1455:
22:
298:"If the six men win, it will mean that the police are guilty of perjury, that they are guilty of violence and threats, that the confessions were invented and improperly admitted in evidence and the convictions were erroneous... This is such an appalling vista that every sensible person in the land would say that it cannot be right that these actions should go any further."
318:, is a valid type of appeal to consequences. Such an argument would seek to show that a proposed action would have unreasonably inconvenient consequences, as for example a law that would require a person wishing to lend money against a security to first ascertain the borrower's title to the property by inquiring in every single courthouse in the country.
178:) instead of its truth value. Therefore, an argument based on appeal to consequences is valid in long-term decision making (which discusses possibilities that do not exist yet in the present) and abstract
151:, since the desirability of a premise's consequence does not make the premise true. Moreover, in categorizing consequences as either desirable or undesirable, such arguments inherently contain subjective
170:) without regard to the formal preservation of the truth from the premises; appeal to consequences does not refer to arguments that address a premise's consequential desirability (
379:
572:
577:
86:
58:
39:
65:
955:
612:
454:
72:
766:
105:
416:
54:
43:
1374:
582:
192:, which is the bringing up of 'artificial' consequences (i.e. punishments) to argue that an action is wrong.
1494:
1410:
1386:
975:
1479:
987:
731:
387:
997:
299:
1489:
1484:
1405:
962:
858:
79:
1400:
1240:
708:
544:
500:
327:
290:
but is both different and fallacious, since "Q is undesirable" is not equivalent to "Q is false".
182:, and in fact such arguments are the cornerstones of many moral theories, particularly related to
1420:
1235:
751:
447:
152:
32:
1342:
1332:
1282:
1256:
906:
873:
774:
756:
656:
505:
487:
1380:
1368:
1348:
1337:
1252:
1065:
1041:
863:
819:
671:
597:
510:
338:
277:
188:
1395:
1299:
1263:
1178:
1134:
970:
901:
691:
520:
495:
8:
1273:
1172:
1119:
1095:
1018:
921:
853:
779:
592:
587:
564:
539:
1458:
1391:
1205:
1090:
1075:
1022:
982:
931:
868:
827:
804:
784:
687:
531:
515:
440:
1277:
1114:
1104:
1080:
1057:
1013:
939:
891:
849:
809:
651:
646:
468:
350:
252:
144:
1427:
1268:
1167:
1109:
1047:
842:
721:
716:
701:
666:
626:
554:
549:
360:
345:
224:
183:
148:
1184:
1148:
1124:
944:
916:
896:
744:
712:
696:
661:
1085:
1070:
992:
911:
837:
477:
355:
332:
303:
1473:
1210:
1100:
832:
795:
739:
607:
602:
286:
162:, appeal to consequences refers only to arguments that assert a conclusion's
1222:
641:
241:
432:
1415:
1192:
1129:
408:
237:
163:
1325:
1319:
1246:
1158:
136:
1432:
1216:
1200:
883:
139:(typically a belief) to be either true or false based on whether the
1362:
143:
leads to desirable or undesirable consequences. This is based on an
21:
1310:
132:
464:
140:
240:
markets will continue to rise this year: home owners enjoy the
179:
248:
159:
128:
186:. Appeal to consequences also should not be confused with
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1471:
573:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
578:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises
448:
380:"Fallacy: Appeal to Consequences of a Belief"
255:travel would be beneficial for space travel."
462:
455:
441:
314:In law, an argument from inconvenience or
131:for "argument to the consequence"), is an
1156:
409:"Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Consequences"
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
1309:
1472:
281:) is a special instance of this form.
436:
342: – circumstantial form
44:adding citations to reliable sources
15:
13:
14:
1506:
1454:
1453:
259:
207:
204:generally has one of two forms:
20:
419:from the original on 2022-02-13
251:will travel faster than light:
195:
31:needs additional citations for
951:Correlation implies causation
401:
372:
1:
284:This form somewhat resembles
7:
321:
316:argumentum ab inconvenienti
124:argumentum ad consequentiam
10:
1511:
1375:I'm entitled to my opinion
1449:
1358:
1297:
1231:
1147:
1056:
1031:
1006:
930:
882:
818:
793:
765:
730:
680:
634:
625:
563:
529:
485:
476:
309:
223:It is closely related to
1401:Motte-and-bailey fallacy
501:Affirming the consequent
366:
328:Affirming the consequent
265:If P, then Q will occur.
213:If P, then Q will occur.
55:"Appeal to consequences"
1421:Two wrongs make a right
752:Denying the correlative
302:in his judgment on the
1406:Psychologist's fallacy
1343:Argument to moderation
1333:Argument from anecdote
1283:Chronological snobbery
907:Quoting out of context
874:Overwhelming exception
757:Suppressed correlative
657:Quoting out of context
532:quantificational logic
506:Denying the antecedent
271:Therefore, P is false.
202:appeal to consequences
119:Appeal to consequences
1369:The Four Great Errors
1349:Argumentum ad populum
1338:Argument from silence
1042:Argumentum ad baculum
820:Faulty generalization
511:Argument from fallacy
339:Argumentum ad hominem
278:argumentum ad baculum
227:in its construction.
219:Therefore, P is true.
200:An argument based on
189:argumentum ad baculum
1387:Invincible ignorance
1193:Reductio ad Stalinum
1179:Reductio ad Hitlerum
1135:Wisdom of repugnance
902:Moving the goalposts
767:Illicit transference
692:Begging the question
613:Undistributed middle
521:Mathematical fallacy
496:Affirming a disjunct
40:improve this article
1495:Relevance fallacies
1120:Parade of horribles
1096:In-group favoritism
922:Syntactic ambiguity
565:Syllogistic fallacy
488:propositional logic
1480:Appeals to emotion
1206:Poisoning the well
1023:Proof by assertion
998:Texas sharpshooter
932:Questionable cause
869:Slothful induction
828:Anecdotal evidence
688:Circular reasoning
583:Exclusive premises
545:Illicit conversion
1467:
1466:
1445:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1381:Ignoratio elenchi
1293:
1292:
1143:
1142:
1105:Not invented here
810:Converse accident
732:Correlative-based
709:Compound question
652:False attribution
647:False equivalence
621:
620:
275:Appeal to force (
268:Q is undesirable.
253:faster-than-light
147:and is a type of
145:appeal to emotion
135:that concludes a
116:
115:
108:
90:
1502:
1490:Consequentialism
1485:Causal fallacies
1457:
1456:
1428:Special pleading
1307:
1306:
1168:Appeal to motive
1154:
1153:
1130:Stirring symbols
1110:Island mentality
1048:Wishful thinking
1029:
1028:
745:Perfect solution
722:No true Scotsman
717:Complex question
702:Leading question
681:Question-begging
667:No true Scotsman
632:
631:
555:Quantifier shift
550:Proof by example
483:
482:
457:
450:
443:
434:
433:
428:
427:
425:
424:
413:fallacyfiles.org
405:
399:
398:
396:
395:
386:. Archived from
376:
361:Wishful thinking
346:Consequentialism
225:wishful thinking
184:consequentialism
149:informal fallacy
121:, also known as
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
1510:
1509:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1463:
1437:
1411:Rationalization
1354:
1301:
1289:
1227:
1149:Genetic fallacy
1139:
1052:
1027:
1002:
926:
917:Sorites paradox
897:False precision
878:
859:Double counting
814:
789:
761:
726:
713:Loaded question
697:Loaded language
676:
617:
559:
525:
472:
461:
431:
422:
420:
407:
406:
402:
393:
391:
378:
377:
373:
369:
324:
312:
262:
216:Q is desirable.
210:
198:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
1508:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1482:
1465:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1450:
1447:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1436:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1389:
1384:
1377:
1372:
1365:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1353:
1352:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1315:
1313:
1304:
1295:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1250:
1243:
1241:Accomplishment
1232:
1229:
1228:
1226:
1225:
1220:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1170:
1164:
1162:
1151:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1062:
1060:
1054:
1053:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1037:
1035:
1026:
1025:
1016:
1010:
1008:
1004:
1003:
1001:
1000:
995:
993:Slippery slope
990:
985:
980:
979:
978:
968:
967:
966:
959:
949:
948:
947:
936:
934:
928:
927:
925:
924:
919:
914:
912:Slippery slope
909:
904:
899:
894:
888:
886:
880:
879:
877:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
847:
846:
845:
840:
838:Cherry picking
830:
824:
822:
816:
815:
813:
812:
807:
801:
799:
791:
790:
788:
787:
782:
777:
771:
769:
763:
762:
760:
759:
754:
749:
748:
747:
736:
734:
728:
727:
725:
724:
719:
706:
705:
704:
694:
684:
682:
678:
677:
675:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
638:
636:
629:
623:
622:
619:
618:
616:
615:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
569:
567:
561:
560:
558:
557:
552:
547:
542:
536:
534:
527:
526:
524:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
492:
490:
480:
474:
473:
460:
459:
452:
445:
437:
430:
429:
400:
384:www.nizkor.org
370:
368:
365:
364:
363:
358:
356:Utilitarianism
353:
351:Pascal's wager
348:
343:
335:
333:Appeal to fear
330:
323:
320:
311:
308:
304:Birmingham Six
296:
295:
273:
272:
269:
266:
261:
258:
257:
256:
245:
233:
232:
221:
220:
217:
214:
209:
206:
197:
194:
176:right or wrong
153:points of view
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1507:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1478:
1477:
1475:
1460:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1357:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1296:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1161:
1160:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1101:Invented here
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1063:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1024:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1009:
1005:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
977:
974:
973:
972:
969:
965:
964:
960:
958:
957:
953:
952:
950:
946:
943:
942:
941:
938:
937:
935:
933:
929:
923:
920:
918:
915:
913:
910:
908:
905:
903:
900:
898:
895:
893:
890:
889:
887:
885:
881:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
864:False analogy
862:
860:
857:
855:
851:
848:
844:
841:
839:
836:
835:
834:
833:Sampling bias
831:
829:
826:
825:
823:
821:
817:
811:
808:
806:
803:
802:
800:
798:
797:
796:Secundum quid
792:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
772:
770:
768:
764:
758:
755:
753:
750:
746:
743:
742:
741:
740:False dilemma
738:
737:
735:
733:
729:
723:
720:
718:
714:
710:
707:
703:
700:
699:
698:
695:
693:
689:
686:
685:
683:
679:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
639:
637:
633:
630:
628:
624:
614:
611:
609:
608:Illicit minor
606:
604:
603:Illicit major
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
570:
568:
566:
562:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
537:
535:
533:
528:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
491:
489:
484:
481:
479:
475:
470:
466:
458:
453:
451:
446:
444:
439:
438:
435:
418:
414:
410:
404:
390:on 2019-12-22
389:
385:
381:
375:
371:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
341:
340:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
319:
317:
307:
305:
301:
293:
292:
291:
289:
288:
287:modus tollens
282:
280:
279:
270:
267:
264:
263:
260:Negative form
254:
250:
246:
243:
242:capital gains
239:
235:
234:
230:
229:
228:
226:
218:
215:
212:
211:
208:Positive form
205:
203:
193:
191:
190:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
168:true or false
165:
161:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:
120:
110:
107:
99:
96:November 2007
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
1396:Naturalistic
1379:
1367:
1347:
1318:
1302:of relevance
1245:
1223:Whataboutism
1215:
1191:
1185:Godwin's law
1177:
1157:
1040:
1033:Consequences
1032:
1014:Law/Legality
988:Single cause
961:
954:
794:
662:Loki's Wager
642:Equivocation
635:Equivocation
421:. Retrieved
412:
403:
392:. Retrieved
388:the original
383:
374:
337:
315:
313:
300:Lord Denning
297:
285:
283:
276:
274:
222:
201:
199:
196:General form
187:
175:
171:
167:
157:
123:
122:
118:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
1416:Red herring
1173:Association
854:Conjunction
775:Composition
672:Reification
588:Existential
540:Existential
238:Real estate
172:good or bad
164:truth value
1474:Categories
1392:Moralistic
1326:Sealioning
1320:Ad nauseam
1247:Ipse dixit
1159:Ad hominem
983:Regression
785:Ecological
598:Four terms
516:Masked man
423:2022-02-23
394:2016-10-29
137:hypothesis
66:newspapers
1433:Straw man
1311:Arguments
1300:fallacies
1274:Tradition
1264:Etymology
1236:Authority
1217:Tu quoque
1201:Bulverism
971:Gambler's
940:Animistic
884:Ambiguity
850:Base rate
593:Necessity
465:fallacies
1459:Category
1091:Ridicule
1076:Flattery
1066:Children
963:Post hoc
843:McNamara
805:Accident
780:Division
627:Informal
417:Archived
322:See also
231:Examples
133:argument
1278:Novelty
1253:Poverty
1115:Loyalty
1081:Novelty
1058:Emotion
1007:Appeals
976:Inverse
956:Cum hoc
945:Furtive
463:Common
294:Example
141:premise
80:scholar
1363:Cliché
1298:Other
1269:Nature
1257:Wealth
892:Accent
478:Formal
310:In law
249:Humans
180:ethics
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
1125:Spite
1019:Stone
367:Notes
174:, or
160:logic
129:Latin
87:JSTOR
73:books
1211:Tone
1086:Pity
1071:Fear
469:list
59:news
530:In
486:In
158:In
42:by
1476::
1394:/
1276:/
1255:/
1103:/
1021:/
852:/
715:/
711:/
690:/
415:.
411:.
382:.
306:.
244:."
155:.
471:)
467:(
456:e
449:t
442:v
426:.
397:.
247:"
236:"
166:(
127:(
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
