Knowledge talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 10

4867:

Paulley's 13:40 5/9/06 version until I changed it (And I didn't contest it, I just added to it). You are violating both popular opinion on this article and you are violating Knowledge policy. As such, you are the one vandalizing the article, sir. I don't care about my past edits. My past edits on Knowledge (which have all been in good faith whether you want to believe that or not) have no role in this discussion...actually, I take that back...their role here is that they back up the fact that your accusation that I am intentionally disrupting the integrity of Knowledge is proposterous and in violation of

3776:. I just attempted to merge the wrestling article into the real name article per a growing consensus in the Afd (he's also a former member of the KKK and has, to me, a rather interesting bio.) In the course of doing this merge I found myself confused because I don't know a thing about pro wrestling. Mostly I'm having trouble distinguishing exactly what "belt" he holds and what wrestling organization awarded it. The orginal article is a bit hard to follow for a novice like myself. I'd love it if someone would give the original article a read, then check my section on 164:), but I have a couple questions. Firstly, I noticed the task of adding them is not on the Project To Do list, so are they desirable in the opinion of the project membership? And, secondly, should they be added for every championship a notable wrestler has won (even non-notable championships), or only the championships that have their own article already? And, while we're on the topic, I would personally like to add some dates to those boxes, perhaps the duration of the championship (eg. January 29, 1984 to April 1, 1988). What does everyone think? 2781:

Grand Slam Champion. Regardless, I think the non-existence now of a Euro title might be moot, since I seem to remember then using the term before that belt came into existence, so I'd assume that one could also qualify as such now that the belts no longer in existence. And not to seem like we're going crazy with AfDs, but I have to wonder if this article should even exist on Knowledge...the dinstinction itself now seems abritrary and like something that might be appropriate for a wrestling-specific Wiki, but maybe not a general Wiki? Idunno.

2356:. Many promotions don't belong even on Knowledge, and the category should be cleaned up in my opinion. It seems like any fan of a smaller or lesser promotion just adds their favorite, and it either lasts or finally gets an AFD a while later. There is a wrestling wiki (if I remember right), many of the lesser promotions should be there, and not on this main wiki. Knowledge = encyclopedia of userful and meaningful content. It shouldn't be cluttered with many lesser promotions that hardly anyone has heard of. 31: 2527:

the best. Even if it's kept, what will result is usually a stronger article with good sources and better writing. (One note for you: I looked at your contributions to see which articles were de-prodded, and noted you don't use edit summaries all that often; if you're prodding something, it might be best to put a short comment in to indicate reasoning. It's also good to use edit summaries whenever possible, just 'cause.)

2553:... maybe you should concentrate on making these articles good quality before deleting other ppls work.. --- sorry but i just think notabillity is a point of view and that we should concentrate on making articles better rather than deleting them.... yet i can understand that not every promotion and wrestler needs an article and when we can we should avoid making each individual an article 119:. I believe I marked them, but I don't know if I did it correctly. Anyway, my opinion on them is... age lists are listcruft and really not needed here on Knowledge. It's just pointless trivia that isn't very important. If people want to make age pages, put it on a wrestling wiki, or your own created wrestling site, not here. What does everyone else think about the age lists pages? 2110:

and users continue to update after every single title defense. Does including every title defense in that section constitute "week by week" updates? I'd be interested to see some feedback on this, as the last thing I want to do is to start a huge Edit War on that page and I'm still not quite 100% certain as to my stance on the issue (though I do think it's gotten out of hand).

2620:

think it'd be best if we'd make some concrete law for the Pro-Wrestling project that determine notability, such as promotions that trained employees in the big three(er... WWE etc.) and the champions of those promotions are automaticly notable. What's the worst that can happen, the servers have to store an extra 150 words of listcruf? I don't really think that

4080:

Championship is part of the WWE Championship's 43 year lineage, then doesn't that mean that's how it should be in the articles? Wouldn't doing otherwise be putting in personal opinion instead of WWE canon? Since it's a championship that's the literal property of the WWE, doesn't the WWE sort of get the last word about it and it's lineage?

1997:

don't think that asserts notability by default. And most of the acting credits that these contestants have are just bit parts in minor movies, not even close to notable. Also keep track that many pages have been deleted and protected, including two of the top 3 from this year's search. Quality, not quantity, is what WP and we need.

2950:

if that alone should warrant an entire entry. And not to completely discount him, as I'm sure there are some people out there remember him from when he was active, but as far as I know he really didn't accomplish anything in his career that would warrant the existence of a Knowledge entry (as harsh as that sounds). Thoughts?

5090:) meaning if i was selfish and didnt uderstand wiki i could consider it my work and tell you, you have no right to remove it... do you not uderstand that after something is contributed on wiki it can no longer be claimed as a users work... the biography section stay and if you dont like it dont edit again --- 637:

needed has been brought up on the talk page. How would the project feel about trying something like this out on some of the harder hit wrestling pages? I don't know how we'd decide who would be patrolling which pages, but that's a bridge to cross when we get to it should we decide to go that route, I think. -

1810:] Why were these even made? It's listcruft and useless trivia that doesn't belong here. Ring of Honor is a popular indy fed, but either way.. a list of title defenses certainly doesn't belong here. I put prods on all three, and I'll wait and see what happens. But they should just be AFD'd and then removed. 5721:

Sorry, I should have said "in the USA and Canada". I hadn't even considered Mexico. You are completely correct that AAA and CMLL are highly notable, non-indy promotions. They trump ROH for notability not only because of their high drawing power, but also history and television deals. Nevertheless,

4742:

Although working on an article does not entitle one to "own" the article, it is still important to respect the work of your fellow contributors. When making large scale removals of content, particularly content contributed by one editor, it is important to consider whether a desirable result could be

4470:

True i saw that and his edits on CZW tag teams and wrestlers have been, for the most part, good efforts, and are JB hasnt been too much into the work of CZW... maybe its just me, i think everytime i see the initials JB i get worried... lol! actually i just checked are JB's second name is Barber false

4301:

Give him wanrings, if he doesn't stop then get an admin. Tell him to read what it says when you edit a page: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." Especially since he probably just lifted thast info from somewhere else and didn't write

3885:

personally i prefer it the other way... there was some talk in making the other info avaliable in (show) boxes... i think its the tag titles that cause most problems with the simple list... as Trips is only had one tag partner per tag title it come out ok but if you are talking a wrestler thats had a

2813:

is a much better candidate for it. Rife with OR, and it was never specifically defined by anyone anyway. This is apparent by reading the article - A world title, a second-tier title, and a tag team title? Some sources please! WWE, on the other hand, have referred to their Grand Slam champions both on

2574:

Um, ROH? Trent's wrestled there. That's a pretty notable promotion. I'm not very familiar with the US indy scene as I am from Canada, but even I've heard of Trent Acid. And if he's notable enough to be listed by Gerweck.net, then he's notable enough for here (Steve Gerweck only lists the top indy

2351:

Well if the person isn't with WWE, TNA or a well known other fed: Ring of Honor, Japan, etc. It's hard to determine. As for Sam Hayne, it looks to be vanity for one thing, which shouldn't be allowed, period. There is a NWA Wisconsin page (which Sam Hayne works for, according to the article), but that

255:

article, someone reverted my edit in which I removed the claim that she is the world's oldest professional wrestler (which was presented as fact on the page, and is just a publicity claim on her part). Just to avoid any unpleasentness, are there any wrestlers who are alive that were born before 1923?

5401:

ROH is a well known indy fed, but that certainly doesn't mean every show is important. I think AFD should be put on pages instead of prods for the most part. Regular editors of pages usually just remove prods pretty quick, then it ends up going to AFD anyway. Also I think several of the shows listed

4718:

If you find yourself warring with other contributors over deletions, reversions and so on, why not take some time off from the editing process? Taking yourself out of the equation can cool things off considerably. Take a fresh look a week or two later. Or if someone else is claiming "ownership" of a

4652:

Some contributors feel very possessive about material (be it categories, templates, articles, images or portals) they have donated to this project. Some go so far as to defend them against all intruders. It's one thing to take an interest in an article that you maintain on your watchlist. Maybe you

4181:

User:JB196 (aka Jonathan Barber) wants his name added to the article because he wrote it on wiki... he doesnt understand that you contribute to wiki freely and that we dont credit arselfs within the article text and that are edits are just traked with the pages edit history... and for that reason he

4126:

says "world heavyweight title." And I would be of the opinion that this is the correct name for the belt. As I said in the RM, I wouldn't support this move but I think the decision needs to be made conclusively, even if the result is one of "just leave it where it is" rather than explicitly favoring

4111:

Quick question - I've seen it said before that the title's official designation is "ROH World Heavyweight Title," so I was going to oppose. However, I do not see the promotion refer to it as anything except the "ROH World Title," particularly on its website (ROHwrestling.com). Could someone please

3205:

I commented on both. In the case of Blitz, I support a delete with the note that he hasn't attained enough notoriety yet to warrant an article...though he could sometime in the future, but that's not the case right now. In the case of the UWF, I remember hearing and reading an awful lot about them

3019:

That's what I grappled with right before I nominated it. What I ultimately decided is that while he wasn't a guy who was just around for a few months and retired, his work was not that notable in that he never seemed to achieve even upper-midcard status. In other words, the conclusion I've reached

2949:

I performed some minor clean-up on the article; it's on my Watchlist so I can keep an eye out. Personally, part of me wonders if we should nominate the article for deletion. His scenes stood out as they were some of the stranger (and subsequently more amusing) aspects of the film, but I don't know

2875:

have been causing me alot of hasstle lately due to me stopping him using wikipedia as a secondary homepage for his local wrestling promotion, RQW. I have been changing his edits on the page to fit with formatting and the look of a wrestling article and well as the tense as his version read like news

2109:

A few weeks ago, I asked if a mention and/or summary of every single defense of the ROH World Heavyweight Title was necessary on the entry's discussion page (unfortunately I had a brainfart and forgot to sign it). It seems that the suggestion has gone on deaf ears, as it didn't receive any response

5661:

events are notable. I think even a casual fan or non-wrestling fan would agree that WrestleMania I was a notable event. It just remains for us to draw the line. For my part, I think any event that is well-known enough (or notorious enough) for a casual fan to want to know about is notable (after

5441:

I think people have gotten derailed here, the original topic in question was non-notable ECW house shows with names. Now it's onto ROH shows with names. I agree most of the ROH shows should be deleted, however I am going against deleting one single one: Survival of the Fittest. SOTF falls under the

3330:

You shouldn't have done that, Knowledge's rules state that PROD tags should not be put back if they are removed(for any reason). The thing to do now is to nominate the articles for deletion. Since I am about to go to sleep, maybe someone else can do it. These seem to be the articles that need to be

2595:

Last time I checked, Knowledge wasn't about point of view, it was about things being notable and known. Improving articles is fine and well, BUT it doesn't make a huge difference if only a few people have heard of that wrestler. Knowledge isn't your personal website for all your favorites (that for

2526:

If a proposed deletion tag is removed and you feel the reason given is incorrect, go ahead and run it through AfD. It takes a bit longer and is a bit annoying, but if you can show that its notability is not strong enough to be encyclopedic (like lacking in Google hits, etc.), then it's probably for

2463:

I've put prods on several lesser promotions, and will continue to be against non-notable promotions and wrestlers. People really need to realize Knowledge can't list every wrestler and promotion ever. Dennis Stamp and many of the diva search contestants are prime examples of non-notable things that

2413:

article was created. I think when it went up, links were added for every mentioned wrestler to see if they already had pages. I planned on going back and removing the majority of the redlinks, but never got to it. Bret is a multi time champion of many titles and has worked in Japan. He has also

2335:

a major one.) I'm torn on whether to do a deletion process on this article (note that it was originally tagged with a speedy deletion tag, userfied by another person, and then restarted by the subject, who then removed a proposed deletion tag I hit it with), but wanted to look at just what level of

1870:

Over five Diva Search contestant articles have been proposed for deletion over the past week. Personally, I oppose most of the deletions, but I'd like us to form a coherent policy on this. I think if we're going to delete the articles, we should merge contestant information into another page, be it

559:

Back in July we had a long discussion on page names and which pages should go where based on who owns the trademark etc. A part of that discussion was the revelation that Samoa Joe's fullname wasn't Joe Seanoa but Nuufolau Joel Seanoa, as per the trademark on his name. At the time Dubhagan e-mailed

5472:

There seems to be a problem with wrestlers on shows like iMPACT! and SmackDown of people putting results before they air, especially when there's a title change involved. I was thinking we can start putting a warning like we do for week by week targets kinda like this: <!--This wrestler is on a

5414:

are two examples. The Sabu show was used to raise funds for him, I don't see that being notable (as there has been many shows to help out wrestlers that need money for surgery or to pay bills or whatever: the shows simply aren't anything notable enough). As for Australia tours: it's a fancruft and

5265:

Those 7 ECW events aren't notable, they are house shows with special names (none of the 7 are TV or PPV events). Just because an ECW event has a special name, doesn't make it notable enough. Look at all the WWE tours that have special names: not many (or any at all) are very notable. Special names

3504:

notable). This would help us determine notability for promotions in places other than the USA, whose notability it might be hard for us to judge subjectively. Another criterion could be any promotion that contests an "authentic" World Championship (Singles or Tag). Then, for wrestlers, we could

3225:

As I was looking through new pages, I noticed yet another ECW show was created. I went to the category: and many shows are listed. Many don't seem that notable. Is there any ECW experts here? From the looks of it, the same user is creating any ECW show that had a special name to it. A special name

2799:

Sorry, I thought the edit histories and the talk page were self-explanatory. Me and the anon were in an edit war over whether JBL counted based on his comments on "a recent episode of Smackdown" (which whether it's good enough for inclusion or not is an absolute BS citation). I contended that that

1996:

Well, the winner should have an article, and those who are regulars on WWE programming (not necessarily by just being signed) should have articles. I don't think being in the contest itself asserts notability. And being a playboy model is iffy, they have so many different magazines and websites, I

174:

Because of this message I just noticed that the projects view on succession was removed from to do. If you look at the top of the page you'll see the current way to display championship succession which I just re-added. Succession boxes are not used anymore and wherever possible the new version is

4866:

because the FACT is (and you cannot deny this) is that I have not more than three times in a day reverted this article to a version that has already existed. Please STOP violating Knowledge's guidelines and accept the version of the article that has been UNIVERSALLY accepted. Nobody had contested

3644:

Good call. Seeing as how they've been a tag team, are currently a tag team, and to the best of my knowledge (and any times I've seen them at least) always been a tag team. No reason for them to have single entries. And ditto for Rory and Robbie. It's one thing to make seperate entries for tag

2780:

I had to go back to the February archives to see what you were talking about, but I'm still not quite sure what you're asking. Are you asking specifically about what qualifies someone as a Grand Slam Champion? If that's the case, I think a debate is pointless as it's anyone WWE would consider a

617:

has brought up that Lou Thesz did not invent the powerbomb by accident and has said it existed for years as well as being done on purpose by Lou Thesz when it first occurred. I am not well versed in this subject so can someone come to the talk page with better knowledge than I take a look at the

5697:

Personally, I don't think ROH is "just an indy". It is an indy, but it is the premiere indy in North America, and it features some of the most talented (and notable) wrestlers in North America. I think of ROH as the third most well-known promotion in North America, after WWE and TNA. I feel the

5210:

Warriors of Wrestling was the AWF tv show that was in 95+96. The page here at Knowledge is just a list of results: which is simply listcruft. I had a prod on it, but it was deleted by an editor because it's a TV show. But to put it simply...Knowledge isn't a place to list wrestling results. Also

4793:

policy cleary backs up my self-revert contention, while you must prove why exactly I am "deliberately attempting to violate the integrity of Knowledge," which in and of itself is violating Knowledge policy because that is far from true. I am going to bring this issue to the Arbitration Committee

3499:

I've been thinking about this too. I think the criteria for notability should be objective, if possible, to avoid the "lawn dart" situation. For promotions, there should be some sort of criterion for automatic notability, perhaps a television deal, or the ability to draw crowds of 5,000 people.

2619:

is an extreme example. I didn't find lawn darts notable because the article I nominated was written poorly, but apparently they were a huge fad when I was about 3 years old... How was I supposed to know this? The same goes for any other article, including but not limited to Indy Wrestling. I

5454:

in that they are all highly important independent wrestling tournaments. These are yearly events in indy wrestlers and they have a wide range of combatants and the winners move places in the indy world, and even to the majors. I'm going to bring up the same argument I brought up when we had the

2516:

Well I've reached a snag in marking things. I put prods on several things, and an adminstrator removed them due to them being "verifible". I think it's just wrong: Knowledge shouldn't just list things because they are real and are known. It should be if they are popular and well known: not just

636:

page you'll see that it gets targeted incredibly heavy, especially after and leading up to pay per views, sometimes getting straight vandalized up to 20 times in a day. The idea of asking for aome kind of permanent lock on the page which would only allow for a few trusted people to edit it when

1900:

I agree with TJ. If they simply did nothing after the diva search, they don't need an article. I'm strongly against a minor contestants page, it would be just useless trivia for one thing, and for another... it would encourage people to re-create minor diva search pages for some or all of the

983:

Um, I thought this page was only for the original ECW? Someone went and added WWE info for it, even though the current ECW wrestlers are actually under WWE contract, not ECW contracts. I think the current incarnation of ECW should be left out of it since it is not seperate from WWE like the

4079:

I'd like to address something, it's not exactly the purpose of this particular discussion, but it does involve it to some degree. It involves listing the WWE Undisputed Championship and it's listing as a seperate title from the WWE Championship. If it's the WWE's position that the Undisputed

2187:

You do not think it's notable enough that the WWE alters the original show. For example, removing the boos in the Goldberg-Lesnar match and putting in cheers. Also, editing the the Mickie James/Trish Stratus match to remove the crotch grab and the botched finished. Also, the removal of Jesse

1850:

All three are AFD now. It's fancruft, listcruft...and simply just useless trivia. Title defenses aren't needed here. If I find any others, they will just tagged AFD right away. I tried just a prod to start, but of course people delete them... because they fail to realize it's just fancruft.

3949:

If the person hasn't won too many titles, then it's OK to list them when and where they won and lost the titles and who they won/lost them from. If they have won too many though(like Jerry Lawler and his 26 USWA Titles) then just listing how many times they won should be sufficient.

4067:

So are we going to throw this to a vote and try to compromise on it or something? It actually seems to be coming up more often recently. I like the idea of listing, but hiding, them but personally never saw the point of putting details like place. There's gotta be a happy medium. -

442:

I'm slightly confused - If I read any of the WWE or associated articles, they all basically start with a link to the professional wrestling page. That defines professional wrestling as a performing art. So why do all of the articles about WWE have places in the sports Category?

5702:

have an article because it is super important, or because WWE is very notable? I think that because WWE is very notable, an event like Backlash will be of interest to more people. Likewise, an indy promotion that is only marginally notable is very unlikely to have any notable

3738:

But his bio on TNA's website has him listed as "The Phenomanal" A.J. Styles. When he's announced by the ring announcer, he's billed as "The Phenomanal" A.J. Styles. I'd say, in those types of cases, the nickname stays, since it is obviously an integral part of the ring name.

3253:, the same user has been listing every ECW show with a special name as a non-PPV supercard. I think that's just wrong. Just because a show has a special name doesn't always mean it's considered a "supercard". While I'm no ECW expert, I think a bit of fancruft is going on here. 3193:

I did a google search on both, and didn't come up with much decent information. An editor of Phil Blitz improved the article, but that certainly doesn't make the wrestler more notable. We really need to go through wrestlers and promotions more and AFD the non-notable ones more.

5501:

before deciding anything. There's a huge ongoing discussion on if spoiler warnings should even be on Knowledge, and it is my understanding that right now only fictional events should have a warning, not real life things such as sporting events (even if taped prior to airing)

3505:

grant automatic notability to any wrestler (or other personality) that was a regular member of a notable promotion's roster. Another criterion, suggested above, would be any wrestler that has possessed an "authentic" World Championship. That way, even if I've never heard of

3419:, except if the removal was clearly not an objection to deletion (such as blanking the entire article, or removing the tag along with inserting blatant nonsense); however, if the edit is not obviously vandalism, do not restore it, even if the tag was apparently removed in 541:

does not class it as a sport. That's why I find it odd that we have all the WWE pages linking to a page that *specific* states that it's not a sport yet we are using the sport categories. I think I'm going to draw up a policy proposal or something similar on the matter.

4244:" - new text after I added other graduates and was told by an ex-student it was missing a class of students. I used the edit summary "this isn't complete, a quick googling shows it lacking wrestlers and an ex-student has informed me it's missing an entire class" 3850:

This is an encyclopedia. Detailed information on fictional title wins is not encyclopedic, and in the case of a prolific wrestler like Triple H, only succeeds in bloating the article. If a reader wants that kind of information, they can either visit a site like

396:

page, it mentions about the trademark lawsuit he had about his fast food chain. I'm pretty sure that it was decided, and it was posted somewhere, so that should be updated by someone who's good at transcribing legal news. I think he lost, and he is appealing.

5243:

So long as the articles are fleshed out enough to be encyclopedic. Reference the WWE and WCW pay-per-view articles to get a feel for the level of detail needed in a single-event article. Perhaps they should be pared down to the ones with significant events

2655:

Well, I'm sure Trent Acid is more notable than many other wrestlers listed here. Anyway, that aside, I propose that we try and establish a set of rules that would deem a wrestler notable enough for Knowledge. That way we can save this type of frustration.

576:

Whether or not he wants his real name known isn't a reason to add it or not. If it's an encylcopedia and it can be sourced it should go in there. I can think of at least two other articles that have gone through the same thing and came to the same conclusion

3393:

I absoultely should have done that, as the tags were removed without a reason given, pretty much, if you give a reason that is valid in an edit summary or the talk page, then it can be removed, not just without specifing something, so I did nothing wrong.

5256:'s crucifixtion angle, etc.). For example, if Born to be Wired was the first time a world title was contested in a barbed-wire match (and I don't know if a world title was even contested at the show at all), then you have a context for significance. -- 134:

Someone really needs to change the Attitude Era from WrestleMania X-Seven to WrestleMania X8. WrestleMania X8 was the last PPV to advertise the Attitude Era not X7. The logos were still around after X7, why is X7 listed as the end of the Attitude Era?

2431:

Unless someone gets there before me, I'll be taking it to AfD after work, as the PROD tag has been removed again, without comment. As the above comment suggests, if wrestlers haven't broken the "big leagues" as it were, the notability is suspect.

3539:

Ooh while were here i was just thinking if we find promotions that dont need to be deleted but are in bad shape (you know the whole list of roster, list of shows, list of titles.. etc) do you think we could get them rewritten to the standard of

4021:

I would rather see the information hidden rather than removed completally... cus it was removed you wouldnt be saving any space as not before long someone will re-add championship sucession boxes and we fought long and hard to remove those ---

3905:

There are also several other avantages with the format, it allows to place belts in chronological order, differenchiate between titles that have changed name (WWF to WWE), and like i have already noted then we wouldnt have succession boxes ---

3816:

I think he may be a sockpuppter, he may not be, but from some recent edits a few random IP's have been making I think it's possible. He is an admitted vandal (talk page) and used to liken himself to will on wheels. Here is one poss sockpuppet.

1062:

Actually, we both did, I was still cleaning it up when you finishes. Not that it matters. I don't think WCW would be a problem because there were only a few Alliance members who didn't compete in the original WCW(like Test and Kurt Angle).

5550:

I know you created the article and put it up for prod to make a point, but don't think everyone is against you. I know my reply seems like I thought you didn't know what the SOTF is but it's to show some of us do care about the indies. ––

5001:. You contribute to Knowledge, you're basically releasing your work to public domain. I have created and expanded several articles myself, yet I know it's pointless to take credit for it as anyone could have found that info elsewhere. 5518: 5675:

events (marking similar milestones) from other indies be notable? My gut reaction would be "No, of course not, why would you ask such a dumb question?" but then why is that not the case of ROH if it is "just an indy" ? If, for example,

3670:

It looks like I'm gonna have problems with this user on the TNA roster page. He wants to delete all nicknames from that page and threatens to keep deleting when we revert back. I left him a message, but I just want to warn everyone.

5293:

Can you post links to some so we can see? I would imagine most could be deleted, people tend to create a lot of fluff articles(like the list of every ROH title defense). ROH is a indy fed, so most of their events would not be notable.

189: 2336:

notability you folks consider for guys who haven't made the big shows yet. Is this guy of a level where he should be included? If I'm asking the question, as a casual wrestling fan, others will certainly be asking it as well. Thanks.

3436:

That's just it, "any reason", there was no reason given to why the tags were removed, so they were not removed properly. They did not put anything in an edit summary, they did not put anything on a talk page, or here, I was right.

1830:

I put AFD on the world heavyweight defenses (since the prod was deleted). Even if they are copyright issues, it's still useless trivia that doesn't belong here. I'm surprised the articles lasted so long, without getting deleted.

3020:

in all I've read about him is that to say he "never made it to the main event" would be putting it very lightly. If he wasn't even all that notable on a regional level, he certainly isn't notable enough to warrant an article.

814:

Can someone make the to-do list smaller? It's too big. I tried to clean it up, but the stuff I deleted was added back to it. Some of the long-term, on-going stuff can be put in the Strategy subpage or placed in the style guide.

786:

Does anyone know why this article needs to exist? Triple teams are a rarity in wrestling, excluding if we're talking about Dragon Gate and Lucha Libre, and then the team pages can easily cover the signature three man moves. ---

5195:

debut should be added to the page. We argued (and reverted) to the point that we both got hit with 3RR warnings. I don't think it's worth dragging a Wiki Admin into it, but a few folk from here can weigh in on the talk page. -

4357:

The user believes that it is just me that opposes his vandalism. He fails to realize that this issue concerns him and all of Knowledge. See below. I will personally give 1 million dollars to whomever can get through to him. --

916: 4926:

to say that - with all due respect, you are like talking to a brick wall. You echo back everything someone else says without any substantiation. That's not the way Knowledge works. At the very least, you are in violation of

3614:

guideline. Another guideline I think needs to be put in place: lists of television show results = listcruft and not needed. Knowledge isn't the place for listing each and every television result of TNA, WWE, WCW, indy, etc.

2352:

certainly isn't enough to make him notable in my opinion. NWA W isn't that notable for Knowledge, but others will disagree with me on that one. I took a look at wrestling promotions: and there is 161 total in that category:

2250:

I think you're reading it wrong, which isn't unusual because the Ventura thing has been confusing to a lot of people. Ventura's commentary is removed from a lot of older VHS/DVDs, but it is all there for the recent box set.

1840:

They were made because the defenses were previously part of the articles on the titles themselves and made the tables ridiculously long. I did NOT copy-and-paste anything from their site, and frankly resent the implication.

1052:

I cleaned up the page, hopefully it doesn't happen again. I wonder if the WCW alumni page is the same? I looked it at a little, and didn't notice any WWE stars (during the Invasion storyline) that shouldn't be on the list.

5028:

I've given up on trying to obtain credit. That's beyond the issue now...we're past that man. bullet has gone ona campaign (literally) to try to ruin my reputation here on Knowledge and that's something that I will not let

4858:. Your revert is not protected, and as such you are in violation of Knowledge policy. Whether you are an admin, a novice, or somewhere in between here on Knowledge, you are violating Knowledge policy as outlined under 3489:

I agree. Obviously most (not all) people from WWF/E, TNA, WCW, ECW and AWA should be included. I said most, because jobbers that appeared for a few matches (and didn't do anything else in their career) aren't notable.

3126:. I don't know if this page should even exist. If it does remain, it needs cleaning as well. There is no point to list results for every show in Australia, when many of them aren't that notable in the first place. -- 417:

article, as if they are in the top 500, they are surely worthy of an article. I challenge you to name another fairly mainstream sport where any of the top 500 athletes in that sport have no article. It's ridiculous!

2408:

I know the real Sam Hayne personally and I highly doubt that he put the article online. While I agree that the article is hardly notable, it's probably my fault. It's been a wanted page since the creation of the

2149:

I'm going to create a section in recent WrestleMania Articles about the changes on the DVD. Does anyone know of a website that outlines the differences? I had a couple of links but lost them in a hard drive crash.

2800:

wasn't good enough to include him, the anon kept putting him back in. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but in the past when other belts were used as subs for the Grand Slam they were accompanied by citations from WWE.com

2365:

That's about what I thought, too. Maybe I'll make a note of cruising through that category at some point soon and see if I can weed it out a bit. Thanks for the second look at the article, too - much appreciated.

3210: 1822:

It also looks like all they did was copy the info that ROH lists on their website, so there is a copyright issue as well. Even if Copywright wasn't a problem I would support deleting these. 07:44, 27 August 2006

5662:

all, that's what an encyclopaedia is for, right?). Also, any well-known annual events and tournaments deserve their own article, though it may be debatable whether each yearly instance deserves its own article.

706:

yea i have had to revert some of his "move list by.." edits again... i just think if he want credit for producing move list on Obsessed With Wrestling then he should get credit on their website not on Wiki. ---

116: 5081:

In fact JB your not reverting away your own work on the article your reverting away my edits and everyone else who contributed after you wrote the biography... infact i went through and rewrote most parts of

799:

Please delete, like yuou said multi person manuevers can easly be explain in the articles rather that making a new page... ala recent problems involving an anon user and Spirit Squad's "high spirits" move ---

3375: 3275: 3266: 3257: 3242: 5712:

AAA and CMLL regularly draw around 10,000 for regular tapings and 18,000 for big shows with TV on national broadcast television with various internataional and cable deals. I think they trump Ring of Honor.

5610:

Because those individual events are not importent. I thought you understood that, the importence of the organization is not directly related to an event. A notable wrestling fed can have non-notable events.

780: 3886:

different partner for ever title run then the simple list looks silly... plus the information was added to stop users from placing succession boxes with articles... anyway i think it should be voted on ---

3198: 3216: 896:

If you think stuff could be put to a subpage then talk about it. Don't just randomly delete stuff. Now the style guide stuff is important for new articles too, so they could go to the project page itself.

3701:

Maybe, but if he is he's going about it the wrong way. Besides, the WWE page includes certain nicknames too, and the TNA page doesn't include all nicknames, just ones that are part of the ring name. --

3009:

I'm not sure if he qualifies as an article under the internet meme guidelines, but didn't he have somewhat of a mid-card career in the florida territories in the 70s? But I did give a weak delete vote.

2051:

Not only do we have alumni pages, but we also have alumni categories. I was thinking, do we really need both? If we can list the wrestlers in an alumni category, are the alumni pages really necessary?

5411: 3180: 3123: 462:

It's debatable, but I don't think professional wrestling fits into any of those categories. Classifying it as sport is not entirely accurate and classifying performing art doesn't seem right either. --

2884:

on my user page which he useds as a talk page (because he doesnt seem to get that they are different things... you understand what im up against here) --- any help or advice would be appriciated ---

1876: 566:

Should the article list his real name as Nuufolau Joel (Joe) Seanoa (the name listed on the Samoa Joe trademark) or simply Joe Seanoa (the name he uses to refer to himself outside of wrestling)? ---

192:)? I ask because it seems that under the "limited-information" scenario, they are being ordered by promotion and then name of title, and this order could be extended to the expanded version as well. 5473:

show that tapes before it airs. Although the results are made available in a myriad of locations, please do not add them here until the show airs either in the article or in "invisible text".--: -->

4604:) and that by reverting my self-edit, a case can be made that you are vandalizing this article. I also take great offense to your negative comments about my intent in editing Knowledge. Please read 2197:

I don't think it's notable enough that it needs a full on section in every article, but where the changes are major (like the ones you just mentioned) they could be mentioned in the notes sections.

3353: 5486:

We already put those warnings on PPV shows and on the WWE page(saying not to post title changes before they air) and they don't seem to do much. Some people even go ahead and remove the warnings.

4653:

really are an expert or you just care about the topic a lot. But when this watchfulness crosses a certain line, then you're overdoing it. Believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a

160:

What's the project's position on Championship Succession boxes? I'd be happy to add them to a whole bunch of people's pages (and have been adding them to new stub articles I've been creating, eg.

5647:

Again, why does it matter when those things happened if individual events aren't important enough for articles? Oh, and if I understood, do you think I'd still be asking all these questions? ;)

3468:

As a result of a discussion on notability above, I propose we, as a WikiProject, set some guidelines as to what makes a wrestler or promotion notable enough to be included here on Knowledge. --

2114: 260: 3624:

I completally agree with the removing of list cruft stuff note the promotions idea... yea the Shane Twins is one example... i wouldnt think of making individual articles for Bulk and Big Dave (

3136: 5038:

All I can see is that the bullet version is way more complete and better than your version. Can you give a good reason why your version of Vic Grimes is better than bullet's? If not, drop it.

4105: 1948:

Yeah, if they didn't do anything noteworthy after the Diva Search, then they probably shouldn't have articles. Is there a precedent set by articles on contestants on other reality contests? --

1102: 546: 517: 486: 456: 5521:. There are Impact results for several months. These aren't really needed. If someone could mass AFD them, that would be helpful. Using prods probably wont work, people usually remove them. 3790:

Firstly, thanks for contacting us! Secondly, I re-wrote some of the section and included a link at the bottom of the entry for his profile on onlineworldofwrestling.com. Hope that helps!

2712:, very notable promotions in the United Kingdom... so how can you say that one is more notable than the other. As for Gerweck.net, it doesnt really cover much outside the United States. --- 563:

I forgot about it until recently and after conversing with Dubhagan I found out he had never received a response from Joe and assumed it was because Joe doesn't want this information known.

3186: 2480: 3004: 2992: 2954: 256:

I know Mae Young and the Fabulous Moolah were also born in the same year, but anyone before that is still alive? Check the talk page of the Gladys Gillem article for more details. Thanks.

5580:

It just being an indy fed doesn't have anything to do with it. It's like how ECWA is just an indy fed but the Super 8 tournament they host is the biggest(and most well known) indy event.

3645:

teams that broke up and split into their own singles careers, but that hasn't happened and if it does most likely won't result in either being notable enough on their own to warrant it.

3361: 112: 4871:. It is not my responsibility to bring it to the WP:Pro Wrestling audience; it is your's. And furthermore, I feel that the Mediation Committee would be better off discussing this matter. 4131: 3721:

I don't think nicknames should only be included on certain wrestlers, like "Hacksaw" Jim Duggan. I don't think A.J. Styles should be listed as "The Phenomanal" A.J. Styles, for example.

3544:, a previously deleted article due to its list fathion which i was allowed by admistrators to readd in its rewritten state.. also do we need individual wrestler articles for tag teams.. 2818: 4153: 4140: 4116: 2804: 2785: 1891:

I think it should depend on what happened after they were eliminated. If they never appeared on WWE TV again of got WWE contracts, then maybe no. Otherwise I think they should be kept.

2794: 999: 273: 1241:

You think it'll be a good idea to be able to hide and show the Won from and Lost to lines? Msybe something like this? It looks a bit messy now but maybe if someone fixes up the code?

2984:

I've actually gone a step further and nominated the page for deletion. This isn't a "quick fix" to the edit war at all; rather, it's due to my personal view that regardless of the

2488: 3086:

There are results pages for TNA Impact!. Type in "TNA Results" in the search bar and you will see there is one for EVERY MONTH. A seperate article for March 2006, April 2006, etc.

3024: 3014: 5624: 5615: 5605: 5584: 5369: 5314: 5288: 2911:

Lol, he just left a very apologetic note on my talk page (yes he actually used my talk page) asking for my help as a few of his sub-par articles have been put up for deletion ---

2880:)... This has been goin on for almost six months with him gettin more and more angry.. yet i have tried to show him how to edit correctly and given pointers he seem now intent on 1855: 1845: 4371: 4306: 3649: 3271:

I checked them: all prods (from the looks of it) seem to be gone, all thanks to some user that isn't registered. If there is a way to do a mass AFD, that would be helpful here.

3130: 3109: 2228: 2182: 2124: 791: 5726: 5716: 5707: 5692: 5666: 5480: 5219: 3716: 2628: 2441: 2426: 1960:

Another problem: A lot of these women are affiliated with Playboy or modeling in some fashion, and have had minor acting roles. How should we assess notability in these cases? -

1883: 529: 499: 469: 4084: 3872: 3784: 773: 5677: 5594: 5270: 5260: 4991: 4965: 4939: 4915: 4849: 4802: 4770: 2261: 2192: 5575: 5349: 4545: 4014: 3928: 3859: 3803: 3794: 3441: 3431: 3398: 3325: 3297:. It's an episode guide of every AWF television show from 95-96. Fancruft/listcruft yet again. I will look at that page, but I don't have alot of free time either right now. 2963: 2001: 1783:

The problem is that it means having to get rid of having the reigns in chronological order and quite a hefty bit of HTML (though I think templates could solve the latter). --

4587: 4296: 3890: 3035: 2384: 149: 5633: 5537: 5365:

ROH is just an indy fed, but it's a big one. I didn't PROD ones that seemed to be importent(like the first ROH event and the one where the first ROH champion was crowned).

5327: 5298: 5279: 5164: 5144: 5135: 4352: 4056: 3954: 3754: 3725: 3494: 3316: 3301: 3288: 2745: 2671: 2600: 2536: 2521: 2468: 2458: 2375: 2360: 2093: 2084: 1955: 1905: 1835: 1222: 1186: 1173: 1164: 1152: 1067: 1057: 1047: 1038: 1029: 1009: 966: 954: 926: 887: 847: 353: 344: 320: 246: 4836:

talk page and discuss your actions with them. Hopefully then you will see that this is NOT my word against yours here, this is Wikipeida policy that is being enforced. --

4380: 4211: 4186: 3619: 3589: 3077: 2915: 2590: 2557: 2492: 1964: 1895: 1791: 1079: 97: 89: 84: 5629:

Era of Honor Begins was the first ROH event, I suppose that's notable. Crowning a Champion marked the first ROH champion. I suppose Honor Invades Boston could go though.

3991: 3521: 3068: 5590: 5033: 3534: 2978: 2943: 2285: 2270: 2207: 2164: 910: 123: 72: 67: 59: 5506: 5490: 5076: 4072: 3695: 3530:

never wrestled for those promotions does that mean he should be deleted... in the England, Ireland and other English language contries that simply would not apply. ---

1124: 1112: 669: 660: 651: 598: 370: 5598: 5419: 5237: 4318: 4262: 3638:... it was mainly a repeat of the same information just copied and pasted into three articles so i dont think there can be much objection.. what do you guys think --- 3143: 3090: 2774: 2549:

article, are in serious need of clean up but it concerns an independant wrestler that has appeared in promotions that either have no television deal or has one in the

1941: 1442: 740: 234: 5060:. He continues to revert the article, reducing its quality claiming that he is not credited as "The Author" in the article itself. The issue is being brought up here 4813: 4554: 4535: 4395: 3164: 3055: 2243: 1976: 168: 5042: 2101: 2041: 2024: 1455: 759:

I suggest keeping a close watch on this article - WWE.com has posted notice of his contract release, and all of the markboards are abuzz with markish speculation. -

213: 196: 179: 4485: 2139: 379: 4832:

including myself have pointed you towards the policies time and time again your numerous violations here on wikipedia. I suggest that you take this issue with the

3686: 2136: 641: 589: 401: 5461: 5016: 4577: 4465: 1985: 731: 5204: 4446: 3369: 3294: 3281: 3231: 3045: 2510: 2402: 2345: 1814: 437: 2154: 585:. While neither one of them (supposedly) wanted their real names to be "out there" they could both be documented and as such were recorded on their articles. - 4890: 4612: 4090: 3483: 3345: 419: 3868:

I agree with Chadbryant, and I like the way that the Triple H page looks now, and it should be kept simple like this, there are other places to get the info.

2848: 5525: 4490:

I already established that... anyway if you remeber i tried assuming good faith with you but then you resulted in your recent edits and subsequent blocking -

4417:(both articles done by JB in which he provided most of the material). JB tends to add numerous templates to articles when he doesn't get what he wants (see: 3836:

A user (also a member of this project) keeps replacing the detailed information of the championship wins with just the amount of times each title was won on

976: 3844: 3825: 5685: 5230: 779: 570: 432: 398: 257: 5476:

That language may need to be cleaned up a little bit, but it would help having to erase something 100 times between Wednesday morning and Friday night. -

3772:

Quick summary: This article is up for Afd, in part because there are multiple articles about this individual including one about his wrestling career as

5114: 2203:

They did not remove Jesse Ventura's commentary. Rent or buy the WrestleMania Anthology set and you will see(or hear) that his commentary is still there.

139: 2902: 5467: 5188: 4997:

JB, why do you want to take credit for your edits? If anyone deserves credit, it's the sources that you got the info from. Read the Knowledge policy

4426: 2067: 1088: 763: 298: 5651: 2077:

was up for deletion a while ago. It seems rather redundant, although the lists do include some extra info about the person's role in the promotion. --

4975: 4949: 4899: 4174: 3764: 3365: 3235: 3153: 2853:

I made some incorrect reverts to this article, trying to maintain the stats at what they have been for a long time. I didn't notice the name change.(

2281:. Listing the changes counteracts the WWE's revisionist history because that is what they are doing, revising wrestling/sports entertainment history 822: 47: 17: 5447: 2857: 2752:

The article states its on the fight network of Canada and TWC in England.... its only showing in America is through DVD releases and live shows ---

1005:

I think wrestlers who only competed for the ECW version should be removed, it would be like having a page for alumni of Raw or alumni of SmackDown.

5681: 3262:

I put PROD tags on some(and someone else put it on others), hopefully they won't remove the tags. If they do then just nominate them for deletion.

5149:

Started, though it needs a major expanding (I don't even have info for a profile). I've asked for help from the OVW community on LiveJournal. --

2316:

and another for all the titles that are on the bottom. I'll move the matches myself, I just want to make sure I'm not stepping on toes with it. -

3122:

used to have a ton of results but I cleaned it. It's TNA's secondary show, but I don't think many of the matches are that notable. Then there is

2484: 1865: 4571:

because this has to have been the most ridiculous escalation I have seen in my entire life. If I've left anything out feel free to edit it. ––

4525: 4435: 698: 622: 5341:

Why not all of them? How can some be notable and some not if "ROH is just an indy fed" ? Is there nothing about that company that we CAN keep?

5202: 4600:

Bullet, what is your position, exactly? Please link to specific Knowledge policies. My position is that I am "self-reverting" (allowed under

3217: 977: 1108:

Not even worth calling it an edit war, obviously week by week stuff is not necessary. Keep deleting it, drop him a note on his user page. -

2998: 1934: 5557: 4743:

obtained by working with the editor, instead of against him or her - regardless of whether he or she "owns" the article or not. See also

2312:

page is insane and I think we need to break it into at least three articles. One for tag teams in general (including the history) one for

4389:, even the information he posted. This goes hand in hand with his previous effort of spamming templates on articles he wants deleted. –– 2328: 2313: 1556: 1331: 2770:

I hate to bring this up again so soon, but no one seemed to notice. I'm just asking for a consensus from WP:PW, and if I'm wrong, fine.

2120:

Someone has taken it further and created a page of EVERY title defense in the title's histories. Title defenses are not really notable.

5320: 4418: 4251:" - JB186 changed it to this with the edit summary "Nobody said it was a list of all the graduates. Hello??? Of course its incomplete." 4196:

That's messed, considering JB most likely got that info from somewhere else, meaning those sources should be given credit, not him. --

3096: 2353: 5345:

03:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC) I went ahead and put prods on the other show articles and I'm tempted to be a real dick and put one on

3526:

However, this is the English Knowledge... note the first suggested criteria concerns pro wrestling in America.... and as the likes of

2257:

You making a crack about my reading ability :-) lol. All I'm want to do is similar to what IMDB has on their page, Alternate Version.

4676:

You can't stop everyone in the world from editing "your" stuff, once you've posted it to Knowledge. As each edit page clearly states:

2446: 1236: 647:

Is it vandalized by anonymous users alot? If that's the case, use a semi-protect lock on it. Otherwise, get a perma-lock I suppose.

2700:.. i have heard of Trent Acid and as far as i know the UK and Canada is the only place ROH has television deals... but the likes of 3545: 2278: 1092: 1081: 4283:

article. He claims he will not stop reverting unless he is credited in the article as "The Author". We need an admin here now. --

3206:

when I was a kid in the mid to late nineties. Maybe we could put out an open call for expansion of the article before deleting?

2837:

You may want to consider semi-protection for this article. The anon WrestleCrappers has struck again! They are also targeting the

4099: 2541:

Rob i know your all for removing articles for wrestlers you feel have low notability... so why have you not but your article for

1937:(locked from recreation due to people creating repeatedly before she got a contract, needs a deletion review to get re-made) --- 111:

Not so recently, I've came across one for TNA (for the X title, and the article is thankfully now gone). Here is several others:

525:

While it's not a 100% realistic sport, I do think that it should be included in categories like "Sports in xxxx" for the PPV's.

2331:

that has my notability sense flashing. (Mostly because the author is using that name to edit under, which makes the problem of

105: 4568: 4412:

JB has changed his modus operandi and is now spamming tags through articles he himself has written. Examples can be found at

2188:

Ventura's commentary from the original events. I think it's notable because it alters what really happened during that event.

5403: 829: 155: 4794:

because you have not shown any willingness to work out this issue beyond quoting a vague page and continually violating the

3312:

Could someone do the mass AFD for me? I don't have alot of free time, and the sooner they go up, the sooner they are gone.

447: 5224: 2089:

A list and category is redundant. I think the categories for alumni should be deleted. The list pages are far more useful.

1034:

Yeah, that what I meant. I was typing that at 2AM. Wrestlers who only competed for the WWE version should not be included.

627: 349:

I imagine he will be fired then, there are other people who could do that. He was never that good of an announcer anyways.

594:

Do people have to use their full legal name when registering trademarks? If so, then put that in his article as his name.

3034: 2932:

article. Several anon. editors may keep readding the "The Dennis Stamp Film Collection" section again. This is obviously

2605:

The problem with notability, is that not everyone that would believe somthing to be notable is on WikiPedia. Notability

329:

He does a little news bit during Canadian airings of WWE programs advertising upcoming houseshows in Canada and such. --

4654: 1727: 5455:

debate about wrestler article names - it's largely a case by case basis. Going all or nothing never helps anybody. ––

1451:

I think it looks good. Do you mean they all need to be linked, even those that don't have articles? Why is that? --

2877: 1674: 492:

No, although there is one for professional wrestling. A sports entertainment category might be a good idea though. --

294:

I don't think he has been on TV. I haven't read he was fired...so he has some backstage role in WWE I would assume.

5698:

notability of any of its events is related to that significance. I believe this is true for all promotions. Does

5407: 3983:'s championships, than removed from WP. I would say that if someone has won a ton of championships, they might be 3665: 2790:

Nevermind, somehow missed the thread above. I still think, though, that the whole debate might be somewhat moot.

2144: 1095:. I don't think it's necessary to include week-by-week detail about their career, but Ram thinks it's necessary. -- 4413: 3041:

Is there a precedent for this that I need to know that keeps this article alive before I afd it as listcruft? ---

551: 307:

I'd just presume he's a sitting duck without any work to do at the moment. He certainly hasn't been fired though.

4595: 4376:

i have been trying since he edited on wikipedia and i cant get it through to him i hope you have better luck ---

3424: 3250: 2410: 4879:"this is Wikipeida policy that is being enforced" - This is also my contention, so it IS my word against yours. 4429:). Can an admin please intervene? This stuff has gone on for too long and he has shown no signs of stopping. –– 687: 5498: 5284:

So, can we delete Ring of Honor and Chikara show pages too since they were not televised or broadcast on PPV?--

3073:

It's listcruft. I wonder if any other show archives exist? I wouldn't be surprised at all, if others do exist.

2322: 1796: 422: 284:

Has anyone seen Steve Romero on WWE TV since Velocity was cancelled? Does anyone know what he is doing now?

1117:

I did drop him a note and put a note on the talk page as well, but it keeps getting added back in. Ah well. --

387: 4481:

assume good faith in the future. I have never nor will I ever need to use a sockpuppet to get something done.

3226:

for a show doesn't mean it's notable. Some examples of just some of the shows that appear to be non-notable:

2763: 2415: 1468: 1246: 537:-- What's a PPV? A sport does not have a pre-determined outcome - which is why the wikipedia page we have on 4348:

The user needs a block if he keeps it up. The constant reverting is vandalism and simply not needed at all.

3628:) cus it seem pointless... i think i might put a merge tag on the Todd and Mike, and on Rory and Robbie --- 4720: 3463: 2975: 2940: 2923: 2845: 2277:

I do not understand how they are not notable. Heck, there is an article that outlines changes in Star Wars

1515: 1278: 5249: 5087: 4752: 4415: 4249:

Below is an incomplete list of the graduates of the Texas Wrestling Academy, compiled by Jonathan Barber:

2705: 2013: 1480: 857: 691: 129: 4517: 4312: 5512: 5437:

Okay, so what's the litmus test? If a show is x, you'll allow it to stay, but if it's y, it must gooo?

4455:

I'm actually not sure if that's the same user as the MO seems different and my discussions with him at

1656: 1550: 1324: 38: 4935:. At the worst, you are intentionally vandalizing Knowledge with the intent of ruining its integrity. 4719:

page, you can bring it up on the associated talk page. Appeal to other contributors, or consider the

3831: 3811: 3610:

I never once said only American wrestlers should be on the site, so don't assume. I was just stating

2730:

ROH is not shown in Canada to the best of my knowledge. I thought it was only shown in the States.

1753: 1595: 1496: 1381: 1259: 724: 721: 427: 2135:

His page is badly in need of an update and/or revision! Take a look and you will see what I mean! --

2130: 4235:

Below is a full list of the graduates of the Texas Wrestling Academy, compiled by Jonathan Barber:

2418:(WWE) under a different gimmick, but I don't know if that makes him notable. If the page goes to 209:

Convention is alphabetically by promotion and the championships in the promotion by date won. ---

5451: 4225: 4189:--- so you guys wannna start tagging the 1000s upon 1000s of contributions we write a month!!!!!! 3773: 3357: 3321:

I restored the tags for the articles in question, as they were removed for no reason whatsoever.

3227: 3148:

I've had to put that for AFD due to the removal of the prod tag. I've just added the prod tag to

2972: 2937: 2842: 2764: 2037:

as well. We need a strict consensus and probably a semi-protect since this anon just won't quit.

2014: 1043:

The page needs major editing, since the ECW brand of WWE seems to be a big part of the article.

5443: 5319:

I've put PROD tags up on some of the ROH shows, and the Torneo one should maybe be merged into

5096: 4546:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Indef blocked user JB196 using AOL sock puppets

3548:

for example; do we really need Rory and Robbie articles which repeat the same information. ---

3105:

I think all the articles mentioned in this thread thus far might qualify for a speedy delete.

2872: 538: 665:

If it's the same people, then they need to be reported. That should help to a point at least.

4045: 3156:, with the latter pretty much a hoax which I don't believe I can list for speedy deletion. -- 2863: 2810: 1643: 1581: 1366: 915:

Randomly? There was nothing random about it. Most of that stuff I deleted was already on the

5061: 769:

Screw the "close watch" - can we get a semiprotect? The anon marks are out in full force. -

5713: 5689: 5648: 5621: 5602: 5572: 5346: 5342: 5306: 5285: 4150: 4128: 4102: 3541: 3280:

I'm a little busy at the moment, but this page explains how to nominate multiple articles:

2815: 2801: 2771: 2046: 2038: 2021: 1842: 1709: 865: 476: 279: 270: 5215:, should get a mass AFD. There is several pages of results for certain months for Impact. 4592:

Here is a copy of the conversation on the Vic Grimes talk page between myself and bullet:

8: 5103: 5064: 4979: 4953: 4903: 4837: 4758: 4748: 4624: 4359: 4334: 4284: 4137: 4113: 4049: 3791: 3646: 3207: 3106: 3021: 3001: 2989: 2951: 2881: 2791: 2782: 2216: 2170: 2111: 146: 5415:

listcruft of many Australia wrestling events: WCW, WWF/E, etc. Non-notable house shows.

1879:, I'm not sure. I just don't want to purge all the information we have here. Thoughts? - 266: 188:

Okay. Thanks. Are the championships to be ordered by promotion and then date won (eg.

5310: 5157: 5128: 5009: 4744: 4531:

Nah, Nah, Nah-Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah-Nah, Hey-ey-ey goodbye! ---- (sorry i couldnt resist)

4204: 4163: 4081: 3747: 3709: 3692: 3679: 3582: 3476: 2985: 2971:

You guys should call for a temporary lock against the anon contribs. for this article.

2933: 2899: 2738: 2664: 2625: 2583: 2532: 2503: 2454: 2437: 2423: 2395: 2371: 2341: 2081: 2074: 2060: 1952: 1215: 1161: 1145: 1121: 1099: 1022: 992: 963: 947: 923: 880: 840: 819: 809: 752: 679: 606: 543: 514: 496: 483: 466: 453: 337: 314: 5233:. I voted to keep them all, I think all ECW events are notable enough for Knowledge. 4608:

for more info on the "Assume good faith" policy which you are clearly in violation of.

5140:

Somebody should create the article, all I know about him is that he wrestled in OVW.

3349: 3162: 3066: 2988:

aspect, I really don't think he's notable enough to justify an entry to begin with.

2830: 1789: 1528: 1292: 406: 3924:

I think it's too confusing with so many lines. Well I'm glad this was brought up. --

5257: 4789:

Sir, its your word against mine. You have no more right to "Revert" than I do. The

3777: 3766: 3527: 2332: 1923: 1620: 1567: 1416: 1342: 861: 4258:

Apparently "full" doesn't mean "all" and i'm an idiot. Yeah that makes sense. ---

3118:

page. All these results are listcruft/fancruft and don't need to be here, period.

5563:

Maybe I got a little carried away, but I don't see what the point is of deleting

4513: 4456: 4422: 4041: 3979:

I would rather see the detailed information hidden, or put on another page, like

3869: 3856: 3438: 3395: 3322: 3011: 2709: 2102: 1998: 1872: 1587: 1373: 905: 770: 760: 3987:

deserving of having their details listed than someone who has not won very much.

607: 375:

Indeed he's hosting, or at least introing, "The Big Ones" on 24/7 on Comcast. -

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5097: 3282:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_list_multiple_related_pages_for_deletion

2550: 2327:

Hey, folks. I'm just doing some page patrolling, and came across an article on

1918: 1606: 1591: 1392: 1377: 869: 614: 5630: 5612: 5581: 5534: 5522: 5503: 5487: 5416: 5366: 5324: 5295: 5276: 5267: 5245: 5234: 5216: 5150: 5141: 5121: 5111: 5002: 4998: 4932: 4928: 4923: 4883: 4868: 4863: 4859: 4855: 4795: 4790: 4628: 4605: 4601: 4478: 4349: 4303: 4197: 4171: 4053: 4011: 3951: 3925: 3841: 3822: 3740: 3722: 3702: 3672: 3616: 3575: 3506: 3491: 3469: 3428: 3420: 3412: 3372: 3313: 3298: 3285: 3272: 3263: 3254: 3239: 3195: 3127: 3087: 3074: 3060:

I've proposed it for deletion for now unless some other editor removes it. --

2896: 2892: 2868: 2854: 2731: 2657: 2597: 2576: 2528: 2518: 2496: 2465: 2450: 2433: 2419: 2388: 2367: 2357: 2337: 2267: 2236: 2204: 2161: 2121: 2090: 2078: 2053: 2034: 1949: 1902: 1892: 1852: 1832: 1811: 1770: 1535: 1500: 1438:

With this format we probably need to wikify every person or team listed. ---

1309: 1263: 1208: 1183: 1170: 1158: 1138: 1118: 1096: 1064: 1054: 1044: 1035: 1015: 1006: 985: 960: 940: 920: 873: 833: 832:

as all those articles under that heading are listed there, as are others. --

816: 737: 666: 648: 595: 526: 493: 463: 413:

I think we should try and create at least stubs for all the wrestlers on the

393: 350: 330: 308: 295: 287: 252: 231: 161: 120: 5533:

I've nominated all the monthly results, the link is at the top of the page.

4242:

Below is an incomplete list of the graduates of the Texas Wrestling Academy:

4146: 2624:

is as big of an issue as people make it out to be, that's just my 2cents. -

5699: 5545: 5120:

I deleted the info and redirected it to JTG, which is still a red link. --

5107: 5091: 4833: 4829: 4532: 4491: 4472: 4450: 4377: 4183: 4092: 4023: 3907: 3887: 3639: 3629: 3549: 3531: 3510: 3157: 3149: 3119: 3061: 3052: 2929: 2912: 2885: 2838: 2753: 2713: 2621: 2554: 2546: 1961: 1880: 1784: 1759: 1543: 1317: 801: 708: 578: 5571:

when their first title match was, their first event out of Philly, etc...

4123: 2212:

A section has already been provided in the main WrestleMania article. See

5723: 5704: 5663: 5567:

of the ROH articles. If the company is to be dismissed as "just an indy"

3988: 3635: 3625: 3571: 3518: 3115: 2030: 1969: 1928: 1649: 1636: 1504: 1452: 1267: 582: 193: 165: 5253: 5212: 5057: 5030: 4936: 4887: 4810: 4799: 4609: 4482: 4386: 4280: 4182:

want to revert the page back to its stub state prior to his edits. ---

4164: 3306:

Oh man, that needs to be deleted just so we can all forget about it. -

3182: 2701: 2542: 2282: 2258: 2240: 2189: 2151: 1742: 1599: 1574: 1560: 1539: 1385: 1359: 1335: 1313: 1179: 900: 753: 680: 508: 5303: 4828:

I do not know what you intend to prove with this since users form the

1157:

Yeah, good idea, it looks like Bdve tagged the article's talk page. --

5477: 5197: 5039: 4069: 3980: 3800: 3781: 3307: 3100: 2960: 2831: 2616: 2317: 2252: 2213: 2198: 2020:

Just read the edit history and the talk page. Tells the whole story.

1109: 657: 638: 633: 586: 552: 414: 407: 376: 367: 5385:

How can you have it both ways? Either ROH is important or it's not.

828:

Well, I'm sure that the Articles to Expand section can be linked to

5553: 5457: 5180: 4573: 4550: 4521: 4461: 4431: 4391: 4315: 4259: 3837: 3500:(note: this doesn't mean smaller promotions would automatically be 3423:. If you still believe the article needs to be deleted, list it on 3140: 3042: 2309: 1982: 1973: 1938: 1913: 1702: 1693: 1689: 1626: 1439: 1423: 788: 728: 695: 619: 567: 446:

I have been discussing the matter over at the pump prior to coming

363: 210: 176: 136: 2997:

NOTE - Sorry for the brainfart. Deletion Discussion Page here:

1763: 1613: 1521: 1508: 1409: 1285: 1271: 3818: 2841:

article as well. I've already tagged them with the 3RR Warning.

4648:

deliberately attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge.

4588:

3bulletproof16's failure to Assume Good Faith, Vic Grimes, etc.

2545:

in this line up... Not only does this article, which like your

1746: 919:

subpage. At any rate, that's why we're discussing it now. ;) --

230:

If only we could hide/show the Defeated to and Lost to lines.--

4279:

I need some help with him right now. He's still active in the

3570:

I've noticed that too about certain tag teams, especially the

3513:, I would consider them notable, and not commit a "lawn dart" 2160:

I don't think those are notable enough to go in the articles.

1910:

The ones that got contracts from the most recent search are -

1207:

I'd say report him then if he's doing more harm than good. --

690:

but it seems that enough time has passed that he's decided to

5620:

I think you misunderstood - why did you NOT prod those ones?

4136:

Cool, thanks. Don't know how I didn't see that or find it.

5187:

believe I have to bring this up anywhere but the talk page.

5106:

started this article, but all he did was copy and paste the

4544:

Not just yet, guess who has started using AOL sock puppets?

4010:

How about Chadbryant's idea of it being not encyclopedic? --

3691:

He might just be trying to make it like the WWE Roster Page

872:. Could someone add it to the to-do list for me please? -- 5519:

Category:Total Nonstop Action Wrestling television programs

4477:

I have no connection to this Jonathan Burgess dude. Please

4228:

which a few weeks back lead to this amusing confrontation:

3238:. I've put prods on several, feel free to AFD if you want. 1766: 1749: 1705: 1696: 1652: 1639: 1629: 1616: 1602: 1577: 1563: 1546: 1524: 1511: 1426: 1412: 1388: 1362: 1338: 1320: 1288: 1274: 694:. I've reverted it for now but what should we be done? --- 5517:

In my opinion, these really aren't needed. Take a look at

5174: 4882:

Again, for the umpteenth time, my edit is protected under

2303: 190:

List of championships and accomplishments won by Ric Flair

505:

It already exists? Professional wrestling is within it

1137:

I'd direct him to this WikiProject and its policies. --

1014:

ECW version? Don't you mean the WWE version of ECW? --

3095:

There's a ton of unnecessary results articles. I mean,

2575:

talent. Heck, we have a lot more wrestlers on here).

1463:

I've had a little play around and I came up with this:

856:

I'm not sure how to format it, but I've requested that

479:

category? surely that is the one that should be used?

269:

was born in 1921 and is still alive. Hope that helps.--

4898:

Discuss this with other more experienced editors here

1981:

Update: Amy Zidian is now up for deletion review. ---

3780:

to see if I transferred the info correctly. Thanks!

3114:

I noticed the Impact results when I just visited the

509:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Sports_entertainment

5231:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/ECW Born To Be Wired

4974:Please keep the discussion on one page. Discuss on 3799:I love your rewrite. Thanks so much for the help! 4471:alarm... sorry new JB didnt mean to offend you -- 1555:Lost to Edge and Christian (who were disguised as 1330:Lost to Edge and Christian (who were disguised as 145:What article is your suggestion in reference to? 5323:since it seems to just describe a type of match. 4976:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling 4950:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling 4900:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling 4569:Knowledge:Lamest edit wars#Miscellaneous lameness 4145:Actually, check again! The website has revamped. 2517:because they exist and aren't something made up. 2487:should be deleted as well. They were created by 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling 4886:and you have not offered any response otherwise. 3051:I'd have to say no. Thanks for catching it. :) - 366:this morning. I'll check it out a little later. 4699:or redistributed by others, do not submit it. 4385:Here's a new one, JB has spammed tags through 1169:RAM has done this with other articles as well. 438:Please clarify for me - sport or performing art 4516:, edit warring, trolling and insulting admins 3819:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:67.185.26.89 117:List of ECW World Heavyweight Champions by age 3218:Category:Extreme Championship Wrestling shows 978:List of Extreme Championship Wrestling alumni 736:Report it. There is no need for an edit war. 4902:. I apparently can't get through to you. -- 4809:Do you agree to a mediation hearing, bullet? 4333:Been there, Done that.... ain't working. -- 2999:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dennis Stamp 2959:I've done it 4 times today alone, I quit. - 2596:the most part, people have never heard of). 2266:DVD changes aren't notable, leave them off. 781:Professional wrestling triple-team maneuvers 4040:The only way I know to hide stuff is using 3411:, including the article's creator, removes 5468:A warning note for pre-tape show wrestlers 5321:List of professional wrestling match types 4512:JB196 has been indefblocked for violating 4400:To expand here's my post on admin notices: 2354:Category:Professional_wrestling_promotions 1469:World Wrestling Federation / Entertainment 1247:World Wrestling Federation / Entertainment 5412:Professional wrestling tours of Australia 4311:I brought it up at the admin noticeboard 4091:Requesting input on a fairly substantial 3124:Professional wrestling tours of Australia 3546:The Highlanders (professional wrestling) 2449:Anyone wants to weigh in, there you go. 2279:List of changes in Star Wars re-releases 1877:Minor contestants of the WWE Diva Search 1093:The Highlanders (professional wrestling) 1082:The Highlanders (professional wrestling) 288:The Holy Trinity of Sports Entertainment 247:Gladys Gillem/"World's Oldest Wrestler?" 5275:My mistake, I assumed they were PPV's. 4695::If you don't want your material to be 4100:Talk:ROH World Heavyweight Championship 3855:, or start their own wrestling wiki. - 3354:ECW Beer, Blood, Babes, and Barbed Wire 2422:, I will remove the redlinks to him. - 1866:The Mass Diva Search Deletion Proposals 14: 5680:is suitable for an article, how about 5063:help would be greatly appreciated. -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5404:Category:Professional wrestling shows 5191:and I disagree on whether or not her 4149:DOES NOT use the word "heavyweight." 4127:"ROH World Heavyweight Championship" 4124:ROHwrestling.com's title history page 3137:The 51 Worst Offenders In WWE History 1573:Won from Edge in a handicap match on 1358:Won from Edge in a handicap match on 830:Category:Professional wrestling stubs 4445:He is using a new user account also 4170:What is going on with this article?( 25: 5497:You might want to bring this up on 3187:Ultimate Wrestling Federation (UWF) 2615:and is relative. My stupid AFD on 2481:Ultimate Wrestling Federation (UWF) 23: 5056:We just can't get through to user 4948:Discussion has been brought up on 4623:FROM OFFICIAL WIKIPEDIA POLICIES: 3362:ECW The Night The Line Was Crossed 2928:You may want to keep watch on the 2105:Page, section: ROH World Champion 1699:in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 1087:There's a little edit war between 113:List of WWE world champions by age 24: 5746: 3634:I have merged Mike and Todd into 2814:the web and in shows many times. 1972:sorry, linked to wrong name. --- 1237:Hide/show championship succession 1182:, even after I told him to stop. 656:It comes from users and anons. - 5408:A Night of Appreciation for Sabu 4459:were quite straight forward. –– 3415:from an article for any reason, 2809:Oh, and as for the AFD, I think 632:If you check the history of the 29: 4922:It would not be a violation of 4567:I've added this entire saga to 3425:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 3251:List of ECW pay-per-view events 2489:User:Menace 2 Society(wrestler) 2411:All-Star Championship Wrestling 1178:He's doing the same thing with 727:at it on Vic Grimes' page. --- 560:Joe to see his response to it. 5499:Knowledge talk:Spoiler warning 4085:00:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 2495:article I mentioned earlier. 1728:WWF Light Heavyweight Champion 1635:Won from Booker T and Test on 1625:Lost to Edge and Christian on 1422:Lost to Edge and Christian on 106:List of champions by age pages 13: 1: 5727:14:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 5722:I feel ROH is highly notable. 5717:15:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5708:08:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5693:08:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5667:07:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5657:I think it can be shown that 5652:07:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5634:07:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5625:06:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5616:06:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5606:06:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5585:06:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5576:06:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5558:06:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5538:05:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5526:04:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5507:05:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5491:04:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5481:03:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5462:05:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5420:04:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5370:04:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5350:04:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5328:03:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5315:01:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 5299:22:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 5289:21:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 5280:20:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 5271:16:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 5261:14:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 5238:10:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 5220:16:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5165:06:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5145:05:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5136:05:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5115:05:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5077:03:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5043:09:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5034:04:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 5017:03:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4992:03:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4966:03:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4940:03:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4916:03:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4891:03:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4862:. My edits do not fall under 4850:03:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4814:02:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4803:02:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4771:02:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4613:02:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4578:08:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 4555:02:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 4536:08:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 4526:05:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 4486:15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 4466:14:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 4436:06:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 4396:06:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 4381:06:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4372:03:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4353:03:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4319:03:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4307:03:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4297:02:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4263:01:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 4212:23:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 4187:23:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 4175:21:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 4154:21:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 4141:06:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 4132:06:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 4117:06:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 4106:05:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 4073:04:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 4057:21:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 4015:07:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 3992:04:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 3955:23:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 3929:20:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 3891:13:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 3873:05:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 3860:23:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 3845:22:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 3826:22:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 3804:01:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 3795:22:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3785:13:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3755:19:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3726:09:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3717:03:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3696:03:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3687:02:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3650:01:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 3620:13:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3590:19:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3535:08:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3522:05:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3442:23:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3432:19:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3399:15:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3376:09:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3326:03:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3165:17:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 3144:00:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2416:World Wrestling Entertainment 1675:WWF Intercontinental Champion 156:Championship Succession boxes 5678:ROH: The Era of Honor Begins 5595:ROH: The Era of Honor Begins 5225:7 ECW events up for deletion 3528:Shirley "Big Daddy" Crabtree 1612:Won from The Dudley Boyz on 1516:Fayetteville, North Carolina 1408:Won from The Dudley Boyz on 1279:Fayetteville, North Carolina 686:We've been over this before 628:John Cena & a perma-lock 7: 5250:NWA World Heavyweight Title 4854:My edit is protected under 4753:Knowledge:Assume good faith 3495:22:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3484:22:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3317:18:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3302:07:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3289:06:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3276:06:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3267:05:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3258:04:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3243:04:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3211:01:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3199:23:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 3131:05:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3110:01:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3091:00:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3078:22:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 3069:20:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 3056:13:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 3046:12:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 3036:ECW on SciFi Match Archives 3025:01:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 3015:17:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 3005:23:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2993:22:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2979:14:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2964:22:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2955:10:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2944:19:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 2916:12:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2903:20:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2858:17:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2849:17:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2819:02:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2805:02:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2795:01:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2786:01:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2775:08:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2746:22:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2706:Frontier Wrestling Alliance 2672:22:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2629:19:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2601:18:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2591:15:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2558:15:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2537:17:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2522:10:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2511:05:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2469:04:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2459:01:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2442:17:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2427:17:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2414:had a dark matchor two for 2403:05:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2385:Menace 2 Society (wrestler) 2376:05:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2361:05:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2346:04:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2286:06:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2271:03:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2262:02:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2244:02:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2229:02:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2208:01:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2193:00:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2183:22:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2165:21:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2155:21:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2140:10:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2125:21:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2115:10:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2094:00:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2085:12:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2068:08:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2042:05:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2029:And this obviously impacts 2025:05:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 2002:04:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1986:04:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1977:03:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1965:03:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1956:02:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1942:02:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1906:01:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1896:01:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1884:00:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1856:00:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1846:05:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1836:18:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1815:02:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1792:14:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1648:Lost to The Dudley Boyz on 1456:05:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1443:01:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1223:07:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1187:07:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1174:07:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1165:22:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1153:22:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1125:22:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1113:22:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1103:22:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1068:21:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1058:21:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1048:21:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1039:20:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1030:17:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1010:07:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1000:21:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 967:22:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 959:lol. Didn't notice that. -- 955:22:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 927:22:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 911:21:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 888:20:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 858:WWE Undisputed Championship 848:20:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 823:12:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 792:06:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 774:22:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 764:22:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 741:07:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 732:07:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 699:09:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 670:05:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 661:05:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 652:05:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 642:05:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 623:07:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 599:02:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 590:01:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 571:00:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 547:21:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 530:21:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 518:17:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 500:17:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 487:17:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 470:17:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 457:17:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 433:15:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 402:04:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 380:01:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 371:21:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 354:05:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 345:04:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 321:04:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 299:04:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 274:03:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 261:23:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 235:13:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 214:08:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 197:08:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 180:05:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 169:05:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 150:10:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 140:12:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 124:00:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 5751: 5589:Then why did you not prod 5309:and here's a Chikara one- 4237:" - original text by JB186 4147:The new title history page 3853:onlineworldofwrestling.com 3403:Read Knowledge's policy: * 2891:I guess you could start a 2876:post (which they are; see 2493:Menace 2 Society(wrestler) 2073:Yeah, this was the reason 1657:Greensboro, North Carolina 1551:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1325:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 5591:ROH: Honor Invades Boston 5211:results at the bottom of 5179:I'm having issues on the 4657:people make on Knowledge. 3765:A little article help on 2383:The same can be said for 1754:Grand Forks, North Dakota 5599:ROH: Crowning a Champion 5266:aren't notable, period. 3666:IP address 24.154.232.76 2882:leaving personal attacks 2692:Like i said notabillity 2145:WrestleMania DVD changes 1632:in Albany, New York, USA 1520:Lost to The Acolytes on 1429:in Albany, New York, USA 1284:Lost to The Acolytes on 5452:ECWA Super 8 Tournament 5304:Here's a whole category 4596:Trying to work this out 4226:Texas Wrestling Academy 3774:Johnny Angel (wrestler) 3358:ECW When Worlds Collide 3228:ECW Natural Born Killaz 3220:needs a bit of cleaning 2491:, who also created the 1771:New York City, New York 5444:Ted Petty Invitational 2323:Question on notability 1797:List of title defenses 935:Um, the strategy page 868:should be merged into 860:should be merged into 539:Professional wrestling 5448:Battle of Los Angeles 5205:Warriors of Wrestling 4447:User:Jonathan Burgess 4046:Template:Hidden begin 3370:ECW Enter The Sandman 3295:Warriors of Wrestling 3232:ECW Enter The Sandman 2811:Triple Crown Champion 1644:Boston, Massachusetts 1582:Hartford, Connecticut 1481:WWF Tag Team Champion 1367:Hartford, Connecticut 362:I think I saw him on 42:of past discussions. 3542:Irish Whip Wrestling 3464:Notability guidlines 3346:ECW Born To Be Wired 3249:Also take a look at 2924:Dennis Stamp article 1710:Knoxville, Tennessee 1701:Lost to Triple H on 692:start doing it again 477:Sports entertainment 5442:same banner as the 5104:User:Weatherman5000 4749:Knowledge:Etiquette 4050:Template:Hidden end 3405:Contested deletions 3135:Here's another one 2893:request for comment 2765:Grand Slam Champion 2464:don't belong here. 2015:Grand Slam Champion 939:the to-do list. -- 866:King Booker's Court 388:Mean Gene's Burgers 130:End of Attitude Era 5686:CZW: Opening Night 5569:why does it matter 5513:TNA Impact results 5311:Torneo Cibernetico 5248:throwing down the 4745:Knowledge:Civility 4721:dispute resolution 4697:edited mercilessly 3417:do not put it back 2895:about the user. -- 2235:Go take a look at 2075:List of WCW alumni 1875:or something like 1557:Los Conquistadores 1332:Los Conquistadores 5203:Up for deletion: 3832:Championship wins 3812:User Cuke monster 3350:ECW Double Tables 3181:Up for deletion: 2704:have appeared in 2535: 2457: 2440: 2374: 2344: 2137:Smart Mark Greene 1529:Buffalo, New York 1483:– with Matt Hardy 1293:Buffalo, New York 984:original was. -- 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5742: 5406:should be gone. 5162: 5155: 5133: 5126: 5088:see edit history 5074: 5069: 5014: 5007: 4989: 4984: 4978:. Thank you. -- 4963: 4958: 4913: 4908: 4847: 4842: 4768: 4763: 4427:Wrestling Spirit 4369: 4364: 4344: 4339: 4294: 4289: 4209: 4202: 3778:Johnny Lee Clary 3767:Johnny Lee Clary 3752: 3745: 3714: 3707: 3684: 3677: 3587: 3580: 3481: 3474: 3293:Here's another: 2871:, and his other 2743: 2736: 2669: 2662: 2588: 2581: 2531: 2508: 2501: 2453: 2436: 2400: 2393: 2370: 2340: 2226: 2221: 2180: 2175: 2131:Capt. Lou Albano 2065: 2058: 1924:Rebecca DiPietro 1621:Washington, D.C. 1568:Albany, New York 1417:Washington, D.C. 1343:Albany, New York 1220: 1213: 1150: 1143: 1027: 1020: 997: 990: 952: 945: 909: 885: 878: 862:WWE Championship 845: 838: 430: 425: 342: 335: 317: 311: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5750: 5749: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5741: 5740: 5739: 5714:Darren Jowalsen 5690:Tromboneguy0186 5649:Tromboneguy0186 5622:Tromboneguy0186 5603:Tromboneguy0186 5573:Tromboneguy0186 5548: 5515: 5470: 5347:Tromboneguy0186 5343:Tromboneguy0186 5307:Darren Jowalsen 5286:Darren Jowalsen 5227: 5208: 5177: 5158: 5151: 5129: 5122: 5110:article there. 5101: 5070: 5065: 5010: 5003: 4985: 4980: 4959: 4954: 4909: 4904: 4843: 4838: 4764: 4759: 4598: 4590: 4457:Talk:Chris Hero 4423:Extreme Warfare 4365: 4360: 4340: 4335: 4290: 4285: 4205: 4198: 4168: 4151:Tromboneguy0186 4138:Deputy Marshall 4129:Tromboneguy0186 4114:Deputy Marshall 4103:Tromboneguy0186 4096: 4042:Template:Hidden 3834: 3814: 3792:Deputy Marshall 3770: 3748: 3741: 3710: 3703: 3680: 3673: 3668: 3647:Deputy Marshall 3583: 3576: 3477: 3470: 3466: 3366:ECW Ultra Clash 3236:ECW Ultra Clash 3222: 3208:Deputy Marshall 3190: 3154:WWE Fight Night 3107:Deputy Marshall 3039: 3022:Deputy Marshall 3002:Deputy Marshall 2990:Deputy Marshall 2952:Deputy Marshall 2926: 2866: 2835: 2816:Tromboneguy0186 2802:Tromboneguy0186 2792:Deputy Marshall 2783:Deputy Marshall 2772:Tromboneguy0186 2768: 2739: 2732: 2710:1 Pro Wrestling 2665: 2658: 2584: 2577: 2504: 2497: 2396: 2389: 2325: 2306: 2222: 2217: 2176: 2171: 2147: 2133: 2112:Deputy Marshall 2107: 2103:Bryan Danielson 2061: 2054: 2049: 2039:Tromboneguy0186 2022:Tromboneguy0186 2018: 1873:WWE Diva Search 1868: 1843:Tromboneguy0186 1799: 1781: 1780: 1733: 1720: 1719: 1680: 1667: 1666: 1588:Right to Censor 1487: 1435: 1434: 1401: 1400: 1374:Right to Censor 1351: 1350: 1301: 1300: 1239: 1216: 1209: 1146: 1139: 1085: 1023: 1016: 993: 986: 981: 948: 941: 903: 881: 874: 841: 834: 812: 784: 757: 684: 630: 618:situation? --- 611: 557: 440: 428: 423: 411: 390: 338: 331: 315: 309: 282: 271:Darren Jowalsen 249: 158: 147:Deputy Marshall 132: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5748: 5738: 5737: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5682:FIP: Emergence 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5627: 5547: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5514: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5494: 5493: 5469: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5317: 5291: 5226: 5223: 5207: 5201: 5176: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5100: 5098:Neighborhoodie 5095: 5054: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5046: 5045: 4995: 4994: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4852: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4732: 4731: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4655:common mistake 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4597: 4594: 4589: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4539: 4538: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4374: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4245: 4238: 4224:Same goes for 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4191: 4190: 4167: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4120: 4119: 4095: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4076: 4075: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3863: 3862: 3833: 3830: 3813: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3769: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3667: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3632: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3465: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3328: 3269: 3260: 3246: 3245: 3221: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3202: 3201: 3189: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3038: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 2995: 2976:*Shout here!** 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2941:*Shout here!** 2936:work. Thanks. 2925: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2906: 2905: 2865: 2862: 2846:*Shout here!** 2834: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2767: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2551:United Kingdom 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2324: 2321: 2305: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2201: 2146: 2143: 2132: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2106: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2048: 2045: 2017: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1932: 1926: 1921: 1919:Maryse Ouellet 1916: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1805: 1804: 1798: 1795: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1757: 1734: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1700: 1681: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1647: 1633: 1624: 1610: 1607:Houston, Texas 1596:The Goodfather 1585: 1571: 1554: 1532: 1519: 1488: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1446: 1445: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1420: 1403: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1393:Houston, Texas 1382:The Goodfather 1370: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1328: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1282: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1176: 1167: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1084: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1060: 1032: 980: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 930: 929: 913: 897: 893: 892: 891: 890: 870:Booker Huffman 851: 850: 811: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 783: 778: 777: 776: 756: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 714: 713: 712: 711: 683: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 629: 626: 615:Talk:Powerbomb 610: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 556: 550: 535: 534: 533: 532: 503: 502: 473: 472: 439: 436: 410: 405: 389: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 359: 358: 357: 356: 326: 325: 324: 323: 302: 301: 281: 278: 277: 276: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 202: 201: 200: 199: 183: 182: 157: 154: 153: 152: 131: 128: 127: 126: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5747: 5728: 5725: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5715: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5706: 5701: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5691: 5687: 5683: 5679: 5674: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5665: 5660: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5650: 5635: 5632: 5628: 5626: 5623: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5614: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5604: 5600: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5583: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5556: 5555: 5539: 5536: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5524: 5520: 5508: 5505: 5500: 5496: 5495: 5492: 5489: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5479: 5474: 5463: 5460: 5459: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5421: 5418: 5413: 5409: 5405: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5371: 5368: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5352: 5351: 5348: 5344: 5329: 5326: 5322: 5318: 5316: 5312: 5308: 5305: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5297: 5292: 5290: 5287: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5278: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5269: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5247: 5246:Shane Douglas 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5236: 5232: 5222: 5221: 5218: 5214: 5206: 5200: 5199: 5194: 5190: 5186: 5182: 5166: 5163: 5161: 5156: 5154: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5143: 5139: 5138: 5137: 5134: 5132: 5127: 5125: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5099: 5094: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5079: 5078: 5075: 5073: 5068: 5062: 5059: 5044: 5041: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5032: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5015: 5013: 5008: 5006: 5000: 4993: 4990: 4988: 4983: 4977: 4973: 4972: 4967: 4964: 4962: 4957: 4951: 4947: 4941: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4925: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4914: 4912: 4907: 4901: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4889: 4885: 4880: 4870: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4851: 4848: 4846: 4841: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4815: 4812: 4808: 4804: 4801: 4797: 4792: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4772: 4769: 4767: 4762: 4756: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4724: 4722: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4700: 4698: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4677: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4658: 4656: 4650: 4649: 4647: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4631: 4630: 4626: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4611: 4607: 4603: 4593: 4579: 4576: 4575: 4570: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4556: 4553: 4552: 4547: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4524: 4523: 4518: 4515: 4511: 4493: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4484: 4480: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4464: 4463: 4458: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4448: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4434: 4433: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4414: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4394: 4393: 4388: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4379: 4375: 4373: 4370: 4368: 4363: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4351: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4343: 4338: 4332: 4320: 4317: 4313: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4305: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4295: 4293: 4288: 4282: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4264: 4261: 4257: 4250: 4246: 4243: 4239: 4236: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4227: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4213: 4210: 4208: 4203: 4201: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4185: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4176: 4173: 4166: 4155: 4152: 4148: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4139: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4130: 4125: 4122: 4121: 4118: 4115: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4104: 4101: 4094: 4086: 4083: 4078: 4077: 4074: 4071: 4066: 4065: 4058: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4025: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4013: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 3993: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3956: 3953: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3930: 3927: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3909: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3892: 3889: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3874: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3861: 3858: 3854: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3843: 3839: 3829: 3827: 3824: 3820: 3805: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3793: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3768: 3756: 3753: 3751: 3746: 3744: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3727: 3724: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3715: 3713: 3708: 3706: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3694: 3693:BionicWilliam 3689: 3688: 3685: 3683: 3678: 3676: 3651: 3648: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3618: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3591: 3588: 3586: 3581: 3579: 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3507:Manami Toyota 3503: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3493: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3482: 3480: 3475: 3473: 3443: 3440: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3413:Template:Prod 3410: 3406: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3397: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3374: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3329: 3327: 3324: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3274: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3261: 3259: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3247: 3244: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3212: 3209: 3204: 3203: 3200: 3197: 3192: 3191: 3188: 3184: 3166: 3163: 3161: 3160: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3108: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3089: 3085: 3079: 3076: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3067: 3065: 3064: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3044: 3037: 3026: 3023: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3013: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2996: 2994: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2977: 2974: 2965: 2962: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2942: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2917: 2914: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2874: 2870: 2869:User:Samgibbs 2864:User SamGibbs 2861: 2859: 2856: 2851: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2840: 2833: 2820: 2817: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2803: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2784: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2773: 2766: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2737: 2735: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2698:point of view 2695: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2673: 2670: 2668: 2663: 2661: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2630: 2627: 2626:NickSentowski 2623: 2618: 2614: 2613:point-of-view 2610: 2609: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2599: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2587: 2582: 2580: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2559: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2520: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2509: 2507: 2502: 2500: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2485:Bishop Steele 2482: 2470: 2467: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2425: 2424:NickSentowski 2421: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2401: 2399: 2394: 2392: 2386: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2334: 2330: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2287: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2242: 2238: 2237:Jesse Ventura 2234: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2220: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2181: 2179: 2174: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2153: 2142: 2141: 2138: 2126: 2123: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2104: 2095: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2066: 2064: 2059: 2057: 2044: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2035:John Layfield 2032: 2027: 2026: 2023: 2016: 2003: 2000: 1995: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1970:Milena Roucka 1968: 1967: 1966: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1929:Milena Roucka 1927: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1904: 1901:contestants. 1899: 1898: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1857: 1854: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1829: 1828: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1809: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1794: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1787: 1772: 1768: 1765: 1761: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1658: 1654: 1651: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1608: 1604: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1592:Bull Buchanan 1589: 1583: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1428: 1425: 1421: 1418: 1414: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1394: 1390: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1378:Bull Buchanan 1375: 1371: 1368: 1364: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1344: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1294: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1214: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1144: 1142: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1083: 1080:Edit war on 1069: 1066: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1021: 1019: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 998: 996: 991: 989: 979: 968: 965: 962: 958: 957: 956: 953: 951: 946: 944: 938: 934: 933: 932: 931: 928: 925: 922: 918: 914: 912: 907: 902: 898: 895: 894: 889: 886: 884: 879: 877: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 849: 846: 844: 839: 837: 831: 827: 826: 825: 824: 821: 818: 803: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 790: 782: 775: 772: 768: 767: 766: 765: 762: 755: 742: 739: 735: 734: 733: 730: 726: 723: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 710: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 697: 693: 689: 688:back in April 682: 671: 668: 664: 663: 662: 659: 655: 654: 653: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 640: 635: 625: 624: 621: 616: 609: 600: 597: 593: 592: 591: 588: 584: 580: 575: 574: 573: 572: 569: 564: 561: 554: 549: 548: 545: 544:Charlesknight 540: 531: 528: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 516: 515:Charlesknight 511: 510: 506: 501: 498: 495: 491: 490: 489: 488: 485: 484:Charlesknight 480: 478: 471: 468: 465: 461: 460: 459: 458: 455: 454:Charlesknight 450: 449: 444: 435: 434: 431: 426: 421: 416: 409: 404: 403: 400: 399:Burgwerworldz 395: 394:Gene Okerlund 381: 378: 374: 373: 372: 369: 365: 361: 360: 355: 352: 348: 347: 346: 343: 341: 336: 334: 328: 327: 322: 319: 318: 312: 306: 305: 304: 303: 300: 297: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 275: 272: 268: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 258:Burgwerworldz 254: 253:Gladys Gillem 236: 233: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 215: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 198: 195: 191: 187: 186: 185: 184: 181: 178: 173: 172: 171: 170: 167: 163: 162:Jaguar Yokota 151: 148: 144: 143: 142: 141: 138: 125: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5700:WWE Backlash 5672: 5658: 5646: 5568: 5564: 5552: 5549: 5516: 5475: 5471: 5456: 5436: 5384: 5340: 5228: 5209: 5192: 5184: 5178: 5159: 5152: 5130: 5123: 5108:Shad Gaspard 5102: 5083: 5080: 5071: 5066: 5055: 5011: 5004: 4996: 4986: 4981: 4960: 4955: 4910: 4905: 4881: 4878: 4844: 4839: 4765: 4760: 4741: 4717: 4696: 4694: 4675: 4651: 4645: 4625:WP:VANDALISM 4622: 4599: 4591: 4572: 4549: 4520: 4509: 4508: 4460: 4430: 4411: 4390: 4366: 4361: 4341: 4336: 4302:it himself. 4291: 4286: 4248: 4241: 4234: 4206: 4199: 4169: 4097: 4082:Odin's Beard 3984: 3852: 3835: 3815: 3771: 3749: 3742: 3711: 3704: 3690: 3681: 3674: 3669: 3611: 3584: 3577: 3514: 3511:Mil Mascaras 3501: 3478: 3471: 3467: 3416: 3408: 3404: 3344: 3158: 3150:Raw Roulette 3120:TNA Xplosion 3062: 3040: 2970: 2930:Dennis Stamp 2927: 2867: 2852: 2839:Dennis Stamp 2836: 2769: 2740: 2733: 2697: 2693: 2666: 2659: 2612: 2607: 2606: 2585: 2578: 2547:Timothy Well 2505: 2498: 2479: 2397: 2390: 2382: 2326: 2307: 2223: 2218: 2177: 2172: 2148: 2134: 2108: 2062: 2055: 2050: 2047:Alumni pages 2028: 2019: 1931:(up for AFD) 1869: 1806: 1785: 1782: 1544:September 24 1497:The Acolytes 1467: 1462: 1318:September 24 1260:The Acolytes 1245: 1240: 1217: 1210: 1147: 1140: 1086: 1024: 1017: 994: 987: 982: 949: 942: 936: 882: 875: 842: 835: 813: 785: 758: 685: 631: 612: 579:MC Frontalot 565: 562: 558: 555:'s real name 536: 512: 507: 504: 481: 474: 451: 445: 441: 412: 391: 339: 332: 313: 285: 283: 280:Steve Romero 267:Black Shadow 250: 159: 133: 78: 43: 37: 5671:Then would 5258:EazieCheeze 5229:Located at 5189:TripleH1976 3636:Shane Twins 3626:UK Pitbulls 3572:Shane Twins 3116:TNA Impact! 2878:this change 2239:'s article 2169:Agreed. -- 2031:Rob Van Dam 1650:November 18 1637:November 12 1089:RAMistheMAN 583:Criss Angel 475:There is a 36:This is an 5213:TNA Impact 5193:SmackDown! 4387:Vic Grimes 4281:Vic Grimes 4165:Vic Grimes 3870:Renosecond 3857:Chadbryant 3439:Renosecond 3396:Renosecond 3323:Renosecond 3183:Phil Blitz 3012:Renosecond 2543:Trent Acid 1999:Renosecond 1935:Amy Zidian 1743:Jerry Lynn 1600:November 6 1575:October 23 1561:October 22 1386:November 6 1360:October 23 1336:October 22 1180:Jeff Hardy 1091:and me at 810:To-do list 771:Chadbryant 761:Chadbryant 754:Kurt Angle 681:User:JB196 613:A user at 608:Ganso Bomb 175:used. --- 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 12 85:Archive 11 79:Archive 10 4510:IMPORTANT 3981:Ric Flair 3421:bad faith 2832:Lex Luger 2702:Bubblegum 2617:Lawn dart 2447:And done. 2329:Sam Hayne 1741:Won from 1688:Won from 1540:Christian 1534:Won from 1495:Won from 1314:Christian 1308:Won from 1258:Won from 864:and that 634:John Cena 553:Samoa Joe 415:PWI Years 408:PWI Years 73:Archive 9 68:Archive 8 60:Archive 5 5631:TJ Spyke 5613:TJ Spyke 5582:TJ Spyke 5535:TJ Spyke 5523:RobJ1981 5504:VegaDark 5488:TJ Spyke 5450:and the 5417:RobJ1981 5367:TJ Spyke 5325:TJ Spyke 5296:TJ Spyke 5277:VegaDark 5268:RobJ1981 5235:VegaDark 5217:RobJ1981 5183:. I can 5181:Layla El 5175:Layla El 5142:TJ Spyke 5112:TJ Spyke 4723:process. 4514:WP:POINT 4419:411mania 4350:RobJ1981 4304:TJ Spyke 4172:Halbared 4054:Aaru Bui 4012:Aaru Bui 3952:TJ Spyke 3926:Aaru Bui 3842:Aaru Bui 3838:Triple H 3823:Halbared 3723:TJ Spyke 3617:RobJ1981 3515:faux pas 3492:RobJ1981 3429:TJ Spyke 3373:TJ Spyke 3331:deleted: 3314:RobJ1981 3299:RobJ1981 3286:TJ Spyke 3273:RobJ1981 3264:TJ Spyke 3255:RobJ1981 3240:RobJ1981 3196:RobJ1981 3128:RobJ1981 3097:RAW Bowl 3088:TJ Spyke 3075:RobJ1981 2986:Fancruft 2934:Fancruft 2897:Jtalledo 2855:Halbared 2598:RobJ1981 2529:Tony Fox 2519:RobJ1981 2466:RobJ1981 2451:Tony Fox 2434:Tony Fox 2368:Tony Fox 2358:RobJ1981 2338:Tony Fox 2310:Tag team 2304:Tag Team 2268:RobJ1981 2205:TJ Spyke 2162:TJ Spyke 2122:TJ Spyke 2091:RobJ1981 2079:Jtalledo 1950:Jtalledo 1914:Layla El 1903:RobJ1981 1893:TJ Spyke 1853:RobJ1981 1833:RobJ1981 1812:RobJ1981 1758:Lost to 1703:April 16 1694:April 10 1690:Triple H 1627:March 19 1586:Lost to 1501:Bradshaw 1424:March 19 1372:Lost to 1264:Bradshaw 1184:TJ Spyke 1171:TJ Spyke 1159:Jtalledo 1119:Jtalledo 1097:Jtalledo 1065:TJ Spyke 1055:RobJ1981 1045:RobJ1981 1036:TJ Spyke 1007:TJ Spyke 961:Jtalledo 921:Jtalledo 917:Strategy 817:Jtalledo 738:RobJ1981 667:RobJ1981 649:RobJ1981 596:TJ Spyke 527:TJ Spyke 494:Jtalledo 464:Jtalledo 364:WWE 24/7 351:TJ Spyke 296:RobJ1981 232:Aaru Bui 121:RobJ1981 5703:events. 5092:Paulley 5029:happen. 4644:Please 4533:Paulley 4492:Paulley 4473:Paulley 4451:Paulley 4378:Paulley 4184:Paulley 4112:cite? 4024:Paulley 3908:Paulley 3888:Paulley 3640:Paulley 3630:Paulley 3550:Paulley 3532:Paulley 3159:Oakster 3063:Oakster 3053:Umdunno 2913:Paulley 2886:Paulley 2754:Paulley 2714:Paulley 2555:Paulley 2314:matches 1962:Umdunno 1881:Umdunno 1786:Oakster 1764:June 25 1726:1-time 1673:1-time 1614:March 5 1522:July 25 1509:June 29 1505:Faarooq 1479:5-time 1410:March 5 1286:July 25 1272:June 29 1268:Faarooq 802:Paulley 709:Paulley 429:erswift 392:On the 251:On the 39:archive 5724:Geoffg 5705:Geoffg 5664:Geoffg 5446:, the 5402:here: 5160:Duggan 5131:Duggan 5067:bullet 5012:Duggan 4999:WP:OWN 4982:bullet 4956:bullet 4933:WP:AGF 4929:WP:3RR 4924:WP:AGF 4906:bullet 4884:WP:3RR 4869:WP:AGF 4864:WP:3RR 4860:WP:AGF 4856:WP:3RR 4840:bullet 4796:WP:3RR 4791:WP:3RR 4761:bullet 4646:DO NOT 4629:WP:OWN 4606:WP:ASG 4602:WP:3RR 4479:WP:AGF 4449:. --- 4362:bullet 4337:bullet 4314:. --- 4287:bullet 4207:Duggan 3989:Geoffg 3750:Duggan 3712:Duggan 3682:Duggan 3585:Duggan 3519:Geoffg 3479:Duggan 3409:anyone 2900:(talk) 2741:Duggan 2708:, and 2667:Duggan 2586:Duggan 2533:(arf!) 2506:Duggan 2455:(arf!) 2438:(arf!) 2420:WP:AFD 2398:Duggan 2372:(arf!) 2342:(arf!) 2333:vanity 2219:bullet 2173:bullet 2082:(talk) 2063:Duggan 1953:(talk) 1747:June 5 1453:Geoffg 1218:Duggan 1162:(talk) 1148:Duggan 1122:(talk) 1100:(talk) 1025:Duggan 995:Duggan 964:(talk) 950:Duggan 924:(talk) 883:Duggan 843:Duggan 820:(talk) 497:(talk) 467:(talk) 340:Duggan 194:Geoffg 166:Geoffg 5597:, or 5254:Raven 5153:James 5124:James 5086:bio ( 5072:proof 5058:JB196 5031:JB196 5005:James 4987:proof 4961:proof 4952:. -- 4937:JB196 4911:proof 4888:JB196 4845:proof 4834:WP:PW 4830:WP:PW 4811:JB196 4800:JB196 4798:rule. 4766:proof 4610:JB196 4519:. –– 4483:JB196 4367:proof 4342:proof 4292:proof 4200:James 4093:WP:RM 4048:with 3743:James 3705:James 3675:James 3578:James 3472:James 3407:: If 2973:Duo02 2938:Duo02 2843:Duo02 2734:James 2660:James 2622:WP:NN 2579:James 2499:James 2391:James 2283:Kyros 2259:Kyros 2241:Kyros 2224:proof 2190:Kyros 2178:proof 2152:Kyros 2056:James 1823:(UTC) 1773:, USA 1760:X-Pac 1756:, USA 1712:, USA 1659:, USA 1646:, USA 1623:, USA 1609:, USA 1598:) on 1584:, USA 1570:, USA 1559:) on 1553:, USA 1531:, USA 1518:, USA 1507:) on 1419:, USA 1395:, USA 1384:) on 1369:, USA 1345:, USA 1334:) on 1327:, USA 1295:, USA 1281:, USA 1270:) on 1211:James 1141:James 1018:James 988:James 943:James 901:Lakes 876:James 836:James 725:going 722:Still 333:James 310:Normy 286:From 16:< 5673:some 5659:some 5565:some 5546:SOTF 5478:Bdve 5410:and 5198:Bdve 5084:your 5040:Fram 4931:and 4751:and 4627:AND 4425:and 4098:See 4070:Bdve 4052:. -- 3985:more 3840:. -- 3801:Dina 3782:Dina 3308:Bdve 3234:and 3185:and 3152:and 3139:--- 3101:Bdve 3099:? - 2961:Bdve 2483:and 2318:Bdve 2308:The 2253:Bdve 2199:Bdve 2033:and 1767:2001 1750:2001 1706:2001 1697:2001 1653:2001 1640:2001 1630:2001 1617:2001 1603:2000 1594:and 1578:2000 1564:2000 1547:2000 1538:and 1536:Edge 1525:1999 1512:1999 1503:and 1427:2001 1413:2001 1389:2000 1380:and 1363:2000 1339:2000 1321:2000 1312:and 1310:Edge 1289:1999 1275:1999 1266:and 1110:Bdve 906:Talk 658:Bdve 639:Bdve 587:Bdve 581:and 448:here 424:fish 420:King 377:Bdve 368:Bdve 115:and 5684:or 5554:Lid 5458:Lid 5185:not 4757:-- 4574:Lid 4551:Lid 4548:–– 4522:Lid 4462:Lid 4432:Lid 4392:Lid 4316:Lid 4260:Lid 4044:or 3612:one 3574:. 3509:or 3502:not 3141:Lid 3043:Lid 2387:. 2215:-- 1983:Lid 1974:Lid 1939:Lid 1769:in 1762:on 1752:in 1745:on 1708:in 1692:on 1655:in 1642:in 1619:in 1605:in 1580:in 1566:in 1549:in 1542:on 1527:in 1514:in 1440:Lid 1415:in 1391:in 1365:in 1341:in 1323:in 1316:on 1291:in 1277:in 789:Lid 729:Lid 696:Lid 620:Lid 568:Lid 316:132 211:Lid 177:Lid 137:LC6 5688:? 5601:? 5593:, 5313:. 5252:, 4747:, 4421:, 4177:) 3828:) 3671:-- 3427:. 3368:, 3364:, 3360:, 3356:, 3352:, 3348:, 3284:. 3230:, 2873:IP 2860:) 2696:a 2694:is 2611:a 2608:is 2052:-- 1808:] 937:is 815:-- 542:-- 513:-- 482:-- 452:-- 94:→ 64:← 5244:( 4755:. 4247:" 4240:" 4233:" 3821:( 3517:. 1803:] 1590:( 1499:( 1376:( 1262:( 908:) 904:( 899:↪ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 10 - Knowledge

Index