Knowledge

Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd

Source 📝

98: 24: 180:
procedures. The William Hill employee who took Calvert's telephone call, John, apparently did not implement the company's procedure and William Hill continued to facilitate Calvert's gambling after he opened another account in his own name two months later. Between June and December 2006 he was permitted to make bets totalling £3.5m, resulting in a net loss of £2.1m.
179:
Nevertheless, he was allowed by William Hill to continue betting two weeks later. His losses escalated so, again, he requested of the bookmaker that they stop taking his bets. During this "rare moment of clarity," Calvert availed himself of William Hill's and other bookmakers' customer self-exclusion
194:
However, Calvert's claim for the £2,052,972.18 he lost was thrown out on the grounds that he would have ruined himself via another bookmaker. He had continued to gamble with other companies even while his William Hill accounts were closed.
246: 191:
were found to have failed in their duty of care to Calvert. The judge also remarked upon "significant structural weakness in William Hill's internal arrangements."
168:
Graham Calvert was a successful greyhound trainer and pathological gambler who in 2006 placed the largest golf bet in history: £347,000 on America to win the
226: 247:
https://web.archive.org/web/20091031012659/http://www.inhouselawyer.co.uk/index.php/litigation-a-dispute-resolution/7318-no-duty-to-save-you-from-yourself
206:
Calvert was gaoled for two years in October 2008 on firearms and drugs charges. He, his family and property had been the subject of attacks from
53: 241: 276: 266: 271: 227:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081025053338/http://www.shieldsgazette.com/news/Gambling-addict-jailed-over-guns.4616074.jp
281: 75: 46: 97: 217:'s self-exclusion policy remains untested, since they had not used the policy in the case of Calvert. 36: 214: 188: 173: 157: 40: 32: 242:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110204210910/http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2008/CACiv/dec0.9.htm
57: 153: 108: 8: 251: 126: 236: 160:
after the bookmaker had failed to implement their own "self-exclusion" policy.
260: 172:. Calvert lost this and a series of other bets, so in May 2006 he closed his 231: 156:
case in which a large bookmaker was sued by a customer who lost £2.1m to
207: 169: 198:
An additional personal injury claim for damages also failed.
252:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/454.html
237:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/7291597.stm
176:account and requested that it not be opened again. 258: 45:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 96: 232:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7243656.stm 76:Learn how and when to remove this message 259: 17: 13: 213:The legality of the disclaimer on 149:Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd. 14: 293: 91:Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd 22: 277:2008 in United Kingdom case law 267:Gambling in the United Kingdom 1: 163: 201: 7: 272:High Court of Justice cases 183: 10: 298: 220: 137: 132: 122: 114: 104: 95: 90: 282:William Hill (bookmaker) 31:This article includes a 60:more precise citations. 154:High Court of Justice 109:High Court of Justice 33:list of references 145: 144: 86: 85: 78: 289: 133:Court membership 100: 88: 87: 81: 74: 70: 67: 61: 56:this article by 47:inline citations 26: 25: 18: 297: 296: 292: 291: 290: 288: 287: 286: 257: 256: 223: 204: 186: 166: 82: 71: 65: 62: 51: 37:related reading 27: 23: 12: 11: 5: 295: 285: 284: 279: 274: 269: 255: 254: 249: 244: 239: 234: 229: 222: 219: 203: 200: 185: 182: 165: 162: 143: 142: 139: 135: 134: 130: 129: 124: 120: 119: 116: 112: 111: 106: 102: 101: 93: 92: 84: 83: 41:external links 30: 28: 21: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 294: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 264: 262: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 224: 218: 216: 211: 209: 199: 196: 192: 190: 181: 177: 175: 171: 161: 159: 155: 151: 150: 140: 138:Judge sitting 136: 131: 128: 127:EWHC 454 (Ch) 125: 121: 118:12 March 2008 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 99: 94: 89: 80: 77: 69: 66:November 2011 59: 55: 49: 48: 42: 38: 34: 29: 20: 19: 16: 215:William Hill 212: 205: 197: 193: 189:William Hill 187: 178: 174:William Hill 167: 158:William Hill 148: 147: 146: 72: 63: 52:Please help 44: 15: 208:loan sharks 58:introducing 261:Categories 164:Background 202:Aftermath 170:Ryder Cup 184:Judgment 141:Briggs J 123:Citation 221:Sources 115:Decided 54:improve 152:was a 105:Court 39:, or 263:: 210:. 43:, 35:, 79:) 73:( 68:) 64:( 50:.

Index

list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message

High Court of Justice
EWHC 454 (Ch)
High Court of Justice
William Hill
Ryder Cup
William Hill
William Hill
loan sharks
William Hill
https://web.archive.org/web/20081025053338/http://www.shieldsgazette.com/news/Gambling-addict-jailed-over-guns.4616074.jp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7243656.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/7291597.stm
https://web.archive.org/web/20110204210910/http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2008/CACiv/dec0.9.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20091031012659/http://www.inhouselawyer.co.uk/index.php/litigation-a-dispute-resolution/7318-no-duty-to-save-you-from-yourself
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/454.html
Categories
Gambling in the United Kingdom
High Court of Justice cases
2008 in United Kingdom case law
William Hill (bookmaker)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.