Antipater son of Epigonus

115:

at an unknown date during the reign of Lysimachus of Telmessos. Lysimachus of Telmessos, ruled as the second Ptolemaic Client King of Telmessos from February 240 BC until his death in 206 BC. Lysimachus’ son, Ptolemy II of Telmessos, ruled from 206 BC until at least 181 BC. Ptolemy II was the fourth

181:

In 197 BC, the region of Lycia was no longer under Ptolemaic control as it was under the occupation of Antiochus III, thus Ptolemy II became a Client King of Telmessos under Seleucid rule. By this time Ptolemy II, Antipater with their families having excellent relations with Antiochus III reveals

170:

in 222 BC, probably Antipater's father and their extended family had the motive and opportunity for divorcing themselves from Ptolemaic suzerainty. At an unknown date during the reign of Lysimachus of Telmessos, Antipater and his relatives were enjoying excellent cordial relations with the

205:

as Eumenes II was an ally to Rome. Though Ptolemy II was able to retain his rule of Telmessos and his major land-holdings under Eumenes II, the family of Ptolemy II and Antipater is not heard of thereafter. Antipater was the likely father of Epigonos by an unnamed wife.

201:, Ptolemy II made offerings of thanks for the Peace of Apamea. This included an offering from Ptolemy II in association with Antipater. From 188 BC until at least 181 BC, Ptolemy II became a Client King under the rule of Eumenes II. Probably Ptolemy II sided with 162:

It seems likely that his family had relative autonomy from Ptolemaic control increased and it is unclear his family's relationship were with the Pharaohs in

182:

they had broken away from Ptolemaic influence, however there is a possibility their family connections with the Ptolemaic dynasty wasn't not wholly broken.

99:

Little is known on the life of Antipater, as he was a part of the Lysimachid dynasty, which is also known as the Ptolemaic/Lysimachid dynasty in

76: 91:

who subsequently became kings of portions of his empire, but the connection of Epigonus and Antipater to this Telmessian dynasty is disputed

178:. Antiochus III reigned from 222 BC until 187 BC, was an enemy of the Ptolemies who was at the time expanding Seleucid power in Asia Minor. 197:. In the Treaty of Apamea, Ptolemy II's position was explicitly safeguarded. According to dedication inscriptions on the Greek island of 591: 323: 647: 637: 632: 116:

and final ruler from their family to rule Telmessos and was also, the third and final Ptolemaic Client King of Telmessos.

139:, through Berenice I. Berenice I was the great-niece of the great marshal Antipater, through her maternal grandfather 616:

M.G. Cohen, The Hellenistic settlements in Europe, the Islands, and Asia Minor, University of California Press, 1995

140: 29: 642: 657: 652: 600: 384: 175: 72: 68: 610:

R.S. Bagnall, The administration of the Ptolemaic possessions outside Egypt, Brill Archive, 1976

20: 605: 534: 510: 395: 347: 259: 222: 167: 64: 166:. As Ptolemaic power declined rapidly and dramatically outside of Egypt after the death of 128: 588: 327: 8: 132: 88: 60: 156: 662: 186: 39:, flourished second half of 3rd century BC and first half of 2nd century BC) was a 613:

R.A. Billows, Kings and colonists: aspects of Macedonian imperialism, BRILL, 1995

595: 172: 84: 202: 626: 189:

in 188 BC, Antiochus III was forced to give the region of Lycia to the King

190: 163: 80: 136: 124: 108: 104: 194: 56: 44: 619:

J.D. Grainger, A Seleukid prosopography and gazetteer, BRILL, 1997

486:

The Hellenistic settlements in Europe, the Island, and Asia Minor

148: 40: 499:

The administration of the Ptolemaic possessions outside Egypt

434:

The administration of the Ptolemaic possessions outside Egypt

198: 112: 100: 34: 135:. Antipater was a distant relation of the great marshal 573: