Knowledge

Boundary problem (spatial analysis)

Source πŸ“

99:(MAUP) inasmuch as MAUP is associated with the arbitrary geographic unit and the unit is defined by the boundary. For administrative purposes, data for policy indicators are usually aggregated within larger units (or enumeration units) such as census tracts, school districts, municipalities and counties. The artificial units serve the purposes of taxation and service provision. For example, municipalities can effectively respond to the need of the public in their jurisdictions. However, in such spatially aggregated units, spatial variations of detailed social variables cannot be identified. The problem is noted when the average degree of a variable and its unequal distribution over space are measured. 68:
spatial distribution and estimation of the statistical parameters of the spatial process. The difference is largely based on the fact that spatial processes are generally unbounded or fuzzy-bounded, but the processes are expressed in data imposed within boundaries for analysis purposes. Although the boundary problem was discussed in relation to artificial and arbitrary boundaries, the effect of the boundaries also occurs according to natural boundaries as long as it is ignored that properties at sites on the natural boundary such as streams are likely to differ from those at sites within the boundary.
92:
interaction and flow among spatial entities. For example, the shape can affect the measurement of origin-destination flows since these are often recorded when they cross an artificial boundary. Because of the effect set by the boundary, the shape and area information is used to estimate travel distances from surveys, or to locate traffic counters, travel survey stations, or traffic monitoring systems. From the same perspective, Theobald (2001; retrieved from) argued that measures of urban sprawl should consider interdependences and interactions with nearby rural areas.
56:. The boundary problem occurs because of the loss of neighbours in analyses that depend on the values of the neighbours. While geographic phenomena are measured and analyzed within a specific unit, identical spatial data can appear either dispersed or clustered depending on the boundary placed around the data. In analysis with point data, dispersion is evaluated as dependent of the boundary. In analysis with area data, statistics should be interpreted based upon the boundary. 133:
generalized least squares theory utilizes time-series modeling that needs an arbitrary transformation matrix to fit the multidirectional dependencies and multiple boundary units found in geographical data. Martin also argued that some of the underlying assumptions of the statistical techniques are unrealistic or unreasonably strict. Moreover, Griffith (1985) himself also identified the inferiority of the techniques through simulation analysis.
108:
construction of an empirical buffer zone, construction of an artificial buffer zone, extrapolation into a buffer zone, utilizing a correction factor, etc. The first method (i.e., the ignorance of the edge effects), assumes an infinite surface in which the edge effects do not occur. In fact, this approach has been used by traditional geographical theories (e.g.,
36:
While geographic phenomena are measured and analyzed within a specific unit, identical spatial data can appear either dispersed or clustered depending on the boundary placed around the data. In analysis with point data, dispersion is evaluated as dependent of the boundary. In analysis with areal data, statistics should be interpreted based upon the boundary.
137:
statistical tests. As such, this strategy examines the sensitivity in the estimation result according to changes in the boundary assumptions. With GIS tools, boundaries can be systematically manipulated. The tools then conduct the measurement and analysis of the spatial process in such differentiated boundaries. Accordingly, such a
84:. This effect originates from the ignorance of interdependences that occur outside the bounded region. Griffith and Griffith and Amrhein highlighted problems according to the edge effect. A typical example is a cross-boundary influence such as cross-border jobs, services and other resources located in a neighbouring municipality. 112:). Its main shortcoming is that empirical phenomena occur within a finite area, so an infinite and homogeneous surface is unrealistic. The remaining five approaches are similar in that they attempted to produce unbiased parameter estimation, that is, to provide a medium by which the edge effects are removed. (He called these 60:
boundaries (e.g., an air pollution boundary in modeling studies or an urban boundary in population migration). In an area isolated by the natural boundaries, the spatial process discontinues at the boundaries. In contrast, if a study area is delineated by the artificial boundaries, the process continues beyond the area.
132:
theory, (2) using dummy variables and a regression structure (as a way of creating a buffer zone), and (3) regarding the boundary problem as a missing values problem. However, these techniques require rather strict assumptions about the process of interest. For example, the solution according to the
107:
Several strategies for resolving geographic boundary problems in measurement and analysis have been proposed. To identify the effectiveness of the strategies, Griffith reviewed traditional techniques that were developed to mitigate the edge effects: ignoring the effects, undertaking a torus mapping,
120:
to be discussed below.) Specifically, the techniques aim at a collection of data beyond the boundary of the study area and fit a larger model, that is, mapping over the area or over-bounding the study area. Through simulation analysis, however, Griffith and Amrhein identified the inadequacy of such
67:
That is, for measurement or administrative purposes, geographic boundaries are drawn, but the boundaries per se can bring about different spatial patterns in geographic phenomena. It has been reported that the difference in the way of drawing the boundary significantly affects identification of the
91:
that results from the artificial shape delineated by the boundary. As an illustration of the effect of the artificial shape, point pattern analysis tends to provide higher levels of clustering for the identical point pattern within a unit that is more elongated. Similarly, the shape can influence
35:
in analysis is a phenomenon in which geographical patterns are differentiated by the shape and arrangement of boundaries that are drawn for administrative or measurement purposes. The boundary problem occurs because of the loss of neighbors in analyses that depend on the values of the neighbors.
141:
allows the evaluation of the reliability and robustness of place-based measures that defined within artificial boundaries. In the meantime, the changes in the boundary assumptions refer not only to altering or tilting the angles of the boundary, but also differentiating between the boundary and
59:
In geographical research, two types of areas are taken into consideration in relation to the boundary: an area surrounded by fixed natural boundaries (e.g., coastlines or streams), outside of which neighbours do not exist, or an area included in a larger region defined by arbitrary artificial
63:
If a spatial process in an area occurs beyond a study area or has an interaction with neighbours outside artificial boundaries, the most common approach is to neglect the influence of the boundaries and assume that the process occurs at the internal area. However, such an approach leads to a
136:
As particularly applicable using GIS technologies, a possible solution for addressing both edge and shape effects is to an re-estimation of the spatial or process under repeated random realizations of the boundary. This solution provides an experimental distribution that can be subjected to
71:
The boundary problem occurs with regard not only to horizontal boundaries but also to vertically drawn boundaries according to delineations of heights or depths (Pineda 1993). For example, biodiversity such as the density of species of plants and animals is high near the surface, so if the
121:
an overbounding technique. Moreover, this technique can bring about issues related to large-area statistics, that is, ecological fallacy. By expanding the boundary of the study area, micro-scale variations within the boundary can be ignored.
987:
Wong, D. W. S., and Fotheringham, A. S. (1990) Urban systems as examples of bounded chaos: exploring the relationship between fractal dimension, rank-size and rural-to-urban migration. Geografiska Annaler 72,
1015:
Martin, R. J. (1989) The role of spatial statistical processes in geographic modeling. In D. A. Griffith (ed) Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, and Future. Institute of Mathematical Geography: Syracuse, NY,
1043:
Openshaw, S., Charlton, M., and Wymer, C. (1987) A mark I geographical analysis machine for the automated analysis of point pattern data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1, 335–350.
1034:
Haslett, J., Wills, G., and Unwin, A. (1990) SPIDER: an interactive statistical tool for the analysis of spatially distributed data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 3, 285–296.
1025:
Griffith, D. A. (1985) An evaluation of correction techniques for boundary effects in spatial statistical analysis: contemporary methods. Geographical Analysis 17, 81–88.
72:
identically divided height or depth is used as a spatial unit, it is more likely to find fewer number of the plant and animal species as the height or depth increases.
936:
Chen, Xiang; Ye, Xinyue; Widener, Michael J.; Delmelle, Eric; Kwan, Mei-Po; Shannon, Jerry; Racine, Racine F.; Adams, Aaron; Liang, Lu; Peng, Jia (27 December 2022).
871:
Kirby, H. R. (1997) Buffon's needle and the probability of intercepting short-distance trips by multiple screen-line surveys. Geographical Analysis, 29 64–71.
337:. Washington, DC: Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council, National Academy Press. 2002. 48:, four major problems interfere with an accurate estimation of the statistical parameter: the boundary problem, scale problem, pattern problem (or 539:
Miller, Harvey J. (3 September 2010). "Potential Contributions of Spatial Analysis to Geographic Information Systems for Transportation (GIS-T)".
975:
Martin, R. J. (1987) Some comments on correction techniques for boundary effects and missing value techniques. Geographical Analysis 19, 273–282.
142:
interior areas in examination and considering a possibility that isolated data collection points close to the boundary may show large variances.
767:
Ferguson, Mark R.; Kanaroglou, Pavlos S. (3 September 2010). "Representing the Shape and Orientation of Destinations in Spatial Choice Models".
1052:
BESR (2002) Community and Quality of Life: Data Needs for Informed Decision Making. Board on Earth Sciences and Resources: Washington, DC.
156: 997:
Ripley, B. D. (1979) Tests of "randomness" for spatial point patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 41, 368–374.
1006:
Yoo, E.-H. and Kyriakidis, P. C. (2008) Area-to-point prediction under boundary conditions. Geographical Analysis 40, 355–379.
1068: 255: 201: 171: 25: 80:
By drawing a boundary around a study area, two types of problems in measurement and analysis takes place. The first is an
196: 890: 716: 342: 313: 230: 191: 920: 379: 288: 186: 676:"An Evaluation of Correction Techniques for Boundary Effects in Spatial Statistical Analysis: Traditional Methods" 176: 96: 53: 938:"A systematic review of the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in community food environmental research" 907: 151: 129: 402:
Stewart Fotheringham, A.; Rogerson, Peter A. (January 1993). "GIS and spatial analytical problems".
16:
This article is about geographical research. For the boundary problem in philosophy of science, see
360: 49: 937: 124:
As alternatives to operational solutions, Griffith examined three correction techniques (i.e.,
21: 590:"Does the edge effect impact on the measure of spatial accessibility to healthcare providers?" 837:
Rogerson, Peter A. (July 1990). "Buffon's needle and the estimation of migration distances".
138: 109: 732:
Arlinghaus, Sandra L.; Nystuen, John D. (January 1990). "Geometry of Boundary Exchanges".
475:"Some Comments on Correction Techniques for Boundary Effects and Missing Value Techniques" 438:
Griffith, DA (August 1983). "The boundary value problem in spatial statistical analysis".
8: 17: 819: 807: 780: 749: 692: 675: 655: 616: 589: 552: 524: 507: 491: 474: 451: 166: 916: 886: 854: 811: 712: 621: 455: 375: 338: 309: 284: 251: 226: 181: 567: 949: 846: 803: 776: 741: 709:
What works : reducing reoffending : guidelines from research and practice
687: 651: 611: 601: 548: 519: 486: 447: 411: 367: 276: 45: 642:
Griffith, Daniel A. (3 September 2010). "Towards a Theory of Spatial Statistics".
588:
Gao, Fei; Kihal, Wahida; Meur, Nolwenn Le; Souris, Marc; Deguen, SΓ©verine (2017).
273:
Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences by Robert Haining
954: 306:
Spatial data analysis by example: Volume 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data
161: 850: 606: 415: 1062: 815: 280: 335:
Community and quality of life : data needs for informed decision making
95:
In spatial analysis, the boundary problem has been discussed along with the
858: 625: 459: 371: 128:) in removing boundary-induced bias from inference. They are (1) based on 823: 102: 753: 574:. Syracuse, NY: Institute of Mathematical Geography. pp. 107–129. 745: 568:"The role of spatial statistical processes in geographic modeling" 794:
Griffith, Daniel A. (1982). "Geometry and Spatial Interaction".
20:. For the boundary value problem in mathematical modeling, see 401: 674:
Griffith, Daniel A.; Amrhein, Carl G. (3 September 2010).
404:
International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
883:
Statistical methods for geography : a student guide
983: 981: 935: 669: 667: 665: 366:. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley. 24:. For the boundary problem in political science, see 103:
Suggested solutions and evaluations on the solutions
978: 766: 662: 587: 359: 796:Annals of the Association of American Geographers 731: 1060: 397: 395: 393: 391: 673: 637: 635: 572:Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, and Future 388: 433: 431: 429: 427: 425: 64:significant model misspecification problem. 594:International Journal of Health Geographics 157:Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography 632: 221:Burt, James E.; Barber, Gerald M. (2009). 220: 953: 899: 691: 615: 605: 523: 490: 422: 905: 880: 836: 793: 641: 437: 329: 327: 325: 706: 583: 581: 357: 270: 1061: 565: 538: 472: 245: 929: 505: 322: 303: 223:Elementary statistics for geographers 75: 578: 202:Uncertain geographic context problem 172:Fuzzy architectural spatial analysis 26:Boundary problem (political science) 13: 808:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01829.x 781:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00392.x 693:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1983.tb00794.x 656:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1980.tb00040.x 553:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00991.x 525:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1987.tb00120.x 508:"On the Imprecision of Boundaries" 492:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1987.tb00130.x 473:Martin, R. J. (3 September 2010). 452:10.1111/j.1467-9787.1983.tb00996.x 14: 1080: 909:The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem 304:Upton, Bernard Fingleton (1985). 187:Modifiable temporal unit problem 225:(3rd ed.). Guilford Press. 197:Tobler's second law of geography 1046: 1037: 1028: 1019: 1009: 1000: 991: 969: 874: 865: 839:Mathematical Population Studies 830: 787: 760: 725: 700: 559: 532: 506:Leung, Yee (3 September 2010). 499: 192:Tobler's first law of geography 466: 351: 297: 275:. Cambridge University Press. 264: 239: 214: 1: 207: 177:Geographic information system 97:modifiable areal unit problem 54:modifiable areal unit problem 39: 1069:Problems in spatial analysis 570:. In Griffith, D. A. (ed.). 358:Cressie, Noel A. C. (1993). 7: 881:Rogerson, Peter A. (2006). 440:Journal of Regional Science 362:Statistics for Spatial Data 248:Nonparametric Geostatistics 145: 10: 1085: 955:10.1007/s44212-022-00021-1 15: 851:10.1080/08898489009525308 607:10.1186/s12942-017-0119-3 416:10.1080/02693799308901936 308:. Chichester, UK: Wiley. 152:Arbia's law of geography 130:generalized least squares 281:10.1017/CBO9780511623356 271:Haining, Robert (1990). 250:. Springer Netherlands. 906:Openshaw, Stan (1983). 707:Mcguire, James (1999). 50:spatial autocorrelation 885:(2nd ed.). SAGE. 566:Martin, R. J. (1989). 22:Boundary value problem 769:Geographical Analysis 680:Geographical Analysis 644:Geographical Analysis 541:Geographical Analysis 512:Geographical Analysis 479:Geographical Analysis 372:10.1002/9781119115151 126:statistical solutions 118:statistical solutions 114:operational solutions 139:sensitivity analysis 110:central place theory 734:Geographical Review 246:Henley, S. (1981). 18:Demarcation problem 167:ecological fallacy 76:Types and examples 1016:pp. 107–129. 942:Urban Informatics 257:978-94-009-8117-1 182:Level of analysis 1076: 1053: 1050: 1044: 1041: 1035: 1032: 1026: 1023: 1017: 1013: 1007: 1004: 998: 995: 989: 985: 976: 973: 967: 966: 964: 962: 957: 933: 927: 926: 914: 903: 897: 896: 878: 872: 869: 863: 862: 834: 828: 827: 791: 785: 784: 764: 758: 757: 729: 723: 722: 704: 698: 697: 695: 671: 660: 659: 639: 630: 629: 619: 609: 585: 576: 575: 563: 557: 556: 536: 530: 529: 527: 503: 497: 496: 494: 470: 464: 463: 435: 420: 419: 399: 386: 385: 365: 355: 349: 348: 331: 320: 319: 301: 295: 294: 268: 262: 261: 243: 237: 236: 218: 87:The second is a 46:spatial analysis 33:boundary problem 1084: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1001: 996: 992: 986: 979: 974: 970: 960: 958: 934: 930: 923: 912: 904: 900: 893: 879: 875: 870: 866: 835: 831: 792: 788: 765: 761: 730: 726: 719: 705: 701: 672: 663: 640: 633: 586: 579: 564: 560: 537: 533: 504: 500: 471: 467: 436: 423: 400: 389: 382: 356: 352: 345: 333: 332: 323: 316: 302: 298: 291: 269: 265: 258: 244: 240: 233: 219: 215: 210: 148: 105: 78: 42: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1082: 1072: 1071: 1055: 1054: 1045: 1036: 1027: 1018: 1008: 999: 990: 977: 968: 928: 921: 898: 892:978-1412907965 891: 873: 864: 845:(3): 229–238. 829: 802:(3): 332–346. 786: 775:(2): 119–137. 759: 746:10.2307/215895 724: 718:978-0471956860 717: 699: 686:(4): 352–360. 661: 650:(4): 325–339. 631: 577: 558: 547:(4): 373–399. 531: 518:(2): 125–151. 498: 485:(3): 273–282. 465: 421: 387: 380: 350: 344:978-0309082600 343: 321: 315:978-0471905424 314: 296: 289: 263: 256: 238: 232:978-1572304840 231: 212: 211: 209: 206: 205: 204: 199: 194: 189: 184: 179: 174: 169: 164: 162:distance decay 159: 154: 147: 144: 116:as opposed to 104: 101: 77: 74: 41: 38: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1081: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1064: 1049: 1040: 1031: 1022: 1012: 1003: 994: 984: 982: 972: 956: 951: 947: 943: 939: 932: 924: 922:0 86094 134 5 918: 911: 910: 902: 894: 888: 884: 877: 868: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 833: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 790: 782: 778: 774: 770: 763: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 728: 720: 714: 710: 703: 694: 689: 685: 681: 677: 670: 668: 666: 657: 653: 649: 645: 638: 636: 627: 623: 618: 613: 608: 603: 599: 595: 591: 584: 582: 573: 569: 562: 554: 550: 546: 542: 535: 526: 521: 517: 513: 509: 502: 493: 488: 484: 480: 476: 469: 461: 457: 453: 449: 446:(3): 377–87. 445: 441: 434: 432: 430: 428: 426: 417: 413: 409: 405: 398: 396: 394: 392: 383: 381:9781119115151 377: 373: 369: 364: 363: 354: 346: 340: 336: 330: 328: 326: 317: 311: 307: 300: 292: 290:9780511623356 286: 282: 278: 274: 267: 259: 253: 249: 242: 234: 228: 224: 217: 213: 203: 200: 198: 195: 193: 190: 188: 185: 183: 180: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 165: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 149: 143: 140: 134: 131: 127: 122: 119: 115: 111: 100: 98: 93: 90: 85: 83: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 55: 51: 47: 37: 34: 27: 23: 19: 1048: 1039: 1030: 1021: 1011: 1002: 993: 971: 959:. Retrieved 945: 941: 931: 908: 901: 882: 876: 867: 842: 838: 832: 799: 795: 789: 772: 768: 762: 737: 733: 727: 711:. J. Wiley. 708: 702: 683: 679: 647: 643: 597: 593: 571: 561: 544: 540: 534: 515: 511: 501: 482: 478: 468: 443: 439: 407: 403: 361: 353: 334: 305: 299: 272: 266: 247: 241: 222: 216: 135: 125: 123: 117: 113: 106: 94: 89:shape effect 88: 86: 81: 79: 70: 66: 62: 58: 43: 32: 30: 961:27 December 410:(1): 3–19. 82:edge effect 208:References 40:Definition 816:0004-5608 740:(1): 21. 600:(1): 46. 1063:Category 859:12283029 626:29228961 460:12279616 146:See also 824:2563023 617:5725922 52:), and 988:89–99. 919:  889:  857:  822:  814:  754:215895 752:  715:  624:  614:  458:  378:  341:  312:  287:  254:  229:  913:(PDF) 820:JSTOR 750:JSTOR 963:2022 917:ISBN 887:ISBN 855:PMID 812:ISSN 713:ISBN 622:PMID 456:PMID 376:ISBN 339:ISBN 310:ISBN 285:ISBN 252:ISBN 227:ISBN 950:doi 847:doi 804:doi 777:doi 742:doi 688:doi 652:doi 612:PMC 602:doi 549:doi 520:doi 487:doi 448:doi 412:doi 368:doi 277:doi 44:In 1065:: 980:^ 948:. 944:. 940:. 915:. 853:. 841:. 818:. 810:. 800:72 798:. 773:30 771:. 748:. 738:80 736:. 684:15 682:. 678:. 664:^ 648:12 646:. 634:^ 620:. 610:. 598:16 596:. 592:. 580:^ 545:31 543:. 516:19 514:. 510:. 483:19 481:. 477:. 454:. 444:23 442:. 424:^ 406:. 390:^ 374:. 324:^ 283:. 31:A 965:. 952:: 946:1 925:. 895:. 861:. 849:: 843:2 826:. 806:: 783:. 779:: 756:. 744:: 721:. 696:. 690:: 658:. 654:: 628:. 604:: 555:. 551:: 528:. 522:: 495:. 489:: 462:. 450:: 418:. 414:: 408:7 384:. 370:: 347:. 318:. 293:. 279:: 260:. 235:. 28:.

Index

Demarcation problem
Boundary value problem
Boundary problem (political science)
spatial analysis
spatial autocorrelation
modifiable areal unit problem
modifiable areal unit problem
central place theory
generalized least squares
sensitivity analysis
Arbia's law of geography
Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography
distance decay
ecological fallacy
Fuzzy architectural spatial analysis
Geographic information system
Level of analysis
Modifiable temporal unit problem
Tobler's first law of geography
Tobler's second law of geography
Uncertain geographic context problem
ISBN
978-1572304840
ISBN
978-94-009-8117-1
doi
10.1017/CBO9780511623356
ISBN
9780511623356
ISBN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑