Knowledge talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Archive 4

617:

these storms). Also (as an exercise) I uploaded tracks for all the named 2005 storms. I don't have much for wpac, nindian, or southern storms yet though; these are harder since the JTWC "best-track" data doesn't include storm names (only numbers). It is now well within the realm of possibility for me to upload a storm track for every known Atlantic hurricane (1851-present) to be included in their season pages...although with the controversy caused by including the 2005 tracks I don't plan to do this any time soon. One thing that could be done to help here is to help set up redirects from the "canonical" name I have used for linking storms from their tracks on wikipedia commons (like

1709:, and I'm afraid it may be because of a bug in my track generator program. However the error shows up in the UNISYS tracks as well. The problem is the max winds for the hurricane are given in the best-track as 115 knots. This is 132.25 mph which rounds off to 130 mph which is Category 3. however 132.25 is really into the Category 4 range. I thought I had accounted for rounding properly, but it seems my track and the unisys one do show this hurricane as reaching Category 4 status. Anyone reading the article will therefore be greatly confused since the article lists it as a Category 3 hurricane. 2607:, I gave the original inHg pressure values, with mbar/hpa as followups, whereas normally I don't think it's important to include inHg. With knots it's an even bigger problem since they all get rounded off to units of 5, so sometimes the mph and km/h will not match for hurricanes. So if you do give knots you have to be consistent and give knots/nm as the primary measurement everywhere through the article - and even more importantly, you have to make sure to give the miles (mph) and km (km/h) measurements alongside each value. 4210:

has been my policy ever since I came to the hurricane pages back in the glory days. The restrictions on length should be much looser than your personal preference. Your length restrictions are too strict. We shouldn't even get nearvous until 80 KB and start cutting stuff at 100 KB. 40 KB is WAY too strict. There needs to be more information on the current season pages than that (on the same page and not on subpages, Jdorje). Cutting or moving all that information does more harm than good. --

131: 32: 77: 59: 6385: 3414:, with the information - and infoboxes - for the storms that do not have their own article. (If a section gets too long there, it can quickly take its own article) Storms with their own articles should only have a link there, no information. (Should not be done for 2005 and future seasons as articles are all planned - even the least-notable storms from 2005 I've been able to make more than stubs for) 280:

we only use named storms? Second, should the infobox (and many other areas as well) include storms after they transition to extratropical? For example, the Longest lasting Tropical Cyclones in the Atlantic Basin is completely wrong IMO because it includes the extratropical portion of their lifetime. I am under the impression that for tropical cyclones, when they become extratropical they're done.

7551:. It contains versions of the WMO session reports on the 2002-2004 Hurricane seasons, and some of the other regions too. Much of the massive reports contain stuff we already know, however I noticed one very useful thing: The reports submitted by the various countries are included within them. This gives information on an area which has a serious lack of it - non-US impacts. For instance I found " 3999: 968:

it would simply get the heading Cyclone Alice-Bob, and the Bob part of Alice would go under the same heading. The headings would be in the same order that all storms in the Southern Hemisphere formed. In the 2004-05 season article, some of the headings for systems in one basin are empty just because all the info on that system is under a different heading because it entered a new basin.

2826:. Delta was never a hurricane, and it wasn't tropical when it affected the Canaries. I think the categories should be renamed to something like "Tropical cyclones in XXXX" instead of "Hurricanes in XXXX", and/or a note indicating that the systems need not necessarily be tropical when they reach the area in question. That would probably prevent further confusion in the future. -- 4584:. There does seem to be some confusion, however, in regard to wind speeds. In hurricanes, the direct wind speeds are an integral part of the process in measurement (data collection) and determining strength and category (differentiation). With tornadoes, this just isn't possible, wind speeds are not directly used because they aren't known and aren't measured directly. The 829:

2005 ones until the end of the season, to save on bother and arguments. On the other hand; if we're noting them at all, maybe we should use an "Other Storms" section, not unlike the unnamed TSs of the 50s and 60s, and have two sentences or so about them. There, they're kept out of the way of the main storms, but still written about. How does that sound? --

1112:. I proposed on the 2005-06 a split into the SW Indian, S Pacific and Australian seasons. Maybe with the older seasons, this will less useful, but it is at least more logical. The 2005-06 S Hemisphere article is really poor currently, Severe Cyclone Larry, which would probably be retired in the Atlantic and could get an FA standard article has only 5 4902:, giving every hurricane to affect the united states - perhaps most interesting here is the gaps; it seems that 1915-1979 has not fully been re-analyzed. Next, the data-by-year provides some very interesting data although it's inconsistent; the most detailed years seem to be the oldest ones (which were most recently added), for instance 4632:

Though the F-scale actually peaks at F12 (Mach 1), only F1 through F5 are used in practice, with F0 attached for tornadoes of winds weaker than hurricane force. Again, F-scale wind-to-damage relationships are untested, unknown and purely hypothetical. They have never been proven and may not represent real tornadoes.

7395:"JTWC products on this website are intended for use by U.S. government agencies. Please consult your national meteorological agency or the appropriate World Meteorological Organization Regional Specialized Meteorological Center for tropical cyclone products pertinent to your country, region and/or local area." 4047:

of inland states. The Fujita scale background color is basically the same color scheme as the Saffir-Simpson scale, with F0 = storm. The "List of tornadoes" sub-section will be in the "Impact" section, after the regional impacts. If there were only a few isolated tornadoes, I wouldn't worry about adding it.

6347:

this is obviously not good. JTWC has one-file-per-storm best-track data; I've started working on using this but it takes a lot of work. An additional problem is that there's no re-analysis for these basins that I know of, so for instance Nancy is still listed in the best-track as having 215 mph winds. —

6180:

I need some advice for this. Excluding the table, should I continue giving the Date, Year- Summary formula for every storm? Or should every storm be in a table, with notable NJ hurricanes at the bottom? The 1944 storm has a lot of information that could be expanded upon, and it might look weird being

5938:

Actually, for New Jersey it is quite the contrary. I plan on using the California hurricanes as a guideline, which includes many storms' remnants. Though two have made landfall in the state in fairly recent history, numerous have passed through the state, and I intend to list them and, briefly, their

5650:

gives $ 43.7 billion. Replacing Andrew's $ 44B with a $ 36B value in the Andrew article is a terrible idea. Listing $ 36B for Andrew in the retiree list while the Andrew article continues to say $ 44B is a terrible idea. And using the GDP value for Andrew while the CPI value is used for (say) Fifi

4743:

I'm not always sure what words should be hyphenated and what shouldn't. For instance northeast is in some places written as north-east, which is simply wrong. But should it be "upper-level low" or "upper level low" - I tend to think this one should be hyphenated. What about "low-pressure system" -

4355:

seen is of Hurricane Carla in 1961 (and it sucked, by the way). I've heard reports that one exists of Hurricane Donna in 1960, but I haven't seen it. So you're not going to find any satellite images of storms before 1960. I've also seen radar images of storms back to Hurricane Alice on New Years Day,

4046:

Thanks, it was more of an afterthought for here - I was trying to reorganize recent tornado outbreaks and realized with the number of tornadoes reported in recent hurricanes, it wouldn't hurt to bring it over here too. It would include any part of the storm, including the extratropical phase or areas

3919:

I made this for tornado outbreak pages, but I think it can apply here when a tornado outbreak occurs within a hurricane. This list should keep track of all the tornadoes and when they occur. It could be included in a sub-section "List of tornadoes" (or, in a large outbreak, as a sub-page to a storm).

2699:

and one for every other nation...for Atlantic hurricanes anyway. This can replace the "history" categories in each hurricane's article. Unlike the by-strength, by-basin, and by-season categories however, this category is not as precise: each hurricane may have more than one category, or none at all

1575:

Tropical depressions in the Pacific Ocean have the suffixes W, C, and E for Western, Central, and Eastern respectively. The JTWC labels (N and S) Atlantic storms with an L suffix. B and A are used in the North Indian Pcean for the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal. Hurricane 12's track picture could have

1203:

Yes, this is a problem. (1) seems reasonable...(2) I don't know what it means...(3) is not a good criteria...(4) is a reasonable criteria, though it's possible both names are retired...(5) is not good. An additional problem is crossovers aren't well or officially documented AFAIK...for instance I've

906:

If you need a list, I have a basic list of ALL the candidates for inclusion into the tropical cyclone best track database from the 1940's to 2003 in Excel format. It does mention which were numbered depressions, but it somewhat lacking in location of the systems. Unfortunately, tropical depressions

7221:

Current practice (which is explained on the project page, but has never been discussed particularly) is that the most notorious storm may take the main name. However for 2005 we have a lot of articles for storms that are not notorious at all (like Zeta, Epsilon, Lee), and I don't particularly think

6619:

The Wartime Tropical Cyclones sounds interesting. A hurricane affected a fleet out of the American War for Indepence, same with the Civil War, the Surprise Hurricane could be mentioned, same with the 1944 Pacific typhoon that killed a lot of our soldiers. I'm not sure how many there are, but this is

5661:

Perhaps we should wonder whether using the GDP deflator is even a good idea, however. Doing so bases inflation on the rate of growth of the U.S. economy - which may be a good way to inflate U.S. hurricane damages, but is surely not a good way to inflate damages from other countries! However, using

4536:

cons. Pros: it will help focus our efforts on one article, potentially leading to faster work since we communnicate about things more. Cons: potentially overlapping work if more than one person works on an article at the same time. It's not like everyone is forced to work on that article though.

4209:

mean cut the entire storms section, that was one ridiculous proposition that made me upset. It sounded very smart-alec to me. The storms section is the heart of the article. For a reason I have yet to understand, you guys saw a need to give 2005AHS a heart transplant. That's why your first paragraph

2574:

I grow increasingly frustrated by the overuse and interchanging of knots and nautical miles with real units. When writing an article, the first priority is to keep the same units for everything. If you use nautical miles, you have to use them (and knots) everywhere. But knots and NM are bad since

1904:

Are you sure the 1959 cane was extratropical? Unisys says it wasn't, but that's beside the point. The new way might not be better. The circles and squares look similar, and at a quick glance, they could get confusing. I don't remember how you did it before, but could you have one for ED, ES, EH, and

1718:

Good question about the Lousisiana Hurricane. I personally have no idea except to call it a 120 knot hurricane. I know it is incorrect, but this way, it can show the Category 4 intensity. In addition, you can't tell the intensities other than the SSS in the maps (i.e. no difference on map between 75

1014:

After doing the 1492-1889 for the Atlantic, all of the North Indian, and much of the Western Pacific, I made a promise to myself that I would not do the Southern Hemisphere, so I cannot help you there. Based on what I see, you seem to be alone. Considering no one else has helped you, you do not have

967:

Under the current system, if a cyclone crosses into a different basin, it gets a new heading. Thus, if Cyclone Alice gets crosses into the SW Indian, it would get renamed to Cyclone Bob and get a new heading elsewhere in the article. It would not go into the Cyclone Alice section. Under my proposal,

345:

In 2005, the only dissipation date that is incorrectly marked on the infoboxes right now is for Hurricane Maria (its damage had not yet been done when it became extratropical), but I cannot find the exact date of dissipation. The best way to figure it out correctly is by the NHC reports - if it says

279:

I have 2 questions about the infobox now. Should tropical depressions be included for Dates, damages, and deaths? Say for example TD 1 formed on May 18, caused $ 500 million in damage, and killed 20, then TS Alberto formed on July 3. Should the TD, if mentioned in the article, be included, or should

269:

Depends on how much there is to write about them. If it's too long for one lump article they can be split. I don't think it would hurt to write them as a lump article and then if necessary it can be split later. I held off on making the categories for the older seasons since I wasn't sure if they

7555:

caused $ 270 million damages in the Dominican Republic, 1.7% of the GDP" - there is no mention of damages in the Dominican Republic in its article. There are potentially useful images in there as well, but I don't know about the copyright issues. A proper examination of these could well improve all

7397:

Only RSMCs and TCWCs provide the official forecasts and name tropical cyclones. Also in relation to another post further up the SS scale only applies to the North Atlantic, NE Pacific, and Central Pacific. The conversion from 10 minute to 1 minute averages given by the BoM is to divide by 0.871 but

7329:

The rule had been set in black and white. The main article goes to the storm that had its name retired, or to a disambiguation page (or a redirect to the first article if only one of that name has occured). A storm ONLY gets the main article if the name was retired, or is likely to be retired based

7264:

In this case, I'm mostly for consistency. The date is more helpful than not. A consensus that all TC titles should be "Name (year)" would makes maintaining and creating new articles as simple as possible. For the average person searching Knowledge, it wouldn't hurt -- they aren't going to know if a

6205:

That works well for Arizona, but the effects can range greatly in NJ. Strong winds, surf, erosion, waves, or rainfall is possible. Would the table still work for NJ? Another problem with NJ is the length of the table. Believe it or not, a lot of storms have passed through the state, of which nearly

5237:

Obviously, not all will be listed. I know needs sources isn't a task, but it should be. For the expand section, I put every retired Atlantic hurricane that it is pretty bad. A current goal for the project is having every Retired Atlantic hurricane article to be at least B class, and those above are

4204:

Well, Jdorje, we need to excercise a greater level of discretion on what is said. There are some facts (like the name of a Hurricane Hunter pilot) that just don't need to be said. Those are the facts that I try to cut from the longer sections, like Bonnie in 2004AHS. The different sections can have

4142:

The blue and grey was always there since it was first introduced by someone else (as an experiment) with Katrina. At first, it was only for US storms, but Wilma was the first that affected both the US and other countries to a great degree. The yellow was added to make sure that each section had its

3435:

What is a hurricane season but the sum of its storms? Removing them would be like writing about the World Series without entries for the individual games. People just need to learn how to follow summary style. If a storm has its own article, you don't need to put very much in the season article. --

2585:

Sorry, I see you changed quite a few, and I can see why you're frustrated. I just took it right from the JTWC or NHC report, figuring the exact versions are better (I see I was wrong). I'll try and remember that for the future. I don't think I use knots (I hope I don't, I hate them). I know, you're

222:

East and central pacific are lumped together into one article/category. Mostly this is because of naming ( ) which leaves no room for distinction. However, they are two separate basins so if you want you could probably have two separate sections in the article for them...with two separate infobox

207:

First, in the hurricane season templates, there are spaces for first formation, number of storms, etc. In the East Pacific, should those dates and totals include the Central Pacific? For example, if there were 14 East Pacific named storms and 1 Central Pacific named storm, at the end of the season,

7254:

I think the qualifier should be on most storms as a rule, Lee needs the qualifier as there were 3 WestPac storms, including a typhoon (I guess that is more notable than the Atlantic one). One thing which might be worth changing with these rules is an active storm gets the main name (if we go ahead

6990:

Or something like that. Almost anything is better than the bland and boring "21st storm, 13th hurricane," etc. Do you see my point? We need to go through all the hurricane articles and make sure that the first sentence is compelling, and not just a numbers race. I tried with Hurricane Katrina, but

6346:

The problem is that the best-track data for wpac, nindian, and spac is terrible. The UNISYS tracks are made from a HURDAT-formatted file that the unisys people must have assembled from the advisory data (it is based on the advisory data not the best-track); this is what I've been using so far but

4735:

Remember to make the length of each storm's summary proportional to that storm's importance. In a bunch of the seasons of the 1980s and 1990s, the important storms are the ones with the least detail since the author knew these storms had their own articles and just gave a short summary. But each

4596:

It's totally unjustified and not something that should be perpetuated by Knowledge or any encyclopedia. Ask a NWS meteorologist if they really can say that those exact speeds are known and they would say no. NSSL, SPC, researchers, Fujita, Grazulis, etc. would tell you the same and it is very well

4164:

for the tornado outbreak charts for storms that indeed had a confirmed outbreak (Cindy, Dennis, Katrina, Rita, Wilma and Emily pending TCR). In most cases, they would be sections of the existing article (except Katrina, which will definitely have its own subarticle, and possibly Rita which will be

3377:

Well, whether it's related or not I'd like an answer ;-). There are hundreds of storm articles with storm tracks and almost all of them come at the beginning of the "Storm history" section, left-aligned. I don't see what could possibly be wrong with this, but it would be a pain to fix (unless we

1889:

where it didn't reach cat5 until extratropical (according to the best track at least). So, I changed it: now the color always indicates strength and shape is used to indicate type. Tropical cyclones use circles, extratropical use squares, and subtropical or non-tropical use triangles. I haven't

1286:

What storms need storm-path images? I can easily make such images if I know the info for the storm. The info needed, of course, is the year and the name of the storm. For wpac, spac, and nindian storms I need the storm *id* instead of the name. Also needed is the title of the storm (Hurricane,

7036:

first sentence needs a different approach too. What I would hope editors and contributors realize is that we don't need special TC article guidelines, we need good writing, which probably doesn't mean starting each article based on a formula that emphasizes obscure data (of the kind only TC geeks

6675:

I'm slowly updating the pages relating to the "wetter cyclones" connected to the Tropical cyclone rainfall climatology page. I understand the need for not jumping around, but some of these cyclones never impacted land significantly. There is merit to update the ones to affect land first, before

6543:

For the Pacific typhoon seasons, I didn't feel like listing every storm, especially if most of them didn't do anything. Track maps would be cool for every season in every basin with an infobox, but that might be a lot of work. Also, if some seasons are really active, they might be pointless. They

4823:

Let me just say I'm sorry for some of that. I basically wrote all of the 1950-1978 storm summaries. I felt by writing only a little bit about an important storm, it would draw people into the storm article. I guess that was wrong, oh well. You're exactly right about references (again sorry!), and

4631:

So if the original F-scale winds are just guesses, why are they so specific? Excellent question. Those winds were arbitrarily attached to the damage scale based on 12-step mathematical interpolation between the hurricane criteria of the Beaufort wind scale, and the threshold for Mach 1 (738 mph).

984:

Hmm, I don't remember reading your original post before. Anyway, I agree with you, the current layout by region is terrible and will make little sense to anyone. To find a storm I have to look through the entire table of contents to see where it is, since it is not ordered in any way that makes

828:

I agree. I'm on the notability bandwagon, and let's face it people, these TDs contribute NOTHING to the season. I personally can't see much in the way of notable tropical depressions. That means that the button bars need to be fixed, but that shouldn't be too much of a hassle. We should leave the

616:

for a complete list. All Atlantic and EPac storms that have articles should now have tracking charts to go with them. I also uploaded charts for Atlantic cat5's that didn't have articles (these are included in the season articles, though I don't rule out the possibility for writing articles for

6896:

Every article mentions "wind speed" in very many places. Infoboxes say that a storm has "XXX mph sustained" winds. But we don't clarify what exactly this means, and this is leading to problems. The NHC and (I think) JTWC use 1-minute sustained winds. However the WMO and other organizations -

5891:

Whoa whoa whoa! Time out. Now why is this a good idea? Only three, maybe four states need articles like this: Florida, Texas, North Carolina, and maybe Louisiana. The other states don't have an extensive enough hurricane history to warrent an article, especially not New Jersey. You want me to do

4729:

Give references. Right now nothing in the season articles is referenced. The MWS is listed as an external link and presumably this is where most information comes from. But from now on when adding info we should give a reference. You can just use the simple inline reference format, and we'll

4446:

As the portal has a space for new articles, I think that we should only create one new article per week so we won't run out of new articles for the portal. We could perhaps "release" the new article every Monday (or whenever) so that there is one new article for the portal each week. Since it is

3047:

Should we broaden out some to make this part of a larger project covering all weather events and details? After all, many of us have worked on other non-tropical sites too...(I'm currently debating on whether the current snow/ice storm, with 500,000 without power and one dead so far, warrants an

2770:

Of course. For the Caribbean however, I find it hard to tell how to break things up. Currently I'm just changing any "XXX history" entries to "XXX hurricanes", which I then make as a new category that's a subset of "XXX history". However there are so many Caribbean islands/countries that this

2654:

but I think this really needs examination.It's misleading to say (as even the 1492-1524 article does) that any season that happened before the June-1st-to-November-30th definition was decided "officially" began and ended on those dates.Some different terminology should be used to make clear that

255:

Second, I have taken the unilateral action of restoring year by year links for Pacific hurricane seasons from 1960-1969 because they named all storms from those seasons. Should we lump the 1950-1959 seasons into one big article, or should we have them seperate like (for example) the 1930s in the

4094:

I've managed to get the lists for Charley, Ivan, Jeanne, Dennis and Isabel, and the numbers sometimes go over the NHC figures (i.e. Isabel at 53, not 50). I don't think I'll be able to compile lists from before then (at least to the current levels of detail) because of the fact that information

2710:

They don't have to make landfall to affect an area, and IMO, extratropical counts if it is damaging there. What about storms that reach into inland states and are damaging there, will they be included? (Of course, we need to be realistic, don't include states like North Dakota and Montana where

686:

From what I've seen, the Atlantic articles from 2003-backwards don't include the tropical depressions in the articles, but are featured in the button bar (where it has one). I think that either we include depressions in articles, or leave them out entirely, taking them off the button bar in the

4623:

depending on how well-built a structure is, wind direction, wind duration, battering by flying debris, and a bunch of other factors. Also, the process of rating the damage itself is largely a judgment call -- quite inconsistent and arbitrary (Doswell and Burgess, 1988). Even meteorologists and

4330:

The storm tracks exist separately from satellite images. Eric has some (partially founded) concerns about adding pictures to articles unnecessarily, but in any case whether we add storm paths is a separate issue from whether to add satellite images. However, before 1890 (or perhaps 1893) the

4187:

For older articles, this means we need to remember to balance the article. For new articles, it is a problem because the level of detail will just grow and grow. Eventually you have the decision of cutting information out and losing it, or splitting data off into a separate article. But the

4183:

detail. The amount of detail given on a particular storm in the intro should be less than what is given in that storm's section; often the intro has more detail on the important storms than those storm sections have. Also, more detail should be given on more notable storms, regardless of the

4059:

Right now, I am starting to work on research to find all the information for past storms - starting with the last few years. I am also working on trying to find specific death toll information to current standards, although that could be difficult. It won't appear on the pages until I have the

1690:

Thanks for the quick response. That might be a ton of work to do one for every storm, and is probably not needed. People should have a good enough sense of geography to be able to read the summaries, and if they can't, will they be able to read a map as well? It would be neat, but I personally

963:

The current setup for southern hemisphere seasons is confusing and hard to follow because it sometimes seperates individual storms into different sections when it enters a new basin. I propose abolishing the major basin headings and replacing it with a season summary/activity section that goes

7110:

In addition, as seen on the talk page for the 2003 season, I propose having a damage table for each storm also on each page. Claudette, for example, would list each area it affected, followed by damage, damage (2005 USD), deaths, and indirect deaths. What do you think of these 2 propositions?

5341:

This list is pretty good and I can see that a lot of work went into it, but (there's always a but, isn't there?) it would need some more work to actually be an article. For example, it lumps Delores and Dolores together, but keeps Kirsten and Kristen apart; it links Michelle but not Mitch; it

710:

Agreed, all or nothing. Personally, I say nothing, unless a tropical depression was notable. For example, if a depression caused $ 1 million in damage and killed some people, it deserves to be mentioned. There should be a separate section for them if anything, but I believe that most tropical

1691:

wouldn't want to see you spend all that time for those storms. Maybe we should just get a list for the unusual tracks and uncertain paths. As the direction, if they read the storm summary they should be able to figure it out. Maybe have an arrow or a "Start" and "End" on the paths, not sure.

1543:

Cyclone 05B I already set up (along with some others), but I haven't uploaded it because I haven't decided on a naming convention. I think it should be "year basin type number", like "1999 North Indian tropical cyclone 05B". But are north indian storms called cyclones or tropical cyclones?

964:

something like this: "This season, 4 cyclones formed in the south Pacific, 9 formed in the southeast indian ocean, and 14 formed in the southwest Indian Ocean. One of the south Pacific cyclones crossed into the SE Indian Ocean, and 3 of the SE Indian cyclones crossed into the SW Indian."

415:

cyclones, with subtropical included due to ambiguity between tropical and subtropical. Isabel should not be listed as September 20. It should be listed as September 19, the day it turned extratropical. For convenience, dissipation should include became extratropical. Remember, these are

364:

Hurricane Isabel is listed as September 20, 2003, and should be, the correct time should be listed as 0600 UTC September 20 (2:00 am EDT). That was when Isabel, still with its identity, merged into a larger extratropical low at high latitudes. (It was over James Bay at the time around

6967:

Which of these gives the least amount of relevant information? I would say they work in order. The first one gives the time - 1985, September; the strength, "powerful"; and the location, though it maybe could mention the eastern seaboard. However, that's handled in the next sentence.

6897:

particularly the Australians - use 10-minute sustained winds. The two are not interchangeable and can't be converted with any certainty, a huge problem. A related problem is that the Australians have their own cyclone rating system that also goes 1-5 but has no relation to the SSS;

5658:, which allows you to use different methods to estimate inflation. However, this doesn't go past 2004, and even worse none of the methods used seems to agree with what the NHC has (the site does have very good explanations of the different methods, however). So the search goes on. 4143:

own color. I see it has been changed since - that should be the color scheme used for 2006 and beyond as it becomes an operational template. I'd only add it though when the death toll reaches about 10 or so, since a small toll could easily be written out well in the impact section.

1637:

I know you typically only do Hurricane articles, but Michelle had a good idea for Hurricane Lili in 1984. Rather than making a hurricane article about the long-lasting December hurricane, it would help readers understand the storm more by having a track map of the Hurricane on the

6425:

Dude, are you kidding me? The Galveston article is far and away the best article on the project. It has plenty of references (28 to be exact) and is better written than any of the other hurricane articles will ever be. IMO, it should be the model for future hurricane articles. --

5666:

the GDP deflator takes us back to the problem in the first paragraph. Using a global GDP inflator (which basically "adjusts for wealth") might be possible but would "seem to" inflate damages from third-world countries tremendously (whether this is justified is another question).

1557:

Err, compare to "1975 Pacific hurricane 12". Note that "Hurricane 12 (1975)" isn't sufficient because the Atlantic had a hurricane 12 too (although the Atlantic one probably had a name, there are certainly other storms where only numbers were used, like "Hurricane 7 (1938)").

1947:

However the 'X' isn't explained in the documentation. '*' in that position means tropical and 'E' means extratropical. I assumed 'X' also means extratropical. So the entry 'X2281023 25 0' means extratropical(?), 22.8 lat, -102.3 long, 25 knot winds, 0 mbar pressure.

4592:

Wind speeds have been added to infoboxes and event article boxes, as well as used inproperly in the manuscript of some articles, and should immediately be removed (or modified in the manuscript of articles) and it understoood that it is pseudoscientific and unecyclopedic.

6371:

I was looking over a featured article included as part of this WikiProject and noted that it possibly isn't up to the standard of today's FA status. Should it be put up for delisted, I have a feeling it might succeed. Does anyone want to have a look at it and comment? --

6515:

The pacific typhoon seasons and pacific hurricane season articles must have track map in infoboxes, storm pic things (I dont know what are they actually called), button bars at the bottom , all of the storms listed, the entire overview of the season must be written (see

5535:

Ooh, whoops. Well, I fixed Bonnie using the costliest without inflation list, but most other ones aren't on the list. How should we fix that discrepancy? Should we use the U.S. Department of Commerce Implicit Price Deflator for Construction, which is what the NHC uses?

5017:

Oh. Well, here might not be the best place to ask, mainly because Eric and I both voted no and Jdorje abstained. Just kidding, but I still don't see the need. One thing we could do instead of that is ensuring every summary of every storm lists the longevitity and peak.

1108:, but there it will get a wider audience. The Southern Hemisphere is treated poorly by the WikiProject at this time, I mean really awfully. This isn't like the combination of CPac and EPac, which is logical as the Central is usually quiet. It is almost like having the 5738:- This would be similar to California's, but would be shorter. Must-haves are Norma (1970), Kathleen (1972), Joanne (1976), Octave (1983), and Nora (1997). It should describe how often it gets the remnants of tropical cyclones despite none actually entering the state. 312:

If TD1 formed and was destructive, then YES, it should count...as for the extratropical part, my opinion is that the date of dissipation should be just that - dissipation - regardless if tropical or extratropical. Here is what is necessary to make a dissipation in my

384:

Hurricane Katrina is listed as August 31, 2005. That is also correct (although it was found to have merged with the front at about 44°N, not 48°N as I first thought). It became extratropical but kept its identity until the amalgamation at 1200 UTC August 31 (8:00 am

1894:. This does make it harder to distinguish tropical from non-tropical, but when looking at the full-sized image it conveys more information. (It also needs a key, which I will add shortly.) So my question is: is this new way better, or is something else needed? 4123:

is more important than by state...a lot of Caribbean hurricanes affected many countries and could use tables. Hink's been adding these, and I've added a few...but our tables look very different than yours. Why do you prefer that weird blue/yellow color scheme?

4205:

different, but not disproportional lengths. We don't need a set length for all sections, that's instruction creep. We get an attachment to these menial facts and demand that they stay, but that causes the length problem, therefore cut the menial facts. And that

2177:

List of 2005 names to dab. Note, names Huaning, Isang and Maring were also used for 2000, 1996, 1992, 1988 etc under the old naming system. I say we just include the ones in the 2001 and on naming system with a note about the old system, see Maring for example.

4692:

I have but it seems to be a pervasive problem of sorts and I'm guessing part of that is due to the influence of wind speeds for tropical cyclones, so I'm covering the bases. It's also applicable to the tornado tables that will go into some hurricane articles.

4188:

principle of balance means you can't just cut from one storm to shorten the article a bit - all storms sections should be kept balanced in length so you may need to cut equally from all storms. The format currently in use for the 2005 season (with a separate

4725:

Don't be too precise with damage amounts; there's no need to say "caused about $ 32.574 million in damages", since it's just an estimate anyway. No way should more than 3 significant digits ($ 32.6 million) be used, and usually 2 is sufficient I'd say ($ 33

5248:

Gilbert, Camille and Mitch should become featured eventually, as they are almost household names due to their impact/intensity, so those should get top priority. After that, I would say Iris and Dora, but those aren't really as important as the other three.

3074:

Would Wikisource be a useful place to put things like notable (or maybe ALL) discussions/public advisories, the tropical cyclone reports, etc.? We can't assume that they will always be available on the NHC's site, and they ARE public domain... Any thoughts?

7106:

There are a few recent seasons with storm infoboxes, which contain peak winds, pressure, and dates. That information should be right in the storm section, so I propose that they be removed in favor for a meteorological statistics section at the bottom.

4717:

Make sure to include units for damages. We always need to include the damage-at-the-time figure, and should also include an inflated amount next to it (which can be updated periodically). I prefer a format like "caused $ 500 in damages ($ 2000 in 2005

5606:

Heh heh. Like I said, it is a problem. Not sure what to do about it. We don't want our articles showing one thing when the NHC's costliest-hurricanes list says something else. But we also don't want different articles to conflict with each other. —

6909:

for southern hemisphere storms. It seems to me we need to change the infoboxes to clarify whether wind speeds are 1-minute sustained or 10-minute sustained, and go through every spac article to see what needs to be fixed. It will be very tedious. —

2965:

Truly amazing. You've jumped ahead of us!!! We should do the same thing here, including articles for the least notable storms (fish-spinners and depressions), and create those infoboxes...you'd be a big help! We have all winter to work on them too...

4243:

As far as I know, length insn't an issue in FAs. The only reason why there is a recommended size of 32 KB is that some old browsers choke with pages that are longer than that, but otherwise, it is usually not an issue in FA nominations. For example,

4184:

presence of other articles. Just because a hurricane has a separate article does not mean it deserves less mention in the season article. The season article needs to stand on its own - with other articles providing only supplementary information.

4588:

is what is used to differentiate tornado intensity and it utilizes damage, it estimates wind speeds correlated to damage but these speeds are not exact, are open to great effect from inordinate variables, and are not calibrated by actual testing.

7330:

on damage (in our best guess - Emily last year was a surprise and was changed back). The qualifier does not go into the name of retired names, unless absolutely necessary (if Cleo, Dora or Hilda is destructive in a future Pacific season).

1256:

Agreed. I think it should only be given a double name if it stayed at least a tropical storm the whole way. This would apply to Cesar and Joan. It would also apply to Irene of 1971 but that storm doesn't have an article that I know of. --

7436:

That best track appears to be exactly what I'm looking for to generate the track maps with. The format is a bit weird but I can adapt to it. Where can we find best track data for the north indian or south pacific/south indian basins? —

3031:

Unlikely. Doesn't everyone use millibars or hPa these days? But since the row title takes up 2 lines, it won't expand the table at all to include it - particularly for older hurricanes, where the inHg measurement is the "original" one.

2009:

Actually, an interesting piece of trivia: The 1938 New England Hurricane was technically extratropical when it hit Long Island, even though it had the winds of a Category 2 (100 mph). This is the strongest extratropical storm I've heard

3058:

I think this wikiproject should remain distinct; most of the guidelines here would not apply to other weather events. However a WikiProject:Meteorology (or Weather and Climate? What's the difference?) could be a good "parent" project.

489: 5442: 5390: 3243:

I think no pic should be preferred to using the track pic. The track pic should go in the storm history section to accompany the text there. An having no pic leaves the nopic category intact so somebody will look for a real picture.

7380:

I've been asked to post this here. From what I can see all NW Pacific TC data is incorrect as for some reason JTWC data appears to have been used. The only offical data for the NW Pacific is produced by the JMA. The JTWC is neither a

5725:. This could be an interesting project; having a list of the most important hurricanes for each state. Some states might be hard (like Delaware or Rhode Island), so that could be blanketed if necessary. Here's what would be needed. 6143:

Well, I've been adding a bit to that article, and I found an interesting fact: tropical storms strike Arizona on average every 5 years, and only about 6% of Pacific hurricanes hit the U.S. So, do you think the article is ready for

6083:

The only states that deserve similar articles to the two on Florida that I wrote are (excluding Florida): Texas, Louisiana, and North Carolina. No other states have had enough catastrophic hurricanes to warrent such an article. --

6008:

I don't see what's wrong with having it. What about notable storms that don't have articles, yet could use more mentioning in the list of ... page? The categories are there as a guide, while the list of page gives a summary to it.

4319:

Storm pics are working pretty good. I only wanted to advice this: Please do not put storm pics for old seasons (before 1950). altough this has not happened I'm warning because it will be very hard finding images for older seasons

3471:

But for most seasons, there would be so little stuff left. I would agree to having each storm having their own article before this, because at least the storm links are right there, though for the record I am still against that.

4874:

I got your note. Maybe we should look to see if one person added all of them. If so, he/she/it/they might have where they got it, and would be able to resolve the whole situation. Worst comes to worst, we could just ask NHC.

526: 7090:

My analysis: Dennis and Floyd are the worst ones. Iniki is great. Galveston is marginal, needs to mention why we have an article on it. Tracy is great, Tracy is exactly what I want Galveston to say. Okeechobee is nice too.

4118:

Sounds good. Note, even if the source is the TCR there should still be a reference. It needs to be obvious where every bit of data comes from so future writers can verify it. Also, I'd say differentiating death tolls by

3853:

The bounds of the season are notable. They're something that the reader should keep in mind when reading records and stuff. The current intro is a nessisary evil Jdorje. We're still an encyclopedia, no matter what kind. --

374:

Hurricane Dennis is listed as July 13, 2005. That is also correct - it never actually became extratropical (due to tropical air reaching well past 45°N), but rather lost its identity. The time was 0600 UTC July 13 (1:00 am

6295:

article was because hurricanes hitting there are unusual. It would be silly to create a list of all Florida tropical cyclones because tropical cyclones hit there all the time. Even the sad 1983 season managed to have one.

3453:

And that's exactly what the "Season summary" section already does! (Well, right now it's a bit incomplete since nobody cares about it much, but it already gives all of the actual important information about each storm.)

3497:

of storms. And Cyrius hits the nail on the head. A table just simply won't cut it. And I'm against creating articles for every storm for any season. The main article is and should remain king, the subpages secondary. --

1766:

The Bhola cyclone's track needs to be changed. It shows it as a tropical depression the whole way which is clearly not true. Let's use gray because we really have no freaking clue what the intensity of the storm was. --

464:

I was not aware of this project when I first started converting over tables to templates. So, I want to make sure that any work I have done, or will create is compatible. Therefore, I have a few suggestions/questions:

1884:

In the older storm track images, extratropical is indicated by using the gray color. This ran into problems with some storms because the storm's strength when extratropical is fairly important. The biggest example is

5641:

I'm reviving this discussion. In that article we run up against the problem head-on: to have consistent damage comparisons we need to use a consistent inflator. But using the inflation calculator above (probably the

1221:

My view: it depends on the situation. If it was notable under both names, it should have the double name. If it was only notable under one name, it should take the more notable name and the other name should redirect.

575:

Don't go overboard in making them. I really don't see why we would ever want to know what season had the second-earliest third storm of a season, and adding that column makes it impossible to integrate the table with

4295: 7398:

it should really be left as a ten minute average as the World Meteorological Organisation standard is a ten minute average at a height of 10m. The term "super typhoon" used by the JTWC is also completely unofficial.

1109: 7178:

I think the titles of tropical cyclones should only have its date if there is more then one. I think the most recent use of the said name shouldn't have a date on it's title, while it's predecessors should (i.e.

1625: 7001:

Entirely agreed. We should write up some criteria for lead sections to add to the main wikiproject page. Another criteria is the inclusion of links and certain information about each storm, as I listed in the

6717:

The Ash Wednsday Storm and the Great Storm of 1987 must be in the seasonal article because... 1) the Ash Wedndseay Storm of 1962 may have been tropical if the data from HURDAT agrees and also I still think that

3545:

to tc meteorology articles. The original scope of the wikiproject, however, was just to cover historical data about tcs. Should these articles be removed from the wikiproject or should the scope be expanded?

1160:

Keep the single name unless it makes landfall under both names (This would mean renaming Cesar-Douglas to Hurricane Cesar, and renaming Hattie and Fifi to Hurricane Hattie-Simone-Inga and Hurricane Fifi-Orlene.

3411: 3409:

Since many older storms have too little information to warrant their own articles, yet the overall length of the season pages are too long in most cases, what about splitting them off to a Storms page, i.e.

2771:

might give way too many categories. Instead we could categorize them as Cuba/DR/Haiti/Jamaica/PR/Leeward/Windward/Bahamas...but a few islands (like Grenada?) may still not fit into any of these categories.

1094:....So don't. No one has a gun to your head, and if you can't find good information, then you don't need to worry about it. It is better to work on bettering existing articles than making new, short ones. 1847:

of the same problems: the storm is shown weaker than the article claims while hitting madagascar, but at the correct strength for its mozambique landfall. For older storms the speeds are simply too low.

1064:

Completely agreed. You really need to calm down on the article creating, and actually listen to what we say. Why do you want help from us when you can't listen to the constructive critism we give to you?

7069:

The Okeechobee Hurricane or Hurricane San Felipe Segundo was a deadly hurricane that struck the Leeward Islands, Puerto Rico, the Bahamas, and Florida in September of the 1928 Atlantic hurricane season.

3261:

Agreed with Hink on the Visibles. They're my favorite. Jdorje, the nopic would still be in place for all storms prior to 1851 and plenty afterwards, so let's not fret about it falling by the wayside. --

4722:)" but other forms are possible too. The same should probably apply to the infoboxes (as is done with hurricanes - we should make it standard to list uninflated and inflated damages, in order) as well. 4714:

Don't use the term "storm strength". "Storm" is too generic to be used as a shortening of "tropical storm". Instead say "It reached tropical storm strength" or better yet "It became a tropical storm".

290:

Those are good questions. Unfortunately I don't know what is best or right. I have the same problem when making hurricane tracks however...whether to include the extratropical portions. For instance

3404: 479: 295:

has an extatropical portion several times larger than its tropical portion, and including it causes the image to be scaled down so you don't see the tropical portion as well. But for some storms like

3836:

What do you mean by season articles? IMO the problem with the current format is that it is too wordy because the first sentence (or two) gives the official bounds which are not particularly notable.

3418: 472:

All tables should be templates. This makes bolding of the hurricane name possible in the referenced page, if the storm/season set a record. It also makes updating and confirmation of records easier.

6901:

is actually a Category 4 on the Australian system meaning we don't know how strong it was on the SSS (probably a 3 I'd guess). All of this is discussed, in an obnoxiously long and repetitive way, at

2725: 2066:

Right now we have typhoon and hurricane disambigs (either at Tropical Storm heading or Typhoon/Hurricane heading, depending on the storms). I've thought about it, and perhaps we want to disambig the

640: 6577: 1965:

I think 'X' actually means they don't have a clue as to whether it was tropical or not. 'X's in other areas of NOAA mean 'not available', so I'm assuming that holds true for the Best Track too. --

7006:

section above. Also, this is a problem that season articles suffer from too, as every AHS article begins with the exact same intro that does not give any notable information about the season. —

5706: 3230:

Sounds good, though I'd make one tweak. I personally think Visible satellite photos should be first, followed by Infrared satellite shots. I think Visibles give a truer perspective of the storm.

2796:

I'd go for the safe side and include a separate category for each island nation. After all, some storms were small enough that they only affected 1 or 2 of them (i.e. Ivan and Emily in Grenada).

1043:

Storm05, why do you insist on creating stub articles that you then leave for the rest of us to fill out or delete? Why do you refuse to discuss creation of new articles before you create them?

4494:

I'm a bit more aprehensive about that. It sounds a little too restrictive. There are pretty strong pros and cons. So I'm not sure if I'm "fer it or agin it". I'll have to think on it a bit. --

2749:

Many storms will go into multiple locations, for example Hazel would also go into the lists for Grenada, Haiti, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York...

2695:. Some user created the Mexico sub-category, and I decided this should be a whole collection of categories. However at this time it's quite empty. I hope to create a sub-category for each 1726:, it shows a track map for the hurricane/cyclone/whatever for its lifetime. It isn't the official NHC, but considering no official agency recognizes the storm, this is probably the best bet. 7187:). When the name is reused (unless the name is retired) then the date should be put in the title (i.e. when Hurricane Epsilon is reused again, then 2005's should have it's titel renamed to 7032:]). I rewrote that several times to get away from "storm x and hurricane y and major hurricane z of the season." I also just posted a comment on the season article discussion page about how 5948:

For Arizona, there is significant information that can't really go elsewhere. For example, I can't add that the state is affected by a tropical storm or its remnants every 4 years or so in

4609:. Different winds may be needed to cause the same damage depending on how well-built a structure is, wind direction, wind duration, battering by flying debris, and a bunch of other factors. 4839:

Naming lists for Atlantic hurricanes go back to 1950, but not a single one of them gives a source. This makes it hard to verify any changes. For instance some anon came through and made

1214:

The way it is is fine. The more notable of the location should determine the storm, unless both are fairly notable. Fifi may need to be changed to Fifi-Orlene, but the others are fine IMO.

6659:

Yes. You should get some of the editors working on the current season article to help out. I suggest working backwards in an organized and complete way, rather than jumping around. —

4018: 3052: 1105: 6974:

The third one gives nothing but the time. It was in 2005, it was a category 5, it was the 21st named storm. So? Almost all of the 2005 hurricane articles are done in this fashion, and

5813:. Finally, we should probably all call them List of PLACENAME hurricanes so all names have a consistent pattern. Also, if a list gets too long, we can split them up like with Florida. 3322:. However, I read somewhere that a picture needs to be right-aligned if it is starting a section, unless there is an infobox or another image that would cause problems with text flow. 1598:

I don't think that's good, since it distinguishes cpac from epac (which we don't do) and doesn't cover the other basins (e.g., the perfect storm which is "1991 Atlantic hurricane 8").

6280: 6070: 5882: 5397:

which is a good article but misnamed; this article simply explains cyclone naming in the different basins and it isn't really a list at all (though it does include several lists). —

5022: 5000: 7309:? It may be more consistent for ALL storms to get qualifiers, but hopelessly unworkable. We would only need to qualify last years Katrina, if the concept of retirement didnt exist. 3140: 660:

Hmm, interesting problem there. The 5B will probably be sufficent, but that's just me. Not sure what to say about the storm tracks. Not every year before 1950 mentions every storm.

5852: 5424:, etc. It can then give the history of the naming systems for each basin (enough for a full article for the Atlantic anyway) as well as the upcoming (and possibly older) lists. — 3606: 2908: 240:

The HURDAT data from NHC and JTWC is separated by basin. It goes NAtlantic, EPac, WPac, NIndian, and South. SIndian is lumped in with SPac, and CPac is lumped in with EPac. See

5747: 2530:

to "65"...but that's not vandalism, it's just failure to understand our system. The entry was changed to "65 (29 direct; 36 indirect)" and I hope there will be no more problems.

6939:

Hurricane Gloria was a powerful Cape Verde-type hurricane that formed during the 1985 Atlantic hurricane season that prowled the Atlantic Ocean from September 16 to September 28.

6524:

for example, it also must have a season summary), have storm paths for the tropical depressions (inc. Atlantic) and have the retirement names section at the bottom if necessary.

5654:

The idea solution, seemingly, would be to use the GDP deflator for our calculations. But like Hink said this is hard. After a surprisingly large amount of searching I hit upon

4537:

We've already been doing this to some degree; as HurricaneHink's been going through the retired Atlantic storms one by one, I've been following and making my own improvements. —

3602:

I've noticed that Spanish wikipedia has very few information about this important assignment, can I help translating these articles into Spanish. Would it help? I need an answer

7486:

The NWP data from the JTWC is only unreliable from 2000 forward, as that is when the JMA took over. Pre-2000, the JTWC was in charge of the NWP, so there are no problems there.

6057: 5421: 4970: 859: 843: 791: 770: 535:

I was also working on a template that would say something like "Record Setting " "This holds records. See the ". This would provide a quick link to the page that has records.

6314: 6237: 6228: 6219: 5838: 5821: 5501:

OK, the totals are conflicting for each page, it seems. Starting now, I propose one inflation calculator is used to avoid different numbers. The one I have been using, located

5375: 5350: 4597:

reflected in the literature. Given that *some* NWS offices do unfortunately post this information, here are a couple of authoritative online sources in support of my position:

4451:

certain that there will be bad/notable hurricanes and typhoons and tropical cyclones in the future, by judiciously conserving our new articles, we won't run out of candidates.

942: 447: 5871: 5280:

Would Knowledge have any use for a list of every tropical cyclone name ever used? I made a list of exactly this over the last few weeks, and I believe it could be benificial.

4465:

The "selected articles" on the portal are for good articles, not for new articles. However the idea of having one article per week to focus on improving is a good one IMO. —

3616: 6276:

Actually, the NJ format is undecided too ;) I am in the same boat. The table can get big and bulky... I think I'm going to have the California hurricane page setup for mine.

6270: 6131: 5794: 4710:

I've copyedited most of the post-1950 AHS articles (up to 1990 at this point), and I have some notes that we should keep in mind when doing future writing (of past seasons).

4424:

gives a complete list of EPac storms (sometime soon I will make up a similar list, but containing tables for max wind speed, formation, dissipation, etc., for all storms). —

6729:

No original research. However I'd be interested in seeing evidence of the Floyd connection...there should be satellite pictures of this so it should be easy to find out. —

4644: 3612:

No need to ask, just go ahead and start! I can't help, as I can't speak a word of Spanish (bar Este usuario no entiende espanol :P :P) but the more languages the better. --

2422:

ex.2) Olaf is used in the Eastern Pacific and the Southern Hemisphere: the name is used as hurricanes and cyclones. So the title of Olaf disambiguation article begins with "

6656:

Improve the Southern Hemisphere Tropical Cylone Season articles, maninly because im getting frustrated being the only one user adding infomation to those seaonal articles.

672:

I am interested in generating some images, but the links to the software on freeciv.org are outdated. Could anyone please provide current links to the (software)files? TIA

7245: 6963:

Hurricane Wilma was the twenty-first named storm, thirteenth hurricane, sixth major hurricane, and fourth Category 5 of the record-breaking 2005 Atlantic hurricane season.

6883: 6870: 6866:

Agreed. That site used doesn't have it set for 2006 yet, so I'd stick to 2005 figures for past storms (of course, current storms in 2006 will have it at current figures).

6786: 6749: 6710: 6624: 6472: 6398: 6117: 6013: 5943: 5925: 5581:

Damn, that's actually really hard. Any idea of where to start looking? I tried googling the source of where the NHC gets it, but the first ~100 pages aren't that helpful.

5281: 4983: 4527: 4051: 4037: 3518: 3234: 3042: 2004: 426: 6339: 3633: 1536: 1098: 1019: 880: 701: 7144: 6581: 6548: 6496: 6210: 6200: 6167: 6047: 5694: 5618: 5585: 5564: 5540: 5526: 5486: 5469: 5449: 5324: 5307: 5267: 5258: 4879: 4828: 4561: 4489: 4476: 4155: 3493:

Completely agreed. Jdorje, in most season summeries, only notable storms are mentioned. The storms section describes them all. Without it, we would be devoid of info on

3476: 3248: 2637: 2611: 2590: 2534: 2022: 1952: 1909: 1869: 1852: 1826: 1695: 1664: 1195: 1069: 1051: 1032: 996: 901: 753: 732: 715: 664: 303: 231: 7215: 6986:

Hurricane Wilma was a powerful hurricane that formed during the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, becoming the most intense hurricane ever observed in the Atlantic Basin.

5288: 4150: 4027: 2526:

Not to say anything about these guys, but make sure you don't confuse vandals with idiots. There was some guy who kept changing the "29 direct, 36 indirect" deaths on

1028:

I do not think it is good just to create dozens of new stub articles. Go through systematically and fill out the articles completely before moving on to the next one.

264: 6325:

Why are there no storm pics templates on the Pacific typhoons and most of the Pacific hurricane season articles?, surely someone had uploaded some storm paths by now.

6185: 5097: 5070: 4979:

If you're talking about the button bar, it is in use for others. If you're talking about the table of contents, that was only because of the massive number of storms.

4697: 4683: 4342: 2519: 2438:

ex.4) Wilda is used only in the Western Pacific: the name is used only as typhoons (not used as hurricanes). So the title of Wilda disambiguation article begins with "

2285: 7115: 6680: 4169: 4099: 4068: 3025: 2680: 394:

Exceptions should be made, however, if the remnant low is still destructive (i.e. with Ivan - although it redeveloped), in which case it should be done case-by-case.

284: 216: 7313: 7296: 7278: 7269: 7259: 7167: 6995: 6690:

I propose we get rid of the AHS button bars. Seriously, what do they add? They do not aid navigation since almost all of the links just take you to one article. —

5238:

pretty bad in need of a complete makeover. We should pick 5 off the expand list for now. I vote Janet, Carla, Camille (which just needs impact), Gilbert, and Mitch.

4198: 3289:

That brings up something that was brought up on the Dennis FAC: The track pic (or any other pic) shouldn't be left-adjusted and starting a section at the same time.

2835: 976: 787:

Yea, it should be discussed. I say get rid of all of them, unless they cause moderate damage or deaths (SD 22 might be an example of this). Otherwise, get them out!

644: 7370: 6811: 6777: 6740: 6701: 6670: 6649: 6614: 6459: 6251: 6003: 5965: 4548: 4389: 4261: 4238: 4128: 4081: 3902: 3881: 3840: 3827: 3444: 3428: 3372: 3358: 3298: 3280: 3063: 2970: 2800: 2775: 2753: 2736: 2715: 2561: 2045: 1983: 1785: 1275: 1226: 1004:

Um, whos doing the Southern Hemisphere seasons?, because im the only one who is doing them and nobody had added any storms to the seasonal articles in that section.

398: 6358: 4420:), and in the proper order (the only one that was missing was a 1981 storm, though several were out of order). Somebody should do this for the other basins too. 3800:

hurricane that heavily damaged Mexico and southern Florida. Wilma is the most intense Atlantic hurricane on record with a minimum pressure of 882 millibars..." --

833: 691: 7095: 7041: 7017: 6569: 6173: 6127:

For the Catastrophic hurricanes, you're right with the ones you gave. However, the other ones (California, Arizona, NJ) give every hurricane to affect the state.

5892:

Alaska while were at it? This is ridiculous. New Jersey? Come on. They've probably had like two hurricanes in the past 150 years. You've got to be kidding me. --

4435: 3589: 3565: 3458: 3392: 3331: 3313: 3165: 3098: 2952: 2624: 2414:

ex.1) Fran is used in the Atlantic and the Western Pacific: the name is used as hurricanes and typhoons. So the title of Fran disambiguation article begins with "

2258: 1730: 1677: 1654: 1602: 1562: 1548: 985:

sense to me. Your proposed layout sounds much better, but I agree it should be discussed on the current season article (which has a number of active editors). —

651: 247: 7448: 7334: 5435: 5408: 2830: 2404:

If the storm name is used in more than one basins (except only in the Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific), the title is of the disambiguation article begins with "

1925:

03335 10/23/1959 M= 7 15 SNBR= 102 NOT NAMED XING=1 03340 10 23*126 967 75 0*127 976 75 0*130 985 75 0*135 993 75 0*

1120: 194: 4917: 3036: 2338: 2308: 2164: 2135: 2105: 1905:

EMH (extratropical depression etc.)? I personally don't have much of an opinion, as I appreciate the long and arduous work you put into making the track files.

1489: 7255:

with the all article thing), and once the storm is finished decide if it should stay at the main name or not; if it has a high chance of retirement I guess. --

7193: 5834:

Yea, I was thinking that eventually about splitting it up. Good idea about the top-level categories, though it could be hard for Europe or the Canary Islands.

2662: 1088: 1008: 274: 186: 181: 169: 164: 159: 7463:. The format from the JMA is better than the NHC format in my view though. You can get position data from this season and last season for the SW Indian Ocean 5732:- To make it an article it would have to describe the 4 major ones (Iniki, Iwa, Estelle, and Dot), as well as describing why it doesn't hurricanes very often. 2704: 2384: 1525: 6485:

Lack of inline references it the problem. Over the last week or so a couple editors have been working to improve this - I haven't looked in on it lately. —

6157: 4898:

file, which provides the whole thing in HTML format, including anchors - this can be used to link directly to hurdat sources. Also quite interesting is the

4356:

1955. Beyond that, you're going to be looking at aerial photos from Hurricane Hunters, damage photos, action shots (during the storm), or nothing at all. --

516: 6822: 6527:

A long time ago I uploaded every season track map the NHC had. If we want more track maps for older seasons we will have to make them ourselves i think. —

6191:

The way I did it is that every storm goes in the table (as the effects are pretty much the same: flooding), and notable storms get mentioned at the bottom.

6136: 4324: 3224: 2430:

ex.3) Emily is used in the Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific: the name is used only as hurricanes. So the title of Emily disambiguation article begins with "

7531:. All tracks before that have been reanalysed and if you look at them they do differ to the JTWC ones, but the RSMC Tokoyo ones will be the official ones. 6921: 6800:

Yes. More info and less info - some sections are way too long, while the all-important impact section is practically empty (talking about Katrina here). —

6538: 5505:, seems to be less than others, but is, IMO, more realistic. We should have one uniform calculator so the numbers remain consistant. Does this sound fair? 4931: 4077:

For direct deaths, the source is always the Tropical Cyclone Report. Often I'm able to get the state but not the county so they will go down as "unknown".

3597: 3539: 2579: 1816: 1760: 1713: 1632: 1291: 4744:

this is usually just written as "low pressure system" and I haven't changed it. This is a minor issue, but it would help to be consistent in our writing.

876:. All notable storms (with their own article) would be removed from this article, and it woudl only include info about the otherwise-non-notable storms. 839:

Actually, that's a really good idea. You have my vote. This way, you can mention what the TD does, while keeping it short and away from the main article.

7576: 7571: 5062: 4857:

to the whole section of the AHS article. However whoever wrote these originally surely does have a source for them. So where are the online sources? —

4278: 1044: 224: 6181:

with the rest of the storms. However, a table for every storm might be too long, especially with brief notes of its effects in it. What should be done?

5509: 5242: 2711:

tropical cyclones will likely never reach - they'd be blocked by a ridge or front coming out of Canada if they tried to go that far in that direction).

4817: 2496: 2492:

I am personally sick of the vandals, so why not list them all here. This applies to any basin or article that is continually vandalized by one person.

2482: 2095: 1898: 1660:

Actually, I think every storm we mention anywhere should have a track map. But I think it would take a bot to upload them all. Anyway, Lili is done.

1178: 4459: 4406:, I only wrote about the notable storms. Since the precedent has been set in others to mention ALL, someone really needs to flesh this article out. -- 1835:

I don't think so. The wind speeds are supposed to be given in knots; the SSS or cyclone scale aren't supposed to have anything to do with that. And

4410: 2659: 6329: 5393:, which is a totally unnecessary list and is replaced by your list (that list is basically an incomplete, inferior version of yours). There's also 3792:

I agree with most of that and can live with the others. I also agree that the intro should be brief. That's why I support the current intro for the

814:

for the United States that a few tropical depressions were significant for rainfall. It's short sighted to just exclude all tropical depressions.

5684: 4868: 6388: 6304: 5371:

Eh, I'm only human. Nice catch, and I got those you mentioned. Though it is mostly tables, what would be required to have this be a real article?

3629:

there is a discussion over the most notable Atlantic hurricanes of all time. If you're translating articles, you might want to start with those.

3147: 1800:

I added some more tracks, including South ones. The best track for older southern hemisphere storms seems to have the windspeed really low. See

1080: 7057:

Hurricane Iniki (Hawaiian for Enid) was the most powerful hurricane to strike the state of Hawaii and the Hawaiian Islands in recorded history.

5050: 4575: 3786: 6951:

Hurricane Rita is the fourth-most-intense Atlantic hurricane ever recorded and the most intense tropical cyclone observed in the Gulf of Mexico.

6419: 3898:

The bounds of the season are notable, and worth mentioning in the article. They are not necessary for a two-paragraph overview of the season.

1250: 1208: 1047:

is currently the worst, but every new southern hemisphere article you have created is a stub. We don't need more stubs. We need more content.

549: 3154: 676: 629: 93: 7084: 6860: 3079: 5718: 5320:

Thanks. The existing article only lists the basin's names, but I thought it would make more sense to list when every name was actually used.

5078: 4619:

Tornado wind speeds are still largely unknown; and the wind speeds on the original F-scale have never been scientifically tested and proven.

4189: 3796:. I think that you should start with a basic sentence and then give the most notable fact about it. Example: "Hurricane Wilma was an intense 3424:

For 2005 I believe a simple table listing all the hurricanes with links to the individual articles should replace the entire storms section.

2980: 2101:

Surely. However, there is certainly possibility for confusion in categorization when a single storm has multiple names in the same category.

1647: 6335:

I would think it is because not every season has every storm. If that happened, then I would fully support it. I really don't know, though.

603: 7512: 5700: 4421: 4309: 147: 17: 4416:

I've been going through the atlantic seasons (currently 1950-2004) and making sure all the storms match up with what's in the best-track (

3139:, and they all repeat the same arguments. To actually reach any kind of consensus this discussion needs to be unified, either here or at 2000:

That sounds right. I seriously doubt there can even be an extratropical category 5 hurricane, let alone an extratropical major hurricane.

7159:. The thought is that we will maintain articles on the response, policy, and general management of hazards. It is a huge task! Please 3914: 3736:

A brief summary of damages and deaths: "At least 62 deaths have been reported, and damages is estimated at $ 18-22 billion dollars (2005

3550: 6926: 6851: 5714: 4650:

Bring it up on the discussion pages of those particular articles and then change them. This problem shouldn't be a hard one to fix. --

4174: 3759:

All of the above are things I would consider manditory for a B-class article. Of course there are other things that can be mentioned:

3687:

A mention of the storm's month (in most cases exact dates are not required I'd say, though in some situations it can be appropriate): "

1646:

doesn't show it, NHC indicated that Lili was subtropical until Advisory 33 when Lili became a hurricane. The NHC best track is located

7274:

Actually I think that is more sensible - put a notice up on Katrina's page suggesting it. That way the 'outside' community will say--

5056:

Good work. Yea, we should probably discuss a new list here, given that not too many people worry about the portal. Here's my thoughts:

1166:

Keep it at the retired name, and mention the appropriate storm at the other name's disambiguation (As Joan/Miriam and Fifi/Orlene do.)

559:

Make sure to keep these templates separate from the article-building templates. They may need a separate section in the project page.

346:"Remnant Low" or "Wave", it doesn't count (unless in a break between tropical periods), but if it says "Extratropical", it does count. 7342: 7160: 3136: 2819: 934:

If they lack the location of the systems, then it might be a little useless. Such a list could be useful if there were an article on

505:

should probably be merged with the Atlantic basin information on the tl|List of notable tropical cyclones moved to a new page titled

84: 64: 7133:. But in addition to the textual storms list I think we should provide table forms of the meteorological and impact statistics. — 5722: 3626: 3117:

Everybody's arguing about the category color changes, but they are doing it all over the place. I've seen separate discussions at

2599:

Yeah, there is the issue of exactness. Most info is given in knots so converting it loses information. A related problem is with

1753:(Except for named epac/natlantic hurricanes) make sure the article has a link to the unisys track or storm ID#, prominently placed. 1187:

On a related note, I managed to build and upload combined track maps for these 4 hurricanes. Are there any other basin-crossers?

5342:

mentions Kendra as a TD but not Dolores (1970) and so on. On the plus side, it would be usuful in finishing disambiguation pages.

4607:

Tornado wind speeds are still largely unknown; and the wind speeds on the F-scale have never been scientifically tested and proven

7150: 6448: 6106: 5992: 5914: 4959: 4672: 4581: 4516: 4378: 4227: 3864: 3810: 3502: 7054:

Hurricane Dennis was the fourth named storm, second hurricane, and first major hurricane of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season.

1287:

Tropical Storm, Typhoon, etc.). Currently AFAIK all Epac and Atlantic storms have tracks...any that do not can be posted here.

7375: 7180: 7060:

Hurricane Floyd was the sixth named storm, fourth hurricane, and third major hurricane in the 1999 Atlantic hurricane season.

6982:, it desperately needs to be replaced with something useful. Move this trivia down to storm history, and replace it with, say: 5275: 223:

tables...as long as it's consistent among all the season articles either is fine. Incidentally, the same issue applies to the

1448: 6262:? I can't decide. And plus, if the table looks best, then I'm not sure which format is best; the one on it now or the one on 4927:

Shouldn't we use the template for the individual storms on the 2005 page on all the other seasons? I don't see why we havn't.

4885: 4840: 4736:

article needs to stand on its own and be internally consistent, so the most notable storms are the ones that should have the

3582: 1736:

All right. I just went through and added a number of storm paths in bulk. So, in future to get a track map put up, do this:

1306:

Although it doesn't have an article, a track of Hurricane 12 would be nice to have in the 1975 Pacific hurricane season page.

873: 811: 7049: 6676:

going after the "fish storms." In principle, I agree that it makes sense to start at the current time and work backwards.

5858:

I'm pretty sure I can dig up some stuff about Arizona tropical storms, as I'm from there... I've been focusing primarily on

5441:

I brought up the renaming over at the List of tropical cyclone names talk page. While we're talking here, should we put the

7173: 7101: 5956:, as it isn't information that necessarily belongs there. However, a state sub-article can be the correct place to add it. 2815: 2692: 2502: 2157: 202: 7460: 4624:

engineers highly experienced in damage survey techniques often came up with different F-scale ratings for the same damage.

7130: 7122: 6971:

The second one does not give a time, but it does give a reason for notability - most intense hurricane ever in the gulf.

5638: 4192:

articles solves this by allowing information to be moved back and forth, but there are other ways we could solve it too.

2686: 2669: 958: 506: 6286: 4064:

Make sure you include source links for any info you find! Lots of storms have no references for their "total damages".

7468: 6879:

Well, we could use the GDP deflator, but that would be too much work, especially if our site gives a different result.

6427: 6085: 5971: 5893: 4938: 4651: 4495: 4357: 4211: 3855: 3801: 3793: 2651: 2511: 4824:

eventually someone should do that. Hopefully we'll be able to use these simple guidelines when writing in the future.

2936: 1314:

except Tropical Storm Alice (that's a disambiguation page) I'll mention the numbers shortly when I can find them out.

6588: 5771: 5765: 3128: 2153: 1311: 6891: 6506: 5744:- Last Island Hurricane, Cheniere Caminanda Hurricane, Hilda, Betsy, Carmen, Juan (1985), Andrew, Lili, and Katrina 4417: 2645: 2569: 1281: 681: 566: 5632: 2843:

I'm a French Wikipédia user and I've created new templates to insert useful data into tropical cyclones articles.

6591:. There have certainly been a lot of cyclones that have caused or affected wars...the top ones are probably the 5413: 5394: 4996:

No. The thing where you put the Storm's pic and track on the main season aricle, next the each individual storm.

3171: 2898: 2620:

I guess what's more important is to include mph and km/h conversions always, no matter what the primary form is.

728:

That's not all or nothing. If you consider a notable TD worthy of inclusion, then all TDs should get a mention.

7406: 7402: 7528: 7066:

Cyclone Tracy was a tropical cyclone that devastated Darwin, Australia, from December 24 to December 25, 1974.

6635:

article, when i took a glance through it, the article had so many errors that its impossible to list them all.

6517: 6453: 6380: 6252: 6111: 5997: 5919: 5231: 5040: 4964: 4764: 4677: 4521: 4383: 4232: 3869: 3815: 3696: 3681: 3507: 3353: 3275: 3219: 3132: 2556: 2061: 2040: 1978: 1780: 1639: 1270: 580: 7301:

Yea, it is arbitrary - but retired storm gets own article works; and can you really see the masses preferring

4844: 7464: 7126: 6521: 6292: 6263: 6259: 6174: 5783: 5777: 5710: 4403: 4351:

Also, the first satellite image was taken on April 1, 1960. The earliest satellite image of a hurricane that

2729: 2586:

not directing your comment towards me, but I'm letting you know what I do and what I will do for the future.

2469:

ex.2) Hermine doesn't have an individual article. So the title of Hermine disambiguation article is without "

590: 5515:

One problem is the NHC often has their own post-inflation list. We don't want to disagree with that one. —

4783:) should be linked since those articles explain what the terms mean. Another common example is linking to " 5741: 4705: 4314: 1879: 1239: 39: 2656: 2633:

Sounds good. Hopefully other Wicanepidians will follow this (what? we hurricane wikipedians need a name).

6405: 6233:

Well, the page is done. Now, I need some help with the picture placement. See the talk page for details.

5690:

Unfortunately, you are 100% right. I emailed them to see what they use, so hopefully I'll find out soon.

5417: 5113: 3646:

Every article has an intro. For storm articles, this introduction should always mention certain things:

3190: 2823: 1706: 852: 6905:

and its archives, but what I'm concerned about (and isn't discussed there) is how we should handle this

4021:. I wouldn't worry about doing it for past storms, but for future storms, it is an idea I came up with. 938:, though only dates don't help much. My vote goes for if there's information on the depression, add it. 7507: 7501: 6437: 6137: 6095: 5981: 5970:

Can't we just make catagories instead of an article and create redirects, like with North Carolina? --

5903: 5810: 5759: 5753: 5735: 4948: 4661: 4505: 4397: 4367: 3012: 2984: 2377: 2331: 2251: 2128: 2088: 1822:

Good question, and I'm not sure. It might have to do with the Australian hurricane scale or something?

1744: 1643: 1618: 1512: 1476: 872:

Some weeks ago I suggested moving the whole 'storms' section of the 2005 season to a separate article,

502: 138: 4146:

It will also be used for other weather-related disasters as well (as necessary), not just hurricanes.

2447:

If some individual articles of the storm exist, the title of the disambiguation article ends up with "

1406: 7418: 7348: 7198: 7063:

The Galveston Hurricane of 1900 made landfall on the city of Galveston, Texas, on September 8, 1900.

6258:

Would it look/be better for the New England article with the table it has now, or a setup similar to

5939:

effects. Remember, this isn't a list of Catastrophic NJ hurricanes, this is a list of every NJ cane.

5729: 4331:

quality of the best-track data deteriorates and it is probably not worthwhile to add storm tracks. —

3319: 2668:

Surely. I already considered using a template for the rote-introduction paragraph, and suggested in

2604: 1794:

We have no set color for "unknown strength". Once we pick one I'll be happy to use it in the tracks.

4767:

could be linked since that goes to SSS which a straightforward explanation of what the term means.

7302: 7284: 7203: 7188: 6320: 6267: 6054: 5849: 4997: 4928: 4834: 4007: 3340:

Wait, how is this related again? And the problem with being left adjusted is the heading right? --

2891: 2027:

I think he got a little tongue tied. I think he accidentally reversed "Category 5" and "major". --

622: 5553:

Sure, if we can use a calculator that gives us the same numbers as the NHC, that would be good. —

4095:

becomes more prevalent with recent storms. However, if I find the information, I will include it.

1079:

Sorry , but information before 1993 is hard to find and I have to rely on these Internet Sources:

92:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

7421:

for SW Pacific systems. I'm not so sure about the North Indian Ocean storms, they should use the

6301: 5818: 5347: 5088: 4558: 4456: 3363:

Well, this is related to this because Jdorje brought up the location of the track picture above.

3121: 3112: 2282: 1581: 1441: 1235: 1175: 1147: 973: 750: 443:

What was the result of this? Is the duration for storms only for tropical or subtropical status?

261: 213: 5445:

up for deletion or for merging? Like you said, the list I created sort of supersedes that page.

2890:

If you can understand French a little bit at least, I suggest you to take a look at this link :

7356: 7265:

more complex guideline is being followed, it would just seem inconsistent and possibly random.

6719: 5646:) gives, for instance, $ 36.4 billion for Andrew in 2004, whereas the NHC (supposedly with the 5496: 5034: 4245: 3641: 1723: 4600: 6364: 5859: 5176: 4851: 2487: 2458: 1891: 1886: 1331: 1298: 1125: 618: 45: 1495: 7352: 7222:

these should take the main name. One could perhaps cite counter-examples however, such as

6677: 6596: 5066: 4895: 4441: 2223: 2187: 908: 815: 636: 608: 7459:

The only other best track data I can find is the the Aus region (SE Indian and SW Pacific

8: 7490: 7422: 7291: 7156: 6723: 6195: 6152: 5960: 5866: 5253: 5074: 4922: 4780: 4752: 4256: 3613: 3560: 3382: 3367: 3326: 3293: 3160: 3093: 3069: 2314: 2205: 2017: 1533: 1083: 935: 856: 830: 767: 688: 89: 7428:

Please note as TDs are not numbered by the JMA they are not included in the best track.

5848:

I think New England should definetly be done. I might be able to a bit extra with that.

4321: 3661:(possibly piped through the text "hurricane", "typhoon", "tropical depression", etc.): " 3603: 1673:

The Lili track brings back the problem of telling what direction the storm is moving...

562:

Make sure they all have a consistent appearance. Current templates follow the style of

7527:

That isn't right. RSMC Tokoyo was set up in July 1989 as it says in all of the reports

7230:(neither of which were unique; Alice wasn't even the most notorious storm of that name 7112: 6902: 6880: 6857: 6783: 6746: 6707: 6621: 6600: 6592: 6545: 6469: 6432: 6395: 6336: 6311: 6297: 6277: 6234: 6225: 6216: 6207: 6182: 6164: 6128: 6090: 6067: 6010: 5976: 5940: 5898: 5879: 5835: 5814: 5791: 5691: 5582: 5537: 5506: 5483: 5446: 5372: 5343: 5321: 5296:

I'm pretty sure there's already an article that lists this. But yours looks better. —

5285: 5264: 5239: 5044: 5019: 4980: 4943: 4906:

lists all measurements on which the best-track is based as well as the NHC comments. —

4876: 4825: 4656: 4554: 4500: 4486: 4452: 4362: 4216: 4034: 3876: 3822: 3767:(IMO this should be somewhere in the article; maybe it should be added to the infobox). 3764: 3744: 3514: 3473: 3346: 3268: 3231: 3212: 2634: 2587: 2549: 2515: 2506: 2493: 2278: 2033: 2001: 1971: 1906: 1866: 1840: 1823: 1773: 1727: 1692: 1651: 1577: 1452: 1437: 1402: 1263: 1171: 1095: 1066: 1016: 969: 939: 898: 840: 788: 746: 712: 661: 444: 423: 281: 257: 209: 6687:

I propose a button bar and storm pics for the North Indian Cyclone Seasonal articles.

6408:. The content is FA-quality but it has technical problems like lack of references. — 4894:. This has a whole host of useful data. Perhaps the most useful single entry is the 4891: 614: 7306: 6794: 6215:

OK, I put them into tables, but I'm not sure that's better. Any suggestions, anyone?

5188: 5172: 5161: 5103: 4899: 4792: 4776: 3707: 3574: 3176:

I believe the chain of command should go, from top choice to last resort, like this:

2995: 2304:

That doesn't seem complicated though...that's exactly the purpose of disambiguation.

1423: 459: 6759:

The Mediterrean Hurricane article is too short ether expand it or merge it with the

3318:

To be honest, I don't know why. It is a style issue which I'm trying to find in the

2700:(though maybe a new category "hurricanes not making landfall" is appropriate here). 1154:

Give the article the double name and redirect the parts to it (as Cesar Douglas has)

897:

So.... what was the result of this? Should every TD be mentioned if they are known?

7552: 7443: 7365: 7240: 7208: 7139: 7079: 7012: 6932: 6916: 6846: 6806: 6772: 6760: 6735: 6696: 6665: 6644: 6609: 6564: 6533: 6491: 6414: 6353: 5949: 5679: 5613: 5559: 5521: 5464: 5430: 5403: 5302: 5213: 5209: 5168: 5121: 4912: 4863: 4812: 4760: 4543: 4471: 4430: 4337: 4304: 4269: 3658: 3441: 2527: 1459: 1430: 1348: 1243: 1131: 991: 6224:

Ehh, the table is way to big. I think I'm going to put it back to the way it was.

5263:

Good point about the "household name". I personaly think Camille should be first.

4017:

If a tornado outbreak inside a hurricane gets a separate page, it should be named

3743:

A brief mention of any meteorological records set. "Wilma became the most intense

1323:(If it has a nindian corresponding storm, I need to know the ID for that one too. 697:

Include 'em! Or remove them from all articles (including the 2004-onwards ones).

355:

Here are three examples: Hurricane Isabel, Hurricane Dennis and Hurricane Katrina.

7227: 7223: 7184: 6956: 5225: 5221: 5217: 5196: 5192: 5184: 5180: 5165: 5153: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5125: 4288: 2317:

to dab it, noting that the typhoons named Kiko also had a second, official name.

2193: 1382: 1143: 907:

have only been well-documented since the late 1960's, minus most of the 1980's.

546: 411:

On the contrary, extratropical portions of storms should not count. They are for

296: 292: 7556:

2002-2004 articles. Good Spanish skills will help, with Cuba for instance.... --

7386: 7382: 7283:

Um, no. There's no need for retired storms to have a qualifier (although having

4759:

should not be linked since those are just redirects back to the monster article

4614: 2451:" (to distinguish individual articles from a disambiguation article definitely). 1937:

03370 10 29X2281023 25 0X2341021 25 0X2401020 25 0* 0 0 0 0*

1935:

03365 10 28X2051037 45 0X2101033 25 0X2161029 25 0X2221026 25 0*

1933:

03360 10 27X1881053 120 0X1931048 120 0X1971044 140 958X2011040 45 0*

1931:

03355 10 26*1721052 120 0*1751056 120 0*1781058 120 0*1831057 120 0*

1929:

03350 10 25*1611029 100 0*1651034 100 0*1681039 110 0*1701045 110 0*

1927:

03345 10 24*1401000 75 0*1451008 75 0*1501016 75 0*1561023 75 0*

146:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7557: 7497: 7310: 7275: 7256: 7164: 6944: 6726:

are the same storm and I think that the NHC might have suggested this as well.

5200: 5157: 5149: 5145: 5129: 5117: 5107: 4903: 4748: 4694: 4641: 3006: 2827: 2371: 2325: 2274: 2245: 2217: 2211: 2149: 2122: 2082: 2071: 1809: 1506: 1470: 1416: 1365: 1139: 1135: 1117: 7405:. It does appear however from looking at other articles they do correctly use 6745:

Agreed. Officially, there's no Floyd connection, but I suppose it's possible.

3702:

A brief mention of where the hurricane went: "The storm formed in the western

1157:

Keep the double name, but only redirect the retired name to it. (None do this)

7565: 7549: 7410: 7331: 6898: 6867: 6632: 6442: 6374: 6365: 6145: 6100: 6066:

I would say both. A hurricane can remain offshore yet cause a lot of damage.

6044: 5986: 5908: 5084: 4953: 4772: 4666: 4510: 4372: 4221: 4166: 4161: 4147: 4096: 4078: 4048: 4024: 3990:

Several barns were destroyed and one home was damaged. No injuries reported.

3861: 3807: 3530: 3499: 3415: 3341: 3263: 3207: 3049: 3018: 2967: 2797: 2750: 2712: 2544: 2199: 2181: 2028: 1966: 1801: 1768: 1532:

Typhoon Bess (1974) is Typhoon 26 from 1974; this needs one as well. Thanks.

1518: 1482: 1412: 1318: 1258: 1223: 395: 7543: 4890:

So last night while browsing the NHC web site I stumbled on the motherlode:

1865:

Hmm, then I have absolutely no idea. Maybe an email should be sent to JTWC?

1163:

Keep it at the retired name, and redirect the new name to it. (None do this)

1130:

We need a naming convention for renamed cyclones. Atlantic to EPac crossers

241: 208:

should put 14 or 15 in the space for number of named storms in the infobox?

6827: 6819: 6326: 5647: 4799: 4585: 3927: 3726: 1357: 1339: 1085: 1005: 579:

For the earliest-formed-storm table, how do you resolve it with the one in

4580:

Several TC project members have also been very helpful in contributing to

4179:

One thing I notice many season articles do not follow is the principle of

7438: 7360: 7288: 7287:

as a redirect can't hurt), and the same holds for highly-notable storms.

7266: 7235: 7134: 7125:

I agree with the idea. This is basically inspired by Madeline's work on

7092: 7074: 7038: 7027: 7007: 6992: 6911: 6841: 6801: 6767: 6730: 6691: 6660: 6639: 6604: 6559: 6528: 6486: 6409: 6348: 6192: 6149: 5957: 5863: 5674: 5608: 5554: 5516: 5459: 5425: 5398: 5297: 5250: 5047: 4907: 4858: 4807: 4768: 4538: 4532:

Hmm, I disagree, I don't really think there are particularly strong pros

4466: 4425: 4407: 4332: 4299: 4253: 4195: 4125: 4065: 4003: 3899: 3837: 3783: 3630: 3586: 3557: 3547: 3455: 3437: 3425: 3389: 3364: 3323: 3310: 3290: 3245: 3157: 3144: 3104: 3090: 3076: 3060: 3033: 2949: 2905: 2772: 2733: 2701: 2677: 2621: 2608: 2576: 2531: 2305: 2161: 2102: 2014: 1949: 1895: 1849: 1836: 1813: 1805: 1757: 1710: 1674: 1661: 1629: 1599: 1559: 1545: 1395: 1373: 1324: 1288: 1247: 1205: 1192: 1188: 1048: 1029: 986: 877: 729: 698: 673: 648: 626: 600: 498: 300: 271: 270:

would stay lumped...but once that's decided the categories can be built.

244: 228: 7548:

I was looking on the WMO Tropical Cyclone page and found this page here

7414: 3797: 3737: 3578: 2696: 2067: 7390: 2886:

In the legend zone, the maximal strength of the cyclone is put in bold

1458:

You've already put the template onto the article, but just to confim,

7532: 7487: 7472: 7429: 4756: 3775: 3703: 3692: 3677: 3666: 2999: 2479: 2364: 2318: 2238: 2115: 2075: 1499: 1463: 1426:(showing the early extratropical part of this is probably necessary.) 6384: 5750:- Camille, Elena, Georges, possibly Katrina's effects in Mississippi 5502: 3388:

to be right-aligned by default, which would have its own problems).

2013:

Wouldn't a Category 5 hurricane be a major hurricane by definition?

6797:

article to get FA Class. (same thing applies to Emiliy and Wilma).

6310:

That's also why I made NJ hurricanes. Storms here are pretty rare.

5862:

and I'm surprised by the lack of information, so it might be hard.

3715: 2148:

I don't have a good example present, but one contrived one is that

1170:

This would also apply to TS Allison in 1989 if it gets an article.

6053:

Are these pages for systems that struck the area, or affected it?

5655: 4847:

edit. Are these correct? I have no way to know, so I just added

1204:

read it is disputed whether Hattie-Simone was actually also Inga.

76: 58: 5953: 5458:

Yes, it should be merged, once your article is up and running. —

4788: 4784: 3722: 3711: 538:

Appreciate any comments, suggestions, and constructive criticism.

469:

Templates should have the basin name, or "worldwide" in the name.

4485:

have an Tropical Cyclone Article Improvement Drive of the week.

1722:

On a different note, I have a potential track map for Catarina.

3309:

Why not? And where should it go and how should it be aligned?

7389:

and is not linked to by the WMO tropical cyclone warning page

7129:, which has been incorporated into various list articles like 6587:

Interesting idea. You should start it out as a subsection of

4802:

is part of the United States. Use "central Atlantic" instead.

4798:

Don't use "mid-Atlantic" to mean the middle of the Atlantic.

4402:

As I just stated on its talk page, when I was alone in making

2672:

that the rote-introduction paragraph does not make for a good

7359:

should be merged. I invite anyone to give comments there. —

2363:

I removed the names that were also used for TDs and invests.

7026:

Yeah. I brought this up on Rita (see my attempt to say what

2461:". So the title of Alex disambiguation article end up with " 326:

Absorption by another tropical or extratropical low or front

5651:

is a terrible idea. Thus, we have rather a large problem.

4249: 3748: 3730: 2600: 6935:, which just went to FAC and will likely become featured: 6558:

Not sure what you mean but you should take it up there. —

5443:

List_of_tropical_cyclone_names_used_in_more_than_one_basin

5391:

List_of_tropical_cyclone_names_used_in_more_than_one_basin

4601:

http://www.srh.weather.gov/jetstream/mesoscale/tornado.htm

2870:

Total compatibility between the active and inactive states

687:

process. No half-and-half business. What do you think? --

6837: 6833: 5643: 4719: 4298:. The category is somewhat unpopulated at this point. — 3752: 3405:

Clearing the overloaded "Storms" sections of season pages

2818:

should be changed, in light of a comment someone made on

1576:"hurricane_12C_1975_track.png" as its name, for example. 6511:

I have suggestions and comments about the following....

6991:

there are many others that suffer from this problem. --

5809:

categories. Perhaps we could also do countries... like

3920:

It should be a section introduced for the 2006 season.

2575:

nobody knows what they are. Use mph and km/h instead.

2226:(2005: TS Tembin; 2001: TS28W - not recognised by JTWC) 1104:

This is a more appropriate place to bring this up than

299:, including the extratropical part is the whole point. 4621:

Different winds may be needed to cause the same damage

3103:

I like the idea of adding the best-track files there.

3089:, but stuff like the TCRs should definitely go there. 2655:

retrospective standards are being employed.--Louis E./

2400:

My suggestion about disambiguation articles is below:

3556:

Uh, which meteorology articles are you referring to?

2724:

One blanket category should cover that I think, like

766:

Would you lot consider this worthy of discussion? --

613:

I've uploaded a vast number of tracking charts. See

6555:

2005 Atlantic hurricane season needs to be updated.

6468:

Agreed, I don't see what is wrong with the article.

3043:

Subproject of a new WikiProject Weather and Climate?

2867:

Contains info about locations and countries affected

745:

Agreed. We should be consistent across all seasons.

639:. If I treat this as an unnamed storm it should be 88:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 6756:

I've added more storms in the article request page.

5482:So what more should I do to get it up and running? 4892:

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/Data_Storm.html

2728:. As for landfall, I agree...Hazel should go into 2543:65 is fine in the article, but not the infobox. -- 2505:- Tends to screw with the Pacific typhoon seasons. 1045:

1977-78_Southern_Hemisphere_tropical_cyclone_season

225:

2004-05 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season

38:This page does not require a rating on Knowledge's 6394:Very good point. That should be on the todo list. 5670:In conclusion, I see no solution to this problem. 3733:state of Florida both received very heavy damage." 2994:Do the lowest pressures also need a conversion to 2852:There's a section to put a satellite-taken picture 1451:- Just to show weirdness of the storm in December. 635:One problem is the naming of numbered storms like 490:Hurricane Atlantic basin number of storms by month 4033:That's a good idea. Never hurts to be organized. 2836:New French Tropical Cyclone templates released... 1015:to continue, but it would be nice for Knowledge. 227:which includes at least 2 and possibly 3 basins. 7563: 6027:Potential blankets for the Catastrophic series: 2732:, obviously. About extratropical I'm not sure. 1110:2005 Northern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season 7351:there is a two-person discussion about whether 5802:These could form good "top end lists" for each 3129:User:AySz88/Sandbox#New_hurricane_color_palatte 2847:Active and inactive tropical cyclones infobox : 2650:I already commented on the Discussion page for 2273:Kiko complicates this. There have been several 1626:Category:Hurricane articles needing a track map 1321:is Typhoon 32 from 2001 and also a zone crosser 855:Post your comments somewhere at the bottom. -- 541:Add my name to the project, if it is warranted. 4605:The F-scale is to be used with great caution. 3155:Talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season statistics 1812:for instance. Anyone know why that might be? 6793:I think more info is needed in order for the 6706:Agreed. See the discussion below below this. 5719:Catastrophic Florida Hurricanes: 1961-present 4791:is a state, so what should be linked here is 4615:http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/#f-scale1 4190:List of 2005 Atlantic hurricane season storms 2880:Initially translated from the English version 2858:Label to show the cyclone's maximal intensity 2855:There's a section showing the cyclone's track 1449:1984 Atlantic hurricane season#Hurricane Lili 5762:- 1893 Sea Islands Hurricane, David, Alberto 5420:, and should probably be split up by basin: 4422:Talk:Accumulated_Cyclone_Energy/EPac_by_year 3598:Lack of tc articles in the spanish wikipedia 3412:Storms of the 2004 Atlantic hurricane season 1494:PS there's a best-track supplied by the JMA 527:Hurricane Atlantic basin earliest formations 517:Hurricane Atlantic Basin earliest formations 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones 4634:F-scale winds should not be taken literally 3782:Overall introduction should be kept brief. 3778:, and sixth major hurricane of the season." 3747:on record when its pressure dropped to 882 2883:Rewritten using the strict Knowledge syntax 2861:Summarized statistics for inactive cyclones 485:, but it should be moved to something like 7577:NA-importance Disaster management articles 7572:Project-Class Disaster management articles 7393:. The JTWC page even says it is unoffical 6955:OK? Now, finally, the first sentence from 6832:At what point to we switch over from 2005 5790:Not sure about New England. Any thoughts? 5715:Catastrophic Florida Hurricanes: 1900-1960 3774:was the twenty-first named storm, twelfth 2514:- was screwing with some season articles. 586:The most important one that is missing is 7170:I am adding the template for visibility. 3650:A mention of the storm's name, in bold: " 3137:2005 Atlantic hurricane season statistics 2822:. That category only contains one storm: 2820:Category:Hurricanes in the Canary Islands 2814:I think some of the subcategory names in 2070:names for typhoons too? For example, see 641:Image:1999 05B tropical cyclone track.png 102:Knowledge:WikiProject Disaster management 31: 29: 5723:Catastrophic Texas Hurricanes since 1900 4296:Tropical cyclone articles to be expanded 3959: 3721:A brief mention of areas affected: "The 3672:A full mention and link to the season: " 3627:Talk:List of notable Atlantic hurricanes 2926:They also made articles for every storm. 2726:Category:Inland United States hurricanes 2160:, but would actually be the same storm. 1705:I'm confused about the max winds of the 105:Template:WikiProject Disaster management 6620:a potential article waiting to happen. 6578:Military Activity and Tropical Cyclones 5786:- Just started. May need a bit of help. 5043:, listed on the portal page to do list 4576:Wind speeds in hurricanes vs. tornadoes 4553:What I meant was the "Did you know..." 2864:Détailed statistics for active cyclones 1242:? Personally I thought it was good as 14: 7564: 5707:History of hurricanes in the Caribbean 3153:Most of the discussion is going on at 2457:ex.1) Alex has an individual article " 1724:Here in Gary Padget's Tropical Summary 1150:. There are five options as I see it: 711:depression references can be removed. 144:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6404:I kindof feel the same way about the 3583:Category:Tropical cyclone meteorology 1142:are all under the Atlantic name, but 1116:covering it in the season article. -- 874:2005 Atlantic hurricane season storms 812:Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Climatology 6638:The article has very little info. — 5701:History of Hurricanes in each state? 4937:I'm not sure what you're asking. -- 2816:Category:Tropical cyclones by region 2693:Category:Tropical cyclones by region 2158:Category:2005 Pacific typhoon season 555:I have just a few thoughts on this: 125: 25: 7131:List of retired Atlantic hurricanes 7123:Talk:2003 Atlantic hurricane season 7003: 6943:Now here's the first sentence from 6856:When 2006 is available... I guess. 5639:List of retired Atlantic hurricanes 3915:Future storm addition: Tornado list 3581:; there may have been others. See 2670:talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 1890:uploaded any new tracks except for 507:List of notable Atlantic hurricanes 44:It is of interest to the following 23: 6927:Need to work on the first sentence 4175:Level of detail in season articles 4006:from websites or documents of the 2652:List of Atlantic hurricane seasons 2214:(2005: TY Damrey; 2001: TY Lekima) 2184:(2005: STY Haitang; 2001: TY Utor) 1433:this will probably be hard, though 24: 7588: 7343:Hurricane preparedness/mitigation 6589:List of notable tropical cyclones 6206:all made landfall further south. 5772:List of North Carolina hurricanes 5766:List of South Carolina hurricanes 5503:http://www.westegg.com/inflation/ 5389:The article I was thinking of is 4156:Tornado project update: March 5th 4019:Hurricane (name) Tornado Outbreak 2202:(2005: TY Talim; 2001: TY Toraji) 2154:Typhoon Longwang (disambiguation) 1843:is from 2,000 and actually shows 1312:category:Retired Pacific typhoons 82:This page is within the scope of 7411:Australian Bureau of Meteorology 7155:I have started a WikiProject on 6383: 3997: 2208:(2005: TY Khanun; 2001: TY Nari) 2190:(2005: TY Gorio; 2001: TS Trami) 643:. As a named storm it would be 480:Hurricane number storms by month 129: 75: 57: 30: 7151:Disaster management WikiProject 6978:, while this IS useful when we 6931:Here's the first sentence from 5414:Lists_of_tropical_cyclone_names 5395:Lists_of_tropical_cyclone_names 4747:Don't insert confusing links. 4418:s:Atlantic hurricane best track 3966: 3141:Template_talk:Storm colour cat5 2196:(2005: TY Sanvu; 2001: TY Yutu) 1419:- I don't know the numbers yet. 810:Keep them. I'm noticing in my 85:WikiProject Disaster management 7401:The JMA best track archive is 7376:Incorrect NW Pacific data used 6518:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 6291:The only reason I created the 6253:List of New England hurricanes 5748:List of Mississippi Hurricanes 5276:List of tropical cyclone names 5232:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 5041:Great Havana Hurricane of 1846 4294:, along with its own category 3714:and heading out into the open 3697:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 3682:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 3133:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 2904:That infobox looks very good. 1918:Pretty sure. From the HURDAT: 581:2005 Atlantic hurricane season 13: 1: 7432:12:07, 17th April 2006 (GMT) 7409:for the SW Indian Ocean, the 7127:1997 Pacific hurricane season 6522:1997 Pacific hurricane season 6293:List of California hurricanes 6264:List of New Jersey hurricanes 6260:List of California hurricanes 6175:List of New Jersey hurricanes 5784:List of New England hurricane 5778:List of New Jersey hurricanes 5711:List of California hurricanes 5422:Naming of Atlantic hurricanes 5023:00:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 5001:00:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 4984:14:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 4971:06:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 4932:01:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 4918:00:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC) 4886:Atlantic hurricane best track 4880:21:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4869:21:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4404:2004 Pacific hurricane season 3393:22:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC) 3373:03:33, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3359:02:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3332:03:33, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3314:03:15, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3299:01:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3281:01:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3249:01:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3235:01:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3225:01:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3166:21:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 3148:23:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 3099:05:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3080:00:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3064:06:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 3053:05:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 3037:10:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3026:08:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2971:02:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC) 2953:06:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 2948:Eh, to each pedia her own. -- 2909:06:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 2801:06:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 2730:Category:Hurricanes in Canada 2562:05:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 2497:01:31, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2385:11:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2339:00:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2309:20:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 2286:19:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 2259:06:11, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 2237:That's about it for 2001/05. 2165:20:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 2136:06:11, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 2106:01:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 2096:00:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 2046:01:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 2023:06:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2005:01:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 1984:05:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1953:22:20, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1910:21:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1899:21:26, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1870:22:31, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1853:21:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1827:21:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1817:07:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1786:05:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1761:00:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1731:03:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 1714:17:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1696:00:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1678:00:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1665:00:17, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 1655:21:48, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 1563:22:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1549:22:49, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1526:00:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1490:00:52, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 1360:is Super Typhoon 27 from 1990 1351:is Super Typhoon 21 from 1991 1292:18:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1276:02:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1234:So what do you guys think of 1209:04:38, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1196:09:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1181:Screw that previous comment. 1179:00:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 977:00:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 881:18:36, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 860:14:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 844:13:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 834:13:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 792:13:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 771:12:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 754:00:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 716:04:38, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 702:00:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 692:23:32, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 665:20:41, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 652:20:03, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 630:19:38, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 427:04:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 399:02:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC) 304:17:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 285:15:26, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 96:and see a list of open tasks. 7535:16:21, 18th April 2006 (GMT) 7475:16:21, 18th April 2006 (GMT) 7174:Titles for tropical cyclones 7102:Storm boxes and Damage table 6163:Good job with that article! 5742:List of Louisiana hurricanes 4829:01:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 4818:00:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 4698:08:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 4684:22:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4645:21:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4562:23:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4549:19:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4528:07:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4490:03:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4477:01:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4460:00:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 4436:21:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 4411:21:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 4390:02:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 4343:01:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 4325:01:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 4310:04:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 4262:02:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 4239:14:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 4199:05:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 4129:16:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 4100:16:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 4082:23:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 4069:19:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 4060:information (if I find it). 4052:03:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 4038:03:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 4028:03:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 3903:04:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 3882:04:21, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 3841:06:03, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3828:21:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3787:19:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3634:23:50, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 3617:23:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 3607:02:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 3590:05:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 3566:04:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2776:02:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 2754:22:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2737:19:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2716:19:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2705:19:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2681:07:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2663:00:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2638:22:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2625:21:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2612:21:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2591:21:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2580:18:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2535:07:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 1633:17:41, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1603:16:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1385:is Super Typhoon 8 from 2002 1251:18:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 1240:Hurricane Hattie-Simone-Inga 1227:04:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 1099:04:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 1089:13:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 1070:20:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 1052:20:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 1033:20:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 1020:16:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 1009:15:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 733:01:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 677:13:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 604:05:57, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 550:18:32, 6 November 2005 (UTC) 275:18:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 265:18:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 248:20:39, 31 October 2005 (UTC) 232:18:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 217:18:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC) 203:Two questions for discussion 108:Disaster management articles 7: 6406:Galveston Hurricane of 1900 5774:- Hazel, Diana, Fran, Floyd 5756:- Frederic, Ivan, Danny (?) 5418:Naming of tropical cyclones 5114:Indianola Hurricane of 1886 3763:A link to the basin; i.e., 3551:21:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 3519:05:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 3477:20:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 3459:18:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 3445:18:23, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 3429:18:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 3419:17:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 3191:Indianola Hurricane of 1886 2687:Tropical cyclones by region 2483:13:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 1839:shows the correct speeds. 1707:Louisiana Hurricane of 1915 1462:(19W 2005) needs one, too. 959:Southern Hemisphere Seasons 329:Circulation completely lost 10: 7593: 7449:18:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 7419:Met Service of New Zealand 7371:03:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 7335:05:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 7314:23:16, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7297:23:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7279:22:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7270:22:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7260:20:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7246:20:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7216:18:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7168:13:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 7018:00:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 6996:23:56, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 6922:20:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 6884:13:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 6871:05:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 6861:18:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6852:17:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6823:17:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6812:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6787:20:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 6778:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6750:20:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 6741:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6711:20:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 6702:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6671:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6650:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6625:20:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 6615:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6570:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6549:20:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 6539:17:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6497:17:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6473:01:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6460:23:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6420:01:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6399:00:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6389:00:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6359:21:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 6340:21:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 6330:20:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 6315:22:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6305:22:25, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6281:22:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6271:22:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6238:02:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 6229:22:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6220:21:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6211:20:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6201:20:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6186:19:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 6168:21:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6158:00:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 6138:List of Arizona hurricanes 6132:23:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6118:23:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6071:21:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 6058:21:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 6048:05:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 6014:00:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 6004:00:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC) 5966:23:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5944:23:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5926:23:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5883:22:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5872:22:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5853:22:11, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5839:22:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5822:22:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5811:List of Bahamas hurricanes 5795:17:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5760:List of Georgia hurricanes 5754:List of Alabama hurricanes 5736:List of Arizona hurricanes 5619:18:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 5586:17:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 5565:17:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 5541:17:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 5527:17:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 5510:15:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 5487:20:46, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 5470:07:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 5450:01:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 5436:01:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 5409:01:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 5376:00:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 5351:00:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 5325:18:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 5308:18:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 5289:16:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 5268:03:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 5259:01:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 5046:. Should list be updated? 4730:convert it to <ref: --> 4002:This article incorporates 3535:Some user has been adding 3206:Thoughts and opinions? -- 2917:It's beautiful, I love it. 2831:07:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 2313:Indeed, we could then use 1121:22:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 997:07:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC) 902:02:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 625:) to the actual articles. 503:Atlantic hurricane records 448:00:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 7349:Talk:Hurricane mitigation 7145:19:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 7116:16:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 7096:06:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 7085:06:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 7042:05:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 6582:Wartime Tropical Cyclones 5730:List of Hawaii hurricanes 5695:22:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 5685:04:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 5243:20:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 5051:18:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 4170:18:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 4151:18:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 3994: 2875:Tropical cyclone footer : 2605:1928 Okeechobee Hurricane 2603:in older hurricanes. In 1537:08:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC) 70: 52: 7303:Hurricane Katrina (2005) 7285:Hurricane Katrina (2005) 7189:Hurricane Epsilon (2005) 6892:wind speed inconsistency 6544:would all run together. 6507:Suggestions and Comments 6039:(VA/DE/MD/DC/PA/NJ/NY), 5071:1875 Indianola Hurricane 5039:Made a copyedit pass on 4274:I added a new template, 4160:I have made sections on 4008:National Weather Service 2892:fr:Ouragan Dennis (2005) 2646:Prehistoric officialness 2570:Knots and nautical miles 1282:Storm track request list 682:Lack of T.D. in articles 645:Image:05B 1999 track.png 623:1900 Galveston hurricane 7413:for that area, and the 7183:, then the most recent 6840:for units of damage? — 6681:17:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 6584:article to be created. 6268:Icelandic Hurricane #12 6055:Icelandic Hurricane #12 5850:Icelandic Hurricane #12 5089:Hurricane Gaston (2004) 3189:Pre-storm photos (a la 3172:Acceptable Infobox Pics 1389:All found using Unisys. 1376:is Typhoon 13 from 1984 1342:is Typhoon 21 from 2002 1236:Hurricane Hattie-Simone 1148:Hurricane Cesar-Douglas 943:21:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 567:most intense hurricanes 7357:Hurricane preparedness 7181:Hurricane Floyd (1993) 6980:first make the article 6720:Hurricane Floyd (1987) 5878:I'll do New Jersey's. 5637:Based on the table in 5093:Wikify: None, probably 4252:is a whopping 127 KB. 4246:Attack on Pearl Harbor 4004:public domain material 3695:during October of the 2156:would both show up in 2062:Typhoon disambiguation 1368:is Typhoon 9 from 2003 853:Check out the sandbox. 522:which should be named 7423:Indian Met Department 5768:- Gracie, Hugo, Klaus 5416:should be renamed as 5205:Stubs: Same as listed 5177:Hurricane Joan-Miriam 2459:Hurricane Alex (2004) 2277:in the east Pacific. 1892:1959 Mexico hurricane 1887:1959 Mexico hurricane 1644:Unisys (Lili's Track) 1332:Tropical Storm Thelma 1299:Hurricane Nora (1997) 1106:on the season article 818:21:10 UTC 7 May 2006 619:Hurricane Hugo (1989) 142:of past discussions. 7353:Hurricane mitigation 6678:User talk:thegreatdr 6597:1780 Great Hurricane 5780:- Under construction 5067:Typhoon Karen (1962) 4765:Category 3 hurricane 4706:Notes on AHS writing 4315:Storm pics templates 4165:discussed further). 3706:, sweeping over the 2824:Tropical Storm Delta 1880:Storm track question 1334:is Tropical Storm 27 909:User talk:thegreatdr 816:User Talk:thegreatdr 637:Tropical Cyclone 05B 591:deadliest hurricanes 7157:Disaster management 6724:Great Storm of 1987 5282:This is what I have 5075:Typhoon Nina (1975) 4998:Icelandic Hurricane 4929:Icelandic Hurricane 4781:extratropical storm 4753:tropical depression 4731:/<reference: --> 4284:that is similar to 4248:is 52 KB long, and 3949:Path length (miles) 2503:User:203.84.186.234 2424:Tropical Storm Olaf 2416:Tropical Storm Fran 2315:Tropical Storm Kiko 1301:1997 Pacific season 936:Tropical depression 332:Sight of storm lost 99:Disaster management 90:Disaster management 65:Disaster management 6903:Talk:Cyclone Larry 6601:1970 Bhola Cyclone 6593:kamikaze (typhoon) 5705:Well, we have the 4398:2004 EP needs love 3770:Storm "numbers": " 3765:Atlantic hurricane 3745:Atlantic hurricane 2114:Uh... do explain? 1841:Cyclone_Leon-Eline 1403:1970 Bhola cyclone 40:content assessment 7544:WMO Final Reports 7516: 7447: 7369: 7307:Hurricane Katrina 7244: 7143: 7083: 7016: 6920: 6850: 6810: 6795:Hurricane Katrina 6776: 6739: 6700: 6669: 6648: 6613: 6568: 6537: 6495: 6457: 6418: 6357: 6115: 6001: 5923: 5683: 5617: 5563: 5525: 5468: 5434: 5407: 5306: 5189:Hurricane Roxanne 5173:Hurricane Gilbert 5162:Hurricane Camille 5104:Hurricane Katrina 5063:Subtropical Ridge 4968: 4916: 4900:US hurricane list 4867: 4816: 4793:Yucatan peninsula 4777:subtropical storm 4681: 4547: 4525: 4475: 4434: 4387: 4341: 4308: 4236: 4015: 4014: 4011: 3873: 3819: 3708:Yucatan Peninsula 3654:was a hurricane." 3575:Annular hurricane 3511: 3357: 3279: 3223: 2996:inches of mercury 2985:infobox hurricane 2560: 2512:User:208.11.236.3 2044: 1982: 1941: 1784: 1745:storm path needed 1619:storm path needed 1424:The Perfect Storm 1274: 995: 911:21:13, 7 May 2006 200: 199: 154: 153: 148:current talk page 124: 123: 120: 119: 116: 115: 7584: 7553:Hurricane Jeanne 7510: 7493: 7441: 7415:Fiji Met Service 7363: 7294: 7238: 7211: 7206: 7201: 7196: 7137: 7077: 7010: 6933:Hurricane Gloria 6914: 6844: 6804: 6770: 6761:tropical cyclone 6733: 6694: 6663: 6642: 6607: 6562: 6531: 6489: 6458: 6451: 6445: 6440: 6435: 6430: 6412: 6387: 6377: 6351: 6321:Pacific typhoons 6302:Talk to Madeline 6198: 6155: 6116: 6109: 6103: 6098: 6093: 6088: 6002: 5995: 5989: 5984: 5979: 5974: 5963: 5950:Tropical cyclone 5924: 5917: 5911: 5906: 5901: 5896: 5869: 5819:Talk to Madeline 5677: 5633:Money conversion 5611: 5557: 5519: 5462: 5428: 5401: 5348:Talk to Madeline 5300: 5256: 5214:Hurricane Hattie 5210:Hurricane Audrey 5169:Hurricane Alicia 5122:Hurricane Connie 4969: 4962: 4956: 4951: 4946: 4941: 4910: 4861: 4856: 4850: 4835:AHS naming lists 4810: 4806:More to come. — 4761:tropical cyclone 4682: 4675: 4669: 4664: 4659: 4654: 4559:Talk to Madeline 4541: 4526: 4519: 4513: 4508: 4503: 4498: 4469: 4457:Talk to Madeline 4449:extremely likely 4428: 4388: 4381: 4375: 4370: 4365: 4360: 4335: 4302: 4293: 4287: 4283: 4277: 4259: 4237: 4230: 4224: 4219: 4214: 4001: 4000: 3995: 3923: 3922: 3880: 3867: 3858: 3826: 3813: 3804: 3710:before crossing 3659:tropical cyclone 3563: 3544: 3538: 3505: 3387: 3381: 3370: 3351: 3329: 3320:Manuals of Stlye 3296: 3273: 3217: 3180:Satellite photos 3163: 3126: 3120: 3096: 3021: 3015: 3009: 3002: 2990:/Lowest pressure 2989: 2983: 2899:The Shadow Knows 2554: 2528:Hurricane Andrew 2520:Talk to Madeline 2471:(disambiguation) 2463:(disambiguation) 2449:(disambiguation) 2380: 2374: 2367: 2334: 2328: 2321: 2283:Talk to Madeline 2254: 2248: 2241: 2131: 2125: 2118: 2091: 2085: 2078: 2038: 2020: 1976: 1924: 1778: 1749: 1743: 1640:seasonal article 1623: 1617: 1582:Talk to Madeline 1521: 1515: 1509: 1502: 1485: 1479: 1473: 1466: 1460:Typhoon Longwang 1442:Talk to Madeline 1431:Cyclone Catarina 1349:Typhoon Mireille 1268: 1244:Hurricane Hattie 1238:? Should it be 1176:Talk to Madeline 989: 974:Talk to Madeline 751:Talk to Madeline 595: 589: 571: 565: 531: 525: 521: 515: 497:As discussed by 494: 488: 484: 478: 262:Talk to Madeline 214:Talk to Madeline 178: 156: 155: 133: 132: 126: 110: 109: 106: 103: 100: 79: 72: 71: 61: 54: 53: 35: 34: 33: 26: 7592: 7591: 7587: 7586: 7585: 7583: 7582: 7581: 7562: 7561: 7546: 7505: 7491: 7378: 7345: 7292: 7228:Hurricane Ethel 7224:Hurricane Alice 7209: 7204: 7199: 7194: 7185:Hurricane Floyd 7176: 7153: 7104: 7052: 7004:#Article_intros 6957:Hurricane Wilma 6929: 6894: 6830: 6509: 6447: 6443: 6438: 6433: 6428: 6382: 6373: 6369: 6323: 6289: 6256: 6196: 6178: 6153: 6141: 6105: 6101: 6096: 6091: 6086: 5991: 5987: 5982: 5977: 5972: 5961: 5913: 5909: 5904: 5899: 5894: 5867: 5703: 5635: 5499: 5278: 5254: 5226:Hurricane Allen 5222:Hurricane Agnes 5218:Hurricane Hilda 5208:Needs Sources: 5197:Hurricane Keith 5193:Hurricane Mitch 5185:Hurricane Diana 5181:Hurricane Anita 5166:Hurricane Celia 5154:Hurricane Hilda 5142:Hurricane Flora 5138:Hurricane Carla 5134:Hurricane Janet 5126:Hurricane Diane 5069:(was retired), 5037: 4958: 4954: 4949: 4944: 4939: 4925: 4888: 4854: 4848: 4837: 4708: 4671: 4667: 4662: 4657: 4652: 4578: 4515: 4511: 4506: 4501: 4496: 4444: 4400: 4377: 4373: 4368: 4363: 4358: 4317: 4291: 4285: 4281: 4275: 4272: 4257: 4226: 4222: 4217: 4212: 4177: 4158: 3998: 3996:As verified by 3971: 3961:{state/country} 3917: 3860: 3856: 3806: 3802: 3794:season articles 3772:Hurricane Wilma 3689:Hurricane Wilma 3674:Hurricane Wilma 3663:Hurricane Wilma 3652:Hurricane Wilma 3644: 3600: 3561: 3542: 3536: 3533: 3407: 3385: 3379: 3368: 3327: 3294: 3199:Rainfall charts 3174: 3161: 3124: 3118: 3115: 3113:Category colors 3094: 3072: 3045: 3024: 3019: 3013: 3007: 3000: 2992: 2987: 2981: 2838: 2689: 2648: 2572: 2490: 2432:Hurricane Emily 2383: 2378: 2372: 2365: 2337: 2332: 2326: 2319: 2275:Hurricane Kikos 2257: 2252: 2246: 2239: 2220:(has been done) 2134: 2129: 2123: 2116: 2094: 2089: 2083: 2076: 2064: 2018: 1882: 1750:to the article. 1747: 1741: 1621: 1615: 1614:Take a look at 1524: 1519: 1513: 1507: 1500: 1488: 1483: 1477: 1471: 1464: 1405:- Can be found 1383:Typhoon Chataan 1284: 1144:Hurricane Cesar 1128: 961: 684: 611: 593: 587: 569: 563: 529: 523: 519: 513: 492: 486: 482: 476: 462: 297:Hurricane Faith 293:Hurricane Mitch 205: 174: 130: 107: 104: 101: 98: 97: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7590: 7580: 7579: 7574: 7545: 7542: 7541: 7540: 7539: 7538: 7537: 7536: 7520: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7495: 7481: 7480: 7479: 7478: 7477: 7476: 7452: 7451: 7377: 7374: 7344: 7341: 7339: 7327: 7326: 7325: 7324: 7323: 7322: 7321: 7320: 7319: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7249: 7248: 7175: 7172: 7152: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7103: 7100: 7099: 7098: 7051: 7048: 7047: 7046: 7045: 7044: 7021: 7020: 6988: 6987: 6965: 6964: 6953: 6952: 6945:Hurricane Rita 6941: 6940: 6928: 6925: 6893: 6890: 6889: 6888: 6887: 6886: 6874: 6873: 6829: 6826: 6817: 6816: 6815: 6814: 6791: 6790: 6789: 6780: 6757: 6754: 6753: 6752: 6743: 6715: 6714: 6713: 6704: 6685: 6684: 6683: 6673: 6654: 6653: 6652: 6629: 6628: 6627: 6617: 6574: 6573: 6572: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6541: 6508: 6505: 6504: 6503: 6502: 6501: 6500: 6499: 6478: 6477: 6476: 6475: 6463: 6462: 6402: 6401: 6379: 6368: 6363: 6362: 6361: 6343: 6342: 6322: 6319: 6318: 6317: 6288: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6255: 6250: 6249: 6248: 6247: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6177: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6140: 6135: 6125: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6120: 6076: 6075: 6074: 6073: 6061: 6060: 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 6021: 6020: 6019: 6018: 6017: 6016: 5946: 5931: 5930: 5929: 5928: 5886: 5885: 5875: 5874: 5846: 5845: 5844: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5804:Hurricanes in 5788: 5787: 5781: 5775: 5769: 5763: 5757: 5751: 5745: 5739: 5733: 5702: 5699: 5698: 5697: 5634: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5530: 5529: 5498: 5497:Inflated costs 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5453: 5452: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5313: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5277: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5270: 5235: 5234: 5228: 5206: 5203: 5201:Hurricane Iris 5158:Hurricane Inez 5150:Hurricane Dora 5146:Hurricane Cleo 5130:Hurricane Ione 5118:Hurricane Edna 5110: 5108:Hurricane Rita 5100: 5094: 5091: 5081: 5058: 5057: 5036: 5035:Tracking to do 5033: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 4989: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4974: 4973: 4924: 4921: 4887: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4836: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4804: 4803: 4796: 4749:tropical storm 4745: 4741: 4733: 4727: 4723: 4715: 4707: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4687: 4686: 4582:tornado events 4577: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4481:Good idea. We 4443: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4399: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4346: 4345: 4316: 4313: 4271: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4176: 4173: 4157: 4154: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4072: 4071: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4041: 4040: 4013: 4012: 3992: 3991: 3988: 3986: 3983: 3980: 3977: 3972: 3967: 3964: 3963: 3957: 3956: 3951: 3946: 3941: 3936: 3931: 3916: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3862:Hurricane ERIC 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3831: 3830: 3808:Hurricane ERIC 3780: 3779: 3768: 3757: 3756: 3741: 3734: 3719: 3700: 3685: 3670: 3655: 3643: 3642:Article intros 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3620: 3619: 3614:Sarsaparilla39 3599: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3569: 3568: 3532: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3500:Hurricane Eric 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3448: 3447: 3432: 3431: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3342:Hurricane Eric 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3302: 3301: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3264:Hurricane Eric 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3238: 3237: 3208:Hurricane Eric 3204: 3203: 3200: 3197: 3194: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3173: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3122:Saffir-Simpson 3114: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3004: 2991: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2912: 2911: 2888: 2887: 2884: 2881: 2872: 2871: 2868: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2853: 2837: 2834: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2719: 2718: 2688: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2647: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2628: 2627: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2594: 2593: 2571: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2545:Hurricane Eric 2538: 2537: 2523: 2522: 2509: 2489: 2486: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2467: 2466: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2444: 2443: 2436: 2435: 2428: 2427: 2420: 2419: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2406:Tropical Storm 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2369: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2323: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2243: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2221: 2215: 2209: 2203: 2197: 2191: 2185: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2150:Typhoon Maring 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2120: 2109: 2108: 2080: 2072:Typhoon Maring 2063: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2029:Hurricane Eric 2011: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1967:Hurricane Eric 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1940: 1938: 1936: 1934: 1932: 1930: 1928: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1913: 1912: 1881: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1830: 1829: 1810:Cyclone Althea 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1789: 1788: 1769:Hurricane Eric 1755: 1754: 1751: 1734: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1668: 1667: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1552: 1551: 1540: 1539: 1534:Sarsaparilla39 1530: 1529: 1528: 1504: 1468: 1456: 1435: 1434: 1428: 1420: 1417:Cyclone Ingrid 1410: 1399: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1378: 1370: 1366:Typhoon Imbudo 1362: 1353: 1344: 1336: 1328: 1310:Everything in 1308: 1303: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1259:Hurricane Eric 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1216: 1215: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1191:I know about. 1168: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1127: 1124: 1102: 1101: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1023: 1022: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 960: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 865: 864: 863: 862: 857:Sarsaparilla39 847: 846: 831:Sarsaparilla39 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 768:Sarsaparilla39 759: 758: 757: 756: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 721: 720: 719: 718: 705: 704: 689:Sarsaparilla39 683: 680: 670: 669: 668: 667: 655: 654: 610: 607: 598: 597: 584: 577: 573: 560: 553: 543: 542: 539: 536: 533: 510: 495: 473: 470: 461: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 404: 403: 402: 401: 389: 388: 387: 386: 379: 378: 377: 376: 369: 368: 367: 366: 359: 358: 357: 356: 350: 349: 348: 347: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 330: 327: 317: 316: 315: 314: 307: 306: 253: 252: 251: 250: 235: 234: 204: 201: 198: 197: 192: 189: 184: 179: 172: 167: 162: 152: 151: 134: 122: 121: 118: 117: 114: 113: 111: 94:the discussion 80: 68: 67: 62: 50: 49: 43: 36: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7589: 7578: 7575: 7573: 7570: 7569: 7567: 7560: 7559: 7554: 7550: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7525: 7524: 7523: 7522: 7521: 7514: 7509: 7503: 7499: 7494: 7489: 7485: 7484: 7483: 7482: 7474: 7470: 7466: 7462: 7458: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7454: 7453: 7450: 7445: 7440: 7435: 7434: 7433: 7431: 7426: 7424: 7420: 7416: 7412: 7408: 7404: 7399: 7396: 7392: 7388: 7384: 7373: 7372: 7367: 7362: 7358: 7354: 7350: 7340: 7337: 7336: 7333: 7315: 7312: 7308: 7304: 7300: 7299: 7298: 7295: 7290: 7286: 7282: 7281: 7280: 7277: 7273: 7272: 7271: 7268: 7263: 7262: 7261: 7258: 7253: 7252: 7251: 7250: 7247: 7242: 7237: 7233: 7229: 7225: 7220: 7219: 7218: 7217: 7213: 7212: 7207: 7202: 7197: 7190: 7186: 7182: 7171: 7169: 7166: 7162: 7158: 7146: 7141: 7136: 7132: 7128: 7124: 7121:As I said on 7120: 7119: 7118: 7117: 7114: 7113:Hurricanehink 7108: 7097: 7094: 7089: 7088: 7087: 7086: 7081: 7076: 7071: 7067: 7064: 7061: 7058: 7055: 7043: 7040: 7037:could love). 7035: 7031: 7029: 7025: 7024: 7023: 7022: 7019: 7014: 7009: 7005: 7000: 6999: 6998: 6997: 6994: 6985: 6984: 6983: 6981: 6977: 6972: 6969: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6958: 6950: 6949: 6948: 6946: 6938: 6937: 6936: 6934: 6924: 6923: 6918: 6913: 6908: 6904: 6900: 6899:Cyclone Tracy 6885: 6882: 6881:Hurricanehink 6878: 6877: 6876: 6875: 6872: 6869: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6862: 6859: 6858:Hurricanehink 6854: 6853: 6848: 6843: 6839: 6835: 6825: 6824: 6821: 6813: 6808: 6803: 6799: 6798: 6796: 6792: 6788: 6785: 6784:Hurricanehink 6782:Sounds good. 6781: 6779: 6774: 6769: 6765: 6764: 6762: 6758: 6755: 6751: 6748: 6747:Hurricanehink 6744: 6742: 6737: 6732: 6728: 6727: 6725: 6721: 6716: 6712: 6709: 6708:Hurricanehink 6705: 6703: 6698: 6693: 6689: 6688: 6686: 6682: 6679: 6674: 6672: 6667: 6662: 6658: 6657: 6655: 6651: 6646: 6641: 6637: 6636: 6634: 6633:Cyclone Larry 6631:Improve that 6630: 6626: 6623: 6622:Hurricanehink 6618: 6616: 6611: 6606: 6602: 6598: 6594: 6590: 6586: 6585: 6583: 6580:or a list of 6579: 6575: 6571: 6566: 6561: 6557: 6556: 6554: 6550: 6547: 6546:Hurricanehink 6542: 6540: 6535: 6530: 6526: 6525: 6523: 6519: 6514: 6513: 6512: 6498: 6493: 6488: 6484: 6483: 6482: 6481: 6480: 6479: 6474: 6471: 6470:Hurricanehink 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6461: 6456: 6455: 6450: 6446: 6441: 6436: 6431: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6421: 6416: 6411: 6407: 6400: 6397: 6396:Hurricanehink 6393: 6392: 6391: 6390: 6386: 6381: 6376: 6367: 6366:Cyclone Tracy 6360: 6355: 6350: 6345: 6344: 6341: 6338: 6337:Hurricanehink 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6328: 6316: 6313: 6312:Hurricanehink 6309: 6308: 6307: 6306: 6303: 6299: 6298:Miss Madeline 6294: 6282: 6279: 6278:Hurricanehink 6275: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6269: 6265: 6261: 6254: 6239: 6236: 6235:Hurricanehink 6232: 6231: 6230: 6227: 6226:Hurricanehink 6223: 6222: 6221: 6218: 6217:Hurricanehink 6214: 6213: 6212: 6209: 6208:Hurricanehink 6204: 6203: 6202: 6199: 6194: 6190: 6189: 6188: 6187: 6184: 6183:Hurricanehink 6176: 6169: 6166: 6165:Hurricanehink 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6156: 6151: 6147: 6139: 6134: 6133: 6130: 6129:Hurricanehink 6119: 6114: 6113: 6108: 6104: 6099: 6094: 6089: 6082: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6072: 6069: 6068:Hurricanehink 6065: 6064: 6063: 6062: 6059: 6056: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6046: 6042: 6038: 6034: 6030: 6015: 6012: 6011:Hurricanehink 6007: 6006: 6005: 6000: 5999: 5994: 5990: 5985: 5980: 5975: 5969: 5968: 5967: 5964: 5959: 5955: 5951: 5947: 5945: 5942: 5941:Hurricanehink 5937: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5927: 5922: 5921: 5916: 5912: 5907: 5902: 5897: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5884: 5881: 5880:Hurricanehink 5877: 5876: 5873: 5870: 5865: 5861: 5857: 5856: 5855: 5854: 5851: 5840: 5837: 5836:Hurricanehink 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5823: 5820: 5816: 5815:Miss Madeline 5812: 5808: 5807: 5801: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5793: 5792:Hurricanehink 5785: 5782: 5779: 5776: 5773: 5770: 5767: 5764: 5761: 5758: 5755: 5752: 5749: 5746: 5743: 5740: 5737: 5734: 5731: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5724: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5708: 5696: 5693: 5692:Hurricanehink 5689: 5688: 5687: 5686: 5681: 5676: 5671: 5668: 5665: 5659: 5657: 5652: 5649: 5645: 5640: 5620: 5615: 5610: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5587: 5584: 5583:Hurricanehink 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5566: 5561: 5556: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5542: 5539: 5538:Hurricanehink 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5528: 5523: 5518: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5508: 5507:Hurricanehink 5504: 5488: 5485: 5484:Hurricanehink 5481: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5471: 5466: 5461: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5454: 5451: 5448: 5447:Hurricanehink 5444: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5432: 5427: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5411: 5410: 5405: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5377: 5374: 5373:Hurricanehink 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5352: 5349: 5345: 5344:Miss Madeline 5340: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5326: 5323: 5322:Hurricanehink 5319: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5309: 5304: 5299: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5287: 5286:Hurricanehink 5284:done so far. 5283: 5269: 5266: 5265:Hurricanehink 5262: 5261: 5260: 5257: 5252: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5241: 5240:Hurricanehink 5233: 5229: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5207: 5204: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5190: 5186: 5182: 5178: 5174: 5170: 5167: 5163: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5123: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5099: 5095: 5092: 5090: 5086: 5085:Typhoon Maemi 5082: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5059: 5055: 5054: 5053: 5052: 5049: 5045: 5042: 5024: 5021: 5020:Hurricanehink 5016: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5002: 4999: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4985: 4982: 4981:Hurricanehink 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4972: 4967: 4966: 4961: 4957: 4952: 4947: 4942: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4930: 4920: 4919: 4914: 4909: 4905: 4901: 4897: 4893: 4881: 4878: 4877:Hurricanehink 4873: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4865: 4860: 4853: 4846: 4842: 4830: 4827: 4826:Hurricanehink 4822: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4814: 4809: 4801: 4797: 4794: 4790: 4787:peninsula" - 4786: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4773:extratropical 4770: 4766: 4762: 4758: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4739: 4734: 4728: 4724: 4721: 4716: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4699: 4696: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4685: 4680: 4679: 4674: 4670: 4665: 4660: 4655: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4643: 4639: 4637: 4635: 4627: 4625: 4622: 4616: 4612: 4610: 4608: 4602: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4587: 4583: 4563: 4560: 4556: 4555:Miss Madeline 4552: 4551: 4550: 4545: 4540: 4535: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4524: 4523: 4518: 4514: 4509: 4504: 4499: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4488: 4487:Hurricanehink 4484: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4473: 4468: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4458: 4454: 4453:Miss Madeline 4450: 4437: 4432: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4409: 4405: 4391: 4386: 4385: 4380: 4376: 4371: 4366: 4361: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4344: 4339: 4334: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4323: 4312: 4311: 4306: 4301: 4297: 4290: 4280: 4263: 4260: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4235: 4234: 4229: 4225: 4220: 4215: 4208: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4197: 4193: 4191: 4185: 4182: 4172: 4171: 4168: 4163: 4153: 4152: 4149: 4144: 4130: 4127: 4122: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4101: 4098: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4083: 4080: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4053: 4050: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4039: 4036: 4035:Hurricanehink 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4026: 4022: 4020: 4009: 4005: 3993: 3989: 3984: 3981: 3978: 3976: 3973: 3970: 3965: 3962: 3958: 3955: 3952: 3950: 3947: 3945: 3942: 3940: 3937: 3935: 3932: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3924: 3921: 3904: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3883: 3879: 3878: 3872: 3871: 3866: 3863: 3859: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3842: 3839: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3829: 3825: 3824: 3818: 3817: 3812: 3809: 3805: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3785: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3739: 3735: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3635: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3618: 3615: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3605: 3591: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3567: 3564: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3549: 3541: 3520: 3517: 3516: 3510: 3509: 3504: 3501: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3478: 3475: 3474:Hurricanehink 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3460: 3457: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3446: 3443: 3439: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3417: 3413: 3394: 3391: 3384: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3371: 3366: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3356: 3355: 3349: 3348: 3343: 3339: 3333: 3330: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3312: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3300: 3297: 3292: 3288: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3271: 3270: 3265: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3250: 3247: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3236: 3233: 3232:Hurricanehink 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3221: 3215: 3214: 3209: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3186:Damage photos 3185: 3182: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3167: 3164: 3159: 3156: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3123: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3097: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3078: 3065: 3062: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3051: 3038: 3035: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3022: 3016: 3010: 3003: 2997: 2986: 2972: 2969: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2954: 2951: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2938: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2895: 2893: 2885: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2860: 2857: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2844: 2841: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2802: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2777: 2774: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2755: 2752: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2738: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2698: 2694: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2639: 2636: 2635:Hurricanehink 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2613: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2592: 2589: 2588:Hurricanehink 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2578: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2552: 2551: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2536: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524: 2521: 2517: 2516:Miss Madeline 2513: 2510: 2508: 2507:Hurricanehink 2504: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2494:Hurricanehink 2488:Known Vandals 2485: 2484: 2481: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2450: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2440:Typhoon Wilda 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2412: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2386: 2381: 2375: 2368: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2340: 2335: 2329: 2322: 2316: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2287: 2284: 2280: 2279:Miss Madeline 2276: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2249: 2242: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2207: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2195: 2192: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2180: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2126: 2119: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2092: 2086: 2079: 2073: 2069: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2036: 2035: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2003: 2002:Hurricanehink 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1954: 1951: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1907:Hurricanehink 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1893: 1888: 1871: 1868: 1867:Hurricanehink 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1854: 1851: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1828: 1825: 1824:Hurricanehink 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802:Cyclone Tracy 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1776: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1752: 1746: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1729: 1728:Hurricanehink 1725: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1708: 1697: 1694: 1693:Hurricanehink 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1652:Hurricanehink 1649: 1645: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1620: 1604: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1583: 1579: 1578:Miss Madeline 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1522: 1516: 1510: 1503: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1486: 1480: 1474: 1467: 1461: 1457: 1455: 1454: 1453:Hurricanehink 1450: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1438:Miss Madeline 1432: 1429: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1418: 1414: 1413:Cyclone Tracy 1411: 1409: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1386: 1384: 1379: 1377: 1375: 1371: 1369: 1367: 1363: 1361: 1359: 1354: 1352: 1350: 1345: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1335: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1320: 1319:Typhoon Vamei 1316: 1315: 1313: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1266: 1265: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1228: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1173: 1172:Miss Madeline 1165: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1149: 1146:redirects to 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1126:Zone Crossers 1123: 1122: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1100: 1097: 1096:Hurricanehink 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1071: 1068: 1067:Hurricanehink 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1017:Hurricanehink 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1007: 998: 993: 988: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 975: 971: 970:Miss Madeline 965: 944: 941: 940:Hurricanehink 937: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 910: 905: 904: 903: 900: 899:Hurricanehink 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 882: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 861: 858: 854: 851: 850: 849: 848: 845: 842: 841:Hurricanehink 838: 837: 836: 835: 832: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 793: 790: 789:Hurricanehink 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 772: 769: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 755: 752: 748: 747:Miss Madeline 744: 743: 742: 741: 734: 731: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 717: 714: 713:Hurricanehink 709: 708: 707: 706: 703: 700: 696: 695: 694: 693: 690: 679: 678: 675: 666: 663: 662:Hurricanehink 659: 658: 657: 656: 653: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 631: 628: 624: 620: 615: 606: 605: 602: 592: 585: 582: 578: 574: 568: 561: 558: 557: 556: 552: 551: 548: 540: 537: 534: 528: 518: 511: 509:, or similar. 508: 504: 500: 496: 491: 481: 474: 471: 468: 467: 466: 449: 446: 445:Hurricanehink 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 428: 425: 424:Hurricanehink 421: 420: 414: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 400: 397: 393: 392: 391: 390: 383: 382: 381: 380: 373: 372: 371: 370: 363: 362: 361: 360: 354: 353: 352: 351: 344: 343: 342: 341: 331: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 311: 310: 309: 308: 305: 302: 298: 294: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 282:Hurricanehink 277: 276: 273: 267: 266: 263: 259: 258:Miss Madeline 249: 246: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 230: 226: 221: 220: 219: 218: 215: 211: 210:Miss Madeline 196: 193: 190: 188: 185: 183: 180: 177: 173: 171: 168: 166: 163: 161: 158: 157: 149: 145: 141: 140: 135: 128: 127: 112: 95: 91: 87: 86: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 66: 63: 60: 56: 55: 51: 47: 41: 37: 28: 27: 19: 7547: 7427: 7407:Meteo-France 7400: 7394: 7379: 7346: 7338: 7328: 7231: 7192: 7177: 7154: 7109: 7105: 7072: 7068: 7065: 7062: 7059: 7056: 7053: 7033: 6989: 6979: 6975: 6973: 6970: 6966: 6954: 6942: 6930: 6906: 6895: 6855: 6831: 6818: 6576:I propose a 6510: 6452: 6403: 6370: 6324: 6290: 6257: 6179: 6142: 6126: 6110: 6040: 6037:Mid-Atlantic 6036: 6032: 6031:(LA/MS/AL), 6028: 6026: 5996: 5918: 5847: 5805: 5803: 5789: 5704: 5672: 5669: 5663: 5660: 5653: 5648:GDP deflator 5636: 5500: 5412: 5388: 5279: 5236: 5038: 4963: 4926: 4889: 4852:not verified 4838: 4805: 4800:Mid-Atlantic 4740:information. 4737: 4709: 4676: 4640: 4633: 4630: 4628: 4620: 4618: 4613: 4606: 4604: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4586:Fujita scale 4579: 4533: 4520: 4482: 4448: 4445: 4442:New articles 4401: 4382: 4352: 4318: 4273: 4231: 4206: 4194: 4186: 4180: 4178: 4162:my user page 4159: 4145: 4141: 4120: 4058: 4023: 4016: 3974: 3968: 3960: 3953: 3948: 3943: 3938: 3933: 3926: 3918: 3877:my dropsonde 3875: 3868: 3823:my dropsonde 3821: 3814: 3781: 3771: 3758: 3727:Quintana Roo 3688: 3673: 3662: 3651: 3645: 3601: 3534: 3515:my dropsonde 3513: 3506: 3494: 3408: 3378:just change 3352: 3347:my dropsonde 3345: 3274: 3269:my dropsonde 3267: 3218: 3213:my dropsonde 3211: 3205: 3183:Action shots 3175: 3116: 3086: 3073: 3046: 2993: 2896: 2889: 2874: 2873: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2813: 2690: 2674:introduction 2673: 2649: 2573: 2555: 2550:my dropsonde 2548: 2491: 2477: 2470: 2462: 2448: 2439: 2431: 2423: 2415: 2405: 2399: 2065: 2039: 2034:my dropsonde 2032: 1977: 1972:my dropsonde 1970: 1923: 1883: 1844: 1799: 1779: 1774:my dropsonde 1772: 1756: 1735: 1721: 1717: 1704: 1636: 1613: 1447: 1436: 1422: 1401: 1394: 1380: 1372: 1364: 1358:Typhoon Mike 1355: 1346: 1340:Typhoon Rusa 1338: 1330: 1317: 1305: 1297: 1285: 1269: 1264:my dropsonde 1262: 1233: 1202: 1169: 1129: 1113: 1103: 1078: 1003: 966: 962: 827: 685: 671: 612: 609:Storm tracks 599: 554: 544: 463: 418: 417: 412: 278: 268: 254: 206: 175: 143: 137: 83: 46:WikiProjects 7050:FA examples 6041:New England 5096:Merge: See 5079:Fishspinner 4896:easy hurdat 4769:subtropical 4322:juan andrés 3604:juan andrés 3070:Wikisource? 1837:Cyclone Zoe 1806:Cyclone Ada 1396:Cyclone 05B 1374:Typhoon Ike 1189:Typhoon Gay 136:This is an 7566:Categories 7513:2006-04-18 7030:says here 6907:in general 6599:, and the 6029:Gulf Coast 5806:Somewhere 5721:, and now 5083:Copyedit: 5061:Requests: 4181:increasing 3944:Time (UTC) 3798:Category 5 3738:US dollars 3657:A link to 3579:1-2-3 rule 3383:storm path 3087:everything 2935:Including 2697:U.S. state 2691:Check out 2660:12.144.5.2 2068:Philippine 547:Mcmillen76 512:I created 475:I created 422:cyclones. 256:Atlantic? 195:Archive 10 7558:Nilfanion 7506:at 01:09 7311:Nilfanion 7276:Nilfanion 7257:Nilfanion 7195:Hurricane 6763:article. 6434:Hurricane 6092:Hurricane 6035:(NC/SC), 5978:Hurricane 5900:Hurricane 5662:anything 5656:this site 5102:Cleanup: 4945:Hurricane 4923:Templates 4757:hurricane 4726:million). 4695:Evolauxia 4658:Hurricane 4642:Evolauxia 4502:Hurricane 4364:Hurricane 4218:Hurricane 3776:hurricane 3725:state of 3704:Caribbean 3693:hurricane 3678:hurricane 3667:hurricane 3540:hurricane 3048:article) 2828:Coredesat 1719:and 90). 1642:. Though 1118:Nilfanion 1114:sentences 460:Templates 187:Archive 6 182:Archive 5 176:Archive 4 170:Archive 3 165:Archive 2 160:Archive 1 7332:CrazyC83 7234:!!!). — 6868:CrazyC83 6836:to 2006 6722:and the 6375:CHANLORD 6287:Comments 6045:CrazyC83 6033:Carolina 5230:Update: 5112:Expand: 4279:tcexpand 4270:tcexpand 4167:CrazyC83 4148:CrazyC83 4097:CrazyC83 4079:CrazyC83 4049:CrazyC83 4025:CrazyC83 3985:5 miles 3979:Unknown 3934:Location 3729:and the 3716:Atlantic 3416:CrazyC83 3050:CrazyC83 2968:CrazyC83 2798:CrazyC83 2751:CrazyC83 2713:CrazyC83 1939:03375 HR 1224:CrazyC83 419:tropical 413:tropical 396:CrazyC83 7232:of 1954 7161:join us 6820:Storm05 6766:Yes. — 6454:archive 6327:Storm05 6112:archive 5998:archive 5954:Arizona 5920:archive 4965:archive 4789:Yucatan 4785:Yucatan 4678:archive 4522:archive 4384:archive 4233:archive 4207:doesn't 4121:country 3987:(8 km) 3975:Anytown 3870:archive 3816:archive 3723:Mexican 3712:Florida 3680:of the 3508:archive 3354:archive 3276:archive 3220:archive 2840:Hello, 2557:archive 2194:Huaning 2041:archive 1979:archive 1781:archive 1271:archive 1086:Storm05 1006:Storm05 139:archive 7439:jdorje 7425:data. 7361:jdorje 7267:DavidH 7236:jdorje 7135:jdorje 7093:Golbez 7075:jdorje 7039:DavidH 7028:Golbez 7008:jdorje 6993:Golbez 6912:jdorje 6842:jdorje 6802:jdorje 6768:jdorje 6731:jdorje 6692:jdorje 6661:jdorje 6640:jdorje 6605:jdorje 6595:, the 6560:jdorje 6529:jdorje 6487:jdorje 6410:jdorje 6349:jdorje 6146:WP:DYK 5952:or in 5675:jdorje 5609:jdorje 5555:jdorje 5517:jdorje 5460:jdorje 5426:jdorje 5399:jdorje 5298:jdorje 5048:DavidH 4908:jdorje 4859:jdorje 4808:jdorje 4732:later. 4539:jdorje 4483:should 4467:jdorje 4426:jdorje 4408:Golbez 4333:jdorje 4300:jdorje 4289:expand 4196:Jdorje 4126:Jdorje 4066:Jdorje 3954:Damage 3939:County 3900:Jdorje 3838:Jdorje 3784:Jdorje 3691:was a 3676:was a 3665:was a 3631:Jdorje 3587:Jdorje 3548:Jdorje 3456:Jdorje 3438:Cyrius 3426:Jdorje 3390:Jdorje 3311:Jdorje 3246:Jdorje 3202:No pic 3196:Tracks 3145:Jdorje 3135:, and 3105:Jdorje 3077:Golbez 3061:Jdorje 3034:Jdorje 2950:Golbez 2906:Jdorje 2773:Jdorje 2734:Jdorje 2702:Jdorje 2678:Jdorje 2622:Jdorje 2609:Jdorje 2577:Jdorje 2532:Jdorje 2306:Jdorje 2218:Maring 2212:Labuyo 2162:Jdorje 2103:Jdorje 1950:Jdorje 1896:Jdorje 1850:Jdorje 1814:Jdorje 1758:Jdorje 1711:Jdorje 1675:Jdorje 1662:Jdorje 1630:Jdorje 1600:Jdorje 1560:Jdorje 1546:Jdorje 1381:Super 1356:Super 1347:Super 1325:Jdorje 1289:Jdorje 1248:Jdorje 1206:Jdorje 1193:Jdorje 1132:Hattie 1049:Jdorje 1030:Jdorje 987:jdorje 878:Jdorje 730:Jdorje 699:Jdorje 649:Jdorje 627:Jdorje 601:Jdorje 501:, the 499:Jdorje 365:53°N!) 313:books: 301:Jdorje 272:Jdorje 245:Jdorje 229:Jdorje 42:scale. 7165:Drdan 3982:0000 3531:Scope 3495:a lot 2379:extra 2333:extra 2253:extra 2224:Ondoy 2200:Isang 2188:Gorio 2182:Feria 2130:extra 2090:extra 576:text. 385:EDT). 375:CDT). 16:< 7533:P.K. 7529:here 7473:P.K. 7469:here 7467:and 7465:here 7461:here 7444:talk 7430:P.K. 7403:here 7391:here 7387:TCWC 7383:RSMC 7366:talk 7355:and 7289:Tito 7241:talk 7191:) — 7163:! -- 7140:talk 7080:talk 7034:that 7013:talk 6917:talk 6847:talk 6828:2006 6807:talk 6773:talk 6736:talk 6697:talk 6666:talk 6645:talk 6610:talk 6603:. — 6565:talk 6534:talk 6492:talk 6415:talk 6354:talk 6193:Tito 6150:Tito 5958:Tito 5864:Tito 5860:Nora 5717:and 5680:talk 5614:talk 5560:talk 5522:talk 5465:talk 5431:talk 5404:talk 5303:talk 5251:Tito 5098:here 4913:talk 4904:1851 4864:talk 4845:this 4843:and 4841:this 4813:talk 4775:(or 4771:and 4755:and 4751:and 4738:most 4544:talk 4472:talk 4431:talk 4353:I've 4338:talk 4305:talk 4254:Tito 4250:Race 4223:ERIC 3749:mbar 3731:U.S. 3577:and 3558:Tito 3365:Tito 3324:Tito 3291:Tito 3158:Tito 3091:Tito 3085:Not 3001:NSLE 2601:inHg 2480:HERB 2366:NSLE 2320:NSLE 2240:NSLE 2206:Kiko 2152:and 2117:NSLE 2077:NSLE 2015:Tito 1845:some 1740:Add 1648:here 1624:and 1501:NSLE 1496:here 1465:NSLE 1415:and 1407:here 1140:Joan 1138:and 1136:Fifi 992:talk 7508:UTC 7488:NSL 7417:or 7385:or 7347:On 7305:to 7226:or 7200:Dev 6976:yes 6838:USD 6834:USD 6520:or 6444:RIC 6102:RIC 5988:RIC 5910:RIC 5664:but 5644:CPI 4955:RIC 4763:. 4720:USD 4668:RIC 4512:RIC 4374:RIC 3874:-- 3820:-- 3755:)." 3753:hPa 3740:)." 3625:At 3512:-- 3020:CVU 2937:Lee 2010:of. 1520:CVU 1484:CVU 674:ghw 621:or 7568:: 7471:. 7293:xd 7214:@ 7091:-- 7073:— 6959:: 6947:: 6300:| 6266:. 6197:xd 6154:xd 6148:? 6043:. 5962:xd 5868:xd 5817:| 5713:, 5709:, 5673:— 5346:| 5255:xd 5224:, 5220:, 5216:, 5212:, 5199:, 5195:, 5191:, 5187:, 5183:, 5179:, 5175:, 5171:, 5164:, 5160:, 5156:, 5152:, 5148:, 5144:, 5140:, 5136:, 5132:, 5128:, 5124:, 5120:, 5116:, 5106:, 5087:, 5073:, 5065:, 4855:}} 4849:{{ 4638:" 4626:" 4611:" 4557:| 4534:or 4455:| 4292:}} 4286:{{ 4282:}} 4276:{{ 4258:xd 3969:F1 3928:F# 3718:." 3699:." 3684:." 3669:." 3585:. 3562:xd 3543:}} 3537:{{ 3386:}} 3380:{{ 3369:xd 3350:- 3344:- 3328:xd 3295:xd 3272:- 3266:- 3216:- 3210:- 3162:xd 3143:. 3131:, 3127:, 3125:}} 3119:{{ 3095:xd 3075:-- 2998:? 2988:}} 2982:{{ 2897:-- 2894:. 2676:. 2553:- 2547:- 2518:| 2478:-- 2473:". 2465:". 2442:". 2434:". 2426:". 2418:". 2408:". 2373:讨论 2327:讨论 2281:| 2247:讨论 2124:讨论 2084:讨论 2074:. 2037:- 2031:- 2019:xd 1975:- 1969:- 1808:, 1804:, 1777:- 1771:- 1748:}} 1742:{{ 1650:. 1628:. 1622:}} 1616:{{ 1580:| 1498:. 1440:| 1267:- 1261:- 1246:. 1174:| 1134:, 1082:, 972:| 749:| 647:. 594:}} 588:{{ 570:}} 564:{{ 545:-- 530:}} 524:{{ 520:}} 514:{{ 493:}} 487:{{ 483:}} 477:{{ 260:| 243:. 212:| 191:→ 7515:) 7511:( 7504:) 7502:C 7500:+ 7498:T 7496:( 7492:E 7446:) 7442:( 7368:) 7364:( 7243:) 7239:( 7210:n 7205:o 7142:) 7138:( 7082:) 7078:( 7015:) 7011:( 6919:) 6915:( 6849:) 6845:( 6809:) 6805:( 6775:) 6771:( 6738:) 6734:( 6699:) 6695:( 6668:) 6664:( 6647:) 6643:( 6612:) 6608:( 6567:) 6563:( 6536:) 6532:( 6494:) 6490:( 6449:§ 6439:E 6429:§ 6417:) 6413:( 6378:/ 6356:) 6352:( 6107:§ 6097:E 6087:§ 5993:§ 5983:E 5973:§ 5915:§ 5905:E 5895:§ 5682:) 5678:( 5616:) 5612:( 5562:) 5558:( 5524:) 5520:( 5467:) 5463:( 5433:) 5429:( 5406:) 5402:( 5305:) 5301:( 5077:, 4960:§ 4950:E 4940:§ 4915:) 4911:( 4866:) 4862:( 4815:) 4811:( 4795:. 4779:/ 4673:§ 4663:E 4653:§ 4636:. 4629:" 4617:" 4603:" 4546:) 4542:( 4517:§ 4507:E 4497:§ 4474:) 4470:( 4433:) 4429:( 4379:§ 4369:E 4359:§ 4340:) 4336:( 4307:) 4303:( 4228:§ 4213:§ 4010:. 3865:§ 3857:§ 3811:§ 3803:§ 3751:( 3503:§ 3442:✎ 3440:| 3193:) 3023:) 3017:+ 3014:C 3011:+ 3008:T 3005:( 2939:. 2658:/ 2382:) 2376:+ 2370:( 2336:) 2330:+ 2324:( 2256:) 2250:+ 2244:( 2133:) 2127:+ 2121:( 2093:) 2087:+ 2081:( 1523:) 1517:+ 1514:C 1511:+ 1508:T 1505:( 1487:) 1481:+ 1478:C 1475:+ 1472:T 1469:( 1327:) 994:) 990:( 596:. 583:? 572:. 532:. 150:. 48::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Archive 4 - Knowledge

Index