Knowledge

Dolan v. City of Tigard

Source 📝

31: 338:, a government agency may not require a person to surrender constitutional rights in exchange for discretionary benefits, where the property sought has little or no relationship to the benefit conferred. A two-prong test was applied: Whether or not there is an "essential nexus" between the permit conditions and legitimate state interest, and whether or not the degree of the exactions required by the permit condition bears the required relationship to the projected impact of the proposed extra development. 291: 322:. LUBA found a reasonable relationship between the development and both conditions of the variance, as the larger building and paved lot would increase runoff into the creek, and the impact of increased traffic justified the requirement for a pathway. The decision was subsequently affirmed by the Oregon State Court of Appeals and the 346:
greenway (as opposed to a private one, to which Dolan would retain other rights of property owners, such as the right of exclusive access), was excessive, and that the City failed to meet its burden of establishing that the proposed pathway was necessary to offset the increased traffic which would be
341:
The Court held that the first condition had been satisfied. However, the Court ruled that the City failed to make an individualized determination that the required dedications are related, in both nature and extent, to the proposed impact. Further, the Court held that the requirement for a
2293: 2109: 2141: 2309: 2197: 1989: 1852: 2277: 2269: 2245: 1997: 2021: 1941: 306:, applied for a permit to expand the store and pave the parking lot of her store. The city planning commission granted conditional approval, dependent on Dolan dedicating land to a public 2133: 2449: 2045: 1820: 378: 2173: 2093: 1949: 2189: 1844: 2061: 314:
State Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), alleging that the land dedication requirements were not related to the proposed development, and thus constituted an uncompensated
2205: 1957: 1149: 1917: 1636: 1389: 1245: 235: 1965: 1085: 881: 2069: 1716: 1309: 1564: 1516: 567: 401: 363: 108: 72: 125:
The city's zoning ordinance was not roughly proportionate to the city's public purpose in such a way to justify infringing upon the property owner's rights.
1756: 1692: 1285: 373: 2349: 2333: 2317: 1772: 1724: 1269: 2005: 1708: 1700: 1652: 2157: 1628: 712: 671: 319: 275: 2085: 703: 310:
along an adjacent creek, and developing a pedestrian and bicycle pathway in order to relieve traffic congestion. The decision was appealed to the
1524: 715: 334:
The Supreme Court overturned the state Land Use Board of Appeals and the Oregon appellate courts. The Court held that under the doctrine of
2117: 2013: 2444: 2373: 274:
to compel property owners to make unrelated public improvements as a condition to getting zoning approval, citing the violation of the
368: 2439: 2357: 2237: 662: 2459: 2213: 2181: 357: 1532: 1184: 299: 1788: 2464: 2037: 696: 2125: 1580: 315: 2341: 2325: 2149: 1933: 255: 35: 729: 2454: 2429: 1508: 1333: 929: 512:"Does Dolan v. City Of tigard Signify The End Of the "specifically And Uniquely Attributable" Standard In Illinois" 1780: 1109: 689: 335: 1868: 1981: 1860: 2389: 2365: 2285: 996: 681: 2253: 1133: 1066: 830: 655: 623: 2424: 873: 473: 100: 2301: 2077: 1421: 1349: 758: 587: 2261: 1925: 1676: 1233: 897: 774: 2381: 2101: 1828: 1604: 1341: 1200: 605: 270:, and has served to establish limits on the ability of cities and other government agencies to use 2434: 2029: 1572: 1381: 1141: 1031: 964: 956: 889: 790: 648: 614: 1740: 1596: 1500: 1492: 1365: 1015: 988: 980: 913: 854: 846: 811: 160: 1909: 1413: 1253: 1125: 1023: 742: 571: 405: 112: 64: 596: 1660: 1176: 1047: 323: 307: 8: 1901: 1748: 1668: 1644: 1612: 1405: 1373: 1325: 1317: 1277: 1093: 937: 640: 192: 578: 421: 2397: 1796: 1620: 1480: 1357: 1293: 1261: 1208: 1192: 782: 408: 2229: 1812: 1588: 1548: 1540: 1397: 1101: 1039: 921: 537: 156: 140: 2053: 1764: 1556: 1445: 1301: 1168: 1117: 67: 2165: 1732: 1437: 972: 905: 838: 267: 184: 172: 2142:
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
1973: 1889: 1684: 1429: 766: 303: 279: 168: 148: 2310:
Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
2418: 1804: 1453: 750: 711: 511: 259: 1836: 180: 1853:
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
2270:
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
632: 443: 486: 104: 538:"Dolan v. City of Tigard: Taking a Closer Look at Regulatory Takings" 290: 79: 326:. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. 271: 1950:
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago
379:
List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
2174:
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County
311: 263: 30: 487:"U.S. Reports: Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994)" 97: 2294:
San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City & County of San Francisco
670: 2450:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
209:
Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
364:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 512
2318:
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States
374:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
2334:
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
2416: 2086:Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City 1525:Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co. 2158:Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis 1232: 697: 656: 96:Appeal from the Supreme Court of Oregon, 854 2118:Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. 2110:Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith 318:of her property, which is disallowed by the 54:Florence Dolan, Petitioner v. City of Tigard 2198:Preseault v. Interstate Commerce Commission 2014:Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford 2374:Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco 1990:Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States 810: 704: 690: 663: 649: 369:List of United States Supreme Court cases 2358:Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania 2238:Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 298:Petitioner Dolan, owner and operator of 289: 2278:Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington 2246:Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation 2214:Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council 2182:Nollan v. California Coastal Commission 1998:Rindge Company v. County of Los Angeles 535: 358:Nollan v. California Coastal Commission 2417: 1533:United States v. Carolene Products Co. 1479: 300:A-Boy Plumbing & Electrical Supply 2342:Horne v. Department of Agriculture II 2022:United States v. General Motors Corp. 1942:Monongahela Nav. Co. v. United States 1887: 1478: 1231: 1185:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 809: 728: 727: 685: 644: 248:, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), more commonly 217:Stevens, joined by Blackmun, Ginsburg 18:1994 United States Supreme Court case 2326:Horne v. Department of Agriculture I 2038:Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States 2126:Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff 1581:Department of Agriculture v. Moreno 13: 2150:United States v. Riverside Bayview 1934:Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. 1888: 1789:Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña 536:Habicht, Craig (January 1, 1995). 347:caused by the proposed expansion. 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2476: 2445:United States Supreme Court cases 574:374 (1994) is available from: 556: 2134:Ruckelshaus v. Montanato Company 930:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 29: 2440:United States land use case law 2046:United States v. Pewee Coal Co. 1781:Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC 272:zoning and land-use regulations 2460:1994 in United States case law 1982:Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon 1861:United States v. Vaello Madero 1821:Flores-Villar v. United States 542:Catholic University Law Review 529: 504: 479: 461: 436: 414: 391: 1: 2390:Sheetz v. County of El Dorado 2366:Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid 2286:Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 2094:Kaiser Aetna v. United States 1509:Adkins v. Children's Hospital 713:United States Fifth Amendment 672:United States Fifth Amendment 384: 2254:Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel 1869:Department of State v. Muñoz 1134:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 1067:Blockburger v. United States 831:Blockburger v. United States 7: 2465:Zoning in the United States 2190:Pennell v. City of San Jose 1845:Sessions v. Morales-Santana 874:United States v. Randenbush 350: 336:unconstitutional conditions 329: 256:United States Supreme Court 10: 2481: 2302:Kelo v. City of New London 2078:Armstrong v. United States 2062:Nelson v. City of New York 1422:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 1350:Dickerson v. United States 759:Wong Wing v. United States 633:Oyez (oral argument audio) 262:regarding the practice of 2262:Palazzolo v. Rhode Island 1926:Cole v. City of La Grange 1896: 1883: 1677:United States v. Antelope 1487: 1474: 1334:Mitchell v. United States 1240: 1234:Self-Incrimination Clause 1227: 1160: 1078:Dual sovereignty doctrine 1077: 1058: 1007: 948: 898:Fong Foo v. United States 865: 823:Meaning of "same offense" 822: 818: 805: 775:United States v. Moreland 737: 723: 679: 444:"Dolan v. City of Tigard" 234: 229: 221: 213: 205: 200: 134: 129: 124: 119: 92: 87: 82:304; 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4826 59: 49: 42: 28: 23: 2382:Tyler v. Hennepin County 2206:Yee v. City of Escondido 2102:Agins v. City of Tiburon 1958:Peabody v. United States 1829:United States v. Windsor 1605:Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld 1342:United States v. Hubbell 1201:North Carolina v. Pearce 1150:Denezpi v. United States 1110:United States v. Wheeler 285: 2455:1994 in the environment 2430:Takings Clause case law 2222:Dolan v. City of Tigard 2030:United States v. Causby 1918:United States v. Lawton 1637:Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong 1573:Frontiero v. Richardson 1390:Corley v. United States 1382:United States v. Patane 1246:Curcio v. United States 1142:Gamble v. United States 1032:United States v. Dinitz 965:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 957:United States v. Wilson 890:Burton v. United States 791:United States v. Cotton 564:Dolan v. City of Tigard 469:Dolan v. City of Tigard 423:Dolan v. City of Tigard 398:Dolan v. City of Tigard 245:Dolan v. City of Tigard 24:Dolan v. City of Tigard 1966:United States v. Cress 1741:Fullilove v. Klutznick 1597:Schlesinger v. Ballard 1501:Adair v. United States 1493:Dred Scott v. Sandford 1366:Yarborough v. Alvarado 1086:United States v. Lanza 1016:United States v. Perez 997:Smith v. United States 989:United States v. Dixon 981:United States v. Felix 914:Burks v. United States 855:United States v. Dixon 847:United States v. Felix 812:Double Jeopardy Clause 295: 1910:Kohl v. United States 1414:Berghuis v. Thompkins 1254:Griffin v. California 1126:United States v. Lara 1024:United States v. Jorn 882:Ball v. United States 743:Hurtado v. California 302:store in the city of 293: 78:114 S. Ct. 2309; 129 45:Decided June 24, 1994 43:Argued March 23, 1994 2070:United States v. Dow 1717:Califano v. Westcott 1661:Califano v. Goldfarb 1310:Doe v. United States 1177:Palko v. Connecticut 1048:Blueford v. Arkansas 476: (Or. 1993). 474:854 P.2d 437 324:Oregon Supreme Court 236:U.S. Const. amend. V 1902:Barron v. Baltimore 1749:Rostker v. Goldberg 1669:Califano v. Webster 1645:Washington v. Davis 1613:Mathews v. Eldridge 1565:Richardson v. Davis 1517:Nichols v. Coolidge 1406:Maryland v. Shatzer 1374:Missouri v. Seibert 1326:McNeil v. Wisconsin 1318:Illinois v. Perkins 1278:Williams v. Florida 1094:Bartkus v. Illinois 1059:Multiple punishment 938:McElrath v. Georgia 624:Library of Congress 491:Library of Congress 193:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 161:Sandra Day O'Connor 2425:Land use in Oregon 2398:DeVillier v. Texas 1797:Miller v. Albright 1757:Heckler v. Mathews 1693:Califano v. Torres 1621:Hills v. Gautreaux 1481:Due Process Clause 1358:Chavez v. Martinez 1294:Edwards v. Arizona 1286:Michigan v. Tucker 1262:Miranda v. Arizona 1209:Benton v. Maryland 1193:Baxstrom v. Herold 783:Beck v. Washington 716:criminal procedure 296: 294:Bike path at issue 145:Associate Justices 2412: 2411: 2408: 2407: 2350:Murr v. Wisconsin 2230:Babbitt v. Youpee 1879: 1878: 1813:Zadvydas v. Davis 1773:Bowen v. Gilliard 1725:Harris v. Rosario 1589:Morton v. Mancari 1549:Schneider v. Rusk 1541:Bolling v. Sharpe 1468: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1398:Florida v. Powell 1270:Boulden v. Holman 1223: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1102:Waller v. Florida 1040:Oregon v. Kennedy 922:Evans v. Michigan 801: 800: 241: 240: 141:William Rehnquist 2472: 2054:Berman v. Parker 2006:Leonard v. Earle 1885: 1884: 1765:Lyng v. Castillo 1709:Davis v. Passman 1701:Vance v. Bradley 1653:Mathews v. Lucas 1557:Rogers v. Bellei 1476: 1475: 1446:Salinas v. Texas 1302:Oregon v. Elstad 1229: 1228: 1169:Ex parte Bigelow 1118:Heath v. Alabama 949:After conviction 820: 819: 807: 806: 725: 724: 706: 699: 692: 683: 682: 665: 658: 651: 642: 641: 637: 631: 628: 622: 619: 613: 610: 604: 601: 595: 592: 586: 583: 577: 550: 549: 533: 527: 526: 524: 522: 508: 502: 501: 499: 497: 483: 477: 471: 465: 459: 458: 456: 454: 440: 434: 433: 432: 430: 418: 412: 395: 130:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 20: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2404: 2166:Hodel v. Irving 1892: 1875: 1733:Harris v. McRae 1629:Mathews v. Diaz 1483: 1470: 1469: 1460: 1438:Howes v. Fields 1236: 1215: 1156: 1073: 1054: 1003: 973:Grady v. Corbin 944: 906:Ashe v. Swenson 866:After acquittal 861: 839:Grady v. Corbin 814: 797: 733: 719: 710: 675: 669: 635: 629: 626: 620: 617: 611: 608: 602: 599: 593: 590: 584: 581: 575: 559: 554: 553: 534: 530: 520: 518: 516:www.lib.niu.edu 510: 509: 505: 495: 493: 485: 484: 480: 467: 466: 462: 452: 450: 442: 441: 437: 428: 426: 420: 419: 415: 396: 392: 387: 353: 332: 320:Fifth Amendment 288: 276:Fifth Amendment 268:property rights 251:Dolan v. Tigard 185:Clarence Thomas 183: 173:Anthony Kennedy 171: 159: 157:John P. Stevens 115:989 (1993). 83: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2478: 2468: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2447: 2442: 2437: 2435:Tigard, Oregon 2432: 2427: 2410: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2403: 2402: 2394: 2386: 2378: 2370: 2362: 2354: 2346: 2338: 2330: 2322: 2314: 2306: 2298: 2290: 2282: 2274: 2266: 2258: 2250: 2242: 2234: 2226: 2218: 2210: 2202: 2194: 2186: 2178: 2170: 2162: 2154: 2146: 2138: 2130: 2122: 2114: 2106: 2098: 2090: 2082: 2074: 2066: 2058: 2050: 2042: 2034: 2026: 2018: 2010: 2002: 1994: 1986: 1978: 1974:Block v. Hirsh 1970: 1962: 1954: 1946: 1938: 1930: 1922: 1914: 1906: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1890:Takings Clause 1881: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1874: 1873: 1865: 1857: 1849: 1841: 1833: 1825: 1817: 1809: 1801: 1793: 1785: 1777: 1769: 1761: 1753: 1745: 1737: 1729: 1721: 1713: 1705: 1697: 1689: 1685:Fiallo v. Bell 1681: 1673: 1665: 1657: 1649: 1641: 1633: 1625: 1617: 1609: 1601: 1593: 1585: 1577: 1569: 1561: 1553: 1545: 1537: 1529: 1521: 1513: 1505: 1497: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1472: 1471: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1458: 1450: 1442: 1434: 1430:Bobby v. Dixon 1426: 1418: 1410: 1402: 1394: 1386: 1378: 1370: 1362: 1354: 1346: 1338: 1330: 1322: 1314: 1306: 1298: 1290: 1282: 1274: 1266: 1258: 1250: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1214: 1213: 1205: 1197: 1189: 1181: 1173: 1164: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1146: 1138: 1130: 1122: 1114: 1106: 1098: 1090: 1081: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1072: 1071: 1062: 1060: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1044: 1036: 1028: 1020: 1011: 1009: 1008:After mistrial 1005: 1004: 1002: 1001: 993: 985: 977: 969: 961: 952: 950: 946: 945: 943: 942: 934: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 869: 867: 863: 862: 860: 859: 851: 843: 835: 826: 824: 816: 815: 803: 802: 799: 798: 796: 795: 787: 779: 771: 767:Maxwell v. Dow 763: 755: 747: 738: 735: 734: 721: 720: 709: 708: 701: 694: 686: 680: 677: 676: 668: 667: 660: 653: 645: 639: 638: 606:Google Scholar 558: 557:External links 555: 552: 551: 528: 503: 478: 460: 435: 413: 389: 388: 386: 383: 382: 381: 376: 371: 366: 361: 352: 349: 331: 328: 304:Tigard, Oregon 287: 284: 280:Takings Clause 258:case. It is a 239: 238: 232: 231: 227: 226: 223: 219: 218: 215: 211: 210: 207: 203: 202: 198: 197: 196: 195: 169:Antonin Scalia 149:Harry Blackmun 146: 143: 138: 132: 131: 127: 126: 122: 121: 117: 116: 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2477: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2420: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2232: 2231: 2227: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2160: 2159: 2155: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1891: 1886: 1882: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1805:Nguyen v. INS 1802: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1486: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1456: 1455: 1454:Vega v. Tekoh 1451: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1235: 1230: 1226: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1159: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1076: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1061: 1057: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1010: 1006: 999: 998: 994: 991: 990: 986: 983: 982: 978: 975: 974: 970: 967: 966: 962: 959: 958: 954: 953: 951: 947: 940: 939: 935: 932: 931: 927: 924: 923: 919: 916: 915: 911: 908: 907: 903: 900: 899: 895: 892: 891: 887: 884: 883: 879: 876: 875: 871: 870: 868: 864: 857: 856: 852: 849: 848: 844: 841: 840: 836: 833: 832: 828: 827: 825: 821: 817: 813: 808: 804: 793: 792: 788: 785: 784: 780: 777: 776: 772: 769: 768: 764: 761: 760: 756: 753: 752: 751:Ex parte Bain 748: 745: 744: 740: 739: 736: 731: 726: 722: 717: 714: 707: 702: 700: 695: 693: 688: 687: 684: 678: 673: 666: 661: 659: 654: 652: 647: 646: 643: 634: 625: 616: 607: 598: 589: 588:CourtListener 580: 573: 569: 565: 561: 560: 548:(1): 221–274. 547: 543: 539: 532: 517: 513: 507: 492: 488: 482: 475: 470: 464: 449: 445: 439: 425: 424: 417: 410: 407: 403: 399: 394: 390: 380: 377: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 359: 355: 354: 348: 345: 339: 337: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 292: 283: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 260:landmark case 257: 253: 252: 247: 246: 237: 233: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201:Case opinions 199: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137:Chief Justice 136: 135: 133: 128: 123: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 99: 95: 91: 86: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 2396: 2388: 2380: 2372: 2364: 2356: 2348: 2340: 2332: 2324: 2316: 2308: 2300: 2292: 2284: 2276: 2268: 2260: 2252: 2244: 2236: 2228: 2221: 2220: 2212: 2204: 2196: 2188: 2180: 2172: 2164: 2156: 2148: 2140: 2132: 2124: 2116: 2108: 2100: 2092: 2084: 2076: 2068: 2060: 2052: 2044: 2036: 2028: 2020: 2012: 2004: 1996: 1988: 1980: 1972: 1964: 1956: 1948: 1940: 1932: 1924: 1916: 1908: 1900: 1867: 1859: 1851: 1843: 1837:Kerry v. Din 1835: 1827: 1819: 1811: 1803: 1795: 1787: 1779: 1771: 1763: 1755: 1747: 1739: 1731: 1723: 1715: 1707: 1699: 1691: 1683: 1675: 1667: 1659: 1651: 1643: 1635: 1627: 1619: 1611: 1603: 1595: 1587: 1579: 1571: 1563: 1555: 1547: 1539: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1507: 1499: 1491: 1452: 1444: 1436: 1428: 1420: 1412: 1404: 1396: 1388: 1380: 1372: 1364: 1356: 1348: 1340: 1332: 1324: 1316: 1308: 1300: 1292: 1284: 1276: 1268: 1260: 1252: 1244: 1207: 1199: 1191: 1183: 1175: 1167: 1148: 1140: 1132: 1124: 1116: 1108: 1100: 1092: 1084: 1065: 1046: 1038: 1030: 1022: 1014: 995: 987: 979: 971: 963: 955: 936: 928: 920: 912: 904: 896: 888: 880: 872: 853: 845: 837: 829: 789: 781: 773: 765: 757: 749: 741: 563: 545: 541: 531: 519:. Retrieved 515: 506: 494:. Retrieved 490: 481: 468: 463: 451:. Retrieved 447: 438: 427:, retrieved 422: 416: 411: (1994). 397: 393: 356: 343: 340: 333: 297: 250: 249: 244: 243: 242: 230:Laws applied 188: 181:David Souter 176: 164: 152: 88:Case history 71: 53: 15: 453:October 13, 107:. granted, 2419:Categories 730:Grand Jury 385:References 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 718:case law 674:case law 562:Text of 521:June 17, 496:June 17, 429:June 17, 351:See also 330:Decision 308:greenway 206:Majority 103:(1993); 597:Findlaw 579:Cornell 254:, is a 222:Dissent 214:Dissent 120:Holding 2401:(2024) 2393:(2024) 2385:(2023) 2377:(2021) 2369:(2021) 2361:(2019) 2353:(2017) 2345:(2015) 2337:(2013) 2329:(2013) 2321:(2012) 2313:(2010) 2305:(2005) 2297:(2005) 2289:(2005) 2281:(2003) 2273:(2002) 2265:(2001) 2257:(1998) 2249:(1998) 2241:(1997) 2233:(1997) 2225:(1994) 2217:(1992) 2209:(1992) 2201:(1990) 2193:(1988) 2185:(1987) 2177:(1987) 2169:(1987) 2161:(1987) 2153:(1985) 2145:(1985) 2137:(1984) 2129:(1984) 2121:(1982) 2113:(1980) 2105:(1980) 2097:(1979) 2089:(1978) 2081:(1960) 2073:(1958) 2065:(1956) 2057:(1954) 2049:(1951) 2041:(1949) 2033:(1946) 2025:(1945) 2017:(1935) 2009:(1929) 2001:(1923) 1993:(1923) 1985:(1922) 1977:(1921) 1969:(1917) 1961:(1913) 1953:(1897) 1945:(1893) 1937:(1885) 1929:(1885) 1921:(1884) 1913:(1875) 1905:(1833) 1872:(2024) 1864:(2022) 1856:(2020) 1848:(2017) 1840:(2015) 1832:(2013) 1824:(2011) 1816:(2001) 1808:(2001) 1800:(1998) 1792:(1995) 1784:(1990) 1776:(1987) 1768:(1986) 1760:(1984) 1752:(1981) 1744:(1980) 1736:(1980) 1728:(1980) 1720:(1979) 1712:(1979) 1704:(1979) 1696:(1978) 1688:(1977) 1680:(1977) 1672:(1977) 1664:(1977) 1656:(1976) 1648:(1976) 1640:(1976) 1632:(1976) 1624:(1976) 1616:(1976) 1608:(1975) 1600:(1975) 1592:(1974) 1584:(1973) 1576:(1973) 1568:(1972) 1560:(1971) 1552:(1964) 1544:(1954) 1536:(1938) 1528:(1935) 1520:(1927) 1512:(1923) 1504:(1908) 1496:(1857) 1457:(2022) 1449:(2013) 1441:(2012) 1433:(2011) 1425:(2011) 1417:(2010) 1409:(2010) 1401:(2010) 1393:(2009) 1385:(2004) 1377:(2004) 1369:(2004) 1361:(2003) 1353:(2000) 1345:(2000) 1337:(1999) 1329:(1991) 1321:(1990) 1313:(1988) 1305:(1985) 1297:(1981) 1289:(1974) 1281:(1970) 1273:(1969) 1265:(1966) 1257:(1965) 1249:(1957) 1212:(1969) 1204:(1969) 1196:(1966) 1188:(1947) 1180:(1937) 1172:(1885) 1153:(2022) 1145:(2019) 1137:(2016) 1129:(2004) 1121:(1985) 1113:(1978) 1105:(1970) 1097:(1959) 1089:(1922) 1070:(1932) 1051:(2012) 1043:(1982) 1035:(1976) 1027:(1971) 1019:(1824) 1000:(2023) 992:(1993) 984:(1992) 976:(1990) 968:(1976) 960:(1833) 941:(2024) 933:(2016) 925:(2013) 917:(1978) 909:(1970) 901:(1962) 893:(1906) 885:(1896) 877:(1834) 858:(1993) 850:(1992) 842:(1990) 834:(1932) 794:(2002) 786:(1962) 778:(1922) 770:(1900) 762:(1896) 754:(1887) 746:(1884) 732:Clause 636:  630:  627:  621:  618:  615:Justia 612:  609:  603:  600:  594:  591:  585:  582:  576:  472:, 400:, 344:public 316:taking 312:Oregon 264:zoning 225:Souter 191: 189:· 187:  179: 177:· 175:  167: 165:· 163:  155: 153:· 151:  1161:Other 570: 404: 286:Facts 111: 93:Prior 572:U.S. 523:2021 498:2021 455:2021 448:Oyez 431:2021 406:U.S. 266:and 113:U.S. 105:cert 98:P.2d 73:more 65:U.S. 63:512 568:512 409:374 402:512 278:’s 109:510 101:437 68:374 2421:: 566:, 546:45 544:. 540:. 514:. 489:. 446:. 282:. 705:e 698:t 691:v 664:e 657:t 650:v 525:. 500:. 457:. 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
374
more
L. Ed. 2d
P.2d
437
cert
510
U.S.
William Rehnquist
Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
U.S. Const. amend. V
United States Supreme Court
landmark case
zoning
property rights
zoning and land-use regulations
Fifth Amendment
Takings Clause

A-Boy Plumbing & Electrical Supply
Tigard, Oregon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.