Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Archive 4

6155:

article, just to say that a song was sung by XXX and composed by YYY is purely meaningless and provokes other editors to create articles for the music they find "great". Now that several sites have started giving out music reviews, in which each song is separately discussed, an editor can just start an article, write a section named critical response and quote large amounts of text, making others feel that the song has to stay. Moving that aside, it is unfortunate that Indian songs have little online statistical publishing to verify their significance. One should also take into account that songs like Teri Meri and Chammak Challo broke records upon release, like the YouTube hits. Perhaps, we should restrict the criterion to create pages for single track release, record-breaking response verified by sources, and those which have won multiple awards.

9573:. Major things like, should the article titles be written in Indic languages in the lead, should the format be changed, should the pages be moved to other title, etc. are discussed beforehand. Minor things like importance ratings, non-controversial moves for spelling mistakes, which image to use in Infobox, are simply done boldly. Ideally speaking, the importance rating should align with the class (FA, FL, GA, A, B, C, Start, Stub) because if the article is of top-importance, it should ideally be maintained well and taken to higher class. But that doesn't necessarily happen as we cannot force editors to edit something that they don't want to. Hence, the importance rating doesn't really matter much. But there are some activities like 8559: 7847: 7880: 7832: 5855:@BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ, No one is saying that these awards should not be mentioned at all on Knowledge. The objection is only on inclusion in Filmography table. The notable awards will of course be mentioned in the article. Non-notable sparkling-face-of-the-year-by-some-detergent-manufacturer are also mentioned. We remove them sometimes but fans insist on having them back. So be it. Only in some rare cases these awards are removed when some admin is involved who fires you with all sorts of essays and nags you till you give up. §§ 8421: 8364: 7604: 8553: 8520: 12010:. There is some recent discrepancy about her relationship status. An earlier editor sourced a contribution indicating she was married, but a recent editor provided a sourced edit that suggests she was not married. She appears to be credited with the last name Abhilash. Anyhow, the subject is beyond the scope of my knowledge, and I can't read the source article. I would also like to suggest that maybe the film credit list in the article is long. Do we need to list cameo appearances? Seems 35: 7817: 4181: 4134: 4096: 4065: 4011: 3971: 3929: 3889: 3849: 3802: 3756: 3699: 3659: 3613: 3571: 3524: 3475: 3435: 3365: 3320: 3275: 3230: 3183: 3138: 3091: 3053: 3008: 2961: 2923: 2885: 2838: 2793: 2748: 2701: 2656: 2611: 2556: 10205:

by copy-pasting the text from the original individual articles, and the proposal to merge was not even notified on the individual articles' talk pages back then. In any case, I do not wish to have a two-way argument, but I wish to build consensus too. What I'm trying to say is that as long as the award is given less than 59 times in 59 years, it qualifies as intermittent as per the meaning of the word. If all of wikipedia had to use a rationale like this, the article

13217:

interference, comes when such standard codes are to be applied. We simply want to have a list of all articles which are biographies and which are related to Indian cinema. Now because of your AWBing we can't have it. And this has nothing to do with article page but has to do with article's talk page. Its a maintenance category which is, let me guess, probably meant for maintenance. Now how on earth is that possible without it having been transcluded in a category? §§

9631:

Lifetime achievement award named after him. And yes, the Filmfare Awards thing... it started in 1955, which was later in most of their careers compared to Amitabh, so perhaps it was a given that he'd win more awards. I'm not going to rate Amitabh Low-importance, because I know he is important, but I do think Dev, Dilip and Raj deserve to be Top importance to. But thanks for explaining that to me. Because I do think that those articles need a lot of maintenance.

10127:. I would like to reiterate that this article's title is a misnomer, because many the awards for other languages are also intermittent, and we cannot really redefine the meaning of a word to suit ourselves. I think we should not be critical and have such arbitrary classifications of awards, but we should apply a common rule for all. It seems very illogical to me e.g. that the award for Oriya, which hasn't been awarded since 2006 is not considered intermittent. 7862: 6071: 5339:

ages. One test before including awards in filmography table we can do is to see if these awards category wise pages are well sourced and full with info. I deproded two BFJA category lists last week. If there are no good references available we will end up having awards only for superstars like Salman or SRK who are regularly covered in news. But then Supporting actors wont have those enteries at all. Thats bit uneven to see and hence should be avoided. §§

7311: 4167: 3997: 3957: 3915: 3835: 3788: 3742: 3685: 3645: 3599: 3557: 3510: 3461: 3421: 3351: 3306: 3261: 3216: 3169: 3124: 3077: 3039: 2994: 2947: 2909: 2871: 2824: 2779: 2734: 2687: 2642: 2597: 2542: 3875: 8532: 8275: 8024: 11005: 7081:). Would anyone object to me converting these embedded navboxes into proper navbox templates, and then transcluding the templates into the relevant film articles (as well as back into the article about the director, of course)? It seems like a no-brainer to me, but I thought I'd ask just in case there had been a previous decision that these directors didn't warrant their own templates, or something like that. Thanks. 4334: 9293:, i intended to have the list itself as the major part. Births-deaths-events would be very less. For events i planned to only give links to existing articles. I did not intent to duplicate content from other articles, even in brief. Also Bollywood doesn't have any good critics who would compare films of a year, or comment on the trends or other aspects of filming, etc. There would hardly be anything in 9132:. The current articles in the category are titled as "Bollywood films of XXXX" (XXXX is year). Should they be moved, leaving a redirect from old name, to "XXXX in Bollywood", they fall in line with many other "XXXX in topic" format on Knowledge. Also, this new name increases the scope of the article to include births, deaths, special events, award ceremonies, debuts, etc. of that year on same page. §§ 12132: 10546: 8229: 6634: 1192: 139: 4298:

only 30% of that are meaningful and the rest are just auto-populated summaries provided by various browsers such as Chrome which proves that he/she is damn lazy and is not really bothered to update it. He certainly needs to be educated/informed/warned about the importance of Edit Summaries since he's been dealing with many major "vandal-magnet" articles. And yes, something def needs to be done.

13441: 8105: 8031: 7973: 11382: 8264: 8193: 4341: 1765: 6903:. It was the first and last time these two prizes were given. And next year "The next superstar award" might be introduced. I think you'll understand what I'm trying to tell here, they don't have any fixed rules, they get bent according to the situation. I wouldn't give them more importance than they deserve. Please don't mistake me, just my humble opinion! 8599:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - 5141:) says, "Scenes featuring Prakash Raj and Jagapathi Babu were reshot for the Telugu version, while dubbing the rest from the Tamil original". Which means the film is certainly a dubbed version, with a few scenes involving Prakash Raj and Jagapathi Babu being shot to suit the Telugu audience. There shouldn't be a separate article for the Telugu version. 9607:. He is also known as the "Man of the Millennium". And to top that all, he is continuously promoted by media. He gets ill, media reports that. He blogs, media reports that. He tweets, media reports that. He has many controversies to his name. Political parties have been involved. With so many notable points, he is of top-importance. 5225:, it states that "one indication of the Bollywoodization of television is the amount of airtime that television networks tend to give to telecasting annual film awards - which have evolved into a mini industry." The book refers to the ZCA as "a major showcase for Indian cinema" and the IIFA as the "so-called Bollywood Oscars". 4877: 10240:

separate page. With your logic of one-missing-in-59-lets-make-it-intermittent, we will end up having every article in the intermittent page. So get the consensus on that as well so that you can move everything you wished to the intermittent page. The examples you've given here are surprisingly irrelevant to the subject!! -

2252:. It has tremendous scope to become a featured article. I am in the process of obtaining two important books on/about the film. The article may need structural changes in places. We have time. IMO, 6 months would be a practical deadline for it. I would urge other users to take up some articles (individually or in groups). 6051:

Anyways those pages just says ABC song is sung by XYZ and written by MNO which could've been mentioned in the soundtrack page itself. Why a separate article for that? BTW, I think "Ooh la la" should be improved and supported for a separate article though I agree the current state of the article is not favorable.

5123:. New editors will continue to create separate articles, particularly from the respective other state. There should be some consenus for such cases. I don't even think these films should be listed twice in filmographies, but that will not be possible since often both versions are considered at award ceremonies. 12696:. It was created as a duplicate article and is the name of a song from the film it now targets, which together with a couple of other things makes me suspect that there might be some plausibility. Input from people knowledgeable about Indian cinema would be especially welcome at the discussion. Thanks, 10204:

I did not do a mere copy-paste of the original article. In addition to making standalone articles, I also made factual corrections to the data and you have added some of the errors back into the 'Discontinued...' article while reverting. One could also say that you created the 'Discontinued...' page

7184:

Indian cinema has reached a level where it potentially depends on speculation and gossip to popularize it further. These are purely not encyclopedic in any manner, however, it may not appear so to a new reader, as there are several articles at the moment having sentences like "XXX was rumored to play

6894:

the special jury award, did they? Then I would have understood and we could have said, yes both are two different prizes! Why wasn't the award given in every language, and why not for actresses too? And who knows whether this critic award will be given regularly from now on. In 2005, they created two

6865:

Name change for "Playback/Debut Actor awards". By what names were these cats previously referred as? If we go by common sense, there is a difference between Critics award and Special award. The Special award for Bollywood films was introduced in 1972 while Critics award was introduced in 1991. Do you

5807:

as editors, consider "notable" awards but the Hindi film industry (according to reliable sources) - I have specifically provided several sources as to show why. I know that there are tonnes of award ceremonies in India, and that is why I felt it was necessary to have this discussion in order to avoid

1536:

Thanks Animesh for taking this up well in advance so that project members have time to work on it. While I think that it would be the most fitting if the article on Raja Harishchandra was TFA, I don't know how many sources we're going to get for it. Ra.One and Ilayaraja seem to be the most developed,

1411:

and make it an FA? Let's make that our top COTM. Other than that, there are numerous possibilities, but I feel that our aim (as part of this centenary) should be the improvement of quality of all Indian cinema articles; concentrating on a few to get to GA/FA status will be a parallel aim. How's that?

13486:

version by opening them in a new window. When you find a good one, copy the URL, click on 'Replace link', paste it in and click okay. When you have found all you can, click 'Save changes' at the top of the page. If we have a few volunteers, we can at least knock out all of our FAs and GAs listed at

11919:

consisting of 2 films, my opinion is that only those film series with 3 or more films should be added (all of which have been released only). Please feel free to come and add more and do the required corrections. Once fully created, this list will be highly informative. I can add only those films in

10828:

Of course there will be others to help. I will be available to some extent. With your recent success in Vidya Balan,you can definitely do it. My first advice would be to read the article carefully, and change/improve prose whenever you feel needed. Content-wise, it is in a good condition. For prose,

10619:

was recently nominated for GA. I read the article, it is quite well-developed, and close to GA. I can do the review, but the problem is the nominator seems to be very new, and he did not contribute to the article at all. The principal contributor (Arfaz) remains blocked. Anyone interested to take up

10239:

Please refer to the pages before and after creation of "Discontinued.." page to verify the copy-paste! Again, you are more than welcome to correct the errors in the page, if you have observed any. The page creation was discussed on the talk page of this task force and then taken a decision to make a

10160:

Your "work" was a mere copy-paste of the original article!! Again, I don't understand your point of putting Oriya into intermittent as it is given more than 30 times in last 59 years and not given in last 5 years. This is very clear there that article have not been "deleted" but directed to the page

9609:

Are others like Kapoor, Kumar, Anand not that important then? They are, but not as much as he is in my opinion. I can't speak for other editors. But if you want to change it, you can change it. Because as explained above, this rating doesn't really matter. I wouldn't mind if you rate Bachchan to low

8817:

I have started to work on categories on Commons, first with Indian and Bolloywood actresses. My objectives is to nominate a valued images for all the main actresses and actors. We already got a few (ABB, Salman Khan, Aishwarya Rai, Madhuri Dixit, Shilpa Shetty, Vidya Balan, Parvathy Omanakuttan). We

6889:

I stopped taking these awards functions seriously some time back. They will introduce some new awards or give them new names whenever they feel like. This year they had to give Dhanush and Vikram the best actor award, had to satisfy both actors' fans. So what to do? Give one of them a critics award!

6709:

should be prepared for this song. I am against it as this would open opportunities for many more songs which share same titles or first few words. We know there could be many songs that start with same/similar wordings. Although the current decision is only for this particular song, it will be cited

6588:

I was surprised to see the pages redirected to film articles in spite of clear result. If redirect was/is the ultimate solution, then why would we take it to AfD? Lets do it by ourselves and not overload admin with this task. Moreover, I wonder why not use WP:PROD as if nobody objects, article would

4987:

The latest trend in the industry has been making "bilingual films", shooting a film in two languages simultaneously. It will be (more or less) the same film shot twice in different languages with a slightly different cast. But how to deal with these bilingual films? Create separate articles for each

1496:

and so on, I fear if we could get much sources on these actors since not much is talked about or published on these stars when compared to the top 5 I listed. Currently of these only Amitabh's and Shahrukh's article are the nearest GA candidates and all others have to be extensively worked on. Among

11197:

Hello friends, thanks for all of your replies. Well I realised that I went overboard of labelling Tito names, and I would like to apologise to Tito for making such terrible statements about him. It is to my good intentions that I think the movie poster is better suited per the statement "theatrical

9549:

But then isn't the importance subjective? For example, Dev Anand, Dilip Kumar and Raj Kapoor were the so-called "Big Three" of Hindi cinema, and of course Raj Kapoor was known as a great actor and director, and Dev Anand did venture into direction as well, so. I apologize if this is being rude, but

5957:

I think we need to ponder which songs got wider media coverage ( for whatever reason). I see many international songs having article, although apparently it seems they might not be notable. On the other hand, many Indian film songs, though extremely popular, lack an article as it is often difficult

5430:

Awards have their own official websites so listing the winners and nominees wouldn't be a problem. As for the other three awards (Screen, Stardust and ZCA), several reputable and reliable sources (such as Bollywood Hungama) publish the winners and nominees close to the time of the awards season. --

5301:

We cannot include all awards in filmography tables just because they all have an article. IMO NFA, FFA, State awards (for regional films) would be sufficient. I would also support the addition of IIFA, as they receive quite a lot of coverage in the media. BJFA can very well be be included, as it is

4479:

Now... should we include these awards in artist's biographies? Why not? They have received recognition of their work from some other people and i see no reason to exclude it. Should we include these home-made awards then? I would say avoid in case its very crowded in the article; but never ever use

4297:

does not make section edits. He/She is contributing by clicking on the main Edit link on the page or is removing the section headings intentionally which is misleading and kinda looks like working in disguise. Secondly though he/she have been adding Edit summaries in close to 70% of his/hers edits,

4277:

I'm not sure whether they are actually non-constructive, since some of his references seem valid. However, some other editors have clearly pointed out that he adds expired links as sources, which he has not stopped even now. I was undecided, and still am to an extent, since ANI would be a big step.

2131:

before. Just started to read it. It is superb. The lead is very catchy, unlike other run-of-the-mill film articles. IMO, this one could be a real gem, both a good melodramatic representation of Indian cinema, and pretty well written. The prose looks high grade. The references look good. Will have a

1819:

Its a nice initiative I must say. What we can do, is we can select an article each month as COTM and improve it (making it as GA standard would be the minimum). At the end of 8/9 months (say around February), we can decide on the articles which can be promoted as FA and work towards the final goal.

11355:

turned into a disambiguation-page, I've fixed most of the incoming links to the dab-page, but there are several Indian films which still got a link to this dab-page. I believe it is the same person, as he listed under "Cinematography" is all the articles, but I haven't fixed those links as I don't

10582:

I am no longer interested in co-ordinating this project. With the presence of a few bad-faith people (who I thought were my good friends), I don't want to waste my time here owing to personal reasons. The project has a lot of potential editors and I think someone could perform the duties much more

9514:

The importance rating is a representation of how important the article is for the work-group. It is irrespective of what the subject of the article is, i.e. biography, film, soundtrack, song, award-list, etc. Bachchan being one of the most reputed film personalities, this project considers it as a

9023:

Comment: You are talking about a lot of work - moves, redirects or link fixes on hundreds of articles, templates {{Bollywood films}} {{Bollywood}}. Some articles use these names in the text. For example: Film YYYY was the highest grossing of the 'Bollywood films of XXXX'. This won't sound right if

7686: 7480:

The purpose of the barnstar is to give a sense of appreciation to those who work exclusively in South Indian film articles. It has not been intended to create an ethnic brawl in this arena and shouldn't be interpreted in that manner. The reason of a sock puppet indulging in mischief is by no means

6154:

A song article should not exist just because a couple of people think it was a hit. Noted charts, like the different FM's should have mentioned the song significantly in their own lists and the songs should have received sufficient critical notice to establish notability. Like it has been said, an

5982:

an exception? Don't know what they mean by "Track". I would take it as "music". But Zee Cine Awards are themselves not that notable. And this all is just for Hindi songs. Non-Hindi songs would hardly fit these criterion. Only good way would be to check GNG. But that should exclude passing mentions

5526:

Oh yes, those can be used for this particular purpose, no problem in that. Essentially, the awards websites ARE the only available reliable source for those awards, as any other (secondary) source will be based on the list of awards. There is no problem in using primary source for straightforward,

4941:

How about looking at this specific issue with a different perspective? Do any other news sources refer to it? If not then it could be argued that it is trivial/non notable ... and if they do (& are not just rehashing the same agency report) then we perhaps could cite them instead or as well as

8622:

regarding whether the English translation of the title is included, as well as the placement of the international DVD film title. I've tried opening a dialogue, but the editor refuses to discuss the matter. I don't want to start an edit war, so his version is currently up at the moment. Since the

6532:

it. One could create a stub article about a song, someone could then AfD it, many editors can opine delete there but finally it can be redirected. So if some editors decided to make better use of their time they can skip all this hoopla and directly jump to making a redirect instead which is okay

5953:

the problem here is lack of objective measures. For example, the song "ooh laa laa" from The Dirty Picture is in AfD now. I personally think the song got enough coverage in media so as to deserve an article. But it is difficult to establish that going by the song notability criteria alone. On the

5176:

For a while now, I have been thinking of adding other awards (wins and nominations) to the filmographies of Bollywood actors – similar to that of their Hollywood colleagues. However, before doing so, I would prefer making a list of the so-called "notable" awards; by doing so it would restrict the

4779:

Indeed not all articles on TOI websites were written by TOI authors. For some time now, TOI has been including articles from other sources as well, like from haihoi.com and cinefundas.com. Only articles in which the author has been mentioned are TOI articles and can be considered as reliable. The

1041:

We, at Knowledge could also do somethings great on this project. Making our works reach the main page could be one such activity. As we celebrate full year, we don't have to aim any particular date. I am posting this almost a year beforehand as this would require quite a lot of efforts from all.

546:

The class of an article depends on various things. Its not just length or good look. It also is not strictly defined with a certain formula. Its a huge range, and many articles would fall under it. You cant also compare articles amongst themselves. If you sit and compare with some Hollywood actor

13216:

Whatever reason you have is just suitable for theories. Article in purview of this task force have never been of interest to global Film taskforce. And thats not just with article editing. We don't see any crowd of non-Indian editors in AfDs or FACs or RMs. The only interference, and it truly is

9858:

Guys, I am new here, however I stumbled upon this page. Actually the writer of Iqbal is Vipul K Rawal and there are numerous articles from various reliable sources attached. I noticed a few from Ecomonic Times, The Hindu and even Moser Bayer, the company that has the DVD rights of the movie have

9252:

If done at all throroughly, a page on a particular year in Bollywood could easily become very big, without including the list of films. There is a huge amount of published material on each year, more than enough to support a standalone article ... so if the film lists were included, it probably

9245:

I want to offer a suggestion here. It seems to me that the standalone lists of films are themselves a very useful navigational tool. I rather like the way that most of them are only list of films, because it makes them more useful as indexes to the enormous number of articles on films. The more

7572:

has already said above, Of course I am not trying to start any kind of fight here, in fact I am trying to remove the misunderstanding that will arise seeing this, I know a mere rename of this barnstar is not going to work, That is why I proposed doing away with this barnstar and using either An

7536:

I agree that a single industry specific barnstar should replace whatever exists at the moment. While it might not be DBigXray's intention to start a fight, in my opinion, the simple point is that a renaming of the existing ones is not going to resolve the issues that he has (perhaps unwittingly)

7435:

Oh come on, There exists a Bollywood, and there are existing Telugu/ Tamil / kannada /Malyalam film industry. I will appreciate if people give barnstars on these names as they really exist. but using divisive terms such as North Indian Barnstar and South Indian Barnstar is not a very appreciable

5338:

As of now i would oppose inclusion of all these awards. IIFA sure does get good coverage for being held internationally. So that probably could go. But there are others like BFJA which are given through ages. BUT, we dont have good references about BFJA. Their home site is like Coming Soon since

5306:

and Filmfans Awards were also highly notable. Filmfans Association awards were given even before NFA and FFA. But these two are not being given regularly over the past decade. Other than these, I'm personally against the addition of other awards, as addition of those will only clutter the table.

5093:

as it would illustrate the critical commentary in a neater manner and take care of other issues like change in plot. For Vishwaroopam, most of the hype and marketing is concentrated towards the Tamil version, and these kinds of factors should also be a part of judging whether we need to initiate

4211:

a number of times, I don't think we are at a situation to adjust anymore. His editing is getting troublesome, and his edit summaries are repetitive and often misleading. In response, he is totally non-communicative and has not bothered to act upon any of the problems which have been pointed out.

13263:

Something that was not done many times is no reason to not do now. Nor is it a reason to call it wrong. I don't know how AWB is "skipping" articles but i can see many biographies still under INCINE. According to you, are you done with all removals by now? Whatever..... it still doesnt solve the

11628:

Well, I reverted some of the redirects (and that IP stopped) but soon after there were some IPs which started the same over and over again if forced me to stop reverting and see what other editors do. Well, my opinion is just to revert these changes (made by IPs) if they keep changing it again,

11476:

is not considered as a reliable source. However, I see that this is used in scholarly articles (journals) as a reference. I remember from the discussion we had regarding reliability of boxofficeindia.com, when an editor presented evidences that the website had been used in scholarly articles as

10635:

Though I do not speak Malayalam, I have seen the movie. Again, I am not the main contributor to the article with only 4 edits till now and pretty new to GAs. I can take this up in case you are starting with the review. This would also give me a chance to learn more about GAs and other Knowledge

9366:

if you wish. But i don't see any point in clubbing all births-deaths per decade just for the sake of writing something. Readers can go on individual pages and read it. Also if the articles on trend changes of Bollywood are to be written, i don't think trends follow decade wise pattern like some

9045:

Good point! Thanks for noting the amount of further work required. I was thinking of redirecting "Bollywood films of XXXX" to "XXXX in Bollywood". That way we need not fix any blue links present in the articles. Two templates fixing won't be a big deal for me. For maybe few days the years won't

6050:

certainly needs to be deleted. I dont get these points here.. What do I get to know reading the two articles of those songs..? Where is the notability and success factors mentioned in the articles..? Hardly remember any radio stations playing those numbers as frequently as "Ooh la la" from TDP.

9630:

Alright then. I think that a lot of people think Amitabh is more important because he just has had more hits in recent years compared to Dev (not a hit since 1978), or Dilip (Started playing character roles and doesn't really work much), and Raj... isn't even here. But at first he did have the

5709:

I'm really keen on adding those awards to the filmographies of actors. If you take a look at the pages of Hollywood actors, you notice that each and every single award is listed. I don't see why it would be a problem to list the awards I mentioned above - these awards are notable enough and do

4895:

Sorry, we do not get to have an opinion on TOI's "reputation". Johannes003, that is inaccurate; newspapers source their info from various agencies like Reuters, Associated Press, PTI, etc. where the reporter's name is not given; surely you cannot dismiss all those news articles? TNN is another

2354:

Can we all nominate ourselves as the main volunteers in the same table below? For eg., I just nominated myself and others on some articles based on the plans stated above. It gives a quick reference and helps us know who's working on what just in case we need to get in touch with the concerned

11883:

Dear Indian cinema experts: This article is being considered for deletion, can someone please volunteer and improve it? Also a debate for deletion is going on according to which this Actor is not notable, it would be a great help if someone could find his Biography and upload an image of him.

8694:

to measure the critical response of a movie, the reliability of such sites are often under question and sometimes removed by some of the editors. In this view it is essential to frame a policy and determine reliability of the following Indian websites which are generally used as aggregators:

9486:

Hi guys, I have a question. I apologize if I am wrong, since I'm new. :) Are the importance ratings for actors going to be all the same? I'm not referring to the importance rating on the WP India banner, but where it says, "This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (marked as

1820:

Concurrently, we can also work on the articles which are currently GA/A and try to get it promoted to FA. As, for the content, it should be a mix of Cinemas, Actors, Actresses, Film Directors, Singers (Songs and music are integral to Indian cinemas). Apart from improving the parent article,

12719:

Hello! I recently added hundreds of Stub-Class articles to this project, because they were previously missing stub tags and/or project banners on their talk pages. However, I've also noticed that there are a large number of articles about Indian people that are tagged with the parameter

10080:@TD: The award for Konkani (4), Manipuri (9) and Punjabi (14) have been given very less time in last 59 years. Also, the count in last ten years makes it eligible for considering it as "intermittent". This is not applicable to the other language awards that were mentioned by you here. - 8623:

article is one of the two film FA's within this task force, and because the changes could affect the format of other Bollywood lead sections, I thought it would be best to see if anybody in the task force would like to contribute to the discussion that I opened on the film's talk page (

2489:

This list is strictly article-related; please do not add DYK or ITN candidates here. Please list the articles alphabetically, and italicize those entries which are for films. All suggestions are welcome, but they could ideally be discussed upon in the above portion before placing here.

7758:

Having separate barnstars for Bollywood, Telugu, Bengali and Bhojpuri cinema might reduce the "north south propaganda", but it is certainly not going to reduce regionalism. I have to agree with SpacemanSpiff here, lets replace all the regional barnstars with an Indian cinema barnstar.

12483:, a Hindu-language and Marathi-language actress. She's been in a few productions with Knowledge pages (so may be notable), but I'm not familiar with the sources in Indian cinema/TV to know whether she passes the bar. Maybe somebody could take a look at sourcing & notability here? 6930:) they were clearly mentioned as "Special Jury Award". But since they have explicitly mentioned this year's award as "Critics Award", I think we should only use that name. Just like Special jury awards, critics award may not be given for other similar categories and contestants. FYI, 13333:

has changed their site appearance and format introducing and implementing a new system of subscription. This subscription system uses monthly or yearly payment of $ 9.90 or $ 79.90 respectively. Only members with subscriptions are allowed to view details. Previous articles like this

1447:

Excellent idea. Though not invited, I would still like to voice out my opinion on this matter. I think apart from all the other articles discussed above, we should try and get some of the Actors and Actresses articles up to FA status (GA atleast). IMO the top 5 living actors:

1254:

This proposal should be focused in order to get some of the things done. We have enough time in hand for at least few of them. IMHO, "Today's featured picture" would be the toughest one. Lets not only target Bollywood film articles for FA/GA. We have some of the editors like

4709:

I don't think that, this is a good idea, because the film was written as one, it was also premiered at Cannes as a single film, so i think we can work on a single article for the film, and i insist on mentioning the two different parts in the release section as i stated in

4996:

in Tamil), which title should be chosen as the page name? With many more upcoming films supposedly being bilingual films (though I suspect that most of these so called bilingual films are only being dubbed into the other language!), this might present us with a problem.

13411: 9694:, one can say that since the media are at high energies round the clock, five references were available to be added. But as far as I can see, it is NOT significant coverage for someone who hasn't completed even one project (generally, if a high amount of info is there, 5479:) cannot be used because they are first-party sources, and therefore not reliable. I personally disagree with this assessment, and would like some comments about that from everyone here. If those are not acceptable, I am thinking neither would something like this for 4988:

version? I'm strictly against this idea as it will be plain redundant but few editors have been doing exactly that. I feel if it's the same film with the same content one article would be sufficient. But then again if the films have different titles (like the recent

1360:

Lets make a list of proposed article/list(s) and their current and expected status and track them over a period of time. Concerned editors can add their proposals. I would suggest to use project page than talk page as latter one gets archived regularly. Thanks. -

11077:(2003) film. Another Wikipedian has disagreed with me on updating the theatrical poster of the page. Previously, the article used a low-quality scan of the DVD cover. Can anyone please advise me on what to do? I thank you for your cooperation. Yours faithfully, 6013:

Certain songs like "Why This Kolaveri Di", "Chammak Challo" and "Teri Meri" definitely deserve their own articles. Rest, has to be seen. I believe that any song which receives unusual coverage and enjoys major acclaim and popularity deserve their own article.

4480:

these awards for establishing notability of artist. Eg. if Kamal Haasan wins some award by these newbies i would avoid mentioning that amongst his other 50-something awards. But if someone has won only 8-10 awards, i don't mind adding one more out of these. §§

13362:

Looks like if you cannot find a cache version, then you have to search their site for the data again, or find it somewhere else. I could get into the main page, but the search doesn't seem to work yet. Maybe it will get better after some time. What a pain!!

12796:

Yes, and the assessment page for this task force states: "Indian cinema may include domestic films, films made by Indian filmmakers abroad, films produced or co-produced by Indian companies, and foreign films shooting in India". Those are all articles about

4926:

but, that aside, we do not use everything that is published in every newspaper, nor in fact is every newspaper generally considered to be a reliable source. Much depends on the context in which a source is used. Even extreme examples, such as the old Soviet

4657:

Hello, i would like to point that there is a bit of a confusion about whether Gangs of Wasseypur should have two different articles or not.As both movies were shot at the same time,it is being argued that ,that can be discussed in a sub-section of "release"

6551:

They could, yes, assuming a clearly notable target exists. If you were to create an article on me, there would be no valid target and thus deletion would be the only option. But for, say, an actress known only for one film, a redirect to that film would be

4694:

So what should be done....?Should I move the page to two articles.I just wanted to make sure that no one merges the two articles back to the original one article.If no one opposes it in a couple of days i think i can safely move the article to two separate

9564:

Yes, it is subjective. Many things on Knowledge are. They are of course written from someone's point of view. Some editor from Australia won't even know about Bachchan. Some Indian who doesn't see Bollywood films wont care either. We have something called

850:

Its very much misleading and does not add much value because its redundant to the corresponding page. Superlative should only include data for corresponding page and not all. And yes, maintenance is a pain. I would support the removal from all 4 pages. -

9550:

maybe some editors rated Amitabh Bachchan Top-importance because the media is promoting him and his son more? I know that isn't relevant to the encyclopedia, but I do think that Dev Anand, Dilip Kumar, and Raj Kapoor deserve to be rated Top-importance.

6804:

I think it indeed denotes the same. The years before it was called the Special Jury Award, this year it's the critics award. I would include it in the same article. Vikram's award for Sethu is also in the same page, shouldn't make much of a difference.

7416:

If you want to get away from the north-south divide, then kill both the Bollywood and the South Indian barnstars and replace with an Indian Cinema barnstar. And better yet, kill all national barnstars and replace with just one barnstar for all cinema.

13138:, i noticed that you have been using AWB to remove |cinema=yes from talk pages of Indian biographies that are connected with cinema. Did you get consensus for it at some different venue? I see nothing of that sort settled and finalized over here. §§ 11310:

This clearly seems to be the case where both Satyanarayanas have been mixed at some places. Also both have same initial of K. So its quite likely to happen. Now the problem here to find the right target. Should the new article on the director be at

12400:

was for a very long time believed to have been released on 15 September 1931. But these recent and authentic news articles containing research by an award winning film historian prove that it was released on 6 February 1932. They are as follows:

5185:

as both of them are unanimously the oldest and most prestigious award ceremonies in India. In addition to that, I would also consider the following five as popular, annual, notable award ceremonies; the awards are listed in alphabetical order:

10279: 826:

started giving "Best Supporting Actor" awards the very next year (1954). If this is the case some may also have to include "Critics Award for Best Performance". So there is no point in considering both categories for calculating superlatives.

800:

I think it was similar to Academy Awards pages, but I do not like it. Some editors come in and try to add other awards into the calculation also, and it becomes a constant maintenance nightmare. I would vote to remove them, if this was an RfC.

9833:"Kukunoor should just recognise his talent lies in directing and not in writing. He should hire a talented script writer on a permanent basis for all his films. He needn’t look far. Vipul K. Rawal who wrote the memorable “Iqbal” should do." §§ 7537:

raised. Also, appearing to associate sockpuppetry with one particular region or name is hardly going to be viewed positively. Finally, I do think this section should be named more neutrally (to something like "Barnstars for this task force").

7436:

thing. I could recall that not very long ago there was a sock of some user who was adding South Indian Film award and South Indian film content on Tamil cinema page and similar pages, before he was blocked for sockpuppetry. (Update: link here

7366:

It's good that you have started a discussion. But you shouldn't have removed that award before getting the opinion of others. The award is given for editors who contribute to South Indian-film articles. I don't think there are issues with it.

6917:

I agree with your point that they may not give the "critics" award next year. These awards are mainly organised to honour actors like Kamal Haasan, SRK, Chiranjeevi, Vikram and a few more actors in the south. There is an one-time award called

5510:"A primary source may only be used on Knowledge to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify are supported by the source." 4939:, may have their place but they would need to be treated with considerable care. Similarly, there is a credibility gap between international agencies such as Reuters and those such as TNN (which seems almost to be an in-house agency for TOI). 6384:

Did you read the attached essay? "A redirect page may even avoid the creation of duplicate articles on the same subject ...." I'm assuming you would rather have that than be constantly trying to redelete non-notable articles. In theory one

5972:

There isn't any chart for Indian songs. Atleast in present days. Some TV and radio stations come up with some top-20 list now and then but then they come up with some other show & this gets flushed. For old Hindi songs i would consider

1106:: In case anyone makes new articles next year, try to match with some significant date and keep them on hold for main page appearance. In case you plan to write new article, work in user space and then only release when DYK criteria is met. 11660:

is still in use, surprisingly to me as an European where it was practiced only few years in the early talkie era. During this year there are/ will be released at least 4 movies which were shot simultaneously in altered language-versions:

12750:, none of them include articles about people. Therefore I just wanted to let this project know, that I plan to remove this parameter from all of the biography articles, so that the film categories will only contain articles about films. 12605: 12500: 12335:, purportedly an upcoming film. The nominator asserted it was a fake article, which was endorsed by another user. Since then, the creator has been in touch with me about trying to get it restored, arguing that it is a real film; see 11121:, which suggests that theatrical poster be used and in case that isn’t found, DVD cover etc can be found. Since I uploaded the DVD image I would have no problem if a better image is found. Though what is alarming is your comments on 5226: 5222: 5076:

IMO, it is all right to have an article if a film has been shot simultaneously (not dubbed) and if the cast is different. But otherwise, I am against adding articles for other versions. At present, some have articles and some don't.

4466:

to write about these new establishments. But maybe some renowned local newspaper at least should have noted these awards. I say "independent third party" because sometimes Award functions are hosted for killing time. Best example is

9983: 9934: 11749: 9776:. I found no credible reference of his notability. I am planning to nominate his article for deletion. Do let me know if I need to mention this article somewhere else in the Indian cinema wiki project, or this talk page was fine. 4453:

In my opinion, Awards which have received some attention of reliable source media or which are given by independent third parties are notable and can have their own articles. If both the clauses satisfy, its well than good. I use

7495:

Thank goodness at least you agree that people can misinterpret this barnstar in such a manner. Why cannot we have barnstar for these film industries, and if a user excels at a number of these film industries, why not give him an

7224:

I donno how many times Gautham Menon's supposedly collaboration with Vijay is added to several articles. I am strictly of the opinion that only "encyclopedic" material should exist. This is also applicable to several TV shows. -

13630:

Also, a word of advice I saw some TOI links dead surprisingly, if you find some replacement use it. For the 2 TOI links I found one was at wayback with the other one not even being in WebCite so best of luck for TOI's archives.

9698:

is allowed to rule over other guidelines), and hence she cannot have the article at present. But recently, the trend of 'redirecting' articles to an appropriate target has become popular, and we follow that for films which fail

487:

Well... MGR doesn't look well written and needs additional sources, contains weasel words, bias, and less about his acting career. In that case, howcome it's B-rated? Is Gemini Ganesan well written (comparatively)? Pls rate it.

4880:

Although it is Hindu's marketing strategy it is very convincing. And this particular example speaks for itself. Although we are not at the point where we can officially delist TOI from RS, it is time to be careful in using it.

4764:

article. Going by the reliability norms, we should have no concerns for its inclusion. But then I doubt the reliability for the language being used in the article. It also mentions nothing more than published date. What say? -

4794:

On what basis do we differentiate between TOI and externally generated content? The above link apparently does not mention the site from which the info has been taken or how the article does not fall under TOI's jurisdiction.

12480: 6457:

Thanks for responding. Was there some history of repeated recreations on these articles which made you think that if deleted it might be recreated and hence it is better to redirect to avoid further conflict and discussions?

5012:

I think there's little point creating articles for both too - and at times I guess it's just best to use common sense/acceptance to see the issue through. Maybe two separate articles are needed when the lead cast differs ie.

13249:. There are thousands of biographical articles that AWB simply skipped over, because they did not need to be updated. I am only removing that parameter from the handful of articles where the parameter was incorrectly added. 11867: 11841: 1336:

to be featured in the main page. The article, a GA is now in a good shape and has a lot of potential to become an FA. Also Kamal Haasan is perhaps the only actor in India to have tasted success in all major film industries.

8893:

were deleted after AfD. The information was not worth keeping on a stand-alone article as it was over-classification per me. However, the information is not all crap and can be kept in some common place in an encyclopedia.

10258: 8495:

I have not made a drastic change, Just added a flexibility to include the Title for Other Cinema industries. That is the difference. If you can come up with different Images then I will include them also in this Barnstar.

6850:

I think it denotes the same, as per Johannes003. Awards in the South have often changed name/format (ie the Playback/Debut Actor awards), and it'd probably be most apt to list Vikram's award in the Special Award category.

12527:

Hi Indian cinema task force, I saw this talk. The way he written article may be not accepted by Wiki guidelines in the Project Film. But to write article on the title "Kuladeivam Rajagopal", please review the references

864:

Count me in for the removal. If the page is for Best Actor, talk about Best Actor. Best Supporting Actor is irrelevant there. The combined superlatives are better suited for the actor pages rather than the award pages.

7185:

a role in a film, (s)he dismissed it later." I happened to find many editors at the moment in WikiProject Film discouraging this, hence, it would serve a purpose, if editors here to pursue their thoughts on the issue.

2221:

But i don't see a set of articles as of now that can go in a book. We would be able to do that maybe after we finish improving the below mentioned articles. We can have books on classic films, current superstars, etc.

1994:

IMHO, lets not make any article GA/FA just because there are lots of sources available on the net!! If film/personality is going to represent Indian cinema, it has to be good. I would not prefer having F/GA status for

1031:

the first full-length Indian feature film, would complete 100 years of release. The year would be observed as the centenary year of Indian Cinema. I am expecting some celebrations or events to happen on this occasion.

13306:? There is an ongoing dispute about the gross, and we're having difficulty finding reliable sources. The ones that have been repeatedly submitted seem sketchy to some users. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you! 11811: 6103:

I completely agree with Ankit, certain songs like Chammak Challo or Kolaveri do reach the mass and enhance its notability. Just adding something, other Indian songs generally doesn't reaches notability stage. --

11426: 12232: 1112:: Probably many chances here. We would have to go through calendar and see events. For appearance in OTD we simply need to have articles in good shape. But we can not have trivial things like "50 yrs ago film 218:

and is therefore officially in production, meaning that it is worthy of having its own article right now. I have removed the redirect and even started work on it. Help is, as usual, much welcomed :D. Cheers.

12566: 12343:). Could anyone help to verify or disprove these claims? While the user's name implies COI, I'd still feel pretty bad if I were preventing a legitimate contribution from a new user. Pinging MfD participants 8200:

Check it out and tell your views if anything can be improved.And about the option-4...I removed it because there was no support for it.Yes,I will let it remain so that we may use it for any other things. :)

5977:

as something that can (not should) have their own article or redirects. Awards are given to singers, musicians, lyricists and now choreographers. But there hardly is any award for the whole song as such. Is

5937:

Are there any specific articles which seem to fail notability? If they do, then they should certainly be deleted. However, the notability of any song article is subjective, despite the presence of policies.

12517: 10213:

shouldn't have its own page, it should be part of a page called 'Countries created after 1900'. For this reason, I'm saying that if one language award has its own page, other awards should too, to maintain

13102:

I don't understand what the problem is. And i have done quite a lot of article assessments. Can the problem be simplified and re-presented? The current status is that template on WikiProject India has a

4375:

I see that articles have been created for many relatively new awards for South Indian industries and wonder whether they are notable enough and deserve to have separate articles. Such awards include the

4896:

network like that. "TOI vs The Hindu" is highly irrelevant; it doesn't matter what we think is inaccurate, at the end of the day, TOI remains a newspaper and all its articles are to be considered valid

13742: 9717:

Nobody is saying that this article shouldn't be here. It's just not notable at this point in time. After the film's release there won't be any problem. For now, the article can be rd-ed to the film's (

9129: 10293: 8474:

Then what would be the difference between all the industries.If we wish to use a unified star for all...then that's it.....why do we have to use separate names of barnstars.....criticisms welcome :)

12197:

Wow! This has really been a productive year. may be we should tell the Signpost? They carried out the news on our plans on the centenary year. This impressive result will be a follow up. What say?--

4228:

Very true! The user sometimes has ok-ok edits but almost always coupled with "providing the much needed sources" as edit-summary. When you actually see whats done, there is an extra paragraph added

11133:, which is a serious charge. What surprised me is that you lost your temper, only after single around of discussion, wherein he basically disagreed with you, so?, dispute is not a license to loose 7437: 1609:

would be a great choice, and I think Google Scholar will help us in getting more information since its an old and renowned film. There were two articles I really wanted to upgrade to GA/FA status:

13111:

and other subsidiaries. This has nothing to do with WikiProject Film and it's banner. The "Indian cinema task force" is practically more a subset of "WikiProject India" than "WikiProject Film". §§

11031:

during the month of March. Events take place both offline and online. We are encouraging WikiProjects to focus on women's history related to their subject for the month of March. Ideas include:

12705: 8183: 5466: 5446: 9185: 9165: 1537:

but I think if we have articles more fitting for the centenary. It would be better if an article on Raj Kapoor, Kamal Hassan, Rajesh Khanna or Amitabh Bachchan is up there. Or, why not work on

7490: 6753: 4616: 10161:

which consolidates all the intermittent awards. This does not harm the reader as long as you get the relevant data. Please do not edit the concerned pages till we reach the consensus here. -

9640: 9625: 9559: 9544: 9382: 9357: 9316: 9010: 8996: 8976: 8962: 8938: 8216: 8049: 8010: 7992: 5780:

Just like these five awards, some may be notable for other users too. We cannot list each and every award. Then whats' the point in having a separate section/page for awards and nominations.

1318:

Oh of course! Nothing specific to Bollywood. Its 100 years for the "Indian cinema". I am not aware of other language film article. Hence couldn't include any. Feel free to add to the list. §§

10735: 10004: 9473: 9442: 7174: 5132: 5103: 4840: 4826: 4804: 13475:

Hello, help needed! Let's start fixing the Box Office India links by either replacing them, or easier in the short term, by adding archived versions. You can use the Checklinks tool here:

12621: 10515: 10463: 10381: 8159: 717: 611: 556: 10714:

In June 2012, we had elaborate discussion on possible featured article, list drive for the centenary year. It's four months from now. Ay update on activities? The stuffs that I know are —

8147: 7268: 6583: 6561: 6546: 6515: 6497: 6483: 6398: 5270: 4630: 13488: 12155: 11184:

I guess, if the poster is adding something to the article, which I am not sure here... Changing image should be least important thing in "restructuring" an article as it is the easiest.--

10354: 10326: 9753: 9739: 9193:

I created most of the Indian and world films lists, yes. 1973 in Bollywood etc would be cool if they were written about as articles and then the list of films and birth/deaths and award.

8310:

There is no special image that can be used in Tamil Cinema, Bhojpuri Cinema etc so I have used the image from above. As in the above section the consensus for Image is image 3 so in the

8126: 8082: 7748: 7517: 7006: 6922:

for Bollywood films. We may have to wait for 50 more years to see the next winner. In this case, we shouldn't consider them as special jury awards. In case of previous awards (Vikram for

6665: 6024: 5992: 5848: 5775: 5747: 5536: 5499: 5375: 4245: 1631: 1601: 1327: 641: 10565: 10533: 9712: 9280: 9111: 9091: 8766: 8096: 7791: 5823: 5798: 5672: 5647: 5521: 5399: 5292: 4913: 359: 333: 12987:

Okay, this is beyond my pay grade. Is there anyone out there in the group that understands this? It looks like we are going to loose visibility on filmmakers if we don't do something.

12585: 10994: 10011:

The respective articles are already there, just redirected to the Discontinued and Intermittent National Film Awards page. And, name is self explanatory when we say "Intermittent" !! -

9299:(Of course if wanted, any silly thing can be bragged and written in lengths. But i don't like such style that assumes readers have short term memory or are unable to understand tables.) 9061: 9040: 8608: 5864: 5413: 5348: 4571: 4548: 4530: 4503: 4489: 4272: 2231: 1355: 936: 193: 179: 152: 13279: 13258: 13232: 13201: 11373: 9260:

pages as new pages. The existing lists could either be transcluded initially, and the transclusions changed to links once size became an issue. That way we get the best of both worlds.

7522:

I agree that the barnstar should not have been removed without a discussion.But yes i would be happy if it got replaced with an industry specific barnstar than a region specific one.--

7233: 6452: 6432: 6184: 5071: 4858: 1441: 12499: 11789: 11408: 11198:

poster be used and in case that isn’t found, DVD cover etc can be found". My intentions of editing articles are all in good faith, so I apologise to everyone again. Yours faithfully,

7656: 7475: 7457: 7430: 6706: 6111: 1982: 1952: 1910: 886: 765: 98: 90: 85: 73: 68: 63: 11645: 11210: 11063: 10948: 10754: 8664: 8513: 8293: 8254: 7735:

First, I have renamed the above section following Ncmvocalist's suggestion. Secondly, why is a "Bollywood Barnstar" okay whereas a "South Indian cinema" isn't? We have an article on

7142: 6607: 5967: 4890: 4602: 4354: 4326: 2324: 2301: 2162: 2141: 1387: 1012: 997: 525: 497: 470: 439: 421: 13457: 13430: 13153: 13126: 12465: 12227: 11508: 11357: 11188: 11175: 11153: 11108: 10799: 10779: 10284:

Should the award for each language have its own article, or should a few of the articles have their own article and rest be grouped into a common article? (See preceding discussion)

10273: 10223: 10179: 10139: 10098: 10067: 10029: 9964: 8890: 8595: 7933: 7911: 6952: 6912: 6884: 6860: 6845: 6814: 6649: 5617:

Not enough comments here to establish consensus, either on adding awards or on using official award sites as a source? I may have to take this to the film project to get more eyes.

5229:

says: "Some of the more popular include the Filmfare Awards, the ZCA, the Stardust Awards, the Indian government-sponsored NFA, and the IIFA awards". In addition to these sources,

5159: 4441: 1680: 922: 292: 273: 13552: 12973:

banner for any articles about people. If such a parameter is created, please let me know, and I will be glad to help make sure that all the biography articles are properly tagged!

12206: 11561: 10838: 10823: 10401:

have similar biographies. Their birth dates are claimed to be different, but their works are all same. Funny thing is that they both claim to have played Maddy in Disney's TV show

9968: 9960: 9456: 9418: 8573: 7546: 7128: 7114: 6973:

I've made some changes to the design of the main page. Members are free to discuss changes and propose new designs. Feel free to revert, if the design is not satisfactory. Thanks!

6737:

that had me suggest a disambig page for those similar titles. While I suppose my thoughts toward a disambig page for the song title can wait until someone else tries to recreate a

6170: 5948: 5697: 4288: 2179: 2120: 1844: 1790: 1757: 1741: 13003: 12982: 12932: 12901: 12863: 12842: 12791: 12274: 12253: 12192: 12174: 12149: 10130:

I urge all the members of this task force to consider my viewpoint and to treat the awards for all the languages equally. I call upon more users to give their views on this topic.

9848: 9820: 9806: 7774:

Agree, but we can atleast do what is in our hands. If an editor wants to award specifically for Bhojpuri films he can do so, but we should not promote the north south feelings. --

7675: 5731:

I happen to think that those Hollywood filmography look awful with all those awards attached. What is the use of the award section then, if all the awards are in the filmography?

5633: 4723: 4704: 4689: 845: 817: 12693: 12666: 11710:

a new section about the Indian practice of this film translating-method should be added. Unfortunately, I didn't find adequate sources in English, so I can't write it by myself.

11402: 8680: 7411: 7385: 6088: 5325: 4789: 2212: 13715: 12847:

I just want to be sure that our group covers both films and actors. Is there anything else that we need to do? Do we need to add our banner/tag under bios or film bios? Thanks.

10930: 10865: 10668: 10654: 7531: 6614:

In the cases "redirected...in spite of clear result" that I have closed, I use the "delete, then redirect" option. Closing as delete, then creating the redirect, when there's a

6148: 5549: 5052:

About which title should be used - I guess we should just make a decision based on common sense, on where the film properly originates from - or what title is referred to most.

4959: 4308: 2395: 2349: 1313: 1293: 875: 350:

and uploaded a (non-free) image of the poster as well. I have provided what seemed to me a reasonable non-free use rationale. Further comments and suggestions would be welcome.

13668: 13643: 13623: 13602: 13569: 13529: 13398: 13379: 13073: 13061: 12296: 12116: 8593:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

8164:

No 3 is good. Only small change in it can be made, if not very difficult to make. Make the Ashoka Chakra coincide with the center of the star. Don't mind flap going bit above.

7254: 7090: 4745: 1554: 880:"Best supporting actor" seems to there in "Best actor" to calculate an "Overall". If we remove Best supporting actor from Best actor, then "Overall" needs to be removed too. -- 794: 10916: 10889: 10722:

became featured article (although it was not discussed in the plan as such, and has already been featured on the main page), The 59th National Film Awards failed at FLC, and

6224: 6211: 5932: 5832:

to see how messy it gets. Awards section has just one listing, everything else is crammed into filmography, including awards not related to acting, and not a source in sight.

5572: 4584: 2078: 1369: 859: 318: 13708: 13507: 11492:

Could you provide examples of these scholarly articles? I have seen some pretty ridiculous numbers coming from IBOS that out out line with reality compared to other sources.

11414: 8923: 8876: 7162: 1267:

who have worked predominantly in Tamil cinema and can get some of the articles to better status but I see no one as of now for Bengali, Marathi, Telugu or Malayalam cinema. (

971: 13315: 10704: 9001:

I see your point there. I am really excited to get started on this if it is approved by other editors, my first big project on Knowledge! And working with other editors! :)

6798: 6354: 1832:, the most popular filmstars who are known outside, landmark films like Mughal-e-Azam, Sholay, Pather Panchali, etc. Regional content should also be given equal importance. 309:. I am not entirely sure if the talk page here is the right space to ask for feedback, but it would be lovely if more experienced editors could take a look at this. Thanks. 13445:. What about others? As a matter of fact BOI produces actual figures while SRK fans are always on the lookout for exaggerated figures, in absence of BOI they'll run amock! 13087: 11592: 11255: 10629: 8660: 4871: 2364: 397: 13354: 12759: 12379: 7960: 7238:

I definitely agree, but IPs seem to love adding the latest "news". Is it just a matter of keeping up with deleting it all, or do you have something else in mind to help?

6407:

As a side note, those which are clearly unlikely/unprobable search terms, such as those with brackets, were deleted (with the correct disambiguation pages modified). See

6216:

What should be the criteria for the article existence for Indian songs then? Lot of articles are of stub/start class and there seem to be no improvement for long time. -

5915:

Normally NSONGS talk about charts to eshtablish notability, I doubt if we have a standard chart for indian songs. some reasonable measuring rod needs to be thought of. --

4680:

I think here should be two articles. These are 2 separate cinemas. An example can be Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows part 1 and part 2, which have individual articles.--

12492: 10601: 5725: 5260:

An obvious support from my side is for IIFA awards; they are very notable IMO and receive a lot of press attention. Not very sure on the others, I'll check up a bit. ~*~

5254: 4621:

The question was also whether the above mentioned awards do even need a separate article. I feel those Edison Awards and Norway Film Festival Awards should get deleted.

700: 6488:

And if theory doesn't object i suppose no admins would object creation of lakhs and crores of song redirects. Although collectively it won't remain cheap any longer. §§

6061: 5909: 13037: 12775:

it says to add "|cinema=yes to the project banner for film-related articles in ...WikiProject India", which includes this taskforce / work group. I am very confused.

11719: 7768: 11992: 6780:

and keep updating related articles. Just like the "Critics award for best performance" for Bollywood films, this cat would've been introduced for Southern FF awards.

6723: 4408:, probably also the most notable one, that may get established in a few years. So which of these are notable that can be included in filmographies and which are not? 1205: 596: 12868:

The best way to make sure that this task force covers film actors, without including them as part of the film project, would be to have a new parameter added to the

11338: 9859:

credited the movie to him. ALso, the website of Rajashree, a reputed production house who have the internet rights of Iqbal have credited the story of Iqbal to him.

8726: 8109:

but best among these will be 3. I will also suggest members to think of some barnstar names so that we can use all of these images in some or the other barnstar.--

4401: 2496: 11539: 8649: 5678: 581:

passed the GA nomination! In fact, I would rate it as "best written". But howcome it has been rated as "B-class" in the above listing? Pls update. Same applies for

12689: 12685: 12678: 11285: 10436: 8454: 6461: 6408: 6336: 6308: 5006: 4417: 2437: 984: 749:

I would say no. Under the express menu it says 'write a review', 'post a blog'. Anyone can write stuff here. I have also been told by other editors not to use it.

129: 111:

Just to increase the activity and honour senior editors of this project, I have a proposal of awarding a barnstar on the lines of "Dadasaheb Palke Award" to them.

21: 12023: 10209:

would never have existed, instead it would have been a paragraph on a page called 'Teams that have never won the football world cup'. Infact one could argue that

9657:

I just wanted to ask a question here whether upcoming actors are considered notable if there exists multiple reliable sources about them. I am struggling to save

8850: 8827: 7296: 6378: 4674: 13339: 10921:

I have not looked at the article in years. But the book Apur Panchali is a great idea. But I think Mother India is in a better stage for an FAC in near future.--

10620:

the responsibility of responding to GA review? Someone who speaks Malayalam, or, at least, has seen the film would be a better candidate, but anyone can do it.--

9927: 9811:

I can't say really. IMDB of Iqbal doesn't mention him, and Nagesh Kukunoor is everywhere credited as the writer of the film. Perhaps he is an uncredited writer.

8397: 8335: 7194: 5611: 4814: 4222: 11897: 11735:. Can editors familiar with the go-to sources for Bollywood articles help source/improve it, since the subject is obviously notable enough to have a wiki bio ? 11622: 11166:– alright! But, it does not say, if this condition is fulfilled (i.e. someone uploads a DVD cover), after 2 years or so, replace it with a theatrical poster. -- 9690:, which says that they must have at least created a small impression in the film industry, that is by releasing at least one film or documentary. In cases like 9508: 5593:

As of now there is no consensus to add those awards. You cannot assume that every other editor is fine with adding these awards since no one commented anymore.

5512:

So as long as we are only stating the fact that a certain award was received by a certain person and not making any analysis based on it, shouldn't it be ok? §§

4773: 1582:

Mike is right. Something that would represent Indian cinema should be up there. A personality would be a good choice for that. In case of films, a classic from

11943: 11744: 9680: 9462: 8796: 8745: 7730: 7647: 7594: 7360: 7158: 6362: 6312: 5894: 5890: 4468: 743: 12328: 10051: 9956: 9407: 8489: 4423:

IMO, none of them deserves a place in filmography tables. However, they can be included in the "awards" sections of the respective actors/films/technicians.

1750:), can you put a mail in the mailing lists regarding this to reach the discussion regarding this to mass? We would get better views upon the discussion. -- 1713: 1576: 1422: 1375: 1248: 6991: 6934:

was not given in 1995, while the jury gave away Best composer awards for the other three languages. It's up to the jury to decide and give away the awards.

2453: 13723: 12360: 11462: 10047: 9952: 9791:

This place is sufficient. And after you nominate the AfD will be listed one various sorting lists as well. But are of the opinion that this is all hoax? §§

9785: 9406:

for featured status. This is the only portal covered by this task force and I expect your comments to improve it. Please take a little time and review it.

9337: 8505: 8446: 8389: 8327: 8246: 8118: 7783: 7722: 7639: 7586: 7509: 7449: 7403: 7352: 6931: 5924: 1813: 12809:

parameters. However, the assessment page says nothing about including Indian actors, directors and filmmakers, because those articles should NOT have the

10976:

by Satyajit Bhatkal? It contains lot of information on the film. I do have the book but currently not with me. Lagaan has also got good chances at FAC. -

9147: 8929:

Hi, I'm new to Knowledge. My first time contributing here. I think that we can do that, it will require a lot of work and references, but it can be done.

8545: 6193:

I agree with SOS. "YouTube hits" wouldn't be a good idea. We should take into account various parameters like critical response and awards consideration.

1702:

mailing lists so that the discussion and the report reaches maximum. It will help us by bringing quality more and more editors. We might also see alot of

12768: 10847:

to FAC? Tito had said few days back that he has a Bengali book by Ray on the film. If that's the case, then it would be an excellent source. What say? -

10709: 10043: 9948: 8905: 7336: 7152: 6896: 5177:

awards we add, as well as eliminate the unnecessary debate later on when people add a bunch of other awards. To begin with, we have already included the

229: 10726:

although nearly ready has not been nominated yet for FAC (I plan to discuss with other collaborators of the article on a FAC soon). Any other updates?--

7332: 2039: 1530: 11486: 11089: 10055: 10039: 9944: 9940: 9203: 6776:

for his work in a Tamil film. The award category is the first of its kind in Southern FF awards. Some users come to a conclusion that it's the same as

6465: 6412: 5190: 2428: 2267: 8943:

Thanks RHOH for the support. But we will wait for more editors to agree (or disagree) as we are talking about 70 - 80 pages here. We might require an

2094:

would be the best choices IMO as of now (excluding the already talked-about FA possibilities). Many of the articles need work, and I'm more vocal for

1049:: We all could concentrate on few articles that we think should appear on Main page. I think we have enough time to work on a seemingly good article. 776:

Why Best supporting actor/actress awards are taken into consideration for calculating superlatives in Best Actor and Best Actress pages respectively.

13634: 13560: 13520: 13448: 13389: 13345: 13084: 13070: 13028: 12376: 12287: 11229:

Hello. A discussion regarding the placement of English DVD titles for films released worldwide in cinemas under the foreign title has been opened at

9228: 4711: 4659: 9579:

Now to answer you specific question about Bachchan. Amitabh holds the record for having the maximum nominations including all acting categories for

9246:

other topics get added to the same page, the more jumping around and scrolling and so on is needed to find the list in the midst of everything else.

9076:

to get more participation in the discussion? It might also be useful to find someone who can do some of the work with a bot if a decision is made.

7200:

Agree. Some of the articles are equivalent to the gossip magazines. Moreover, few of the articles are also created purely based on the rumors. e.g.

6176:

Hit song is and should not be the criterion. With lot of blogs, fan based sites available, there are lot of "Hit" songs available in the market!! -

2258:

is a nice example of collaboration that is currently taking place. That could be an FA as well in 6-8 months, even earlier. Any thoughts or plans?--

13482:. When you run the tool, most of the BOI links will come up red. You then open up the plus sign, and click on 'Wayback Machine' and search for a 10521: 9989:

Two or three is very less. There is no point in having such small stubs. One big mix page like this is good. I am happy with this current state. §§

9915: 9900: 9892: 9875: 9860: 9197:

I think I started doing something to that effect. Feel free to move, so long as they remain consistent and properly linked in existing templates.♦

8581: 8564: 8536: 7888: 7074: 6470:

I did not include "Balleilakka" in my example. But thanks for pointing. I am also striking two more songs which were expressed as be redirected by

4757: 11047: 9249:

OTOH, I can see the utility of the broader year-in-topic style of article which Dharmadhyaksha has proposed. So my suggestion is: why not do both?

2478: 388:, I hope to see them equally good! Someone pls look at Geminiganesan article and pls see the edit history, howz the work? U think it can improve? 305:

Hi all. I am relatively new to editing. I created an article in userspace for a Hindi film after I noticed that one didn't exist while browsing :

11815: 11755: 11394: 11365: 11343: 11099:

and naturally c) he got an alert from Hazard bot that his upload will be deleted d) most probably uploader Ekabhishek is on a short Wikibreak! --

11051: 8499: 8440: 8383: 8321: 8240: 8112: 7804: 7777: 7716: 7633: 7580: 7503: 7443: 7397: 7346: 7078: 7073:

contain embedded "filmography" navboxes, added by an IP editor during the past month, which result in the articles being incorrectly included in

6344: 5918: 5541:

As long as there are no analysis or interpretation done, I believe primary sources should be ok. At least, thats what WP:PRIMARY says. Thanks. -

13652:

Yeah, sometimes you can find replacements with the search tool of the site in question, or just search Google for the article's original title.

4810: 11230: 10685: 8900:, one would find not only top grossers, but also notable events, deaths, births, etc. on these articles. On similar lines, should our articles 7391: 1648:

was actually a GA, but got delisted due to constant edit warring, especially over its earnings, which is still not resolved. I also think that

734:

is a reliable source. Because they provide many film reviews, (even for oldies) which may seem to be the only existing reviews for such films.

11276:

who claims he is "Kasetty Sathyanarayana" also goes by screen name "Satish Kasetty", a film director. The user has been editing the articles

9046:

appear in bold in templates. Thats acceptable. Also, the format of "XXXX in ABC" is seen a lot on Knowledge. Something to bring uniformity! §§

11732: 8779: 8699: 8668: 5954:

other hand, another song, "mere hath mein" from film Fanaa, (also in AfD), although a hit song, does not probably deserve a separate article.

1804:

should be the best article to consider. The article is already well written, and with some more work we can definitely get it to that level.

13607:

Keep in mind that often times India Today links show up as dead when they are really not. Try not to tag them unless they are really dead.

10542:

as "for connoisseurs of Bollywood horror of the d-grade variety". Some to-do for our taskforce and pain for those notability-essay-writers.

8736:

review gang looks more credible. It lists the critic reviews. I guess many Indan movies have review aggregates in rotten tomatoes as well.--

1939:

would be good as well if someone has the book (Spirit of Lagaan), and can iomprove the article based on that. I do not have book sources on

13081: 13067: 12373: 10939:; it has incredible details. As usual of Ray's writing, it is lucid and very easy to read. Feeling inspired to work on the article again!-- 6890:

In my opinion, it should be included in the special jury category, according to me it is the same, they didn't give both the Critics award

6460:

Oh! So because of brackets you delete them. Songs usually have more lyrics than two words. Hence i suppose you don't mind if a redirect of

5554:

There exists no other way to find reliable sources for awards. In case of Academy Awards and see the sources used in all its sub articles.

4590: 10999: 7339:, as we already have enough of the north south propaganda by the politicians, lets keep this away from wikipedia, at least. Please use an 5062:

had primarily Tamil crew and hence the articles were named as such. I guess an emboldening version of the title in the lead is also fine.

13108: 12508:

Dear Indian cinema experts: Can someone from this project give some advice to the creator or this submission? I have tried. Thanks! —

12422: 6824: 6699: 6440: 5653: 1374:

Lets collect all possible articles here in this week. Then sort out the ones which have good chances and then we can according begin our

822:

Hmmm, this is not a good idea. In case of Academy Awards, "Best Actor" awards included both leading and supporting roles until 1936. But

12387: 11319:

or what? I need help of someone who knows somewhat about the two subjects. Is the screen name popular enough to be the article name per

11788:

Please leave AFC submissions alone UNLESS they have the beige "reviewing" template somewhere on the page and you are familiar with the

6900: 6714:, why let something like this happen in the very first place. Hence thought of dropping a note here to bring this to your attention. §§ 1968:(Satyajit Ray has many white papers on him, the film is always discussed) has references on jstor (google search, no access to jstor). 1497:

the actresses, I don't care much since none of them have really made a huge impact in this male dominated industry except the likes of

11920:

Hindi and Malayalam and that too not many. Members from other language communities are also invited. All future opinions and comments

5983:

like "Blah Blah song is awesome with music by PQR and dhinchak dance by XYZ" in the film's review. And don't just show Google hits. §§

12408: 10442:

What about imdb listing for Ishaan? And perhaps Disney India website too? And once you confirm, you can have the other one tagged as

6571: 5979: 1586:

should be good. But there isn't much that we can do about old films. We would be stuck (probably already are) with no more info. But

8751:

I would prefer to have original sources. We should not rely on these rev.agg's selective writing. They might be picking biasedly. §§

8305: 7938: 4314: 11137:. I believe the problem also started when you first replaced the image without mentioning anything in edit summary as seen here in 10338: 10120: 9569:

here. The general usage of this policy would be when editors discuss things and agree on something. There is also something called

7797: 5365:

I guess there is adequate consensus to keep IIFA. BFJA is totally new to me, and I do agree that its awarding is shaky at best. ~*~

5196: 10342: 10334: 10124: 10116: 9974:

I suggest that we have a criteria like 'languages that have been awarded more than two or three times be given their own article'.

7739:. Using that as a paradigm, is it pertinent to say that Knowledge articles promote regional division between the North and South? 12633: 12537: 11303:). Both refs show images of the person, which look same to me. This person also has a website, (claimed as official owner's), at 6729:

Well... as noted, the AFD in question is about one song from one film, and a wish to use a cheap redirect to send readers to the

6157: 4536: 4405: 1221:

may become an FA, I suspect Ilayiaraja won't be there. There are other articles which can potentially become FA by then, such as

771: 8858:

You're doing a great job and your work is much appreciated. Look forward to more number of valued images of Indian celebrities.

5901:. Please express your opinion here so that article creation can be managed well for songs. IMO, redirect is not the solution. - 5404:

Yeah they all are notable. They have their own articles. But do we have sufficient sources to maintain uniformity throughout? §§

161:

editors and presenting them doesn't mean that their era in WP has come to end or the award must only be given to retired users.

12030: 8654: 2465: 10303:, to be useful. Even then it should only split off sub-articles that are necessary, not one for every applicable language. — 6819:

I don't think both are same. As far as Filmfare Awards (for Bollywood films) are concerned, they are two different categories—

5451:

Since no one has anymore comments, I am assuming that you guys are fine with adding those awards to actors' filmographies. --

4863:

In that case, I am afraid that many articles would be applicable for the reassessment for the references mentioned for TOI. -

11520: 11224: 9352: 9275: 7012: 300: 11444: 8981:

We wait till we get the response. If not, i will have to raise individual page move requests and i don't want to do that. §§

8131:

I like number 3. It looks the most like other WP barnstars and represents our project best, using the same clapboard image.

13426: 13322: 13275: 13228: 13149: 13122: 12888:

banner, which directs those articles to this task force. Otherwise, those biography articles will not be included once the

12281: 12047: 11458: 11334: 11016: 10715: 10561: 10511: 10432: 10000: 9844: 9802: 9621: 9540: 9378: 9312: 9181: 9143: 9107: 9057: 8992: 8958: 8919: 8762: 6759: 6443:

and several related discussions indicate that a redirect would be acceptable by at least some of this project's members. —

4119: 1892:

is at GA quality IMO (GA review ongoing), but it may not be comprehensive till mid-2013 when all awards for 2012 are over.

1694:

to be a FA, so that it appears on the main page on its 100th anniversary. It would be great if Vensatry puts a mail in the

13335: 6693: 1723:

to FA is going to be very tough. Anyways, I'll not say that to be an impossible task. It requires lot of offline sources.

1281:

can become FL or not as its 2 year old event. Senior editors should clarify on this so that I can work on it accordingly.

10874:, which I have read. And yes, it's the best source for all the three movies in the Apu trilogy (especially the third). -- 10676: 9584: 8669:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:LinkSearch&limit=500&offset=0&target=http%3A%2F%2F*.chakpak.com

8222: 306: 12653:

people supported it but there are urgent need of improvements to make it appear on front page. Issues are discussed on

11073:

Hello fellow friends. I need your opinions. I am currently in the process of restructuring a film article, which is the

4212:

Seeing his name and his edit history, this user is close to INCINE, so I thought of discussing possible action here. ~*~

12742:

banner instead. This applies to all of the film task forces as well, and of the other task forces using the parameters

12728:, the Film project does not include actors, directors and filmmakers. Those people are covered by adding the parameter 12087: 11776:

if not notable or radically cleaned up/wikified if notable. There are so many I haven't bothered to tag them all yet.

11567: 9321:

I see your point, but it still think that it would be a pity to dismantle the excellent collection of film lists under

6777: 5876: 4404:

in Malayalam, but I can't comment much about the other South Indian industries. The most recent inclusion has been the

2110:, which could wait for later due to their already better quality. What about some iconic films of Amitabh Bachchan? ~*~ 13237:

I apologize for any frustration, but the truth is that the majority of articles about Indian actors and filmmakers do

9235: 9209: 8271:

never mind...I didn't get the idea :D Actually I had that idea but thought that i might be awkward.But it seems great

2170:, what an absolutely beautiful film. The best example to showcase the changing face of Indian cinema. Has my support. 1521:

I'm not much into Regional Cinema and hence I could list only Bollywood names since my knowledge is only up to that.--

13295: 12712: 11635: 10606: 10321: 8834: 6741:

page about one of these other titles, being pre-emptive in dealing with such could prevent confusions in the future.

6503: 4385: 4377: 12951:

parameter. I understand that the template is locked, but any editor can submit an edit request. What you need, is a

1035: 403:

GAN for these articles? I don't think it's possible. The best thing you could do is bring them upto B class levels.

11606:. Can anything be done? There is not much use in leaving warnings, because the IP address keeps shifting slightly. 10577: 7500:

rather than this. I am not trying to start a fight here, just a genuine concern, that I feel should be addressed.--

6537:. And this is not applicable for just these article. Almost all AfDs can terminate in redirect then. Can't they? §§ 215: 11413:

Anyone who is able to provide insight into the reliability of reviewbol is invited to share their perspectives at

6622:

new chap seeing a redlink and deciding to fill it. That said, the 'redirect instead of AfD' would be a good idea (

6234: 11974: 11921: 11024: 9923: 9883: 9394: 9322: 9239: 8884: 8311: 7627: 7574: 7497: 7340: 6138:

response (with the exception of "Zara Dil Ko Thaam Lo", and even that was nothing eye-popping statistically). ~*~

5471:

Not yet. Sourcing will be a big problem. I was told by a fellow editor that websites such as those listed above (

1664:, but that's another one that receives too much unwanted attention from folks promoting the regional industries. 51: 17: 4733: 4229: 649: 12882: 12767:

I don't claim to understand all of this stuff, but did you see the statement under 'Tagging and assessment' at

12736: 12436: 11765: 8018: 7133:

The IP editor added embedded navboxes to another 8 Indian film director articles, which I have also processed.

6919: 658:

being a leading actor in Indian cinema, articles on his films need expansion. can anyone pls view the articles

367: 10414: 10299:

I support merging all of this stuff into one article, unless and until it is so unwieldy it has to split, per

8731: 12396: 12258:

Added. That's 12 new FAs, and a quick count shows 13 new GAs, but some of those could have been missed also.

11861: 11835: 10421:. I cant find any reliable sources to check which one is fake. But i think Shah is right one. Help needed. §§ 10206: 9610:

importance either. But i am sure someone else will revert it. These rating are just for maintenance works. §§

8809: 8613: 7879: 5974: 4924:

generally, it is crap nowadays & the standard of English written in it often gives rise to much ambiguity

3826: 2725: 2057:

stand out from the rest (and can be made into FA's); among regional cinema, we have several examples such as

13302:

Hello task force! Anybody have any ideas on where to find a reliable source for box office gross totals for

10759:

I was worried about some of the claims made in MEA, and lost my partner. I then got sidetracked to work on

9523:

is not an actor, her contribution to Indian cinema is huge and hence her article is also of Top-importance.

7809:

Hello people..I have created a few barnstar designs for Indian Cinema Barnstars.Please leave your comments.

11248: 10418: 9156:

appears to be one of the main contributor to these articles. I'll ping him and ask his opinion about this.

8642: 6734: 6711: 5239:

the following five awards apart from other two awards which are no longer held. Leave me your thoughts! --

4233: 4125: 4087: 4056: 2414:

has also kick-started. I'm already cooped up with two articles now, but I shall try my best to help out on

1064:(Currently under Peer review after previous two FA reviews. Would most probably be FA by the time we want.) 8624: 7394:

I can read what it was intended for, please comment on the merits/demerits of the South Indian barnstar.--

2440:. All are requested to help in it. We will be taking up the 58th article only after this list becomes FL. 12549: 11950: 9959:

have been rather intermittent in recent years and yet they have their own articles, while languages like

9749: 9708: 9161: 8792: 8571: 8543: 8006: 7956: 7744: 7710: 7486: 7264: 7190: 7002: 6164: 5099: 4836: 4800: 1997: 1260: 13264:

problem on how do we get all the articles that are biographies and are concerned with Indian cinema?? §§

11164:"which suggests that theatrical poster be used and in case that isn’t found, DVD cover etc can be found" 6506:). I doubt any so created would be deleted, but I can think of several better uses for editors' time. — 1642:, but there are few (and some contradicting) sources online. It would require offline research as well. 282:

True. Some editor redirected it to the Back in Action article, so I'll have to open a move proposal. ~*~

13172: 12967: 12941: 12910: 12872: 12827: 12772: 12617: 12488: 11970: 11651: 11514: 8685: 7764: 6765: 6272: 5882: 5881:

I have observed that there are several articles created for Indian film songs. These can be seen under

5820: 5772: 5722: 5463: 5443: 5251: 5081:

was made in Hindi as 13b but I don't see any page for it. Some more examples for simultaneous make are

4751: 4732:

Thanks for responding Bineet Ojha but i believe you are a bit late and i have already requested a move

4652: 4186: 4172: 4139: 4101: 4070: 4016: 4002: 3976: 3962: 3934: 3920: 3894: 3854: 3840: 3807: 3793: 3761: 3747: 3704: 3690: 3664: 3650: 3618: 3604: 3576: 3562: 3529: 3515: 3480: 3466: 3440: 3426: 3370: 3356: 3325: 3311: 3280: 3266: 3235: 3221: 3188: 3174: 3143: 3129: 3096: 3082: 3058: 3044: 3013: 2999: 2966: 2952: 2928: 2914: 2890: 2876: 2843: 2829: 2798: 2784: 2753: 2739: 2706: 2692: 2661: 2647: 2616: 2602: 2561: 2547: 2246:

Ok. List is growing. Let's make some concrete plans. I am taking up the responsibility for the article

1583: 1432:

a FA, considering there arent enough sources about it. But there is a slight chance of making it a GA.

106: 42: 13342:. However articles can be accessed through the home. New consensus has to take place and immediately. 12100:

I don't know how many were actually displayed on the front page, but I know that Priyanka Chopra was.

10500:. I suppose this is some different Kaushal Singh as our Singh is claimed to have been born in 1993. §§ 8661:

Knowledge:Help desk#wish to remove all the deadlinks related to my site on Knowledge. how can i do it?

1210: 1051:(All our current FAs have made their appearances once and i don't think we should/can use them again.) 13386:

Even if their search function works they will not provide the articles for free, man its a business!

13182: 12813: 11707: 11418: 11277: 11126: 9636: 9555: 9504: 9466: 9411: 9348: 9271: 9006: 8972: 8934: 8179: 7038: 6750: 6719: 6579: 6542: 6493: 6479: 6374: 6046: 5988: 5860: 5643: 5517: 5409: 5344: 4886: 4809:

Well, as I said the authors's name will be explicitly mentioned at the beginning of the article like

4612: 4598: 4544: 4499: 4485: 4322: 4241: 4158: 4107: 4081: 4050: 3880: 3733: 3548: 3501: 3412: 3342: 3297: 3252: 3207: 3160: 3115: 3030: 2985: 2862: 2815: 2770: 2678: 2633: 2588: 2533: 2449: 2433: 2227: 1597: 1383: 1323: 1282: 1278: 1201: 1093: 1087: 932: 713: 607: 570: 552: 329: 189: 148: 12340: 8466: 346:

for the quick responses. This is heartening for a newbie :) . I have moved the article to mainspace

13422: 13271: 13224: 13145: 13118: 12472: 12062: 12011: 11454: 11330: 11273: 11118: 10557: 10507: 10428: 10350: 10289: 10269: 10219: 10135: 10063: 9996: 9979: 9971:

have been equally or more regularly awarded in recent years, and yet are on the intermittent page.

9840: 9826: 9798: 9617: 9536: 9374: 9308: 9177: 9139: 9103: 9053: 8988: 8954: 8915: 8758: 7058: 6643: 6502:

Note that the essay is against creating redirects for redirects sakes (i.e. creating redirects for

6325:

Should we infer that we can make redirects of possibly all Indian songs? They are cheap after all.

5388:

I personally feel all the awards mentioned by BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ are notable enough to be mentioned.

5171: 5086: 4294: 4208: 1690:

Sorry for the late rely, was damn busy yesterday. One thing I could see is that all are supporting

1468:) should feature on Main page. Though I acknowledge the immense contributions and super-stardom of 954: 7846: 7831: 1888:

Rang De Basanti seems to a GA state currently (will need work). The A class is a 2009 assessment.

12320: 11891: 11669: 11663: 10457: 10371: 10115:

Hello Vivvt, I was disappointed that you have reverted my work of creating separate articles for

9763: 9652: 9194: 9123: 8901: 7469: 7424: 7278: 6389:

create redirects of songs from a certain album, targeted at that album, but most people don't. —

4982: 4662: 4576:

You may want to raise a merge proposal and discuss on the talk page to avoid constant reverts. -

4370: 4180: 4010: 3970: 3928: 3888: 3848: 3801: 3755: 3698: 3658: 3612: 3570: 3523: 3474: 3434: 3364: 3319: 3274: 3229: 3182: 3137: 3090: 3052: 3007: 2960: 2922: 2884: 2837: 2792: 2747: 2700: 2655: 2610: 2555: 13756: 11356:

know where to link to. Could any member of this project find the correct disambiguator (perhaps

9890: 8772: 8166:

Also i have another suggestion. Few months back Vensatry had suggested giving award on lines of

2468:. All are requested to help expand/improve/cleanup the article to make it a possible FA. Thanks 13168:

parameter are explained above. I understand that you feel this task force is more important to

12562: 12461: 11999: 11715: 11597: 11440: 11312: 11260: 11059: 10366:. I was invited by RfC bot, however I can't contribute to this topic due to lack of knowledge. 9745: 9704: 9157: 8788: 8482: 8286: 8209: 8167: 8042: 8002: 7985: 7952: 7926: 7904: 7861: 7740: 7482: 7301: 7260: 7186: 6998: 6820: 6471: 6340: 5760:

awards, all of which are well-known in Hindi cinema, and are awarded regularly every year. --

5504:

Oh no! Bad!!! We are using the NFA issued booklet as the basic source on all related articles.

5095: 4832: 4796: 4202: 3486: 2021: 1437: 1020: 739: 696: 685: 660: 592: 521: 493: 435: 393: 377: 13407:

Don't worry. SRK's fans will figure out how to get the numbers out even without subscription.

11122: 11037:

Improving coverage about Indian women filmmakers, actors, directors, producers, and executives

8967:

Yeah, but your question has been there for a long time. How much longer will we have to wait?

4133: 4095: 4064: 13311: 12613: 12581: 12513: 12484: 12019: 11724: 11640: 11477:

references, boxofficeindia became a source that we could reliably use. Any thought on ibos?--

11269: 10520:

Whatever may be the outcome of this confusion, it has led us to a seemingly attractive film,

10311: 9461:

Good question! and appropriate answer by Dwaipayan ;) After this, I'm thinking to create the

9242:

and its subcategories. Its scope includes all these Bollywood articles, but goes a lot wider.

9198: 8676: 7760: 7542: 7050: 6908: 6856: 6810: 6661: 6615: 6557: 6511: 6448: 6428: 6394: 6304: 6086: 5886: 5810: 5762: 5712: 5453: 5433: 5303: 5241: 5128: 5067: 5002: 4822: 4785: 4626: 4413: 4381: 3718: 3714: 9529:

being one of classic hits, is also a top-importance article. Hope your doubt is answered. §§

7481:

sufficient to deduce that the item will be used in a defamatory sense and start a war here.

5756:

of the awards - there is a separate section for that. I suggested that we only add the five

13579: 13479: 12662: 12202: 11985: 11936: 11925: 11904: 11796: 11675: 11482: 11320: 11204: 11083: 10944: 10926: 10834: 10795: 10750: 10731: 10664: 10625: 10529: 10388: 10377: 9911: 9871: 9632: 9588: 9551: 9500: 9452: 9341: 9264: 9084: 9002: 8968: 8930: 8741: 8720: 8175: 8156: 7292: 7284: 7170: 7138: 7124: 7086: 6743: 6715: 6702: 6575: 6538: 6489: 6475: 6370: 6332: 6143: 6108: 6019: 5984: 5963: 5943: 5856: 5639: 5532: 5513: 5405: 5370: 5340: 5265: 5182: 4882: 4719: 4685: 4608: 4594: 4540: 4495: 4481: 4318: 4283: 4237: 4217: 4145: 3940: 3767: 3710: 3628: 2575: 2445: 2423: 2390: 2338: 2319: 2296: 2263: 2223: 2157: 2137: 2115: 1948: 1838: 1754: 1710: 1626: 1593: 1571: 1417: 1379: 1319: 1309: 1244: 1197: 1007: 994: 979: 928: 870: 709: 636: 603: 548: 347: 343: 325: 287: 224: 185: 144: 12654: 11969:

is India based but it is a Hollywood movie. My doubt is that should it be included in the

7816: 5480: 2241: 1878:

becomes a FA, we wouldn't want a film which has "worst film" in the FA blurb on this day.

1184:

Please add other articles that you feel might have good chance. Other suggestion, besides

8: 13735: 13701: 13661: 13616: 13595: 13545: 13500: 13416: 13372: 13265: 13218: 13139: 13112: 13054: 12996: 12925: 12856: 12784: 12701: 12267: 12220: 12167: 12109: 11966: 11915:. Since there a lot of them I need your help in adding more series. Since there a lot of 11740: 11615: 11585: 11554: 11532: 11501: 11448: 11324: 11171: 11146: 11104: 10772: 10697: 10551: 10501: 10422: 10346: 10285: 10265: 10215: 10131: 10059: 9990: 9975: 9919: 9904: 9896: 9879: 9864: 9834: 9792: 9611: 9566: 9530: 9368: 9302: 9221: 9171: 9133: 9097: 9047: 9033: 8982: 8948: 8909: 8752: 8569: 8541: 8140: 7736: 7668: 7247: 6968: 6639: 6316: 6300: 5841: 5740: 5690: 5665: 5626: 5492: 4907: 4397: 4389: 3874: 3771: 1960:(at least 1 white paper on film alone, many on general portrayal of women in Bollywood), 1673: 1566:

have not been talked about. That, at least to me, looks like a very potent future FA. ~*~

1548: 1136: 810: 758: 355: 314: 266: 13726:? I am almost ready to take this article to GA, but the title has to be settled first. 7287:

about the correct spelling of the film's name. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks.

6589:

ultimately get deleted!!! First go for AfD and then go for RfD and then wait...gosh!! -

13254: 13197: 12978: 12897: 12838: 12755: 12344: 12245: 11912: 11885: 11874: 11759: 11700: 11398: 11369: 11138: 11134: 11130: 10886: 10820: 10593: 10451: 10367: 9731: 9434: 8868: 8604: 8174:

can be converted into 2 awards of silver and golden and can be given annually or so. §§

8074: 7463: 7418: 7377: 7201: 7106: 7070: 7046: 6983: 6944: 6876: 6837: 6790: 6618:

that will remove the redlink, both assisting the reader and reducin the chance of some

6292: 6203: 5790: 5603: 5564: 5317: 5151: 4947: 4846: 4563: 4522: 4448: 4433: 4264: 3819: 3582: 3194: 3102: 2972: 2849: 2712: 2567: 2208: 2175: 2074: 1855: 1809: 1782: 1733: 1656: 1407: 1347: 1129: 1027: 837: 786: 462: 413: 171: 121: 12336: 8618:

Hello. There is currently an editor attempting to make changes to the lead section of

8101:

Glad to see that Strike quickly acted upon my request for images. I like all of them.

4718:

of each film. I will soon start my work on the article, and i am open to other ideas.

1285:

is awaiting an official catalogue. (One provided by DFF is darn corrupt!!). Thanks. -

12601: 12558: 12457: 11857: 11831: 11711: 11657: 11415:

Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Identifying_.22Reviewbol.22_as_reliable_source

11055: 10300: 9670: 9570: 9516: 8558: 8477: 8281: 8204: 8092: 8037: 7980: 7921: 7899: 7527: 7259:

I guess that the best option would be to delete them, as they serve no purpose here.

7054: 7026: 7022: 6262: 6253: 6248: 5505: 5231: 5045: 4935: 4741: 4700: 4670: 4393: 2053: 2047: 2015: 1433: 735: 725: 692: 681: 588: 517: 489: 431: 389: 11602:

There are some IPs 39.32.x.x and 39.47.x.x that keep messing up articles related to

11014:

Women's history month is around the corner, in March, and we're planning the second

10345:

be independent articles, or should they be a part of the 'Discontinued...' article?

9939:

I feel that we need to rethink the criteria for including a language in the article

9935:

Criteria for inclusion in Discontinued and Intermittent National Film Awards article

9367:

government regulations. That would also be a page filler. Hence better unwritten. §§

7438:

Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_50#South_Indian_Jingoism

6730: 4494:

I agree with Vensatry. Filmography table no, Awards section...read my note above. §§

13307: 12609: 12577: 12509: 12125: 12041:? We did pretty well in 2013. Here is the list of just the new FAs for this year: 12015: 11958: 11750:

Possible COI editor creating new pages that need notability checks and wikification

11630: 11573: 11281: 11241: 11028: 10742: 10445: 10306: 9687: 9574: 9488: 9481: 9403: 9395: 9153: 8672: 8635: 8619: 7998: 7569: 7538: 7062: 7030: 6904: 6852: 6806: 6657: 6553: 6507: 6444: 6424: 6390: 6320: 6081: 6075: 5898: 5124: 5090: 5063: 4998: 4955: 4818: 4781: 4622: 4509: 4409: 2719: 2582: 1977: 1905: 1449: 967: 881: 13476: 10583:

better than me with lot of involvement. Thanks for the support and encouragement.

12658: 12650: 12198: 12072: 11978: 11929: 11478: 11390: 11199: 11185: 11150: 11142: 11096: 11078: 10987: 10940: 10922: 10909: 10858: 10830: 10791: 10760: 10746: 10727: 10681: 10660: 10647: 10621: 10525: 10482: 10251: 10172: 10091: 10022: 9580: 9520: 9499:

is rated as High- too. Shouldn't they all be the same, since they're all actors?

9448: 9077: 8737: 8715: 8589:

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on the Indian Cinema Task Force for a

8552: 8420: 8363: 8153: 7603: 7288: 7179: 7166: 7134: 7120: 7082: 7034: 6600: 6267: 6244: 6140: 6105: 6058: 6016: 5959: 5940: 5528: 5367: 5262: 5214: 5208: 5178: 5027: 4855: 4681: 4351: 4305: 4280: 4214: 4152: 4112: 3866: 3779: 3624: 2979: 2571: 2475: 2420: 2387: 2360: 2316: 2293: 2259: 2154: 2133: 2112: 1944: 1882: 1865: 1833: 1825: 1821: 1751: 1707: 1661: 1650: 1623: 1588: 1568: 1538: 1526: 1414: 1305: 1300: 1264: 1240: 1229: 1149: 1004: 991: 976: 867: 666: 633: 339: 284: 221: 11300: 9519:

whose article is a low-importance one, even if he is also an actor. Even though

1706:

there who will help us to feature it on the main page on the mentioned date. --

452:

Sivaji Ganesan and MGR are currently B class articles. What else do you expect?

50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

13727: 13693: 13653: 13608: 13587: 13537: 13492: 13364: 13192:

task force, and is subject to the same criteria as all other film task forces.

13046: 12988: 12917: 12848: 12776: 12725: 12697: 12441: 12259: 12233:

List of Indian submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film

12212: 12159: 12101: 12052: 12007: 11769: 11736: 11607: 11577: 11546: 11524: 11493: 11316: 11167: 11100: 10764: 10689: 10539: 10264:

In order to have the views of the wider community, I am requesting for comment.

9213: 9025: 8846: 8823: 8519: 8132: 7660: 7239: 6769: 6623: 5833: 5732: 5682: 5657: 5618: 5484: 5116: 5108: 5078: 4902: 3452: 3336: 3291: 2809: 2084: 1870: 1829: 1665: 1543: 1510: 802: 750: 672: 381: 373: 351: 310: 258: 203: 10333:

I would like to ask the question that started off this entire discussion: Can

8818:

need a place on Commons to discuss Indian related subjects. What do yo think?

8410:{{subst:Indian Cinema Barnstar|cinema=Bhojpuri|1=Put your message here. ~~~~}} 7951:

third one, followed by the second, while the others are also welcome to stay.

6353:

And why stop there? We could also prepare redirects for famous dialogues like

5236: 4736:.I think it would be fair that you point out out your objections on that page. 13250: 13193: 13135: 12974: 12893: 12834: 12751: 12356: 12238: 12181: 12138: 12092: 11773: 11725: 11694: 11603: 11361: 11352: 11345: 11292: 10876: 10810: 10586: 10394: 9816: 9781: 9769: 9724: 9700: 9695: 9604: 9496: 9427: 8944: 8861: 8691: 8600: 8067: 7713:, I Agree some Image tweaking would be needed to make it look like a star. -- 7370: 7099: 6976: 6937: 6869: 6830: 6783: 6619: 6284: 6276: 6196: 5783: 5596: 5557: 5389: 5310: 5282: 5202: 5144: 5021: 4556: 4515: 4474: 4426: 4257: 4251: 3988: 3726: 3541: 3246: 3024: 2410: 2275: 2204: 2171: 2148: 2070: 1805: 1775: 1726: 1638: 1611: 1502: 1493: 1485: 1473: 1461: 1340: 1256: 1223: 912: 830: 779: 455: 406: 164: 114: 11961:

Indian or Canadian? I know that it is Indian subcontinent based but is it a

8627:) to see what everyone thought would be the best way to present it. Thanks. 4831:

What is the expansion of "TNN" exactly? Quite a few news articles use that.

2200: 2197: 911:

Well I see there's pretty much a clear consensus here so I'm with you guys.

13575: 12694:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 20#Thalapathy (2013 film)

12543: 12082: 12057: 11850: 11824: 11467: 11431: 11068: 10723: 10538:

Yes Dwaipayanc! We dont have many (is it any?) articles on films which are

9773: 9691: 9662: 9658: 9592: 9070: 9024:

the title is changed to 'XXXX in Bollywood', hence the need for redirects.

8897: 8088: 7523: 6288: 5829: 5476: 5427: 5120: 5082: 4897: 4737: 4696: 4666: 3676: 2939: 2281: 2248: 2127: 2003: 1617: 1498: 1333: 1161: 1155: 655: 9128:

I propose redirecting and reformatting all articles (74 in number) in the

5302:

perhaps the oldest award in the country. At one point of time awards like

5089:. Its better if the latter has a separate article for the Telugu version, 11916: 11291:

Now the references say that the jury of 59th NFA was "K. Satyanarayana" (

11234: 10719: 10615: 10607: 9599:. He is also recipient of two of the top four national civilian awards, 8628: 7042: 7017:

Hi WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. I notice that the articles

6738: 6328: 6296: 6040: 5278: 4951: 3201: 3069: 2856: 2764: 2672: 2627: 1514: 1481: 1465: 1453: 11095:

a) Both images are non free. b) the first image was uploaded in 2010 by

10496: 10413:

I am doubtful on Singh's biography as the July 2012 version seems to be

8904:

be reformated to include events, births, deaths, debuts and be moved to

5679:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_42#Best_sources_for_awards here

1746:

I too agree, but we have almost a year with us. Why can't we? Vensatry (

1152:: 5 Mar 1913 (No established connection with our Project. But still....) 13517:

Yes GA or Fa's should be attended first. So when is the starting time?

12369: 11875: 10977: 10899: 10848: 10637: 10491: 10477: 10398: 10241: 10162: 10081: 10012: 9600: 7462:

And this is exactly why I think en.wiki is no longer a place to edit. —

7226: 6590: 6348: 6217: 6177: 6053: 5902: 5542: 5281:

and Bollywood Movie Awards. What do you think about the Sansui Awards?

4864: 4850: 4766: 4577: 4346: 4300: 3109: 2901: 2527: 2483: 2470: 2356: 2342: 2032: 1522: 1477: 1469: 1457: 1362: 1286: 1269: 1067: 852: 11141:, which makes the action suspicious to any editor, who would normally 10472: 7310: 4607:

Even if its just formality, could you opine at the merger proposal? §§

631:

still has problems which, when wrapped up, will allow another FAC. ~*~

13338:

are dead, that is just out of millions. There is a web-cache present

12413: 11962: 11792:

or at least know to use the AFC Helper Script gadget or manually add

9596: 9492: 9328:

If there is little material for each year, then rather than creating

8842: 8819: 7161:

for deletion. Please express any views you may have on the matter at

7066: 6733:

where the song may be spoken of in context. It was Animeshkulkarni's

6420: 2065: 1489: 13536:

Haha, its not an official thing; just do what you can when you can.

12156:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Notable_articles

7685: 7655: 6247:. This has recently happened with almost all songs that were AfDed. 4254:, if their edits look nonconstructive even after multiple warnings. 1405:

Excellent idea. I was wondering, why not first and foremost work on

13303: 12352: 12348: 9812: 9777: 7212: 7206: 6423:

were modified to point potential searchers at the right article. —

6358: 6280: 5897:

etc. Most of them are not notable enough and qualify for AfD under

5058: 4756:

Do we consider TOI as a reliable source? I believe yes. Anon cited

3494: 3405: 2027: 1644: 1562: 247:

part is just a tag line, and not part of the title. If you look at

208:

Just a small notice so that people don't delete the article again:

12211:

Sounds like a good idea. We should list how many GAs we got too.

12006:

Hi WikiProject, I respectfully request some familiar eyes over at

11754:

All pages created by the relatively new and possibly-COI'd editor

8087:

Great effort!!!Option 1 and 2 would be my choices in that order.--

324:

The article looks good to me. You can move it to article space. §§

13583: 12819:

banner on their talk pages, and consequently should not have the

12427: 12067: 11682: 11046:

We hope you'll participate! You can list your your project focus

11004: 10786: 9889:

As a reference I am attaching the link from the Moser Baer quiz.

8891:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Bollywood debuts in 2010s

5112: 5015: 3590: 2460: 2254: 2090: 1235: 621: 577: 249: 210: 7568:

Clarify: Good Heavens ! Apologies if I was not clear enough. As

6134:

fail notability. Heck, that films' soundtrack received a rather

4553:

I did once, but there is a user who is constantly reverting it.

2203:

can financially support for the printing copies of that book --

12646: 12077: 11807: 11688: 10403: 9525: 6258: 6243:

in AfDs, the closing admin will come and redirect them because

5033: 4929: 3948: 3906: 3636: 2287: 2132:

detailed read later, But looks like it could be a little gem.--

2009: 1904:(all GAs) may have good references due to age and influence. -- 1217: 1060: 990:

Great work Anit, that was the first stepping stone. Thanks! --

974:. Do have a look and put your thoughts here about the move. ~*~ 627: 583: 13692:

films? BOI was our #1 source, and now it's essentially gone.

9825:

Looks uncredited to me. Didn't find his name in the film. But

8353:{{subst:Indian Cinema Barnstar|1=Put your message here. ~~~~}} 13757:

http://c2w.com/quizzes/94820-Moserbaer-Friday-Iqbal/questions

13688:

Now, where are we supposed to get box office information for

13489:

WP:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Notable articles

12452:

I request someone to read them thoroughly and decide whether

12423:"'Bhaktha Prahladha': First Telugu talkie completes 81 years" 11576:

and give your opinion regarding when this film was released.

11231:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film#Placement of alternate titles

10210: 8708: 8234: 7018: 6627: 3154: 2314:, but the article is going to be one hell of a tough job. ~*~ 2059: 1943:

anymore, otherwise that would be a great candidate as well.--

1919:

would probably be the worst representative of Indian cinema!

1864:

needs to improved at least to be in a GA state to be in OTD.

1621:. Both should not be too difficult to improve, I believe. ~*~ 1506: 587:

which has been labelled as a GA, though it looks like an FA.

13245:

parameter, because it should only be used on articles about

11304: 8703: 4477:. Media keeps printing all such rubbish things very fondly.) 4236:. Its annoying that we cannot rely on his edit summaries. §§ 12546:, Ilankai Tamil Sangam, Sachi Sri Kantha, December 12, 2012 11436: 11074: 11040:

Developing content about women owned Indian film businesses

8690:

While the use of reliable aggregator sites is accepted per

6416: 6366: 5472: 5423: 5039: 4761: 731: 12606:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Kuladheivam Rajagopal

12501:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Kuladheivam Rajagopal

11473: 11409:

reliability of review aggregation site is under discussion

10058:, because they are clearly being awarded "intermittently". 430:

So u can u pls re-check the articles, and re-assess them?

12916:. Will that be good enough? I cannot edit that template. 11814:

alone until the complex history split/merge requested at

11629:

probably warn them and see whether they stop after that.

7947:

Impressive indeed, Srikar. My obvious support is for the

385: 12284:

achieved GA status on Jan 2, but main work was in 2013.

11973:? If possible then direct all your comments or opinions 11286:

National Film Award for Best Film on Other Social Issues

6710:

as precedence for future. Though there is huge essay on

5638:

Sure! Give us the link when you start the discussion. §§

11928:

only please since I would not be watching this page. -

10808:

further, but with my work load I cannot do it alone. --

10784:

Now that major awards are over, anyone willing to take

9686:

Generally, actors and actresses are expected to follow

9661:

inspite of five references from national newspapers. --

5654:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Best_sources_for_awards

5056:

obviously has Telugu stars and crew, while others like

4918:

Animesh has mentioned this thread to me. My opinion of

1868:

was in OTD on 18 May 2012 (100 years since release of

1215:

Excellent proposal! We should work towards this. While

1139:

wins Nobel prize in 1913 (date of presentation unknown)

12540:, The Hindu, Cinema Plus, December 4, 2010 19:57 IST . 12372:

but not notable for Knowledge, out of project scope. —

11299:

and winner of NFA is credited as "K. Sathyanarayana" (

11023:

This event, which is organized by volunteers from the

9253:

wouldn't be long before hey had to be split out again.

7626:

After reading the above discussion I have created the

4473:(That article is probably kept just because it passes 2495:

Participants are requested to add new entries to this

13574:

All of the FAs are done now except a couple links on

11731:

This BLP is completely unreferenced and currently at

10718:

is almost at the end of the featured list candidacy,

5049:, where the lead cast is the same one article is apt. 13066:

The next day never came, let me first untangle it. —

12771:? This this correct or not? Also under 'Tasks' at 10659:

So be it! I've started to provide review comments.--

9744:

Based on a deeper look, it appears to be otherwise.

4780:

above article is apparently from some other source.

135:

I don't want that ever. That's given to old people!

12769:

Knowledge:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

11272:, a veteran actor in Telugu films. There is a user 7337:

Knowledge:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

5191:

Apsara Film & Television Producers Guild Awards

4817:. I would only consider these ones as TOI content. 1080:: As of date we have no FL. But we could still try. 11233:. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. 11149:, as this is escalating into an edit war there! -- 10056:Discontinued and Intermittent National Film Awards 9941:Discontinued and Intermittent National Film Awards 9577:where editors take priority articles for editing. 9285:Sounds good; the idea of having list separate and 6528:it is against creating redirects. But it does not 5677:The result was that primary sources are okay. see 2337:With official catalogue released from DFF, me and 1660:is really the one we want for the anniversary; or 1090:(Fairly good in layout. But no reviews till date.) 547:biographies, they might be ranked even below B. §§ 12557:Isn't enough to start a article on this title? -- 9768:I have added a non-notable tag to the article of 7653:You should use an actual star, such as this one: 6735:argument about other songs sharing similar titles 1935:being alreday A class, may be easier to work on. 970:centenary year plans. You can see the suggestion 602:They both still under review. Would pass soon. §§ 12679:Assistance needed at RfD: Thalapathy (2013 film) 12576:Perhaps you would like to create the article. — 10280:RfC: Separate pages for awards in each language? 8667:). There are currently 272 links to the site at 7075:Category:Indian film director navigational boxes 6932:Filmfare Award for Best Music Director – Kannada 4714:, but we can create separate articles for the 2442:(Would save time by avoiding unnecessary edits.) 11816:Knowledge:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen 11812:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/V R Sankar 8833:So, I started a WikiProject India on Commons: 8472:Tho phir sab industries me pharak kya padta hai 7079:Category:Tamil film director navigational boxes 5958:to establish notability. That is unfortunate.-- 4589:Well... i too tried that. But have started the 1070:(Has had two FA reviews, but way back in 2007.) 708:You can always improve any article you want. §§ 13045:Hey Soham. Any possibility of action on this? 10935:I did a quick and partial reading of the book 10686:Knowledge:Peer review/Priyanka Chopra/archive1 10411:s article however credits Shah and not Singh. 10393:Weirdly, two television and film child actors 9943:instead of having its own article. Awards for 2069:which could be worked upon, atleast for a GA. 1239:. We should aim for a main page on that day.-- 380:. But at the same time, competing actors like 10829:it needs a new pair of eyes which you have!-- 6533:because the bottom line of the essay is that 6335:. On similar lines one could make a redirect 5221:While looking through several books, such as 4876:TOI has started loosing reputation for sure. 13080:SMK Nope, this is beyond my pay grade too. — 12959:for example), which would take the place of 12947:banner for this task force is tied into the 11360:?), and fix the remaining incoming links to 11323:? I personally have no knowledge of them. §§ 9424:Why there isn't a portal for Indian cinema. 8064:Good work! Option 1 and 3 looks good to me. 6705:suggests that a disambiguation article like 2045:Among contemporary Hindi cinema, films like 1304:which was, and is, in a respectable shape.-- 13109:Category:WikiProject Indian cinema articles 10763:, which is almost ready for an FA try now. 10710:Following up on the centenary year planning 8172:(which is eliminated now, i don't know why) 8152:Hi all ;) No 3 looks simple and best :) -- 7153:Template:Chiranjeevi nominated for deletion 6825:Filmfare Critics Award for Best Performance 6700:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Paisa paisa 6441:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Balleilakka 5808:the addition of "each and every award". -- 2341:has started working on 59th NFA. Thanks. - 1096:(Layout work also required. Reviews, none.) 12604:!) and a few more to a new version of the 11054:. Thank you for all you do for Knowledge! 9515:Top-importance. Same will not happen with 9170:Oh! Did not notice that before. Thanks! §§ 8714:I would request all to share their views. 6239:How much so ever you discuss here or vote 1560:I was wondering why certain articles like 11802:in the right place in the submission, and 11768:) need to be reviewed for notability and 11011:Hi everyone at WikiProject India cinema! 10745:is a current featured portal candidate.-- 9236:Talk:Bengali films of 2012#Requested_move 9210:Talk:Bengali_films_of_2012#Requested_move 9130:Category:Lists of Bollywood films by year 8418: 8361: 6572:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kyun Hawa 5980:Zee Cine Award for Best Track of the Year 2285:. Work will start as soon as this darned 2196:If the Wikiproject can make a book like 1964:(at least 5 white papers on film alone), 13722:Can I please get some comments on this: 12612:or others, maybe you could take a look? 8596:here are the questions for the interview 8518: 7943:Which option are you likely to support? 5483:, which I have seen in lots of articles 5197:International Indian Film Academy Awards 4178: 4008: 3968: 3926: 3886: 3846: 3799: 3753: 3696: 3656: 3610: 3568: 3521: 3472: 3432: 3362: 3317: 3272: 3227: 3180: 3135: 3088: 3050: 3005: 2958: 2920: 2882: 2835: 2790: 2745: 2698: 2653: 2608: 2553: 11806:Unless you are an administrator, leave 6866:mean to say both are one and the same. 4406:South Indian International Movie Awards 3872: 2146:Speaking of Bengali cinema, what about 14: 13188:, but the fact remains that this is a 13107:parameter. This adds the talk page in 12608:, contributions there would be great. 12154:Okay, it had not been list as such on 10843:@Dwaipayanc: Are you planning to take 10450:and maybe reference this discussion. — 9591:, which is also a record he hold with 9587:winner. He is also recipient of three 8529: 8272: 8021: 7210:which was later 'officially' named as 7204:'s new film was earlier rumored to be 6997:The new page looks better. Good work. 1886:which is A class is a better bet, IMO. 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 12692:, has been nominated for deletion at 12538:Blast from the past: Kula Deivam 1956 12351:in case they have anything to add. -- 11521:Knowledge:Peer review/Sholay/archive1 10480:verifies two of his claimed credits, 9447:Perhaps because it was not created!-- 9332:articles, why not do them by decade: 9212:. I put a link to here on that page. 8221:Strike I need to be given Credit for 6130:songs having separate articles? They 4331: 4293:Few analysis here. Firstly, the user 4131: 4093: 4062: 2273:I'm beginning to formulate plans for 1636:A while back I was trying to improve 13438: 13408: 12600:I've added these references (thanks 12282:Once Upon ay Time in Mumbai Dobaara! 12129: 12048:National Film Award for Best Actress 11911:I have started creating the article 11027:, supports improving coverage about 10716:National Film Award for Best Actress 10543: 9208:A similar discussion was started at 8896:If one happens to see the format of 8226: 8102: 8028: 7970: 7577:or an Industry specific barnstar. -- 6631: 6156: 4166: 4164: 4120:List of accolades received by Ra.One 3996: 3994: 3956: 3954: 3914: 3912: 3834: 3832: 3787: 3785: 3741: 3739: 3684: 3682: 3644: 3642: 3598: 3596: 3556: 3554: 3509: 3507: 3460: 3458: 3420: 3418: 3350: 3348: 3305: 3303: 3260: 3258: 3215: 3213: 3168: 3166: 3123: 3121: 3076: 3074: 3038: 3036: 2993: 2991: 2946: 2944: 2908: 2906: 2870: 2868: 2823: 2821: 2778: 2776: 2733: 2731: 2686: 2684: 2641: 2639: 2596: 2594: 2541: 2539: 1189: 136: 29: 13716:"Shahrukh Khan" or "Shah Rukh Khan" 13636: 13562: 13522: 13450: 13391: 13347: 13030: 12289: 12038: 10490:. So i would guess they are right. 9585:Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award 9297:if the list of films is taken out. 9256:So what I suggest is to create the 8671:. Many of them are from articles. 8550:As of strike's comment, what about 6626:) in cases where there's a clearly 4933:publication or recently-demised UK 307:User:AnshumanF/Abdullah (1980 film) 27: 12649:for front page ITN section and on 12394:Telugu cinema's first talkie film 12088:National Film Award for Best Actor 11003: 10894:I believe yes. He mentioned it as 10790:further, towards a possible FAC?-- 9289:as a separate article. But in the 8625:Talk:Taare Zameen Par#Lead section 6504:every song in Rihanna's repertoire 5527:descriptive statements of facts.-- 4471:. They give awards to themselves. 4458:attention" because i don't expect 1772:Looking forward for more editors. 1428:I dont think its possible to make 28: 13771: 12437:"Telugu Cinema turns a grand 82!" 11000:Women's History Month is in March 9487:______-importance)." Because for 8318:for a special usage. eg. below -- 7969:Srikar!?!?!? How do you know...? 5975:Binaca Geetamala's annual toppers 4508:Is a separate article needed for 4386:Big FM Tamil Entertainment Awards 4378:Norway Tamil Film Festival Awards 2355:primary editor of that article.-- 2217:Book is a brilliant idea Naveen. 1541:? That would be perfect for TFA. 157:I never said old people. I meant 13724:Talk:Shahrukh_Khan#Proposed_move 13439: 13409: 12388:Bhaktha Prahladha's release year 12331:that contained a description of 12130: 12037:Remember this discussion on the 11380: 10544: 8889:Recently a group of articles of 8582:Indian Cinema Task Force in the 8557: 8551: 8530: 8419: 8362: 8273: 8262: 8227: 8191: 8103: 8029: 8022: 7971: 7878: 7860: 7845: 7830: 7815: 7798:Proposed Barnstars(Please !vote) 7684: 7654: 7602: 7319:The South Indian Cinema Barnstar 7309: 6707:User:MichaelQSchmidt/Paisa Paisa 6632: 6069: 5235:, a popular website portal also 4339: 4338: 4332: 4179: 4165: 4132: 4094: 4063: 4009: 3995: 3969: 3955: 3927: 3913: 3887: 3873: 3847: 3833: 3800: 3786: 3754: 3740: 3697: 3683: 3657: 3643: 3611: 3597: 3569: 3555: 3522: 3508: 3473: 3459: 3433: 3419: 3363: 3349: 3318: 3304: 3273: 3259: 3228: 3214: 3181: 3167: 3136: 3122: 3089: 3075: 3051: 3037: 3006: 2992: 2959: 2945: 2921: 2907: 2883: 2869: 2836: 2822: 2791: 2777: 2746: 2732: 2699: 2685: 2654: 2640: 2609: 2595: 2554: 2540: 1763: 1190: 137: 33: 12634:Gulzar - Dadasaheb Phalke Award 11358:Harmeet Singh (cinematographer) 11117:Kotak, see here for clarity on 10988: 10979: 10910: 10901: 10859: 10850: 10648: 10639: 10252: 10243: 10173: 10164: 10092: 10083: 10023: 10014: 9907:) 12:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 9899:) 12:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 9867:) 12:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 9772:who claims to be the writer of 9703:. The same could be done here. 9491:, it is rated as Top-, and for 9468: 9413: 9364:List of Bollywood films of YYYY 9323:Category:Lists of films by year 9240:Category:Lists of films by year 8507: 8501: 8448: 8442: 8391: 8385: 8329: 8323: 8312:Template:Indian Cinema Barnstar 8248: 8242: 8120: 8114: 7785: 7779: 7724: 7718: 7641: 7635: 7628:Template:Indian Cinema Barnstar 7588: 7582: 7575:Template:Indian Cinema Barnstar 7511: 7505: 7498:Template:Indian Cinema Barnstar 7451: 7445: 7405: 7399: 7354: 7348: 7228: 6601: 6592: 6570:Hmm! Btw, why was this deleted 6219: 6179: 6162: 6158: 5926: 5920: 5904: 5544: 4866: 4768: 4579: 2344: 2034: 1364: 1288: 854: 772:Superlatives in Filmfare Awards 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film 13750: 12518:18:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 12031:Centenary year progress report 10688:. Want to apply for FAC soon. 9886:) 12:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 9402:Hello friends, I've nominated 8877:03:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 8851:15:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 8828:16:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 8797:10:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 8746:05:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 8727:04:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 8681:01:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 8655:Dead links to Indian film site 6920:Filmfare Best Film of 50 Years 6778:Filmfare Special Award – South 5710:deserve a mention as well. -- 5094:pages for simultaneous makes. 2219:Didn't know about this at all. 1298:Vivvt's comment reminds me of 962:I have put forth a request at 625:has passed the GA nomination. 13: 1: 13127:11:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 13088:13:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 13074:13:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 13062:13:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 12380:13:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 12361:21:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC) 12275:08:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 12254:05:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 12228:21:28, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 12207:15:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 12193:15:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 12182: 12175:15:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 12150:14:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 12139: 12117:14:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 11944:07:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 11745:17:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC) 11225:Placement of alternate titles 11205: 11200: 11129:on him, and called him to be 11084: 11079: 10870:I assume Tito meant the book 10669:01:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 10655:00:44, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 10630:18:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC) 10566:08:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 10534:07:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 10516:07:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 10494:however lists some 1992 film 10464:05:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 10437:05:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 10207:Indian national football team 10099:15:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC) 10068:01:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC) 10030:17:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 10005:04:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 9984:07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 9474:13:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 8841:Please come and participate! 8650:23:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 7013:Embedded filmography navboxes 5037:. But in such instances like 2502: 2031:, for that matter. Thanks. - 1188:are needed and hence welcome. 301:Feedback on userspace article 257:there as well on the poster. 13669:16:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 13644:15:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 13624:17:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 13603:17:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 13570:14:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 13553:13:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 13530:04:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 13508:20:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 13458:05:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 13431:04:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 13399:04:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 13380:18:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 13355:17:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 13323:BOI Revamp = Ultimate crisis 13164:My reasons for removing the 13038:17:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 13004:17:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12983:16:52, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12933:16:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12902:16:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12864:16:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12843:15:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12792:15:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12760:14:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 12586:04:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 12567:14:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC) 12297:17:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 11898:11:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 11842:17:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC) 11339:04:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 11295:). The director of the film 11256:00:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 11211:08:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 11189:05:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 11176:04:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 11154:04:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 11109:12:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 11090:11:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 11064:21:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 11050:, and also help improve our 10995:03:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 10949:03:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 10931:06:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10917:04:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10890:04:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10866:04:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10839:03:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10824:03:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10800:03:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 10780:14:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 10755:05:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC) 10736:05:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC) 10602:13:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 10475:only features on-air shows. 10382:08:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 10355:08:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 10327:07:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 10294:18:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 10274:18:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 10259:17:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 10224:17:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 10180:16:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 10140:08:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 9928:12:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 9754:16:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 9740:15:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 9713:14:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9681:08:24, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9641:14:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9626:04:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9560:20:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 9545:09:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 9509:21:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 9457:18:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 9443:16:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 9419:15:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 9383:05:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 9358:18:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 9317:04:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 9281:21:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 9229:19:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 9204:12:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9186:12:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9166:12:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 9148:09:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 9112:09:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 9092:21:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 9062:16:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 9041:16:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 9011:21:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 8997:08:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 8977:00:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 8963:09:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 8939:16:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 8430:The Bhojpuri Cinema Barnstar 7709:This one already exists at 6774:Critics Award for Best Actor 6760:Critics Award for Best Actor 7: 13478:. The documentation is at 13417: 13266: 13219: 13140: 13113: 13025:I'll take a shot tomorrow. 12185: 12142: 12024:01:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 11993:05:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 11868:18:34, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 11720:23:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 11656:In India the production of 11449: 11325: 11162:Slight logical confusion – 10705:17:49, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 10684:peer review underway here: 10677:Priyanka Chopra peer review 9849:04:36, 6 October 2012 (UTC) 9821:14:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 9807:08:28, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 9786:16:28, 4 October 2012 (UTC) 8924:09:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 8767:08:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 8609:16:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC) 7711:Template:Bollywood Barnstar 7630:barnstar, comments please-- 6355:Mooche ho to Nathulal jaise 6126:Why the hell are those two 5591:Comment to Bollywood Dreamz 4207:After ignoring and warning 1998:Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham... 1509:,.. (Ohh there are plenty 1277:Btw, I am not sure whether 10: 13776: 13280:03:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC) 13259:01:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC) 13233:16:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC) 13202:19:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 13154:18:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 12773:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 12706:18:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC) 12667:09:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC) 12479:There's a pending AfC for 12466:05:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 11971:List of Indian film series 11790:AFC reviewing instructions 11706:As there is a lemma about 11568:Year of release discussion 11540:15:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 11519:We could use some eyes at 11509:15:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 11487:15:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC) 11463:12:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 11427:12:18, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 11403:09:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC) 11374:09:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 11344:Disambiguation needed for 9238:affects over 850 lists in 8574:16:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8546:15:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8514:17:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8490:15:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8455:15:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8398:15:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8373:The Indian Cinema Barnstar 8336:17:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8294:14:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 8255:14:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 8217:14:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 8184:17:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8160:17:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 8148:12:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 8127:13:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 8097:11:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 8083:10:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 8050:10:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 8011:10:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 7993:10:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 7961:10:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 7934:14:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 7912:09:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 7807:and Interested to butt in) 7792:13:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 7769:00:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 7749:14:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 7731:17:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7676:17:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7648:17:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7613:The Indian Cinema Barnstar 7595:17:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7547:15:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7532:13:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7518:13:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7491:13:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7476:12:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7458:11:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7431:11:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7412:11:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7386:10:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7361:10:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 7269:14:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 6766:59th Filmfare Awards South 6754:18:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 6724:12:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 6331:is also now redirected to 6315:as it was closed by Admin 6273:Yeh Hum Aa Gaye Hain Kahan 5883:Category:Songs by language 5877:Indian film songs articles 5865:08:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 5803:The question is not what, 5467:01:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 5447:22:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5414:20:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5400:20:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5376:10:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5349:10:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5326:07:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5293:06:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5277:I support this - plus the 5271:05:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 5255:01:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 4950:to consider, of course. - 1931:- anything is better. And 1584:Category:Indian epic films 968:Indian Cinema task force's 13743:01:36, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 13296:Drishyam box office gross 12801:, and should include the 12713:Indian biography articles 12657:, please help. Regards, - 12655:Knowledge: ITN/C#April 12 12622:12:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 12493:15:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 12445:. 7 February 2013. p. 10. 11957:This is my doubt. Is the 11708:multiple-language version 11305:http://satishkasetty.com/ 11278:59th National Film Awards 11125:, where you start making 11025:WikiWomen's Collaborative 11017:WikiWomen's History Month 10038:In that case, awards for 9495:, it is listed as High-. 8835:Commons:WikiProject India 8704:http://www.reviewgang.com 8425: 8368: 8314:I have added a parameter 7918:Option 4 is eliminated. 7690: 7683: 7608: 7601: 7315: 7308: 7297:22:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 7283:There is a discussion at 7255:20:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 7234:15:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 7218:(That reminds of RfD for 7195:15:11, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 7175:05:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 7143:05:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 7129:06:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 7115:06:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 7096:Please go ahead and fix. 7091:05:11, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 7039:Suresh Krishna (director) 7007:09:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 6992:16:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 6953:07:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 6913:21:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 6885:15:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 6861:15:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 6846:06:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 6815:23:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 6799:17:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 6666:05:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 6650:22:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6608:13:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6584:12:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6562:10:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6547:10:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6516:09:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6498:08:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6484:08:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6453:08:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6433:08:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6399:08:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6379:07:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 6225:16:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 6212:18:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 6185:18:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 6171:12:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 6149:17:19, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 6112:17:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 6089:16:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 6062:08:05, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 6047:Dushman Mera (Don 2 song) 6025:05:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 5993:18:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 5968:18:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 5949:17:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 5933:17:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 5910:17:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 5849:16:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 5824:21:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 5799:10:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 5776:22:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 5748:21:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 5726:03:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 5698:21:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 5673:16:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 5648:12:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 5634:00:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 5612:13:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 5573:13:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 5550:14:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 5537:14:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 5522:13:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 5500:20:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 5160:17:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 5137:The lede (of the article 5133:20:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 5115:has its own page as does 4960:07:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 4914:07:27, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 4891:07:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 4872:16:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 4675:15:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 4617:12:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 4603:13:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4585:13:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4572:12:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4549:17:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 4531:17:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 4504:10:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 4490:10:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 4442:09:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 4418:09:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 4355:08:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4327:08:45, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4309:08:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4289:09:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 4273:05:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 4246:12:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 4223:11:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 4130: 4092: 4082:59th National Film Awards 4061: 4051:58th National Film Awards 4041: 4007: 3967: 3925: 3885: 3798: 3695: 3655: 3609: 3471: 3395: 3087: 2957: 2919: 2518: 2479:05:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC) 2454:10:49, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 2434:59th National Film Awards 2429:09:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2396:08:18, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2365:06:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2232:08:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 2213:07:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 2180:08:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 2125:I never read the article 1915:Agree with Redtiger that 1700:English Wikiproject India 1283:59th National Film Awards 1279:58th National Film Awards 1094:58th National Film Awards 1088:59th National Film Awards 1013:15:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 998:12:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 985:08:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 937:08:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 923:08:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 887:06:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 876:05:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 860:04:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 846:04:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 818:01:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 795:14:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 766:03:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 744:03:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 718:08:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 701:04:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 642:08:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 557:08:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 526:04:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 360:21:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 334:18:56, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 319:15:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 293:06:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 274:01:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 13709:16:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 12063:Satyajit Ray filmography 11646:18:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 11623:18:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 11593:17:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 11562:17:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 11274:User talk:Satish.kasetty 10578:Withdraw as co-ordinator 9408:Here's a nomination page 8223:the idea of the option 3 7059:Pasupuleti Krishna Vamsi 6080:agree with you. Thanks - 5104:16:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 5087:Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa 5072:15:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 5007:15:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 4859:09:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 4841:16:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 4827:15:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 4805:15:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 4790:09:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 4774:18:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 4746:18:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 4724:17:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 4705:03:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 4690:18:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 4631:09:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 2350:17:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 2325:12:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 2302:16:00, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2268:15:56, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2163:16:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2142:05:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2121:05:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2079:05:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2040:18:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1983:17:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1953:17:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1911:17:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1845:12:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1814:11:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1791:12:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1758:10:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1742:09:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1714:08:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1681:12:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1654:would be a good choice. 1632:06:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 1602:17:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1577:17:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1555:17:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1531:14:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1442:12:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1423:11:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1388:11:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1370:11:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1356:05:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1328:15:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 1314:14:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 1294:14:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 1249:13:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 1206:12:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 1172:Today's featured picture 1047:Today's Featured Article 1002:Sure, and thanks :). ~*~ 732:http://www.mouthshut.com 730:I would like to know if 612:07:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 597:06:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 498:16:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 471:12:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 440:06:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 422:13:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 398:12:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 230:09:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 194:17:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 180:16:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 153:14:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 130:13:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 22:Indian cinema task force 13316:18:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 12730:|filmbio-work-group=yes 11670:David (2013 Tamil film) 11664:David (2013 Hindi film) 11422:aka The Red Pen of Doom 10972:Does anybody has book, 10471:is not listed on IMDb. 9263:How does that sound? -- 9195:Bollywood films of 1950 8902:Bollywood films of 2008 8885:Bollywood films of XXXX 8528:Here comes my version. 8437:Put your message here. 8380:Put your message here. 7343:wherever applicable. -- 7163:the deletion discussion 6616:logical redirect target 4663:Talk:Gangs of Wasseypur 4402:Mathrubhumi Film Awards 2385:That's a good idea. ~*~ 237:Dhoom 3: Back in Action 235:It is currently titled 12892:parameter is removed. 12690:Thalapathy (2013 film) 12686:Thalapathy (2013 film) 12544:MGR Remembered, Part 1 12337:User talk:BDD#Untitled 12039:Centenary year project 11572:Please have a look at 11445:In the news nomination 11441:Dadasaheb Phalke Award 11313:Kasetty Sathyanarayana 11268:We have an article at 11008: 10896:Pather (Apur) Panchali 9469:— Bill william compton 9414:— Bill william compton 8524: 8168:Dadasaheb Phalke Award 7694:The Bollywood Barnstar 7341:Indian Cinema barnstar 7157:FYI, I have nominated 6821:Filmfare Special Award 6712:how other stuff exists 6472:User:Secret of success 6462:Tere Liye Hum Hai Jiye 6409:Lodi (Veer-Zaara song) 6341:Hera Pheri (2000 film) 6337:Baburao Ganpatrao Apte 6309:Kaisi Paheli Zindagani 2418:whenever possible. ~*~ 2022:Do Aankhen Barah Haath 1133:released on 3 May 1913 1116:released on this day." 661:Vettaiyaadu Vilaiyaadu 368:Elevation of the South 12883:WikiProject Biography 12737:WikiProject Biography 12645:Hi, I have nominated 12158:; I just updated it. 11270:Kaikala Satyanarayana 11145:, plus this reeks of 11007: 10804:I would like to take 8810:Categories on Commons 8614:Taare Zameen Par lead 8522: 7659:It could be renamed. 7333:removed this barnstar 7051:Chandra Sekhar Yeleti 6764:In the recently held 6439:And as a final note: 6327:Funny thing to note, 6305:Parineeta (2005 film) 5887:Category:Indian songs 5304:Cinema Express Awards 4660:Gangs of Wasseypurand 4382:Edison Awards (India) 2310:I've started work on 1860:(Changing and adding) 1719:Believe me, bringing 1592:has a fair chance. §§ 1272:is blocked long back. 1186:Project Aim Main Page 1078:Today's Featured List 46:of past discussions. 13580:Lage Raho Munna Bhai 13480:Knowledge:CHECKLINKS 12937:No, the link on the 12906:I see our banner at 12417:. September 9, 2012. 11965:movie. For example, 11676:Gouravam (2013 film) 11447:for your support. §§ 9589:National Film Awards 9463:Indian Cinema Portal 7285:Talk:Ninne Pelladata 7159:Template:Chiranjeevi 6897:Best Action Director 6895:new categories, for 6772:was honoured with a 6703:User:MichaelQSchmidt 6363:Ki...Ki...Ki...Kiran 6333:Krrish (film series) 5895:Category:Tamil songs 5891:Category:Hindi songs 5752:I never said to add 5183:National Film Awards 4469:STAR Parivaar Awards 2291:gets wrapped up. ~*~ 691:Answer my question! 654:I really think that 650:Kamal Haasan's films 516:Answer my question! 239:. It should be just 13437:No doubt they will 12955:parameter (such as 12550:RANGOON RADHA Story 12431:. February 7, 2013. 12409:"Wake up, industry" 11967:Slumdog Millionaire 11951:Indian or Canadian? 11123:User_talk:Titodutta 10054:should be moved to 9362:Well... move it to 7737:South Indian cinema 6535:redirects are cheap 6317:User:The Bushranger 6303:were redirected to 6301:Soona Man Ka Aangan 6287:were redirected to 6275:were redirected to 6245:redirects are cheap 6083:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 4398:Vanitha Film Awards 4396:in Kannada and the 4390:Suvarna Film Awards 4388:in Tamil. Also the 4032: 3386: 2509: 1137:Rabindranath Tagore 12327:I recently closed 11913:Indian film series 11701:Janda Pai Kapiraju 11658:multilingual films 11652:Multilingual films 11545:It is closed now. 11515:Sholay peer review 11472:As far as I know, 11009: 10492:Singh's IMDb entry 9338:1980s in Bollywood 9334:YYY0s in Bollywood 8686:Review aggregators 8566:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 8538:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 8525: 8473: 8412: 8355: 8225:in the file image 7997:Lol, we've met in 7871: 7335:from main page of 7077:(and some also in 7071:Trivikram Srinivas 7047:Bhaskar (director) 6311:on the other hand 6293:Hui Main Parineeta 5119:'s Telugu version 5111:'s Telugu version 4847:Times News Network 4752:The Times of India 4716:critical reception 4712:Gangs of Wasseypur 4653:Gangs of Wasseypur 4030: 3820:Raja Harishchandra 3384: 2507: 2466:up for Peer Review 2438:up for Peer Review 1862:Raja Harishchandra 1800:Well, I feel that 1721:Raja Harishchandra 1692:Raja Harishchandra 1657:Raja Harishchandra 1430:Raja Harishchandra 1408:Raja Harishchandra 1130:Raja Harishchandra 1028:Raja Harishchandra 376:well looks like a 107:Achievement awards 13763: 13746: 13719: 13712: 13685: 13639: 13565: 13525: 13511: 13472: 13453: 13394: 13358: 13350: 13326: 13319: 13299: 13292: 13208: 13173:WikiProject India 13158: 13131: 13098: 13040: 13033: 13022: 13020: 12968:WikiProject India 12942:WikiProject India 12911:WikiProject India 12873:WikiProject India 12828:WikiProject India 12823:parameter on the 12763: 12716: 12709: 12682: 12675: 12637: 12630: 12592: 12570: 12554: 12533: 12521: 12505: 12496: 12476: 12469: 12456:is worth moving. 12449: 12403: 12391: 12384: 12364: 12324: 12317: 12292: 12120: 12097: 12043: 12034: 12027: 12012:WP:INDISCRIMINATE 12003: 11996: 11954: 11947: 11908: 11901: 11880: 11871: 11866: 11865: 11847: 11844: 11840: 11839: 11783: 11423: 11143:assume good faith 10540:reviewed by users 10478:Shah's IMDb entry 10324: 9931: 9914:comment added by 9888: 9874:comment added by 9746:Secret of success 9705:Secret of success 9676: 9517:Sidharth Malhotra 9356: 9330:YYYY in Bollywood 9295:YYYY in Bollywood 9291:YYYY in Bollywood 9287:2012 in Bollywood 9279: 9258:YYYY in Bollywood 9158:Secret of success 8906:2008 in Bollywood 8789:Secret of success 8723: 8471: 8464: 8463: 8460: 8459: 8408: 8403: 8402: 8351: 8003:Secret of success 7953:Secret of success 7891: 7873: 7869: 7855: 7840: 7825: 7808: 7741:Secret of success 7704: 7703: 7624: 7623: 7483:Secret of success 7329: 7328: 7261:Secret of success 7187:Secret of success 7055:K. Vijaya Bhaskar 7027:Seeman (director) 7023:Karu Pazhaniappan 6999:Secret of success 6263:Hum To Bhai Jaise 6254:Aisa Des Hai Mera 6249:Aaya Tere Dar Par 6159:Secret of success 5232:Bollywood Hungama 5096:Secret of success 4936:News of the World 4925: 4845:"TNN" stands for 4833:Secret of success 4797:Secret of success 4591:merger discussion 4452: 4394:Udaya Film Awards 4250:Take the user to 4200: 4199: 4196: 4195: 4026: 4025: 3380: 3379: 2500: 2491: 2054:The Dirty Picture 2016:Akaler Shandhaney 1859: 1841: 1748:being coordinator 1456:, The Khan Trio ( 1273: 1025:On 3rd May 2013, 680:improve I think. 571:GA/FA nominations 184:It was a joke! §§ 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current talk page 13767: 13759: 13754: 13747: 13740: 13734: 13730: 13720: 13713: 13706: 13700: 13696: 13686: 13666: 13660: 13656: 13642: 13638: 13635: 13621: 13615: 13611: 13600: 13594: 13590: 13568: 13564: 13561: 13550: 13544: 13540: 13528: 13524: 13521: 13512: 13505: 13499: 13495: 13473: 13456: 13452: 13449: 13444: 13443: 13442: 13419: 13414: 13413: 13412: 13397: 13393: 13390: 13377: 13371: 13367: 13359: 13353: 13349: 13346: 13329:Box-office India 13327: 13320: 13300: 13293: 13268: 13244: 13221: 13209: 13187: 13183:WikiProject Film 13181: 13177: 13171: 13167: 13159: 13142: 13132: 13115: 13106: 13099: 13059: 13053: 13049: 13042: 13036: 13032: 13029: 13024: 13021: 13001: 12995: 12991: 12972: 12966: 12962: 12958: 12950: 12946: 12940: 12930: 12924: 12920: 12915: 12909: 12891: 12887: 12881: 12877: 12871: 12861: 12855: 12851: 12832: 12826: 12822: 12818: 12814:WikiProject Film 12812: 12808: 12804: 12789: 12783: 12779: 12764: 12749: 12745: 12741: 12735: 12731: 12723: 12717: 12710: 12688:, a redirect to 12683: 12676: 12651:Knowledge: ITN/C 12638: 12631: 12614:Jodi.a.schneider 12593: 12571: 12555: 12534: 12522: 12506: 12497: 12485:Jodi.a.schneider 12481:Tejaswini Lonari 12477: 12473:Tejaswini Lonari 12470: 12450: 12446: 12432: 12418: 12404: 12392: 12385: 12370:film might exist 12365: 12325: 12318: 12295: 12291: 12288: 12272: 12266: 12262: 12252: 12243: 12225: 12219: 12215: 12187: 12184: 12172: 12166: 12162: 12144: 12141: 12135: 12134: 12133: 12126:Deepika Padukone 12121: 12114: 12108: 12104: 12098: 12044: 12035: 12028: 12004: 11997: 11990: 11983: 11959:Elements trilogy 11955: 11948: 11941: 11934: 11909: 11902: 11894: 11888: 11881: 11872: 11855: 11854: 11848: 11829: 11828: 11820: 11801: 11795: 11785: 11778: 11643: 11638: 11633: 11620: 11614: 11610: 11590: 11584: 11580: 11574:Talk:Kati Patang 11559: 11553: 11549: 11537: 11531: 11527: 11506: 11500: 11496: 11451: 11424: 11421: 11388: 11384: 11383: 11351:Hi there. After 11327: 11282:Hope (2006 film) 11253: 11246: 11239: 11207: 11202: 11127:personal attacks 11086: 11081: 10993: 10990: 10982: 10981: 10974:Spirit of Lagaan 10915: 10912: 10904: 10903: 10882: 10879: 10864: 10861: 10853: 10852: 10816: 10813: 10777: 10771: 10767: 10743:Portal:Bollywood 10702: 10696: 10692: 10653: 10650: 10642: 10641: 10600: 10591: 10554: 10549: 10548: 10547: 10504: 10473:Disney's website 10460: 10454: 10449: 10425: 10419:Jan 2012 version 10384: 10325: 10320: 10319: 10317: 10257: 10254: 10246: 10245: 10178: 10175: 10167: 10166: 10097: 10094: 10086: 10085: 10028: 10025: 10017: 10016: 9993: 9930: 9908: 9887: 9868: 9837: 9795: 9738: 9729: 9677: 9672: 9667: 9614: 9533: 9489:Amitabh Bachchan 9471: 9470: 9441: 9432: 9416: 9415: 9404:Portal:Bollywood 9396:Portal:Bollywood 9371: 9347: 9344: 9305: 9300: 9270: 9267: 9234:The proposal at 9226: 9220: 9216: 9201: 9174: 9136: 9100: 9075: 9069: 9050: 9038: 9032: 9028: 8985: 8951: 8912: 8875: 8866: 8755: 8724: 8722: 8718: 8647: 8640: 8633: 8620:Taare Zameen Par 8567: 8562: 8561: 8555: 8539: 8535: 8534: 8533: 8511: 8509: 8503: 8487: 8485: 8480: 8452: 8450: 8444: 8423: 8416: 8415: 8411: 8395: 8393: 8387: 8366: 8359: 8358: 8354: 8340: 8339: 8333: 8331: 8325: 8317: 8306:parameter cinema 8291: 8289: 8284: 8278: 8277: 8276: 8270: 8266: 8265: 8252: 8250: 8244: 8232: 8231: 8230: 8214: 8212: 8207: 8199: 8195: 8194: 8173: 8145: 8139: 8135: 8124: 8122: 8116: 8108: 8107: 8106: 8081: 8072: 8047: 8045: 8040: 8034: 8033: 8032: 8027: 8026: 8025: 7999:Hyderabad, India 7990: 7988: 7983: 7976: 7975: 7974: 7939:Comments go here 7931: 7929: 7924: 7909: 7907: 7902: 7886: 7882: 7868: 7864: 7853: 7849: 7838: 7834: 7823: 7819: 7802: 7789: 7787: 7781: 7761:CorrectKnowledge 7728: 7726: 7720: 7688: 7681: 7680: 7673: 7667: 7663: 7658: 7645: 7643: 7637: 7606: 7599: 7598: 7592: 7590: 7584: 7515: 7513: 7507: 7472: 7466: 7455: 7453: 7447: 7427: 7421: 7409: 7407: 7401: 7384: 7375: 7358: 7356: 7350: 7313: 7306: 7305: 7252: 7246: 7242: 7231: 7230: 7223: 7113: 7104: 7063:Raghava Lawrence 7031:Selva (director) 6990: 6981: 6951: 6942: 6883: 6874: 6844: 6835: 6797: 6788: 6746: 6646: 6637: 6636: 6635: 6606: 6603: 6595: 6594: 6466:Tere Liye (song) 6464:was created for 6413:Tere Liye (song) 6321:User:Crisco 1492 6277:Veer-Zaara#Music 6222: 6221: 6210: 6201: 6182: 6181: 6169: 6168: 6160: 6084: 6073: 6072: 6056: 5930: 5928: 5922: 5907: 5906: 5846: 5840: 5836: 5816: 5813: 5797: 5788: 5768: 5765: 5745: 5739: 5735: 5718: 5715: 5695: 5689: 5685: 5670: 5664: 5660: 5631: 5625: 5621: 5610: 5601: 5571: 5562: 5547: 5546: 5497: 5491: 5487: 5459: 5456: 5439: 5436: 5396: 5324: 5315: 5289: 5247: 5244: 5172:Bollywood Awards 5158: 5149: 5091:Ye Maaya Chesave 4946:. There is also 4923: 4910: 4905: 4898:reliable sources 4869: 4868: 4853: 4771: 4770: 4582: 4581: 4570: 4561: 4529: 4520: 4510:1st SIIMA Awards 4478: 4446: 4440: 4431: 4349: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4303: 4271: 4262: 4184: 4183: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4137: 4136: 4099: 4098: 4068: 4067: 4033: 4029: 4014: 4013: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3974: 3973: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3932: 3931: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3892: 3891: 3878: 3877: 3852: 3851: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3805: 3804: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3759: 3758: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3702: 3701: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3662: 3661: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3616: 3615: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3574: 3573: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3527: 3526: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3478: 3477: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3438: 3437: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3387: 3383: 3368: 3367: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3323: 3322: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3278: 3277: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3233: 3232: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3186: 3185: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3141: 3140: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3094: 3093: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3056: 3055: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3011: 3010: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2964: 2963: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2926: 2925: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2888: 2887: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2841: 2840: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2796: 2795: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2751: 2750: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2720:Dadasaheb Phalke 2704: 2703: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2659: 2658: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2614: 2613: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2583:Amitabh Bachchan 2559: 2558: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2510: 2506: 2503: 2494: 2488: 2473: 2443: 2347: 2346: 2220: 2037: 2036: 1980: 1908: 1853: 1842: 1840: 1836: 1789: 1780: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1740: 1731: 1678: 1672: 1668: 1551: 1546: 1450:Amitabh Bachchan 1367: 1366: 1354: 1345: 1332:I'd like to see 1291: 1290: 1268: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1180:: Can't predict. 1052: 1039: 919: 884: 857: 856: 844: 835: 815: 809: 805: 793: 784: 763: 757: 753: 469: 460: 420: 411: 271: 265: 261: 178: 169: 142: 141: 140: 128: 119: 82: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 13775: 13774: 13770: 13769: 13768: 13766: 13765: 13764: 13762: 13755: 13751: 13736: 13732: 13728: 13718: 13702: 13698: 13694: 13662: 13658: 13654: 13632: 13617: 13613: 13609: 13596: 13592: 13588: 13558: 13546: 13542: 13538: 13518: 13501: 13497: 13493: 13446: 13440: 13410: 13387: 13373: 13369: 13365: 13343: 13325: 13298: 13242: 13185: 13179: 13175: 13169: 13165: 13104: 13055: 13051: 13047: 13026: 12997: 12993: 12989: 12970: 12964: 12960: 12956: 12948: 12944: 12938: 12926: 12922: 12918: 12913: 12907: 12889: 12885: 12879: 12875: 12869: 12857: 12853: 12849: 12830: 12824: 12820: 12816: 12810: 12806: 12802: 12785: 12781: 12777: 12747: 12743: 12739: 12733: 12729: 12721: 12715: 12681: 12636: 12504: 12475: 12454:Bhakta Prahlada 12435: 12421: 12407: 12397:Bhakta Prahlada 12390: 12323: 12321:Choo Mantar 3D? 12285: 12268: 12264: 12260: 12250: 12239: 12236: 12221: 12217: 12213: 12168: 12164: 12160: 12131: 12110: 12106: 12102: 12073:Priyanka Chopra 12033: 12014:. Thank you! 12002: 11986: 11979: 11953: 11937: 11930: 11907: 11892: 11886: 11879: 11799: 11793: 11782:One exception: 11752: 11729: 11654: 11641: 11636: 11631: 11616: 11612: 11608: 11600: 11586: 11582: 11578: 11570: 11555: 11551: 11547: 11533: 11529: 11525: 11517: 11502: 11498: 11494: 11470: 11434: 11419: 11411: 11391:User:Niceguyedc 11381: 11379: 11349: 11263: 11249: 11242: 11235: 11227: 11097:User:Ekabhishek 11071: 11029:women's history 11002: 10985: 10978: 10907: 10900: 10880: 10877: 10856: 10849: 10845:Pather Panchali 10814: 10811: 10773: 10769: 10765: 10761:Priyanka Chopra 10712: 10698: 10694: 10690: 10682:Priyanka Chopra 10679: 10645: 10638: 10612: 10598: 10587: 10584: 10580: 10552: 10545: 10502: 10488:Aao Wish Karein 10483:Tere Mere Phere 10458: 10452: 10443: 10423: 10415:copy-paste work 10391: 10375: 10315: 10310: 10304: 10282: 10249: 10242: 10170: 10163: 10089: 10082: 10020: 10013: 9991: 9937: 9909: 9869: 9835: 9793: 9766: 9764:Writer of Iqbal 9736: 9725: 9722: 9671: 9663: 9655: 9653:Upcoming actors 9633:Red Hat On Head 9612: 9581:Filmfare Awards 9552:Red Hat On Head 9531: 9521:Lata Mangeshkar 9501:Red Hat On Head 9484: 9467: 9439: 9428: 9425: 9412: 9400: 9369: 9342: 9303: 9298: 9265: 9222: 9218: 9214: 9199: 9172: 9134: 9126: 9098: 9096:There we go. §§ 9073: 9067: 9048: 9034: 9030: 9026: 9003:Red Hat On Head 8983: 8969:Red Hat On Head 8949: 8931:Red Hat On Head 8910: 8887: 8873: 8862: 8859: 8812: 8775: 8753: 8734: 8721: 8716: 8709:desimartini.com 8688: 8657: 8643: 8636: 8629: 8616: 8587: 8565: 8556: 8537: 8531: 8498: 8483: 8478: 8476: 8469: 8439: 8432: 8409: 8382: 8375: 8352: 8320: 8315: 8308: 8287: 8282: 8280: 8274: 8263: 8261: 8239: 8228: 8210: 8205: 8203: 8192: 8190: 8176:AnimeshKulkarni 8171: 8170:. The option 4 8141: 8137: 8133: 8111: 8104: 8079: 8068: 8065: 8043: 8038: 8036: 8030: 8023: 7986: 7981: 7979: 7972: 7941: 7927: 7922: 7920: 7905: 7900: 7898: 7892: 7883: 7874: 7865: 7856: 7850: 7841: 7835: 7826: 7820: 7800: 7776: 7715: 7669: 7665: 7661: 7632: 7615: 7579: 7502: 7470: 7464: 7442: 7425: 7419: 7396: 7390:I see you have 7382: 7371: 7368: 7345: 7304: 7281: 7279:Ninne Pelladata 7248: 7244: 7240: 7227: 7217: 7182: 7155: 7111: 7100: 7097: 7035:Siva (director) 7015: 6988: 6977: 6974: 6971: 6949: 6938: 6935: 6881: 6870: 6867: 6842: 6831: 6828: 6795: 6784: 6781: 6762: 6744: 6716:AnimeshKulkarni 6696: 6648: 6644: 6633: 6598: 6591: 6576:AnimeshKulkarni 6539:AnimeshKulkarni 6490:AnimeshKulkarni 6476:AnimeshKulkarni 6371:AnimeshKulkarni 6268:Main Yahan Hoon 6237: 6218: 6208: 6197: 6194: 6178: 6082: 6070: 6054: 5985:AnimeshKulkarni 5917: 5903: 5879: 5857:AnimeshKulkarni 5842: 5838: 5834: 5828:Have a look at 5814: 5811: 5795: 5784: 5781: 5766: 5763: 5741: 5737: 5733: 5716: 5713: 5691: 5687: 5683: 5666: 5662: 5658: 5640:AnimeshKulkarni 5627: 5623: 5619: 5608: 5597: 5594: 5569: 5558: 5555: 5543: 5514:AnimeshKulkarni 5493: 5489: 5485: 5481:National Awards 5457: 5454: 5437: 5434: 5406:AnimeshKulkarni 5390: 5341:AnimeshKulkarni 5322: 5311: 5308: 5283: 5245: 5242: 5215:Zee Cine Awards 5209:Stardust Awards 5179:Filmfare Awards 5174: 5156: 5145: 5142: 5028:Unnaipol Oruvan 4985: 4983:Bilingual films 4908: 4903: 4883:AnimeshKulkarni 4865: 4851: 4767: 4754: 4655: 4609:AnimeshKulkarni 4595:AnimeshKulkarni 4578: 4568: 4557: 4554: 4541:AnimeshKulkarni 4527: 4516: 4513: 4512:at this stage. 4496:AnimeshKulkarni 4482:AnimeshKulkarni 4472: 4438: 4427: 4424: 4373: 4371:New film awards 4347: 4340: 4333: 4319:AnimeshKulkarni 4301: 4269: 4258: 4255: 4238:AnimeshKulkarni 4205: 4153:Cinema of India 4108:Animeshkulkarni 3867:Rang De Basanti 3780:Pather Panchali 2980:Lata Mangeshkar 2486: 2471: 2446:AnimeshKulkarni 2441: 2343: 2244: 2224:AnimeshKulkarni 2218: 2108:Rang De Basanti 2033: 1978: 1970:Rang De Basanti 1966:Pather Panchali 1941:Pather Panchali 1933:Rang De Basanti 1921:Rang De Basanti 1906: 1894:Pather Panchali 1883:Rang De Basanti 1866:Cinema of India 1839: 1834: 1826:Amitabh Bacchan 1822:Cinema of India 1802:Pather Panchali 1787: 1776: 1773: 1764: 1762: 1738: 1727: 1724: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662:Cinema of India 1651:Pather Panchali 1607:Pather Panchali 1594:AnimeshKulkarni 1589:Pather Panchali 1549: 1544: 1539:Cinema of India 1517:and so on..). ' 1380:AnimeshKulkarni 1363: 1352: 1341: 1338: 1320:AnimeshKulkarni 1301:Pather Panchali 1287: 1230:Rang De Basanti 1213: 1198:AnimeshKulkarni 1191: 1174:: I see no way. 1150:Gangubai Hangal 1104:Did you know... 1050: 1033: 1023: 966:concerning the 960: 929:AnimeshKulkarni 913: 882: 853: 842: 831: 828: 811: 807: 803: 791: 780: 777: 774: 759: 755: 751: 728: 710:AnimeshKulkarni 667:Unnaipol Oruvan 652: 604:AnimeshKulkarni 573: 549:AnimeshKulkarni 467: 456: 453: 418: 407: 404: 370: 344:AnimeshKulkarni 326:AnimeshKulkarni 303: 267: 263: 259: 253:, you will see 206: 186:AnimeshKulkarni 176: 165: 162: 145:AnimeshKulkarni 138: 126: 115: 112: 109: 78: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 13773: 13761: 13760: 13748: 13717: 13714: 13684: 13683: 13682: 13681: 13680: 13679: 13678: 13677: 13676: 13675: 13674: 13673: 13672: 13671: 13647: 13646: 13605: 13533: 13532: 13471: 13470: 13469: 13468: 13467: 13466: 13465: 13464: 13463: 13462: 13461: 13460: 13418:Dharmadhyaksha 13402: 13401: 13324: 13321: 13297: 13294: 13291: 13290: 13289: 13288: 13287: 13286: 13285: 13284: 13283: 13282: 13267:Dharmadhyaksha 13220:Dharmadhyaksha 13207: 13206: 13205: 13204: 13157: 13156: 13141:Dharmadhyaksha 13130: 13129: 13114:Dharmadhyaksha 13097: 13096: 13095: 13094: 13093: 13092: 13091: 13090: 13019: 13018: 13017: 13016: 13015: 13014: 13013: 13012: 13011: 13010: 13009: 13008: 13007: 13006: 12714: 12711: 12680: 12677: 12674: 12673: 12672: 12671: 12670: 12669: 12635: 12632: 12629: 12628: 12627: 12626: 12625: 12624: 12591: 12590: 12589: 12588: 12553: 12552: 12547: 12541: 12532: 12531: 12530: 12529: 12503: 12498: 12474: 12471: 12448: 12447: 12442:The Hans India 12433: 12419: 12389: 12386: 12383: 12382: 12333:Choo Mantar 3D 12322: 12319: 12316: 12315: 12314: 12313: 12312: 12311: 12310: 12309: 12308: 12307: 12306: 12305: 12304: 12303: 12302: 12301: 12300: 12299: 12246: 12096: 12095: 12090: 12085: 12080: 12075: 12070: 12065: 12060: 12055: 12053:Kareena Kapoor 12050: 12032: 12029: 12008:Lena (actress) 12001: 12000:Lena (actress) 11998: 11952: 11949: 11906: 11903: 11878: 11873: 11846: 11845: 11803: 11780:Two exceptions 11777: 11751: 11748: 11728: 11723: 11705: 11678:(Telugu/Tamil) 11653: 11650: 11649: 11648: 11599: 11598:SRK IP vandals 11596: 11569: 11566: 11565: 11564: 11516: 11513: 11512: 11511: 11469: 11466: 11450:Dharmadhyaksha 11433: 11430: 11410: 11407: 11406: 11405: 11348: 11342: 11326:Dharmadhyaksha 11317:Satish Kasetty 11262: 11261:Mixed identity 11259: 11226: 11223: 11222: 11221: 11220: 11219: 11218: 11217: 11216: 11215: 11214: 11213: 11192: 11191: 11179: 11178: 11157: 11156: 11119:infobox images 11112: 11111: 11070: 11067: 11044: 11043: 11042: 11041: 11038: 11001: 10998: 10970: 10969: 10968: 10967: 10966: 10965: 10964: 10963: 10962: 10961: 10960: 10959: 10958: 10957: 10956: 10955: 10954: 10953: 10952: 10951: 10711: 10708: 10678: 10675: 10674: 10673: 10672: 10671: 10611: 10605: 10594: 10579: 10576: 10575: 10574: 10573: 10572: 10571: 10570: 10569: 10568: 10553:Dharmadhyaksha 10522:Khooni Dracula 10503:Dharmadhyaksha 10497:Khooni Dracula 10476: 10424:Dharmadhyaksha 10412: 10390: 10387: 10386: 10385: 10380:comment added 10361: 10360: 10359: 10358: 10357: 10347:The Discoverer 10286:The Discoverer 10281: 10278: 10277: 10276: 10266:The Discoverer 10237: 10236: 10235: 10234: 10233: 10232: 10231: 10230: 10229: 10228: 10227: 10226: 10216:The Discoverer 10191: 10190: 10189: 10188: 10187: 10186: 10185: 10184: 10183: 10182: 10149: 10148: 10147: 10146: 10145: 10144: 10143: 10142: 10132:The Discoverer 10128: 10106: 10105: 10104: 10103: 10102: 10101: 10073: 10072: 10071: 10070: 10060:The Discoverer 10033: 10032: 10008: 10007: 9992:Dharmadhyaksha 9976:The Discoverer 9936: 9933: 9856: 9855: 9854: 9853: 9852: 9851: 9836:Dharmadhyaksha 9794:Dharmadhyaksha 9765: 9762: 9761: 9760: 9759: 9758: 9757: 9756: 9732: 9654: 9651: 9650: 9649: 9648: 9647: 9646: 9645: 9644: 9643: 9613:Dharmadhyaksha 9608: 9578: 9532:Dharmadhyaksha 9483: 9480: 9479: 9478: 9477: 9476: 9459: 9435: 9399: 9393: 9392: 9391: 9390: 9389: 9388: 9387: 9386: 9385: 9370:Dharmadhyaksha 9326: 9304:Dharmadhyaksha 9261: 9254: 9250: 9247: 9243: 9191: 9190: 9189: 9188: 9173:Dharmadhyaksha 9135:Dharmadhyaksha 9125: 9122: 9121: 9120: 9119: 9118: 9117: 9116: 9115: 9114: 9099:Dharmadhyaksha 9049:Dharmadhyaksha 9021: 9020: 9019: 9018: 9017: 9016: 9015: 9014: 9013: 8984:Dharmadhyaksha 8950:Dharmadhyaksha 8911:Dharmadhyaksha 8895: 8886: 8883: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8879: 8869: 8839: 8838: 8811: 8808: 8807: 8806: 8800: 8799: 8784: 8783: 8774: 8771: 8770: 8769: 8754:Dharmadhyaksha 8733: 8730: 8712: 8711: 8706: 8687: 8684: 8665:permanent link 8656: 8653: 8615: 8612: 8586: 8580: 8579: 8578: 8577: 8576: 8517: 8516: 8468: 8465: 8462: 8461: 8458: 8457: 8434: 8433: 8428: 8426: 8424: 8413: 8405: 8404: 8401: 8400: 8377: 8376: 8371: 8369: 8367: 8356: 8348: 8347: 8344: 8307: 8304: 8303: 8302: 8301: 8300: 8299: 8298: 8297: 8296: 8187: 8186: 8165: 8162: 8150: 8129: 8099: 8085: 8075: 8061: 8060: 8059: 8058: 8057: 8056: 8055: 8054: 8053: 8052: 8001:, haven't we? 7964: 7963: 7940: 7937: 7914: 7894: 7893: 7885: 7884: 7877: 7875: 7867: 7866: 7859: 7857: 7852: 7851: 7844: 7842: 7837: 7836: 7829: 7827: 7822: 7821: 7814: 7810: 7799: 7796: 7795: 7794: 7756: 7755: 7754: 7753: 7752: 7751: 7702: 7701: 7697: 7696: 7691: 7689: 7679: 7678: 7622: 7621: 7617: 7616: 7611: 7609: 7607: 7566: 7565: 7564: 7563: 7562: 7561: 7560: 7559: 7558: 7557: 7556: 7555: 7554: 7553: 7552: 7551: 7550: 7549: 7378: 7327: 7326: 7322: 7321: 7316: 7314: 7303: 7302:ICTF Barnstars 7300: 7280: 7277: 7276: 7275: 7274: 7273: 7272: 7271: 7181: 7178: 7154: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7107: 7014: 7011: 7010: 7009: 6984: 6970: 6967: 6966: 6965: 6964: 6963: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6959: 6958: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6945: 6926:, Yuvan's for 6877: 6838: 6791: 6761: 6758: 6757: 6756: 6695: 6694:Disambiguation 6692: 6691: 6690: 6689: 6688: 6687: 6686: 6685: 6684: 6683: 6682: 6681: 6680: 6679: 6678: 6677: 6676: 6675: 6674: 6673: 6672: 6671: 6670: 6669: 6668: 6642: 6640:The Bushranger 6565: 6564: 6519: 6518: 6486: 6469: 6459: 6436: 6435: 6402: 6401: 6352: 6326: 6324: 6319:and not Admin 6236: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6228: 6227: 6204: 6188: 6187: 6152: 6151: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6120: 6119: 6118: 6117: 6116: 6115: 6114: 6092: 6091: 6036: 6035: 6034: 6033: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6028: 6027: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5995: 5955: 5878: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5872: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5791: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5652:Link is here: 5604: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5565: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5352: 5351: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5318: 5296: 5295: 5274: 5273: 5219: 5218: 5212: 5206: 5200: 5194: 5173: 5170: 5169: 5168: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5162: 5152: 5117:Abhiyum Naanum 5079:Yaavarum Nalam 5050: 4992:in Telugu and 4984: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4922:is well known 4753: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4654: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4564: 4523: 4492: 4464:New York Times 4434: 4372: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4295:Ghajinidetails 4265: 4209:Ghajinidetails 4204: 4203:Ghajinidetails 4201: 4198: 4197: 4194: 4193: 4190: 4176: 4162: 4155: 4149: 4148: 4143: 4129: 4122: 4116: 4115: 4111: 4105: 4091: 4084: 4078: 4077: 4074: 4060: 4053: 4047: 4046: 4043: 4040: 4037: 4027: 4024: 4023: 4020: 4006: 3992: 3984: 3983: 3980: 3966: 3952: 3944: 3943: 3938: 3924: 3910: 3902: 3901: 3898: 3884: 3870: 3862: 3861: 3858: 3844: 3830: 3823: 3815: 3814: 3811: 3797: 3783: 3775: 3774: 3770: 3765: 3751: 3737: 3730: 3722: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3708: 3694: 3680: 3672: 3671: 3668: 3654: 3640: 3632: 3631: 3627: 3622: 3608: 3594: 3586: 3585: 3580: 3566: 3552: 3545: 3537: 3536: 3533: 3519: 3505: 3498: 3490: 3489: 3484: 3470: 3456: 3453:Chak De! India 3448: 3447: 3444: 3430: 3416: 3409: 3401: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3391: 3381: 3378: 3377: 3374: 3360: 3346: 3339: 3337:Vyjayanthimala 3333: 3332: 3329: 3315: 3301: 3294: 3292:Sivaji Ganesan 3288: 3287: 3284: 3270: 3256: 3249: 3243: 3242: 3239: 3225: 3211: 3204: 3198: 3197: 3192: 3178: 3164: 3157: 3151: 3150: 3147: 3133: 3119: 3112: 3106: 3105: 3100: 3086: 3072: 3066: 3065: 3062: 3048: 3034: 3027: 3021: 3020: 3017: 3003: 2989: 2982: 2976: 2975: 2970: 2956: 2942: 2936: 2935: 2932: 2918: 2904: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2880: 2866: 2859: 2853: 2852: 2847: 2833: 2819: 2812: 2810:Dimple Kapadia 2806: 2805: 2802: 2788: 2774: 2767: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2743: 2729: 2722: 2716: 2715: 2710: 2696: 2682: 2675: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2651: 2637: 2630: 2624: 2623: 2620: 2606: 2592: 2585: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2565: 2551: 2537: 2530: 2524: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2514: 2508:Personalities 2485: 2482: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2305: 2304: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2085:Chak De! India 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1871:shree pundalik 1848: 1847: 1830:Shah Rukh Khan 1824:, we can work 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1783: 1734: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1558: 1557: 1511:Waheeda Rehman 1445: 1444: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1348: 1212: 1209: 1182: 1181: 1175: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1159: 1153: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1134: 1125: 1124: 1118: 1117: 1110:On this day... 1107: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1091: 1082: 1081: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1065: 1054: 1053: 1040: 1022: 1021:Centenary year 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 959: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 838: 787: 773: 770: 769: 768: 727: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 676:? They should 673:Manmadhan Ambu 651: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 615: 614: 572: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 463: 445: 444: 443: 442: 425: 424: 414: 382:Gemini Ganesan 374:Sivaji Ganesan 369: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 302: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 277: 276: 255:Back in Action 245:Back in Action 243:. I think the 205: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 172: 122: 108: 105: 102: 101: 96: 93: 88: 83: 76: 71: 66: 56: 55: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 13772: 13758: 13753: 13749: 13745: 13744: 13741: 13739: 13731: 13725: 13711: 13710: 13707: 13705: 13697: 13691: 13670: 13667: 13665: 13657: 13651: 13650: 13649: 13648: 13645: 13641: 13640: 13629: 13628: 13627: 13626: 13625: 13622: 13620: 13612: 13606: 13604: 13601: 13599: 13591: 13585: 13581: 13577: 13573: 13572: 13571: 13567: 13566: 13556: 13555: 13554: 13551: 13549: 13541: 13535: 13534: 13531: 13527: 13526: 13516: 13515: 13514: 13513: 13510: 13509: 13506: 13504: 13496: 13491:. Thank you, 13490: 13485: 13481: 13477: 13459: 13455: 13454: 13436: 13435: 13434: 13433: 13432: 13428: 13424: 13420: 13406: 13405: 13404: 13403: 13400: 13396: 13395: 13385: 13384: 13383: 13382: 13381: 13378: 13376: 13368: 13361: 13360: 13357: 13356: 13352: 13351: 13341: 13337: 13332: 13318: 13317: 13313: 13309: 13305: 13281: 13277: 13273: 13269: 13262: 13261: 13260: 13256: 13252: 13248: 13240: 13236: 13235: 13234: 13230: 13226: 13222: 13215: 13214: 13213: 13212: 13211: 13210: 13203: 13199: 13195: 13191: 13184: 13174: 13163: 13162: 13161: 13160: 13155: 13151: 13147: 13143: 13137: 13136:User:Fortdj33 13134: 13133: 13128: 13124: 13120: 13116: 13110: 13101: 13100: 13089: 13086: 13083: 13079: 13078: 13077: 13076: 13075: 13072: 13069: 13065: 13064: 13063: 13060: 13058: 13050: 13044: 13043: 13041: 13039: 13035: 13034: 13005: 13002: 13000: 12992: 12986: 12985: 12984: 12980: 12976: 12969: 12954: 12943: 12936: 12935: 12934: 12931: 12929: 12921: 12912: 12905: 12904: 12903: 12899: 12895: 12884: 12874: 12867: 12866: 12865: 12862: 12860: 12852: 12846: 12845: 12844: 12840: 12836: 12829: 12815: 12800: 12795: 12794: 12793: 12790: 12788: 12780: 12774: 12770: 12766: 12765: 12762: 12761: 12757: 12753: 12738: 12727: 12708: 12707: 12703: 12699: 12695: 12691: 12687: 12668: 12664: 12660: 12656: 12652: 12648: 12644: 12643: 12642: 12641: 12640: 12639: 12623: 12619: 12615: 12611: 12607: 12603: 12599: 12598: 12597: 12596: 12595: 12594: 12587: 12583: 12579: 12575: 12574: 12573: 12572: 12569: 12568: 12564: 12560: 12551: 12548: 12545: 12542: 12539: 12536: 12535: 12526: 12525: 12524: 12523: 12520: 12519: 12515: 12511: 12502: 12495: 12494: 12490: 12486: 12482: 12468: 12467: 12463: 12459: 12455: 12444: 12443: 12438: 12434: 12430: 12429: 12424: 12420: 12416: 12415: 12410: 12406: 12405: 12402: 12399: 12398: 12381: 12378: 12375: 12371: 12367: 12366: 12363: 12362: 12358: 12354: 12350: 12346: 12345:Bovineboy2008 12342: 12338: 12334: 12330: 12298: 12294: 12293: 12283: 12280: 12279: 12278: 12277: 12276: 12273: 12271: 12263: 12257: 12256: 12255: 12251: 12249: 12244: 12242: 12234: 12231: 12230: 12229: 12226: 12224: 12216: 12210: 12209: 12208: 12204: 12200: 12196: 12195: 12194: 12191: 12189: 12188: 12178: 12177: 12176: 12173: 12171: 12163: 12157: 12153: 12152: 12151: 12148: 12146: 12145: 12127: 12123: 12122: 12119: 12118: 12115: 12113: 12105: 12094: 12093:Mughal-e-Azam 12091: 12089: 12086: 12084: 12081: 12079: 12076: 12074: 12071: 12069: 12066: 12064: 12061: 12059: 12056: 12054: 12051: 12049: 12046: 12045: 12042: 12040: 12026: 12025: 12021: 12017: 12013: 12009: 11995: 11994: 11991: 11989: 11984: 11982: 11976: 11972: 11968: 11964: 11960: 11946: 11945: 11942: 11940: 11935: 11933: 11927: 11923: 11918: 11914: 11900: 11899: 11895: 11889: 11877: 11870: 11869: 11863: 11859: 11852: 11843: 11837: 11833: 11826: 11823: 11819: 11817: 11813: 11809: 11804: 11798: 11791: 11787: 11786: 11784: 11781: 11775: 11771: 11767: 11764: 11761: 11757: 11747: 11746: 11742: 11738: 11734: 11727: 11726:Javed Jaffrey 11722: 11721: 11717: 11713: 11709: 11703: 11702: 11697: 11696: 11695:Nimirndhu Nil 11691: 11690: 11685: 11684: 11679: 11677: 11672: 11671: 11666: 11665: 11659: 11647: 11644: 11639: 11634: 11627: 11626: 11625: 11624: 11621: 11619: 11611: 11605: 11604:Shahrukh Khan 11595: 11594: 11591: 11589: 11581: 11575: 11563: 11560: 11558: 11550: 11544: 11543: 11542: 11541: 11538: 11536: 11528: 11522: 11510: 11507: 11505: 11497: 11491: 11490: 11489: 11488: 11484: 11480: 11475: 11465: 11464: 11460: 11456: 11452: 11446: 11442: 11438: 11429: 11428: 11425: 11416: 11404: 11400: 11396: 11392: 11387: 11378: 11377: 11376: 11375: 11371: 11367: 11363: 11362:Harmeet Singh 11359: 11354: 11353:Harmeet Singh 11347: 11346:Harmeet Singh 11341: 11340: 11336: 11332: 11328: 11322: 11321:WP:COMMONNAME 11318: 11314: 11308: 11306: 11302: 11298: 11294: 11289: 11287: 11283: 11279: 11275: 11271: 11266: 11258: 11257: 11254: 11252: 11247: 11245: 11240: 11238: 11232: 11212: 11208: 11203: 11196: 11195: 11194: 11193: 11190: 11187: 11183: 11182: 11181: 11180: 11177: 11173: 11169: 11165: 11161: 11160: 11159: 11158: 11155: 11152: 11148: 11144: 11140: 11136: 11132: 11128: 11124: 11120: 11116: 11115: 11114: 11113: 11110: 11106: 11102: 11098: 11094: 11093: 11092: 11091: 11087: 11082: 11076: 11066: 11065: 11061: 11057: 11053: 11049: 11039: 11036: 11035: 11034: 11033: 11032: 11030: 11026: 11021: 11019: 11018: 11012: 11006: 10997: 10996: 10991: 10983: 10975: 10950: 10946: 10942: 10938: 10937:Apur Panchali 10934: 10933: 10932: 10928: 10924: 10920: 10919: 10918: 10913: 10905: 10897: 10893: 10892: 10891: 10888: 10887: 10884: 10883: 10873: 10872:Apur Panchali 10869: 10868: 10867: 10862: 10854: 10846: 10842: 10841: 10840: 10836: 10832: 10827: 10826: 10825: 10822: 10821: 10818: 10817: 10807: 10803: 10802: 10801: 10797: 10793: 10789: 10788: 10783: 10782: 10781: 10778: 10776: 10768: 10762: 10758: 10757: 10756: 10752: 10748: 10744: 10740: 10739: 10738: 10737: 10733: 10729: 10725: 10721: 10717: 10707: 10706: 10703: 10701: 10693: 10687: 10683: 10670: 10666: 10662: 10658: 10657: 10656: 10651: 10643: 10634: 10633: 10632: 10631: 10627: 10623: 10618: 10617: 10610:GA nomination 10609: 10604: 10603: 10599: 10597: 10592: 10590: 10567: 10563: 10559: 10555: 10541: 10537: 10536: 10535: 10531: 10527: 10523: 10519: 10518: 10517: 10513: 10509: 10505: 10499: 10498: 10493: 10489: 10485: 10484: 10479: 10474: 10470: 10467: 10466: 10465: 10462: 10461: 10455: 10447: 10441: 10440: 10439: 10438: 10434: 10430: 10426: 10420: 10416: 10410: 10406: 10405: 10400: 10396: 10395:Kaushal Singh 10383: 10379: 10373: 10369: 10368:Jesus Presley 10365: 10362: 10356: 10352: 10348: 10344: 10340: 10336: 10332: 10331: 10330: 10329: 10328: 10323: 10313: 10309: 10308: 10302: 10298: 10297: 10296: 10295: 10291: 10287: 10275: 10271: 10267: 10263: 10262: 10261: 10260: 10255: 10247: 10225: 10221: 10217: 10212: 10208: 10203: 10202: 10201: 10200: 10199: 10198: 10197: 10196: 10195: 10194: 10193: 10192: 10181: 10176: 10168: 10159: 10158: 10157: 10156: 10155: 10154: 10153: 10152: 10151: 10150: 10141: 10137: 10133: 10129: 10126: 10122: 10118: 10114: 10113: 10112: 10111: 10110: 10109: 10108: 10107: 10100: 10095: 10087: 10079: 10078: 10077: 10076: 10075: 10074: 10069: 10065: 10061: 10057: 10053: 10049: 10045: 10041: 10037: 10036: 10035: 10034: 10031: 10026: 10018: 10010: 10009: 10006: 10002: 9998: 9994: 9988: 9987: 9986: 9985: 9981: 9977: 9972: 9970: 9966: 9962: 9958: 9954: 9950: 9946: 9942: 9932: 9929: 9925: 9921: 9917: 9913: 9906: 9902: 9898: 9894: 9891: 9885: 9881: 9877: 9873: 9866: 9862: 9850: 9846: 9842: 9838: 9832: 9830: 9824: 9823: 9822: 9818: 9814: 9810: 9809: 9808: 9804: 9800: 9796: 9790: 9789: 9788: 9787: 9783: 9779: 9775: 9771: 9770:Vipul K Rawal 9755: 9751: 9747: 9743: 9742: 9741: 9737: 9735: 9730: 9728: 9720: 9716: 9715: 9714: 9710: 9706: 9702: 9697: 9693: 9689: 9685: 9684: 9683: 9682: 9678: 9675: 9668: 9666: 9660: 9642: 9638: 9634: 9629: 9628: 9627: 9623: 9619: 9615: 9606: 9605:Padma Bhushan 9602: 9598: 9594: 9590: 9586: 9583:. He is also 9582: 9576: 9572: 9568: 9563: 9562: 9561: 9557: 9553: 9548: 9547: 9546: 9542: 9538: 9534: 9528: 9527: 9522: 9518: 9513: 9512: 9511: 9510: 9506: 9502: 9498: 9497:Shammi Kapoor 9494: 9490: 9475: 9472: 9464: 9460: 9458: 9454: 9450: 9446: 9445: 9444: 9440: 9438: 9433: 9431: 9423: 9422: 9421: 9420: 9417: 9409: 9405: 9397: 9384: 9380: 9376: 9372: 9365: 9361: 9360: 9359: 9354: 9350: 9346: 9339: 9335: 9331: 9327: 9324: 9320: 9319: 9318: 9314: 9310: 9306: 9296: 9292: 9288: 9284: 9283: 9282: 9277: 9273: 9269: 9262: 9259: 9255: 9251: 9248: 9244: 9241: 9237: 9233: 9232: 9231: 9230: 9227: 9225: 9217: 9211: 9206: 9205: 9202: 9200:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 9196: 9187: 9183: 9179: 9175: 9169: 9168: 9167: 9163: 9159: 9155: 9152: 9151: 9150: 9149: 9145: 9141: 9137: 9131: 9113: 9109: 9105: 9101: 9095: 9094: 9093: 9090: 9089: 9088: 9083: 9082: 9081: 9072: 9065: 9064: 9063: 9059: 9055: 9051: 9044: 9043: 9042: 9039: 9037: 9029: 9022: 9012: 9008: 9004: 9000: 8999: 8998: 8994: 8990: 8986: 8980: 8979: 8978: 8974: 8970: 8966: 8965: 8964: 8960: 8956: 8952: 8946: 8942: 8941: 8940: 8936: 8932: 8928: 8927: 8926: 8925: 8921: 8917: 8913: 8907: 8903: 8899: 8892: 8878: 8874: 8872: 8867: 8865: 8857: 8856: 8855: 8854: 8853: 8852: 8848: 8844: 8836: 8832: 8831: 8830: 8829: 8825: 8821: 8815: 8805: 8802: 8801: 8798: 8794: 8790: 8786: 8785: 8782: 8781: 8777: 8776: 8768: 8764: 8760: 8756: 8750: 8749: 8748: 8747: 8743: 8739: 8729: 8728: 8725: 8719: 8710: 8707: 8705: 8701: 8698: 8697: 8696: 8693: 8683: 8682: 8678: 8674: 8670: 8666: 8662: 8652: 8651: 8648: 8646: 8641: 8639: 8634: 8632: 8626: 8621: 8611: 8610: 8606: 8602: 8598: 8597: 8592: 8585: 8575: 8572: 8570: 8568: 8560: 8554: 8549: 8548: 8547: 8544: 8542: 8540: 8527: 8526: 8521: 8515: 8512: 8510: 8504: 8494: 8493: 8492: 8491: 8488: 8486: 8481: 8456: 8453: 8451: 8445: 8436: 8435: 8431: 8427: 8422: 8417: 8414: 8407: 8406: 8399: 8396: 8394: 8388: 8379: 8378: 8374: 8370: 8365: 8360: 8357: 8350: 8349: 8345: 8342: 8341: 8338: 8337: 8334: 8332: 8326: 8313: 8295: 8292: 8290: 8285: 8269: 8260: 8259: 8258: 8257: 8256: 8253: 8251: 8245: 8236: 8224: 8220: 8219: 8218: 8215: 8213: 8208: 8198: 8189: 8188: 8185: 8181: 8177: 8169: 8163: 8161: 8158: 8155: 8151: 8149: 8146: 8144: 8136: 8130: 8128: 8125: 8123: 8117: 8100: 8098: 8094: 8090: 8086: 8084: 8080: 8078: 8073: 8071: 8063: 8062: 8051: 8048: 8046: 8041: 8020: 8016: 8015: 8014: 8013: 8012: 8008: 8004: 8000: 7996: 7995: 7994: 7991: 7989: 7984: 7968: 7967: 7966: 7965: 7962: 7958: 7954: 7950: 7946: 7945: 7944: 7936: 7935: 7932: 7930: 7925: 7917: 7913: 7910: 7908: 7903: 7890: 7881: 7876: 7863: 7858: 7848: 7843: 7833: 7828: 7818: 7813: 7812: 7811: 7806: 7793: 7790: 7788: 7782: 7773: 7772: 7771: 7770: 7766: 7762: 7750: 7746: 7742: 7738: 7734: 7733: 7732: 7729: 7727: 7721: 7712: 7708: 7707: 7706: 7705: 7699: 7698: 7695: 7692: 7687: 7682: 7677: 7674: 7672: 7664: 7657: 7652: 7651: 7650: 7649: 7646: 7644: 7638: 7629: 7619: 7618: 7614: 7610: 7605: 7600: 7597: 7596: 7593: 7591: 7585: 7576: 7571: 7548: 7544: 7540: 7535: 7534: 7533: 7529: 7525: 7521: 7520: 7519: 7516: 7514: 7508: 7499: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7488: 7484: 7479: 7478: 7477: 7474: 7473: 7467: 7461: 7460: 7459: 7456: 7454: 7448: 7439: 7434: 7433: 7432: 7429: 7428: 7422: 7415: 7414: 7413: 7410: 7408: 7402: 7393: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7383: 7381: 7376: 7374: 7365: 7364: 7363: 7362: 7359: 7357: 7351: 7342: 7338: 7334: 7324: 7323: 7320: 7317: 7312: 7307: 7299: 7298: 7294: 7290: 7286: 7270: 7266: 7262: 7258: 7257: 7256: 7253: 7251: 7243: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7232: 7221: 7215: 7214: 7209: 7208: 7203: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7192: 7188: 7177: 7176: 7172: 7168: 7164: 7160: 7144: 7140: 7136: 7132: 7131: 7130: 7126: 7122: 7118: 7117: 7116: 7112: 7110: 7105: 7103: 7095: 7094: 7093: 7092: 7088: 7084: 7080: 7076: 7072: 7068: 7064: 7060: 7056: 7052: 7048: 7044: 7040: 7036: 7032: 7028: 7024: 7020: 7008: 7004: 7000: 6996: 6995: 6994: 6993: 6989: 6987: 6982: 6980: 6954: 6950: 6948: 6943: 6941: 6933: 6929: 6925: 6921: 6916: 6915: 6914: 6910: 6906: 6902: 6898: 6893: 6888: 6887: 6886: 6882: 6880: 6875: 6873: 6864: 6863: 6862: 6858: 6854: 6849: 6848: 6847: 6843: 6841: 6836: 6834: 6826: 6822: 6818: 6817: 6816: 6812: 6808: 6803: 6802: 6801: 6800: 6796: 6794: 6789: 6787: 6779: 6775: 6771: 6767: 6755: 6752: 6751: 6748: 6747: 6740: 6736: 6732: 6728: 6727: 6726: 6725: 6721: 6717: 6713: 6708: 6704: 6701: 6667: 6663: 6659: 6656:Good idea. — 6655: 6654: 6653: 6652: 6651: 6647: 6645:One ping only 6641: 6629: 6625: 6621: 6617: 6613: 6612: 6611: 6610: 6609: 6604: 6596: 6587: 6586: 6585: 6581: 6577: 6573: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6566: 6563: 6559: 6555: 6552:plausible. — 6550: 6549: 6548: 6544: 6540: 6536: 6531: 6527: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6517: 6513: 6509: 6505: 6501: 6500: 6499: 6495: 6491: 6487: 6485: 6481: 6477: 6473: 6467: 6463: 6456: 6455: 6454: 6450: 6446: 6442: 6438: 6437: 6434: 6430: 6426: 6422: 6418: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6400: 6396: 6392: 6388: 6383: 6382: 6381: 6380: 6376: 6372: 6368: 6364: 6360: 6356: 6350: 6346: 6345:Laxmi Godbole 6342: 6338: 6334: 6330: 6322: 6318: 6314: 6310: 6306: 6302: 6298: 6294: 6290: 6286: 6285:Chanda Chamke 6282: 6278: 6274: 6270: 6269: 6264: 6260: 6257: 6255: 6250: 6246: 6242: 6226: 6223: 6215: 6214: 6213: 6209: 6207: 6202: 6200: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6189: 6186: 6183: 6175: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6166: 6161: 6150: 6146: 6145: 6142: 6137: 6133: 6129: 6125: 6113: 6110: 6107: 6102: 6101: 6100: 6099: 6098: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6090: 6087: 6085: 6079: 6077: 6068: 6067: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6063: 6060: 6059: 6057: 6049: 6048: 6043: 6042: 6026: 6022: 6021: 6018: 6012: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6005: 6004: 6003: 5994: 5990: 5986: 5981: 5976: 5971: 5970: 5969: 5965: 5961: 5956: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5946: 5945: 5942: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5931: 5929: 5923: 5914: 5913: 5912: 5911: 5908: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5888: 5884: 5866: 5862: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5847: 5845: 5837: 5831: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5822: 5821: 5818: 5817: 5806: 5802: 5801: 5800: 5796: 5794: 5789: 5787: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5774: 5773: 5770: 5769: 5759: 5755: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5746: 5744: 5736: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5724: 5723: 5720: 5719: 5699: 5696: 5694: 5686: 5680: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5671: 5669: 5661: 5655: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5632: 5630: 5622: 5616: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5609: 5607: 5602: 5600: 5592: 5574: 5570: 5568: 5563: 5561: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5548: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5534: 5530: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5519: 5515: 5511: 5507: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5498: 5496: 5488: 5482: 5478: 5474: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5465: 5464: 5461: 5460: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5445: 5444: 5441: 5440: 5429: 5425: 5421: 5420: 5415: 5411: 5407: 5403: 5402: 5401: 5397: 5395: 5394: 5387: 5386: 5377: 5373: 5372: 5369: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5327: 5323: 5321: 5316: 5314: 5305: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5294: 5290: 5288: 5287: 5280: 5276: 5275: 5272: 5268: 5267: 5264: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5253: 5252: 5249: 5248: 5238: 5234: 5233: 5228: 5224: 5216: 5213: 5210: 5207: 5204: 5203:Screen Awards 5201: 5198: 5195: 5192: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5184: 5180: 5161: 5157: 5155: 5150: 5148: 5140: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5114: 5110: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5075: 5074: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5060: 5055: 5051: 5048: 5047: 5042: 5041: 5036: 5035: 5030: 5029: 5024: 5023: 5022:Kathanayakudu 5018: 5017: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4995: 4991: 4962: 4961: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4945: 4938: 4937: 4932: 4931: 4921: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4912: 4911: 4906: 4899: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4879: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4870: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4857: 4856: 4854: 4848: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4802: 4798: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4772: 4763: 4759: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4664: 4661: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4614: 4610: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4583: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4567: 4562: 4560: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4528: 4526: 4521: 4519: 4511: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4476: 4470: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4450: 4449:edit conflict 4445: 4444: 4443: 4439: 4437: 4432: 4430: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4356: 4353: 4352: 4350: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4313:But the user 4312: 4311: 4310: 4307: 4306: 4304: 4296: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4286: 4285: 4282: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4270: 4268: 4263: 4261: 4253: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4220: 4219: 4216: 4210: 4191: 4189: 4188: 4182: 4177: 4175: 4174: 4163: 4161: 4160: 4156: 4154: 4151: 4150: 4147: 4144: 4142: 4141: 4135: 4128: 4127: 4123: 4121: 4118: 4117: 4114: 4109: 4106: 4104: 4103: 4097: 4090: 4089: 4085: 4083: 4080: 4079: 4075: 4073: 4072: 4066: 4059: 4058: 4054: 4052: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4038: 4035: 4034: 4028: 4021: 4019: 4018: 4012: 4005: 4004: 3993: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3985: 3981: 3979: 3978: 3972: 3965: 3964: 3953: 3951: 3950: 3946: 3945: 3942: 3939: 3937: 3936: 3930: 3923: 3922: 3911: 3909: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3899: 3897: 3896: 3890: 3883: 3882: 3876: 3871: 3869: 3868: 3864: 3863: 3859: 3857: 3856: 3850: 3845: 3843: 3842: 3831: 3829: 3828: 3824: 3822: 3821: 3817: 3816: 3812: 3810: 3809: 3803: 3796: 3795: 3784: 3782: 3781: 3777: 3776: 3773: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3763: 3757: 3752: 3750: 3749: 3738: 3736: 3735: 3731: 3729: 3728: 3727:Mughal-e-Azam 3724: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3709: 3707: 3706: 3700: 3693: 3692: 3681: 3679: 3678: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3667: 3666: 3660: 3653: 3652: 3641: 3639: 3638: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3626: 3623: 3621: 3620: 3614: 3607: 3606: 3595: 3593: 3592: 3588: 3587: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3578: 3572: 3567: 3565: 3564: 3553: 3551: 3550: 3546: 3544: 3543: 3542:Iti Mrinalini 3539: 3538: 3534: 3532: 3531: 3525: 3520: 3518: 3517: 3506: 3504: 3503: 3499: 3497: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3488: 3485: 3483: 3482: 3476: 3469: 3468: 3457: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3449: 3445: 3443: 3442: 3436: 3431: 3429: 3428: 3417: 3415: 3414: 3410: 3408: 3407: 3403: 3402: 3398: 3392: 3389: 3388: 3382: 3375: 3373: 3372: 3366: 3361: 3359: 3358: 3347: 3345: 3344: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3328: 3327: 3321: 3316: 3314: 3313: 3302: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3293: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3283: 3282: 3276: 3271: 3269: 3268: 3257: 3255: 3254: 3250: 3248: 3247:Shahrukh Khan 3245: 3244: 3240: 3238: 3237: 3231: 3226: 3224: 3223: 3212: 3210: 3209: 3205: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3196: 3193: 3191: 3190: 3184: 3179: 3177: 3176: 3165: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3152: 3148: 3146: 3145: 3139: 3134: 3132: 3131: 3120: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3111: 3108: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3099: 3098: 3092: 3085: 3084: 3073: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3063: 3061: 3060: 3054: 3049: 3047: 3046: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3026: 3025:Madhuri Dixit 3023: 3022: 3018: 3016: 3015: 3009: 3004: 3002: 3001: 2990: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2977: 2974: 2971: 2969: 2968: 2962: 2955: 2954: 2943: 2941: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2931: 2930: 2924: 2917: 2916: 2905: 2903: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2893: 2892: 2886: 2881: 2879: 2878: 2867: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2858: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2848: 2846: 2845: 2839: 2834: 2832: 2831: 2820: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2803: 2801: 2800: 2794: 2789: 2787: 2786: 2775: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2756: 2755: 2749: 2744: 2742: 2741: 2730: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2721: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2709: 2708: 2702: 2697: 2695: 2694: 2683: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2666: 2664: 2663: 2657: 2652: 2650: 2649: 2638: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2619: 2618: 2612: 2607: 2605: 2604: 2593: 2591: 2590: 2586: 2584: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2563: 2557: 2552: 2550: 2549: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2505: 2504: 2501: 2498: 2492: 2481: 2480: 2477: 2476: 2474: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2422: 2417: 2413: 2412: 2411:Iti Mrinalini 2397: 2393: 2392: 2389: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2348: 2340: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2318: 2313: 2312:Mughal-e-Azam 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2290: 2289: 2284: 2283: 2278: 2277: 2276:Mughal-e-Azam 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2251: 2250: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2168:Iti Mrinalini 2166: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2151: 2150: 2149:Iti Mrinalini 2145: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2114: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2056: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2030: 2029: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2012: 2011: 2006: 2005: 2000: 1999: 1984: 1981: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1885: 1884: 1877: 1873: 1872: 1867: 1863: 1857: 1856:edit conflict 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1843: 1837: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1792: 1788: 1786: 1781: 1779: 1770: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1756: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1737: 1732: 1730: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1669: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1647: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1639:Mughal-e-Azam 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1614: 1613: 1612:Mughal-e-Azam 1608: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1540: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1503:Madhuri Dixit 1500: 1495: 1494:Shammi Kapoor 1491: 1487: 1486:Rajesh Khanna 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474:Sanjeev Kumar 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462:Shahrukh Khan 1459: 1455: 1451: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1416: 1410: 1409: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1368: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1351: 1346: 1344: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1292: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1265:Karthik Nadar 1262: 1258: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1225: 1224:Chak De India 1220: 1219: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1187: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1095: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1037: 1030: 1029: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1001: 1000: 999: 996: 993: 989: 988: 987: 986: 982: 981: 978: 973: 969: 965: 957: 938: 934: 930: 927:Same here! §§ 926: 925: 924: 920: 918: 917: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 888: 885: 879: 878: 877: 873: 872: 869: 863: 862: 861: 858: 849: 848: 847: 843: 841: 836: 834: 825: 821: 820: 819: 816: 814: 806: 799: 798: 797: 796: 792: 790: 785: 783: 767: 764: 762: 754: 748: 747: 746: 745: 741: 737: 733: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 698: 694: 689: 687: 683: 679: 675: 674: 669: 668: 663: 662: 657: 643: 639: 638: 635: 630: 629: 624: 623: 619: 618: 617: 616: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 580: 579: 558: 554: 550: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 499: 495: 491: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 472: 468: 466: 461: 459: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 441: 437: 433: 429: 428: 427: 426: 423: 419: 417: 412: 410: 402: 401: 400: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 323: 322: 321: 320: 316: 312: 308: 294: 290: 289: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 275: 272: 270: 262: 256: 252: 251: 246: 242: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 226: 223: 217: 216:begun filming 213: 212: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 177: 175: 170: 168: 160: 156: 155: 154: 150: 146: 134: 133: 132: 131: 127: 125: 120: 118: 100: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 13752: 13737: 13721: 13703: 13689: 13687: 13663: 13633: 13618: 13597: 13576:Preity Zinta 13559: 13547: 13519: 13502: 13483: 13474: 13447: 13388: 13374: 13344: 13330: 13328: 13301: 13246: 13238: 13189: 13056: 13027: 13023: 12998: 12957:|filmbio=yes 12952: 12927: 12858: 12798: 12786: 12718: 12684: 12602:Inbamkumar86 12559:Inbamkumar86 12556: 12507: 12478: 12458:Kailash29792 12453: 12451: 12440: 12426: 12412: 12395: 12393: 12332: 12326: 12286: 12269: 12247: 12240: 12222: 12190: 12180: 12169: 12147: 12137: 12111: 12099: 12083:Rani Mukerji 12058:Mother India 12036: 12005: 11987: 11980: 11956: 11938: 11931: 11926:my talk page 11910: 11905:Help Please! 11882: 11849: 11821: 11818:is complete. 11805: 11779: 11762: 11753: 11730: 11712:Hoerestimmen 11699: 11693: 11687: 11681: 11674: 11668: 11662: 11655: 11617: 11601: 11587: 11571: 11556: 11534: 11518: 11503: 11471: 11435: 11412: 11385: 11350: 11309: 11296: 11290: 11267: 11264: 11250: 11243: 11236: 11228: 11163: 11147:WP:Ownership 11139:page history 11072: 11056:SarahStierch 11045: 11022: 11015: 11013: 11010: 10973: 10971: 10936: 10895: 10885: 10875: 10871: 10844: 10819: 10809: 10805: 10785: 10774: 10724:Mother India 10713: 10699: 10680: 10614: 10613: 10595: 10588: 10581: 10495: 10487: 10481: 10468: 10456: 10408: 10402: 10392: 10389:Double roles 10363: 10305: 10283: 10238: 9973: 9938: 9910:— Preceding 9870:— Preceding 9857: 9828: 9774:Iqbal (film) 9767: 9733: 9726: 9718: 9692:Thulasi Nair 9673: 9664: 9659:this article 9656: 9593:Kamal Haasan 9567:WP:CONSENSUS 9524: 9485: 9436: 9429: 9401: 9363: 9333: 9329: 9294: 9290: 9286: 9257: 9223: 9207: 9192: 9127: 9086: 9085: 9079: 9078: 9066:Why not use 9035: 8898:2008 in film 8888: 8870: 8863: 8840: 8816: 8813: 8803: 8778: 8735: 8713: 8689: 8658: 8644: 8637: 8630: 8617: 8594: 8590: 8588: 8583: 8497: 8475: 8470: 8438: 8429: 8381: 8372: 8319: 8309: 8279: 8267: 8238: 8202: 8196: 8142: 8110: 8076: 8069: 8035: 8017:haha...Yes! 7978: 7948: 7942: 7919: 7915: 7897: 7895: 7887:Option-5 by 7803:(Invited by 7801: 7775: 7757: 7714: 7693: 7670: 7631: 7625: 7612: 7578: 7567: 7501: 7468: 7441: 7423: 7395: 7379: 7372: 7344: 7331:Guys I have 7330: 7318: 7282: 7249: 7219: 7211: 7205: 7183: 7156: 7108: 7101: 7016: 6985: 6978: 6972: 6946: 6939: 6927: 6923: 6891: 6878: 6871: 6839: 6832: 6792: 6785: 6773: 6763: 6749: 6742: 6731:film article 6697: 6620:well-meaning 6534: 6529: 6525: 6386: 6289:Fanaa (film) 6266: 6252: 6240: 6238: 6205: 6198: 6153: 6139: 6135: 6131: 6127: 6074: 6052: 6045: 6039: 6038:Songs like 6037: 6015: 5939: 5916: 5880: 5843: 5830:Vivek Oberoi 5819: 5809: 5804: 5792: 5785: 5771: 5761: 5757: 5753: 5742: 5721: 5711: 5708: 5692: 5667: 5628: 5605: 5598: 5590: 5589: 5566: 5559: 5509: 5494: 5462: 5452: 5442: 5432: 5392: 5391: 5366: 5319: 5312: 5285: 5284: 5261: 5250: 5240: 5230: 5220: 5175: 5153: 5146: 5139:Aakasamantha 5138: 5121:Aakasamantha 5083:Vishwaroopam 5057: 5053: 5044: 5038: 5032: 5026: 5020: 5014: 4993: 4989: 4986: 4943: 4940: 4934: 4928: 4919: 4901: 4849: 4755: 4715: 4656: 4565: 4558: 4524: 4517: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4435: 4428: 4374: 4345: 4299: 4279: 4266: 4259: 4213: 4206: 4185: 4171: 4157: 4138: 4124: 4100: 4086: 4069: 4055: 4015: 4001: 3987: 3975: 3961: 3947: 3933: 3919: 3905: 3893: 3879: 3865: 3853: 3839: 3825: 3818: 3806: 3792: 3778: 3760: 3746: 3732: 3725: 3703: 3689: 3677:Mother India 3675: 3663: 3649: 3635: 3617: 3603: 3589: 3575: 3561: 3547: 3540: 3528: 3514: 3500: 3493: 3487:Classicfilms 3479: 3465: 3451: 3439: 3425: 3411: 3404: 3369: 3355: 3341: 3324: 3310: 3296: 3279: 3265: 3251: 3234: 3220: 3206: 3187: 3173: 3159: 3142: 3128: 3114: 3095: 3081: 3057: 3043: 3029: 3012: 2998: 2984: 2965: 2951: 2940:Kamal Haasan 2927: 2913: 2889: 2875: 2861: 2842: 2828: 2814: 2797: 2783: 2769: 2752: 2738: 2724: 2705: 2691: 2677: 2660: 2646: 2632: 2615: 2601: 2587: 2560: 2546: 2532: 2493: 2487: 2469: 2459: 2457: 2432: 2419: 2415: 2409: 2408: 2386: 2315: 2311: 2292: 2286: 2282:Jodhaa Akbar 2280: 2274: 2253: 2249:Mother India 2247: 2245: 2167: 2153: 2147: 2128:Mother India 2126: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2089: 2083: 2064: 2058: 2052: 2046: 2026: 2020: 2014: 2008: 2002: 1996: 1993: 1976:have few. -- 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1958:Mother India 1957: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1902:Mother India 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1881: 1879: 1875: 1869: 1861: 1801: 1799: 1784: 1777: 1768: 1747: 1735: 1728: 1720: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1689: 1675: 1655: 1649: 1643: 1637: 1622: 1618:Jodhaa Akbar 1616: 1610: 1606: 1587: 1567: 1561: 1559: 1542: 1518: 1499:Shabana Azmi 1446: 1434:Kailash29792 1429: 1413: 1406: 1404: 1349: 1342: 1334:Kamal Haasan 1299: 1234: 1228: 1222: 1216: 1214: 1185: 1183: 1177: 1171: 1164:: 1 Aug 1913 1162:Bhagwan Dada 1158:: 1 May 1913 1156:Balraj Sahni 1128: 1113: 1109: 1103: 1077: 1059: 1046: 1038:few things.) 1036:has promised 1026: 1024: 1003: 975: 963: 961: 955: 915: 914: 866: 839: 832: 823: 812: 788: 781: 775: 760: 736:Kailash29792 729: 693:Kailash29792 690: 682:Kailash29792 677: 671: 665: 659: 656:Kamal Haasan 653: 632: 626: 620: 589:Kailash29792 582: 576: 574: 518:Kailash29792 490:Kailash29792 464: 457: 432:Kailash29792 415: 408: 390:Kailash29792 372:The article 371: 304: 283: 268: 254: 248: 244: 240: 236: 220: 209: 207: 173: 166: 158: 123: 116: 110: 79: 47: 41: 13308:Cyphoidbomb 13243:|cinema=yes 13166:|cinema=yes 13105:|cinema=yes 12961:|cinema=yes 12949:|cinema=yes 12890:|cinema=yes 12821:|cinema=yes 12807:|Indian=yes 12803:|cinema=yes 12744:|cinema=yes 12722:|cinema=yes 12578:Anne Delong 12510:Anne Delong 12124:You forgot 12016:Cyphoidbomb 11917:film series 11797:afc comment 11364:? Cheers, 11135:WP:civility 10720:Vidya Balan 10616:Swayamvaram 10608:Swayamvaram 10376:—Preceding 10307:SMcCandlish 10214:uniformity. 9721:) article. 9154:Dr. Blofeld 8804:Desimartini 8780:Review Gang 8700:Review Gang 8673:PrimeHunter 7570:Ncmvocalist 7539:Ncmvocalist 7392:reverted me 7043:S. J. Surya 6969:Page design 6905:Johannes003 6901:Best Editor 6853:Editor 2050 6807:Johannes003 6739:Paisa paisa 6698:In the Afd 6658:Crisco 1492 6554:Crisco 1492 6508:Crisco 1492 6445:Crisco 1492 6425:Crisco 1492 6391:Crisco 1492 6329:Rohit Mehra 6313:was deleted 6297:Kasto Mazza 6078:likes this. 6076:25 Cents FC 6041:Hai Ye Maya 5279:BFJA Awards 5125:Johannes003 5064:Editor 2050 4999:Johannes003 4948:WP:CITEKILL 4878:Check this. 4819:Johannes003 4782:Johannes003 4720:Bineet Ojha 4623:Johannes003 4535:Merge with 4410:Johannes003 4315:never talks 4045:Volunteers 3715:Redtigerxyz 3399:Volunteers 3202:Salman Khan 3070:Rajinikanth 2857:Hema Malini 2765:Dilip Kumar 2673:Chiranjeevi 2628:Asha Bhosle 2576:Bineet Ojha 2522:Volunteers 1979:Redtigerxyz 1907:Redtigerxyz 1874:). Even if 1515:Asha Parekh 1482:Manoj Kumar 1466:Salman Khan 1454:Dilip Kumar 1178:In the news 883:Redtigerxyz 40:This is an 12878:banner or 12179:Thanks. -- 11876:Razak Khan 11822:completed. 11523:. Thanks, 11443:for 2012. 11186:Ekabhishek 11168:Tito Dutta 11151:Ekabhishek 11131:“trolling" 11101:Tito Dutta 11052:to-do list 10417:of Shah's 10399:Rohan Shah 10301:WP:SUMMARY 9601:Padma Shri 9571:WP:BE BOLD 9345:HairedGirl 9336:, such as 9268:HairedGirl 8732:Discussion 8717:Amartyabag 7872:Eliminated 7289:DH85868993 7167:DH85868993 7165:. Thanks. 7135:DH85868993 7121:DH85868993 7083:DH85868993 6768:ceremony, 6524:The essay 6349:Chachi 420 6235:Redirected 5506:WP:PRIMARY 5211:(Stardust) 4722:|BINEET| 4146:Ankitbhatt 3941:Ankitbhatt 3768:Ankitbhatt 3719:Dr.Blofeld 3711:Dwaipayanc 3110:Raj Kapoor 2902:Ilaiyaraja 2528:Aamir Khan 1880:Improving 1835:Amartyabag 1478:Dharmendra 1470:Raj Kapoor 1458:Aamir Khan 1211:Discussion 1068:Ilaiyaraja 340:Ankitbhatt 13729:BollyJeff 13695:BollyJeff 13655:BollyJeff 13610:BollyJeff 13589:BollyJeff 13539:BollyJeff 13494:BollyJeff 13366:BollyJeff 13241:have the 13048:BollyJeff 12990:BollyJeff 12919:BollyJeff 12850:BollyJeff 12778:BollyJeff 12748:|film=yes 12698:Thryduulf 12414:The Hindu 12341:permalink 12261:BollyJeff 12248:(Ping me) 12214:BollyJeff 12199:Dwaipayan 12161:BollyJeff 12103:BollyJeff 11963:Bollywood 11770:WP:PRODed 11737:Abecedare 11609:BollyJeff 11579:BollyJeff 11548:BollyJeff 11526:BollyJeff 11495:BollyJeff 11479:Dwaipayan 11439:wins the 11301:ref pg 19 11293:ref pg 46 10941:Dwaipayan 10923:Dwaipayan 10831:Dwaipayan 10792:Dwaipayan 10766:BollyJeff 10747:Dwaipayan 10728:Dwaipayan 10691:BollyJeff 10661:Dwaipayan 10636:norms. - 10622:Dwaipayan 10596:(Ping me) 10526:Dwaipayan 9916:Saddumama 9901:Saddumama 9893:Saddumama 9876:Saddumama 9861:Saddumama 9829:The Hindu 9734:(Ping me) 9688:WP:NACTOR 9597:Mammootty 9575:WP:INCOTM 9493:Dev Anand 9449:Dwaipayan 9437:(Ping me) 9410:, thanks. 9215:BollyJeff 9027:BollyJeff 8871:(Ping me) 8787:Support. 8738:Dwaipayan 8479:TheStrike 8283:TheStrike 8206:TheStrike 8154:♪Karthik♫ 8134:BollyJeff 8077:(Ping me) 8039:TheStrike 7982:TheStrike 7923:TheStrike 7901:TheStrike 7889:Vibhijain 7662:BollyJeff 7380:(Ping me) 7241:BollyJeff 7109:(Ping me) 7067:Ravi Babu 6986:(Ping me) 6947:(Ping me) 6879:(Ping me) 6840:(Ping me) 6793:(Ping me) 6421:Tere Liye 6206:(Ping me) 6106:♪Karthik♫ 5960:Dwaipayan 5899:WP:NSONGS 5835:BollyJeff 5812:Bollywood 5793:(Ping me) 5764:Bollywood 5734:BollyJeff 5714:Bollywood 5684:BollyJeff 5659:BollyJeff 5620:BollyJeff 5606:(Ping me) 5567:(Ping me) 5529:Dwaipayan 5486:BollyJeff 5455:Bollywood 5435:Bollywood 5320:(Ping me) 5243:Bollywood 5227:This book 5154:(Ping me) 4695:articles. 4682:Dwaipayan 4566:(Ping me) 4525:(Ping me) 4460:The Hindu 4436:(Ping me) 4267:(Ping me) 3772:Bollyjeff 3629:Dwaipayan 2416:Mrinalini 2260:Dwaipayan 2134:Dwaipayan 2102:than for 2066:Noukadubi 1945:Dwaipayan 1785:(Ping me) 1752:♪Karthik♫ 1736:(Ping me) 1708:♪Karthik♫ 1667:BollyJeff 1490:Dev Anand 1350:(Ping me) 1306:Dwaipayan 1241:Dwaipayan 992:♪Karthik♫ 840:(Ping me) 804:BollyJeff 789:(Ping me) 752:BollyJeff 726:Reliable? 465:(Ping me) 416:(Ping me) 352:AnshumanF 311:AnshumanF 260:BollyJeff 174:(Ping me) 124:(Ping me) 99:Archive 9 91:Archive 6 86:Archive 5 80:Archive 4 74:Archive 3 69:Archive 2 64:Archive 1 13304:Drishyam 13251:Fortdj33 13194:Fortdj33 12975:Fortdj33 12894:Fortdj33 12835:Fortdj33 12833:banner. 12752:Fortdj33 12241:Vensatry 11981:Jayadevp 11932:Jayadevp 11862:contribs 11836:contribs 11766:contribs 11756:Senseltd 11395:Mentoz86 11366:Mentoz86 10589:Vensatry 10453:Spaceman 10339:Manipuri 10322:Contrib. 10121:Manipuri 10052:Assamese 9965:Manipuri 9957:Assamese 9924:contribs 9912:unsigned 9884:contribs 9872:unsigned 9727:Vensatry 9482:Question 9430:Vensatry 9353:contribs 9276:contribs 8947:also. §§ 8864:Vensatry 8601:Mabeenot 8591:Signpost 8584:Signpost 8523:Option 5 8467:Comments 8070:Vensatry 7977:Thanks! 7896:Cheers, 7870:Option-4 7854:Option-3 7839:Option-2 7824:Option-1 7805:DBigXray 7700:{{{1}}} 7620:{{{1}}} 7465:Spaceman 7420:Spaceman 7373:Vensatry 7325:{{{1}}} 7220:Therdhal 7207:Therdhal 7102:Vensatry 6979:Vensatry 6940:Vensatry 6872:Vensatry 6833:Vensatry 6786:Vensatry 6745:Schmidt, 6630:target. 6624:be bold! 6359:Sharaabi 6281:Dekho Na 6199:Vensatry 6055:...Msrag 5786:Vensatry 5599:Vensatry 5560:Vensatry 5475:and the 5426:and the 5313:Vensatry 5205:(Screen) 5193:(Apsara) 5181:and the 5147:Vensatry 5059:Thoranai 4852:...Msrag 4658:section. 4559:Vensatry 4518:Vensatry 4429:Vensatry 4348:...Msrag 4302:...Msrag 4260:Vensatry 4039:Current 4036:Article 3583:Smarojit 3495:Enthiran 3406:3 Idiots 3393:Current 3390:Article 3195:Shshshsh 3103:Vensatry 2973:Vensatry 2850:Shshshsh 2713:Vensatry 2568:Smarojit 2516:Current 2513:Article 2497:sub page 2472:...Msrag 2458:Hi All, 2205:naveenpf 2172:Smarojit 2071:Smarojit 2028:Umbartha 1806:Smarojit 1778:Vensatry 1729:Vensatry 1645:Enthiran 1563:Enthiran 1343:Vensatry 1257:Vensatry 964:Signpost 956:Signpost 833:Vensatry 824:Filmfare 782:Vensatry 575:I think 458:Vensatry 409:Vensatry 167:Vensatry 117:Vensatry 20:‎ | 13584:Kahaani 13484:working 12963:on the 12732:to the 12726:WP:FILM 12528:below : 12428:CNN-IBN 12368:Such a 12068:Kahaani 11851:davidwr 11825:davidwr 11683:Zanjeer 10806:Kahaani 10787:Kahaani 10446:db-hoax 10409:Ishaan' 10378:undated 10364:Neutral 10343:Konkani 10335:Punjabi 10125:Konkani 10117:Punjabi 10048:English 9969:Konkani 9961:Punjabi 9953:English 9674:talk me 9665:Anbu121 8814:Hello, 8346:Result 8316:|cinema 8157:♪Nadar♫ 8089:Ayanosh 7524:Ayanosh 7202:Shankar 7180:Rumours 6628:logical 6415:: both 6132:clearly 6109:♪Nadar♫ 5758:notable 5113:Gaganam 5109:Payanam 5016:Kuselan 4994:Naan Ee 4760:on the 4738:Ayanosh 4697:Ayanosh 4667:Ayanosh 4593:now. §§ 4031:Others 3591:Kahaani 2484:Listing 2461:Kahaani 2339:Animesh 2255:Kahaani 2201:chapter 2091:Kahaani 1890:Kahaani 1755:♪Nadar♫ 1711:♪Nadar♫ 1236:Kahaani 1144:Births: 1123:Events: 995:♪Nadar♫ 958:request 622:Kahaani 578:Kahaani 338:Thanks 250:Dhoom 2 241:Dhoom 3 211:Dhoom 3 43:archive 13557:Okay. 13340:though 12724:. Per 12647:Gulzar 12329:an MfD 12078:Sholay 11924:or on 11887:Foodie 11808:Sankar 11689:Toofan 11420:TRPoD 11265:Hello! 10741:Also, 10469:Ishaan 10404:Ishaan 10044:Telugu 9949:Telugu 9701:WP:NFF 9696:WP:GNG 9526:Sholay 9398:for FP 9349:(talk) 9272:(talk) 8692:WP:AGG 7119:Done. 6770:Vikram 6259:Do Pal 6241:delete 6136:thanda 5815:Dreamz 5767:Dreamz 5717:Dreamz 5473:Apsara 5458:Dreamz 5438:Dreamz 5424:Apsara 5393:Shahid 5286:Shahid 5246:Dreamz 5199:(IIFA) 5034:Eenadu 4952:Sitush 4930:Pravda 4475:WP:GNG 4252:WP:ANI 3989:Sivaji 3949:Sholay 3907:Ra.One 3637:Lagaan 3385:Films 2288:Ra.One 2104:Lagaan 2100:Sholay 2010:Piravi 1974:Sholay 1962:Lagaan 1937:Lagaan 1929:Sholay 1925:Lagaan 1917:Ra.One 1898:Sholay 1876:Ra.One 1704:admins 1696:Indian 1218:Ra.One 1061:Ra.One 1034:(Govt 916:Shahid 678:really 628:Ra.One 584:Ra.One 204:Notice 159:senior 13637:Soham 13563:Soham 13523:Soham 13451:Soham 13392:Soham 13348:Soham 13247:films 13178:than 13031:Soham 12799:films 12659:Nizil 12290:Soham 11774:AFD'd 11642:bolly 11632:Tolly 11284:and 11206:kasut 11201:Kotak 11085:kasut 11080:Kotak 10980:Vivvt 10902:Vivvt 10878:smaro 10851:Vivvt 10812:smaro 10640:Vivvt 10459:Spiff 10312:Talk⇒ 10244:Vivvt 10211:India 10165:Vivvt 10084:Vivvt 10040:Oriya 10015:Vivvt 9945:Oriya 9827:here 9719:Kadal 9343:Brown 9266:Brown 9087:Vesey 8773:Votes 8484:Σagle 8288:Σagle 8235:CC-SA 8211:Σagle 8044:Σagle 8019:here! 7987:Σagle 7949:first 7928:Σagle 7906:Σagle 7471:Spiff 7426:Spiff 7229:Vivvt 7019:Ezhil 6924:Sethu 6593:Vivvt 6387:could 6299:and 6220:Vivvt 6180:Vivvt 6144:Bhatt 6141:Ankit 6128:Don 2 6020:Bhatt 6017:Ankit 5944:Bhatt 5941:Ankit 5905:Vivvt 5545:Vivvt 5508:says 5371:Bhatt 5368:Ankit 5266:Bhatt 5263:Ankit 5237:lists 5217:(ZCA) 4904:Lynch 4867:Vivvt 4769:Vivvt 4580:Vivvt 4537:SIIMA 4284:Bhatt 4281:Ankit 4218:Bhatt 4215:Ankit 4113:Vivvt 4042:Goal 3827:Start 3625:Msrag 3396:Goal 3155:Rekha 2726:Start 2572:Msrag 2519:Goal 2424:Bhatt 2421:Ankit 2391:Bhatt 2388:Ankit 2357:Msrag 2345:Vivvt 2320:Bhatt 2317:Ankit 2297:Bhatt 2294:Ankit 2158:Bhatt 2155:Ankit 2152:? ~*~ 2116:Bhatt 2113:Ankit 2060:Deool 2048:Udaan 2035:Vivvt 2007:than 2004:Jeans 1627:Bhatt 1624:Ankit 1572:Bhatt 1569:Ankit 1545:Lynch 1523:Msrag 1507:Rekha 1418:Bhatt 1415:Ankit 1365:Vivvt 1289:Vivvt 1270:Arfaz 1008:Bhatt 1005:Ankit 980:Bhatt 977:Ankit 871:Bhatt 868:Ankit 855:Vivvt 637:Bhatt 634:Ankit 288:Bhatt 285:Ankit 225:Bhatt 222:Ankit 16:< 13738:talk 13704:talk 13664:talk 13619:talk 13598:talk 13582:and 13548:talk 13503:talk 13421:§§ { 13375:talk 13331:.com 13312:talk 13270:§§ { 13255:talk 13223:§§ { 13198:talk 13190:film 13144:§§ { 13117:§§ { 13057:talk 12999:talk 12979:talk 12928:talk 12898:talk 12859:talk 12839:talk 12805:and 12787:talk 12756:talk 12702:talk 12663:talk 12618:talk 12610:Anne 12582:talk 12563:talk 12514:talk 12489:talk 12462:talk 12357:talk 12347:and 12270:talk 12235:too 12223:talk 12203:talk 12170:talk 12112:talk 12020:talk 11977:. - 11975:here 11922:here 11893:talk 11858:talk 11832:talk 11810:and 11760:talk 11741:talk 11716:talk 11618:talk 11588:talk 11557:talk 11535:talk 11504:talk 11483:talk 11474:ibos 11468:ibos 11453:§§ { 11437:Pran 11432:Pran 11399:talk 11386:Done 11370:talk 11329:§§ { 11297:Hope 11172:talk 11105:talk 11075:Paap 11069:Paap 11060:talk 11048:here 10989:Talk 10945:talk 10927:talk 10911:Talk 10898:. - 10860:Talk 10835:talk 10796:talk 10775:talk 10751:talk 10732:talk 10700:talk 10665:talk 10649:Talk 10626:talk 10556:§§ { 10530:talk 10506:§§ { 10486:and 10427:§§ { 10397:and 10372:talk 10351:talk 10341:and 10290:talk 10270:talk 10253:Talk 10220:talk 10174:Talk 10136:talk 10123:and 10093:Talk 10064:talk 10050:and 10024:Talk 9995:§§ { 9980:talk 9967:and 9955:and 9920:talk 9905:talk 9897:talk 9880:talk 9865:talk 9839:§§ { 9831:says 9817:talk 9797:§§ { 9782:talk 9750:talk 9709:talk 9637:talk 9616:§§ { 9603:and 9595:and 9556:talk 9535:§§ { 9505:talk 9453:talk 9373:§§ { 9340:? -- 9307:§§ { 9224:talk 9176:§§ { 9162:talk 9138:§§ { 9102:§§ { 9080:Ryan 9052:§§ { 9036:talk 9007:talk 8987:§§ { 8973:talk 8953:§§ { 8935:talk 8914:§§ { 8908:? §§ 8847:talk 8843:Yann 8824:talk 8820:Yann 8793:talk 8757:§§ { 8742:talk 8677:talk 8659:See 8605:talk 8343:Code 8268:Done 8233:per 8197:Done 8180:talk 8143:talk 8093:talk 8007:talk 7957:talk 7916:Note 7765:talk 7745:talk 7671:talk 7543:talk 7528:talk 7487:talk 7293:talk 7265:talk 7250:talk 7191:talk 7171:talk 7139:talk 7125:talk 7087:talk 7069:and 7003:talk 6928:Oye! 6909:talk 6899:and 6857:talk 6823:and 6811:talk 6720:talk 6662:talk 6602:Talk 6580:talk 6558:talk 6543:talk 6530:mean 6526:says 6512:talk 6494:talk 6480:talk 6474:. §§ 6449:talk 6429:talk 6419:and 6417:Lodi 6411:and 6395:talk 6375:talk 6369:. §§ 6367:Darr 6361:and 6343:and 6283:and 6271:and 6165:talk 6147:~*~ 6044:and 6023:~*~ 5989:talk 5964:talk 5947:~*~ 5861:talk 5844:talk 5743:talk 5693:talk 5668:talk 5644:talk 5629:talk 5533:talk 5518:talk 5495:talk 5477:IIFA 5428:IIFA 5422:The 5410:talk 5374:~*~ 5345:talk 5269:~*~ 5223:this 5129:talk 5100:talk 5085:and 5068:talk 5054:Eega 5043:and 5040:Eega 5031:and 5019:and 5003:talk 4990:Eega 4956:talk 4887:talk 4837:talk 4823:talk 4815:here 4811:here 4801:talk 4786:talk 4762:Roja 4758:this 4742:talk 4734:here 4701:talk 4686:talk 4671:talk 4627:talk 4613:talk 4599:talk 4545:talk 4539:. §§ 4500:talk 4486:talk 4456:some 4414:talk 4400:and 4392:and 4384:and 4323:talk 4317:. §§ 4287:~*~ 4242:talk 4221:~*~ 4126:List 4088:List 4057:List 2450:talk 2427:~*~ 2394:~*~ 2361:talk 2323:~*~ 2300:~*~ 2279:and 2264:talk 2242:Plan 2228:talk 2209:talk 2176:talk 2161:~*~ 2138:talk 2119:~*~ 2098:and 2088:and 2075:talk 2051:and 2025:and 1972:and 1949:talk 1828:and 1810:talk 1769:Done 1698:and 1676:talk 1630:~*~ 1615:and 1598:talk 1575:~*~ 1527:talk 1519:P.S: 1464:and 1438:talk 1421:~*~ 1384:talk 1378:. §§ 1376:COTY 1324:talk 1310:talk 1245:talk 1233:and 1202:talk 1011:~*~ 983:~*~ 972:here 933:talk 874:~*~ 813:talk 761:talk 740:talk 714:talk 697:talk 686:talk 670:and 640:~*~ 608:talk 593:talk 553:talk 522:talk 494:talk 436:talk 394:talk 384:and 356:talk 348:here 342:and 330:talk 315:talk 291:~*~ 269:talk 228:~*~ 214:has 190:talk 149:talk 13690:new 13336:one 13239:not 13082:Soh 13068:Soh 12953:new 12746:or 12374:Soh 12353:BDD 12349:Jni 12186:muk 12183:kri 12143:muk 12140:kri 11860:)/( 11834:)/( 11772:or 11733:AFD 11417:-- 11389:by 11315:or 11244:pho 10881:jit 10815:jit 10524:!-- 10374:) 10314:ɖ∘¿ 9813:Jay 9778:Jay 9351:• ( 9274:• ( 9124:RFC 9071:RFC 8945:RFC 8638:pho 8508:ray 8502:Big 8449:ray 8443:Big 8392:ray 8386:Big 8330:ray 8324:Big 8249:ray 8243:Big 8182:) 8121:ray 8115:Big 7786:ray 7780:Big 7725:ray 7719:Big 7642:ray 7636:Big 7589:ray 7583:Big 7512:ray 7506:Big 7452:ray 7446:Big 7440:)-- 7406:ray 7400:Big 7355:ray 7349:Big 6892:and 6722:) 6582:) 6545:) 6496:) 6482:) 6377:) 6365:to 6357:to 6347:to 6339:to 6014:~*~ 5991:) 5938:~*~ 5927:ray 5921:Big 5863:) 5754:all 5646:) 5520:) 5412:) 5398:• 5347:) 5291:• 5046:180 5025:or 4944:TOI 4920:TOI 4889:) 4813:or 4615:) 4601:) 4547:) 4502:) 4488:) 4462:or 4325:) 4278:~*~ 4244:) 4192:– 4076:– 4022:– 3982:– 3900:– 3860:– 3813:– 3670:– 3535:– 3446:– 3376:– 3331:– 3286:– 3241:– 3149:– 3064:– 3019:– 2934:– 2896:– 2804:– 2759:– 2667:– 2622:– 2464:is 2452:) 2436:is 2230:) 2106:or 2096:MEA 2019:or 2001:or 1900:or 1600:) 1412:~*~ 1386:) 1326:) 1263:or 1261:SoS 1204:) 1114:XYZ 935:) 921:• 865:~*~ 716:) 688:)` 610:) 555:) 386:MGR 332:) 219:~*~ 192:) 151:) 13586:. 13578:, 13429:} 13415:§§ 13314:) 13278:} 13257:) 13231:} 13200:) 13186:}} 13180:{{ 13176:}} 13170:{{ 13152:} 13125:} 13085:am 13071:am 12981:) 12971:}} 12965:{{ 12945:}} 12939:{{ 12914:}} 12908:{{ 12900:) 12886:}} 12880:{{ 12876:}} 12870:{{ 12841:) 12831:}} 12825:{{ 12817:}} 12811:{{ 12758:) 12740:}} 12734:{{ 12704:) 12665:) 12620:) 12584:) 12565:) 12516:) 12491:) 12464:) 12439:. 12425:. 12411:. 12377:am 12359:) 12205:) 12136:-- 12022:) 11988:13 11939:13 11896:) 11884:-- 11800:}} 11794:{{ 11743:) 11718:) 11704:. 11692:, 11680:, 11673:, 11485:) 11461:} 11401:) 11393:. 11372:) 11337:} 11307:. 11288:. 11280:, 11251:is 11209:. 11174:) 11107:) 11088:. 11062:) 11020:. 10984:• 10947:) 10929:) 10906:• 10855:• 10837:) 10798:) 10753:) 10734:) 10667:) 10644:• 10628:) 10564:} 10550:§§ 10532:) 10514:} 10448:}} 10444:{{ 10435:} 10407:. 10353:) 10337:, 10318:þ 10292:) 10272:) 10248:• 10222:) 10169:• 10138:) 10119:, 10088:• 10066:) 10046:, 10042:, 10019:• 10003:} 9982:) 9963:, 9951:, 9947:, 9926:) 9922:• 9882:• 9847:} 9819:) 9805:} 9784:) 9752:) 9711:) 9679:) 9639:) 9624:} 9558:) 9543:} 9507:) 9455:) 9381:} 9315:} 9301:§§ 9184:} 9164:) 9146:} 9110:} 9074:}} 9068:{{ 9060:} 9009:) 8995:} 8975:) 8961:} 8937:) 8922:} 8849:) 8826:) 8795:) 8765:} 8744:) 8702:- 8679:) 8645:is 8607:) 8563:? 8496:-- 8237:-- 8095:) 8009:) 7959:) 7767:) 7747:) 7545:) 7530:) 7489:) 7295:) 7267:) 7222:.) 7216:. 7193:) 7173:) 7141:) 7127:) 7089:) 7065:, 7061:, 7057:, 7053:, 7049:, 7045:, 7041:, 7037:, 7033:, 7029:, 7025:, 7021:, 7005:) 6911:) 6859:) 6827:. 6813:) 6664:) 6638:- 6597:• 6574:§§ 6560:) 6514:) 6468:. 6451:) 6431:) 6397:) 6351:. 6323:. 6307:. 6295:, 6291:. 6279:. 6265:, 6261:, 6251:, 5966:) 5893:, 5889:, 5885:, 5805:we 5681:. 5656:. 5535:) 5131:) 5102:) 5070:) 5005:) 4958:) 4900:. 4881:§§ 4839:) 4825:) 4803:) 4788:) 4744:) 4703:) 4688:) 4673:) 4629:) 4416:) 4380:, 4232:, 4187:FA 4173:GA 4140:FL 4102:FL 4071:FL 4017:FA 4003:GA 3977:FA 3963:GA 3935:FA 3921:GA 3895:FA 3855:FA 3841:GA 3808:FA 3794:GA 3762:FA 3748:GA 3705:FA 3691:GA 3665:FA 3651:GA 3619:FA 3605:GA 3577:FA 3563:GA 3530:FA 3516:GA 3481:FA 3467:GA 3441:FA 3427:GA 3371:FA 3357:GA 3326:FA 3312:GA 3281:FA 3267:GA 3236:FA 3222:GA 3189:FA 3175:GA 3144:FA 3130:GA 3097:FA 3083:GA 3059:FA 3045:GA 3014:FA 3000:GA 2967:FA 2953:GA 2929:FA 2915:GA 2891:FA 2877:GA 2844:FA 2830:GA 2799:FA 2785:GA 2754:FA 2740:GA 2707:FA 2693:GA 2662:FA 2648:GA 2617:FA 2603:GA 2562:FA 2548:GA 2444:§§ 2363:) 2266:) 2222:§§ 2211:) 2199:; 2178:) 2140:) 2077:) 2063:, 2013:, 1951:) 1927:, 1923:, 1896:, 1812:) 1529:) 1513:, 1505:, 1501:, 1492:, 1488:, 1484:, 1480:, 1476:, 1472:, 1460:, 1452:, 1440:) 1312:) 1274:) 1259:, 1247:) 1227:, 1196:§§ 742:) 699:) 664:, 595:) 524:) 496:) 438:) 396:) 378:GA 358:) 317:) 143:§§ 95:→ 13733:| 13699:| 13659:| 13614:| 13593:| 13543:| 13498:| 13427:C 13425:/ 13423:T 13370:| 13310:( 13276:C 13274:/ 13272:T 13253:( 13229:C 13227:/ 13225:T 13196:( 13150:C 13148:/ 13146:T 13123:C 13121:/ 13119:T 13052:| 12994:| 12977:( 12923:| 12896:( 12854:| 12837:( 12782:| 12754:( 12700:( 12661:( 12616:( 12580:( 12561:( 12512:( 12487:( 12460:( 12355:( 12339:( 12265:| 12237:— 12218:| 12201:( 12165:| 12128:. 12107:| 12018:( 11890:( 11864:) 11856:( 11853:/ 11838:) 11830:( 11827:/ 11763:· 11758:( 11739:( 11714:( 11698:/ 11686:/ 11667:/ 11637:4 11613:| 11583:| 11552:| 11530:| 11499:| 11481:( 11459:C 11457:/ 11455:T 11397:( 11368:( 11335:C 11333:/ 11331:T 11237:Ω 11170:( 11103:( 11058:( 10992:) 10986:( 10943:( 10925:( 10914:) 10908:( 10863:) 10857:( 10833:( 10794:( 10770:| 10749:( 10730:( 10695:| 10663:( 10652:) 10646:( 10624:( 10585:— 10562:C 10560:/ 10558:T 10528:( 10512:C 10510:/ 10508:T 10433:C 10431:/ 10429:T 10370:( 10349:( 10316:¤ 10288:( 10268:( 10256:) 10250:( 10218:( 10177:) 10171:( 10134:( 10096:) 10090:( 10062:( 10027:) 10021:( 10001:C 9999:/ 9997:T 9978:( 9918:( 9903:( 9895:( 9878:( 9863:( 9845:C 9843:/ 9841:T 9815:( 9803:C 9801:/ 9799:T 9780:( 9748:( 9723:— 9707:( 9669:( 9635:( 9622:C 9620:/ 9618:T 9554:( 9541:C 9539:/ 9537:T 9503:( 9465:. 9451:( 9426:— 9379:C 9377:/ 9375:T 9355:) 9325:. 9313:C 9311:/ 9309:T 9278:) 9219:| 9182:C 9180:/ 9178:T 9160:( 9144:C 9142:/ 9140:T 9108:C 9106:/ 9104:T 9058:C 9056:/ 9054:T 9031:| 9005:( 8993:C 8991:/ 8989:T 8971:( 8959:C 8957:/ 8955:T 8933:( 8920:C 8918:/ 8916:T 8860:— 8845:( 8837:. 8822:( 8791:( 8763:C 8761:/ 8759:T 8740:( 8675:( 8663:( 8631:Ω 8603:( 8506:X 8500:D 8447:X 8441:D 8390:X 8384:D 8328:X 8322:D 8247:X 8241:D 8178:( 8138:| 8119:X 8113:D 8091:( 8066:— 8005:( 7955:( 7784:X 7778:D 7763:( 7743:( 7723:X 7717:D 7666:| 7640:X 7634:D 7587:X 7581:D 7541:( 7526:( 7510:X 7504:D 7485:( 7450:X 7444:D 7417:— 7404:X 7398:D 7369:— 7353:X 7347:D 7291:( 7263:( 7245:| 7213:I 7189:( 7169:( 7137:( 7123:( 7098:— 7085:( 7001:( 6975:— 6936:— 6907:( 6868:— 6855:( 6829:— 6809:( 6782:— 6718:( 6660:( 6605:) 6599:( 6578:( 6556:( 6541:( 6510:( 6492:( 6478:( 6447:( 6427:( 6393:( 6373:( 6256:, 6195:— 6167:) 6163:( 5987:( 5962:( 5925:X 5919:D 5859:( 5839:| 5782:— 5738:| 5688:| 5663:| 5642:( 5624:| 5595:— 5556:— 5531:( 5516:( 5490:| 5408:( 5343:( 5309:— 5143:— 5127:( 5098:( 5066:( 5001:( 4954:( 4909:7 4885:( 4835:( 4821:( 4799:( 4784:( 4740:( 4699:( 4684:( 4669:( 4665:. 4625:( 4611:( 4597:( 4555:— 4543:( 4514:— 4498:( 4484:( 4454:" 4451:) 4447:( 4425:— 4412:( 4321:( 4256:— 4240:( 4234:2 4230:1 4159:C 4110:, 3881:A 3734:C 3549:C 3502:C 3413:B 3343:B 3298:B 3253:B 3208:B 3161:B 3116:C 3031:B 2986:B 2863:B 2816:B 2771:C 2679:B 2634:B 2589:B 2534:B 2499:. 2448:( 2359:( 2262:( 2226:( 2207:( 2174:( 2136:( 2073:( 1947:( 1858:) 1854:( 1808:( 1774:— 1725:— 1671:| 1596:( 1550:7 1525:( 1436:( 1382:( 1339:— 1322:( 1308:( 1243:( 1200:( 931:( 829:— 808:| 778:— 756:| 738:( 712:( 695:( 684:( 606:( 591:( 551:( 520:( 492:( 454:— 434:( 405:— 392:( 354:( 328:( 313:( 264:| 188:( 163:— 147:( 113:— 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Archive 4 - Knowledge

Index