31:
311:
dissented. The
Supreme Court ruling means that Republican legislators in the state of North Carolina can act and advocate for a voter-identification law that they believe the state's attorney general, a Democrat, isn't defending adequately in court. The Court rejected the idea that courts should just
282:
was not adequately defending the law. The district court denied both motions, asserting that Stein would defend the law fairly. The
General Assembly appealed, and a divided panel of the Fourth Circuit reversed in an opinion written by Judge
436:
340:
428:
272:
303:
Certiorari was granted in the case on
November 24, 2021. Oral arguments were held on March 21, 2022. On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court reversed the Fourth Circuit in an 8–1 vote. Justice
406:
532:
330:
245:
invalidated that law in 2016, and the
Supreme Court later denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in 2017 after disputes about whether North Carolina's new governor,
257:
466:
242:
79:
261:
537:
238:
398:
373:
527:
312:
presume that representation is adequate where the state law has explicitly authorized some other party to intervene in the process.
522:
295:, and affirmed the district court by a 9–6 vote. The General Assembly subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari.
249:, could withdraw the petition. In November 2018, the people of North Carolina adopted a voter identification amendment to the
218:
35:
256:
After the HB 589 litigation, the
General Assembly modified state law, again over Cooper's veto, to direct that the
276:
230:
253:, and the General Assembly then passed SB 824 to implement the amendment in December 2018, over Cooper's veto.
250:
221:
case related to the ability of state officials to intervene to defend the constitutionality of state laws.
63:
275:
in late
December 2018. The General Assembly sought to intervene in defense of the law twice, believing
284:
331:"Court will consider effort by North Carolina legislators to intervene to defend state voter-ID law"
477:
504:
362:
112:
470:
288:
74:
486:
8:
181:
308:
173:
157:
137:
429:"5 Other Notable Decisions the Supreme Court Has Reached in Its Current Session"
264:
be able to intervene in any litigation over the constitutionality of state law.
54:
Philip E. Berger, et al. v. North
Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, et al.
145:
516:
198:
Gorsuch, joined by
Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett
304:
169:
149:
129:
495:
234:
161:
102:
335:
279:
246:
90:
399:"Supreme Court Sticks Up for the Adversarial Process in Voter-ID Case"
273:
United States
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
86:
30:
268:
363:"Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP"
533:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
463:
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
258:
Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
214:
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
24:
Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
243:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
291:dissented. The court of appeals granted rehearing
262:President pro tempore of the North Carolina Senate
514:
267:The North Carolina State Conference of the
307:wrote the majority opinion, while Justice
538:United States civil procedure case law
515:
343:from the original on December 2, 2021
18:2022 United States Supreme Court case
328:
13:
439:from the original on June 24, 2022
409:from the original on June 23, 2022
379:from the original on June 24, 2022
370:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
549:
528:United States Supreme Court cases
473:___ (2022) is available from:
455:
271:filed suit against SB 824 in the
298:
29:
329:Howe, Amy (November 24, 2021).
277:North Carolina Attorney General
231:North Carolina General Assembly
523:2022 in United States case law
421:
391:
355:
322:
251:Constitution of North Carolina
1:
315:
224:
217:, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a
505:Supreme Court (slip opinion)
241:law. A divided panel of the
7:
219:United States Supreme Court
10:
554:
496:Oyez (oral argument audio)
285:A. Marvin Quattlebaum Jr.
202:
194:
189:
123:
118:
108:
98:
69:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
233:passed, and Governor
45:Decided June 23, 2022
43:Argued March 21, 2022
239:voter identification
237:signed, HB 589, a
134:Associate Justices
405:. June 23, 2022.
210:
209:
182:Amy Coney Barrett
545:
509:
503:
500:
494:
491:
485:
482:
476:
449:
448:
446:
444:
425:
419:
418:
416:
414:
395:
389:
388:
386:
384:
378:
367:
359:
353:
352:
350:
348:
326:
119:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
553:
552:
548:
547:
546:
544:
543:
542:
513:
512:
507:
501:
498:
492:
489:
483:
480:
474:
458:
453:
452:
442:
440:
427:
426:
422:
412:
410:
403:National Review
397:
396:
392:
382:
380:
376:
365:
361:
360:
356:
346:
344:
327:
323:
318:
309:Sonia Sotomayor
301:
227:
174:Brett Kavanaugh
172:
160:
158:Sonia Sotomayor
148:
138:Clarence Thomas
94:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
551:
541:
540:
535:
530:
525:
511:
510:
478:Google Scholar
457:
456:External links
454:
451:
450:
420:
390:
354:
320:
319:
317:
314:
300:
297:
226:
223:
208:
207:
204:
200:
199:
196:
192:
191:
187:
186:
185:
184:
146:Stephen Breyer
135:
132:
127:
121:
120:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
100:
96:
95:
89:2251306; 2022
84:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
550:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
520:
518:
506:
497:
488:
479:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
438:
434:
430:
424:
408:
404:
400:
394:
375:
371:
364:
358:
342:
338:
337:
332:
325:
321:
313:
310:
306:
299:Supreme Court
296:
294:
290:
289:Pamela Harris
286:
281:
278:
274:
270:
265:
263:
259:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:In 2013, the
222:
220:
216:
215:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:Case opinions
188:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:Chief Justice
125:
124:
122:
117:
114:
111:
107:
104:
103:Oral argument
101:
97:
92:
88:
82:
81:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
462:
441:. Retrieved
432:
423:
411:. Retrieved
402:
393:
381:. Retrieved
369:
357:
345:. Retrieved
334:
324:
305:Neil Gorsuch
302:
292:
266:
255:
228:
213:
212:
211:
177:
170:Neil Gorsuch
165:
153:
150:Samuel Alito
141:
130:John Roberts
78:
53:
15:
347:December 2,
235:Pat McCrory
162:Elena Kagan
517:Categories
336:SCOTUSblog
316:References
280:Josh Stein
247:Roy Cooper
225:Background
91:U.S. LEXIS
60:Docket no.
206:Sotomayor
70:Citations
461:Text of
437:Archived
407:Archived
374:Archived
341:Archived
260:and the
195:Majority
109:Decision
99:Argument
443:July 9,
413:July 9,
383:July 9,
293:en banc
203:Dissent
113:Opinion
508:
502:
499:
493:
490:
487:Justia
484:
481:
475:
287:Judge
180:
178:·
176:
168:
166:·
164:
156:
154:·
152:
144:
142:·
140:
64:21-248
469:
377:(PDF)
366:(PDF)
269:NAACP
85:2022
77:___ (
471:U.S.
445:2022
415:2022
385:2022
349:2021
93:3052
80:more
75:U.S.
73:597
467:597
433:WSJ
519::
465:,
435:.
431:.
401:.
372:.
368:.
339:.
333:.
87:WL
447:.
417:.
387:.
351:.
83:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.