210:, in which he said: "If you look back at the people who created the Internet they talked very deliberately about it being a space that governments couldn't reach. I think we are having to revisit that stuff seriously now ... There is content that should just not be available to be viewed. That is my view. Absolutely categorical." The article suggested that Burnham was planning to negotiate with the Barack Obama administration "to draw up new international rules for English language websites" and that another idea being considered was "giving film-style ratings to individual websites".
203:
conference in London, in which he said that the government planned to crack down on the
Internet to "even up" the regulatory imbalance with television, saying that "a fear of the internet" had caused a loss of confidence that had robbed the TV industry of "innovation, risk-taking and talent sourcing"
169:
That terms and conditions which guide consumers on the types of content which are acceptable on a site should be prominent. It should be made more difficult for users to avoid seeing and reading the conditions of use: as a consequence, it would become more difficult for users to claim ignorance of
195:
to help people "better navigate the internet". He referred to the Byron Review, saying that he thought people felt a "sense of risk and uncertainty about this world they are roaming". Burnham told journalists that he had an "open mind" about whether there was a need for a new
Communications Act
117:
The report was generally well received by parenting groups, the government and the media industry. The video games industry, however, raised concerns over how increased classification would be funded, with some concerned that the BBFC did not have the capacity for such an increased workload.
153:
gave oral evidence to the committee explaining that the Prime
Minister's Internet Taskforce would be concerned not just with illegal content on the Internet, but also with "harmful and inappropriate content as well ... which may not be illegal but which cause all of us concern".
190:
suggested the government should have a role in ensuring that content on the
Internet met the same standards as that on television as "the boundaries between the two media blur". Burnham also raised the idea of warnings being applied to certain content on websites such as
162:
That any approach to the protection of children from online dangers should be based on the probability of risk. We believe that incontrovertible evidence of harm is not necessarily required in order to justify a restriction of access to certain types of content in any
177:
should work with
Internet-based industries to develop a consistent and transparent policy on take-down procedures with clear maximum times within which inappropriate material will be removed. This should be subject to independent verification and
425:
228:
was announced. Its initial brief included organising methods for the removal of inappropriate content on user-generated websites and developing measures to take down
Internet sites promoting harmful behaviour.
435:
129:
In June 2008 the government published "The Byron Review Action Plan". This document set out how the recommendations of the Byron Review would be implemented across government. In
December 2009 the
498:
75:
Many parents do not understand the media, which the Review terms the "generational digital divide". This can mean that parents are overprotective through fear of what is available.
59:
Use of the
Internet and videogames is extensive among children of all ages, and the use of these can be beneficial since they offer opportunities for learning and development.
360:
493:
137:
asked Tanya Byron to provide a progress review. Titled "Do we have Safer
Children in a Digital World?", The Byron Progress Review was published in March 2010.
81:
There should be a shared culture of responsibility between families, government, and industry, to restrict availability of inappropriate material to children.
134:
65:
The report does not focus on whether the media itself causes harm to children but instead looks at how the media can be used to make children's lives better.
513:
121:
On the day following publication of the report, most UK newspapers had a story on their front page outlining the classification system proposed.
28:
286:
157:
The
Culture, Media and Sport Committee's report was published on 31 July 2008 and contained various recommendations among which were:
238:
146:
221:
that TV-style regulation of the Internet is both undesirable and unworkable, as the Internet is a network rather than a medium.
62:
There exists in both media material that is potentially inappropriate for children, both in terms of content and safety online.
367:
243:
225:
174:
105:
196:
before the next General Election, indicating that his own preference was for smaller pieces of legislation as needed.
518:
214:
308:
94:
There are many systems already in place to inform parents and help them to restrict access to inappropriate games.
268:
98:
47:
websites) by children, and discussed the use of classification and the role of parenting in policing these.
166:
That the structure and funding of the Home Office Task Force on Child Internet Safety should be formalised.
84:
The Review proposes a "national strategy for child Internet safety" which provides information to families.
78:
Parents should be available to assist their children in making decisions about and during use of the media.
406:
385:
200:
149:
held an inquiry into harmful content in video games and on the Internet. On 14 May 2008 Minister
20:, titled "Safer Children in a Digital World", was a report ordered in September 2007 by the then
217:, who pointed out that it was hard to reconcile his comments with the views of media regulator
294:
204:
in programming. He enlarged on his remarks in an interview published the following day in
8:
430:
332:
206:
184:
44:
450:
464:
358:
341:
426:"Internet sites could be given 'cinema-style age ratings', Culture Secretary says"
130:
21:
345:
287:"UK govt commits to delivering Byron recommendations on child internet safety"
507:
248:
150:
390:
187:
24:
32:
36:
359:
House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee (31 July 2008).
40:
316:
140:
192:
101:) are sometimes misunderstood by parents as "difficulty ratings".
309:"The Byron Review (2008) and the Byron Progress Review (2010)"
218:
170:
terms and conditions if they upload inappropriate content.
386:"Andy Burnham hints at tighter control of online content"
213:
Burnham's words were criticized by technology journalist
104:
The classification system should be reformed so that the
199:
On 26 September 2008, Burnham delivered a speech at the
361:"Harmful content on the Internet and in video games"
69:
505:
366:. The Stationery Office Limited. Archived from
330:Petley, Julian (February 2009). "Web Control".
141:Department of Culture, Media and Sport response
29:Department for Children, Schools and Families
27:and delivered on the 27 March 2008 to the UK
88:
442:
417:
377:
457:
398:
239:Internet censorship in the United Kingdom
147:Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee
108:plays a larger role in classifying games.
514:Reports of the United Kingdom government
448:
383:
352:
423:
407:"Government to tighten up web controls"
224:On 29 September 2008 the launch of the
506:
404:
329:
124:
323:
424:Winnett, Robert (27 December 2008).
244:UK Council for Child Internet Safety
226:UK Council for Child Internet Safety
175:UK Council for Child Internet Safety
35:. The report focussed on the use of
55:Key points of the review included:
13:
465:"Children's web watchdog launched"
405:Sweney, Mark (26 September 2008).
31:. It was authored and overseen by
14:
530:
487:
449:Thompson, Bill (1 October 2008).
97:Current ratings systems (such as
384:Holmwood, Leigh (11 June 2008).
293:. 27 March 2008. Archived from
70:Parental/carer responsibilities
301:
279:
269:"The Byron report: key points"
261:
1:
254:
50:
451:"The medium and the message"
112:
7:
232:
10:
535:
499:The Byron Progress Review
346:10.1080/03064220802712266
313:UK Government Web Archive
89:Video game classification
519:2008 in British politics
434:. London. Archived from
201:Royal Television Society
181:
159:
438:on 30 December 2008.
471:. 29 September 2008
431:The Daily Telegraph
333:Index on Censorship
273:The Guardian Online
207:The Daily Telegraph
135:Children's Minister
125:Government response
185:Culture Secretary
45:social networking
526:
494:The Byron Review
481:
480:
478:
476:
461:
455:
454:
446:
440:
439:
421:
415:
414:
402:
396:
395:
381:
375:
374:
373:on 4 March 2016.
372:
365:
356:
350:
349:
327:
321:
320:
315:. Archived from
305:
299:
298:
297:on June 4, 2011.
283:
277:
276:
275:. 27 March 2008.
265:
145:In May 2008 the
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
504:
503:
490:
485:
484:
474:
472:
463:
462:
458:
447:
443:
422:
418:
403:
399:
382:
378:
370:
363:
357:
353:
328:
324:
307:
306:
302:
285:
284:
280:
267:
266:
262:
257:
235:
143:
127:
115:
91:
72:
53:
12:
11:
5:
532:
522:
521:
516:
502:
501:
496:
489:
488:External links
486:
483:
482:
456:
441:
416:
397:
376:
351:
322:
319:on 2010-04-07.
300:
278:
259:
258:
256:
253:
252:
251:
246:
241:
234:
231:
180:
179:
171:
167:
164:
142:
139:
131:prime minister
126:
123:
114:
111:
110:
109:
102:
95:
90:
87:
86:
85:
82:
79:
76:
71:
68:
67:
66:
63:
60:
52:
49:
43:(particularly
22:prime minister
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
531:
520:
517:
515:
512:
511:
509:
500:
497:
495:
492:
491:
470:
466:
460:
452:
445:
437:
433:
432:
427:
420:
412:
408:
401:
393:
392:
387:
380:
369:
362:
355:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
326:
318:
314:
310:
304:
296:
292:
288:
282:
274:
270:
264:
260:
250:
249:Bailey Review
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
236:
230:
227:
222:
220:
216:
215:Bill Thompson
211:
209:
208:
202:
197:
194:
189:
186:
183:In June 2008
176:
172:
168:
165:
161:
160:
158:
155:
152:
151:Vernon Coaker
148:
138:
136:
132:
122:
119:
107:
103:
100:
96:
93:
92:
83:
80:
77:
74:
73:
64:
61:
58:
57:
56:
48:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
23:
19:
473:. Retrieved
468:
459:
444:
436:the original
429:
419:
411:The Guardian
410:
400:
391:The Guardian
389:
379:
368:the original
354:
340:(1): 78–90.
337:
331:
325:
317:the original
312:
303:
295:the original
290:
281:
272:
263:
223:
212:
205:
198:
188:Andy Burnham
182:
178:publication.
156:
144:
128:
120:
116:
54:
25:Gordon Brown
18:Byron Review
17:
15:
453:. BBC News.
37:video games
33:Tanya Byron
508:Categories
475:22 October
255:References
51:Key points
413:. London.
394:. London.
173:That the
113:Reception
469:BBC News
233:See also
133:and the
41:Internet
39:and the
193:YouTube
163:medium.
291:Forbes
371:(PDF)
364:(PDF)
219:Ofcom
477:2013
106:BBFC
99:PEGI
16:The
342:doi
510::
467:.
428:.
409:.
388:.
338:38
336:.
311:.
289:.
271:.
479:.
348:.
344::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.