1097:Битолската плоча: „помлада е за околу 25 годни од Самуиловата плоча... Направена е по заповед на Јоан Владислав, еден од наследниците на Самуила. …Истакнувањето на бугарското потекло од страна на Јоан Владислав е во согласност со настојувањето на Самуиловиот род да се поврзе со државноправната традиција на Симеоновото царство. Од друга страна, и западни и византиски писатели и хроничари, сите жители на царството на Петар , наследникот на бугарскиот цар Симеон, ги наречувале Бугари." Дел од содрината на плочата, според преводот на Скаловска:„Овој град се соѕида и се направи од Јоан самодржец на бугарското (блъгарьскаго) цраство... Овој град (крепост) беше направен за цврсто засолниште и спасение на животот на Бугарите (Блъгаромь)... Овој цар и самодржец беше родум Бугарин (Блъгарїнь), тоест внук на благоверните Никола и Рипсимија, син на Арона, постариот брат на самодржавниот цар Самуил..." (Р.У. Скаловска, Записи и летописи. Скопје 1975. 43–44.) The Bitola inscription: "it is about 25 years younger than Samuel's inscription... It was made by order of John Vladislav, one of the heirs of Samuil. ...The highlighting of the Bulgarian origin by Ioan Vladislav is in accordance with the effort of Samuel's family to connect with the legal tradition of Simeon's kingdom. On the other hand, both Western and Byzantine writers and chroniclers called all the inhabitants of the kingdom of Peter , the successor of the Bulgarian emperor Simeon, Bulgarians." Part of the content of the tablet, according to the translation of Skalovska: "This city was built and made by John the autocrat of the Bulgarian (Bulgarian) kingdom... This city (fortress) was made for a strong refuge and salvation of the life of the Bulgarians (Bulgarians).. This king and autocrat was born Bulgarian (Blăgarin), that is, the grandson of the pious Nikola and Ripsimia, the son of Arona, the elder brother of the autocratic king Samuel..." (R.U. Skalovska, Chronicles. Skopje 1975. 43- 44.)
999:"Из њих потиче и једини сачувани изворни споменик изражавања етничке самосвести, такозвани Битољски натпис. Јован Владислав је дао да се на њему уклеше да је он „Бугарин родом“. После уништења Самуилове државе долази до кризе, мада не и до нестајања, друштвене елите која је била носилац традиција Бугарског царства. То ће етногенетске процесе успорити, и оставити простор за релативно безболну имплементацију неке довољно сличне словенске традиције, као што је она српске средњовековне државе." (In English: The only preserved original monument of ethnic self-awareness, the so-called Bitola inscription, originates from them. Jovan Vladislav had it engraved that he was a "Bulgarian native". After the destruction of Samuel's state, there is a crisis, although not the disappearance, of the social elite that was the bearer of the traditions of the Bulgarian Empire. This will slow down the ethnogenetic processes, and leave room for a relatively painless implementation of some sufficiently similar Slavic tradition, such as that of the Serbian medieval state.") in Срђан Пириватрић, „Самуилова држава. Обим и карактер", Византолошки институт Српске академије науке и уметности, посебна издања књига 21, Београд, 1997, стр. 196.
874:Битольская надпись Иоанна Владислава была создана, как считается, в 1015–1016 гг. (издание: Попконстантинов, Тотоманова 2014: 40–41, илл. 28а, 30). Однако, поскольку цифирь в надписи утрачена (см. Попконстантинов, Тотоманова 2014: илл. 28а, 30; см. затем примеч. 6 к этой статье), представляется более правильным датировать надпись временем правления Ивана Владислава, который упомянут в этой надписи как действующий самодержец, в сочетании с глагольной формой настоящего времени: 1015–1018 гг. (In English: "The Bitola inscription of John Vladislav was created, it is believed, in 1015–1016. (edition: Popkonstantinov, Totomanova 2014: 40–41, ill. 28a, 30). However, since the numbers in the inscription have been lost (see Popkonstantinov, Totomanova 2014: ill. 28a, 30; see then note 6 to this article), it seems more correct to date the inscription to the reign of Ivan Vladislav, who is mentioned in this inscription as the current autocrat, combined with the present tense verb form: 1015–1018.") in "Новые данные по истории древнеболгарского языка в эпиграфике Первого болгарского царства", 2023, Кирило-Методиевски студии 33:63-80.
1320:"Samuel's kingdom was indeed a Bulgarian state, whose people the Greeks regarded as Bulgars. Paul Stephenson states in carefully measured phrasing, that during the period of peace with Samuel, (1005-1014) "on my reading of the evidence, [Emperor) Basil (II) recognized an independent realm known as Bulgaria." Besides this, Ivan Vladislav, the last Tsar, in an inscription found on Bitola castle, intended it as "a refuge for the Bulgars." He declared himself "autocrat of the Bulgars" and "Bulgarian by birth"...By writing, as Boškoski does, about the Macedonians", "the Macedonian Tsar", and the "Macedonian defence", he merely creates, in an otherwise valuable study, an ahistorical artifact to serve present day nationalist sentiment. Pirivatrić, a Serbian author, avoids the issue by claiming that modern notions of national identity are inappropriate to the era of the kometopuli, but Bulgarian national consciousness was nonetheless vibrant. It was to remain so throughout the 11th century." For more see: Michael Palairet, Macedonia: A Voyage through History, Volume 1, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016,
985:"Славянское население Македонии в средние века ощущало и именовало себя болгарами, что отражалось и в царских титулах даже тогда, когда столицами болгарского государства становились македонские города Охрид и Преспа. Об этом красноречиво говорит, в частности, известная Битольская надпись властителя Ивана-Владислава, в которой он именует себя "царем болгар". (In English: The Slavic population of Macedonia in the Middle Ages felt and called themselves Bulgarians, which was reflected in the royal titles even when the Macedonian cities of Ohrid and Prespa became the capitals of the Bulgarian state. This is eloquently evidenced, in particular, by the famous Bitola inscription of ruler Ivan Vladislav, in which he calls himself “tsar of the Bulgarians.”) in Г. Г. Литаврин, Прошлое и настоящее Македонии в свете современных проблем. в Македония: проблемы истории и культуры, редактор д-р ист. наук Р.П. Гришина. Институт славяноведения, Российская Академия Наук, Москва,
996:"Един от паметните моменти в този период е кратковременното управление на Йоан (Иван Владислав), племенник на цар Самуил, който управлява до 1018 г., след като е убил през 1015 г. братовчед си Гаврил Радомир в една семейна драма, която остава необяснена. Иван Владислав става прочут в българската история с надписа, който издига в Битоля." (In English: One of the memorable moments of this period is the short-lived reign of John (Ivan Władysław), a nephew of King Samuel, who ruled until 1018, after having murdered his cousin Gavril Radomir in 1015 in a family drama that remains unexplained. Ivan Vladislav became famous in Bulgarian history with the inscription he erected in Bitola.") in Василка Тъпкова-Заимова, Битолския надпис, стр. 42-46 в (Не)познатата проф. Василка Тъпкова-Заимова. Редактор: Проф. д.и.н. Рая Заимова, Институт за балканистика с център по тракология, Българска академия на науките. 2020, Studia balcanica № 34.
529:
prepared a tourist catalogue of the town. It was printed with the entire text of the inscription on its front cover, with the word "Bulgarian" clearly visible on it. News about that had spread prior to the official presentation of the catalogue and was a cause for confusion among the officials of the Bitola municipality. The French consulate was warned and the printing of the new catalogue was stopped, and the photo on the cover was changed. In 2021, a
Bulgarian television team made an attempt to shoot the artefact and make a film about it. After several months of waiting and the refusal of the local authorities, the team complained to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Sofia. A protest note was sent from there to Skopje, after which the journalists received permission to work in Bitola.
1243:"Најголема слабост на теоријата за датирање во XIII в. се јавува секако невоможноста да се направи смислена реконструкција на натписот и на спомнатите личности во него. Според тоа без да се смета целосно за затворено прашање засега датирањето на натписот во времето на Јован Владислав се јавува најаргументирано." (In English: The greatest uncertainty of the dating theory from the XIII century is the impossibility of making a meaningful reconstruction of the inscription and the persons mentioned in it. Therefore, without considering it a completely closed question, the dating of the inscription from the time of Ivan Vladislav appears to be the most well-argued for now.) in Stojkov, Stojko (2014). Битолската плоча. Goce Delčev University. p. 85.
309:
856:"Тоя субект се определя от сравнително ясно очертаната дата SФКВ (6522) от сътворението на света, или 1014 г. от новата ера, когато става поражението на Самуиловите войски при Беласица (на 29 юли)." "That subject is determined by the relatively clearly defined date SФKВ (6522) from the creation of the world, or 1014 of the new era, when the defeat of Samuel's troops at Belasitsa (on July 29) took place." in Йордан Заимов, Василка Тъпкова-Заимова (1970) Битолски надпис на Иван Владислав самодържец български. Старобългарски паметник от 1015-1016 година. Изд-во на Българската Академия на науките, стр. 28.
1396:. "Compared to our East Roman sources, the perspective from Bulgaria itself is more limited. The sources are not as extensive but still offer a glance into how Bulgarian authors viewed their East Roman counterparts and highlighted their own communal identity. One of the most common designations for the East Romans was “Greeks,” instead of Romaioi, with the emperors called “tsars.” (...) Another inscription of Tsar Ivan Vladislav (r. 1015–18), located in Bitolja and dated to 1016, mentions the “Greek army of Tsar Basil,” referencing Emperor Basil II (r. 976–1025)."
31:
974:"Gabriels Nachfolger, Ioannes Vladislav (1015–1018), nach der Bitola - Inschrift ein gebürtiger Bulgare und „Enkel von Nikola und Rhipsime" (In English: Gabriel's successor, Jonnes Vladislav (1015–1018), according to the Bitola inscription a native Bulgarian and "grandson of Nikola and Rhipsime".) in War and Warfare in Byzantium: The Wars of Emperor Basil II Against the Bulgarians (976–1019), in Krieg und Kriegführung in Byzanz: Die Kriege Kaiser Basileios II. Gegen die Bulgaren (976–1019)], Paul Meinrad Strässle, Böhlau Verlag Köln Weimar 2006,
425:
is unclear, it is correct to date it to the reign of Ivan
Vladislav, who is mentioned as acting there, accordingly to the used present tense verb form. The art historian Robert Mihajlovski one the other hand, puts the dating of the inscription in the historical context of its content, i.e., also during the reign of Ivan Vladislav. The majority academic view, shared by a number of foreign and Bulgarian as well as some Macedonian researchers, is that the inscription is an original artefact, made during the rule of tsar
407:
1252:"Although the inscription is of exceptional interest, the first study that attempted to fill in the missing text, was carried out by Vladimir Mošin only one decade after it was brought to light. Since, it has been the subject of studies of numerous researchers. Most of them reckon that the inscription is the last written source of the First Bulgarian State with an accurate dating..." For more see: Elena Kostić, Georgios Velenis, New Interpretation about the Content of the Cyrillic Inscription from Bitola.
130:
963:"The most extreme among the many illustrative examples of this scientific ethically questionable fact is probably the way in which an inscription found in Bitola in 1956 from the early eleventh century on Tsar Ivan Vladislav was dealt by the Yugoslav Macedonian authorities." Das makedonische Jahrhundert: von den Anfängen der nationalrevolutionären Bewegung zum Abkommen von Ohrid 1893–2001; ausgewählte Aufsätze, Stefan Troebst, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2007,
474:, when he conquered Bitola. They maintain, the inscription mentions some glorious past events to connect the Second Bulgarian Empire to the Cometopuli. Some Macedonian researchers also dispute the authenticity or dating of the inscription. According to the historian Stojko Stojkov, the most serious problem of the dating of the inscription from the 13th century is the impossible task of making any logical link among the persons mentioned in it, with the time of the
1019:"...Ivan Vladislav, who in an inscription dated 1015–16 called himself "autocrat of the Bulgarian tsardom". Moreover, the inscription clearly describes him as a “native-born Bulgarian ", which is unambiguous evidence that the awareness of constituting a natio had by then been fully established among the empire's political and cultural elite." in Eduard Mühle (2023) Slavs in the Middle Ages Between Idea and Reality. Brill,
865:"Наспроти Коцо кој смета дека на ред 11 немало година,17 Мошин и Заимов овде ја читаат 6522 (1013/1014) г. макар Мошин да признава дека „годината е излижана“. (In English: Contrary to Koco, who believes that there was no year on line 11, Moshin and Zaimov read here 6522 (1013/1014), although Moshin admitted that "the year has been rubbed".) in Stojkov, Stojko (2014). Битолската плоча. Goce Delčev University. p. 82.
478:, and in this way the dating from the time of Ivan Vladislav is the most well-argued. Velenis and Kostić confirmed too, that most of the researchers suppose that the plate is the last written source of the First Bulgarian Empire with an roughly accurate dating. Per the historian Paul Stephenson, given the circumstances of its discovery, and its graphical characteristics, that is undoubtedly a genuine artifact.
487:
1303:." (Finally (per Pirivatric) the Bitola inscription shows that Ivan Vladislav considered himself a Bulgarian and considered his subjects Bulgarians... The Bitola inscription is an example of a particular expression of ethnic consciousness.) Румен Даскалов, Историографски спорове за средновековието - българо-сръбски, българо-македонски. Унив. издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“, 2024,
908:"However, John Vladislav was able to renovate and strengthen the fortifications of an alternative base, Bitola, commemorating the work with an inscription. Moreover, Basil's eighty-eight-day siege of Pernik ended in failure and heavy losses, while his siege of Kastoria, in late spring or summer 1017, was also unsuccessful." New Cambridge Medieval History, volume 3,
182:. A fellow told him that he had found a stone inscription while working on a new building and that the word "Bulgarians" was on it. The following morning, they went to the building where Eftimov took a number of photographs which were later given to the Bulgarian embassy in Belgrade. His photos were sent through diplomatic channels to Bulgaria and were classified.
436:), and is therefore the last remaining inscription from the First Bulgarian Empire with an roughly correct dating. The Macedonian researcher to directly work on the plate in the 1970s, Radmilova Ugrinova-Skalovska, has also confirmed the dating and authenticity of the plate. According to her, Ivan Vladislav's claim to Bulgarian ancestry is in accordance with the
886:"Mihajlovski gives the following measurements of the marble slab: “92cm long, 58cm wide and 55cm thick” (p. 17) and puts the inscription on the marble block in its historical context, i.e. the reign of Jovan Vladislav." in Sebastian Kempgen: A Superscript for the Bitola Inscription. Draft paper, p. 4, 12, May 2023. Bamberg University, Germany.
905:, pp. 194–195. "Bulgarian scholars have treated Samuel’s rule as a continuation of the so-called First Bulgarian Tsardom, whose eastern part fell to Byzantium in 871. They have also referred to evidence such as John Vladislav’s inscription found in Bitola, where the tsar is described as ‘‘Bulgarian by birth.’’"
1543:
row of the inscription, and so the sentence begins with two present participles, making it incomplete. Last, the conjunction "же" in the second half of the third line introduces a new, second sentence, which reveals another side of the inscription's content, and cannot be a continuation of the first sentence.
1542:
Zaimov claims that the paleographer Hristo Kodov had the idea for the existence of the first, lost row. There are several reasons for this suggestion. First of all, an initial cross is missing, which was inevitable in such inscriptions then. Also, a verb and a subject are stuck in the preserved first
626:
Robert
Mihajlovski, Circulation of Byzantine lead seals as a contribution to the location of medieval Bitola on International Symposium of Byzantologists, Nis and Byzantyum XVIII, "800 years since the Аutocephaly of the Serbian Church (1219–2019): Church, Politics and Art in Byzantium and neighboring
528:
After the collapse of
Yugoslavia, the stone was re-exposed in the medieval section of the Bitola museum, but without any explanation about its text. In 2006, the inscription was subject to controversy in the Republic of Macedonia (now North Macedonia) when the French consulate in Bitola sponsored and
424:
There is a single year mentioned on line 11 of the plate, which Moshin and Zaimov deciphered as 6522 (1013/1014). According to Zaimov, this date is relatively clearly visible, although Moshin admitted that it has been rubbed. Per the
Slavist Roman Krivko, although the year carved in the inscription
415:
According to Zaimov, there was additional 13th row, at the upper edge. The marble slab bearing the inscription has on the top narrow surface holes and channels to fit metal joints. This is contrary to the Zaimov's claims that the inscription could have had another line on the top side. Per
Sebastian
512:
had an incipient
Bulgarian consciousness. The proclamation announced the first use of the Slavic title "samodŭrzhets", meaning "autocrat". The name of the city of Bitola is mentioned for the first time in the inscription. The inscription indicates that in the 10th and 11th centuries, the patron
222:
on the stone, which had already been reconstructed with linguistic methods. However
Kempgen has shown that it actually exists, but it is a mystery why it has not been discovered before him. He has supposed that the superscript was made from a second stonecutter. Kempgen has also deduced, that
960:, pp. 56–57. "...and the fourth (epigraph) inscribed in Cyrillic rather than Greek letters, to the strengthening of another fortress, this time at Bitola in western Macedonia by John Vladislav, the Bulgarian tsar, also dated, although with rather less certainty, to 1015."
214:
in 1970. The stone was locked away in the same year and a big
Bulgarian-Yugoslav political scandal arose. The museum director was fired for letting such a mistake happen. The Macedonian researcher Ugrinova-Skalovska published her translation of the inscription in 1975.
158:
during the conquest of the town in 1385. According to the inscription, the fortress of Bitola was reconstructed on older foundations in the period between the autumn of 1015 and the spring of 1016. At that time Bitola was a capital and central military base for the
919:"An early example of the Cyrillic script, this inscription, carved in 1016, commemorates the refurbishment of the fortress of Bitolja (Macedonia) by John Vladislav, brother of the Bulgarian king Samuel, after the latter had been decisively defeated by Basil II."
304:
brother. There are also reconstructions by the
Macedonian scientist prof. Radmila Ugrinova-Skalovska and by the Yugoslav/Russian researcher Vladimir Moshin (1894–1987), In Zaimov's reconstruction the text with unreadable segments marked gray, reads as follows:
410:
Top angle of the stone. The upper side per Kempgen reveals the former existence of some clips to mount the stone onto a wall. This suggests that if additional text would exist, it might have been not above the existing one, but rather on another stone to the
938:"John Vladislav proclaimed himself Emperor of the Bulgarians, a title mentioned in an inscription dated to 6522 (ad 1014/5)." Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250], Cambridge medieval textbooks, Florin Curta, Cambridge University Press, 2006,
788:
Georgi Mitrinov, Contributions of the Sudzhov family to the preservation of Bulgarian cultural and historic heritage in Vardar Macedonia, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, language; Bulgarian, Journal: Българска реч. 2016, Issue No: 2, pp.
153:
near the old Sheep Bazaar. The stone inscription was found under the doorstep of the main entrance and it is possible that it was taken as a building material from the ruins of the medieval fortress. The medieval fortress was destroyed by the
545:
Vasilka Tăpkova-Zaimova, Bulgarians by Birth: The Comitopuls, Emperor Samuel and their Successors According to Historical Sources and the Historiographic Tradition, East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450, BRILL, 2018,
1006:(In English: Notes: (2) In the Old Bulgarian inscription from Bitola of 1016 (Zaimov–Zaimova, Bitolski nadpis; Božilov in: KME I 196–198) where Ivan Vladislav is literally referred to as “son of Aaron, brother of Samuel” (l. 7f.).
440:'s insistence to bound their dynasty to the political traditions of the Bulgarian Empire. Per Skalovska, all Western and Byzantine writers and chroniclers at that time, called all the inhabitants of their kingdom Bulgarians.
1003:
Anmerkungen: (2) In der altbulgarischen Inschrift von Bitola von 1016 (Zaimov–Zaimova, Bitolski nadpis; Božilov in: KME I 196–198) wird dieser Ivan Vladislav – wörtlich als “Sohn des Aaron, des Bruders des Samuel” (l. 7f.)
594:
The Bitola inscription (found in 1956) of the last Bulgarian king Ivan Vladislav, son of Aaron (and nephew of Samuil), in which he defined himself as Bulgarian by descent gave strong arguments in favor of the Bulgarian
575:
Jonathan Shepard, Equilibrium to Expansion (886–1025); pp 493-536; from Part II - The Middle Empire c. 700–1204 in The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire C.500-1492 (2008) Cambridge University Press, p. 529,
189:
magazine. Meanwhile, the plate was transported to the local museum repository. At that time, Bulgaria avoided publicizing this information as Belgrade and Moscow had significantly improved their relations after the
1222:Стојков, Стојко (2014) Битолската плоча – дилеми и интерпретации. Во: Самуиловата држава во историската, воено-политичката, духовната и културната традиција на Македонија, 24–26 октомври 2014, Струмица, Македонија.
563:"Among the most significant findings of this period presented in the permanent exhibition is the epigraphic monument a marble slab with Cyrillic letters of Jovan Vladislav from 1015/17." The official site of the
1106:
Horace Lunt, Review of "Bitolski Nadpis na Ivan Vladislav Samodurzhets Bulgarski: Starobulgarski Pametnik ot 1015–1016 Godina" by Iordan Zaimov and Vasilka Zaimova, Slavic Review, vol. 31, no. 2 (Jun. 1972), p.
1301:Най-сетне (според Пириватрич) Битолският надпис показва, че Иван Владислав се счита за българин и счита своите поданици за българи...Битолският надпис е пример за своеобразно изразяване на етническо съзнание
209:
from the inscription. Zaimova claims that no one stopped them from working on the plate in Bitola. As such, they deciphered the text according to their own interpretation of it, which was published by the
223:
initially the inscription was carved at least on two stone plates, set together horizontally. Some letters from the current inscription were written on a lost plate, located left to the present block.
1354:
Room, Adrian, Placenames of the world: origins and meanings of the names for 6,600 countries, cities, territories, natural features, and historic sites, Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company,
205:, living in Yugoslavia. As a result, Bulgarian linguist Yordan Zaimov and his wife, historian Vasilka Tapkova-Zaimova, travelled to Bitola in 1968. At the Bitola Museum, they made a secret
1522:
Lunt, Horace. On dating Old Church Slavonic bible manuscripts. // A. A. Barentsen, M. G. M. Tielemans, R. Sprenger (eds.), South Slavic and Balkan linguistics, Rodopi, 1982, p. 230.
1525:
Georgios Velenis, Elena Kostić, (2017). Texts, Inscriptions, Images: The Issue of the Pre-Dated Inscriptions in Contrary with the Falsified. The Cyrillic Inscription from Edessa.
1016:" (In addition to the above opinion speaks the text of the so-called Bitola plate erected by Jovan Vladislav in 1016/17. He "renewed the city of Bitola" (J. Zaimov 1970, 1—160).)
1014:Во прилог на горното мислење зборува и текстот на т.н. Битолска плоча подигната од Јован Владислав во 1016/17 година. Тој „го обновил градот Битола” (Ј. Заимов 1970, 1—160).
235:
mosque. There are missing parts around the left and right edge and a large part on the lower left segment. In its current state, the following text is visible on the stone:
682:Булатова Р. В. Основатель югославской палеографической науки — В. А. Мошин. В Русская эмиграция в Югославии. — М.: Институт славяноведения и балканистики РАН. (1996)
362:, was renewed with the help and the prayers of Our Most Holy Lady and through the intercession of her twelve supreme Apostles. The fortress was built as a haven and
113:
Ivan Vladislav was able to renovate and strengthen his last fortification, commemorating his work with this elaborate inscription. The inscription found in 1956 in
178:
After the inscription was found, information about the plate was immediately announced in the city. It was brought to Bulgaria with the help of the local activist
1513:
Mathiesen, R. The Importance of the Bitola Inscription for Cyrilic Paleography // The Slavic and East European Journal, 21, Bloomington, 1977, 1, pp. 1–2.
1425:
1388:
Grant Schrama, Bulgarian Perceptions of East Romans in The Routledge Handbook of Byzantine Visual Culture in the Danube Regions, 1300-1600, Routledge, 2024,
1116:
Robert Mathiesen, The Importance of the Bitola Inscription for Cyrillic Paleography, The Slavic and East European Journal, 21, Bloomington, 1977, 1, pp. 1–2.
185:
In 1959, the Bulgarian journalist Georgi Kaloyanov sent his own photos of the inscription to the Bulgarian scholar Aleksandar Burmov, who published them in
597:
Roumen Daskalov (2021) Master Narratives of the Middle Ages in Bulgaria, East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450-1450, BRILL, pp. 226-227,
1052:
Roumen Daskalov (2021) Master Narratives of the Middle Ages in Bulgaria, East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450-1450, BRILL, pp. 226-227.
1072:
Ivan Biliarsky, Word and Power in Mediaeval Bulgaria, Volume 14 of East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450, BRILL, 2011, p. 215.
284:
A reconstruction of the missing parts was proposed by Yordan Zaimov. According to the reconstructed version, the text talks about the kinship of the
1055:
Dennis P. Hupchick, The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony: Silver-Lined Skulls and Blinded Armies, Springer, 2017, p. 314.
1253:
1483:Заимов, Йордан. Битольская надпись болгарского самодержца Ивана Владислава, 1015–1016 // Вопросы языкознания, 28, Москва, 1969, 6, с. 123–133.
1441:
1337:
Ivan Biliarsky, Word and Power in Mediaeval Bulgaria, Volume 14 of East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450, BRILL, 2011,
1012:Иван Микулчиќ, Средновековни градови и тврдини во Македонија. (Македонска академија на науките и уметностите — Скопје, 1996), стр. 140–141. "
1282:
Dennis P. Hupchick, The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony: Silver-Lined Skulls and Blinded Armies, Springer, 2017,
1041:
Stefan Rohdewald (2022) Sacralizing the Nation Through Remembrance of Medieval Religious Figures in Serbia, Bulgaria and Macedonia, Vol. 1,
615:
447:
maintained that the year mentioned on the inscription is not deciphered correctly, thus the plate might have been made during the reign of
201:
In 1966, a new report on the inscription was published. It was done by the historian and linguist Vladimir Moshin, a member of the Russian
1601:
1183:
Texts, Inscriptions, Images: The Issue of the Pre-Dated Inscriptions in Contrary with the Falsified. The Cyrillic Inscription from Edessa
657:
1205:
Mitko B. Panov, The Blinded State: Historiographic Debates about Samuel Cometopoulos and His State (10th–11th Century); BRILL, 2019,
1581:
1008:) Ivan Vladislav. In Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit (2013). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
416:
Kempgen, if additional text would exist, it might have been not above the existing one, but rather on another stone to the left.
1371:
Robert Mihajlovski (2021) The Religious and Cultural Landscape of Ottoman Manastır. Handbook of Oriental Studies, BRILL, p. 18;
1075:
Robert Mihajlovski (2021) The Religious and Cultural Landscape of Ottoman Manastır. Handbook of Oriental Studies, BRILL, p. 18.
1190:
1165:
841:
105:, among the permanent exhibitions as a significant epigraphic monument, described as "a marble slab with Cyrillic letters of
231:
There have been preserved 12 rows of the inscription. The text is fragmentary, as the inscription was used as a step of the
313:
1596:
1069:
Chris Kostov (2010) Contested Ethnic Identity. he Case of Macedonian Immigrants in Toronto, 1900-1996. Peter Lang, p. 51.
736:
715:„Битолския надпис на Иван Владислав, самодържец български. Старобългарски паметник от 1015 – 1016 година.", БАН. 1970 г.
628:
398:
where gold was taken and in this Tsar was defeated by Emperor Basil in 6522 (1014) since the creation of the world in
1576:
1501:Томовић, Г. Морфологиjа ћирилских натписа на Балкану // Историјски институт, Посебна издања, 16, Скопје, 1974, с. 33.
949:
614:
Present location opposite the trade center Javor on the left side of the street Philip II of Macedonia. For more see:
1571:
1477:Заимов, Йордан. Битолският надпис на цар Иван Владислав, самодържец български. Епиграфско изследване // София, 1970.
1393:
1359:
1308:
1270:
1083:
1063:
1046:
1035:
1024:
990:
968:
957:
943:
932:
913:
499:
1459:Божилов, Иван. Битолски надпис на Иван Владислав // Кирило-методиевска енциклопедия, т. І, София, 1985, с. 196–198.
816:Заимов, Йордан. Битолският надпис на цар Иван Владислав, самодържец български. Епиграфско изследване, София 1970, .
773:Заимов, Йордан. Битолският надпис на цар Иван Владислав, самодържец български. Епиграфско изследване, София 1970, .
1422:
195:
171:. This act saved the fortress from destruction. The old fortress was located most likely on the place of the today
1465:Бурмов, Александър. Новонамерен старобългарски надпис в НР Македония // сп. Пламък, 3, София, 1959, 10, с. 84–86.
706:Как Йордан Заимов възстанови Битолския надпис на Иван Владислав? 3 декември 2013, автор: Василка Тъпкова-Заимова.
1591:
1410:
1376:
1342:
1325:
1287:
1210:
979:
902:
602:
581:
551:
495:
458:. His views were based on the photos, as well as the latex mold reprint of the inscription made by philologist
110:
834:
Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies: Thematic Sessions of Free Communications
194:
in 1948. However, after 1963, the official authorities openly began criticizing the Bulgarian position on the
1154:
Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies: Thematic sessions of free communications
395:
211:
149:. The mosque was the first mosque that was built in Bitola, in 1435. It was located on the left bank of the
366:
Bulgarians. The work on the fortress of Bitola commenced on the twentieth day of October and ended on the
164:
1586:
470:, maintained that the year on the plate is actually 1202/1203, which would place it in the reign of Tsar
1471:Заимов, Йордан. Битолски надпис на Иван Владислав, старобългарски паметник от 1015–1016 // София, 1969.
426:
218:
In 2023 the German linguist Sebastian Kempgen made an optical inspection of the plate. He discovered a
1058:
Michael Palairet, Macedonia: A Voyage through History, Volume 1, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016,
1495:Мошин, Владимир. Уште за битолската плоча од 1017 година // Историја, 7, Скопје, 1971, 2, с. 255–257
1423:Исправена печатарска грешка, Битола за малку ќе се претставуваше како бугарска. Дневник-online, 2006.
1078:
David Marshall Lang (1976) The Bulgarians. From Pagan Times to the Ottoman Conquest. Westview Press,
1030:
Henrik Birnbaum, Aspects of the Slavic Middle Ages and Slavic Renaissance culture, Peter Lang, 1991,
308:
1127:
724:
1556:
1152:
1128:"ΜΟΡΦΟΛΟΓΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΥΡΙΛΛΙΚΗΣ ΓΡΑΦΗΣ ΣΤΙΣ ΕΠΙΓΡΑΦΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΜΦΑΝΙΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΩΣ ΤΑ ΤΕΛΗ ΤΟΥ 12ΟΥ ΑΙΩΝΑ"
616:
Chaush-Bey Mosque – one of the oldest mosques in the Balkans (demolished in 1956), on Bitola.info
475:
1489:Мошин, Владимир. Битољска плоча из 1017. год. // Македонски jазик, XVII, Скопје, 1966, с. 51–61
1233:БИТОЛСКА_ПЛОЧА_ВЕРОДОСТОЕН_ПАМЕТНИК_ИЛИ_ПОДМЕТНАТ_ФАЛСИФИКАТ_2020_ сп. Снежник, бр. 7528, 2020.
160:
86:
54:
98 cm × 61 cm × 27 cm (39 in × 24 in × 11 in)
924:
661:
191:
798:Угриновска-Скаловска, Радмила. Записи и летописи. Maкедонска книга, Скопје 1975. стр. 43–44.
1160:. Belgrade: The Serbian National Committee of AIEB and the contributors 2016. p. 128.
836:. Belgrade: The Serbian National Committee of AIEB and the contributors 2016. p. 128.
683:
1265:
Paul Stephenson, The legend of Basil the Bulgar-slayer, Cambridge University Press, 2003,
897:
Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Macedonia, Dimitar Bechev, Scarecrow Press, 2009
8:
875:
471:
379:
293:
260:
8. ......................................................рьжавьнаго ꙗже i разбїсте .....
90:
807:Мошин, Владимир. Битољска плоча из 1017. год. // Македонски jазик, XVII, 1966, с. 51–61
459:
387:
301:
285:
263:
9. .......................................................лїа кде же вьзꙙто бы зл.....
257:
7. ...к..................................................благовѣрьнѹ сынь Арона С.....
118:
30:
1406:
1389:
1372:
1355:
1338:
1321:
1304:
1283:
1266:
1206:
1186:
1161:
1079:
1059:
1042:
1031:
1020:
986:
975:
964:
953:
939:
928:
909:
898:
837:
750:
598:
577:
547:
463:
269:
11. ....................................................в.. лѣ... оть створ...а мира
254:
6. ...ис.................................................быстъ бльгарїнь родомь ѹ...
202:
354:
In the year 6523 since the creation of the world , this fortress, built and made by
266:
10. ....................................................фоꙙ съ же в... цр҃ь ра.....
640:Николова, В., Куманов, М., България. Кратък исторически справочник, том 3, стр. 59.
508:
and his successors considered their state Bulgarian, as well as revealing that the
399:
383:
375:
359:
297:
289:
288:, as well as some historical battles. Ivan Vladislav, claims to be the grandson of
1405:
J. Pettifer ed., The New Macedonian Question, St Antony's Series, Springer, 1999,
172:
1606:
1429:
514:
102:
952:, Oxford studies in Byzantium, Catherine Holmes, Oxford University Press, 2005,
406:
564:
355:
150:
106:
1565:
1254:
23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies, Belgrade, 22–27 August 2016
1231:Ристо Бачев, Битолска плоча - веродостоен паметник или подметнат фалсификат.
818:
775:
565:
Institute for preservation of monuments of culture, Museum and Gallery Bitola
206:
179:
155:
467:
448:
142:
129:
114:
920:
505:
466:
in 2016, archaeologists Elena Kostić and Georgios Velenis based on their
444:
251:
5. ...... градь с.....и..ола м͠ца ок...вра въ К҃. коньчѣ же сѧ м͠ца...
219:
272:
12. ........................................................мѹ исходꙙщѹ.
167:
in 1018, the local boyars surrendered the town to the Byzantine emperor
1516:Угринова-Скаловска, Радмила. Записи и летописи // Скопје, 1975, 43–44.
703:
517:. The inscription confirms the Bulgarian perception of the Byzantines (
509:
437:
1507:Џорђић, Петар. Историја српске ћирилице // Београд, 1990, с. 451–468.
1232:
694:Битољска плоча из 1017 године. Македонски jазик, XVII, 1966, 51–61.
391:
168:
94:
325:омощїѫ и молїтвамї прѣс͠тыѧ владч҃ицѧ нашеѧ Б͠цѧ ї въз
117:, provided strong arguments supporting the Bulgarian character of
97:
alphabet. Currently, it is located at the Institute and Museum of
1185:. Sofia: Институт за изследване на изкуствата, БАН. p. 117.
518:
390:, Tsar of Bulgaria, the two who routed the Greek army of Emperor
245:
3. ...ѫпенїе І҃В҃ і врьховънюю апл҃ъ съ же градь дѣлань быст...
486:
138:
98:
73:
44:
248:
4. ...ѣж.... и на спс҃енѥ ї на жизнь бльгаромъ начѧть же і...
242:
2. ...омощїѫ и молїтвамї прѣс͠тыѧ владч҃ицѧ нашеѧ Б͠цѧ ї в...
735:
Sebastian Kempgen: A Superscript for the Bitola Inscription.
331:градь сиола м͠ца оквра въ К҃. коньчѣ же сѧ м͠ца
133:
Sungur Chaush-Bey mosque in which ruins the plate was found.
522:
1144:
825:
327:ѫпенїе І҃В҃ і врьховънюю апл҃ъ съ же градь дѣлань бысть
239:
1. ....аемъ и дѣлаемъ Їѡаном самодрьжъцемъ блъгарьско...
876:
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1109461
1440:Битолският надпис в bTV Репортерите на 19 и 20 юни.
312:Bitola inscription as per Zaimov's reconstruction,
1563:
1180:
1150:
950:Basil II and the governance of Empire (976–1025)
831:
725:Камъкът на страха – филм на Коста Филипов – БНТ.
329:бѣ и на спс҃енѥ ї на жизнь бльгаромъ начѧть же
323:аемъ и дѣлаемъ Їѡаном самодрьжъцемъ блъгарьско
513:saints of Bitola were the Holy Virgin and the
490:Museum of Bitola where the plate is exhibited.
462:, when he visited Bitola in 1968. On the 23rd
521:) as Greeks, including the use of the term "
464:International Congress of Byzantine Studies
163:. After the death of John Vladislav in the
658:"Камъкът на страха, филм на Коста Филипов"
109:from 1015/17". In the final stages of the
1100:
485:
405:
307:
128:
1181:Georgios Velenis, Elena Kostić (2017).
1151:Georgios Velenis, Elena Kostić (2016).
1125:
832:Georgios Velenis, Elena Kostić (2016).
748:
279:
145:, in 1956 during the demolition of the
1564:
525:", when referencing their emperors.
364:for the salvation of the lives of the
121:, disputed by the Yugoslav scholars.
755:. Goce Delčev University. p. 80
652:
650:
648:
646:
16:Medieval Bulgarian stone inscription
13:
1602:Inscriptions in medieval Macedonia
1216:
1174:
792:
782:
688:
402:and died at the end of the summer.
14:
1618:
643:
500:Historiography in North Macedonia
198:, and thus changed its position.
320:
85:is a stone inscription from the
29:
1582:1956 archaeological discoveries
1536:
1434:
1416:
1399:
1382:
1365:
1348:
1331:
1314:
1293:
1276:
1259:
1246:
1237:
1225:
1199:
1119:
1110:
1091:
925:The Oxford History of Byzantium
889:
880:
868:
859:
850:
810:
801:
767:
742:
729:
718:
709:
697:
431:
676:
634:
620:
608:
587:
569:
557:
539:
504:The inscription confirms that
496:Nationalism in the Middle Ages
111:Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria
1:
1453:
452:
212:Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
137:The inscription was found in
739:Bamberg University, Germany.
532:
7:
1550:
333:ис быстъ бльгарїнь родомь ѹ
10:
1623:
1597:Old Bulgarian inscriptions
1428:February 24, 2012, at the
737:Draft paper, 12, May 2023.
493:
472:Ivan I Kaloyan of Bulgaria
337:рьжавьнаго ꙗже i разбїсте
335:к благовѣрьнѹ сынь Арона С
314:National Historical Museum
173:Ottoman Bedesten of Bitola
124:
72:Sungur Chaush-Bey mosque,
1577:11th-century inscriptions
481:
419:
66:
58:
50:
40:
28:
23:
1572:11th century in Bulgaria
1529:
749:Stojkov, Stojko (2014).
374:, grandson of the pious
343:В҃ лтѣ оть створѧ мира
147:Sungur Chaush-Bey mosque
1126:ΚΟΣΤΙΤΣ, ΕΛΕΝΑ (2014).
476:Second Bulgarian Empire
339:лїа кде же вьзꙙто бы зл
226:
491:
412:
404:
348:
317:
274:
161:First Bulgarian Empire
134:
87:First Bulgarian Empire
35:The Bitola inscription
1592:Slavonic inscriptions
489:
409:
386:, who was brother of
352:
319:
311:
237:
165:Battle of Dyrrhachium
132:
1557:Samuil's Inscription
302:Samuel of Bulgaria's
280:Text reconstructions
294:Ripsimia of Armenia
196:Macedonian Question
91:Old Church Slavonic
1587:Medieval Macedonia
629:pp. 573 – 588; 574
492:
468:paleographic study
443:American linguist
413:
341:фоꙙ съжев цр҃ь ра
318:
135:
83:Bitola inscription
24:Bitola inscription
1192:978-954-8594-65-3
1167:978-86-83883-23-3
843:978-86-83883-23-3
233:Sungur Chaush-Bey
192:Tito–Stalin split
79:
78:
1614:
1544:
1540:
1519:
1510:
1504:
1498:
1492:
1486:
1480:
1474:
1468:
1462:
1444:
1442:17.06.2021, bTV.
1438:
1432:
1420:
1414:
1403:
1397:
1386:
1380:
1369:
1363:
1352:
1346:
1335:
1329:
1318:
1312:
1297:
1291:
1280:
1274:
1263:
1257:
1250:
1244:
1241:
1235:
1229:
1223:
1220:
1214:
1203:
1197:
1196:
1178:
1172:
1171:
1159:
1148:
1142:
1141:
1139:
1137:
1132:
1123:
1117:
1114:
1108:
1104:
1098:
1095:
1089:
893:
887:
884:
878:
872:
866:
863:
857:
854:
848:
847:
829:
823:
814:
808:
805:
799:
796:
790:
786:
780:
771:
765:
764:
762:
760:
752:Битолската плоча
746:
740:
733:
727:
722:
716:
713:
707:
701:
695:
692:
686:
680:
674:
673:
671:
669:
664:on July 24, 2016
660:. Archived from
654:
641:
638:
632:
624:
618:
612:
606:
591:
585:
573:
567:
561:
555:
543:
457:
454:
435:
434: 1015–1018
433:
360:Tsar of Bulgaria
347:
298:Aron of Bulgaria
93:language in the
33:
21:
20:
1622:
1621:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1562:
1561:
1553:
1548:
1547:
1541:
1537:
1532:
1518:(in Macedonian)
1517:
1508:
1502:
1497:(in Macedonian)
1496:
1491:(in Macedonian)
1490:
1484:
1478:
1472:
1466:
1460:
1456:
1450:
1448:
1447:
1439:
1435:
1430:Wayback Machine
1421:
1417:
1404:
1400:
1387:
1383:
1370:
1366:
1353:
1349:
1336:
1332:
1319:
1315:
1298:
1294:
1281:
1277:
1264:
1260:
1251:
1247:
1242:
1238:
1230:
1226:
1221:
1217:
1204:
1200:
1193:
1179:
1175:
1168:
1157:
1149:
1145:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1105:
1101:
1096:
1092:
894:
890:
885:
881:
873:
869:
864:
860:
855:
851:
844:
830:
826:
815:
811:
806:
802:
797:
793:
787:
783:
772:
768:
758:
756:
747:
743:
734:
730:
723:
719:
714:
710:
702:
698:
693:
689:
681:
677:
667:
665:
656:
655:
644:
639:
635:
625:
621:
613:
609:
592:
588:
574:
570:
562:
558:
544:
540:
535:
515:Twelve Apostles
502:
484:
455:
430:
422:
344:
342:
340:
338:
336:
334:
332:
330:
328:
326:
324:
321:
282:
276:
229:
127:
103:North Macedonia
89:written in the
71:
36:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1620:
1610:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1560:
1559:
1552:
1549:
1546:
1545:
1534:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1523:
1520:
1514:
1511:
1505:
1499:
1493:
1487:
1481:
1479:(in Bulgarian)
1475:
1473:(in Bulgarian)
1469:
1467:(in Bulgarian)
1463:
1461:(in Bulgarian)
1455:
1452:
1446:
1445:
1433:
1415:
1398:
1381:
1364:
1362:, 2006, p. 60.
1347:
1330:
1313:
1292:
1275:
1258:
1245:
1236:
1224:
1215:
1198:
1191:
1173:
1166:
1143:
1118:
1109:
1099:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1039:
1028:
1017:
1010:
1000:
997:
994:
983:
972:
961:
947:
936:
927:. OUP Oxford.
917:
906:
888:
879:
867:
858:
849:
842:
824:
809:
800:
791:
781:
766:
741:
728:
717:
708:
696:
687:
675:
642:
633:
619:
607:
586:
568:
556:
537:
536:
534:
531:
483:
480:
427:Ivan Vladislav
421:
418:
281:
278:
228:
225:
126:
123:
119:Samuil's state
107:Ivan Vladislav
77:
76:
68:
64:
63:
60:
56:
55:
52:
48:
47:
42:
38:
37:
34:
26:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1619:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1569:
1567:
1558:
1555:
1554:
1539:
1535:
1524:
1521:
1515:
1512:
1506:
1500:
1494:
1488:
1482:
1476:
1470:
1464:
1458:
1457:
1451:
1443:
1437:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1419:
1412:
1408:
1402:
1395:
1394:9780367639549
1391:
1385:
1378:
1374:
1368:
1361:
1360:0-7864-2248-3
1357:
1351:
1344:
1340:
1334:
1327:
1323:
1317:
1310:
1309:9789540759128
1306:
1302:
1296:
1289:
1285:
1279:
1272:
1271:0-521-81530-4
1268:
1262:
1255:
1249:
1240:
1234:
1228:
1219:
1212:
1208:
1202:
1194:
1188:
1184:
1177:
1169:
1163:
1156:
1155:
1147:
1129:
1122:
1113:
1103:
1094:
1085:
1084:9780891585305
1081:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1064:9783034301961
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1047:9789004516335
1044:
1040:
1037:
1036:9780820410579
1033:
1029:
1026:
1025:9789004536746
1022:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
998:
995:
992:
991:5-7576-0087-X
988:
984:
981:
977:
973:
970:
969:3-486-58050-7
966:
962:
959:
958:0-19-927968-3
955:
951:
948:
945:
944:0-521-81539-8
941:
937:
934:
933:0-19-814098-3
930:
926:
922:
918:
915:
914:9780521364478
911:
907:
904:
900:
896:
895:
892:
883:
877:
871:
862:
853:
845:
839:
835:
828:
821:
820:
819:Slavic Review
813:
804:
795:
785:
778:
777:
776:Slavic Review
770:
754:
753:
745:
738:
732:
726:
721:
712:
705:
700:
691:
685:
684:стр. 183—199.
679:
663:
659:
653:
651:
649:
647:
637:
630:
623:
617:
611:
604:
600:
596:
590:
583:
579:
572:
566:
560:
553:
549:
542:
538:
530:
526:
524:
520:
516:
511:
507:
501:
497:
488:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:Ihor Ševčenko
450:
446:
441:
439:
428:
417:
408:
403:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:This Tsar was
365:
361:
357:
351:
350:Translation:
345:
315:
310:
306:
303:
299:
296:, and son of
295:
291:
290:Comita Nikola
287:
277:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
240:
236:
234:
224:
221:
216:
213:
208:
204:
199:
197:
193:
188:
183:
181:
180:Pande Eftimov
176:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
152:
148:
144:
140:
131:
122:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
75:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
32:
27:
22:
19:
1538:
1509:(in Serbian)
1503:(in Serbian)
1485:(in Russian)
1449:
1436:
1418:
1401:
1384:
1367:
1350:
1333:
1316:
1300:
1295:
1278:
1261:
1248:
1239:
1227:
1218:
1201:
1182:
1176:
1153:
1146:
1134:. Retrieved
1121:
1112:
1102:
1093:
1013:
1007:
1002:
923:ed. (2002).
921:Mango, Cyril
891:
882:
870:
861:
852:
833:
827:
817:
812:
803:
794:
784:
774:
769:
759:November 18,
757:. Retrieved
751:
744:
731:
720:
711:
699:
690:
678:
668:February 19,
666:. Retrieved
662:the original
636:
622:
610:
593:
589:
571:
559:
554:, pp. 17–18.
541:
527:
503:
449:Ivan Asen II
442:
423:
414:
371:
367:
363:
353:
349:
322:
283:
275:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
232:
230:
217:
203:White émigré
200:
186:
184:
177:
151:River Dragor
146:
143:SR Macedonia
136:
115:SR Macedonia
82:
80:
18:
1311:, стр. 310.
1004:bezeichnet.
916:, page 600.
627:countries"
506:Tsar Samuel
456: 1230
445:Horace Lunt
346:мѹ исходꙙщѹ
220:superscript
1566:Categories
1454:References
1411:0230535798
1377:900446526X
1343:9004191453
1326:1443888435
1288:3319562061
1211:900439429X
980:341217405X
903:0810855658
704:сп. Факел.
603:9004464875
582:0521832314
552:9004352996
510:Cometopuli
494:See also:
438:Cometopuli
370:Bulgarian
300:, who was
286:Comitopuli
67:Discovered
1345:, p. 215.
1328:, p. 245.
1290:, p. 314.
1066:, p. 245.
1038:, p. 540.
993:, 1999 г.
982:, p. 159.
971:, S. 414.
946:, p. 246.
935:, p. 238.
533:Footnotes
382:, son of
62:1015/1016
1551:See also
1426:Archived
1413:, p. 75.
1273:, p. 30.
1213:, p. 74.
1136:July 24,
1086:, p. 79.
1049:, p. 69.
1027:,p. 163.
822:31: 499.
789:104–112.
779:31: 499.
392:Basil II
380:Ripsimia
372:by birth
316:, Sofia.
169:Basil II
156:Ottomans
95:Cyrillic
41:Material
519:Romaioi
207:rubbing
125:History
59:Created
1607:Bitola
1409:
1392:
1375:
1358:
1341:
1324:
1307:
1286:
1269:
1209:
1189:
1164:
1082:
1062:
1045:
1034:
1023:
989:
978:
967:
956:
942:
931:
912:
901:
840:
601:
595:cause.
580:
550:
482:Legacy
420:Dating
400:Klyuch
396:Stipon
388:Samuil
376:Nikola
187:Plamak
139:Bitola
99:Bitola
74:Bitola
45:Marble
1530:Notes
1158:(PDF)
1131:(PDF)
411:left.
384:Aaron
1407:ISBN
1390:ISBN
1373:ISBN
1356:ISBN
1339:ISBN
1322:ISBN
1305:ISBN
1284:ISBN
1267:ISBN
1207:ISBN
1187:ISBN
1162:ISBN
1138:2024
1080:ISBN
1060:ISBN
1043:ISBN
1032:ISBN
1021:ISBN
987:ISBN
976:ISBN
965:ISBN
954:ISBN
940:ISBN
929:ISBN
910:ISBN
899:ISBN
838:ISBN
761:2022
670:2019
599:ISBN
578:ISBN
548:ISBN
523:tsar
498:and
378:and
356:Ivan
292:and
227:Text
81:The
70:1956
51:Size
1107:499
394:at
1568::
645:^
453:c.
451:,
432:r.
358:,
175:.
141:,
101:,
1379:.
1299:"
1256:.
1195:.
1170:.
1140:.
846:.
763:.
672:.
631:.
605:.
584:.
429:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
