31:
394:, reasoned that Robins had alleged injuries sufficient to establish standing because FCRA protected individual, rather than collective, rights and Robins was suing for a violation of his own statutory rights. In a footnote, the Circuit explicitly found it did not need to reach Robins' additional allegations regarding injuries to his employment prospects or from anxiety.
520:, dissented. Justice Ginsburg wrote that she agreed with much of the Court’s opinion but saw "no utility" in remanding the case back to the Ninth Circuit. Justice Ginsburg saw the many inaccuracies published by Spokeo as concretely harming Robins and, as such, she would have simply affirmed.
470:
requires any plaintiff to allege an injury-in-fact that is "concrete and particularized". While the Ninth
Circuit identified particular harms to Robins, it erred, according to the Court, by not also determining that those harms were "concrete". Although intangible harms such as
359:
for not alleging "any actual or imminent harm" after which Robins amended his complaint to allege employment, stress and anxiety injuries. In May 2011, Judge Wright found Robins had alleged a valid injury-in-fact before then reversing himself and dismissing the case for lack of
528:
On August 15, 2017, the Ninth
Circuit again allowed Robins' lawsuit to proceed. Judge O'Scannlain, joined by the same judges as before, now found that Robins had alleged a sufficiently concrete harm to establish an injury in fact under the Constitution. Relying on an
351:, alleged that he was unemployed while Spokeo's profile of him falsely stated that he worked in a professional field, had a graduate degree, was a married parent, had a high level of wealth, and included a false age and profile photograph. In January 2011, Judge
475:
can be concrete, the Court clarified, "bare procedural violations" cannot. The Court remanded the case while taking "no position as to whether the Ninth
Circuit’s ultimate conclusion— that Robins adequately alleged an injury in fact— was correct."
1279:
2196:
2071:
1494:
1486:
1454:
1907:
340:
2252:
2156:
2598:
1899:
539:
in support of Robins, Judge O'Scannlain determined that publishing even flattering inaccuracies could harm a job seeker. Spokeo again petitioned the
Supreme Court for a writ of
1502:
562:
172:
Because the Ninth
Circuit failed to consider both the concrete and particularized aspects of the injury-in-fact requirement, its Article III standing analysis was incomplete.
1187:
1859:
1851:
1478:
1179:
2588:
2391:
1867:
1295:
2284:
1163:
967:
769:
588:
82:
1835:
1526:
557:
379:
305:
2164:
1147:
719:
1763:
1340:
308:
on the basis that the Ninth
Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had
488:
added a concurrence, alone. He wrote separately to describe his belief that the
Constitution's Case or Controversy requirement is founded upon the
2276:
1779:
1332:
1096:
460:
316:. The Court did not discuss whether "the Ninth Circuit’s ultimate conclusion — that Robins adequately alleged an injury in fact — was correct."
1542:
1875:
1683:
1883:
1510:
1155:
798:
852:
2593:
1574:
1357:
720:"Spokeo to Pay $ 800,000 to Settle FTC Charges Company Allegedly Marketed Information to Employers and Recruiters in Violation of FCRA"
1787:
552:
2613:
2603:
2356:
2268:
2608:
1352:
996:
2055:
1084:
412:
313:
693:
1534:
1303:
1199:
1017:
2300:
1795:
1639:
1374:
536:
2513:
1422:
1218:
2188:
1590:
1131:
1093:
398:
297:
278:
35:
2446:
1026:
895:
1550:
1755:
1891:
1747:
1582:
1110:
664:
2228:
2180:
1518:
1430:
2260:
1989:
1614:
1598:
1287:
931:
644:
2292:
2204:
1675:
1398:
1324:
932:
Recent Case: Ninth
Circuit Allows Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Action to Proceed Past Standing Challenge
1973:
1414:
1390:
1315:
1044:
1035:
77:
2529:
1731:
1606:
1210:
1077:
467:
2340:
1699:
344:
274:
916:
752:
159:
133:
2561:
2332:
1981:
1771:
1739:
1446:
1226:
724:
428:
372:
301:
111:
1004:
371:
In June 2012, Spokeo agreed to pay $ 800,000 to settle a separate FCRA based lawsuit filed by the
2545:
2537:
2474:
2116:
1566:
1263:
383:
2026:
1723:
1462:
1406:
1382:
1139:
335:" with which its users can obtain in-depth consumer reports on individual persons. In 2010, a
2415:
2316:
2148:
2091:
1843:
1827:
1803:
1707:
1667:
1280:
Black & White
Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.
1070:
1048:
1022:
971:
592:
74:
978:
584:
1062:
8:
2132:
2108:
2018:
1965:
1651:
1438:
1122:
513:
207:
2521:
2407:
2364:
2220:
2197:
Valley Forge
Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State
2100:
2001:
1819:
1659:
1558:
1254:
1039:
857:
774:
669:
649:
501:
63:
2553:
2421:
2399:
2383:
2348:
2324:
2079:
1915:
1811:
1715:
1366:
1234:
1171:
352:
332:
2458:
1923:
1470:
1242:
424:
282:
2505:
2466:
2212:
2172:
2124:
1691:
1031:
517:
485:
444:
440:
387:
227:
203:
195:
1495:
C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
2236:
2140:
2072:
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
2063:
1944:
1271:
493:
456:
448:
361:
309:
215:
1053:
2582:
2047:
2010:
1487:
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
531:
497:
415:
Malcom Stewart appeared for the government as a friend in support of Robins.
408:
1455:
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
2244:
829:
770:"Justices Hear Debate on Suing Companies for Seemingly Harmless Falsehoods"
665:"Jay Edelson, the Class-Action Lawyer Who May Be Tech's Least Friended Man"
436:
432:
336:
219:
187:
987:
824:
423:
On May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court delivered judgment in favor of Spokeo,
101:
765:
452:
231:
1008:
489:
455:, wrote that the circuit below had failed to establish that Robins had
403:
391:
141:
1908:
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.
356:
348:
89:
2038:
1956:
341:
United States District Court for the Central District of California
137:
2253:
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
2157:
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
1013:
1057:
382:
reversed Judge Wright's dismissal and remanded the case. Judge
1900:
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
365:
324:
30:
1503:
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
563:
List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
1188:
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.
799:"Opinion: Justices Should Let an Online Privacy Case Proceed"
1860:
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
1852:
Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
1479:
Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
1180:
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States
1092:
472:
328:
156:
130:
2392:
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
1296:
Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.
853:"Supreme Court Returns False-Data Case to Appeals Panel"
694:"Spokeo Is Penalized by F.T.C. in Sale of Personal Data"
248:
Alito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Kagan
2599:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
894:, 136 S. Ct. at 1551 (Thomas, J., concurring), citing
2285:
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn
1164:
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
162:(9th Cir. 2017); cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 931 (2018).
1836:
Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida
1527:
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
1148:
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux
558:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
380:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
306:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
2165:
Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War
796:
1764:Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley
466:The Court first explained that the Constitution's
2589:United States Constitution Article Three case law
1780:American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co.
1341:Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
2580:
2277:Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
1333:District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
461:Article Three of the United States Constitution
1543:Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York
595:___, 136 S. Ct. 1540, slip op. at 8-11 (2016).
479:
1876:Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor
1684:American Insurance Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton
1078:
507:
411:were heard on November 2, 2015, where Deputy
1884:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
1511:United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
1156:United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co.
645:The Supreme Court, 2015 Term — Leading Cases
378:In February 2014, a unanimous panel of the
1788:Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
1575:Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.
1085:
1071:
523:
662:
553:List of United States Supreme Court cases
54:Spokeo, Inc., Petitioner v. Thomas Robins
2357:FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
2269:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation
950:, 138 S. Ct. 931 (2018).
797:The Editorial Board (November 1, 2015).
637:
635:
633:
401:granted Spokeo's petition for a writ of
997:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
631:
629:
627:
625:
623:
621:
619:
617:
615:
613:
418:
2581:
1056:on remand before the Ninth Circuit at
898:Does History Defeat Standing Doctrine?
850:
764:
2493:
2444:
1942:
1637:
1535:Dolan v. United States Postal Service
1304:Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States
1108:
1066:
1018:Electronic Privacy Information Center
922:
691:
18:2016 United States Supreme Court case
2301:Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
1796:Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States
928:
901:, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 689, 693 (2004).
641:
610:
537:Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
300:case in which the Court vacated and
2514:Osborn v. Bank of the United States
2056:Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner
1423:Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino
1219:Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy
935:, 131 Harv. L. Rev. 894 (2018).
13:
2189:Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
1943:
1591:Jam v. International Finance Corp.
1132:Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co.
663:Dougherty, Conor (April 5, 2015).
399:Supreme Court of the United States
347:(FCRA). Thomas Robins, the named
144:. granted, 135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015).
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
2625:
2594:United States Supreme Court cases
1375:The Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon
1027:United States Chamber of Commerce
974:___ (2016) is available from:
956:
1638:
1551:Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
29:
2614:United States Internet case law
2604:United States standing case law
1892:Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
1583:OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs
939:
904:
885:
873:
844:
817:
692:Wyatt, Edward (June 13, 2012).
2609:2016 in United States case law
2229:Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
2181:Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
1519:Republic of Austria v. Altmann
1431:Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez
1109:
790:
758:
740:
712:
685:
656:
598:
574:
1:
2261:DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
1990:Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer
1599:Republic of Sudan v. Harrison
1288:Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
851:Liptak, Adam (May 17, 2016).
568:
343:, alleging violations of the
319:
296:, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a
264:Ginsburg, joined by Sotomayor
2205:City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
1399:Schillinger v. United States
1325:Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
339:law firm sued Spokeo in the
331:website featuring a "people
7:
2445:
1974:Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
1415:United States v. Wunderlich
1036:Legal Information Institute
546:
480:Justice Thomas' concurrence
431:by a vote of 6-2. Justice
298:United States Supreme Court
10:
2630:
2530:Mistretta v. United States
2494:
1756:Burton v. United States II
1732:City of St. Louis v. Myers
1607:Opati v. Republic of Sudan
1211:Murdock v. City of Memphis
988:Oyez (oral argument audio)
508:Justice Ginsburg's dissent
468:Case or Controversy Clause
459:to file the lawsuit under
435:, joined by Chief Justice
364:after Spokeo filed for an
2500:
2489:
2453:
2440:
2375:
2341:TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez
2090:
2037:
2000:
1955:
1951:
1938:
1748:Burton v. United States I
1700:United States v. Jackalow
1676:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
1646:
1633:
1351:
1314:
1253:
1198:
1121:
1117:
1104:
919: (9th Cir. 2017).
896:Woolhander & Nelson,
755: (9th Cir. 2014).
345:Fair Credit Reporting Act
275:Fair Credit Reporting Act
273:
268:
260:
252:
244:
239:
181:
176:
171:
166:
148:
122:
117:
107:
97:
69:
59:
49:
42:
28:
23:
2562:Bank Markazi v. Peterson
2333:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
1982:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
1772:Muskrat v. United States
1740:Barrett v. United States
1447:United States v. Stanley
1227:Fox Film Corp. v. Muller
1202:independent state ground
930:
825:"Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins"
725:Federal Trade Commission
643:
373:Federal Trade Commission
2546:United States v. Hatter
2538:Peretz v. United States
2475:Cramer v. United States
2117:Massachusetts v. Mellon
1868:Thomas v. Union Carbide
1567:United States v. Bormes
1316:Rooker–Feldman doctrine
1264:United States v. Hudson
524:Subsequent developments
43:Argued November 2, 2015
2309:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
2027:Nixon v. United States
1724:United States v. Klein
1615:Trump v. United States
1463:Saudi Arabia v. Nelson
1407:Feres v. United States
1383:Mississippi v. Johnson
1140:Burford v. Sun Oil Co.
1054:Video of oral argument
964:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
947:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
912:Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.
748:Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.
581:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
439:, as well as Justices
413:U.S. Solicitor General
355:dismissed the initial
293:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
24:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
2467:United States v. Burr
2416:Rucho v. Common Cause
2317:Texas v. Pennsylvania
2293:Bond v. United States
2149:Sierra Club v. Morton
1844:Arizona v. New Mexico
1828:Glidden Co. v. Zdanok
1804:Wisconsin v. Illinois
1708:Ex parte Vallandigham
1668:United States v. More
1358:presidential immunity
1049:Vanderbilt Law Review
917:867 F.3d 1108
882:, 136 S. Ct. at 1550.
543:but this was denied.
312:to bring his case in
88:136 S. Ct. 1540; 194
1391:United States v. Lee
768:(November 3, 2015).
753:742 F.3d 409
492:distinction between
419:Opinion of the Court
384:Diarmuid O'Scannlain
112:Opinion announcement
108:Opinion announcement
45:Decided May 16, 2016
2133:Altvater v. Freeman
2109:Fairchild v. Hughes
2019:Goldwater v. Carter
1966:DeFunis v. Odegaard
1652:Chisholm v. Georgia
1439:Nixon v. Fitzgerald
535:brief filed by the
514:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
386:, joined by Judges
208:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
2522:Forrester v. White
2408:Vieth v. Jubelirer
2365:Murthy v. Missouri
2221:Diamond v. Charles
2101:Bailiff v. Tipping
2002:Political question
1820:Colegrove v. Green
1660:Marbury v. Madison
1559:Samantar v. Yousuf
1353:Sovereign immunity
1255:Federal common law
1094:U.S. Supreme Court
1040:Cornell Law School
858:The New York Times
803:The New York Times
775:The New York Times
698:The New York Times
670:The New York Times
502:William Blackstone
500:as articulated by
327:, Inc. operates a
192:Associate Justices
2576:
2575:
2572:
2571:
2554:Stern v. Marshall
2485:
2484:
2436:
2435:
2432:
2431:
2422:Benisek v. Lamone
2400:Davis v. Bandemer
2349:Biden v. Nebraska
2325:Trump v. New York
2080:Trump v. New York
1934:
1933:
1916:Bowles v. Russell
1812:Crowell v. Benson
1716:Ex parte McCardle
1629:
1628:
1625:
1624:
1367:Little v. Barreme
1235:Harrison v. NAACP
1172:Younger v. Harris
607:, slip op. at 11.
353:Otis D. Wright II
289:
288:
2621:
2491:
2490:
2459:Ex parte Bollman
2442:
2441:
1953:
1952:
1940:
1939:
1924:Patchak v. Zinke
1635:
1634:
1471:Clinton v. Jones
1243:Michigan v. Long
1119:
1118:
1106:
1105:
1087:
1080:
1073:
1064:
1063:
1001:
995:
992:
986:
983:
977:
951:
949:
943:
937:
936:
934:
926:
920:
914:
908:
902:
889:
883:
877:
871:
870:
868:
866:
848:
842:
841:
839:
837:
821:
815:
814:
812:
810:
794:
788:
787:
785:
783:
762:
756:
750:
744:
738:
737:
735:
733:
716:
710:
709:
707:
705:
689:
683:
682:
680:
678:
660:
654:
653:
647:
639:
608:
602:
596:
578:
407:and one-hour of
177:Court membership
153:Finding standing
127:Finding standing
33:
32:
21:
20:
2629:
2628:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2568:
2506:Stuart v. Laird
2496:
2481:
2449:
2428:
2371:
2213:Allen v. Wright
2173:Warth v. Seldin
2125:Ex parte Levitt
2086:
2033:
1996:
1947:
1930:
1692:Sheldon v. Sill
1642:
1621:
1356:
1347:
1310:
1249:
1201:
1194:
1113:
1100:
1091:
999:
993:
990:
984:
981:
975:
959:
954:
945:
944:
940:
927:
923:
910:
909:
905:
890:
886:
878:
874:
864:
862:
849:
845:
835:
833:
823:
822:
818:
808:
806:
795:
791:
781:
779:
763:
759:
746:
745:
741:
731:
729:
728:. June 12, 2012
718:
717:
713:
703:
701:
690:
686:
676:
674:
661:
657:
652:437 (2016).
640:
611:
603:
599:
579:
575:
571:
549:
526:
518:Sonia Sotomayor
510:
486:Clarence Thomas
482:
445:Clarence Thomas
441:Anthony Kennedy
421:
388:Susan P. Graber
322:
230:
228:Sonia Sotomayor
218:
206:
204:Clarence Thomas
196:Anthony Kennedy
93:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
2627:
2617:
2616:
2611:
2606:
2601:
2596:
2591:
2574:
2573:
2570:
2569:
2567:
2566:
2558:
2550:
2542:
2534:
2526:
2518:
2510:
2501:
2498:
2497:
2487:
2486:
2483:
2482:
2480:
2479:
2471:
2463:
2454:
2451:
2450:
2438:
2437:
2434:
2433:
2430:
2429:
2427:
2426:
2412:
2404:
2396:
2388:
2384:Hayburn's Case
2379:
2377:
2373:
2372:
2370:
2369:
2361:
2353:
2345:
2337:
2329:
2321:
2313:
2305:
2297:
2289:
2281:
2273:
2265:
2257:
2249:
2241:
2237:Raines v. Byrd
2233:
2225:
2217:
2209:
2201:
2193:
2185:
2177:
2169:
2161:
2153:
2145:
2141:Flast v. Cohen
2137:
2129:
2121:
2113:
2105:
2096:
2094:
2088:
2087:
2085:
2084:
2076:
2068:
2064:Laird v. Tatum
2060:
2052:
2043:
2041:
2035:
2034:
2032:
2031:
2023:
2015:
2006:
2004:
1998:
1997:
1995:
1994:
1986:
1978:
1970:
1961:
1959:
1949:
1948:
1945:Justiciability
1936:
1935:
1932:
1931:
1929:
1928:
1920:
1912:
1904:
1896:
1888:
1880:
1872:
1864:
1856:
1848:
1840:
1832:
1824:
1816:
1808:
1800:
1792:
1784:
1776:
1768:
1760:
1752:
1744:
1736:
1728:
1720:
1712:
1704:
1696:
1688:
1680:
1672:
1664:
1656:
1647:
1644:
1643:
1631:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1622:
1620:
1619:
1611:
1603:
1595:
1587:
1579:
1571:
1563:
1555:
1547:
1539:
1531:
1523:
1515:
1507:
1499:
1491:
1483:
1475:
1467:
1459:
1451:
1443:
1435:
1427:
1419:
1411:
1403:
1395:
1387:
1379:
1371:
1362:
1360:
1349:
1348:
1346:
1345:
1337:
1329:
1320:
1318:
1312:
1311:
1309:
1308:
1300:
1292:
1284:
1276:
1272:Swift v. Tyson
1268:
1259:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1248:
1247:
1239:
1231:
1223:
1215:
1206:
1204:
1196:
1195:
1193:
1192:
1184:
1176:
1168:
1160:
1152:
1144:
1136:
1127:
1125:
1115:
1114:
1102:
1101:
1090:
1089:
1082:
1075:
1067:
1061:
1060:
1051:
1042:
1029:
1020:
1011:
1002:
958:
957:External links
955:
953:
952:
938:
921:
903:
884:
872:
843:
816:
805:. p. SR10
789:
757:
739:
711:
684:
655:
609:
597:
572:
570:
567:
566:
565:
560:
555:
548:
545:
525:
522:
509:
506:
494:private rights
481:
478:
449:Stephen Breyer
420:
417:
409:oral arguments
321:
318:
287:
286:
279:15 U.S.C.
271:
270:
266:
265:
262:
258:
257:
254:
250:
249:
246:
242:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
216:Stephen Breyer
193:
190:
185:
179:
178:
174:
173:
169:
168:
164:
163:
150:
146:
145:
124:
120:
119:
115:
114:
109:
105:
104:
99:
95:
94:
87:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2626:
2615:
2612:
2610:
2607:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2597:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2586:
2584:
2564:
2563:
2559:
2556:
2555:
2551:
2548:
2547:
2543:
2540:
2539:
2535:
2532:
2531:
2527:
2524:
2523:
2519:
2516:
2515:
2511:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2502:
2499:
2492:
2488:
2477:
2476:
2472:
2469:
2468:
2464:
2461:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2452:
2448:
2443:
2439:
2424:
2423:
2418:
2417:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2405:
2402:
2401:
2397:
2394:
2393:
2389:
2386:
2385:
2381:
2380:
2378:
2374:
2367:
2366:
2362:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2351:
2350:
2346:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2335:
2334:
2330:
2327:
2326:
2322:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2311:
2310:
2306:
2303:
2302:
2298:
2295:
2294:
2290:
2287:
2286:
2282:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2271:
2270:
2266:
2263:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2247:
2246:
2242:
2239:
2238:
2234:
2231:
2230:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2215:
2214:
2210:
2207:
2206:
2202:
2199:
2198:
2194:
2191:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2178:
2175:
2174:
2170:
2167:
2166:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2151:
2150:
2146:
2143:
2142:
2138:
2135:
2134:
2130:
2127:
2126:
2122:
2119:
2118:
2114:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2103:
2102:
2098:
2097:
2095:
2093:
2089:
2082:
2081:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2069:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2058:
2057:
2053:
2050:
2049:
2048:Poe v. Ullman
2045:
2044:
2042:
2040:
2036:
2029:
2028:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2016:
2013:
2012:
2011:Baker v. Carr
2008:
2007:
2005:
2003:
1999:
1992:
1991:
1987:
1984:
1983:
1979:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1968:
1967:
1963:
1962:
1960:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1941:
1937:
1926:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1917:
1913:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1902:
1901:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1878:
1877:
1873:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1841:
1838:
1837:
1833:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1822:
1821:
1817:
1814:
1813:
1809:
1806:
1805:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1774:
1773:
1769:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1710:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1697:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1670:
1669:
1665:
1662:
1661:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1636:
1632:
1617:
1616:
1612:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1601:
1600:
1596:
1593:
1592:
1588:
1585:
1584:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1556:
1553:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1500:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1481:
1480:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1457:
1456:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1420:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1359:
1354:
1350:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1317:
1313:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1256:
1252:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1203:
1197:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1095:
1088:
1083:
1081:
1076:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1059:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1003:
998:
989:
980:
973:
969:
965:
961:
960:
948:
942:
933:
925:
918:
913:
907:
900:
899:
893:
888:
881:
876:
860:
859:
854:
847:
832:
831:
826:
820:
804:
800:
793:
777:
776:
771:
767:
761:
754:
749:
743:
727:
726:
721:
715:
699:
695:
688:
673:. p. BU1
672:
671:
666:
659:
651:
650:Harv. L. Rev.
646:
638:
636:
634:
632:
630:
628:
626:
624:
622:
620:
618:
616:
614:
606:
601:
594:
590:
586:
582:
577:
573:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
550:
544:
542:
538:
534:
533:
532:amicus curiae
521:
519:
515:
505:
503:
499:
498:public rights
495:
491:
487:
477:
474:
469:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
416:
414:
410:
406:
405:
400:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
376:
374:
369:
367:
363:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:search engine
330:
326:
317:
315:
314:federal court
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:Case opinions
238:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:Chief Justice
183:
182:
180:
175:
170:
165:
161:
158:
154:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
128:
125:
121:
116:
113:
110:
106:
103:
102:Oral argument
100:
96:
91:
85:
84:
79:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
2560:
2552:
2544:
2536:
2528:
2520:
2512:
2504:
2473:
2465:
2457:
2420:
2414:
2406:
2398:
2390:
2382:
2363:
2355:
2347:
2339:
2331:
2323:
2315:
2308:
2307:
2299:
2291:
2283:
2275:
2267:
2259:
2251:
2245:FEC v. Akins
2243:
2235:
2227:
2219:
2211:
2203:
2195:
2187:
2179:
2171:
2163:
2155:
2147:
2139:
2131:
2123:
2115:
2107:
2099:
2078:
2070:
2062:
2054:
2046:
2025:
2017:
2009:
1988:
1980:
1972:
1964:
1922:
1914:
1906:
1898:
1890:
1882:
1874:
1866:
1858:
1850:
1842:
1834:
1826:
1818:
1810:
1802:
1794:
1786:
1778:
1770:
1762:
1754:
1746:
1738:
1730:
1722:
1714:
1706:
1698:
1690:
1682:
1674:
1666:
1658:
1650:
1640:Jurisdiction
1613:
1605:
1597:
1589:
1581:
1573:
1565:
1557:
1549:
1541:
1533:
1525:
1517:
1509:
1501:
1493:
1485:
1477:
1469:
1461:
1453:
1445:
1437:
1429:
1421:
1413:
1405:
1397:
1389:
1381:
1373:
1365:
1339:
1331:
1323:
1302:
1294:
1286:
1278:
1270:
1262:
1241:
1233:
1225:
1217:
1209:
1200:Adequate and
1186:
1178:
1170:
1162:
1154:
1146:
1138:
1130:
1045:Case preview
1032:Case preview
963:
946:
941:
924:
911:
906:
897:
891:
887:
879:
875:
865:February 12,
863:. Retrieved
861:. p. B3
856:
846:
836:February 12,
834:. Retrieved
830:Oyez Project
828:
819:
809:February 12,
807:. Retrieved
802:
792:
782:February 12,
780:. Retrieved
778:. p. B3
773:
766:Liptak, Adam
760:
747:
742:
732:February 12,
730:. Retrieved
723:
714:
704:February 12,
702:. Retrieved
700:. p. B2
697:
687:
677:February 12,
675:. Retrieved
668:
658:
604:
600:
580:
576:
540:
530:
527:
516:, joined by
511:
483:
465:
437:John Roberts
433:Samuel Alito
422:
402:
396:
377:
370:
337:class action
323:
304:a ruling by
292:
291:
290:
269:Laws applied
223:
220:Samuel Alito
211:
199:
188:John Roberts
152:
126:
118:Case history
81:
53:
15:
1097:Article III
541:certiorari,
453:Elena Kagan
283:§ 1681
253:Concurrence
232:Elena Kagan
2583:Categories
1123:Abstention
1111:Federalism
1009:SCOTUSblog
583:, No.
569:References
490:common law
404:certiorari
392:Carlos Bea
320:Background
149:Subsequent
60:Docket no.
1034:from the
1023:Case page
1014:Case page
1005:Case page
429:remanding
357:complaint
349:plaintiff
90:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
2092:Standing
2039:Ripeness
1957:Mootness
1099:case law
962:Text of
547:See also
512:Justice
484:Justice
457:standing
425:vacating
362:standing
310:standing
302:remanded
245:Majority
138:9th Cir.
98:Argument
2447:Treason
1058:YouTube
585:13-1339
285:et seq.
261:Dissent
167:Holding
140:2014);
64:13-1339
2565:(2016)
2557:(2011)
2549:(2001)
2541:(1991)
2533:(1989)
2525:(1988)
2517:(1824)
2509:(1803)
2495:Others
2478:(1945)
2470:(1807)
2462:(1807)
2425:(2019)
2411:(2004)
2403:(1986)
2395:(1985)
2387:(1792)
2376:Others
2368:(2024)
2360:(2024)
2352:(2023)
2344:(2021)
2336:(2021)
2328:(2020)
2320:(2020)
2312:(2016)
2304:(2013)
2296:(2011)
2288:(2011)
2280:(2007)
2272:(2007)
2264:(2006)
2256:(2000)
2248:(1998)
2240:(1997)
2232:(1992)
2224:(1986)
2216:(1984)
2208:(1983)
2200:(1982)
2192:(1978)
2184:(1977)
2176:(1975)
2168:(1974)
2160:(1973)
2152:(1972)
2144:(1968)
2136:(1943)
2128:(1937)
2120:(1923)
2112:(1922)
2104:(1805)
2083:(2020)
2075:(1985)
2067:(1972)
2059:(1967)
2051:(1961)
2030:(1993)
2022:(1979)
2014:(1962)
1993:(2023)
1985:(2021)
1977:(2016)
1969:(1974)
1927:(2018)
1919:(2007)
1911:(2005)
1903:(2002)
1895:(1995)
1887:(1986)
1879:(1986)
1871:(1985)
1863:(1982)
1855:(1977)
1847:(1976)
1839:(1974)
1831:(1962)
1823:(1946)
1815:(1932)
1807:(1929)
1799:(1926)
1791:(1921)
1783:(1916)
1775:(1911)
1767:(1908)
1759:(1906)
1751:(1905)
1743:(1898)
1735:(1885)
1727:(1871)
1719:(1869)
1711:(1864)
1703:(1862)
1695:(1850)
1687:(1828)
1679:(1816)
1671:(1805)
1663:(1803)
1655:(1793)
1618:(2024)
1610:(2020)
1602:(2019)
1594:(2019)
1586:(2015)
1578:(2014)
1570:(2012)
1562:(2010)
1554:(2008)
1546:(2007)
1538:(2006)
1530:(2005)
1522:(2004)
1514:(2003)
1506:(2003)
1498:(2001)
1490:(1999)
1482:(1998)
1474:(1997)
1466:(1993)
1458:(1991)
1450:(1987)
1442:(1982)
1434:(1978)
1426:(1964)
1418:(1951)
1410:(1950)
1402:(1894)
1394:(1882)
1386:(1867)
1378:(1812)
1370:(1804)
1344:(2005)
1336:(1983)
1328:(1923)
1307:(1943)
1299:(1938)
1291:(1938)
1283:(1928)
1275:(1842)
1267:(1812)
1246:(1983)
1238:(1959)
1230:(1935)
1222:(1896)
1214:(1875)
1191:(1983)
1183:(1976)
1175:(1971)
1167:(1964)
1159:(1962)
1151:(1959)
1143:(1943)
1135:(1941)
1000:
994:
991:
985:
982:
979:Justia
976:
929:Note,
915:,
892:Spokeo
880:Spokeo
751:,
648:, 130
642:Note,
605:Spokeo
587:,
451:, and
366:appeal
325:Spokeo
281:
256:Thomas
226:
224:·
222:
214:
212:·
210:
202:
200:·
198:
155:, 867
129:, 742
1047:from
970:
591:
123:Prior
972:U.S.
867:2018
838:2018
811:2018
784:2018
734:2018
706:2018
679:2018
593:U.S.
496:and
473:risk
427:and
397:The
390:and
329:.com
160:1108
157:F.3d
142:cert
131:F.3d
83:more
75:U.S.
73:578
1355:and
1038:at
1025:at
1016:at
1007:at
968:578
589:578
134:409
92:635
78:330
2585::
2419:/
966:,
855:.
827:.
801:.
772:.
722:.
696:.
667:.
612:^
504:.
463:.
447:,
443:,
375:.
368:.
277:,
1086:e
1079:t
1072:v
869:.
840:.
813:.
786:.
736:.
708:.
681:.
136:(
86:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.