User talk:Robert McClenon/Archive 28

8475:- I haven't been able to find a good way to formulate questions of when to create a second article when there is a redirect to an existing article. It definitely isn't a merge proposal, because a merge either converts two articles into one or pulls draft material into an article. A merge tag is often appropriate when someone writes a draft on a topic that already has an article, but the content is somewhat different but overlapping. If there is an article, and a draft is submitted that has the topic of a redirect to the article, I think that the discussion should be on the article talk page. The problem seems to be that the terminology of split and merge causes confusion. Do you have a different idea in general of how to handle these cases? In this specific case I will re-review the draft on the dance. The question seems to be largely one of terminology. Is there a more substantive issue? 9423:

the band Reyko meets the following: 1. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart 2. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country 3. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. 4. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network Please, reconsider. But also, please, feel free to improve the article or give me any advice? Thank you! --

5934:

For my uni, i am studying a course which asks me to write a wikipage and need to post it. If it is not published or delete or there are any problems with copyright i might get a failure to this unit.So i am so urgent as the assignment is already due. Also, my uni is in a English speaking country and i have to edit in English. I also dont have the right to ask my tutor to ask in the education board. I think i have the ability to do this by my self.What i am trying to do now is that fix all the problems and try my best to let it submit succesfully.That's the reason i resubmitted several time yesterday and i do revised a lot of places .But i am feel worried that i still have not got passed. Could you tell me the reason? I have checked on the

5523:- First, I see that the article has been accepted; I see that it is currently only a stub. That is all right; it needs expansion. Second, I see that I misread the draft as to one letter and therefore three orders of magnitude when I declined it. I read that Bezos had donated $ 10 million to the fund, which is a non-trivial amount of money that will finance an organization with an executive director who is paid out of endowment, but I have a template that says that not every 501(c)(3) organization, or its equivalent under other national laws, is notable. It didn't say that Bezos had pledged $ 10 million to the fund. This wasn't a Rockefeller or a Ford; this was Bezos. The size of the founding gift was 4262:, and was tagging crud that needed tagging. The issue was that I was thought by some editors to be tagging it too quickly, and I respectfully disagreed with their opinion. So I have not been at New Page Patrol much recently, now that the throw-away accounts have to play for four days before they can submit stuff, and some of them learn what is a proper submission, and some of them submit to AFC, which is even more backlogged. If your question is whether I have become a different editor or have grown up, the answer is no. I was already a grown-up. If the question is whether I have annoyed anyone recently, the answer is that I have annoyed a few contentious editors about content disputes. 1354:

closures at TfD pending a more thorough understanding of the nuances of the process and, even at RfD, I have not closed anything in over a month. None have been challenged at DRV and all were supported by the participants, but even there, I want to more fulsomely digest the applicable policies in that area before I resume closures. At least 4-6 months. Even when I resume doing a few closures, I will still limit myself to one or two areas and not AfD, given that is a much more high profile and controversial area. CfDs can be complicated in terms of multiple closing outcomes discussed in the comments, so would also avoid that, and I would also avoid MfD until the dispute over portals ends.

8994:

getting the permission from the owner, so I have to download them from her page & uploaded to Wikimedia Common with her named attached ( I complainted this to the owner of the photos, she said she will try to upload the photos by herself tomorrow, but she never join Knowledge before). This Thai user proposed many other photos I uploaded to other article for deletion as well! Some photos, I took it by myself from the National Museum of Cambodia and 1 photo, I asked my friend to took it when he was on a trip to Angkor Wat temple! So I get them via FB which is convenient. I am a new contributor/ editor, I dont know much about Knowledge. Help me! I dont know that technical stuff!

10435:. A grade is a paraphyletic group of organisms that lack the innovations of a derived group. For example fish are a grade, lacking the legs of tetrapods. Herptiles are a grade, lacking the hair and homeothermy of mammals, and the feathers, wings and homeothermy of birds. Non-bat, non-cetacean mammals could be seen as a grade, though anthropocentrism gets in the way of that. Green algae are a grade, lacking the derived features of land plants. A guild is a collection of species with similar ecological roles, such as a carnivore guild, a browser guild, a grazer guild, a scavenger guild, and so on. Algae in general can be seen as a guild of photosynthetic organisms. 4502:

first, I would have to wait for the administrator to delete the redirect first, which would leave the title temporarily vacant until I saw that the redirect had been deleted. What I do is to move the redirect out of the way, and then accept the draft, and then tag the redirect for G6. I have been doing this for maybe two or three years. It has the advantage that it doesn't require me to wait for the administrator to delete the redirect first, because the redirect can be deleted afterwards. Other administrators haven't objected, so I assumed that this was one reasonable way to accept drafts when there already is a redirect.

3096:

picked up where I left off. Several of my pages have since been approved. Thats really cool...but one page seems to be hijacked by the company itself. I made the article for Traackr, and it was very long. I took a long time on it...and it was completely neutral. Complete w/ a section for controversy. Anyhow, it looks like last mont the company itself tried to submit it's own article, and in doing so deleted my draft and created a fluff peice. You went ahead and denied their article and basically told them to quit being corporate scum. How do I get my original draft back? I can't find it anywhere in the revision history?

1496:

but this is movie article and i had discuss with one of our editor on Tea house, he said we can not add biography information in movie article. second point you said this person is not notable but i have given you some news paper links of mid-day Mumbai, Times of India and some other web links. i have saw some Biographical article on Knowledge with very less references but they got publish. so i think i have given proper references then why my article is getting declined. so i don't want to split this article with another article i want to make biography article of Sunil Prem Vyas. so please guide me for the same.

4967:. I just wanted to let you know that this was an article before I had it as a userspace draft (My Usual MO for major expansions), unfortunately, there was a discussion about the validity of the article and the consensus was to redirect it into the article the character originated from. The consensus was reached with only 2-3 people voting and improper research was made which resulted in the consensus that there were not enough sources to constitute a separate article. I was just wondering how I would get that decision reversed as there was insufficient research done for the consensus of redirecting it was reached?-- 9850:- I'll clarify, since this is high school math (and I've forgotten college math). He is saying that the title should be Modular forms modulo p, which is like Modular forms modulo n, except that n is an integer and p is a prime integer. It could be Modular forms modulo 3 or Modular forms modulo 5. You aren't overthinking it. He changed the nature of the complexity from 2 to any prime number. Everything beyond stating what the modulo is gets into discrete higher math, which I haven't forgotten because I didn't study it. (I have forgotten differential equations.) 1118:'s comment that he would like to see the thread closed, I'm contemplating closing as no consensus and/or wrong venue or unclear proposal. There's a lot of involved editors and administrators that are likely precluding it from being closed. There is some later discussion that some issues may be worth considering, in a different venue, but there is no consensus for the original proposal. Being an experienced editor, and seeing as you're also uninvolved in that thread, would you mind giving me a second opinion on if you think such a close has merit? 4168:- I am willing to try again if you have looked at my previous RFA, and if you recognize that I haven't tried to be the different editor that some well-meaning supporters told me I should become, and then try again. That is, some editors gave me advice for the track record I should establish in order to have another RFA. I didn't plan to become an "excellent content creator" or to be more tolerant of crud. If you are willing to nominate me again anyway, then I would prefer to wait about a week to ten days and then give it a chance again. 2059:- To explain a little further, what was weird was that I had apparently confused you to the point where I couldn't resolve the confusion, because I thought that I had tried to explain that it was a question of whether to spin out an article and that the place to discuss was the existing article. I felt that I was trapped in the situation where what I communicated the first time was not what I meant, and where it was apparently impossible to re-explain. Maybe now I have explained, and maybe I will still have to explain four more times. 7846:- Okay, you are likely right in that maybe I should have given your draft a more detailed review. On the other hand, you are being very undiplomatic if your objective is to get me to re-review the draft. You have now annoyed me so that I am not likely to be neutral. If your objective was to ask for a different reviewer, you will get your request, because I will recuse from reviewing your draft. If your objective was for me to accept your draft as an article, I will recuse from reviewing it, because I am no longer unbiased. 3403:. That illustrates two unrelated issues with the scripts that reviewers use. The one that I usually complain about is that it thinks it was my sandbox. My only connection was that I had moved a previous draft out of that sandbox. Also, it doesn't accept the reviewer's input as to what language it is. Well, I didn't decline that draft, and so I never said it was in German. But I have tried to say that drafts were in German or French or Spanish, and it has sometimes only said that they weren't in English. Oh well. 4847: 10870:. Honestly I've never heard of the term in this draft, so I suspect if this is made up of. Also, apologies that I have to review in breakneck speed due to a busy real life, so sometimes I don't list out all the reason, if I find one reason, I decline it right away unless there are so many problems that I'm not comfortable if I don't tell the author. Sorry for that. However, this article is still a duplicate. Regarding the trout, I don't mind people trouting me but this is not used in the right occasion. 3692:. PS: It's been my direct experience that if you want to track down previous references to something like this (e.g. with "What links here"), and fix the links to point to the current location, no one is likely to object (even in talk-page archives). It'll almost never produce a revert if you leave the original link (if visible) alone and pipe it to the current location. But many editors would not care to bother with that, since most of us don't read archives unless looking for something specific. 1885:

terms “Inca ruins”, “Inca citadel”. “Inca ruins at Pisac” is not suitable as it is a term of the state of repair. “Inca citadel at Pisac” is not quite correct as it had more functions than acting as a fortress. The legal name of the complex is the “Pisca Archeological Park”. I don’t think this is the best as we don’t use the legal name for the palaces, castles, etc which are now museums as their article name. But at the end of the day the important thing is to describe this stunning place.

9022:. I have declined the draft at this time because it is difficult to read because the English is not good. It needs a heavy copy-edit for grammar, style, and usage. A history merge of the draft into the existing redirect is then needed. (I am not recommending a merge into the article on the goddess, but a history merge into what is currently a redirect from the title of the dance to the goddess.) If you have any further questions, you may ask them here, or on the talk page of the draft. 2763:

higher education, just as I do.) I didn't choose to invite him to the Teahouse. I simply used the Articles for Creation script, and it decides whether to invite an editor to the Teahouse. If an editor chooses to use Articles for Creation, they will get invited to the Teahouse. He can ignore the invitation, just as anyone else who gets it from a script can. I will pass on to the editors who maintain the script that it annoys some experienced editors who submit articles for review.

4757:

individual. I checked through the page history and fully agree with you, that there were multiple accounts involved. I do not know who's behind these accounts, why he's constantly trying to vandalize the article, and what could be his intentions. I understand that he may have violated Knowledge's guidelines that led the page to be redirected. I tried resubmitting the draft but it got rejected for the subject not being notable. I read Knowledge's General Notability Guidelines at

6665: 9961: 8122: 6577: 1050: 10887: 7442:

deserve to be addressed in this manner. Some of us need to eat, and love to help people make articles. I guess the articles won’t pass AfC unless they are at featured status first, but I didn’t know that, I am new to the process. Last I knew, we had a policy of “Don’t bite the newbies”, and I was new to this. They should just ban paid editing entirely if this is the way that paid editors who attempt to disclose and contribute are going to be treated.

1699: 10348:- I have reviewed the revised draft briefly, and it does not appear to be a significant improvement. I can either decline it again or leave it for another reviewer. There is a myth in Knowledge about references. The myth is that any draft will be accepted if enough references are added to it. References are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the acceptance of a draft. If you want the opinions of other reviewers, you can ask at 9511:

to the article, but it seems to be moved or deleted. Can you please give me more information on that? Where is Draft:Joseph G. Giambra? There is some comment about copyright infringement, but no requests were made regarding further information. While I do not have a copy of the deleted draft, my recollection is that the photos were taken by me or owned by Joseph Giambra. Or links to other websites such as IMBD. The content was my own.

3323: 2280: 1616: 295: 5273: 2167: 7936:- I don't see anything in the game notability guidelines that is different about coverage for games that have not yet been released, but perhaps the game press routinely provides neutral coverage to games prior to release in a way that is different from films, books, or other subjects. My advice still is to discuss the split on the talk page. I would also suggest that a general discussion of games and unreleased games at 3565:

advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Knowledge to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Knowledge is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

6126: 5338: 4689:. Talk to the reviewer there. I don't know anything about algebraic geometry. It isn't one of the mathematical subjects that I have forgotten, because it isn't part of the higher mathematics that is studied by a chemist. So either discuss at the talk page of the existing article, or discuss at the mathematics project talk page. You would be better off to talk to a real mathematician at 9905: 8067: 6522: 995: 844: 648: 243: 5443: 4600: 1451: 10500:: Here is a long partial answer. First, as I noted above to another editor, there is a myth in Knowledge about references. The myth is that any draft will be accepted if enough references are added to it, or the right references. References are a necessary but not a sufficient condition for acceptance of a draft. The first part of my conclusion is that the track does not satisfy 11220:. She was correct in noting that I was parsing the meanings of an English word to a degree of precision that requires en-5, and she is at en-4, and her English is better than that of some Americans. (It is probably also better than that of some Britons.) I saw a sarcastic humor in her comment about lexical meanings and languages. I agree that her comments about 7980:- I am not sure that I understand. I think I understand that you want to avoid having the draft deleted, but I am not sure what sort of deletion you are concerned about needing to avoid. I don't think that there is a risk that it is about to be deleted. Has someone posted something to that effect? If you have a vague general concern, you could ask a question at 3434:- If it notifies multiple editors who were involved in the history, then it is worth the false positives to avoid any misses where the actual creator is not notified. If it is notifying multiple editors, including the true creator, then I will mostly stop complaining, because it is a reasonable solution then, if it minimizes the annoyance factor. 7398:- There is a difference between paid editing and the paid collection of household garbage. Both are looked down on. The difference is that someone has to do the paid collection of garbage, because no one will do it for free, and it has to be done. No one has to do paid editing of Knowledge, because it will be done for free if it needs doing. 6299:

the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" (Knowledge: Notability (Music)). Could you please iterate what exactly you feel I should do to indicate that the first criteria for musical notability is satisfied? Thank you.

7901:) that are all regarding upcoming releases. I'm just curious to figure out how an unreleased game with healthy coverage (ironically much of it being geared towards its unreleased nature) wouldn't be considered notable. I'm definitely waiting to hear from other editors on the Star Citizen page, just wanted to clear up that part. Thanks! — 8447:, I think it would be much clearer to frame the discussion as a choice of whether to (1) create a stand-alone article of a subtopic, or (2) merge the draft's content into the main article. A new maintenance tag would be best suited for this, but if we must choose among existing tags, I'd say it makes much more sense to tag the issue as a 5898:, because assignments involving editing articles in Knowledge are problematic. If your assignment is to write a paper on the subject, you do not need to submit it for review, but it should still be in your own words and not copied. Please explain your university assignment. In particular, please explain why this draft is important. 5795:- Thank you. My name is Sandrah.Akol, am seriously struggling to contribute African Content on Knowledge but its an fortunate that most times I donot conform to its policies. Recently I wrote about Ntinda Vocational Training Institution-Kampala, I have been reading about the Knowledge's guidelines and I believe currently this article 959:- This is an interesting situation because it seems that more disambiguation is needed than is usually the case, because there are two people in the same line of work with the same name. I have renamed your draft to include his middle initial. This is an interesting disambiguation question, and I suggest asking for advice at the 9039:@Robert_McCleon Quite disappointing after the draft article is declined for the second time. I'm not a native speaker of English, thus limited in the language used! I did my best for the contribution anyway! I'm completely blank who can really help me over here! Will find somebody to help and resubmit the draft again! Sad 5816:- Stop submitting multiple copies with slightly different names. That only shows that you are trying to confuse the reviewers. We have told you where and how to discuss, and you should discuss rather than just resubmitting multiple copies, and you should discuss with the community rather than asking me on my talk page. 8195:'The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability'. This has been proven by providing numerous citations (significant attention) from independent sources. 10705:- I have not reviewed the sources for the draft in depth. The draft reads as if it is written from the company's viewpoint, which is expected because it is being written from the company's viewpoint. I have not reviewed the sources, but the draft does not convince me of the need to review the sources in depth. 5159:

redirect first. So I move the redirect and accept the draft. If you would prefer that I move the redirect to draft space or user space, I am willing to do that. Is that your request? I can move the redirect to draft space, or to my user space, and accept the draft. Is that what you are asking? If so, okay.

3040:, someone has a snit and decides that some sportsperson fails general notability although they passed a sports notability guideline. My own thinking is to pretend that the special notability guideline is the only one that matters if there is one, because it is clearer. So my advice would be not to assess for 3593:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Per Dorsetonian (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 4093:- It appears that what is needed is a History Merge, which is somewhat different from a regular merge. I have left your merge request on the page, but have added a History Merge request. This is done by an administrator, and is done in order to preserve the attribution in accordance with the terms of the 9114:@Robert_McCleon,thanks for your help. But can you please add some sections from the second submission of the draft as it contains more information such the characters' costume,...etc & could get help from the team as well. Really appreciate your assistance! Take care & stay healthy! God blessed! 11281:

have reviewed your proposed version of the article and have stated that they prefer the existing version. They are not required to comment in detail on your version. It is unfortunate that you choose to characterize editors with whom you disagree about article content as your opponents, but that is

10015:

or somewhere else, and found that comment, that it should be in article space, persuasive. So I resubmitted the draft, and then I reviewed the draft and accepted it. As a result of the fact that I was the last submitter of the draft to review, the script put the message on my talk page, saying that

9698:

The copyright infringement was probably of the text of the draft, because copyright to images and copyright to text are handled by somewhat different procedures. We normally will allow the use of copyrighted pictures with the consent of the photographer or other copyright owner. We cannot allow the

8732:

said was that the parties should have used dispute resolution. Barkeep further said that could be an RFC. With multiple parties coming from multiple directions, RFC is more likely to be an effective method of dispute resolution than is moderated discussion at DRN. You still can formulate an RFC.

8535:, sometimes after some discussion, and sometimes unilaterally. In those cases, it really is important to ensure that there is new discussion. In cases where there is no special notability guideline and no previous discussion, it is really just a matter of inclusion philosophy, and that gets messy. 8530:

criteria are detailed and well-defined, so that the draft can be accepted if it charted or otherwise meets a specific criterion, and otherwise can usually be declined. One of the considerations, that you mentioned, is that quite often there was an article, and it has been stubbed down to a redirect,

8439:

in an article. The tag you placed, saying, "It has been suggested that this article be split into a new article titled Draft:Robam Moni Mekhala," made no sense to me, because the content is already in the target, and there's no existing content in the main article to be split. (In any case, one would

6000:

Why would you suggest to these users that they should consider bringing things to DRV? How would that be in scope for DRV? I think you should stop doing these random things. Draftspace is for waylaying dubious contributors, and DRV is a high level forum for admin continuing education. There is no

3265:

Resubmitted after considering the notability criteria pointed out (thanks!, there was indeed some stuff to clean up and reorganize). References and comments have been added to make clear the contribution to the academic discipline of algorithmic music, as well as citations to its global impact in the

10831:

to the one with whom you disagree. You are asking multiple reviewers for help. They may notice that you were quick to put a big fish on the talk page of a reviewer. I agree that you have made the case that brand activism is not the same as consumer activism. At the same time, your draft does not

8993:

from Thailand. After trying to prevent the draft article : Robam Moni Mekhala from being approved as a separate article, now he proposed many of the photos I uploaded to Knowledge ( including those used in the draft article) for DELETION! Some photos I got them from the facebook page (Hattha) after

8188:

6. The list of markets that the subject covers is not an 'Example of trivial coverage' on the pure basis that, the list of markets that the subject covers, are the reason for the citations & existence of the subject's secondary coverage in the first place, wholly this would seem 'trivial' had it

5158:

Move, but this would require then that I wait anywhere between 5 minutes and 24 hours to see when an administrator has deleted the redirect, and during the time after the deletion and before I can accept the draft, there is nothing. So I want to accept the draft, which means that I need to move the

5054:

to create a draft for review. The alternative, since it is so old, would be just to create the page, but as a reviewer I don't think that I should ignore the previous closure. You already have a draft. I will request permission to review it. In that case, we probably don't need to discuss at the

4631:

I saw you rejected my article because you labelled it as a spinoff of the article on derived algebraic geometry. Although these articles has similar sounding titles, they are distinct subjects. Here's a useful analogy: algebraic geometry is to noncommutative geometry as derived algebraic geometry is

3614:

who said it's mandatory to re-submit for further review (though, he still hasn't shown me where it says that this is mandatory). In any event, I'd like to request your help and receive feedback for further edits, if any. I've made suggested changes to the sources, added a COI (not an autobiography),

413:

for copyright violation. Knowledge takes copyright violation very seriously, and I see no particular reason why we should assist you in recovering content that was lost because you infringed copyright. If you have the original material available on your computer or elsewhere, you can resubmit it.

373:

Hello Robert, I had posted a page to be published and you had deleted it due to a quote from a magazine that was used directly. I would gladly update that to be a paraphrased version but the entire page is now gone. How can it be restored and then fixed? Thank you for any insight you can provide on

9510:

I am unfamiliar with the Wikipage process and hope you will excuse my query here if it does not follow the appropriate protocol. I reach out to you because you left me a message that the tone of my article was not acceptable. I made edits to comply with the request. I just popped in to add an IMBD

9422:

Hi Robert! Hope you are well? Thank you for your feedback, I'm very new to Knowledge so I'm trying my best here. I have deleted the draft for Reyko as the article is already published. And I have seen your nomination to delete the article so I have checked the criteria for notability in music and

9339:

I accepted it as is, and then fixed the headings; sometimes in a case like this I fix them first, and then accept. This is simply a decent quality translation from the frWP, not a machine translation. (Iddon ot know why the contributor didn't copy the hreading format, but it's one of the things

8202:

Furthermore, the Notability terms state 'The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own

8198:

None of the citations, or coverage can be regarded as 'Self-promotion, autobiography, product placement and most paid material are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article' The articles to which I've referred are not paid, nor classifiable as the remainder above. They're provided by independent

7377:

I know paid editing is very looked down upon, but do you know of anyone who does it well, you know, produces good quality articles in a Knowledge sense? Or is there a forum or wiki project for sharing best practices about how to comply with disclosed paid editing? I am a very old hand at Knowledge,

7059:

Hi, I'm writing to ask which is the best way to go about resolving a particular dispute along with some ongoing civility issues. I am asking you because you are the first editor on the Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers list who has made any edits today. I hope I'm going about this the right

7039:

Hi Robert, I have been working on the article for Councilmember Rishi Kumar. A bunch of people showed up and changed a lot of stuff, and submitted a bunch more articles. Can I please have to time to fix it, before it get's deleted. Can you please help me with getting this up. I am doing this in the

6298:

I would like to emphasize that my references include Voir, The Jerusalem Post, and 303 Magazine - which has an editorial board. An editor on live chat also agreed with me that these three sources should be viable for the page to be accepted. I believe I have satisfied the first criteria: "Has been

3521:

I have been told my article is not being published because it seems I may be compensated directly or indirectly for this article. I was asked to reply here to assure wiki that that is not the case. I assure you that is not the case. I am not being paid directly or indirectly to create and post this

2781:

AfC (afaik), but others move his creations to draft, where some simmer until too old ... - sad topic. They are moved to draft because they are translations from fr and de, where sourcing is different. I struggle with that a lot, and sometimes feel that writing an article from scratch is easier than

1495:

Hello Robert McClenon, last month you had rejected Biographical article of "Sunil Prem Vyas". i'm not able to understand what kind of changes should i do in article. first point you said i can split this article with another article "Take it easy (Movie 2015)" which is directed by Sunil Perm Vyas.

1245:

I will restate something that apparently needs restating. The banner at the top of a noticeboard archive that says not to edit the contents of the archive means not to edit the archive of a noticeboard or a talk page. If you think that you misread it because your thread was supposed to be closed,

571:

I created a Knowledge entry for my client, "Webfleet Solutions" and submitted it two months ago. At the time I received timely feedback from you, I quickly made all the arrangements (added third party information from reliable sources) you suggested on your feedback but I have not received any news

126:

I apologise if it looks like I have duplicated a submission. My understanding was that the article was sitting in the Draft space for a number of months but on checking the guidance it looked like it had to be moved to my own user space and then submitted. My understanding of the Draft page is that

10840:

I would expect to see to sell a product. The fact that you are promoting a strategy turns my level of discomfort with the phrase down from 10 to 8. So if I had reviewed your draft, I probably would have declined it for a different reason than WikiAviator. So address the tone issues. You might

8736:

After reviewing the explanation of the need for cookies and your personal inability to enable cookies, I do not find a compelling reason to allow anonymous participation in a moderated dispute where moderation is not likely to work anyway. In the absence of an explanation that goes into excessive

8489:

There are some common cases where a draft has the same title as a redirect, such as the name of an album that is redirected to the article on the artist, or the name of a song or track that is redirected to the article on the album. In those cases, I think it is clear that discussion should be at

7965:

continues? I'd agree with jumping the gun on submitting it for review, I just don't want it to be deleted while the rest is ongoing (I don't really know how all this works in detail). Or would it be best to leave it in the state it's in now, continue improving it and continuing the discussion, and

5933:

Hi!I am Matilda. This topic is about a type of surgery. My cat has the hip dysplasia disease and need this type of surgery. I did a lot of researches on this and i hope my draft can be posted. Maybe i had violated the copyright.But i did not mean to do it. This is my first time to edit a wikipage.

5840:

Hi! My ID is Zzhu8516. My article is rejected by u as u said it is contrary to the aim of wikipedia which means i copy too much. And my wikipage is deleted now. I know some people rejected my article before but i already changed a lot of words and sentences. This wikipage is cooresponding with my

5375:

Hello. Thanks for your message about the deletion of "Political Game Theory". Sorry I didn't see it until now. I'm very old and I don't log in at Knowledge very often these days. I think that article was probably an obsolete idea for a longer page or a neglected stub from a long time ago. Deletion

5298:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

5197:

Lourdes' solution is the one I usually suggest for extendedmovers who find themselves having to jump through complex hoops to get things done, yes. (I don't offer to nominate anymore, though; my endorsement would be of little value.) In the meantime, moving the leftover revisions into draft:, or

4865:

discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to

2871:

Thank you for deleting the draft. I incorrectly submitted it as an article for creation when I was, in fact, attempting to create a user-page. I was looking for how to retract the submission myself, but you beat me to it. Sorry for wasting your time! I am still learning how to properly use the

2521:

in one detail, and that is that, in my opinion, draftifying an undersourced article a second time should never be done, even if its author is a known paid editor. Draftifying a page twice is move-warring, and move-warring is disruptive, and experienced editors should not edit-war or move-war. If

2204:

1868:

I visited the area in 2017 and was blown away of how massive what I term “Inca Pisac” is. Upon my return home I found that there is very little information available on it, mostly tourist blogs and the odd scientific paper. As a result I decided to be bring it to people’s attention. I had intended

1198:

could have closed the thread if they had acted. Now my view, which is consistent with the banner at the top of the archive, is to let sleeping bears sleep. (If you wake up a bear, the result is unpredictable, because bears are unpredictable, but one likely result is that the bear will injure you

575:

I wanted to ask you if you knew a way of knowing when will I receive new feedback or to know if my entry is approved or rejected? I contacted the help desk yesterday and they sent me information regarding conflicts of interests but I'm not sure how this is related to me since Webfleet Solutions is

11020: 10826:

did. I disagree with both you and WikiAviator. On the one hand, I agree that you have made a case that brand activism is not the same as consumer activism, and so I think that WikiAviator was too quick to decline your draft, in particular after I had said that the evaluation should focus on the

8030:

You didn't submit them for review, so I submitted them. You also have drafts in some other genera in various plant families, but I have left them alone, because you didn't ask about them. I am willing to accept any draft on a species with a proper source and a proper binomial name, based on the

7828:

Addendum: Also did you even read the draft talk page before declining the submission? Literally no one has thus far said that sources like GQ, Elite Daily, and Tempo don't constitute significant coverage. The draft was declined *in the past* because those sources *had not been discovered yet*. So

7152:

completely unacceptable. What is the best way to go about dealing with consistently uncivil behavior? I'm not trying to get this editor blocked or anything, but I feel a warning of some sort is in good order, and as mentioned and pointed out, I'm definitely not the only editor who feels this way.

5565:

In general, common sense is better than elaborate guidelines. I could not figure out why you had not accepted it, but that you had not noticed the actual size certainly explains it; had it been $ 10 million I wouldn't have either. I noticed it especially because I was aware of it from the NYT

3568:

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted

3175:

I can't find anything to say that the article ever existed at all, which is strange because I made it. I have the code saved in a Google Doc. I'd rather not resubmit something that got deleted already however. I just figured if it was already there maybe I could edit it up. I'll just let this one

2536:

I thought that I wasn't going to review it, but I see that a previous article on the actress was already deleted after a deletion discussion, and that was sufficient for me to decline it with a warning that I am ready to nominate it for deletion if it is resubmitted again without evidence that it

1872:

The concurrent Knowledge article called “Pisac” is on the existing town and surrounding area. This area was settled by various tribes from which no buildings remains before it was conquered by the Incas. They constructed a massive complex on a mountain side overlooking the valley. This complex is

10511:

However, second, since you are being so persistent, I am willing to do either of two things for you. I advised you to discuss the rejection with other editors before resubmitting. You have chosen to persist in asking me. I am willing, the first option, just to get you to stop bothering me, to

8371:

The sources cited are the only available references I can find for the proposed article as such English-based books regarding this Cambodian dance is rare although it is a popular dance in Cambodia. The acceptance of this draft article will open it up to other editors who may have access to more

8213:

The Notability guidelines state 'No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization'. It has been proven that there has been Significant attention given to the subject matter by; multiple,

8170:

1. The citations provided are to articles which are written specifically upon the subject matter submitted, these are not 'just passing mentions' so much as they provide "Significant coverage" by 'addressing the topic directly and in detail, so that no research is needed to extract the content'

5963:

I dont understand why things become so difficult. I have revised my article and i am all the way trying to make my article better.The problem is not i violated the poiucy or what my tutor ask is unreasonable. It is that i am trying my best to revise it. I hope my effort could make sense. Or if i

3095:

So around two years ago I decided I would try and become the "Influencer Guy" on wiki. So I made pages for several YouTube Celebrities and Agency's. I think all of my submissions got deleted, and then I got bored and went elsewhere. But I returned today out of curiosity, and see that other users

2762:

is an experienced editor. Knowledge is sometimes a strange complicated place. I will add that you do not have problems with English. Your English is at proficiency level 4, and I cannot tell the difference in writing between level 4 and level 5. (What I do notice is that you appear to have a

1884:

Part of the problem is that the name “Inca Pisac” also refers to the period of Inca occupation of the area, which I think confused you. If you agree that your decision should be reversed there is still the problem of the article name, if you feel it is confusing. Various peoples seem to use the

1260:

Sorry if I wasn't clear? I am not suggesting that it should be closed post-archiving - I just dropped in to explain why I didn't close it myself (since you pinged me, and mentioned that I could have done so), and to say that I'm happy to leave it as is. I'm not suggesting that anyone disturb the

10770:

Brand activism seeks to change society's biggest problem (such as economic injustice, education, healthcare, immigration etc. issues), using the economic power of the business. The Brand activism claims that today for the companies is not enough to offer good product and price, but they have to

8178:

3. This draft is not written from the viewpoint of the company, the submission details only factual points relating to the subject matter & is fully cited for all factual points made, as would be expected from an external source's viewpoint. Furthermore the citations are "Independent of the

7441:

I have added over 40,000 edits to this encyclopedia over since 2006 over countless hours, for free. I have created dozens of Good Articles, and contributed to at least 5 Featured Articles. I have won dozens of barnstars, and over 98% of all my contributions have been retained thus far. I do not

4501:

I always (almost always) deal with drafts that replace redirects in this fashion. An example is a redirect for an album to the article on the musical artist, or a redirect for a song to the article on the album. Then a draft is written for the article or the song. If I were to G6 the redirect

1880:

If what you are saying is correct then shouldn’t these and any place, castle, significant structure not have a separate article and instead be incorporated in the article on the town or city in which they are located. If you search for “Pisac Archaeological Park” in Google maps and go to the 3D

1740:

Hello Robert McClenon, thank you for reviewing my submission. It seems I have resubmitted a more recent draft with the same name. How do we move forward reviewing the most recent draft (December 28, 2019), and discarding the first draft reviewed in (September 30, 2019)? Thank you for your help.

1193:

are archived if there is no activity in a period of time which may be 72 hours. If you read the header of an archive, you will notice that it normally has instructions which say not to edit it. That means do not edit the archive of a talk page or a noticeboard. This amounts to a close due to

11120:

Dispute resolution noticeboard was created to solve issues. You have taken the responsibility to sum up the disputes therefore you must understand the essence of the problem, in my case – to check a draft in detail. You didn't do it yourself and didn't let other people join when you closed the

8367:

I wish this article will be accepted as a separate article from Manimekhala. This proposed article is a separate article for a Cambodian traditional dance Robam Moni Mekhla while Manimekhala is an article for a goddess in Hindu and Buddhist mythology. Like there are an article for Apsara and a

7888:

Hello, you left a comment on the Squadron 42 draft that I was a little confused with. I understand the discussion on splitting Star Citizen with Squadron 42, I opened that discussion but so far there's only been one other person talking it over prior to me really working on this draft. In your

1353:

page overly cluttered relative to other areas of Knowledge, so I just missed that banner you referenced. In terms of non-admin closures, I haven't closed any AfDs (other than withdrawing my nomination) and my closures have been limited to a handful of RfDs and several TfDs. I have curtailed my

8576:

I would appreciate you reading the various comments in the Arbitration Enforcement request where this matter was referred to DRN, if you haven't already, and reconsidering your closure in light of that. This dispute has been churning on the talk page and at AE for the past month, so it's very

8504:

Yes, it does seem it's an issue mainly of terminology. Would probably be best to create a new template to cover this directly. It would make sense to discuss cases at the main article talk page, but a more pertinent question, I think, would be when this is necessary. Redirects that used to be

8221:

Therefore, my submission should be approved wholly as the corporation is decidedly 'notable'. In fact, as one of my citations states, the subject is award winning, this is 'notable' in its own right. My submission has provided multiple citations to 'significant coverage' of the subject, from

5154:- Okay. How would you prefer that I handle these drafts? I am willing to follow a somewhat different approach. The situation is that there is a draft article submitted for review that should be accepted, but there is a redirect to a parent article. I could tag the redirect for deletion as 3564:

Hello Mmizeasrm. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to American Society for Reproductive Medicine, but you have not complied with Knowledge's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid

1291:

threads could be archived without closure. It's clear that nothing needs to happen from that thread as there's no clear outcome on what, if anything, needs to happen. If someone from that thread wants to re-open an aspect of that discussion, they're certainly able to do that by bringing a new

8217:

The Notability guidelines specifically state that 'A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. notable if it has been the subject of

8206:

Which of course is the case, multiple independent, sources have considered the topic notable enough to have written and published non-trivial work of their own that specifically focus upon the subject, without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to this topic matter.

5050:- First, you made a typo in copying the URL of the deletion discussion to my talk page, and it didn't link to anything, but I guessed what it was supposed to be and have fixed it and viewed the AFD. That is a nine-year-old AFD. The usual procedure in such a case is to request permission at 8225:

I have spoken to members of the Tea Room & one comment was that the City A.M. citation is of a 'trivial coverage' nature. To rebuttal this, my comment is, the statement is short, stating the company raised 30k. But just because the statement is short, does not mean it doesn't constitute

8156:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Knowledge article — that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the

4756:

I am writing to you regarding the draft about Saket Modi which was declined by you stating There has been a history of sockpuppetry in the previous article on Saket Modi that has been stubbed down to a redirect. I am assuming by "sockpuppetry" you mean multiple accounts operated by a single

1331:

is archived, and there are other things you don't know, is it possible that you don't know enough to do non-admin closures of XFD? Either you know what you are doing and can't explain it, so that other think you don't know what you are doing, or you actually don't know what you are doing.

8163:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate

3806:

The creator of this material came to me several weeks ago and requested me to assist him create his first article. I did not have the time at that time. When I found the time, I noticed that his draft has been rejected on more than one occasion, despite the presence of adequate referencing

3572:

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mmizeasrm. The template

7799:. There have been statements that she has enough individual coverage to qualify for a separate article, and there have been statements that she does not have enough individual coverage to qualify for a separate article. I am requesting that the community discuss at the group talk page. 6999:- It says: "Both the sender and recipient must have allowed user emails in their preferences." That confirms my thinking. If the would-be sender, GDX420, hasn't allowed user emails at their end, they can't email me, although I have enabled email. Both users have to have enabled it. 10580:

I'd argue that testguild.com definitely is a noteworthy independent source, as it is one of the top resources in the software testing space. There are also a lot of other third-party references in the article, including an article in the "Computer Standards & Interfaces" journal.

8759:

I will note that 2600:1004 has been a productive contributor to the discussion for quite some time and so if that was the only thing preventing this from being handled at DRN I'd ask for reconsideration. However, I will affirm that while DRN is part of the dispute resolution process,

3561:@Robert McClenon:I received the below from Dorsetonian. Please see in the message below where I am asked to respond to the message below that I am not being compensated directly or indirectly. I apparently replied to you rather than Dorsetonian in error. I apologize. Can you help me? 10374:

I understand that you have rejected the submission from my sandbox. I understand most reasons for your decision. I do not understand why the info in my sandbox has been erased -- this does not make sense to me if I want to improve the text. Can you reinstate the sandbox content?

8572:

I'm unable to use an account because I can't enable cookies on the device that I use to edit. I don't know who the other IP is, or whether they have a legitimate reason for editing anonymously, but they're a different person. (It's helpful to compare our respective geolocations.)

3120:- What exact name did you give to the article or draft that you created? There was a page deleted from article space eight years ago that was also a fluff piece by the same author as wrote the draft that I declined last month. There was also a draft deleted two years ago named 4632:

to derived noncommutative algebraic geometry. The basic objects considered in these fields are separate. In DNCAG the objects are triangulated categories while in DAG they are derived rings, such as simplicial rings or differential graded algebras. Here's a couple relevant links

8737:

detail (for which I am not asking), it sounds as though, first, you may be able to find a device at a library or Internet café, second, the "personal reason" sounds like the device isn't really yours, third, I don't know which of the other parties to the dispute you might be.

4987:- I will review the history of the article within 48 hours. In any case, you should discuss on the talk page of the existing article. What I will research is whether any sort of formal action in order to approve the split (thus reversing the decision to redirect) is needed. 6334:

based on the first criterion, my advice is to indicate that on the draft talk page and in an AFC comment, and resubmit the draft. AFC review is done based on what is in the draft. If you and another editor think that it satisfies criterion 1, say so and resubmit the draft.

11085:

I'm a new person in an established community, English is not my native language, I openly support what most users oppose. This is not like an equal condition for me and you. And you know that your position is stronger now. Don't tell me that this is not discrimination in its

5004:- Where was the consensus reached to stub the article down to a redirect? I haven't found the discussion. Unless I can find it, my thought would be that I can accept it, and if anyone objects, they can nominate it for deletion, and we will have a deletion discussion. 1225:

Yeah - I didn't feel I should be the closer, since I'd expressed an opinion on one of the various side issues that arose (the relisting of the AfD, which was criticised by the OP). I'm quite content for it to slip away into the archive and attract dust instead of flame.

191:

and identify which criteria she satisfies. I am not saying that she does or does not satisfy the criteria, but that I am asking you to decide which criteria are applicable. Please indicate on the draft talk page what criteria are applicable and what references apply.

7064:. I also feel that SchroCat followed me to this article (no previous edits there). I don't know if this constitutes hounding/harassment, but I do wonder if it is something I should bring up. Several other editors and I have experienced civility issues with SchroCat at 3817:

If the transfer of material to one of my sandboxes violates some Knowledge rule, please show me how to do it properly. If it is a problem, I will delete the material, as I have other ways to help the writer without using his draft. Your guidance is welcome. Thank you.

10508:. Any argument that you make for acceptance of the draft should be based on general notability, because I think that it fails musical notability. I personally do not want to try to evaluate whether a song track passes general notability based on added references. 2100:

had commented on the Dilshad draft that "It's definitely better, nice". That was what made me confident enough that it would pass the review. How do you think I can improve it till it becomes eligible for an article? Your suggestions would be a great help. Cheers! —

1876:

In many ways what I have termed “Inca Pisac” is the same as the following all of which have separate articles in Knowledge: - The Acropolis overlooking Athens - The Alhambra palace complex overlooking the city of Granada - Edinburgh castle overlooking Edinburgh

10722:

Thank you for taking time to go over the article! I fully agree with your feedback and has since removed the content that came across as pitchy and rewrote the rest aiming for a significantly more neutral tone. I've also re-submitted the article for review.

4681:- I did not reject your draft. I declined your draft, which means that you can resubmit it. (Knowledge has its own vocabulary, just as any branch of mathematics or science does.) If you want more information about the draft review process, you may ask at 8362: 9223:

I was wondering what I can do to improve the article. I also want to let you know that "Let's Fall in Love for the Night" is Finneas' most successful song. It reached the top 20 on the alternative songs billboard chart and number 26 on the rock airplay.

7182:) regarding my submission for Criterion Software limited page, I wanted to understand what can be done in order for this page to be accepted? The Criterion Games page (which is a subsidiary of criterion software limited) has its own page. Please advise 8490:

the parent article talk page. I agree that some cases are less clear. In general, I would prefer to see discussion on a talk page if there is an appropriate talk page, rather than just making a reviewer decision. Do you understand what I am saying?

8226:'Significant coverage' as it addresses the subject directly in detail, as required by the Notability guidelines. This is no different to referring to a famous persons date of birth, or death. A statement, backed up by an independent, reliable source. 10523:

Do you want me to remove the Rejection and let another reviewer review it when they are ready? Do you want me to remove the Rejection and move it into article space (accept the draft) based on your request, without reviewing it myself? Your call.

6065:

content from the draft into the main article. Having thought a bit more about it, though, I'm not sure I agree that being a subtopic to an existing article should be a categorical reason for declining AfC drafts. The most relevant guideline would be

3875:

1. In the draft space, either you or one of your colleagues threatened to erase the draft. I might wake up tomorrow and that draft is gone! I wanted it in a place where I could find it when time came to work on it. 2. I could not find a sandbox for

1095: 10763:

While Consumer activism focuses on consumption and how goods or services are produced and delivered, Brand activism is a marketing and business management process by which businesses concern for the communities they serve and the world we live in.

10273:

I have been told by other editors that a song article can be notable if the references are good. I have done more research and found books and other websites explaining the origin of the song. Please check it out and see if it is good to resubmit.

9951: 10940:

Robert, thank you for your advice on more facts and a neutral tone. It will really help me write better. As for trout, I never knew it was too daring to use. I assumed it was normal functionality, I apologize to WikiAviator for using it hastily.

8112: 6567: 718:- I do not usually follow a draft through the approval process. However, you say that this is an important article. Why is it important? Why is the subject notable? Is it important because you are working for the subject? If so, please read 3880:. If it exists, please show me and I will gladly put the draft there. 3. My concern now is that the young man or woman has been frustrated and given up editing on Knowledge for good. He/She has not responded to my messages in the last two days. 5246:

is ready for the mainspace. I was thinking of moving the draft page myself into the mainspace, but I would like to have a second opinion. Could you possibly look over the draft, see if it needs anything else, before it moves to the mainspace?

3662:, but that is a difference of opinion. You should not have been move-warring with Bearcat. Editors who have a conflict of interest are not permitted to move their drafts into article space or otherwise to edit them. I do not know whether 1040: 7523:. The ref has more detail, but I'm tired. Could you please move the article back to article space, where it belonged all the time, imho? It could be improved better in the open, connected to links in articles and to the German Knowledge. -- 9575: 9437: 8222:

multiple, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject; of which the citations adhere totally to Knowledge's Notability guidelines & my sources follow the exact points set out in the general notability guideline.

1873:

believed to have functioned as a combined royal retreat, farm, fortress and town. When the Spanish came the Inca complex was abandoned and the Spanish established a town on the valley floor below it and gave the Inca name to this town.

500: 10101: 10667:

Also, I just want to be transparent with that both I and the original draft submitter work for Load Impact, the company providing the open-source stewardship for the k6 project. This is also the reason why we we submitted to the AfC.

1530:- First, the page that was rejected was a sandbox that has only a picture of Vyas but no biography. If you want to use your sandbox for some other purpose, you can blank it and reuse it. Second, I suggest that you ask for advice at 5182:

has another suggestion above that would simplify acceptance by allowing me to delete the redirect, but it could be otherwise controversial, so I would like know what your advice is on accepting drafts that are blocked by redirects.

7412:

If you can set up a forum or WikiProject for sharing best practices, the other paid editors will appreciate it. Whether the volunteer editors will appreciate it may depend on whether you do it with as little stinking as possible.

4339: 10016:

the draft had been accepted and was Class C. So did I really do that? I guess yes and no. There is also a similar message accepting one of your plants, but that is for a stub. Does that tell you more than you wanted to know?

2353: 9890: 10478: 8174:

2. The subject is published in reliable, secondary sources, as the sources are 'third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy'... The first source is Bloomberg L.P The second source City A.M.

8052: 5857: 3453: 6507: 2801: 867: 11035:

in investigations against unscrupulous editors. The quality of Google translator allows you to easily check this. Why should my word weigh less than the word of David_Gerard? (This is a rhetorical question, no need to answer.)

9199:- If there is information from another version that needs to be added to the article, go ahead and add it. The article is tagged for copy-edit and is waiting for a copy-editor, so that any additions will also be copy-edited. 8509:}}, it could probably be accepted as a separate article straight away. Regarding your album and song examples, I'm not regularly involved at AfC, but if I were, I'd probably prefer to approve and "deal with it in Mainspace". -- 10771:

understand the long-term needs of the society and to solve global problems as economic problems, regulations, corruption, global warming, discrimination, education, healthcare, and etc. using the economic power they possess.

3493: 752:

The only conflict of interest is that I'm interested in it. I'm about as remote as physically possible from that person. I live on a different continent and I learned about them only a few weeks ago while researching for the

4903: 3048:. If she does, accept the draft, and it will almost certainly be all right. If she doesn't pass acting notability, she almost certainly will not pass general notability either. So: Has she had multiple significant roles? 1417: 6060:

I think they're that different. In the case covered by the guideline, the content currently in main article is split off into a new sub-article. With drafts about potential sub-articles, the discussion would be whether to

5702: 980: 10520:. If you ask me to accept your draft without a review, I will accept your draft without a review. It is likely to be nominated for deletion. In that case, I am willing to remain neutral in a deletion discussion. 8815:

you are the main person who's monitoring behavioral issues on these articles, so I would particularly like your guidance on whether it's acceptable for the opening summary of a RFC to make these kinds of allegations.

4573:

on the DRN talk page, which has now gone from requesting a closure review (which I complied with) to simply relitigating the dispute at hand. I would do it myself, but at this point I would consider myself involved.

9248: 8821: 3484: 3154:

Do you see a View Logs link when you view the history of the draft? That shows you a few actions, including any past deletions with the same name. Of course, it only works with the same name, not a similar name.

10512:

remove the Rejection from the draft and allow you to resubmit it and have another editor review it. I do not plan to review it again. My guess is that another editor will decline or reject it, but you can try.

7813:

That's a strange way of not answering my question. I mean, *you* were the person who said Chaeyoung did not have enough coverage to satisfy GNG, and i asked you to explain that...you dodged that question entirely.

7378:

but very new to any paid editing and I want to try to fulfill the stringent requirements of disclosure, for example, and I keep doing it wrong. If you know of anyone that does it well, please let me know. Thanks,

2522:

the page has been improperly moved into article space a second time, it should be taken to AFD instead. That is my opinion anyway. But I agree with the current move-protection, and I do not plan to accept it.

579:

Also, I would like to know if I edit the draft version and submit it again, will the days start counting again until a reviewer can see my entry? I mean, if I edit it again, will I have to wait two more months?

10515:

The second option is that I am willing, based on your request, and on your opinion, and not my review or judgment, to move the draft into article space, without offering my opinion as to whether it will pass a

2595: 6866:

Hi Robert, I've looked all over my skin. I can see a few gnar scars, a birthmark and a dodgy tattoo from fresher's week 1999 but I can't see any email links sorry. Where would be the best place to send what I

6755:

and understand your viewpoint. That might have been the case earlier, but in the edits yesterday and today, the mentions on CNN, Fox, Vice, Guardian etc are substantial. Please see my comment at the bottom on

6704: 2726:(where I pointed by "read below"), and thousands of others. Admitted, we both are foreigners, and have problems with English. I thought inviting him to the teahouse was not appropriate. When an editor is new 9665: 9542: 10263: 10249: 10042: 9557:

because it was a copy of copyrighted material. You may discuss with the deleting administrator, but copyright infringement is never restored. You may rewrite the draft in your own words and resubmit it.

9652: 9529: 7586:- I will work them off as I work them off. I am about to go to bed, and I hope that I don't see them or read them for the next eight hours, because if I do, those are weird dreams, but dreams are weird. 10188: 8421: 8384: 7317:

This is an article of a health network, I think that this draft should be made its own article because of the fact that this is a hospital within the health network. A great example of another article is

10658:- Ref 13 is a study of scalable rest applications published in the journal "Computer Standards & Interfaces" where k6 was one of two tools used, which has since been quoted in an article on wiley.com 9978: 8140: 6595: 3650:'s actions somewhat, but I completely disagree with your actions. I do not normally follow a draft through the approval process, and I very seldom if ever assist paid editors or other editors who have 10141: 8716:

at least four times within the past month, as you said. That, in itself, doesn't incline me to try to mediate a dispute that keeps going back to conduct forums. I understand that you understand that

8412:@Robert McClenon Thanks anyway! I'll try to improve the draft later. I hope this will be my second article being approved. This is all I can contribute. Sorry to disturb you! Take care!God bless you. 5329: 1857: 598: 4455: 2432: 1147: 1068: 8435:

to the article back in January, but could not understand what the request was supposed to entail. In my understanding (and I believe this is the way most people see it), a split primarily concerns

2700: 426:. In either case, I am not optimistic that we will be able to restore your page. It should have been your responsibility to keep a copy of it. I have found a record that I moved your sandbox to 9992: 7889:

comment, it says that upcoming or unreleased games don't generally qualify under notability, but the page you linked to doesn't seem to have any information on that, and there are a few articles (

3533: 1114:

thread originated with a single proposal, supported by one other editor, and then devolved (as is typical at ANI) into a series of sidebar discussions and general comments and observations. Given

948: 10169:

Hi Robert, I would like to see what is the issue of not accepting the article for Nemanja Jovanovic. I see that you refer to Notability for sports but there also exists part for College athletes

2885: 696:. Many of these sources are restricted by paywalls, and I can't afford to go out of the way. This is an important article. Please hear me out, I'd love feedback and help with the article. Best, 11106:

Neither I nor any other editor are required to check a draft in detail. Besides, you didn't ask me to check your draft, and so you shouldn't fault me for not volunteering to check your draft.

6026:, but that guideline is about splitting off content from long articles, not creating new content that could be a subtopic of an existing one. It seems a bit confusing, pointing editors there. -- 7739:

Hello. You said Chaeyoung does not have significant coverage in secondary sources, but you didn't explain why. Chaeyoung has received coverage as an individual from multiple secondary sources.

3718:

i didn't understand what i should do to improve the article should i delete eh article on my sandbox because there are 2 copies of the article ?, that's what i understand from these messages.--

2930: 2918: 9384:

Dear Robert McClenon, I take the view that the Jack Harman article meets the following criterion: "The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument" as demonstrated here:

5639:

that claims that the subject is worth $ 30.4 billion. After this discussion, I thought it particularly appropriate to do a very quick fact-check. The subject exists, and probably did attend

10132: 5657: 7310: 5662:

Hello Robert Mcclenon, my name is Sandrah.Akol. The Article was nominated for speedy deletion under category G5, and I have no financial stake on this article. I have done new edits on the

2841: 2438: 1323:- There is much detail about Knowledge, some of which one should know, most of which one can get away without knowing, as long as one doesn't mess in it. This may be off any subject, but, 6830:- Does your skin (view) include a link called Email this user when viewing a user talk page or user page? If it does, that works. If it doesn't, that is an issue that you could raise at 4074:. Please merge the histories, or have an admin help merge the histories so we don't lose credit to contributors of the original (which is also required by copyright). Thank you in advance 448:

The page was also hopelessly spammy. If a new version were to be created, it would need to have almost entirely different text so there is no point in letting you see the deleted stuff. —

6966:

Hi Robert, there doesn't appear to be a connection. I've just tested it by unchecking the option in my own preferences, but I'm still able to see "email this user" on your page. GDX, see

3610:

Thanks for the edits to the article. After making changes to it and following your suggestions, I moved the article to mainspace, where it was later reverted to draftspace and blocked by

3544:- Who asked you to reply her that you are not being paid for the draft? Who told you that your article is not being published because you are being paid directly or indirectly for it? 2696: 1894: 830: 502: 229: 8693: 8659: 8633: 8611: 10399:. It is still there. Your sandbox has a link to the draft, so that you can either go from your sandbox to the draft, or do something else with your sandbox. The draft will remain at 9147:

Hi Robert_McCleon! I can not view or edit the draft: Robam Moni Mekhala, is the draft deleted? So, disappointing as I spent lot of times working on it! Or I have to re-draft it again?

8902:- A small issue, which is that the way her dates were formatted made it appear to say she is still alive. That should be changed to b. 1867 or to a ? . Go ahead and review it again. 8843: 6204: 6192: 2154: 10011:

and asked other reviewers to review it. I declined it based on advice from mathematicians. I then got a further comment that the text should be in article space somewhere, either as

8916:

I don't know how to "review it again" as I didn't review it to begin with, e.g. I think all of the articles I create are put into auto-reviewed status. Is this something you can do? --

8185:

5. The submission provides "Significant coverage" in its citations as they 'addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content'.

6046:- Do you have a suggestion for how to improve the template message, such as a different guideline? Do you think that the two cases of splitting an article are really that different? 5400:

Do you still have objections to the deletion of this move page? I saw your note on the draft talk page but I wasn't sure if you had taken discussion of this page elsewhere. Thank you.

5365: 3930:

All of the sources are independent, and other blockchain platforms in Corda's peer group (some that are significantly less notable) have their own pages. Any help appreciated - thanks

2541:. Also, I agree that the editor should be blocked for the personal attacks of yelling vandalism. I do not have an opinion on whether the block should be for 72 hours or indefinite. 10321: 7134:

Looks like someone else already did that, and consensus has been reached regarding the commas. That only covers one of the issues I brought up, but I guess that's that. Thanks again.

6290:

Hello! You recently declined my draft submission for the artist 'Anomalie' and I noticed the comment that said I must indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied.

634: 5353: 862: 261: 5938:

that my article have Violation Unlikely under 30%.And it is marked with green which i think it is fine. If u think it is not enough, i still need to make any change,just tell me .

3842:. It isn't clear to me why you thought it was necessary to copy-paste this into your sandbox when it was already in draft space (and when you could have put it in their sandbox). 11190:

whom she also accuses here of being 'cunning'. FWIW, I concur with David's removal of all the promo-speak and McClennon's DRN closure. Knowledge volunteers are not here to provide

6207:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 4027:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 2933:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 693: 10767:

Consumer activism seeks to change the way in which goods or services are produced in order to make the production process safer, more ethical, more environmentally friendly, etc.

10177:

and if this one is accepted I don't see the reason for not accepting Nemanja, too. Thanks for the review and I hope you'll accept this additional explanation. Best regards, Marko

8825: 7829:

far, you have been literally the only person to say those sources don't constitute significant coverage, and when questioned about this above you act like you never even said it.

7212:

In 2018, you offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has now accepted that request for arbitration, and an arbitration case has been opened at

4570: 3297:- I didn't really review the draft and I didn't decline it. I only commented that it should be reviewed. I may review it in the future, or I may leave it for another reviewer. 3036:, is occasionally contentious. As written, most of the special notability guidelines usually say that if they are met, notability is "presumed", and occasionally, typically with 2832: 907: 9271:

I also want to reaffirm my commitment towards following the rules guarding Knowledge editors. I have never taken com compensations for editing or creating articles on Knowledge.

675: 11248:

All my opponents make personal complaints about me and my choice of work instead of formally discussing claims to the text on three discussion pages. I see we are done here.))--

10307: 10268: 6933:, go to "Preferences" at the top of your page, then on that page scroll down to "Email options" and tick "allow other users to email me". Robert will then be able to email you. 5834: 5391: 2643:. The ANI report was almost a year ago, but the other party to the DRN likely remembers it as clearly and bitterly as if it were last week. The editor who filed the report at 2201: 2176: 2159: 540: 209: 9615: 9477: 6285: 6148: 2077: 6156:

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

1574:

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

473:- I assume you are telling the OP that there is no point is letting them see the deleted draft, because I didn't ask to see it. It is common for material to be both copyvio 10969: 8685: 8650:

What device are you using that doesn't accept cookies? I can use cookies on a smartphone, or a laptop, or a desktop. Where are you and what device are you trying to use?

8625: 8578: 8269: 8084: 7519:: I found a decent ref for this long-term music professor of the Leipzig Music University, with a premiere of his piece conducted by Masur during the opening of the Leipzig 7308: 223: 6729:- I probably would have seen that shortly, but thank you for mentioning it. I will respond to it when I respond to it, maybe in 24 to 48 hours, but anyway within a week. 6186: 5841:

assignment in the uni.So it is super important.Can u tell me what i need to improve as i think Violation Unlikely is below 28.6% now. I think i did not disobey any rules.--

2243: 2228: 9290: 9244: 8817: 7670:- Okay. I'll start sending them back. Thank you for being polite about this issue. We don't need to create extra work in a labor of love. (It just occurred to me. Is 4024: 4012: 1721:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

10052:

Is there anyway that nirvana books like “Nirvana: The Recording Sessions” be used as a reference for this article. I’ve seen it been used on other nirvana song articles.

9252: 7343: 6388:

Hello, Thank you for reviewing and publishing my draft. This was the first of many contributions I seek to make to Knowledge and become a part of this amazing community!

5139:

If you're going to move redirects out of the way like this to deliberately nonsensical names and request deletion, could you please move them out of the main namespace? —

7898: 5675: 4780: 1840:, let the user edit. If the user edits, the userboxes are harmless. If the user doesn't edit, the userboxes just sit there and are harmless. None of them tell lies. 898: 10328:

with the citations that have been added to the page but it has been under review for a long time. Is there any way you could re-assess the page when you have a moment?

9643:

Thanks so much for the reply, Robert. How can I determine what part he thought was infringement? and how do I get a message to him? I can't find a talk page for him.

6318: 11048: 10539: 10497: 10482: 10287: 10275: 10255: 10241: 10069: 10053: 10034: 9931: 9225: 9019: 8431:

Hi. I just noticed the Manimekhala discussion mentioned above, and I must say I find your notion of what constitutes article splitting to be very peculiar. I saw your

8088: 6543: 6111: 5995: 5989: 5261: 4805: 2611: 2589: 1083: 1016: 531: 249: 234: 10584:

What kind of source is it that you think is lacking, exactly? I would love to assist in digging up more resources, but I personally think this should be good enough?

10093: 7869: 7855: 7838: 7823: 7808: 6010: 4874:

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the

3202: 3164: 3149: 10294:. My reading of the guidelines is that a song is normally considered notable if the song satisfies the special notability guidelines by having charted. Discuss at 9797: 9712: 9693: 9673: 9657: 9644: 9606: 9587: 9567: 9550: 9534: 9521: 9468: 9449: 4862: 10232: 9191: 9085: 9031: 8404: 8167:

I would like to state the case that this decline is not correct, under the terms of Knowledge's rules & guidelines. I will address the points made as follows:

3375:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

2332:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1668:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

347:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

10929: 10836:

tone. It strikes me as being "in-your-face" in its support of brand activism. If brand activists are seeking to "solve the global problems", that is the sort of

10793: 10196: 10180: 10113: 8073: 8058: 7088:- Well, my first thought is that if this is an issue about commas, it isn't worth making an issue about. I will review the issue in more detail within 24 hours. 6678: 6169: 6161: 5324: 3128:, which is the code for spam or advertising. If it was yours, then you could ask to have it undeleted, but requests to have things undeleted that were deleted as 11071:

when it is based on suspect categories. The employment status of an editor is a category for which we are allowed to discriminate, that is, make a distinction.

10854: 9208: 8265: 7993: 7972: 7949: 7928: 7436: 7422: 5017: 4917: 4554: 2962: 2680: 2550: 2531: 583:

On the other hand, before submitting this entry I had not previously been active on Knowledge and had no Wiki authority, does this affect the review of my entry?

490: 10937: 10732: 10714: 10619: 9283: 8232: 6606: 5198:

user:, or talk: while it's awaiting deletion would avoid polluting mainspace. As an aside, admins who G6 a redirect to make way for a page move are supposed to

4669: 4623: 3800: 3675: 3391: 3314: 2149: 2112: 1825: 1718: 1710: 1702: 1691: 798: 689: 443: 427: 406: 10697: 10677: 10412: 7451: 7407: 7143: 7129: 7111: 7097: 5064: 4996: 4788: 2575: 2508: 1932: 1849: 626: 9867:, See, I was a liberal arts major in an effort to avoid any of this. I accepted the page with the suggested name, although I probably should have considered a 9306: 7553: 7503: 5825: 5385: 5345: 5295: 5280: 5266: 3248: 2791: 2772: 1774: 1480: 1466: 1275: 1255: 1240: 10814: 10504:

because it has not charted or satisfied another of the criteria for inclusion. The second part of my conclusion is that the track does not appear to satisfy

10464: 9826:

that the title should be? Am I overthinking what he's saying or did he somehow make it more complicated? I don't want to feel dumb and ask the guy to clarify

9233: 7162: 6236: 4003: 2068: 2051: 1762: 11282:

your designation; I did not see them identify you as an opponent. Again, RFC appears to be the most appropriate way to resolve the content of the article.

10744: 10599: 9823: 9399: 8782:. As I understand it, dispute resolution requests typically aren't accepted while there's a RFC underway, so at this point I'm willing to accept the closure. 8586: 8499: 7364: 7008: 6987: 6976: 6961: 6757: 6752: 5925: 5907: 5370: 4821: 3643: 3622: 3601: 2977: 2969: 2917: 2631: 1955: 1941: 1765:. You submit a draft for review by submitting it. You did not submit that draft. Click on the tab for the purpose. Do you want me to submit it for you? 1631: 1609: 1561: 1543: 1349:, I accept that don't know everything about Knowledge and, you're right, you can get away with that as it's not necessary. However, to be honest, I find the 402: 381: 11167: 11153: 11130: 11115: 10025: 9880: 9859: 8956: 8942: 8925: 8911: 8773: 8044: 7701: 7687: 7544:. In the future, if you are posting to something near the top of my talk page, a comment at the bottom would help, but I found your post via the history. 6497: 6277: 5192: 4194: 3747: 3553: 3417:

Yeah, I wish there was a way to fix the script so it only notified the original creator, rather than everyone who has been involved in the article process.

1904: 1794: 1750: 972: 9703:

releases the text for reuse by anyone else under a similar license anywhere in the world, and that is usually not the way people want to give permission.

9326: 9288: 8544: 8518: 8484: 7609: 7595: 6797: 6079: 6055: 5886: 5785: 5765: 5740: 5558: 4948: 4615: 3913: 3851: 3634: 3227: 3218:

are the 5 edits which were deleted in 2018 as "spam or advertising". Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but at least you now have the mystery solved :) --

2907: 2295: 2273: 1991: 1587: 1579: 463: 11291: 11241: 11099: 11080: 10960: 10361: 8395:- I will review the draft within 48 hours, probably 24 (since there isn't a whole lot that anyone can do other than use the Internet with the lockdown). 7722: 7662: 6647: 6480: 6344: 5225: 5208: 5168: 4735: 4702: 4426: 4294: 4271: 4177: 4121: 4106: 3443: 3412: 3082: 3059: 2183:, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Knowledge's goals. Please note that 11182:

is hardly a new user. Her English is excellent and her suggestion to continue this discussion in another language is very inappropriate. Her comments at

9257: 7300: 7221: 7217: 6918: 6897: 6876: 6861: 6847: 6016: 5813: 5800: 5667: 4647:

Will you let me resubmit this article? Is there anything you'd like me to add to the DAG article to try and differentiate the two subjects even further?

4351: 3348:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 2305:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 2263: 1786: 1758: 1742: 1684: 1641:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 1375: 1341: 1220: 320:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 201: 156: 11039:

I want a substantive discussion about draft quality, and not about my paid editing. Please help me phrase a request to the community at the Teahouse. --

10076:, but I see two separate questions. The first is whether Nirvana books can be used as references. The second is whether a particular song satisfies a 9738: 7768: 7355:

request, and I will put a comment to discuss on the talk page of the existing article whether other editors agree that separate articles are in order.

7019: 6450:

I hadn't seen the draft. It's certainly notable, & long enough for its own article. There seem to be 4 editors now who think so, so I'd just do it.

5808: 4537: 4511: 4222: 3306: 2499:

thread. If the editor in question is indeffed, it will leave the draft to be available for review in a few weeks or a few months by a neutral editor.

2348: 818: 776: 739: 9930:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the 7647: 6738: 5718: 4892: 4056: 3947: 3931: 2424: 2365: 1730: 1406: 1199:

and then go back to sleep.) If the user who was the original subject of the discussion messes with the article, then I would suggest that a report at

11012:– volunteers or affiliates – should follow Knowledge rules in the same way. Now my situation looks like discrimination (but I understand that this is 10911:

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the trout in this picture, your trouting of Wikipedians is overdone.

10215:. If they think that he is notable, I will accept. I am not really interested in whether other college coaches are listed, because that is known as 9371: 8894: 8182:

4. This business corporation is notable, given the significant coverage that has been provided by multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources.

7764: 6622: 5616: 5540: 5515: 5435: 5081: 5039: 4976: 3791: 3773: 1313: 11008:– non my case. My contract says that I get paid for creating a draft for Knowledge, and not for publishing and saving the article. But I’m sure that 10975: 8979: 8689: 8629: 8582: 7189: 6419:

article take place on the the talk page of the existing article. The discussion, however, appears to have ended up on the talk page of the redirect,

6191: 5101: 4784: 2445: 2107: 1799: 1527: 1506: 393: 363: 310: 288: 10561: 10533: 9297:

I just came across it, and wanted to run reFill on it for a second, but don't want to create an edit conflict. (I wasn't intending to review it.) --

6939: 6459: 5996:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft%3ANtinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala&type=revision&diff=941798286&oldid=941797532

5869: 4794:

Hi Robert McClenon, I understand you must be busy. I will be highly obliged if you take out few minutes and help me fix above issue...thanks a lot

3185: 3109: 10983: 10649:- Ref 5, testguild.com is very well-considered in the software testing space, and, at least in my opinion, counts as a credible third-party source. 5964:

violate the policy for once, then i can not make some changes? I will be labelled as a rule breaker and i can not publish any article since then?

3541: 3525: 3465: 2988:

guidelines? Cause the coverage for the subject is low or close to nothing and being that she's played a couple of roles there should be something.

2031: 956: 940: 879: 11257: 11203: 10337: 8684:

of accepting cookies, but for personal reasons I can't enable them. If you aren't willing to reconsider your decision, you can just tell me that.

6210:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

4030:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

3426: 2997: 2936:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

1548:

Also, you are having difficulty in communicating in English. Have you considered contributing to the Knowledge in your first language, maybe the

1436: 1211:

thread. But to answer your question about policy, the policy is that the thread is closed by having been ignored by the community for 72 hours.

11212:, but will comment on his comment on her suggestion to continue the discussion in Russian. It was not inappropriate, but sarcastic, and, on the 7483: 6242: 6157: 6149: 5971: 5945: 5891: 5874: 5842: 5143: 3663: 3215: 3121: 3073:- Also, if you decide to accept it, and you need help with the redirect, please let me know and I will move it. A hatnote will then be added. 2663:. I haven't looked at the recent edit-war, but if the filing editor is being a bully, which is what it appears, then they have been notified of 1689: 1607: 7271:

I have added an email address and the link to my user page. I have lots of evidence about paid editing which I am sure will lead to indictments.

6690: 5983: 5957: 5850: 5796: 5652: 4545:

I remember noticing the redirect, and realizing that I must have been interrupted after I accepted the draft and before I tagged the redirect.

1181: 7280: 6769: 6327: 6306: 4097:. I think that is what you are requesting. In any case, thank you for calling the attention of reviewers and administrators to the problem. 2271: 10384: 9058: 9003: 8240: 7232: 6397: 5706: 4936:

type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of

937:

Thank you. This is for a different chef with the same name, John Shields, in Chicago. Please let me know if there are any changes I can make!

9411: 8871: 8444: 7784: 7713:

this was discussed elsewhere and I thought you had been told; sorry if that isn't the case. All you have to do is to use {{subst:PAGENAME}}.

7220:. Please add your evidence by March 23, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, 6996: 6981:

Perhaps this is connected to the "Allow emails from brand-new users" option? I'd have thought GDX's account was old enough, but perhaps not.

5709:). Looks like some blocks and salting may be in order. I'm a bit busy to investigate further atm, but if you need any help please ping me. -- 1735: 184: 168: 144: 128: 75: 10994: 7261: 3814:

can create a sandbox of his/her own. I have sent a message to the owner of the material to inform him that I am ready to work with him/her.

11232:

after the fact from a request for mediation to a request to review a draft, and that DRN is not a forum for requesting review of a draft.

10569: 8753: 7907: 7334:

in Central and Western Massachusetts." As you may know, a healthcare system consists of many hospitals as does UMass Memorial Health Care.

6600: 5894:- Does your university assignment involve including an article in Knowledge? If so, please have your instructor discuss the assignment at 5680: 5411: 5093: 3294: 3273: 1602: 10061: 9839: 7077: 7049: 6140: 5577: 5461: 2476: 7760: 4809: 4427:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts/MMA_notability#Current_list_of_notable_MMA_organizations_and_promotions

3285: 2088: 1575: 286: 273: 267: 10492: 10007:. They are differential equations, and I have forgotten all of the higher mathematics that I learned fifty years ago. I was reviewing 9218: 7239: 6099: 6070:, but it doesn't actually say that the issue must be discussed on the main article talk page before a standalone page can be created. -- 3889: 3827: 47: 10444: 9809: 8990: 7748: 7566:

Thanks. Was going to approve these after I moved them but looks like you are taking care of it. Thanks for speeding up the process. --

7213: 7201: 6173: 6089: 5072:

Thanks, I tried to find the actual discussion that resulted in the redirect but was unable to find it. Again, thanks for the insight.--

4379: 4011: 3708: 3599: 2712: 2083:

Hey Robert! I had submitted the Dilshad draft for review. Thanks for reviewing it. I hope it isn't wrong if I "argue" for my "case" :D

1591: 1079: 9243:

Many thanks for pointing out the perceptual gap - should have picked this up myself but it is all good learning. Much appreciated. --

9166: 8562: 7772: 7532: 6905:- Maybe you don't have the ability to send email enabled because you don't have the ability receive email enabled. Ask about that at 6819: 5877:- Have you considered editing the Knowledge in your first language? You are having difficulty explaining what you are trying to do. 5626: 2777:

Thank you for taking the time to explain. My education is as you assume, and noted in the infobox on my user page. LouisAlain doesn't

2008: 1967: 5256: 4443:

He is currently Rizin FF Light Heavyweight Champion and has vacated the title to fight for the UFC which is a top tier organization.

2209:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 8566: 6035: 5487: 1518: 10753: 10315: 9597: 9459: 8799:

not neutrally worded, including a statement that I have "persistently advocated for lending credence to white supremacist sources".

6471:- I've accepted the draft. That appears to have been a mistake on my part about where to discuss, but that is enough discussion. 6378: 4820:

I put the right sources after you told me put other sources and improve the page can you review it again after editing the page is

4276:

Sure. Whenever you are ready, ping me a couple of days in advance. Let's start working on your mandatory queries in the meanwhile.

2967: 9918:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

9432: 7575: 3344:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2599: 2557:

Thanks, Robert. I thought it best to draft again under the circumstances rather than move right to AfD. Creator is overwrought.--

2301:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

1637:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

316:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

266: 10123: 9351: 9162: 9054: 7619: 7319: 7013:

I've unchecked "Allow other users to email me" in my preferences and I've just sent you a test email via your "Email this user".

6257: 5086: 3939: 3509: 2393: 1907:. (It helps a reviewer to be given a link to the draft or article in question.) If you think that a separate article should be 176: 136: 11067:

between sense 1 and sense 3. We do discriminate between paid editing and volunteer editing. Discrimination is only considered

9137: 9123: 7474:

in Main space, merged with content from the draft. The draft is no longer needed. I don't now how to deal with the situation. --

7387: 5600:

If you owe your bank a million dollars, you are at their mercy. If you owe your bank a billion dollars, they are at your mercy.

4585: 4334: 2747: 7266: 7149: 5797:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ntinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala#Draft:_Ntinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala

5262: 4958: 4713: 4690: 4686: 3986:

is never a satisfactory argument in itself for the acceptance of a draft. After you answer the first question, we can discuss

2155: 1194:

community boredom. So the community decided not to do anything about that issue because they didn't do anything in 72 hours.

87: 9109: 8878: 8451:

suggestion from the draft page. In this case, consensus not to merge would equal one to create a separate standalone article.

6067: 4838: 4082: 2731: 1816:, considering that, after checking, for all 3 days of their account's existence all they have done is accumulate userboxes. -- 1207:, but either would be reasonable. If there is another thread opened, then please ping me. I wasn't paying attention to that 10455:- Thanks. Ok. A guild is people or organisms who do the same work. A grade is what you pass thru in school or evolution. 9268:

I'll go ahead and add more citations from independent and reliable websites to further improve the standard of the article.

8505:

articles will need discussion to determine whether the reason for merging or redirecting still applies. But if it's tagged {{

8019: 6444: 5833: 5390: 4370: 3497: 2013: 1090: 8464: 7919:

to see if games are different from other subjects such as films and books in often being notable before they are released.

7511: 4433:

should not have a wikipedia page because she has only fought at ONE Championship which is second tier according to the list

2647:

was, in my opinion, the one who made the DRN difficult, and it lasted several months. I suggest that you also consult with

707: 692:. The topic is worth writing an article on and I've really been struggling write this. There are reliable sources out there 9407: 6746: 6655: 6634:, not because it was uncivil, which it was not, but because I have reconsidered my ideas on notability. I have replied at 6107: 4910: 4801: 4066:

Hi! The article exists because an editor just copied and pasted the text into the main space from the draft. Now the whole

3630: 3505: 2722:

LouisAlain and I have collaborated for many years. He translated all Bach cantatas to French, and created articles such as

2076: 389: 368: 10477:

Please recheck the draft I have created. I have put way more references that are both reliable and good. Please check out

9182:

now. Please do not edit the draft for now. It is waiting to be reworked by an editor whose native language is English.

7740: 7060:

way and not too much of a nuisance to you. The editor SchroCat and I are in a disagreement about comma use in the article

4940:

for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

4395: 3489: 2495:. I haven't reviewed the draft in detail but agree that it should be reviewed by a neutral editor. I have looked at the 10886: 10157: 8153:

Yesterday I submitted a draft submission , receiving back a notification of decline from you, for the following reason:

6095: 5935: 1471:

Thanks much! And, I don't remember being part of a dispute before, but am now familiar with how it works, thanks to you.–

1397: 730:. If I were to re-review the draft, I would decline it again, and I do not think that the Teahouse will be optimistic. 522: 10978:

me a comment at 15:43, but already at 16:57 you closed the discussion. Isn't a Dispute resolution noticeboard meant for

7228: 4833: 3807:(admittedly not well formatted). I also noticed that the draft was under threat of deletion, because it had gone stale. 11090:. 💁‍♀️ If you want to argue about lexical meanings then let's go into my language – I will continue with pleasure.))-- 8010:

Hi, I am notifying you that I've created 5 articles in the Salomonia genus and I think they are ready to be submitted.

7461: 5331: 4447: 4361: 3028:. I for one prefer the special notability guidelines, because they are usually clearer, and they sometimes provide an 2782:

the search for sources some other editor, often much earlier, and offline, may have had. End of sigh, happy editing! --

2384: 2022:. I just need a little clarification. Sorry if you felt that it went a little weird. We're all still friends. Regards, 6718: 3727: 3032:

test. The exact relationship between the general notability guidelines and any special notability guideline, such as

2602:. Reading the DRN gives me the impression that one particular editor was most of the problem. Any comment is welcome, 10998: 10956: 10789: 10173:

which can be applied in this case as Nemanja is part of NCAA team staff. The article is somewhat similar to this one

9265:

I got your review of my article "Alex Ajipe" and I acknowledge your observations on how to make the article better.

9238: 8853: 7207: 7061: 5498:- I will look at the NYT and USA Today. If they are stories about the Bezos Earth Fund, I agree. Please discuss at 5008:

is an authoritative method of determining what the consensus is on notability. Where is the inadequate discussion?

4490: 4157: 3703: 3260: 2375: 1978:- I do not usually follow a draft through the approval process, but I am willing to ask other experienced editors at 11121:

discussion. Please do not engage in discussions where you are not ready to help, especially because of prejudices.--

10904:

The trout you used to slap another Wikipedian has been gutted, roasted over the coals, and served with tartar sauce.

8859: 7197: 5216:- Okay. I can move the redirects into draft space without renaming them, then, while waiting for their deletion. 4418:

1.Have fought at least three professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC (see WP:MMATIER);

4216: 3689: 2857: 2569: 2470: 2409: 1514: 669: 10754:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Brand_activism?fbclid=IwAR0u5fzm8wvFjtD_Xb-3ZVAFNwSVxsG63w65YPRSpseUFORCN7gtJb8MKJ8

5701:) and IP addresses are still at it. In addition to the request at WP:REFUND, my reinstatement of AFC templates at 4383: 2130: 10867: 10827:

differences. However, you aren't likely to make any friends with the AFC reviewers by being too quick to give a

10145: 10103: 9942: 9892: 9577: 9439: 8707: 8102: 8054: 6557: 6509: 6116: 6103: 4341: 3475: 3455: 3012:, but here is what I think, and why it is complicated. The primary guideline for notability for anything is the 2803: 2355: 1919:. Please discuss there. If you have any further questions, then experienced editors may be able to help you at 1569: 1030: 982: 889: 869: 809:, but they are likely to advise including any appropriate information about Dinka in the article on the region. 422:, although material that was deleted for copyright violation is very seldom if ever restored, or you can request 10822:- Here are my initial comments, and I may comment further. First, I didn't decline your article. As you know, 4391: 3501: 10990: 10841:

want to find a WikiProject that will help you work on the draft. If you want advice in finding a WikiProject,

10369: 10153: 9817: 8203:

that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter' .

7638:. I don't think they should be accepted until this is fixed; they are causing a lot of work for plant editors. 6610: 5979: 5953: 5469: 5422:- At this point the stupid redirect has already been moved into neverland, so that its effective deletion is a 5110: 5105: 4375: 4299:

Can we set up a sub-page with your three mandatory questions? Or would you prefer email communication? Thanks,

3810:

As I formulate the best way to help this young editor, I copied his material to one of my sandbox pages, until

3090: 2823: 2397: 568:

Hi Robert. I'm writing to kindly ask for your help in regards to a Knowledge entry I submitted two months ago.

481:) if it was copied from corporate advertising. That is two reasons why we don't want that crap in Knowledge. 459: 10137: 8792: 8791:

I have one other question, though. Is it a requirement for RFCs to be neutrally worded? That is what's stated

8363:

Request for a separate article for Robam Moni Mekhala (Cambodiaan dance) from Manimekhala (goddess of the sea)

5589:- I think that we can have a common-sense idea that won't be in policy but will sometimes be quoted that if a 4636: 923: 10543: 10486: 10279: 10259: 10245: 10057: 10038: 10008: 9938: 9229: 9158: 9050: 8506: 8098: 6805: 6553: 6383: 6314: 5114: 4964: 4731: 4665: 3799: 3244: 3181: 3105: 2405: 2019: 1026: 9787:

How is this not worth of wikipedia? Instead, will appreciate your feedback on the page to get this approved

8779: 2389: 2211: 1954:

Could you please spare some time to review my draft? Could you please check this draft out for an approval?

1709:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 9927: 9661: 9648: 9591: 9538: 9525: 9453: 9379: 8599: 7865: 7834: 7819: 7780: 5317: 2845: 2596:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Msasag reported by User:Bhaskarbhagawati (Result: )

2518: 1862:

I wish to ask you to reconsider your decision to not allow the creation of my article called “Inca Pisac”.

1370: 1308: 1176: 1160:

discussions being archived? Should they be closed, or perhaps one should initiate a request for closure? --

1142: 83: 9388:

He also meets "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor" as a recipient of the

4466: 11287: 11237: 11149: 11111: 11076: 10850: 10810: 10710: 10615: 10557: 10529: 10408: 10357: 10303: 10228: 10184: 10117: 10089: 10021: 9974: 9855: 9805: 9708: 9689: 9563: 9367: 9334: 9322: 9204: 9187: 9133: 9119: 9081: 9027: 8999: 8975: 8938: 8907: 8839: 8749: 8607: 8540: 8495: 8480: 8417: 8400: 8380: 8145: 8136: 8040: 7989: 7945: 7924: 7851: 7804: 7683: 7591: 7549: 7499: 7432: 7418: 7403: 7360: 7179: 7125: 7093: 7004: 6957: 6952:

wasn't able to email me? Does the ability to receive email have to be enabled to enable sending email?

6914: 6893: 6857: 6843: 6793: 6734: 6643: 6591: 6476: 6412: 6340: 6273: 6220:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

6051: 5921: 5903: 5882: 5821: 5761: 5736: 5648: 5612: 5536: 5511: 5431: 5221: 5188: 5164: 5097: 5060: 5013: 4992: 4698: 4611: 4550: 4530: 4507: 4483: 4290: 4267: 4190: 4173: 4102: 4040:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

3999: 3909: 3847: 3743: 3671: 3549: 3439: 3408: 3338: 3316: 3302: 3281: 3198: 3160: 3145: 3136:. However, I am not optimistic that you can get your draft restored. You can ask for further advice at 3078: 3055: 2946:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

2903: 2853: 2768: 2676: 2627: 2546: 2527: 2504: 2259: 2064: 2047: 1987: 1940: 1928: 1845: 1770: 1557: 1539: 1462: 1337: 1251: 1216: 1064: 968: 858: 814: 772: 735: 622: 556: 486: 439: 257: 197: 152: 43: 10982:?)) David_Gerard is cunning when he says that he doesn’t know about Insilico's CEO Alex Zhavoronkov. He 10320:

I was going through some public company pages and noticed you were the last editor to review this page (

9631: 9493: 8372:

photos, sources, and information. As I am alone for this article, I need assistance from other editors.

7756: 5119: 2837: 10219:, and maybe the other stuff should be deleted, or maybe it should be kept. So I suggest discussing at 10211:, explain on the draft talk page, and resubmit. I would suggest asking the advice of other editors at 9403: 8984: 8565:

by the administrator who closed Dlthewave's Arbitration Enforcement request against Jweiss11. When you

8247: 8236: 7467: 7327: 7054: 7034: 6714: 6539: 6420: 5300: 3626: 2451: 2206: 385: 8440:

want to split into Mainspace, not a draft, and the template doesn't even work with Draftspace pages.)

4070:

of the draft is lost and this person is "credited" in the main space article as the main contributor,

1785:

I was wondering if the updated draft has been resubmitted properly, with the updated edits. Thank you

911: 10610:- I will try to research this within 24 hours, but it would help if you would identify the article. 10460: 10423: 9389: 9105: 8882: 8655: 7883: 7296: 7120:

at the Third Opinion noticeboard, but maybe from an editor who is neither an American nor a Briton.

6852:

I would email you so that you can reply, but I think that you should get this capability addressed.

6015: 5936:

https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=User%3AZzhu8516%2Fsandbox

4761:

and the topic fullfils the requirements, it has been featured in multiple reliable sources including

4387: 4185:- I think that the comments addressed my concerns. I am willing, but will wait a week to ten days. 3683: 3350: 1413:

Today we worked on updating the lede regarding the content that Lightningstrikers was concerned about

544: 65:

Please tell me where you see and advertisement? If so, then I see many more advertisements here too:

17: 10149: 9619: 9481: 6788:? Since you ask me to reconsider, please re-read. Are you satisfied that I already reconsidered? 1246:

you read it correctly, and it says not to edit the archive. Leave it alone, like a sleeping bear.

919: 688:

I noticed you declined my draft, thanks for the feedback! I added more sources and rewrote my draft

11032: 11028: 11024: 10728: 10693: 10673: 10595: 10472: 8764:

is correct that I suggested an RfC as the proper kind of dispute resolution for this matter. Best,

8259: 6967: 6393: 5799:

Comforms to its standards. But for any help please kindly don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you--

5131: 4748: 3240: 3209: 3177: 3117: 3101: 2448:

how do I go about resubmitting my article for another review by you? Or do I not resubmit? Thanks!

2103: 1424:

I am hoping that we all come back with a calmer approach going forward. Should this be closed now?

903: 552: 117: 10324:) and saw that it was a public company that could use some cleaning up. I think the subject meets 9627: 9489: 8218:

significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.'

6784:? Did you notice that I entered a statement that Knowledge should pay a little more attention to 5527:

in its own right. I don't know if we should have a special notability guide to that effect or if

3666:

is notable, but, now that you have move-warred, it is unlikely that an article will be accepted.

3379:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2401: 2336:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2126: 1672:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 1084:

Knowledge:Teahouse#Disambiguation Question for Two Individuals with Same Name in Same Line of Work

536: 351:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 10952: 10785: 10380: 10012: 10004: 9911: 9896: 9778: 9611: 9473: 8834:

or another administrator decide what should be done about a concern that an RFC is non-neutral.

8598:

whether there is a way to edit from a registered account without cookies. That discussion is at

7861: 7843: 7830: 7815: 7792: 7776: 7734: 7718: 7643: 7561: 7447: 7383: 7216:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 7158: 7139: 7107: 7073: 7045: 6374: 6160:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 5287:, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term. 5077: 5035: 5028: 4972: 4211: 3950:- I have a few questions. The first question is not optional. Do you have any affiliation with 3654:. In my opinion, rather than moving your article back to draft space a second and a third time, 2708: 2690: 2564: 2465: 1890: 1821: 1578:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 1490: 664: 594: 516: 127:

this is a temporary page. Provided the original article is in the queue for review that is fine.

10989:

I’m very surprised by your behavior. Why do you not want to check the sources and text style of

8712:

I have reviewed the DRN request as you requested. I see that Race and Intelligence has been to

11183: 9725:

I don't remember everything, but a quick check reveals some text was copied from this website:

9196: 9175: 9154: 9129: 9115: 9069: 9046: 9011: 8995: 8971: 8432: 8413: 8392: 8376: 7528: 7479: 7193: 5804: 5671: 5470: 5252: 5237: 4451: 4355: 4330: 2787: 2743: 1790: 1746: 1510: 1476: 1432: 1270: 1235: 850: 835: 654: 639: 26: 10752:

Thank you you have read and commented on the Brand activism draft I did. (here is the draft:

10400: 10396: 9782: 7961:

Question, is it possible to revert this draft to an unsubmitted state while the discussion at

2849: 10986:

the removal of the article about this scientist in 2017. Did I expect any help from David?))

10925: 10440: 9767: 9417: 9279: 7516: 6528: 6513: 6241: 5476:

I rather think the nYT article + the USA today article amounts to significant coverage. ????

5127: 4637:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Noncommutative_geometry#Noncommutative_affine_and_projective_schemes

4564: 4239:, just pinging you to request you to keep this thread in your watchlist if possible. Thanks, 3935: 3700: 2428: 2369: 2027: 1643: 1012: 219: 10170: 5705:

was undone, and there have been moves and redirects all over the place including mainspace (

5663: 4773:. I was wondering if you could provide me with some guidance and help me restore the page. 2307: 1427:

I wasn't sure how to ask that on the dispute page if no one had volunteered to take it yet.–

11283: 11233: 11145: 11107: 11072: 10944: 10861: 10846: 10806: 10777: 10719: 10706: 10633: 10611: 10553: 10525: 10456: 10404: 10353: 10299: 10224: 10085: 10047: 10017: 9970: 9864: 9851: 9801: 9704: 9685: 9559: 9428: 9395: 9363: 9318: 9200: 9183: 9150: 9101: 9077: 9042: 9023: 8934: 8903: 8835: 8761: 8745: 8651: 8603: 8536: 8491: 8476: 8452: 8396: 8132: 8036: 7985: 7977: 7967: 7956: 7941: 7933: 7920: 7902: 7847: 7800: 7679: 7600:

Yeah. The more I move, the more that appear. Hopefully they don't appear in your dreams. --

7587: 7545: 7495: 7471: 7428: 7414: 7399: 7356: 7339: 7292: 7185: 7121: 7089: 7000: 6953: 6910: 6889: 6853: 6839: 6789: 6785: 6730: 6639: 6587: 6485: 6472: 6415:, which you declined and where you requested that a discussion on splitting section of the 6408: 6360: 6336: 6302: 6269: 6232: 6221: 6047: 5975: 5967: 5949: 5941: 5917: 5899: 5878: 5817: 5757: 5732: 5644: 5608: 5532: 5507: 5427: 5361: 5217: 5184: 5160: 5056: 5009: 4988: 4875: 4797: 4776: 4758: 4719: 4709: 4694: 4653: 4607: 4546: 4503: 4286: 4263: 4186: 4169: 4098: 4061: 4052: 4041: 3995: 3905: 3864: 3843: 3779: 3761: 3739: 3667: 3618: 3545: 3435: 3404: 3376: 3298: 3269: 3194: 3156: 3141: 3074: 3051: 2958: 2947: 2899: 2764: 2672: 2623: 2607: 2542: 2523: 2500: 2333: 2255: 2184: 2060: 2043: 1983: 1948: 1924: 1841: 1782: 1766: 1669: 1553: 1535: 1502: 1458: 1346: 1333: 1284: 1247: 1212: 1104: 1073: 1060: 964: 854: 810: 760: 731: 680: 618: 482: 435: 377: 348: 253: 193: 165: 148: 71: 39: 10993:

and suggest corrections for it? I insist on checking my version because it was written on

8600:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Are_Cookies_Required_for_Registered_Editors%3F

7224:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. 617:, I have replied there rather than here so that we can keep the discussion in one place. 214:

I have created another page kindly review my sandbox and let me know what's you feedback.(

8: 10724: 10702: 10689: 10669: 10607: 10591: 9988: 9876: 9868: 9835: 8952: 8921: 8890: 8867: 8769: 8556: 8251: 8097:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 8015: 7697: 7658: 7065: 6686: 6552:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 6493: 6440: 6389: 6352: 6310: 6253: 6006: 4829: 4727: 4661: 3987: 3975: 3971: 3926:

Hi - please can you give me some guidance on what to improve to get this page approved?

3921: 3787: 3769: 3723: 3615:

and adjusted the tone. Please advise on next steps, as it would be greatly appreciated.

3529: 3469: 3345: 3029: 2302: 1958:. I added extra links on the talk page of the article. Maybe this could be considered. -- 1865:

You suggested that I incorporate what I have written into the existing “Pisac” article.

1638: 1025:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 944: 915: 883: 414:

If you believe that a substantial amount of non-infringing material was deleted, you can

322: 317: 280: 11060: 9937:

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can

7752: 4235:

How has been your deletion tagging (the issue which was a significant one pointed out)?

2188: 548: 10428: 10392: 10376: 10200: 9623: 9485: 9302: 9179: 9142: 9073: 8514: 8460: 7796: 7714: 7667: 7639: 7605: 7571: 7443: 7395: 7379: 7323: 7257: 7154: 7135: 7103: 7085: 7069: 7041: 6765: 6370: 6136: 6075: 6031: 5865: 5846: 5781: 5714: 5554: 5073: 5047: 5031: 5001: 4984: 4968: 4762: 4712:

Thanks for the heads up and direction :). I'll go ahead and chat with the folks at the

4206: 3885: 3823: 3223: 3009: 2881: 2817: 2704: 2559: 2514: 2492: 2484: 2460: 2452: 2122: 2004: 1963: 1886: 1833: 1817: 659: 606: 590: 512: 453: 79: 9317:- Go ahead and make any minor tweaks to it. I will deal with it within a few hours. 4258:- I have done little deletion tagging since then. I was doing New Page Patrol before 1584:

Please add your evidence by January 28, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes.

11274: 11270: 11253: 11221: 11217: 11199: 11187: 11163: 11126: 11095: 11044: 10757: 10333: 9793: 8426: 8005: 7962: 7632: 7541: 7524: 7491: 7475: 6618: 6613:, I ask that you strike through your uncivil comments on my talk page, AFD, and XFD. 6455: 6402: 6023: 5860:

rather than the red link above. There are no deleted edits in this user's history. --

5640: 5503: 5381: 5248: 5123: 4929: 4879: 4524: 4477: 4326: 4320: 4259: 4153: 4119: 4080: 3422: 3387: 3277: 3037: 2993: 2783: 2755: 2739: 2717: 2652: 2344: 2234:

Sorry, you got twinkled since ASA c&p'd another copy over the redirect you left.

2145: 1908: 1801: 1680: 1472: 1444: 1428: 1280: 1262: 1227: 1195: 1115: 849:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

768: 653:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

359: 248:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

11064: 6166:

Please add your evidence by March 13, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes.

10948: 10921: 10823: 10819: 10802: 10781: 10501: 10452: 10436: 10077: 9275: 8577:

unlikely that kicking it back to those places will produce any further resolution.

8527: 7372: 7326:. The proposed draft is just an hospital within the health network. If you look at 7276: 6872: 6815: 6331: 6214: 6177: 5686: 5311: 4516:

Okay, that works, I'm just surprised by the 24 hour delay in tagging for G6. Best,

4034: 3695: 3334: 3133: 3045: 3041: 3033: 3017: 2985: 2981: 2940: 2664: 2291: 2239: 2224: 2056: 2039: 2023: 1705:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 1627: 1362: 1300: 1168: 1134: 1001: 986: 419: 415: 306: 215: 188: 172: 132: 5770:

Thanks. I've dealt with your RFPP request. While doing that, I found another SPA:

2458:

If you have some time, this has been the subject of some strife and discontent.--

11225: 11191: 10892: 10828: 10432: 9960: 9733: 9681: 9424: 8121: 7916: 7894: 7744: 7675: 7352: 7348: 7335: 7014: 6992: 6982: 6971: 6945: 6934: 6810:

What is your email address mate? I think it's about time we got all this settled.

6698: 6576: 6228: 6200: 5666:

Please help me and review this page, for any help is kindly accepted. thank you--

5499: 5357: 4204:

FWIW, I like you just fine and would have supported the last time had I known.--

4048: 4020: 3974:? Third, do the other blockchain platforms that have their own articles satisfy 3959: 2954: 2926: 2759: 2636: 2619: 2603: 2097: 1912: 1809: 1726: 1549: 1049: 703: 5299:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

5284: 5283:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

5200: 5029:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Billy_(Black_Christmas)

2639:- Yes. That was an extremely difficult DRN, and I agree with the assessment of 2205:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2180: 2179:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

1881:

option you will get an appreciation of its size and how it relates to the town.

34:

Comments about drafts that have been nominated for deletion should be posted to

10837: 10833: 10000: 9984: 9872: 9847: 9831: 8948: 8930: 8917: 8899: 8886: 8863: 8831: 8810: 8765: 8729: 8717: 8027: 8011: 7708: 7693: 7654: 7625: 6711: 6682: 6489: 6464: 6436: 6424: 6366: 6265: 6249: 6002: 5749: 5636: 5243: 4937: 4825: 4766: 4422:

Has fought 12 times for Rizin FF which is considered a top tier organization.

4409: 3783: 3765: 3735: 3719: 2980:

but i want to clear this up with you first, in the case where she doesn't meet

2723: 2668: 2660: 2648: 2644: 2216: 1911:

from the article on the village to discuss the Inca ruin, the place to discuss

1813: 1596: 1200: 1099:

discussion for "Doncram's actions ignoring the AfD Result and now edit warring"

610: 276: 7068:. What is the best way to go about resolving these issues? Thanks in advance! 4846: 3927: 3329:

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the

2655:. I had to threaten to fail the moderation and to let the parties go back to 2441:

I've left a comment/question on Teahouse, If you'd like to review. Thank you.

2286:

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the

1622:

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the

1121:

If you prefer to close that thread, I would have no issues with that as well.

301:

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the

11266: 11229: 11178:

From the claims she makes on her user page and her user data (all projects),

11138: 10842: 10517: 10505: 10349: 10295: 10291: 10220: 10216: 10212: 10208: 10204: 10081: 10073: 9677: 9347: 9314: 9298: 9015: 8741: 8725: 8595: 8532: 8523: 8510: 8472: 8456: 8214:

independent, reliable, secondary sources, from outside of its organisation.

7981: 7937: 7890: 7671: 7601: 7583: 7567: 7244: 6906: 6885: 6835: 6831: 6781: 6777: 6761: 6631: 6132: 6071: 6043: 6027: 5913: 5895: 5861: 5792: 5777: 5753: 5745: 5728: 5724: 5710: 5582: 5573: 5550: 5528: 5483: 5423: 5051: 5005: 4933: 4899: 4682: 4593: 4578: 4460: 3991: 3983: 3979: 3967: 3963: 3901: 3897: 3881: 3877: 3839: 3835: 3819: 3811: 3659: 3651: 3587: 3577: 3330: 3234: 3219: 3137: 3129: 3125: 3025: 3021: 3013: 2895: 2877: 2813: 2538: 2496: 2488: 2287: 2000: 1979: 1975: 1959: 1920: 1837: 1714: 1706: 1623: 1531: 1350: 1328: 1288: 1208: 1204: 1190: 1157: 1111: 1096: 960: 831: 806: 727: 719: 635: 478: 474: 470: 449: 434:

then deleted your sandbox because it was only a redirect to a deleted page.

423: 410: 302: 230: 35: 10080:. The two questions are not directly related. Beyond that, I would ask at 8624:

In light of the response there, are you willing to reconsider your closure?

8561:

I didn't mention this in my DRN request, but seeking dispute resolution was

8189:

not been for the 'significant coverage' relating to these subject matters.

4895:

around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.

2898:- You already have created a user page. So I think that we are all right. 1916: 11278: 11262: 11249: 11209: 11195: 11179: 11159: 11122: 11091: 11056: 11040: 10345: 10329: 9095: 8713: 7117: 6635: 6614: 6468: 6451: 6430: 5664:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ntinda_Vocational_Training_Institute-Kampala

5590: 5377: 5213: 5205: 5179: 5155: 5151: 5140: 4815: 4723: 4678: 4657: 4300: 4282: 4277: 4255: 4240: 4182: 4165: 4149: 4145: 4139: 4114: 4090: 4075: 3655: 3647: 3611: 3431: 3418: 3400: 3383: 3070: 3005: 2989: 2656: 2340: 2141: 2137: 2118: 1676: 614: 355: 6664: 4759:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline

4325:

THanks for the barnstar! It brightened up a less than stellar day today.

722:

and make your declaration. The article should explain why the subject is

103: 66: 10325: 10171:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:NCOLLATH&redirect=no

8032: 7288: 7272: 6949: 6930: 6902: 6881: 6868: 6827: 6811: 6248:

Hi i was wondering why this page does not online yet on google search?.--

5594: 5524: 5305: 4133: 2251: 2235: 2220: 2093: 1355: 1324: 1320: 1293: 1186: 1161: 1127: 723: 11019:

It’s unpleasant for me that people look at my work through prejudice. I

11001:

sources. It's unlikely that anyone will find sources better than these.

10403:

but may be subject to normal editing. Does that answer your question?

9941:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

8101:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

6556:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1869:

once the article was accepted to then revise the main “Pisac” article.

1029:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

107: 94: 10395:- I did not remove content from your sandbox. I moved your sandbox to 9796:- Please sign your posts. Also please follow the advice to discuss at 9730: 9726: 9554: 7520: 7148:

Sorry to keep bugging you, but I find SchroCat's recent reply to me at

4542: 4518: 4498: 4471: 4236: 3713: 2640: 1722: 1698: 794: 764: 715: 699: 430:. I cannot retrieve its content. You should have kept a copy of it. 11228:. I will also note that she is changing the nature of her request at 8093:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

6548:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

5290:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2196:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1021:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

8721: 8284: 8094: 6726: 6708: 6549: 6423:

where no one is likely to see it. Did you intend it to take place at

6416: 1022: 802: 754: 11194:

or any other assistance to editors who use Knowledge to earn money.

7775:. Surely the GQ and Tempo articles alone are enough to satisfy GNG. 6607:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Preemptory review request

4963:

Hello Robert McClenon, I got your messages on my submitted draft of

11213: 10174: 9959:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

9700: 9359: 9342: 8569:, were you were that this matter had been referred to DRN from AE? 8120:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

6575:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

5632: 5586: 5568: 5520: 5495: 5478: 5452: 5419: 5402: 4770: 4094: 2018:

Hey RMcC, I hope you don't stress too much about the discussion at

1858:

Non acceptance of the proposed article on the Inca complex ar Pisac

1156:

A bot just archived that discussion. What's the policy on unclosed

1048:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

431: 10774:

Can you, please, give me advice on how to proceed? Thanks, Ivan

7470:, - the article was created independently by a different user and 4878:. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at 4439:

2.Have fought for the highest title of a top-tier MMA organization

3008:- That's a good question, and I would like to see it discussed at 1080:

Knowledge:Teahouse#Disambiguation and Draft:John B. Shields (chef)

11137:

I don't think that you need help in formulating a request at the

9914:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 8076:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 6531:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 5603:

Reviewer: "Hmmm. That looks notable with two billion euros ...

4285:- I'm ready any time, and will be even more ready on Wednesday. 3569:

through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

1812:'s case, I am wondering if I need to take any special actions on 1004:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 11004:

My persistence is my character, 🙃 it's not about paid editing.

10866:

Thanks, but I still doubt if solving global problems is part of

10003:- Yes and no, I guess. I certainly couldn't have written about 9777:

There is plethora articles on Danish Renzu with released films?

9676:- If you are having difficulty with talk pages, ask for help at 9385: 7427:

If I knew of someone who did it well, I wouldn't let you know.

5772: 2117:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2096:. I believe the Dilshad one matches that one's "quality". Also, 6125: 2437:

Hello, this is in reference to the article you recently denied

963:

as to exactly what is the preferred degree of disambiguation.

11144:

I will reply to your request in more detail within 48 hours.

11006:

In fact, if your employer needs it, Knowledge doesn't need it.

9779:

https://www.amazon.com/Half-Widow-Neelofar-Hamid/dp/B07XLW36SX

9699:

use of copyrighted text by "ordinary" permission, because our

8989:

Hello @Robert_McClenon I suspected the intention of this user

5337: 4410:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Jiri_Prochazka_(martial_artist)

2699:

know it was proposed for deletion. Comments can be made here

1915:

an article is the talk page of the existing article, that is,

11269:

to ask the community to choose between your proposed text of

8970:@Robert_McCleon I just saw it after a break. Thank so much! 8031:

idea, that I stated yesterday, that if there is agreement on

6909:. But you don't have the ability to receive email enabled. 5344:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

3928:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Corda_(decentralized_database)

2042:- I thought I had clarified it after the first explanation. 1717:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

9772: 4641: 3782:

i put the new sources in the draft can you review again ?.--

10756:) I see the draft is declined, for it looks similar to the 9904: 9783:

https://bookandfilmglobe.com/film/movie-review-the-illegal/

8066: 6521: 5691: 5204:

too, but as you've no doubt observed, they usually don't. —

1086:

earlier, if you'd like to combine the two sections, or ...

994: 843: 647: 242: 11023:

a review-flagg in Russian Knowledge, I'm a true Knowledge

4943:

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

4913:

with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.

3124:, the same name as the one I declined. It was deleted as 2215:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 1203:

would be more likely to get action than another report at

797:- Why is it important to have a separate stub article for 9948:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

8862:, please let me know why you unreviewed it. Thank you. -- 8858:

Hello. Regarding this note that you left on my talkpage,

8740:

Do you want assistance in formulating a neutrally worded

8455:

would also be the most relevant guideline to point to. --

8375:

Please reconsider this draft article! Thanks in advance!

8109:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

6564:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

1037:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

147:- You created multiple copies. I will review one copy. 104:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Comparison_of_genealogy_software

67:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Comparison_of_genealogy_software

8879:

User talk:Rosiestep#I have unreviewed a page you curated

6293: 6170:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports/Workshop

6162:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports/Evidence

5055:

article talk page, because DRV is a more public forum.

4138:

If you're interested, I'll be more than pleased to nom.

3349: 2659:

at least twice, and was ready to recommend that they be

405:- After considerable searching, I see that a draft page 11186:

are borderline inflammatory and/or personal attacks at

10479:

Draft:Gallons of Rubbing Alcohol Flow Through the Strip

10269:

Draft:Gallons of Rubbing Alcohol Flow Through the Strip

8304: 7678:

because labor is what happens nine months after love?

6365:, thank you for reviewing, approving and assessing the 6068:

Knowledge:Notability#Whether to create standalone pages

5858:

Draft:Triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) (canine and feline)

5697: 4947:

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

4340:

Request on 15:31:41, 7 February 2020 for assistance on

3955: 3951: 3454:

Request on 13:55:45, 30 January 2020 for assistance on

3097: 2802:

Request on 03:39:39, 26 January 2020 for assistance on

2758:- I will consider your advice, and will recognize that 2354:

Request on 16:29:27, 23 January 2020 for assistance on

2121:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1711:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Toy portals

805:

independence movement. I suggest asking for advice at

210:

I have Created Another Page Please Give me The Feedback

110:

you have no objection to me posting the article again.

108:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Windows-only_software

95:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Windows-only_software

8445:

User talk:Robert McClenon/Archive 27#Template:Talkspin

6286:

Declined Draft: Anomalie - Musical Notability Criteria

6168:

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,

6100:

Knowledge:Village_pump_(policy)#Rethinking_draft_space

4685:. Also, I advised the merger based on the comment at 1586:

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,

868:

Request on 21:31:44, 9 January 2020 for assistance on

572:

or update or feedback from you or any other reviewer.

10970:

Comment about Wikipedian reputation and small request

10760:

article, but they are completely different concepts.

10102:

Request on 20:51:38, 26 March 2020 for assistance on

9576:

Request on 20:35:46, 24 March 2020 for assistance on

9438:

Request on 19:25:33, 24 March 2020 for assistance on

8877:

Here's the right link to where you left the message,

8368:

separate article for Robam Tep Apsara (in Cambodia).

123: 8285:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:ARRACO_Global_Markets

7238:

The secondary mailing list is in use for this case:

6330:- If another editor thinks that the draft satisfies 4469:? Normally, you would G6 the redirect first, right? 4430: 1588:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung/Workshop

1580:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung/Evidence

8860:

user:Rosiestep#I have unreviewed a page you curated

8246:Please see additional discussion of this matter at 7222:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop

7218:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Evidence

3900:- I will be requesting input from other editors at 1409:dispute. I think it can be closed for two reasons: 10637: 10175:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bogdan_Karai%C4%8Di%C4%87 8728:, but that isn't exactly what Barkeep said. What 8316: 7984:. I am not sure that I understand the question. 6022:Hi. I noticed that your template message links to 5990:Stop inappropriately directing new users to WP:DRV 5703:Draft:Ntinda Vocational Training Institute-Kampala 5658:Draft:Ntinda Vocational Training Institute-Kampala 3764:i want the draft not the article in the sandbox.-- 2590:AN3 report which mentions a DRN that you moderated 2487:- I have given the user an additional warning for 4113:Indeed it is a history merge I meant. Thank you! 3583:can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: 3176:ride off into the sun. Thanks for the info dude. 1327:, please consider whether, if you don't know how 801:? His notability appears to have to do with the 8881:, and here's a link to the article in question, 7235:are being read into the evidence for this case. 5549:... billion?! Wowsers, that's a lot of money! -- 3485:Draft:American Society for Reproductive Medicine 1642: 9514:Please advise as to how I can view the draft. 9386:https://en.wikipedia.org/Statue_of_Harry_Jerome 7692:Thanks for letting me know via the talk pages. 7653:I'm gonna go through them and change them all. 7628:has had accepted contain unsubstituted uses of 6158:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports 6150:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Motorsports 6094:As a user who has expressed an interest in the 4624:Draft:Derived noncommutative algebraic geometry 3132:are usually denied. You ask for undeletion at 2306: 2113:Disambiguation link notification for January 21 1110:I don't have an opinion on the matter, but the 6172:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 5912:Please ask for advice on editing Knowledge at 5607:yen? Hmmm. I'll review it more carefully." 5426:. Go ahead and deal with the silly dispute. 5285:section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2181:section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1590:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 10745:How can I proceed with this declined article? 10203:essentially say that the subject should meet 8830:RFCs should be neutrally worded. I will let 8157:notability of organizations and companies). 7494:I have redirected the draft to the article. 3382:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge! 2339:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge! 1675:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge! 354:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge! 93:And I see many more advertisements here too: 5531:(about uncommon endowments) is sufficient. 3193:Maybe you called it Trackr or Traackr.com. 1999:Thank you. Would be expecting a feedback. -- 1287:, thanks for your replies. I didn't realize 321: 268:Draft: The Masked Singer (American season 3) 9773:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Danish_Renzu 9258:Your review in Afc: Alex Ajipe (March 2020) 5748:- Okay. I have attacked it in two forums, 5593:mentions a billion dollars, it is probably 5352:redirect, you might want to participate in 4642:https://en.wikipedia.org/Algebraic_geometry 4148:, but it depends whether he would have me. 3838:- My first comment is to ask for advice at 3688:MfD closed; userspaced without redirect to 2600:DRN, which concluded in June 2019, was here 2185:Knowledge is not a free web hosting service 1576:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung 274:Talk:The Masked Singer (American TV series) 10640:, and just to give some additional "meat": 9553:- Your draft was deleted by administrator 7214:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog 6611:Knowledge:Civility#Dealing with incivility 6174:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 6098:, you are invited to join a discussion at 5348:. Since you had some involvement with the 4920:to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn. 4839:New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020 4429:is outdated. If rules are consistent then 4414:The MMA notability criteria has been met 3970:. Second, does the Corda product satisfy 3044:at all, but to look at whether she passes 2191:, such pages may be deleted at any time. 1592:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 54:The following discussion has been closed. 9128:Robert McClenon, Thank for information! 8130:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 8035:, cleanup can be done in article space. 7966:then making the final decision later? — 6585:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 6217:of the content if it meets requirements. 5727:- Thank you. I will look at it, and may 5242:I believe my draft for financial company 4465:Hey, would you mind explaining this move 4037:of the content if it meets requirements. 3966:, you must declare it in accordance with 3140:, but they may say much the same thing. 2943:of the content if it meets requirements. 2734:(= go to my user page, click on the word 2622:I will check it within 8 hours or less. 1058:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 102:Since you cannot see advertisements here 10577:Thank you for reviewing our submission! 10538:I am going to go for the second option. 9934:to see how you can improve the article. 8091:to see how you can improve the article. 6780:- Did you read the entire discussion at 6546:to see how you can improve the article. 5643:, and that is the extent of the truth. 1019:to see how you can improve the article. 726:. I suggest that you ask for advice at 8686:2600:1004:B14E:63FD:A8E7:E862:289A:18DD 8626:2600:1004:B14E:63FD:A8E7:E862:289A:18DD 8579:2600:1004:B14E:63FD:A8E7:E862:289A:18DD 8443:Picking up from my previous comment at 7320:Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital 7227:All content, links, and diffs from the 7040:interest of free and fair elections. -- 6294:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Anomalie 5376:was probably the right thing. Cheers! 3738:- Which version do you want reviewed? 2701:Talk:2019 Lilbourn, Missouri Earthquake 586:Thank you in advance for your answers. 14: 10201:College athletic notability guidelines 9245:2A02:C7F:DC5B:C700:8C6C:BD8E:A197:2CE3 8885:(my 1,390th new woman's biography). -- 8818:2600:1004:B159:F772:1F3:3811:8D45:C868 8305:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bloomberg_L.P 8229:Many thanks for your time. The Dolph 7330:, the line states "...and the largest 7150:Talk:John Davie (British Army officer) 3098:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Traackr 2671:may be the only way to contain this. 2665:India-Pakistan discretionary sanctions 1736:Draft:Trang T. Lê rejected questions. 1416:The user has been blocked for 2 weeks 8724:specifically referred the parties to 8087:. You may like to take a look at the 8083:, which is recorded on the article's 6542:. You may like to take a look at the 6538:, which is recorded on the article's 6203:. I just wanted to let you know that 5695:(possibly the user formerly known as 4781:2402:3A80:64D:4B17:FCF0:5DBF:953:5E3D 4371:Draft:Jiri Prochazka (martial artist) 4301:Lourdes 12:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 4278:Lourdes 13:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC) 4023:. I just wanted to let you know that 3954:? All of your edits have been about 2931:Draft:Order of Franciscans Ecumenical 2929:. I just wanted to let you know that 2919:Draft:Order of Franciscans Ecumenical 2703:. (You worked on the draft version) 2651:, who was in the background with the 1808:In the light of people's opinions on 1015:. You may like to take a look at the 1011:, which is recorded on the article's 38:, not to the nominator's talk page. 10587:Thanks in advance and best regards, 10570:Resolving issues with the k6 article 10133:Draft:Nemanja Jovanovic (basketball) 9781:And work with Academy winning actor 9727:http://www.perniente.org/actors.html 6601:Preemptory review requested at WP:AE 5681:Ntinda Vocational Training Institute 4930:Geographic regions, areas and places 4241:Lourdes 06:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 4140:Lourdes 08:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 1292:discussion to an appropriate venue. 124:https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Pmsouc 10805:- I will respond within 24 hours. 7311:Draft:UMass Memorial Medical Center 6268:- I will reply on your talk page. 6096:Knowledge:The future of NPP and AfC 5371:Deletion of "Political Game Theory" 5301:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 4431:https://en.wikipedia.org/Angela_Lee 3214:Robert is correct. Your 5 edits to 3010:the Articles for Creation talk page 2695:Just letting editors who worked on 2439:Draft:Aid Worker Security Database. 2207:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 503:Knowledge: Webfleet Solutions entry 23: 11216:, nobody knows that you are being 9903: 8065: 7153:Thanks again for taking the time. 6520: 6090:Discussion on the Draft namrespace 5336: 5271: 4845: 3321: 2697:2019 Lilbourn, Missouri Earthquake 2385:Draft:Aid Worker Security Database 2278: 2165: 1614: 993: 842: 646: 409:was deleted on 4 November 2019 by 293: 241: 24: 11309: 10845:would be a good place to start. 10638:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:K6 10254:I have added it to the tea house 9968:Thanks again, and happy editing! 9922:The article has been assessed as 8780:RFC on a closely related question 8317:https://en.wikipedia.org/City_A.M 8079:The article has been assessed as 7062:John Davie (British Army officer) 6638:, and am not striking anything. 6534:The article has been assessed as 6205:Draft:Rostrevor Old Collegians FC 6193:Draft:Rostrevor Old Collegians FC 6176:. For the Arbitration Committee, 5450:Thanks for your prompt response. 5330:"Adhesive Bonding (2)" listed at 5027:Here is the archived discussion: 1594:. For the Arbitration Committee, 1007:The article has been assessed as 11273:and the current text. At least 10885: 10322:Draft:Information Services Group 10316:Information Services Group Draft 10240:I have added it on the teahouse 9580:submission by MariaAnnelovesyou2 9442:submission by MariaAnnelovesyou2 9219:Let's fall in love for the night 9018:- I have completed my review of 6671:For surviving a swarm of weevils 6663: 6124: 5441: 4598: 3690:User:Robert McClenon/Toy portals 2254:- Oh. That sandbox. Oh well. 1697: 1449: 11158:OK. This is an honest answer.-- 10920:Happy editing for both of you! 10868:corporate social responsibility 10290:- I suggest that we discuss at 10106:submission by Markomarkovic1980 9072:- Isn't it in article space at 8778:Someone else has just opened a 7620:Starzoner articles for creation 7291:Indictments for what by whom? 7243:For the Arbitration Committee, 6760:. I hope you will reconsider. 4898:A recent discussion of whether 4866:make the discussion a success. 3968:the conflict of interest policy 3962:, and Corda. If you have any 720:the conflict of interest policy 189:the musical notability criteria 10207:. If you think that he meets 10033:Sorry, I meant “song article” 9729:; there mqy hqve been others. 9680:. You may post a message at 8349: 8340: 8331: 8322: 8310: 8298: 8289: 8278: 7267:Paid editing off-wiki evidence 6227:Thank you for your attention. 4959:Draft: Billy (Black Christmas) 4955:16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC) 4047:Thank you for your attention. 3024:. There are also a number of 2984:can it still be reviewed with 2953:Thank you for your attention. 2833:User:Loanfish/sandbox/Loanfish 13: 1: 10209:general notability guidelines 10205:general notability guidelines 10009:Draft:Hyperbolastic functions 9822:Do you get what that dude is 8795:, but this particular RFC is 6187:00:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC) 6141:15:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC) 6112:08:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC) 6080:20:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 6056:19:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 6036:18:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 6011:09:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5984:02:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 5958:19:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5926:14:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5908:14:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5887:14:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5870:14:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5851:20:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5835:Draft:Triple pelvic osteotomy 5826:15:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC) 5809:08:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC) 5786:20:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5766:18:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5741:17:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5719:15:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5676:08:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC) 5653:01:56, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5617:01:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 5578:22:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5559:21:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5541:17:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 5516:20:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 5488:19:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 5462:03:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 5436:00:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 5412:23:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC) 5392:Draft:Move The City Beautiful 5386:17:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 5366:14:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 5325:01:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 5257:20:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 5226:18:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 5209:15:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 5193:15:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 5169:15:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 5144:08:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 5082:16:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 5065:16:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 5040:16:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 5018:01:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC) 4997:02:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 4977:02:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 4834:21:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 4810:18:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 4789:18:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 4736:19:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 4703:03:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 4670:01:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 4616:01:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC) 4586:00:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC) 4295:18:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC) 3249:07:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 3228:14:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC) 3026:special notability guidelines 2177:User:Arav Sri Agarwal/sandbox 2160:User:Arav Sri Agarwal/sandbox 2020:Talk:Take It Easy (2015 film) 2014:Talk:Take It Easy (2015 film) 1982:to comment within 24 hours. 1795:20:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC) 283:) 2:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 10078:musical notability criterion 10072:- I suggest that you ask at 8933:- I've marked it reviewed. 8680:The device is theoretically 8526:- For albums and songs, the 6747:Kyle Kulinski Draft Deletion 6656:Outlasted the Invasion Award 5750:Requests for Page Protection 5689:, I'm letting you know that 5566:before I saw the WP article 4934:general notability guideline 4555:03:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 4538:02:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 4512:02:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 4491:01:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 4456:15:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 4335:15:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 4272:17:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC) 4223:17:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 4195:16:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 4178:16:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 4158:15:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 4122:17:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4107:16:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4083:13:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4057:01:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 4004:06:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 3940:19:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 3914:23:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 3890:19:41, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 3852:18:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 3828:08:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 3792:06:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC) 3774:12:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 3748:03:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC) 3728:02:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC) 3709:05:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 3676:22:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 3635:22:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 3554:15:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 3534:13:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC) 3444:17:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3427:16:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3413:16:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3392:16:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3307:17:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3286:10:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3203:16:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3186:09:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 3165:22:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 3150:22:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 3110:21:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 3083:23:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 3060:22:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 3022:general notability guideline 3020:is what is described by the 3014:general notability guideline 2998:20:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 2963:01:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 2908:03:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 2886:03:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 2792:08:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 2773:08:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 2748:08:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 2713:19:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2681:01:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 2645:the edit-warring noticeboard 2632:19:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2612:17:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2576:12:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2551:04:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2539:special notability guideline 2532:04:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2519:User:Winged Blades of Godric 2509:04:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 2477:17:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 2433:16:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 2349:11:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 2264:21:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 2244:20:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 2229:16:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 2189:criteria for speedy deletion 2150:08:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 2108:05:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 2078:Draft:Dilshad (entrepreneur) 2069:20:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 2052:07:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 2032:05:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 2009:00:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 1992:21:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 1968:16:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 1933:00:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 1895:23:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 1850:18:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 1826:18:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC) 1775:23:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC) 1751:23:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC) 1731:23:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC) 1685:21:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC) 1603:05:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC) 1562:16:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 1544:16:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 1519:08:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 1481:05:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1467:05:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1437:03:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1376:17:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1342:16:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1314:16:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1276:16:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1256:16:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1241:15:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1221:05:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1201:the edit-warring noticeboard 1182:02:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1148:02:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 1091:00:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 819:16:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 777:14:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 491:21:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 464:20:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 369:Sumitomo SHI FW Page Deleted 7: 10891: 10636:Sure! The draft article is 9926:, which is recorded on its 9076:and tagged for copy-edit? 6413:Draft:Linthorpe Art Pottery 4902:restraunts are notable was 3317:User:Mighty.Germany/sandbox 1761:- The draft in question is 1398:Dispute resolution - close? 1069:21:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 973:21:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 949:21:31, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 863:21:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 740:21:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 708:19:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 676:04:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 627:15:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC) 599:12:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC) 505:submission by Suarezmartell 444:21:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC) 394:15:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC) 364:19:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC) 262:23:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 224:20:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 202:20:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 177:18:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 157:18:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 137:18:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 99:And I can continue this... 88:16:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 48:16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC) 10: 11314: 11292:23:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11258:20:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11242:19:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11204:18:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11168:11:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11154:21:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 11131:11:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11116:21:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 11100:11:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 11081:21:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 11049:21:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10961:03:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 10930:01:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 10855:21:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10815:16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10794:15:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10733:10:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC) 10678:16:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10620:16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10600:14:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10562:16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 10534:03:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 10493:Gallons of Rubbing Alcohol 10465:23:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC) 10445:19:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC) 10413:15:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC) 10385:14:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC) 10362:15:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC) 10338:13:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC) 10308:23:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10264:23:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10250:23:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10233:22:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10189:20:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10094:04:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10062:04:11, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10043:04:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 10026:18:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 9993:17:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 9979:17:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 9881:23:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9860:23:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9840:23:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9810:22:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9739:09:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 9713:21:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9694:21:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9666:20:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9653:20:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9568:20:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9543:19:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9530:19:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9433:18:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 9412:06:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 9372:03:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 9352:02:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 9327:01:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 9307:00:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 9291:Draft:Xbox system software 9284:20:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 9253:07:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 9234:19:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 9209:18:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 9192:21:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 9167:08:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 9138:03:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC) 9124:16:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 9110:18:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 9086:15:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 9059:07:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 9032:17:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 9004:13:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8980:17:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 8957:01:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8943:00:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8926:19:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8912:18:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8895:18:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8872:16:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8844:04:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8826:04:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8774:03:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8754:03:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8694:04:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8660:03:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8634:01:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8612:00:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 8587:20:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 8545:01:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 8519:00:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 8500:01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8485:01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8465:19:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 8422:03:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8405:01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC) 8385:16:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 8266:17:40, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 8248:User_talk:Dolphinhouse2019 8241:16:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 8141:23:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 8045:00:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC) 8020:21:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC) 7994:15:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 7973:19:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 7950:14:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7929:13:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7908:05:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7870:04:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7856:04:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7839:03:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7824:03:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7809:03:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7785:02:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 7723:16:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7702:16:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7688:15:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7663:15:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7648:15:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7624:Many of the articles that 7610:05:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7596:05:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7576:04:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7504:14:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7484:07:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7468:Draft:Le Concert Spirituel 7462:Draft:Le Concert Spirituel 7452:15:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7437:15:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7423:15:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7408:15:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7388:01:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7365:01:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7351:- In that case, this is a 7344:22:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC) 7328:UMass Memorial Health Care 7301:04:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC) 7163:07:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC) 7144:16:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 7130:01:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 6630:I have updated my post at 6435:who created the redirect. 6421:Talk:Linthorpe_Art_Pottery 6104:MediaWiki message delivery 5635:and I just encountered an 4344:submission by 210.6.22.101 4025:Draft:Windlass Steelcrafts 4013:Draft:Windlass Steelcrafts 3978:? If not, should they be 2738:, search for the name). -- 1082:, the other editor posted 613:has replied to you at the 501:Request for assistance on 10715:00:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC) 10698:12:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC) 9390:Order of British Columbia 9239:Orwell Society submission 8883:Evelyn Campbell (actress) 8854:Evelyn Campbell (actress) 7899:Final Fantasy VII: Remake 7281:19:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC) 7262:17:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC) 7112:17:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC) 7098:17:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC) 7078:16:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC) 7050:18:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 7020:22:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 7009:22:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6988:20:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6977:20:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6962:20:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6940:19:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6919:19:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6898:19:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6877:15:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6862:14:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6848:14:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6820:14:33, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 6798:15:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 6770:13:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 6739:01:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 6719:22:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC) 6691:20:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC) 6662: 6648:06:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 6623:05:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 6596:01:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 6498:02:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 6481:01:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 6460:23:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC) 6445:22:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC) 6398:11:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 6379:04:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 6345:16:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 6319:00:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 6278:00:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 6258:22:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC) 6237:01:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC) 5896:the Education Noticeboard 5685:Further to the ping from 5279:A tag has been placed on 5201:actually perform the move 4886:Discussions and Resources 3660:nominated it for deletion 3261:Article on Francisco Vico 2594:Hello Robert. Please see 2358:submission by HumOutcomes 2175:A tag has been placed on 1903:The draft in question is 1818:MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) 899:Draft:John Shields (chef) 18:User talk:Robert McClenon 11069:invidious discrimination 10498:User:Beatleswillneverdie 10288:User:Beatleswillneverdie 10070:User:Beatleswillneverdie 9983:Did you really do that? 9962:leaving us some feedback 9939:create articles yourself 9871:when I saw the article. 9178:- It should be there at 9020:Draft:Robam Moni Mekhala 8270:(Not watching this page) 8123:leaving us some feedback 8099:create articles yourself 7860:All good, my apologies. 7844:User:Apples&Manzanas 7793:User:Apples&Manzanas 7554:23:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 7533:22:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 7202:10:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC) 7102:Ok, thank you, no rush. 6968:Knowledge:Emailing users 6888:about Email This User. 6836:Village pump (technical) 6677:For surviving the grand 6578:leaving us some feedback 6554:create articles yourself 6131:Here is a cheeseburger 5332:Redirects for discussion 4904:archived without closure 3646:- Well, I disagree with 3118:User:PopCultureSuperHero 1800:Yet another potentially 1405:You posted a message on 1051:leaving us some feedback 1027:create articles yourself 532:Draft:Webfleet Solutions 250:User:Aureliojohn/sandbox 235:User:Aureliojohn/sandbox 57:Please do not modify it. 10013:Hyperbolastic functions 10005:hyperbolastic functions 9912:Hyperbolastic functions 9897:Hyperbolastic functions 9798:Draft talk:Danish Renzu 9674:User:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9607:Draft:Joseph G. Giambra 9551:User:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9469:Draft:Joseph G. Giambra 8714:Arbitration Enforcement 8433:addition of a split tag 7795:- I said to discuss at 7208:Arbitration case opened 6636:Arbitration Enforcement 6117:A cheeseburger for you! 5754:Miscellany for Deletion 5356:if you wish to do so. 5354:the redirect discussion 4965:Billy (Black Christmas) 4857:Source Guide Discussion 4853:Hello Robert McClenon, 4714:WikiProject Mathematics 4691:WikiProject Mathematics 4687:WikiProject Mathematics 3458:submission by Mmizeasrm 3134:Requests for Undeletion 2657:Arbitration Enforcement 1570:Arbitration case opened 1407:the Occupational stress 872:submission by Jziemniak 420:Requests for Undeletion 11184:Talk:Insilico Medicine 10370:Recovery of my sandbox 10197:User:Markomarkovic1980 9908: 9818:Math talk page Comment 9197:User:Antony Willianson 9176:User:Antony Willianson 9070:User:Antony Willianson 9012:User:Antony Willianson 8393:User:Antony Willianson 8074:Salomonia longiciliata 8070: 8059:Salomonia longiciliata 6970:for more information. 6751:I saw your comment on 6525: 5856:Probably referring to 5752:in article space, and 5627:An Unreal $ 30 billion 5471:Draft:Bezos Earth Fund 5341: 5292:contest the nomination 5276: 4932:generally do not need 4850: 4569:You may want to close 3980:nominated for deletion 3326: 3091:I could use your help! 2976:I was about to review 2806:submission by Loanfish 2283: 2212:deleting administrator 2198:contest the nomination 2170: 1713:and please be sure to 1619: 998: 851:Draft:Joseph I. Castro 847: 836:Draft:Joseph I. Castro 655:Draft:Joseph I. Castro 651: 640:Draft:Joseph I. Castro 298: 246: 10938:User:Robert McClendon 10688:A gentle reminder :) 9943:Articles for Creation 9907: 9893:Articles for creation 8567:closed my DRN request 8103:Articles for Creation 8069: 8055:Articles for creation 7517:Draft:Reinhard Pfundt 7116:As I said, request a 6948:. Was that also why 6806:Paid editing evidence 6609:. In accordance with 6558:Articles for Creation 6529:Linthorpe Art Pottery 6524: 6514:Linthorpe Art Pottery 6510:Articles for creation 6384:Thanks for the review 5776:(already blocked). -- 5506:a separate article. 5340: 5275: 5087:Moves to "hyperspace" 5006:Articles for Deletion 4849: 3801:Draft:Andrew Naimanye 3331:Articles for Creation 3325: 2288:Articles for Creation 2282: 2169: 1719:Knowledge:Toy portals 1703:Knowledge:Toy portals 1692:Knowledge:Toy portals 1624:Articles for Creation 1618: 1031:Articles for Creation 997: 983:Articles for creation 846: 799:Draft:Fon Gorji Dinka 650: 428:Draft:Sumitomo SHI FW 407:Draft:Sumitomo SHI FW 303:Articles for Creation 297: 245: 11267:Request for Comments 11265:- You may publish a 11208:I mostly agree with 10749:Hi Rober McClennon, 10720:User:Robert McClenon 10634:User:Robert McClenon 9392:Please reconsider. 9380:Jack Harman (artist) 9340:that don't matter. 8742:Request for Comments 8563:specifically advised 8531:sometimes by formal 8507:r with possibilities 8355:Knowledge:Notability 8346:Knowledge:Notability 8337:Knowledge:Notability 8328:Knowledge:Notability 8295:Knowledge:Notability 7978:User:Seadoubleyoujay 7940:might be in order. 7934:User:Seadoubleyoujay 7322:being separate from 6786:Internet celebrities 5350:Adhesive Bonding (2) 5346:Adhesive Bonding (2) 5281:Adhesive Bonding (2) 5267:Adhesive Bonding (2) 4753:Hi Robert McClenon, 4710:User:Robert McClenon 4260:auto-confirmed trial 3964:conflict of interest 3780:User:Robert McClenon 3762:User:Robert McClenon 3652:conflict of interest 3315:Your draft article, 3042:significant coverage 3018:significant coverage 2730:, perhaps check out 2272:Your draft article, 2138:Opt-out instructions 2092:which was passed by 1608:Your draft article, 287:Your draft article, 10838:marketing buzzspeak 10703:User:Simon Aronsson 10608:User:Simon Aronsson 10540:Beatleswillneverdie 10518:deletion discussion 10483:Beatleswillneverdie 10429:Evolutionary grades 10401:Draft:David Tománek 10397:Draft:David Tománek 10276:Beatleswillneverdie 10256:Beatleswillneverdie 10242:Beatleswillneverdie 10054:Beatleswillneverdie 10035:Beatleswillneverdie 9891:Your submission at 9335:Draft:René Panthier 9226:Beatleswillneverdie 8160:Additionally that: 8146:Declined submission 8053:Your submission at 7862:Apples&Manzanas 7831:Apples&Manzanas 7816:Apples&Manzanas 7777:Apples&Manzanas 7066:Talk:No Time to Die 6508:Your submission at 4822:Draft:Arash Shakour 4650:--Thanks, Wundzer 4072:which he/she is not 3988:software notability 3976:software notability 3972:software notability 3644:User:AMPLIFYHER2020 3602:Draft:Karlyn Percil 3351:edit the submission 3337:page you started, " 3241:PopCultureSuperHero 3210:PopCultureSuperHero 3178:PopCultureSuperHero 3102:PopCultureSuperHero 2978:Draft:Brooke Butler 2970:Draft:Brooke Butler 2489:the personal attack 2308:edit the submission 2294:page you started, " 2131:fix with Dab solver 2086:I had earlier made 1956:Draft:Martin Fayomi 1942:Draft:Martin Fayomi 1644:edit the submission 1630:page you started, " 1610:Draft:Aarthi Ganesh 981:Your submission at 403:User:Ravikrishnan72 323:edit the submission 309:page you started, " 10506:general notability 10502:musical notability 10393:User:David.Tomanek 10217:Other Stuff Exists 9909: 9869:different approach 9658:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9645:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9588:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9535:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9522:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9450:MariaAnnelovesyou2 9180:Robam Moni Mekhala 9074:Robam Moni Mekhala 8985:Paul_012 Intention 8528:musical notability 8071: 7797:Talk:Twice (group) 7668:User:Peter coxhead 7396:User:Integritas888 7324:RWJBarnabas Health 7309:AfC submission of 7086:User:GrammarDamner 7055:Dispute Resolution 7035:Draft: Rishi Kumar 6753:Kulinski Draft MfD 6526: 6411:, I stumbled upon 6332:musical notability 5342: 5277: 5048:User:Paleface Jack 5002:User:Paleface Jack 4985:User:Paleface Jack 4893:ongoing discussion 4851: 4763:The Economic Times 3984:Other Stuff Exists 3327: 2515:User:Deepfriedokra 2485:User:Deepfriedokra 2453:Draft:Rubina Bajwa 2284: 2274:Draft:Intersection 2171: 2123:Curve of the Earth 1834:User:Moonythedwarf 1715:sign your comments 1690:MfD nomination of 1620: 999: 848: 652: 607:User:Suarezmartell 416:request undeletion 299: 247: 11275:User:David Gerard 11271:Insilico Medicine 11222:User:David Gerard 10963: 10947:comment added by 10918: 10917: 10913: 10906: 10796: 10780:comment added by 10758:Consumer activism 10433:ecological guilds 10424:Grades and guilds 10181:Markomarkovic1980 10114:Markomarkovic1980 9899:has been accepted 9794:User:Cinephile786 9414: 9398:comment added by 9289:Are you still on 9169: 9155:Antony Willianson 9153:comment added by 9130:Antony Willianson 9116:Antony Willianson 9061: 9047:Antony Willianson 9045:comment added by 8996:Antony Willianson 8972:Antony Willianson 8708:DRN Closure Reply 8414:Antony Willianson 8377:Antony Willianson 8272: 8061:has been accepted 7963:Talk:Star Citizen 7884:Squadron 42 draft 7542:User:Gerda Arendt 7492:User:Gerda Arendt 7332:healthcare system 7204: 7188:comment added by 7018: 6986: 6975: 6938: 6696: 6695: 6516:has been accepted 6321: 6305:comment added by 6146: 6145: 6017:Template:Talkspin 5986: 5970:comment added by 5960: 5944:comment added by 5814:User:Sandrah.Akol 5773:Akol Joseph Latif 5756:in draft space. 5641:Oxford University 5296:visiting the page 4951: 4844: 4812: 4800:comment added by 4791: 4779:comment added by 4738: 4722:comment added by 4672: 4656:comment added by 3684:Userspacification 3637: 3621:comment added by 3288: 3272:comment added by 3046:acting notability 3038:sports notability 3034:acting notability 2756:User:Gerda Arendt 2653:Sword of Damocles 2493:yelling vandalism 2202:visiting the page 1836:- As they say at 1763:Draft:Trang T. Lê 1759:User:Namnguyen408 1521: 1505:comment added by 1445:User:CaroleHenson 1196:User:Girth Summit 989:has been accepted 838:has a new comment 779: 763:comment added by 642:has a new comment 576:not my company. 396: 380:comment added by 237:has a new comment 115: 114: 90: 74:comment added by 11305: 10942: 10912: 10909: 10902: 10899: 10889: 10882: 10881: 10865: 10824:User:WikiAviator 10820:User:Ivan gurkov 10803:User:Ivan gurkov 10775: 10473:Recheck my draft 10453:User:Lavateraguy 10162: 10161: 9964: 9954: 9736: 9636: 9635: 9498: 9497: 9393: 9148: 9040: 8814: 8594:I have asked at 8437:existing content 8356: 8353: 8347: 8344: 8338: 8335: 8329: 8326: 8320: 8314: 8308: 8302: 8296: 8293: 8287: 8282: 8271: 8268: 8262: 8256: 8233:Dolphinhouse2019 8210:IN CONCLUSION. 8125: 8115: 7970: 7960: 7905: 7712: 7637: 7631: 7252: 7250: 7183: 7017: 6985: 6974: 6937: 6667: 6660: 6659: 6580: 6570: 6434: 6364: 6300: 6213:You may request 6128: 6121: 6120: 5965: 5939: 5775: 5729:request deletion 5700: 5694: 5545:It's only 10... 5529:Use Common Sense 5460: 5449: 5445: 5444: 5410: 5323: 5274: 5135: 5117: 4946: 4900:Michelin starred 4863:NPP source guide 4843: 4795: 4774: 4749:Draft:Saket Modi 4717: 4651: 4606: 4602: 4601: 4536: 4489: 4400: 4399: 4219: 4214: 4209: 4033:You may request 3948:User:Nickpwarren 3707: 3616: 3592: 3586: 3582: 3576: 3514: 3513: 3371: 3370: 3365: 3364: 3359: 3358: 3353: 3324: 3267: 3238: 3213: 2939:You may request 2862: 2861: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2513:I disagree with 2473: 2468: 2463: 2414: 2413: 2328: 2327: 2322: 2321: 2316: 2315: 2310: 2281: 2214: 2168: 2127:check to confirm 2057:User:Cyphoidbomb 2040:User:Cyphoidbomb 1905:Draft:Inca Písac 1701: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1652: 1651: 1646: 1617: 1601: 1599: 1500: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1373: 1365: 1311: 1303: 1268: 1265: 1233: 1230: 1179: 1171: 1145: 1137: 1089: 1053: 1043: 1002:Joseph I. Castro 987:Joseph I. Castro 928: 927: 758: 694:cambridge source 672: 667: 662: 561: 560: 375: 343: 342: 337: 336: 331: 330: 325: 296: 187:- Please review 118:Hayley Griffiths 69: 59: 31: 30: 11313: 11312: 11308: 11307: 11306: 11304: 11303: 11302: 11284:Robert McClenon 11234:Robert McClenon 11196:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 11146:Robert McClenon 11108:Robert McClenon 11073:Robert McClenon 10972: 10910: 10893: 10862:Robert McClenon 10859: 10847:Robert McClenon 10807:Robert McClenon 10747: 10707:Robert McClenon 10612:Robert McClenon 10572: 10554:Robert McClenon 10526:Robert McClenon 10495: 10475: 10457:McClenon mobile 10426: 10405:Robert McClenon 10372: 10354:Robert McClenon 10318: 10300:Robert McClenon 10271: 10225:Robert McClenon 10135: 10131: 10108: 10086:Robert McClenon 10050: 10018:Robert McClenon 9981: 9971:Robert McClenon 9950: 9945:if you prefer. 9901: 9865:Robert McClenon 9852:Robert McClenon 9820: 9802:Robert McClenon 9770: 9734: 9705:Robert McClenon 9686:Robert McClenon 9682:User talk:WilyD 9609: 9605: 9582: 9560:Robert McClenon 9507:Hello Robert, 9471: 9467: 9444: 9420: 9382: 9364:Robert McClenon 9337: 9319:Robert McClenon 9295: 9266: 9260: 9241: 9221: 9201:Robert McClenon 9184:Robert McClenon 9145: 9140: 9102:McClenon mobile 9098: 9078:Robert McClenon 9024:Robert McClenon 8987: 8935:Robert McClenon 8904:Robert McClenon 8856: 8836:Robert McClenon 8808: 8762:Robert McClenon 8746:Robert McClenon 8710: 8652:McClenon mobile 8604:Robert McClenon 8559: 8537:Robert McClenon 8492:Robert McClenon 8477:Robert McClenon 8429: 8397:Robert McClenon 8365: 8360: 8359: 8354: 8350: 8345: 8341: 8336: 8332: 8327: 8323: 8315: 8311: 8303: 8299: 8294: 8290: 8283: 8279: 8260: 8252: 8148: 8143: 8133:Robert McClenon 8111: 8105:if you prefer. 8063: 8037:Robert McClenon 8008: 7986:Robert McClenon 7969:seadoubleyoujay 7968: 7957:Robert McClenon 7954: 7942:Robert McClenon 7921:Robert McClenon 7917:game notability 7904:seadoubleyoujay 7903: 7895:Half-Life: Alyx 7886: 7848:Robert McClenon 7801:Robert McClenon 7737: 7735:Chaeyoung draft 7706: 7680:Robert McClenon 7676:double entendre 7635: 7629: 7622: 7588:Robert McClenon 7564: 7562:Rubiaceae stubs 7546:Robert McClenon 7514: 7512:Reinhard Pfundt 7496:Robert McClenon 7464: 7429:Robert McClenon 7415:Robert McClenon 7400:Robert McClenon 7375: 7357:Robert McClenon 7349:User:Andrew nyr 7314: 7293:McClenon mobile 7269: 7248: 7247: 7210: 7122:Robert McClenon 7090:Robert McClenon 7057: 7037: 7001:Robert McClenon 6993:User:SlimVirgin 6954:Robert McClenon 6946:User:SlimVirgin 6911:Robert McClenon 6890:Robert McClenon 6854:Robert McClenon 6840:Robert McClenon 6808: 6790:Robert McClenon 6749: 6731:Robert McClenon 6703:Did you notice 6701: 6679:weevil invasion 6658: 6640:Robert McClenon 6603: 6598: 6588:Robert McClenon 6566: 6560:if you prefer. 6518: 6486:Robert McClenon 6473:Robert McClenon 6428: 6409:Robert_McClenon 6405: 6386: 6361:Robert McClenon 6358: 6355: 6337:Robert McClenon 6288: 6270:Robert McClenon 6246: 6197: 6154: 6119: 6092: 6048:Robert McClenon 6020: 5992: 5918:Robert McClenon 5900:Robert McClenon 5879:Robert McClenon 5838: 5818:Robert McClenon 5771: 5758:Robert McClenon 5733:Robert McClenon 5696: 5690: 5683: 5660: 5645:Robert McClenon 5629: 5609:Robert McClenon 5605:adjusts glasses 5591:reliable source 5547:adjusts glasses 5533:Robert McClenon 5508:Robert McClenon 5500:Talk:Jeff Bezos 5474: 5451: 5442: 5440: 5428:Robert McClenon 5401: 5397:Hello, Robert, 5395: 5373: 5335: 5322: 5304: 5272: 5270: 5263:Speedy deletion 5240: 5218:Robert McClenon 5185:Robert McClenon 5161:Robert McClenon 5108: 5092: 5089: 5057:Robert McClenon 5052:Deletion Review 5010:Robert McClenon 4989:Robert McClenon 4961: 4953: 4841: 4818: 4751: 4695:Robert McClenon 4626: 4608:Robert McClenon 4599: 4597: 4577: 4571:this discussion 4567: 4547:Robert McClenon 4517: 4504:Robert McClenon 4470: 4463: 4373: 4369: 4346: 4323: 4287:Robert McClenon 4264:Robert McClenon 4217: 4212: 4207: 4187:Robert McClenon 4170:Robert McClenon 4150:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4136: 4099:Robert McClenon 4064: 4017: 3996:Robert McClenon 3960:David E. Rutter 3924: 3906:Robert McClenon 3865:Robert McClenon 3844:Robert McClenon 3804: 3740:Robert McClenon 3716: 3693: 3686: 3668:Robert McClenon 3605: 3600:Need your help 3590: 3584: 3580: 3574: 3566: 3546:Robert McClenon 3487: 3483: 3460: 3436:Robert McClenon 3405:Robert McClenon 3368: 3367: 3362: 3361: 3356: 3355: 3354:and remove the 3322: 3320: 3299:Robert McClenon 3263: 3232: 3207: 3195:Robert McClenon 3157:Robert McClenon 3142:Robert McClenon 3100:Thanks dude! -- 3093: 3075:Robert McClenon 3052:Robert McClenon 2974: 2923: 2900:Robert McClenon 2835: 2831: 2808: 2765:Robert McClenon 2760:User:LouisAlain 2720: 2693: 2691:Just a heads up 2673:Robert McClenon 2637:User:EdJohnston 2624:Robert McClenon 2620:user:EdJohnston 2592: 2570: 2565: 2560: 2543:Robert McClenon 2524:Robert McClenon 2501:Robert McClenon 2471: 2466: 2461: 2456: 2446:Robert McClenon 2387: 2383: 2360: 2325: 2324: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2312: 2311:and remove the 2279: 2277: 2256:Robert McClenon 2210: 2166: 2163: 2156:Speedy deletion 2115: 2081: 2061:Robert McClenon 2044:Robert McClenon 2016: 1984:Robert McClenon 1949:Robert McClenon 1945: 1925:Robert McClenon 1860: 1842:Robert McClenon 1810:User:Bryan.Wade 1806: 1783:Robert McClenon 1767:Robert McClenon 1738: 1695: 1661: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1647:and remove the 1615: 1613: 1597: 1595: 1572: 1554:Robert McClenon 1550:Hindi Knowledge 1536:Robert McClenon 1528:User:Jay1Rudra1 1493: 1491:Sunil Prem Vyas 1459:Robert McClenon 1450: 1448: 1400: 1369: 1361: 1347:Robert McClenon 1334:Robert McClenon 1307: 1299: 1285:Robert McClenon 1273: 1266: 1263: 1248:Robert McClenon 1238: 1231: 1228: 1213:Robert McClenon 1175: 1167: 1141: 1133: 1105:Robert McClenon 1101: 1087: 1076: 1071: 1061:Robert McClenon 1039: 1033:if you prefer. 991: 965:Robert McClenon 901: 897: 874: 865: 855:Robert McClenon 840: 811:Robert McClenon 732:Robert McClenon 683: 678: 670: 665: 660: 644: 619:Robert McClenon 534: 530: 507: 483:Robert McClenon 436:Robert McClenon 424:Deletion Review 371: 340: 339: 334: 333: 328: 327: 326:and remove the 294: 292: 289:Draft:Quantenna 271: 264: 254:Robert McClenon 239: 212: 194:Robert McClenon 166:Robert McClenon 149:Robert McClenon 120: 55: 40:Robert McClenon 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 11311: 11299: 11297: 11296: 11295: 11294: 11246: 11245: 11244: 11175: 11174: 11173: 11172: 11171: 11170: 11142: 11135: 11134: 11133: 11104: 11103: 11102: 11061:discrimination 10971: 10968: 10967: 10966: 10965: 10964: 10916: 10915: 10907: 10901: 10890: 10880: 10879: 10878: 10877: 10876: 10875: 10874: 10873: 10871: 10746: 10743: 10742: 10741: 10740: 10739: 10738: 10737: 10736: 10735: 10725:Simon Aronsson 10690:Simon Aronsson 10683: 10682: 10681: 10680: 10670:Simon Aronsson 10662: 10661: 10660: 10659: 10653: 10652: 10651: 10650: 10644: 10643: 10642: 10641: 10627: 10625: 10624: 10623: 10622: 10592:Simon Aronsson 10571: 10568: 10567: 10566: 10565: 10564: 10494: 10491: 10474: 10471: 10470: 10469: 10468: 10467: 10425: 10422: 10420: 10418: 10417: 10416: 10415: 10371: 10368: 10367: 10366: 10365: 10364: 10317: 10314: 10313: 10312: 10311: 10310: 10270: 10267: 10238: 10237: 10236: 10235: 10168: 10166: 10165: 10164: 10163: 10129: 10107: 10100: 10099: 10098: 10097: 10096: 10049: 10046: 10031: 10030: 10029: 10028: 10001:User:Starzoner 9932:grading scheme 9919: 9916: 9902: 9900: 9889: 9888: 9887: 9886: 9885: 9884: 9883: 9848:User:Sulfurboy 9819: 9816: 9815: 9814: 9813: 9812: 9769: 9766: 9765: 9764: 9760: 9757: 9754: 9751: 9748: 9746: 9745: 9744: 9743: 9742: 9741: 9718: 9717: 9716: 9715: 9696: 9642: 9640: 9639: 9638: 9637: 9603: 9581: 9574: 9573: 9572: 9571: 9570: 9504: 9502: 9501: 9500: 9499: 9465: 9443: 9436: 9419: 9416: 9400:Sheijiashaojun 9381: 9378: 9377: 9376: 9375: 9374: 9336: 9333: 9332: 9331: 9330: 9329: 9294: 9287: 9264: 9262:Hi McClenon, 9259: 9256: 9240: 9237: 9220: 9217: 9216: 9215: 9214: 9213: 9212: 9211: 9144: 9141: 9127: 9097: 9094: 9093: 9092: 9091: 9090: 9089: 9088: 9037: 9036: 9035: 9034: 8986: 8983: 8968: 8967: 8966: 8965: 8964: 8963: 8962: 8961: 8960: 8959: 8931:User:Rosiestep 8900:User:Rosiestep 8855: 8852: 8851: 8850: 8849: 8848: 8847: 8846: 8832:User:Barkeep49 8803: 8802: 8801: 8800: 8786: 8785: 8784: 8783: 8730:User:Barkeep49 8718:User:Barkeep49 8709: 8706: 8705: 8704: 8703: 8702: 8701: 8700: 8699: 8698: 8697: 8696: 8669: 8668: 8667: 8666: 8665: 8664: 8663: 8662: 8641: 8640: 8639: 8638: 8637: 8636: 8617: 8616: 8615: 8614: 8558: 8555: 8554: 8553: 8552: 8551: 8550: 8549: 8548: 8547: 8487: 8428: 8425: 8410: 8409: 8408: 8407: 8364: 8361: 8358: 8357: 8348: 8339: 8330: 8321: 8309: 8297: 8288: 8276: 8275: 8274: 8273: 8254:TransporterMan 8150:Dear Robert, 8147: 8144: 8128: 8127: 8118: 8089:grading scheme 8078: 8064: 8062: 8051: 8050: 8049: 8048: 8047: 8028:User:Starzoner 8007: 8004: 8003: 8002: 8001: 8000: 7999: 7998: 7997: 7996: 7931: 7915:I will review 7885: 7882: 7881: 7880: 7879: 7878: 7877: 7876: 7875: 7874: 7873: 7872: 7826: 7757:korea herald 2 7736: 7733: 7732: 7731: 7730: 7729: 7728: 7727: 7726: 7725: 7621: 7618: 7617: 7616: 7615: 7614: 7613: 7612: 7563: 7560: 7559: 7558: 7557: 7556: 7513: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7506: 7463: 7460: 7459: 7458: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7454: 7425: 7410: 7374: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7313: 7307: 7306: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7268: 7265: 7209: 7206: 7176: 7175: 7174: 7173: 7172: 7171: 7170: 7169: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7056: 7053: 7036: 7033: 7031: 7029: 7028: 7027: 7026: 7025: 7024: 7023: 7022: 7011: 6979: 6927: 6926: 6925: 6924: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6900: 6850: 6807: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6801: 6800: 6748: 6745: 6744: 6743: 6742: 6741: 6700: 6697: 6694: 6693: 6674: 6673: 6668: 6657: 6654: 6653: 6652: 6651: 6650: 6602: 6599: 6583: 6582: 6573: 6544:grading scheme 6533: 6519: 6517: 6506: 6505: 6504: 6503: 6502: 6501: 6500: 6465:User:Vexations 6427:instead? Ping 6425:Talk:Linthorpe 6404: 6401: 6390:ElricFullMetal 6385: 6382: 6367:Kontoor Brands 6354: 6351: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6287: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6280: 6266:User:FCBlinder 6245: 6240: 6199:Hi there, I'm 6196: 6190: 6153: 6147: 6144: 6143: 6129: 6118: 6115: 6091: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6082: 6019: 6014: 6001:crossover. -- 5991: 5988: 5931: 5930: 5929: 5928: 5910: 5889: 5837: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5743: 5682: 5679: 5659: 5656: 5628: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5601: 5598: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5518: 5473: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5438: 5394: 5389: 5372: 5369: 5334: 5328: 5308: 5269: 5265:nomination of 5260: 5244:Draft:PayActiv 5239: 5238:Draft:PayActiv 5236: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5228: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5137: 5136: 5088: 5085: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 4960: 4957: 4927: 4926: 4922: 4921: 4914: 4907: 4896: 4888: 4887: 4876:New Pages Feed 4872: 4871: 4859: 4858: 4842: 4840: 4837: 4817: 4814: 4802:42.107.133.105 4767:Business World 4750: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4645: 4644: 4639: 4625: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4575: 4566: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4540: 4462: 4459: 4446: 4436: 4406: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4367: 4345: 4338: 4322: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4244: 4243: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4197: 4180: 4135: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4063: 4060: 4019:Hi there, I'm 4016: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 3923: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3803: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3777: 3776: 3755: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3736:User:FCBlinder 3715: 3712: 3685: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3623:AMPLIFYHER2020 3604: 3598: 3596: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3542:User:Mmizeasrm 3520: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3481: 3459: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3415: 3333:submission or 3319: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3152: 3092: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3049: 2973: 2966: 2925:Hi there, I'm 2922: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2873: 2870: 2868: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2829: 2807: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2724:Reinhold Fritz 2719: 2716: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2649:User:Abecedare 2591: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2511: 2455: 2450: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2381: 2359: 2352: 2290:submission or 2276: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2162: 2158:nomination of 2153: 2114: 2111: 2080: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2054: 2015: 2012: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1951: 1944: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1897:John Prattley 1859: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1814:User:ChopChop4 1805: 1798: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1737: 1734: 1694: 1688: 1626:submission or 1612: 1606: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1546: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1422: 1421: 1414: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1271: 1236: 1125: 1100: 1094: 1078:Hi. Regarding 1075: 1072: 1056: 1055: 1046: 1017:grading scheme 1006: 992: 990: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 957:User:Jziemniak 934: 932: 931: 930: 929: 895: 873: 866: 841: 839: 834:notification: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 745: 744: 743: 742: 682: 679: 645: 643: 638:notification: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 611:User:ColinFine 589: 567: 565: 564: 563: 562: 528: 506: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 477:) and spammy ( 467: 466: 382:Ravikrishnan72 370: 367: 305:submission or 291: 285: 270: 265: 240: 238: 233:notification: 228: 211: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 162: 161: 160: 159: 119: 116: 113: 112: 61: 60: 51: 50: 28: 27:Advertisement? 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 11310: 11301: 11293: 11289: 11285: 11280: 11276: 11272: 11268: 11264: 11261: 11260: 11259: 11255: 11251: 11247: 11243: 11239: 11235: 11231: 11227: 11223: 11219: 11215: 11211: 11207: 11206: 11205: 11201: 11197: 11193: 11189: 11185: 11181: 11177: 11176: 11169: 11165: 11161: 11157: 11156: 11155: 11151: 11147: 11143: 11140: 11136: 11132: 11128: 11124: 11119: 11118: 11117: 11113: 11109: 11105: 11101: 11097: 11093: 11089: 11088:general sense 11084: 11083: 11082: 11078: 11074: 11070: 11066: 11062: 11058: 11055: 11054: 11053: 11052: 11051: 11050: 11046: 11042: 11037: 11034: 11030: 11026: 11025:pop-scientist 11022: 11017: 11015: 11011: 11007: 11002: 11000: 10999:Science-level 10996: 10992: 10987: 10985: 10981: 10977: 10962: 10958: 10954: 10950: 10946: 10939: 10936: 10935: 10934: 10933: 10932: 10931: 10927: 10923: 10914: 10905: 10900: 10898: 10897: 10888: 10884: 10883: 10872: 10869: 10863: 10858: 10857: 10856: 10852: 10848: 10844: 10839: 10835: 10830: 10825: 10821: 10818: 10817: 10816: 10812: 10808: 10804: 10801: 10800: 10799: 10798: 10797: 10795: 10791: 10787: 10783: 10779: 10772: 10768: 10765: 10761: 10759: 10755: 10750: 10734: 10730: 10726: 10721: 10718: 10717: 10716: 10712: 10708: 10704: 10701: 10700: 10699: 10695: 10691: 10687: 10686: 10685: 10684: 10679: 10675: 10671: 10666: 10665: 10664: 10663: 10657: 10656: 10655: 10654: 10648: 10647: 10646: 10645: 10639: 10635: 10632: 10631: 10630: 10629: 10628: 10621: 10617: 10613: 10609: 10606: 10605: 10604: 10603: 10602: 10601: 10597: 10593: 10588: 10585: 10582: 10578: 10575: 10563: 10559: 10555: 10551: 10550: 10549: 10548: 10547: 10545: 10541: 10536: 10535: 10531: 10527: 10521: 10519: 10513: 10509: 10507: 10503: 10499: 10490: 10488: 10484: 10480: 10466: 10462: 10458: 10454: 10451: 10450: 10449: 10448: 10447: 10446: 10442: 10438: 10434: 10430: 10421: 10414: 10410: 10406: 10402: 10398: 10394: 10391: 10390: 10389: 10388: 10387: 10386: 10382: 10378: 10377:David.Tomanek 10363: 10359: 10355: 10351: 10347: 10344: 10343: 10342: 10341: 10340: 10339: 10335: 10331: 10327: 10323: 10309: 10305: 10301: 10297: 10293: 10289: 10286: 10285: 10284: 10283: 10282: 10281: 10277: 10266: 10265: 10261: 10257: 10252: 10251: 10247: 10243: 10234: 10230: 10226: 10222: 10218: 10214: 10210: 10206: 10202: 10198: 10195: 10194: 10193: 10192: 10191: 10190: 10186: 10182: 10178: 10176: 10172: 10159: 10155: 10151: 10147: 10143: 10139: 10134: 10130: 10128: 10127: 10125: 10122: 10119: 10115: 10112: 10111: 10110: 10105: 10095: 10091: 10087: 10083: 10079: 10075: 10071: 10068: 10067: 10066: 10065: 10064: 10063: 10059: 10055: 10045: 10044: 10040: 10036: 10027: 10023: 10019: 10014: 10010: 10006: 10002: 9999: 9998: 9997: 9996: 9995: 9994: 9990: 9986: 9980: 9976: 9972: 9969: 9966: 9963: 9957: 9955: 9953: 9946: 9944: 9940: 9935: 9933: 9929: 9925: 9920: 9915: 9913: 9906: 9898: 9894: 9882: 9878: 9874: 9870: 9866: 9863: 9862: 9861: 9857: 9853: 9849: 9846: 9845: 9844: 9843: 9842: 9841: 9837: 9833: 9829: 9825: 9811: 9807: 9803: 9799: 9795: 9792: 9791: 9790: 9789: 9788: 9785: 9784: 9780: 9775: 9774: 9768:Why rejected? 9763: 9762: 9761: 9758: 9755: 9752: 9749: 9740: 9737: 9732: 9728: 9724: 9723: 9722: 9721: 9720: 9719: 9714: 9710: 9706: 9702: 9697: 9695: 9691: 9687: 9683: 9679: 9675: 9672: 9671: 9670: 9669: 9668: 9667: 9663: 9659: 9655: 9654: 9650: 9646: 9633: 9629: 9625: 9621: 9617: 9613: 9608: 9604: 9602: 9601: 9599: 9596: 9593: 9589: 9586: 9585: 9584: 9579: 9569: 9565: 9561: 9556: 9552: 9549: 9548: 9547: 9546: 9545: 9544: 9540: 9536: 9532: 9531: 9527: 9523: 9518: 9515: 9512: 9508: 9505: 9495: 9491: 9487: 9483: 9479: 9475: 9470: 9466: 9464: 9463: 9461: 9458: 9455: 9451: 9448: 9447: 9446: 9441: 9435: 9434: 9430: 9426: 9418:Reyko Article 9415: 9413: 9409: 9405: 9401: 9397: 9391: 9387: 9373: 9369: 9365: 9361: 9358: 9357: 9356: 9355: 9354: 9353: 9349: 9345: 9344: 9328: 9324: 9320: 9316: 9315:User:Gryllida 9313: 9312: 9311: 9310: 9309: 9308: 9304: 9300: 9292: 9286: 9285: 9281: 9277: 9272: 9269: 9263: 9255: 9254: 9250: 9246: 9236: 9235: 9231: 9227: 9210: 9206: 9202: 9198: 9195: 9194: 9193: 9189: 9185: 9181: 9177: 9174: 9173: 9172: 9171: 9170: 9168: 9164: 9160: 9156: 9152: 9139: 9135: 9131: 9126: 9125: 9121: 9117: 9112: 9111: 9107: 9103: 9087: 9083: 9079: 9075: 9071: 9068: 9067: 9066: 9065: 9064: 9063: 9062: 9060: 9056: 9052: 9048: 9044: 9033: 9029: 9025: 9021: 9017: 9016:User:Paul_012 9013: 9010: 9009: 9008: 9007: 9006: 9005: 9001: 8997: 8992: 8982: 8981: 8977: 8973: 8958: 8954: 8950: 8947:Thank you. -- 8946: 8945: 8944: 8940: 8936: 8932: 8929: 8928: 8927: 8923: 8919: 8915: 8914: 8913: 8909: 8905: 8901: 8898: 8897: 8896: 8892: 8888: 8884: 8880: 8876: 8875: 8874: 8873: 8869: 8865: 8861: 8845: 8841: 8837: 8833: 8829: 8828: 8827: 8823: 8819: 8812: 8807: 8806: 8805: 8804: 8798: 8794: 8790: 8789: 8788: 8787: 8781: 8777: 8776: 8775: 8771: 8767: 8763: 8758: 8757: 8756: 8755: 8751: 8747: 8743: 8738: 8734: 8731: 8727: 8723: 8719: 8715: 8695: 8691: 8687: 8683: 8679: 8678: 8677: 8676: 8675: 8674: 8673: 8672: 8671: 8670: 8661: 8657: 8653: 8649: 8648: 8647: 8646: 8645: 8644: 8643: 8642: 8635: 8631: 8627: 8623: 8622: 8621: 8620: 8619: 8618: 8613: 8609: 8605: 8601: 8597: 8593: 8592: 8591: 8590: 8589: 8588: 8584: 8580: 8574: 8570: 8568: 8564: 8546: 8542: 8538: 8534: 8529: 8525: 8524:User:Paul 012 8522: 8521: 8520: 8516: 8512: 8508: 8503: 8502: 8501: 8497: 8493: 8488: 8486: 8482: 8478: 8474: 8473:User:Paul 012 8471: 8470: 8469: 8468: 8467: 8466: 8462: 8458: 8454: 8453:WP:PAGEDECIDE 8450: 8446: 8441: 8438: 8434: 8424: 8423: 8419: 8415: 8406: 8402: 8398: 8394: 8391: 8390: 8389: 8388: 8387: 8386: 8382: 8378: 8373: 8369: 8352: 8343: 8334: 8325: 8318: 8313: 8306: 8301: 8292: 8286: 8281: 8277: 8267: 8263: 8257: 8255: 8249: 8245: 8244: 8243: 8242: 8238: 8234: 8230: 8227: 8223: 8219: 8215: 8211: 8208: 8204: 8200: 8196: 8193: 8190: 8186: 8183: 8180: 8176: 8172: 8168: 8165: 8161: 8158: 8154: 8151: 8142: 8138: 8134: 8131: 8124: 8119: 8116: 8114: 8108: 8107: 8106: 8104: 8100: 8096: 8090: 8086: 8082: 8077: 8075: 8068: 8060: 8056: 8046: 8042: 8038: 8034: 8029: 8026: 8025: 8024: 8023: 8022: 8021: 8017: 8013: 7995: 7991: 7987: 7983: 7979: 7976: 7975: 7974: 7971: 7964: 7958: 7953: 7952: 7951: 7947: 7943: 7939: 7935: 7932: 7930: 7926: 7922: 7918: 7914: 7913: 7912: 7911: 7910: 7909: 7906: 7900: 7896: 7892: 7891:Halo Infinite 7871: 7867: 7863: 7859: 7858: 7857: 7853: 7849: 7845: 7842: 7841: 7840: 7836: 7832: 7827: 7825: 7821: 7817: 7812: 7811: 7810: 7806: 7802: 7798: 7794: 7791: 7790: 7789: 7788: 7787: 7786: 7782: 7778: 7774: 7773:IBT Singapore 7770: 7766: 7762: 7758: 7754: 7750: 7746: 7742: 7724: 7720: 7716: 7715:Peter coxhead 7710: 7705: 7704: 7703: 7699: 7695: 7691: 7690: 7689: 7685: 7681: 7677: 7673: 7672:labor of love 7669: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7660: 7656: 7652: 7651: 7650: 7649: 7645: 7641: 7640:Peter coxhead 7634: 7627: 7611: 7607: 7603: 7599: 7598: 7597: 7593: 7589: 7585: 7584:User:CNMall41 7582: 7581: 7580: 7579: 7578: 7577: 7573: 7569: 7555: 7551: 7547: 7543: 7539: 7538: 7537: 7536: 7535: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7522: 7518: 7505: 7501: 7497: 7493: 7490: 7489: 7488: 7487: 7486: 7485: 7481: 7477: 7473: 7469: 7453: 7449: 7445: 7444:Integritas888 7440: 7439: 7438: 7434: 7430: 7426: 7424: 7420: 7416: 7411: 7409: 7405: 7401: 7397: 7394: 7393: 7392: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7385: 7381: 7380:Integritas888 7366: 7362: 7358: 7354: 7350: 7347: 7346: 7345: 7341: 7337: 7333: 7329: 7325: 7321: 7316: 7315: 7312: 7302: 7298: 7294: 7290: 7287: 7286: 7285: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7278: 7274: 7264: 7263: 7259: 7255: 7254: 7253: 7241: 7240: 7236: 7234: 7230: 7225: 7223: 7219: 7215: 7205: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7191: 7187: 7181: 7164: 7160: 7156: 7155:GrammarDamner 7151: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7141: 7137: 7136:GrammarDamner 7133: 7132: 7131: 7127: 7123: 7119: 7118:Third Opinion 7115: 7114: 7113: 7109: 7105: 7104:GrammarDamner 7101: 7100: 7099: 7095: 7091: 7087: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7080: 7079: 7075: 7071: 7070:GrammarDamner 7067: 7063: 7052: 7051: 7047: 7043: 7042:PoliticalEddy 7032: 7021: 7016: 7012: 7010: 7006: 7002: 6998: 6994: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6984: 6980: 6978: 6973: 6969: 6965: 6964: 6963: 6959: 6955: 6951: 6947: 6943: 6942: 6941: 6936: 6932: 6928: 6920: 6916: 6912: 6908: 6904: 6901: 6899: 6895: 6891: 6887: 6883: 6880: 6879: 6878: 6874: 6870: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6859: 6855: 6851: 6849: 6845: 6841: 6837: 6833: 6829: 6826: 6825: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6817: 6813: 6799: 6795: 6791: 6787: 6783: 6779: 6778:User:Viktorpp 6776: 6775: 6774: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6767: 6763: 6759: 6754: 6740: 6736: 6732: 6728: 6725: 6724: 6723: 6722: 6721: 6720: 6716: 6713: 6710: 6706: 6692: 6688: 6684: 6680: 6676: 6675: 6672: 6669: 6666: 6661: 6649: 6645: 6641: 6637: 6633: 6629: 6628: 6627: 6626: 6625: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6612: 6608: 6597: 6593: 6589: 6586: 6579: 6574: 6571: 6569: 6563: 6562: 6561: 6559: 6555: 6551: 6545: 6541: 6537: 6532: 6530: 6523: 6515: 6511: 6499: 6495: 6491: 6487: 6484: 6483: 6482: 6478: 6474: 6470: 6466: 6463: 6462: 6461: 6457: 6453: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6442: 6438: 6432: 6426: 6422: 6418: 6414: 6410: 6400: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6381: 6380: 6376: 6372: 6371:FelixtheNomad 6368: 6362: 6346: 6342: 6338: 6333: 6329: 6326: 6325: 6324: 6323: 6322: 6320: 6316: 6312: 6308: 6304: 6296: 6295: 6291: 6279: 6275: 6271: 6267: 6264: 6263: 6262: 6261: 6260: 6259: 6255: 6251: 6244: 6243:Arash Shakour 6239: 6238: 6234: 6230: 6225: 6223: 6222:WP:REFUND/G13 6218: 6216: 6211: 6208: 6206: 6202: 6194: 6189: 6188: 6184: 6183: 6182: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6163: 6159: 6151: 6142: 6138: 6134: 6130: 6127: 6123: 6122: 6114: 6113: 6109: 6105: 6101: 6097: 6081: 6077: 6073: 6069: 6064: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6053: 6049: 6045: 6044:User:Paul 012 6042: 6041: 6040: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6025: 6018: 6013: 6012: 6008: 6004: 5998: 5997: 5987: 5985: 5981: 5977: 5973: 5969: 5961: 5959: 5955: 5951: 5947: 5943: 5937: 5927: 5923: 5919: 5915: 5911: 5909: 5905: 5901: 5897: 5893: 5892:User:Zzhu8516 5890: 5888: 5884: 5880: 5876: 5875:User:Zzhu8516 5873: 5872: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5859: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5848: 5844: 5836: 5827: 5823: 5819: 5815: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5806: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5793:User:kingboyk 5791: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5774: 5769: 5768: 5767: 5763: 5759: 5755: 5751: 5747: 5746:User:kingboyk 5744: 5742: 5738: 5734: 5730: 5726: 5725:User:kingboyk 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5708: 5704: 5699: 5693: 5688: 5678: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5655: 5654: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5638: 5637:autobiography 5634: 5631:Well, well. 5618: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5602: 5599: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5584: 5583:User:kingboyk 5581: 5580: 5579: 5575: 5571: 5570: 5564: 5560: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5538: 5534: 5530: 5526: 5522: 5519: 5517: 5513: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5497: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5485: 5481: 5480: 5472: 5463: 5459: 5457: 5456: 5448: 5439: 5437: 5433: 5429: 5425: 5424:fait accompli 5421: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5409: 5407: 5406: 5398: 5393: 5388: 5387: 5383: 5379: 5368: 5367: 5363: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5339: 5333: 5327: 5326: 5320: 5319: 5314: 5313: 5307: 5302: 5297: 5293: 5288: 5286: 5282: 5268: 5264: 5259: 5258: 5254: 5250: 5245: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5207: 5203: 5202: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5190: 5186: 5181: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5157: 5153: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5142: 5133: 5129: 5125: 5121: 5116: 5112: 5107: 5103: 5099: 5095: 5091: 5090: 5084: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5074:Paleface Jack 5066: 5062: 5058: 5053: 5049: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5037: 5033: 5032:Paleface Jack 5030: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5003: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4994: 4990: 4986: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4974: 4970: 4969:Paleface Jack 4966: 4956: 4952: 4950: 4944: 4941: 4939: 4935: 4931: 4924: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4912: 4911:resource page 4908: 4905: 4901: 4897: 4894: 4890: 4889: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4881: 4877: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4864: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4848: 4836: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4813: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4792: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4754: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4715: 4711: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4655: 4648: 4643: 4640: 4638: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4629: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4605: 4595: 4594:User:Rosguill 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4572: 4565:DRN talk page 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4541: 4539: 4534: 4533: 4528: 4527: 4522: 4521: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4500: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4487: 4486: 4481: 4480: 4475: 4474: 4468: 4458: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4444: 4441: 4440: 4434: 4432: 4428: 4423: 4420: 4419: 4415: 4412: 4411: 4407: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4372: 4368: 4366: 4365: 4363: 4360: 4357: 4353: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4343: 4337: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4302: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4257: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4233: 4224: 4221: 4220: 4215: 4210: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4198: 4196: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4181: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4142: 4141: 4123: 4120: 4118: 4117: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4081: 4079: 4078: 4073: 4069: 4059: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4045: 4043: 4042:WP:REFUND/G13 4038: 4036: 4031: 4028: 4026: 4022: 4014: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3898:User:Fsmatovu 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3878:User:Wkigenyi 3866: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3836:User:Fsmatovu 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3815: 3813: 3812:User:Wkigenyi 3808: 3802: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3778: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3711: 3710: 3705: 3702: 3699: 3698: 3691: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3664:Karlyn Percil 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3613: 3608: 3603: 3597: 3594: 3589: 3579: 3570: 3562: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3486: 3482: 3480: 3479: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3467: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3457: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3380: 3378: 3373: 3352: 3347: 3342: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3318: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3236: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216:Draft:Traackr 3211: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3174: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3153: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3122:Draft:Traackr 3119: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3050: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2971: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2951: 2949: 2948:WP:REFUND/G13 2944: 2942: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2928: 2920: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2834: 2830: 2828: 2827: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2815: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2805: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2761: 2757: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2705:Elijahandskip 2702: 2698: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2577: 2574: 2573: 2568: 2563: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2475: 2474: 2469: 2464: 2454: 2449: 2447: 2442: 2440: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2421: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2386: 2382: 2380: 2379: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2357: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2337: 2335: 2330: 2309: 2304: 2299: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2275: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2213: 2208: 2203: 2199: 2193: 2192: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2172: 2161: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2090: 2084: 2079: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976:User:Goldie19 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1952: 1950: 1943: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887:John Prattley 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1863: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1803: 1797: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1693: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1671: 1666: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1633: 1632:Aarthi Ganesh 1629: 1625: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1497: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1403: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1366: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1352: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1304: 1302: 1297: 1296: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1269: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1234: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1189:- Threads in 1188: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1172: 1170: 1165: 1164: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1138: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1113: 1108: 1106: 1098: 1093: 1092: 1085: 1081: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1052: 1047: 1044: 1042: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1003: 996: 988: 984: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 946: 942: 938: 935: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 900: 896: 894: 893: 891: 888: 885: 881: 878: 877: 876: 871: 864: 860: 856: 852: 845: 837: 833: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 756: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 695: 691: 686: 677: 674: 673: 668: 663: 657:. Thanks! -- 656: 649: 641: 637: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 591:Suarezmartell 587: 584: 581: 577: 573: 569: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 533: 529: 527: 526: 524: 521: 518: 514: 513:Suarezmartell 511: 510: 509: 504: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 471:User:RHaworth 469: 468: 465: 461: 458: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 412: 411:User:RHaworth 408: 404: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 366: 365: 361: 357: 352: 350: 345: 324: 319: 314: 312: 308: 304: 290: 284: 282: 278: 275: 269: 263: 259: 255: 251: 244: 236: 232: 227: 225: 221: 217: 203: 199: 195: 190: 186: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 174: 170: 167: 158: 154: 150: 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 138: 134: 130: 125: 111: 109: 105: 100: 97: 96: 91: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 68: 63: 62: 58: 53: 52: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 32: 19: 11298: 11279:User:Kudpung 11263:User:Birulik 11210:User:Kudpung 11188:David_Gerard 11139:the Teahouse 11087: 11068: 11065:discriminate 11057:User:Birulik 11038: 11018: 11013: 11009: 11005: 11003: 10988: 10979: 10973: 10943:— Preceding 10919: 10908: 10903: 10895: 10894: 10843:the Teahouse 10776:— Preceding 10773: 10769: 10766: 10762: 10751: 10748: 10626: 10589: 10586: 10583: 10579: 10576: 10573: 10537: 10522: 10514: 10510: 10496: 10476: 10427: 10419: 10373: 10350:the Teahouse 10346:User:Edproms 10319: 10296:the Teahouse 10292:the Teahouse 10272: 10253: 10239: 10221:the Teahouse 10213:the Teahouse 10179: 10167: 10120: 10109: 10082:the Teahouse 10074:the Teahouse 10051: 10048:Song article 10032: 9982: 9967: 9958: 9949: 9947: 9936: 9923: 9921: 9917: 9910: 9827: 9821: 9786: 9776: 9771: 9759: 9756: 9753: 9750: 9747: 9678:the Teahouse 9656: 9641: 9594: 9583: 9533: 9519: 9516: 9513: 9509: 9506: 9503: 9456: 9445: 9421: 9394:— Preceding 9383: 9362:Thank you. 9341: 9338: 9296: 9273: 9270: 9267: 9261: 9242: 9222: 9149:— Preceding 9146: 9113: 9099: 9041:— Preceding 9038: 8988: 8969: 8857: 8796: 8739: 8735: 8711: 8681: 8596:the Teahouse 8575: 8571: 8560: 8448: 8442: 8436: 8430: 8411: 8374: 8370: 8366: 8351: 8342: 8333: 8324: 8312: 8300: 8291: 8280: 8253: 8231: 8228: 8224: 8220: 8216: 8212: 8209: 8205: 8201: 8197: 8194: 8191: 8187: 8184: 8181: 8177: 8173: 8169: 8166: 8164:notability. 8162: 8159: 8155: 8152: 8149: 8129: 8110: 8092: 8080: 8072: 8009: 7982:the Teahouse 7938:the Teahouse 7887: 7753:Korea Herald 7738: 7623: 7565: 7525:Gerda Arendt 7515: 7476:Gerda Arendt 7465: 7376: 7331: 7270: 7246: 7245: 7242: 7237: 7229:original ARC 7226: 7211: 7184:— Preceding 7177: 7058: 7038: 7030: 6907:the Teahouse 6886:the Teahouse 6832:the Teahouse 6809: 6750: 6702: 6670: 6604: 6584: 6565: 6547: 6535: 6527: 6469:User:Johnbod 6406: 6387: 6356: 6328:User:Afunk45 6301:— Preceding 6297: 6292: 6289: 6247: 6226: 6219: 6215:Userfication 6212: 6209: 6198: 6180: 6179: 6165: 6155: 6093: 6062: 6021: 5999: 5993: 5966:— Preceding 5962: 5940:— Preceding 5932: 5914:the Teahouse 5839: 5801:Sandrah.Akol 5692:Sandrah.Akol 5684: 5668:Sandrah.Akol 5661: 5630: 5604: 5567: 5546: 5477: 5475: 5454: 5453: 5446: 5404: 5403: 5399: 5396: 5374: 5349: 5343: 5316: 5310: 5291: 5289: 5278: 5249:Cardei012597 5241: 5214:User:Cryptic 5199: 5180:User:Lourdes 5152:User:Cryptic 5138: 5071: 5026: 4962: 4954: 4945: 4942: 4928: 4891:There is an 4873: 4860: 4852: 4819: 4796:— Preceding 4793: 4775:— Preceding 4755: 4752: 4718:— Preceding 4683:the Teahouse 4679:User:Wundzer 4652:— Preceding 4649: 4646: 4630: 4627: 4603: 4580: 4579: 4568: 4531: 4525: 4519: 4484: 4478: 4472: 4464: 4448:210.6.22.101 4445: 4442: 4438: 4435: 4424: 4421: 4417: 4416: 4413: 4408: 4405: 4358: 4352:210.6.22.101 4347: 4327:Nightenbelle 4324: 4283:User:Lourdes 4256:User:Lourdes 4205: 4183:User:Kudpung 4166:User:Lourdes 4144:I'd co-nom, 4143: 4137: 4115: 4091:User:Teemeah 4076: 4071: 4067: 4065: 4062:Draft:Ayanga 4046: 4039: 4035:Userfication 4032: 4029: 4018: 3992:the Teahouse 3925: 3902:the Teahouse 3874: 3840:the Teahouse 3816: 3809: 3805: 3754: 3717: 3696: 3687: 3658:should have 3656:User:Bearcat 3648:User:Bearcat 3617:— Preceding 3612:User:Bearcat 3609: 3607:Hi Robert, 3606: 3595: 3571: 3567: 3560: 3524: 3519: 3472: 3461: 3432:User:Bkissin 3401:User:Bkissin 3381: 3374: 3363:{{db-draft}} 3343: 3328: 3268:— Preceding 3264: 3239:Thanks man! 3173:MY RESPONSE: 3172: 3171: 3138:the Teahouse 3094: 3071:User:Lapablo 3006:User:Lapablo 2975: 2968:About Draft 2952: 2945: 2941:Userfication 2938: 2935: 2924: 2876: 2867: 2820: 2809: 2784:Gerda Arendt 2778: 2740:Gerda Arendt 2735: 2727: 2721: 2694: 2661:topic-banned 2593: 2558: 2537:satisfies a 2459: 2457: 2443: 2436: 2422: 2419: 2372: 2361: 2338: 2331: 2320:{{db-draft}} 2300: 2296:Intersection 2285: 2233: 2197: 2195: 2194: 2187:. Under the 2174: 2173: 2164: 2135: 2119:Mystery Jets 2116: 2102: 2089:this article 2087: 2085: 2082: 2017: 1998: 1980:the Teahouse 1953: 1946: 1921:the Teahouse 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1807: 1787:Namnguyen408 1781: 1743:Namnguyen408 1739: 1696: 1674: 1667: 1656:{{db-draft}} 1636: 1621: 1583: 1573: 1532:the Teahouse 1501:— Preceding 1499:Thank you. 1498: 1494: 1473:CaroleHenson 1454: 1429:CaroleHenson 1426: 1423: 1404: 1401: 1368: 1360: 1356: 1306: 1298: 1294: 1281:Girth Summit 1174: 1166: 1162: 1153: 1140: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1120: 1116:Girth Summit 1109: 1102: 1077: 1074:John Shields 1057: 1038: 1020: 1008: 1000: 939: 936: 933: 886: 875: 807:the Teahouse 759:— Preceding 728:the Teahouse 698: 687: 685:Hey Robert, 684: 681:Hello Robert 658: 588: 585: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 519: 508: 456: 376:— Preceding 372: 353: 346: 335:{{db-draft}} 315: 300: 272: 213: 163: 121: 101: 98: 92: 70:— Preceding 64: 56: 11141:for advice. 11010:all editors 10949:Ivan gurkov 10922:WikiAviator 10782:Ivan gurkov 10574:Hi Robert, 10437:Lavateraguy 9824:saying here 9517:Thank you. 9276:Thisissegun 8557:DRN closure 8192:IN SUMMARY 7749:Elite Daily 7289:User:GDX420 6997:User:Gdx420 6950:User:GDX420 6944:Thank you, 6903:User:GDX420 6882:User:GDX420 6828:User:GDX420 6605:Please see 5502:whether to 4628:Hi Robert, 4199:Thank you. 3932:Nickpwarren 3922:Corda draft 3697:SMcCandlish 3399:Thank you, 2425:HumOutcomes 2366:HumOutcomes 2252:User:Cabayi 2104:JosephJames 2024:Cyphoidbomb 1325:User:Dmehus 1321:User:Dmehus 1187:User:Dmehus 1009:Start-Class 216:Aureliojohn 185:User:Pmsouc 145:User:Pmsouc 11059:- Look up 10980:discussion 9555:User:WilyD 9425:Bluevespa8 9100:Nothing. 8199:sources. 8179:subject" 8081:Stub-Class 8033:notability 7521:Gewandhaus 7336:Andrew nyr 7233:latest ARC 7190:WikiWhizz2 6488:, thanks! 6229:HasteurBot 6201:HasteurBot 6024:WP:SPINOUT 5358:Lithopsian 5094:Pipara (0) 4880:WP:RPATROL 4861:The first 4543:User:L293D 4499:User:L293D 4049:HasteurBot 4021:HasteurBot 3522:article. 3369:{{db-g13}} 3357:{{db-afc}} 3295:User:Quipa 3030:ipso facto 2955:HasteurBot 2927:HasteurBot 2641:User:Bbb23 2604:EdJohnston 2326:{{db-g13}} 2314:{{db-afc}} 2098:Largoplazo 1917:Talk:Písac 1802:WP:NOTHERE 1662:{{db-g13}} 1650:{{db-afc}} 1507:Jay1Rudra1 1357:Doug Mehus 1295:Doug Mehus 1163:Doug Mehus 1129:Doug Mehus 853:. Thanks! 795:User:Flalf 757:article. 716:User:Flalf 341:{{db-g13}} 329:{{db-afc}} 252:. Thanks! 164:Thank you 11218:sarcastic 10984:initiated 9985:Starzoner 9952:help desk 9928:talk page 9873:Sulfurboy 9832:Sulfurboy 8949:Rosiestep 8918:Rosiestep 8887:Rosiestep 8864:Rosiestep 8811:Barkeep49 8797:obviously 8766:Barkeep49 8722:User:El_C 8427:Splitting 8113:help desk 8095:Knowledge 8085:talk page 8012:Starzoner 8006:Salomonia 7769:IDN times 7761:IBT India 7709:Starzoner 7694:Starzoner 7655:Starzoner 7626:Starzoner 6884:- Ask at 6727:User:Tvx1 6683:Sulfurboy 6681:of 2020. 6568:help desk 6550:Knowledge 6540:talk page 6490:Vexations 6437:Vexations 6417:Linthorpe 6403:Linthorpe 6353:Thank you 6250:FCBlinder 6003:SmokeyJoe 5687:WP:REFUND 4925:Refresher 4870:Redirects 4826:FCBlinder 4425:The list 4321:Thank you 3784:FCBlinder 3766:FCBlinder 3720:FCBlinder 3526:Mmizeasrm 3466:Mmizeasrm 3377:this link 3346:mainspace 2986:WP:NACTOR 2982:WP:SIGCOV 2874:-Claudia 2718:My friend 2669:topic-ban 2334:this link 2303:mainspace 1913:splitting 1670:this link 1639:mainspace 1598:CodeLyoko 1272:(blether) 1261:bears... 1237:(blether) 1041:help desk 1023:Knowledge 1013:talk page 941:Jziemniak 880:Jziemniak 803:Ambazonia 755:ambazonia 615:Help Desk 349:this link 318:mainspace 311:Quantenna 277:Rider0101 11214:Internet 11192:WP:BOGOF 10991:my draft 10957:contribs 10945:unsigned 10790:contribs 10778:unsigned 10124:contribs 9701:copyleft 9598:contribs 9460:contribs 9408:contribs 9396:unsigned 9360:User:DGG 9299:Gryllida 9274:Thanks. 9163:contribs 9151:unsigned 9143:Question 9055:contribs 9043:unsigned 8991:Paul 012 8511:Paul_012 8457:Paul_012 7633:PAGENAME 7602:CNMall41 7568:CNMall41 7373:Question 7231:and the 7198:contribs 7186:unsigned 6762:Viktorpp 6315:contribs 6303:unsigned 6133:Gale5050 6072:Paul_012 6028:Paul_012 5980:contribs 5972:Zzhu8516 5968:unsigned 5954:contribs 5946:Zzhu8516 5942:unsigned 5862:kingboyk 5843:Zzhu8516 5778:kingboyk 5711:kingboyk 5698:Likol Jo 5633:User:DGG 5587:User:DGG 5551:kingboyk 5521:User:DGG 5504:spin out 5496:User:DGG 5420:User:Liz 4918:proposal 4798:unsigned 4777:unsigned 4771:India TV 4732:contribs 4720:unsigned 4666:contribs 4654:unsigned 4581:Rosguill 4576:signed, 4362:contribs 4095:copyleft 3882:Fsmatovu 3820:Fsmatovu 3631:contribs 3619:unsigned 3476:contribs 3282:contribs 3270:unsigned 3266:media. 3235:Kingboyk 3220:kingboyk 2878:Loanfish 2824:contribs 2814:Loanfish 2732:Precious 2667:, and a 2376:contribs 2001:Goldie19 1960:Goldie19 1909:spun out 1707:deletion 1515:contribs 1503:unsigned 1124:Cheers, 961:Teahouse 890:contribs 773:contribs 761:unsigned 609:- Since 523:contribs 460:contribs 450:RHaworth 432:User:Liz 390:contribs 378:unsigned 122:Robert, 106:or here 84:contribs 72:unsigned 11250:Birulik 11226:uncivil 11180:Birulik 11160:Birulik 11123:Birulik 11092:Birulik 11041:Birulik 11014:caution 10896:Sizzle! 10834:neutral 10832:have a 10552:Done. 10330:Edproms 10146:history 9924:C-Class 9620:history 9482:history 8682:capable 7015:SarahSV 6983:SarahSV 6972:SarahSV 6935:SarahSV 6615:EllenCT 6536:C-Class 6452:Johnbod 6431:Johnbod 6307:Afunk45 6195:concern 6178:Dreamy 5707:example 5595:notable 5525:notable 5378:wayland 5206:Cryptic 5141:Cryptic 5111:protect 5106:history 4938:WP:SPAM 4724:Wundzer 4716:page. 4658:Wundzer 4384:history 4146:Lourdes 4116:Teemeah 4077:Teemeah 4068:history 4015:concern 3498:history 3419:Bkissin 3384:Bkissin 3372:code. 3339:sandbox 2990:Lapablo 2921:concern 2896:Claudia 2869:Robert, 2846:history 2444:Also - 2398:history 2341:Lapablo 2329:code. 2142:DPL bot 1677:Bkissin 1665:code. 1402:Hello, 1154:Comment 912:history 724:notable 690:article 545:history 374:this. 356:Lapablo 344:code. 11033:assist 10590:Simon 9520:Maria 7897:, and 7540:Done, 7466:Help! 7273:GDX420 7251:Thomas 6931:GDX420 6869:GDX420 6812:GDX420 6369:page. 6152:opened 5306:Utopes 5115:delete 3016:, and 2779:choose 2728:to you 2598:. The 2497:WP:ANI 2236:Cabayi 2221:Cabayi 2094:Frayae 1947:Hello 1804:editor 1329:WP:ANI 1267:Summit 1232:Summit 1209:WP:ANI 1205:WP:ANI 1191:WP:ANI 169:Pmsouc 129:Pmsouc 76:Midibo 11224:were 11029:tutor 10976:wrote 10829:trout 10154:watch 10150:links 9828:again 9628:watch 9624:links 9490:watch 9486:links 9348:talk 8449:merge 7741:Tempo 7353:split 6867:have? 6699:Query 6063:merge 5574:talk 5484:talk 5132:views 5124:watch 5120:links 4520:L293D 4473:L293D 4461:Query 4392:watch 4388:links 4237:SoWhy 4213:fried 3506:watch 3502:links 3366:, or 3335:Draft 3274:Quipa 2872:site. 2854:watch 2850:links 2736:Peace 2566:fried 2467:fried 2406:watch 2402:links 2323:, or 2292:Draft 2140:.) -- 1723:Hobit 1659:, or 1628:Draft 1264:Girth 1229:Girth 920:watch 916:links 765:Flalf 700:Flalf 666:fried 553:watch 549:links 338:, or 307:Draft 16:< 11288:talk 11277:and 11254:talk 11238:talk 11200:talk 11164:talk 11150:talk 11127:talk 11112:talk 11096:talk 11077:talk 11063:and 11045:talk 11031:, I 11027:and 11021:have 10995:WSJ- 10974:You 10953:talk 10926:talk 10851:talk 10811:talk 10786:talk 10729:talk 10711:talk 10694:talk 10674:talk 10616:talk 10596:talk 10558:talk 10544:talk 10530:talk 10487:talk 10461:talk 10441:talk 10431:and 10409:talk 10381:talk 10358:talk 10334:talk 10326:WP:N 10304:talk 10280:talk 10260:talk 10246:talk 10229:talk 10185:talk 10158:logs 10142:talk 10138:edit 10118:talk 10090:talk 10058:talk 10039:talk 10022:talk 9989:talk 9975:talk 9877:talk 9856:talk 9836:talk 9806:talk 9731:Wily 9709:talk 9690:talk 9662:talk 9649:talk 9632:logs 9616:talk 9612:edit 9592:talk 9564:talk 9539:talk 9526:talk 9494:logs 9478:talk 9474:edit 9454:talk 9429:talk 9404:talk 9368:talk 9323:talk 9303:talk 9280:talk 9249:talk 9230:talk 9205:talk 9188:talk 9159:talk 9134:talk 9120:talk 9106:talk 9096:Test 9082:talk 9051:talk 9028:talk 9000:talk 8976:talk 8953:talk 8939:talk 8922:talk 8908:talk 8891:talk 8868:talk 8840:talk 8822:talk 8793:here 8770:talk 8750:talk 8720:and 8690:talk 8656:talk 8630:talk 8608:talk 8583:talk 8541:talk 8515:talk 8496:talk 8481:talk 8461:talk 8418:talk 8401:talk 8381:talk 8261:TALK 8250:. — 8237:talk 8137:talk 8041:talk 8016:talk 7990:talk 7946:talk 7925:talk 7866:talk 7852:talk 7835:talk 7820:talk 7805:talk 7781:talk 7765:SCMP 7719:talk 7698:talk 7684:talk 7659:talk 7644:talk 7606:talk 7592:talk 7572:talk 7550:talk 7529:talk 7500:talk 7480:talk 7448:talk 7433:talk 7419:talk 7404:talk 7384:talk 7361:talk 7340:talk 7297:talk 7277:talk 7258:talk 7194:talk 7180:talk 7178:Hi ( 7159:talk 7140:talk 7126:talk 7108:talk 7094:talk 7074:talk 7046:talk 7005:talk 6958:talk 6915:talk 6894:talk 6873:talk 6858:talk 6844:talk 6816:talk 6794:talk 6766:talk 6735:talk 6705:this 6687:talk 6644:talk 6619:talk 6592:talk 6494:talk 6477:talk 6456:talk 6441:talk 6394:talk 6375:talk 6341:talk 6311:talk 6274:talk 6254:talk 6233:talk 6185:🎷 6181:Jazz 6137:talk 6108:talk 6076:talk 6052:talk 6032:talk 6007:talk 5976:talk 5950:talk 5922:talk 5904:talk 5883:talk 5866:talk 5847:talk 5822:talk 5805:talk 5782:talk 5762:talk 5737:talk 5715:talk 5672:talk 5649:talk 5613:talk 5555:talk 5537:talk 5512:talk 5447:Done 5432:talk 5382:talk 5362:talk 5318:cont 5312:talk 5303:. 5253:talk 5222:talk 5189:talk 5165:talk 5128:logs 5102:talk 5098:edit 5078:talk 5061:talk 5036:talk 5014:talk 4993:talk 4973:talk 4949:here 4830:talk 4806:talk 4785:talk 4728:talk 4699:talk 4662:talk 4612:talk 4604:Done 4551:talk 4508:talk 4467:here 4452:talk 4396:logs 4380:talk 4376:edit 4356:talk 4331:talk 4291:talk 4268:talk 4218:okra 4208:Deep 4191:talk 4174:talk 4154:talk 4103:talk 4053:talk 4000:talk 3936:talk 3910:talk 3886:talk 3848:talk 3824:talk 3788:talk 3770:talk 3744:talk 3724:talk 3672:talk 3627:talk 3588:paid 3578:paid 3550:talk 3530:talk 3510:logs 3494:talk 3490:edit 3470:talk 3440:talk 3423:talk 3409:talk 3388:talk 3341:". 3303:talk 3278:talk 3245:talk 3224:talk 3199:talk 3182:talk 3161:talk 3146:talk 3106:talk 3079:talk 3056:talk 2994:talk 2959:talk 2904:talk 2882:talk 2858:logs 2842:talk 2838:edit 2818:talk 2788:talk 2769:talk 2744:talk 2709:talk 2677:talk 2628:talk 2608:talk 2571:okra 2561:Deep 2547:talk 2528:talk 2517:and 2505:talk 2472:okra 2462:Deep 2429:talk 2410:logs 2394:talk 2390:edit 2370:talk 2345:talk 2298:". 2260:talk 2240:talk 2225:talk 2219:. 2217:here 2146:talk 2133:). 2065:talk 2048:talk 2028:talk 2005:talk 1988:talk 1964:talk 1929:talk 1891:talk 1846:talk 1822:talk 1791:talk 1771:talk 1747:talk 1727:talk 1681:talk 1634:". 1558:talk 1540:talk 1511:talk 1477:talk 1463:talk 1455:Done 1433:talk 1418:here 1338:talk 1283:and 1252:talk 1217:talk 1065:talk 969:talk 945:talk 924:logs 908:talk 904:edit 884:talk 859:talk 815:talk 769:talk 736:talk 704:talk 671:okra 661:Deep 623:talk 595:talk 557:logs 541:talk 537:edit 517:talk 487:talk 454:talk 440:talk 386:talk 360:talk 313:". 281:talk 258:talk 220:talk 198:talk 173:talk 153:talk 133:talk 80:talk 44:talk 11230:DRN 11016:). 10997:or 10352:. 10298:. 10223:. 10104:AfC 10084:. 9800:. 9684:. 9578:AfC 9440:AfC 9343:DGG 8726:DRN 8602:. 8533:AFD 6929:Hi 6838:. 6834:or 6782:MFD 6758:MfD 6632:MFD 6407:Hi 6357:Hi 5994:RE 5916:. 5731:. 5569:DGG 5479:DGG 5294:by 4824:.-- 4693:. 4437:or 4342:AfC 4134:RfA 3994:. 3990:at 3982:? 3904:. 3706:😼 3456:AfC 3130:G11 3126:G11 2804:AfC 2491:of 2356:AfC 2200:by 1923:. 1838:UAA 1552:? 1534:. 1351:ANI 1289:ANI 1158:ANI 1112:ANI 1103:Hi 1097:ANI 870:AfC 832:AfC 636:AfC 479:G11 475:G12 418:at 279:, ( 231:AfC 36:MFD 11300:. 11290:) 11256:) 11240:) 11202:) 11166:) 11152:) 11129:) 11114:) 11098:) 11079:) 11047:) 10959:) 10955:• 10928:) 10853:) 10813:) 10792:) 10788:• 10731:) 10713:) 10696:) 10676:) 10618:) 10598:) 10560:) 10546:) 10532:) 10489:) 10481:. 10463:) 10443:) 10411:) 10383:) 10360:) 10336:) 10306:) 10262:) 10248:) 10231:) 10199:- 10187:) 10156:| 10152:| 10148:| 10144:| 10140:| 10126:) 10092:) 10060:) 10041:) 10024:) 9991:) 9977:) 9965:. 9956:. 9895:: 9879:) 9858:) 9838:) 9830:. 9808:) 9711:) 9692:) 9664:) 9651:) 9630:| 9626:| 9622:| 9618:| 9614:| 9600:) 9566:) 9541:) 9528:) 9492:| 9488:| 9484:| 9480:| 9476:| 9462:) 9431:) 9410:) 9406:• 9370:) 9350:) 9325:) 9305:) 9282:) 9251:) 9232:) 9207:) 9190:) 9165:) 9161:• 9136:) 9122:) 9108:) 9084:) 9057:) 9053:• 9030:) 9014:, 9002:) 8978:) 8955:) 8941:) 8924:) 8910:) 8893:) 8870:) 8842:) 8824:) 8772:) 8752:) 8744:? 8692:) 8658:) 8632:) 8610:) 8585:) 8543:) 8517:) 8498:) 8483:) 8463:) 8420:) 8403:) 8383:) 8264:) 8239:) 8139:) 8057:: 8043:) 8018:) 7992:) 7948:) 7927:) 7893:, 7868:) 7854:) 7837:) 7822:) 7807:) 7783:) 7771:, 7767:, 7763:, 7759:, 7755:, 7751:, 7747:, 7745:GQ 7743:, 7721:) 7700:) 7686:) 7674:a 7661:) 7646:) 7636:}} 7630:{{ 7608:) 7594:) 7574:) 7552:) 7531:) 7502:) 7482:) 7472:IS 7450:) 7435:) 7421:) 7406:) 7386:) 7363:) 7342:) 7299:) 7279:) 7260:) 7200:) 7196:• 7161:) 7142:) 7128:) 7110:) 7096:) 7076:) 7048:) 7007:) 6995:, 6960:) 6917:) 6896:) 6875:) 6860:) 6846:) 6818:) 6796:) 6768:) 6737:) 6717:1 6689:) 6646:) 6621:) 6594:) 6512:: 6496:) 6479:) 6467:, 6458:) 6443:) 6396:) 6377:) 6343:) 6317:) 6313:• 6276:) 6256:) 6235:) 6224:. 6164:. 6139:) 6110:) 6102:. 6078:) 6054:) 6034:) 6009:) 5982:) 5978:• 5956:) 5952:• 5924:) 5906:) 5885:) 5868:) 5849:) 5824:) 5807:) 5784:) 5764:) 5739:) 5717:) 5674:) 5651:) 5615:) 5585:, 5576:) 5557:) 5539:) 5514:) 5486:) 5458:iz 5434:) 5408:iz 5384:) 5364:) 5315:/ 5255:) 5224:) 5191:) 5167:) 5156:G6 5130:| 5126:| 5122:| 5118:| 5113:| 5109:| 5104:| 5100:| 5080:) 5063:) 5038:) 5016:) 4995:) 4975:) 4916:A 4909:A 4882:. 4832:) 4816:Hi 4808:) 4787:) 4769:, 4765:, 4734:) 4730:• 4701:) 4668:) 4664:• 4614:) 4596:- 4553:) 4529:• 4510:) 4482:• 4454:) 4394:| 4390:| 4386:| 4382:| 4378:| 4364:) 4333:) 4293:) 4270:) 4193:) 4176:) 4156:) 4105:) 4055:) 4044:. 4002:) 3958:, 3956:R3 3952:R3 3938:) 3912:) 3888:) 3876:[[ 3850:) 3826:) 3790:) 3772:) 3746:) 3726:) 3714:Hi 3694:— 3674:) 3633:) 3629:• 3591:}} 3585:{{ 3581:}} 3575:{{ 3552:) 3532:) 3508:| 3504:| 3500:| 3496:| 3492:| 3478:) 3442:) 3425:) 3411:) 3390:) 3360:, 3305:) 3284:) 3280:• 3247:) 3226:) 3201:) 3184:) 3163:) 3148:) 3108:) 3081:) 3058:) 2996:) 2961:) 2950:. 2906:) 2884:) 2856:| 2852:| 2848:| 2844:| 2840:| 2826:) 2790:) 2771:) 2746:) 2711:) 2679:) 2630:) 2610:) 2549:) 2530:) 2507:) 2431:) 2408:| 2404:| 2400:| 2396:| 2392:| 2378:) 2347:) 2317:, 2262:) 2242:) 2227:) 2148:) 2129:| 2067:) 2050:) 2030:) 2007:) 1990:) 1966:) 1931:) 1893:) 1848:) 1824:) 1793:) 1773:) 1749:) 1729:) 1683:) 1653:, 1582:. 1560:) 1542:) 1517:) 1513:• 1479:) 1465:) 1447:- 1435:) 1340:) 1254:) 1219:) 1126:-- 1107:, 1088:—— 1067:) 985:: 971:) 947:) 922:| 918:| 914:| 910:| 906:| 892:) 861:) 817:) 775:) 771:• 738:) 706:) 625:) 597:) 555:| 551:| 547:| 543:| 539:| 525:) 489:) 462:) 442:) 392:) 388:• 362:) 332:, 260:) 226:) 222:) 200:) 175:) 155:) 135:) 86:) 82:• 46:) 11286:( 11252:( 11236:( 11198:( 11162:( 11148:( 11125:( 11110:( 11094:( 11075:( 11043:( 10951:( 10924:( 10864:: 10860:@ 10849:( 10809:( 10784:( 10727:( 10709:( 10692:( 10672:( 10614:( 10594:( 10556:( 10542:( 10528:( 10485:( 10459:( 10439:( 10407:( 10379:( 10356:( 10332:( 10302:( 10278:( 10258:( 10244:( 10227:( 10183:( 10160:) 10136:( 10121:· 10116:( 10088:( 10056:( 10037:( 10020:( 9987:( 9973:( 9875:( 9854:( 9834:( 9804:( 9735:D 9707:( 9688:( 9660:( 9647:( 9634:) 9610:( 9595:· 9590:( 9562:( 9537:( 9524:( 9496:) 9472:( 9457:· 9452:( 9427:( 9402:( 9366:( 9346:( 9321:( 9301:( 9293:? 9278:( 9247:( 9228:( 9203:( 9186:( 9157:( 9132:( 9118:( 9104:( 9080:( 9049:( 9026:( 8998:( 8974:( 8951:( 8937:( 8920:( 8906:( 8889:( 8866:( 8838:( 8820:( 8813:: 8809:@ 8768:( 8748:( 8688:( 8654:( 8628:( 8606:( 8581:( 8539:( 8513:( 8494:( 8479:( 8459:( 8416:( 8399:( 8379:( 8319:. 8307:. 8258:( 8235:( 8135:( 8126:. 8117:. 8039:( 8014:( 7988:( 7959:: 7955:@ 7944:( 7923:( 7864:( 7850:( 7833:( 7818:( 7803:( 7779:( 7717:( 7711:: 7707:@ 7696:( 7682:( 7657:( 7642:( 7604:( 7590:( 7570:( 7548:( 7527:( 7498:( 7478:( 7446:( 7431:( 7417:( 7402:( 7382:( 7359:( 7338:( 7295:( 7275:( 7256:( 7249:C 7192:( 7157:( 7138:( 7124:( 7106:( 7092:( 7072:( 7044:( 7003:( 6956:( 6913:( 6892:( 6871:( 6856:( 6842:( 6814:( 6792:( 6764:( 6733:( 6715:x 6712:v 6709:T 6707:? 6685:( 6642:( 6617:( 6590:( 6581:. 6572:. 6492:( 6475:( 6454:( 6439:( 6433:: 6429:@ 6392:( 6373:( 6363:: 6359:@ 6339:( 6309:( 6272:( 6252:( 6231:( 6135:( 6106:( 6074:( 6050:( 6030:( 6005:( 5974:( 5948:( 5920:( 5902:( 5881:( 5864:( 5845:( 5820:( 5803:( 5780:( 5760:( 5735:( 5713:( 5670:( 5647:( 5611:( 5597:. 5572:( 5553:( 5535:( 5510:( 5482:( 5455:L 5430:( 5405:L 5380:( 5360:( 5321:) 5309:( 5251:( 5220:( 5187:( 5163:( 5134:) 5096:( 5076:( 5059:( 5034:( 5012:( 4991:( 4971:( 4906:. 4828:( 4804:( 4783:( 4726:( 4697:( 4660:( 4610:( 4549:( 4535:) 4532:✎ 4526:☎ 4523:( 4506:( 4488:) 4485:✎ 4479:☎ 4476:( 4450:( 4398:) 4374:( 4359:· 4354:( 4329:( 4289:( 4266:( 4189:( 4172:( 4152:( 4101:( 4051:( 3998:( 3934:( 3908:( 3884:( 3867:, 3846:( 3822:( 3786:( 3768:( 3742:( 3722:( 3704:¢ 3701:☏ 3670:( 3625:( 3548:( 3528:( 3512:) 3488:( 3473:· 3468:( 3438:( 3421:( 3407:( 3386:( 3301:( 3276:( 3243:( 3237:: 3233:@ 3222:( 3212:: 3208:@ 3197:( 3180:( 3159:( 3144:( 3104:( 3077:( 3054:( 2992:( 2972:. 2957:( 2902:( 2880:( 2860:) 2836:( 2821:· 2816:( 2786:( 2767:( 2742:( 2707:( 2675:( 2626:( 2606:( 2545:( 2526:( 2503:( 2427:( 2412:) 2388:( 2373:· 2368:( 2343:( 2258:( 2238:( 2223:( 2144:( 2136:( 2125:( 2063:( 2046:( 2026:( 2003:( 1986:( 1962:( 1927:( 1889:( 1844:( 1820:( 1789:( 1769:( 1745:( 1725:( 1679:( 1556:( 1538:( 1509:( 1475:( 1461:( 1431:( 1420:. 1371:C 1367:· 1363:T 1336:( 1309:C 1305:· 1301:T 1250:( 1215:( 1177:C 1173:· 1169:T 1143:C 1139:· 1135:T 1063:( 1054:. 1045:. 967:( 943:( 926:) 902:( 887:· 882:( 857:( 813:( 767:( 734:( 702:( 621:( 593:( 559:) 535:( 520:· 515:( 485:( 457:· 452:( 438:( 384:( 358:( 256:( 218:( 196:( 171:( 151:( 131:( 78:( 42:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index