: 2522: 2517: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2487: 2481: 2479: 2473: 2472: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2462: 2452: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2440: 2435: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2415: 2406: 2404: 2398: 2397: 2395: 2394: 2389: 2384: 2379: 2374: 2369: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2328: 2322: 2320: 2314: 2313: 2311: 2310: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2295: 2286: 2281: 2276: 2266: 2261: 2256: 2250: 2248: 2245:Biological and 2242: 2241: 2239: 2238: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2226: 2221: 2211: 2206: 2204:Multimorbidity 2201: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2161: 2155: 2153: 2147: 2146: 2144: 2143: 2141:Vector control 2138: 2133: 2128: 2126:School hygiene 2123: 2122: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2109:Sanitary sewer 2106: 2101: 2096: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2067:Patient safety 2064: 2063: 2062: 2057: 2052: 2047: 2042: 2037: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1993: 1983: 1978: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1960: 1958: 1952: 1951: 1949: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1913: 1908: 1903: 1898: 1893: 1888: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1876: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1851: 1846: 1841: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1799: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1772: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1750:Harm reduction 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1725: 1715: 1710: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1684: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1670: 1669: 1662: 1655: 1647: 1638: 1637: 1635: 1634: 1631:List of topics 1627: 1620: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1606: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1583:Selection bias 1579: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1559: 1554: 1549: 1543: 1541: 1535: 1534: 1532: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1504:Animal testing 1501: 1496: 1490: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1456:Mortality rate 1442: 1440: 1434: 1433: 1416: 1414: 1408: 1407: 1378: 1376: 1370: 1369: 1348: 1346: 1337: 1331: 1330: 1328: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1312: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1285: 1271: 1269: 1257: 1256: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1249:Platform trial 1241: 1240: 1239: 1234: 1229: 1218: 1216: 1204: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1168: 1161:Clinical trial 1157: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1139: 1138: 1131: 1124: 1116: 1110: 1109: 1102: 1101:External links 1099: 1098: 1097: 1090: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1025: 970: 959:(3): 403–411. 943: 936: 918: 883: 844: 806: 777:(7455): 1519. 757: 708: 659: 616: 571: 530: 502: 459: 413: 406: 384: 377: 367:, ed. (2008). 353: 298: 238: 236: 233: 232: 231: 226: 221: 216: 209: 206: 190: 187: 153: 150: 137: 134: 118:cohort studies 109: 106: 88: 85: 67: 64: 60:cohort studies 47: 44: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2847: 2836: 2833: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2823: 2822: 2820: 2805: 2804: 2795: 2793: 2792: 2783: 2781: 2780: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2757: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2726:Joseph Lister 2724: 2722: 2719: 2717: 2714: 2712: 2709: 2708: 2706: 2702: 2694: 2691: 2689: 2686: 2684: 2681: 2679: 2676: 2675: 2673: 2671: 2668: 2667: 2665: 2661: 2654: 2650: 2648: 2645: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2628: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2615: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2605:Health Canada 2603: 2602: 2600: 2596: 2593: 2592: 2590: 2586: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2577: 2575: 2571: 2568: 2567: 2565: 2561: 2558: 2557: 2555: 2554: 2552: 2550:Organizations 2548: 2545: 2537: 2531: 2528: 2526: 2523: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2513: 2511: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2498: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2482: 2480: 2474: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2448: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2416: 2414: 2411: 2410: 2408: 2407: 2405: 2399: 2393: 2390: 2388: 2387:Vaccine trial 2385: 2383: 2380: 2378: 2375: 2373: 2370: 2368: 2365: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2353: 2349: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2321: 2315: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2300: 2296: 2294: 2292: 2287: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2277: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2264:Relative risk 2262: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2249: 2243: 2237: 2234: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2224:Health equity 2222: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2189:Health system 2187: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2179:Global health 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2159:Biostatistics 2157: 2156: 2154: 2152: 2148: 2142: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2082: 2080: 2077: 2073: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2058: 2056: 2053: 2051: 2048: 2046: 2043: 2041: 2038: 2036: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2028: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1974: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1962: 1961: 1959: 1957: 1953: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1939: 1937: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1904: 1902: 1901:Right to food 1899: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1889: 1887: 1884: 1880: 1877: 1875: 1872: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1834:Mental health 1832: 1830: 1827: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1782:Housing First 1780: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1770:Health system 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765:Health policy 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1701: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674:Public health 1668: 1663: 1661: 1656: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1574: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1562:Meta-analysis 1560: 1558: 1555: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1530: 1529:Vaccine trial 1527: 1525: 1524:Seeding trial 1522: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1489: 1485: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1293:Retrospective 1291: 1290: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1262: 1258: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1213:EBM I to II-1 1209: 1205: 1199: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1181: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1137: 1132: 1130: 1125: 1123: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1093: 1091:0-19-502933-X 1087: 1082: 1081: 1074: 1073: 1063:, esp. ch. 2. 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1029: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 974: 966: 962: 958: 954: 947: 939: 933: 929: 922: 914: 910: 906: 902: 899:(2): 226–35. 898: 894: 887: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 848: 840: 836: 832: 828: 825:(1): 205–13. 824: 820: 813: 811: 802: 798: 793: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 761: 753: 749: 744: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 712: 704: 700: 695: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 663: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 632:(2): 218–28. 631: 627: 620: 612: 608: 603: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 581:Davey Smith G 575: 567: 563: 558: 553: 549: 545: 541: 534: 519: 515: 509: 507: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 463: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 420: 418: 409: 403: 398: 397: 388: 380: 374: 370: 366: 360: 358: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 302: 287: 283: 278: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 250: 243: 239: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 211: 205: 203: 199: 195: 186: 182: 180: 176: 175:relative risk 172: 168: 164: 163:relative risk 160: 149: 147: 146:Bradford Hill 143: 133: 131: 127: 122: 119: 114: 105: 103: 99: 93: 84: 80: 78: 72: 63: 61: 56: 53: 43: 41: 37: 32: 28: 24: 19: 2825:Epidemiology 2801: 2789: 2777: 2746:Radium Girls 2741:Typhoid Mary 2428:Microbiology 2298: 2290: 2253: 2174:Epidemiology 2072:Organization 2023:Oral hygiene 2013:Hand washing 1991:Healthy diet 1921:Right to sit 1814:Labor rights 1629: 1622: 1615: 1404:Hazard ratio 1304: 1288:Cohort study 1079: 1037: 1028: 987: 983: 973: 956: 952: 946: 927: 921: 896: 892: 886: 853: 847: 822: 818: 774: 770: 760: 725: 721: 711: 676: 672: 662: 629: 625: 619: 595:(3): 464–7. 592: 588: 574: 550:(3): 78–79. 547: 543: 533: 521:. Retrieved 517: 472: 468: 462: 429: 425: 395: 387: 368: 315: 311: 301: 289:. Retrieved 262:(1): 54–60. 259: 255: 242: 192: 183: 155: 142:Richard Doll 139: 123: 115: 111: 94: 90: 81: 73: 69: 57: 51: 49: 26: 22: 20: 18: 2803:WikiProject 2543:and history 2423:Engineering 2136:Vaccination 2008:Food safety 1598:Null result 1557:Replication 1452:Infectivity 1374:Association 1325:Case report 1315:Case series 1298:Prospective 579:Lawlor DA, 102:confounding 2819:Categories 2556:Caribbean 2433:Processing 2367:Quarantine 2289:Student's 2089:Sanitation 1723:History of 1400:Odds ratio 1392:Risk ratio 1358:Prevalence 1344:Occurrence 1320:Case study 953:Biometrika 854:Biometrics 235:References 171:odds ratio 159:odds ratio 46:Definition 40:odds ratio 2736:John Snow 2663:Education 2653:Full list 2541:education 2465:ISO 22000 2418:Chemistry 2331:Epidemics 2284:ROC curve 2094:Emergency 1874:Radiation 1854:Pollution 1838:Ministers 1735:Euthenics 1460:Morbidity 1448:Virulence 1350:Incidence 1060:Q21203378 1052:26682260M 1004:0277-6715 332:0277-6715 2779:Category 2478:sciences 2413:Additive 2084:Safe sex 2055:Medicine 1969:Theories 1740:Genomics 1718:Eugenics 1708:Deviance 1688:Auxology 1624:Glossary 1617:Category 1494:In vitro 1335:Measures 1154:Overview 1056:Wikidata 1020:11387977 1012:12185893 801:15213107 752:13364389 722:Br Med J 703:14772469 673:Br Med J 654:16749356 646:16014596 611:15166201 566:16184164 497:10770936 489:11844534 446:15836892 348:11387977 340:12185893 286:12533370 208:See also 152:Analysis 136:Examples 50:Porta's 2791:Commons 2704:History 2601:Canada 2576:Europe 2060:Nursing 2040:Hygiene 2003:Hygiene 1728:Liberal 1681:General 1499:In vivo 913:1251836 878:7046823 870:2529852 839:2190942 743:2035864 694:2038856 365:Porta M 291:5 March 277:1726024 194:Tetlock 177:or the 2591:India 2566:China 2438:Safety 2119:Worker 1088:  1058:  1050:  1018:  1010:  1002:  934:  911:  876:  868:  837:  799:  792:437139 789:  750:  740:  701:  691:  652:  644:  609:  564:  523:4 July 495:  487:  469:Lancet 454:836985 452:  444:  426:Lancet 404:  375:  346:  338:  330:  284:  274:  2616:U.S. 2460:HACCP 2409:Food 2301:-test 2293:-test 1879:Light 1864:Water 1438:Other 1016:S2CID 866:JSTOR 650:S2CID 493:S2CID 450:S2CID 344:S2CID 252:(PDF) 165:(see 77:power 2392:WASH 2348:List 2336:List 1869:Soil 1277:vs. 1145:and 1086:ISBN 1008:PMID 1000:ISSN 932:ISBN 909:PMID 874:PMID 835:PMID 797:PMID 748:PMID 699:PMID 642:PMID 626:JAMA 607:PMID 562:PMID 525:2019 485:PMID 442:PMID 402:ISBN 373:ISBN 336:PMID 328:ISSN 293:2012 282:PMID 144:and 100:and 98:bias 1859:Air 992:doi 961:doi 901:doi 897:103 858:doi 827:doi 787:PMC 779:doi 775:328 771:BMJ 738:PMC 730:doi 689:PMC 681:doi 634:doi 630:294 597:doi 552:doi 477:doi 473:359 434:doi 430:365 320:doi 272:PMC 264:doi 2821:: 1474:, 1470:, 1466:, 1462:, 1458:, 1454:, 1450:, 1446:, 1428:, 1424:, 1420:, 1402:, 1398:, 1394:, 1390:, 1386:, 1382:, 1364:, 1360:, 1356:, 1352:, 1281:, 1054:, 1048:OL 1046:, 1042:, 1014:. 1006:. 998:. 988:21 986:. 982:. 957:66 955:. 907:. 895:. 872:. 864:. 833:. 823:19 821:. 809:^ 795:. 785:. 773:. 769:. 746:. 736:. 724:. 720:. 697:. 687:. 675:. 671:. 648:. 640:. 628:. 605:. 593:33 591:. 587:. 560:. 546:. 542:. 516:. 505:^ 491:. 483:. 471:. 448:. 440:. 428:. 416:^ 356:^ 342:. 334:. 326:. 316:21 314:. 310:. 280:. 270:. 260:20 258:. 254:. 132:. 21:A 2655:) 2651:( 2299:Z 2291:t 1840:) 1836:( 1666:e 1659:t 1652:v 1311:) 1307:( 1268:) 1264:( 1215:) 1211:( 1135:e 1128:t 1121:v 1094:. 1022:. 994:: 967:. 963:: 940:. 915:. 903:: 880:. 860:: 841:. 829:: 803:. 781:: 754:. 732:: 726:2 705:. 683:: 677:2 656:. 636:: 613:. 599:: 568:. 554:: 548:6 527:. 499:. 479:: 456:. 436:: 410:. 381:. 350:. 322:: 295:. 266::

Index

observational study
randomized controlled trial
odds ratio
cohort studies
power
bias
confounding
cohort studies
randomized controlled trials
hierarchy of evidence
Richard Doll
Bradford Hill
odds ratio
relative risk
rare disease assumption
odds ratio
relative risk
incidence rate ratio
Tetlock
Archie Cochrane
randomized control trials
Nested case–control study
Retrospective cohort study
Prospective cohort study
Randomized controlled trial
"8. Case–control and cross sectional studies"
doi
10.1136/emj.20.1.54
PMC
1726024

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.